DOCSLIB.ORG

A Case Study on Zemo Svaneti, Georgia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Case Study on Zemo Svaneti, Georgia Faculty of Agriculture and Horticulture SLE Publication Series Strategic Options towards Sustainable Development in Mountainous Regions A Case Study on Zemo Svaneti, Georgia The SLE team: Eric Engel (Teamleiter), Henrica von der Behrens, Dorian Frieden, Karen Möhring, Constanze Schaaff, Philipp Tepper, Ulrike Müller, Siddharth Prakash In cooperation with: Rusudan Barkalaia, Giorgi Gigauri Mestia / Berlin, Dezember 2006 Centre of Advanced Training in Rural Development Foreword i Schriftenreihe des SLE (Seminar für Ländliche Entwicklung) SLE Publication Series (Centre for Advanced Training in Rural Development) Herausgeber / SLE Seminar für Ländliche Entwicklung Editor (Centre for Advanced Training in Rural Development) Humboldt Universität zu Berlin Sitz: Hessische Straße 1-2, Unter den Linden 6, 10099 Berlin, Germany E-Mail: [email protected] Internet: www.agrar.hu-berlin.de/sle www.berlinerseminar.de Redaktion / Karin Fiege Managing Editor SLE - Seminar für Ländliche Entwicklung Druck / PPMDW Präsentation Plus Printing Märkische Druck- und Werbeproduktionsgesellschaft mbH Landsberger Str. 263 12623 Berlin (Mahlsdorf) Vertrieb / Seminar für Ländliche Entwicklung Distributors Hessische Straße 1-2, Unter den Linden 6, 10099 Berlin 1. Auflage 2006 / 1-120 1st edition 2006 Copyright 2006 by SLE - Seminar für Ländliche Entwicklung (Centre for Advanced Training in Rural Development) ISSN 1433-4585 ISBN 3-936602-28-X Titelbild / View of Mestia Cover photo (by Philipp Tepper) Foreword i Foreword The Centre for Advanced Training in Rural Development (Seminar für Ländliche Entwicklung, SLE) at the Humboldt University in Berlin has trained young professionals in the field of German and international development cooperation for more than forty years. Consulting projects conducted on behalf of German and international cooperation organisations form part of the one-year postgraduate course. In multidisciplinary teams, young professionals carry out studies on innovative future-oriented topics, and act as consultants. Including diverse local actors in the process is of great importance here. The outputs of this “applied research” are an immediate contribution to the solving of development problems in rural areas. Throughout the years, SLE has carried out over a hundred consulting projects in more than sixty countries, and regularly published the results in this series. In 2006, SLE teams completed studies in Georgia, Ghana, Mozambique, and Nicaragua, all of which dealt with topics relevant to the most recent discussions in international cooperation. The present six-month study was commissioned by and conducted in cooperation with the Centre for Training and Consultancy (CTC), Tbilisi. The research is part of the pilot phase of the CTC intervention in Zemo Svaneti financed by the German Church Development Service (EED) aiming at rural development of Zemo Svaneti. The consultancy team was composed of one environmental scientist, one geo- ecologist, one forestry scientist, one social anthropologist, one political scientist (all participants of the 44th course of SLE), one social anthropologist and geographer (team leader) as well as one cattle breeding specialist and one forestry scientist (both Georgian counterparts). Prof. Dr. Otto Kauffmann Carola Jacobi-Sambou Dean Director Agricultural Horticultural Faculty Centre for Advanced Training in Rural Development ii Acknowledgements Acknowledgements This study is based on the enormous assistance provided by many people in Georgia and Germany supporting the research team with their ideas, feedback and practical help. Not all of them can be named here, but we hope that those not mentioned know how much we appreciated their help and enjoyed the time spent together. This holds in particular true for the population of Zemo Svaneti who received us with great friendliness, responded patiently to interviews and participated in group discussions, who integrated us into their lives, hopes, and worries and who showed us around their fantastic mountain region. We strongly hope that our work will contribute to improve living conditions of the population of Zemo Svaneti. We owe special thanks to CTC, in particular to Merab Khergiani and Nino Ratiani of the Mestia office as well as to Pavle Tvaliashvili, project coordinator for CTC Zemo Svaneti in Tbilisi. Their never-ending patience, assistance in logistical matters, and support during the field phase as well as their great humour and art of reception helped us to find our way into Svan society. Our gratitude also goes to Irina Khantadze, director of CTC, as well as to Matthias Valentin, board member of CTC, for their feedback and guidance. George “Malinki” Eliozov secured the teams’ connection with the (home)world – we would like to express our special appreciation to him. During the preparation in Germany, we were introduced to peculiarities of Zemo Svaneti by the precious consultancy of Rolf and Brigitta Schrade as well as Jan Koehler. Theo Rauch and Kurt Peters accompanied the mission with their expertise on rural development and animal husbandry. The list of Georgian and international organisations which supported us is too long to be displayed here in full length. We are particularly indebted to Günther Fichtner of Friedrich Ebert Foundation South Caucasus for his suggestions and feedback, to Knut Gerber of GTZ Tbilisi for his permanent help, as well as to Nina Shatberashvili of REC Caucasus for their practical support to understand the state of community development projects in mountain regions of Georgia. All other agencies and people we met can be assured our gratitude for generously sharing their project designs, strategic visions, and practical experience. In Mestia district, we owe gratitude to the local administration for their willingness to support our study and their cooperation in the research process. We whish Vakhtang Nakani of Mestia sakrebulo, Muradi Ushkhvani, deputy gamgebeli as well as Tengo Pangani of Tsvirmi, Carl Sagliani of Tskhumari, Zhuzhuna Gurchiani of Chuberi and Zozo Gvarmiani of Nakra all the best for their communities and future work as well as to their families. Shota Chartolani in Mestia, Teimuraz Nijaradze in Ushguli, and Acknowledgements iii Bachuki Gvarmiani in Nakra were of enormous help as resource persons and for organising events in their respective communities. Particular gratitude goes to Nato Gvarliani, Ana Girgvliani, and Natia Zhorzholiani for their capacities as Svan- Georgian-English interpreters and their facilitation skills during the working process. They have helped us to open a lot of doors and hearts. The research team cooperated closely with the cattle breeding expert Rusudan Barkalaia and the forester Giorgi Gigauri who greatly contributed to the study with their dedication during the preparation phase and their expertise during research. To them as well as to Zoya Goshteliani, our host and entrance door to the joys and hardships of daily life in Zemo Svaneti goes our deepest thanks and friendship. We would like to express our gratitude to EED in Bonn and Tbilisi for supporting CTC in financing the research. Gerlind Melsbach of EED Tbilisi helped with background information and provided valuable feedback, thus setting the base for the study and its results. Last but not least, we want to thank Gabriele Beckmann of SLE for continuous backstopping and precious comments. iv How to Read this Report How to Read this Report This report gathers the results of a three-month field research on economic development potentials in Zemo Svaneti, Georgia. It is directed to a broad range of readers, such as local population in Zemo Svaneti interested in getting active in development, government actors in Georgia, current development actors in Zemo Svaneti, future development actors in Zemo Svaneti, and CTC as the commissioner of this study. For all those, we want to give at hand a guideline how this report can be used. A Georgian version of this report shall be shortly available with CTC. If you are living in Zemo Svaneti and interested in getting active for development in your region, this report can serve as a pool of ideas, possibly stimulating or complementing own ideas. It may also serve as an instrument for lobbying with possible donors for supporting local ideas and projects. It then makes sense to take a short look at the problems in Chapters 2.3.2 (p. 30), 2.4.3 (p. 35), 2.5.2 (p. 38), 2.7.2 (p. 43), 2.8.2 (p. 47), 2.9.2 (p. 53). They should sound quite familiar to you. So you can quickly move on to the given conclusions in Chapters 2.6 (p. 39), 2.7.4 (p. 45), 2.8.4 (p. 51), 2.9.4 (p. 56) for comprehensive recommendations; you might also have a closer look at detailed sector-related recommendations at Chapter 3 (p. 57). For donors from outside Zemo Svaneti or even Georgia, it might be also important to have a look at the baseline data which is presented in Chapters 1.23), 2.3.1 (p. 23), 2.4.1 (p. 33), 2.4.2 (p. 34), 2.5.1 (p. 37), 2.7.1 (p. 40), 2.8.1 (p. 46), 2.9.1 (p. 51) and more in detail in the Annex and on CD-Rom available with CTC in Tbilisi. If you are a government actor in Georgia and are or want to get involved in development activities in Zemo Svaneti, you may benefit from the recommendations related to your respective sector (see Chapter 3.1, p. 57). For data substantiating these, have a look at Chapter 3.2 (p. 58) for agriculture, Chapter 3.8 (p. 66) for forestry, Chapter 3.9 (p. 70) for tourism, and Chapter 3.10 (p. 74) for disasters. When reckoning if to include donors in your strategy, baseline data (Chapter 1, p. 1, Chapter 2, p. 18 and Annex) is also helpful. If you are currently active in Zemo Svaneti, the baseline data might help you to substantiate project proposals, and recommendations, in the strategic options (Chapter 3.12, p. 81) as well as sector-related, could complement your own ideas and give you a hint where to look for cooperating partners.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • COLUMBIA UNDERGRADUATE JOURNAL of ART HISTORY Winter 2021
    COLUMBIA UNDERGRADUATE JOURNAL of ART HISTORY Winter 2021 COLUMBIA UNDERGRADUATE JOURNAL of ART HISTORY Winter 2021 The Columbia Undergraduate Journal of Art History January 2021 Volume 3, No. 1 A special thanks to Professor Barry Bergdoll and the Columbia Department of Art History and Archaeology for sponsoring this student publication. New York, New York Editorial Board Editor-in-Chief Noah Percy Yasemin Aykan Designers Elizabeth Mullaney Lead Editors Zehra Naqvi Noah Seeman Lilly Cao Editor Kaya Alim Michael Coiro Jackie Chu Drey Carr Yuxin Chen Olivia Doyle Millie Felder Kaleigh McCormick Sophia Fung Sam Needleman Bri Schmidt Claire Wilson Special thanks to visual arts student and lead editor Lilly Cao, CC’22, for cover art, Skin I, 2020. Oil on canvas. An Editor’s Note Dear Reader, In a way, this journal has been a product of the year’s cri- ses—our irst independent Spring Edition was nearly interrupted by the start of the COVID-19 Pandemic and this Winter Edition arrives amidst the irst round of vaccine distribution. he humanities are often characterized as cloistered within the ivory tower, but it seems this year has irreversibly punctured that insulation (or its illusion). As under- graduates, our staf has been displaced, and among our ranks are the frontline workers and economically disadvantaged students who have borne the brunt of this crisis. In this issue, we have decided to confront the moment’s signiicance rather than aspire for escapist normalcy. After months of lockdown and social distancing in New York, we decided for the irst time to include a theme in our call for papers: Art in Conine- ment.
    [Show full text]
  • World Heritage Watch: Report 2018. WHW
    W H W World Heritage Watch Report 2018 World Heritage Watch Report 2018 Report Watch Heritage World World Heritage Watch Heritage World World Heritage Watch World Heritage Watch Report 2018 Berlin 2018 2 Bibliographical Information World Heritage Watch: World Heritage Watch Report 2018. Berlin 2018 184 pages, with 217 photos and 53 graphics and maps Published by World Heritage Watch e.V. Berlin 2018 ISBN 978-3-00-059753-4 NE: World Heritage Watch 1. World Heritage 2. Civil Society 3. UNESCO 4. Participation 5. Natural Heritage 6. Cultural Heritage 7. Historic Cities 8. Sites 9. Monuments 10. Cultural Landscapes 11. Indigenous Peoples 12. Participation W H W © World Heritage Watch e.V. 2018 This work with all its parts is protected by copyright. Any use beyond the strict limits of the applicable copyright law without the consent of the publisher is inadmissable and punishable. This refers especially to reproduction of figures and/or text in print or xerography, translations, microforms and the data storage and processing in electronical systems. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinions whatsoever on the part of the publishers concerning the legal status of any country or territory or of its authorities, or concerning the frontiers of any country or territory. The authors are responsible for the choice and the presentation of the facts contained in this book and for the opinions expressed therein, which are not necessarily those of the editors, and do not commit them. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form without written permission from the publishers except for the quotation of brief passages for the purposes of review.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    The World Bank Report No: ISR6658 Implementation Status & Results Georgia Secondary & Local Roads Project (P086277) Operation Name: Secondary & Local Roads Project (P086277) Project Stage: Implementation Seq.No: 16 Status: ARCHIVED Archive Date: 07-Aug-2011 Country: Georgia Approval FY: 2004 Public Disclosure Authorized Product Line:IBRD/IDA Region: EUROPE AND CENTRAL ASIA Lending Instrument: Specific Investment Loan Implementing Agency(ies): Roads Department of the Ministry of Regional Development and Infrastructure (RDMRDI) Key Dates Board Approval Date 24-Jun-2004 Original Closing Date 31-Oct-2009 Planned Mid Term Review Date 31-Jul-2007 Last Archived ISR Date 07-Aug-2011 Public Disclosure Copy Effectiveness Date 21-Oct-2004 Revised Closing Date 30-Jun-2012 Actual Mid Term Review Date 03-Nov-2006 Project Development Objectives Project Development Objective (from Project Appraisal Document) The Project Development Objectives are to: (i) upgrade and rehabilitate the secondary and local roads network; and (ii) increase Roads Department of the Ministry of regional development and Infrastructure's (RDMRDI's) and local governments' capacity to manage the road network in a cost-effective and sustainable manner. Has the Project Development Objective been changed since Board Approval of the Project? Yes No Public Disclosure Authorized Component(s) Component Name Component Cost Rehabilitation of Secondary and Local Roads 118.50 Strengthening the capacity of the Road Sector Institutions 2.70 Designing and Supervising Road Rehabilitation 6.30 Overall Ratings Previous Rating Current Rating Progress towards achievement of PDO Satisfactory Satisfactory Overall Implementation Progress (IP) Moderately Satisfactory Satisfactory Public Disclosure Authorized Overall Risk Rating Implementation Status Overview The implementation progress and overall safeguard compliance of the project is Satisfactory.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. World Heritage Property Data 2. Statement of Outstanding Universal
    Periodic Report - Second Cycle Section II-Upper Svaneti 1. World Heritage Property Data 1.8 - Other designations / Conventions under which the property is protected (if applicable) 1.1 - Name of World Heritage Property Upper Svaneti 2. Statement of Outstanding Universal Value 1.2 - World Heritage Property Details 2.1 - Statement of Outstanding Universal Value / Statement of Significance State(s) Party(ies) Comment Georgia Brief Synthesis Preserved by its long geographical isolation, Type of Property the mountain landscape of Upper Svaneti region of the cultural Caucasus is an exceptional example of mountain scenery with Identification Number medieval villages and tower houses. The property occupies 709 the upper reaches of the lnguri river basin between the Caucasus and Svaneti ranges. It consists of several small Year of inscription on the World Heritage List villages forming a community that are dominated by the 1996 towers and situated on the mountain slopes, with a natural environment of gorges and alpine valleys and a backdrop of 1.3 - Geographic Information Table snow-covered mountains. The most notable feature of the Name Coordinates Property Buffer Total Inscription settlements is the abundance of towers. The village of (latitude/longitude) (ha) zone (ha) year Chazhashi in Ushguli community, situated at the confluence of (ha) lnguri and Black rivers, has preserved more than 200 Upper 42.916 / 43.011 1.06 19.16 20.22 1996 medieval tower houses, churches and castles. The land use Svaneti and settlement structure reveal the continued dwelling and Total (ha) 1.06 19.16 20.22 building traditions of local Svan people living in harmony with the surrounding natural environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Svaneti Adaptation Strategy to the Climate Change
    Upper Svaneti Adaptation Strategy to the Climate Change Tbilisi 2014 1 The present report is drafted in the process of preparation of Georgia’s Third National Communication to the UNFCCC. The preparation process involved a large group of specialists, representing: the Ministry of Environment and National Resources Protection of Georgia; the Ministry of Agriculture of Georgia; the Ministry of Energy of Georgia; the Ministry of Economy and Sustainable Development of Georgia; the Ministry of Labor, Health and Social Affairs of Georgia; the Ministry of Regional Development and Infrastructure of Georgia; the Ministry of Education and Science of Georgia; Georgian National Agency of Cultural Heritage Protection; National Environmental Agency; Institute of Geography; individual academic institutes; representatives of local government of Mestia municipality and local consultants engaged in tourism, health and agriculture, independent experts and NGOs. Published with the support of the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) Georgia "The views expressed in this publication belong to the authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the United Nations or the United Nations Development Programme“ © UNDP Georgia 2014 Copyright Published in Georgia 2 Abbreviations ADA - Austrian Development Agency CDM - Clean Development Mechanism CTCN – Climate Technology Centre and Network CVD- Cardiovascular Diseases ENVSEC -Environmental Security Initiative EU –European Union EWS – Early Warning Systems GCF - Green Climate Fund GDP –Gross Domestic
    [Show full text]
  • Pilot Integrated Regional Development Programme for Guria, Imereti, Kakheti and Racha Lechkhumi and Kvemo Svaneti 2020-2022 2019
    Pilot Integrated Regional Development Programme for Guria, Imereti, Kakheti and Racha Lechkhumi and Kvemo Svaneti 2020-2022 2019 1 Table of Contents List of maps and figures......................................................................................................................3 List of tables ......................................................................................................................................3 List of Abbreviations ..........................................................................................................................4 Chapter I. Introduction – background and justification. Geographical Coverage of the Programme .....6 1.1. General background ........................................................................................................................... 6 1.2. Selection of the regions ..................................................................................................................... 8 Chapter II. Socio-economic situation and development trends in the targeted regions .........................9 Chapter ...........................................................................................................................................24 III. Summary of territorial development needs and potentials to be addressed in targeted regions .... 24 Chapter IV. Objectives and priorities of the Programme ................................................................... 27 4.1. Programming context for setting up PIRDP’s objectives and priorities ..........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage at Risk
    H @ R 2008 –2010 ICOMOS W ICOMOS HERITAGE O RLD RLD AT RISK R EP O RT 2008RT –2010 –2010 HER ICOMOS WORLD REPORT 2008–2010 I TAGE AT AT TAGE ON MONUMENTS AND SITES IN DANGER Ris K INTERNATIONAL COUNciL ON MONUMENTS AND SiTES CONSEIL INTERNATIONAL DES MONUMENTS ET DES SiTES CONSEJO INTERNAciONAL DE MONUMENTOS Y SiTIOS мЕждународный совЕт по вопросам памятников и достопримЕчатЕльных мЕст HERITAGE AT RISK Patrimoine en Péril / Patrimonio en Peligro ICOMOS WORLD REPORT 2008–2010 ON MONUMENTS AND SITES IN DANGER ICOMOS rapport mondial 2008–2010 sur des monuments et des sites en péril ICOMOS informe mundial 2008–2010 sobre monumentos y sitios en peligro edited by Christoph Machat, Michael Petzet and John Ziesemer Published by hendrik Bäßler verlag · berlin Heritage at Risk edited by ICOMOS PRESIDENT: Gustavo Araoz SECRETARY GENERAL: Bénédicte Selfslagh TREASURER GENERAL: Philippe La Hausse de Lalouvière VICE PRESIDENTS: Kristal Buckley, Alfredo Conti, Guo Zhan Andrew Hall, Wilfried Lipp OFFICE: International Secretariat of ICOMOS 49 –51 rue de la Fédération, 75015 Paris – France Funded by the Federal Government Commissioner for Cultural Affairs and the Media upon a Decision of the German Bundestag EDITORIAL WORK: Christoph Machat, Michael Petzet, John Ziesemer The texts provided for this publication reflect the independent view of each committee and /or the different authors. Photo credits can be found in the captions, otherwise the pictures were provided by the various committees, authors or individual members of ICOMOS. Front and Back Covers: Cambodia, Temple of Preah Vihear (photo: Michael Petzet) Inside Front Cover: Pakistan, Upper Indus Valley, Buddha under the Tree of Enlightenment, Rock Art at Risk (photo: Harald Hauptmann) Inside Back Cover: Georgia, Tower house in Revaz Khojelani ( photo: Christoph Machat) © 2010 ICOMOS – published by hendrik Bäßler verlag · berlin ISBN 978-3-930388-65-3 CONTENTS Foreword by Francesco Bandarin, Assistant Director-General for Culture, UNESCO, Paris ..................................
    [Show full text]
  • Short History of Abkhazia and Abkhazian-Georgian Relations
    HISTORY AND CONTROVERSY: SHORT HISTORY OF ABKHAZIA AND ABKHAZIAN-GEORGIAN RELATIONS Svetlana Chervonnaya (Chapter 2 from the book” Conflict in the Caucasus: Georgia, Abkhazia and the Russian Shadow”, Glastonbury, 1994) Maps: Andrew Andersen, 2004-2007 Below I shall try to give a short review of the history of Abkhazia and Abkhazian-Georgian relations. No claims are made as to an in-depth study of the remote past nor as to any new discoveries. However, I feel it necessary to express my own point of view about the cardinal issues of Abkhazian history over which fierce political controversies have been raging and, as far as possible, to dispel the mythology that surrounds it. So much contradictory nonsense has been touted as truth: the twenty five centuries of Abkhazian statehood; the dual aboriginality of the Abkhazians; Abkhazia is Russia; Abkhazians are Georgians; Abkhazians came to Western Georgia in the 19th century; Abkhazians as bearers of Islamic fundamentalism; the wise Leninist national policy according to which Abkhazia should have been a union republic, and Stalin's pro-Georgian intrigues which turned the treaty-related Abkhazian republic into an autonomous one. Early Times to 1917. The Abkhazian people (self-designation Apsua) constitute one of the most ancient autochthonous inhabitants of the eastern Black Sea littoral. According to the last All-Union census, within the Abkhazian ASSR, whose total population reached 537,000, the Abkhazians (93,267 in 1989) numbered just above 17% - an obvious ethnic minority. With some difference in dialects (Abzhu - which forms the basis of the literary language, and Bzyb), and also in sub- ethnic groups (Abzhu; Gudauta, or Bzyb; Samurzaqano), ethnically, in social, cultural and psychological respects the Abkhazian people represent a historically formed stable community - a nation.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact on Ethnic Conflict in Abkhazia and South Ossetia
    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School February 2019 Soviet Nationality Policy: Impact on Ethnic Conflict in Abkhazia and South Ossetia Nevzat Torun University of South Florida, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the Other International and Area Studies Commons, and the Political Science Commons Scholar Commons Citation Torun, Nevzat, "Soviet Nationality Policy: Impact on Ethnic Conflict in Abkhazia and South Ossetia" (2019). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/7972 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Soviet Nationality Policy: Impact on Ethnic Conflict in Abkhazia and South Ossetia by Nevzat Torun A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts School of Interdisciplinary Global Studies College of Arts and Sciences University of South Florida Major Professor: Earl Conteh-Morgan, Ph.D. Kees Boterbloem, Ph.D. Bernd Reiter, Ph.D. Date of Approval February 15, 2019 Keywords: Inter-Ethnic Conflict, Soviet Nationality Policy, Self Determination, Abkhazia, South Ossetia Copyright © 2019, Nevzat Torun DEDICATION To my wife and our little baby girl. I am so lucky to have had your love and support throughout the entire graduate experience. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost, I want to thank Dr. Earl Conteh-Morgan, my advisor, for his thoughtful advice and comments. I would also like to thank my thesis committee- Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • UNICEF Georgia COVID-19 Situation Report 18 September 2020
    UNICEF Georgia COVID-19 Situation Report 18 September 2020 HIGHLIGHTS SITUATION IN NUMBERS • On 15 September, UNICEF celebrated the start of another academic year 3,119 with videos of children talking about their experiences as they return to schools, and social media posts of children sharing their views on school reopening. Confirmed cases • An agreement between the Ministry of Education, Science, Culture, and Sports (MoESCS) of Georgia, the Government of Estonia, and UNICEF was signed, which 19 Confirmed deaths focuses on training teachers, school administrators, and educators from 100 schools in distance teaching, learning concepts, and quality education practices. • UNICEF’s partner, MAC Georgia, provided information on health and safety 159 requirements for returning to preschool/school, engaging 110,000 people. Child (<18 years) cases • UNICEF, in partnership with NCDC and with the financial support of USAID, organized a training in Batumi for regional media representatives on COVID-19- 5,014 related health risks and recommendations. Quarantined • UNICEF, in partnership with the Adjara Organization of Georgian Scout Movement, launched a project to involve young scouts in shaping initiatives Abkhazia supporting the COVID-19 response and recovery for adolescents residing in the Confirmed cases - 782 mountainous villages of the Adjara region. Confirmed deaths - 7 • UNICEF launched a new partnership with NGO RHEA Union to organize UNICEF funding gap developmental activities for children and young people with intellectual US$ 1,841,399 (42%) disabilities in Akhalkalaki and Aspindza municipalities. Humanitarian Strategy UNICEF continues to work closely with the Government, WHO, and other United Nations and humanitarian partners to provide technical guidance and support.
    [Show full text]
  • Crossroads of the Caucasus: Azerbaijan, Georgia & Armenia 2021
    Crossroads of the Caucasus: Azerbaijan, Georgia & Armenia 2021 31 AUG – 21 SEP 2021 Code: 22129 Tour Leaders Davit Naskidashvili Physical Ratings With Georgian Archaeologist, Davit Naskidashvili, explore the fascinating history, art, architecture and unforgettable scenery of Azerbaijan, Georgia and Armenia. Overview Travel with Georgian archaeologist, Davit Naskidashvili, on this cultural expedition through the Caucasus. Explore the intricate history and richly varied culture of the Caucasus. Learn how this region was a crossroads of invasion and trade by Persians, Greeks, Romans, Arabs and Turks and became a vital leg of the famed Silk Route. Journey through some of the world’s most magnificent landscapes, with verdant valleys framed by the great Caucasus Mountains and supreme Ararat. Discover the fascinating, at times eccentric, ultra modern architecture of Baku, including the Flame Towers, Carpet Museum and Zaha Hadid's Heydar Aliyev Centre. Wonder at the richly decorated interior of the Khan’s Summer Palace, Sheki, with exquisite paintings inspired by late medieval Persia. Drive high into the Greater Caucasus Mountain Range to stay in a famous mountain lodge and visit Gergeti Trinity Church framed by high Caucasus peaks, and (optional) Dariali Gorge with a waterfall walk. Visit the Upper Svaneti region, a UNESCO World-heritage site, featuring exceptional mountain scenery with medieval-type villages and distinctive koshki (defensive stone towers). Appreciate the distinctiveness of Armenian religious culture; this was the first state formerly to adopt Christianity as its official religion. View the fascinating decoration of Georgia’s and Armenia’s stunningly located mountain monasteries, that fuses local, Islamic and Western motifs. Enjoy supreme quality Eastern fresco painting in Gelati Monastery (Kutaisi, Georgia) and in the Church of the Dormition (Vardzia, Georgia).
    [Show full text]
  • Abkhazia – Historical Timeline
    ABKHAZIA – HISTORICAL TIMELINE All sources used are specifically NOT Georgian so there is no bias (even though there is an abundance of Georgian sources from V century onwards) Period 2000BC – 100BC Today’s territory of Abkhazia is part of Western Georgian kingdom of Colchis, with capital Aee (Kutaisi - Kuta-Aee (Stone-Aee)). Territory populated by Georgian Chans (Laz-Mengrelians) and Svans. According to all historians of the time like Strabo (map on the left by F. Lasserre, French Strabo expert), Herodotus, and Pseudo-Skilak - Colchis of this period is populated solely by the Colkhs (Georgians). The same Georgian culture existed throughout Colchis. This is seen through archaeological findings in Abkhazia that are exactly the same as in the rest of western Georgia, with its capital in central Georgian city of Kutaisi. The fact that the centre of Colchian culture was Kutaisi is also seen in the Legend of Jason and the Argonauts (Golden Fleece). They travel through town and river of Phasis (modern day Poti / Rioni, in Mengrelia), to the city of Aee (Kutaisi – in Imereti), where the king of Colchis reigns, to obtain the Golden Fleece (method of obtaining gold by Georgian Svans where fleece is placed in a stream and gold gets caught in it). Strabo in his works Geography XI, II, 19 clearly shows that Georgian Svan tribes ruled the area of modern day Abkhazia – “… in Dioscurias (Sukhumi)…are the Soanes, who are superior in power, - indeed, one might almost say that they are foremost in courage and power. At any rate, they are masters of the peoples around them, and hold possession of the heights of the Caucasus above Dioscurias (Sukhumi).
    [Show full text]