DOCSLIB.ORG

Monday, September 23, 1996

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Monday, September 23, 1996 CANADA VOLUME 134 S NUMBER 072 S 2nd SESSION S 35th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Monday, September 23, 1996 Speaker: The Honourable Gilbert Parent CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) The House of Commons Debates are also available on the Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca 4529 HOUSE OF COMMONS Monday, September 23, 1996 The House met at 11 a.m. He goes on to say very specifically: I congratulate the hon. member for his initiative. _______________ To suggest that statement was somewhat less than genuine might Prayers be best put if I read what he went on to say. He said: _______________ This bill would, unintentionally, restrict Canada’s capacity to guarantee Canadian content and the availability of French programming outside of Quebec. As a francophone from outside Quebec, I believe that access by the regions outside Quebec to French programs is essential— PRIVATE MEMBERS’ BUSINESS It would be impossible for me to support such a bill that would take away the flexibility of the Canadian government. That would also go for Canadian content. It would also go for the rural regions. It would have a negative impact right across [English] Canada. It is clear the MPs are against negative optioning. The new president of the CRTC BROADCASTING ACT has indicated that she prefers the positive option. The cable companies have indicated that they are against and they do not intend to use it. The House resumed from September 16 consideration of Bill C-216, an act to amend the Broadcasting Act (broadcasting policy), Why do we have laws? With due respect to the shareholders and as reported (with an amendment) from the committee. the management of the cable companies, I suggest that when they Mr. Jim Abbott (Kootenay East, Ref.): Mr. Speaker, when this went ahead and used negative option billing and received a bill first came to the House, I referred to it as being a band-aid or a resounding rebuke from the people of Canada should be enough of small piece of trim on a far larger problem. My opinion remains the a warning to us as members of Parliament that we should be taking same. steps to protect the members of the Canadian public from such activity as was undertaken by the cable companies. I suggest that Our problem is that government after government, Liberal or this was totally disingenuous on the part of the parliamentary Conservative, keep on moving forward and never really solve the secretary, who after all was speaking for the heritage minister and real problems with respect to Canadian content, with respect to the the heritage department when he said: ‘‘I congratulate this member CRTC, with respect to the CBC. I therefore recommended to my on his wonderful bill but I am not going to support it’’. It was colleagues in the Reform Party that we begrudgingly support the significantly disingenuous. bill. D (1105) It was rather interesting that the result of the vote on the bill at second reading was that 147 of the members of the House voted in Then we read in the Globe and Mail over the weekend about favour of it and only 25 voted against it. some of the background that has now become public. I listened with interest to the Parliamentary Secretary to the Mr. Bureau argues that passage of the bill would effectively kill the chances for Minister of Canadian Heritage and I quote from his speech of last success of any new French-language speciality service. week. Astral has a stake in two speciality channels that were approved this month by the —I am pleased to rise today to speak on the hon. member’s bill, and would like to CRTC: the Comedy Network and Teletoon, an animation station that will be take advantage of the same opportunity to congratulate him on the effort he has put broadcast in English and French— into it. ‘‘To put it simply, new French services just won’t be able to survive.’’ I, and I believe most of the other members of this House, share the objective sought by the hon. member for Sarnia—Lambtom in introducing this bill. We all The bill has other opponents, including the CRTC and heritage minister Sheila agree that Canadians must be able to fully express their opinion on the programs Copps, who say it could hamper the commission’s ability to require cable they receive in their homes. We all wish to ensure that that Canadian consumers distributors to offer services that it feels should be available to all in the national receive the programs they want at a reasonable price. interest. 4530 COMMONS DEBATES September 23, 1996 Private Members’ Business The front benches of the government have suddenly woken up D (1110 ) to the fact that as opposed to the steps that they have consistently taken time and time again to bring in their own vision of what This bill has been something of a sleeper. I commend the Canada is all about, this bill will give Canadian consumers member who brought it to the House. I sincerely commend him freedom and opportunity which the government would prefer they because he took action on behalf of the people in his constituency, not have. In other words, those 23 speciality channels which the on behalf of the people in Ontario and indeed, by extension, on CRTC just licensed, without a form of negative option billing, behalf of all people who receive cable in their homes. He brought probably will never make it to air or certainly some of them will forward this bill that is going to stand in the way of the kind of not. manipulation that there has been, not only by the cable companies but indeed by the heritage ministry, of what is good and what is not good, what is Canadian and what is not. The most blatant form of negative option billing was the one that was undertaken in January of last year. Members will recall that new channels were tacked on and a bill arrived in the mail box of This Canadiana idea and keeping it under control I suggest is the the householder. This was rather sneaky because when many core of what is behind the front bench going against this. people receive a bill they simply pay it. Many people would have taken a look at that bill and because there was only $1, $2 or $3 I ask Liberal members: When we had a vote in this House of added to the bill, would have ignored the extra charges and paid it. Commons of 147 to 25, how in the world can any of them even contemplate changing their vote? This is truly going to be a time of I do not believe that any cable company, either in Quebec, counting, a time when we are going to see those who have the Ontario or any other province, would have the audacity to do that backbone to stand up to the front bench. kind of blatant negative option billing. Ms. Colleen Beaumier (Brampton, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, I am pleased to participate in the debate on Bill C-216 and specifically What I believe could happen and I know this is the reason why to address the motions put to this House by the hon. member for the heritage department and the heritage minister is so opposed to Richmond—Wolfe and the hon. member for Sarnia—Lambton who this is that the cable companies could be offering different pack- is the sponsoring member. ages. With new technology they can now come up with different bundles or groups of offerings of channels. The hon. member for Richmond-Wolfe has introduced a motion which would defeat Bill C-216. I cannot in good conscience If I want to receive a particular channel then along with it comes support this motion. all of this other material. If these channels are so good why are they not prepared to stand on their own? Why will cable companies not I was pleased to speak in support of Bill C-216 in the House on say it will cost you 75 cents to see French cartoons? Why would April 26 of this year. Those of us who have supported this they not say it will cost you 50 cents to see speciality programming legislation from the beginning are very pleased with the progress it whatever the speciality programming is? has made. It is a testament to the quality of this legislation that it has made it this far. I suggest the reason for that is because there is money involved and where money is involved there is influence. I am rather My comments during that first debate focused on consumer interested in the number of people who have been working the rights. I argued that this legislation is in the best interest of Liberal backbenches on this one. The list of lobbyists who have Canadian consumers. worked opposing the bill reads like a who’s who in the Liberal Party. As members of Parliament, I believe it is our duty to protect those interests. Often when our constituents call us they forget that before we were elected and again after we are finished we were For example, the former minister of communications, Francis consumers, we are consumers, we are taxpayers and we will Fox, Liberal strategist, Michael Robinson who appears Thursday continue to be. It is not an issue that we are devoid and separated morning on CTV, the former CRTC guru, André Bureau, who I just from.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Journaux Journals
    HOUSE OF COMMONS OF CANADA CHAMBRE DES COMMUNES DU CANADA 37th PARLIAMENT, 1st SESSION 37e LÉGISLATURE, 1re SESSION Journals Journaux No. 12 No 12 Tuesday, February 13, 2001 Le mardi 13 février 2001 10:00 a.m. 10 heures The Clerk informed the House of the unavoidable absence of the Le Greffier informe la Chambre de l’absence inévitable du Speaker. Président. Whereupon, Mr. Kilger (Stormont — Dundas — Charlotten- Sur ce, M. Kilger (Stormont — Dundas — Charlottenburgh), burgh), Deputy Speaker and Chairman of Committees of the Vice–président et président des Comités pléniers, assume la Whole, took the Chair, pursuant to subsection 43(1) of the présidence, conformément au paragraphe 43(1) de la Loi sur le Parliament of Canada Act. Parlement du Canada. PRAYERS PRIÈRE DAILY ROUTINE OF BUSINESS AFFAIRES COURANTES ORDINAIRES PRESENTING REPORTS FROM COMMITTEES PRÉSENTATION DE RAPPORTS DE COMITÉS Mr. Lee (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the M. Lee (secrétaire parlementaire du leader du gouvernement à la Government in the House of Commons), from the Standing Chambre des communes), du Comité permanent de la procédure et Committee on Procedure and House Affairs, presented the des affaires de la Chambre, présente le 1er rapport de ce Comité, 1st Report of the Committee, which was as follows: dont voici le texte : The Committee recommends, pursuant to Standing Orders 104 Votre Comité recommande, conformément au mandat que lui and 114, that the list of members and associate members for confèrent les articles 104 et 114 du Règlement, que la liste
    [Show full text]
  • Alternative North Americas: What Canada and The
    ALTERNATIVE NORTH AMERICAS What Canada and the United States Can Learn from Each Other David T. Jones ALTERNATIVE NORTH AMERICAS Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars One Woodrow Wilson Plaza 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, D.C. 20004 Copyright © 2014 by David T. Jones All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, scanned, or distributed in any printed or electronic form without permission. Please do not participate in or encourage piracy of copyrighted materials in violation of author’s rights. Published online. ISBN: 978-1-938027-36-9 DEDICATION Once more for Teresa The be and end of it all A Journey of Ten Thousand Years Begins with a Single Day (Forever Tandem) TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction .................................................................................................................1 Chapter 1 Borders—Open Borders and Closing Threats .......................................... 12 Chapter 2 Unsettled Boundaries—That Not Yet Settled Border ................................ 24 Chapter 3 Arctic Sovereignty—Arctic Antics ............................................................. 45 Chapter 4 Immigrants and Refugees .........................................................................54 Chapter 5 Crime and (Lack of) Punishment .............................................................. 78 Chapter 6 Human Rights and Wrongs .................................................................... 102 Chapter 7 Language and Discord ..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Core 1..24 Committee
    Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights JUST Ï NUMBER 157 Ï 1st SESSION Ï 42nd PARLIAMENT EVIDENCE Tuesday, June 11, 2019 Chair Mr. Anthony Housefather 1 Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights Tuesday, June 11, 2019 eligible for release for parole”. It is not mandatory for the jury to provide a recommendation, and the judge is not beholden to the jury Ï (0950) in taking the recommendation, should it be made. [English] The Chair (Mr. Anthony Housefather (Mount Royal, Lib.)): We will now resume our meeting for our first meeting of studying I know there are some concerns around whether or not this Bill C-266, an act to amend the Criminal Code (increasing parole violates section 12 of the charter regarding cruel and unusual ineligibility). punishment. I should state again that this is strictly judicial Our first witness is our colleague Mr. James Bezan, the MP for discretion. The parole ineligibility period can be set at anywhere Selkirk—Interlake—Eastman. from 25 years up to 40 years, based upon the discretion of the judge. When determining the parole ineligibility period, the judge must Mr. Bezan, it's a pleasure to have you before the committee. The have “regard to the character of the offender, the nature of the floor is yours. offences and the circumstances surrounding their commission”. Mr. James Bezan (Selkirk—Interlake—Eastman, CPC): Thank you, Mr. Chair and colleagues. It's indeed a pleasure to be able to appear on my private member's I modelled my bill after former Bill C-48, the Protecting bill, an act to amend the Criminal Code (increasing parole Canadians by Ending Sentence Discounts for Multiple Murderers ineligibility), Bill C-266, the short title of which is the respecting Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Interview of Robert Pickton – Project Evenhanded 2001E-1388 – February 23, 2002
    INTERVIEW OF ROBERT PICKTON – PROJECT EVENHANDED 2001E-1388 – FEBRUARY 23, 2002 Sgt. Bill FORDY: Just have a seat. Yeah, just have a seat there. Okay, so you got some juice down there this morning? Robert PICKTON: That’s right. Sgt. Bill FORDY: Was it, fresh juice? Robert PICKTON: Yeah, it’s orange juice. Sgt. Bill FORDY: Orange juice. (STARTS NOTES) (INDECIPHERABLE) Okay. I never got a chance to introduce myself downstairs Rob ah, my name is Bill FORDY and I’m a Sgt. and I’m with the RCMP. I’m a police officer okay um, but while we’re here today I don’t want you to get all caught up in official titles or anything like that. Ah, my friends call me Bill and I prefer that you call me Bill okay. Robert PICKTON: Okay. Sgt. Bill FORDY: Now, is it okay if I call you Rob? Robert PICKTON: Yeah. Sgt. Bill FORDY: Okay Rob. Um, like I said to you Rob, I am a police officer okay. Ah, I didn’t mean not to say anything to you on the way up there,it’s just ... Robert PICKTON: Um, hum. Sgt. Bill FORDY: Ah, I wanted to wait until I was in the interview room here with you so that everything that I say to you ah, is recorded, because we are being video recorded in here today okay. There’s a video recorder up there and that’s ah, for your protection and my protection okay. Before I start to talk to you ah, Rob there’s a couple of things that I want to make sure that you understand okay.
    [Show full text]
  • Core 1..146 Hansard (PRISM::Advent3b2 8.00)
    CANADA House of Commons Debates VOLUME 140 Ï NUMBER 098 Ï 1st SESSION Ï 38th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Friday, May 13, 2005 Speaker: The Honourable Peter Milliken CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) All parliamentary publications are available on the ``Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire´´ at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca 5957 HOUSE OF COMMONS Friday, May 13, 2005 The House met at 10 a.m. Parliament on February 23, 2005, and Bill C-48, an act to authorize the Minister of Finance to make certain payments, shall be disposed of as follows: 1. Any division thereon requested before the expiry of the time for consideration of Government Orders on Thursday, May 19, 2005, shall be deferred to that time; Prayers 2. At the expiry of the time for consideration of Government Orders on Thursday, May 19, 2005, all questions necessary for the disposal of the second reading stage of (1) Bill C-43 and (2) Bill C-48 shall be put and decided forthwith and successively, Ï (1000) without further debate, amendment or deferral. [English] Ï (1010) MESSAGE FROM THE SENATE The Speaker: Does the hon. government House leader have the The Speaker: I have the honour to inform the House that a unanimous consent of the House for this motion? message has been received from the Senate informing this House Some hon. members: Agreed. that the Senate has passed certain bills, to which the concurrence of this House is desired. Some hon. members: No. Mr. Jay Hill (Prince George—Peace River, CPC): Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Core 1..24 Committee
    House of Commons CANADA Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights JUST Ï NUMBER 001 Ï 1st SESSION Ï 39th PARLIAMENT EVIDENCE Thursday, May 4, 2006 Chair Mr. Art Hanger Also available on the Parliament of Canada Web Site at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca 1 Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights Thursday, May 4, 2006 Ï (1535) Ms. Freeman moves that Mr. Ménard be elected second vice-chair [English] of the committee. The Clerk of the Committee (Ms. Diane Diotte): Honourable Is it the pleasure of the committee to adopt the motion? members of the committee, I see a quorum. (Motion agreed to) We can now proceed to the election of the chair. I am ready to receive motions to that effect. Mr. Réal Ménard (Hochelaga, BQ): At least there will be someone who leans slightly to the left. Mr. Myron Thompson (Wild Rose, CPC): I would like to nominate Mr. Art Hanger, Calgary Northeast. [English] The Clerk: Are there any further motions? The Clerk: I now invite Mr. Lee, the vice-chair from the official opposition, to take the chair in the absence of Mr. Hanger. Mr. Myron Thompson: On a point of order, Madam Clerk, I was to point out that Mr. Hanger's wife is having a serious operation, and The Vice-Chair (Mr. Derek Lee (Scarborough—Rouge River, he could not be here today. Lib.)): Colleagues, we have to run through some routine motions The Clerk: It has been moved by Mr. Thompson that Mr. Hanger dealing with the procedure of the committee.
    [Show full text]
  • Core 1..31 Journalweekly (PRISM::Advent3b2 8.00)
    HOUSE OF COMMONS OF CANADA CHAMBRE DES COMMUNES DU CANADA 38th PARLIAMENT, 1st SESSION 38e LÉGISLATURE, 1re SESSION Journals Journaux No. 134 No 134 Friday, October 7, 2005 Le vendredi 7 octobre 2005 10:00 a.m. 10 heures PRAYERS PRIÈRE GOVERNMENT ORDERS ORDRES ÉMANANT DU GOUVERNEMENT The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Mitchell La Chambre reprend l'étude de la motion de M. Mitchell (Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food), seconded by Mr. Brison (ministre de l'Agriculture et de l'Agroalimentaire), appuyé par M. (Minister of Public Works and Government Services), — That Bill Brison (ministre des Travaux publics et des Services S-38, An Act respecting the implementation of international trade gouvernementaux), — Que le projet de loi S-38, Loi concernant commitments by Canada regarding spirit drinks of foreign la mise en oeuvre d'engagements commerciaux internationaux pris countries, be now read a second time and referred to the par le Canada concernant des spiritueux provenant de pays Standing Committee on Agriculture and Agri-Food. étrangers, soit maintenant lu une deuxième fois et renvoyé au Comité permanent de l'agriculture et de l'agroalimentaire. The debate continued. Le débat se poursuit. The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to. La motion, mise aux voix, est agréée. Accordingly, Bill S-38, An Act respecting the implementation En conséquence, le projet de loi S-38, Loi concernant la mise en of international trade commitments by Canada regarding spirit oeuvre d'engagements commerciaux internationaux pris par le drinks of foreign countries, was read the second time and referred Canada concernant des spiritueux provenant de pays étrangers, est to the Standing Committee on Agriculture and Agri-Food.
    [Show full text]
  • A STUDY of CANADA's CRIMINAL PROSTITUTION LAWS Report
    HOUSE OF COMMONS CANADA THE CHALLENGE OF CHANGE: A STUDY OF CANADA’S CRIMINAL PROSTITUTION LAWS Report of the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights Art Hanger, M.P. Chair Report of the Subcommittee on Solicitation Laws John Maloney, M.P. Chair DECEMBER 2006 The Speaker of the House hereby grants permission to reproduce this document, in whole or in part for use in schools and for other purposes such as private study, research, criticism, review or newspaper summary. Any commercial or other use or reproduction of this publication requires the express prior written authorization of the Speaker of the House of Commons. If this document contains excerpts or the full text of briefs presented to the Committee, permission to reproduce these briefs, in whole or in part, must be obtained from their authors. Also available on the Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire: http://www.parl.gc.ca Available from Communication Canada — Publishing, Ottawa, Canada K1A 0S9 THE CHALLENGE OF CHANGE: A STUDY OF CANADA’S CRIMINAL PROSTITUTION LAWS Report of the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights Art Hanger, M.P. Chair Report of the Subcommittee on Solicitation Laws John Maloney, M.P. Chair DECEMBER 2006 Membership of the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights CHAIR Art Hanger VICE-CHAIRS Derek Lee Réal Ménard MEMBERS Larry Bagnell Sue Barnes Patrick Brown Joe Comartin Carole Freeman Rob Moore Brian Murphy Daniel Petit Myron Thompson Membership of the Subcommittee on Solicitation Laws of the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights
    [Show full text]
  • Balancing the Scales: the State of Victims' Rights in Canada a Report Prepared by the Canadian Resource Centre for Victims of Crime
    BALANCING THE SCALES: THE STATE OF VICTIMS' RIGHTS IN CANADA A REPORT PREPARED BY THE CANADIAN RESOURCE CENTRE FOR VICTIMS OF CRIME FOREWORD The Canadian Resource Centre for Victims of Crime is a non-profit national lobby group that advocates for victims’ rights and an effective justice system. Formed in 1993 by the Canadian Police Association, the Centre has literally helped hundreds of victims of crime. The Centre has made dozens of presentations to both the Commons Justice Committee and the Senate Justice Committee on issues that affect victims of crime and potential victims of crime. Emerging as a leader in the fight for victims’ rights, the Centre works with many victims’ advocates and groups across the country. Because of this, the Centre formed the National Justice Network. The NJN is a grassroots network system of victim advocates/groups. Through the Centre, groups can share information and are kept up to date on legislation affecting victims. The following report is a compilation of the insight of the crime victims the Centre has worked with and helped over the last five years. The recommendations are based not on academic research, but on the real life experiences of people. It is to them that this report is dedicated. Their courage and bravery in the face of such tragedy and pain is an inspiration to all of us who work with them, and for them. It is our hope that this report will help ease the suffering of those who will unfortunately become victims in the future. 1 © 1998 Canadian Resource Centre for Victims of Crime TABLE
    [Show full text]
  • On the Construction of a Social Problem : British Columbian Newspaper Coverage of Missing Children, 1981-1991
    Timothey Harrison B.A., Cni\-ersit? of Guelph, 199 1 THESIS SUBMITTED LY PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOQTSE DEGREE QF MASTER OF rZIiTS In the School of Criminof ogy @Timothey Harrison 1995 Simon Fraser University March 1995 Aft rights reserved. This work may not be reproduced in ir.ho!e or in part, by photocopy or other means, without permission of the author. The quality of this microform is La qualite de cette microforme heavily dependent upon the depend grandernent de la qualite quality of the original thesis de Ea Phhe soumise au submitted or microfiirning. rnicror'iimage. Nous avons tout Every effort has been made to fait pour assurer une qualite ensure the highest quality of superieure de reproduction. reproduction possible. If pages are missing, contact the S3i!manque des pages, veuillez university which granted the cornmuniquer avec I'universite degree. qui a confer6 le grade. Some pages may have indistinct La qualite d'impression de print especially if the originat certaines pages peut kisser B pages were typed with a poor dbsirer, surtout si les pages typewrbr ribbon or if the originales ont ete university sent us an inferior dactyfographiees a I'aide d'un photocopy. ruban use ou si I'universite nous a fait parvenir une photacopie de qualit6 infbrieure. Reproduction in full or in part of La reproduction, mBme partielle, this microform is governed by de cette microforme est soumise the Canadian Copyright Act, B fa Loi canadienne sur le droit A'C)~.CA% u C 0 4 fi P en * $970, C. GOand u aurr;L5t5 JRL r ~70,C.
    [Show full text]
  • Maintaining Party Unity: Analyzing the Conservative Party of Canada's
    Maintaining Party Unity: Analyzing the Conservative Party of Canada’s Integration of the Progressive Conservative and Canadian Alliance parties by Matthew Thompson A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Affairs in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science Carleton University Ottawa, Ontario © 2017, Matthew Thompson Federal conservative parties in Canada have long been plagued by several persistent cleavages and internal conflict. This conflict has hindered the party electorally and contributed to a splintering of right-wing votes between competing right-wing parties in the 1990s. The Conservative Party of Canada (CPC) formed from a merger of the Progressive Conservative (PC) party and the Canadian Alliance in 2003. This analysis explores how the new party was able to maintain unity and prevent the long-standing cleavages from disrupting the party. The comparative literature on party factions is utilized to guide the analysis as the new party contained faction like elements. Policy issues and personnel/patronage distribution are stressed as significant considerations by the comparative literature as well literature on the PCs internal fighting. The analysis thus focuses on how the CPC approached these areas to understand how the party maintained unity. For policy, the campaign platforms, Question Period performance and government sponsored bills of the CPC are examined followed by an analysis of their first four policy conventions. With regards to personnel and patronage, Governor in Council and Senate appointments are analyzed, followed by the new party’s candidate nomination process and Stephen Harper’s appointments to cabinet. The findings reveal a careful and concentrated effort by party leadership, particularly Harper, at managing both areas to ensure that members from each of the predecessor parties were motivated to remain in the new party.
    [Show full text]
  • Crime Prevention in Native Communities
    ARCHIVED - Archiving Content ARCHIVÉE - Contenu archivé Archived Content Contenu archivé Information identified as archived is provided for L’information dont il est indiqué qu’elle est archivée reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It est fournie à des fins de référence, de recherche is not subject to the Government of Canada Web ou de tenue de documents. Elle n’est pas Standards and has not been altered or updated assujettie aux normes Web du gouvernement du since it was archived. Please contact us to request Canada et elle n’a pas été modifiée ou mise à jour a format other than those available. depuis son archivage. Pour obtenir cette information dans un autre format, veuillez communiquer avec nous. This document is archival in nature and is intended Le présent document a une valeur archivistique et for those who wish to consult archival documents fait partie des documents d’archives rendus made available from the collection of Public Safety disponibles par Sécurité publique Canada à ceux Canada. qui souhaitent consulter ces documents issus de sa collection. Some of these documents are available in only one official language. Translation, to be provided Certains de ces documents ne sont disponibles by Public Safety Canada, is available upon que dans une langue officielle. Sécurité publique request. Canada fournira une traduction sur demande. ----~s~COLu~O:========================================================== -~-:~~· . .,~, ~ ;:: t" .. ;!! .(). t) ~~ ~0 PR£V£NT10N ====~v~NTIO~~~~======================================================= Vol. 3, No.4, February, 1986 A bi-monthly publication of the British Columbia Crime Prevention Association Copynght of th1s document does not belong to the Crown. >:oper authonzation must be obtained from the author for ; .;(]ymtended use j l_es droits d'auteur du present document n'appartiennent as aI'Etat.
    [Show full text]