Design of an Accelerator to Make Portuguese Parishes Smarter Inês Vizela De Freitas
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
DESIGN OF AN ACCELERATOR TO MAKE PORTUGUESE PARISHES SMARTER Inês Vizela de Freitas Dissertation presented as partial requirement for obtaining the master’s degree in Statistics and Information Management i 2019 Title: Design of an accelerator to make Portuguese parishes smarter Inês Vizela de Freitas MEGI i i NOVA Information Management School Instituto Superior de Estatística e Gestão de Informação Universidade Nova de Lisboa DESIGN OF AN ACCELERATOR TO MAKE PORTUGUESE PARISHES SMARTER by Inês Vizela de Freitas Dissertation presented as partial requirement for obtaining the master’s degree in Information Management, with a specialization in Information System and Technologies Management Advisor / Co Advisor: Professor Doutor Vítor Duarte dos Santos / Doutor Emanuel Costa February 2019 ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would first like to thank my thesis advisor Professor Doctor Vítor Duarte dos Santos of the NOVA Information Management School at Universidade NOVA de Lisboa as he was the one who challenged me to a theme as innovative as the one that gave motto to this master’s thesis as smart parish is. It was a concept that he had already thought about and he gave me the chance to share the study of this new concept with him. I want also to thank him for encouraging me and motivating me even when the time to devote to this master’s thesis was not what was wanted and expected. I would also like to thank Dr. Emanuel Costa from Lisbon Metropolitan Area as he was a key element to let this master’s thesis happen, since he helped on a better understanding of parish realities. He also chose and contacted the right people to enable to make a focus group meeting as rich as the one that was done. So, thank you! Also, a very special thank you to the ones who have spent more than one hour in such a rich and important focus group meeting even knowing that their agendas were difficult to combine. They are: Drª. Fernanda Marques - director of economical and local development department, Dr. Bruno Martinho – municipal director of economy, innovation and communication and José Ricardo Dias Martins – president of Costa de Caparica parish council. A very special thanks to you all. Finally, I big thank you to my parents for encouraging me and giving me the chance to do this master’s in areas as interesting and exciting as information systems management and information management are. That gave me the possibility to have a career that I have dreamed of. It would not be possible without their support. iii ABSTRACT The key problem for performing this study was the need to get citizens and parish councils closer. As it was known, the lack of communication between these two is real. So, a main objective was set, to make an innovation accelerator to bring some smartness to parishes. To get all insights needed to achieve this objective, there was the need to learn more about public administration and Portuguese specificities compared to other realities, which was done related to smart cities as well as understand what such a broad concept involves and to get to know a bit more on innovation and creativity in general and case studies of previous of innovation accelerators. As the main objective was to make parishes smarter, there was a need for a clear definition of it, so it was defined that smartness inside a parish must include an improvement on the relationship with citizens, citizens who feel that their opinions count, training for citizens to promote digital inclusion and also for parish employees to make sure that their processes are more citizen centered, and, last but not the least, an improvement of citizens quality of living inside the parish. It was concluded at the focus group meeting, used to validate the proposed framework, that it is possible to get all this smartness through the implementation of the proposed framework in a parish inside Portugal as it is aligned with what parishes want for them in the near future. KEYWORDS smart cities; local e-government; innovation accelerator; smart parish; citizens; local public administration; lean startup; agile; iv INDEX 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................. 1 1.1. Background ............................................................................................................ 1 1.2. Motivation ............................................................................................................. 2 1.3. Objectives .............................................................................................................. 2 2. Literature review/ Theoretical framework ................................................................... 4 2.1. Public Local Administration ................................................................................... 4 2.1.1. Concepts ......................................................................................................... 4 2.1.2. European Reality ............................................................................................ 5 2.1.3. Portuguese Reality ......................................................................................... 7 2.1.4. Challenges/Desires ....................................................................................... 11 2.1.5. Technological current use state ................................................................... 13 2.2. Smart Cities .......................................................................................................... 16 2.2.1. Concept......................................................................................................... 16 2.2.2. Fundamental areas ....................................................................................... 17 2.2.3. Some relevant cases ..................................................................................... 17 2.2.4. Technologies ................................................................................................. 21 2.3. Innovation and Creativity .................................................................................... 22 2.3.1. Concepts ....................................................................................................... 22 2.3.2. Mechanisms to stimulate innovation ........................................................... 22 2.3.3. Innovation accelerators ................................................................................ 25 3. Methodology .............................................................................................................. 31 3.1. Design Science Research (DSR)............................................................................ 31 3.2. Implementation strategy of investigation ........................................................... 34 3.3. Focus Group ......................................................................................................... 35 4. Framework for an accelerator to make parishes smarter.......................................... 38 4.1. Smart Parish Concept .......................................................................................... 38 4.2. Assumptions ........................................................................................................ 38 4.3. Innovation Accelerator for Parishes .................................................................... 41 4.3.1. Framework ................................................................................................... 41 4.3.2. Guidelines for an implementation of innovation accelerator for parishes . 42 4.4. Validation ............................................................................................................. 47 4.5. Discussion ............................................................................................................ 56 5. Conclusions ................................................................................................................. 58 v 5.1. Synthesis of the development work .................................................................... 58 5.2. Limitations ........................................................................................................... 58 5.3. Future work ......................................................................................................... 58 BIBLIOGRAPHY ................................................................................................................. 60 ANNEXES .......................................................................................................................... 67 vi LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 - Main components of a smart city (Khatoun & Zeadally, 2016) ............................... 17 Figure 2 - Dimensions and Subdimensions of Intelligent Cities (INTELI, 2012) ....................... 20 Figure 3 - Combine Design Thinking, Lean Startup and Agile (Glaveski, 2017) ....................... 25 Figure 4 - DSR Knowledge Contribution Framework (Gregor & Hevner, 2013) ...................... 31 Figure 5 - DSR Method Adaptation (Peffers, Tuunanen, Rothenberger, & Chatterjee, 2007) 32 Figure 6 - DSR implementation strategy .................................................................................. 34 Figure 7 - Framework Components .......................................................................................... 41 Figure 8 - Framework Implementation Phase 1 ....................................................................... 43 Figure 9 - Framework Implementation