PROPOSAL LETTER
HONORABLE CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE BOARD LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY ONE GATEWAY PLAZA LOS ANGELES, CA 90012-2952
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL CONTRACT NO. RFP No. AE47810E0128 Systems Engineering and Support Services
In response to the above referenced Request for Proposals (RFP) and in accordance with the accompanying Instructions to Proposers and Submittal Requirements, we the undersigned hereby offer to perform and complete the work as required in the Contract Documents.
If recommended for contract award, will provide to Metro all required Certificates of Insurance.
The proposal submitted in response to subject RFP shall be in effect for one hundred and eighty (180) days after the proposal due date.
Further, the undersigned agrees to execute the Metro prepared Contract within ten calendar days after receipt of Notice of Award and provide to Metro all required Certificates of Insurance. The Proposer represents that the following person(s) are authorized to negotiate on its behalf with Metro in connection with this RFP and will provide appropriate evidence of authorization upon request: 213-212-5738 ( ) Brent Lesjak Metro Systems + Partners Program Manager Printed Name Title Phone
Printed Name Title Phone
Printed Name Title Phone
In addition to the formal certifications provided, the Proposer certifies that it has:
A. Examined and is fully familiar with all of the provisions of the RFP Documents and any amendment thereto;
B. Satisfied itself as to the requirements of the Contract;
C. Carefully reviewed the accuracy of all statements shown in this Proposal;
D. Examined the experience, skill and certification (if any) requirements specified in the Statement of Work and that the entities (Contractor, Subcontractor, Supplier) performing the work fulfill the specified requirements, and
E. Satisfied itself with respect to other matters pertaining to the RFP which in any way affect the performance of the Work.
METRO GA17-140 PROPOSAL LETTER RFP NO. AE47810E0128 5-1 PRO FORM 53A ISSUED: 11.14.17 REVISION DATE: 03.02.17
EXPERIENCE AND CAPABILITIES OF THE FIRMS ON THE CONSULTANT’S PROJECT TEAM
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER
OUR TEAM IS LACMTA’S BEST CHOICE FOR THE SESS CONTRACT Our Leader Our Team Our Contribution Best PM to lead this Program Unparalleled Depth & Breadth of Systems Staff DBE Mentoring Program The MS+P team is a highly qualified group MS+P Program Manager, Brent Lesjak, The MS+P team offers over 250 committed systems staff We provide an award-winning program that has of professionals, experienced support staff, brings a history of implementing best with broad, and extensive skills to efficiently design and received considerable acclaim by our clients. and selected for their expertise in transit practices and successfully leading complex implement LACMTA’s systems infrastructure program. MS+P is pleased to offer LACMTA a program based on Hatch’s systems design and construction. transit mega-programs. We offer a comprehensive team of qualified professionals, award-winning Metro-Protégé Program for the City of Houston. augmented by an experienced staff, that is carefully chosen for ANTHONY ZELOYLE Brent Lesjak is committed This program is lauded in Houston for achieving successful their extensive expertise in transit systems design, integration, OCS MANAGER for the long term and results and is being implemented for clients across North and construction. Our approach to staffing the team promotes Anthony has over 20 years of experience will apply his 18 years of America. Building on this success, MS+P will mentor four in design and construction of all types of responsiveness, regardless of the delivery process, while program, project, and DBE firms at different tiers under this program for Metro. We OCS for rail systems projects for public providing consistency, with with existing processes and flexibility technology leadership believe it is the team’s professional and social responsibility to agencies throughout North America. for innovation to LACMTA. Our Organization Chart highlights the to manage the Systems mentor firms and provide opportunities for cross-learning. Our clear lines of communication, responsibility, and accountability Engineering and Support commitment is to enhance the capabilities of our protégé’s skills PERE BUSQUET of all staff on our team. Services (SESS) Program. and improve their ability to grow and prosper. TRACTION POWER MANAGER Brent and the MS+P team are excited and ready today to Pere has 25 years of experience in the Brent’s career is defined design and construction of traction power by a history of leading provide seamless leadership and dedication for the duration of Develop a Local and and Sustainable Workforce systems, including cutting-edge transit multidisciplinary teams the contract and beyond. MS+P supports the Measure R & M initiatives to ease congestion, projects across North America. to provide exceptional and is committed to provide a sustainable local transit results. His recent workforce that is necessary for the support of LACMTA’s DALE HEIN assignments provided systems throughout their lifecycle. TRAIN CONTROL MANAGER similar program Dale is a senior project manager with management services MS+P comprehends the enormous challenge to create this 29 years transit systems engineering specialized workforce. We will provide: experience in the design and construction for LACMTA and other of train control systems. agencies including the Ongoing and inclusive resource management program to Massachusetts Bay identify key skills and position key staff locally, with a long-term Transportation Authority (MBTA) and the Orange success path for junior staff. JON MCDONALD COMMUNICATIONS MANAGER County Transportation Authority (OCTA). A Mentor/Protégé Program that is a proven success and an Communications expert who has led Brent has the experience, collaborative skills, integral part of the MS+P culture. systems development on some of the leadership, and passion for excellence to deliver largest and most advanced transit projects Technical and business mentoring strategies to promote in the world over the past 25 years. the integrated systems program. He will act as a growth and professional opportunities. champion for small businesses in this effort. As a demonstration of our commitment, our workforce will Proven Delivery to LACMTA participate in the process improvement program to increase Our team understands Metro. the reliability to Metro’s systems and the efficiencies of their Operations and Maintenance. Our goal is to support LACMTA to The MS+P team has extensive knowledge and understanding make Los Angeles the transit infrastructure capital of America. of LACMTA policies, procedures, and expectations through past projects. Our knowledge derives from deep collaboration and relationships that have successfully delivered Metro transit RENE LEFLECHE ANES SASSI PAUL NOLAN systems projects for decades. Our team will continue to deliver DPM - DESIGN DPM - DPM - CM&PC the project excellence to which LACMTA is accustomed, such as INTEGRATION delivering the Red Line North Hollywood Extension $100 million under budget and 6 months early. Sustainable, Flexible, Innovative RFP No. AE47810E0128 EX.7 Systems Engineering and Support Services EXPERIENCE AND CAPABILITIES OF THE FIRMS ON THE CONSULTANT’S PROJECT TEAM Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER EXPERIENCE AND CAPABILITIES OF THE FIRMS ON THE CONSULTANT’S PROJECT TEAM
The Metro Systems + Partners (MS+P) is an integrated Metro Systems + Partners joint venture of Hatch and SENER with subconsultants a JV of Hatch & SENER connecting North American and global transit systems JV PARTNERS, MENTOR SUBCONSULTANTS expertise with local experience and relationships to deliver ✓✓ Hatch JV PARTNER / MENTOR ✓✓ SENER JV PARTNER / MENTOR exceptional systems engineering consulting services ✓✓ CH2M MENTOR SUBCONSULTANT for all Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation ✓✓ IBI MENTOR SUBCONSULTANT Authority’s (LACMTA) capital project needs. ✓✓ Jacobs MENTOR SUBCONSULTANT MS+P is a local team with an extensive history of working SMALL BUSINESSES & DBEs ✓✓ ABCS DBE together and we are proud to showcase our successes as ✓✓ Acumen DBE a team within this proposal. Our team has a depth and ✓✓ Anil Verma Associates DBE breadth of systems expertise that is unrivaled. Collectively, ✓✓ Colmena DBE the firms on our team have provided a combined total of ✓✓ GCM Consulting SBE ✓✓ Innovative Solutions in Signaling over 240 years of proven project delivery for LACMTA and ✓✓ Kewo Engineering DBE ranked in the top two nationally on ENR’s Top Mass Transit ✓✓ MARRS SBE & Rail 2017 list. We have not only built an unparalleled ✓✓ Project X Corrosion Control DBE depth and breadth of available systems expertise, we ✓✓ RF Networks SBE provide LACMTA with a deep bench of local systems ✓✓ T&T PR DBE ✓✓ Triad Consulting DBE experts to quickly respond and resolve project challenges, ✓✓ VSCE DBE and to develop a sustainable local workforce with our ✓✓ W2 Design DBE award-winning DBE mentoring program. Supported by 500 additional systems experts among our team firms, MS+P is the best choice to deliver all of LACTMA’s future systems needs.
THE METRO SYSTEMS + PARTNERS ADVANTAGE EVALUATION CRITERIA Degree of corporate skills ✓✓ Best PM to Lead this ✓✓ Award-winning DBE A.1 7-Year Effort: Our PM, Brent Mentoring Program: We and experience in similar or Lesjak, brings a history of best provide an award-winning related projects and record of practices and has successfully mentor-protégé program, meeting satisfactory performance for led complex transit system with great acclaim from the Metro and/or other clients. mega-programs. clients we’ve implemented it for. Experience with the level of A.2 ✓✓ Unparalleled Depth ✓✓ Proven Delivery to LACMTA: effort, challenges, lessons and Breadth of Systems Our team knows your system. Our learned on projects. Staff: Our bench of over team has a combined history of Record of satisfactory 250 experts is presented over 240 years of LACMTA project A.3 here, and are supported by experience. performance and performance another 500 transit systems of similar services for current ✓✓ Ability to Develop a Local and past clients. experts in the firms of our and Sustainable Workforce: team. Ability to manage personnel We’ll leverage our expertise in A.4 ✓✓ Highest Rated Team: outreach, staff training, and changes, and other work MS+P ranks in the top two mentoring teaming partners in unrelated to Metro, without nationally on the ENR’s Top order to develop additional local sacrificing quality of service Mass Transit & Rail 2017 list. resources organically. on any Metro assignments.
RFP No. AE47810E0128 A.1 Systems Engineering and Support Services EXPERIENCE AND CAPABILITIES OF THE FIRMS ON THE CONSULTANT’S PROJECT TEAM Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER HATCH MS+P JV PARTNER Hatch is an award-winning, full-service engineering METRO AND HATCH: firm with a reputation for technical excellence, innovation, and client responsiveness on some of A CONTINUED PARTNERSHIP the world’s most prominent projects. Starting with the Red Line, 25 years ago, Hatch and LACMTA have enjoyed a long-standing Hatch’s transit systems expertise began over 60 working history together, successfully A.1 years ago with the Toronto Transit Commission delivering transit systems projects. Hatch Since then, we have successfully delivered is currently the tunnel design engineer of record hundreds of transit systems projects throughout for LACMTA’s Regional Connector project, and was North America and the world, including projects in the prime consultant for LACMTA’s Crenshaw/LAX the west for LACMTA, San Bernardino Associated Corridor project providing advanced conceptual Governments, North County Transit District, Santa engineering and preliminary engineering services, Clara Valley Transportation Authority, Bay Area as well as support services during construction, Rapid Transit, Caltrain, Seattle’s Sound Transit, including all systems elements of the project. Utah Transit Authority, as well as with AMTRAK, Union Pacific Railroad, and BNSF Railway. We have worked with LACMTA on eight additional projects, including providing CM services on Hatch has provided engineering services for some LACMTA’s Red Line North Hollywood Extension, of the most prominent transit systems projects in which was delivered $100 million under budget North America. Our staff hasin-depth experience and 6 months early. Other projects include leading complex integrated project teams and Connect-LAX; Mid-City/Westside Corridor Study; coordinating work with other parties, as well as Construction Management Support; Red Line strong familiarity with the Federal Transportation -Vermont/Beverly Station; Red Line - Santa Monica Authority (FTA) . We have extensive project interface Mountain Tunnels; Gold Line -Eastside Extension experience with Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR ), Ventilation Design; and Exposition Line - Ventilation as well as design support during construction, of Flower Street Grade Separation. enabling us to develop designs to suit construction staging, phasing, interfaces, and environmental RECORD OF CLIENT SATISFACTION mitigation. Hatch’s technical accomplishments Hatch takes client satisfaction very seriously. and successful performance is a result of placing Our commitment to quality, technical expertise, a strong emphasis on cost-control measures innovation, and focus on exceeding our clients’ built into the firm’s work plans that maintain the expectations has enabled us to achieve an integrity of quality, reliability, and project scope. outstanding track record of client satisfaction on transit systems projects. A.3 “I would like to say thanks to your [Hatch] guys who helped us out at short notice for the testing at Erlton and Stampede, it was great to have the testing of all of our signalling systems here and be able to return the south leg to full revenue service before Stampede...” Malcolm Rosbrook Calgary Transit “Your folks did such a great job at responding to our recent track layout request, we would like you to quote on the remainder of the track design work as part of our project.” Dayna Fitz, Manager Transportation Equipment and Responsible Care Leader Canexus Ltd.
RFP No. AE47810E0128 A.2 Systems Engineering and Support Services EXPERIENCE AND CAPABILITIES OF THE FIRMS ON THE CONSULTANT’S PROJECT TEAM Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER SENER ENGINEERING AND SYSTEMS MS+P JV PARTNER Founded in 1956, SENER is a privately held INNOVATION THROUGH engineering and technology group, with over 2,500 TECHNOLOGY employees worldwide. SENER is an internationally recognized expert A.1 SENER is a recognized worldwide expert in transit for the International Union of Railways, and & rail engineering and has been leading transit our work has involved close coordination with projects for the past 30 years. Amtrak, Federal Railroad Administration, and the SENER’s experience includes the engineering of Association of American Railroads. over 70 different urban transit systems and more SENER has led the systems design of many major rail than 6,000 miles of rail projects, including over 900 and transit systems projects all over the world and miles of operational high-speed rail. delivered systems innovations including: At SENER we celebrate a culture of innovation. Barcelona Metro Line 9 and 10 Fostered by selecting the best people and allowing This line will be 29.7 miles long with 52 stations them the freedom to work, by providing Innovation (24 are currently in operation) and it will be the Awards and by hosting an Innovation Forum—an longest driverless, fully unattended train operation incubator for cross-fertilization between professionals (UTO) metro lines in the world. SENER has been a from different fields. As a result, some of our leader for Barcelona Metro delivering innovative technology innovations in our transit and rail sector engineering solutions at all project stages, from the have come from our work in aerospace engineering. design to the construction phase. Diversity and equality is in SENER’s DNA. Our Mexico City - Toluca Commuter Line equality policy and code of conduct support these This contract is one of SENER’s largest in the rail values globally. In fact, a number of SENER’s top sector (a share of $76.7 million of the total project executives are women, including our Systems budget of $2.9 billion). This line will connect over Division Lead, the SENER USA President, and the 300,000 passengers a day to the metropolitan SENER International General Manager. area of Mexico City. Mobilizing over 70 employees SENER is a key player in the California High-Speed in one year, SENER’s Mexico project office grew to Rail program, being the lead designer for the owner one of the largest local SENER offices. SENER has during the preliminary engineering phase in the been the lead designer for the owner in all phases Palmdale to Burbank section. SENER has also of the design, including the design of systems participated in the design in the sections that are (track, Overhead Contact System (OCS), traction currently under construction in the Central Valley. substations, and train systems). SENER delivered the SENER’s California project experience also includes design on time and work started in 2013, and the line the masterplan for Los Angeles Union Station and completed commissioning in December 2017 and is the Angels Flight in downtown Los Angeles. currently operational. California High Speed Rail CP 2/3 A.3 SENER developed a comprehensive verification “SENER has performed outstanding work for and validation process on behalf of the CHSRA. Metro Barcelona over the past two decades. SENER’s role has been to ensure conformance of the SENER has shown outstanding innovation design-builder consortium’s work to the contract capabilities, by developing, managing, and requirements during final design, construction, and implementing novel systems engineering testing. To manage this process, SENER applied techniques in the Line 9 management.” DOORS, which is an innovative requirements management and traceability tool, in order to Antoni Perez i Oteros, Chief of the Division Civil Works INFRAESTRUCTURES CAT manage and close all project requirements. DOORS (Cataluña transport infrastructure authority) is software normally applied across the more technologically advanced field of aerospace. RFP No. AE47810E0128 A.3 Systems Engineering and Support Services EXPERIENCE AND CAPABILITIES OF THE FIRMS ON THE CONSULTANT’S PROJECT TEAM Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER SUBCONSULTANTS The MS+P team is comprised of cutting edge transit systems experts, ranging in size from ENR-rated global industry leaders to specialized small businesses and disadvantaged business enterprises. GLOBAL A/E/C FIRMS CH2M, IBI, and Jacobs Engineering Group join IBI Hatch and SENER on the MS+P team to provide IBI brings a 30-year history working on transit lessons learned from transit systems experience systems including bus rapid transit, transit earned throughout the world, ranging from center design and technology integration, complex projects in Spain to delivering multiple transit communications system upgrades and metro projects, from work on the Red Line over two implementations throughout North America. IBI decades ago to recent project successes, such as has been working with LACMTA for 22 years. the preliminary engineering of all systems for the Jacobs Crenshaw project. Ranked 2nd on ENR’s Top Mass Transit & Rail CH2M 2017 list, Jacobs has extensive experience in the CH2M has been working with LACMTA for 28 planning, design and implementation of transit years, having led numerous systems and vehicle and metro rail systems. They are involved in all design, asset management and safety certification project aspects, from program management and projects. CH2M is a nationally recognized transit planning to detailed design through to testing and systems industry leader, and is currently listed 5th commissioning of transit systems. Jacobs has been on ENR’s Top Mass Transit & Rail 2017 list. working with LACMTA for 22 years.
SMALL BUSINESSES AND DBEs Yrs. of LACMTA Firm Name/Role Value to Metro and the MS+P Team experience ABCS DBE / Project Controls Over two decades of LACMTA project controls experience 22
Acumen DBE / Fare Collection & Communications 20+ years of transit systems experience with rail and bus 5
Anil Verma Associates DBE / Tunnel Ventilation Worked on Red, Blue, Green, Orange, Purple, Gold & Expo lines 37
Colmena DBE / Systems Design & Integration Significant heavy rail and LRT systems design experience 2
GCM Consulting SBE / Quality Management ASQ Certified Manager of Quality / Organizational Excellence 15
Innovative Solutions in Signaling / Comms 15 years of LACMTA transit signaling systems experience 15
Kewo Engineering DBE / Traction Power Directly related experience in LADWP electric utility projects 0
MARRS SBE / Utilities & Project Controls Experience with LACMTA projects, procedures & expectations 10
Project X Corrosion Consult. DBE / Corrosion Over a decade of corrosion engineering & asset mgmt. 0
RF Networks SBE / RF Engineering Red & Purple Line radio systems designer & systems integrator 23
Triad Consulting DBE / System Security Security credentialed staff with 30+ years of experience 0
T&T PR DBE / DBE Mentor Protégé Designed & implemented one of first SBE/DVBE COMP Programs 4
VSCE DBE / Scheduling & Project Controls Extensive experience with live transit systems 1
W2 Design DBE / Utilities Extensive utility relocation experience with LACMTA projects 13
RFP No. AE47810E0128 A.4 Systems Engineering and Support Services EXPERIENCE AND CAPABILITIES OF THE FIRMS ON THE CONSULTANT’S PROJECT TEAM Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER
SUMMARY OF EXPERIENCE AND CAPABILITIES A.1 RELATIVE TO THE SCOPE OF SERVICES In the rail and transit industry, Systems Engineering is a term used to encompass a broad range of TRAIN CONTROL EXPERIENCE electrical/electronic and related disciplines. On the Metro Gold Line Foothills Extension, Generally, transit systems engineering includes: Phase 2A project, Innovative Solutions in • Communications Signaling provided signal engineering and consulting services for the 11-mile Phase 1A • Signal and Train Control extension from Sierra Madre Villa to Azusa. • Traction Power and OCS ISiS’ work was completed on time and within • System Integration budget. COMMUNICATIONS We have the expertise required to meet SIGNALS & TRAIN CONTROL LACMTA’s requirements for all rail and transit MS+P is a leader in detailed design and project/ communications systems including: construction management of all types of signal/ • Voice and video data train control systems, based on microprocessor, conventional relay or combination. MS+P has • Fiber optic and radio proven experience in the design, development, • SCADA procurement and management of modern cab • Audio and video message board signaling and automatic train control systems. MS+P • Train to wayside offers proven experience with remote or centralized • PFC and harmonic filters control for commuter rail, and heavy and light rail systems. We can also provide support to LACMTA in MS+P team members have provided communication the development of customized signal engineering systems design for such projects as the Tasman standards and signal maintenance / test programs. Corridor, the Sheppard Subway, and the Buffalo LRT system. Our services include design of: TRACTION POWER • Fiber optic and copper communications links Our team designs 3rd and 4th rail as well as trolley • Radio (VHF, UHF, Microwave, GPS) and overhead catenary electrification systems. • Alarm and detection systems We design traction power systems, which include: • Public address substations, distribution, LRT, and overhead catenary systems, 3rd rail, and distribution. • Passenger information • Telephone systems Our technical expertise and practical knowledge of LACMTA’s needs lead to optimum traction • Local Area Networks and Wide Area Networks power solutions. Our use of advanced computer • Network Management Systems simulation and analysis programs assist in refining traction power systems by determining the most advantageous location and sizing of substations, COMMUNICATIONS EXPERIENCE overhead contact systems and/or 3rd rail. Our valued subconsultant Acumen’s expertise is in IT communications, transit infrastructure, hardware & software design services, and TRACTION POWER EXPERIENCE systems design. Acumen staff supported With a long history of LADWP experience, our the design, installation, build-out, testing, valued subconsultant Kewo Engineering has infrastructure, and scheduling of Caltrain’s directly related experience in electric utility Communications Based Overlay Signal System, projects, and can help ensure successful including building its back-up central control coordination with LADWP for electric service facility in Menlo Park, California. and resolving issues.
RFP No. AE47810E0128 A.5 Systems Engineering and Support Services EXPERIENCE AND CAPABILITIES OF THE FIRMS ON THE CONSULTANT’S PROJECT TEAM Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER ABILITY TO MANAGE PERSONNEL CHANGES AND WORK UNRELATED TO LACMTA WHILE MAINTAINING QUALITY At a corporate and individual level, our team A.4 members have been selected on the basis of SYSTEMS INTEGRATION EXPERIENCE depth of expertise to assist LACMTA in achieving its Our valued subconsultant Colmena was Engineer project outcomes. Each firm on the MS+P team has of Record for the systemwide electrical and been selected for its world-class, top-quality, qualified communications design for the BART Silicon individuals for each of the positions identified in the Valley Extension program. Colmena’s scope of RFP and as identified in the org chart on page C.4. services was expanded to oversee the electrical Our ability to manage personnel changes is based on engineering of the wayside facilities as well as the basic principle of selecting qualified professionals the Milpitas and Berryessa stations. Colmena is who are committed and available for the assignment. working on final testing of all communication The organization has and will continue to devote systems including systems integration, considerable energy to ensuring client expectations emergency ventilation system testing and and obligations would be met, and also that the authoring test plans and procedures. individuals offered bring a breadth of experience across a number of complementary mandates, to SYSTEMS INTEGRATION benefit their current and future clients. Consequently, As systems integration specialists, MS+P ensures in developing our proposed staffing plan, we and our that all system elements properly and efficiently subconsultants have engaged in a series of reviews interface with each other as well as with facilities. of current project and assignment workloads for This is an integral part of our project involvement, those individuals who are currently available or those from the earliest conceptual design through who will be coming available during the contract construction and testing. It involves contractual duration as a result of successfully delivering their and physical interfaces, construction phasing and current assignments. Furthermore, to demonstrate implementation. our commitment to the mandate, we can ensure continuity of staff as offered by highest levels within To coordinate and manage the numerous activities MS+P’s parent organizations. related to systems integration we prepare a Systems Integration Plan. A key to our Systems Integration We have discussed, at length, the importance of Plan is the development of an Interface Control maintaining current commitments of the respective Manual, which identifies and tracks all interfaces, firms while delivering successful programs to defining responsibilities to ensure full coordination LACMTA. Building and developing deep team staff and integration, achieving first time quality. allows LACMTA to have suitably qualified staff members delivering on a number of assignments associated with this mandate, and to have the MS+P TEAM MEMBER PROJECTS flexibility to allow practitioners to complete existing The following pages highlight a representative assignments, as well as being available at relevant sample of projects from all MS+P member times in the contract. We also have the depth of firms, rather than just the JV and larger professional staff to be drawn upon at short notice subconsultants’ experience. We are pleased from around North America to supplement the to highlight that every firm on our team is an core team with any specific skill or expertise that expert in their respective field(s). may be required to satisfy the contract program or task within the program, or other, as yet unforeseen aspects of each task order. If there is a sound reason to affect a change in staff assignments, we have the ability to replace an individual with an individual acceptable to LACMTA.
RFP No. AE47810E0128 A.6 Systems Engineering and Support Services EXPERIENCE AND CAPABILITIES OF THE FIRMS ON THE CONSULTANT’S PROJECT TEAM
EXPERIENCE AND CAPABILITIES OF THE FIRMS ON THE CONSULTANT’S PROJECT TEAM Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER
MS+P TEAM REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS
Representative Project Experience Eglinton Scarborough Crosstown LRT Hatch-CH2M Angels Flight SENER Client: Metrolinx, Location: Toronto, ON Client: Angels Flight Foundation, Location: Los Angeles, CA The project is the largest transit expansion project ever SENER has been involved with the evaluation testing, concept undertaken in Toronto, consisting of approximately 12.5 miles engineering design, validation and safety certification for the of new LRT alignment with 20 new stations. Hatch and CH2M revitalization of the Angels Flight Funicular in Downtown Los provided program management services, concept design Angeles. SENER and ACS will also operate the line during the services for elements of the project, and project management next 30 years, as appointed by Angels Flight Foundation. This and technical advisory services for the P3 procurement. the project is the first rail transit related P3 in California. project, and project management and technical advisory.
High Speed 2, London to West Midlands, UK CH2M-SENER LA Metro Fleet Systems & Comms Strategic Plan IBI Client: HS2 Ltd., Location: London, UK Client: LACMTA, Location: Los Angeles, CA CH2M and SENER are working together in this $448 million As lead technical expert subconsultant under the LA Metro SBE contract. The 140 mile route will provide enhanced infrastructure prime program, IBI provided extensive technical and program links between London and the West Midlands (Phase One). assistance in the development of the LA Metro Fleet Systems and The consortium will provide expert engineering, program Communications Strategic Plan. This Plan focused on assessing management and construction management support as well as Metro needs for bus, rail, and customer information systems, as assisting with preparation for the procurement of the main civil well as reviewing a wide range of communications options (e.g. contracts for the London to Birmingham stage of the route. commercial cellular data, land mobile radio, LA-RICS data, etc.).
Gilbert Road Light Rail Extension Jacobs Westside Subway Extension ABCS Client: Valley Metro, Location: Mesa, AZ Client: LACMTA, Location: Los Angeles, CA Jacobs is providing complete final design services to extend the The Westside Subway Extension Project extends the existing light rail 1.9 miles down Main Street from its termination just east Metro Purple Line from Wilshire/Western station to Westwood/ of Hobson Road. Jacobs provided the design for: traction power, VA station in the City of Los Angeles. CH2M provided tunnel the Overhead Contact System to meet the client goal of reducing ventilation services and for the past six years ABCS have been visual clutter, and the signal and communication designs, providing cost estimating & scheduling services along with including the interface to the existing Central Mesa operating feasibility studies, and constructability reviews for the project. systems. Designs were coordinated with track and civil designs.
Communications Based Overlay Signal Acumen Metro Red Line Escalator Replacement Anil Verma System & Positive Train Control Project Client: LACMTA, Location: Los Angeles, CA Client: Caltrain, Location: San Carlos, CA As Architect & Engineer of Record, AVA provided architectural, Acumen staff supported the design, installation, build-out, mechanical, electrical, plumbing, and structural design services testing, infrastructure and scheduling of Caltrain’s CBOSS & for the five (5) upgraded replacement escalators at the Pershing PTC, including building its Back-Up Central Control Facility in Square station and updated CCTV monitoring of the escalators Menlo Park, CA. This facility controls the wayside installation of and adjacent stairs, replacing the analog CCTV system with the the signaling overlay equipment and radio system equipment latest digital cameras and switches at each of the three entrances and telecommunication network. and in the station train control and communications room.
VTA/BART Silicon Valley Extension Colmena Engineering I-405 Sepulveda Pass Widening Design Build Project GCM Client: BART, Location: Fremont-Milpitas, CA CH2M Client: LACMTA, Location: Los Angeles, CA The Berryessa Extension is a 10-mile, two station extension GCM assisted in the preparation of the Design Quality of the BART transit system. Colmena Engineering was directly Management Plan and served as Quality Assurance Manager for responsible for the oversight and the Engineer of Record for the project. Responsibilities included: training staff, reviewing the systemwide electrical and communications design. During design submittals, and implementing the plan with consultant Construction, Colmena Engineering’s scope of services was staff. GCM worked with LA Metro, contractors, and designers to expanded to oversee the electrical engineering of the Wayside work through problems and to help gather lessons learned on Facilities as well as the Milpitas and Berryessa Stations. the project for implementation on future Design Build projects.
RFP No. AE47810E0128 A.7 Systems Engineering and Support Services EXPERIENCE AND CAPABILITIES OF THE FIRMS ON THE CONSULTANT’S PROJECT TEAM
EXPERIENCE AND CAPABILITIES OF THE FIRMS ON THE CONSULTANT’S PROJECT TEAM Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER
MS+P TEAM REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS
Representative Project Experience Houston Metro Light Rail Transit Corridors ISiS Corrosion Investigation Projects Project X Client: Houston Metro, Location: Houston, TX Client: Tesoro Corporation, Location: Carson, CA As a subconsultant, Innovative Solutions provided hardware Project X Engineers was contracted to perform failure design and processor programming to expand the client’s analysis of various metal pipes and other metal products existing light rail network. Work included an extension to suffering internal or external corrosion. Examination of the the existing Red Line, as well as all engineering for the new parts included visual inspection, metallurgical analysis of Green and Purple lines. Innovative Solutions’ responsibilities the materials, Scanning Electron Microscopy and Energy included hardware design for over 100 houses and cases, as Dispersive X-Ray Spectroscopy testing, hardness testing, and well as programming for more than 100 vital processors. Microbiologically Induced Corrosion testing.
SAS-2 Project Controls and Training Kewo Engineering Regional Transit Connector Wet Utilities Relocation MARRS Client: LADWP, Location: Los Angeles, CA Client: LACMTA, Location: Los Angeles, CA Kewo Engineering is contracted to provide Project Controls and The Metro Regional Transit Connector Project will create a 1.9 Training for the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power mile light rail line from 7th and Flower Street to 1st street and (LADWP) from April 2017 through April 2020. With KEC’s in-depth Central Ave that connects to the Metro Blue Expo, Blue and Gold knowledge of LADWP’s power system, standards, requirements, Lines, and includes three new stations. MARRS involvement and processes, KEC provides on-the-job training and mentoring includes tasks associated with each phase of work, including to LADWP engineers on several topics to accomplish transfer of engineering and design services (PS&E) to relocate utilities in knowledge in LADWP design standards and practices. conflict. MARRS was a subconsultant to the HMM JV.
Red and Purple Line Subway RF Networks-CH2M Torrance Transit Park and Ride Terminal Triad Consulting Radio System Design Upgrade Client: Torrance Transit, Location: Torrance, CA Client: LACMTA, Location: Los Angeles, CA Triad Consulting provided design and construction Designer of the current Upgrade of the 22 year old LACMTA Red administration services for security and audio/visual systems and Purple line radio and communication systems. The new at the regional multi-modal transit facility located on design is intended to solve the issues related to the maintenance Crenshaw Boulevard in the city of Torrance. In addition, Triad of a “state of good repair” caused by failed components whose Consulting coordinated space, power, and data requirements replacements are no longer available while simultaneously for the ticket purchasing kiosks and fare validation leveraging “state-of-the-art” design and for the next 25 years. equipment.
I-605/SR 60 Interchange Improvement Project T&T PR Silicon Valley Berryessa Extension Project VSCE-CH2M Client: LACMTA, Location: Los Angeles, CA Client: VTA/BART, Location: San Jose-Milpitas, CA T&T PR acts as Diversity Manager for the prime’s Contracting VSCE has been providing Communications and Community Outreach and Mentoring Plan (COMP), which includes a mentor Outreach services to VTA BART - Silicon Valley. Project Outreach protégé plan, SBE/DVBE utilization commitment and strategies Liaison serves as interface between the design-builder and for innovative, non-traditional approaches to include SBEs and project owner, Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority DVBEs in all phases of project implementation. The overarching (VTA), providing internal and external outreach support for the objective is to ensure that SBE/DVBE sub-consultants play a $772 million line track and stations portion of the $2.3 billion larger and more significant role in all phases of Metro projects. BART Silicon Valley Berryessa Extension Project.
Metro Division 13 – Bus Maintenance Facility W2 Design Toronto-York Spadina Subway (TYSSE) Hatch Client: LACMTA, Location: Los Angeles, CA Client: Toronto Transit Commission (TTC), Location: Toronto, ON The project encompasses 8 acres of a 33 acre campus dedicated Hatch was the lead partner of the TYSSE Program Management to bus maintenance and operations. The project expands the team and worked in an integrated team with embedded client existing maintenance building, adding eight bays for regular personnel. The team performed the preliminary design and buses and nine bays for articulated buses. W2 Design, Inc. development of the specifications for all systems elements provided off-site design and pre-construction engineering for this 5.3 mile subway extension. Hatch also performed the to prepare the site for construction. Of significance, a street System Safety Assurance, testing and commissioning, training, bisecting the site was vacated along with all the utilities. rail activation, system integration, and safety certification.
RFP No. AE47810E0128 A.8 Systems Engineering and Support Services EXPERIENCE AND CAPABILITIES OF THE FIRMS ON THE CONSULTANT’S PROJECT TEAM Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER MS+P’S REPRESENTATIVE MAJOR PROJECTS MS+P brings in-depth experience and best practices to LACMTA from our successful history of serving as a program, project, and on-call systems engineering consultant for transit and railroad agencies across the North America. As demonstrated on the detailed qualifications in the following pages, MS+P’s experience in rail systems planning and engineering for railroad infrastructure, multimodal transportation, and transportation planning projects makes us uniquely qualified to manage the multiple task orders that will develop from LACMTA’s systems contract. Our recent and relevant project examples, which can be found on the following pages, have been performed by our key personnel and describe our experience working with some of the largest transit agencies in the United States, North America, and the world.
MS+P HAS THE PROVEN EXPERIENCE TO DELIVER LACMTA’S SYSTEMS NEEDS
Scope of Work for RFP No. AE47810E0128 Systems Engineering and
Support Services studies Alignment & trackwork systems Communications Construction management Cost benefit analysis Design support services studies Environmental engineering & concept studies Feasibility assessment Independent safety and service facility Maintenance system contact Overhead center & control Operation Planning & program Preliminary engineering services management Program studies Seismic & ground control Signaling and train repair of good State & MEP Stations activation Systems management construction Systems integration Systems & certification assurance safety System coordination party Third collection & fare Ticketing power supply system Traction Utility relocations MS+P‘s Six Major Projects Crenshaw LAX Corridor Gold Line Foothill Extension
Barcelona Line 9
GO Transit Signalling Toluca Intercity Urban Line Columbia Junction Re-signaling
RFP No. AE47810E0128 A.9 Systems Engineering and Support Services EXPERIENCE AND CAPABILITIES OF THE FIRMS ON THE CONSULTANT’S PROJECT TEAM Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER
CRENSHAW/LAX TRANSIT CORRIDOR AGENCY/FIRM PROJECT REFERENCE LA Metro (LACMTA) Charles Beauvoir, SE Executive Officer, Project Management CONTRACT NAME Advanced Conceptual/Preliminary Crenshaw/LAX Project, Project Director Engineering for Crenshaw Transit Program Management Group Corridor Los Angeles County Transportation Authority Address: One Gateway Plaza, Mail Stop 99-22-3, CONTRACT NUMBER Los Angeles, CA, 90012-2952 E0117 Tel: 323.903.4114
CONSULTANT’S ROLE Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Hatch, as a member of the HMM joint A.1 Authority’s (LACMTA) Crenshaw/LAX Transit venture and prime design consultant, Corridor extends approximately 8.5 miles from provided four phases of engineering services in the existing Metro Green Line at Imperial Highway support of the environmental clearance and in to the Exposition Line (opened April 2012) at development and support of the proposed design- Exposition Boulevard. The Crenshaw corridor had build delivery, including: poor connections to Metro’s LRT; the extension • Phase 1 – Advanced Conceptual Engineering improved public transit and mobility with support for the environmental documents connections to the existing Metro Green Line and (NEPA and CEQA) Metro Expo Line. Portions of five jurisdictions are in • Phase 2 – Preliminary Engineering, the corridor—the cities of El Segundo, Hawthorne, including preparation of design-build contract Inglewood, and Los Angeles, and portions of documents, and bid period support services unincorporated Los Angeles County. The project • Phase 3 – Design support services during the also included the development of a new full- design-build phase, as requested by Metro service maintenance yard with track storage for up to 70 LRT vehicles. • Phase 4 – Systems activation and startup support services.
RFP No. AE47810E0128 A.10 Systems Engineering and Support Services EXPERIENCE AND CAPABILITIES OF THE FIRMS ON THE CONSULTANT’S PROJECT TEAM Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER CHALLENGES / LESSONS LEARNED on the Project specific elements. A single form Preparation of the Project Definition document was created for each element of the A.2 Documents required alternative thinking. design and construction conformance checklist. The timing of this work directly coincided with Preliminary Hazard Analysis (PHA), The PHA is an Metro’s will to depart from the CSI 16 division analysis of the generic hazard groups present in a Master Format specifications into the newer 50 system, their evaluation, and recommendations division specifications. Since the new specifications for control. This PHA is the first step in the would not be available until late in the Crenshaw system safety process to identify and categorize development stage, Hatch came up with a solution hazards or potential hazards associated with the to prepare Project Definition Documents without operations of the proposed rail system. the benefit of base specifications as a starting • Environmental support includes: point. LACMTA design criteria was also undergoing • Public outreach to diverse communities to some significant revisions, and knowing this, Hatch clarify issues of safety, visual quality, cultural was able to pre-plan and define known criteria identity, construction impacts, and future revisions in with the Project Definition Documents. operations • Refinement of the project environmental RECORD OF PERFORMANCE footprint to establish the basis for the In applying the above solution to preparing A.3 assessment of impacts and mitigation the Project Definition Documents, the planned • Preservation of historic structures and procurement schedule was ably preserved. parklands through design mitigation SCOPE OF SERVICES • Developing alternatives at intersections to • Extensive third-party stakeholder coordination, minimize traffic delays during construction including Caltrans, LAWA, BNSF, CPUC, cities of • Tunnel and Underground Station Ventilation Los Angeles and Inglewood, Los Angeles DOT, and Fire Protection: Hatch used Computational and FTA Fluid Dynamics (CFD) coupled with our egress • The corridor includes at-grade running sections, modeling software to design the emergency aerial alignment, underground cut and cover ventilation systems for smoke control and tunnel segments, and tunnel segments. The alignment maintenance operations. passes through an active fault zone • Both Jacobs Engineering and IBI were part of the • The corridor will include underground stations HMM JV team for the Conceptual/Preliminary at Crenshaw/Vernon, Crenshaw/Martin Luther Engineering phase of the Crenshaw project. King Jr., Crenshaw/Exposition; aerial stations Jacobs provided systems services as the at Aviation/Century; and at-grade stations at maintenance facility lead, and IBI’s scope Florence/La Brea, Florence/Hindry, Florence/ included traffic & transit integration. West, and Crenshaw/Slauson RESOURCE MANAGEMENT • The corridor project includes a new, site selection The project had no major resource issues, and A.4 study based, full-service maintenance and 70-LRT was completed without resource challenges. vehicle storage yard MS+P approach is to complete each project with • Advanced Utility Relocations – design and bid appropriate planning to ensure the correct resources procurement services are dedicated at the project outset. • Safety Certification: Hatch prepared the safety certification checklist. A comprehensive review MS+P TEAM EXPERIENCE of LACMTA’s Design Criteria and other current Eleven MS+P team members participated on industry regulations, codes, and practices the Crenshaw project: Brent Lesjak, Abadi Djalil, was conducted and applied to the developed Paul Nolan, Mike Philips, Steve Schibuola, Gino checklist for design and construction. The Bondoc, Riaz Chaudhary, Somesh Debnath, Mashel certifiable elements list was based on LACMTA Jongert, Jon McDonald, Kenneth Shields. criteria and additional subsystems added based
RFP No. AE47810E0128 A.11 Systems Engineering and Support Services EXPERIENCE AND CAPABILITIES OF THE FIRMS ON THE CONSULTANT’S PROJECT TEAM Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER
GOLD LINE FOOTHILL EXTENSION D-B LIGHT RAIL SYSTEM AGENCY/FIRM PROJECT REFERENCE LA Metro (LACMTA) Habib Balian, Chief Executive Officer Address: Metro Gold Line Foothill Extension CONTRACT NAME Metro Gold Line Light Rail Transit Foothill Construction Authority, Extension Phase 2A 406 E. Huntington Drive, Monrovia, CA 91016 Tel: 626.471.9050 CONTRACT NUMBER C1177
CONSULTANT’S ROLE CH2M provided program management services CH2M had overall Project Management A.1 to the Metro Gold Line Foothill Extension design- responsibilities over communications build light rail system. The Metro Gold Line Light systems construction management and Rail Transit Foothill Extension Phase 2A (Project oversight for a comprehensive system safety, and or Foothill Extension) continued the Metro Gold certification program. Specifically, CH2M: Line from its current terminus in East Pasadena • Prepared the System Safety Program Plan through the cities of Arcadia, Monrovia, Duarte, (SSPP), Safety Certification Plan (SCP), and Safety Irwindale, and Azusa. The project included Analyses approximately 11.4 miles of double light rail main • Prepared the Safety Certification Design and track. The project planned for six stations located Construction Checklists in Arcadia, Monrovia, Duarte, Irwindale and Azusa. • Audited the Safety Certification Program and The extension runs along the previously acquired Checklist verification (database application) Atchison Topeka & Santa Fe (AT&SF) railroad right- of-way (ROW), paralleling Interstate 210 (I-210) and • Prepared the Preliminary Hazard Analysis (PHA) Foothill Blvd, and connects the historic downtowns • Reviewed contractor-provided training and of Arcadia, Monrovia, Duarte, Irwindale, and Azusa. manuals Operation of the line was supervised at the LACMTA • Coordinated with the California Public Utilities Rail Operation Control (ROC) facility. LACTMA Commission (CPUC) integrated the operation of the Foothill Extension • Prepared and submitted to the CPUC the Safety LRT into existing Gold Line service and oversees Certification Verification Report operation and maintenance of the line since • Developed the charter for the Safety Certification construction is now complete. Committee and provided technical support • Oversaw integrated testing of communications systems and equipment
MS+P TEAM EXPERIENCE Three MS+P team members participated on the Metro Gold Line Light Rail Transit Foothill Extension Phase 2A project: John Simon, John Spellman, and Rick Newton.
RFP No. AE47810E0128 A.12 Systems Engineering and Support Services EXPERIENCE AND CAPABILITIES OF THE FIRMS ON THE CONSULTANT’S PROJECT TEAM Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER
CHALLENGES / LESSONS LEARNED RESOURCE MANAGEMENT Key lessons learned from the Foothill project The project had no major resource issues, and A.2 A.4 included: was completed without resource challenges. • The Foothill project was delivered under MS+P approach is to complete each project with the Design-Build process. The CH2M team appropriate planning to ensure the correct resources coordinated with project stakeholders during are dedicated at the project outset. the safety certification process including the D-B contractor, LACMTA, and the CPUC. This close coordination led to the approval of the Safety Certification Verification Report. • Compliance with the O&M requirements: CH2M coordinated the work of the Design-Build contractor and the final operator (in charge of O&M) to ensure that the design and construction was developed in accordance with LACMTA’s O&M requirements. This process, implemented at different levels was very successful, and led to LACMTA’s acceptance of the Foothill extension. RECORD OF PERFORMANCE CH2M’s safety certification program was A.3 completed in 2015 at which time the Foothill Extension was turned over to the LACMTA to begin operations. CH2M maintained consistent staffing throughout the entirety of the contract, and successfully delivered the communications systems management and oversaw the successful implementation of the system safety and certification program.
RFP No. AE47810E0128 A.13 Systems Engineering and Support Services EXPERIENCE AND CAPABILITIES OF THE FIRMS ON THE CONSULTANT’S PROJECT TEAM Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER
BARCELONA METRO LINE 9 AGENCY/FIRM PROJECT REFERENCE INFRAESTRUCTURES CAT (Cataluña Antoni Perez i Oteros former transport infrastructure authority) Cataluña Regional Authority Official Address: C/ Carrer dels Vergós 36-42, 08017, CONTRACT NAME Barcelona Metro Line 9 Barcelona (Spain) Tel: + 34 93 444 44 44 CONTRACT NUMBER Email: [email protected] TM-02609
CONSULTANT’S ROLE As prime consultant, SENER was selected by the A.1 • Development of the concept design and client as the designer for the complete package development of the system-wide functional of services, the core of which included systems requirements of the line engineering and system integration. SENER has • Preparation of the bid documentation to support been the lead designer since the year 2000, working the owner in procuring the various system with the Catalan Infrastructure Agency. SENER was packages responsible for overall planning, concept design, • Systems construction management support estimating and construction review. This line wil be during procurement and systems installation 29.7 miles long with 52 stations and will be the longest • On award of the construction contracts, SENER driverless, unattended train operation s(UTO) transit was requested to act as the owner’s representative line in the world. to ensure contractor compliance during the The firm’s approach to systems tasks is based on detailed design phase by the project suppliers, and the use of proven tools, such as DOORS along with coordination of the systems suppliers’ contracts, previously developed custom applications for specific including coordinating and reviewing deliverables, design purposes. ensuring consistency, and validating engineering • Program Management: Project development, design submissions. implementation, and performance evaluation. • Management of the systems suppliers’ contracts. Development of the project management This included providing project progress reporting processes which included scope development and monthly construction financial cost reviews systems integration processes, and development and certification. of Key Performance Indicators (KPI’s). Additionally, • Construction management roles that included SENER managed the schedule, Risk Analysis and systems installation supervision and testing and Mitigation Plan (RAMP), value engineering, health commissioning and safety management, quality requirements, and contract administration efforts on behalf of the • Leadership of the management interface of the client. different contractors and stakeholders
RFP No. AE47810E0128 A.14 Systems Engineering and Support Services EXPERIENCE AND CAPABILITIES OF THE FIRMS ON THE CONSULTANT’S PROJECT TEAM Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER was able to develop a truly integrated approach to MS+P TEAM EXPERIENCE the implementation of all systems. A case in point Twenty-two MS+P team members was early definition of the dynamic envelope of participated on the Barcelona Metro Line the trains and the infrastructure gauge. 9 project: Pere Busquet, Joan Guasch, Marta Navarro, Enric Jiménez, José Manuel Martín, Oriol KEY PROJECT INNOVATIONS Giner, Laura Carrasco, José Antonio Llanas, Enrique • Barcelona Line 9 is a UTO line, and the PTC and González, Isabel Navarro, August Siches, David CBTC components are critical to the operation Martín, Ignasi Gerez, Eduard Just, Ricard Solà, José of the system. SENER innovations included the Luis Ortiz, Jordi Martínez, Julian Torres, Ferran design and implementation of a real-time bi- Biosca, Jordi Adame, Toni Carayol, Pedro Ruiz. directional radio transmission network for data and video between trains and control center. • Implementation of a safety process based on This real-time radio was one of the first to be EN50126 performing safety assurance during all implemented in a transit system. the project phases. • Line 9 was one of the first railway projects in • Management of integration testing, trial running Europe using PLM (Product Lifecycle Management) and line start up for systems acceptance • The development by SENER of a document management software ensured that strategic CHALLENGES / LESSONS LEARNED stakeholders received critical information on time. • The SENER team provided key reviews and • Implementation of a new operational model analyses of previous construction packages A.2 with operator’s staff acting as mobile agents to create a “lessons learned” matrix. Armed available for the complete line. By generating this with this analysis SENER optimized the design operational flexibility it has been possible to lower packages to reduce the subsequent costs of the operating costs over the lifetime of the project. construction • Compliance with the O&M requirements: SENER RECORD OF PERFORMANCE coordinated the work of the main contractor and “SENER has performed outstanding A.3 the final operator (in charge of O&M) to ensure work for Metro Barcelona over the past that the design and construction was developed two decades. SENER has shown outstanding in accordance with the pre- determined O&M innovation capabilities, by developing, managing, requirements. This process, implemented at and implementing novel systems engineering different levels was very successful, and led to techniques in the Line 9 management.” proven cost savings and benefits with respect Antoni Perez i Oteros, Chief of the Division Civil Works to the implementation of complex systems with Cataluña infrastructure authority significant integration/ interface challenges • This is one of several programs that show RESOURCE MANAGEMENT SENER led the design for Metro Barcelona SENER’s experience and ability to build a team A.4 around a large-scale program in its local area on multiple projects/task orders for over • Barcelona Metro Line 9 shines as an example 17 years. In balancing resources, our systems of well managed resources for a program of design and integration team developed over enormous scope and longevity, and to the 100 specialized, local staff, for multiple systems owner’s complete satisfaction. design, CM and systems integration projects. This long term relationship allowed SENER to create • Commissioning and safety certification a body of knowledge for the agencies which achievement: the certification of the complete included protocols, design standards and O&M system applying EU CENELEC standards and EU requirements. common safety methods • Interface management as an essential item for successful delivery: Having considered all project interfaces at the early stages of the project, SENER RFP No. AE47810E0128 A.15 Systems Engineering and Support Services EXPERIENCE AND CAPABILITIES OF THE FIRMS ON THE CONSULTANT’S PROJECT TEAM Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER
GO TRANSIT SIGNALING AND TRAIN CONTROL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AGENCY/FIRM PROJECT REFERENCE GO Transit/Metrolinx Robin S. Woolfrey, Senior Manager, Signals & Communication CONTRACT NAME GO Transit Signaling and Train Control Address: Metrolinx, Suite 2610, 199 Bay Street, Improvement Program Toronto, Ontario, M5L 1E2 Tel: 647.660.1922 CONTRACT NUMBER RQQ-2013-USP-091
CONSULTANT’S ROLE Hatch is providing Technical Consultant Adjacent to the USRC, two interlockings are A.1 services to support the Metrolinx Program approaching end of life and require major Management team in the management, remodeling to accommodate future service. These administration, oversight and implementation are being renewed under the West Approach of the whole Program, which is comprised of the Signaling Project (WASP), which is another major USRC Signaling System Project, the GO Transit element of this program. Train Control System Project, the West Approach The entire signaling, electrical and Signaling Project and the supporting Switch communications systems in both the USRC and Machine and Electrical Enabling Works projects, WASP will be replaced with modern, state of the art with a total capital cost of approximately $800 systems while maintaining day-to-day operations. million. The entire GO Transit network encompasses 264 The Union Station Rail Corridor (USRC) is route miles of which 213 miles are owned by GO the railway infrastructure leading to Toronto Transit but operated by CN, CP, GEXR and TTR out Union Station. This heavy rail system services of six separate control centers and towers. approximately 270 train movements daily through To enable efficient service operations, all 213 miles its four interlockings and it is critical to GO Transit of owned infrastructure will be consolidated under and VIA rail operations. The station consists of singular control at a new, state of the art, computer 16 tracks and is also used by Amtrak, Canadian based Control and Management System operated National Railway, and Canadian Pacific Rail trains. from the GO Transit Control Centre, backed up at a The current wayside signal technology is obsolete Business Resumption Centre, and is referred to as and cannot support the projected doubling the GO Transit Train Control System (GTCS) Project; of traffic. It contains a complex network of which is also part of this Program. approximately 275 switches and 200 signals, and Finally, to enable the projects to proceed smoothly, controls train movements over 4,000 signaled enabling works to prepare switch machines (Switch routes within its six mile limits. This program Machine Enabling Works – SMEW) and power includes full refurbishment of this infrastructure. distribution systems (Electrical Enabling Works – EEW) are being implemented under this program.
RFP No. AE47810E0128 A.16 Systems Engineering and Support Services EXPERIENCE AND CAPABILITIES OF THE FIRMS ON THE CONSULTANT’S PROJECT TEAM Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER
CHALLENGES / LESSONS LEARNED A.2 • Acceptance activities for all lifecycle activities One of the major challenge of this program from design to commissioning of all system is with staging of the works requiring detailed and components, within a managed Systems exhaustive advanced planning due to limited track Engineering lifecycle to IEEE 1220. access. This necessitates that: • Independent Safety Assessment of all safety • All construction is planned months in advance critical and safety related components. and documented in detail with full participation • Acceptance activities for the provision of a of the Designer, Installer, Tester, Operations, and modern, state of the art, VDU based control Work Block Coordinator; system complete with SCADA system providing • Full contingency plans based on past lessons multiplexing function for control and indication learned and industry experience be developed of relay-based and solid state interlockings in advance to deal with emergent situations that throughout the GO Transit network, including may occur; and design acceptance, installation inspection, testing • Full coordination be undertaken with other and commissioning witnessing, and sign-off of works involving all disciplines to make most handover into service. optimal use of limited track time. • Acceptance activities for the provision of a modern, state of the art, management system RESOURCE MANAGEMENT Despite the size and complexity of this complete with complete with automated A.4 functions for diagnostics, root-cause analysis, program, our team of experts are cross spares and asset management for the control functional such that each member of the team system, relay based and solid state interlockings has expertise in multiple areas of the rail systems throughout the GO Transit network, including design, engineering and assurance disciplines. design acceptance, installation inspection, testing This allows us to handle multiple projects and commissioning witnessing, and sign-off of simultaneously and to balance fluctuations in handover into service. loading levels and competing priority projects. This cross-functional capability is however, not • Acceptance activities and steering group gained at the expense of depth of experience, leadership for the derivation of Standard Signaling as our entire team has extensive foundational Principles and conversion to standardized Boolean experience in the fundamentals of all rail systems data for a computer based interlocking. disciplines that then forms the basis of their • Acceptance activities for the provision of modern, subsequent work in systems engineering and state of the art interlocking systems, including all systems assurance. This approach means our team wayside equipment throughout the USRC and can fluidly move from role to role and support any Fort York, including design acceptance, installation project seamlessly. inspection, testing and commissioning witnessing, and sign-off of handover into service. • Acceptance activities for the provision of robust, MS+P TEAM EXPERIENCE redundant power distribution systems within Twenty-seven MS+P team members the USRC and Fort York, including design participated on the GO Transit Signaling acceptance, installation inspection, testing and Train Control Improvement Program: and commissioning witnessing, and sign-off of Steven Bailey, Ray Bateman, Djoko Corovic, Mridu handover into service. Dutton, Colin Eccles, John Eull, Jeetendra Gavli, • Design, test and commission of enabling signals Matthew Hyland, Luis Joaquim, Sinan Keser, Mandy work. Khattra, Jordan Kodzhahinchev, Robyn Korenic, Sanja Krnjic-Cevriz, Pav Kuner, Henry Luetjen, • Maintaining existing signal drawings. Richard Morris, Zhenyu Niu, Adrian Peach, Andrew • Providing day-to-day engineering support for Redmond, Ivan Rodrigues, Raymond Shanks, Li Shi, signaling contractor Dave Smith, Mansour Tabari, Aleksandra Trpkovic.
RFP No. AE47810E0128 A.17 Systems Engineering and Support Services EXPERIENCE AND CAPABILITIES OF THE FIRMS ON THE CONSULTANT’S PROJECT TEAM Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER
TOLUCA TO VALLE DE MEXICO INTERCITY URBAN TRAIN AGENCY/FIRM PROJECT REFERENCE Secretaría de Transportes y Javier Izquierdo Lara, Contract Manager Comunicaciones (SCT) Address: Nueva York 115 piso 10. Colonia Napoles. Delegación Benito Juarez. Ciudad de Mexico. CONTRACT NAME Updates and Modification for the Mexico Distrito Federal (Mexico) Toluca Commuter Rail Tel: +52 55 5723 9300 CONTRACT NUMBER DGTFM-13-15 and DGTFM-09-14 CONSULTANT’S ROLE
SENER provided feasibility studies, preliminary design, and detailed design services to the control system has been designed with open and SCT Toluca – Valle de Mexico commuter train. A.1 integrated control platforms, to allow for flexible The Toluca to Mexico City commuter line control from the control center and stations. A will connect the metropolitan area of Toluca with wireless broadband network has been included Mexico City and it planned to provide service to in the communications systems to permit train to over 300,000 passengers a day, rising up to 500,000 base to train, for the bidirectional transmission of passengers by the year 2047. The mountainous video and data. terrain and environmental conditions in which this SENER was responsible for the following services: network is being built present a major challenge; the result is a design where 92% of the track is • Design of track, overhead contact system, either in tunnels or on viaducts. Altogether, the traction substations, control center 36 miles of the route comprises almost 30 miles • Vehicle on-board systems, including signaling, of viaducts and 2.9 miles of twin tunnel. The line ticketing and all the communication systems. has six elevated stations. The main characteristics • Preliminary Design, including legal and financial for the system are a design speed of up to 100 studies mph, international gauge track, and a planned • Cost-benefit analysis of the system journey time of 39 minutes with a minimum service • Adaptations, updates and modifications of headway of 2.5 minutes. the executive project of the Mexico - Toluca The traction power supply system is rated at 2 x 25 commuter train as required during the kV and 60 Hz. Train control is by an ERTMS Level 2 construction phase signaling system, and an additional automatic train operation (ATO) system. Both characteristics make CHALLENGES / LESSONS LEARNED it practically a semiautomatic railway system. The
RFP No. AE47810E0128 A.18 Systems Engineering and Support Services EXPERIENCE AND CAPABILITIES OF THE FIRMS ON THE CONSULTANT’S PROJECT TEAM Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER
MS+P TEAM EXPERIENCE Twenty-seven MS+P team members participated on the Toluca to Valle de Mexico Intercity Urban Train project: Pere Busquet, Hassan Al Maimouni, Jose Manuel Marin Alonso, Laura Carrasco Amores, Ruben Prado Caballero, Enrique Corro, Joan Carles Enguix, Jose Maria Fernandez, Manuel Cervera Fortis, Jose Antonio Galletero, Javier Fernandez Garcia, Raul Piernau Garcia, Ignacio Gerez, Joan Guasch, Jose Maria Pey Gutierrez, Roberto Rodriguez Illanes, Enric Jimenez, Ferran Biosca Navarro, Isabel Navarro, Oscar Martinez Parker, Alberto Martin Perez, Marta Luisa Perez, Antonio Francisco Carayol Romero, Pedro Ruiz, Ricard Sola, Jaume Sole, Julian Torres.
The project staff team was organized and SENER was selected for this critical project due coordinated using an established Work to it’s ability mobilized a blended team of Breakdown Structure. The Project Director A.2 expert designers including civil, rail, systems A.4 has been supported by a Technical Discipline specialists to provide a complete suite Lead in each of the technological areas required. of design services. In less than a year, SENER This interface has been coordinated transversally created a multi-office firm of over 70 technical by an Interface Coordinator, who was responsible and management staff. The client required a lead for the identification and follow-up of the processes designer, and Owner’s Representative for this for identification, definition and resolution. new line on an extremely compressed timeframe This project took lessons learned from SENER’s to meet the funding and ridership requirements. Barcelona Metro Line 9 in building a team in SENER provided the extra management effort that support of a local and very large program, as created a specific locally resourced and “blended” well as managing long-term resources over an design firm with global management support. enormous and complex scope. Providing not only design services, but also staff augmentation co-located in multiple owner offices RECORD OF PERFORMANCE as an Integrated PM team. This facilitated the Jesus Carrillo Barrientos, Director of Works and decision making process to meet the schedule. Contracts for the Secretary for Transport Additionally SENER developed multiple design A.3 and Communications for the Mexican production offices, enabling design efficiency of 24 government, rated SENER’s services for the hours the clock to complete the design. Toluca to Mexico City commuter train project as exceptional for every service SENER provided on LACMTA’s Form V1.0. ”SENER clearly exceeded all contractual requirements, as well as their expectations of SENER’s value to deliver projects on time and on budget as a highly-effective partner with the client.” RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
RFP No. AE47810E0128 A.19 Systems Engineering and Support Services EXPERIENCE AND CAPABILITIES OF THE FIRMS ON THE CONSULTANT’S PROJECT TEAM Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER
COLUMBIA JUNCTION SIGNAL REPLACEMENT AGENCY/FIRM PROJECT REFERENCE Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority Erik Scheier, MBTA Senior Project Manager Address: 100 Summer Street, Boston, MA 02110 CONTRACT NAME Columbia Junction Signal Replacement Tel: 617.222.3214 Project CONTRACT NUMBER Q40PS01
CONSULTANT’S ROLE A.1 Jacobs is providing design, engineering and of the track and 21 switches. Assessment of construction phase services for the reconstruction in-service track and track components included of this key interlocking on the MBTA’s Red Line. rails, ties, rail fasteners, special trackwork, contact This interlocking is the largest on the MBTA system. rail systems, ballast, right of way issues and grade The project scope includes the replacement crossings. This information was utilized for material of all signal and traffic work in this 21 switch procurement, diversion planning, operational interlocking at the heart of the MBTA’s busiest issues, construction staging, and installation. heavy rail line. Beginning in 2015, Jacobs took on additional The design utilizes a modular approach to allow work under their existing contract to support ease of interfacing to the existing system by planned winter resiliency improvements. Jacobs optimizing the reliability of the new equipment. is providing engineering design support services The design is based on integration of the track, for the removal of existing 150 NMC (and other power, signals and communications systems. A key configuration) third rail and appurtenances component of the project is replacing the existing including heater elements and replacement with relay logic with redundant hot standby processors 85C Composite third rail and appurtenances for both vital and non-vital systems. In the field, a including heater elements on the MBTA Red Line significant element is replacing all of the signals, tracks between Andrew (Dorchester Ave.) Portal to signal heads and associated signal cables. A third the south end of Wollaston Station on the NB track key element is to upgrade a significant portion and the Linden Street Truck Pad north of Wollaston of the track and replace all the switches in the Station on the SB track. The distance of track interlocking. is approximately 25,673 LF on the NB track and The project involves replacing the existing relay 24,473 LF on the SB track (total 50,146 LF). based controls with redundant microprocessor based vital and non-vital control systems. Jacobs conducted a detailed inspection and assessment
RFP No. AE47810E0128 A.20 Systems Engineering and Support Services EXPERIENCE AND CAPABILITIES OF THE FIRMS ON THE CONSULTANT’S PROJECT TEAM Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER
MS+P TEAM EXPERIENCE Two MS+P team members participated on the Columbia Junction Signal Replacement project: Michael Zagachin and Dan Shay.
CHALLENGES / LESSONS LEARNED RECORD OF PERFORMANCE Columbia Junction serves as the gateway to In Jacobs Engineering’s most recent A.2 A.3 the main maintenance facility as well as the performance evaluation, they received junction point for the Red Line’s two branches. “Excellent” ratings in the following areas: This location presents technical challenges with • Technical (Expertise, Budget Conformance, and regard to implementing upgrades to a portion of Quality of Work) the MBTA’s operating system where throughput is • Procedural (Knowledge, Project Approach, and critical – while keeping the system operational for Subconsultant Management) weekly rush hour service. • Administration (Organization and Scheduling). The engineering and construction phase services are based on the integration of the existing system RESOURCE MANAGEMENT with the new system with no impact on service. The project had no major resource issues, and was completed without resource challenges. A.4 MS+P approach is to complete each project with appropriate planning to ensure the correct resources are dedicated at the project outset.
RFP No. AE47810E0128 A.21 Systems Engineering and Support Services KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE
KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE
Our MS+P team is a highly qualified group of licensed and certified professionals; well experienced support staff; and handpicked for their expertise in passenger system design and construction. We have successfully worked together and with LACMTA on highly complex transit projects and are 100% committed to helping meet LACMTA’s goals for the Systems Engineering and Support Services program. Our approach to staffing the team promotes responsiveness and innovation to Metro for all tasks, while providing clear lines of responsibility, communication, and accountability throughout each phase of the program. Brent Lesjak, our program manager has a diverse background leading multidisciplinary teams and provides superior results for clients. He is a highly effective leader and relationship manager with more than 18 years of experience in program/project management and systems engineering. Brent’s most recent effort was managing the ~$463 M Positive Train Control (PTC) program for the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority’s Commuter Rail Service, which is the largest contracted commuter rail service in the United States. This complex program touched every discipline of the railroad across a broad geography. Effective communication and stakeholder coordination were key factors to maintain the schedule, keep costs in check, and achieve identified performance metrics. Brent and the MS+P staff are not simply committed to providing the right team for Metro’s systems needs today, but for the entire length of the contract.
“I am fully committing myself and the MS+P Team to be here for the duration and to help Metro make this Program a long-term success.”
RFP No. AE47810E0128 B.1 Systems Engineering and Support Services KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE
KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER BRENT LESJAK PROGRAM MANAGER KEY ROLE
RFP REQUIREMENTS Brent Lesjak will apply his 18 years of program, project, and 99 Relevant Bachelor’s Degree technical leadership to oversee the Systems Engineering 99 Over 15 years of senior- and Support Services Program. Brent’s career has been level transit systems design driven by a history of leading multidisciplinary teams to and program management provide superior results for clients across the country. He experience. recently provided similar program management services 99 Possesses the organizational, for various agencies including LACMTA, the Massachusetts technical, team building skills Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA), and the Orange County to manage multidisciplinary Transportation Authority (OCTA) on a variety of systems teams, engineering related projects and programs. 99 Managed relevant transit Based upon all of this, systems programs Brent has what is needed to deliver throughout North America, this program in a collaborative environment that is focused including for LACMTA on a sustainable LACMTA rail system for the future. 99 California Professional Brent has more than eighteen years of experience in program/project Engineer registration pending management and systems engineering, focusing on organizational change management, design, start-ups, systems integration, commuter rail, light and heavy rail transit, bus rapid transit, fare collection, safety certification, safety analysis, safety and security field reviews, design reviews, and human factors relating to rail/bus transit and aviation maintenance.
SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCE Crenshaw/LAX Light Rail Transit Corridor Project, Maintenance and Storage Facility (M&SF), LACMTA, Los Angeles, CA Project Manager (2010-2012). Brent managed the Maintenance and Storage Facility (M&SF) design efforts for the $1.7 billion Crenshaw/ FIRM LAX Light Rail Transit (LRT) Corridor Project. The project team Hatch successfully completed Advanced Conceptual Engineering (ACE) and the majority of the Preliminary Engineering (PE) activities EDUCATION / TRAINING including advancing the scope of the design, defining the extent B.S., Industrial/Systems of the infrastructure required, outlining appropriate and feasible Engineering, Minor in Business construction methods, advancing procurement documents, and Administration, University of developing projected project costs for a complete design-build Southern California, 1999 procurement document package.
REGISTRATION Universal Fare System (UFS), LACMTA, Los Angeles County, CA Professional Engineer Start-up Program Manager (2004-2006). Brent served as the start-up CA pending program manager for 11 bus divisions (more than 2,600 coaches), YEARS IN PRACTICE four rail lines, and one bus rapid transit line. Oversaw entire 18 implementation of this program including site reviews, installation,
RFP No. AE47810E0128 B.2 Systems Engineering and Support Services KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE
KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER
BRENT LESJAK PROGRAM MANAGER testing, monitoring, contract compliance, deliverables for Mobilization alone), data technical reviews, contractor mediation, and requirements reviews, and training. scheduling/coordination. Program Management Services, Maryland Program Management Services, Massachusetts Transit Administration (MTA) Baltimore, MD Bay Transportation Authority, Boston, MA Program Manager (2012-2013). Brent managed Director - Program Management (2015-2017). Brent a diverse professional team responsible for managed a diverse professional team responsible the oversight, management, and completion for providing program management and technical of all work associated with the transition and support services to oversee and manage MBTA’s mobilization of a new third party operations ~$463M Positive Train Control (PTC) program. and maintenance contractor for the MTA’s MARC This included providing a full portfolio of program Train Service along the Brunswick and Camden management and technical support services Commuter Rail Lines (including all related including procurement support and contractor facilities). The base value of the program was selection, contractor oversight & compliance, $204M with the potential for up to $409M with project controls, technical documentation reviews, option years. The Project Team provided program design reviews, environmental reviews, installation management, technical, project, and financial oversight & inspection, testing oversight, change reporting oversight support services, regulatory management, configuration controls, assess reporting, contractor oversight, stakeholder management oversight, stakeholder coordination, coordination, employee transition/training, reporting development & support (both Union negotiations, technical documentation internally and to regulators), grant identification reviews, and data requirement reviews. & securement, warranty oversight, and other necessary tasks. Program Management Services, Phase II, Orange County Transportation Authority Program Management Services, Massachusetts (OCTA), Orange County, CA Bay Transportation Authority, Boston, MA Program Manager (2006-2009). Brent managed Program Manager (2013-2015). Brent managed a diverse professional team responsible for the a diverse professional team responsible for oversight, management, and completion of all the oversight, management, and completion work associated with the development of the of all work associated with the transition and OCTA Rapid Transit Program from planning mobilization of a new third party operations through construction. Projects within the Rapid and maintenance contractor for the MBTA’s Transit Program included, Bravo! Bus Rapid Commuter Rail Service ($2.68B base program Transit (BRT), Go Local, and the Anaheim Regional with the potential for up to $4.3 billion with Transportation Intermodal Center (ARTIC). option years), including organizational Brent also served as the project manager leading development for the MBTA’s long term the overall delivery and oversight of the $125 management of this contract. The project team million Bravo! Program which consisted of provided program management, technical, three BRT corridors, totaling over 75 miles, as project, and financial reporting oversight support well as a complimentary local bus circulator. services, contract close-out for the previous Services included project controls, conceptual operator, regulatory reporting/compliance, design, environmental and regulatory support, contractor oversight, stakeholder coordination, stakeholder coordination and facilitation, employee transition, Union negotiations, specification development, procurement support technical documentation reviews (over 271 and contractor selection, and final design Operator Deliverable Requirements List (ODRLs) oversight services. RFP No. AE47810E0128 B.3 Systems Engineering and Support Services KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE
KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER ANTHONY ZELOYLE OCS MANAGER KEY ROLE
RFP REQUIREMENTS Anthony Zeloyle has over twenty years of experience in design 99 Relevant Bachelor’s Degree and construction of all types of Overhead Contact Systems 99 Twenty years of OCS (OCS) for above ground and underground rail systems projects engineering experience for public agencies throughout North America. Anthony 99 California Professional has been managing design and construction engineering Engineer registration pending teams for OCS systems on large transit projects for over fifteen years, and is experienced with all aspects of systems design management. Recently he has provided project management services for a multidisciplinary project in New York City, overseeing the modification and relocation of essential systems, including OCS. Anthony has 20 years of experience in the design and layout of light rail, commuter rail and heavy rail electrification systems, structural engineering and civil engineering. This experience includes catenary design, traction power design, and design and analysis of railroad catenary and transmission support structures, design of deep and shallow foundations, conduit systems to carry signal power, signal cables and traction power cables. Anthony has managed multiple projects successfully, including: the Brookfield Properties Project, SEPTA 30th to K Interlocking, TEMPE Streetcar, and OCS Lead for the NJT County Yard.
SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCE Brookfield Properties over Amtrak, New York City, NY Project Manager (2007-2016). Project Manager overseeing the design of two new towers over Amtrak and LIRR facilities. This is a multidiscipline project, involving the modification and relocation FIRM of catenary systems, third rail, radio systems, and signal systems to Jacobs Engineering facilitate the installation of the support structure for the overbuild.
EDUCATION / TRAINING Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA), B.S., Civil Engineering, Villanova Wayne Junction to Glenside, Philadelphia, PA University, Villanova, PA, 1992 Project Coordinator (2004-2006). As project coordinator, Anthony was responsible for coordinating the engineering tasks for Jacobs, REGISTRATION Professional Engineer and performing several tasks for the Contractor, including; catenary (Structural) material submittal for approval, Site Specific Work Plans for the AZ, DE, IN, PA installation of Catenary, structural calculations for temporary CA pending construction, structural calculations for conduits crossing railroad bridges, messenger wire stringing tension calculations. SEPTA YEARS IN PRACTICE upgraded the interlockings between Wayne Junction and Glenside. 26
RFP No. AE47810E0128 B.4 Systems Engineering and Support Services KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE
KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER
ANTHONY ZELOYLE OCS MANAGER
Jacobs assisted the electrical contractor, Vanalt Metra, Winsdor Park Station, Chicago, IL Electrical Construction, during the installation/ OCS Manager (2005). Manager of overhead modification of the catenary systems, and catenary systems, responsible for the design of supported the contractor, Farfield Construction, catenary modifications, grounding and bonding. in many aspects of construction. Station upgrades included a new track alignment; this new alignment required the relocation of Amtrak, Readville Interlocking to Cove several catenary structures and the relocation of Interlocking, Boston, MA the signal power facilities for the grade crossing. OCS Manager (2005-2006). Manager of Overhead Catenary Systems responsible for the design Minnesota Department of Transportation, of catenary profiles and verification of design Hiawatha LRT, Design-Build, Minneapolis, MN by BBC for the electrification of Track #3 from Senior OCS Designer (2000-2004). Senior OCS Readville to Cove. Designer responsible for the design of 11 miles of new, 750 Vdc overhead catenary systems. SEPTA, Mainline Schuylkill, Philadelphia, PA Significant coordination is required with Station Project Coordinator (2002-2003). As project Architect’s and Bridge designers. OCS consists of coordinator responsible for coordinating the auto-tension, fixed termination, street running engineering tasks for Jacobs and he performed downtown and 2 miles of TBM tunnels. several tasks for the contractor, including; catenary material submittals for approval, Amtrak, Hudson Interlocking, Newark, NJ site specific work plans for the installation Project Enginer (1999-2002). Project engineer of Catenary, structural calculations for for the reconfiguration of Hudson Interlocking temporary construction, and assisted during the to provide high-speed crossovers. Responsible installation/modification of the catenary systems. for catenary design, traction power design, CPM SEPTA upgraded the catenary systems from 30th scheduling, and cost estimating. Street Station to Suburban Station and Jacobs Amtrak, Manor Interlocking, New York, NY supported the contractor, Mass Electric. Project Engineer (2008). Project engineer for catenary modifications (elimination of hanging NICTD, Kensington Interlocking beams, main messengers and bridle wires) for an Improvements, Chicago, IL interlocking located on Amtrak’s Hellgate Line OCS Manager (2003-2004). Manager of overhead north of New York City. Responsible for catenary catenary systems responsible for the design of design, traction power design, CPM scheduling, catenary modifications, grounding and bonding and cost estimating. and switch heaters design. NICTD is modifying the interlocking to provide a route that will Amtrak, Hellgate Line Catenary Modifications, allow them to bypass 115th Street station. This New York, NY required two new crossovers and the extension Project Manager (2008). Project manager for the existing NICTD Westbound to CNIC track 4. catenary modifications (elimination of hanging beams, main messengers and bridle wires) for 14 miles of Amtrak’s Hellgate Line north of New York City. Responsible for catenary design, traction power design, CPM scheduling, and cost estimating.
RFP No. AE47810E0128 B.5 Systems Engineering and Support Services KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE
KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER PERE BUSQUET, PE TRACTION POWER MANAGER KEY ROLE
RFP REQUIREMENTS Pere Busquet has 25 years of experience in the design and 99 Relevant Bachelor’s Degree construction of traction power systems. Recently he has 99 Over two decades of provided Traction Power engineering services in North traction power engineering America for the California High Speed Rail Authority as well as experience for the Regional Railway “Valle de Mexico - Toluca” in Mexico. 99 Registered California Pere is a highly skilled professional with proven capabilities Professional Engineer when managing complex projects and multiple concurrent assignments related to electrical engineering installations in stations, tunnels, and depots. Pere has 25 years of experience in systems engineering (final design, specifications, civil works management assistance and systems commissioning) specifically in the rail system environment (medium voltage power supply systems, low voltage power distribution systems, traction substations, high voltage supply), substations, and electrical centrals (400/220/110/25 kV distribution substations, and hydraulic centrals.) He has proven experience in developing emergency and backup power supply strategies, design of substations and switchgear, earthing systems, protection systems against stray current, as well as cathodic protection. He has successfully worked for the Spanish Railway Infrastructure Authority (ADIF), Catalonian Railway Authority as well as for the Ministry of Civil Works, for projects of transport infrastructure and specially railways. Pere has deep knowledge of coordinating electrical systems with other systems in stations, tunnels, and depots.
SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCE LUSAIL LRT – ICE Services, Lusail/Qatar FIRM Independent Checking Engineer (2014-2017). SENER is currently SENER working as Independent Checking Engineer (ICE) for LUSAIL LRT, lines green, red, yellow, and purple. Pere served as the authorized reviewer EDUCATION / TRAINING of energy as well as earthing and bonding documents. MSc Electrical Engineering, Universidad de Cataluña. 1989 California High-Speed Train Project, Palmdale to Burbank REGISTRATION Section, California High-Speed Rail Authority, CA Professional Engineer Traction Power Designer (2015-2017). SENER is in charge of PE CA, E21516 environmental and engineering services during preliminary design Spain Association of phase. Pere is designing the electrical traction installations (2x25 kV, Industrial Engineers # 8301 traction substations, paralleling substations and switching substations) for each proposed route. YEARS IN PRACTICE 25
RFP No. AE47810E0128 B.6 Systems Engineering and Support Services KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE
KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER
PERE BUSQUET TRACTION POWER MANAGER
Maryland Metro Purple Line, Maryland Transit Regional Railway “Valle de Mexico – Toluca” , Administration, Bethesda, MD Secretaría de Transportes y Comunicaciones, OCS Manager (2005-2006). SENER prepared the Mexico City, Mexico bid design for Maryland Purple Line Partners EPC Senior Electrical Engineer (2014). The Toluca Contractors as lead designer and engineer of – México City intercity train will connect the record for alignment, geotechnical, structures, metropolitan area of Toluca with Mexico City. stations, architectural, civil, MEP, systems, and Pere served as senior electrical engineer proposal documentation preparation. Pere responsible for resolution of interfaces with CFE served as senior systems engineer preparing the (electrical supplier) for the necessary connections review of the technical documentation regarding at 23 kV (stations, tunnel, and technical buildings) traction, and earthing and bonding systems. and 230 kV (traction substations and detail design of needed electrical connections). Barcelona Metro Line 9, Cataluña Regional Authority, Barcelona, Spain Abu Dhabi LRT/Tram Study, Abu Dhabi Senior Systems Engineer (2003-2017). Pere has Department of Transportm Abu Dhabi/UAE served as senior systems engineer working in the Senior Systems Engineer (2014). Pere served as following contracts: senior systems engineer. He prepared the review • Responsible for the preparation of of technical design requirements to be applied in specifications of the bids for the D/B of the energy systems for the tramway lines: LRT1, LRT2, Platform Screen Door (PSD) system for the and LRT3 in Abu Dhabi. new line Guadalajara LRT Line 3, Secretaría de • Senior systems engineer for earthing and Transportes y Comunicaciones, Guadalajara, bonding systems. Responsible for the Mexico management of the on-board systems. System Engineer (2012-2013). SENER carried out Implementation and coordination of the the preliminary and final design of systems in design and the manual of grounding and the new Guadalajara LRT line 3, including energy protective connection of all electrical system design. Pere served as systems engineer systems - HV (220 kV), MV (30 kV), traction responsible for energy systems. current, and LV (400 V) • Coordinated the technical evaluation of High-Speed Railway Line Madrid-Zaragoza- the proposals for traction substations, Barcelona-French Border, Section Figueres- 220/30 kV receptors substations and energy Perpignan, Spain-France distribution systems Senior Electrical Enginer (2004-2011). As senior electrical engineer, Pere contributed • Preparation of technical specifications for to the successful design of the electrical and the design of: ATC, signaling and command systems infrastructures according to client center, telecommunication systems, and requirements and technical specifications. He energy systems also provided technical assistance during the • Preliminary functional study of Line 9 concession bid project for the high-speed line, electrification systems allowing to the contractor joint venture to be • Technical assistance for the access and awarded this contract. He provided supervision connection to the transmission electrical in all the phases of the project from design to grid (220 kV) with system operator (REE) and commissioning and completion of the line. energetic transmission company (REE).
RFP No. AE47810E0128 B.7 Systems Engineering and Support Services KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE
KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER DALE HEIN TRAIN CONTROL MANAGER KEY ROLE
RFP REQUIREMENTS Dale Hein is a senior project manager with 29 years 99 Relevant Bachelor’s Degree transit systems engineering experience in the design and 99 Over two decades of transit construction of train control systems, including Automatic control systems engineering Train Protection (ATP), Automatic Train Operation (ATO), experience and Automatic Train Supervision (ATS) for above ground 99 California Professional and underground rail systems projects. His experience Engineer registration pending includes the development of best practices and standards, requirements specification, design management and systems integration. Recently he has provided rail system project management services for a multidisciplinary team for the Green Line LRT project for the City of Calgary, overseeing all aspects of Train Control Management. Dale is a senior project manager with 29 years of systems engineering, signal design and project management experience in transit, heavy and commuter rail systems, including the development of best practices and standards, requirements specification, design management and systems integration. He also has experience in staff development, systems commissioning, and aligning rail systems to operational needs. Dale has extensive experience in developing and implementing safety and verification & validation plans for Positive Train Control (PTC) and the associated Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) regulatory filings.
SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCE 17th Avenue SE – Stampede Park Crossing Conceptual Study & Functional Design, The City of Calgary, Calgary, AB Rail Systems Manager (2016-2017). Rail Systems Manager examining FIRM the feasibility of an at-grade extension of 17 Avenue SE, at Macleod HATCH Trail SE, into Stampede Park adjacent to the Victoria Park/Stampede LRT station. Reviewed operations, track and rail systems constraints EDUCATION / TRAINING B.Sc. Computer Engineering, to determine an approach to construction phasing. Developed details University of Manitoba, to support estimates. Winnipeg, MB, 1986 Red Book and Recommended Practice Updates, Canadian Pacific, REGISTRATION Calgary, AB Professional Engineer Manager (2016-2017). Manager leading the task order project to revise ON, 90381443, 1994 CP’s Red Book of S&C Requirements and S&C Recommended Practices AB, M72454, 2001 to incorporate the changes and new processes introduced over the prior CA pending 7 years. Restructured Test Instructions so they could be more effectively employed by both senior and junior employees. Standard plans to YEARS IN PRACTICE show best practices for construction and components required for 29 construction were created. RFP No. AE47810E0128 B.8 Systems Engineering and Support Services KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE
KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER
DALE HEIN TRAIN CONTROL MANAGER
Green Line LRT, The City of Calgary, Calgary, AB Capital Metro Transit Authority (CMTY) PTC Rail Systems Manager (2016-2017). Rail Systems Program | Austin, Texas Manager for the preliminary design of the of Senior Engineer - Systems Safety Assurance (2015- the 25 mile, $5B Green Line LRT connecting 2016). Responsible for FRA compliance for the North Pointe and Seton to downtown Calgary, general engineering consultant team employed including a 2.5 mile tunnel. Dale is involved in by CMTY on a task order basis. Dale is involved in advancing preliminary design for systems (signals, developing the Project Management Plan (PMP), communications, OCS, traction power, track power the RFP documents and supporting Technical modeling, vehicles and systems integration), Specifications including the specifications for run time modeling (including LRT run times and vehicle, communications, wayside and control impacts to traffic), development of the concept of office System for the Enhanced Automatic Train operations, construction staging and scheduling, Control System system. In addition, Dale was freight railway proximity setbacks, and risk responsible for the development of the revised management strategies. Evaluated and presented PTCIP and the draft CMTY concept of operations. alternative train control system solutions including line of sight, Automatic Train Protection (ATP), PTC Test & Regulatory Program, CN, Automatic Train Operation (ATO), and Automatic Homewood, IL Train Supervision (ATS) for above ground and Senior Manager (2013 - 2017). Responsible for the underground rail segments. strategic development and implementation of the system test program for CN’s $220 million Positive Green Line Southeast Transitway, The City of Train Control program; PTC is an automatic train Calgary, Calgary, AB protection system. Acquired test equipment and Signal and Communications System Development contract resources for the PTC lab. Responsible Manager (2015-2016). Manager leading the Signal for development and submission of necessary and Communications System Development for regulatory filings including the preparation of the Preliminary Design and Transit Oriented CN’s PTC Safety Plan. Developed CN specific PTC Development Integration for the 16 mile, $2.6B documentation, policy and instructions. Most new Transitway linking Downtown Calgary recently, Dale has been involved in the development with Southeast Calgary. Work involved the of test cases for railroad operating scenarios and development of the City’s BRT and Low Floor LRT coaching members of the QA team in railroad PTC Design Guideline Manuals, advancing preliminary operations. design, construction staging and scheduling, PTC Wayside Design, CN, Various Locations, U.S. freight railway proximity setbacks, and risk Senior Manager (2010-2013). Responsible for management strategies. The scope of work wayside signal and communications material involved preliminary design of 8 miles of rail- sourcing and design activities associated with convertible BRT Transitway, transition to low-floor the $100 million program of wayside updates. LRT, and extension of the LRT line a further 8 miles. To address cost and schedule concerns, created building blocks of typical plans & configurations for wayside signal locations. Developed specifications for and managed contracts for PTC radio tower construction. Dealt with FCC regulatory issues. Developed portions of the industry PTC Safety Plan template. Reviewed system safety documents and provided comments from CN.
RFP No. AE47810E0128 B.9 Systems Engineering and Support Services KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE
KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER JON MCDONALD COMMUNICATIONS MANAGER KEY ROLE
RFP REQUIREMENTS With nearly 25 years of experience, Jonathan McDonald 99 Relevant Bachelor’s Degree has successfully led the multidisciplinary systems 99 Over two decades of development on some of the largest and most advanced professional transit systems transit systems projects in the world including California’s communications engineering High-Speed Rail, multiple BART extensions with its state-of- 99 Registered California the-art ATO system, Seattle’s Central Link Light Rail with its Professional Engineer mixed bus/rail tunnel operations, and more recently Toronto’s Metrolinx Regional Express Rail program with its $40B mega brownfield PPP approach. Jon is one of the leading forces in the rail industry for advancing the state-of-the-art of both technology and the methods used to successfully implement new technology into existing organizations His project experience covers nearly all modes and configurations FIRM of transit including Commuter/Freight Rail, LRT/Streetcar, and BRT HATCH in tunnel, aerial, and at-grade configurations. Beyond his technical talent, Jon has an extensive background in estimating, fire/life EDUCATION / TRAINING safety management, scheduling, and construction management of B.S., Electrical Engineering, systems. But most of all, he is known for his unique combination of University of Illinois UC, 1992 broad technical knowledge, strong business acumen, and solid team M.S., Business Administration, building skills which have helped clients realize bottom line value University of Chicago Booth, through improvements in technology strategy and organizational 2004 management. REGISTRATION Professional Engineer SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCE CA, 21322 Redline Radio Replacement, LACMTA, Los Angeles, CA IL, FL, VA , WA Quality Assurance & Engineering Review (2017). LA Metro’s Redline INDUSTRY AFFILIATIONS radio was installed in several segments from 1990 through 1997 and American Public Transportation has reached the end of its useful life. CH2M as a subconsultant to KKCS Association (APTA) has been hired to design a replacement system and including new provisions for LA RICS 700 MHz data radio system. Mr. McDonald serves • Chairman of Research & Technology Committee the project as quality assurance and peer reviewer of the design. • Standards Development Regional Express Rail Program Management, Metrolinx, Toronto, ON Oversight Council Master Integration Program Manager (2016-2017). Metrolinx is Transportation Research Board embarking on a $22.5 billion program to upgrade their existing 311 (TRB) mile commuter rail line from 200,000 to 1.6 million passengers per day. • TCRP Oversight and Project This program will include electrification of 60 percent of the system, Selection Committee a signal upgrade to CBTC, a new fleet, 12 new stations, 20+ upgraded stations. The program is planned to go out as two P3 contracts with YEARS IN PRACTICE 30-year DBOMF concessions with a total estimated value over $40 25
RFP No. AE47810E0128 B.10 Systems Engineering and Support Services KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE
KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER
JON MCDONALD COMMUNICATIONS MANAGER billion. Jon managed the master integration, lead, Jon led the development of systems (traction systems assurance, requirements management, power, OCS, signals, and comms) requirements for and P3 integration. the segment up to the 30 percent design including land take and environmental impact statement Crenshaw/LAX and Regional Connector, (EIS) support. LACMTA, Los Angeles, CA Independent Safety Assessor (2015-2015). For Sound Transit Central Link Light Rail, Puget these two multi-billion-dollar rail extension Sound Regional Transit Authority, Seattle, WA projects, Jon served as the independent safety Communications Manager and Engineer of Record assessor helping the authority resolved disputes (2000-2007). This is a 15-mile FTA New Start rail with contractors on several fire/life safety, system. Unique to the project was the retrofit of the tunnel ventilation, and holistic rail systems and existing downtown Seattle bus tunnel to deliver operations issues in the tunnels. joint bus-rail service to the central transit corridor. As the Engineer of Record and design manager BART Extensions Programs, Bay Area Rapid on the $45 million mission-critical voice, video, Transit District, San Francisco, CA and data communication and operations control Task Force Lead and Deputy Project Manager (2011- system project for the mixed mode bus/rail starter 2012). Jon has served as systems (traction power, system; he was the first to incorporate reliability signals, comms, and fare collection) task force management, IP-based emergency phones, and a lead and deputy project manager on the Dublin/ distributed central control. Mr. McDonald led the Pleasanton, Colma, Pittsburgh/Antioch, and Warm systems integration and coordination efforts on the Springs extensions. Over the course of two projects design phase of the project, which included fire/life for BART, he led the design, project management, safety coordination, throughout the cut over of the and systems integration on more than 20 miles first phase of construction. of line extensions for BART under design/build contracts. South and North LRT Extensions, City of Edmonton, AB, Canada PCJPB/Caltrain, San Carlos, CA Project Manager (2007-2010). Over the course of Communications Manager (2010-2012). three projects, the City of Edmonton extended Communications manager seconded part time their existing light rail transit system 15 km and to JPB Engineering for communications support added seven stations, retrofitted existing stations, on this 70 mile commuter rail system in Northern and revised many of the existing systems. As California. Mr. McDonald has been involved with project principal, Mr. McDonald supervised the JPB’s narrow banding efforts; signal improvement commissioning and communications engineering project; rail operations control system upgrades; real teams for the three extensions. time information system improvements; and design criteria, standards, and as-built update projects. Regional Transportation Commission, RAPID Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Stations Design, Reno, California High Speed Rail San Jose-San NV Francisco Segment, California High Speed Rail Communcations Lead (2009-2010). Communications Authority, San Francisco, CA project manager and lead designer for this Systems Task Force Lead (2010-2012). The San Jose 14-station BRT project in Downtown Reno. to San Francisco segment is approximately 65 miles Communications elements included CCTV, PA/VMS, of this located primarily on the existing Caltrain fare collection, and point to multi-point WiFi system. alignment, the most highly populated segment on the alignment. As systems engineering task force
RFP No. AE47810E0128 B.11 Systems Engineering and Support Services KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE
KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER JOHN SIMON SYSTEMS SAFETY ASSURANCE LEAD SPECIALTY TECHNICAL POSITION
RFP REQUIREMENTS John Simon has more than 27 years of transit systems 99 Relevant Bachelor’s Degree engineering experience, with an emphasis on safety. He 99 Nearly triple the required brings unparalleled expertise in safety planning, threat and safety experience vulnerability analyses, safety certification, hazard analyses, 99 Knowledge of applicable rules and security assessments, and a track record conducting and regulations regarding safety investigations of critical subway subsystems (fire alarm transportation systems and emergency management, and subway ventilation and electrical power systems). Recently, he was responsible for system safety program plan for the Escondido to Oceanside Sprinter LRT system, as well as having supported numerous safety and security projects for LACMTA including Foothill Gold Line, Eastside Extension, Expo Phase 2 Extension, and Pasadena Gold Line. John’s transit systems engineering career has focused on system safety certification, fire/life system security, safety operational planning, emergency response evaluation, emergency response drills, hazard analyses, and reliability engineering. John has led state safety oversight audit projects for the Federal, State and local transit clients and is knowledge of applicable local, state, and federal laws, rules and regulations governing public transportation systems. He has provided Safety Certification Management services for the following related projects: TexRail Commuter Rail, Redlands Commuter Rail, North County Transit District Sprinter Line, Exposition Line, and the LACMTA Blue Line in North America.
SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCE LACMTA Safety and Security Projects, Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Los Angeles, CA FIRM Safety and Security Certification Manager (1991 - 2017). John CH2M supported LACTMA with safety and security on numerous LRT EDUCATION / TRAINING projects. Responsible for conducting safety investigations of B.S., Electrical Engineering, critical subway subsystems, including, fire alarm and emergency California State University, management, and subway ventilation and electrical power systems. Fullerton, 1987 Also provides technical support for operations and maintenance planning and coordinated audits of the safety certification REGISTRATION documentation. Certified Safety Professional • P3010 Safety and Security Certification. Supporting the (Serial No. 14564), 1995 certification of the P3010 safety and security certification effort. YEARS IN PRACTICE Helped develop the criteria conformance and specification 27 conformances checklists.
RFP No. AE47810E0128 B.12 Systems Engineering and Support Services KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE
KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER
JOHN SIMON SYSTEM SAFETY ASSURANCE LEAD
• Foothill Gold Line. Supports the team Safety and Security Certification Centralized with auditing and documenting the safety Traffic Control Dispatch System; NCTD; San certification program. Diego, CA • Exposition Line Construction Authority. Project Manager (2008-2011). John managed the Supported team with auditing and safety and security certification of the Centralized documenting the safety certification Traffic Control (CTC) dispatch system upgrade along program. the San Diego subdivision of the LOSSAN corridor. • Eastside Extension. Served as the lead Managed program to integrate the new PTC- auditor to audit and document the safety complaint CTC system. Most certification revolved certification program. around contractor acceptance testing. Certification of the design and installation was also required as • Pasadena Gold Line Safety Certification well as operational readiness activities including Program. Supported the team with auditing completion of manuals, training, integrated testing, and documenting the safety certification and simulated operations for both normal and program. emergency situations. Escondido to Oceanside “Sprinter” New Start Redlands Commuter Rail, San Bernardino LRT System; North County Transit District County Transportation Authority SBCTA (NCTD); Oceanside, CA Safety and Security Planning Lead (2005- Transit & Rail Division Safety Certification Manager (2015-2017). 2008). Led the safety and security effort for Mr. Simon is currently serving as the Safety the system and prepared the System Safety Certification Manager for the Redlands Commuter Program (SSP) Plan, generated hazard analyses, Rail Project. The Redlands commuter rail project and participated in the existing Safety Review is an 8-mile Diesel Multiple Unit (DMU) system Committee. Witnessed and verified rail activation between the Metrolink Commuter Rail station and integration testing program. Represented the in San Bernardino to the University of Redlands. project at hearings on safety certification in front Mr. Simon is managing the safety and security of the California Public Utilities Commission. certification of the entire alignment including the Safety Certification Project for LRT Projects; vehicles and maintenance facility. Sacramento Regional Transit District; Los Angeles Metro Blue Line, Los Angeles Sacramento, CA County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Project Manager (2006-2017). Responsible for Los Angeles, CA overseeing the safety certification of six RT light Project Manager (1995-1996). John served as the rail projects, including certification of the South Project Manager for an assessment of the Los Line Extension, Folsom Line, and new vehicles Angeles Metro Blue Line Grade Crossing Program. from the Spanish manufacturer, CAF. More The assessment evaluated four areas of the recently, John prepared hazard and security program including engineering safeguards, public reviews of the South Line Phase 2 Light). outreach, legislative efforts, and law enforcement. As a result of this study, several improvements were incorporated into the system including expanding the photo-enforcement program, increasing the fines for violations, and improving the public outreach program.
RFP No. AE47810E0128 B.13 Systems Engineering and Support Services KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE
KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER CARL WRIGHT OPERATIONS AND PLANNING LEAD SPECIALTY TECHNICAL POSITION
RFP REQUIREMENTS Carl Wright is a leading expert on operations and maintenance, 99 Relevant Bachelor’s Degree signaling, rollingstock, and safety assurance. Recognized as 99 Nearly double the required an innovator, integrator, leader, and versatile technical liaison, transit systems experience with the experience, knowledge and interpersonal abilities to 99 Knowledge of theories, maintain the unified progress of team and project activity. Carl principles, and practices of has over 19 years transit systems experience in operations and public rail transit operations maintenance planning, line planning, signaling, rollingstock, and maintenance. and safety assurance, line planning, integrated test plan, 99 Management level experience activation plan, operating schedules and staffing levels and in rail transit operations, other related assignments as required. maintenance, start up, or Over Carl’s career of nearly two decades, he has maintained hands-on scheduling. and consultative influence on the design, planning and integration of greenfield and brownfield transit projects in Australia, Hong Kong, Singapore, Japan, Canada, and the US. Former contributor to major greenfield and brownfield projects including the Melbourne Metropolitan Rail, Long Island Rail Road, Japan Railway East, Edmonton Transit LRT System, and Engineering and Maintenance Manager for Edmonton LRT. Recently he has provided project management services for a multidisciplinary program in Edmonton as the Owner’s Engineer.
SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCE Communications Based Train Control (CBTC), Edmonton Transit Service, Edmonton, AB Project Manager (2011-2017). Project Manager representing the City of Edmonton as the Owners’ Engineer for the new Edmonton CBTC signals project. As part of the North LRT extension to its existing system, Edmonton Transit is installing a CBTC system on 2 miles of new greenfield extension, overlaying CBTC on top of 4.5 miles of FIRM in-service brownfield alignment, retrofitting 94 light rail vehicles for HATCH Automatic Train Operation, and replacing the existing office system with a CBTC Automatic Train Supervisory system. EDUCATION / TRAINING B. Eng. (Hons), Mechatronics, Edmonton SE-W Preliminary Engineering, Edmonton Transit James Cook University of North Service, Edmonton, AB Queensland, Australia, 1996 Rail Systems and Operations & Maintenance Technical Lead (2011- 2013). Rail Systems and Operations & Maintenance Technical Lead REGISTRATION on project team performing the preliminary engineering of a 17 Professional Engineer AB, M72332, 2001 miles low floor LRT system for the City of Edmonton. Involved in all aspects with key areas including operations and maintenance YEARS IN PRACTICE facility, consolidated control centre, traffic integration, signals, light 20 rail vehicles, and traction power.
RFP No. AE47810E0128 B.14 Systems Engineering and Support Services KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE
KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER
CARL WRIGHT OPERATIONS AND PLANNING LEAD
Melbourne Metro Rail Project, Concept manpower and resources to meet varying workload Design for Melbourne Metro Rail Authority, conditions for various projects. Melbourne, Australia The work included development and Project Engineer (2014 - 2017). Project Engineer implementation of technical training programs responsible for CBTC technical input for the in electrical/electronic systems for maintenance concept design of the upgrade to the Melbourne forces. Duties included evaluating, developing Metro. The project includes 6 miles of tunnels and and implementing modifications, computerized 5 new stations at an estimated CAPEX of $12b information systems, document control, AUD. The scope for the concept design included configuration management and maintenance routing and run time optimization, speed zone programs. analysis, signal design including safe braking Major projects included the acquisition, design, distance analysis and headway optimization, rolling project management, and commissioning of 37 stock analysis incorporating vehicle dynamics new light rail vehicles; South LRT line expansion optimization, TPC and vehicle requirements involving five new substations, catenary, and development, statistic analysis including dwell time signal system; refurbishment of existing LRV fleet, variability, system recoverability/conflict resolution substation and catenary system upgrades; and and driver performance sensitivity. Opentrack and whole sale replacement of 6 miles of existing signal other key software was utilized in the analysis. system.
Edmonton Unified Control Centre Relocation M7 Long Island Rail Road, Mitsubishi Electric Study, Edmonton Transit Service, Edmonton, Japan, Montreal, QC Canada Resident Engineer and Primary Technical Liaison Systems Lead (2012). Systems lead for the (1997-2001). Resident engineer and primary relocation study of the Edmonton Transit Unified technical liaison for Mitsubishi Electric Japan to Control Centre from Churchill Station to Corona Bombardier and to supply new trains to LIRR. Station. Performed system design of hardware and software. Wrote system functional description, Edmonton Transit System, Edmonton Transit electrical and system interface, software Service, Edmonton, Canada requirements and specification documentation. LRT Fleet and Electrical Systems Engineering Acted as the technical liaison to brake and train Manager (2006-2011). Directly responsible for information management system suppliers. the management, administration, and provision Led design meetings for Mitsubishi, for up to 60 of engineering, technical support, maintenance, representatives between Mitsubishi, Bombardier commissioning, and capital replacement/upgrade/ and LIRR in New York and Japan. Prepared and expansion services for LRT and trolley system delivered technical presentations to Bombardier traction power and overhead catenary system, and LIRR. Preformed review of hazard analysis LRT signal system, light rail vehicles, auxiliary and FMECA documentation. Reviewed EMI/EMC equipment, associated shop and test equipment, documentation. Wrote qualification and routine electronic laboratory and testing/commissioning test procedures. Performed qualification tests with personnel, within operating and capital budget the customer. allocations, and in accordance with city policy. Work involved preparation of specifications and technical reports; conducting tender evaluations; administering contracts; project management; planning, organizing and presenting capital/current budget submissions; organizing and directing
RFP No. AE47810E0128 B.15 Systems Engineering and Support Services KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE
KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER C. CHARLES “CHUCK” PINEDA SYSTEMS INTEGRATION LEAD SPECIALTY TECHNICAL POSITION
RFP REQUIREMENTS Chuck Pineda has over 36 years of transit system integration 99 Relevant Bachelor’s Degree project experience. Chuck knows LACMTA’s standards and 99 Nearly four decades of expectations, having recently provided similar services on transit systems integration the Westside Purple-Line Phase 1 Design Build project. experience Chuck Pineda has 36 years of transit system integration project 99 Registered California experience. Chuck is a professional engineer and certified general Professional Engineer contractor with extensive multi-disciplined experience on major public and private sector work, including over 30 years in leadership roles on rail transit infrastructure projects under various delivery methods including Design/Bid/Build (D/B/B), Design/Build(D/B) and Public-Private Partnerships (P3). Chuck’s work history includes project management, construction management, planning, design, construction / fabrication, systems engineering, systems integration, test & commissioning, systems safety certification on various transportation environments including the following: • Heavy Rail/Metro, LRT, Commuter Rail Transit Systems • Automated Transit Systems, People Movers & other fixed guideway systems • Transit Stations, O&M Facilities & Control Centers, Multi-Modal Facilities • Freight Rail and related infrastructure
SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCE Angels Flight Restoration (P3), Angels Flight Foundation, Los Angeles, CA FIRM Project Manager (2017). As part of the P3 JV, managed activity related SENER to the full refurbishment and bringing back into service, the historic EDUCATION / TRAINING Angels Flight Funicular Railway in downtown Los Angeles. Service was MS, Electrical Engineering, NYU, successfully recommenced on August 30, 2017. Reviewed and verified 1987 design plans and calculations for work including control, electrical BS, Electrical Engineering, NYU, and mechanical systems. Monitored construction, installation and 1981 testing for control, electrical and mechanical systems elements. Supported the system safety certification process with the CPUC. REGISTRATION Professional Engineer Westside Purple Line Phase 1 (D/B), Los Angeles County CA, #36627 Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Los Angeles, CA FL, GA, NY Systems Design & Construction Manager. (2014 - 2016). As a sub to Certified Value Engineer design-build JV, led the design and construction effort for rail systems work on the 3.9-mile dual bore tunnels and three new station extension YEARS IN PRACTICE of the LA Metro Purple Line, Phase 1, in Los Angeles. Responsible for 36
RFP No. AE47810E0128 B.16 Systems Engineering and Support Services KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE
KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER
CHUCK PINEDA SYSTEMS INTEGRATION LEAD design and construction effort for traction power, MIC Airlink Metrorail Connector (D/B), Florida Train Control and Communications (TC&C) and DOT & Miami-Dade Transit, Miami, FL track design support services. Developed TC&C final Construction Manager (2009-2011). As part of the design packages for three line segments including contractor JV, managed design and construction subway stations (La Brea, Fairfax, and La Cienega). of track, systems (traction power, train control/ signaling, communications) and station electrical Blue Line LRT Extension, Final Design (D/B/B) systems, for the 2.5 miles Airlink extension, Charlotte Area Transit System, Charlotte, NC connecting Earlington Heights Metrorail Station Systems Integration Manager (2012 - 2015). Working with Miami Airport, at their new Miami Intermodal for the design engineer, managed and led systems Center. Project included a major new passenger integration for full scope of final design for the 9.5- station, all elevated track, new traction power mile extension of the CATS LRT in Charlotte, North substations, and new switches/turnouts. Carolina. Work included 11 new passenger stations, multiple bridges and road/rail grade crossings, and Tri-Rail Double Tracking & New River Bridge expansion of maintenance facility. Coordinated (D/B), South Florida Regional Transportation progress of design with design leaders for the Authority, Miami, FL various disciplines (utilities, civil, structures, track, Construction Manager (2002-2005). As part of systems, stations, & facilities) through the 90%, the PM/CM consultant team, provided oversight 100%, and IFC plan review cycle. on design and construction activity for a major new commuter rail expansion in south Florida, East Side Access Project (D/B/B), Long Island the double-tracking and upgrade of existing Rail Road, New York, NY commuter rail line between Miami and West Palm Construction Manager (2011-2012). As part of the Beach, Florida. Work included, 43 miles of new PM/CM team, managed force-account work related signalized track, new storage yard, new higher- to the expansion of LIRR Commuter Rail Services to speed turnouts w/switchgear signaling upgrades Manhattan’s east side, in New York. Work included and new control points, upgraded control center, construction of new tunnels (TBM Construction) nine expanded stations (additional platform to from Queens (below East River), a new LIRR serve new track), one complete new passenger passenger station (below existing historic Grand station, 10 new passenger bridges at all stations, Central Station), 11 miles of new signalized track 17 new low span rail bridges across existing canals, and extensive number of new track switches for and one major high span bridge over the New expanded flexibility of operation for LIRR, Amtrak, River Canal. Managed upgrades for 72 roadway-rail New Jersey Transit, and Metro North Railroads, grade crossings to meet “full-closure” standards. including upgraded control and communications Led multi-disciplined team of staff professionals capability. Developed and implemented detailed in timely review of final design documentation for work plans and procedures for replacement of elements including utility relocation/installation, tracks and laying of new tracks and switches, civil, structures (bridges and stations), track, and including modifications to overhead catenary, 3rd systems (signaling, communications, SCADA, and rail, and signal/communications systems in use by passenger information system). the operating rail roads to carry over 1000 trains per day through Harold Interlocking.
RFP No. AE47810E0128 B.17 Systems Engineering and Support Services KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE
KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER MARK TURNER VEHICLE INTERFACE LEAD SPECIALTY TECHNICAL POSITION
RFP REQUIREMENTS Mark Turner has significant exposure to international 99 Relevant Bachelor’s Degree projects, having worked in Australia, Taiwan, Korea, 99 30 years of vehicle design Spain, France, UK, Ireland, Canada, and the United States, and vehicle engineering which has led to a clear understanding of global systems management standards and innovations, and their application. Mark has 99 California Professional reliably managed staff operating on multiple concurrent Engineer registration pending assignments. Recently he has provided vehicle interface engineering services for a multidisciplinary project in Guadalajara Mexico, overseeing the vehicle design and vehicle/system integration design reviews and approvals on behalf of the client. Mark Turner has more than 30 years of Transit System experience in engineering design and technical development of railway rolling stock and vehicle systems integration and interfaces with system components transit projects. Responsibilities have ranged from truck and suspension design engineer to technical design manager for complete vehicles. Functions have included vehicle design studies, from preliminary through to manufacturing, contract negotiation, testing and commissioning, configuration management, vehicle certification, and vehicle warranty.
SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCE Angels Flight Funicular, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA Project Engineer (2016 - 2017). Project Engineer responsible for initial assessment and development of plan to return this iconic Los Angeles landmark back to passenger service. During the 2017 reformation project, worked with the system development company during the process of modification implementation, and developed and managed FIRM certification process with California Public Utilities Commission. System SENER is now in service. Principle challenge met: achieved entry into service in EDUCATION / TRAINING accordance with agreed deadline. BSc (Hons) Mechanical Engineering, Coventry Finch West Light Rail Transit EPC, RFP Phase, Canada Systems Integration Engineer (2016). Systems Integration Engineer Polytechnic (UK), 1985 during the bid phase on Finch West LRT bid phase. Responsible for REGISTRATION systems design and integration covering signaling, power systems, Professional Engineer communications, vehicle interfaces, and SCADA. Client: Dragados. CA pending Project currently in bid assessment phase.
YEARS IN PRACTICE 30
RFP No. AE47810E0128 B.18 Systems Engineering and Support Services KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE
KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER
MARK TURNER VEHICLE INTERFACE LEAD
Guadalajara LRT Line 3, Mexico Citadis 402 and 401 Trams, Dublin, Ireland Vehicle and Systems Approval Engineer (2015- Project Engineering Manager (2005-2010). Project 2017). Vehicle and Systems Approval Engineer for Engineering Manager at Alstom for two projects Guadalajara Light Metro Line 3, which is a new involving the development and supply of trams, metro line in Mexico, approximately 13.6 miles in to the highly successful Luas tram system in length. Responsible for vehicle design and vehicle/ Dublin, Ireland. Led all technical negotiations and system integration design reviews and approvals on discussions with client, operator and maintainer behalf of the client Secretaría de Comunicaciones y (three different organizations). Tasks involved Transportes (SCT) / Mexican Secretary for Transport management of design teams in France and and Communications. Assisted at all vehicle Spain of 25 engineers and designers, liaison with dynamic testing in factory and on test track as part manufacturing, vehicle verification, validation, of the vehicle validation process. Principal challenge and certification. Client was Railway Procurement met: developed good working relationship with Agency of Ireland. Contract values were vehicle supplier to ensure timely validation of approximately $15M and $45M. Principal challenge vehicle. met: Achieved full vehicle certification against new stricter European and Irish requirements in New Tram Development for Russia accordance with deadline. Project Configuration Manager (2012-2014). Project Configuration Manager at Alstom for new London Underground Jubilee Line Rolling Citadis tram destined for countries within Russian Stock Procurement, London, UK Commonwealth of Independent States. Responsible Project Engineering Manager (2003-2005). Project for managing modifications and controlling all Engineering Manager at Alstom in Barcelona modifications on a new tram development from responsible for the design coordination between UK design through to warranty. and Barcelona, and production of additional trains and trailer cars for existing trains for the Jubilee Line Series UT113 urban trains for Ferrocarriles de on London Underground. Supervision of bodyshell la Generalitat de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain production and equipment installation in Barcelona Project Engineering Manager (2011-2014). factory. Liaison with suppliers in France and UK for Project Engineering Manager with responsible for production and delivery of all principle equipment. managing the engineering design and development Contract value approximately $100M. Principal of new urban trains for Catalan Railways. Role challenge met: Team achieved full fleet delivery was to be the main technical contact with the to enable extension of existing 69 six-car trains to client and communicating requirements to design seven cars and returning them to service over a 4 teams both in Alstom and in Construcciones y day “big bang” period during Christmas shutdown. Auxiliar de Ferrocarriles (CAF Group) of up to 30 engineers and designers. Innovative features were introduction of a new standard ergonomic cab and car body structure designed and tested to meet new crash worthiness standards. Contract value was equivalent to $60M.
RFP No. AE47810E0128 B.19 Systems Engineering and Support Services KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE
KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER JONATHAN HU TRAIN CONTROL DESIGN LEAD SPECIALTY TECHNICAL POSITION
RFP REQUIREMENTS Jonathan Hu has over 15 years of experience in design 99 Relevant Bachelor’s Degree and construction of automatic train control and signaling 99 15 years of design and systems for above ground and underground rail systems construction of automatic projects. His experience at Thales Canada demonstrates train control systems his understanding of the requirements and other details 99 California Professional of train control from a two-fold owner/consultant and Engineer registration pending supplier perspectives, encompassing wayside and vehicle, as well as hardware and software.. Jonathan has extensive experience in rail/transit train control and signaling systems, with expertise in both Communication Based Train Control (CBTC) technology and conventional control and signaling systems. In addition, he has significant project management experience in designing, implementing, and deploying signaling systems in both green and brown field environment globally. Experience includes seven years for transit authorities in North America. Jonathan is an excellent team player, experienced and seasoned in leading and managing teams in a multiple assignment workstream.
SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCE Ottawa Confederation Line Extension, Metrolinx, Toronto, Canada Systems Manager (2017). Responsibilities include: managing systems design components for an LRT expansion project. Coordinating with systems design staff from headquarters to deliver system design package on behalf of the joint venture group for the LRT proposal. FIRM Interface with other joint venture parties to align systems design with SENER civil, facilities, and track design.
EDUCATION / TRAINING Multiple Projects, Metrolinx, Toronto, Canada Bachelor of Applied Science Signaling and Communications Manager (2016-2017). Managed the (Electrical Engineering), delivery of signaling and train control system Metrolinx’s projects for the University of Waterloo, 1997 package 1 of the Regional Express Rail (RER) for the Barrie, Stouffville, Masters of Business Lakeshore East, Lakeshore West, and Kingston corridors in Ontario, Administration, Athabasca Canada (200 MCAD). University, 2012 • Managed Metrolinx consultants in developing the methodology for signaling system immunization for electrification REGISTRATION • Participated in the development of request for design proposals Professional Engineer (RFP); evaluated and recommended requests for proposal or CA pending requests for quote (RFP/RFQ) submissions YEARS IN PRACTICE • Monitored contractors’ construction plans and schedules to 15 ensure they are complete, workable, and comply with contract RFP No. AE47810E0128 B.20 Systems Engineering and Support Services KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE
KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER
JONATHAN HU TRAIN CONTROL DESIGN LEAD
documents; oversees contractor compliance • Reviewed customer requirements and with contract provisions, and monitors managing internal system requirement and contractor compliance with safety, quality, traceability environmental, budgeted costs, and schedule • Managed change requests performance • Performed trade-off analysis of technical • Directly managed staff, providing leadership, solution by assessing the feasibility, cost and oversight, and direction to manage individual maintainability for a proposed solution. Metrolinx corridor work. Multiple Projects, Thales Canada – Transport Multiple Projects, Thales Canada – Transport Solution (Formerly Alcatel), Toronto, Canada Solution (Formerly Alcatel), Toronto, Canada Group Leader—Simulation / Work Package Manager Principle System Engineer / Technical Project (2009-2013). Manager (2014-2016). Technical leader for the • Delivered simulation software for various CBTC signaling upgrade project in Hong Kong Shatin projects: Mecca Metro (Saudi Arabia), Dubai Central Link Phase 1 (SCL-Ph1) East West Line (EWL) Metro, Guangzhou Metro Extension (China), project, for the Mass Transit Railway Corporation of Wuhan Metro Extension (China), Kuala Lumpur Hong Kong (65 MCAD). LRT Yard Expansion (Malaysia), Istanbul KK • Primary technical interface with the customer Line (Turkey), Dockland Light Rail (U.K.), for project technical discussion leading major Vancouver Skytrain Expansion (Canada) design reviews and technical meetings • Managed a team of software analysts to • Managing cross-discipline technical teams in develop software simulators to support delivering major project technical milestone. in-house vital software validation and • Responsible for the end to end technical provided tools and simulators for customers solution for the project involving design, • Performed work package management by implementation, installation and coordinating simulation activities, managing commissioning of system to customer projects’ milestones and controlling budget • Making key technical decisions to minimize the and schedule on various projects cost and schedule impact of the project • Created requirements for various simulators • Ensure technical requirements adhere to the and provided traceability to system customer’s contract and the project follows requirements the agreed upon scope with customer. • Participated in integrated design team to develop solution for new functions and Multiple Projects, Thales Canada – Transport customer requirements. Solution (Formerly Alcatel), Toronto, Canada Project System Specialist (2013-2014). Leading the Hurontario LRT, Metrolinx, Toronto, Canada integrated design team (IDT) to develop a technical Systems Manager (2017). Responsibilities solution for various CBTC projects: Wuhan Metro include: managing systems design components. Extension Phase 3 (for Wuhan Metro Co., Ltd), Hong Coordinating with systems design staff from Kong Airport People Mover (for Airport Authority headquarters to deliver system design package Hong Kong), Hong Kong East-West Line (for Mass on behalf of the joint venture group for the LRT Transit Railway Corporation of Hong Kong). proposal. Interface with other joint venture parties to align systems design with civil, facilities, and track design.
RFP No. AE47810E0128 B.21 Systems Engineering and Support Services KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE
KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER KURT DRUMMOND RF ENGINEERING LEAD SPECIALTY TECHNICAL POSITION
RFP REQUIREMENTS Kurt Drummond is nationally recognized as an expert in 99 Relevant Bachelor’s Degree the field of mission-critical and public safety land-mobile 99 28 years of professional radio communication systems, packet digital radio and transit systems radio wide-area networks for transit systems. frequency engineering With over 28 years of experience, Kurt has provided transit systems 99 Registered California engineering services for above ground and underground rail systems Professional Engineer projects with public transit agencies in Southern California including (Electrical) Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (LACMTA) and the Southern California Regional Railroad Authority (Metrolink / SCRRA). His Engineering Design expertise has been sought by diverse Agencies such as LACMTA, SCRRA, PANYNJ, PCJPB, LVMPD and others for design and consultation in support of mission-critical land-mobile communication networks. These networks include Public Safety Agency-Police, Fire, and EMS, Railroad Train Control Communications for PTC and CTC and Subway communication systems.
SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCE Red and Purple Line Subway Radio System Design Upgrade, Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Los Angeles, CA Principal Designer (2017). Designer of the current Upgrade of the 22 year old LACMTA Red and Purple line radio and communication systems. This upgrade is intended to solve the issues related to the maintenance of a “state of good repair” caused by failed components whose replacements are no longer available while simultaneously FIRM leveraging “state-of-the-art” design and technology to support the next RF Networks 25 years of use.
EDUCATION / TRAINING Red and Purple Line Subway Radio System Design, Los Angeles MSc., Electrical Engineering, County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Los Angeles, CA Univ. of Southern California, Designer and Systems Integrator (1994-1998). Designer and 1994 Systems Integrator of the LACMTA Red and Purple line radio and BSc., Electronics Engineering & communication systems used to support mission-critical voice and data Physics. Univ. of the West Indies, communications on these subway lines in Los Angeles County. These 1985. subway lines served public safety (LAPD and LAFD) as well as LACMTA railroad voice and data operations through a maze of approximately REGISTRATION 20 miles of subway tunnels and passenger stations and seamlessly Professional Electrical Engineer integrated with the existing LAPD/LAFD/Metro infrastructures above and CA, E-16247 below ground. This radio system has reliably served the needs of the YEARS IN PRACTICE LACMTA and the various stakeholders for the past 20 years. 28
RFP No. AE47810E0128 B.22 Systems Engineering and Support Services KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE
KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER
KURT DRUMMOND RF ENGINEERING LEAD
VVSG Communications Backhaul Project, now occupies the space formerly occupied by the Southern California Regional Railroad World Trade Center. Authority/Metrolink, Southern California Designer, Principal Engineer and Systems LVMPD Radio Replacement, Las Vegas Metro Integrator (2010-2013). Designer, Principal Engineer Police Department (LVMPD), Las Vegas, NV and Systems Integrator for mission-critical Subject Matter Expert, Consultant (2005-2008). For communication back-haul network covering over the LVMPD, was sought as the subject matter expert 10,000 square miles of territory, and utilizing diverse for the development of the Technical Specifications state-of-the art technologies to connect Central and Conceptual Design of a new mission-critical Offices to tens of base stations and hundreds packet-digital trunked radio network, operating of field devices in a wide area RF network. This County-wide to support over 6,000 Las Vegas Metro network currently supports the Metrolink commuter Police Officers. Assisted with the review and support railroad’s mission critical Centralized Traffic Control services for the replacement of the Agency’s radio (CTC) and Positive Train Control (PTC) operations, system during construction and integration. and is also leveraged to support business critical services such as passenger information systems. “Big Dig” Project, Massachusetts Highway Network traffic includes Packet Digital data, Circuit Department (MHD), Boston, MA Digital data, Voice and Data Radio, SCADA, and Subject Matter Expert, Consultant (2003-2005). utilized technologies as diverse as packet digital As a consultant to Parsons Transportation Microwave radio, Ethernet radio, SONET, Gigabit- Group (PTG) and Bechtel for the diagnosis and Ethernet, in hardened, resilient topologies providing development of Engineering solutions to resolve availabilities in excess of 99.999% for the network severe performance problems in the Boston backbone. Designer of CCTV network to monitor Central Artery’s (Big Dig) radio system used by the back-haul infrastructure. four Public Safety agencies in the City of Boston. Was sought and selected, after the appearance of Positive Train Control (PTC) Project, Southern severe system performance problems, to design California Regional Railroad Authority/ the retrofits for the complex DAS used to serve the Metrolink, Southern California network of roadway tunnels and stations. PTC Technical Specifications Author (2009-2014). Author of the first Positive Train Control technical NCTD Sprinter Railroad, North County Transit specifications, nationwide which was used for District, North San Diego County, CA the successful design and integration of the PTC Communication Systems Principal Engineer communication system used by Metrolink in the (2006-2008). Designer of the radio, CCTV, SONET LA basin. Responsible for the review and oversight and other communication systems for the new of all elements of the PTC communication system Sprinter railroad. Performed the final, detailed design, construction, integration and testing design, development, integration, testing and performed by the Contractor. cut-over of the new railroad radio and passenger communication systems System components Freedom Tower Radio DAS, Port Authority of included a land mobile voice radio network to New York and New Jersey (PANYNJ), NY, NJ support railroad dispatch and maintenance Subject Matter Expert, Consultant (2007-2009). For channels, plus all related railroad communications the PANYNJ: Was sought and selected to be the subsystems including SONET, CCTV, TVM, CTC and subject-matter expert for the consultant-design of PA. the radio system that shall serve the NYPD, NYFD and EMS in the new Freedom Tower complex that
RFP No. AE47810E0128 B.23 Systems Engineering and Support Services KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE
KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER RENÉ LAFLECHE DPM — SYSTEMS DESIGN PROGRAM MANAGEMENT SUPPORT
René is an engineer with over 30 years of project management experience in heavy rail, light rail system and transit systems including design, procurement, contract management, systems integration, and standards. He has a strong systems background including technical expertise in signaling, communications, traffic systems, and power systems. . René has delivered projects using a variety of project delivery methods including D/B, D/B/B and DBFOM. René has been consulting in the rail and transit industry since 2007, when he established and grew a new Hatch Mott MacDonald office in Edmonton, Alberta while also serving as the rail and transit systems practice manager for its Canadian operations. Prior to that, he spent most of his career (1984-1998, 2001- 2007) in various systems engineering, operations and management roles at Canadian National Railway (CN), including six years in the role of Manager, Signal Standards, where he published CN’s signal engineering standards, including its General Instructions, Codes of Practices and Power Standards.
SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCE Valley LRT P3 Procurement and Implementation, City of Edmonton, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada Integration Lead (2015-2017). Integration Lead for Owner/Engineer procurement and implementation of City of Edmonton’s Valley Line low floor LRT rail system encompassing 8 miles of double track and 12 stations, which is being constructed using a P3 Design/Build/Finance/Operate/ Maintain project delivery model. Responsible for developing, coordinating and integrating the design and construction performance requirements for FIRM the project and providing construction monitoring services. Integration scope Hatch includes O&M and rail systems (signals, traction power, communications), vehicles, roadways, tunnels, track and traffic systems while adhering to the EDUCATION / TRAINING overall sustainable urban integration objectives of the project. B.Sc., Electrical Engineering, Metrolinx, Vehicle Technical Assessment, Toronto, Ontario, Canada University of Manitoba, LRT Operations Lead (2015-2017). LRT Operations Lead, authored a report Winnipeg, MB, 1984 which provided a high-level comparison between two manufacturer’s REGISTRATION light rail vehicles to determine the viability of substituting vehicles on the Eglington Crosstown LRT project. The scope of this study included Professional Engineer assessing O&M and systems impacts, geometric envelope modeling, and AB, M73563, 2001 dimensional parameter assessments of the vehicles and their associated ON, 100138414, 2008 impacts to the proposed alignment and storage / maintenance facilities, CA pending and made recommendations on replacement strategy. YEARS IN PRACTICE 33
RFP No. AE47810E0128 B.24 Systems Engineering and Support Services KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE
KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER
RENÉ LAFLECHE DPM — SYSTEMS DESIGN
TransLink, South of Fraser Rapid Transit, Surrey, Via Rail, VIA Rail Traffic Control System, Montreal, BC, Canada PQ, Canada Systems Design Lead (2015-2017). Systems Design Project Manager (2009-2010). Project Manager for Lead for the preliminary engineering and feasibility procurement and implementation of a new centralized assessment of city of Surrey’s South of Fraser Rapid rail traffic control system to allow expansion of Via Transit system consisting of 7 miles of double track Rail’s passenger rail network. Functionality included rail line and 11 passenger stops for a low floor LRT territory transfer flexibility, playback capability, system rail system. Design lead responsibilities included performance monitoring, bilingual capability, blocking coordinating activities involving operations control, and alarms management, data storage capability and traction power, signaling, communications, and interfaces to legacy signal code systems. integrated traffic management. Metrolinx, GO Transit Lakeshore Electrification, Melbourne Metro Rail Authority, Melbourne Metro Toronto, ON, Canada Rail Project, Melbourne, Australia Project Manager (2008-2009). Project Manager for the Independent Peer Reviewer (2015-2016). Systems economic evaluation of electrification of GO Transit’s Design Lead for the preliminary engineering of City Lakeshore corridor. The key objectives of the study were of Edmonton’s Southeast to West low floor LRT to compare the economic costs of diesel and electric rail system encompassing approximately 17 miles operation and report on the feasibility of electrification of double track and 29 new stations and stops. using net present value analyses of the cost streams for Design Lead responsibilities include the disciplines both modes of operation over a 25-year period. of communications, signals, right-of-way electrical City of Calgary, West LRT Expansion, Calgary, and mechanical, EMI/EMC, traction power, overhead Alberta, Canada catenary system and transit signal priority system. Rail Systems Lead (2008-2010). Rail Systems Lead for owner’s engineer team for the 5-mile extension Edmonton Transit System, CBTC Design/Build Procurement, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada of C-Train LRT. Responsible for defining Design/ Owner’s Engineer Project Manager (2010-2013). Build performance requirements / technical Owner’s Engineer Project Manager for procurement specifications for preliminary design and subsequent of design/build construction of a Communications RFP, encompassing traction power, signals and Based Train Control (CBTC) system for the Edmonton communications infrastructure. Transit System (ETS), having primary responsibility for Virginia Dept of Rail & Public Transportation, defining the performance requirements and technical Buckingham Branch Railroad, Richmond, VA specifications of the system, including CBTC predictive Project Manager (2008-2009). Signals Project Manager activation of grade crossing warning systems and for evaluation of signaling and communications greenfield/brownfield operational interfaces. options for the Richmond area improvements on the Buckingham Branch RR line. Deliverables included Edmonton Transit System, Northeast Signals Upgrade Program, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada signal pre-design report identifying communication Owner’s Engineer Project Manager (2009-2011). overviews, signal placements, crossing layouts and Owner’s Engineer Project Manager for design/build estimates. replacement of the legacy LRT signal system on the 8 Calgary Transit, Siemens Re-Signaling Project, mile northeast leg of the ETS Capital line. Developed Haysboro-Anderson, Calgary, AB, Canada detailed design and construction performance Signals Project Manager (2007-2009). Signals Project requirements for a bidirectional running electronic Manager for replacement of legacy signal system vital signal control system while successfully at two major interlockings with Siemens Sicas S7 developing an “out of the box” solution for vital controllers. Hatch provided detailed interface replacement of an entire obsolete duct bank system management to Siemens and performed all vital logic within a constrained corridor without impacting design, programming and validation & verification. existing LRT operations. This project was the first successful implementation of Siemens Sicas technology in a vital North American transit application.
RFP No. AE47810E0128 B.25 Systems Engineering and Support Services KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE
KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER ANES SASSI DPM — SYSTEMS INTEGRATION PROGRAM MANAGEMENT SUPPORT
Anes is a systems engineer with 15 years of professional experience in the transit sector. He has developed the processes for integration engineering, requirement management, interface management, from a designer point of view, contractor´s point of view and the owner’s. He is capable of managing multiple assignments as his experience shows his capability and flexibility in leading cross functional teams as well as overlapping project start dates and completion dates. He has proven experience in project and team management, multi- discipline coordination, analysis, and scheduling of operations and tasks. Anes has excellent organizational and interpersonal skills and is results oriented. Anes has lived the whole life cycle of a transport infrastructures project, from the planning stage: functional and conceptual design, masterplans, feasibility studies, to design stage: preliminary and detailed engineering, value engineering, execution design, integration, to construction stage: bid documents and evaluation, site supervision, quality control, construction management, and testing and commissioning, to final operation and maintenance stage. FIRM His technical skills include the design and testing of the majority SENER of railway systems, including but not limited to CBTC signaling, OCS/SCADA, automatic fare collection, radiocommunications, and EDUCATION / TRAINING MSc Electronics Engineering, communications. specialization in Communications and Signal SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCE Processing, Grenoble, 2003 California High-Speed Rail Section CP2-3, CA Double degree program in Project Manager (2014-2017). SENER provides validation, verification and MSc Telecommunication self-certification services to the construction JV of CHSRA CP2-3 Design/ Engineering, Barcelona, 2005 Build contract (60 miles of high speed rail) to assure an integrated system is built. Anes led SENER’s services as project manager. In this project, Executive Leadership he has implemented the processes for the design management, change Development Program, Stanford management, quality management, interface management, requirement Graduate School of Business, management and, test and acceptance management. Together with USA, 2016 the systems ngineering team, he managed to reduce rework and ensure conformance of the delivered product to the authority’s criteria. REGISTRATION Professional Engineer CA pending
YEARS IN PRACTICE 15
RFP No. AE47810E0128 B.26 Systems Engineering and Support Services KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE
KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER
ANES SASSI DPM — SYSTEMS INTEGRATION
LRT3 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Oran LRT Project, Algeria Project Manager (2015). SENER delivered the Project Manager (2006-2013). SENER carried out conceptual design for the contractor bid proposal for preliminary design, final design and bid process the Project Delivery Partner (PDP). The line is 22 miles assistance. In addition, SENER provided construction long (with 21 miles elevated and one underground) management and construction works supervision. including 25 stations, workshops, and depots. Anes held the position of project manager. He led The activities include the design of the following general coordination, systems integration, revision of systems: light rail vehicles, signaling and train control architecture and landscape planning studies, railway system, operation control center, power supply systems (energy and communications), alignment and distribution system, track works, conductor and track, as well as construction management for rail system, automatic fare collection system, tramway line 1. He also performed technical and telecommunication systems, intrusion preventive economic management and led the coordination and system, platform screen doors, system, card access communications with client and partners. system, information technology and trackworks, MEP, maintenance tools, and equipment for the depot. Algiers Metro Network Extensions, Algeria Anes led SENER’s services as project manager in Project Engineer (2006-2016). SENER’s scope includes order to provide the best value solution at bid stage, preliminary, final design and construction supervision to provide a coherent integrated LRT system and to for three extensions of Line 1 of Algiers Metro, totaling provide a basis to evaluate and quantify the risks and 5.3 miles of metro lines and eight stations. Anes opportunities of the project. worked as project engineer providing general project management, preparing specifications for signaling, He led the design and costing efforts in front office, train control and, systems of land and mobile and managing the multi-local teams of designers communications. Additionally, he assisted in contract to deliver the required products in conformance to evaluation from a system integration point of view schedule and quality. as well as acted as a systems expert on the interface Hanoi First Metro Line, Vietnam between main line in service and the extensions, the Project Manager (2012-2015). SENER’s role was main challenges consisting in the integration of the Independent Checking Engineer (ICE) and the scope OCC and the interface resolution of the CBTC signaling consisted in the review of the design documents modes between different contractors. and tender documents of the metro line 3 in Hanoi. Moroccan Railways Northern Lines - Signaling Services included the technical design, budget and bid System Upgrades, Morocco documentation review for the underground section Railway Systems Engineer (2011-2013). Upgrade (2.5 miles double tube with 4 stations) and the set of 8 studies for the signaling of three railway lines in miles line-level electromechanical systems, signaling, Morocco: Tanger – Sidi Kacem, Tanger – Ras Rmel telecommunications, track and power systems. The and Sidi Yahya – Bel Ksiri. The three lines have a associated cost was approximately $1.1 billion. total accumulated length of 165 miles and have Anes served as project manager providing technical 22 passenger stations. The project developed all and financial management, coordination, and necessary studies allowing the client to make strategic integration. and pertinent decisions in order to increase the The use of systems engineering and the railway lines technical capacity and safety. The project implementation of a rigorous interface management is divided into four stages or missions that will allow plan were key for the successful completion of the the definition of possible scenarios, the technical contracted services. development of the adopted solution, the preparation of the bid documents for works and installations, and the technical support during the construction stage . Anes served as railways systems engineer responsible for the systems final design and technical assistance during civil works management.
RFP No. AE47810E0128 B.27 Systems Engineering and Support Services KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE
KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER PAUL NOLAN DPM — CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AND PROJECT CONTROLS PROGRAM MANAGEMENT SUPPORT Paul Nolan is a well-experienced senior project manager, and construction contracts specialist. Most importantly is Paul’s is attention to QA/QC. He ably manages a multitude of designers, and design consultants and resources. Project success is assured with his out of the box approach including implementation of alternative solutions to unique conditions and constraints. Projects under Paul’s direct charge are delivered well, with high quality, on time and within budget. Paul Nolan is adept with design-bid-build, design-build, variations of private-public-partnership design-build-finance-operate-maintain contracts, construction manager at-risk, and job order contract procurement models. His expertise includes task order based development of contract scope, procurement documents; schedule conscious planning; project budget control; contract change process, claims avoidance and mitigation management ;including evaluation and negotiation.
SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCE LA Metro AMC 96th Street Station, Los Angeles, CA Subconsultant Project Director (2015-2017). Subconsultant Project Director on the $300M interface gateway station connection of the LAX automated people mover to the new LA Metro Crenshaw light rail transit line. Responsible for design oversight of the civil works. LA Metro C0988 Crenshaw/LAX Transit Corridor Project, Los Angeles, CA Senior Specialist Manager (2011-2017). Senior Specialist Manager for the FIRM PE of a new $1.8b Light Rail Transit Design-Build 8-mile LRT. The project Hatch consists of aerial guideways, tunnels, deep open cut sections, stations, built in a densely populated urban setting. Led preparation of Design-Build EDUCATION / TRAINING definition documents, assembly of procurement documents and support B.Sc., Electrical Engineering, to bidder questions in coordination with Metro, and bid amendments. Post University of Manitoba, award support included preparation of potential scope change notices, Winnipeg, MB, 1984 RFI response, submittal reviews, contract and technical requirements clarifications, and other general contractual support to the Metro project REGISTRATION team. Professional Engineer AB, M73563, 2001 LA Metro C0991 Division 16 Southwestern Yard, Los Angeles, CA ON, 100138414, 2008 Senior Specialist Manager (2013-2017). Senior Specialist Manager for the CA pending PE of the new $300M Design-Build Southwestern Yard LRT maintenance yard as part of the new Crenshaw LRT project. The yard includes several YEARS IN PRACTICE facilities for the maintenance and storage of 74 LRT vehicles. Led 33
RFP No. AE47810E0128 B.28 Systems Engineering and Support Services KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE
KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER
PAUL NOLAN DPM — CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AND PROJECT CONTROLS preparation of Design-Build definition documents, Metrolinx, Eglinton-Scarborough Crosstown assembly of procurement documents and support Project, Toronto, ON to bidder questions in coordination with Metro, Sr. Project Manager (20012). Sr. Project Manager, and bid amendments. Post award support included conducted a high level constructability review and preparation of potential scope change notices, RFI schedule development of the $8b Design-Build- response, submittal reviews, contract and technical Finance-Maintain LRT project. Focussed on concurrent requirements clarifications, and other general construction of 9 new cut and cover stations along a contractual support to the Metro project team. 10km corridor alignment of bored tunnels within a major, densely populated urban setting. LAX APM Design-Build-Finance-Operate-Maintain, Los Angeles, CA - Proposal RFQ and RFP Hong Kong International Airport (Chek Lap Kok), Sr. Project Manager (2015-2017). Sr. Project Manager Third Runway and Concourse, Hong Kong supporting the procurement design development Sr. Project Manager (2013). Sr. Project Manager for of the $2.5b P3 APM project. The APM is the first development of the $180b USD 3rd Runway initial transportation Design-Build-Finance-Operate- Design Construction Phasing program. This mega- Maintain procurement undertaken in Los Angeles. project involves sea reclamation, airfield upgrades, a massive network of new transportation, baggage, LAX Tom Bradley International Terminal (TBIT) APM facilities and utility tunnels, utilities, a new Code Expansion, Los Angeles World Airports (LAWA), Los E runway and taxiway system, a new 70-plus gate Angeles, CA terminal concourse building and over 50 new support Project Manager (2008-2014). Project Manager facilities. Led the phasing, schedule, and supply chain for design and construction support of numerous programming for multiple contracts construction major airfield facilities on the $5 billion LAX airside within one of the world’s busiest international modernization. Managed in-house and multiple airports. subconsultant designers on over 100 Task Orders. Led the FAA to CSI specification format conversion, bid New Terminal 1, Greater Toronto Airports Authority addenda, project controls, schedules, designer fees (GTAA), Toronto Pearson International Airport, and payments, construction estimates, scope change Toronto, ON Project Manager (2002-2008). Project Manager for civil notices, and post award construction administration. landside and airside and aircraft gating design, tender South Fraser Rapid Transit Newton Guildford LRT development, construction contract administration, Preliminary Engineering Design, Surrey, BC site compliance, deficiencies, and commissioning for Sr. Project Manager (2017). Sr. Project Manager the $4.4b airport development program. Multiple leading development of PE design Construction tasks included payment certifications, changes programming for the new Newton Guildford LRT. and cost negotiations, coordination with program The Project is an 11 station, at-grade center road management, multiple designers, technical, running 10.6km low floor light rail transit (LRT) line operational, maintenance and security staff. constructed through 57 controlled traffic intersections. Programming considers community traffic impacts. Rapid Transit Expansion Program, Toronto Transit Commission, Toronto, ON MBTA Red Line Cabot Yard, Boston, MA Resident Superintendent (1994-2002). Resident Sr. Peer Reviewer (2017). Sr. Peer Reviewer for Superintendent on the $950M Sheppard Subway constructability of a $90M rebuild, overhaul, and fit-out project at the Sheppard/Yonge area. Project was of the existing operational Cabot maintenance rail car a deep open cut and connection to the existing maintenance yard facility. Project includes complex operating station and subway within one of the phased construction of the building envelope, and largest, busiest urban, intersections in Toronto. maintenance refits including new wheel truing, paint This was the most complex, highest risk and critical booth and vehicle wash facilities. project. Successfully completed the project with high degree of quality, on time and under budget.
RFP No. AE47810E0128 B.29 Systems Engineering and Support Services KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE
KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER MIKE PHILLIPS INDEPENDANT QUALITY MANAGER PROGRAM MANAGEMENT SUPPORT
Mike Phillips is a quality management certified expert who provides comprehensive understanding of special concerns relevant to projects with multiple stakeholders. He has over 15 years of experience of succesfully delivering quality assurance and control services on LACMTA projects, including the Crenshaw/LAX LRT Design-Build project, I-710 North Utility Study, and I-405 Sepulveda Pass Widening Design- Build project. Mike’s 27 years of experience illustrates his extensive knowledge in the areas of quality control/quality assurance, project management, civil engineering support, public relations, client service management, utility coordination, transportation planning, environmental planning, construction permitting, business development, and project controls/ administration. He provides experience in ensuring projects in environmentally sensitive areas comply with federal, state, and local regulations and permits.
SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCE I-710 North Utility Study; LACMTA; Los Angeles, CA Utility Coordination and Quality Control Services (2013-2017). Utility Coordination and Quality Control Services; The I-710 Utility Study is the precursor to the I-710 Dedicated Truck Lane Bypass project that is an elevated truck lane that travels from the Port of Long Beach and Port of Los Angeles inland to State Route 60 south of downtown LA. The purpose FIRM of the project is to improve air quality and traffic congestion by removing trucks from the main corridor. Mr. Phillips is providing Utility Coordination, GCM Consulting Base Map development Utilities Quality Control Services, coordination with EDUCATION / TRAINING Caltrans District 7 and strategy consulting services related to the Utility BS, Urban and Regional Relocations for the project. Planning, 1991 Crenshaw/LAX LRT Design Build Project; LACMTA; Los Angeles, CA Design Quality Assurance Manager (2011-2012). Design Quality Assurance CERTIFICATIONS Manager; Assisted in the preparation of the Quality Management Plan (QMP), CQA trained staff, conducted audits, and implemented the QMP with Hatchmott CMQ/OE MacDonald staff and their subconsultants. The work conducted under this Programs Management contract was to develop the bridging documents to be used during the Quality Management procurement process for the design build team for 8.5 miles of light rail Project Manager transit including segments that are to be in a tunnel, cut and cover, at grade, Planning and Utility and elevated. This $1.5 billion-dollar project was recently awarded to the Coordination and Oversight design build team which includes HNTB as the lead designer.
YEARS IN PRACTICE 27
RFP No. AE47810E0128 B.30 Systems Engineering and Support Services KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE
KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER
MIKE PHILLIPS INDEPENDANT QUALITY MANAGER
I-405 Sepulveda Pass Widening Design Build Positive Train Control Design Build Project; North Project; LACMTA; Los Angeles, CA County Transit District; Oceanside, CA Design Quality Assurance Manager (2009-2011). Quality Manager (2013-2017). Quality Manager under Design Quality Assurance Manager; As a consultant the Program Management team representing North to HNTB/Kiewit Pacific, assisted in the preparation of County Transit District (NCTD) as the Owner for the the Design Quality Management Plan (QMP), trained project. As a consultant to HNTB Corp., monitor and staff, implemented the QMP with design build staff oversee the proper implementation of the quality which included over 4,000 plan sheets and supporting programs for the project including both design and specifications and reports. Mr. Phillips also conducted construction of the PTC project. Duties includes: audits of the design team and attended all quality verification of the proper implementation of the meetings with the contractor, LA Metro, and Caltrans various quality programs, performing quality audits Staff as the representative of the design team. These and surveillances; development and monitoring freeway improvements include 10 miles of HOV lane of deficiency notices, non-conformance reports, widening between I-10 and SR-101 in the City of Los and corrective action reports; and stakeholder Angeles. This approximate $1 billion-dollar project is coordination. The Positive Train Control project is an still under construction. electronic and civil construction project which includes software architecture design and development. PTC Foothill Transportation Corridor South; components are being installed on all of the NCTD Transportation Corridor Agency; Orange and San locomotives, and Bombardier Cab Cars as well as fiber Diego Counties, CA optic and hardware component construction along the Utilities Coordinator and Quality Assurance/Quality existing NCTD railroad line. Control (2006-2009). Utilities Coordinator and Quality Assurance/Quality Control; Provided on-going utility SR-57 Northbound Lanes Freeway Expansion; coordination with all utility agencies, the client, and our Orange County Transportation Authority; Orange project team in the further design of this 16-mile design County, CA build project. Served as the Quality Assurance Manager Design Quality Assurance Manager (2009-2011). Design during times when the lead Quality Assurance Manager Quality Assurance Manager; Quality Assurance Manager was not available. Provided quality control reviews for for the project to review all project deliverables being all utility designs. developed by project staff prior to submittal to the client to ensure that they met the quality assurance / California High Speed Rail Authority – Palmdale to quality control (QA/QC) requirements set forth in our Burbank Section, Los Angeles, CA Quality Management Plan. This project was design-bid- Quality Manager (2015-2017). Quality Manager for the build and has a construction cost of $110M. environmental and engineering team. The first stages of this historic project will be to provide environmental clearance (Record of Decision) through the NEPA and CEQA processes. This includes development of the engineered footprint for the project to include multiple elevated structures and deep tunnels for the new High- Speed Rail line that will be in operation between Los Angeles and Sacramento / San Francisco. The second phase of the project will be to bring the engineering plans up to 30% design and to develop the bridging documents for procurement of the Design Build Team. Primary duties on the project is to act as the project’s Quality Assurance Manager, and to review and approve all submittals prior to issuance to the client. Additional Project Management and support services are also being provided to this project.
RFP No. AE47810E0128 B.31 Systems Engineering and Support Services KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE
KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER PHYLLIS TUCKER COMP MENTOR PROGRAM LEAD PROGRAM MANAGEMENT SUPPORT
Phyllis Tucker established her reputation as an award-winning strategist and manager while working with the state of California on various public education and community outreach campaigns. She won the Outreach Campaign of the Year and the Public Education Campaign of the Year awards for programs targeting California’s diverse communities and hard-to-reach audiences. Phyllis Tucker has more than 27 years of communications experience working with clients in both the public and private sectors. Phyllis is an accomplished manager, having dealt with multi-faceted public relations campaigns that encompass the disciplines of outreach, public education, media relations, social marketing, diversity communications, internal communications, brand strategy, and crisis and risk communications.
SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCE I-605/SR-60 Interchange Improvement Project, LACMTA, Los Angeles, CA Diversity Manager (2016-2017). Phyllis manages HDR’s SBE/DVBE subconsultant outreach and mentorship program to track and monitor progress to meet Metro’s SBE/DVBE participation goal and help identify qualified firms when needed. Activities include: assist in developing and implementing an innovative SBE/DBE Contracting Outreach and Mentoring Plan (COMP); assist in developing and implementing the SBE/DBE Tier Program; oversee development and implementation of the HDR I-605/SR 60 Mentor-Protégé Program; coordinate with HDR Project Manager and Task Leads to monitor SBE/DVBE performance; monitor and report to Metro on SBE contributions to the Earned Value Report; and conduct small business outreach as needed.
Ridership Growth Action Plan, Los Angeles, CA Municipal Operators Interviews And Focus Groups (2017-2018). Phyllis FIRM co-manages the firm’s work as a subcontractor to Fehr & Peers in this study T&T Public Relations for Metro that seeks to learn more about the ridership trends in LA County as well as in other metropolitan areas in the country. This information is EDUCATION / TRAINING used to develop strategies to increase bus and rail ridership in Metro and Master of Public Administration, all municipal operators countywide. Mrs. Tucker uses her knowledge and University of Southern California expertise around focus group planning and implementation, developing Bachelor of Arts, Psychology discussion guides and materials for focus groups with transit riders and and Philosophy, Western municipal transit staff interviews, facilitating focus groups and interview Michigan University sessions with transit operators and municipal staff, and preparing summary reports. YEARS IN PRACTICE 27
RFP No. AE47810E0128 B.32 Systems Engineering and Support Services KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE
KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER
PHYLLIS TUCKER COMP MENTOR PROGRAM LEAD
Bike/Bus Interface Study, LACMTA, Los Angeles, CA Community meetings and outreach were conducted in Municipal Interviews and Focus Groups (2016-2017). the Purple Line extension area, including elected official Phyllis managed the municipal interviews, bus operator briefings, meeting preparation and identification of and cyclist focus groups process as a subcontractor issues of concern specific to the Westside community, to Fehr & Peers. Her work included developing the thus increasing our awareness and understanding of outreach plan, focus group and interview discussion how to work effectively on issues that impact quality of guides and coordinating implementation which life, mobility, and safety for residents. included seven municipal interviews and six bus operator focus group meetings. Under Mrs. Tucker’ Positive Train Control Design Build Project; North leadership, the team consulted on the cyclist survey, County Transit District; Oceanside, CA Quality Manager (2013-2017). provided input to the Bike/Bus work group and Quality Manager under coordinated with Metro as needed. the Program Management team representing North County Transit District (NCTD) as the Owner for the Countywide Small Business Outreach Campaign, project. As a consultant to HNTB Corp., monitor and LACMTA, Los Angeles, CA oversee the proper implementation of the quality Project Manager (2014-2015). Developed the strategic programs for the project including both design and plan for the “Metro Countywide Small Business construction of the PTC project. Duties includes: Outreach Plan and Campaign.” Conducted reasearch verification of the proper implementation of the and analysis to inform plan development. The plan various quality programs, performing quality audits encompassed internal and external strategic elements and surveillances; development and monitoring aimed at generating program awareness, education of deficiency notices, non-conformance reports, and acceptance and, ultimately, increasing the and corrective action reports; and stakeholder number of small businesses that participate in Metro’s coordination. The Positive Train Control project is an procurement process and receive contract awards. electronic and civil construction project which includes Refreshed existing programs to create relevance for software architecture design and development. PTC small businesses, created new programs such as “Meet components are being installed on all of the NCTD the Project Managers” to complement signature locomotives, and Bombardier Cab Cars as well as fiber events, and refined presentations to add clarity to optic and hardware component construction along the Metro messaging. Coordinated external components existing NCTD railroad line. between Metro and Small Business Community and developed outreach tools to support SBE/DBE new African American Outreach, Covered California business pursuits.The objective of the firm’s work with Project Manager (2014-2017). Develop strategy and the small business community was to build capacity oversee the statewide African American Outreach of small businesses to compete for and win Metro strategy for Covered California. Develop tactics to contracts, either as primes or as subcontractors. increase the number of African Americans that enroll in health coverage plans through Covered California. 2016-2040 Regional Transportation Plan/ Coordinate with key community leaders, influencers Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS), and pastors; make presentations to small and large Southern California Association of Governments , groups. Develop faith-based tool kit for churches and Public Outreach Services provide strategic counsel to Covered California officials. Deputy Project Manager (2014-2016). Conducted Elements T&T oversees include media outreach, faith- outreach and media services throughout SCAG’s based partnerships, events, community outreach, six-county region to support the development of educational materials and collateral development. The the 2016-2040 RTP/SCS. Worked with stakeholders engagement requires coordination with state officials, to plan and implement workshops, public hearings, community leaders and on-the-ground community build participant database, develop communications agents to ensure accurate flow of information and materials and other outreach activities to obtain early to manage expectations around program goals and and meaningful feedback from interested stakeholders, objectives and the needs of the community. address environmental justice issues, and increase public participation in decision-making process.
RFP No. AE47810E0128 B.33 Systems Engineering and Support Services KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE
KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER STEVE SCHIBUOLA OPERATIONS AND PLANNING — BRT PROGRAM MANAGEMENT SUPPORT
Steve Schibuola has managed complex projects involving interdisciplinary teams throughout his 29 year career. He has managed several bench and on-call contracts for transportation agencies including LACMTA, the San Diego Association of Governments, the Orange County Transportation Authority and the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority, He has a proven ability for coordinating IBI Group’s resources to deliver effectively on multiple concurrent task orders. Steve Schibuola has over 29 years experience (23 in Southern California) in a diverse variety of urban transportation disciplines including strategic and service planning for public transportation; major investment studies, feasibility studies and environmental assessments of transportation improvements; policy and research studies in the field of sustainable transportation; and user needs assessments, software design and operations planning for Intelligent Transportation Systems.
SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCE LA Metro Crenshaw/LAX Corridor Advanced Conceptual Engineering and Preliminary Engineering, LACMTA, Los Angeles, CA Subconsultant Project Manager (2009-2017). Steve oversaw IBI Group’s responsibilities on this 8-mile LRT corridor project, which included street improvement design (including at-grade crossings), traffic operations and feeder bus service planning. His role included Road improvement design, traffic engineering, bus operations planning.
Mid-Cities Transit Restructuring Study, LACMTA/LADOT, Los Angeles, CA Project Manager (1995-1997). IBI Group restructured bus transit services in the Mid-Cities region of Los Angeles County; a 50 square mile area home to over 900,000 people, including the Vermont Corridor, and having the highest level of transit dependence and use in the county. The study reviewed about FIRM 65 existing local and regional routes for both the MTA and LADOT systems IBI and made recommendations regarding improvements in operational effectiveness, cost efficiency and service equity to meet the area’s mobility EDUCATION / TRAINING needs. The vision that emerged consisted of a three tiered service plan MA Ap. Sc. (Transportation), encompassing community circulators, standard line-haul routes and a University of Toronto, Toronto, network of limited-stop services with distinctive livery and signal priority. ON, 1988 BA Ap. Sc. - Honors (Civil Regional Connector AA/ACE/DEIR/DEIS, LACMTA, Los Angeles, CA Subconsultant Principal-in-Charge (2007-2010). The Regional Connector Engineering), University of LRT project is currently in the construction phase phase. During the Toronto, Toronto, ON, 1986 conceptual design and environmental clearance phase, Steve was the YEARS IN PRACTICE 29
RFP No. AE47810E0128 B.34 Systems Engineering and Support Services KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE
KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER
STEVE SCHIBUOLA OPERATIONS AND PLANNING — BRT
Principal-in-Charge for IBI Group’s portion of the project, which included leading urban design, station design and street improvement design, for both Subway and At-Grade configurations of this Light Rail Transit system.
101 Freeway to 7th Street Rail Corridor Coordination Study, LACMTA, Los Angeles, CA Project Manager (2014-2015). Mr. Schibuola was Project Manager for this study of Metro’s land holdings and rail infrastructure south of Union Station. Already home to Metro’s Division 20 and Metro’s portion of the LOSSAN regional and intercity rail corridor, this stretch of land is set to house several more critical transportation projects and services, including the Southern California Regional Interconnector Project (SCRIP), a significant expansion of Division 20 to serve the Purple Line Extension, the California High Speed Rail Corridor, and potential new passenger stations and connections with the West Santa Ana Branch Transit Corridor. Mr. Schibuola led an extensive collaboration and coordination effort among several Metro teams working on the individual projects to develop a consensus-based plan for allocating land among the projects while preserving Metro’s relationship with the burgeoning Arts District immediately adjacent.
Santa Clara/Alum Rock BRT Preliminary Engineering and Final Design, Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority, Santa Clara County, CA Subconsultant Principal-in-Charge (2012-2017). Mr. Schibuola is the Principal-in-Charge of this project to provide ITS and communications system design, and urban design and station architecture for the first Bus Rapid Transit system for the Santa Clara Valley Transit Authority. The system features a mix of operating conditions including side-running and median-running. The architectural component includes passenger station and platform architecture; corridor, architectural and urban design plans; coordination of outside artists and graphic designers; and a design guidelines report. IBI Group provided preliminary and final design as well as Design Support During Construction. The service opened to the public in 2017.
RFP No. AE47810E0128 B.35 Systems Engineering and Support Services KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE
KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER PAUL LAVELLEE SYSTEMS INTEGRATION — BRT PROGRAM MANAGEMENT SUPPORT
Paul P. Lavallee, is a Director with IBI Group with 30 years of experience in the planning, design, implementation and integration of Intelligent Transportation Systems. He brings extensive experience with systems integration for projects up and down the Pacific Coast. Paul Lavellee’s career has a particular focus on the integration of transit systems such as computer aided dispatch systems, bus and facility surveillance systems, ADA-compliant automated stop announcement systems, passenger counting systems, real-time passenger information systems and conventional and smart card fare collection systems.
SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCE Foothill Transit CAD/AVL & Radio Replacement Project, West Covina, CA Senior Engineer and Onboard Systems Specialist (2014-2017). Paul was acting as a Senior Engineer and Onboard Systems Specialist on a project for Foothill Transit to replace their existing ACS/Xerox CAD/AVL/radio system with a new CAD/AVL and Voice over IP (VoIP) communications system. Paul authored the mobile gateway router requirements to support integration with multiple onboard devices, and is currently supporting implementation, testing and integration efforts.
CAD/AVL Replacement Project, AC Transit, Oakland, CA Project Director and Onboard System Specialist (2014-2017). Paul was acting as Project Director and Onboard Systems Specialist on a project to replace an existing ACS/Xerox CAD/AVL/radio system with a new CAD/AVL and Voice over IP (VoIP) communications system. Paul authored the mobile gateway router requirements to support integration with multiple onboard systems, and also worked with AC Transit and the contractor to implement and integrate a fully redundant hosted central computer system. Paul is currently supporting the final stages of system testing and implementation.
FIRM Denver Regional Transit District Transit Technology Projects, Denver, CO IBI Senior Engineer, Onboard Systems Specialist, Fare Collection Systems Specialist (2009-2017). Acting as a Senior Engineer, Onboard Systems EDUCATION / TRAINING Specialist, and Fare Collection Systems Specialist, Paul was involved in B.A.Sc. - Honors (Civil multiple task order-based projects to deploy and integrate computer aided Engineering), University of dispatch and fare collection systems for the Regional Transit District in Toronto, 1987 Denver. He also provided business process re-engineering support to the M.S. (Transportation agency to integrate new technologies into their existing infrastructure and Engineering), University of operations. California at Berkeley, 1990
YEARS IN PRACTICE 30
RFP No. AE47810E0128 B.36 Systems Engineering and Support Services KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE
KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER
PAUL LAVELLEE SYSTEMS INTEGRATION — BRT
Community Transit Advanced Public Transportation passenger information system implementation; voice/ System, Everett, WA call logger replacement; and land mobile radio system Project Manager. Paul has been the Project Manager on upgrade. Paul’s experience at managing multiple a number of assignments for Community Transit related simultaneous projects under an overall program, to the implementation of transit technologies since coordinating efforts across projects, and helping to the late 2000’s, including the deployment of a CAD/ adjust across the board when one project experiences AVL (INIT) and data radio system, real-time information issues provided invaluable best practices as the technologies and tools, and planning and design of a agency embarks on the next generation of projects new Voice over IP (VoIP) bus communications system. and customer-facing applications. IBI Group was also Most recently, he has been working with them to recently selected for the next task order-based contract optimize their bus vehicle location system for BRT for C-TRAN which focuses on real-time passenger operations. information systems and data analytics.
Santa Clara VTA Bus Rapid Transit ITS Design, San South Coast British Columbia Transportation Jose, CA Authority Smart Card and Faregate Senior Engineer. Paul acted as a Senior Engineer Implementation, Vancouver, BC involved in the design of the transit station ITS Project Manager. The TransLink COMPASS system components (communications, next bus arrival signs, involved the deployment of a new smart card system emergency kiosks, and fare collection) for the new Alum across 1,500 buses, three medium-capacity rail Rock bus rapid transit corridor in San Jose, CA. lines, commuter rail, and a passenger ferry, and at approximately 96% market penetration is one of Next Generation Clipper® Card (“C2”) Project, the most successful fare collection projects in North Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC), San America. Paul acted initially as the TransLink project Francisco, CA manager for the project responsible for business Project Manager and Fare Payment Systems Specialist case development, funding approval, and program (2015-2017). Paul was the project manager for this management, and then once the project was underway multi-firm team providing systems engineering and with the vendor assumed the position of systems integration services to MTC and its 22 partner transit manager responsible for all technical elements of operators for the replacement of the Clipper® smart the new system. Two unique aspects of this project card payment program. MTC selected the IBI Group are that it involves conversion of the three SkyTrain team as the system solution consultant responsible for lines from proof-of-payment to gated operation, and finalizing the system concept, developing functional implementation of tap-on/tap-off distance-based requirements, defining the procurement approach fare payment capabilities. The project is very forward and supporting the agency throughout procurement, thinking and includes a heavy emphasis on customer and implementation oversight for the Next Generation service and demonstration of value. It is also the first Clipper® Card (C2) replacement project. The project system in North America to fully implement the EMV includes extensive use of application programming contact and contactless standards which represent the and other interfaces to support integration with transit next generation of open payment. operators, payment systems, and third parties. Spokane Transit Authority Advanced Public C-TRAN (Clark County) Transit Technology Systems, Transportation System, Spokane, WA Vancouver, WA Project Director (2010-2015). Paul was the Project Project Director and Subject Matter Expert (2012- Director for the implementation of a new CCTV and 2016). Following a task order-based contract approach, CAD/AVL system for Spokane Transit in eastern IBI Group under Paul’s direction was responsible for Washington. Responsibilities included requirements nine IT and ITS implementation and integration projects definition, procurement support, and ongoing technical including: bus CCTV and mobile router replacement; support. Trapeze was the CAD/AVL contractor and CAD/AVL upgrade; IT department re-organization; utilized a Sierra/InMotion mobile gateway router. farebox replacement; facilities CCTV project; ticket vending machines specifications; BRT real-time
RFP No. AE47810E0128 B.37 Systems Engineering and Support Services KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE
KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER DON MURPHY VEHICLE INTERFACE — BRT PROGRAM MANAGEMENT SUPPORT
Mr. Murphy has 22 years of experience in the transit systems and Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) fields. Over the past several years, Don Murphy has specialized in project management and technical liaison support for public agencies deploying transit management and communications systems, as well as Transit Signal Priority (TSP) & Bus Rapid Transit. Don’s experience encompasses a broad range of transit operations, wireless communications, systems integration, and software development efforts that allow him to be a flexible and well informed implementation support manager. Don supported SANDAG’s early efforts and technical reviews for Bus on Shoulder Driver Support Systems.
SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCE LA Metro Fleet Management & Communications Systems Strategic Plan, LACMTA, Los Angeles, CA IBI Task Lead, Vehicle Architecture SME (2016-2017). Don led IBI Group efforts as part of a consulting team to prepare a strategic implementation plan that included reviews of existing technologies and communications for bus and rail, emerging technology trends, agency needs, recommended new projects and phasing, and rough order of magnitude costs. This Plan also proposed connected and autonomous vehicle timelines, new on-board vehicle architectures, and new data communications systems.
FIRM Bus on Shoulder Concept I-805, SANDAG, San Diego, CA IBI Technical Liaison (2009-2012). Don provided technical support for the development of initial operating concepts, functional needs, and SOP review EDUCATION / TRAINING for the initial Bus on Shoulder concept. This included review of vendor IBM/Rational Rose, RequisitePro submittals, coordination with OEM suppliers – including New Flyer, review of Functional Requirements liability concerns, and discussions on operational risk and SIL analyses. Management Training, 2001 Foothill Transit SmartBus System Specifications, Procurement, & B.A. (Economics and Urban Implementation – West Covina, CA Studies/Planning), University of Project Manager & SME Fleet System (2015-2017). Don is the project lead California San Diego, La Jolla, for this effort that included review of existing Foothill systems and fleet, CA, 1992 development of specifications for a new bus fleet management and Various US DOT/FHWA communications system, support during procurement/negotiations, and Sponsored Courses on on-going support during implementation and testing. The project includes ITS System Architecture new on-board mobile access routers, commercial cellular data, VoIP Development, Systems voice communications with fallback digital radio system, and a fully new Procurement, ITS Operations on-board architecture for Foothill buses.
YEARS IN PRACTICE 22
RFP No. AE47810E0128 B.38 Systems Engineering and Support Services KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE
KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER
DON MURPHY VEHICLE INTERFACE — BRT
Santa Clara Alum Rock BRT Systems & Shelters providing technical and functional assistance to Preliminary & Final Design, Santa Clara Valley TransLink in the evaluation, procurement, contract Transportation Authority, San Jose, CA negotiations, and implementation of the regional Project Manager, SME ITS Integration (2014-2017). Don Bus Communications System (1,400 bus system). was IBI Group’s project manager for the SCAR BRT project This system included full voice/data radio system where IBI Group performed preliminary and final design replacement to an 800MHz OpenSky system with nine efforts for systems and shelter architecture elements. sites. From a management perspective, he supported Systems elements include real time info LED displays, multi-displicinary review of project issues, risks, and LCD displays, TVMs, TSP, communications, and CCTV contracting issues. His technical area focus was on the cameras. Mr. Murphy manages design team efforts, Computer Aided Dispatch/Automatic Vehicle Location reviews plans and systems specifications, and supported (CAD/AVL) and service management functions that will VTA in considering operational impacts and procedures be provided and supported by the new system. His related to new BRT elements. Early in design, this project efforts included working with agency IT and DBA staff also reviewed options for bus guidance and driver to determine data needs, flows, and schemas for the support systems in a narrow median guideway including development of the new agency RTI and Enterprise lane keeping and platform docking. databases. He was directly involved in all phases of TMAC testing from factory acceptance including system SWIFT BRT Headway Operations Review – Everett, WA acceptance in time for the 2010 Winter Olympics. SME Headway Operations (2016-2017). Don led efforts to review and assess on-going Community Transit Bus Dispatch System Assessment, Technical BRT operations, as well as use and effectiveness of Support and Design Review, TriMet, Portland, OR their headway management tools. This effort led Technical Systems Engineering Support. Don provided to several operations, data clean-up, and policy technical systems engineering support to assist recommendations to improve service reliability TriMet in the assessment of transit management and and modify the supporting software. Follow-up communications system functionality. The effort efforts included field operational tests where various included an industry and peer agency review process real-world variables (such as driver behavior were highlighting the latest available functions from controlled) to confirm system operations and results. existing vendor offerings and comparing that with the pending TODSS guidelines. TriMet’s efforts focused South Bay BRT One Way Transitway Ops & on systemwide service recovery and disaster response Implementation Support, Chula Vista, CA functionality, in addition to traditional CAD/AVL and Project Manager & TSP SME (2016-2017). Don led communications functions. Mr. Murphy continued IBI Group efforts for the implementation of a bus to provide subject matter expert support for central guideway access and directional control system for system and database integration functionality through the South Bay BRT. The objectives were to maximize vendor selection and vendor design review. transit speeds and minimize dwell times at signals and control points. The project efforts were conducting Escondido Rapid Bus Design & Deployment, in conjunction with several design and construction Escondido, CA teams along the multi-segment corridor. Project Manager. Don was project manager for the full end to end concept to final design and implementation AC Transit Bus Dispatch/CAD/AVL System, Oakland, CA for the San Diego Region’s first Rapid Bus deployment. Subject Matter Expert. Don was a subject matter expert This effort included new shelters and customer for specification and procurement of AC Transit’s CAD/ amenities, a transit queue jump and lane, Transit Signal AVL system replacement including review of on-board Priority (TSP), and Daktronics LED real-time transit equipment, new equipment specifications/options, information displays at eight locations supported by and integration with existing on-board systems. He wireless communications. As part of this effort, Mr. continues to provide SME support as the project moves Murphy provided oversight for the regional TSP factory through implementation. acceptance testing , field testing, and operational roll TransLink Bus Communications System CAD/AVL out on the region’s Xerox/ACS OrbCAD system. (TMAC) Technical Support, Vancouver, BC Project Manager. Don was IBI Group’s project manager
RFP No. AE47810E0128 B.39 Systems Engineering and Support Services KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE
KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER LES DURRANT FACILITIES/MEP LEAD PROGRAM MANAGEMENT SUPPORT
Les Durrant past experience includes design, construction and equipment commissioning of rail vehicles and systems. He has led, managed, and has been part of teams performing engineering and construction work on heavy rail, light rail, street cars, bus rapid transit vehicles and facilities, train control, SCADA, communications, central control, fare collection traction power, and electrical power distribution systems. He also upgraded existing systems and vehicle equipment, provided interface support between systems, and supported maintenance and procurement. he has managed projects as Owner’s staff, and as a consultant. Les has worked with Operations and Maintenance (O&M) staffs on their systems and facilities requirements including the Metro Red Line, Tacoma Streetcar, Seattle Link Light Rail Systems, and maintenance facilities. He is experienced on both new and replacement equipment work, and their installation with minimum impact on operations. Mr. Durrant has been the Systems Director at Anil Verma Associates (AVA) for the past six years, and was recently the Project Manager and Designer of Record for the design and installation of replacement APTA compliant heavy-duty transit escalators at Pershing Square station. While managing the condition assessment of Metro structures, he coordinated with Metro’s O&M group on track allocation for the inspections in tunnels, stations and elevated structures, reported on progress, prepared and quality reviewed a number of condition assessment reports. He led mechanical and plumbing design to add more elevators to some stations; bring them into compliance with the current ADA requirements, and to retrofit air conditioning to the elevator machine rooms. FIRM Anil Verma SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCE EDUCATION / TRAINING Red Line Pershing Square Escalator Replacement, Contract No. C1073, BS and MS Electrical LACMTA, Los Angeles, CA Engineering Certificates - Project Manager (2015-2017). Les was AVA’s Designer of Record for this Mechanical Engineering Design-Build contract with Clark Construction Group to replace five Post Graduate Diploma in escalators to the current APTA standards for heavy duty traction escalators, Management Studies and fitted them into the existing well ways. The control equipment was relocated outside the pit in the entrance area for ease of maintenance. YEARS IN PRACTICE AVA also designed the interfaces to the existing SCADA system, and the 30
RFP No. AE47810E0128 B.40 Systems Engineering and Support Services KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE
KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER
LES DURRANT FACILITIES/MEP LEAD replacement of the analog CCTV system with a digital Minimum Operable Segment and the Extensions, CCTV system. LACMTA, Los Angeles, CA Senior Engineer, Project Engineer, Systems Manager, Rail Facilities & 3rd Party, Structural Inspection of and Systems Lead for Design and Construction Underground and Elevated Structures, Contract (1983-1998). Led designs for trains and systems No.PS 8510-3002, LACMTA, Los Angeles, CA from concept through developing criteria, final Project Manager (2014-2017). Les managed AVA’s design, procurement documents, procurement, bid and team which recently completed the structural proposal evaluation; contractor design, manufacture, inspections and condition assessment that reported testing, installation and commissioning. on Metro’s underground stations, tunnels, as well Brought past experience with ATC systems at London as its elevated track structures and stations. The Transport to enhance the performance of the Metro work was performed to National Bridge (NBIS) and system. tunnel standards that identified defects, severity, and prioritized and made recommendations on the repairs Standardized the designs and updated the system-wide needed. AVA described the repair procedures and elements for Segment 2 & 3 including: Traction power, developed a rough order of magnitude cost estimate communications including radio, CCTV, cable to repair the most serious defects for a State of Good transmission system, fire and emergency management Repair. Mr. Durrant coordinated the work with Metro’s system (F&EM), SCADA, and central control, as well as maintenance and operations groups, often attending communications interfaces for train control. Updated track allocation meetings himself and with other AVA RCC equipment, seamlessly upgrading and integrating personnel. In almost all instances, the work could only the initial operating segment. Total Contract value >$ be performed at night, during nonrevenue-operating 100 million. hours. At LACTC’s request, he performed an independent root cause analysis of the fires at Willow and Wardlow Blue Supplemental Engineering Services-Security Kiosks Line substations prior to the opening of the Blue Line at Metro Rail Stations, Contract No. PS 8510-3001, with consultant support. LACMTA, Los Angeles, CA Project Lead (2013-2015). Les led AVA’s design of the Link Light Rail Vehicles and Systems, Yard and air conditioning, electrical, plumbing, communications Maintenance Facility, and Tacoma Light Rail and conduit runs for the bullet proof kiosk. He paid Projects, Sound Transit, Seattle, WA particular attention to the user interfaces and the Systems Engineering Manager (1998-2000). Les set up locations of the kiosks for ease of maintenance. The and managed the agency’s systems group responsible work included on-site inspections to provide optimal for the trains, traction power, and train control conduit runs in operating stations. communications, including radio, CCTV, SCADA, O&M, and central maintenance facility that included the Metro Red Line Additional Elevators at Metro Rail operations control center and yards for the new light Stations, LACMTA, Los Angeles, CA rail line in Seattle, and a street car in Tacoma. With Project Lead (2012-2014). Les led AVA’s work for the procurement support, Mr. Durrant negotiated the ventilation, plumbing, and the design for adding air purchase of the street cars for Tacoma from Inekon in conditioning to the existing elevator rooms. the Czech Republic.
RFP No. AE47810E0128 B.41 Systems Engineering and Support Services KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE
KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER ROBERTO RODRIGUEZ CADD MANAGER PROGRAM MANAGEMENT SUPPORT
Roberto Rodriguez is a civil engineer with 14 years of experience managing and coordinating railway infrastructure projects both in the private sector working for engineering companies as well as in the public sector managing rail contracts working for the Spanish Railway Infrastructure Authority (ADIF). Roberto has specific experience in preliminary and functional studies, cartographical and environmental studies; feasibility studies; basic and detailed design projects for track and track formation; risk analysis and detailed design projects for fire & life safety facilities in tunnels; acoustic and vibration studies; environmental impact mitigation projects; aerodynamical dimensioning of tunnels; instrumentation, monitoring and surveillance of track, earthworks and structures ; interface management among systems. Roberto also has pursued advanced doctorate courses in the railways field and is member of several national and international working groups for the development of railway regulations. He is an expert in railway gauging nominated by AENOR.
SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCE Engineering and Environmental services for the Palmdale to Burbank section of the California High Speed Rail Line, California High Speed Rail Authority, CA Deputy Project & Engineering Manager (2015-2017). Preliminary design for the 45 mi high-speed line section from Palmdale station in the North, to the Burbank Airport station in the south. These engineering services include conceptual (15% and 30%) design engineering and analysing of various alternatives before selecting the preferred one. oberto has been involved in the project as Deputy Project & Engineering Manager..
Toluca to Valle de Mexico Intercity Urban Train Track Design Supervision (2014). Topography, soil mechanics, environmental, hydrological, legal, financial, railway, electromechanical FIRM and rolling stock studies for the elaboration of the Toluca to Valle de Mexico SENER Intercity Urban Train.
EDUCATION / TRAINING MSc Civil Engineer, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM), 2003 PhD/Doctorate studies in the railways field, UPM, 2006
YEARS IN PRACTICE 14
RFP No. AE47810E0128 B.42 Systems Engineering and Support Services KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE
KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER
ROBERTO RODRIGUEZ CADD MANAGER
Misc. Projects Major Recent Experience related to HSR and Metro • Operation conditions studies for the Irún-Hendaye Projects with ADIF (Spanish Railways Infrastructure railway complex (Spain & France) (2006) Manager): • Tunnel aerodynamic design for High Speed Lines • High Speed Rail for the multimodal corridor (Spain, 2009) San Antonio - Austin - Dallas Forth Worth, Texas. Assessment to P3 investor (CINTRA) (USA 2006) • Detailed design of the tunnel safety equipment for the New Pajares Railway Link (Spain, 2009) • Technical & detailed design projects for the High Speed Line Madrid – Valencia (Spain, 2005) • Detailed design of the tunnel safety equipment for the High Speed Line Madrid - Galicia. Section: • High Speed Line Vitoria-Bilbao-San Sebastian Orense – Santiago (Spain, 2009) (Basque Y). Assessment on the supervision of the detailed design projects for the High Speed Line • Complementary Civil Works Projects in the New Vitoria – Bilbao (Spain, 2005) Pajares Railway Link (Spain, 2008) • High Speed Line Bobadilla – Granada. Assessment • Noise protection barriers project & vibrations on the supervision of the detailed design projects study for the High Speed Line Barcelona - (Spain, 2005) Figueras. Section: La Roca del Vallés - Riudellots de la Selva (Spain, 2008) • International High Speed Line Figueras – Perpignan. Location: Girona (Spain) & Languedoc-Rousillon (France) (2004) Assistant to the Project Manager and Project Engineer in charge of the detailed design project for the track. • Feasibility Study of the High Speed Line Ponferrada - Monforte de Lemos (Spain, 2004). Project Manager • Spanish Eastern HSR. Technical & detailed design projects & construction management for the High Speed Line Madrid - Valencia. Section: Minglanilla - Villargordo del Cabriel (Spain, 2004) • Spanish Eastern HSR. Technical & detailed design projects & construction management for the High Speed Line Madrid - Levante. Section: Elda – Novelda (2003). Location: Alicante (Spain)
RFP No. AE47810E0128 B.43 Systems Engineering and Support Services KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE
KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER ARUL EDWIN SPECIFICATIONS/PDD LEAD PROGRAM MANAGEMENT SUPPORT
Arul Edwin has over 25 years of diverse experience in project control, project development, design management including preparation of specifications/special provisions and cost estimates of large scale transportation projects. He worked on several transit expansions and highway programs both as the owner and as a consultant. Arul Edwin’s experience includes design reviews, design coordination, value engineering, preparation of risk registers, scope/cost/schedule control using project control procedures such as Earned Value assessment. He was also responsible for managing the quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) programs, developing QA manuals, and performing audits of internal as well as external teams. He is specialized in Intelligent Transportation Systems, traffic forecasting/simulations for roadway and intersection projects. Arul has proven record of coordinating multiple Santa Clara County’s Measure, B projects concurrently and delivering on time. In addition, his project experience includes development of Design-Build Specifications for Washington DOT and Design-Build traffic staging for the Central Artery/ Tunnel Project, Boston. He has worked as a consultant for BART, Caltrans, Alameda CTC (formerly ACCMA), AC Transit, VTA (formerly SCCTA) and Mendocino Council of Governments (MCOG).
SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCE BART Expansion Program Sustainable Construction Management Program, San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART), Oakland, CA Senior Specifications Engineer (2017). Arul was the Senior Specifications FIRM Engineer for the BART specifications update. Prepared revisions to VSCE the BART specifications with focus on specifications related to train communication and radio systems upgrade. EDUCATION / TRAINING M.S., Civil/Transportation Eng. – Ministry of Transport, Qatar, Metro and Bus Improvement Program University of California, Berkeley Senior Transportation Specialist (2013-2016). Senior Transportation M. Eng., Civil/Transportation Specialist, prepared Qatar Bus Action Plan including bus/metro station Eng. – National Univ. of interface design. Performed design review and coordination for the by-pass Singapore, Singapore roadway to the Airport. Performed Quality Assurance and Quality Control for design submittals and provided corrective actions for consultants. M. Eng., Highway & Airport Eng. – Bangalore University, India Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Program, AC Transit, Oakland, CA B. Eng., Civil Eng. – Bangalore Program Director (2012). As the program director, led the BRT team, and University, India transitioned project from planning to engineering and performed design coordination; Prepared progress reports, cost estimates, Quality Assurance YEARS IN PRACTICE Manual; Project Management Plan; Negotiated and Finalized BRT Design 25
RFP No. AE47810E0128 B.44 Systems Engineering and Support Services KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE
KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER
ARUL EDWIN SPECIFICATIONS/PDD LEAD
Contract; Participated in Community Meetings in the PS&E for State Route 87 HOV Lane widening project (SR Cities of San Leandro and Oakland; Coordinated BRT 87 from Route 85 to Julian Street). Design issues with Cities of Oakland and San Leandro and led the BRT Team in presentations to the City. Design-Build HOV Lane Widening/BRT Program, Seattle, WA Altamont Corridor Express Rail Improvement Design-Build Specification Coordinator (2003-2005). As Program a Design-Build Specification Coordinator, Developed Senior Project Manager (2016-2017). Senior Project Corridor-wide Signing and, Intelligent Transportation Manager for traffic engineering input related to System Plans as part of the Design Build RFP; Provided at-grade crossings such as vehicular and pedestrian, Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) Equipment and accident data for environmental assessment and Procurement Assistance that included writing grade crossing improvements. specifications for equipment needs. Served as the lead project manager for packaging the Design-Build I-880 Southbound HOV Lane Widening from specifications and preliminary design. Hegenberger Road to Marina Boulevard, ACTC, Oakland CA Central Artery/Tunnel Project, (Massachusetts DOT) Senior Project Manager. As a Senior Project Manager, Boston, MA prepared the scope/Cost/Schedule for the projects; Area Traffic Manager (1993-2000). As an Area Traffic Completed Verification and Validation of documents Manager for downtown Boston, planned and designed provided by client to proceed with the design traffic elements such as traffic management/control activities; Performed Scope/Cost/Specs/Schedule plans, incident management plans, signing plans, control on a weekly basis as design progressed; traffic signal timing plans, and detour plans; Prepared tracked the actual to earned expenditures; Developed specifications/Special Provisions for maintenance of independent cost estimates; Coordinating with traffic during construction for the downtown Boston. Caltrans on plans and specification reviews/permits; Supervised the construction staging implementation Performed Quality Assurance Audits in design by the contractor (Design-Build), reviewed and consultant offices; Prepared the Project Management approved weekly contractor submittals; Served as Plan (PMP). lead engineer for the freeway ramp closures and ramp relocation planning and implementation; Prepared Santa Clara County Measure B (VTA/CALTRANS) value engineering proposals to help implement Transportation Improvement Program, San Jose, CA traffic staging on schedule; Performed traffic Senior Highway Design Manager (1990-1994, 2000-- forecasting and traffic operations analysis; Developed 2003). As a Senior Highway Design Manager, provided replacement parking plans; Served as a liaison for transportation planning/traffic engineering support to the Massachusetts Turnpike, City of Boston, Artery environmental studies; Performed Traffic Forecasting Business Committee and North-end Communities; and Traffic Operations Analysis, traffic simulations, Implemented a one-way couplet system to improve managed sub-consultants, performed scope/cost/ traffic flow during construction; Prepared pedestrian schedule control through project control procedures routing plan for various construction staging phases; and trend meetings; prepared cost estimates and Performed community outreach presentations to local special provisions. Conducted Quality Assurance audits communities and businesses. and prepared Corrective Action Reports (CAR). Prepared
RFP No. AE47810E0128 B.45 Systems Engineering and Support Services KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE
KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER LINA MAINGI TASK ORDER ADMINISTRATOR PROGRAM MANAGEMENT SUPPORT
Lina Maingi is a Project Management Professional with over 10 years experience in financial and administrative project management. As a project controls specialist, Lina’s responsibilities include cost control and reporting, financial forecasting, progress reporting, invoicing, preparation and tracking of change orders and document control. Lina is also familiar with and utilizes a variety scheduling software in the preparation of project schedules.
SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCE Green Line Southeast Transitway, City of Calgary, AB Project Controls Specialist (2014-2017). Project Controls specialist on a project where HATCH is the prime consultant responsible for leading the planning and preliminary design of the GL-SE on behalf of The City. Roles on the project include: • Manage and process subcontractor agreements, invoices, and budgets. • Coordinate with the sub-consultants on budget updates and invoicing. • Manage and report on monthly budget status. • Prepare and submit monthly invoices and budget summary reports. • Monitor and track all project codes to ensure proper coding in adherence to the project Work Breakdown Structure and task codes.
Westbrook Operations Control Centre, City of Calgary, AB Project Controls Lead (2014-2017). HATCH is the lead consultant leading a team of sub-consultants responsible for the design and implementation of tenant fit-out and new operating control centre in the Westbrook Centre. As the HATCH Project Controls lead, the role includes: • Coordinate with the sub-consultants on budget updates and invoicing. • Manage and process subcontractor agreements, invoices, and budgets. • Coordinate preparation and submission of monthly progress measurement (EVA) reports. • Set up staff cost rates on the project and new charge codes as required. FIRM HATCH • Monitor and track all project codes to ensure proper coding in adherence to the project Work Breakdown Structure and task codes. EDUCATION / TRAINING B. Ed, Mathematics & Geography, Moi University, Kenya, 2001
YEARS IN PRACTICE 10
RFP No. AE47810E0128 B.46 Systems Engineering and Support Services KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE
KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER
LINA MAINGI TASK ORDER ADMINISTRATOR
Edmonton SE to West LRT, City of Edmonton, AB budget summary reports. Project Controls Lead (2011-2017). HATCH Project • Participate in monthly project control meetings. Controls for the preliminary engineering of City of Edmonton’s Southeast to West 27km low-floor BNSF PTC Design, Progress Rail Services, ON urban style LRT system in Edmonton. The estimated Project Controls Support (2010-2017). Project Controls project capital cost is approximately $3.9 Billion. Key support on a project providing signal design services responsibilities on the project include the following to Progress Rail Services, primarily for Positive Train project controls functions: Control design work on behalf of the Burlington • Assist project management team with the Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) railroad. Key responsibilities preparation of discipline workplans. on the project include: • Manage and report on monthly budget status. • Manage and report monthly budget status. • Set up staff cost rates on the project and new • Closely monitor and track all project codes to charge codes as required. ensure proper coding in adherence with the project purchase orders within a very tight project • Coordinate preparation and submission of a budget. monthly discipline and progress measurement (EVA) report. • Assist in the preparation and review of monthly project invoices. • Prepare and submit monthly invoices and budget summary reports. • Participate in monthly project control meetings. • Manage and process subcontractor agreements, ETS Maintenance Procedures, City of Edmonton, AB invoices, and budgets. Project Controls Lead (2011-2017). Project Controls • Monitor payments against issued invoices and lead on a project to evaluate the existing ETS signal follow up on outstanding payments. equipment, systems, and applicable maintenance • Monitor and track all project codes to ensure procedures in order to propose detailed instructions proper coding in adherence to the project Work as required. Responsibilities on the project include the Breakdown Structure and task codes. following roles: • Participate in monthly project control meetings. • Manage and report monthly budget costs. • Coordinate preparation and submission of NLRT Signal Construction, City of Edmonton, AB monthly project progress reports and invoices. Project Controls Support (2010-2017). Project • Participate in monthly project control meetings. Controls support on the NLRT project which consists of constructing a new 3.3km extension line as well ETS NE LRT Owner’s Engineer, City of Edmonton, AB as upgrading the existing line to support a new Project Controls Support (2010-2011). Project controls Communication Based Train Control (CBTC) system. support on an Owner’s Engineer assignment for The overall project capital cost is approximately $775 the complete refurbishment of the wayside signal million. Responsibilities on the project include the system on the northeast segment of the LRT system. following: This includes upgrading the entire segment with • Manage and report on monthly budget status. bi-directional running, vital electronic system and • Process changes orders (CO) and incorporate and installation of a new ductbank. The project capital cost track CO budget. was approximately $40 million. Key responsibilities • Manage project document control and update on the project include the following project controls document control log. functions: • Manage and report monthly budget status. • Work with the project management team to ensure continued improvement on existing • Review and submit monthly invoice to the client. document control process and ensure that project • Assist in the development of project documents documents and correspondence are properly filing system and posted project documentation maintained. to the client’s document control system • Coordinate preparation and submission of (SharePoint). monthly project progress reports, invoices and
RFP No. AE47810E0128 B.47 Systems Engineering and Support Services KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE
KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER DJALIL ABADI SCHEDULE/ESTIMATE LEAD PROGRAM MANAGEMENT SUPPORT
Mr. Abdi’s project experience is foremost with the construction of Los Angeles Metro Transit projects. He has been providing services from the early days of Metro Blue Line construction, through design management of Red Lines Segments (1, 2 & 3) and System-wide projects. Continued with Design/Build of Orange Line Extension & Expo Line Phase I & II and negotiating systems change orders for Gold Line Eastside Extension. For the past seven years he has been providing project control services for Westside Purple Line extension project. Concurrently he has been providing project control oversight services for Crenshaw/LAX LRT and Regional Connector and Mesa BRT Corridor El Paso Texas; and Austin BRT. Mr. Abadi has an established methodology for Life Cycle Cost Analysis for the systems components of metro projects and has prepared Life Cycle Cost for Purple Line (HRT) and Crenshaw/LAX (LRT) projects. Djalil Abadi has over 30 years of experience in the construction industry specializing in cost estimating, scheduling, budgeting and financial management, cost control, and forecasting. He is also experienced in value engineering, claims analysis & settlements, negotiation of change orders, as well as construction management.
SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCE Westside Purple Line Extension Project, LACMTA, Los Angeles, CA FIRM Cost Estimator/Scheduler (2010-2017). For the past seven years Mr. Abadi ABCS have been providing cost estimating & scheduling services along with feasibility studies, and constructability reviews for this mega project. EDUCATION / TRAINING He started with the preparation of cost estimate for Alternative Analysis MS Construction Management, along with summary construction schedules via slope diagram method University of Northern Colorado, (SD). Continued with providing services for preparation of bottom up 1980 construction cost estimates utilizing HCSS Software (Heavy Bid) for each BS Engineering, Aria-Mher section of the project per FTA cost categories. Setup automated estimating University of Technology, 1977 worksheets for the Guideway and stations that account for the main block Construction Contract Claims of the construction cost. Prepared Slope Diagram schedules for various tunneling alternatives clarifying interfaces issues among project elements Professional Workshop in time and space. Continued with preparation of the Engineer’s Estimate Primavera Project Planner (P3/ for Major Design/Build Contracts C1045, Section 1. C1120 Section -2 and P6) Certified Advanced User C1151, C1152 Contracts for Section 3. Current project forecast is $8.5B for all three Sections. YEARS IN PRACTICE 30
RFP No. AE47810E0128 B.48 Systems Engineering and Support Services KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE
KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER
DJALIL ABADI SCHEDULE/ESTIMATE LEAD
Crenshaw / Lax Transit Corridor LRT Project, LACMTA, BART Earthquake Safety Program, Retrofit of A, C Los Angeles, CA & R lines Stations, Bay Area Rapid Transit District, Cost Estimator (2010-2011). Prepared cost estimate Oakland, CA analysis & reviewed and participated in risk analysis Senior – Estimator/Scheduler (2008-2012). Senior – workshops for ACE & PE phase of the project. Prepared Estimator/Scheduler responsible for providing cost independent cost estimate to verify project estimated estimating and scheduling services for the retrofit of capital cost and prepared Life Cycle Cost analysis. 13 stations from 30% design through bid documents. Attended project team meetings, reviewed Regional Connector Transit Corridor LRT Project, LACMTA, Los Angeles, CA constructability issues for the retrofit of the operating Independent Cost Estimate Analyst (2011-2012). facilities and prepared reports. Prepared independent cost estimate analysis & review Empire Avenue and Buena Vista Street Grade and recommended value engineering proposals that Separations, Burbank, CA reduced the construction cost over $10 million. Senior – Estimator/Scheduler (2008-2012). Senior – Estimator/Scheduler responsible for providing cost FTA-PMO Projects (Nationwide) Estimator/Scheduler In-Charge (2011-2012). As a estimating services from 30% design through bid member of Project Management Oversight team, Mr. documents. Attended project team meetings and Abadi was responsible for reviewing and analyzing determined estimating requirements of the projects cost & schedule & budget reports provided by the with the client. Provided value engineering report consultants to ensure compliance with FTA procedures along with cost saving estimate that was adopted. and standard cost categories. A few of the projects Provided input for construction schedules and project include New Orleans CBD/French Quarter Streetcar master schedule. Expansion; Mesa BRT Corridor El Paso Texas; and Alameda Corridor Project Los Angeles, CA Austin BRT CMTA Metro. Chief Scheduler (2000-2002). Chief Scheduler. Managed the day-to-day activities of the project Exposition Metro LRT Project Phase I & II, LACMTA, Los Angeles, CA control engineers who were responsible for reviewing Project Control Manager (2007-2011). Project Control and approving contractors’ schedules. Checked Manager responsible for design cost estimates and the work of schedulers responsible for developing, schedule impacts for environmental remediation maintaining, and preparing status reports of project analysis for this LRT Line with transit stations, schedule and construction cost. Prepared and maintenance facilities, aerial structures, and maintained construction schedules identifying additional infrastructure tie-in facilities. Provided cost interfacing among 30 construction contracts, estimating for establishing project budget and cost establishing contract milestones and implementation analysis for route selection studies, from DEIR through in contract documents. Managed and supervised the current FEIR documents for Expo-2 $1.36B. preparation of the Time Impact Analysis (TIA) prepared by schedulers and directly involved in preparing TIAs Metro Orange Line Extension, LACMTA, Los Angeles, for major changes ($2.5B). CA Senior Estimator/Scheduler (2007-2009). Senior Mission Valley East Light Rail Project, San Diego, CA Estimator/Scheduler responsible for providing Senior Estimator (2000-2002). Senior Estimator. cost estimating and scheduling services from Prepared and maintained a resource-loaded, detailed, conceptual stages through design-build bid stage. design schedule. Prepared preliminary overall Attended project team meetings, reviewed project integrated schedule, bid cycle, construction, system controls issues, provided schedules, and determined integration and pre-revenue operation. Managed estimating requirements of the projects with the and supervised the preparation of the project master client. Participated in the value engineering and peer estimate ($176M). design review. Prepared project master schedule and identified major interfaces via milestones that were incorporated in the bid documents.
RFP No. AE47810E0128 B.49 Systems Engineering and Support Services KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE
KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER DAMIAN CAREY RISK MANAGER PROGRAM MANAGEMENT SUPPORT
Damian Carey’s experience encompasses major transit projects worldwide, performing rail vehicle engineering and proposals, and proposals for turnkey rail projects, with responsibility for system and subsystem design, procurement and integration. Close to 20 years of professional services experience in North America, supporting new rail transit projects, including technical specification, innovative project delivery strategy, design, construction and project management. Mr. Carey has over 30 years of professional experience in public transportation project delivery, encompassing capital program implementation, project management, engineering design and construction management, and rail vehicle infrastructure engineering. Clients have included many major transit authorities, as well as the Federal Transit Administration.
SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCE Exposition Line Phase 2, LACMTA, Los Angeles, CA Systems Procurement Support (2009-2010). Responsible for development of the systems requirements for this LRT expansion project as part of a Design / Build procurement.
Federal Transit Administration (FTA), Washington, DC Project Management Oversight Consultant (2005). Led the oversight of a range of Miami Dade Transit (MDT) projects that include North Corridor Extension to the Metrorail System, the Metrorail and Metromover Car Rehabilitation Projects, and the Kendall Busway Construction Project. Provided monitoring and reporting on project progress, reviewing MDT’s management and design documentation for completeness and compliance with FTA guidelines, and providing options on the grantee’s performance FIRM and readiness for progress through the FTA funding process. Led a Jacobs team performing a risk assessment on the New Britain-Hartford Busway Project being developed by Connecticut Department of Transportation EDUCATION / TRAINING (ConnDOT). Reviewed project scope, schedule, and cost estimate build-up, B.E. Electrical and Electronic and prepared reports presenting the findings. Addressed the appropriate Engineering, University of application of contingencies, unit prices, and escalation, and prepared a Bradford UK, 1989 risk register and an initial risk mitigation plan. In support of FTA’s response to the damage caused by hurricanes Katrina and Rita, helped FTA develop a REGISTRATIONS process for PMO field reviews of affected transit providers and the reporting Chartered Engineer – of damage assessments, using regular situation reports at property, state, Engineering Council UK and national levels.
YEARS IN PRACTICE 30
RFP No. AE47810E0128 B.50 Systems Engineering and Support Services KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE
KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER
DAMIAN CAREY RISK MANAGER
EAGLE P3 Project, Regional Transportation District, METRO Solutions, Metropolitan Transit Authority of Denver, CO Harris County, Houston, TX Design/Integration Manager (2008-2014). Responsible Program Initiation Support (2005-2008). Led support for design management and oversight, system of the METRO Solutions light rail expansion program, integration and interface management for the entire providing procurement negotiation assistance and EAGLE P3 Project of three commuter rail corridors, support for the FTA New Starts process. Assisted in maintenance facility and rolling stock fleet. Lead preparation of the procurement documentation for author of design/build and operate/maintain the innovative Public-Private Partnership project requirements for the 34 year concession to finance, implementation. Instrumental in the development of construct and operate a multi-corridor commuter the design-build-operate-maintain scope of services rail network. Task lead for the risk management and the coordination of the complete request for and assessment process for the EAGLE P3 Project to proposals, and a participant in the industry review ensure appropriate risk transfer within the contract, workshops. Developed project FTA readiness mitigation of owner-retained risks and management documents, including METRO’s program management of contingency budget. Assists in the coordination plan, risk management program, quality management and reporting processes necessary with FTA, in regard program, and operations and fleet management plans. to progressing projects through the FTA New Starts LaGuardia Airport AirTrain Development, Port funding program and RTD’s participation in FTA’s Authority of New York and New Jersey (PANYNJ) Public Private Partnership Pilot Program. Program Management Support (2017). Responsible LIRR East Side Access, MTA Capital Construction, New for providing technology and procurement expertise York, NY to oversee the planning consultant for this 2-mile, JV Project Director, Construction Management (2014- 3-station high capacity airport People Mover project. 2017). Responsible for leading a Joint Venture with Participates in development workshops, document a staff of over 90 people, delivering and managing reviews and strategy discussions. a team of Construction Managers and their staffs, SunRail Phase 2 Design Consultant, Middlesex/Herzog administering construction contracts for this $10 JV, Orlando, FL Billion+ program linking the Long Island Railroad Integrated Testing (2017). Responsible for preparation mainline in Queens to a new terminal station under of integrated testing procedures and plans, and review the historic Grand Central Terminal in Manhattan. of configuration plans as part of the design team The work scope includes tunnels, facilities, rail responsible for infrastructure design for this 17 mile infrastructure and systems, fire/life systems, extension of the SunRail commuter rail system for maintenance/storage yards, and associated upgrades Florida DOT. to existing LIRR, MNR and Amtrak facilities in the affected area. Responsible for contract administration and negotiation, staff recruitment and assignment, coordination of special task orders and reviews, including risk assessment, constructability, incident investigation, and independent review.
RFP No. AE47810E0128 B.51 Systems Engineering and Support Services KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE
KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER RHODIE LUMANOG DOCUMENT ADMINISTRATOR PROGRAM MANAGEMENT SUPPORT
As an Office Engineer, Ms. Lumanog has effectively implemented project controls in the area of quality, cost, and schedule while working with the contractor to successfully achieve the project objectives. Other responsibilities included Project Coordinator, Document Controller, Construction Administrator / Office Engineer and Facilities Supervisor. She is experienced in managing contract documents, standard specifications and plans and has performed constructability reviews and change order evaluations and estimates. Ms. Lumanog has over 15 years of experience in positions ranging from Project Manager to Project Engineer for programming, design, and construction for projects that include airports, infrastructure, highways, and facilities capital projects for both private and public owners including LAX airport, Caltrans District 7, and local school districts.
SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCE South Airfield Improvement Program, LAWA/LAX, Los Angeles, CA Office Engineer / Document Controller Manager (2012-2013). Served as an Office Engineer / Document Controller Manager for $340 million of runway revision / taxiway relocation (25L) and Reconstruction of existing RWY 7L-25R Safety Area Improvements and Pavement Rehabilitation that included utilities. Ms. Lumanog assisted with the project and document control process, as well as actively interacted and supported the on-site partners such as the LAWA Engineering Project Management Division, Inspection team.
Richmond / San Rafael Bridge Deck Replacement, Caltrans, Richmond, CA Office Engineer (2013-2017). As an Office Engineer for the Richmond/San Rafael Bridge Deck replacement project, her duties included multiple task FIRM handling all phases of construction and providing administrative support on multiple construction contracts. Worked on daily reports, CCO reports, VSCE correspondence to the Contractors, maintain the Web-Log CALTRANS EDUCATION / TRAINING for Scofield and Western Bridge Projects. Verified and approved Extra Construction and Project Work Bills for Contract Change Orders. Tracking incoming and outgoing Management Certificate Turner material submittals and RFIs. She successfully developed and implemented a streamlined method of receiving, logging, organizing, tracking and School of Construction, LA, CA disseminating all construction related documentation to support the Prolog Manager Application Resident Engineer. Certificate, Bovis Lend Lease, LA, CA
YEARS IN PRACTICE 15
RFP No. AE47810E0128 B.52 Systems Engineering and Support Services KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE
KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER
RHODIE LUMANOG DOCUMENT ADMINISTRATOR
Measure CC Bond Program, Culver City Unified School Measure E Bond. El Camino Community College, Los District, Culver City, CA Angeles, CA Document Control/Office Engineer (2014-2017). As Office Engineer (2014-2017). As an Office Engineer for the Document Control/Office Engineer, Ms. Lumanog multiple new construction projects handling phases of is the focal point of all communication to and from construction and administrative multiple construction the construction contractors. Maintaining reporting contracts for multiple schools. Performing the role systems for scope, sequencing, scheduling, budgets of Document Control Manager in charge of tracking and communication and over sight of the construction incoming and outgoing material submittals and District Wide Summer 2017 Projects. These projects “requests for information” while supporting a team of address immediate, District-wide, non-DSA facility 6 to 8 project managers and project engineers while needs such as roofing repairs, ceiling repairs, security under a performance based contract. She successfully system upgrades, plumbing and fixture repairs and developed and implemented a streamlined method upgrades, shade structures, drainage improvements, of receiving, logging, organizing, tracking and telecom systems, door repairs, signage, lighting disseminating all construction related documentation. repairs, and wall repairs. Estimated construction value Other Projects: Industry and Technology Renovation is $1M. ($25.0 mil), and STEM Renovation ($2.1 mil). Carlsbad Water Recycling Facility Phase III Expansion Cerritos College Measure CC Bond, Los Angeles, CA Office Engineer (2014-2017). As an Office Engineer, Ms. Document Control Manager/ Project Engineer (2007- Lumanog was responsible for coordinating between 2012). Served as a Document Control Manager/ Project the DB team and plant staff to schedule tie-ins and Engineer for the $210 million bond measure projects. shut-downs. She monitored and tracked the project Her duties included prepared logs for tracking shop schedule and budget and provided quality assurance drawings, contract documents, submittals, and review. Additionally, she investigated field conditions, request for information, change orders and other reviewed and process RFIs, review and process Change documentation, reviewed project correspondence, Order Request and obtaining all required quantity field reports and RFI responses for status, tracked estimates and take-off. Review contractors draw construction project design and shop drawings for request, verifying certified payroll, equipment rates distribution to architect, engineer, owner, trade per CALTRANS standard. contractors and subcontractors. Performed contract Water Loop Project and Street Improvement administration and secured all required project Document Control (2014-20017). As a Document permits and submittals, review construction plans Control staff, Ms. Lumanog provided contract and assist consultants and district personnel in bid administration and document control for the documents package completion. infrastructure project which consisted of the construction of an approximately 350-foot section of storm drain on Archibald Ave. Ms. Lumanog was responsible for project correspondence, and maintained coordination with the City of Ontario. Additionally, she held weekly conference calls with Southern California Edison and other stakeholders to ensure all parties were informed of project progress.
RFP No. AE47810E0128 B.53 Systems Engineering and Support Services KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER RESUME TABLE OF CONTENTS Our pool of staff resources are sorted by firm and then alphabetical by last name.
HATCH Systems design and program, project, and construction management services.
FIRST LAST ROLE FIRST LAST ROLE Keith ADAM Systems Integration Jimmy JIANG Rial Signal Obrad ALEKSIC Commumications Engineer Luis JOAQUIM Signals Designer Byron ANDERSON Electrical Engineer Mengdi KANG Rail Signaling Steven BAILEY Signal Engineer Sinan KESER Systems Specialist Ray BATEMAN Train Control Engineer Abdul KHAN Structural Engineer Greg BAYNE Signal Engineer Mandy KHATTRA System Integration & Safety Kent BENNETT Rail Systems Engineer Anders BERGENWALL Train Control Engineer Jordan KODZHA- Signal Designer HINCHEV Ashley BILES Electrical Engineer Robyn KORENIC Electrical Engineer Brian BILLAY Traction Power Engineer Nenad KRESOVIC Electrical Engineer Ryan BIRD Rail Signal Designer Sanja KRNJIC-CEVRIZ Signals Designer Niamh BLAKE CAD Technician Pav KUNER Signals Engineer Peter BOHMERT Rail Signal Designer RENÈ LAFLÈCHE DEPUTY PROJECT MANAG- David BRUNT Signals Specialist ER - DESIGN Jean CARON Industrial Computing Mike LAI Communications Engineer Analyst Mihajlo LAKICEVIC Communications Specialist Clement CHAN Civil System Engineer Alan LAMBERT Signal Engineer Jason CHEUNG Train Control Engineer Brent LESJAK Program Manager Djoko COROVIC Communications Electrical Engineer Lisa LI Signal Designer Graham DOW Egineer Support Henry LUETJEN Signals Mridu DUTTON Train Control Engineer LINA MAINGI TASK ORDER ADMINISTRA- TOR Christine DYCK Signal Engineer Philippe MARTIN IT & Communications Colin ECCLES Contract Administrator Specialist John EULL Signals and Communica- JON MCDONALD Communications Manager tions Engineer Mei MENG Senior Signaling Engineer Aaron FRASER Rail Systems Engineer Ananya MISHRA Signal Design Engineer Jeetendra GAVLI Train Control Engineer Richard MORRIS Rail Systems DALE HEIN TRAIN CONTROL MANAGER Zhenyu NIU Systems Engineer Robert HENDERSON Rail Signaling PAUL NOLAN DEPUTY PROJECT MANAG- Jacky HUANG Senior Singals Designer ER - CONTRACT Jason HUCK Rail Signals and Communi- CONTRACT MANAGEMENT & cations PROJECT CONTROLS Matt HYLAND Systems Engineer Tudor NYAWASHA Rail Systems & Communica- tions Engineer Eseohe IKHUREIGBE Signals Adrian PEACH Signaling Systems Engineer Mikhail ILYUKHIN Rail Signaling Deon PEENS Train Control Engineer Mandy JEZIN Project Administrator
RFP No. AE47810E0128 B.54 Systems Engineering and Support Services KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER
FIRST LAST ROLE SENER Curtis PORATH Signaling and Communi- Systems design and program, project, and cations construction management services. Wei QIAO Electrical Engineer Andrew REDMOND Rail Systems Modeling FIRST LAST ROLE Norm RHODES Mechanical Engineer, Jorge ADAME Communications Engineer Systems Hassan AL MAIMOUNI Communications Engineer Ivan RODRIGUES Signals, Train Control, CAD Enrique ALIAGA Mechanical Engineer, Ray SHANKS Signal, Train Control, & Systems Systems Integration Kimberly AUSTIN Systems Engineer Li SHI Railway Signal Designer & Angel AYESTA Communications Engineer Electrical Engineer Juan Luis BARRIOS Communications Engineer Dave SMITH Signals, Train Control & Ferran BIOSCA Traction Power Engineer Systems Integration Carlos BRIONES Systems Engineer Abh SONI Signals, Train Control & Electrical Engineer PERE BUSQUET TRACTION POWER MAN- AGER Mansour TABARI Rail Signaling & Communi- cations Vicente CALABUIG OCS Engineer Aleks TRPKOVIC Rail System Modeling Ana- Antonio CARAYOL Signals Engineer lyst, Signaling Laura CARRASCO Electrical Engineer Roy WAGHORN Senior Specialist / Mechan- Lee Castellion Communications Engineer ical José Anto- CASTRO Communications Engineer Phil WATT Signals, Train Control nio CARL WRIGHT OPERATIONS AND PLAN- Jose DE LA HIGUERA Systems Engineer NING LEAD Joan Carles ENGUIX Operations and Planning Kelvin YU Signals Engineer, Train Control Javier FERNÁNDEZ OCS Engineer Nathan YU Rail Systems, Commission- José María FERNANDEZ Communications ing Engineer PERRINO Jose Anto- GALLETERO Systems Engineer nio Ramón GARRIGOSA Systems Engineer Ignacio GEREZ Communications Engineer Enrique GONZALEZ Systems Engineer Juan GUASCH Signals and Train Control Lourdes HOWARD Systems Engineerr JONATHAN HU TRAIN CONTROL DESIGN LEAD Enric JIMÉNEZ MEP Engineer Jose Anto- LLANAS Communications Engineer nio Angela MALMIERCA Communications Engineer David MARTÍN Systems Integration Engi- neer José Man- MARTÍN Communications Engineer uel Alberto MARTÍN DE LA Communications Engineer TORRE
RFP No. AE47810E0128 B.55 Systems Engineering and Support Services KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER
José MERINO Communications Engineer ABCS Ramón Project controls and scheduling services for Andrés MORIEL RAMS Engineer System the team, combined with decades of LACMTA Assurance expereince. Borja MUÑOZ Communications Engineer Isabel NAVARRO Communications Engineer DJALIL ABADI SCHEDULING/ESTIMATOR LEAD Javier NÚÑEZ Traction Power Engineer Charles MUNROSE Scheduling/Estimator Fernando PALLARÉS Signals Engineer Mike SOTO Scheduling/Estimator Albert PEDRA RAMS Engineer System Assurance Elisa PÉREZ RAMS Engineer System Assurance Marta Luisa PÉREZ Communications Engineer ACUMEN OCS, system design, signaling, train control, Raul PIERNAU Electrical Engineer commumnication, MEP, traction power, system CHUCK PINEDA SYSTEMS INTEGRATION safety, & fare collection. LEAD Juan PRADAS Communications Engineer Fred BAILEY MEP Electrical Engineer Ruben PRADO Systems Engineer David BENNETT Systems Engineer Rachid RAHLI Electrical Engineer Thomas BORDEAUX Systems Engineet Julio RODRIGUEZ Rolling Stock Vehicle John CHAN MEP Electrical Engineer Engineer Te-Chuan CHANG Scheduling ROBERTO RODRIGUEZ CADD MANAGER Jose FLORES Safety & Telecommunica- Pedro RUIZ Communications Engineer tions Laura SACRISTIAN Systems Engineer David FOLK- Scheduler ANES SASSI DEPUTY PROJECT MANAG- MAN-MOORE ER - INTEGRATION Eric FUEHRING Train Control Engineer Blanca SOLER Systems Engineer Todd GEORGEN Train Control Engineer Daniel Torres Systems Engineer Maria Lopez CAD Technician Julian Torres Communications Engineer Alexander Malinovsky Farebox Software Engineer MARK TURNER VEHICLE INTERFACE LEAD Elisa MINAYA CAD Technician David UBEDA Rolling Stock Vehicle Robert MURRAY Systems Integration Engi- Engineer neer Roberto VILLAR Rolling Stock Vehicle Robert PILGRIM Systems Senior Engineer Engineer John POLK MEP Electrical Engineer Ricard Z Systems Engineer Farah SOLTANE MEP Electrical Engineer DJALIL ABADI SCHEDULING/ESTIMATOR James SOTO MEP LEAD Douglas VAN BLARICOM Systems Integration Engi- Charles MUNROSE Scheduling/Estimator neer Mike SOTO Scheduling/Estimator Richard Warsinger Cost Estimator Fred BAILEY MEP Electrical Engineer David BENNETT Systems Engineer Thomas BORDEAUX Systems Engineet John CHAN MEP Electrical Engineer Te-Chuan CHANG Scheduling Jose FLORES Safety & Telecommunica- tions
RFP No. AE47810E0128 B.56 Systems Engineering and Support Services KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER ANIL VERMA COLMENA Facilities & mechanical, electrical, plumbing, HVAC, Systems desgn and integration services, along with CADD, and scheduling sevices CADD, structural, traction power, and OCS talent.
Kenneth Arvidson Traction Power Engineer Alexis BROOKES CAD Technician Linus Chen MEP Electrical Engineer Carl JOHNSON Communications Electrical Raymundo Cruz MEP Electrical Engineer Engineer Somesh Debnath Architect Layne Kelser Systems Integration Engi- neer Edgardo Del Rosario MEP Plumbing Engineer Cesar Lopez MEP Electrical Engineer Gregorio Del Rosario MEP Plumbing Engineer Beatriz Mendez Senior Systems Engineer LESLIE DURRANT FACILITIES/MEP Jay Wetmore Quality Assurance Engineer Tony Garshasebi CAD Technician Fu XIONG CAD Technician Rolando Gonzales MEP Electrical Engineer Elenor Kendrick Cost Estimator / Scheduler Moh Khazeli MEP Designer GCM CONSULTING ASQ certified quality manager with 15 years of Vincent Lau MEP Electrical Engineer LACMTA experience. Peter Maguire MEP Electrical Engineer
Peter Ng CAD Technician MIKE PHILLIPS INDEPENDENT QUALITY Jesse Quitalig Cost Estimator MANAGER Chris Rauch MEP Mechanical Joseph Rigonan MEP Mechanical IBI Narendra Shaw Traction Power, CCTV, COM- BRT & LRT systems design and integration, vehicles, Ms, other and operations services.. Martha Udrescu CAD Technician
Manny Ursua MEP Civil Engineer PAUL LAVALLEE SYSTEMS INTEGRATION Anil Verma Architect LEAD DON MURPHY VEHICLE INTERFACE LEAD - BRT CH2M STEVE SCHIBUOLA OPERATIONS AND PLAN- Systems safety assurance, system safety & security, NING - BRT ITS, and operations services.
Jaspal BOPARAI Senior Systems Engineer INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS IN John GREGORY Materials Engineer SIGNALLING Charlie HETLAND Transportation Engineer Communications and signaling & train control Susan HOWARD Cyber Security and Tele- services. communications John SPELLMAN Signals Train Control Vish MAWLEY Electrical Systems Engineer Sahith MOTURU RAMS Engineer System Assurance Rick NEWTON Railroad Operations JOHN SIMON SYSTEM SAFETY ASSUR- ANCE LEAD Jim ZEHM Rolling Stock Vehicle Engineer
RFP No. AE47810E0128 B.57 Systems Engineering and Support Services KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER JACOBS MARRS OCS Management, as well as system safety & Utilities and project controls services, and over a security, systems design & integration, traction decade of LACMTA experience. power; and vehicles.
John BLACK Rolling Stock Vehicle Steve Anderson Civil MEP Engineer Engineer Gino BONDOC Civil MEP Third Party Coor- DAMIAN CAREY RISK MANAGER dination Robert CRAIG Regulations and Certifica- Riaz Chaudhary Utilities tions Charles FEIST Civil MEP Scheduler Cost Greg CROCOMBE Systems Signaling and Ismail Gosla Fire Safety Engineer Rolling Stock Mashel Jongert Senior Estimate Steve DIANA Signals Design Gary MCARTHUR Civil MEP Estimator William GEORGE Commumications Engineer John O’Brien Civil MEP Claims Support Bob HIGHFILL Semior Vehicle integration Farooq Qureshi Systems Integrator Design Leo HIMMEL Testing and Comissioning Kiran SAMPAT Senior Mechanical Engineer Lee KHUMALO Inspection Cris KWONG Traction Power Engineer Thomas LI Traction Power Engineer PROJECT X Jon-Henry MCPHAIL Traction Power Engineer Corrorsion control services and asset management Robert MCPHERSON Train Control Engineer Ed Hernandez Senior Corrosion Engineer Patrick NELSON OCS Engineer Ernesto Padilla Asset Management Spe- Robert ROSA Electrical Engineer cialist Gerad RUGGIERO Rail Safety & Security Dan SHAY System Integration Kenneth SHIELDS Rail Systems RF NETWORKS Scott TOLLEFSON Traction Power Engineer RF Networks is providing RF Engineering leadership Harry TOM Commissioning Manager and communications services. Thomas TRUDEL Systems Engineer KURT DRUMMOND RF ENGINEERING LEAD Scott WITT Rolling Stock Vehicle Anthony MINIKON RF & Systems Integration Engineer Michael ZAGACHIN Train Control Engineer ANTHONY ZELOYLE OCS MANAGER T&T PR COMP program and DBE Mentor Protege services.
KEWO Eneida TALLEDA Diversity Manager COMP Traction power and electrical engineering services. PHYLLIS TUCKER MENTOR PROGRAM LEAD
Anh Thu Doan Electrical Engineer Joseph Forson Senior Electrical Engineer TRIAD CONSULTING Brian Kewo Senior Electrical Engineer System security, with credentialed staff with thirty years of experience on complex transit systems. Gregory Brandon Safety and Security David Skusek Senior Systems Engineer Rick Wither Safety and Security
RFP No. AE47810E0128 B.58 Systems Engineering and Support Services KEY PERSONNEL’S SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER VSCE Specifications, PDD development, and document controls. Jill Brown Systems Integration Sup- port Bert Dasmarinas Scheduler ARUL EDWIN SPECIFICATIONS / PDDS Santana Jimenez Systems Integrator Support RHODIE LUMANOG DOCUMENT ADMINISTRA- TOR Cassandra Manansala Document Control Even McCulloch Systems Integration Sup- port BRT Ralph Morales Safety Manager Jasmine Rischau Administrative Assistant Frank Sana Civil Engineer Christine Shin Assistant Document Control Jesus Vargas Project Controls
W2 DESIGN Utility design and relocation services. W2 is experienced with bus/rail facility projects. Tanaya Bell Associate Civil Engineer Eric Gutierrez CAD Technician Ron Ibarra Civil MEP Engineer Ryan Lim Civil MEP Engineer Aaron So CAD Technician Patrick Wong Civil MEP Engineer Tony Wong Civil MEP Engineer
RFP No. AE47810E0128 B.59 Systems Engineering and Support Services EFFECTIVENESS OF MANAGEMENT PLAN Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER EFFECTIVENESS OF MANAGEMENT PLAN
We recognize and acknowledge that this contract may be one of LACMTA’s largest engineering services programs. Therefore to excel at delivering this very challenging project, the successful team will need to be substantial, both in terms of depth of experience and expertise, and in terms of availability of resources. To meet these challenges pro-actively, MS+P has assembled a sustainable, flexible, and innovative team of rail transit professionals. The depth and breadth of this team includes over 250 project managers, engineers, designers, and operations personnel who have previously exceeded expectations for similar systems engineering services projects at LACMTA and other transit agencies.
Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER PROGRAM MANAGEMENT TEAM ORGANIZATION C.1 The MS+P team understands that the Transit Asset Management (TAM), and Joint implementation of superior systems design forms Venture projects for both Rail and Bus Rapid the backbone of LACMTA’s transit operations. The Transit (BRT). This must be accomplished in an systems must be reliable and enable safe, efficient efficient, organized, and open manner from the passage for its patrons and traveling public. It all onset of design through design support, and begins with properly engineered transit systems. during construction in order for these projects to With this in mind, MS+P will approach the design be not only successful, but also meet stakeholder’s program with an emphasis to communicate and expectations. This is an important responsibility for achieve the highest degree of quality design which MS+P is prepared and will accomplish. delivery, employing an organizational structure We recognize that this is a complex and far reaching that will ensure the right balance of program design and engineering support program that must management capability with design functionality. be well-managed and focused on the engineering This approach is paramount to the success of the goals and objectives of this 7 plus year assignment. Systems Engineering Support Services (SESS). We are committed to employing a lean program LACMTA will require a partner to supplement and management structure. MS+P focus will be the support the Engineering Department resources by technical delivery with the necessary balance of providing high quality systems engineering design control and reporting structure to ensure that the for the anticipated LACMTA transit operations, program evolves through its peaks and valleys of Capital Projects, State of Good Repair (SOGR), support service demands.
EVALUATION CRITERIA Demonstration of a well-defined Past experience that Past experience that C.1 C.2 C.3 line of communication between demonstrates and demonstrates and the Prime and all Subcontractors, describes the ability to describes effective cost including the reporting structure manage multiple Metro and schedule control. and identification of Project assignments with skilled Manager, point-of-contact, and the personnel and qualified independent Quality Manager. technical resources.
RFP No. AE47810E0128 C.1 Systems Engineering and Support Services EFFECTIVENESS OF MANAGEMENT PLAN Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER
Our management team will help to guide and steer the anticipated Design Task Orders (such as the Metro East San Fernando Valley project).
We have aligned our proposed Key Personnel with the Program Management and support Quite simply, our focus is on providing personnel to timely and cost effectively execute the Metro with good sustainable systems required tasks and deliverables. This functional engineering and support, while we program structure has been formulated to unify ensure the design processes are well- all phases and activities and affords the desired managed and controlled. interconnectivity, synergy, and accountability. Program related issues can quickly and The Program Management Organization highlights directly flow to the appropriate manager for a manageable, non-siloed flow of communications action without hampering the overall flow of among the functional design groups, with design development. The functional Program administrative and procurement functions, that Management organization chart (in Section C, on includes communications with LACMTA leadership page C.4) focuses on demonstrating organizational and the key stakeholders’. The goal is to be relationships of the MS+P team. It identifies them nimble, responsive, adaptable, and be readily rolling up to Brent Lesjak, our Program Manager, supplemented with appropriate staff as necessary who is ultimately accountable with a reporting line to meet the demands of the program. directly to the LACMTA Systems Executive Officer. This affords our team seamless synergy while Our organization is structured to openly delivering world class service to LACMTA. encourage top to bottom, bottom to top, and lateral communications among our full team of Our organizational approach merges the desired engineering, contract, and support specialists. Key Personnel and our deep bench of technical expertise with the highly-experienced technical The proposed Program Management Organization and contractual managers. This management Chart on the following page demonstrates our team will guide and develop the anticipated vision of the reporting relationships from our multitude of Design Task Orders to the desired level valued subconsultants through to Brent Lesjak, our of engineering, no matter which project delivery Program Manager. The organization provides for method, while ensuring that LACMTA’s engineering effective management of the key personnel within standards and criteria are maintained. three functional Deputy Program Management (DPM) areas, these being Systems Design led by DPM, Rene LaFleche, Systems Integration led by
RFP No. AE47810E0128 C.2 Systems Engineering and Support Services EFFECTIVENESS OF MANAGEMENT PLAN Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER DPM, Anes Sassi, and Contract Management & and that the development of Project Definition Project Controls led by DPM, Paul Nolan. Documents, specifications, and other technical Each of these functional Deputy Program publications are appropriately aligned with Management (DPM) areas have critical LACMTA’s contractual and procurement approach interrelationships. It is imperative that Systems to the various works. The relationships between the Design coordinates with Systems Integration three functional areas is fluid and will ensure that the desired technical and administrative functions are coordinated and well-aligned.
Communicate - Maintain Constant Flow of Consistent Information We believe it is imperative that we deliver high quality work products, and to provide this very necessary Program Management level of assurance , Mike Phillips, our Key Personnel and DPM’s Independent Quality Manager, has a Highlight issues, risks, & design Communication Tools direct reporting line to Brent Lesjak. Face-to-face Meetings Across the Team Project Reports MS+P believes that to be a Open dialogue between functional E-mail management, subconsultants, Metro sustainable service provider, we Quality Control Obtain management buy-in Negotiate, partner, encourage adequate must raise the bar for the Contract resource, timeliness, budgets Communication Tools Outreach and Mentoring Plan Face-to-face Subconsultant Team Meetings (COMP). This important component Clear scope and deliverables Task Order Leads Authorized Task Orders will not get lost with the design Identify Client criteria & needs E-mail Communication Tools Respect Commitments and support services work. Our Face-to-face Meetings COMP Mentoring Program is being Reports spearheaded by Phyllis Tucker, who E-mail Project Requirements will report directly to Brent Lesjak. Quality Reviews Obtain Commitments Our Program Management Team (PMT) is comprised of our key personnel that will be co-located in LACMTA’s project site offices, LACMTA headquarters, and/or within our local LA offices to facilitate and maximize MS+P coordination and collaboration efforts. In all cases, the Program Management organization will remain responsible to ensure that the overall program requirements are properly coordinated, consistently applied, and implemented into each Task Order project. Communications lines will remain open and untethered to allow each task order to be staffed with the appropriate, high quality expertise regardless of company affiliation, and be performed with the expected level of quality, on time, and within budget.
RFP No. AE47810E0128 C.3 Systems Engineering and Support Services EXPERIENCE AND CAPABILITIES OF THE FIRMS ON THE CONSULTANT’S PROJECT TEAM
EFFECTIVENESS OF MANAGEMENT PLAN Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER
Metro Systems + Partners Program Organization Chart
Systems Executive Officer
Appendix A: LEGEND
MS+P Oversight Committee Appendix A Lee Sander HA Program Manager Key Roles HA Angel Ares SE Brent Lesjak Independant Quality COMP Mentor Manager Program Lead Appendix A GC Mike Phillips Phyllis Tucker TT DBE Specialty Technical Positions
DPM — Systems DPM — Systems DPM — Contract Management Program Management Integration Design & Project Controls Anes Sassi SE Rene LaFleche HA Paul Nolan HA Support DBE Specifications / PDDs CADD Manager Lead Task Order Roberto Rodriguez SE Arul Edwin VS Administrator Program Management Lina Maingi HA Support
System Safety Operations and Systems Vehicle Integration Traction Power Train Control Communications Schedule / Estimate OCS Manager Facilities / MEP Lead Assurance Lead Planning Lead Integration Lead Lead Manager Manager Manager Lead Resumes for the Anthony Zeloyle JA Les Durrant AV DBE John Simon CH Carl Wright HA Chuck Pineda SE Mark Turner SE Pere Busquet SE Dale Hein HA Jon McDonald HA Djalil Abadi AB DBE entire MS+P team are located in Appendix A Operations and Systems Vehicle Train Control Risk Manager RF Engineering Lead Planning — BRT Integration — BRT Integration — BRT Design Lead Damian Carey JA Kurt Drummond RF Steve Schibuola IB Paul Lavallee IB Don Murphy IB Jonathan Hu SE FIRMS HA Hatch Document SE SENER Administrator Rhodie Lumanog VS AB ABCS DBE MS+P PROGRAM ORGANIZATION AC Acumen DBE AV Anil Verma DBE TASK ORDERS TASK ORDERS TASK ORDERS TASK ORDERS CH CH2M CO Colmena DBE MS+P FIRMS & ROLES Refer to Section B (Key Personnel’s Skills and Experience) in this volume for a listing of our available MS+P staff resources. GC GCM Consulting SBE IB Hatch ABCS DBE Anil Verma DBE Colmena DBE IBI Jacobs MARRS SBE RF Networks SBE T&T PR DBE W2 Design DBE IBI Systems design and Project controls and Facilities & mechanical, Systems desgn and BRT & LRT systems OCS Management, as Utilities and project RF Networks COMP program and Utility design and IS Innovative Solutions program, project, scheduling services for electrical, plumbing, integration services, design and integration, well as system safety & controls services, is providing RF DBE Mentor Protege relocation services. W2 JA Jacobs and construction the team, combined HVAC, CADD, and along with CADD, vehicles, and operations security, systems design and over a decade of Engineering leadership services. is experienced with bus/ management services. with decades of scheduling sevices. structural, traction services. & integration, traction LACMTA experience. and communications rail facility projects. KE Kewo Engineering DBE LACMTA expereince. power, and OCS talent. power; and vehicles. services. MA MARRS SBE PX Project X DBE SENER Acumen DBE CH2M GCM Consulting SBE Innovative Solutions Kewo Eng. DBE Project X DBE Triad Consulting DBE VSCE DBE RF RF Networks SBE Systems design and OCS, system design, Systems safety ASQ certified quality Communications Traction power and Corrorsion control System security, with Specifications, PDD Over 250 staff TR program, project, signaling, train control, assurance, system manager with 15 years and signaling & train electrical engineering services and asset credentialed staff development, and resources Triad Consulting DBE and construction commumnication, MEP, safety & security, of LACMTA experience. control services. services. management. with thirty years of document controls. available to TT T&T PR DBE management services. traction power, system ITS, and operations experience on complex LACMTA VS VSCE DBE safety, & fare collection. services. transit systems. W2 W2 Design DBE
RFP No. AE47810E0128 C.4 Systems Engineering and Support Services EFFECTIVENESS OF MANAGEMENT PLAN Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER
In accordance with SP-06, MS+P will confer with BRENT LESJAK LACMTA and our team and prepare, a unique and PROGRAM MANAGER distinct management plan for each project Task In a key role as a direct report to Order representing a functional organization that LACMTA, our Program Manager, will flow and report into our Program Management Brent Lesjak will apply his 18 years Organization. Depending on the nature and of project and program leadership complexity of the project engineering task, a to oversee the Systems Engineering dedicated Project Manager and technical expertise and Support Services program. organization may be appointed to each particular Brent is responsible for the overall delivery and project. In many cases, the required individual management of the work and will be guided with management and technical staff will be drawn from support from our team’s Executive Oversight our team’s experienced depth of technical expertise Committee. Brent’s focus will be on establishing and support resources. In other less complex tasks, and maintaining a collaborative relationship the effort can be readily accommodated by the Key with LACMTA, external authorities, and the wider Personnel and Program Management Support staff. consultant team, during all program delivery phases As part of our program management organization to maintain consistency and knowledge transfer structure, MS+P has identified our Program throughout the program. Brent is the primary Manager, Key Personnel, and other Program management lead to LACMTA and in this Key Management support staff who have worked Role, he will assure the team provides high quality with LACMTA and other major transit agencies to Systems Engineering and Support Services expertise deliver large, complex, multi-modal transit related in a proactive manner. Brent has full decision- programs and projects. These individuals have making authority in all program and design related a breadth of local and international experience functions and activities of our team. Brent will instill in delivering this similar type of assignment and a partnering approach among the members of our bring exceptional expertise. MS+P believes this team, and with key stakeholders. Brent will ensure Management Team provides the necessary key skills we erase all corporate boundaries within our team, with the necessary level of expertise to LACMTA and integrate decision makers within LACMTA and and provide the leadership to design, deliver, and the team to focus everyone toward understanding maintain LACMTA’s expectations for a world-class common project goals and aspirations. We are transit network. This can only occur through an committed to making sure that MS+P and LACMTA ingrained value system of partnering and open integrate and gel together quickly. communications. MS+P is committed to shedding Brent will establish the procedures and processes all borders, and sharing our wealth of knowledge for activities such as project control (time, cost, and experience with our full team. We will ensure schedule, and change management), reporting, that LACMTA, and the stakeholders with which we bid evaluation and contract administration, work, will have access to our technical experts, quality assurance, quality control, staged design and are provided the opportunity to gain in-depth reviews, including environmental considerations, technical knowledge in a timely manner. sustainability and health, and most importantly – safety, while upholding the principles of our partnering approach.
“[Hatch] has always been a company that does the technical work very well. You follow directions and know the requirements of the design. In other words we don’t have to keep educating new people on what the requirements are. This is reflective of the leadership team.” Stephen Cross, Senior Engineer, Canadian Pacific
RFP No. AE47810E0128 C.5 Systems Engineering and Support Services EFFECTIVENESS OF MANAGEMENT PLAN Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER
RENE LAFLECHE DPM — SYSTEMS DESIGN Rene will manage the overall In essence, Rene will serve as MS+P’s overall Systems Design efforts and will technical manager, vertically coordinating the report directly to Brent Lesjak. Direct availability, competencies, and assignments of reports to Rene will be Key Personnel the technical managers, technical leads, and our including our Overhead Contact technical pool of over 250 personnel. As Hatch’s Systems Manager, Traction Power practice lead for rail and transit systems, Rene has Manager, Train Control Manager, Communications a thorough understanding of all phases of design Manager, Specifications/PDD, the CADD Manager, and to efficiently identify, develop, and allocate the and our Facilities/MEP lead. Rene, under our PM’s technical resources and tools to effectively address oversight, has the authority to require that top tier systems challenges on complex transit projects. He talent and necessary resources are brought to the has been the systems lead on a number of recent program by member firms, with a focus on delivering large scale alternate delivery LRT projects, such as high quality work within tight timelines. Rene will Edmonton Valley Line LRT (P3) and Calgary West interface directly with Systems Integration as well LRT (Design-Build). Rene has strong technical as Contract Management and Project Controls to expertise in signals, communications, traction ensure the appropriate technical, cost, and schedule power, OCS, and MEP as well as how the design and coordination applicable to each Task Order is being engineering of these systems are applied on such preserved. Rene will work closely with the LACMTA projects. For all MS+P technical resources, Rene will team to integrate and coordinate work across all ensure uniform understanding and application of technical disciplines and, under the direction of the LACMTA’s standards, policies, and procedures (i.e. Program Manager, manage and oversee the work Quality, Safety, Operations, etc.) as well as local, being undertaken by the wider consultant team. state and federal regulations. He will define project competency requirements and develop programs to ensure new resources have the appropriate levels of expertise over the duration of the project. Rene will work our team to map a grooming and promotion plan to ensure resources within the resource team exist to provide full redundancy. He will ensure we appropriately define the Task Order scope, schedule, and deliverables and ensure the availability of resources to deliver.
“Rene [LaFleche] really knows his stuff... [Compared to other consultants, Hatch is the] Top of the Heap!” Brad Griffith, Director (LRT Design and Construction), Edmonton North LRT / Edmonton SE-W LRT
RFP No. AE47810E0128 C.6 Systems Engineering and Support Services EFFECTIVENESS OF MANAGEMENT PLAN Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER
ANES SASSI PAUL NOLAN DEPUTY PROGRAM MANAGER — SYSTEMS DEPUTY PROGRAM MANAGER — CONTRACT INTEGRATION MANAGEMENT AND PROJECT CONTROLS Anes will manage the key Systems Paul will manage the overall Contract Integration components and will Management and Project Controls report directly to Brent Lesjak. and will report directly to Brent Direct reports to Anes will be Lesjak. Direct reports to Paul will specialty technical positions be the Task Order Administrator, including the Systems Safety Schedule and Estimate Lead, Assurance Lead, Operations and Planning Lead, Risk Manager, and the Document Administrator. Systems Integration Lead, and Vehicle Integration Specifications/PDD will also indirectly support Paul Lead. The CADD Manager will indirectly report to to ensure that LACMTA’s contractual and prescriptive Anes as well. Anes, under our Program Manager’s requirements are appropriately captured and oversight, has the authority to require that top incorporated, and that the development of technical tier talent and necessary resources are brought procurement documents ascribe to LACMTA’s to the program by member firms, with a focus on contractual requirements. Paul, under our Program delivering high quality work within tight timelines. Manager’s oversight, has the authority to ensure Anes will interface directly with Systems Design as that the necessary resources by member firms are well as Contract Management and Project Controls provided, along with a focus on the contractual to ensure the appropriate technical, cost, and requirements being met, measured, reported, and schedule coordination applicable to each Task properly documented. Paul is ideal for this role due to Order is being preserved. Anes will work closely his significant experience working within the LACMTA with the LACMTA team to integrate and coordinate structure. Paul will interface directly with Systems work across all technical disciplines and, under the Design as well as Systems Integration DPMs to direction of the Program Manager, manage and ensure the appropriate technical, cost, and schedule oversee the work being undertaken by the wider coordination applicable to each Task Order is being consultant team. preserved. Paul will work closely with the LACMTA Anes Sassi maintains a ‘line of sight’ on what is team to integrate and coordinate work across all important when it comes to project execution technical disciplines and, under the direction of the and project ownership. It is imperative that all Program Manager, manage and oversee the work partners understand who is responsible for what, being undertaken by the wider consultant team. and what is expected of them in terms of delivery. He will serve in a way as MS+P’s operations manager Anes will manage project-wide interfaces to ensure and quarterback for the specific Task Orders. He will full systems integration is achieved throughout the work with the other DPMs to define the task order delivery phase. scope, schedule, and deliverables to be captured and documented within task order-specific assignments. Having served as senior manager on several recent By ensuring the appropriate LACMTA Crenshaw projects, Paul understands LACMTA’s requirements from the perspective of its managerial and reporting design standards, procurement processes, design structures and resources are in review procedures, and design services, including place for each task order, we will claims mitigation and analysis process during final design and construction. His unique background deliver the right answer – the first will be essential to MS+P’s ability to efficiently select, time. structure, and implement the technical resources and support to deliver the design work collaboratively with LACMTA. This position is critical to define and manage the expectations of LACTMA for each project.
RFP No. AE47810E0128 C.7 Systems Engineering and Support Services EFFECTIVENESS OF MANAGEMENT PLAN Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER
MIKE PHILLIPS ANTHONY ZELOYLE INDEPENDENT QUALITY MANAGER OVERHEAD CONTACT SYSTEMS MANAGER Mike Phillips will serve as our Anthony will lead this Key Role as the Independent Quality Manager, OCS Manager. He is well-reputed in reporting directly to Brent Lesjak the transit industry with 25+ years of and working closely and proactively experience. in the design and layout with our project team. Mike will of light rail, commuter, and heavy manage quality through our rail electrification systems, catenary quality management system, which will be defined systems, structural, and civil engineering. Anthony in the Quality Management Plan. All procedures brings invaluable expertise to LACMTA in this role and governing individual task orders will be developed has been managing OCS design and construction and incorporated within the Quality Management engineering teams on large transit projects for over 15 Plan. Mike will continually monitor the quality of years. Anthony will report direct to Rene. the designs and associated technical documents PERE BUSQUET to ensure they are readied for publication in strict TRACTION POWER MANAGER compliance with our Quality Management Plan. Pere will lead this key role as For MS+P it is critical that we approach quality the Traction Power Manager. management in a planned and systematic manner. He is highly skilled with proven Mike will ensure that MS+P delivers designs and capabilities managing complex engineering support with a high level of quality projects and multiple concurrent confidence and that all processes, designs, assignments related to electrical materials, components, structures, systems, and systems engineering. Pere has successfully delivered facilities coordinate as intended. Mike will ensure numerous transportation projects, and has over 25 standardization and provide the visibility, monitoring, years of experience in the design and construction and measurement to ensure corrective action is taken of traction power systems. Pere is fully versed with early to remove or mitigate the impact of any non- high and medium voltage power supply systems, low compliance and that critical activities are executed in voltage power distribution systems, traction power a proper manner. substations, and power supply agency distribution PHYLLIS TUCKER substations. He has proven experience in developing COMP MENTOR PROGRAM LEAD emergency and backup power supply strategies, Phyllis will lead and manage our complete design of substations and switchgear, stray COMP program. Phyllis has been current protection, and cathodic protection. Pere’s instrumental in developing similar in-depth experience, knowledge, and capability award-winning outreach programs, of coordinating electrical systems with other for LACMTA and other agencies and underground, above ground, and station systems will is very well-regarded. Upon award, be an invaluable asset to LACMTA. Phyllis will participate in finalizing and monitoring the DBE Contracting Outreach and Mentoring Plan (COMP); assist in developing and implementing the SBE/DBE Tier Program and oversee development and implementation Mentor-Protégé Program. Phyllis will report directly to Brent Lesjak and prepare COMP reports for submission to LACMTA.
RFP No. AE47810E0128 C.8 Systems Engineering and Support Services EFFECTIVENESS OF MANAGEMENT PLAN Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER
DALE HEIN JOHN SIMON TRAIN CONTROL MANAGER SYSTEMS SAFETY ASSURANCE LEAD Dale will lead this Key Role as John is our Systems Safety the Train Control Manager. He Assurance Lead for this Specialty is an experienced professional, Technical Position. He is a certified seasoned systems and signal safety professional with 26 years engineer, and manager with over of expertise in safety planning, 29 years of experience in the design, threat and vulnerability analyses, construction, and implementation of train control safety certification, hazard analyses, and security systems, including Automatic Train Protection (ATP), assessments. He is adept at conducting safety Automatic Train Operations (ATO), and Automatic investigations of critical subway subsystems (fire Train Supervision (ATS) in underground and above alarm and emergency management, subway ground applications. Dale will apply his wealth of best ventilation, and electrical power systems. John has practices, standards knowledge, and very capable supported numerous LACMTA projects including the management approach to this very important Key Foothill Gold Line, Eastside Extension, Expo Phase 2 Role. He is a great mentor and believes in advancing Extension, and Pasadena Gold Line. He has led state staff development and this will be of great value to safety, and security oversight projects at the federal, LACMTA. state and local levels. John’s experience, and practical approach brings great value to LACMTA. JON MACDONALD COMMUNICATIONS MANAGER CARL WRIGHT Jon will lead this key role as the OPERATIONS AND PLANNING LEAD Communications Manager. He has Carl is our Operations and Planning led systems development on some Lead for this Specialty Technical of the largest and most advanced Position. He is a well-renowned transit systems projects in the leading expert with operational world including California’s High- and maintenance planning and Speed Rail, BART, Seattle’s Central Link Light Rail, implementation of the appropriate Hong Kong’s $10B Westrail Line, and more recently signaling, rollingstock, and safety assurances. He is Toronto’s Metrolinx Regional Express Rail program well-versed with integrated test planning, activation with its $40B mega brownfield P3 approach. Jon is plan, operating schedules, and operational staffing a leading force in the rail industry for advancing the levels. Carl is an innovator, an integrator, an excellent state-of-the-art communications technology into communicator, and a natural leader. His 19 years of existing organizations. Jon’s 25 years of experience experience, knowledge, and interpersonal abilities covers LRT/Streetcar, BRT, in tunnel, aerial, and to lead the operations and planning will be of great at-grade configurations across all transit modes. value to LACMTA. He also has an extensive background in systems estimating, scheduling, and construction oversight, and Jon’s solid team building skills will be of great benefit to LACMTA.
Hatch and SENER has a long and well-established history of providing services on a project specific basis, on-call basis, or as part of staff augmentation contracts where we work on a blended teams with our clients. These experiences have provided the MS+P Team with a true appreciation for the level of teamwork, staffing flexibility, and responsiveness that is required to successfully complete tasks on schedule and within budget.
RFP No. AE47810E0128 C.9 Systems Engineering and Support Services EFFECTIVENESS OF MANAGEMENT PLAN Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER
C. CHARLES “CHUCK” PINEDA STEVE SHIBOULA SYSTEMS INTEGRATION LEAD OPERATIONS AND PLANNING – BRT Chuck is our Systems Integration Lead Steve will lead the Bus Rapid Transit for this Specialty Technical Position. operations and planning efforts. Chuck is very familiar with LACMTA’s Steve is well-regarded by LACMTA standards and expectations, has over and will bring his 29+ years of urban 30 years of transit system integration transportation planning to the BRT project experience, and recently systems design. Steve has been provided similar services on the Westside Purple- involved in numerous facets of LACMTA projects and Line Phase 1 Design-Build project. He has extensive LACMTA will be the beneficiary of Steve’s wide-ranging multi-disciplined experience on major public and inside knowledge. private sector work with leadership roles on rail PAUL LAVALLEE transit infrastructure projects using various delivery SYSTEMS INTEGRATION – BRT methods including P3, Design-Build, Design-Bid- Paul will be our Systems Integration Build. Chuck ably manages transit systems planning, Lead for BRT systems. He knows BRT’s systems engineering and design, systems integration and has over 30 years of experience and testing, and systems safety certification. Chuck’s in his field of practice. Paul will be extensive transit system development background invaluable to LACMTA in advancing will be invaluable to LACMTA. BRT systems integration, especially in MARK TURNER the realm of computer aided dispatch systems, and VEHICLE INTERFACE LEAD bus and facility surveillance systems, ADA-compliant Mark is our Vehicle Interface automated stop announcement systems, passenger Lead for this Specialty Technical counting systems, real-time passenger information Position. Mark ably manages staff systems, and conventional and smart card fare operating on multiple concurrent collection systems. assignments. He has more than 30 DON MURPHY years of transit system experience VEHICLE INTERFACE – BRT in engineering design, vehicle system integration Don will lead the Vehicle Integration design, and technical development of railway rolling – BRT efforts. He has over 22 years of stock. Mark is very adept with truck and suspension experience of managing the design design engineering through to complete vehicle and efficient implementation of Bus development. Mark is also very capable in the realm Rapid Transit including Intelligent of contract negotiations, testing and commissioning, Transportation Systems (ITS) and configuration management, vehicle certifications, and related fields. He is very adept with handling multiple warranties. His significant experience with national concurrent assignments. He is a flexible and well- and international projects from Canada, the U.S., informed manager and has successfully liaised with Australia, Taiwan, Korea, Spain, France, UK, Ireland, third parties and authorities. LACMTA will be the has led to a clear understanding of global systems beneficiary of Don’s skillset in this role. standards and innovations and their applications will be of significant benefit to LACMTA.
RFP No. AE47810E0128 C.10 Systems Engineering and Support Services EFFECTIVENESS OF MANAGEMENT PLAN Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER
JONATHAN HU ARUL EDWIN TRAIN CONTROL DESIGN LEAD SPECIFICATIONS/PDD LEAD Jonathan is our Train Control Design Arul is responsible for development Lead for this Specialty Technical of the project written specifications Position. He has over 15 years and associated Design-Build, or other of experience in the design and alternative procurement delivery management of rail/transit train Project Definition Documents. Arul control and signaling systems, with will report directly to Rene LaFleche expertise in both Communication Based Train Control and ensure that technical requirements are properly technology and conventional control and signaling conveyed. He will coordinate with the technical leads systems. He ably deployed signaling systems in both to translate the engineering, testing, and certification green and brown field projects and this experience design, vision, and intent into clear language and know-how will prove invaluable to LACMTA. appropriate and specific for the selected project delivery procurement. He will also work directly with KURT DRUMMOND Paul Nolan to ensure that LACMTA’s contractual and RF ENGINEERING LEAD Kurt is our RF Engineering Lead for technical requirements are properly coordinated this Specialty Technical Position. Kurt and represented in the published procurement is a well-regarded practitioner in the documents. field of transit based radio systems. ROBERTO RODRIGUEZ He is an expert in the field of mission- CADD MANAGER critical and public safety land-mobile Roberto will be responsible for radio communication systems, packet digital radio, establishing drawing protocols and and wide-area networks for transit systems. He procedures in keeping with LACMTA has over 33 years of experience on multiple above criteria while incorporating the latest ground and underground rail systems projects. CADD, BIM, and 3D technologies. He Kurt’s expertise is widely sought by transit agencies will also oversee the output from for design and consultation in support of mission- the team of designers to ensure drawing products critical land-mobile communication networks such as are consistent with the requirements. He will report Public Safety Agency-Police, Fire, and EMS, Railroad directly to Rene, and indirectly to Anes. Roberto Train Control Communications for PTC and CTC, and will oversee the CADD efforts through all phases Subway communication systems. Kurt is experienced of the project including schematic design, design with LACMTA radio systems and has a sincere development, construction documents and design to appreciation for the lifeline that they provide when construction. faced with an emergency event. Kurt’s expertise and LINA MAINGI passion will be an invaluable asset to LACMTA. TASK ORDER ADMINISTRATOR LES DURRANT Lina will interface with the technical FACILITIES/MEP LEAD leads, coordinate and manage the Les will lead the facilities/MEP scope and cost content development systems associated design efforts for Task Orders with LACMTA. Lina related to existing and new will report directly to Paul and will facilities, including overseeing the also interface directly with LACMTA’s spatial, structural, mechanical, and Contract Administrator and assist Brent in finalizing electrical design components. He the various task order approvals. Upon authorization brings 30+ years of transit related systems, electrical of Task Orders, Lina will lead the preparation of and mechanical design, as well as management subconsultant work orders, track expenditures, and experience. Les has extensive and invaluable LACMTA prepare invoices and process invoices. Lina will also experience which will be of significant value to lead the preparation of the monthly cost reports. LACMTA in this very important role.
RFP No. AE47810E0128 C.11 Systems Engineering and Support Services EFFECTIVENESS OF MANAGEMENT PLAN Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER
DJALIL ABADI DAMIAN CAREY SCHEDULE/ESTIMATE LEAD RISK MANAGER Djalil will create and maintain Damian will oversee the Risk engineering and construction Management Program to identify schedules, facilitate schedule design and construction risks development, reports and associated with the SESS Program maintenance with the full project and on a Task Order by Task Order team, analyze schedule information, basis. He will implement a risk register provide recommendations for corrective action to matrix and risk management reporting approach assure that the project meets required service dates in keeping with FTA and program management and ensure that the project management team is oversight principles. Damian has successfully aware of corrective schedule-compliant measures performed similar duties on other major transit where necessary. Djalil will also lead the development projects and programs and brings a wealth of of independent cost estimates and reports including invaluable experience that can be readily applied to supplemental information for each of the defined this program. project stages. Djalil has over 25 years of experience RHODIE LUMANOG in cost estimating, scheduling, budgeting, and DOCUMENT ADMINISTRATOR financial management, most of which has been with Rhodie will bring her 15 years of transportation infrastructure, including Heavy & Light major project related document Rail, Bus & Mass Transit, Subway, & Highway projects. control management and office Djalil will report directly to Paul in coordination with engineering experience to lead the task order administration and project technical leads. management and diligent filing of the Systems Engineering and Support Services electronic and paper documents. This position requires much more than just assigning document control numbers and placing them into automatic filing. It requires some well-grounded engineering competency to discern what should go to whom, when, and how best to categorize and file the subject matter for efficient, quick retrieval, and reference. Rhodie is ideal for this role and is adaptable and amenable to using various management software platforms. Rhodie and her team of document efficiency staff will report direct to Paul.
OUR VALUED SUPPORT SUBCONSULTANTS AND STAFF MS+P have assembled a 250+ strong team of great people who each bring valuable expertise in the various Systems Engineering and Support disciplines. MS+P is able to quickly mobilize these resources when and where needed. MS+P also recognizes that upon award of the contract, that additional qualified expertise may become available. MS+P is prepared to bring this additional expertise on board to reinforce and enhance our valued resources to LACMTA.
RFP No. AE47810E0128 C.12 Systems Engineering and Support Services EFFECTIVENESS OF MANAGEMENT PLAN Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER HISTORY OF WORKING TOGETHER Hatch and SENER have a long and well-established “The important thing to recognize history of providing services on a project specific is that it takes a team, and the team basis, on-call basis, or as part of staff augmentation contracts working on a blended teams with our ought to get credit for the wins and clients. These experiences have provided the the losses. Successes have many MS+P team with a true appreciation for the level of fathers, failures have none.” teamwork, staffing flexibility, and responsiveness Philip Caldwell, that is required to successfully complete tasks on former President and CEO of schedule and within budget. the Ford Motor Company Hatch and SENER are unified in this concept and in forming the MS+P joint venture, have taken care to Our MS+P team is comprised of many firms, each of select the specific team of subconsultants and staff whom have worked successfully together with one to complement our strategy, and to ensure that or another in a myriad of capacities, on multiple our successes will be LACMTA successes. Our team projects, each with their own varying degree of approach will result in meeting LACMTA’s goals and design task complexity. What ties us together is exceeding expectations for Systems Engineering performing efficiently and collectively to design and Support Services over the complete contract projects with skilled, able personnel and resources, duration. With our team at its side, LACMTA will irrespective of the complexities and multiple succeed. tasks involved. Key and notable associations are highlighted in the following passages.
Figure C-1. Working Relationship Matrix LACMTA MS+P Firm MS+P Firm DBE LACMTA Hatch SENER ABCS Acumen Anil Verma CH2M Colmena GCM IBI ISiS Jacobs Kewo MARRS X Project RF Networks Triad T&T PR VSCE W2 LACMTA Hatch SENER ABCS Acumen Anil Verma CH2M Colmena GCM IBI ISiS Jacobs Kewo MARRS Project X RF Networks Triad T&T PR VSCE W2
RFP No. AE47810E0128 C.13 Systems Engineering and Support Services EFFECTIVENESS OF MANAGEMENT PLAN Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER HATCH-SENER HATCH-CH2M In 2015, Hatch and SENER worked together on Both Hatch and CH2M have extensive experience the new 8 mile Edmonton Valley West LRT project working together, including projects such as: which is being constructed under a DBFOM P3 • Annacis Water Supply Tunnel Preliminary project delivery method. In line with the City of Design, Vancouver, Canada Edmonton’s vision of working collaboratively on • Annacis Island Wastewater Treatment Plant major transportation projects, a series of Technical Outfall, Vancouver, Canada Confidential Collaborative Meetings were held • Coquitlam Intake No.2, Vancouver, Canada during the procurement phase of the project.These meetings were intended to guide each proponent • Lake Mead Intake #3, Clark County, Nevada through early design development to ensure project • New Irvington Tunnel, San Francisco, California compliant technical proposals would ultimately be • Brightwater Conveyance System, Seattle, submitted by all teams. During these technically Washington and contractually challenging circumstances, both • Ashbridges Bay Wastewater Treatment Plant firms grew to develop a mutual respect of each Outfall Sewer, Toronto, Canada other’s professionalism and technical capabilities, • Galore Creek Mine Project, British Columbia, and created the genesis for jointly pursuing future Canada related opportunities. • Kinder Morgan Trans Mountain Expansion HATCH-JACOBS Project, Vancouver, BC, Canada Hatch and Jacobs have worked very closely together • Lulu Wastewater Treatment Plant, Vancouver, in a joint venture arrangement for the Sound Transit BC, Canada Beacon Hill Station and Tunnels. Hatch performed the tunnel excavation and final lining designs while SENER-JACOBS Jacobs delivered the mechanical, tunnel ventilation SENER and Jacobs are currently working together system, and electrical designs. A great spirit of on the California High Speed Rail Construction cooperation and shared goals developed throughout Package 2-3, the 60-mile route located within the project which resulted in increased and well- the counties of Fresno, Tulare, and Kings and the executed coordination between the disciplines. cities of Hanford, Corcoran, and Allensworth. This collaboration has been underway for 2 years. The The project was managed from an integrated project project includes construction of at-grade, aerial, office within Sound Transit’s main office in Seattle, and below grade sections of the high-speed rail, where the joint venture co-located the management relocation of approximately 5.5 miles of existing team. Regular coordination meetings with back BNSF tracks, crossing evaluation of existing BNSF office designers were held via conference calls as railroad tracks, construction of waterway and well as in-person workshops and presentations to wildlife crossings, and roadway reconstructions, the client and their nominated peer review panel. relocations, and closures. A very technically challenging project, the Beacon On this $1.5 billion design-build project, Jacobs Hill station is the deepest subway station in the is the main designer, with SENER leading the United States. During the construction, serious systems integration, the interface management, issues related to unexpected geotechnical and Verification and Validation of the authority’s conditions surfaced. As a result of the collaborative requirements across the project, during the design, pre-planning, our design team was able to respond construction, and commissioning phases. quickly and effectively. A remedial jet grouting program was devised and implemented in a timely, mitigating manner. Hatch and Jacobs have also worked together on the LA Metro Red Line under the JMA Joint Venture.
RFP No. AE47810E0128 C.14 Systems Engineering and Support Services EFFECTIVENESS OF MANAGEMENT PLAN Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER
Many of our proposed team members and eight of the firms that are part of the MS+P team worked together and helped LACMTA successfully deliver the Crenshaw/LAX Transit Corridor project
SENER-CH2M HATCH-IBI SENER is a member of the EDP, Engineering Hatch and IBI partnered on the preliminary design Development Partner that provides high-speed for the $2.6 billion, 16-mile Green Line Transitway rail engineering and consultancy services with the linking downtown Calgary with southeast Calgary. highest technical standards. This JV is led by CH2M This project involved Hatch and IBI collaborating with SENER as a partner. This significant project on the development of the city’s BRT and Low started in 2016 and the SENER-CH2M partnership will Floor LRT Design Guideline Manuals, ITS concepts, continue until project opening in the year 2026. traffic analysis, traffic signal pre-emption, and SENER is fully committed to achieving their client’s road design. The project scope envisioned a 8-mile global goals. To ensure success, it is vital to work as of rail-convertible BRT Transitway, which would one team, in an inclusive and coordinated manner. later transition to low-floor LRT and be extended a EDP’s commitment is to seamlessly assimilate staff further 8 miles. The partnership has continued as across all the JV partners to create a single cohesive the project has further evolved into the $5 billion, and mutually-supporting team. In this respect, 25-mile Green Line LRT connecting North Pointe SENER has seconded staff on a long-term basis to and Seton to downtown Calgary. ensure this complete assimilation in the project Other projects where we have worked together offices in the UK. include: The JV is complementary in terms of technical • Crenshaw/LAX Corridor Preliminary Engineering, competence and organizational culture. The team LACMTA deploys world-class technical expertise which • Metrolink Stations Assessment, LACMTA supports, encourages, and reinforces HS2 Ltd’s • Rail Infrastructure Improvement Program, GO culture. Transit, Toronto, Canada • Toronto Union Station Modernization Program, GO Transit, Toronto, Canada • Eglinton Crosstown LRT Tunnel Station Footprints Study - Metrolinx, Toronto Canada
RFP No. AE47810E0128 C.15 Systems Engineering and Support Services EFFECTIVENESS OF MANAGEMENT PLAN Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER
EXPERIENCE MANAGING MULTIPLE ASSIGNMENTS C.2 LACMTA’s goal is to deliver a number of capital METROLINX SIGNALING AND TRAIN improvements to the network during the immediate 7-year plus lifespan of this Systems Engineering and CONTROL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM The Metrolinx Signaling and Train Control Support Services (SESS) contract. This is also the Improvement Program is very large and complex, typical delivery cycle for major funded LRT and BRT and requires that discipline experts be assigned projects from design through to final commissioning. in multiple roles. As an example, the skills of the MS+P’s experience in delivering multiple transit same cadre of Systems Assurance personnel were projects around the globe and in North America, has simultaneously required on all major project highlighted the best practice to develop a clear vision elements of the program, i.e. USRC Signaling of systems consistency in projects, especially as System Project, the GO Transit Train Control relates to the reliability of the core systems between System Project, the West Approach Signaling all stakeholders at the outset of the program. Project, the supporting Switch Machine and Both MS+P JV partners, SENER and Hatch, are Electrical Enabling Works. We manage our actively leading many multiple-task major transit resources by ensuring cross-skills exist for all our projects in the world. As part of that experience, we key personnel so that multiple team members continually monitor and manage project risks for can be devoted across several assignments. We large transit capital programs. effectively develop talented switch hitters that can knock any ball out of the park. MS+P believes that this SESS contract has the potential to provide LACMTA with a major change in The talent pool used on the Metrolinx Signaling its ability to deliver projects through the application and Train Control Improvement Program will be of improved delivery tools which we have available for assignment on the SESS program. successfully deployed to other transit agencies and The volume and quality of our resources clearly operators throughout North America. illustrates how MS+P has unparalleled team Our team has a thorough understanding of Task experience breadth and depth. Order based contracts. Flexibility is required to respond to the large number of Task Orders that LACMTA may issue. On past projects, we have demonstrated this flexibility by performing work as a lead or where required, as a member of a larger team. Our extensive experience delivering Transit and Rail task order projects on behalf of agencies and operators demonstrates our capacity and capability to perform the work under this contract.
RFP No. AE47810E0128 C.16 Systems Engineering and Support Services EFFECTIVENESS OF MANAGEMENT PLAN Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER
TORONTO-YORK SPADINA SUBWAY EXTENSION PROGRAM MANAGEMENT The rail systems component of the Toronto- Our team has successfully performed the York Spadina Subway Extension – Program preliminary design and development of the Management project was extremely complex and performance specifications for all systems extensive. It encompassed a major civil engineering elements including track, train control, traction construction schedule, leading to a highly complex power supply and distribution, communications, systems integration, including the brownfield integrated controls (SCADA), and fire ventilation. interface of the existing control system. The Our role also included System Safety Assurance, stakeholder engagement process for this project training, rail activation, and system integration. involved very complex utility and adjacent third- We finalized testing, commissioning, and safety party coordination, representing one of the most certification in December, 2017 and the line is now comprehensive processes encountered on any operational. transit project. The talent pool used on the Toronto-York Spadina With a deeply engrained culture of partnering Subway Extension – Program Management will through our Spadina Link Project Managers JV be available for assignment on the LACMTA SESS team, Hatch had resources 100% dedicated to project as presented in in our staffing matrix in the project since its inception in 2008 until its Section B. The volume and quality of these resources completion in December 2017. Our staff were fully clearly illustrates how MS+P has unparalleled team embedded at TTC’s offices and fully integrated with experience breadth and depth. TTC staff under the motto “We are one team!”.
The volume and quality of our staff resources clearly illustrates how MS+P has unparalleled team experience breadth and depth.
RFP No. AE47810E0128 C.17 Systems Engineering and Support Services EFFECTIVENESS OF MANAGEMENT PLAN Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER
LINE 9 METRO BARCELONA, DETAILED DESIGN AND PM/CM SENER was a key partner of the Barcelona Metro L9 Due to the complexity of coordinating all other and L10 extension. Beginning in 2000, SENER led firms involved on this project, the client engaged all stages (planning, conceptual, design, bid stage, SENER to lead the technical design of the construction, start-up, testing, and commissioning) systems, infrastructure integration engineering, of the development for each line, and have been coordination of the design, along with testing and selected to implement critical components such as commissioning of the lines. SENER has successfully PCC, CBTC , PSD, WIR , TETRA, Electrification, and managed a team of over 52 contractors, project Communications. managers, and construction managers, on over 37 subsystems, 13 project and construction managers, 2 concessionaires, with over 3,800 functional requirements.
RFP No. AE47810E0128 C.18 Systems Engineering and Support Services EFFECTIVENESS OF MANAGEMENT PLAN Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER
COST AND SCHEDULE CONTROL EXPERIENCE C.3 ON CONTRACT TASK ORDER ASSIGNMENTS
MS+P has assembled a team with exceptional international expertise, a team that is familiar with the requirements as described in LACMTA and California codes and standards to be used on the project as well as international standards, codes, and guidelines. This team, which includes professionals that have the complete lifecycle of a transit project, have the ability to develop solutions to complex issues, and cost effectively deliver our systems engineering services on time in order to minimize overall project risk.
MS+P will adopt a cost and schedule control Following lists some projects where proper approach similar to what has proven successful implementation of schedule and cost controls have on past projects. In doing so, we eliminate a need benefitted our clients. to reinvent the wheel. Our philosophy has, and will continue to be to deliver our engineering and Superior Cost and Schedule Performance support services in a successful manner. Success LA Metro Redline Segment 3, North Hollywood Extension must be enjoyed by the client receiving the service Original construction finished $100M under budget; and the as well as the entity performing the service. The line opened six months early. key to this success very simply is, doing it right VTA Capitol Light Rail the first time, which saves time, and saved time Completed three months ahead of schedule and $9M under saves LACMTA’s budget. We intend to do it best, budget. the first time, and we will do this by instilling an VTA Tasman East Light Rail Completed a month ahead of schedule & $15M under budget. understanding of our objectives and goals, and adopting proper controls within our team structure. VTA Tasman West Light Rail Completed one year ahead of schedule. Our control process is described in more detail VTA Vasona Light Rail under Section D. Therefore, as with our past projects, Completed 3 months ahead of schedule & $8M under budget. we will affect proper schedule and cost controls Calgary West LRT throughout the performance life of this contract, and Line completed on time and within budget. we’ll do this by providing quality work products. TriMet Portland to Milwaukie LRT - East Segment Delivered $50K under budget and within schedule after a three month start delay due to funding delays. Sound Transit University Link Ahead of schedule and under budget. Sound Transit 710 Beacon Hill Design completed on schedule and within budget. Caltrain Service Improvements Completed on schedule and $300K under budget. Sound Transit 755 S. Boeing Access Road to S. 154th St. $23M under budget and eight months ahead of schedule.
As part of the JMA JV, Hatch helped deliver the LA Metro Red Line Segment 3, North Hollywood Extension project with superior cost and schedule performance. The original construction finished $100 million under budget and the line opened 6 months early. RFP No. AE47810E0128 C.19 Systems Engineering and Support Services UNDERSTANDING OF WORK AND APPROPRIATENESS OF APPROACH FOR IMPLEMENTATION
UNDERSTANDING OF WORK AND APPROPRIATENESS OF APPROACH FOR IMPLEMENTATION Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER UNDERSTANDING OF WORK AND APPROPRIATENESS OF APPROACH FOR IMPLEMENTATION
MS+P will provide a full range of high quality systems engineering design and support services that fulfill LACMTA’s objectives, are delivered on schedule, and can be constructed on time for the budgeted amount. These services will include providing Program Management and Controls, Systems Engineering, Design Services, Procurement Bid Documentation, Design Services During Construction, and other general engineering support services as needed, on a Task Order basis. We will assign our personnel to specific LACMTA Projects, subject to the acceptance of LACMTA’s Project Manager or designee, as set out in Special Provision SP-22 of the RFP. Our extensive experience with on-call, bench, and program management assignments has provided us with valuable insights into properly managing complex work, and is coupled with firms with an extensive history of working together and delivering critical rail transit and systems infrastructure projects. The MS+P systems team was carefully chosen for the breadth and depth of their systems engineering and support services experience, and understanding of LACMTA as demonstrated by the eight significant projects referenced in Section A. Individual staff selections were governed by their knowledge level, with an average of over 17 years of experience for the over 250 proposed and available staff resources. Our repeat clients attest to our ability to deliver innovative, quality, cost effective, and efficient solutions that fulfill our client’s expectations and best interests. This focus on project success has resulted in our team having established long term working relationships with passenger rail and transit agencies across the United States, North America, and the globe. We will show you how MS+P has built an unparalleled team of systems expertise, which will provide Metro a deep and sustainable bench of local transit systems experts. We will provide design leadership, resolve project challenges working as an integral team player, and develop a sustainable local workforce including providing our award-winning DBE mentoring program.
Metro Systems + Partners is the right team for all of LACMTA’s transit systems needs
Our team knows Metro. Four of the firms that are part of the MS+P team successfully provided Metro with preliminary engineering design services, support services during construction, and systems activation and startup support services for the Crenshaw/LAX Transit Corridor project.
RFP No. AE47810E0128 D.1 Systems Engineering and Support Services UNDERSTANDING OF WORK AND APPROPRIATENESS OF APPROACH FOR IMPLEMENTATION
UNDERSTANDING OF WORK AND APPROPRIATENESS OF APPROACH FOR IMPLEMENTATION Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER INNOVATIVE APPROACHES INTRODUCTION MS+P understands that regardless of the delivery MS+P commits to the following key principals – method, and whether tasked with a Capital, State of which provide the building blocks of our approach Good Repair (SOGR), or Transit Asset Management and understanding: System (TAMS) project(s), we will be charged to We will maintain and work with the legacy provide the engineering leadership on a program- systems. We will work with LACMTA to design wide systems design role that will include rail an achievable, cost effective integration and bus assignments in all aspects of systems path to deliver and implement MS+P value integration. Our selected team will function as staff added, proven, maintainable, and sustainable augmentation for design that spans the conceptual technologies. This will also include: through final design, on separate Task Orders. This • TAMS and SOGR coordination and support program is a highly complex endeavor and requires a mindful, comprehensive, and multifaceted • Development of cost/benefit/timing analysis approach. The team organization provided in of service proven technologies Section C reflects our approach and will highlight Our dedicated team will be sustainable for clear lines of communication (both within the JV the life of the project; flexible to work on a and across the entire implementation team), and mixture of co-located situations; innovative provides a thorough well-organized work plan, in implementing an ‘all-round’ approach to while being flexible for a variety of project sizes systems integration, using: and durations. Finally, our commitment to DBE • Our unparalleled depth and breadth of participation is a bedrock of the MS+P Task Order systems experience, with our Key Roles and development, and will step in the Contracting Specialty Technical personnel. Outreach Mentoring Program (COMP) program. • Our experience with matrix organizations and Brent Lesjak, our Program Manager, will work Task Order management/execution. directly for the Systems Executive Officer and • Our team’s work experience with LACMTA. control a broad and deep, multi-faceted, collaborative systems team of dedicated • Our experience to leverage and demonstrate professionals. Brent has extensive, recent best practices to document and support our experience leading this specific type of work. He client’s management approval processes. will be supported by a matrix organization that is • Mentor/Protégé “champions” through our developed to align with the LACMTA organization. Task Order Response Personnel (TORP) In this Section MS+P clearly identifies the methods, process procedures, and protocols we have successfully implemented on similar projects in North America and ‘best practices’ around the world. We commit to implementing the goals that the Los Angeles County stakeholders expect when they approved the Measure R and M ballot measures, and which LACMTA demands.
RFP No. AE47810E0128 D.2 Systems Engineering and Support Services UNDERSTANDING OF WORK AND APPROPRIATENESS OF APPROACH FOR IMPLEMENTATION
UNDERSTANDING OF WORK AND APPROPRIATENESS OF APPROACH FOR IMPLEMENTATION Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER
CHALLENGE 1: BUILDING A SPECIALIZED, LOCAL MS+P’s major JV partners have identified Los AND DIVERSE WORKFORCE Angeles as the most critical North American It is clear to MS+P that the importance of the Measure market in which to focus our systems practice. R & M initiatives is not only to provide a sustainable We are fully committed to using local proven transit network, but also to develop the workforce resources. Our Program Management Organization that is necessary for the sustainability of LACMTA’s is wholeheartedly endorsed by our Joint Venture Systems assets. This will ensure a world class transit partners and strategically informs the makeup of network for the service life of the systems now in our team. Throughout this Section we will show place as well as those still in the planning stages. how this support will be applied and executed at all levels. It includes key areas of focus and research We and our competitors face serious challenges and technology that identifies key performance in Southern California according to American indicators to show success. MS+P understands Public Transportation Association (APTA) research clearly the enormous challenge to create this contained in the 2016 – Strategic Plan: specialized, sustainable workforce and proposes: “Aging Workforce • Ongoing and inclusive resource management Since 2001, APTA has recognized that there is a program to identify key skills and position key problem with the increased average age of the staff locally, with a long-term success path for industry’s workforce. While there are no exact junior staff, numbers, we currently estimate that the average age • Implementation of a Mentor/Protégé plan that is around 50 years old. This is similar to the energy is a proven success and an integral part of the utility industry which came to similar conclusions MS+P DNA, with in the early 2000’s. To illustrate the scope of the problem, we’ve taken the chart shown in Figure • Both technical and business mentoring D.1 to show effect of aging. In this chart from 2008, strategies to promote growth and professional it shows that 20% of workforce will retire before opportunities. 2015 and another 37% will retire before 2025. So if we assume similar in the public transit industry, Figure D-1: Workforce Age Distribution we see that 57% of the workforce will retire within the next 9 years. If that were not bad enough, the industry has few if any training programs. There are no university degrees in public transit engineering or operations, albeit some in planning and policy. This is particularly acute in rail where there are unique technologies for which there are only surface level training programs and no certification or qualification program(s).“
RFP No. AE47810E0128 D.3 Systems Engineering and Support Services UNDERSTANDING OF WORK AND APPROPRIATENESS OF APPROACH FOR IMPLEMENTATION
UNDERSTANDING OF WORK AND APPROPRIATENESS OF APPROACH FOR IMPLEMENTATION Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER
CHALLENGE 2: DEVELOP SYSTEMWIDE APPROACH TO TASK ORDER PLANNING The anticipated project Task Orders include extensions, upgrades, and/or state of good repair projects for LACMTA’s existing system as well as new lines. This complex menu requires careful consideration to future maintenance and operations, in order to allow inter-operability and to limit impacts to spares and maintenance costs. A system wide approach to task order planning will be essential to apply consistency in systems integration and safety assurance to ensure these are optimized to meet LACMTA’s needs. In this Section we outline: • The components of the program management plan and our integrated team structure, • Our innovative management approach for managing our resources across multiple Task Orders, including applying advance project management tools such as iPas DM, • Support from the Program Manager to the project initiation Task Order Response Personnel (TORP) team for each major Task Order, • The role of our Key Personnel and additional management support, including our Deputy Program Managers, • A work breakdown approach, based on both representative minor and major scale Task Orders being issued, • MS+P will fufill the DBE compliance requirements. MS+P believes that this Program Management plan uniquely responds to the key principals outlined earlier, and proactively answers the challenges we see as fundamental to the success of the Systems Engineering and Support Services (SESS) Program. Our team understands both the technical and operational issues of this contract, and the opportunity it represents for LACMTA. Our goal is to provide a synergistic partnership with LACMTA staff, contractors, and all stakeholders.
Our team has a long history of experience in delivering successful transit systems projects. Hatch worked with the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority in an integrated team environment to provide design and engineering oversight services, and full program controls and construction management services.
RFP No. AE47810E0128 D.4 Systems Engineering and Support Services UNDERSTANDING OF WORK AND APPROPRIATENESS OF APPROACH FOR IMPLEMENTATION
UNDERSTANDING OF WORK AND APPROPRIATENESS OF APPROACH FOR IMPLEMENTATION Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER SATISFACTORY APPROACH TO MANAGE SCHEDULES, SCOPES, AND COST OF CONTRACT TASK ORDERS Our organization chart(s) in Section C identifies the outcomes. The team leadership reports directly organizational reporting structure, which MS+P to Metro staff on the Key Performance Indicators proposes as a framework to execute the Program. (KPIs), as well as cost and schedule for the entire In Section C, we indicated the organizational and program, including each individual Task Order. communication structure of our team - strategic We propose to use a “dashboard” to continuously and complementary program management monitor our effectiveness. The Technical Resource elements wedded to a committed technical Team provides the staff resources (firms and resource team. In this section we describe how individuals) for each/or multiple Task Orders. the MS+P comprehensive approach to Task Order PROGRAM MANAGER management ‘matrix’- strong, capable Task Order Brent Lesjak will be responsible for managing teams, augmented with key horizontal support all aspects of the MS+P Team for the successful specialists that will lead to improved, efficient, execution of the LACMTA Systems Engineering and thorough and successful Task Order completion. Support Services Program. He will: Our matrix organization is uniquely optimized • Act as the primary point of contact to the LACMTA. for the management and execution of systems • Have full authority to negotiate, obligate, and sign Task Orders. As shown in Figure D-2 below, the for the Joint Venture. process is highlighted by our designated Program • Lead the MS+P team and ensure the availability Management Team, which is depicted on the ‘y’ and appropriate application of resources and axis, and our Technical Resource Team, which is technologies. depicted on the ‘x’ axis. • Manage the development and execution of the The role of the Program Management Team Program Management Plan (PMP). is to provide the leadership, communication, • Foster a collaborative delivery approach. and specific technical skills to achieve the best
Figure D-2: Matrix Organization for Systems Task Orders
Task Order Task Order Task Order Task Order Task Order Program Manager
DPM System Integration System Int., System Safety, Integration Integration Team Team Ops. & Planning, BRT-LRT
DPM Design Discipline Discipline Train Control, Traction Power, Discipline Leads Leads Leads OCS-Third Rail, Comms./RF
DPM Contract Management & Project Controls PROGRAM MANAGEMENT TEAM MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Project Controls Estimates & Schedules
Contract Management Task Task Task Task Task Order Order Order Order Order Response Response Response Response Response Personnel Personnel Personnel Personnel Personnel (TORP) (TORP) (TORP) (TORP) (TORP)
TECHNICAL RESOURCE TEAM MS+P Philosophy of Staffing Decisions for each Task Order and how Staffing of Task Orders will be accomplished.
RFP No. AE47810E0128 D.5 Systems Engineering and Support Services UNDERSTANDING OF WORK AND APPROPRIATENESS OF APPROACH FOR IMPLEMENTATION
UNDERSTANDING OF WORK AND APPROPRIATENESS OF APPROACH FOR IMPLEMENTATION Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER • Ensure the successful execution of the DBE COMP impact design development strategies in order to Program. provide the most effective design and planning • Drive quality throughout every aspect of the documents. program. DPM — SYSTEMS INTEGRATION • Ensure safety is the first priority for all work Anes Sassi will be responsible for: execution. • Coordination and uniform application of systems Brent has: assurance, systems integration, safety standards, • Demonstrated record of successfully managing and operational requirements across all Task similar programs for transportation agencies Orders. across the United States • Developing integrated solutions, coordinated • Considerable LACMTA experience. relationships to Metro O&M teams, and CPUC • Team-building and mentoring expertise for large coordination. multi-disciplinary teams. • Configuration Management and requirements • Excellent communication skills with the ability tracking. to relate, deliver messages, and build consensus Anes and his team has: across all levels of the Program Team and client • Depth of experience with the integral components organization. of various systems through their entire life cycle, • Broad scale knowledge of systems technologies vendors and rolling stock manufacturers – their and delivery approaches across all transit modes. proprietary requirements or restrictions, and their • Leadership expertise to drive quality, safety, and adaptability and interoperability. excellence by the entire MS+P Team. • Extensive experience with complex, integration Brent will be supported by three Deputy testing, commissioning, validation, and verification Program Managers (DPM) with specific roles and of the completed system. responsibilities. Each MS+P DPM will have the • Key knowledge of interoperability, RAMS analysis, following responsibilities and unique qualifications and system startup. specific to their roles: DPM — SYSTEMS DESIGN Rene LaFleche will be responsible for the application Program Manager of consistent systems design standards and requirements definitions across all Tasks for multiple delivery types, and providing the systems discipline DPM System Integration criteria, procedures, and design management for System Int., System Safety, each Task Order. Ops. & Planning, BRT-LRT Rene and his team has: DPM Design • In- depth history of industry standards, strong Train Control, Traction Power, professional guidance and direction, plus the OCS-Third Rail, Comms./RF ability to lead qualified and accomplished engineers, provide control in key disciplines, and DPM Contract Management & ensure a comprehensive quality product. Project Controls • Technical expertise for Communications, Train TEAM MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Control, OCS, Traction Power principles, and Project Controls technologies used by Metro. Estimates & Schedules • Profound understanding of the discipline requirements. Contract Management • Extensive experience with the complete range of project delivery methods and how each shall
RFP No. AE47810E0128 D.6 Systems Engineering and Support Services UNDERSTANDING OF WORK AND APPROPRIATENESS OF APPROACH FOR IMPLEMENTATION
UNDERSTANDING OF WORK AND APPROPRIATENESS OF APPROACH FOR IMPLEMENTATION Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER
DPM — CONTRACT MANAGEMENT & PROJECT CONTROLS (CM&PC) Paul Nolan will be responsible for providing the • Possess in-depth industrywide knowledge of reporting interface between the Program Manager construction, up-to-date pricing and current and all Task Order Leads, contract and sub- economic trends, and sustainable solutions for the contract Management, as well as managing Project built environment. Controls. He will also manage the development and monitoring of Key Performance Indicators, as TASK ORDER OVERVIEW well tracking on-time and on-budget Task Order Management of Task Orders will require an completion. integrated team approach between all MS+P firms as illustrated in the flow chart shown in Figure D-3 Paul and his team has: below. This presents a process representation of • Knowledge of the Metro organization, key staff, the project organization chart provided in Section as well as Metro procedures to ensure a seamless C, page C.4. The key to managing task orders internal navigation to create consensus while effectively is to vest the executive decision making moving each Task Order process to completion. on assignment of Task Order personnel to a small, • Experience in project controls, financial analysis empowered key team identified as the Task Order & cost forecasting, program & CPM scheduling, Response Personnel (TORP). estimating, and project closeout & auditing.
Figure D-3: Task Order Management Flow Chart
RFP No. AE47810E0128 D.7 Systems Engineering and Support Services UNDERSTANDING OF WORK AND APPROPRIATENESS OF APPROACH FOR IMPLEMENTATION
UNDERSTANDING OF WORK AND APPROPRIATENESS OF APPROACH FOR IMPLEMENTATION Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER
PROGRAM MANAGEMENT Figure D-4: Task Order Response Personnel TEAM Task Task Task Task Task DPM Contract Management Order #1 Order #2 Order #3 Order #4 Order #X Project & Controls Task Task Task Task Task Project Controls Order Order Order Order Order Estimates & Schedules Response Response Response Response Response Personnel Personnel Personnel Personnel Personnel Contract Management (TORP) (TORP) (TORP) (TORP) (TORP)
TECHNICAL RESOURCE TEAM
A. TASK ORDER PROCESS INITIATION Our Program Manager, Brent Lesjak, will manage the Step 3: The TORP will review the scope and overall initiation process for Task Orders. requirements with representatives of each subconsultant firm to draw the best available Step 1: Upon being notified of a pending Task Order assignment, Brent will mobilize the TORP, comprised resources to suit the Task Order, integrate with of our three DPMs (Paul Nolan, Anes Sassi, René requirements of the other executed Task Orders, as LaFleche), and augmented by Key Personnel subject well as to meet the DBE goals. Tracking of available matter experts as needed by the nature of the resource skills and availability will be centrally assignment. (Note: with minor Task Orders, Brent managed with our powerful iPas PM tool. This may solely perform the role of the TORP). database will be kept current by our Task Order Administrator, Lina Maingi, who will solicit regular Step 2: The TORP will, working collaboratively with resource utilization updates from our subcontractors. LA Metro, key stakeholders (CPUC, Metrolink, or other third party agencies), and other preliminary Step 4: Working with the Team Firms, the TORP will engineering design firms (civil, architectural, confirm the firm(s) and individual staff selected from structural), to understand the Key Performance the Technical Resource Team that are best suited to Indicators (KPIs) for the Task Order. This meet the proposed KPI’s (this can be visualized by includes understanding the schedule, budgetary the green rectangles on Figure D-5). A draft scope considerations, key parameters and milestones, and schedule, and budget shall be provided by each of Metro goals, and other project resource interfaces. the selected firms. The TORP will draw from the Program Management The Task Order Lead will be selected to match Team i.e. our Key Personnel from Section B and the specific Metro requirements: this may include allocate their utilization for each Task Order, and co-location within another design team; design also create a specific Integration, Design, and support services during construction with an on- Control support team for the Task Order (this can site Integrated Project Management Office (IPMO), be visualized by the colored ovals within each and/or staff augmentation at Metro in a Systems vertical Task Order rectangle on Figure D-4 above Design supporting role. The Task Order Lead may representing variable participation of Key Personnel be a named Key Personnel, or may be selected across multiple Task Orders). from the Technical Resource Team, and will report operationally for the duration of the Task Order to Paul Nolan, our DPM — Contract Management and Project Controls.
We believe that effective coordination with all Metro stakeholders, internal and external will be critical to the success of this Project. We will maintain a collaborative “partnering” approach throughout all project stages, similar to how we collaborated with multiple parties through preliminary engineering, procurement and implementation of the Edmonton Valley Line LRT Design/Build/Finance/Operate/Maintain project.
RFP No. AE47810E0128 D.8 Systems Engineering and Support Services UNDERSTANDING OF WORK AND APPROPRIATENESS OF APPROACH FOR IMPLEMENTATION
UNDERSTANDING OF WORK AND APPROPRIATENESS OF APPROACH FOR IMPLEMENTATION Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER Step 5: The TORP will review and finalize the Task B. TASK ORDER EXECUTION — Order staffing, scope, deliverables, schedule, and budget to complete the Task Order Response. MANAGEMENT During execution, each Task Order will be led by the This response will include the proposed organization Task Order Lead whose responsibilities include: for the performance of the Task Order, showing: • Coordinate applicable sub-contract task orders • Lines of authority, responsibility, and through the PM and DPM CM&PC. The DPM communication to Metro personnel and other CM&PC will provide a copy of the executed DBE stakeholders; subcontracts to the Mentor Program Lead, Phyllis • Office organizations, if any; and Tucker, for separate reporting (this is detailed later • Names, titles, and functions of all supervisory and in this Section). other key personnel. • Mobilize the Task Order Project Team in accordance with the authorized Task Order. Step 6: Our Program Manager will submit the Task Order draft proposal for Metro review, feedback • Manage and coordinate the development of the (and resubmittal if necessary), negotiation, and Project Execution Plan (PEP) in conformance with acceptance. the overall Program Management Plan (PMP). Once the Task Order proposal is accepted, the • Develop the Work Breakdown Structure (WBS). responsibility will pass to the Task Order Lead. • Provide KPIs and milestones for internal review Throughout execution of the Task Orders, our based on TORP requirements. PM Brent will manage the overall availability and • Ensure compliance to the Quality Management utilization of our team resources, with forecasting Plan. based on upcoming LA Metro projects, and initiate • Manage day-to-day delivery of the project and appropriate steps to address deficiencies and adherence to scope, schedule, and budget. provide detailed reporting. Key items include: • Ensure coordination and design support with Civil • Develop cross functional expertise of our team designs (Structures, Stations and Guideways. members in multiple areas of the design, • Manage the development of monthly Progress engineering and assurance disciplines, as was Reports. successfully executed by Hatch on the Go Transit Signaling and Train Control Improvement Program, • Ongoing and inclusive resource management program to identify key skills and position key staff locally, with a long-term success path for junior staff, and • Facilitate ongoing needs/skills assessment, skill building, and management.
Managing the coordination and design support with Civil designs (Structures, Stations and Guideways) will require an effective design staging plan that recognizes the asynchronous nature of design progression between various design teams. We will prioritize early project work to focus our design efforts on systems elements that are minimally impacted by other design teams, while applying a risk based approach, such as is being used on the Calgary Greenline LRT project, to quantify how far later design efforts should progress where these are more greatly impacted. We will also need to understand how and when our design efforts impact other design teams and prioritize our efforts accordingly so we do not expose Metro to claims from other parties.
RFP No. AE47810E0128 D.9 Systems Engineering and Support Services UNDERSTANDING OF WORK AND APPROPRIATENESS OF APPROACH FOR IMPLEMENTATION
UNDERSTANDING OF WORK AND APPROPRIATENESS OF APPROACH FOR IMPLEMENTATION Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER
We will provide ongoing operations support by collaborating with Metro’s O&M stakeholders to understand the underlying principles that drive Metro’s design requirements and will consider and communicate the operational impacts of proposed designs. Our team brings extensive LRT and rail operations background by having previously worked for transit operators and railroads.
C. TASK ORDER EXECUTION — INTEGRATION MS+P proposes that for each Task Order, when pertain to Integration activities for Task Orders. applicable, a separate team of Integration experts • Review the KPIs and other input documents for will be formed consisting of uniquely qualified and the project and develop a comprehensive list of highly experienced Hatch, SENER, and subconsultant requirements and manage these in accordance staff. They will have the responsibility to develop with the Requirements Management Plan. standards, procedures, and verification processes • Coordinate with Metro O&M and State of Good to enable each Metro Task Order to meet the 21st Repair stakeholders. Century RAMS, interoperability standards, and • Prepare a detailed interface description for each customer satisfaction. During execution they will be interface that can be used during design. Manage cognizant of maintaining the existing infrastructure, these interfaces in accordance with the Interface and planning of new technologies and their Management Plan. We propose that for complex implementation by coordinating with the Metro O&M Metro task orders our SIRENA interface tool will and risk stakeholders. This approach requires a be used. team that brings unique experience with multiple transit systems now being implemented across • Adapt comment management procedures North America and the tested standards being from the PMP to capture, review, and manage implemented around the world. This is a core design review comments from Metro and project competency and a key asset that MS+P will provide stakeholders. LACMTA. • Support a Task Order risk register to identify, track and mitigate risks to eliminate, or During the execution of each Task Order, the DPM minimize, risk impacts to the project. – Integration, Anes Sassi will provide Integration leadership and support to the Task Order Project • Ensure compliance with the Safety and Security Team. This support will provide consistency and Management Plan. continuity between each (or multiple) Task Orders • Ensure compliance with Change Management to maintain adherence to Metro’s standards, policies Plan. and procedures, and to ensure the safety and security During execution of each Task Order, Anes will of Metro’s operations. Specific support activities regularly collaborate with the Task Order Lead and that will be performed by the Task Order Integration the other DPMs to review and adjust, if required, support team with oversight from Anes will include: the Integration support team, or to adopt or revise • Adapt Project Procedure Manuals (PPM’s) to Integration related activities in response to unique form the Project Execution Plan (PEP) as they Figure D-5: Task Order System Integration Task Task Task Task Task Order #1 Order #2 Order #3 Order #4 Order #X
DPM System Integration System Int., System Safety, Integration Integration Team Team Ops. & Planning, BRT-LRT MANAGEMENT TEAM MANAGEMENT
TECHNICAL RESOURCE TEAM RFP No. AE47810E0128 D.10 Systems Engineering and Support Services UNDERSTANDING OF WORK AND APPROPRIATENESS OF APPROACH FOR IMPLEMENTATION
UNDERSTANDING OF WORK AND APPROPRIATENESS OF APPROACH FOR IMPLEMENTATION Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER Figure D-6: Task Order Design Task Order #1 Task Order #2 Task Order #3 Task Order #4 Task Order #5
DPM Design Discipline Train Control, Traction Power Discipline Leads Leads OCS-Third Rail, Comms./RF
Task Order project challenges.
D. TASK ORDER EXECUTION — Intra/inter disciplinary coordination requires DESIGN personnel that can work at a high level of technical MS+P proposes to group our highly skilled expertise across a variety of disciplines. This can engineering team for Train Control, Traction Power, only be acquired through past experience working OCS/Third Rail, Communications to provide the on multi-disciplinary teams on projects which necessary ‘discipline’ leadership for each project, are closely relevant. Our Deputy PM – Design whether large or small. This key resource team is (Rene LaFleche) has led multi-disciplinary LRT focused on providing best practices, application of program management teams such as Calgary West LRT and Edmonton Valley Line LRT, serving in a Metro design standards, and the ultimate execution multi-disciplinary lead role which encompassed of KPI deliverables. intradisciplinary as well interdisciplinary elements. During execution of each Task Order, the DPM – Design, René LaFleche, will provide leadership and • Ensure delivery of design data in accordance support to every Task Order Project Team. This with project milestones. support will ensure the appropriate level of design • Update design impacts to key interfaces in is correctly incorporated for each (or multiple) Task accordance with the Interface Management Plan. Order, and will apply the optimal and up-to-date • Ensure design review comments from Metro and resource expertise from the technical resource project stakeholders. team. Specific activities that will be performed by • Ensure Task Order risk register is updated when the Task Order Design team with oversight from impacted by design decisions. René will include: • Ensure design activities comply with the Safety • Adapt Project Procedure Manuals (PPM’s) to and Security Management Plan form the Project Execution Plan (PEP) as they • Ensure design activities comply with the Quality pertain to design activities for Task Orders Management Plan • Develop the project basis of design by reviewing the KPIs and other documents for the project During execution of each Task Order, René will and develop a comprehensive list of design regularly collaborate with the Task Order Lead and deliverables and execute these in compliance the other DPMs to review and adjust, if required, the with the Design Management Plan, and monitor Design support team, or to adopt or revise design the execution for compliance related activities in response to unique Task Order project challenges. • Provide intra/inter disciplinary coordination
The project basis of design will establish key functions such as: • Clear definition of scope • Design review processes and acceptance of • Clear definition of LA Metro requirements feedback • Clear definition of stakeholder goals • Integrated constructability reviews • Clear definition of the deliverables and schedule • Design package release that supports the overall • Design management project schedule • Identification of key milestones • Phasing and staging design for construction, • Escalation process including regular constructability reviews
RFP No. AE47810E0128 D.11 Systems Engineering and Support Services UNDERSTANDING OF WORK AND APPROPRIATENESS OF APPROACH FOR IMPLEMENTATION
UNDERSTANDING OF WORK AND APPROPRIATENESS OF APPROACH FOR IMPLEMENTATION Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER
Figure D-7: Task Order Project Controls Task Order #1 Task Order #2 Task Order #3 Task Order #4 Task Order #5
Project Controls Estimates & Schedules
E. TASK ORDER EXECUTION — PROJECT CONTROLS During execution of each Task Order, Paul Nolan, Project Status Reports our DPM – Project Management & Project Controls, We will provide dashboard to LACMTA monthly, both on a Task Order and will provide project control oversight of the Task roll-up program basis. Performance categories Order Project Team. This will include Task Order will include safety metrics, cost performance, administration, scheduling and estimating, risk schedule performance, scope performance, management, and document administration. quality performance, project team effectiveness, A key aspect of our approach includes and risk exposure. Format of reports will be understanding, and planning for, the impact of presented in a manner consistent with Metro project standard reporting. possible Measure R and M project timing and/ or acceleration. Planning for their likely effect of these changes on system resources will be a key up to Brent Lesjak (Program Manager) and LACMTA. consideration for resource management. Figure APPROACH TO DESIGN SCHEDULES D-8 on the following page is our projection of the Once the Task Order scope is established by the complexity of the seven-year program based on TORP, Djali Abadi of ABCS, our lead Scheduler/ our current understanding of the LACMTA project Estimator and his support staff will develop design schedules. and construction schedules that identify key, Another key element of our design schedules is milestones dates and completion. Schedules will be the understanding of the project delivery process. resource loaded as applicable to monitor progress With the complex and undetermined nature of against elapsed time and reviewed regularly for future delivery, MS+P will be proactive in advising compliance. LACMTA of key project issues that may impact the Schedules will be P6 platform based to inform design schedule. These include the possibility of and integrate with LACMTA’s overall Program P3 delivery or change from Design/Bid/Build to Management system. With this understanding, we Design/ Build. We will include in the Task Order will establish a Master Systems Engineering and schedules a reporting milestone to alert teams as Support Services schedule as each Task Order is the project cycles through the 30/60/90/100 percent issued and authorized. We anticipate that once completion milestones to incorporate changes. multiple Task Orders are simultaneously underway, Without integral and timely cost estimates along the Systems program schedule and status with schedule milestones, few projects can be information will feed into our Program Management successful. Our Task Order teams are focused on dashboard. project completion, with the Design and Integration All schedules will be well-coordinated with LACMTA, overlay teams, in a wide variety of potential office stakeholders, and the technical team. Schedules locations, and working either directly for LACMTA, or will include representative detail of activities that attached to other design teams in IPMO’s across the define key interim and final deliverables. region. These teams will need consistent and timely Our schedules will be pre-planning based, and will updates. The Project Controls team will support consider the various factors that impact the start each Task Order team and Task Order Lead to create and completion of each design or construction meaningful reports and ‘dashboards’ for reporting
RFP No. AE47810E0128 D.12 Systems Engineering and Support Services UNDERSTANDING OF WORK AND APPROPRIATENESS OF APPROACH FOR IMPLEMENTATION
UNDERSTANDING OF WORK AND APPROPRIATENESS OF APPROACH FOR IMPLEMENTATION Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER
Figure D-8: Planning for Multiple Projects
2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028
E. San. Fer. Valley TC*
Vermont TC
WPLE Section 3 Orange Line BRT
Greenline Ext.to Torrance Eastside Phase 2 Ext.
Crenshaw Northern Ext.**
West Santa Ana TC
Sepulveda Pass TC
Blue Line Resignaling
4 Projects 4 Projects 4 Projects 4 toto 5 5 55 to to 6 6 * TC = Transit Corridor 4 Projects 4 Projects 4 Projects 4 Projects4 Projects Projects Projects ** Assuming Project Acceleration Projects Projects
Overall Project Duration SEC Preliminary Engineering SEC Procurement Support SEC Final Design Reviews SEC System Integration activity. The drivers of our approach are duration, early corrective actions when necessary. potential “work-arounds,” and “what needs to We recognize that with Measure R &M programs, be done before and after”. In this way, MS+P is that there will likely be numerous concurrent able to confidently represent the activities within Task Order underway at any given time. Figure the project schedules. Input from stakeholders D-9 above is derived directly from LACMTA and technical design and support teams will published information and provides insight into be obtained as the planning and schedule are the development of the proposed Measure R&M developed. As best practice, we will apply a critical projects. The pink highlights identify durations path method (CPM) analysis to these schedules, when multiple projects may be underway. With and employ a logical overview approach in the potential for multiple delivery methods, it addition to the auto-generated critical path. Design highlights the need for competent, and timely deliverable milestones will be clearly defined. design and construction schedule information During the performance period, we will regularly for MS+P to ensure that we are able to meet our supplement the CPM schedules with representative needs and have skilled , trained expertise available Line of Balance schedules to communicate progress at the appropriate times. Resource planning of the engineering effort against the plan and the will be a key component of this work, and one projected completions. Importantly this will provide which we are prepared. Upon award, we will at-a-glance trending of the design schedule and is coordinate with LACMTA to obtain the current an informative management tool that will prompt status of Program Works which will be subject to inclusion of the Systems Engineering and Support Services and immediately initiate compilation of a master Systems Program schedule. As individual project needs and Task Order details become available, MS+P will revise the master schedule with additional project specific constraints and information.
RFP No. AE47810E0128 D.13 Systems Engineering and Support Services UNDERSTANDING OF WORK AND APPROPRIATENESS OF APPROACH FOR IMPLEMENTATION
UNDERSTANDING OF WORK AND APPROPRIATENESS OF APPROACH FOR IMPLEMENTATION Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER
Design-Build Systems Engineering, P3 Systems TASK ORDER COST CONTROL Design Engineering and Design-Bid-Build Our approach to cost control is to develop realistic The systems design schedules will be coordinated budgets for each Task Order. Our TORP team with each prime consultant team responsible for the will present the proposed budget, negotiate, Preliminary Engineering (PE) or Final Design (FD) of and finalize with LACMTA. Upon Task Order specific major projects. We will promote scheduling authorization, the budget cost and utilization the durations and designs of systems common hours will serve as the baseline budget against elements as early activities with the understanding which committed costs are compared. During that civil alignments which drive the envisioned each reporting period, expenditures for each work systems will need to occur towards the later end of package/task will be maintained and measured. the PE or PD development schedule. This approach This information will be translated into Variance will save design time, as the bulk of the design Reports which will be generated per Task Order. engineering may be accomplished early, leaving Variance Reports will identify negative or positive detailed refinements as a later activity. The progress cost and utilizations deviations as applicable from of the design work will be monitored and measured established budgets. The appropriate Task Order in real time, with clearly defined design deliverables. lead will be kept informed in real time, and where We assume that a probable construction required, a corrective action plan will be developed schedule may be required to identify and validate and implemented. We will monitor this information construction completions and milestones. MS+P throughout the life of the Program. has the capability to develop, and will provide With the assistance of real time costs, we propose the systems efforts for these schedules. These to implement a centralized data based time schedules will be developed in conjunction with sheet reporting system software package such as the applicable consultant team(s), and coordinated ActiTIME which collects time from each MS+P staff with LACMTA for approval. member performing any service on the project. Engineering Augmentation Tasks Time entries will be per a task based WBS. This has numerous benefits. It will allow us to monitor and The design schedules for miscellaneous engineering assemble utilization hours and accrued costs on a assignment tasks will be prepared in consultation weekly basis, monitor specific task utilization, and with the LACMTA and MS+P Program Manager. We enable auto generated monthly invoices. Having will work closely with LACMTA staff to identify each this aspect centralized will prevent latent trailing major task activity and associated development utilization and costs that may be overlooked during activities for each deliverable. We envision cost reporting periods. This allows MS+P to have a that task work may consist of refinements and commanding position with Task Order Cost Control. updates to systems and systems related Metro Rail LACMTA will be the benefit of having real time Design Criteria, Metro Bus Rapid Transit Design knowledge of the Systems Engineering and Support Criteria, Metro baseline specifications sections, Services cost status. Standard Drawings, Directive Drawings and other miscellaneous engineering support. Each of these will be evaluated, planned, and scheduled. We will ensure that deliverable development and review periods are reasonable, achievable, and maintained.
RFP No. AE47810E0128 D.14 Systems Engineering and Support Services UNDERSTANDING OF WORK AND APPROPRIATENESS OF APPROACH FOR IMPLEMENTATION
UNDERSTANDING OF WORK AND APPROPRIATENESS OF APPROACH FOR IMPLEMENTATION Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER
APPROACH TO PREPARING COST ESTIMATES Our approach to estimating construction cost precise cost estimate for the changes as project estimates will match project needs at various proceed to Systems installation in construction. stages of development, and the needs of a wide We will also provide estimating review services variety of Task Orders. During the project planning for Systems elements of ongoing projects as phase, a high reliance is placed on conceptual requested. Our estimating staff is familiar with estimating staff resources to assess the probable LACMTA’s projects and protocols, and will be most cost and viability of a proposed systems design efficient in providing cost estimating; whether for enhancement. Our experienced design staff, with 30 capital improvements projects or maintenance years of experience working on LACMTA’s projects, works, and from conceptual design through final will be able to develop conceptual cost for project phase of procurement. MS+P team experience alternatives very efficiently and effectively while with LACMTA projects, and understanding of FTA following FTA Standard Cost Categories. funding requirements will ensure that they will As the System’s design Task Orders progress, our be embedded within our estimate procedures estimating efforts exponentially increase during and formats. MS+P estimates will be structured to the critical detailed production phase. MS+P will LACMTA’s standard and meet FTA requirements prepare “bottom up” estimates derived from while being accurate and supportable. Additionally, detailed quantity takeoffs, based on LACMTA’s our estimating team is very familiar with LACMTA’s established labor rates, local material & equipment Independent Cost Estimate (ICE) process and costs, and productions rates experienced on will prepare and package these estimates in LACMTA’s projects. Our staff familiarity with systems coordination with LACMTA’s estimating department established during design, will enable and provide requirements.
MS+P team members worked on the 6.3-mile Metro Red Line North Hollywood Extension (Segment 3) , whose services to LACMTA included cost controls. The original construction for the project was completed $100 million under budget with line opening six months early
RFP No. AE47810E0128 D.15 Systems Engineering and Support Services UNDERSTANDING OF WORK AND APPROPRIATENESS OF APPROACH FOR IMPLEMENTATION
UNDERSTANDING OF WORK AND APPROPRIATENESS OF APPROACH FOR IMPLEMENTATION Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER EXPLANATION OF THE PROPOSER’S UNDERSTANDING OF METRO’S REQUIREMENTS; AND EXPECTED OUTCOMES FOR THE PROJECT SAFETY (i) REQUIREMENTS MANAGEMENT Safety is our first priority. With complex transit projects it is necessary to use MS+P understands that LACMTA is an operating a structured form of requirements management for rail and bus system. We are familiar with the project control. MS+P has very experienced staff that requirements of LACMTA’s operations. These are currently leading in this issue, specifically with include safety and operational requirements set the deployment of IBM DOORS software to facilitate forth by LACMTA, such as LACMTA Rail Operations control. DOORS has become an industry standard Track Allocation/Work Permit Process. and facilitates the elemental beak down of a project general requirements into discrete packages that Development and application of the Safety and can be managed efficiently, while maintaining Security Management Plan will be managed by transparency of the overall project objectives. It John Simon, our Systems Safety Assurance Lead, provides a useful tool to assist in the management who will work directly with Metro’s Systems Safety of requirements by assisting in the identification, Manager, or as otherwise directed by Metro, while allocation and tracking of the requirements maintaining Metro program-wide perspective by throughout the project lifecycle. coordinating with Anes Sassi, our DPM - Integration. One of the more innovative uses to which members Systems Assurance Plan of MS+P has applied DOORS is management of the During execution of our deliverables, we will technical requirements on the Metro Barcelona Line implement and execute a structured approach 9 project. It provided the key technical assistance to system and safety assurance that includes the tool for the systems integration process. The specific following activities to be formalized in the Systems DOORS project program was developed by key Assurance Plan: MS+P staff to meet the specific needs of the Line i. Requirements management; 9 infrastructure. DOORS is an ideal methodology for breaking down large and complex system ii. Reliability, Availability, and Maintainability and requirements into discrete and manageable Dependability (RAMD) management; tasks which we anticipate for the SESS contract iii. Interface management; with overlapping multiple Task Orders. Our iv. Verification and validation and team developed an automated, documentable requirements management process, which was v. Safety certification; the basis of the systems engineering integration activities. MS+P also integrated this process within the safety management process, keeping all hazards and mitigation actions in one singular database. This allowed a seamless integration with documentation, not only of the contractual requirements, but also any hazard and safety mitigation actions. We propose to apply a similar approach for the major Task Orders developed for this project. At the outset of the Project, MS+P will propose and formalize this approach and procedures in a Requirements Management Plan which will be a sub-plan of the Program Management Plan. This will be led by Anes Sassi, our DPM – Integration and prepared for Metro review and comment.
RFP No. AE47810E0128 D.16 Systems Engineering and Support Services UNDERSTANDING OF WORK AND APPROPRIATENESS OF APPROACH FOR IMPLEMENTATION
UNDERSTANDING OF WORK AND APPROPRIATENESS OF APPROACH FOR IMPLEMENTATION Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER
Figure D-10: RAMD Management The process followed in defining system and sub-system reliability performance
System Subsystem Subsystem Availability Availability Reliability Definiation apportionment Targets
Reliability and Criticality Subsystem Subsystem System RAMD Contractural Availability Maintainability Analysis Availability RAMD Prediction Prediction RAMD targets Apportionment Targets (FMECA) apportionment Analysis Analysis
RAMD Indicators/ Subsystem Subsystem Service Availability Reliability Performance apportionment Targets Measures
Subsystem System RAMD RAMD Demonstration Demonstration
(ii) RAMD MANAGEMENT RAMD management is a “look ahead” process during the project life cycle. Figure D-10 above during the design stage of any project. MS+P staff below presents a diagram for RAMD activities and have extensive experience and expertise in defining, deliverables. developing, and allocating key targets for these At the outset of the Task Order, MS+P will propose parameters that will be applied to the sub-systems. and formalize these parameters and procedures in The RAMD management objective for any project on a RAMD Management Plan which will be a sub-plan which MS+P is engaged is to design and construct a of the PMP. This will be led by Anes Sassi, our DPM – system capable of performing at the availability level Integration. required by the operator or owner in accordance (iii) INTERFACE MANAGEMENT with the EN 50126 or MIL-STD-785B standards. For MS+P, through its SENER systems group, has new projects, based upon previous experience, the developed an in-house software tool, SIRENA, RAMD process identifies service alarms, during all to manage interfaces which follows a five-stage phases of operation and proposes RAMD provides process. This tool will assist MS+P to manage, procedures to reduce these service issues to an monitor, and report all system interfaces in a acceptable level. coordinated and cohesive. It ensures that the A similar exercise must be carried out for projects integration of all systems in the final product are involving an extension or expansion of an existing fully validated and provide “a complete system”. line. In these instances, it is important to carry out The process relies on continuous communication a study of the existing system to ascertain how it through regular project meetings that all project is performing and how any new systems can be team members are involved in the dialogue to integrated to ensure that the new work provides the specify and resolve each interface. overall improvement sought. Issues are typically Within each interface there may be a number of of design, operation or maintenance type. Using a parameters that need to be addressed and closed. previously defined systems breakdown structure for the project, targets for reliability and maintainability An important point within the interface for subsystems and components are derived. The management process is the design freeze subsystems will take account of these targets as a milestone. This is achieved when all parties guide for their analysis and the identification of to agree on the technical solution to an interface, all reduce the service alarms to an acceptable level, parameters are known and frozen for validation, which is defined through the Availability parameters. and the specific design milestone is then issued. Other specific RAMD activities will be carried out Following this point, any changes to “frozen”
RFP No. AE47810E0128 D.17 Systems Engineering and Support Services UNDERSTANDING OF WORK AND APPROPRIATENESS OF APPROACH FOR IMPLEMENTATION
UNDERSTANDING OF WORK AND APPROPRIATENESS OF APPROACH FOR IMPLEMENTATION Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER systems which have an interface with other systems the general provisions of IEC 15288 “Life Cycle must be dealt with through a modification control Management – System Life Cycle Processes”. The and configuration management process. This V&V process was tailored to the requirements of a process is critical, as it must consider all changes civil/structural project and is proving a very useful from the point of view of interfaces. tool in the development of this project. At the outset of the Project, MS+P will develop and At the outset of the Project, MS+P will propose and formalize these principles and procedures for each formalize these procedures in a Verification and Task Order, in an Interface Management Plan which Validation Plan which will be a sub- plan of the PMP. will be a sub- plan of the PMP. This will be led by This will be led by Anes Sassi, our DPM – Integration. Anes Sassi, our DPM – Integration. (v) SAFETY CERTIFICATION (iv) VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION MS+P understands that safety certification will be MS+P has developed is implementing currently, a the primary responsibility of other parties, but that comprehensive verification and validation process we will remain in a support role for these activities. currently on the California High Speed Rail CP2/3 Many of the members of our Hatch Technical construction project. It demonstrates how each Resource Team are very experienced with safety technical contract requirement was incorporated certification processes and have completed the during final design, construction, and testing highly successful TTC TYSSE and WMATA ATC Safety process. For this project the V&V process was based Certification projects. upon the general provisions of INCOSE Systems Engineering Handbook and followed
By ensuring the appropriate level of design is correctly scoped for each Task Order, and bringing to bear the right technical resources from MS+P’s unparalleled systems expertise, we will deliver the right answer – the first time.
RFP No. AE47810E0128 D.18 Systems Engineering and Support Services UNDERSTANDING OF WORK AND APPROPRIATENESS OF APPROACH FOR IMPLEMENTATION
UNDERSTANDING OF WORK AND APPROPRIATENESS OF APPROACH FOR IMPLEMENTATION Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER DESIGN CRITERIA & STANDARDS In managing the design standards and as an MS+P has extensive experience in working with LA extension of the the RAMD process, the MS+P team Metro’s design standards. As an example, on the LA proposes to create a review committee for Design Crenshaw LRT project, Hatch regularly managed Standards which will review regularly operations contract documents that required an in-depth and maintenance data and ensure that issues knowledge of Metro Rail Design Criteria, Metro Bus affecting the reliability of systems are designed Rapid Transit Design Criteria, Standard Drawings, out of all systems and that LACMTA continues Directive Drawings and Baseline Specifications. to increase its efficiency of operations and maintenance for years to come. MS+P is committed to applying this recent understanding, while responding to the challenges CADD of maintaining them. It is critical that the design MS+P’s team will include a substantial CADD standards are regularly updated, revised where capability for and on-site office as well as off-site appropriate, relevant, and useful for all design work. We are proficient in all the latest Bentley projects, whichever project delivery system is MicroStation/Inroads/BIM and AutoCad/Revit ultimately identified. MS+P is familiar with LACMTA’s programs. For each Task Order, we will apply the Systemwide Baseline Change Notice (SBCN) Process platforms to use for the duration of the project as and will manage the work accordingly. specified by Metro and we will comply with all Metro MS+P has provided key coordination with local CADD Criteria. municipal jurisdictions such as the certification MS+P, through Hatch’s rail systems group, have of Metro’s Crenshaw/LAX Rail Crossings Hazard collaborated with Bentley Systems to develop Analysis Report with the California Public Utilities advanced BIM solutions using Promis.e electrical Commission. controls software as the foundation. These solutions We understand the importance of working with deliver an automated Bill of Materials (BOM) generator the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) project and wire tag list generation, with remarkable on transit projects. We regularly implement and capabilities when ordering assembled parts through ensure compliance with its practices such as those its parts database manager. This tool is very effective described in the ‘Handbook for Transit Safety and while delivering the 3D layouts for visualization to Security Certification’ which is published by the FTA. eliminate installation conflicts. Moreover, it provides the schematic overlay to meet the rail systems industry DESIGN STANDARDS PROJECT EXECUTION requirements for wall layouts within a design package. At the initial outset of the Program, MS+P, under the These functionalities operate in a two-dimensional direction of René LaFleche, our DPM - Design, will (2D) fashion and algorithms have been modified to propose acceptable procedures for applying and mimic the 3D environment. The Hatch Rail Systems maintaining Metro design standards as part of our group has also created a custom wizard that allows Design Management Plan, which will be a sub-plan designers to pass site specific information to the of the overall PMP. This sub- plan will subsequently Promis.e Application Program Interface (API), which undergo periodic review and update on a two- automates the drawing production and 3D layouts. year interval, or earlier as required. The Design This functionality allows for the replacement of the Management Plan will also include procedures to current CAD templates with an automated system address the overarching goals of the design process, which is far more precise. It’s most impressive aspect which is to deliver complete, compliant and safety is the capability to relate 3D components to their and quality assured designs in a cost-effective and schematic representations dynamically resulting in timely manner. Examples of such procedures include dramatically reduced designer based errors, which design checking and approval requirements. promotes safety in design. These solutions were DESIGN STANDARDS TASK ORDER EXECUTION originally developed for Canadian Pacific (CP), and Application of design standards will be managed were subsequently applied to CN and the Metrolynx across Task Orders by René LaFleche, our DPM - Barrie Corridor projects and are mode transferable. Design. This application will be available for all Task Orders
RFP No. AE47810E0128 D.19 Systems Engineering and Support Services UNDERSTANDING OF WORK AND APPROPRIATENESS OF APPROACH FOR IMPLEMENTATION
UNDERSTANDING OF WORK AND APPROPRIATENESS OF APPROACH FOR IMPLEMENTATION Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER and useful in developing systems design elements and Award Winning and Globally Recognized facilities in 3-D conceptual layouts and renderings. All In November of 2014, Hatch’s use of intelligent rail CADD record files will be developed and transmitted design was recognized by Bentley Systems at its Be on Metro required media for Contract documents. Inspired Awards, winning the award for Innovation CADD PROGRAM EXECUTION in Rail and Transit. Allocation and oversight of CADD resources will be managed across Task Orders by our CADD Manager, Roberto Rodriguez of SENER, while maintaining Metro program-wide perspective by coordinating with René LaFleche, DPM-Design.
DATA COLLECTION/FIELD ASSESSMENTS The MS+P team understands that good design locations where work will take place as well as starts with a thorough and accurate understanding potential interviews with LACMTA staff. A full of both the existing conditions of a system and the evaluation report will be developed as part of the future objectives of that system. To that end, MS+P initial design work and will contain the following, as will work diligently with LACMTA to collect existing applicable: documentation, as-builts, and data on their existing • Redline as-builts systems. We understand that no organization’s • Pictures of existing conditions ‘as-builts’ will ever be 100% so we will verify their • Damage assessment and mitigation reports accuracy through field assessments as well as collect an understanding of the pitfalls of past • Assessment of nuisance alarms designs and goals of the future system from LACMTA • Conduit fill assessments staff entrusted to operate and maintain the systems. • Field notes on space availability for cabinets, Our experience with brownfield upgrades on the rooms, and staging Crenshaw line and Metrolinx USRC projects taught • Special operating or maintenance us the importance of this task. considerations For each task order assigned, data collection Throughout the process of collecting and producing and field assessment will vary. However, the the field assessment reports, the MS+P team will information that is anticipated to be included as notify LACMTA of any condition that would interfere part of the data will include, but not be limited to, with proper design, installation, testing, safety, the following: operations, or reliability of the systems under • As-built plans design. In this way, we start off with the greatest • Maintenance records and plans chance of success in meeting LACMTA’s goals. • Field data reports (developed by signal maintainers) • Incident reports • Equipment hardware, software, and firmware configurations, conditions, and reports • Asset Management Data • LACMTA standards and operating documents • Previous benchmark information Field assessments will be performed at relevant
RFP No. AE47810E0128 D.20 Systems Engineering and Support Services UNDERSTANDING OF WORK AND APPROPRIATENESS OF APPROACH FOR IMPLEMENTATION
UNDERSTANDING OF WORK AND APPROPRIATENESS OF APPROACH FOR IMPLEMENTATION Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER TRAIN CONTROL DESIGN SERVICES MS+P will provide detailed vital and non-vital train of vital and non-vital software programs developed control circuit design services in support of Metro internally and by third parties for our clients such for modifications and upgrades to existing Metro as Edmonton Transit System and Canadian Pacific. train control systems. Vital-Sim is a software tool which permits signal These design services for which our key personnel engineers to test vital and non-vital application have many years of collective train control logic programs produced using a variety of signal experience, will include: interlocking processor systems. The tool is versatile and permits the integration of multiple location • Block design and headway analysis, using tools programs enabling simulation of entire systems. such as Berkeley Simulations’ RTC model • Control line generation and verification The scale of projects range from testing the software programs, validating operating and • Track circuit and signal layout functional test plans, and producing verification • Grade crossing layout reports for multiple interconnected ElectrologIXS • Cab signal control lines and safe braking or MicroLok based locations up to large complex calculations multi-track interlockings with multiple serially or IP • Vital and non-vital circuit design and wiring connected processors. MS+P has used the tool to diagrams for interlockings, train detection, cab identifying key software errors and deficiencies in signaling, grade crossings, signal bungalows test documents during factory testing of software and cases prior to field installation. The use of this software • Review of train control design provided by has reduced the potential of reprogramming, others, which may include on-site review of re-verification and regression testing during installation and/or witnessing of testing cut-overs – saving time and budget dollars. While • Independent Safety Analysis (Perform safety this tool has proven to find many problems before analysis of systems or sub-systems, particularly installation, it is not intended as a substitute for at tie-ins, of contractor designs) actual field testing. • Development of test procedures MS+P has also employed Prover iLock to automate • Oversight and support for acceptance tests, the generation of test and verification reports as factory, special laboratories, field tests, start-up well as forms for factory and commissioning tests. and final integrated tests Prover iLock employs signaling rules defined for the railroad and a graphical representation of the signal • Other related work, as required plant configuration to generate test plans for the Delivering these services will be the responsibility location(s) to be tested. MS+P has found this tool to of Dale Hein, our Train Control Manager. Dale brings significantly reduce the effort to create tests books over 30 years of experience as a Signal Design and to reduce the errors in those books. The MS+P Manager on transit systems, passenger rail, as signaling professionals of our Technical Resource well as class 1 railroads. Additionally, Dale is a key Team have experience with Prover iLock to develop asset for his mentoring capabilities, which will be the signaling rules for Canadian Pacific and other in use for the MS+P mentor/protégé program. Dale projects. VISSIM and Prover iLock are examples of was instrumental in developing cross functional tools MS+P will propose. They assist in our primary expertise of the Hatch team in multiple areas of goal of delivering safe train control systems. the design, engineering, and assurance disciplines, TRAIN CONTROL TASK ORDER EXECUTION which was successfully executed by Hatch on the Go Transit Signaling and Train Control Improvement Allocation and oversight of Train Control resources Program. will be managed across Task Orders by Dale Hein, our Train Control Manager, with assistance from To improve the quality of software delivered, MS+P Jonathan Hu, our Train Control Design Lead, while has employed Vital-Sim for independent checking maintaining Metro program-wide perspective by coordinating with René LaFleche, our DPM – Design.
RFP No. AE47810E0128 D.21 Systems Engineering and Support Services UNDERSTANDING OF WORK AND APPROPRIATENESS OF APPROACH FOR IMPLEMENTATION
UNDERSTANDING OF WORK AND APPROPRIATENESS OF APPROACH FOR IMPLEMENTATION Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER COMMUNICATIONS DESIGN SERVICES For close to a decade LACMTA capital projects (as well In addition to Jon for communications design MS+P as operations, maintenance, and safety departments) has added Kurt Drummond (RF Design Lead) and have collectively made substantial efforts to improve Lee Castellion. Drummond’s Metro experience radio the performance and consistency of the various system spans almost 20 years, dating from Red elements that make up the communication system Line Phase 1 through to the system replacement. for LACMTA. The primary and most challenging aspect Castellion adds 28 years of experience in a wide for the SESS Program is the 28 major projects costing range of communications design, including systems approximately $100B, state of good repair upgrades engineering and integration background with recent on 30 year old systems, and the potential for new California HSR, Denver RTD, Washington WMATA, San P3’s. MS+P has a plan to drive the communicaion Francisco SFMTA and Dallas DART experience. consistency and improvement for the next 7+ Our approach to Communications will focus on years. Unlike the other systems components that three areas – staffing, strategy, and oversite/ change more slowly, communications technology support. is diverse, covering a host of different technologies borrowed from other industries. Innovations occur Staffing– The Task Order based approach for the constantly. Upgrades happen nearly every six main Capital programs, along with State of Good months, and customer expectations include an ever Repair projects, require key staff assignments. MS+P deepening reliance on information in real time. It PM will work with Metro to ensure the design meets is to answer this specific challenge that the MS+P Metro technical and budgetary KPI’s for each task communications team is formed, and will provide from design through design support services – the critical feature of our team to meet and exceed regardless of project delivery. Metro expectations – now, and for the next 10 years. Strategy – The Communication team will work MS+P has assembled a strong team of jointly with Metro to understand and organize communications experts, lead by Jonathan the goals and KPI’s of each Task Order for McDonald. Jon brings over 25 years of experience communications and current asset condition/ delivering complex systems. He has acted as a obsolescence. Immediately after, the team will designer and team manager to design entire work with Metro communications staff to develop communications systems in Seattle, to make a phased lifecycle plan or strategy to achieve functional a communications system supplied Metro Task Order goals efficiently, monitor the in pieces by 47 prime contracts in Edmonton, design progress and report at significant schedule and to develop the system requirements for a P3 milestones through the Task Order Leads. contract in Toronto. Jon has worked for Metro for Oversite – MS+P key Communications staff will almost 10 years managing teams for Gold Line provide technical review and oversite to each Phase 1 communications, providing independent of the Task Order team to ensure the assigned safety oversite of both the Crenshaw and Regional communications team members are providing the Connector programs, and most recently design highest technical quality, providing consistency oversite on the Red Line Radio Replacement project. with Metro standards and specifications, resolving Jon also brings knowledge of industry trends, issues arising from the design or construction of the standards, and technology. He leads the Research communications systems. Our Communications & Technology Committee Chair for APTA which team will maintain Metro program-wide goals, is responsible for the industry’s key technology update Standard Drawings, and provide key standards, procure of technology practices, and coordination with the DPM-Design René LaFleche, research in the technology areas with the Transit our DPM – Integration Anes Sassi. Cooperative Research Program.
RFP No. AE47810E0128 D.22 Systems Engineering and Support Services UNDERSTANDING OF WORK AND APPROPRIATENESS OF APPROACH FOR IMPLEMENTATION
UNDERSTANDING OF WORK AND APPROPRIATENESS OF APPROACH FOR IMPLEMENTATION Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER TRACTION POWER DESIGN SERVICES Figure D-11: Traction Power Modeling Tool Traction power supply design and management can be a challenging component of the systems for many transit agencies. MS+P understands that this requires performance data from the vehicle, parameters from the power supply network, plus operational inputs (the number of trains in each section), all of which are used in traction power sub- station design, specifications, equipment characteristics, cable routing, overhead and line system definition. Overhead Contact Systems (OCS) installation design can be within stations, tunnels on viaducts, or through street intersections. MS+P traction power team will apply modeling tools as illustrated in Figure D-11. MS+P has extensive modeling experience in North America including Hurontario LRT, Ottawa LRT, Toronto Finch LRT. Maryland LRT, Edmonton LRT & Line 3 of Metro Guadalajara & Line 12 of Mexico DF (Mexico). Siting of substations requires a thorough understanding of not only electrical supply Of increasing importance is the capacity of the parameters, but also local environmental and vehicle to return energy generated under braking access considerations. They must be secure to the traction supply system to allow other trains from unauthorized access and allow access for to use this energy. Studies show potentil energy maintenance and emergency staff. savings where this is implemented. The method to Recent trends toward specifying and installing implement this strategy is for one vehicle to receive modular traction sub- stations on projects shows the energy generated by a braking vehicle in the significant design and construction savings. Fully same vehicle block. Please note that vehicles are modular sub-stations are being provided on the not always this closely spaced, and require other Metro Crenshaw and Edmonton Valley Line LRT methods/strategies to allow energy storage. projects. The equipment fitting is completed off- site, and the complete unit is installed on an existing pre-formed foundation, saving time and budget.
Innovation Currently MS+P is engaged in the development of fixed energy storage facilities at critical points on systems that allow the trains braking energy to be used by other trains in different sections.
RFP No. AE47810E0128 D.23 Systems Engineering and Support Services UNDERSTANDING OF WORK AND APPROPRIATENESS OF APPROACH FOR IMPLEMENTATION
UNDERSTANDING OF WORK AND APPROPRIATENESS OF APPROACH FOR IMPLEMENTATION Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER
MS+P brings transferrable experience on integrating TRACTION POWER TASK ORDER EXECUTION electrical energy storage systems and high- Allocation and oversight of MS+P Traction power frequency charging /discharging constraints. Such design resources will be managed across Task solutions provide other benefits such as reducing Orders by Pere Busquet, the Traction Power peak power demand on substations, providing Manager, while maintaining program-wide additional voltage support and also emergency perspective by coordinating with René LaFleche, short term power. MS+P, through its Hatch electrical our DPM – Design. team, has closely evaluated and integrated several energy storage system products including Kinetic OCS DESIGN SERVICES Traction Systems Inc (KTSI) of California which MS+P has carried out numerous catenary studies in supplies high-speed composite-rotor flywheels. the framework of electrification projects for similar Metro has currently installed a KTSI flywheel system transit agencies that have interest in developing on the Gold Line and we propose to explore this new standards, with the potential for including a option. variety of catenary systems. Clients from high speed trains, commuter rail, and traditional light rail have MS+P has designed an innovative power ramp-up this interest. control using a combination of KTSI flywheel and li-ion battery for wind turbine power smoothing. MS+P partner SENER has developed a proprietary For rail applications, we believe there is benefit to software tool, SIRECA, that allows our designers to Metro and propose using a technology agnostic generate a variety to OCS studies, thereby improving approach to evaluate a variety of solutions including the Task Orders design process to reduce the super capacitors, batteries, and flywheels as design duration while optimizing the distribution well as provide specifications on custom control of the catenary supports and the related installed functionality for such systems. equipment – saving our clients time and budget. Numerous Technical Resource Team personnel are SIRECA also allows a great flexibility to review and active members of international energy storage modify OCS design criteria. The software is fully standardization bodies such as IEC on energy storage customizable based on the agency needs. systems and are well- versed in standards such as As shown in the diagram above, SIRECA interfaces the new IEEE standard 1887-2017 on Wayside Energy all phases of the project, to model a complete and Storage Systems for DC Traction Applications. reliable OCS solution. RFP No. AE47810E0128 D.24 Systems Engineering and Support Services UNDERSTANDING OF WORK AND APPROPRIATENESS OF APPROACH FOR IMPLEMENTATION
UNDERSTANDING OF WORK AND APPROPRIATENESS OF APPROACH FOR IMPLEMENTATION Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER
SIRECA is capable of developing both basic and TRANSVERSE PROFILES detailed Overhead Contact System deliverables, in • Geometrical representation for every single particular: profile; LAYOUT SPREADSHEETS • Calculation of all mechanical equipment • Optimized location of each catenary support (foundations, poles, cantilevers); according to table of spans, singular points, • Constructive details for cantilevers fabrication stations platforms, crossovers, traction power and installation; buildings, any external utilities (gas, water pipe) • Information useful for maintenance activity. and civil works (viaduct, overhead bridge with BILL OF MATERIALS reduced vertical clearance, underpass, tunnel); • Detailed and exact list of components; • Distribution of the tensioning length according to the maximum length of the canton and the • Useful information for purchasing activity; electrification scheme; • Fully customizable: it can be delivered by station, • Loads calculation, on the base of the pole, by tensioning length, by stretch or for the all from the weight of the equipment added to project. staggering, wind, curve and seismic data; OCS TASK ORDER EXECUTION • Foundations and poles calculation within safety Allocation and oversight of MS+P OCS design coefficient avoiding over-sizing; resources will be managed across Task Orders • Adjustment of the height of the contact wire by the Anthony Zeloyle, our Overhead Contact (and system height) according to the external Systems Manager, while maintaining program-wide constraints. perspective by coordinating with René LaFleche, our DPM – Design. LAYOUT DRAWINGS • Longitudinal drawings with the graphic OPERATIONAL RUNTIME AND representation of any information included in MODELING the layout spreadsheets. MS+P’s transit operations simulation and analysis • Fully customizable, it can be schematic or scaled. team are proficient in a wide variety of simulation packages including RTC, OpenTrack, and VISSIM. HANGERS REPORTS • Hangers are calculated for every span; Berkeley Simulations’ RTC model has a proven record of accurate simulation in transit, mixed, and • Amount, position and length are detailed for freight environments. Its input and output schemes construction purpose and material saving and allow for detailed reporting on any aspect of the reconstruction; operation and it is a de-facto standard used by • Track geometry and altimetry feed the software several operators in North America. as inputs, among with the layout spreadsheets and other equipment (e.g. presence of section Light rail systems, and often heavy transit rail insulator). systems, can also use the OpenTrack simulation model. Developed predominantly to address transit rail networks, OpenTrack is extremely well suited to BENEFITS handle high- frequency / low-headway transit rail ✓✓ Automated documents situations, in a streamlined modeling environment. ✓✓ Eliminating errors from repetitive tasks PTV’s VISSIM model is a road and highway traffic simulation package. It’s flexibility makes it an ✓✓ Mathematical calculation engine ideal choice for street traffic modeling where rail ✓✓ Optimized distribution of elements interacts with vehicular and pedestrian traffic ✓✓ Flexibility of operation and results at intersections, for at grade BRT and LRT -like performance operations, or at grade-crossings for any type of rail ✓✓ Fully customizable for each project operations.
RFP No. AE47810E0128 D.25 Systems Engineering and Support Services UNDERSTANDING OF WORK AND APPROPRIATENESS OF APPROACH FOR IMPLEMENTATION
UNDERSTANDING OF WORK AND APPROPRIATENESS OF APPROACH FOR IMPLEMENTATION Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER
SmallSim is a Hatch proprietary technology which OPERATIONAL RUNTIME AND MODELING TASK allows the concurrent running of two or more ORDER EXECUTION compatible simulation packages, for example where MS+P has Eric Vaillancourt on our Technical road and transit systems have a reciprocal effect on Resource Team to lead the application of Berkeley each other, providing comprehensive model analysis Simulations’ RTC for operations simulation and of the effects of traffic signals on transit operations. analysis. Eric is proficient in the use of this tool, Our team has been using this technology on both having delivered a Rail Network Capacity Planning the Calgary Greenline and LR the Edmonton Valley Study, to AMT in Montreal, QC, as well as performing Line LRT. It allows the systems to simultaneously a Line Capacity Analysis on the AcelorMittal Fire link results from OpenTrack and VISSIM in real-time Lake expansion project in Canada. Eric is supported for analysis of street-running LRT interactions with by Alex Trpkovic and Rick Newton, experts on variably timed traffic signal systems. simulating transit operations. This capability sets MS+P apart. It will allow our Allocation and oversight of these, and additional team to prepare Metro studies that represent the resources, will be managed across Task Orders by Carl complex interactions between modes of traffic Wright, our Operations and Planning Lead. In addition that is unique and innovative. MS+P proposes this to his LRT project experience, Carl has experience for consideration to be applied for VISSIM and with LRT operations, as the Operations Engineering Berkeley Simulations’ RTC. Manager for Edmonton Transit Systems. Program- MS+P offers to leverage the use of Hatch Rail wide consistency will be maintained by Anes Sassi, Optimizer (HRO), another tool that brings our DPM – Integration. optimization of supply chain of transit operations planning. Integrating state-of-the art optimization routines, HRO is a planning tool that can be used to develop schedules that optimize project specific constraints such as train delay, car delay, passenger transit time, and vehicle fleet utilizations.
RFP No. AE47810E0128 D.26 Systems Engineering and Support Services UNDERSTANDING OF WORK AND APPROPRIATENESS OF APPROACH FOR IMPLEMENTATION
UNDERSTANDING OF WORK AND APPROPRIATENESS OF APPROACH FOR IMPLEMENTATION Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER CORROSION CONTROL MS+P has performed detailed corrosion control Our design will consider the source of the stray work on various underground systems including current, the soil resistivity and identified susceptible Calgary Greenline LRT and Edmonton Valley Line elements will be modeled and the stray current in LRT. Our design strategy relies on baseline surveys the earth will be estimated based on the methods to assess soil conditions and pre-existing stray identified in standards such as BS EN-50122-2, BS currents. During design, focus will be to decrease EN 50162, IEC 62128-2 and good industry practice. the resistance of the rail return paths, increasing the The final design submissions will include the resistance of the rail-to-earth leakage paths, and details of the stray current calculations, design, and identifying susceptible elements such as pipelines mitigation methods deployed. on which cathodic protection will be applied. CORROSION CONTROL TASK ORDER EXECUTION A partial list of mitigation strategies deployed, Allocation and oversight of MS+P corrosion control which for these examples will be considered in resources will be managed across Task Orders by the development and review of tunnel designs for the Traction Power Manager – Pere Busquet , in Metro, such as: consultation with Les Durant, the Facilities/MEP • Electrically isolate rails from concrete by use of Lead. fully insulated direct fixation rail fasteners with epoxy coated anchor bolts installed in epoxy grout, • Specify that reinforcing steel in track slabs and concrete walls are made electrically continuous via use of wire ties, bonding, and mechanical connectors, • Include bare copper bonding conductor to transverse tunnel track invert rebar underneath the track to run the extents of tunnels, • Develop ways for bonding across expansion joints while preventing bonding between the walls and the invert slabs, • Isolate all rebar from any line wide electrical grounding systems, and • Include test stations, with reference electrodes, to facilitate measurements of shifting corrosion potential.
RFP No. AE47810E0128 D.27 Systems Engineering and Support Services UNDERSTANDING OF WORK AND APPROPRIATENESS OF APPROACH FOR IMPLEMENTATION
UNDERSTANDING OF WORK AND APPROPRIATENESS OF APPROACH FOR IMPLEMENTATION Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER SYSTEMS INTEGRATION MS+P key area of expertise is systems integration. MS+P proposes that prioritizing messages The critical goal of systems integration is the between the vehicle and the control center must development and application of common be defined at this point, and will be defined in methodologies to ensure effective, constant and coordination with Metro Operations to ensure coherent interface and integration management that the appropriate levels are implemented.Rail processes are applied and implemented. The vehicles and systems can produce interactions principal system interface is the rolling stock. This that influence the immediate environment, component is an excellent example of how MS+P and which may not be readily apparent. These experience on previous projects provides important disturbances are specifically the noise and vibration lessons. It is also an illustration of our design team environment and electromagnetic emissions will manage Metro Task Orders. that, our experience, often best managed as a In specific application of rail vehicles, our design form of functional interface. Principal sources of team evaluates physical interfaces and functional electromagnetic emissions are vehicles, traction interfaces. All interfacing parameters are defined by power sub-stations and auxiliary transformers. the two or more entities responsible for the design When considering these factors, MS+P proposes of the interfacing systems. For each interfacing that a “holistic” approach to be followed, which system, a functional interface specification which considers all sources and receptors, and how the details all aspects that define the complete system receptors may behave under the influence of the interface was developed. Physical interfaces are source. Certain mitigations may be clear by siting principally physical parameters, such as the wheel of traction power sub- stations to place each to rail interface or the pantograph to overhead as far possible from sensitive equipment. Prior line interface. In these cases, our team evaluates to any systems design or systems parameters each interface as a “physical interface” requiring being developed, a detailed Electromagnetic all parameters be identified, defined and mutually Compatability (EMC) Plan be developed and agreed between all design parties. Other systems implemented as a sub-plan of the PMP. The EMC such as on-board signaling systems or radio Plan sets out the parameters for the design of systems are considered as functional interfaces, systems and the management of the process, which imply that the systems can only operate including mitigation and verification and validation. successfully if they interact at all levels. An example A typical EMI mitigation process is shown in the is that the on-board equipment requires a power Figure D-12 on the following page. supply from the vehicle, and all parameters are SYSTEMS INTEGRATION TASK ORDER defined and consensus developed. On-board EXECUTION equipment is required to meet the vehicle Ongoing Allocation and oversight of MS+P Systems equipment installation regulations. Examples are Integration resources will be managed across Task fire and smoke requirements and electromagnetic Orders by the Systems Integration Lead, Chuck compatibility restrictions. The functional interface Pineda. will define all software operating parameters necessary to ensure that interfacing control and communication systems function correctly. Principal interfaces are between the vehicle traction and braking control system and the communication based train operation system. Similarly, all external communication systems must interact with the vehicle on board communication systems.
RFP No. AE47810E0128 D.28 Systems Engineering and Support Services UNDERSTANDING OF WORK AND APPROPRIATENESS OF APPROACH FOR IMPLEMENTATION
UNDERSTANDING OF WORK AND APPROPRIATENESS OF APPROACH FOR IMPLEMENTATION Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER ELECTRICAL POWER SUPPLY FACILITIES, MECHANICAL/ MS+P includes experienced electrical coordination ELECTRICAL/PLUMBING & FIRE capabilities through a key consultant with considerable DWP experience, Kewo Engineering PROTECTION MS+P has extensive experience developing Corporation. They will provide electrical service the design of facilities mechanical, electrical, design, including evaluation and design of low-, plumbing, and fire protection services through medium-, and high voltage electrical systems; our familiarity with LACMTA standards, and of various electrical equipment including transformers, our recent experience on projects. We have motors, generators, switchgear, and protective supported the integration of systems with devices; fire alarm systems; communications facilities, LACMTA Operations & Maintenance systems; and control systems. and are uniquely positioned to support projects The team is comprised of highly qualified electrical during the environmental phase. For the Metro engineers with the technical expertise, licenses/ Regional Connector Transit Corridor project, MS+P certifications, and substantial, directly- related developed three stations within the urban fabric of work experience, having delivered these specific stakeholder neighborhoods. Importantly the design engineering services to local clients, which include met the goals and expectations of the communities. Los Angeles Department of Water and Power The three stations include the layout of the ancillary (LADWP), the largest municipal utility in the United equipment rooms, and public concourses and States, and the primary power supplier for Metro. entrances, with systems integration. MS+P led the FACILITIES AND SYSTEMWIDE ELECTRICAL TASK coordination of the facilities, systems, and the ORDER EXECUTION major mechanical equipment and access paths to Allocation and oversight of facilities and assure safety and security, while providing access Systemwide Electrical resources will be managed for maintenance replacement. across Task Orders by the DPM - Design, Rene MS+P prepared the final design drawings, LaFleche. calculations, and technical specifications for the HVAC, plumbing systems, and fire protection Figure D-12: EMI mitigation systems required for the new BART Hayward process for a transit project Maintenance Complex and provided mechanical, HVAC, plumbing and fire protection services for a new 16,000 sq.ft. service and storage canopy. FACILITIES AND SYSTEMWIDE MECHANICAL/ PLUMBING/FIRE PROTECTION TASK ORDER EXECUTION Allocation and oversight of Facilities and Systemwide Mechanical/Plumbing/Fire Protection resources will be managed across Task Orders by the DPM - Design, Rene LaFleche.
RFP No. AE47810E0128 D.29 Systems Engineering and Support Services UNDERSTANDING OF WORK AND APPROPRIATENESS OF APPROACH FOR IMPLEMENTATION
UNDERSTANDING OF WORK AND APPROPRIATENESS OF APPROACH FOR IMPLEMENTATION Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER CONSTRUCTABILITY REVIEWS DURING DESIGN PHASE MS+P extensive field experience as well as extensive design office experience. This allows for efficient and effective design reviews that will spot design flaws early, and reduce design and/or construction time due to costly revisions or modifications. MS+P personnel have a blend of field and office experience to resolve both design and field issues quickly and effectively. MS+P personnel have supported construction activities such as with design build and design-bid-build. MS+P staff have lead the design-build (LA Metro Westside Purple – Phase 1) project.
RFP No. AE47810E0128 D.30 Systems Engineering and Support Services UNDERSTANDING OF WORK AND APPROPRIATENESS OF APPROACH FOR IMPLEMENTATION
UNDERSTANDING OF WORK AND APPROPRIATENESS OF APPROACH FOR IMPLEMENTATION Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER ABILITY TO PROVIDE AN EFFICIENT PROCESS OF HOW WORK WILL BE ALLOCATED AMONG THE TEAM MEMBERS MANAGING PERSONNEL AND TECHNICAL RESOURCES FROM THE TECHNICAL RESOURCE TEAM PROJECT EXECUTION PLAN which he reports, is committed to place in motion Prior to any Task Order being issued, MS+P will additional resource development plans. We will work develop the basic framework for delivering the Project hand in hand with LACMTA to develop Los Angeles to LACMTA, which will be incorporated in our overall County and Metro as the transit capital of the United Program Management Plan (PMP). The PMP will be States. made up of several sub-plans including: ASSEMBLING THE TEAM MEMBERS AND • Quality Management Plan IDENTIFYING THEIR ROLES • Design Management Plan Based on the specific needs of the individual tasks, • Safety Assurance Plan the appropriate staff will be assigned to the task • Requirements Management Plan order. The proper mix of senior resources through production-level staff will be combined to provide • RAMD Management Plan the most effective task team, and resource pool • Interface Management Plan for the timely, high quality execution of the goals, • Verification and Validation Plan KPI’s and other expectations of Metro all Task Order • EMC Plan stakeholders. From the PMP we will generate the Project Procedure Developing the team assignments a special interest Manuals which will include detailed information will be focused on: concerning procedures and processes, including lines • Prior experience of the team member with the of communication. team, LACMTA, and other stakeholders for the Task When a Task Order is initiated, and the Task Order Order. Project Team has been assembled, a Project • Availability of the team member on the basis of Execution Plan (PEP) will be generated, drawing participation on other Metro Task Orders, relevant sections from the PMP. • Availability of technical leadership inside the Task SUSTAINABILITY OF THE TEAM Order proposed team on the basis of participation on other Metro Task Orders. An important aspect of MS+P approach to the SESS contact, and in particular its JV partners, • DBE participation. is the partners full commitment to the creation, • Professional ability to meet the specific KPI’s. development and sponsorship of high caliber, long A dashboard roll-up reflecting the overall utilization term, sustainable transit systems work force within of each proposed team members will be provided the confines of Los Angeles County. The following to Metro as part of the Task Order Response. Team COMP/DBE plan outlines our commitment in detail. members assigned to a Task Order will be given Throughout execution of all Task Orders, the specific roles and responsibilities that directly relate Program Manager will conscientiously monitor to the negotiated scope of services. Task Order DBE participation while providing JV oversight of orientation will be provided by a thorough review and the availability and utilization of all of our team explanation of the Project Execution Plan. Day to day resources. This utilization is dependent and relies on reporting for Task Order team members will be as the developing schedule of the anticipated Metro directed by the Task Order Lead. Measure R and M capital, SOGR, and TAMS projects. During the duration of the contract, and if a potential imbalance of anticipated skills develops, Brent Lesjak, MS+P Program Manager, and the Joint Venture to
RFP No. AE47810E0128 D.31 Systems Engineering and Support Services UNDERSTANDING OF WORK AND APPROPRIATENESS OF APPROACH FOR IMPLEMENTATION
UNDERSTANDING OF WORK AND APPROPRIATENESS OF APPROACH FOR IMPLEMENTATION Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER DBE CONTRACT OUTREACH AND MENTORING PLAN METRO SYSTEMS + PARTNERS OUTREACH EVENT PHILOSOPHY MS+P is fully committed in the search for the best and brightest subcontractors to be on our team, Metro Systems + Partners (MS+P), a JV of Hatch/ not only for this project, but for everything we do. SENER, along with our major subconsultant On November 29, 2017, MS+P held a DBE Outreach Partners (CH2M, IBI, and Jacobs); are committed event to identify and recruit subcontractors to diversity and inclusion in all aspects of its specifically qualified in the areas outlined this work throughout the U.S., North America and scope of work. Senior members of the team, Paul internationally. Within their respective companies, Nolan (Hatch, Director/Construction Management) each has historically been guided by policies of non- and John Merkler (SENER, Director of Business discrimination and a determination to work with Development), presented an overview of the the best companies available regardless of culture, Project, highlighted positions/roles to be filled, nationality, gender, race, or ethnicity. Each partner and conducted on-the-spot interviews. During the prides itself on routinely exceeding DBE goals and event, a questionnaire was also circulated asking requirements established by agencies and clients firms to tell us if they were interested in being part and each considers diversity to be part of their DNA. of the Mentor-Protégé Program. In addition to the We wholeheartedly embrace the opportunity outreach event, MS+P reached out via telephone, presented by the DBE Contracting Outreach and email, and in-person visits to DBE subcontractors Mentoring Plan (COMP) to assemble a team of with specialty skills, and small businesses not experienced, bright and innovative small business located in the Los Angeles area, but willing to subcontractors, to mentor those that are ready to relocate, and others who have demonstrated strong grow, and to ensure that all our teaming partners systems backgrounds and have worked successfully have the support they need to successfully fulfill in the past with the JV partners. their scopes of work. METRO SYSTEMS + PARTNERS DBE COMP EXECUTIVE SUMMARY MS+P has selected 10 DBE firms to be part of the team and will meet the DBE contract goal of 15% of the total contract price. The expertise of the selected DBE firms cuts across a variety of disciplines required by the Project including Fare Collection, Train Control, Traction Power and Distribution, Cyber Security Systems, and EMI/ EMC Control. Four of the subcontractors, Colmena Engineering, Kewo Engineering Corporation, VSCE, Inc., and W2 Design Inc., have been selected to Rene LaFleche, DPM - Design, interviews participate in MS+P award-winning Mentor-Protégé subcontractors at Nov. 29 outreach event. Program.
RFP No. AE47810E0128 D.32 Systems Engineering and Support Services UNDERSTANDING OF WORK AND APPROPRIATENESS OF APPROACH FOR IMPLEMENTATION
UNDERSTANDING OF WORK AND APPROPRIATENESS OF APPROACH FOR IMPLEMENTATION Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER MS+P held a pre-proposal meeting on Dec. 7 where, DBE subcontractors participated in a brainstorming session, strategy development and building a winning proposal and team. From the beginning, our goal has been to build a strong and cohesive team that would be ready to hit the ground running and provide LA Metro world-class systems support that will address planned and unanticipated needs of the region’s rapidly expanding transportation network. Below we describe our DBE COMP that details how we will successfully meet the 15% DBE participation goal and strategies for utilizing small businesses in all phases of subcontracting. Additionally, we DBE Subcontractors participate in MS+P Outreach Event describe our award-winning approach to the to learn about opportunities on the Project. Mentor-Protégé Program that not only helps DBEs graduate to the next level, but also incorporates ongoing sponsorship that calls for us to take these companies with us from job to job in Los Angeles County and throughout the U.S. DBE COMP 1. MS+P has a deep bench of DBE subcontractors work. As a result of our resource depth and highly with a broad skill set uniquely suited to the Systems skilled team, we are certain to meet or exceed the Engineering and Support Services Project (SESS). 15% DBE participation for all future Task Orders. Our subcontractors are indispensable to our In addition to our current DBE subcontractor team design, making them an integral part of our teaming partners listed below, MS+P rounds out work and ensuring that each DBE subcontractor our team with other highly qualified and specialized will perform a commercially useful function. subcontractors the majority of which are Certified Understanding that this Project will be task-order Small Business Enterprises who can be called upon based, we’ve built a multidisciplinary subcontractor as program needs are identified. team whose skill sets align with the SESS scope of
Contract DBE Firms Role Amount 1 ABCS Scheduling TBD
2 Acumen Scheduling & Communications TBD
3 Anil Verma Associates Systems, MEP, Support TBD
4 Colmena Train Control, Communications, Traction Power & Distribution Systems TBD
5 Kewo Engineering Traction Power TBD
6 Project X Corrosion Consultants Corrosion Engineering TBD
7 Triad Consulting System Security TBD
8 T&T PR DBE Liaison TBD
9 VSCE Project Controls TBD
10 W2 Design 3rd Party Coordination TBD
RFP No. AE47810E0128 D.33 Systems Engineering and Support Services UNDERSTANDING OF WORK AND APPROPRIATENESS OF APPROACH FOR IMPLEMENTATION
UNDERSTANDING OF WORK AND APPROPRIATENESS OF APPROACH FOR IMPLEMENTATION Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER
2. MS+P will issue a Subcontracting/ 5. The Work Breakdown Structure will follow closely Task Order to procure subcontracts and the ultimate tasks that are assigned through this purchase orders over the life of the Project. project. The following chart illustrates the Work Each Subcontracting Task Order will Breakdown Structure we will employ for the Project include critical information such as required and how DBE subcontractors are to be incorporated tasks, period of performance, deliverables, in the project. schedule of completion, and DBE Total percentage for each DBE subcontractor and WBS Code WBS Name other LACMTA Key Performance Indicators, Activities Systems Engineering and Support as well as other goals. The Task Order will SCE 41 describe key personnel, project coordinator, Services task order lead and reporting requirements. SCE.00 Award & Contract Negotiations 3 Upon receipt of a task order from LACMTA, SCE.1.01 Program Management 16 our team will quickly issue a subcontracting SCE.1.01.1 Project Management 1 task order to all qualified subcontractors. SCE.1.01.2 Technical Leads 1 Once signed by the selected subcontractor SCE.1.01.3 Quality Management 1 and MS+P, the subcontracting task order 11 will constitute the subcontractor’s Notice to SCE.1.01.4 Project Controls Proceed (NTP). To ensure compliance with SCE.1.01.4.1 Cost Control & Reporting 5 the DBE COMP, the DBE Liaison Officer will SCE.1.01.4.2 Project Scheduling 5 be notified of the pending procurement and SCE.1.01.4.3 Cost Estimating 1 a copy of the signed subcontracting task SCE.1.01.5 Project Administration 2 order. SCE.1.01.5.1 Contract Administration 1 3. MS+P will utilize a combination of SCE.1.01.5.2 Document Control 1 self-performance and performance by SCE.1.02 Quality 5 subcontractor identified in our bid proposal. SCE.1.03 Computer Aided Design and Drafting 5 However, we recognize that this preference 1 may be subject to specific Task Order SCE.1.04 Train Control Design Services requirements and will require us to be SCE.1.05 Communications Design Services 1 flexible to meet the demands of LACMTA SCE.1.06 Traction Power Design Services 1 Overhead Contact Systems (OCS) and the project. SCE.1.07 1 Design Services 4. MS+P major partners (Hatch, SENER, Operational Runtime Simulation and SCE.1.08 1 Jacobs, CH2M, and IBI), all are intimately Modeling familiar with the importance of meeting SCE.1.09 Corrosion Control 1 or exceeding the goals of Metro’s Small SCE.1.10 Systems Integration 1 Business Programs. To that end, our goal SCE.1.11 Facilities and Systemwide Electrical 1 is that each Task Order will include one or more DBE subcontractors who, combined SCE.1.12 Facilities and Systemwide Electrical-1 1 or separately, will perform a minimum SCE.1.13 Facilities Plumbing 1 of 15% of the work. This approach will SCE.1.14 Facilities Fire Protection 2 ensure that we are in compliance with DBE Design Services During Construction SCE.1.15 1 participation goals at all times. (DSDC) Westside Purple Line Extension SCE.1.15.1 0 Section 3
RFP No. AE47810E0128 D.34 Systems Engineering and Support Services UNDERSTANDING OF WORK AND APPROPRIATENESS OF APPROACH FOR IMPLEMENTATION
UNDERSTANDING OF WORK AND APPROPRIATENESS OF APPROACH FOR IMPLEMENTATION Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER
6. The DBE Liaison Officer will coordinate with they need to fulfill their scopes of work on time and the MS+P Program Manager to create a Monthly on budget, to the satisfaction of the Metro Project Provisional Sum Work Status Report. Prior to Manager. submission of the first report, the DBE Liaison Officer will obtain approval from LACMTA on the report DBE LIAISON OFFICER (1-10) format including sum items, requests, and approvals. DBE LIAISON OFFICER 7. Providing technical assistance to DBE The proposed DBE Liaison Officer is a DBE subcontractors is critical to the success of almost all subcontractor, T&T Public Relations (T&T PR). major projects. Based on the DBE Liaison Officer’s The T&T PR principals assigned to experience managing an SBE/DVBE COMP, we the project are Phyllis Tucker and know small businesses possess technical know- Eneida Talleda. The team will be how, but we have learned that many of them led by Phyllis Tucker who has more need support in other areas, such as bonding than 27 years’ experience working assistance, marketing, accounting systems, business with clients in both the public and development and other support services that could private sectors; Eneida has more Phyllis L. Tucker mean the difference between growth or no-growth, than 25 years’ experience. Both are T&T Public success or failure. Under the aegis of our Mentor- accomplished managers, having Relations Senior Partner Protégé Program, we will conduct an overall needs dealt with multi-faceted small assessment to determine the type of support most business outreach programs DBE subcontractors need and then develop a that encompass the disciplines “Lunch & Learn” program that will focus on those of strategic communications skill sets identified in the needs assessment. Lunch planning, program management, & Learn sessions will be geared toward the scope partnership development, of services for this Project, but may also be more diversity communications, stakeholder engagement, internal Eneida M. Talleda general in nature to help DBEs develop greater T&T Public capacity to compete for larger LACMTA contracts or communications, brand strategy, Relations Senior to become prime contractors on future procurement and crisis and risk communications. Partner opportunities. T&T Public Relations has coordinated small business outreach programs for organizations such The DBE Liaison Officer will work closely with the 8. as Hewlett Packard (HP), Pacific Gas and Electric MS+P Program Manager to implement and enforce Company (PG&E), Santa Monica and Malibu Unified compliance by the Contractor and its lower-tier non- School District, California Department of Consumer DBE subcontractors relative to DBE subcontracting Affairs, Bureau of Automotive Repair and the Los requirements as set forth in federal regulations, 49 Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation CFR Part 26 and any amendments. Authority. The DBE Liaison Officer will work closely with 9. In 2015, T&T Public Relations completed the MS+P Program Manager to implement and development of the Metro Countywide Small enforce compliance by the Contractor and lower- Business Outreach Plan and helped launch key plan tier non- DBEs relative to DBE requirements. The components. The Countywide Small Business Plan Subcontracting Task Order will be the base document refreshed existing Metro Small Business Programs, for monitoring activities, as it details the DBE including the SBE/DBE programs, and introduced percentage for each subcontractor, scope of work, new initiatives such as Small Business Prime and period of performance and key personnel, among DVBE, geared toward leveling the playing field for other things. Monthly reports will be submitted by the small businesses and developing key tools to help DBE Liaison Officer to DEOD and any issues relative to small businesses compete successfully for LACMTA contract compliance will be identified and explained contracts, specifically as primes under the set-aside in sufficient detail, including steps to mitigate program, or as subcontractors to large primes. problems as they occur. Our goal is to ensure all DBE subcontractors receive the support and assistance
RFP No. AE47810E0128 D.35 Systems Engineering and Support Services UNDERSTANDING OF WORK AND APPROPRIATENESS OF APPROACH FOR IMPLEMENTATION
UNDERSTANDING OF WORK AND APPROPRIATENESS OF APPROACH FOR IMPLEMENTATION Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER Currently, T&T Public Relations is managing the contractor to LACMTA DEOD, T&T PR developed the SBE/DVBE COMP as a subcontractor to HDR for the Small Business Tool Kit that currently resides on I-605/SR 60 Highway Interchange Improvement LACMTA’s Vendor Portal. The Tool Kit has been used Project. That program includes contract by LACMTA and other subcontractors to help small compliance, SBE outreach events, and the design businesses develop greater capacity to compete for and execution of the Mentor-Protégé Program. LACMTA procurements and to bid on contracts as As part of the small business community, and as a the prime contractor.
Responsibilities Critical Elements for Consideration Report to LACMTA DEOD DBE • Develop reporting format, maintain open line of communication with Metro contractor/supplier status DEOD to enable rapid response and/or reporting regarding DBE subcontractors • Build collaborative process to facilitate problem solving, innovative approaches Carry out technical assistance • Work with MS+P Program Manager to conduct needs/skills assessment, activities for DBEs including business development, skill building, management, etc. • Develop technical assistance plan in alignment with subcontractors’ scope of work and Task Order needs • Oversee execution of technical assistance plan and report progress and/or issues to DEOD Submit DBE subcontracts/purchase • Monitor submission of Small Business Programs Compliance Reporting System orders to the DEOD within 14 days (SBCRS) forms by subcontractors; respond to Metro when receiving reports of of the Subcontractor Agreement subcontractor non-compliance Execution • Receive timely DBE subconstracts and announcements Interface with DEOD regarding DBEs’ • Work collaboratively with MS+P to perform monitoring and corrective action and issues and obtaining approvals for provide regular updates to DEOD all DBE replacements, substitutions • Work with MS+P Program Manager to develop and submit written or terminations recommendations for DBE replacements, substitutions or terminations to DEOD Resolve conflict or disagreement • Work closely with LACMTA procurement officer to facilitate problem solving and between the procurement address issues of concern regarding award of a DBE subcontract officer and the DBE Liaison • Identify and follow protocols for resolving disputes regarding DBE subcontract Officer regarding the award of a awards subcontract/purchase order or • Maintain documentation of outreach activities to ensure accurate reporting of documentation of good faith efforts good faith efforts Monitor lower-tier subcontractors • Maintain open communications with all lower-tier subcontractors to facilitate and suppliers to ensure that they 3600 feedback comply with the DBE Program • Utilize MS+P tools to monitor compliance with DBE program requirements requirements and the DBE COMP submitted by the Contractor Submit written monthly reports • Develop format and content for DBE monthly reports detailing the DBE activities, • Provide written documentation of monthly meetings including issues discussed, DBE Participation Reports and outcomes, next steps, etc. schedule monthly meetings with DEOD
RFP No. AE47810E0128 D.36 Systems Engineering and Support Services UNDERSTANDING OF WORK AND APPROPRIATENESS OF APPROACH FOR IMPLEMENTATION
UNDERSTANDING OF WORK AND APPROPRIATENESS OF APPROACH FOR IMPLEMENTATION Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER
In 2014, former Houston Mayor, Annise D. Parker, and former Public Works and Engineering Director, Daniel W. Krueger recognized Hatch Chester, a member of the Hatch Group, for their exemplary support of the growth of minority and disadvantaged firms throughout the City Houston.
MENTOR-PROTÉGÉ PROGRAM MS+P has developed an exciting Mentor-Protégé MENTOR PROTÉGÉ APPROACH AND GENERAL Program based on Hatch’s award-winning Mentor- REQUIREMENTS Protégé Program in the City of Houston. Hatch has Our strategic approach to the Mentor-Protégé also implemented this award winner in Pittsburgh, Program is to identify DBE firms at each tier level, PA and Columbus, OH and has achieved successful based on dollar thresholds, who are ready to grow results in both cities. Robert L. Agbede, Vice to the next level. MS+P will develop a customized Chairman, Hatch USA leads this effort for Hatch mentoring program for each protégé, assign a in the U.S., further demonstrating the company’s mentor from one of the partner firms that provides commitment to mentoring and underscoring its the best match for that protégé, and develop a enthusiasm to bring this best-practices program to training curriculum that adds value and expertise to Los Angeles and Metro. both mentor and protégé. Protégés will be awarded Based on the Hatch model, MS+P will mentor four a Certificate of Completion from MS+P upon DBE firms at different tiers within the DBE program. completion of course and field work. Tier levels are determined by the DBE firm’s Our strategy includes a significant opportunity annual revenue. We believe it is the partnership’s for successful protégés to continue in the professional and social responsibility to mentor “Sponsorship” program once their mentorship other firms, providing opportunities for cross- responsibilities have been fulfilled. As a sponsored learning and growth for all parties. Our commitment agency, MS+P will “take the protégé with them” on is to enhance the capabilities of the firms we new projects. Hatch is doing this successfully in mentor, improve their ability to successfully other cities and we intend to import that strategic grow and compete and assist them with building element to the Metro SESS Project. relationships with small and large firms with whom We are confident the playing field will be they may ultimately choose to do business. dramatically leveled for our Protégé firms as they get personalized training, counseling and exposure to Projects beyond the current RFP.
RFP No. AE47810E0128 D.37 Systems Engineering and Support Services UNDERSTANDING OF WORK AND APPROPRIATENESS OF APPROACH FOR IMPLEMENTATION
UNDERSTANDING OF WORK AND APPROPRIATENESS OF APPROACH FOR IMPLEMENTATION Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER
DEFINITIONS AND ROLES FOR PROTÉGÉ, MENTOR-PROTÉGÉ AGREEMENTS MENTOR, AND MS+P Mentor-Protégé Agreements will be handled in two Protégé: Complete required nomination forms, phases. In Phase One, pre-bid phase, protégés, needs assessment, collaborate with mentor on mentors and DBE Liaison Officer will complete the curriculum development, complete training classes Protégé Candidate Nomination form and a protégé within the three-year period, continue as sponsored Evaluation Checklist, both of which will be on file firm, if the right fit. in MS+P shared drive. Combined, the two forms include the following required information (please Mentor: Participate in protégé onboarding, participate on Mentor-Protégé Strategic Advisors see attached): Panel, identify instructors, develop customized a. Names of Mentor and DBE protégé training curriculum, schedule and conduct training b. Description of mentoring activities and or provide oversight and supervisorial support to estimated number of hours instructors providing the training, recommend next c. Deliverables associated with mentoring work steps including Sponsorship Program d. Duties and responsibilities of Mentor and MS+P: Through the DBE Liaison Officer, MS+P will Protégé, including list of key personnel manage all aspects of the Mentor-Protégé Program. e. Benchmarks to measure progress The DBE Liaison Officer will develop the framework f. Proc ess for evaluating Mentor-Protégé and structure for the Mentor-Protégé Program, relationship including develop & design Mentor-Protégé g. Termination provisions Timeline, develop & design needs assessment form, Phase Two, will require signing a formal Mentor- develop & design protégé candidate nomination Protégé Agreement. The formal Agreement form, develop & design curriculum spreadsheet, will include a detail statement of curriculum, develop & design training evaluation form, develop instructors, and completion requirements. The & design program evaluation form, develop formal Agreement will contain provisions for and coordinate fully executed Mentor-Protégé evaluating the Mentor/Protégé relationship and Agreements, coordinate support services and termination provisions. technical assistance for protégés and other DBE Subcontractors. PROTÉGÉ TO MENTOR A PROTÉGÉ One reason we’re so excited about our award- SELECTION PROCESS FOR EACH TIER winning program is that it contains a built- In the pre-bid phase, MS+P conducted an initial in component for protégés to mentor other assessment of DBE subcontractors that had already protégés. We know from experience working in agreed to be a teaming partner. To ensure no one the DBE community, smaller businesses are more was overlooked, we distributed questionnaires comfortable with other small businesses, especially at the Outreach event on November 29 to give when it comes to navigating through Metro’s subcontractors the opportunity to self-nominate. procurement process. Our protégés have already We then conducted a review of all candidates to successfully navigated that path and each will identify DBE subcontractors at the various levels be called upon to share their learnings with DBE and those who demonstrated readiness for the subcontractors that require help in this area. Mentor-Protégé Program. We invited six firms to participate, two declined and four accepted leaving During the first year of the program, we will identify us with the protégés noted in the chart below. DBE subcontractors who have an interest in being mentored. Once a protégé completes its program, we will connect them with a DBE subcontractor who has expressed interest in the program and facilitate the Protégé-to-Protégé mentoring program. Additionally, through our Lunch & Learn Program, we’ll identify protégés who have matured and
RFP No. AE47810E0128 D.38 Systems Engineering and Support Services UNDERSTANDING OF WORK AND APPROPRIATENESS OF APPROACH FOR IMPLEMENTATION
UNDERSTANDING OF WORK AND APPROPRIATENESS OF APPROACH FOR IMPLEMENTATION Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER developed an expertise that can be shared with The subjects covered can include: other small businesses in a group setting so • Project Management everyone benefits, not just the business being • Accounting Practices mentored. Teaching is a powerful empowerment for Success tool and we will use the Protégé-to-Protégé • Federal Procurement mentoring program to help these small businesses grow. • Marketing Techniques • Role of Certifications in BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE Growing a Business Business development assistance will be offered to • Business Development all MS+P’ DBE Subcontractors in a “Lunch & Learn” • Business Operations Series. Our subject-matter experts, instructors and mentors will conduct customized “Lunch & Learn” NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF THE MENTOR AND seminars to enhance the capabilities of protégé PROTÉGÉ POINT OF CONTACT firms while offering DBE subcontracting partners an Names and addresses of the mentor and protégé advanced level of technical expertise. points of contact, please refer to the table below.
METRO SYSTEMS + PARTNERS MENTOR-PROTÉGÉ PROGRAM The Protégés: 4 DBE Subcontractor Partners Protégé Company Description Mentor Colmena Engineering is a DBE-certified company Rene LaFleche providing Electrical Engineering and Systems Hatch Communications Consulting Services. Colmena 601 South Figueroa Street specializes in the preparation of construction contract Suite 4575 Beatriz Mendez Lora documents for Municipal and Transit/Transportation Los Angeles CA 90017 Colmena Engineering Industries. 45 Villanova Lane Oakland, CA 94611 Kewo Engineering Corporation (KEC) specializes in Mark Turner Electric Power related engineering services for electric SENER utilities, public agencies and private companies 800 Wilshire Boulevard, Brian Kewo worldwide. Our comprehensive range of services Suite 700 - Los Angeles, CA 90017 Kewo Engineering Corporation includes design and engineering; program and project 510 S. Hewitt Street, Unit 304 management; procurement and quality assurance; Los Angeles, CA 90013 and manufacturer’s representation. Jesus M. Vargas VSCE, INC. provides professional services for Paul Nolan VSCE, Inc. construction management, program management Hatch 515 S. Flower Street, and public relations services to public works and 601 South Figueroa Street 36th Fl. private clients throughout California. Suite 4575 Los Angeles, CA Los Angeles CA 90017 94071 W2 Design, Inc. is a multi-discipline consulting firm Kenneth Shields specializing in civil engineering, transportation, traffic Jacobs signals and lighting, construction management, urban 600 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1000 planning, land development, permit processing, and Los Angeles, CA 90017 entitlement.
Patrick Wong W2 Design, Inc. 50 South De Lacey Avenue, Suite 100 Pasadena, CA 91105
RFP No. AE47810E0128 D.39 Systems Engineering and Support Services UNDERSTANDING OF WORK AND APPROPRIATENESS OF APPROACH FOR IMPLEMENTATION
UNDERSTANDING OF WORK AND APPROPRIATENESS OF APPROACH FOR IMPLEMENTATION Metro Systems + Partners a JV of Hatch & SENER
DEFINE MENTOR-PROTÉGÉ ARRANGEMENTS; DEFINE GUIDELINES CONCERNING THE MEASURING AND EVALUATING SUCCESS WITHDRAWAL OR TERMINATION OF A MENTOR The formal structure of the Mentor-Protégé PROTÉGÉ AGREEMENT Program, including training, management and The formal Mentor-Protégé Agreement which oversight, and measurement and evaluation and will be filed with Metro will clearly define terms of reporting regularly to Metro are key to the program’s engagement, including withdrawal. The general success. Our approach includes steps to address the terms for termination state that the Protégé or unique needs of each protégé while simultaneously Mentor may voluntarily terminate the Agreement helping all protégé firms build greater capacity to if either party no longer wishes to participate in take on larger Metro projects and/or graduate to the the Program as a Protégé or Mentor. The Protégé next level. or Mentor shall notify the Metro Systems Mentor- To that end, MS+P will form a strategic advisors Protégé Strategic Advisory Panel and the DBE panel called the “Metro Systems Mentor-Protégé Liaison Officer in writing at least 30 days prior to the Strategic Advisory Panel.” The Panel will comprise proposed termination date with justification for the representatives from Hatch, SENER, Jacobs, and request for termination. CH2M and will be responsible for overall guidance, ENSURE THAT DBES ARE AN INDEPENDENT oversight and program evaluation. The Panel will BUSINESS ENTITY AND A CERTIFIED DBE meet every 6 months to make decisions regarding MS+P has obtained a copy of each protégé’s DBE the Mentor-Protégé Program, evaluate progress, certificate and will maintain them in its files for the facilitate problem solving, support program duration of the Project. activities such as training and instruction and ensure that their respective companies are engaged in the Program. Through ongoing coordination activities, the Panel will receive updates from Task Order leads to aid in the evaluation process and to alert MS+P if a protégé is experiencing challenges relative to fulfillment of their scope of work. The DBE Liaison Officer will provide management support to the Panel and will report quarterly to Metro on behalf of the Panel.
RFP No. AE47810E0128 D.40 Systems Engineering and Support Services BIDDER/ PROPOSER: Hatch Associates Consultants, Inc.
LIST OF CURRENT CONTRACTS (BACKLOG)
OWNER’S NAME, ESTIMATED VALUE OF ESTIMATED CONTRACT NAME DESCRIPTION OF WORK/ ADDRESS, PHONE NO., BIDDER'S/PROPOSER'S COMPLETION AND LOCATION SERVICES CONTACT PERSON WORK/SERVICES DATE Regional Connector ☐Prime ☒ Sub LACMTA $3 million 2020 Transit Corridor, Description: Prime Designer One Gateway Plaza, Los Angeles, on a scope that includes final Los Angeles, CA 90012 California Tel: (213) 922-7277 design of 1.9 miles of twin Gary Baker bored and cut-and-cover tunnels, three underground stations, systems design and integration.
Valley Line LRT, ☐Prime ☒ Sub City of Edmonton $5.4 million 2020 Edmonton, Alberta, Description: Owner’s Main Floor, 13310-50A Canada Engineer, responsibilities Street DL MacDonald, included supporting the City Edmonton, AB Tel: (780) 446-0833 of Edmonton as the P3 Brad Griffith Technical Advisor. West LRT ☒Prime ☐ Sub The City of Calgary $250,000 2017 Associated Works, 4th Floor, Alberta Trade Description: Owner’s th Calgary, Alberta, Engineer, assisted The City of Centre 315-10 Avenue Canada SE, Calgary, AB Calgary with management of Tel: (403) 268-1775 the entire project. Jim Sulpher Metro Line LRT ☐Prime ☒ Sub City of Edmonton $1.4 million 2017 CBTC, Edmonton, Description: Lead Engineer Floor 12, 10235-101 Alberta, Canada responsible for all aspects of Street NW, Edmonton, AB Tel: (780) 423-5229 CBTC design, construction, Guy Boston project management, quality management, systems engineering, systems
Page 1 of 3
BIDDER/ PROPOSER: Hatch Associates Consultants, Inc.
OWNER’S NAME, ESTIMATED VALUE OF ESTIMATED CONTRACT NAME DESCRIPTION OF WORK/ ADDRESS, PHONE NO., BIDDER'S/PROPOSER'S COMPLETION AND LOCATION SERVICES CONTACT PERSON WORK/SERVICES DATE integration, testing and commissioning in compliance with the detailed requirements. Green Line LRT, ☒Prime ☐ Sub The City of Calgary $150-200 million 2026 nd Calgary, Alberta Description: Prime 615 Macleod Trail, 2 Canada Consultant, responsible for Floor Rocky Mountain Plaza, Calgary, AB leading the planning, Tel: (403) 268-5594 preliminary design, functional Fabiola MacIntyre design, and program management. Eglinton Crosstown ☒Prime ☐ Sub Metrolinx $61 million 2021 th LRT, Toronto, Description: Technical 20 Bay Street, 18 Fl., Ontario, Canada Advisor and Tunnel Designer Toronto, ON Tel: (416) 869-3600 for new LRT line Thom Budd Regional Express ☒Prime ☐ Sub Metrolinx $100 million (approx.) 2027 th Rail (RER), Toronto, Description: Technical 20 Bay Street, 18 Fl., Ontario, Canada Advisor for RER program; Toronto, ON Tel: (416) 869-3600 conducted business case ext.5365 Karla Avis-Birch Barrie Rail Corridor ☒Prime ☐ Sub Metrolinx $24 million 2023 th Expansion, Toronto, Description: EA and design 20 Bay Street, 18 Fl., Ontario, Canada Toronto, ON for expansion of rail corridor Tel: (416) 869-3600 Mike Stancu Davenport Diamond ☒Prime ☐ Sub Metrolinx $8 million 2020 th Grade Separation, Description: Technical 20 Bay Street, 18 Fl., Toronto, Ontario, Advisor for grade separation; Toronto, ON Canada Tel: (416) 869-3600
Page 2 of 3
BIDDER/ PROPOSER: Hatch Associates Consultants, Inc.
OWNER’S NAME, ESTIMATED VALUE OF ESTIMATED CONTRACT NAME DESCRIPTION OF WORK/ ADDRESS, PHONE NO., BIDDER'S/PROPOSER'S COMPLETION AND LOCATION SERVICES CONTACT PERSON WORK/SERVICES DATE also performed TPAP/EA, Renee Pettigrew conceptual design East Harbour ☒Prime ☐ Sub First Gulf $664K to $1 million 2023 Planning Project, Description: Providing 3751 Victoria Park Toronto, Ontario, engineering, project Avenue/Toronto, ON Canada Tel:(416)368-5752 management, economics and Derek Goring strategy services for financial advisory, urban development and planning, and engineering
Page 3 of 3
BIDDER/PROPOSER: ______
LIST OF CURRENT PROJECTS (BACKLOG)
OWNER'S NAME, PROJECT NAME AND ESTIMATED COST OF ESTIMATED DESCRIPTION OF WORK ADDRESS, PHONE NO. LOCATION BIDDER'S WORK COMPLETION CONTACT PERSON $ Prime Sub
$ Prime Sub
$ Prime Sub
$ Prime Sub
$ Prime Sub
METRO ARCHIVE # LIST OF CURR & COMP PROJ (BACKLOG) TBD (IFB/RFP NO.) 1 PRO FORM 054 ISSUED 00/00/00 REVISION DATE: 05.15.02
PROPOSER: ABCS Consulting Services
LIST OF CURRENT PROJECTS (BACKLOG) (Click here for the pdf with form fields version: http://media.metro.net/ebb/contract_templates/5- 005_054_and_055_List_of_Curr_and_Comp_Proj_%28Backlog%29.pdf)
OWNER'S NAME, PROJECT NAME AND ADDRESS, PHONE NO. ESTIMATED COST OF ESTIMATED DESCRIPTION OF WORK LOCATION CONTACT PERSON PROPOSER'S WORK COMPLETION EMAIL ADDRESS 8FTUTJEF1VSQMF-JOF -"$.5"3L8JMTPO Y $ , &YUFOTJPO4FDUJPO Prime Sub %FQVUZ&YFDVUJWF0GGJDFS -PT"OHFMFT 1SPHSBN$POUSPM $BMJGPSOJB
Prime Sub $
Prime Sub $
Prime Sub $
Prime Sub $
METRO GA17-140 LIST OF CURR & COMP PROJ (BACKLOG) RFP NO. AE47810E0128 5-6 PRO FORM 054 ISSUED: 11.14.17 REVISION DATE: 05.15.02 PROPOSER: ______
LIST OF CURRENT PROJECTS (BACKLOG) (Click here for the pdf with form fields version: http://media.metro.net/ebb/contract_templates/5- 005_054_and_055_List_of_Curr_and_Comp_Proj_%28Backlog%29.pdf)
OWNER'S NAME, PROJECT NAME AND ADDRESS, PHONE NO. ESTIMATED COST OF ESTIMATED DESCRIPTION OF WORK LOCATION CONTACT PERSON BIDDER'S WORK COMPLETION EMAIL ADDRESS
Prime Sub $
Prime Sub $
Prime Sub $
Prime Sub $
Prime Sub $
METRO 17-31CO LIST OF CURR & COMP PROJ (BACKLOG) RFP NO. AE40289MC073 5-6 PRO FORM 054 ISSUED: 04.10.17 REVISION DATE: 05.15.02 PROPOSER: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.
LIST OF CURRENT PROJECTS (BACKLOG) (Click here for the pdf with form fields version: http://www.metro.net/EBB/contract_templates/5- 005_054_and_055_List_of_Curr_and_Comp_Proj_%28Backlog%29.pdf)
OWNER'S NAME, PROJECT NAME AND ADDRESS, PHONE NO. ESTIMATED COST OF ESTIMATED DESCRIPTION OF WORK LOCATION CONTACT PERSON BIDDER'S WORK COMPLETION EMAIL ADDRESS Prime Sub Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority LACMTA Contract E0117 - (LACMTA) $3.7 Million (Design 2018 Crenshaw-LAX Transit Corridor One Gateway Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90012 Completed) (construction Advanced Conceptual/Preliminary Construction Phase – in administration Engineering-Light Rail System, Los Mr. Roderick Diaz, Director, Countywide, Systemwide progress phase) Angeles, CA (FORMERLY with LA Metro) NOW with Metrolink Director, Planning & Development Tel: (213)452-0455, [email protected] LACMTA DB-C0980 - Regional Prime Sub Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority 2017 (design) Connector Transit Corridor, One Gateway Plaza, Los Angeles, Ca 90012 2019 $4.2 Million Design-Build Contract, (construction (AVA’s fee) Los Angeles, CA Mr. Girish Roy, Director of Construction Manager administration Tel: (213) 893-7119, [email protected] phase) LACMTA DB C1073 - Metro Red Prime Sub Clark Construction Group - California, LP $900,000 (AVA’s fee) 2016 (design) Line Pershing Square Canopy 18201 Von Karman, Suite 800, Irvine, CA 92612 2017 Addition & Escalator Replacement, (construction Los Angeles, CA Jorge Delgadillo, Project Manager administration Tel: (213) 248-6807, [email protected] phase)
LACMTA PS24153268 – Van Nuys Prime Sub Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority $215K (AVA’s fee) 2016 (design) North Platform Project, Los One Gateway Plaza, Los Angeles, Ca 90012 2018 Angeles, CA (construction Ms. Danielle Libring, PE, Project Manager administration Tel: (949) 383-2332, [email protected] phase) Kamehameha Highway Station Prime Sub Honolulu Authority for Rapid Transportation (HART) 2015 (design Group, Honolulu Authority for 1099 Alakea St., Suite 1700, Honolulu, HI 96813 $10.5 Million phase) Rapid Transportation (HART), Mr. Michael Yoshida, AIA, Contract Manager Honolulu (AVA’s fee) 2019(construction Honolulu, HI Authority for Rapid Transportation administration Tel: (808) 768-5459, [email protected] phase) Prime Sub Los Angeles Trade Technical College (LATTC) LACCD MATOC - PM/CM & 400 W. Washington Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90015 $3 Million 2019 Support Services, Contract 1006 Mr. Deba Mohapatra (Retired-Project Director) (AVA’s fee) Tel: (562) 746-5826, [email protected]
METRO GA17-140 LIST OF CURR & COMP PROJ (BACKLOG) RFP NO. AE47810E0128 5-6 PRO FORM 054 ISSUED: 11.14.17 REVISION DATE: 05.15.02 PROPOSER: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.
Prime Sub Bay Area Rapid Transit District (BART) 300 Lakeside Drive., 21st Flr., Oakland, CA 94612 BART Operations Control Center (OCC) Transit Oriented (TOD) at Mr. Richard Pakulski, Project Manager $3.7 Million (AVA’s fee) 2018 the Existing Lake Merritt Station, Planning and Development - Systems Capital Group Oakland, CA Tel: 510-464-6566, [email protected]
The BART Silicon Valley Berryessa Prime Sub Station (SVBX) Design Build, Santa Clara Valley Transit Authority (VTA) 2014 (design C700, Stations, Wayside Facilities, 3331 N. 1st Street, San Jose, CA 95134 phase) Structures and Systems, Santa $12 Million (AVA’s fee) 2017(construction Clara Valley Transportation Mr. Rajwinder Sehdev, Principal Architect administration Authority, San Jose, CA Tel: (408) 942-6143, [email protected] phase
Prime Sub Federal Transit Administration (FTA) 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Project Management Mr. Sebouh (Steve) Asatoorian, Contracting Officer’s $13 Million (AVA’s fee) 2020 Oversight Contract DTFT60-14-D- Representative (retired) 00019 Tel: (301) 404-8401, [email protected]
Prime Sub Bay Area Rapid Transit District (BART) BART General Engineering 300 Lakeside Drive 23rd Floor Services for BART Projects, Oakland, CA 94612 $20 Million (AVA’s fee) 2018 Agreement No. 6M8043, Oakland, CA Mr. Tian Feng, FAIA, FCSI Tel: (510) 464-6549, [email protected] Prime Sub Bay Area Rapid Transit District (BART) 300 Lakeside Drive 23rd Floor BART 6M8104 Construction Oakland, CA 94612 Management Services, Agreement $500K (AVA’s fee) 2021 No. 6M8104, Oakland, CA Mr. Javed Khan, PM Tel: (510) 464-6583, [email protected]
Prime Sub City of Santa Clarita 23920 Valencia Boulevard City of Santa Clarita, Vista Canyon Santa Clarita, CA 91355 Multi-Modal Center (Metrolink $213K (AVA’s fee – Phase 1) 2017 Station), Santa Clarita, CA Ms. Danielle Libring, PE, Project Manager Tel: (949) 383-2332, [email protected]
Prime Sub Alameda Corridor East Construction Authority (ACE) Puente Avenue Grade Separation 4216 Baldwin Avenue, El Monte, CA 91731 Project – Agreement 15-04, $591K (AVA’s fee) 2017 Industry, CA Andres Roldan, PE, PM Tel: (818) 414-1611, [email protected]
METRO GA17-140 LIST OF CURR & COMP PROJ (BACKLOG) RFP NO. AE47810E0128 5-6 PRO FORM 054 ISSUED: 11.14.17 REVISION DATE: 05.15.02
BIDDER/PROPOSER: CH2M HILL, Inc.
(Click here for the pdf with form fields version: http://www.metro.net/EBB/contract_templates/5-
005_054_and_055_List_of_Curr_and_Comp_Proj_%28Backlog%29.pdf ) LIST OF CURRENT PROJECTS (BACKLOG) OWNER'S NAME, PROJECT NAME AND ADDRESS, PHONE NO. ESTIMATED COST OF ESTIMATED DESCRIPTION OF WORK LOCATION CONTACT PERSON, BIDDER'S WORK COMPLETION EMAIL ADDRESS I-5 North Managed Lanes Prime Sub Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation CH2M HILL Fee: $31M Ongoing Los Angeles, CA Authority Completion of One Gateway Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90012 PS&E December Phone: 213.922.8830 2018 Ayokunle Ogunrinde [email protected] On-Call Design, Construction Prime Sub Caltrans District 12, Design A CH2M HILL Fee: $3.3M Ongoing Support, and Surveying 3337 Michelson Drive, Suite: CN 380 July 2020 Services Irvine, CA 92612-8894 Orange County, CA Phone: 949-724-2167 Mili Lim Stamation Email: [email protected] Project Management, Quality Prime Sub Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation CH2M HILL Fee: $5M Ongoing Assurance/Quality Control Authority (Ends December Support Services One Gateway Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90012 2017) Los Angeles, CA Phone: 213.922.7343 Benkin Jong e-mail: [email protected] I-710 South Soundwalls Prime Sub Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation CH2M HILL Fee: $3.2M Ongoing Early Action Project (EAP), Authority Project Report and One Gateway Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90012 Complete Environmental Document Phone: 213.922.7343 September 2017 Los Angeles, CA Ernesto Chaves, Transportation Planning Manager e-mail: [email protected]
METRO GA17-140 5-6 LIST OF CURR & COMP PROJ (BACKLOG) RFP NO. AE47810E0128 PRO FORM 054 ISSUED: 11.14.17 REVISION DATE: 05.15.02 BIDDER/PROPOSER: CH2M HILL, Inc. LIST OF CURRENT PROJECTS (BACKLOG) OWNER'S NAME, PROJECT NAME AND ADDRESS, PHONE NO. ESTIMATED COST OF ESTIMATED DESCRIPTION OF WORK LOCATION CONTACT PERSON, BIDDER'S WORK COMPLETION EMAIL ADDRESS I-710 Soundwalls Package No. Prime Sub Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation CH2M HILL Fee: $4.8 million Ongoing 3 PS&E Authority May 2018 Los Angeles, CA One Gateway Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90012 Phone: 213.922.7343 Ernesto Chaves, Transportation Planning Manager e-mail: [email protected] SR-710 North Study Prime Sub Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Construction: $100M to $5.4B Ongoing Alternatives Analysis, Project Authority CH2M HILL Fee: $37.3M (2017) Report, and Environmental One Gateway Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90012 Documentation Phone: 213.922.3057 Los Angeles, CA Michelle Smith, Project Manager e-mail: [email protected] Sixth Street Viaduct Prime Sub City of Los Angeles, Department of Public Works Construction: $400M Ongoing Replacement Program Bureau of Engineering CH2M HILL Fee: $13M (2019) Management 1149 South Broadway, Suite 750 Los Angeles, CA Los Angeles, California 90015 Phone: 213.485.5233 Jim Wu, Project Manager e-mail: [email protected] SR-126/I-5 Interchange Prime Sub Newhall Land Construction: $35M PS&E Completed: Improvement Project, PS&E 25124 Springfield Court, Suite 300, Valencia, CA 91355 CH2M HILL Fee: $3.7M 2014 Los Angeles, County, CA Phone: 661.255.4481 DSDC: Ongoing Tom Mitchell, Director of Infrastructure and Planning e-mail: [email protected] SR-79 Realignment PA/ED Prime Sub Riverside County Transportation Commission CH2M HILL Fee: $31M Ongoing Riverside County, CA 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Complete Riverside, CA 92501 February 2017 Phone: 951.787.7945 Patti Castillo, Project Manager e-mail: [email protected]
METRO GA17-140 5-7 LIST OF CURR & COMP PROJ (BACKLOG) RFP NO. AE47810E0128 PRO FORM 054 ISSUED: 11.14.17 REVISION DATE: 05.15.02 Colmena Engineering PROPOSER: ______
LIST OF CURRENT PROJECTS (BACKLOG) (Click here for the pdf with form fields version: http://media.metro.net/ebb/contract_templates/5- 005_054_and_055_List_of_Curr_and_Comp_Proj_%28Backlog%29.pdf)
OWNER'S NAME, PROJECT NAME AND ADDRESS, PHONE NO. ESTIMATED COST OF ESTIMATED DESCRIPTION OF WORK LOCATION CONTACT PERSON PROPOSER'S WORK COMPLETION EMAIL ADDRESS VTA/BART Silicon Valley Emile Jilwan, PE, Group Manager Prime Sub BART $ 2.0 Million June 2018 Berryessa Extension 300 Lakeside Drive (SVBX) San Jose, CA Oakland, CA 94612 510-874-7389 [email protected] Mary Sue Abel Blue Line Extension LRT Prime Sub BLRT Deputy Project Director $ 2.2 Million December 2018 Bottineau LRT 5514 W. Broadway, Suite 200 (Design) Metro Transit Crystal, MN 55428 Crystal, MN 612-373-5376 [email protected] Jim Alexander June 2020 Green Line Extension LRT Prime SWLRT Deputy Project Director $ 3.0 Million Southwest LRT Sub 6465 Wayzata Blvd., Suit 500 (Construction Metro Transit St. Louis Park, MN 55426 Support) Minneapolis, MN 612-373-3880 [email protected]
Prime Sub $
Prime Sub $
METRO GA17-140 LIST OF CURR & COMP PROJ (BACKLOG) RFP NO. AE47810E0128 5-6 PRO FORM 054 ISSUED: 11.14.17 REVISION DATE: 05.15.02 PROPOSER: ______
LIST OF CURRENT PROJECTS (BACKLOG) (Click here for the pdf with form fields version: http://media.metro.net/ebb/contract_templates/5- 005_054_and_055_List_of_Curr_and_Comp_Proj_%28Backlog%29.pdf)
OWNER'S NAME, PROJECT NAME AND ADDRESS, PHONE NO. ESTIMATED COST OF ESTIMATED DESCRIPTION OF WORK LOCATION CONTACT PERSON PROPOSER'S WORK COMPLETION EMAIL ADDRESS
Prime Sub $
Prime Sub $
Prime Sub $
Prime Sub $
Prime Sub $
METRO GA17-140 LIST OF CURR & COMP PROJ (BACKLOG) RFP NO. AE47810E0128 5-6 PRO FORM 054 ISSUED: 11.14.17 REVISION DATE: 05.15.02 ÿ
ÿÿ ÿ ÿ ÿÿ !!"#ÿ$!%"ÿ&'()01ÿ ÿ 4 #"!5ÿ#(2"6ÿ $!%"ÿ#(2"ÿ(#3ÿ "2("3ÿÿÿ "2("3ÿ 3"!$#ÿÿ4!)ÿ (33!"6ÿ$7#"ÿ#8ÿ (#ÿ '33"!5ÿ4!)ÿ 2$"#ÿ #(ÿ$"!#ÿ pqrÿÿÿÿÿÿÿtuÿvwxxÿyÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿÿÿÿÿÿEÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ i pzdpk wseuÿwxÿrÿ ty wÿtÿuxÿ $9@ABÿÿ ÿ ÿCDÿÿ ÿ ÿuÿgÿeÿ uÿtÿÿ q{hq{{ u wuÿdefgÿvpÿh{ wxxÿtÿtÿ wuÿdefgÿvp vuwÿdy {g{ghy |h}|hh}h {qiq{ ÿÿÿÿÿÿ ÿ ÿ ÿÿÿÿÿÿEÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ pqrÿtuÿvwxxÿyhÿiÿ pzdpk wseuÿwxÿrÿ tyÿ wÿtÿuxÿ $9@ABÿÿiÿ ÿCDÿÿ ÿ ÿuÿgÿeÿ u wuÿdefgÿvpÿh{ uÿt yqiq{ wuÿdefgÿvp vuwÿdy g| g{i tiÿqÿ |h}|hh}h yqiq{h
jÿÿÿÿÿÿÿkuÿlmuÿ ÿ ÿ vpkÿÿÿÿÿÿEÿÿÿÿÿÿÿiqiq{ÿÿÿÿÿ $9@ABÿÿ ÿ ÿCDÿÿ ÿ ÿvyÿtÿygÿ{tÿ~x g|i rnueuÿop i lÿpufxgÿvpÿh twufÿvuÿqÿlÿ wuÿjwttwe pufxÿvugÿvp {i}{i|}hh| wwttwewfywyf ÿÿÿÿÿÿ ÿ ÿ ÿÿÿÿÿÿEÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ wueÿefuwxÿoeeÿ pzdpk hgy{{ qiq{{ defuqvurefweugÿ $9@ABÿÿiÿ ÿCDÿÿ ÿ ÿuÿgÿeÿ jueeufgÿ wuÿdefgÿvpÿh{ sxteuf vuwÿdy wuÿdefgÿvp |h}|hh}h ÿÿÿÿÿÿ ÿ ÿ ÿÿÿÿÿÿ Eÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ uÿvweÿewÿ v{jÿmllgÿmuy {{ g{{ {q{q{ $9@ABÿÿ ÿ ÿCDÿÿiÿ {ÿvyÿuwwgÿeÿ y ÿqÿdefuÿpxxy wuÿdefgÿvpÿh{ wuÿdefgÿvp wuÿwu |h}{{}{| twuytwut{wyw ÿ
FG ÿÿHIPQÿRÿ a Gÿ TÿIXÿbÿI Fÿ cÿSHIda eW GÿSTTÿU VWÿ `ÿ ÿT FÿYfg XÿYYYYYYÿ Q UÿHGÿÿYfV`fVYh ÿ PROPOSER: ISiS Consultants, LLC
LIST OF CURRENT PROJECTS (BACKLOG) (Click here for the pdf with form fields version: http://media.metro.netlebb/contract templates/S- 005 054 and 055 List of Curr and Comp Proj %28Backlog%29.pdf)
OWNER'S NAME, PROJECT NAME AND ADDRESS, PHONE NO. ESTIMATED COST OF ESTIMATED DESCRIPTION OF WORK LOCATION CONTACT PERSON PROPOSER'S WORK COMPLETION EMAIL ADDRESS Metro Gold Line Poothill Gold Line 6/2017 Foothills Extension Prime 0 Sub ~ ronstruetion Authority $ 200,000
Phase 2B 406 E. Huntington Dr I Los Angeles Co & Morovia, CA 91016 San Bernardino Co, CA Phil Dinets pdinets@foo hillgoldline.org LIRC and CSXT Louisville & Indiana RR South Wind Project Prime [] Sub 0 500 Willinger Lane $ 75,000 6/ 2017 Louisville, KY to Jeffersonville, IN 47130 Indianapolis, IN (812)288-4977 James Connolly jeonnoll [email protected] rlagg Bridge Louisville & Indiana R 50,000 1 2/201 7 ~eliability Project Prime !Xl Sub D 500 Willinger Lane $ .f-'0uisville, KY Jeffersonville, IN 471 0 i (B12) 288-4977 James Connolly jeonnol [email protected]
Prime 0 Sub 0 $
Prime D Sub $ I D
METRO GA17-140 LIST OF CURR & COMP PROJ (BACKLOG) RFP NO. AE47810E0128 5-6 PRO FORM 054 ISSUED: 11.14.17 REVISION DATE: 05.15.02 PROPOSER: ______
LIST OF CURRENT PROJECTS (BACKLOG)
OWNER'S NAME, PROJECT NAME AND ADDRESS, PHONE NO. ESTIMATED COST OF ESTIMATED DESCRIPTION OF WORK LOCATION CONTACT PERSON BIDDER'S WORK COMPLETION EMAIL ADDRESS
Prime Sub $
Prime Sub $
$ Prime Sub
$ Prime Sub
Prime Sub $
METRO ARCHIVE # LIST OF CURR & COMP PROJ (BACKLOG) RFP NO. AE47810E0128 5-6 PRO FORM 054 ISSUED:November 2017 REVISION DATE: 05.15.02 Kewo Engineering PROPOSER: ______Corporation
LIST OF CURRENT PROJECTS (BACKLOG) (Click here for the pdf with form fields version: http://media.metro.net/ebb/contract_templates/5- 005_054_and_055_List_of_Curr_and_Comp_Proj_%28Backlog%29.pdf)
OWNER'S NAME, PROJECT NAME AND ADDRESS, PHONE NO. ESTIMATED COST OF ESTIMATED DESCRIPTION OF WORK LOCATION CONTACT PERSON PROPOSER'S WORK COMPLETION EMAIL ADDRESS Sylmar 500kV Ground LADWP 61,230 07/01/2018 Electrode Monitoring Prime Sub 111 N Hope St $ Los Angeles, CA 90012 Mohammad Khajavi 213-367-2713
SAS-2 Project Controls LADWP Prime Sub ■ $ 1,026,000 04/01/2020 and Training 111 N Hope St Los Angeles, CA 90012 Eric Taylor 213-367-2418
Prime Sub $
Prime Sub $
Prime Sub $
METRO GA17-140 LIST OF CURR & COMP PROJ (BACKLOG) RFP NO. AE47810E0128 5-6 PRO FORM 054 ISSUED: 11.14.17 REVISION DATE: 05.15.02 LIST OF CURRENT PROJECTS (BACKLOG)
(Click here for the pdf with form fields version: http://www.metro.net/EBB/contract_templates/5- 005_054_and_055_List_of_Curr_and_Comp_Proj_%28Backlog%29.pdf)
OWNER’S NAME, ADDRESS, PHONE ESTIMATED COST OF ESTIMATED PROJECT NAME AND LOCATION DESCRIPTION OF WORK NO. CONTACT PERSON PROPOSER’S WORK COMPLETION On-Call Construction Management Prime Sub Los Angeles MTA (Owner) Consultant (CMC) Bus Projects One Gateway Plaza
Los Angeles, CA Los Angeles, CA 90012-2952 Client Cont.# PS26331 Phone: 213.922.7327 $3M 2019 MP# CA16384 Contact: Brian Mahaffey, Sr. Contract Administrator Construction Management Support Prime Sub Los Angeles MTA (Owner) Services for Purple Line – 1 Westside Extension Support Team, JV
Los Angeles, CA (Prime (Stantec/Jacobs)) Client Cont.# CMSSC-12-MC071 Los Angeles, CA $2.89M 2023 MP# CA13320 Phone: 818.594.0040 Contact: Paul Ryan, Administrative Project Manager LAX Upgrade/Modernization Program Prime Sub City of Los Angeles/Los Angeles World Project Control Services Airports (Owner)
Los Angeles, CA 7301 World Way West, 9th Floor Client Cont.# DA-5128 Los Angeles CA, 90045 $14.5M 2022 MP# CA16386 Phone: 424.646.9036 Contact: Quentin Gonzalez, Sr. Contract Management Regional Connector Design-Build Prime Sub Los Angeles MTA (Owner) Contract Utility Relocation Mott Macdonald (PRIME)
Los Angeles, CA 1000 Wilshire Blvd., #400 $1.2M 2017 Client Cont.# 294646-514 Los Angeles, CA 90017 MP# CA14343 Phone: 818.508.6388 Contact: Lisa Karwoski, Project Engineer I-405 Express Lanes/Design-Build Prime Sub OCTA (Owner) Program Management Parsons (Prime) Orange County, CA 2201 Dupont Dr., Suite 200 Client Cont.# 647954-007 Irvine, CA 92612 $4.35M 2020 MP# CA14336 Phone: 949.333.4500 Contact: Hans Gaus, Principal Project Controls Manager
METRO GA17-140 LIST OF CURR & COMP PROJ (BACKLOG) RFP NO. AE47810E0128 PRO FORM 054 ISSUED: 11.14.17 REVISION DTE: 05.15.02
PROPOSER: ______
LIST OF CURRENT PROJECTS (BACKLOG) (Click here for the pdf with form fields version: http://media.metro.net/ebb/contract_templates/5- 005_054_and_055_List_of_Curr_and_Comp_Proj_%28Backlog%29.pdf)
OWNER'S NAME, PROJECT NAME AND ADDRESS, PHONE NO. ESTIMATED COST OF ESTIMATED DESCRIPTION OF WORK LOCATION CONTACT PERSON PROPOSER'S WORK COMPLETION EMAIL ADDRESS
Prime Sub $
Prime Sub $
Prime Sub $
Prime Sub $
Prime Sub $
METRO GA17-140 LIST OF CURR & COMP PROJ (BACKLOG) RFP NO. AE47810E0128 5-6 PRO FORM 054 ISSUED: 11.14.17 REVISION DATE: 05.15.02 RF NETWORKS INC. BIDDER/PROPOSER: ______
LIST OF CURRENT PROJECTS (BACKLOG)
OWNER'S NAME, PROJECT NAME AND ESTIMATED COST OF ESTIMATED DESCRIPTION OF WORK ADDRESS, PHONE NO. LOCATION BIDDER'S WORK COMPLETION CONTACT PERSON $ SCRRA Professional Southern California Regional Railroad Authority ✔ 2700 Melbourne Ave. Pomona, CA 91767. 172,485 3/31/2018 Engineering & Technical Prime Sub Jerone Hurst Director: Communications & Signaling Support. Office: 909-451-2346 Los Angeles, CA Email: [email protected]
$ Wynn Design and Stella Smith | contract administrator Prime ✔ Sub Wynn Design and Development | t. 688,332 6/30/2019 Development. 702.770.5024 | f. 702.770.5005 734 Pilot Road | Las Vegas | NV | 89119 [email protected] Boston, MA $ Prime Sub
$ Prime Sub
$ Prime Sub
METRO ARCHIVE # LIST OF CURR & COMP PROJ (BACKLOG) TBD (IFB/RFP NO.) 1 PRO FORM 054 ISSUED 00/00/00 REVISION DATE: 05.15.02 BIDDER/PROPOSER: ______Triad Consulting & System
EXHIBIT 6 - LIST OF CURRENT CONTRACTS (BACKLOG)
OWNER'S NAME, ESTIMATED VALUE OF ESTIMATED CONTRACT NAME DESCRIPTION OF WORK/SERVICES ADDRESS, PHONE NO., BIDDER'S/PROPOSER'S COMPLETION AND LOCATION CONTACT PERSON, WORK/SERVICES DATE EMAIL ADDRESS Tarrant County Water Prime ✔ Sub Tarrant Regional Water $ 229,000 2018 District District Write a Physical Security Forth Worth TX 800 E. Northside Dr. Description: Master Plan. Providing Forth Worth, Texas 76102 recommendations for security Cf City -Wide Surveillance Prime ✔ Sub City of Temecula $ 153,150 2018 Temecula, CA 41000 Main Street City wide video, surveillance Temecula, Ca 92590 Description: assessment and design to Michael Heslin Dir of IT include camera equipment, County of Riverside, Prime ✔ Sub County of Riverside $ 25,000 2019 On Call , Corona MOB David Baucon Design of electronic security Riverside CA Director of Facilities Description: systemf for medical office Riverside University Health building, access control, Alarm Project Upgrade Prime ✔ Sub University California Irvine $ 50,000 2018 University California Designing campus -wide Irvine, Ca Irvine Description: alarm intrusion system Elena Blackwell PM Irvine CA upgrade for 100 buildings 949.824.5683 bl k ll@ i d Placer County Water Prime ✔ Sub Placer County Water $ 200,000 2018 Agency Security site assessments to Agency Sacramento CA Description: determining physical and Brent Smith, PE - Director electronic security of Technical Services T:
Page 1 of 1
BIDDER/PROPOSER: ______W2 Design, Inc.
LIST OF CURRENT PROJECTS (BACKLOG)
OWNER'S NAME, PROJECT NAME AND ESTIMATED COST OF ESTIMATED DESCRIPTION OF WORK ADDRESS, PHONE NO. LOCATION BIDDER'S WORK COMPLETION CONTACT PERSON $ Metro Willowbrook/Rosa LACMTA (Metro)(Sub to RNL Design) Prime Sub ✔ 523 W. 6th Street, Suite 1200 224,837 2017 Parks Station Los Angeles, CA 90014 Improvement Project Civil Engineering, Utility Engineering, and Stormwater (213) 922-7217 (estimated) Management Wells Lawson Los Angeles, CA [email protected] $ Foothill Transit West Foothill Transit (Sub to RNL Design) Prime Sub ✔ 333 S. Grand Avenue, Suite 1480 28,998 On-Going Covina Transit Center Los Angeles, CA 90071 West Covina, CA (213) 955-9775 Civil & Utility Engineering, Right of Way Engineering, Third Mr. Ed Carfagno Party [email protected]
Foothill Transit (Sub to RNL Design) $ Foothill Transit Prime Sub ✔ 333 S. Grand Avenue, Suite 1480 06/13/2018 Covina Park and Ride Los Angeles, CA 90071 65,000 (213) 955-9775 Covina, CA Civil & Utility Engineering, Third Party, Grading/Drainage Mr. Ed Carfagno [email protected] $ MTA Cesar Chavez Bus LACMTA (Metro) (Sub to Gensler) Prime Sub ✔ 500 S. Figueroa Street 24,000 11/1/2018 Stop Improvements and Los Angeles, CA 90071 Transit Pavilion (818) 209-5266 Los Angeles, CA Civil Engineering Chris Musich [email protected] $ Metro Orange Line Grade LACMTA (Metro) (Sub to Iteris) Prime Sub ✔ 801 S. Grand Avenue, Suite 530 39,134 06/30/2017 Separation Analysis and Los Angeles, CA 90017 Operational Improvements (213) 802-1724 Technical Study Civil & Utility Engineering Sam Morrissey San Fernando Valley, CA [email protected]
METRO ARCHIVE # LIST OF CURR & COMP PROJ (BACKLOG) TBD (IFB/RFP NO.) 1 PRO FORM 054 ISSUED 00/00/00 REVISION DATE: 05.15.02 BIDDER/ PROPOSER: Hatch Associates Consultants, Inc.
EXHIBIT 7 - LIST OF COMPLETED CONTRACTS - LAST FIVE (5) YEARS
Include only contracts that are pertinent for this Invitation for Bids/Request for Proposal, in order to demonstrate Bidder's/Proposer's ability to perform the required Work/Services.
OWNER’S NAME, ESTIMATED VALUE OF ESTIMATED CONTRACT NAME DESCRIPTION OF WORK/ ADDRESS, PHONE NO., BIDDER'S/PROPOSER'S COMPLETION AND LOCATION SERVICES CONTACT PERSON WORK/SERVICES DATE Crenshaw/LAX ☒Prime ☐ Sub LACMTA ~$20 million 2010-2015 Transit Corridor As prime design One Gateway Plaza (Although still Description: under Project, Preliminary consultant, providing four Los Angeles, CA Engineering and Tel: (818) 435-7759 construction, phases of engineering services: Hatch no longer Design Support environmental clearance, Robert Rincon works on the During preliminary engineering, design project) Construction, Los build design support, systems Angeles, California activation and start-up support CA High-Speed ☒Prime ☐ Sub California High-Speed over $20 million 2009-2015 Rail; Palmdale to Description: Hatch was the Rail Authority Los Angeles, lead JV partner for design and 700 N. Alameda, Room 3- California environmental clearance; led the 532 Los Angeles, CA effort to identify feasible 90012 alignments Tel: (213) 457-8420 Michelle Boehm CA High-Speed ☒Prime ☐ Sub California High-Speed over $20 million 2009-2015 Rail; Bakers Field to Description: Lead JV partner Rail Authority Palmdale, California for design and environmental 700 N. Alameda, Room 3- clearance; supported and 532 Los Angeles, CA assisted the Greater Merced 90012 High-Speed Rail Committee in Tel: (213) 457-8420 the location of the Heavy Michelle Boehm Maintenance Facility West LRT ☒Prime ☐ Sub The City of Calgary $41 million 2008-2014 Extension, Calgary, Description: As Owner’s 133 6 Avenue SW, 10 (Although the Alberta, Canada floor, Andrew Davidson original contract is Engineer, assisted the City with complete Hatch is overall project management Building, Calgary, Alberta Tel: (403) 268-5287 currently working
Page 1 of 2
BIDDER/ PROPOSER: Hatch Associates Consultants, Inc.
OWNER’S NAME, ESTIMATED VALUE OF ESTIMATED CONTRACT NAME DESCRIPTION OF WORK/ ADDRESS, PHONE NO., BIDDER'S/PROPOSER'S COMPLETION AND LOCATION SERVICES CONTACT PERSON WORK/SERVICES DATE including: pre-design stages, Brian Demers on associated developing alternative works along this alignment) alignments, participating in public consultations and briefings, and developing a contracting strategy, risk management plan, project schedule, and associated cost estimates. Niagara Tunnel ☒Prime ☐ Sub Ontario Power Generation $1.6 billion 2004-2013 Project, Niagara Description: Owner's 700 University Avenue, Falls, Ontario, Representative, Tunnel Toronto, ON Canada Tel: (416) 592-2555 Designer for new water tunnel Clara Greco at OPG station York-Durham ☒Prime ☐ Sub Region of York $546 million 2004-2015 Southeast Collector, Description: PM, tunnel 17250 Yonge St., Toronto, Ontario, designer for twinning of Newmarket, ON Canada Tel: (905) 380-4444 sewage system sewer ext. 75107 Grant Robinson Northwest PATH ☒Prime ☐ Sub City of Toronto $150 million 2010-2015 th Tunnel (Union Description: PM, designer of 55 John Street, 20 Floor, Station to pedestrian tunnel Toronto, ON Wellington), Tel: (416) 392-5242 Toronto, Ontario, Easton Gordon Canada Georgetown South ☒Prime ☐ Sub Metrolinx $3 million 2010-2015 th Track Layout and Description: PM, designer for 20 Bay Street, 18 Fl., Grading, Toronto, corridor expansion (incl. Toronto, ON Ontario, Canada 416-869-3600, ext. 5282 pedestrian tunnel) Andre Marois
Page 2 of 2
BIDDER/PROPOSER: ______
LIST OF COMPLETED PROJECTS - LAST THREE YEARS
Include only projects that are pertinent for this Invitation For Bids/Request for Proposal, in order to demonstrate Bidder's/Proposer's ability to perform the required Work.
OWNER'S NAME, DATE PROJECT NAME AND ACTUAL FINAL DESCRIPTION OF WORK ADDRESS, PHONE NO. CONTRACT LOCATION CONTRACT VALUE CONTACT PERSON DURATION $ Prime Sub
$ Prime Sub
$ Prime Sub
$ Prime Sub
$ Prime Sub
METRO ARCHIVE # LIST OF CURR & COMP PROJ (BACKLOG) TBD (IFB/RFP NO.) 2 PRO FORM 055 ISSUED 00/00/00 REVISION DATE: 05.15.02
PROPOSER: ABCS Consulting Services
LIST OF COMPLETED PROJECTS - LAST THREE YEARS (Click here for the pdf with form fields version http://media.metro.net/ebb/contract_templates/5- 005_054_and_055_List_of_Curr_and_Comp_Proj_%28Backlog%29.pdf)
Include only projects that are pertinent for this Invitation For Bids/Request for Proposal, in order to demonstrate Bidder's/Proposer's ability to perform the required Work. OWNER'S NAME, DATE PROJECT NAME AND ADDRESS, PHONE NO. ACTUAL FINAL DESCRIPTION OF WORK CONTRACT LOCATION CONTACT PERSON CONTRACT VALUE DURATION EMAIL ADDRESS 8FTUTJEF1VSQMF-JOF -"$.5"3JDL8JMTPO Prime Sub Y $ &YUFOTJPO4FDUJPO %FQVUZ&YFDVUJWF0GGJDFS 'FCVBSZ -PT"OHFMFT $BMJGPSOJB 1SPHSBN$POUSPM UP +VOF -"$.5".JDIBFM.BSUJO 8FTUTJEF1VSQMF-JOF Prime Sub Y $ $84 .BSDI &YUFOTJPO4FDUJPO 4S%JSFDUPS1SPHSBN UP -PT"OHFMFT $BMJGPSOJB $POUSPM +VOF
Prime Sub $
Prime Sub $
Prime Sub $
METRO GA17-140 LIST OF CURR & COMP PROJ (BACKLOG) RFP NO. AE47810E0128 5-7 PRO FORM 055 ISSUED: 11.14.17 REVISION DATE: 05.15.02 PROPOSER: ______LIST OF COMPLETED PROJECTS - LAST THREE YEARS (Click here for the pdf with form fields version http://media.metro.net/ebb/contract_templates/5- 005_054_and_055_List_of_Curr_and_Comp_Proj_%28Backlog%29.pdf)
Include only projects that are pertinent for this Invitation For Bids/Request for Proposal, in order to demonstrate Bidder's/Proposer's ability to perform the required Work. OWNER'S NAME, DATE PROJECT NAME AND ADDRESS, PHONE NO. ACTUAL FINAL DESCRIPTION OF WORK CONTRACT LOCATION CONTACT PERSON CONTRACT VALUE DURATION EMAIL ADDRESS
Prime Sub $
Prime Sub $
Prime Sub $
Prime Sub $
Prime Sub $
METRO 17-31CO LIST OF CURR & COMP PROJ (BACKLOG) RFP NO. AE40289MC073 5-7 PRO FORM 055 ISSUED: 04.10.17 REVISION DATE: 05.15.02 PROPOSER: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.
LIST OF COMPLETED PROJECTS LAST THREE YEARS (Click here for the pdf with form fields version: http://www.metro.net/EBB/contract_templates/5- 005_054_and_055_List_of_Curr_and_Comp_Proj_%28Backlog%29.pdf)
Include only projects that are pertinent for this invitation For Bids/Request For Proposal, in order to demonstrate Bidder's/Proposer's ability to perform the required Work. OWNER'S NAME, DATE PROJECT NAME AND DESCRIPTION OF ADDRESS, PHONE NO. ACTUAL FINAL CONTRACT LOCATION WORK CONTACT PERSON CONTRACT VALUE DURATION EMAIL ADDRESS LACMTA PS-8510-3001 - Prime Sub Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority $350,000 (AVA’s fee) 2013 - 2015 Supplemental Engineering Services One Gateway Plaza, Los Angeles, Ca 90012 for Rail System Engr., Los Angeles, CA Michael Ratnasingham Tel: (213)922-7523 [email protected]
Prime Sub Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena Airport Authority 2800 N. Clybourn, Burbank, CA 91505 Regional Intermodal Transportation Mr. James (Jim) Adams Center, Project No. E10-07, $140 Million 2010 – 2014 STV, Inc. Burbank, CA Tel: (213) 482-9444 [email protected]
SANDAG Roof/HVAC Replacement Prime Sub RailPros $127,662 (AVA’s fee) 2015 - 2016 Project, San Diego, CA 401 B Street, Suite 302, San Diego, CA 92101
Mr. Matt Britten, PE, Senior Project Manager Tel: 619.795.0325 x 220 or Direct: 619-929-3362 [email protected]
Baldwin Avenue Grade Separation Prime Sub Alameda Corridor East Construction Authority (ACE) $597,204 (AVA fee) 2013-2015 Project, El Monte, CA 4216 Baldwin Avenue, El Monte, CA 91731
Elmo Delos Santos, PE (formely with AECOM) Tel: (949) 842-6739 [email protected]
Federal Transit Administration Prime Sub Federal Transit Administration (FTA) $13 Million (AVA’s fee) 2009 – 2015 (FTA) Project Management 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Oversight Contract, Contract Washington, DC 20590 DTFT60-09-D-00022 Mr. Suleman Shoaib, Project Manager Tel: (817) 978-0556 [email protected]
METRO GA17-140 5-7 LIST OF CURR & COMP PROJ (BACKLOG) RFP NO. AE47810E128 PRO FORM 055 ISSUED: 11.14.17 REVISION DATE: 05.15.02 BIDDER/PROPOSER: CH2M HILL, Inc.
LIST OF COMPLETED PROJECTS - LAST FIVE YEARS (Click here for the pdf with form fields version: http://www.metro.net/EBB/contract_templates/5-
005_054_and_055_List_of_Curr_and_Comp_Proj_%28Backlog%29.pdf)
Include only projects that are pertinent for this Invitation For Bids/Request for Proposal, in order to demonstrate Bidder’s/Proposer’s ability to perform the required Work.
OWNER'S NAME, ADDRESS, PHONE NO., ACTUAL FINAL DATE PROJECT NAME AND CONTACT PERSON, CONTRACT CONTRACT LOCATION DESCRIPTION OF WORK E-MAIL ADDRESS VALUE DURATION On-Call Design Services Contract Prime Sub Caltrans District 8 CH2M Fee: $8M 2015 San Bernardino, CA 464 West 4th Street, Room 1227 San Bernardino, CA 92401 Phone: 909.383.5952 Masud Zahedi e-mail: [email protected] US 101/SR-23 Interchange and Prime Sub City of Thousand Oaks Construction Cost: $32M PS&E Completed: Mainline Improvements PS&E 2100 Thousand Oaks Blvd CH2M Fee: $1M 2014 Thousand Oaks, CA Thousand Oaks, CA 91362 DSDC: Ongoing Phone: 805.449.2462 Dean Morales, Engineering Division Manager e-mail: [email protected] I-5/Oso Parkway Prime Sub Orange County Transportation Authority CH2M Fee: $3.2M 2011 Interchange PS&E 550 S. Main Street, Orange, CA 92863 Orange County, CA Phone: 714.560.5648 Pradeep Gunaratne Program Manager e-mail: [email protected] SR-57 Northbound Widening Prime Sub Orange County Transportation Authority Construction: $55M PS&E Completed: (Yorba Linda Boulevard to 550 S. Main Street, Orange, CA 92863 CH2M Fee: $6.4M 2010 Lambert Road) Phone: 714.560.5874 DSDC: 2013 Steven King Program Manager Orange County, CA e-mail: [email protected] Commerce Center Drive/ Prime Sub Newhall Land Construction: $35M PS&E Completed: SR-126 PS&E 25124 Springfield Court, Suite 300 CH2M Fee: $1.8M 2012 Los Angeles, County, CA Valencia, CA 91355 DSDC: Ongoing Phone: 661.255.4481 Tom Mitchell, Director of Infrastructure and Planning e-mail: [email protected]
METRO GA17-140 5-8 LIST OF CURR & COMP PROJ (BACKLOG) RFP NO. AE47810E0128 PRO FORM 055 ISSUED: 11.14.17 REVISION DATE: 05.15.02 PROPOSER: ______Colmena Engineering LIST OF COMPLETED PROJECTS - LAST THREE YEARS (Click here for the pdf with form fields version http://media.metro.net/ebb/contract_templates/5- 005_054_and_055_List_of_Curr_and_Comp_Proj_%28Backlog%29.pdf)
Include only projects that are pertinent for this Invitation For Bids/Request for Proposal, in order to demonstrate Bidder's/Proposer's ability to perform the required Work. OWNER'S NAME, DATE PROJECT NAME AND ADDRESS, PHONE NO. ACTUAL FINAL DESCRIPTION OF WORK CONTRACT LOCATION CONTACT PERSON CONTRACT VALUE DURATION EMAIL ADDRESS Green Line LRT Mark Furhmann January 2007 Prime Sub Metropolitan Council $ 2 Million Central Corridor LRT 570 6th Ave N. to St. Paul, MN Minneapolis, MN 55411 June 2014 612-373-3810 $957M Total Project [email protected] The Interchange Project Ed Hunter - Project Director Prime Sub $ 272k January 2012 Target Field LRT Station Hennepin County Interchange Office 400 S. 4th Street, Suite 200 to Minneapolis, MN Minneapolis, MN 55415 $79.3M Total Project May 2014 612-543-7273 [email protected] Snelling A-Line BRT Katie Roth Prime $ 276k January 2014 St. Paul, MN Sub Metro Transit 570 6th Ave N. to Minneapolis, MN 55411 $25M Total Project June 2017 612-349-7772 [email protected] LA Metro Michael Ratnasingham _Exec Off Eng Prime $ 156k December 2014 MRL Elevator Addition Sub LA County MTA 1 Gateway Plaza to Los Angeles, CA Los Angeles, CA 90012 April 2015 213-922-7523 [email protected]
Prime Sub $
METRO GA17-140 LIST OF CURR & COMP PROJ (BACKLOG) RFP NO. AE47810E0128 5-7 PRO FORM 055 ISSUED: 11.14.17 REVISION DATE: 05.15.02 PROPOSER: ______LIST OF COMPLETED PROJECTS - LAST THREE YEARS (Click here for the pdf with form fields version http://media.metro.net/ebb/contract_templates/5- 005_054_and_055_List_of_Curr_and_Comp_Proj_%28Backlog%29.pdf)
Include only projects that are pertinent for this Invitation For Bids/Request for Proposal, in order to demonstrate Bidder's/Proposer's ability to perform the required Work. OWNER'S NAME, DATE PROJECT NAME AND ADDRESS, PHONE NO. ACTUAL FINAL DESCRIPTION OF WORK CONTRACT LOCATION CONTACT PERSON CONTRACT VALUE DURATION EMAIL ADDRESS
Prime Sub $
Prime Sub $
Prime Sub $
Prime Sub $
Prime Sub $
METRO GA17-140 LIST OF CURR & COMP PROJ (BACKLOG) RFP NO. AE47810E0128 5-7 PRO FORM 055 ISSUED: 11.14.17 REVISION DATE: 05.15.02 ÿ
ÿÿ ÿ ÿÿ !""#ÿ!$%"ÿ&ÿ'ÿ($""ÿ)"'$ÿ ÿ 012345ÿ6027ÿ896@51ABÿACDAÿD95ÿ859AE050AÿF69ÿACEBÿ0GEADAE60ÿH69ÿE4B5I35BAÿF69ÿ9686BD2PÿE0ÿ69459ÿA6ÿ45Q60BA9DA5ÿE4459RB9686B59RBÿDSE2EA7ÿA6ÿ 859F69QÿAC5ÿ95I3E954ÿT69UVÿ ÿ X W"$`ÿW' "aÿ #'"ÿ !$%"ÿW' "ÿ'W#ÿ 'c'ÿW'ÿ #"$!WÿÿX$Yÿ '##$"aÿ!(W"ÿWbÿ W$'ÿ 'Wÿ W$'ÿd'c"ÿ W'ÿ!"$Wÿ #c$'Wÿ ÿÿÿÿÿÿ ÿ ÿ ÿÿÿÿÿÿqÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ dÿfgÿhfiÿjffÿ rtÿwfg hv ÿfgÿ klmÿnglogÿnggolpflgpÿ !efghÿÿÿ ÿipÿÿ ÿ jfqod l}igmsÿjgp rgsÿtpumsvÿnt ÿÿÿÿÿÿ ÿ ÿ ÿÿÿÿÿÿqÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ rtÿwxtyÿÿzqsÿ{ÿklmÿmfÿ luÿx}isdsf|s vhh qpÿÿfgÿ jdsf|sÿjfful}ÿ~mp !efghÿÿ ÿ ÿipÿÿÿ ÿjfpoÿjfvÿjfÿ }|ÿ rgsÿtpumsvÿnt jpfÿwgpl}vÿntÿ
ÿÿÿÿÿÿ ÿ ÿ wgÿÿÿÿÿffÿw} gpmoÿqÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ rtÿwxtyÿrtÿngqpfdÿwfgmlpÿ ÿlmsilÿzmovÿjfÿ v hÿ jfflgpsÿtssss|pfÿ{ÿ !efghÿÿ ÿ ÿipÿÿÿ rgsÿtpumsvÿntÿ |g|pfÿ~mp gogpÿo fgÿ rgsÿtpumsvÿnt ugogpio|gff|}}g| h
ÿÿÿÿÿÿ ÿ ÿ ÿÿÿÿÿÿqÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ ntÿluiÿjoÿklmÿ gsfÿ{ÿ~fps v fgÿh tqfiglfdyÿÿnmlgplÿluiÿ !efghÿÿ ÿ ÿipÿÿÿ ÿplplfÿrggvÿwjÿtn joÿklmÿ~mpplpuÿpoÿ nqflpgvÿntÿ ngp}fqmÿ slupÿ jl}s sggmggsfpo~fps}g|
rtÿÿÿÿÿÿÿwxtyÿÿwfgÿdÿ ÿ ÿ rtÿÿÿÿÿÿÿwfg qÿÿÿÿÿÿvhh ÿÿqmdÿÿÿÿÿÿ zqfll}flgpÿ~gu|ÿjlfÿ !efghÿÿÿ ÿipÿÿ ÿ jm}flgpÿmqflgpÿnlfl wmlssÿ~ fgÿqmdÿ xsÿyÿmqfÿrtÿngqpfdÿ | |fgpf ds rgsÿtpumsvÿnt
ÿ
rs ÿÿtuvwÿxÿ y sÿ Hÿuÿÿu rÿ ÿtuy sÿHHÿ Vÿ ÿ ÿH rÿ ÿÿ w ÿtsÿÿVV ÿ PROPOSER: ISiS Consul tants, LLC
USTOFCOMPLETEDPROJECTS-LASTTHREEYEARS (Click here for the pdf with form fields version http://media.metro.netlebb/contract templates/5- 005 054 and 055 List of Curr and Comp Proj %28Backlog%29.pdf)
Include only projects that are pertinent for this Invitation For Bids/Request for Proposal, in order to demonstrate Bidder's/Proposer's ability to pe rform the reauired Work OWNER'S NAME, DATE PROJECT NAME AND ADDRESS, PHONE NO. ACTUAL FINAL DESCRIPTION OF WORK CONTRACT LOCATION CONTACT PERSON CONTRACT VALUE DURATION EMAIL ADDRESS Metro Gold Line lA Metro $ 1.4M Foothills Extension Prime 0 Sub [XJ 84 S. Santa Fe Ave 5/2012 - CA 90012 Phase 2A was Angeles, 6/2016 Los Angeles Co, CA (213) 922-3218 ~icardo Moran MoranR@Me ro.net
J...A Me~ro Metro Gold Line Prime KJ Sub 0 284 S. Santa Fe Ave $ 305,929 Aspect Revision LOS Angeles, CA 90012 6/2014 - Project (213) 922-3218 7/2016 Los Angeles Co, CA Ricardo Moran MoranR@Me ro . net LACMTA/ SCRRA Raymer to Bernson Prime 0 One Gateway Plaza $303 , 13 9 9/ 2014 - Double Track Projec Sub ~ lUoS Angeles, CA 90012 6/ 2016 Los Angeles Co, CA (909)451-2351 p-aime Ramo RomoJ@SCRRA net Metro Blue Line LA Metro Prime Gl $ 114,247 Grade Crossing Sub 0 284 S. Santa Fe Ave 4/2013 - Circuits Modificati n Los Angeles, CA 90012 1/2015 Los Angeles Co, CA (213)922 -3218 Ricardo Moran MoranR@Me ro . net Metro Blue Line LA Metro Prime G0 Sub 0 $26,407 124th Street Quad 284 s. Santa Fe Ave 2/2 012 - CA 90012 Gate Control & Los Angeles, 11/2015 Vehicle Detection (213) 922-3218 Los Angeles Co, CA Ricardo Moran MoranR@Me ro.net . . ------L-. --
METRO GA17-140 LIST OF CURR & COMP PROJ (BACKLOG) RFP NO. AE47810E0128 5-7 PRO FORM 055 ISSUED: 11 .14.17 REVISION DATE: 05.15.02 PROPOSER: ______
LIST OF COMPLETED PROJECTS - LAST THREE YEARS
Include only projects that are pertinent for this Invitation For Bids/Request for Proposal, in order to demonstrate Bidder's/Proposer's ability to perform the required Work. OWNER'S NAME, DATE PROJECT NAME AND ADDRESS, PHONE NO. ACTUAL FINAL DESCRIPTION OF WORK CONTRACT LOCATION CONTACT PERSON CONTRACT VALUE DURATION EMAIL ADDRESS
Prime Sub $
Prime Sub $
$ Prime Sub
$ Prime Sub
Prime Sub $
METROARCHIVE # LIST OF CURR & COMP PROJ (BACKLOG) RFP NO. AE47810E0128 5-7 PRO FORM 055 ISSUED:November 2017 REVISION DATE: 05.15.02 Kewo Engineering PROPOSER: ______Corporation LIST OF COMPLETED PROJECTS - LAST THREE YEARS (Click here for the pdf with form fields version http://media.metro.net/ebb/contract_templates/5- 005_054_and_055_List_of_Curr_and_Comp_Proj_%28Backlog%29.pdf)
Include only projects that are pertinent for this Invitation For Bids/Request for Proposal, in order to demonstrate Bidder's/Proposer's ability to perform the required Work. OWNER'S NAME, DATE PROJECT NAME AND ADDRESS, PHONE NO. ACTUAL FINAL DESCRIPTION OF WORK CONTRACT LOCATION CONTACT PERSON CONTRACT VALUE DURATION EMAIL ADDRESS Substation Automation LADWP Prime Sub $ 581,448 10/01/2015 System Engineering 111 N Hope St - Los Angeles, CA 90012 12/31/2016 Eric Taylor 213-367-2418
SAS Project Support Prime Sub ■ $ 109,990 01/01/2017 - 04/30/2017
Sylmar 500kV Ground LADWP Prime $ 146,390 02/01/2016 Electrode Sub 111 N Hope St - Los Angeles, CA 90012 Mohammad Khajavi 06/30/2017 213-367-2713
Prime Sub $
Prime Sub $
METRO GA17-140 LIST OF CURR & COMP PROJ (BACKLOG) RFP NO. AE47810E0128 5-7 PRO FORM 055 ISSUED: 11.14.17 REVISION DATE: 05.15.02 LIST OF COMPLETED PROJECTS – LAST THREE YEARS (Click here for the pdf with form fields version: http://www.metro.net/EBB/contract_templates/5- 005_054_and_055_List_of_Curr_and_Comp_Proj_%28Backlog%29.pdf) Include only projects that are pertinent for this Invitation For Bids/Request for Proposal, in order to demonstrate Bidder's/Proposer's ability to perform the required Work. ESTIMATED COST OWNER’S NAME, ADDRESS, PHONE ESTIMATED PROJECT NAME AND LOCATION DESCRIPTION OF WORK OF PROPOSER’S NO. CONTACT PERSON COMPLETION WORK Metro Bus Facilities Projects Construction Prime Sub Los Angeles MTA (Owner) Management Consultant (CMC) One Gateway Plaza
Los Angeles, CA Los Angeles, CA 90012-2952 $9.88M 2017 Client Cont.# PS1008002641 Phone: 213.922.7327 MP# CA11276 Contact: Brian Mahaffey, Sr. Contract Administrator LAX Modernization/Upgrade Project Prime Sub City of Los Angeles/Los Angeles World Controls Support Services Airports (Owner) Los Angeles, CA 7301 World Way West, 9th Floor Client Cont.# DA-4829 Los Angeles CA, 90045 $13.5M 2016 MP# CA13319 Phone: 424.646.9036 Contact: Quentin Gonzalez, Sr. Contract Management LA Metro LAX-Crenshaw Light Rail Project Prime Sub Los Angeles MTA Los Angeles, CA One Gateway Plaza
Client Cont. # EO117 Los Angeles, CA 90012-2952 $882K 2014 MP# CA11279 Phone: 213.933.7208 Contact: Matt Gallagher, Director of Construction Management LA Department of Water and Power, Prime Sub City of Los Angeles, Department of Water Owens Lake Dust Mitigation and Power (LADWP)
Client Cont.# 47034-1 111 North Hope Street $544K 2014 MP# CA11278 Los Angeles, CA 90012 Phone: 213.367.1031 Contact: Luis Rubalcaba On-Call Wastewater and Environmental Prime Sub City of Los Angeles, Department of Services for Utility and Environmental Sanitation
Projects 12000 Vista Del Mar $137K 2014 Client Cont.# C-120719 Playa Del Rey, CA 90293 MP# CA12295 Phone: 310.648.6120 Contact: Michael Sarullo
METRO GA17-140 LIST OF CURR & COMP PROJ (BACKLOG) RFP NO. AE47810E0128 PRO FORM 055 ISSUED: 11.14.17 REVISION DTE: 05.15.02
PROPOSER: ______LIST OF COMPLETED PROJECTS - LAST THREE YEARS (Click here for the pdf with form fields version http://media.metro.net/ebb/contract_templates/5- 005_054_and_055_List_of_Curr_and_Comp_Proj_%28Backlog%29.pdf)
Include only projects that are pertinent for this Invitation For Bids/Request for Proposal, in order to demonstrate Bidder's/Proposer's ability to perform the required Work. OWNER'S NAME, DATE PROJECT NAME AND ADDRESS, PHONE NO. ACTUAL FINAL DESCRIPTION OF WORK CONTRACT LOCATION CONTACT PERSON CONTRACT VALUE DURATION EMAIL ADDRESS
Prime Sub $
Prime Sub $
Prime Sub $
Prime Sub $
Prime Sub $
METRO GA17-140 LIST OF CURR & COMP PROJ (BACKLOG) RFP NO. AE47810E0128 5-7 PRO FORM 055 ISSUED: 11.14.17 REVISION DATE: 05.15.02 BIDDER/PROPOSER: ______RF NETWORKS INC.
LIST OF COMPLETED PROJECTS - LAST THREE YEARS
Include only projects that are pertinent for this Invitation For Bids/Request for Proposal, in order to demonstrate Bidder's/Proposer's ability to perform the required Work.
OWNER'S NAME, DATE PROJECT NAME AND ACTUAL FINAL DESCRIPTION OF WORK ADDRESS, PHONE NO. CONTRACT LOCATION CONTRACT VALUE CONTACT PERSON DURATION
SCRRA- Metrolink. Southern California Regional Railroad Authority $ ✔ 2700 Melbourne Ave. Pomona, CA 91767. PTC PROJECT. Prime Sub Jerone Hurst 1,100,000 12/2014. Director: Communications & Signaling Los Angeles County, CA Office: 909-451-2346 5 years Email: [email protected]
Southern California Regional Railroad Authority $ SCRRA- Metrolink. ✔ 2700 Melbourne Ave. Pomona, CA 91767. VVSG PROJECT. Prime Sub Jerone Hurst 1,400,000 6/2015 Director: Communications & Signaling Los Angeles County, CA Office: 909-451-2346 5years Email: [email protected]
Arkady Bernshteyn $ LACMTA. ✔ LA Metro 12/2017 Prime Sub Sr. Director, Project Engineering 515,000 TO19- MRL Radio System Rail Maintenance and Engineering Upgrade. Los Angeles, CA 213.617.6249 W 1year [email protected] $ Prime Sub
$ Prime Sub
METRO ARCHIVE # LIST OF CURR & COMP PROJ (BACKLOG) TBD (IFB/RFP NO.) 2 PRO FORM 055 ISSUED 00/00/00 REVISION DATE: 05.15.02 PROPOSER: T&T Public Relations LIST OF COMPLETED PROJECTS - LAST THREE YEARS (Click here for the pdf with form fields version http://media.metro.net/ebb/contract_templates/5- 005_054_and_055_List_of_Curr_and_Comp_Proj_%28Backlog%29.pdf)
Include only projects that are pertinent for this Invitation For Bids/Request for Proposal, in order to demonstrate Bidder's/Proposer's ability to perform the required Work. OWNER'S NAME, DATE PROJECT NAME AND ADDRESS, PHONE NO. ACTUAL FINAL DESCRIPTION OF WORK CONTRACT LOCATION CONTACT PERSON CONTRACT VALUE DURATION EMAIL ADDRESS
LA Metro Countywide LACMTA, Miriam Long, One Prime X Sub $ 112,000 June 2014- Small Business Outreach Gateway Plaza, Los Angeles, March 2015 Campaign, Los Angeles 90017, 213-922-7249 County [email protected]
Southern California Association Jeff Liu, Manager of Communications of Governments (SCAG), Prime Sub X Southern Calif. Assoc. of Governments $ 95,000 April 2014 - Jan. RTP/SCS Outreach Services 818 W. 7th St., 12th Floor 2016 Southern California Region Los Angeles, CA 90017, 213-236-1998 [email protected]
Feb. 2014 - City of Huntington Park X Christina Dixon, Public Works $ 52,000 Prime Sub Jan. 2015 Illegal Dumping Public Manager, 6900 Bissell Ave. Education Campaign Huntington Park, CA 90255 Huntington Park, CA 323-584-6323, [email protected]
Prime Sub $
Prime Sub $
METRO GA17-140 LIST OF CURR & COMP PROJ (BACKLOG) RFP NO. AE47810E0128 5-7 PRO FORM 055 ISSUED: 11.14.17 REVISION DATE: 05.15.02 PROPOSER: ______Triad Consulting LIST OF COMPLETED PROJECTS - LAST THREE YEARS (Click here for the pdf with form fields version http://media.metro.net/ebb/contract_templates/5- 005_054_and_055_List_of_Curr_and_Comp_Proj_%28Backlog%29.pdf)
Include only projects that are pertinent for this Invitation For Bids/Request for Proposal, in order to demonstrate Bidder's/Proposer's ability to perform the required Work. OWNER'S NAME, DATE PROJECT NAME AND ADDRESS, PHONE NO. ACTUAL FINAL DESCRIPTION OF WORK CONTRACT LOCATION CONTACT PERSON CONTRACT VALUE DURATION EMAIL ADDRESS Albquerque City of Albuquerque Prime Sub One City Plaza $ Deptartment of X 108,000 May 2014- Albq, NM 87102 June 2015 Transportation Bruce Riezzieri [email protected] City of Torrance City of Torrance Prime Sub X Frank Webb Architects $ 27,000 July 2013- Park & Ride 8607 Venice Blvd February 2018 Regional Terminal Los Angeles ,ca Torrance Ca [email protected] Utah Transit Authority Utah Transit Authority Prime $ Salt Lake City Utah X Sub 669 West 200 South 49,650 January 2014- Salt Lake City, Ut 84101 July 2014 Dave Goeres PE-Chief
San Diego Airport CH2M Hill Prime $ Taxi Hold lot Sub X 402 West Broadway 150,000 Feburary 2015- San Diego,Ca 92191 March 2016 Ryan Martin Project Mgr
University of California Prime Sub $ Irvine X University of California Irvine 320,000 October 2014- Jerry Neardoof Facilites Dir. May 2015 [email protected]
METRO GA17-140 LIST OF CURR & COMP PROJ (BACKLOG) RFP NO. AE47810E0128 5-7 PRO FORM 055 ISSUED: 11.14.17 REVISION DATE: 05.15.02
BIDDER/PROPOSER: ______W2 Design, Inc.
LIST OF COMPLETED PROJECTS - LAST THREE YEARS
Include only projects that are pertinent for this Invitation For Bids/Request for Proposal, in order to demonstrate Bidder's/Proposer's ability to perform the required Work.
OWNER'S NAME, DATE PROJECT NAME AND ACTUAL FINAL DESCRIPTION OF WORK ADDRESS, PHONE NO. CONTRACT LOCATION CONTRACT VALUE CONTACT PERSON DURATION
Rose Bowl Tenant Rose Bowl Operating Company $ 1001 Rose Bowl Drive August 2009 Improvements and Prime ✔ Sub Pasadena, CA 91103 1,022,580 Renovations Ms. Margo Mavridis To Civil and Utility Engineering, Stormwater Management, (626) 577-3100 Pasadena, CA [email protected] October 2015 Third Party Coordination
LA County Metro $ Expo Rail Operations ✔ One Gateway Plaza May 2011 Prime Sub Los Angeles, CA 90012 455,000 and Maintenance Facility (213) 922-7297 To Mr. Tim Lindholm Santa Monica, CA Civil and Utility Engineering, Stormwater Management, [email protected] May 2016 SWPPP, Third Party Approvals
Metrolink/SCCRA $ Metrolink Train Control and ✔ Sub to RNL Design September 2012 Prime Sub 523 W. 6th Street, Suite 1200, Los Angeles, CA 90014 125,000 Operations Support Facility (213) 955-9775 To Mr. Pat McKelvey October 2015 Pomona, CA Civil and Utility Engineering, Stormwater Management [email protected]
LA County Metro $ East San Fernando ✔ Sub to KOA Corporation 120,000 May 2011 Valley Transit Corridor Prime Sub 1100 Corporate Ctr Dr, Ste 201 Monterey Park, CA 91754 To Study Civil and Utility Engineering, Water Resources (323) 260-4703 Mr. Jimmy Lin March 2016 San Fernando, CA Email: [email protected] $ Metro Division 13 LA County Metro February 2012 Prime Sub ✔ One Gateway Plaza 315,000 Bus Maintenance Los Angeles, CA 90012 To Facility (213) 922-7297 February 2016 Civil, Utility, and Traffic Engineering, Third Party Approvals Mr. Tim Lindholm Metro Los Angeles, CA [email protected]
METRO ARCHIVE # LIST OF CURR & COMP PROJ (BACKLOG) TBD (IFB/RFP NO.) 2 PRO FORM 055 ISSUED 00/00/00 REVISION DATE: 05.15.02 FORM V1.0 EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE Page 1 of 3
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority
Questionnaire Purpose / Introduction
THIS PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE IS TO ASSIST THE LACMTA IN ITS ASSESSMENT OF THE GENERAL PAST EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE OF A PROPOSER, SUBCONSULTANT OR OTHER ENTITY THAT WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PERFORMING WORK. PROPOSER (IDENTIFIED CONSULTANT IN SECTION 1 BELOW) HAS IDENTIFIED YOUR ORGANIZATION AS A REFERENCE FOR PAST EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE.
SECTION 1: PROPOSER/CONSULTANT IDENTIFICATION (COMPLETED BY EVALUATOR)
Name of Proposer/Subconsultant/Other Entity
______
______
______
SECTION 2: IDENTIFICATION OF RESPONDING FIRM (COMPLETED BY EVALUATOR)
1. Name & Title of Responding Firm(s) Representative
2. Exact Name of Responding Firm
3. Physical / Mailing Address
City State Country Zip Code
4. Primary / Main Telephone No. Alt. Telephone No. Email 5. Brief Description of Work Performed for Responding firm FORM V1.0 EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE Page 2 of 3
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority
SECTION 3: OVERALL PROJECT EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE
IN THIS SECTION, PLEASE INDICATE YOUR ORGANIZATION’S SATISFACTION WITH THE PAST OR CURRENT OVERALL PERFORANCE OF THE CONSULTANT IDENTIFIED IN SECTION 1 ABOVE. THE CONSULTANT IN QUESTION IS TO BE ASSESSED ON THE BASIS OF YOUR ORGANIZATION’S FIRST-HAND/DIRECT EXPERIENCE WITH THE CONSULTANT ONLY.
PLEASE PLACE AN “X” IN THE APPROPRIATE BOX, INDICATING YOUR ORGANIZATION’S LEVEL OF SATISFACTION WITH THE CONSULTANT IN QUESTION. THE SCALE IS DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:
U – UNSATISFACTORY: CONSULTANT IS OR WAS IN DANGER OF NOT BEING ABLE TO SATISFY CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS AND RECOVERY WAS OR IS NOT LIKELY IN A TIMELY MANNER. AREA OF EVALUATION CONTAINS SERIOUS PROBLEMS FOR WHICH THE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS APPEAR INEFFECTIVE. S – SATISFACTORY: PERFORMANCE MEETS CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS. AREA OF EVALUATION CONTAINS SOME PROBLEMS FOR WHICH CORRECTIVE ACTIONS HAVE YET TO TAKEN, OR HAS NOT BEEN FULLY IMPLEMENTED, BUT APPEAR ONLY SATISFACTORY. G – GOOD: PERFORMANCE CLEARLY MEETS CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS. AREA OF EVALUATION CONTAINS SOME MINOR PROBLEMS FOR WHICH CORRECTIVE ACTIONS APPEAR EFFECTIVE. E – EXCEPTIONAL: PERFORMANCE CLEARLY EXCEEDS CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS. AREA OF EVALUATION CONTAINS FEW MINOR PROBLEMS FOR WHICH CORRECTIVE ACTION APPEAR HIGHLY EFFECTIVE.
Fail Pass
U S G E N/A 1. Consultant accomplished/performed work being evaluated. 2. Consultant provided experienced design and/or project managers with abilities needed to meet contract requirements. 3. Consultant demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace (if necessary) qualified personnel during the contract period. 4. Consultant provided a timely response to nonconformance issues. 5. Consultant exercised initiative to solve problems.
6. Consultant provided timely resolution of design defects.
7. Consultant developed and met established project schedules.
8. Contractor provided timely cost proposals for changed work.
9. Consultant paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner.
10. Consultant provided effective Occupational Safety & Health Policies, Procedures & Programs to meet contract requirements. 11. Consultant provided and effectively implemented Project Quality Program Manual requirements. 12. Consultant provided Quality Control Inspection Instructions and effectively conducted inspections. 13. Consultant effectively implemented requirements for Engineering Design Procedures(s). 14. Consultant obtained permits, inspections and necessary approvals from third-party’s in a timely manner. 15. Consultant effectively coordinated with the Buyer/Owner. 16. Consultant mitigated claims and changes. FORM V1.0 EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE Page 3 of 3
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Any other comments you would like to make such as would you contract again with this Consultant? (Note: if no additional comments so indicate below.)
______
______
______
______
______
______
______
To Pass Consultant/Subconsultant/Other Entity must receive passing marks or a N/A in twelve (12) out of the sixteen (16) questions, at a minimum, for this reference only.
The Experience/Performance Questionnaire shall be considered in the evaluation of the skill and experience of the Proposer and its Key Participants. Score
Proposer’s status after review _____
______Past Experience/Performance Team Member Date
FORM V1.0 EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE Page 1 of 3
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority
Questionnaire Purpose / Introduction
THIS PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE IS TO ASSIST THE LACMTA IN ITS ASSESSMENT OF THE GENERAL PAST EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE OF A PROPOSER, SUBCONSULTANT OR OTHER ENTITY THAT WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PERFORMING WORK. PROPOSER (IDENTIFIED CONSULTANT IN SECTION 1 BELOW) HAS IDENTIFIED YOUR ORGANIZATION AS A REFERENCE FOR PAST EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE.
SECTION 1: PROPOSER/CONSULTANT IDENTIFICATION (COMPLETED BY EVALUATOR)
Anil Verma Associates, Inc. Name of Proposer/Subconsultant/Other Entity
______
______
______
SECTION 2: IDENTIFICATION OF RESPONDING FIRM (COMPLETED BY EVALUATOR)
1. Carlos Garay, PE Project Manager (Retired) Name & Title of Responding Firm(s) Representative
2. Retired Federal Transit Administration Exact Name of Responding Firm
3. 4355 Huntley Court Physical / Mailing Address Woodbridge VA 22192 City State Country Zip Code
4. (703) 861-0101 [email protected] Primary / Main Telephone No. Alt. Telephone No. Email 5. Brief Description of Work Performed for Responding firm
Management of construction and oversight of signature underground heavy rail transit projects, such as The Eastside Access, Second Avenue Fulton Street Center and the Lower Manhattan Recovery project
including the World Trade Center in New York, and Tren Urbano Rio Piedras Heavy Rail Design-Build Subway
project in San Juan, Puerto Rico.
FORM V1.0 EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE Page 2 of 3
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority
SECTION 3: OVERALL PROJECT EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE
IN THIS SECTION, PLEASE INDICATE YOUR ORGANIZATION’S SATISFACTION WITH THE PAST OR CURRENT OVERALL PERFORANCE OF THE CONSULTANT IDENTIFIED IN SECTION 1 ABOVE. THE CONSULTANT IN QUESTION IS TO BE ASSESSED ON THE BASIS OF YOUR ORGANIZATION’S FIRST-HAND/DIRECT EXPERIENCE WITH THE CONSULTANT ONLY.
PLEASE PLACE AN “X” IN THE APPROPRIATE BOX, INDICATING YOUR ORGANIZATION’S LEVEL OF SATISFACTION WITH THE CONSULTANT IN QUESTION. THE SCALE IS DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:
U – UNSATISFACTORY: CONSULTANT IS OR WAS IN DANGER OF NOT BEING ABLE TO SATISFY CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS AND RECOVERY WAS OR IS NOT LIKELY IN A TIMELY MANNER. AREA OF EVALUATION CONTAINS SERIOUS PROBLEMS FOR WHICH THE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS APPEAR INEFFECTIVE. S – SATISFACTORY: PERFORMANCE MEETS CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS. AREA OF EVALUATION CONTAINS SOME PROBLEMS FOR WHICH CORRECTIVE ACTIONS HAVE YET TO TAKEN, OR HAS NOT BEEN FULLY IMPLEMENTED, BUT APPEAR ONLY SATISFACTORY. G – GOOD: PERFORMANCE CLEARLY MEETS CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS. AREA OF EVALUATION CONTAINS SOME MINOR PROBLEMS FOR WHICH CORRECTIVE ACTIONS APPEAR EFFECTIVE. E – EXCEPTIONAL: PERFORMANCE CLEARLY EXCEEDS CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS. AREA OF EVALUATION CONTAINS FEW MINOR PROBLEMS FOR WHICH CORRECTIVE ACTION APPEAR HIGHLY EFFECTIVE.
Fail Pass
U S G E N/A 1. Consultant accomplished/performed work being evaluated. X 2. Consultant provided experienced design and/or project X managers with abilities needed to meet contract requirements. 3. Consultant demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace X (if necessary) qualified personnel during the contract period. 4. Consultant provided a timely response to nonconformance X issues. 5. Consultant exercised initiative to solve problems. X
6. Consultant provided timely resolution of design defects. X
7. Consultant developed and met established project schedules. X 8. Contractor provided timely cost proposals for changed work. X
9. Consultant paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner. X 10. Consultant provided effective Occupational Safety & Health Policies, Procedures & Programs to meet contract X requirements. 11. Consultant provided and effectively implemented Project X Quality Program Manual requirements. 12. Consultant provided Quality Control Inspection Instructions and X effectively conducted inspections. 13. Consultant effectively implemented requirements for X Engineering Design Procedures(s). 14. Consultant obtained permits, inspections and necessary X approvals from third-party’s in a timely manner. 15. Consultant effectively coordinated with the Buyer/Owner. X
16. Consultant mitigated claims and changes. X
FORM V1.0 EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE Page 3 of 3
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Any other comments you would like to make such as would you contract again with this Consultant? (Note: if no additional comments so indicate below.)
______Anil Verma Associates, Inc. is very well versed with the design and construction of underground stations and tunnels. they have an impressive knowledge of underground systems and an impressive porfolio of transit ______projects all accross the country, including Hawaii and Puerto Rico.
______
______
______
______
______
To Pass Consultant/Subconsultant/Other Entity must receive passing marks or a N/A in twelve (12) out of the sixteen (16) questions, at a minimum, for this reference only.
The Experience/Performance Questionnaire shall be considered in the evaluation of the skill and experience of the Proposer and its Key Participants. Score
Proposer’s status after review _____16%
______Carlos Garay, PE ______November 29, 2017 Past Experience/Performance Team Member Date
CH2M
FORM V1.0 EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE Page 1 of 3
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority
Questionnaire Purpose / Introduction
THIS PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE IS TO ASSIST THE MTA IN ITS ASSESSMENT OF THE GENERAL PAST EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE OF A PROPOSER, SUBCONSULTANT OR OTHER ENTITY THAT WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PERFORMING WORK. PROPOSER (IDENTIFIED CONSULTANT IN SECTION 1 BELOW) HAS IDENTIFIED YOUR ORGANIZATION AS A REFERENCE FOR PAST EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE.
SECTION 1: PROPOSER/CONSULTANT IDENTIFICATION (COMPLETED BY EVALUATOR)
CH2M Name of Proposer/Subconsultant/Other Entity
______
______
______
SECTION 2: IDENTIFICATION OF RESPONDING FIRM (COMPLETED BY EVALUATOR)
Karen Woo , Director (Acting), Program Controls, Program Management 1. Name & Title of Responding Firm(s) Representative Metrolinx 2. Exact Name of Responding Firm
3. 20 Bay Street, Suite 600 Physical / Mailing Address Toronto Ontario Canada M5J 2W3 City State Country Zip Code
4. 416-452-2663 [email protected] Primary / Main Telephone No. Primary Email 5. Brief Description of Work Performed for Responding firm CH2M is currently the Owner's Engineer and Program Management Services provider for the
Metrolinx Capital Project Group infrastructure program. FORM V1.0 EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE Page 2 of 3
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority
SECTION 3: OVERALL PROJECT EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE
IN THIS SECTION, PLEASE INDICATE YOUR ORGANIZATION’S SATISFACTION WITH THE PAST OR CURRENT OVERALL PERFORANCE OF THE FIRM IDENTIFIED IN SECTION 1 ABOVE. THE FIRM IN QUESTION IS TO BE ASSESSED ON THE BASIS OF YOUR ORGANIZATION’S FIRST-HAND/DIRECT EXPERIENCE ONLY.
PLEASE PLACE AN “X” IN THE APPROPRIATE BOX, INDICATING YOUR ORGANIZATION’S LEVEL OF SATISFACTION WITH THE FIRM IN QUESTION. THE SCALE IS DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:
x U – UNSATISFACTORY: FIRM IS OR WAS IN DANGER OF NOT BEING ABLE TO SATISFY CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS AND RECOVERY WAS OR IS NOT LIKELY IN A TIMELY MANNER. AREA OF EVALUATION CONTAINS SERIOUS PROBLEMS FOR WHICH THE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS APPEAR INEFFECTIVE. x S – SATISFACTORY: PERFORMANCE MEETS CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS. AREA OF EVALUATION CONTAINS SOME PROBLEMS FOR WHICH CORRECTIVE ACTIONS HAVE YET TO TAKEN, OR HAS NOT BEEN FULLY IMPLEMENTED, BUT APPEAR ONLY SATISFACTORY. x G – GOOD: PERFORMANCE CLEARLY MEETS CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS. AREA OF EVALUATION CONTAINS SOME MINOR PROBLEMS FOR WHICH CORRECTIVE ACTIONS APPEAR EFFECTIVE. x E – EXCEPTIONAL: PERFORMANCE CLEARLY EXCEEDS CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS. AREA OF EVALUATION CONTAINS FEW MINOR PROBLEMS FOR WHICH CORRECTIVE ACTION APPEAR HIGHLY EFFECTIVE.
Fail Pass
USGE N/A 1. The Firm accomplished the contracted work within budget. x 2. The Firm provided experienced managers with the abilities x needed to meet contract requirements. 3. The Firm hired, maintained, and replaced (if necessary) x qualified personnel during the contract period. 4. The Firm responded satisfactorily and resolved x nonconformance or performance issues. 5. The Firm exercised initiative to solve problems. x 6. The Firm developed and met project schedules and contract milestones. x
7. The Firm paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner. x 8. The Firm was effective in complying with policies, procedures and programs to meet contract requirements. x
9. The Firm provided qualified personnel resources for the Project. x
10. The Firm provided quality control of the services performed. x 11. The Firm proactively addressed challenges/issues on the x project. 12. The Firm effectively collaborated with its team. x 13. The Firm effectively utilized small or disadvantaged x businesses. 14. The Firm effectively coordinated and /or partnered with the x Buyer/Owner. 15. The Firm effectively responded to contract change orders/ work orders. x FORM V1.0 EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE Page 3 of 3
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority
Any other comments you would like to make, such as, would you contract again with this Firm? (Note: if no additional comments so indicate below.)
Yes- I would contract with CH2M again. CH2M have worked hard to find experienced and appropriate ______
______staff that fit into the Metrolinx work culture and also fit within budget. While we have had challenges
______with a few personnel with respect to performance, CH2M have handled it in a responsive and
______timely manner.
______
______
______
To pass the Firm must receive passing marks or a N/A in twelve (12) out of the fifteen (15) questions, at a minimum, for this reference only.
(Note: The Evaluation Team may determine any item rated as “Unsatisfactory” critical to the procurement)
Score
Firm’s status after review _____15/15 (Pass)
______Karen Woo ______December 5th 2016 Evaluator Date
16 FORM V1.0 EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE Page 1 of 3
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority
Questionnaire Purpose / Introduction
THIS PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE IS TO ASSIST THE LACMTA IN ITS ASSESSMENT OF THE GENERAL PAST EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE OF A PROPOSER, SUBCONSULTANT OR OTHER ENTITY THAT WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PERFORMING WORK. PROPOSER (IDENTIFIED CONSULTANT IN SECTION 1 BELOW) HAS IDENTIFIED YOUR ORGANIZATION AS A REFERENCE FOR PAST EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE.
SECTION 1: PROPOSER/CONSULTANT IDENTIFICATION (COMPLETED BY EVALUATOR)
M•P Consultants, PC which will do business in California as COLMENA ENGINEERING Name of Proposer/Subconsultant/Other Entity
______
______
______
SECTION 2: IDENTIFICATION OF RESPONDING FIRM (COMPLETED BY EVALUATOR)
1. Nick Landwer, Director, Engineering and Design Name & Title of Responding Firm(s) Representative
2. Metropolitan Council (Metro Transit) Exact Name of Responding Firm
3. 5514 West Broadway, Suite 200 Physical / Mailing Address Crystal MN USA 55428 City State Country Zip Code
4. 612.373.5372 [email protected] Primary / Main Telephone No. Alt. Telephone No. Email 5. Brief Description of Work Performed for Responding firm
MP Consultants performed electrical and communication design for the Blue Line Extension
Light Rail project. FORM V1.0 EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE Page 2 of 3
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority
SECTION 3: OVERALL PROJECT EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE
IN THIS SECTION, PLEASE INDICATE YOUR ORGANIZATION’S SATISFACTION WITH THE PAST OR CURRENT OVERALL PERFORANCE OF THE CONSULTANT IDENTIFIED IN SECTION 1 ABOVE. THE CONSULTANT IN QUESTION IS TO BE ASSESSED ON THE BASIS OF YOUR ORGANIZATION’S FIRST-HAND/DIRECT EXPERIENCE WITH THE CONSULTANT ONLY.
PLEASE PLACE AN “X” IN THE APPROPRIATE BOX, INDICATING YOUR ORGANIZATION’S LEVEL OF SATISFACTION WITH THE CONSULTANT IN QUESTION. THE SCALE IS DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:
U – UNSATISFACTORY: CONSULTANT IS OR WAS IN DANGER OF NOT BEING ABLE TO SATISFY CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS AND RECOVERY WAS OR IS NOT LIKELY IN A TIMELY MANNER. AREA OF EVALUATION CONTAINS SERIOUS PROBLEMS FOR WHICH THE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS APPEAR INEFFECTIVE. S – SATISFACTORY: PERFORMANCE MEETS CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS. AREA OF EVALUATION CONTAINS SOME PROBLEMS FOR WHICH CORRECTIVE ACTIONS HAVE YET TO TAKEN, OR HAS NOT BEEN FULLY IMPLEMENTED, BUT APPEAR ONLY SATISFACTORY. G – GOOD: PERFORMANCE CLEARLY MEETS CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS. AREA OF EVALUATION CONTAINS SOME MINOR PROBLEMS FOR WHICH CORRECTIVE ACTIONS APPEAR EFFECTIVE. E – EXCEPTIONAL: PERFORMANCE CLEARLY EXCEEDS CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS. AREA OF EVALUATION CONTAINS FEW MINOR PROBLEMS FOR WHICH CORRECTIVE ACTION APPEAR HIGHLY EFFECTIVE.
Fail Pass
U S G E N/A 1. Consultant accomplished/performed work being evaluated. XX 2. Consultant provided experienced design and/or project X managers with abilities needed to meet contract requirements. 3. Consultant demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace X (if necessary) qualified personnel during the contract period.
4. Consultant provided a timely response to nonconformance X issues. 5. Consultant exercised initiative to solve problems. X
6. Consultant provided timely resolution of design defects. X 7. Consultant developed and met established project schedules. X 8. Contractor provided timely cost proposals for changed work. X
9. Consultant paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner. X
10. Consultant provided effective Occupational Safety & Health Policies, Procedures & Programs to meet contract X requirements.
11. Consultant provided and effectively implemented Project X Quality Program Manual requirements. 12. Consultant provided Quality Control Inspection Instructions and X effectively conducted inspections. 13. Consultant effectively implemented requirements for Engineering Design Procedures(s). X 14. Consultant obtained permits, inspections and necessary approvals from third-party’s in a timely manner. X
15. Consultant effectively coordinated with the Buyer/Owner. X
16. Consultant mitigated claims and changes. X FORM V1.0 EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE Page 3 of 3
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Any other comments you would like to make such as would you contract again with this Consultant? (Note: if no additional comments so indicate below.)
______M-P Consultants have been an integral part of the design team for our light rail project. The staff from M-P are professional, knowledgeable
______and deliver on their tasks. M-P has been part of a responsive design team that has met all milestone deliverable goals and have provided
______a complete and quality design. I look forward to continuing work with M-P Consulting on this project and future projects.
______
______
______
______
To Pass Consultant/Subconsultant/Other Entity must receive passing marks or a N/A in twelve (12) out of the sixteen (16) questions, at a minimum, for this reference only.
The Experience/Performance Questionnaire shall be considered in the evaluation of the skill and experience of the Proposer and its Key Participants. Score
Proposer’s status after review _____16
______12/27/2017 Past Experience/Performance Team Member Date
16
FORM V1.0 EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE Page 1 of 3
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority
Questionnaire Purpose / Introduction
THIS PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE IS TO ASSIST THE LACMTA IN ITS ASSESSMENT OF THE GENERAL PAST EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE OF A PROPOSER, SUBCONSULTANT OR OTHER ENTITY THAT WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PERFORMING WORK. PROPOSER (IDENTIFIED CONSULTANT IN SECTION 1 BELOW) HAS IDENTIFIED YOUR ORGANIZATION AS A REFERENCE FOR PAST EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE.
SECTION 1: PROPOSER/CONSULTANT IDENTIFICATION (COMPLETED BY EVALUATOR)
Name of Proposer/Subconsultant/Other Entity
______
______
______
SECTION 2: IDENTIFICATION OF RESPONDING FIRM (COMPLETED BY EVALUATOR)
1. Name & Title of Responding Firm(s) Representative
2. Exact Name of Responding Firm
3. Physical / Mailing Address
City State Country Zip Code
4. Primary / Main Telephone No. Alt. Telephone No. Email 5. Brief Description of Work Performed for Responding firm FORM V1.0 EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE Page 2 of 3
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority
SECTION 3: OVERALL PROJECT EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE
IN THIS SECTION, PLEASE INDICATE YOUR ORGANIZATION’S SATISFACTION WITH THE PAST OR CURRENT OVERALL PERFORANCE OF THE CONSULTANT IDENTIFIED IN SECTION 1 ABOVE. THE CONSULTANT IN QUESTION IS TO BE ASSESSED ON THE BASIS OF YOUR ORGANIZATION’S FIRST-HAND/DIRECT EXPERIENCE WITH THE CONSULTANT ONLY.
PLEASE PLACE AN “X” IN THE APPROPRIATE BOX, INDICATING YOUR ORGANIZATION’S LEVEL OF SATISFACTION WITH THE CONSULTANT IN QUESTION. THE SCALE IS DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:
U – UNSATISFACTORY: CONSULTANT IS OR WAS IN DANGER OF NOT BEING ABLE TO SATISFY CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS AND RECOVERY WAS OR IS NOT LIKELY IN A TIMELY MANNER. AREA OF EVALUATION CONTAINS SERIOUS PROBLEMS FOR WHICH THE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS APPEAR INEFFECTIVE. S – SATISFACTORY: PERFORMANCE MEETS CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS. AREA OF EVALUATION CONTAINS SOME PROBLEMS FOR WHICH CORRECTIVE ACTIONS HAVE YET TO TAKEN, OR HAS NOT BEEN FULLY IMPLEMENTED, BUT APPEAR ONLY SATISFACTORY. G – GOOD: PERFORMANCE CLEARLY MEETS CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS. AREA OF EVALUATION CONTAINS SOME MINOR PROBLEMS FOR WHICH CORRECTIVE ACTIONS APPEAR EFFECTIVE. E – EXCEPTIONAL: PERFORMANCE CLEARLY EXCEEDS CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS. AREA OF EVALUATION CONTAINS FEW MINOR PROBLEMS FOR WHICH CORRECTIVE ACTION APPEAR HIGHLY EFFECTIVE.
Fail Pass
U S G E N/A 1. Consultant accomplished/performed work being evaluated. 2. Consultant provided experienced design and/or project managers with abilities needed to meet contract requirements. 3. Consultant demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace (if necessary) qualified personnel during the contract period. 4. Consultant provided a timely response to nonconformance issues. 5. Consultant exercised initiative to solve problems.
6. Consultant provided timely resolution of design defects.
7. Consultant developed and met established project schedules.
8. Contractor provided timely cost proposals for changed work.
9. Consultant paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner.
10. Consultant provided effective Occupational Safety & Health Policies, Procedures & Programs to meet contract requirements. 11. Consultant provided and effectively implemented Project Quality Program Manual requirements. 12. Consultant provided Quality Control Inspection Instructions and effectively conducted inspections. 13. Consultant effectively implemented requirements for Engineering Design Procedures(s). 14. Consultant obtained permits, inspections and necessary approvals from third-party’s in a timely manner. 15. Consultant effectively coordinated with the Buyer/Owner. 16. Consultant mitigated claims and changes. FORM V1.0 EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE Page 3 of 3
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Any other comments you would like to make such as would you contract again with this Consultant? (Note: if no additional comments so indicate below.)
______
______
______
______
______
______
______
To Pass Consultant/Subconsultant/Other Entity must receive passing marks or a N/A in twelve (12) out of the sixteen (16) questions, at a minimum, for this reference only.
The Experience/Performance Questionnaire shall be considered in the evaluation of the skill and experience of the Proposer and its Key Participants. Score
Proposer’s status after review _____
______Past Experience/Performance Team Member Date FORM V1.0 EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE Page 1 of 3
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority
Questionnaire Purpose / Introduction
THIS PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE IS TO ASSIST THE LACMTA IN ITS ASSESSMENT OF THE GENERAL PAST EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE OF A PROPOSER, SUBCONSULTANT OR OTHER ENTITY THAT WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PERFORMING WORK. PROPOSER (IDENTIFIED CONSULTANT IN SECTION 1 BELOW) HAS IDENTIFIED YOUR ORGANIZATION AS A REFERENCE FOR PAST EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE.
SECTION 1: PROPOSER/CONSULTANT IDENTIFICATION (COMPLETED BY EVALUATOR)
Name of Proposer/Subconsultant/Other Entity
______
______
______
SECTION 2: IDENTIFICATION OF RESPONDING FIRM (COMPLETED BY EVALUATOR)
1. Name & Title of Responding Firm(s) Representative
2. Exact Name of Responding Firm
3. Physical / Mailing Address
City State Country Zip Code
4. Primary / Main Telephone No. Alt. Telephone No. Email 5. Brief Description of Work Performed for Responding firm FORM V1.0 EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE Page 2 of 3
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority
SECTION 3: OVERALL PROJECT EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE
IN THIS SECTION, PLEASE INDICATE YOUR ORGANIZATION’S SATISFACTION WITH THE PAST OR CURRENT OVERALL PERFORANCE OF THE CONSULTANT IDENTIFIED IN SECTION 1 ABOVE. THE CONSULTANT IN QUESTION IS TO BE ASSESSED ON THE BASIS OF YOUR ORGANIZATION’S FIRST-HAND/DIRECT EXPERIENCE WITH THE CONSULTANT ONLY.
PLEASE PLACE AN “X” IN THE APPROPRIATE BOX, INDICATING YOUR ORGANIZATION’S LEVEL OF SATISFACTION WITH THE CONSULTANT IN QUESTION. THE SCALE IS DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:
U – UNSATISFACTORY: CONSULTANT IS OR WAS IN DANGER OF NOT BEING ABLE TO SATISFY CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS AND RECOVERY WAS OR IS NOT LIKELY IN A TIMELY MANNER. AREA OF EVALUATION CONTAINS SERIOUS PROBLEMS FOR WHICH THE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS APPEAR INEFFECTIVE. S – SATISFACTORY: PERFORMANCE MEETS CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS. AREA OF EVALUATION CONTAINS SOME PROBLEMS FOR WHICH CORRECTIVE ACTIONS HAVE YET TO TAKEN, OR HAS NOT BEEN FULLY IMPLEMENTED, BUT APPEAR ONLY SATISFACTORY. G – GOOD: PERFORMANCE CLEARLY MEETS CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS. AREA OF EVALUATION CONTAINS SOME MINOR PROBLEMS FOR WHICH CORRECTIVE ACTIONS APPEAR EFFECTIVE. E – EXCEPTIONAL: PERFORMANCE CLEARLY EXCEEDS CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS. AREA OF EVALUATION CONTAINS FEW MINOR PROBLEMS FOR WHICH CORRECTIVE ACTION APPEAR HIGHLY EFFECTIVE.
Fail Pass
U S G E N/A 1. Consultant accomplished/performed work being evaluated. 2. Consultant provided experienced design and/or project managers with abilities needed to meet contract requirements. 3. Consultant demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace (if necessary) qualified personnel during the contract period. 4. Consultant provided a timely response to nonconformance issues. 5. Consultant exercised initiative to solve problems.
6. Consultant provided timely resolution of design defects.
7. Consultant developed and met established project schedules.
8. Contractor provided timely cost proposals for changed work.
9. Consultant paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner.
10. Consultant provided effective Occupational Safety & Health Policies, Procedures & Programs to meet contract requirements. 11. Consultant provided and effectively implemented Project Quality Program Manual requirements. 12. Consultant provided Quality Control Inspection Instructions and effectively conducted inspections. 13. Consultant effectively implemented requirements for Engineering Design Procedures(s). 14. Consultant obtained permits, inspections and necessary approvals from third-party’s in a timely manner. 15. Consultant effectively coordinated with the Buyer/Owner. 16. Consultant mitigated claims and changes. FORM V1.0 EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE Page 3 of 3
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Any other comments you would like to make such as would you contract again with this Consultant? (Note: if no additional comments so indicate below.)
______
______
______
______
______
______
______
To Pass Consultant/Subconsultant/Other Entity must receive passing marks or a N/A in twelve (12) out of the sixteen (16) questions, at a minimum, for this reference only.
The Experience/Performance Questionnaire shall be considered in the evaluation of the skill and experience of the Proposer and its Key Participants. Score
Proposer’s status after review _____
______Past Experience/Performance Team Member Date FORM V1.0 EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE Page 1 of 3
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority
Questionnaire Purpose / Introduction
THIS PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE IS TO ASSIST THE LACMTA IN ITS ASSESSMENT OF THE GENERAL PAST EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE OF A PROPOSER, SUBCONSULTANT OR OTHER ENTITY THAT WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PERFORMING WORK. PROPOSER (IDENTIFIED CONSULTANT IN SECTION 1 BELOW) HAS IDENTIFIED YOUR ORGANIZATION AS A REFERENCE FOR PAST EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE.
SECTION 1: PROPOSER/CONSULTANT IDENTIFICATION (COMPLETED BY EVALUATOR)
IBI Group Name of Proposer/Subconsultant/Other Entity
______
______
______
SECTION 2: IDENTIFICATION OF RESPONDING FIRM (COMPLETED BY EVALUATOR)
1. Eric Farrington, PE, Senior Project Manager, IT Name & Title of Responding Firm(s) Representative
2. Regional Transportation District Exact Name of Responding Firm
3. 1560 Broadway, Suite 1099 Physical / Mailing Address Denver CO USA 80202 City State Country Zip Code
4. 303.299.2216 [email protected] Primary / Main Telephone No. Alt. Telephone No. Email 5. Brief Description of Work Performed for Responding firm Provided a range of transit technology consulting services across multiple task orders
including computer aided dispatch, fare collection, and real-time passenger information
sysetem projects. FORM V1.0 EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE Page 2 of 3
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority
SECTION 3: OVERALL PROJECT EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE
IN THIS SECTION, PLEASE INDICATE YOUR ORGANIZATION’S SATISFACTION WITH THE PAST OR CURRENT OVERALL PERFORANCE OF THE CONSULTANT IDENTIFIED IN SECTION 1 ABOVE. THE CONSULTANT IN QUESTION IS TO BE ASSESSED ON THE BASIS OF YOUR ORGANIZATION’S FIRST-HAND/DIRECT EXPERIENCE WITH THE CONSULTANT ONLY.
PLEASE PLACE AN “X” IN THE APPROPRIATE BOX, INDICATING YOUR ORGANIZATION’S LEVEL OF SATISFACTION WITH THE CONSULTANT IN QUESTION. THE SCALE IS DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:
x U – UNSATISFACTORY: CONSULTANT IS OR WAS IN DANGER OF NOT BEING ABLE TO SATISFY CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS AND RECOVERY WAS OR IS NOT LIKELY IN A TIMELY MANNER. AREA OF EVALUATION CONTAINS SERIOUS PROBLEMS FOR WHICH THE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS APPEAR INEFFECTIVE. x S – SATISFACTORY: PERFORMANCE MEETS CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS. AREA OF EVALUATION CONTAINS SOME PROBLEMS FOR WHICH CORRECTIVE ACTIONS HAVE YET TO TAKEN, OR HAS NOT BEEN FULLY IMPLEMENTED, BUT APPEAR ONLY SATISFACTORY. x G – GOOD: PERFORMANCE CLEARLY MEETS CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS. AREA OF EVALUATION CONTAINS SOME MINOR PROBLEMS FOR WHICH CORRECTIVE ACTIONS APPEAR EFFECTIVE. x E – EXCEPTIONAL: PERFORMANCE CLEARLY EXCEEDS CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS. AREA OF EVALUATION CONTAINS FEW MINOR PROBLEMS FOR WHICH CORRECTIVE ACTION APPEAR HIGHLY EFFECTIVE.
Fail Pass
USGE N/A 1. Consultant accomplished/performed work being evaluated. 2. Consultant provided experienced design and/or project managers with abilities needed to meet contract requirements. 3. Consultant demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace (if necessary) qualified personnel during the contract period. 4. Consultant provided a timely response to nonconformance issues. 5. Consultant exercised initiative to solve problems.
6. Consultant provided timely resolution of design defects.
7. Consultant developed and met established project schedules.
8. Contractor provided timely cost proposals for changed work.
9. Consultant paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner.
10. Consultant provided effective Occupational Safety & Health Policies, Procedures & Programs to meet contract requirements. 11. Consultant provided and effectively implemented Project Quality Program Manual requirements. 12. Consultant provided Quality Control Inspection Instructions and effectively conducted inspections. 13. Consultant effectively implemented requirements for Engineering Design Procedures(s). 14. Consultant obtained permits, inspections and necessary approvals from third-party’s in a timely manner. 15. Consultant effectively coordinated with the Buyer/Owner. 16. Consultant mitigated claims and changes. FORM V1.0 EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE Page 3 of 3
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Any other comments you would like to make such as would you contract again with this Consultant? (Note: if no additional comments so indicate below.)
______
______
______
______
______
______
______
To Pass Consultant/Subconsultant/Other Entity must receive passing marks or a N/A in twelve (12) out of the sixteen (16) questions, at a minimum, for this reference only.
The Experience/Performance Questionnaire shall be considered in the evaluation of the skill and experience of the Proposer and its Key Participants. Score
Proposer’s status after review _____
______Past Experience/Performance Team Member Date
FORM V1.0 EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE Page 1 of 3
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority
Questionnaire Purpose / Introduction
THIS PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE IS TO ASSIST THE LACMTA IN ITS ASSESSMENT OF THE GENERAL PAST EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE OF A PROPOSER, SUBCONSULTANT OR OTHER ENTITY THAT WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PERFORMING WORK. PROPOSER (IDENTIFIED CONSULTANT IN SECTION 1 BELOW) HAS IDENTIFIED YOUR ORGANIZATION AS A REFERENCE FOR PAST EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE.
SECTION 1: PROPOSER/CONSULTANT IDENTIFICATION (COMPLETED BY EVALUATOR)
Jacobs Name of Proposer/Subconsultant/Other Entity
______
______
______
SECTION 2: IDENTIFICATION OF RESPONDING FIRM (COMPLETED BY EVALUATOR)
1. Jinfar Liu, PE, Senior Electrical Engineer Name & Title of Responding Firm(s) Representative
2. The Port Authority of NY & NJ Exact Name of Responding Firm
3. 4 World Trade Center, 19th Floor4 World Trade Center, 19th Floor Physical / Mailing Address New York NY USA 10007 City State Country Zip Code
4. (212) 435-6015 Primary / Main Telephone No. Alt. Telephone No. Email 5. Brief Description of Work Performed for Responding firm
Detail design for 3 new traction power substations including construction support services with the following capacities: - Christopher Street Substation (Sub 1) 4 X 3.3MW - construction completed - Harrison Substation (Sub 9) 3 X 2MW - design completed, under construction - Harrison Main Line, Yard and Car Maintenance Facility Substation (Sub 14) 2 X 4MW, 2 X 2MW - conceptual design completed FORM V1.0 EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE Page 2 of 3
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority
SECTION 3: OVERALL PROJECT EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE
IN THIS SECTION, PLEASE INDICATE YOUR ORGANIZATION’S SATISFACTION WITH THE PAST OR CURRENT OVERALL PERFORANCE OF THE CONSULTANT IDENTIFIED IN SECTION 1 ABOVE. THE CONSULTANT IN QUESTION IS TO BE ASSESSED ON THE BASIS OF YOUR ORGANIZATION’S FIRST-HAND/DIRECT EXPERIENCE WITH THE CONSULTANT ONLY.
PLEASE PLACE AN “X” IN THE APPROPRIATE BOX, INDICATING YOUR ORGANIZATION’S LEVEL OF SATISFACTION WITH THE CONSULTANT IN QUESTION. THE SCALE IS DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:
x U – UNSATISFACTORY: CONSULTANT IS OR WAS IN DANGER OF NOT BEING ABLE TO SATISFY CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS AND RECOVERY WAS OR IS NOT LIKELY IN A TIMELY MANNER. AREA OF EVALUATION CONTAINS SERIOUS PROBLEMS FOR WHICH THE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS APPEAR INEFFECTIVE. x S – SATISFACTORY: PERFORMANCE MEETS CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS. AREA OF EVALUATION CONTAINS SOME PROBLEMS FOR WHICH CORRECTIVE ACTIONS HAVE YET TO TAKEN, OR HAS NOT BEEN FULLY IMPLEMENTED, BUT APPEAR ONLY SATISFACTORY. x G – GOOD: PERFORMANCE CLEARLY MEETS CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS. AREA OF EVALUATION CONTAINS SOME MINOR PROBLEMS FOR WHICH CORRECTIVE ACTIONS APPEAR EFFECTIVE. x E – EXCEPTIONAL: PERFORMANCE CLEARLY EXCEEDS CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS. AREA OF EVALUATION CONTAINS FEW MINOR PROBLEMS FOR WHICH CORRECTIVE ACTION APPEAR HIGHLY EFFECTIVE.
Fail Pass
USGE N/A 1. Consultant accomplished/performed work being evaluated. X 2. Consultant provided experienced design and/or project X managers with abilities needed to meet contract requirements. 3. Consultant demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace X (if necessary) qualified personnel during the contract period. 4. Consultant provided a timely response to nonconformance X issues. 5. Consultant exercised initiative to solve problems. X 6. Consultant provided timely resolution of design defects. X 7. Consultant developed and met established project schedules. X 8. Contractor provided timely cost proposals for changed work. X 9. Consultant paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner. X 10. Consultant provided effective Occupational Safety & Health Policies, Procedures & Programs to meet contract X requirements. 11. Consultant provided and effectively implemented Project X Quality Program Manual requirements. 12. Consultant provided Quality Control Inspection Instructions and X effectively conducted inspections. 13. Consultant effectively implemented requirements for X Engineering Design Procedures(s). 14. Consultant obtained permits, inspections and necessary X approvals from third-party’s in a timely manner. 15. Consultant effectively coordinated with the Buyer/Owner. X 16. Consultant mitigated claims and changes. X FORM V1.0 EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE Page 3 of 3
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Any other comments you would like to make such as would you contract again with this Consultant? (Note: if no additional comments so indicate below.)
I______would contract with the consultant, Jacobs, again.
I______am confident in their work; they are responsive and provide______recommendations and options for our operation.
Jacobs______has worked on many PANY/NJ substation design projects______and they have the knowledge and background experience______that I am looking for in a consultant.
______
To Pass Consultant/Subconsultant/Other Entity must receive passing marks or a N/A in twelve (12) out of the sixteen (16) questions, at a minimum, for this reference only.
The Experience/Performance Questionnaire shall be considered in the evaluation of the skill and experience of the Proposer and its Key Participants. Score
Proposer’s status after review16/16 _____
______12/20/2017 ______Past Experience/Performance Team Member Date
FORM V1.0 EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE Page 1 of 3
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority
Questionnaire Purpose / Introduction
THIS PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE IS TO ASSIST THE LACMTA IN ITS ASSESSMENT OF THE GENERAL PAST EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE OF A PROPOSER, SUBCONSULTANT OR OTHER ENTITY THAT WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PERFORMING WORK. PROPOSER (IDENTIFIED CONSULTANT IN SECTION 1 BELOW) HAS IDENTIFIED YOUR ORGANIZATION AS A REFERENCE FOR PAST EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE.
SECTION 1: PROPOSER/CONSULTANT IDENTIFICATION (COMPLETED BY EVALUATOR)
MARRS Services Inc., 340 E. Commonwealth Ave., Fullerton, CA, 92832 P: 714-213-8650/F: 714-213-8657 Name of Proposer/Subconsultant/Other Entity
______
______
______
SECTION 2: IDENTIFICATION OF RESPONDING FIRM (COMPLETED BY EVALUATOR)
1. Ben Neil, Project Manager Name & Title of Responding Firm(s) Representative
2. Morlin Asset Management Exact Name of Responding Firm
3. 701 N. Brand Blvd., Suite 810 Physical / Mailing Address Glendale, CA, USA, 91203 City State Country Zip Code
4. 818-248-8504 [email protected] Primary / Main Telephone No. Alt. Telephone No. Email 5. Brief Description of Work Performed for Responding firm MARRS provided construction management and inspection support for several interior and exterior renovations and tenant improvement projects at the Metro Union Station in downtown Los Angeles totaling $40 million. Our team provided peer review services of plans and specs, coordination, and QA/QC, including code inspections and material testing. The scope of work included structural, mechanical, electrical, plumbing, and building code inspections. Our peer review of all plans helped eliminate change orders, control costs and schedule impacts. Our experienced inspectors work with the owner’s representatives and contractors to ensure the construction work being performed met plans and building code requirements. MARRS provided daily reports and photo documentation with time and date stamp recording all pertinent information to the owner, engineer and stakeholders. FORM V1.0 EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE Page 2 of 3
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority
SECTION 3: OVERALL PROJECT EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE
IN THIS SECTION, PLEASE INDICATE YOUR ORGANIZATION’S SATISFACTION WITH THE PAST OR CURRENT OVERALL PERFORANCE OF THE CONSULTANT IDENTIFIED IN SECTION 1 ABOVE. THE CONSULTANT IN QUESTION IS TO BE ASSESSED ON THE BASIS OF YOUR ORGANIZATION’S FIRST-HAND/DIRECT EXPERIENCE WITH THE CONSULTANT ONLY.
PLEASE PLACE AN “X” IN THE APPROPRIATE BOX, INDICATING YOUR ORGANIZATION’S LEVEL OF SATISFACTION WITH THE CONSULTANT IN QUESTION. THE SCALE IS DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:
U–UNSATISFACTORY: CONSULTANT IS OR WAS IN DANGER OF NOT BEING ABLE TO SATISFY CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS AND RECOVERY WAS OR IS NOT LIKELY IN A TIMELY MANNER. AREA OF EVALUATION CONTAINS SERIOUS PROBLEMS FOR WHICH THE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS APPEAR INEFFECTIVE. S–SATISFACTORY: PERFORMANCE MEETS CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS. AREA OF EVALUATION CONTAINS SOME PROBLEMS FOR WHICH CORRECTIVE ACTIONS HAVE YET TO TAKEN, OR HAS NOT BEEN FULLY IMPLEMENTED, BUT APPEAR ONLY SATISFACTORY. G–GOOD: PERFORMANCE CLEARLY MEETS CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS. AREA OF EVALUATION CONTAINS SOME MINOR PROBLEMS FOR WHICH CORRECTIVE ACTIONS APPEAR EFFECTIVE. E–EXCEPTIONAL: PERFORMANCE CLEARLY EXCEEDS CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS. AREA OF EVALUATION CONTAINS FEW MINOR PROBLEMS FOR WHICH CORRECTIVE ACTION APPEAR HIGHLY EFFECTIVE.
Fail Pass
USGE N/A 1. Consultant accomplished/performed work being evaluated. 2. Consultant provided experienced design and/or project managers with abilities needed to meet contract requirements. 3. Consultant demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace (if necessary) qualified personnel during the contract period. 4. Consultant provided a timely response to nonconformance issues. 5. Consultant exercised initiative to solve problems.
6. Consultant provided timely resolution of design defects.
7. Consultant developed and met established project schedules.
8. Contractor provided timely cost proposals for changed work.
9. Consultant paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner.
10. Consultant provided effective Occupational Safety & Health Policies, Procedures & Programs to meet contract requirements. 11. Consultant provided and effectively implemented Project Quality Program Manual requirements. 12. Consultant provided Quality Control Inspection Instructions and effectively conducted inspections. 13. Consultant effectively implemented requirements for Engineering Design Procedures(s). 14. Consultant obtained permits, inspections and necessary approvals from third-party’s in a timely manner. 15. Consultant effectively coordinated with the Buyer/Owner. 16. Consultant mitigated claims and changes. FORM V1.0 EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE Page 3 of 3
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Any other comments you would like to make such as would you contract again with this Consultant? (Note: if no additional comments so indicate below.)
______Marrs was contracted to provide Peer Review, code inspections and Q.C. testing. They provided superior services.
______
______
______
______
______
______
To Pass Consultant/Subconsultant/Other Entity must receive passing marks or a N/A in twelve (12) out of the sixteen (16) questions, at a minimum, for this reference only.
The Experience/Performance Questionnaire shall be considered in the evaluation of the skill and experience of the Proposer and its Key Participants. Score
Proposer’s status after review _____
______12-14-17 Past Experience/Performance Team Member Date FORM V1.0 EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE Page 1 of 3
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority
Questionnaire Purpose / Introduction
THIS PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE IS TO ASSIST THE LACMTA IN ITS ASSESSMENT OF THE GENERAL PAST EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE OF A PROPOSER, SUBCONSULTANT OR OTHER ENTITY THAT WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PERFORMING WORK. PROPOSER (IDENTIFIED CONSULTANT IN SECTION 1 BELOW) HAS IDENTIFIED YOUR ORGANIZATION AS A REFERENCE FOR PAST EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE.
SECTION 1: PROPOSER/CONSULTANT IDENTIFICATION (COMPLETED BY EVALUATOR)
Name of Proposer/Subconsultant/Other Entity
______
______
______
SECTION 2: IDENTIFICATION OF RESPONDING FIRM (COMPLETED BY EVALUATOR)
1. Name & Title of Responding Firm(s) Representative
2. Exact Name of Responding Firm
3. Physical / Mailing Address
City State Country Zip Code
4. Primary / Main Telephone No. Alt. Telephone No. Email 5. Brief Description of Work Performed for Responding firm FORM V1.0 EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE Page 2 of 3
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority
SECTION 3: OVERALL PROJECT EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE
IN THIS SECTION, PLEASE INDICATE YOUR ORGANIZATION’S SATISFACTION WITH THE PAST OR CURRENT OVERALL PERFORANCE OF THE CONSULTANT IDENTIFIED IN SECTION 1 ABOVE. THE CONSULTANT IN QUESTION IS TO BE ASSESSED ON THE BASIS OF YOUR ORGANIZATION’S FIRST-HAND/DIRECT EXPERIENCE WITH THE CONSULTANT ONLY.
PLEASE PLACE AN “X” IN THE APPROPRIATE BOX, INDICATING YOUR ORGANIZATION’S LEVEL OF SATISFACTION WITH THE CONSULTANT IN QUESTION. THE SCALE IS DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:
U – UNSATISFACTORY: CONSULTANT IS OR WAS IN DANGER OF NOT BEING ABLE TO SATISFY CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS AND RECOVERY WAS OR IS NOT LIKELY IN A TIMELY MANNER. AREA OF EVALUATION CONTAINS SERIOUS PROBLEMS FOR WHICH THE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS APPEAR INEFFECTIVE. S – SATISFACTORY: PERFORMANCE MEETS CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS. AREA OF EVALUATION CONTAINS SOME PROBLEMS FOR WHICH CORRECTIVE ACTIONS HAVE YET TO TAKEN, OR HAS NOT BEEN FULLY IMPLEMENTED, BUT APPEAR ONLY SATISFACTORY. G – GOOD: PERFORMANCE CLEARLY MEETS CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS. AREA OF EVALUATION CONTAINS SOME MINOR PROBLEMS FOR WHICH CORRECTIVE ACTIONS APPEAR EFFECTIVE. E – EXCEPTIONAL: PERFORMANCE CLEARLY EXCEEDS CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS. AREA OF EVALUATION CONTAINS FEW MINOR PROBLEMS FOR WHICH CORRECTIVE ACTION APPEAR HIGHLY EFFECTIVE.
Fail Pass
U S G E N/A 1. Consultant accomplished/performed work being evaluated. 2. Consultant provided experienced design and/or project managers with abilities needed to meet contract requirements. 3. Consultant demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace (if necessary) qualified personnel during the contract period. 4. Consultant provided a timely response to nonconformance issues. 5. Consultant exercised initiative to solve problems.
6. Consultant provided timely resolution of design defects.
7. Consultant developed and met established project schedules.
8. Contractor provided timely cost proposals for changed work.
9. Consultant paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner.
10. Consultant provided effective Occupational Safety & Health Policies, Procedures & Programs to meet contract requirements. 11. Consultant provided and effectively implemented Project Quality Program Manual requirements. 12. Consultant provided Quality Control Inspection Instructions and effectively conducted inspections. 13. Consultant effectively implemented requirements for Engineering Design Procedures(s). 14. Consultant obtained permits, inspections and necessary approvals from third-party’s in a timely manner. 15. Consultant effectively coordinated with the Buyer/Owner. 16. Consultant mitigated claims and changes. FORM V1.0 EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE Page 3 of 3
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Any other comments you would like to make such as would you contract again with this Consultant? (Note: if no additional comments so indicate below.)
______
______
______
______
______
______
______
To Pass Consultant/Subconsultant/Other Entity must receive passing marks or a N/A in twelve (12) out of the sixteen (16) questions, at a minimum, for this reference only.
The Experience/Performance Questionnaire shall be considered in the evaluation of the skill and experience of the Proposer and its Key Participants. Score
Proposer’s status after review _____
______Past Experience/Performance Team Member Date
FORM V1.0 EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE Page 1 of 3
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority
Questionnaire Purpose / Introduction
THIS PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE IS TO ASSIST THE LACMTA IN ITS ASSESSMENT OF THE GENERAL PAST EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE OF A PROPOSER, SUBCONSULTANT OR OTHER ENTITY THAT WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PERFORMING WORK. PROPOSER (IDENTIFIED CONSULTANT IN SECTION 1 BELOW) HAS IDENTIFIED YOUR ORGANIZATION AS A REFERENCE FOR PAST EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE.
SECTION 1: PROPOSER/CONSULTANT IDENTIFICATION (COMPLETED BY EVALUATOR)
Name of Proposer/Subconsultant/Other Entity
______
______
______
SECTION 2: IDENTIFICATION OF RESPONDING FIRM (COMPLETED BY EVALUATOR)
1. Name & Title of Responding Firm(s) Representative
2. Exact Name of Responding Firm
3. Physical / Mailing Address
City State Country Zip Code
4. Primary / Main Telephone No. Alt. Telephone No. Email 5. Brief Description of Work Performed for Responding firm FORM V1.0 EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE Page 2 of 3
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority
SECTION 3: OVERALL PROJECT EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE
IN THIS SECTION, PLEASE INDICATE YOUR ORGANIZATION’S SATISFACTION WITH THE PAST OR CURRENT OVERALL PERFORANCE OF THE CONSULTANT IDENTIFIED IN SECTION 1 ABOVE. THE CONSULTANT IN QUESTION IS TO BE ASSESSED ON THE BASIS OF YOUR ORGANIZATION’S FIRST-HAND/DIRECT EXPERIENCE WITH THE CONSULTANT ONLY.
PLEASE PLACE AN “X” IN THE APPROPRIATE BOX, INDICATING YOUR ORGANIZATION’S LEVEL OF SATISFACTION WITH THE CONSULTANT IN QUESTION. THE SCALE IS DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:
U – UNSATISFACTORY: CONSULTANT IS OR WAS IN DANGER OF NOT BEING ABLE TO SATISFY CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS AND RECOVERY WAS OR IS NOT LIKELY IN A TIMELY MANNER. AREA OF EVALUATION CONTAINS SERIOUS PROBLEMS FOR WHICH THE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS APPEAR INEFFECTIVE. S – SATISFACTORY: PERFORMANCE MEETS CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS. AREA OF EVALUATION CONTAINS SOME PROBLEMS FOR WHICH CORRECTIVE ACTIONS HAVE YET TO TAKEN, OR HAS NOT BEEN FULLY IMPLEMENTED, BUT APPEAR ONLY SATISFACTORY. G – GOOD: PERFORMANCE CLEARLY MEETS CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS. AREA OF EVALUATION CONTAINS SOME MINOR PROBLEMS FOR WHICH CORRECTIVE ACTIONS APPEAR EFFECTIVE. E – EXCEPTIONAL: PERFORMANCE CLEARLY EXCEEDS CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS. AREA OF EVALUATION CONTAINS FEW MINOR PROBLEMS FOR WHICH CORRECTIVE ACTION APPEAR HIGHLY EFFECTIVE.
Fail Pass
U S G E N/A 1. Consultant accomplished/performed work being evaluated. 2. Consultant provided experienced design and/or project managers with abilities needed to meet contract requirements. 3. Consultant demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace (if necessary) qualified personnel during the contract period. 4. Consultant provided a timely response to nonconformance issues. 5. Consultant exercised initiative to solve problems.
6. Consultant provided timely resolution of design defects.
7. Consultant developed and met established project schedules.
8. Contractor provided timely cost proposals for changed work.
9. Consultant paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner.
10. Consultant provided effective Occupational Safety & Health Policies, Procedures & Programs to meet contract requirements. 11. Consultant provided and effectively implemented Project Quality Program Manual requirements. 12. Consultant provided Quality Control Inspection Instructions and effectively conducted inspections. 13. Consultant effectively implemented requirements for Engineering Design Procedures(s). 14. Consultant obtained permits, inspections and necessary approvals from third-party’s in a timely manner. 15. Consultant effectively coordinated with the Buyer/Owner. 16. Consultant mitigated claims and changes. FORM V1.0 EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE Page 3 of 3
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Any other comments you would like to make such as would you contract again with this Consultant? (Note: if no additional comments so indicate below.)
______
______
______
______
______
______
______
To Pass Consultant/Subconsultant/Other Entity must receive passing marks or a N/A in twelve (12) out of the sixteen (16) questions, at a minimum, for this reference only.
The Experience/Performance Questionnaire shall be considered in the evaluation of the skill and experience of the Proposer and its Key Participants. Score
Proposer’s status after review _____
______Past Experience/Performance Team Member Date
FORM V1.0 EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE Page 1 of 3
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority
Questionnaire Purpose / Introduction
THIS PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE IS TO ASSIST THE LACMTA IN ITS ASSESSMENT OF THE GENERAL PAST EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE OF A PROPOSER, SUBCONSULTANT OR OTHER ENTITY THAT WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PERFORMING WORK. PROPOSER (IDENTIFIED CONSULTANT IN SECTION 1 BELOW) HAS IDENTIFIED YOUR ORGANIZATION AS A REFERENCE FOR PAST EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE.
SECTION 1: PROPOSER/CONSULTANT IDENTIFICATION (COMPLETED BY EVALUATOR)
Name of Proposer/Subconsultant/Other Entity
______
______
______
SECTION 2: IDENTIFICATION OF RESPONDING FIRM (COMPLETED BY EVALUATOR)
1. Name & Title of Responding Firm(s) Representative
2. Exact Name of Responding Firm
3. Physical / Mailing Address
City State Country Zip Code
4. Primary / Main Telephone No. Alt. Telephone No. Email 5. Brief Description of Work Performed for Responding firm FORM V1.0 EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE Page 2 of 3
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority
SECTION 3: OVERALL PROJECT EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE
IN THIS SECTION, PLEASE INDICATE YOUR ORGANIZATION’S SATISFACTION WITH THE PAST OR CURRENT OVERALL PERFORANCE OF THE CONSULTANT IDENTIFIED IN SECTION 1 ABOVE. THE CONSULTANT IN QUESTION IS TO BE ASSESSED ON THE BASIS OF YOUR ORGANIZATION’S FIRST-HAND/DIRECT EXPERIENCE WITH THE CONSULTANT ONLY.
PLEASE PLACE AN “X” IN THE APPROPRIATE BOX, INDICATING YOUR ORGANIZATION’S LEVEL OF SATISFACTION WITH THE CONSULTANT IN QUESTION. THE SCALE IS DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:
U – UNSATISFACTORY: CONSULTANT IS OR WAS IN DANGER OF NOT BEING ABLE TO SATISFY CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS AND RECOVERY WAS OR IS NOT LIKELY IN A TIMELY MANNER. AREA OF EVALUATION CONTAINS SERIOUS PROBLEMS FOR WHICH THE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS APPEAR INEFFECTIVE. S – SATISFACTORY: PERFORMANCE MEETS CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS. AREA OF EVALUATION CONTAINS SOME PROBLEMS FOR WHICH CORRECTIVE ACTIONS HAVE YET TO TAKEN, OR HAS NOT BEEN FULLY IMPLEMENTED, BUT APPEAR ONLY SATISFACTORY. G – GOOD: PERFORMANCE CLEARLY MEETS CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS. AREA OF EVALUATION CONTAINS SOME MINOR PROBLEMS FOR WHICH CORRECTIVE ACTIONS APPEAR EFFECTIVE. E – EXCEPTIONAL: PERFORMANCE CLEARLY EXCEEDS CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS. AREA OF EVALUATION CONTAINS FEW MINOR PROBLEMS FOR WHICH CORRECTIVE ACTION APPEAR HIGHLY EFFECTIVE.
Fail Pass
U S G E N/A 1. Consultant accomplished/performed work being evaluated. 2. Consultant provided experienced design and/or project managers with abilities needed to meet contract requirements. 3. Consultant demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace (if necessary) qualified personnel during the contract period. 4. Consultant provided a timely response to nonconformance issues. 5. Consultant exercised initiative to solve problems.
6. Consultant provided timely resolution of design defects.
7. Consultant developed and met established project schedules.
8. Contractor provided timely cost proposals for changed work.
9. Consultant paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner.
10. Consultant provided effective Occupational Safety & Health Policies, Procedures & Programs to meet contract requirements. 11. Consultant provided and effectively implemented Project Quality Program Manual requirements. 12. Consultant provided Quality Control Inspection Instructions and effectively conducted inspections. 13. Consultant effectively implemented requirements for Engineering Design Procedures(s). 14. Consultant obtained permits, inspections and necessary approvals from third-party’s in a timely manner. 15. Consultant effectively coordinated with the Buyer/Owner. 16. Consultant mitigated claims and changes. FORM V1.0 EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE Page 3 of 3
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Any other comments you would like to make such as would you contract again with this Consultant? (Note: if no additional comments so indicate below.)
______
______
______
______
______
______
______
To Pass Consultant/Subconsultant/Other Entity must receive passing marks or a N/A in twelve (12) out of the sixteen (16) questions, at a minimum, for this reference only.
The Experience/Performance Questionnaire shall be considered in the evaluation of the skill and experience of the Proposer and its Key Participants. Score
Proposer’s status after review _____
______Past Experience/Performance Team Member Date FORM V1.0 EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE Page 1 of 3
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority
Questionnaire Purpose / Introduction
THIS PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE IS TO ASSIST THE LACMTA IN ITS ASSESSMENT OF THE GENERAL PAST EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE OF A PROPOSER, SUBCONSULTANT OR OTHER ENTITY THAT WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PERFORMING WORK. PROPOSER (IDENTIFIED CONSULTANT IN SECTION 1 BELOW) HAS IDENTIFIED YOUR ORGANIZATION AS A REFERENCE FOR PAST EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE.
SECTION 1: PROPOSER/CONSULTANT IDENTIFICATION (COMPLETED BY EVALUATOR)
RF Networks Inc. Name of Proposer/Subconsultant/Other Entity
______
______
______
SECTION 2: IDENTIFICATION OF RESPONDING FIRM (COMPLETED BY EVALUATOR)
1. Tony Tiritilli Name & Title of Responding Firm(s) Representative
2. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transit Authority Exact Name of Responding Firm
3. One Gateway Plaza Physical / Mailing Address Los Angeles CA USA 90013 City State Country Zip Code
4. 213-922-7233 [email protected] Primary / Main Telephone No. Alt. Telephone No. Email 5. Brief Description of Work Performed for Responding firm
Provided a complete engineering radio system design bid package to support the Metro Red Line radio
system upgrade, replacement, and enhancement future project. FORM V1.0 EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE Page 2 of 3
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority
SECTION 3: OVERALL PROJECT EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE
IN THIS SECTION, PLEASE INDICATE YOUR ORGANIZATION’S SATISFACTION WITH THE PAST OR CURRENT OVERALL PERFORANCE OF THE CONSULTANT IDENTIFIED IN SECTION 1 ABOVE. THE CONSULTANT IN QUESTION IS TO BE ASSESSED ON THE BASIS OF YOUR ORGANIZATION’S FIRST-HAND/DIRECT EXPERIENCE WITH THE CONSULTANT ONLY.
PLEASE PLACE AN “X” IN THE APPROPRIATE BOX, INDICATING YOUR ORGANIZATION’S LEVEL OF SATISFACTION WITH THE CONSULTANT IN QUESTION. THE SCALE IS DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:
x U – UNSATISFACTORY: CONSULTANT IS OR WAS IN DANGER OF NOT BEING ABLE TO SATISFY CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS AND RECOVERY WAS OR IS NOT LIKELY IN A TIMELY MANNER. AREA OF EVALUATION CONTAINS SERIOUS PROBLEMS FOR WHICH THE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS APPEAR INEFFECTIVE. x S – SATISFACTORY: PERFORMANCE MEETS CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS. AREA OF EVALUATION CONTAINS SOME PROBLEMS FOR WHICH CORRECTIVE ACTIONS HAVE YET TO TAKEN, OR HAS NOT BEEN FULLY IMPLEMENTED, BUT APPEAR ONLY SATISFACTORY. x G – GOOD: PERFORMANCE CLEARLY MEETS CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS. AREA OF EVALUATION CONTAINS SOME MINOR PROBLEMS FOR WHICH CORRECTIVE ACTIONS APPEAR EFFECTIVE. x E – EXCEPTIONAL: PERFORMANCE CLEARLY EXCEEDS CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS. AREA OF EVALUATION CONTAINS FEW MINOR PROBLEMS FOR WHICH CORRECTIVE ACTION APPEAR HIGHLY EFFECTIVE.
Fail Pass
USGE N/A 1. Consultant accomplished/performed work being evaluated. X
2. Consultant provided experienced design and/or project X managers with abilities needed to meet contract requirements.
3. Consultant demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace X (if necessary) qualified personnel during the contract period.
4. Consultant provided a timely response to nonconformance X issues.
5. Consultant exercised initiative to solve problems. X
6. Consultant provided timely resolution of design defects. X
7. Consultant developed and met established project schedules. X
8. Contractor provided timely cost proposals for changed work. X
9. Consultant paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner. X
10. Consultant provided effective Occupational Safety & Health Policies, Procedures & Programs to meet contract X requirements.
11. Consultant provided and effectively implemented Project X Quality Program Manual requirements.
12. Consultant provided Quality Control Inspection Instructions and X effectively conducted inspections.
13. Consultant effectively implemented requirements for X Engineering Design Procedures(s).
14. Consultant obtained permits, inspections and necessary X approvals from third-party’s in a timely manner. 15. Consultant effectively coordinated with the Buyer/Owner. X 16. Consultant mitigated claims and changes. X FORM V1.0 EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE Page 3 of 3
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Any other comments you would like to make such as would you contract again with this Consultant? (Note: if no additional comments so indicate below.)
______RF Networks is a very valuable resource to Metro. Their radio communications experience dating back to the Red Line
______segment 2A & 2B projects is unsurpassed by any other communications system design contractor. RF Networks knows
______Metro's engineering needs and requirements and has the engineering talent to get the job done right the first time!
______
______
______
______
To Pass Consultant/Subconsultant/Other Entity must receive passing marks or a N/A in twelve (12) out of the sixteen (16) questions, at a minimum, for this reference only.
The Experience/Performance Questionnaire shall be considered in the evaluation of the skill and experience of the Proposer and its Key Participants. Score
Proposer’s status after review _____16
______TONY TIRITILLI ______12/19/2017 Past Experience/Performance Team Member Date FORM V1.0 EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE Page 1 of 3
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority
Questionnaire Purpose / Introduction
THIS PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE IS TO ASSIST THE MTA IN ITS ASSESSMENT OF THE GENERAL PAST EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE OF A PROPOSER, SUBCONSULTANT OR OTHER ENTITY THAT WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PERFORMING WORK. PROPOSER (IDENTIFIED CONSULTANT IN SECTION 1 BELOW) HAS IDENTIFIED YOUR ORGANIZATION AS A REFERENCE FOR PAST EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE.
SECTION 1: PROPOSER/CONSULTANT IDENTIFICATION (COMPLETED BY EVALUATOR)
RF Networks Inc. Name of Proposer/Subconsultant/Other Entity
______
______
______
SECTION 2: IDENTIFICATION OF RESPONDING FIRM (COMPLETED BY EVALUATOR)
1. Jerone Hurst, Director Signals & Communication Systems Name & Title of Responding Firm(s) Representative
2. Southern California Regional Rail Authority Exact Name of Responding Firm
3. 2700 Melbourne Ave Physical / Mailing Address Pomona CA USA 91767 City State Country Zip Code
4. 909-451-2346 909-621-7679 / [email protected] Primary / Main Telephone No. Primary / Main Fax No. 5. Brief Description of Work Performed for Responding firm
Communications Systems Design, RF Engineering staff assistance, and design support during construction. FORM V1.0 EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE Page 2 of 3
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority
SECTION 3: OVERALL PROJECT EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE
IN THIS SECTION, PLEASE INDICATE YOUR ORGANIZATION’S SATISFACTION WITH THE PAST OR CURRENT OVERALL PERFORANCE OF THE CONSULTANT IDENTIFIED IN SECTION 1 ABOVE. THE CONSULTANT IN QUESTION IS TO BE ASSESSED ON THE BASIS OF YOUR ORGANIZATION’S FIRST-HAND/DIRECT EXPERIENCE WITH THE CONSULTANT ONLY.
PLEASE PLACE AN “X” IN THE APPROPRIATE BOX, INDICATING YOUR ORGANIZATION’S LEVEL OF SATISFACTION WITH THE CONSULTANT IN QUESTION. THE SCALE IS DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:
x U – UNSATISFACTORY: CONSULTANT IS OR WAS IN DANGER OF NOT BEING ABLE TO SATISFY CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS AND RECOVERY WAS OR IS NOT LIKELY IN A TIMELY MANNER. AREA OF EVALUATION CONTAINS SERIOUS PROBLEMS FOR WHICH THE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS APPEAR INEFFECTIVE. x S – SATISFACTORY: PERFORMANCE MEETS CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS. AREA OF EVALUATION CONTAINS SOME PROBLEMS FOR WHICH CORRECTIVE ACTIONS HAVE YET TO TAKEN, OR HAS NOT BEEN FULLY IMPLEMENTED, BUT APPEAR ONLY SATISFACTORY. x G – GOOD: PERFORMANCE CLEARLY MEETS CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS. AREA OF EVALUATION CONTAINS SOME MINOR PROBLEMS FOR WHICH CORRECTIVE ACTIONS APPEAR EFFECTIVE. x E – EXCEPTIONAL: PERFORMANCE CLEARLY EXCEEDS CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS. AREA OF EVALUATION CONTAINS FEW MINOR PROBLEMS FOR WHICH CORRECTIVE ACTION APPEAR HIGHLY EFFECTIVE.
Fail Pass
USGE N/A 1. Consultant accomplished/performed work being evaluated. ■
2. Consultant provided experienced design and/or project ■ managers with abilities needed to meet contract requirements. 3. Consultant demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace ■ (if necessary) qualified personnel during the contract period. 4. Consultant provided a timely response to nonconformance ■ issues. 5. Consultant exercised initiative to solve problems. ■
6. Consultant provided timely resolution of design defects. ■
7. Consultant developed and met established project schedules. ■
8. Contractor provided timely cost proposals for changed work. ■
9. Consultant paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner. ■
10. Consultant provided effective Occupational Safety & Health Policies, Procedures & Programs to meet contract ■ requirements 11. Consultant provided and effectively implemented Project ■ Quality Program Manual requirements. 12. Consultant provided Quality Control Inspection Instructions and ■ effectively conducted inspections. 13. Consultant effectively implemented requirements for ■ Engineering Design Procedures(s) 14. Consultant obtained permits, inspections and necessary ■ approvals from third-party’s in a timely manner. 15. Consultant effectively coordinated with the Buyer/Owner ■ 16. Consultant mitigated claims and changes. ■
17. Any other comments you would like to make such as would ■ you contract again with this Consultant? FORM V1.0 EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE Page 3 of 3
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority
Any other comments you would like to make such as would you contract again with this Consultant? (Note: if no additional comments so indicate below.)
I have worked with RF Networks for several years. I have a high regard for their professionalism, skill, ______
______knowledge, and experience. With their assistance we were able to build out a state of the art communications network which
______has been critical for our train control systems including PTC. I would absolutely contract again with this Consultant should
______the opportunity arise in the future without hesitation.
______
______
______
To Pass Consultant/Subconsultant/Other Entity must receive passing marks or a N/A in twelve (12) out of the sixteen (16) questions, at a minimum, for this reference only.
(Note: The Technical Evaluation Team may determine any unsatisfactory identified as critical to the procurement)
Score
Proposer’s status after review _____16
______JERONE HURST ______12/18/2017 Past Experience/Performance Team Member Date FORM V1.0 EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE Page 1 of 3
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority
Questionnaire Purpose / Introduction
THIS PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE IS TO ASSIST THE MTA IN ITS ASSESSMENT OF THE GENERAL PAST EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE OF A PROPOSER, SUBCONSULTANT OR OTHER ENTITY THAT WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PERFORMING WORK. PROPOSER (IDENTIFIED CONSULTANT IN SECTION 1 BELOW) HAS IDENTIFIED YOUR ORGANIZATION AS A REFERENCE FOR PAST EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE.
SECTION 1: PROPOSER/CONSULTANT IDENTIFICATION (COMPLETED BY EVALUATOR)
RF NETWORKS Inc. Name of Proposer/Subconsultant/Other Entity
______
______
______
SECTION 2: IDENTIFICATION OF RESPONDING FIRM (COMPLETED BY EVALUATOR)
1. Hubert Chan, Project Manager Name & Title of Responding Firm(s) Representative
2. Caltrain (aka Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board, PCJPB) Exact Name of Responding Firm
3. 1250 San Carlos Avenue Physical / Mailing Address San Carlos CA U.S.A. 94402 City State Country Zip Code
4. (650) 508-7786 [email protected] Primary / Main Telephone No. Primary / Main Fax No. 5. Brief Description of Work Performed for Responding firm
Kurt and Tony designed and assisted in implementation of various communications and railroad signal work; including
design, test & implementation of data radio & microwave network, voice radio networks, & relocation of a dispatch center. FORM V1.0 EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE Page 2 of 3
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority
SECTION 3: OVERALL PROJECT EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE
IN THIS SECTION, PLEASE INDICATE YOUR ORGANIZATION’S SATISFACTION WITH THE PAST OR CURRENT OVERALL PERFORANCE OF THE CONSULTANT IDENTIFIED IN SECTION 1 ABOVE. THE CONSULTANT IN QUESTION IS TO BE ASSESSED ON THE BASIS OF YOUR ORGANIZATION’S FIRST-HAND/DIRECT EXPERIENCE WITH THE CONSULTANT ONLY.
PLEASE PLACE AN “X” IN THE APPROPRIATE BOX, INDICATING YOUR ORGANIZATION’S LEVEL OF SATISFACTION WITH THE CONSULTANT IN QUESTION. THE SCALE IS DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:
x U – UNSATISFACTORY: CONSULTANT IS OR WAS IN DANGER OF NOT BEING ABLE TO SATISFY CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS AND RECOVERY WAS OR IS NOT LIKELY IN A TIMELY MANNER. AREA OF EVALUATION CONTAINS SERIOUS PROBLEMS FOR WHICH THE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS APPEAR INEFFECTIVE. x S – SATISFACTORY: PERFORMANCE MEETS CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS. AREA OF EVALUATION CONTAINS SOME PROBLEMS FOR WHICH CORRECTIVE ACTIONS HAVE YET TO TAKEN, OR HAS NOT BEEN FULLY IMPLEMENTED, BUT APPEAR ONLY SATISFACTORY. x G – GOOD: PERFORMANCE CLEARLY MEETS CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS. AREA OF EVALUATION CONTAINS SOME MINOR PROBLEMS FOR WHICH CORRECTIVE ACTIONS APPEAR EFFECTIVE. x E – EXCEPTIONAL: PERFORMANCE CLEARLY EXCEEDS CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS. AREA OF EVALUATION CONTAINS FEW MINOR PROBLEMS FOR WHICH CORRECTIVE ACTION APPEAR HIGHLY EFFECTIVE.
Fail Pass
USGE N/A 1. Consultant accomplished/performed work being evaluated. ■ 2. Consultant provided experienced design and/or project ■ managers with abilities needed to meet contract requirements. 3. Consultant demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace ■ (if necessary) qualified personnel during the contract period. 4. Consultant provided a timely response to nonconformance ■ issues. 5. Consultant exercised initiative to solve problems. ■
6. Consultant provided timely resolution of design defects. ■
7. Consultant developed and met established project schedules. ■
8. Contractor provided timely cost proposals for changed work. ■
9. Consultant paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner. ■
10. Consultant provided effective Occupational Safety & Health Policies, Procedures & Programs to meet contract ■ requirements 11. Consultant provided and effectively implemented Project ■ Quality Program Manual requirements. 12. Consultant provided Quality Control Inspection Instructions and ■ effectively conducted inspections. 13. Consultant effectively implemented requirements for ■ Engineering Design Procedures(s) 14. Consultant obtained permits, inspections and necessary ■ approvals from third-party’s in a timely manner. 15. Consultant effectively coordinated with the Buyer/Owner ■ 16. Consultant mitigated claims and changes. ■
17. Any other comments you would like to make such as would ■ you contract again with this Consultant? FORM V1.0 EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE Page 3 of 3
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority
Any other comments you would like to make such as would you contract again with this Consultant? (Note: if no additional comments so indicate below.)
Kurt & Tony provided excellent support to the Caltrain, while under contract. They were invested in their ______
______design and their work. They were also easy to work with, once any issues became apparent with their design and work.
______Due to their size at the time they performed work for the Caltrain, they sometimes had issues meeting all projects schedules.
______However, they always found a way to meet Caltrain's, often, demanding needs. Recommend strongly.
______
______
______
To Pass Consultant/Subconsultant/Other Entity must receive passing marks or a N/A in twelve (12) out of the sixteen (16) questions, at a minimum, for this reference only.
(Note: The Technical Evaluation Team may determine any unsatisfactory identified as critical to the procurement)
Score
Proposer’s status after review _____16
______HUBERT CHAN ______12/19/2017 Past Experience/Performance Team Member Date
FORM V1.0 EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE Page 1 of 3
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority
Questionnaire Purpose / Introduction
THIS PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE IS TO ASSIST THE LACMTA IN ITS ASSESSMENT OF THE GENERAL PAST EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE OF A PROPOSER, SUBCONSULTANT OR OTHER ENTITY THAT WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PERFORMING WORK. PROPOSER (IDENTIFIED CONSULTANT IN SECTION 1 BELOW) HAS IDENTIFIED YOUR ORGANIZATION AS A REFERENCE FOR PAST EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE.
SECTION 1: PROPOSER/CONSULTANT IDENTIFICATION (COMPLETED BY EVALUATOR)
Triad Consulting & System Design Group Name of Proposer/Subconsultant/Other Entity
______
______
______
SECTION 2: IDENTIFICATION OF RESPONDING FIRM (COMPLETED BY EVALUATOR)
1. Name & Title of Responding Firm(s) Representative
2. Exact Name of Responding Firm
3. Physical / Mailing Address
City State Country Zip Code
4. Primary / Main Telephone No. Alt. Telephone No. Email 5. Brief Description of Work Performed for Responding firm FORM V1.0 EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE Page 2 of 3
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority
SECTION 3: OVERALL PROJECT EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE
IN THIS SECTION, PLEASE INDICATE YOUR ORGANIZATION’S SATISFACTION WITH THE PAST OR CURRENT OVERALL PERFORANCE OF THE CONSULTANT IDENTIFIED IN SECTION 1 ABOVE. THE CONSULTANT IN QUESTION IS TO BE ASSESSED ON THE BASIS OF YOUR ORGANIZATION’S FIRST-HAND/DIRECT EXPERIENCE WITH THE CONSULTANT ONLY.
PLEASE PLACE AN “X” IN THE APPROPRIATE BOX, INDICATING YOUR ORGANIZATION’S LEVEL OF SATISFACTION WITH THE CONSULTANT IN QUESTION. THE SCALE IS DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:
U – UNSATISFACTORY: CONSULTANT IS OR WAS IN DANGER OF NOT BEING ABLE TO SATISFY CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS AND RECOVERY WAS OR IS NOT LIKELY IN A TIMELY MANNER. AREA OF EVALUATION CONTAINS SERIOUS PROBLEMS FOR WHICH THE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS APPEAR INEFFECTIVE. S – SATISFACTORY: PERFORMANCE MEETS CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS. AREA OF EVALUATION CONTAINS SOME PROBLEMS FOR WHICH CORRECTIVE ACTIONS HAVE YET TO TAKEN, OR HAS NOT BEEN FULLY IMPLEMENTED, BUT APPEAR ONLY SATISFACTORY. G – GOOD: PERFORMANCE CLEARLY MEETS CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS. AREA OF EVALUATION CONTAINS SOME MINOR PROBLEMS FOR WHICH CORRECTIVE ACTIONS APPEAR EFFECTIVE. E – EXCEPTIONAL: PERFORMANCE CLEARLY EXCEEDS CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS. AREA OF EVALUATION CONTAINS FEW MINOR PROBLEMS FOR WHICH CORRECTIVE ACTION APPEAR HIGHLY EFFECTIVE.
Fail Pass
U S G E N/A 1. Consultant accomplished/performed work being evaluated. 2. Consultant provided experienced design and/or project managers with abilities needed to meet contract requirements. 3. Consultant demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace (if necessary) qualified personnel during the contract period. 4. Consultant provided a timely response to nonconformance issues. 5. Consultant exercised initiative to solve problems.
6. Consultant provided timely resolution of design defects.
7. Consultant developed and met established project schedules.
8. Contractor provided timely cost proposals for changed work.
9. Consultant paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner.
10. Consultant provided effective Occupational Safety & Health Policies, Procedures & Programs to meet contract requirements. 11. Consultant provided and effectively implemented Project Quality Program Manual requirements. 12. Consultant provided Quality Control Inspection Instructions and effectively conducted inspections. 13. Consultant effectively implemented requirements for Engineering Design Procedures(s). 14. Consultant obtained permits, inspections and necessary approvals from third-party’s in a timely manner. 15. Consultant effectively coordinated with the Buyer/Owner. 16. Consultant mitigated claims and changes. FORM V1.0 EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE Page 3 of 3
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Any other comments you would like to make such as would you contract again with this Consultant? (Note: if no additional comments so indicate below.)
______
______
______
______
______
______
______
To Pass Consultant/Subconsultant/Other Entity must receive passing marks or a N/A in twelve (12) out of the sixteen (16) questions, at a minimum, for this reference only.
The Experience/Performance Questionnaire shall be considered in the evaluation of the skill and experience of the Proposer and its Key Participants. Score
Proposer’s status after review _____
______Past Experience/Performance Team Member Date
FORM V1.0 EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE Page 1 of 3
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority
Questionnaire Purpose / Introduction
THIS PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE IS TO ASSIST THE LACMTA IN ITS ASSESSMENT OF THE GENERAL PAST EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE OF A PROPOSER, SUBCONSULTANT OR OTHER ENTITY THAT WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PERFORMING WORK. PROPOSER (IDENTIFIED CONSULTANT IN SECTION 1 BELOW) HAS IDENTIFIED YOUR ORGANIZATION AS A REFERENCE FOR PAST EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE.
SECTION 1: PROPOSER/CONSULTANT IDENTIFICATION (COMPLETED BY EVALUATOR)
VSCE, Inc. Name of Proposer/Subconsultant/Other Entity
______
______
______
SECTION 2: IDENTIFICATION OF RESPONDING FIRM (COMPLETED BY EVALUATOR)
1. Trinity Nguyen, Director of Project Delivery Name & Title of Responding Firm(s) Representative
2. Alameda County Transportation Commission Exact Name of Responding Firm
3. 1111 Broadway, Suite 800 Physical / Mailing Address Oakland CA USA 94607 City State Country Zip Code
4. 510-208-7441 [email protected] Primary / Main Telephone No. Alt. Telephone No. Email 5. Brief Description of Work Performed for Responding firm
Project Management, Programming Support, Financial Administrative Support, and Technicians FORM V1.0 EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE Page 2 of 3
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority
SECTION 3: OVERALL PROJECT EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE
IN THIS SECTION, PLEASE INDICATE YOUR ORGANIZATION’S SATISFACTION WITH THE PAST OR CURRENT OVERALL PERFORANCE OF THE CONSULTANT IDENTIFIED IN SECTION 1 ABOVE. THE CONSULTANT IN QUESTION IS TO BE ASSESSED ON THE BASIS OF YOUR ORGANIZATION’S FIRST-HAND/DIRECT EXPERIENCE WITH THE CONSULTANT ONLY.
PLEASE PLACE AN “X” IN THE APPROPRIATE BOX, INDICATING YOUR ORGANIZATION’S LEVEL OF SATISFACTION WITH THE CONSULTANT IN QUESTION. THE SCALE IS DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:
U–UNSATISFACTORY: CONSULTANT IS OR WAS IN DANGER OF NOT BEING ABLE TO SATISFY CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS AND RECOVERY WAS OR IS NOT LIKELY IN A TIMELY MANNER. AREA OF EVALUATION CONTAINS SERIOUS PROBLEMS FOR WHICH THE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS APPEAR INEFFECTIVE. S–SATISFACTORY: PERFORMANCE MEETS CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS. AREA OF EVALUATION CONTAINS SOME PROBLEMS FOR WHICH CORRECTIVE ACTIONS HAVE YET TO TAKEN, OR HAS NOT BEEN FULLY IMPLEMENTED, BUT APPEAR ONLY SATISFACTORY. G–GOOD: PERFORMANCE CLEARLY MEETS CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS. AREA OF EVALUATION CONTAINS SOME MINOR PROBLEMS FOR WHICH CORRECTIVE ACTIONS APPEAR EFFECTIVE. E–EXCEPTIONAL: PERFORMANCE CLEARLY EXCEEDS CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS. AREA OF EVALUATION CONTAINS FEW MINOR PROBLEMS FOR WHICH CORRECTIVE ACTION APPEAR HIGHLY EFFECTIVE.
Fail Pass
USGE N/A 1. Consultant accomplished/performed work being evaluated. x 2. Consultant provided experienced design and/or project x managers with abilities needed to meet contract requirements. 3. Consultant demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace x (if necessary) qualified personnel during the contract period. 4. Consultant provided a timely response to nonconformance x issues. 5. Consultant exercised initiative to solve problems. x 6. Consultant provided timely resolution of design defects. x
7. Consultant developed and met established project schedules. x
8. Contractor provided timely cost proposals for changed work. x 9. Consultant paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner. x 10. Consultant provided effective Occupational Safety & Health Policies, Procedures & Programs to meet contract x requirements. 11. Consultant provided and effectively implemented Project x Quality Program Manual requirements. 12. Consultant provided Quality Control Inspection Instructions and x effectively conducted inspections. 13. Consultant effectively implemented requirements for x Engineering Design Procedures(s). 14. Consultant obtained permits, inspections and necessary x approvals from third-party’s in a timely manner. 15. Consultant effectively coordinated with the Buyer/Owner. x 16. Consultant mitigated claims and changes. x FORM V1.0 EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE Page 3 of 3
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Any other comments you would like to make such as would you contract again with this Consultant? (Note: if no additional comments so indicate below.)
______Yes. VSCE continues to work with Alameda CTC. Responsive.
______
______
______
______
______
______
To Pass Consultant/Subconsultant/Other Entity must receive passing marks or a N/A in twelve (12) out of the sixteen (16) questions, at a minimum, for this reference only.
The Experience/Performance Questionnaire shall be considered in the evaluation of the skill and experience of the Proposer and its Key Participants. Score
Proposer’s status after review _____16
______12/20/2017 Past Experience/Performance Team Member Date
FORM V1.0 EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE Page 1 of 3
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority
Questionnaire Purpose / Introduction
THIS PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE IS TO ASSIST THE LACMTA IN ITS ASSESSMENT OF THE GENERAL PAST EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE OF A PROPOSER, SUBCONSULTANT OR OTHER ENTITY THAT WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PERFORMING WORK. PROPOSER (IDENTIFIED CONSULTANT IN SECTION 1 BELOW) HAS IDENTIFIED YOUR ORGANIZATION AS A REFERENCE FOR PAST EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE.
SECTION 1: PROPOSER/CONSULTANT IDENTIFICATION (COMPLETED BY EVALUATOR)
Name of Proposer/Subconsultant/Other Entity
______
______
______
SECTION 2: IDENTIFICATION OF RESPONDING FIRM (COMPLETED BY EVALUATOR)
1. Name & Title of Responding Firm(s) Representative
2. Exact Name of Responding Firm
3. Physical / Mailing Address
City State Country Zip Code
4. Primary / Main Telephone No. Alt. Telephone No. Email 5. Brief Description of Work Performed for Responding firm FORM V1.0 EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE Page 2 of 3
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority
SECTION 3: OVERALL PROJECT EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE
IN THIS SECTION, PLEASE INDICATE YOUR ORGANIZATION’S SATISFACTION WITH THE PAST OR CURRENT OVERALL PERFORANCE OF THE CONSULTANT IDENTIFIED IN SECTION 1 ABOVE. THE CONSULTANT IN QUESTION IS TO BE ASSESSED ON THE BASIS OF YOUR ORGANIZATION’S FIRST-HAND/DIRECT EXPERIENCE WITH THE CONSULTANT ONLY.
PLEASE PLACE AN “X” IN THE APPROPRIATE BOX, INDICATING YOUR ORGANIZATION’S LEVEL OF SATISFACTION WITH THE CONSULTANT IN QUESTION. THE SCALE IS DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:
U – UNSATISFACTORY: CONSULTANT IS OR WAS IN DANGER OF NOT BEING ABLE TO SATISFY CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS AND RECOVERY WAS OR IS NOT LIKELY IN A TIMELY MANNER. AREA OF EVALUATION CONTAINS SERIOUS PROBLEMS FOR WHICH THE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS APPEAR INEFFECTIVE. S – SATISFACTORY: PERFORMANCE MEETS CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS. AREA OF EVALUATION CONTAINS SOME PROBLEMS FOR WHICH CORRECTIVE ACTIONS HAVE YET TO TAKEN, OR HAS NOT BEEN FULLY IMPLEMENTED, BUT APPEAR ONLY SATISFACTORY. G – GOOD: PERFORMANCE CLEARLY MEETS CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS. AREA OF EVALUATION CONTAINS SOME MINOR PROBLEMS FOR WHICH CORRECTIVE ACTIONS APPEAR EFFECTIVE. E – EXCEPTIONAL: PERFORMANCE CLEARLY EXCEEDS CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS. AREA OF EVALUATION CONTAINS FEW MINOR PROBLEMS FOR WHICH CORRECTIVE ACTION APPEAR HIGHLY EFFECTIVE.
Fail Pass
U S G E N/A 1. Consultant accomplished/performed work being evaluated. 2. Consultant provided experienced design and/or project managers with abilities needed to meet contract requirements. 3. Consultant demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace (if necessary) qualified personnel during the contract period. 4. Consultant provided a timely response to nonconformance issues. 5. Consultant exercised initiative to solve problems.
6. Consultant provided timely resolution of design defects.
7. Consultant developed and met established project schedules.
8. Contractor provided timely cost proposals for changed work.
9. Consultant paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner.
10. Consultant provided effective Occupational Safety & Health Policies, Procedures & Programs to meet contract requirements. 11. Consultant provided and effectively implemented Project Quality Program Manual requirements. 12. Consultant provided Quality Control Inspection Instructions and effectively conducted inspections. 13. Consultant effectively implemented requirements for Engineering Design Procedures(s). 14. Consultant obtained permits, inspections and necessary approvals from third-party’s in a timely manner. 15. Consultant effectively coordinated with the Buyer/Owner. 16. Consultant mitigated claims and changes. FORM V1.0 EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE Page 3 of 3
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Any other comments you would like to make such as would you contract again with this Consultant? (Note: if no additional comments so indicate below.)
______
______
______
______
______
______
______
To Pass Consultant/Subconsultant/Other Entity must receive passing marks or a N/A in twelve (12) out of the sixteen (16) questions, at a minimum, for this reference only.
The Experience/Performance Questionnaire shall be considered in the evaluation of the skill and experience of the Proposer and its Key Participants. Score
Proposer’s status after review _____
______12/20/2017 Past Experience/Performance Team Member Date FORM V1.0 EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE W2 Design QUESTIONNAIRE Page1of3
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority
Questionnaire Purpose / Introduction
THIS PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE IS TO ASSIST THE LACMTA IN ITS ASSESSMENT OF THE GENERAL PAST EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE OF A PROPOSER, SUBCONSULTANT OR OTHER ENTITY THAT WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PERFORMING WORK. PROPOSER (IDENTIFIED CONSULTANT IN SECTION 1 BELOW) HAS IDENTIFIED YOUR ORGANIZATION AS A REFERENCE FOR PAST EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE.
SECTION 1: PROPOSER/CONSULTANT IDENTIFICATION (COMPLETED BY EVALUATOR)
W2 Design Name of Proposer/Subconsultant/Other Entity
______
______
______
SECTION 2: IDENTIFICATION OF RESPONDING FIRM (COMPLETED BY EVALUATOR)
1. Eduardo Cervantes, Senior Director - Program Management, Construction Management Name & Title of Responding Firm(s) Representative
2. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Exact Name of Responding Firm
3. One Gateway Plaza Physical / Mailing Address Los Angeles CA USA 90012 City State Country Zip Code
4. (213) 922-7255 Primary / Main Telephone No. Alt. Telephone No. Email 5. Brief Description of Work Performed for Responding firm W2 Design provided civil and utility engineering, stormwater management, including third party
coordination for Division 13, Division 14, Link US, ESOC and Willowbrook / Rosa Parks Station Improvements. FORM V1.0 EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE W2 Design QUESTIONNAIRE Page2of3
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority
SECTION 3: OVERALL PROJECT EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE
IN THIS SECTION, PLEASE INDICATE YOUR ORGANIZATION’S SATISFACTION WITH THE PAST OR CURRENT OVERALL PERFORANCE OF THE CONSULTANT IDENTIFIED IN SECTION 1 ABOVE. THE CONSULTANT IN QUESTION IS TO BE ASSESSED ON THE BASIS OF YOUR ORGANIZATION’S FIRST-HAND/DIRECT EXPERIENCE WITH THE CONSULTANT ONLY.
PLEASE PLACE AN “X” IN THE APPROPRIATE BOX, INDICATING YOUR ORGANIZATION’S LEVEL OF SATISFACTION WITH THE CONSULTANT IN QUESTION. THE SCALE IS DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:
U – UNSATISFACTORY: CONSULTANT IS OR WAS IN DANGER OF NOT BEING ABLE TO SATISFY CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS AND RECOVERY WAS OR IS NOT LIKELY IN A TIMELY MANNER. AREA OF EVALUATION CONTAINS SERIOUS PROBLEMS FOR WHICH THE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS APPEAR INEFFECTIVE. S – SATISFACTORY: PERFORMANCE MEETS CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS. AREA OF EVALUATION CONTAINS SOME PROBLEMS FOR WHICH CORRECTIVE ACTIONS HAVE YET TO TAKEN, OR HAS NOT BEEN FULLY IMPLEMENTED, BUT APPEAR ONLY SATISFACTORY. G – GOOD: PERFORMANCE CLEARLY MEETS CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS. AREA OF EVALUATION CONTAINS SOME MINOR PROBLEMS FOR WHICH CORRECTIVE ACTIONS APPEAR EFFECTIVE. E – EXCEPTIONAL: PERFORMANCE CLEARLY EXCEEDS CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS. AREA OF EVALUATION CONTAINS FEW MINOR PROBLEMS FOR WHICH CORRECTIVE ACTION APPEAR HIGHLY EFFECTIVE.
Fail Pass
USGE N/A 1. Consultant accomplished/performed work being evaluated. X 2. Consultant provided experienced design and/or project X managers with abilities needed to meet contract requirements. 3. Consultant demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace (if necessary) qualified personnel during the contract period. X 4. Consultant provided a timely response to nonconformance X issues. 5. Consultant exercised initiative to solve problems. X 6. Consultant provided timely resolution of design defects. X 7. Consultant developed and met established project schedules. X 8. Contractor provided timely cost proposals for changed work. X 9. Consultant paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner. X 10. Consultant provided effective Occupational Safety & Health Policies, Procedures & Programs to meet contract X requirements. 11. Consultant provided and effectively implemented Project Quality Program Manual requirements. X 12. Consultant provided Quality Control Inspection Instructions and effectively conducted inspections. X 13. Consultant effectively implemented requirements for X Engineering Design Procedures(s). 14. Consultant obtained permits, inspections and necessary X approvals from third-party’s in a timely manner. 15. Consultant effectively coordinated with the Buyer/Owner. X 16. Consultant mitigated claims and changes. X FORM V1.0 EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE W2 Design QUESTIONNAIRE Page3of3
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Any other comments you would like to make such as would you contract again with this Consultant? (Note: if no additional comments so indicate below.)
______W2 Design is profession, talented and very knowledgeable consultant that has always treated its client
______well. It's a consultant that is committed to high quality work and passionate about meeting schedule and
______budget. A great consultant to have on one's team.
______
______
______
______
To Pass Consultant/Subconsultant/Other Entity must receive passing marks or a N/A in twelve (12) out of the sixteen (16) questions, at a minimum, for this reference only.
The Experience/Performance Questionnaire shall be considered in the evaluation of the skill and experience of the Proposer and its Key Participants. Score
Proposer’s status after review _____16
Eduardo Cervantes ______10/12/17 Past Experience/Performance Team Member Date FORM V1.0 EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE W2 Design QUESTIONNAIRE Page1of3
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority
Questionnaire Purpose / Introduction
THIS PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE IS TO ASSIST THE LACMTA IN ITS ASSESSMENT OF THE GENERAL PAST EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE OF A PROPOSER, SUBCONSULTANT OR OTHER ENTITY THAT WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PERFORMING WORK. PROPOSER (IDENTIFIED CONSULTANT IN SECTION 1 BELOW) HAS IDENTIFIED YOUR ORGANIZATION AS A REFERENCE FOR PAST EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE.
SECTION 1: PROPOSER/CONSULTANT IDENTIFICATION (COMPLETED BY EVALUATOR)
W2 Design Name of Proposer/Subconsultant/Other Entity
______
______
______
SECTION 2: IDENTIFICATION OF RESPONDING FIRM (COMPLETED BY EVALUATOR)
1. Paul Whang, Senior Engineering Manager, Program Management Name & Title of Responding Firm(s) Representative
2. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Exact Name of Responding Firm
3. One Gateway Plaza Physical / Mailing Address Los Angeles CA USA 90012 City State Country Zip Code
4. (213) 922-4705 Primary / Main Telephone No. Alt. Telephone No. Email 5. Brief Description of Work Performed for Responding firm W2 Design provided civil and utility engineering, stormwater management, including third party
coordination for Willowbrook / Rosa Parks Station Improvements. FORM V1.0 EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE W2 Design QUESTIONNAIRE Page2of3
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority
SECTION 3: OVERALL PROJECT EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE
IN THIS SECTION, PLEASE INDICATE YOUR ORGANIZATION’S SATISFACTION WITH THE PAST OR CURRENT OVERALL PERFORANCE OF THE CONSULTANT IDENTIFIED IN SECTION 1 ABOVE. THE CONSULTANT IN QUESTION IS TO BE ASSESSED ON THE BASIS OF YOUR ORGANIZATION’S FIRST-HAND/DIRECT EXPERIENCE WITH THE CONSULTANT ONLY.
PLEASE PLACE AN “X” IN THE APPROPRIATE BOX, INDICATING YOUR ORGANIZATION’S LEVEL OF SATISFACTION WITH THE CONSULTANT IN QUESTION. THE SCALE IS DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:
U – UNSATISFACTORY: CONSULTANT IS OR WAS IN DANGER OF NOT BEING ABLE TO SATISFY CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS AND RECOVERY WAS OR IS NOT LIKELY IN A TIMELY MANNER. AREA OF EVALUATION CONTAINS SERIOUS PROBLEMS FOR WHICH THE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS APPEAR INEFFECTIVE. S – SATISFACTORY: PERFORMANCE MEETS CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS. AREA OF EVALUATION CONTAINS SOME PROBLEMS FOR WHICH CORRECTIVE ACTIONS HAVE YET TO TAKEN, OR HAS NOT BEEN FULLY IMPLEMENTED, BUT APPEAR ONLY SATISFACTORY. G – GOOD: PERFORMANCE CLEARLY MEETS CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS. AREA OF EVALUATION CONTAINS SOME MINOR PROBLEMS FOR WHICH CORRECTIVE ACTIONS APPEAR EFFECTIVE. E – EXCEPTIONAL: PERFORMANCE CLEARLY EXCEEDS CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS. AREA OF EVALUATION CONTAINS FEW MINOR PROBLEMS FOR WHICH CORRECTIVE ACTION APPEAR HIGHLY EFFECTIVE.
Fail Pass
USGE N/A 1. Consultant accomplished/performed work being evaluated. X 2. Consultant provided experienced design and/or project X managers with abilities needed to meet contract requirements. 3. Consultant demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace X (if necessary) qualified personnel during the contract period. 4. Consultant provided a timely response to nonconformance X issues. 5. Consultant exercised initiative to solve problems. X 6. Consultant provided timely resolution of design defects. X 7. Consultant developed and met established project schedules. X 8. Contractor provided timely cost proposals for changed work. X 9. Consultant paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner. X 10. Consultant provided effective Occupational Safety & Health Policies, Procedures & Programs to meet contract X requirements. 11. Consultant provided and effectively implemented Project X Quality Program Manual requirements. 12. Consultant provided Quality Control Inspection Instructions and X effectively conducted inspections. 13. Consultant effectively implemented requirements for X Engineering Design Procedures(s). 14. Consultant obtained permits, inspections and necessary X approvals from third-party’s in a timely manner. 15. Consultant effectively coordinated with the Buyer/Owner. X 16. Consultant mitigated claims and changes. X FORM V1.0 EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE W2 Design QUESTIONNAIRE Page3of3
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Any other comments you would like to make such as would you contract again with this Consultant? (Note: if no additional comments so indicate below.)
______W2 Design has provided timely, thorough and quality production for the Willowbrook project -
______especially, with the complexities of multiple phases and third party coordination that was required.
______One specific highlight of their work has been the efficient work and response by W2 Design for work has
______been required in responding to Caltrans and the myriad of administrative requirements by the State agency.
______
______
______
To Pass Consultant/Subconsultant/Other Entity must receive passing marks or a N/A in twelve (12) out of the sixteen (16) questions, at a minimum, for this reference only.
The Experience/Performance Questionnaire shall be considered in the evaluation of the skill and experience of the Proposer and its Key Participants. Score
Proposer’s status after review _____16
Paul Whang ______11/15/17 Past Experience/Performance Team Member Date FORM V1.0 EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE W2 Design QUESTIONNAIRE Page1of3
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority
Questionnaire Purpose / Introduction
THIS PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE IS TO ASSIST THE LACMTA IN ITS ASSESSMENT OF THE GENERAL PAST EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE OF A PROPOSER, SUBCONSULTANT OR OTHER ENTITY THAT WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PERFORMING WORK. PROPOSER (IDENTIFIED CONSULTANT IN SECTION 1 BELOW) HAS IDENTIFIED YOUR ORGANIZATION AS A REFERENCE FOR PAST EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE.
SECTION 1: PROPOSER/CONSULTANT IDENTIFICATION (COMPLETED BY EVALUATOR)
W2 Design Name of Proposer/Subconsultant/Other Entity
______
______
______
SECTION 2: IDENTIFICATION OF RESPONDING FIRM (COMPLETED BY EVALUATOR)
1. Tim Lindholm, Executive Officer - Program Management, Capital Projects Name & Title of Responding Firm(s) Representative
2. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Exact Name of Responding Firm
3. One Gateway Plaza Physical / Mailing Address Los Angeles CA USA 90012 City State Country Zip Code
4. (213) 922-7297 Primary / Main Telephone No. Alt. Telephone No. Email 5. Brief Description of Work Performed for Responding firm W2 Design provided civil and utility engineering, stormwater management, including third party
coordination for Division 13, Division 14, Division 9, Division 1, and CMF Cafeteria. FORM V1.0 EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE W2 Design QUESTIONNAIRE Page2of3
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority
SECTION 3: OVERALL PROJECT EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE
IN THIS SECTION, PLEASE INDICATE YOUR ORGANIZATION’S SATISFACTION WITH THE PAST OR CURRENT OVERALL PERFORANCE OF THE CONSULTANT IDENTIFIED IN SECTION 1 ABOVE. THE CONSULTANT IN QUESTION IS TO BE ASSESSED ON THE BASIS OF YOUR ORGANIZATION’S FIRST-HAND/DIRECT EXPERIENCE WITH THE CONSULTANT ONLY.
PLEASE PLACE AN “X” IN THE APPROPRIATE BOX, INDICATING YOUR ORGANIZATION’S LEVEL OF SATISFACTION WITH THE CONSULTANT IN QUESTION. THE SCALE IS DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:
U – UNSATISFACTORY: CONSULTANT IS OR WAS IN DANGER OF NOT BEING ABLE TO SATISFY CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS AND RECOVERY WAS OR IS NOT LIKELY IN A TIMELY MANNER. AREA OF EVALUATION CONTAINS SERIOUS PROBLEMS FOR WHICH THE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS APPEAR INEFFECTIVE. S – SATISFACTORY: PERFORMANCE MEETS CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS. AREA OF EVALUATION CONTAINS SOME PROBLEMS FOR WHICH CORRECTIVE ACTIONS HAVE YET TO TAKEN, OR HAS NOT BEEN FULLY IMPLEMENTED, BUT APPEAR ONLY SATISFACTORY. G – GOOD: PERFORMANCE CLEARLY MEETS CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS. AREA OF EVALUATION CONTAINS SOME MINOR PROBLEMS FOR WHICH CORRECTIVE ACTIONS APPEAR EFFECTIVE. E – EXCEPTIONAL: PERFORMANCE CLEARLY EXCEEDS CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS. AREA OF EVALUATION CONTAINS FEW MINOR PROBLEMS FOR WHICH CORRECTIVE ACTION APPEAR HIGHLY EFFECTIVE.
Fail Pass
USGE N/A 1. Consultant accomplished/performed work being evaluated. X 2. Consultant provided experienced design and/or project X managers with abilities needed to meet contract requirements. 3. Consultant demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace (if necessary) qualified personnel during the contract period. X 4. Consultant provided a timely response to nonconformance X issues. 5. Consultant exercised initiative to solve problems. X 6. Consultant provided timely resolution of design defects. X 7. Consultant developed and met established project schedules. X 8. Contractor provided timely cost proposals for changed work. X 9. Consultant paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner. X 10. Consultant provided effective Occupational Safety & Health Policies, Procedures & Programs to meet contract X requirements. 11. Consultant provided and effectively implemented Project Quality Program Manual requirements. X 12. Consultant provided Quality Control Inspection Instructions and effectively conducted inspections. X 13. Consultant effectively implemented requirements for X Engineering Design Procedures(s). 14. Consultant obtained permits, inspections and necessary X approvals from third-party’s in a timely manner. 15. Consultant effectively coordinated with the Buyer/Owner. X 16. Consultant mitigated claims and changes. X FORM V1.0 EXPERIENCE/PERFORMANCE W2 Design QUESTIONNAIRE Page3of3
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Any other comments you would like to make such as would you contract again with this Consultant? (Note: if no additional comments so indicate below.)
______W2 Design has performed excellently for Metro providing civil design services for numerous projects,
______including Division 13, Division 14, Division 9/El monte Station, and numerous other projects. They are
______a valued partner at Metro, and I would not hesitate to contract with them again.
______
______
______
______
To Pass Consultant/Subconsultant/Other Entity must receive passing marks or a N/A in twelve (12) out of the sixteen (16) questions, at a minimum, for this reference only.
The Experience/Performance Questionnaire shall be considered in the evaluation of the skill and experience of the Proposer and its Key Participants. Score
Proposer’s status after review _____16
Tim Lindholm ______10/17/17 Past Experience/Performance Team Member Date