Rural Tourism in Georgia in Transition: Challenges for Regional Sustainability

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Rural Tourism in Georgia in Transition: Challenges for Regional Sustainability sustainability Article Rural Tourism in Georgia in Transition: Challenges for Regional Sustainability Lela Khartishvili 1,2,*, Andreas Muhar 1 , Thomas Dax 3 and Ioseb Khelashvili 2 1 Institute of Landscape Development, Recreation and Conservation Planning; BOKU University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna. Peter Jordan-Str. 82, 1190 Wien, Austria; [email protected] 2 Tourism Hospitality Management Department, Faculty of Economics and Business Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University. University Str., 0186 Tbilisi, Georgia; [email protected] 3 Federal Institute for Less-Favoured and Mountainous Areas, Vienna, Austria; Marxergasse 2, 1030 Wien, Austria; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +43-677-627-07781; Fax: +995-599-99-2161 Received: 30 November 2018; Accepted: 9 January 2019; Published: 15 January 2019 Abstract: Tourism in rural regions of Georgia has a long tradition; however, many structures had been developed during Soviet times under the framework of a centrally planned economy and forced collectivism. Today, Rural Tourism is widely discussed by the national government and international cooperation partners as a means for regional development and as an alternative source of employment in agricultural areas and mountain regions. The purpose of this study is to develop suggestions for the institutionalization of Rural Tourism in the country and to propose relevant actions. Research methods comprised a document analysis, qualitative interviews with various stakeholders, and focus group discussions. We analyzed recent tendencies and challenges of rural tourism development in Georgia with a focus on the concept of community-based tourism and integrated rural development. We also review the challenges of the current structure of tourism marketing on the national level with regard to Rural Tourism products. The key findings of the research include recommendations to create a central leading structure for rural tourism at the national level, which will work on strategic issues and general norms of Rural Tourism. At the same time, we propose the development of destination management organizations, which will integrate general provisions in regional legislation and marketing in close cooperation with local stakeholders. Keywords: rural tourism; national tourism associations; regional partnership; community-based tourism 1. Introduction Across the developed world, Rural Tourism has been recognized as a promising complement to a declining agricultural sector that is increasingly unable to sustain income to people living in rural areas [1]. Rural Tourism is meant to stimulate nontraditional development and entrepreneurship opportunities, as tourism generates jobs, supports retail growth [2], adds vitality to a traditionally poor economy, and transfers capital, income, and employment from industrial, urban, and developed areas to nonindustrial regions [3]. Therefore, Rural Tourism has become a part of strategies and policy documents for rural development at the national and international level. It has become widespread since the 1970s in developed countries and since the 1990s in developing countries. Rural Tourism has been promoted as an opposite strategy to package-type mass tourism, encouraging independent, non-organized visits to destination areas [4], and has been closely linked to “Sustainable Tourism” approaches. The concept of Rural Tourism has also been recognized by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) as a potential tool for the conservation of nature and cultural Sustainability 2019, 11, 410; doi:10.3390/su11020410 www.mdpi.com/journal/sustainability Sustainability 2019, 11, 410 2 of 20 Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 2 of 20 landscapes and sustainable regional development [3]. Given its direct and multiplying effects on other sectorseffects and on industries, other sectors developing and industries, countries developing see it as an co acceleratoruntries see to it manyas an ofaccelerator the UN Sustainable to many of the DevelopmentUN Sustainable Goals (SDGs).Development Goals (SDGs). 1.1. Purpose1.1. Purpose of the of Study the Study DespiteDespite the long the long history history of the of developmentthe development of Rural of Rural Tourism Tourism and relatedand related institutions institutions in Europe, in Europe, this formthis form of tourism of tourism has has appeared appeared only only recently recently in post-Sovietin post-Soviet countries, countries, most most of of which which still still face face the the challengeschallenges ofof decentralizationdecentralization processes processes and and searching searching for for sustainable sustainable concepts concepts for regionalfor regional developmentdevelopment and localand local partnership. partnership. Georgia Georgia carries carries significant significant natural natural recreational recreational resources resources along along withwith an indigenous an indigenous cultural cultural heritage heritage that that give give it a solidit a solid ground ground to consider to consider Rural Rural Tourism Tourism as an as an importantimportant activity activity to address to address local local problems problems and toand promote to promote sustainable sustainable development. development. The purposeThe purpose of this of study this is study to provide is to a betterprovide understanding a better understanding of recent trends of in recent the development trends in the of Ruraldevelopment Tourism inof GeorgiaRural Tourism as an alternative in Georgia form as an of altern tourism,ative andform to of identify tourism, strategic and to identify actions thatstrategic needactions to be taken that toneed institutionalize to be taken to and institutionalize promote this field.and promote The paper this highlights field. The recent paper tendencies highlights and recent recognitiontendencies of Rural and recognition Tourism in thisof Rural country, Tourism where, in overthis country, the decades where, of the over Soviet the decades era, tourism of the had Soviet beenera, managed tourism in had a centralized been managed way, in mostly a centralized based on way, spa mo resorts.stly based Yet, in on recent spa resorts. years, Yet, Rural in Tourismrecent years, has becomeRural Tourism part of development has become approaches,part of development policy papers, approaches, and programs policy andpapers, has alsoand been programs promoted and has by internationalalso been promoted agreements by andinternational donor organizations. agreements Compared and donor to organizations. other countries Compared in Central andto other Easterncountries Europe, in this Central occurred and Eastern relatively Europe, late in Georgiathis occurred due to relatively the political late situation in Georgia as welldue to as the latepolitical developmentsituation ofas thewell tourism as the late infrastructure development in general.of the tourism infrastructure in general. 1.2. Key1.2. FactsKey Facts about about Georgia Georgia GeorgiaGeorgia is a is small a small mountainous mountainous country country in thein the South South Caucasus Caucasus region region with with a a population population of of 3.7 3.7 million.million. About About 54% 54% of of the the territory territory lies lies at at elevations elevations higher higher than than 1000 1000 mm aboveabove seasea levellevel (a.s.l.)(a.s.l.)[5], [5], and and 42%42% ofof thethe populationpopulation lives lives in in mountainous mountainous areas, areas, where where the the village village of Ushguli,of Ushguli, located located at 2200 at 2200 m m a.s.l.,a.s.l., is one is ofone the of highest the highest permanent permanent settlements settlements in Europe in Europe (see Figure(see Figure1). 1). Figure 1. TheFigure village 1. ofThe Ushguli. village Upper of Ushguli. Svaneti Upper region. Svaneti (photo: region. Georgian (photo: National Georgian Tourism National Administration). Tourism Administration). Georgia is a traditional agricultural country. During Soviet times, it was a main supplier of citrus fruits, wine,Georgia and tea is a for traditional the Soviet agricultural Union, and country. exports During exceeded Soviet imports times, by it 70%was [a6 main]. Production supplier wasof citrus organizedfruits, basedwine, onand large tea for collective the Soviet units Union, (Kolkhoz), and expo whererts theexceeded land and imports the produce by 70% belonged[6]. Production to the was stateorganized [7]. Since based 1990, afteron large a privatization collective units reform, (Kolkhoz), people where became the land land owners,and the produce and the agriculturebelonged to the sectorstate is now [7]. organizedSince 1990, based after ona privatization family farms reform, and their people fragmented became land land plots owners, [8–15 and]. Recent the agriculture land sector is now organized based on family farms and their fragmented land plots [8–15] .Recent land registration reforms, introduced by the Ministry of Justice of Georgia in 2016, simplified registration Sustainability 2019, 11, 410 3 of 20 Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 3 of 20 registrationprocedures reforms, for private introduced owners by theto encourage Ministry of farmers Justice ofto Georgiaobtain ownership in 2016, simplified documents registration and register procedurestheir land for privatewithout owners any barriers. to encourage farmers to obtain ownership documents and register their land withoutNearly any half barriers. of
Recommended publications
  • 14 July 2015 Assessment of Wood and Agricultural Residue Biomass
    ASSESSMENT OF WOOD AND AGRICULTURAL RESIDUE BIOMASS ENERGY POTENTIAL IN GEORGIA Prepared for UNDP under Micro-Capital Grant Agreement for Non-Credit Related Activities of 26.06.14 WORLD EXPERIENCE FOR GEORGIA TBIILISI 2014 Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................... 2 Acronyms ........................................................................................................................................................ 4 Summary ......................................................................................................................................................... 5 Assessment of Agricultural Residue Availability from Perennial Crops in Georgia ...................................... 13 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 13 Methodology for Perennial Crops ............................................................................................................ 15 Vineyards’ Pruning Residue ...................................................................................................................... 17 Fruit orchards’ Pruning Residue................................................................................................................ 23 Apple, pear, peach ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding the Need for Good Planning Project Newsletter #2
    Integrated Solid Waste Management Kutaisi - Project Newsletter # 2- May 2017 News ევროკავშირი საქართველოსთვის The European Union for Georgia SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT Ministry of Regional Development and COMPANY OF GEORGIA Infrastructure of Georgia Project nanced by KfW and Government of Georgia and supported with funding by Project implemented by consortium leaders PEM Consult and ERM Landll Operators the European Union Understanding the need for good planning Project Newsletter #2 Starting from November 2016, the team of the project “Inte- Imereti region journalists and media grated Solid Waste Management Kutasisi – Accompanying learn about the new regional waste management system Page 2 Measures Consulting (AMC) Services” is hosting a series of training courses for all municipalities in Imereti and Racha- Safer and healthier working Lechkhumi and Kvemo Svaneti Regions. In our interview with conditions for over 200 Mr. René Boesten, the team leader of the project, explains the landll sta Page 2 training programme Municipal Waste Manage- ment Plan Training - mid Mr. Boesten, what is the main landll. A third priority is to set up fair term review Page 3 purpose and reason for this training and manageable systems for the OHS and EMS commitment programme? waste service charge that citizens (and of SWMCG Page 4 In accordance with the Waste Code of hotels etc.) have to pay for the collection The waste management Georgia, the municipalities have to and safe disposal of waste. system in Georgia - Main develop municipal waste management Separate collection and recycling will responsibilities of the involved plans in order to better manage and become obligatory in 2019. Are the parties Page 4 control municipal waste collection, and municipalities prepared? SWMCG website in future also recycling.
    [Show full text]
  • COLUMBIA UNDERGRADUATE JOURNAL of ART HISTORY Winter 2021
    COLUMBIA UNDERGRADUATE JOURNAL of ART HISTORY Winter 2021 COLUMBIA UNDERGRADUATE JOURNAL of ART HISTORY Winter 2021 The Columbia Undergraduate Journal of Art History January 2021 Volume 3, No. 1 A special thanks to Professor Barry Bergdoll and the Columbia Department of Art History and Archaeology for sponsoring this student publication. New York, New York Editorial Board Editor-in-Chief Noah Percy Yasemin Aykan Designers Elizabeth Mullaney Lead Editors Zehra Naqvi Noah Seeman Lilly Cao Editor Kaya Alim Michael Coiro Jackie Chu Drey Carr Yuxin Chen Olivia Doyle Millie Felder Kaleigh McCormick Sophia Fung Sam Needleman Bri Schmidt Claire Wilson Special thanks to visual arts student and lead editor Lilly Cao, CC’22, for cover art, Skin I, 2020. Oil on canvas. An Editor’s Note Dear Reader, In a way, this journal has been a product of the year’s cri- ses—our irst independent Spring Edition was nearly interrupted by the start of the COVID-19 Pandemic and this Winter Edition arrives amidst the irst round of vaccine distribution. he humanities are often characterized as cloistered within the ivory tower, but it seems this year has irreversibly punctured that insulation (or its illusion). As under- graduates, our staf has been displaced, and among our ranks are the frontline workers and economically disadvantaged students who have borne the brunt of this crisis. In this issue, we have decided to confront the moment’s signiicance rather than aspire for escapist normalcy. After months of lockdown and social distancing in New York, we decided for the irst time to include a theme in our call for papers: Art in Conine- ment.
    [Show full text]
  • A Case Study on Zemo Svaneti, Georgia
    Faculty of Agriculture and Horticulture SLE Publication Series Strategic Options towards Sustainable Development in Mountainous Regions A Case Study on Zemo Svaneti, Georgia The SLE team: Eric Engel (Teamleiter), Henrica von der Behrens, Dorian Frieden, Karen Möhring, Constanze Schaaff, Philipp Tepper, Ulrike Müller, Siddharth Prakash In cooperation with: Rusudan Barkalaia, Giorgi Gigauri Mestia / Berlin, Dezember 2006 Centre of Advanced Training in Rural Development Foreword i Schriftenreihe des SLE (Seminar für Ländliche Entwicklung) SLE Publication Series (Centre for Advanced Training in Rural Development) Herausgeber / SLE Seminar für Ländliche Entwicklung Editor (Centre for Advanced Training in Rural Development) Humboldt Universität zu Berlin Sitz: Hessische Straße 1-2, Unter den Linden 6, 10099 Berlin, Germany E-Mail: [email protected] Internet: www.agrar.hu-berlin.de/sle www.berlinerseminar.de Redaktion / Karin Fiege Managing Editor SLE - Seminar für Ländliche Entwicklung Druck / PPMDW Präsentation Plus Printing Märkische Druck- und Werbeproduktionsgesellschaft mbH Landsberger Str. 263 12623 Berlin (Mahlsdorf) Vertrieb / Seminar für Ländliche Entwicklung Distributors Hessische Straße 1-2, Unter den Linden 6, 10099 Berlin 1. Auflage 2006 / 1-120 1st edition 2006 Copyright 2006 by SLE - Seminar für Ländliche Entwicklung (Centre for Advanced Training in Rural Development) ISSN 1433-4585 ISBN 3-936602-28-X Titelbild / View of Mestia Cover photo (by Philipp Tepper) Foreword i Foreword The Centre for Advanced Training in Rural Development (Seminar für Ländliche Entwicklung, SLE) at the Humboldt University in Berlin has trained young professionals in the field of German and international development cooperation for more than forty years. Consulting projects conducted on behalf of German and international cooperation organisations form part of the one-year postgraduate course.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Prosperity Initiative
    USAID/GEORGIA DO2: Inclusive and Sustainable Economic Growth October 1, 2011 – September 31, 2012 Gagra Municipal (regional) Infrastructure Development (MID) ABKHAZIA # Municipality Region Project Title Gudauta Rehabilitation of Roads 1 Mtskheta 3.852 km; 11 streets : Mtskheta- : Mtanee Rehabilitation of Roads SOKHUMI : : 1$Mestia : 2 Dushet 2.240 km; 7 streets :: : ::: Rehabilitation of Pushkin Gulripshi : 3 Gori street 0.92 km : Chazhashi B l a c k S e a :%, Rehabilitaion of Gorijvari : 4 Gori Shida Kartli road 1.45 km : Lentekhi Rehabilitation of Nationwide Projects: Ochamchire SAMEGRELO- 5 Kareli Sagholasheni-Dvani 12 km : Highway - DCA Basisbank ZEMO SVANETI RACHA-LECHKHUMI rehabilitaiosn Roads in Oni Etseri - DCA Bank Republic Lia*#*# 6 Oni 2.452 km, 5 streets *#Sachino : KVEMO SVANETI Stepantsminda - DCA Alliance Group 1$ Gali *#Mukhuri Tsageri Shatili %, Racha- *#1$ Tsalenjikha Abari Rehabilitation of Headwork Khvanchkara #0#0 Lechkhumi - DCA Crystal Obuji*#*# *#Khabume # 7 Oni of Drinking Water on Oni for Nakipu 0 Likheti 3 400 individuals - Black Sea Regional Transmission ZUGDIDI1$ *# Chkhorotsku1$*# ]^!( Oni Planning Project (Phase 2) Chitatskaro 1$!( Letsurtsume Bareuli #0 - Georgia Education Management Project (EMP) Akhalkhibula AMBROLAURI %,Tsaishi ]^!( *#Lesichine Martvili - Georgia Primary Education Project (G-Pried) MTSKHETA- Khamiskuri%, Kheta Shua*#Zana 1$ - GNEWRC Partnership Program %, Khorshi Perevi SOUTH MTIANETI Khobi *# *#Eki Khoni Tskaltubo Khresili Tkibuli#0 #0 - HICD Plus #0 ]^1$ OSSETIA 1$ 1$!( Menji *#Dzveli
    [Show full text]
  • World Heritage Watch: Report 2018. WHW
    W H W World Heritage Watch Report 2018 World Heritage Watch Report 2018 Report Watch Heritage World World Heritage Watch Heritage World World Heritage Watch World Heritage Watch Report 2018 Berlin 2018 2 Bibliographical Information World Heritage Watch: World Heritage Watch Report 2018. Berlin 2018 184 pages, with 217 photos and 53 graphics and maps Published by World Heritage Watch e.V. Berlin 2018 ISBN 978-3-00-059753-4 NE: World Heritage Watch 1. World Heritage 2. Civil Society 3. UNESCO 4. Participation 5. Natural Heritage 6. Cultural Heritage 7. Historic Cities 8. Sites 9. Monuments 10. Cultural Landscapes 11. Indigenous Peoples 12. Participation W H W © World Heritage Watch e.V. 2018 This work with all its parts is protected by copyright. Any use beyond the strict limits of the applicable copyright law without the consent of the publisher is inadmissable and punishable. This refers especially to reproduction of figures and/or text in print or xerography, translations, microforms and the data storage and processing in electronical systems. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinions whatsoever on the part of the publishers concerning the legal status of any country or territory or of its authorities, or concerning the frontiers of any country or territory. The authors are responsible for the choice and the presentation of the facts contained in this book and for the opinions expressed therein, which are not necessarily those of the editors, and do not commit them. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form without written permission from the publishers except for the quotation of brief passages for the purposes of review.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnobiology of Georgia
    SHOTA TUSTAVELI ZAAL KIKVIDZE NATIONAL SCIENCE FUNDATION ILIA STATE UNIVERSITY PRESS ETHNOBIOLOGY OF GEORGIA ISBN 978-9941-18-350-8 Tbilisi 2020 Ethnobiology of Georgia 2020 Zaal Kikvidze Preface My full-time dedication to ethnobiology started in 2012, since when it has never failed to fascinate me. Ethnobiology is a relatively young science with many blank areas still in its landscape, which is, perhaps, good motivation to write a synthetic text aimed at bridging the existing gaps. At this stage, however, an exhaustive representation of materials relevant to the ethnobiology of Georgia would be an insurmountable task for one author. My goal, rather, is to provide students and researchers with an introduction to my country’s ethnobiology. This book, therefore, is about the key traditions that have developed over a long history of interactions between humans and nature in Georgia, as documented by modern ethnobiologists. Acknowledgements: I am grateful to my colleagues – Rainer Bussmann, Narel Paniagua Zambrana, David Kikodze and Shalva Sikharulidze for the exciting and fruitful discussions about ethnobiology, and their encouragement for pushing forth this project. Rainer Bussmann read the early draft of this text and I am grateful for his valuable comments. Special thanks are due to Jana Ekhvaia, for her crucial contribution as project coordinator and I greatly appreciate the constant support from the staff and administration of Ilia State University. Finally, I am indebted to my fairy wordmother, Kate Hughes whose help was indispensable at the later stages of preparation of this manuscript. 2 Table of contents Preface.......................................................................................................................................................... 2 Chapter 1. A brief introduction to ethnobiology......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Gambling in Georgia Second Report
    Gambling in Georgia Second Report July 2015 2 Transparency International Georgia Research supervisor: Levan Natroshvili Researcher: Mariam Chachua Transparency International Georgia Address: 26 Rustaveli Avenue, Tbilisi Georgia 0108 Phone: (+995 32) 292 14 03 E-mail: [email protected] Web: http://transparency.ge The report was prepared with the financial support of the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida). All opinions expressed herein belong to Transparency International Georgia and may not express the views of the donor. Gambling in Georgia: Second Report 3 Contents I. Summary ........................................................................................................................................................... 4 II. Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................... 7 III. Public Opinion Survey Results ........................................................................................................................ 9 IV. Gambling-Related Problems ........................................................................................................................ 13 1. Problem and underage gambling .............................................................................................................. 13 2. Money laundering ..................................................................................................................................... 14 3. Control
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    The World Bank Report No: ISR6658 Implementation Status & Results Georgia Secondary & Local Roads Project (P086277) Operation Name: Secondary & Local Roads Project (P086277) Project Stage: Implementation Seq.No: 16 Status: ARCHIVED Archive Date: 07-Aug-2011 Country: Georgia Approval FY: 2004 Public Disclosure Authorized Product Line:IBRD/IDA Region: EUROPE AND CENTRAL ASIA Lending Instrument: Specific Investment Loan Implementing Agency(ies): Roads Department of the Ministry of Regional Development and Infrastructure (RDMRDI) Key Dates Board Approval Date 24-Jun-2004 Original Closing Date 31-Oct-2009 Planned Mid Term Review Date 31-Jul-2007 Last Archived ISR Date 07-Aug-2011 Public Disclosure Copy Effectiveness Date 21-Oct-2004 Revised Closing Date 30-Jun-2012 Actual Mid Term Review Date 03-Nov-2006 Project Development Objectives Project Development Objective (from Project Appraisal Document) The Project Development Objectives are to: (i) upgrade and rehabilitate the secondary and local roads network; and (ii) increase Roads Department of the Ministry of regional development and Infrastructure's (RDMRDI's) and local governments' capacity to manage the road network in a cost-effective and sustainable manner. Has the Project Development Objective been changed since Board Approval of the Project? Yes No Public Disclosure Authorized Component(s) Component Name Component Cost Rehabilitation of Secondary and Local Roads 118.50 Strengthening the capacity of the Road Sector Institutions 2.70 Designing and Supervising Road Rehabilitation 6.30 Overall Ratings Previous Rating Current Rating Progress towards achievement of PDO Satisfactory Satisfactory Overall Implementation Progress (IP) Moderately Satisfactory Satisfactory Public Disclosure Authorized Overall Risk Rating Implementation Status Overview The implementation progress and overall safeguard compliance of the project is Satisfactory.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. World Heritage Property Data 2. Statement of Outstanding Universal
    Periodic Report - Second Cycle Section II-Upper Svaneti 1. World Heritage Property Data 1.8 - Other designations / Conventions under which the property is protected (if applicable) 1.1 - Name of World Heritage Property Upper Svaneti 2. Statement of Outstanding Universal Value 1.2 - World Heritage Property Details 2.1 - Statement of Outstanding Universal Value / Statement of Significance State(s) Party(ies) Comment Georgia Brief Synthesis Preserved by its long geographical isolation, Type of Property the mountain landscape of Upper Svaneti region of the cultural Caucasus is an exceptional example of mountain scenery with Identification Number medieval villages and tower houses. The property occupies 709 the upper reaches of the lnguri river basin between the Caucasus and Svaneti ranges. It consists of several small Year of inscription on the World Heritage List villages forming a community that are dominated by the 1996 towers and situated on the mountain slopes, with a natural environment of gorges and alpine valleys and a backdrop of 1.3 - Geographic Information Table snow-covered mountains. The most notable feature of the Name Coordinates Property Buffer Total Inscription settlements is the abundance of towers. The village of (latitude/longitude) (ha) zone (ha) year Chazhashi in Ushguli community, situated at the confluence of (ha) lnguri and Black rivers, has preserved more than 200 Upper 42.916 / 43.011 1.06 19.16 20.22 1996 medieval tower houses, churches and castles. The land use Svaneti and settlement structure reveal the continued dwelling and Total (ha) 1.06 19.16 20.22 building traditions of local Svan people living in harmony with the surrounding natural environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Medicinal Ethnobotany of Wild Plants
    Kazancı et al. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine (2020) 16:71 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-020-00415-y RESEARCH Open Access Medicinal ethnobotany of wild plants: a cross-cultural comparison around Georgia- Turkey border, the Western Lesser Caucasus Ceren Kazancı1* , Soner Oruç2 and Marine Mosulishvili1 Abstract Background: The Mountains of the Western Lesser Caucasus with its rich plant diversity, multicultural and multilingual nature host diverse ethnobotanical knowledge related to medicinal plants. However, cross-cultural medicinal ethnobotany and patterns of plant knowledge have not yet been investigated in the region. Doing so could highlight the salient medicinal plant species and show the variations between communities. This study aimed to determine and discuss the similarities and differences of medicinal ethnobotany among people living in highland pastures on both sides of the Georgia-Turkey border. Methods: During the 2017 and 2018 summer transhumance period, 119 participants (74 in Turkey, 45 in Georgia) were interviewed with semi-structured questions. The data was structured in use-reports (URs) following the ICPC classification. Cultural Importance (CI) Index, informant consensus factor (FIC), shared/separate species-use combinations, as well as literature data were used for comparing medicinal ethnobotany of the communities. Results: One thousand five hundred six UR for 152 native wild plant species were documented. More than half of the species are in common on both sides of the border. Out of 817 species-use combinations, only 9% of the use incidences are shared between communities across the border. Around 66% of these reports had not been previously mentioned specifically in the compared literature.
    [Show full text]
  • Restoration of Stepantsminda Museum (Kazbegi Municipality) Subproject Phase 2
    Public Disclosure Authorized Restoration of Stepantsminda Museum (Kazbegi Municipality) Subproject Phase 2 Public Disclosure Authorized Sub-project Environmental and Social Screening and Environmental and Social Review Public Disclosure Authorized Third Regional Development Project Funded by the World Bank Public Disclosure Authorized April, 2019 Subproject Description The Subproject (SP) considers restoration of three buildings of Alexander Kazbegi historical museum complex in the borough of Stepantsminda - historical museum building, Alexander Kazbegi Memorial House and Nikoloz Kazbegi (uncle of Alexander Kazbegi) house, as well as arrangement of the museum yard. Rehabilitation works for the complex were initiated in 2017, under the Regional Development Project III. The following works were completed under phase I of rehabilitation works: Al. Kazbegi House-Museum: - Wooden stairs, plaster and wood floor of the first story were removed in the interior. - Foundation was strengthened. - The vault existing on top of the access to southern balcony was rearranged. - The later period facing of northern part of the western façade of the building was removed. - Ceramic tile finishing of the balcony was removed. House of Nikoloz Kazbegi: - Plaster and wood floor of the first story were removed in the interior. - The old roof was removed and temporary roofing was arranged. - Two semi-circular staircases were removed. According to the new circumstances revealed during rehabilitation works, the National Agency for Cultural Heritage Preservation
    [Show full text]