DOCSLIB.ORG

The Philosophy Book Big Ideas Simply Explained By

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Philosophy Book Big Ideas Simply Explained By MIND IMAGINATION HAS NO DECIDES WE ONLY THINK WHEN EVERYTHING THE UNIVERSE GENDER WE ARE CONFRONTED HAS NOT ALWAYS WITH PROBLEMS TO BE IS TO BE EXISTED PERCEIVED MAN IS I THINK AN ANIMAL THEREFORE MAN WAS BORN FREE, THAT MAKES YET EVERYWHERE I AM HE IS IN CHAINS BARGAINS MAN IS THE MEASURE OF THE ALL THINGS PHILOSOPHY MAN IS A BOOK MACHINE BIG IDEAS SIMPLY EXPLAINED HAPPY IS HE WHO MAN IS AN HAS OVERCOME INVENTION OF HIS EGO RECENT DATE THE END JUSTIFIES THE MEANS THERE IS OVER HIS OWN NOTHING BODY AND MIND, OUTSIDE OF ACT AS IF WHAT LIFE WILL BE LIVED YOU DO MAKES ALL THE BETTER IF THE INDIVIDUAL THE TEXT A DIFFERENCE IT HAS NO MEANING IS SOVEREIGN THE PHILOSOPHY BOOK THE PHILOSOPHY BOOK LONDON, NEW YORK, MELBOURNE, MUNICH, AND DELHI DK LONDON DK DELHI First American Edition 2011 Published in the United States by PROJECT ART EDITOR PROJECT ART EDITOR DK Publishing Anna Hall Neerja Rawat 375 Hudson Street SENIOR EDITOR ART EDITOR New York, New York 10014 Sam Atkinson Shriya Parameswaran 11 12 13 14 15 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 EDITORS ASSISTANT ART EDITORS Cecile Landau, Andrew Szudek, Showmik Chakraborty, Devan Das, 001–176426–Feb/2011 Sarah Tomley Niyati Gosain, Neha Sharma Copyright © 2011 EDITORIAL ASSISTANT MANAGING ART EDITOR Dorling Kindersley Limited Manisha Majithia Arunesh Talapatra US EDITORS All rights reserved Liza Kaplan, Rebecca Warren PRODUCTION MANAGER Without limiting the rights under MANAGING ART EDITOR Pankaj Sharma copyright reserved above, no part Karen Self DTP MANAGER/CTS of this publication may be reproduced, MANAGING EDITOR Balwant Singh stored in or introduced into a retrieval Camilla Hallinan system, or transmitted, in any form, or DTP DESIGNERS by any means (electronic, mechanical, ART DIRECTOR Bimlesh Tiwary, Mohammad Usman Philip Ormerod photocopying, recording, or otherwise), DTP OPERATOR without the prior written permission of ASSOCIATE PUBLISHER Neeraj Bhatia both the copyright owner and the Liz Wheeler above publisher of this book. PUBLISHER Jonathan Metcalf styling by Published in Great Britain by Dorling STUDIO8 DESIGN Kindersley Limited. ILLUSTRATIONS A catalog record for this book is James Graham available from the Library of Congress. PICTURE RESEARCH DK books are available at special Ria Jones, Myriam Megharbi discounts when purchased in bulk ISBN 978-0-7566-6861-7 for sales promotions, premiums, fund-raising, or educational use. Printed and bound in Singapore PRODUCTION EDITOR For details, contact: DK Publishing by Star Standard Luca Frassinetti Special Markets, 375 Hudson Street, PRODUCTION CONTROLLER New York, New York 10014 or Discover more at Sophie Argyris [email protected]. www.dk.com CONTRIBUTORS WILL BUCKINGHAM JOHN MARENBON A philosopher, novelist, and lecturer, Will Buckingham A Fellow of Trinity College, Cambridge, UK, is particularly interested in the interplay of philosophy John Marenbon studies and writes on medieval and narrative. He currently teaches at De Montfort philosophy. His books include Early Medieval University, Leicester, UK, and has written several Philosophy 480–1150: An Introduction. books, including Finding our Sea-Legs: Ethics, Experience and the Ocean of Stories. MARCUS WEEKS DOUGLAS BURNHAM A writer and musician, Marcus Weeks studied philosophy and worked as a teacher before embarking A professor of philosophy at Staffordshire University, on a career as an author. He has contributed to many UK, Douglas Burnham is the author of many books books on the arts and popular sciences. and articles on modern and European philosophy. OTHER CONTRIBUTORS CLIVE HILL The publishers would also like to thank Richard A lecturer in political theory and British history, Osborne, lecturer of philosophy and critical theory at Clive Hill has a particular interest in the role of Camberwell College of Arts, UK, for his enthusiasm the intellectual in the modern world. and assistance in planning this book, and Stephanie Chilman for her help putting the Directory together. PETER J. KING A doctor of philosophy who lectures at Pembroke College, University of Oxford, UK, Peter J. King is the author of the recent book One Hundred Philosophers: A Guide to the World’s Greatest Thinkers. CONTENTS 10 INTRODUCTION 46 The life which is unexamined is not THE MEDIEVAL worth living THE ANCIENT Socrates WORLD 250–1500 WORLD 50 Earthly knowledge is 700 BCE–250 CE but shadow Plato 72 God is not the parent 56 Truth resides in the world of evils 22 Everything is made around us Aristotle St. Augustine of Hippo of water Thales of Miletus 64 Death is nothing to us 74 God foresees our free Epicurus thoughts and actions 24 The Dao that can be told Boethius is not the eternal Dao 66 He has the most who is Laozi most content with the least 76 The soul is distinct Diogenes of Sinope from the body Avicenna 26 Number is the ruler of forms and ideas 67 The goal of life is living 80 Just by thinking about God Pythagoras in agreement with nature we can know he exists Zeno of Citium St. Anselm 30 Happy is he who has overcome his ego 82 Philosophy and religion Siddhartha Gautama are not incompatible Averroes 34 Hold faithfulness and sincerity as first principles 84 God has no attributes Confucius Moses Maimonides 40 Everything is flux 86 Don’t grieve. Anything Heraclitus you lose comes round in another form 41 All is one Parmenides Jalal ad-Din Muhammad Rumi 42 Man is the measure of 88 The universe has not all things Protagoras always existed Thomas Aquinas 44 When one throws to me a peach, I return to him 96 God is the not-other a plum Mozi Nikolaus von Kues 45 Nothing exists except 97 To know nothing is atoms and empty space the happiest life Democritus and Leucippus Desiderius Erasmus RENAISSANCE THE AGE OF AND THE AGE REVOLUTION OF REASON 1750–1900 1500–1750 146 Doubt is not a pleasant condition, but certainty 102 The end justifies the means is absurd Voltaire Niccolò Machiavelli 148 Custom is the great guide 108 Fame and tranquillity of human life David Hume can never be bedfellows Michel de Montaigne 154 Man was born free yet everywhere he is in chains 186 Every man takes the limits 110 Knowledge is power Jean-Jacques Rousseau of his own field of vision Francis Bacon for the limits of the world 160 Man is an animal that Arthur Schopenhauer 112 Man is a machine makes bargains Thomas Hobbes Adam Smith 189 Theology is anthropology Ludwig Andreas Feuerbach 116 I think therefore I am 164 There are two worlds: René Descartes our bodies and the 190 Over his own body and external world mind, the individual 124 Imagination decides Immanuel Kant is sovereign everything Blaise Pascal John Stuart Mill 172 Society is indeed a contract 126 God is the cause of all Edmund Burke 194 Anxiety is the dizziness things, which are in him of freedom Benedictus Spinoza 174 The greatest happiness Søren Kierkegaard for the greatest number 130 No man’s knowledge Jeremy Bentham 196 The history of all hitherto here can go beyond his existing society is the experience John Locke 175 Mind has no gender history of class struggles Mary Wollstonecraft Karl Marx 134 There are two kinds of truths: truths of reasoning 176 What sort of philosophy 204 Must the citizen ever and truths of fact one chooses depends on resign his conscience Gottfried Leibniz what sort of person one is to the legislator? Johann Gottlieb Fichte Henry David Thoreau 138 To be is to be perceived George Berkeley 177 About no subject is there 205 Consider what effects less philosophizing than things have about philosophy Charles Sanders Peirce Friedrich Schlegel 206 Act as if what you do 178 Reality is a historical makes a difference process Georg Hegel William James 241 Only as an individual can THE MODERN man become a philosopher WORLD Karl Jaspers 1900–1950 242 Life is a series of collisions with the future José Ortega y Gasset 214 Man is something to be surpassed 244 To philosophize, first one Friedrich Nietzsche must confess Hajime Tanabe 222 Men with self-confidence come and see and conquer 246 The limits of my language Ahad Ha’am are the limits of my world Ludwig Wittgenstein 223 Every message is made of signs 252 We are ourselves the 268 Existence precedes Ferdinand de Saussure entities to be analyzed essence Martin Heidegger Jean-Paul Sartre 224 Experience by itself is not science Edmund Husserl 256 The individual’s only true 272 The banality of evil moral choice is through Hannah Arendt 226 Intuition goes in the very self-sacrifice for the direction of life community 273 Reason lives in language Henri Bergson Tetsuro Watsuji Emmanuel Levinas 228 We only think when we are 257 Logic is the last scientific 274 In order to see the world confronted with problems ingredient of philosophy we must break with our John Dewey Rudolf Carnap familiar acceptance of it Maurice Merleau-Ponty 232 Those who cannot 258 The only way of knowing remember the past are a person is to love them 276 Man is defined as condemned to repeat it without hope a human being and George Santayana Walter Benjamin woman as a female Simone de Beauvoir 233 It is only suffering that 259 That which is cannot makes us persons be true Herbert Marcuse 278 Language is a social art Miguel de Unamuno Willard Van Orman Quine 260 History does not belong 234 Believe in life to us but we belong to it 280 The fundamental sense of William du Bois Hans-Georg Gadamer freedom is freedom from chains Isaiah Berlin 236 The road to happiness lies 262 In so far as a scientific in an organized diminution statement speaks about 282 Think like a mountain of work Bertrand Russell reality, it must be Arne Naess falsifiable Karl Popper 240 Love is a bridge from 284 Life will be lived all the poorer to richer knowledge 266 Intelligence is a moral better if it has no meaning Max Scheler category Theodor Adorno Albert Camus.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Metanoia As a Response to Philosophy's Death
    KRITIKE VOLUME FIVE NUMBER ONE (JUNE 2011) 62-69 Article Metanoia as a Response to Philosophy’s Death: From Injustice to Conversion Jonathan Ray Villacorta Abstract: When the fate of the Japanese people has been decided at the end of the war, the Japanese intellectuals cannot feign a naïve stance of innocence that would have mitigated pursed lips, silent pens and empty sheets of paper. And when some of them did take this recourse, or worse, tried to revise their earlier positions with regard to the Japanese’ involvement in the World War by tampering on their published works, Hajime Tanabe took the road less traveled and confronted the issue of flawed scientific philosophical position head-on; his is a genuine attempt at self-criticism that would put to question every inveterate beliefs one has held at the expense of an openness to a reality that is neither pre-given nor statically perfect. This paper, then, will be a reflection on Tanabe’s suggestion on what we should or could do if rationality has become pathological, if thinking can no longer contain the irrational, and if at the demise of philosophy, nothing remains but the haunting gossamer of injustice’s debris crying for recognition, demanding for an apology. Key words: Hajime Tanabe, metanoia, zange, metanoetics Prologue hen the fate of the Japanese people was decided at the end of the Second World War, the Japanese intellectuals could not feign a naïve Wstance of innocence that would have mitigated pursed lips, silent pens and empty sheets of paper. And when some of them did take this recourse, or worse, tried to revise their earlier positions with regard to the Japanese’ involvement in the War by tampering on their published works, Hajime Tanabe took the road less traveled and confronted the issue of flawed scientific philosophical position head-on.1 The easy path of preserving through 1 James Heisig gave a picturesque portrait of this event.
    [Show full text]
  • THE PHILOSOPHY BOOK George Santayana (1863-1952)
    Georg Hegel (1770-1831) ................................ 30 Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860) ................. 32 Ludwig Andreas Feuerbach (1804-1872) ...... 32 John Stuart Mill (1806-1873) .......................... 33 Soren Kierkegaard (1813-1855) ..................... 33 Karl Marx (1818-1883).................................... 34 Henry David Thoreau (1817-1862) ................ 35 Charles Sanders Peirce (1839-1914).............. 35 William James (1842-1910) ............................ 36 The Modern World 1900-1950 ............................. 36 Friedrich Nietzsche (1844-1900) .................... 37 Ahad Ha'am (1856-1927) ............................... 38 Ferdinand de Saussure (1857-1913) ............. 38 Edmund Husserl (1859–1938) ....................... 39 Henri Bergson (1859-1941) ............................ 39 Contents John Dewey (1859–1952) ............................... 39 Introduction....................................................... 1 THE PHILOSOPHY BOOK George Santayana (1863-1952) ..................... 40 The Ancient World 700 BCE-250 CE..................... 3 Miguel de Unamuno (1864-1936) ................... 40 Introduction Thales of Miletus (c.624-546 BCE)................... 3 William Du Bois (1868-1963) .......................... 41 Laozi (c.6th century BCE) ................................. 4 Philosophy is not just the preserve of brilliant Bertrand Russell (1872-1970) ........................ 41 Pythagoras (c.570-495 BCE) ............................ 4 but eccentric thinkers that it is popularly Max Scheler
    [Show full text]
  • Contributions to Phenomenology
    Contributions To Phenomenology In Cooperation with The Center for Advanced Research in Phenomenology Volume 101 Series Editors Nicolas de Warren, Pennsylvania State University, PA, USA Ted Toadvine, Pennsylvania State University, PA, USA Editorial Board Lilian Alweiss, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland Elizabeth Behnke, Ferndale, WA, USA Rudolfh Bernet, Husserl Archive, KU Leuven, Belgium David Carr, Emory University, GA, USA Chan-Fai Cheung, Chinese University Hong Kong, China James Dodd, New School University, NY, USA Lester Embree, Florida Atlantic University, FL, USA Alfredo Ferrarin, Università di Pisa, Italy Burt Hopkins, University of Lille, France José Huertas-Jourda, Wilfrid Laurier University, Canada Kwok-Ying Lau, Chinese University Hong Kong, China Nam-In Lee, Seoul National University, Korea Rosemary R.P. Lerner, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, Peru Dieter Lohmar, University of Cologne, Germany William R. McKenna, Miami University, OH, USA Algis Mickunas, Ohio University, OH, USA J.N. Mohanty, Temple University, PA, USA Junichi Murata, University of Tokyo, Japan Thomas Nenon, The University of Memphis, TN, USA Thomas M. Seebohm, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität, Germany Gail Soffer, Rome, Italy Anthony Steinbock, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale, IL, USA Shigeru Taguchi, Hokkaido University, Japan Dan Zahavi, University of Copenhagen, Denmark Richard M. Zaner, Vanderbilt University, TN, USA Scope The purpose of the series is to serve as a vehicle for the pursuit of phenomenological research across a broad spectrum, including cross-over developments with other fields of inquiry such as the social sciences and cognitive science. Since its establishment in 1987, Contributions to Phenomenology has published more than 80 titles on diverse themes of phenomenological philosophy.
    [Show full text]
  • HISTORY and ETERNITY in TANABE's PHILOSOPHY Makoto OZAKI
    239 HISTORY AND ETERNITY IN TANABE'S PHILOSOPHY Makoto OZAKI ABSTRACT. The paper attempts to elucidate the relationship of action, history, and eternity in terms of the so-called Logic of Species, advocated by the Kyoto School philosopher, Tanabe Hajime. Tanabe does not presuppose any eternal prototype of history prior to history, but starts from the present situation given in the actual world. History is composed of subjective action and objective being, and is directed towards the future as a moving point or contact point between time and eternity. This shows a parallel to A.N. Whitehead's conception of process constituted by subjective becoming and objective or superjective being with the irreversible direction towards the future. The irreversibility of time corresponds to Tanabe's concept of the future as the actively creating presence of eternity in the world. Time, however, does not exist by or in itself, but is rather created by actual entities in succession. The reciprocal transformation of action and being, or, subject and object, occurs in and through the mediation of eternity as the principle of absolute universality in the field of history. The movement of history and eternity in and through action is interpreted by the dialectic of the triadic Logic of Species. KEYWORDS: future, eternity, action, history, negation, dialectic, Absolute Nothingness Hajime Tanabe (1885–1962), the so-called Kyoto School philosopher of modern Japan, explores his own unique Triadic Logic of Species in the form of the Dialectic as the foundation of his whole system of thought. He creates a new synthesis of Western and Eastern philosophy on the basis of the traditional Buddhist notion of Emptiness or Absolute Nothingness, the latter of which was first used by his mentor Kitaro Nishida under whose influence Tanabe develops his ideas in a different way from Nishida„s.
    [Show full text]
  • From Tanabe's Dialectical Perspective
    406 RELIGION AND THE STATE: FROM TANABE’S DIALECTICAL PERSPECTIVE Makoto OZAKI ABSTRACT. Tanabe Hajime, the Kyoto School philosopher of modern Japan, proposes a new idea of the relationship between religion and politics in terms of the triadic logic of species that is motivated by the religious moment of repentance. Even the state existence has the inherently radical evil as in the case of the individual person, due to its duality of the species level of being. This means that the state existence is on the way of actualization of the genus-like universality, while always involving in the regression into the past substrative being which prevents it from realizing its own universality. In other words, the state existence is not absolute as such but rather a balanced being between ideality and reality, absolute and relative. This entails that politics is in need of perpetual reformation in connection with the religious act of repentance for sin and evil deeply lurked in human beings from time immemorial. Tanabe’s Logic of Species as the dialectic elucidates the negative mediation of politics and religion from the metanoetic perspective and sheds a new light on the relation of world religion and politics today. KEYWORDS: religion, the state existence, repentance, sin and evil, Absolute Nothingeness, politics, species, dialectic Contrary to Hegel, who regards the state existence as the Kingdom of God realized in history, Tanabe asserts that the state existence is inevitably involved in radical evil. For Tanabe, the state is not the realization of eternal truth in the actual world, but is, in its authentic form of the realized universality, sustained through the individual’s subjective action mediated by Absolute Nothingness.
    [Show full text]
  • The Limit of Logicism in Epistemology: a Critique of the Marburg and Freiburg Schools” ______
    Journal of World Philosophies Articles/1 Translation of Tanabe Hajime’s “The Limit of Logicism in Epistemology: A Critique of the Marburg and Freiburg Schools” _____________________________________ TAKESHI MORISATO Université libre de Bruxelles ([email protected]) This article provides the first English translation of Tanabe’s early essay, “The Limit of Logicism in Epistemology: A Critique of the Marburg and Freiburg Schools” (1914). The key notion that the young Tanabe seeks to define in relation to his detailed analyses of contemporary Neo-Kantian epistemology is the notion of “pure experience” presented in Nishida’s philosophy. The general theory of epistemology shared among the thinkers from these two prominent schools of philosophy in early 20th century Germany aimed to eliminate the empirical residues in Kant’s theory of knowledge while opposing naïve empiricism and the uncritical methodology of positive science. Their “logicistic” approach, according to Tanabe, seems to contradict Nishida’s notion of pure experience, for it cannot allow any vestige of empiricism in its systematic framework, which is specifically designed to ground scientific knowledge. Yet given that the Neo-Kantian configuration of epistemology does not create the object of knowledge, it must face sensation or representational content as its limiting instance. Thus, to ground a Neo-Kantian theory of knowledge while taking account of this limit of logicism involves explaining their understanding of the unity of subject and object in human knowing. For this,
    [Show full text]
  • REVIEW ARTICLE James W. Heisig, Philosophers of Nothingness: an Essay on the Kyoto School University of Hawaii Press, 2001
    PARRHESIA NUMBER 10 • 2010 • 87-92 REVIEW ARTICLE James W. Heisig, Philosophers of Nothingness: An Essay on the Kyoto School University of Hawaii Press, 2001 Eugene Thacker 1. DEATH IN DEEP SPACE There is a motif commonly found in science fiction, which derives from earlier narratives of nautical adven- ture and stories of castaways. The motif is that of the sole human being, unmoored, set loose, and adrift in space. One of the most popular versions of this is found in Stanley Kubrick’s 2001: A Space Odyssey, in which astronaut Frank Poole is set loose by the intelligent supercomputer HAL to drift aimlessly into the depths of deep space. In the film Kubrick portrays the scene without a soundtrack or, for that matter, any sound at all. The scene of being set adrift into space is depicted with silent horror: all we as viewers see is a lone figure speeding off into a black abyss. JAMES W. HEISIG, PHILOSOPHERS OF NOTHINGNESS During the Golden Age of science fiction in the 1920s and 1930s, pulp authors tended to depict the “adrift in space” motif as being “lost in space,” that is, as a by-product of inter-galactic adventure narratives. One was only lost in space until the next adventure, the next battle, the next conquest. However, for earlier works—most notably Camille Flammarion’s metaphysical science fiction Lumen—being adrift in space is less a by-way to yet another adventure, but a speculative opportunity in and of itself. Being adrift in space is the story itself, so much so that Edgar Allen Poe could pen entire cosmic dialogues around the theme, without character, plot, or setting.
    [Show full text]
  • La Nación Metanoética De Tanabe Hajime
    GRAU D’ESTUDIS D’ÀSIA ORIENTAL TREBALL FI DE GRAU LA NACIÓN METANOÉTICA DE TANABE HAJIME MARTA SANZ GÓMEZ TUTORA MONTSERRAT CRESPÍN PERALES BARCELONA, JUNY DE 2015 ÍNDICE 1. Introducción 2. Rasgos generales de la Lógica de la Especie 3. La filosofía del camino del arrepentimiento o zangedô 4. Análisis de “El carácter religioso de la praxis” 4.1. Indagación en la Lógica de la Especie 4.1.1. La lógica de la mediación absoluta 4.1.2. La nación y la praxis del individuo 4.1.3. La nación como mediador absoluto 4.2. Problemas de la reformulación 4.2.1. La libertad individual 4.2.2. ¿Fe Activa o Mística? 4.2.3. ¿Emanacionismo o renovacionismo? 4.2.4. La Lógica de la Crítica Absoluta y la no-filosofía 5. Conclusiones 6. Bibliografía 1. Introducción TANABE Hajime (1885 - 1962) es, junto a NISHIDA Kitarô (1870 – 1945) y NISHITANI Keiji (1900 – 1990), uno de los tres exponentes más conocidos de la llamada Escuela de Kioto. NISHIDA Kitarô1 es conocido como el primer filósofo japonés que lleva a cabo una propuesta genuina que da un paso más allá respecto a los pioneros de la filosofía moderna japonesa, difusores de autores y escuelas europeas. Así, tanto Nishida como los filósofos que forman la escuela, adaptan el lenguaje y problemática de la filosofía occidental forma profunda y crítica al contexto, estableciendo por primera vez un puente entre los pensamientos de Oriente y Occidente. De la amplia trayectoria de Tanabe es especialmente conocida la Lógica de la especie (shu no ronri), que dio forma entre 1934 y 1941 (Heisig, 2002: 145), y formuló con la intención de realizar un análisis filosófico del nacionalismo que reinaba en el Japón de ese contexto.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded on 2017-02-12T09:55:00Z
    Title The Kyoto School and Confucianism: a Confucian reading of the philosophy of history and political thought of Masaaki Kosaka Author(s) Rhydwen, Thomas Parry Publication date 2016 Original citation Rhydwen, T. P. 2016. The Kyoto School and Confucianism: a Confucian reading of the philosophy of history and political thought of Masaaki Kosaka. PhD Thesis, University College Cork. Type of publication Doctoral thesis Rights © 2016, Thomas P. Rhydwen. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ Embargo information No embargo required Item downloaded http://hdl.handle.net/10468/3066 from Downloaded on 2017-02-12T09:55:00Z The Kyoto School and Confucianism: A Confucian Reading of the Philosophy of History and Political Thought of Masaaki Kōsaka Thomas Parry Rhydwen National University of Ireland, Cork PhD May 2016 Department of Philosophy Head of Department: Vittorio Bufacchi Supervisor: Graham Parkes Table of Contents Declaration ........................................................................................................ iv Acknowledgements ............................................................................................. v Dedications ........................................................................................................ vi Introduction ........................................................................................................ 1 Part One – On the Possibility of a Confucian Kyoto School ............................ 23 Chapter 1: The Challenge of Orientalism 1a: The Influence of Edward
    [Show full text]
  • Dialogical Transformation: Exploring the Creative
    DIALOGICAL TRANSFORMATION: EXPLORING THE CREATIVE POSSIBILITIES OF INTERRELIGIOUS DIALOGUE AS A PRACTICE PROMOTING SOTERIOLOGICAL GROWTH A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Department of Religious Studies University of the West In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy by Jesse F. Tanner Spring 2012 APPROVAL PAGE FOR GRADUATE Approved and recommended for acceptance as a dissertation in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Religious Studies. Jesse F. Tanner Date “Dialogical Transformation: Exploring the Creative Possibilities of Interreligious Dialogue as a Practice Promoting Soteriological Growth” APPROVED: Signature (J. Bruce Long, Committee Chair) Date Signature (William Howe, Committee Member) Date Signature (Joshua Capitanio, Committee Date Member) © 2012 Jesse F. Tanner ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to recognize all of those individuals who have been sources of support and inspiration for me during the course of this project. I extend my utmost appreciation to my advisor, Dr. J. Bruce Long, for his intellectual and scholarly mentorship, as well as my other doctoral committee members, Dr. William Howe and Dr. Joshua Capitanio, for their academic assistance. I also thank my parents, Mark and Dianna Tanner, and my entire family for their moral support. Most of all, I am grateful for my wife, Khoa Ngo, who has been a steadfast companion continually inspiring me through her encouragement, insight, and strength. iii ABSTRACT In the midst of growing religious plurality and diversity, interreligious dialogue has been an increasingly prominent response to this situation. The present project analyzes the history and significance of interreligious encounter, particularly in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Syllabus Number 4 Course Transcendence of the Good Name
    Syllabus Number 4 Course Transcendence of the Good Name Semester, Year First Semester, 2017 Number of Credits 2 credits Course level 5000 Course Number 027005 Instructor(s) Shigeru TAGUCHI (大学院文学研究科) (Institution) The aim of this seminar is to investigate different conceptions of the transcendence of the good in the ethical writings of Levinas, Derrida, Nishida, and Tanabe. The seminar begins with two sets of lectures from Levinas' early and late thinking: Time and the Other; God, Death, and Time. In both of these lectures, Levinas develops a conception of ethics based on the primacy of the other and the disruptive irruption of the infinite within an ontological economy of desire and egotism. Levinas' elemental insight into the traumatism of the Good (as the commandant "thou shall not kill" inscribed in the face of the other, as the infinite, as messianic hope) is further developed and explored, at times critically, in the writings of Derrida on mourning, responsibility, and forgiveness. Levinas’ text “Transcendence of Evil” and his debate with Phillipe Nemo will also be addressed. Next, these considerations of Good and Evil in Levinas and Derrida are compared with the ethical thinking of the Course modern Japanese philosophers, Kitaro Nishida and Hajime Tanabe. Nishida started his career with his book Inquiry into the Good. In this work, he claims that what is truly good is to know the true self, and hence fusing Objectives with the essence of the universe and uniting with the will of God. However, the later Nishida no longer simply speaks of such unity with the good.
    [Show full text]
  • 紀要19号A(P99-107).Pdf
    愛知工業大学研究報告 99 第四号A 昭和59 年 ORIENTAL NOTHINGNESS Kohei Kohei KOKETSU 東洋的無 瀕旗康兵 ln ln this short paper ，1 would like to explain briefty about th 巴 philosophy of Nishida ，Tanabe ， Nishitani Nishitani and Hisamatsu. World ，" "Goethe's Metaphysical Background" and 1. 1. NISHIDA'S PHILOSOPHY OF ABSOLUTE "The Unity of Opposites." The first of these analyzes the the Mind which contains all reality according to NOTHINGNESS Mahayana though t. The title ， "The lntelligible World ，'" refers to the images and concepts present Although Kitaro Nishida (1870 時 1945) is one of ]apan's ]apan's greatest Zen Buddhist philosophers ， his idiom within the Mind. According to Nishida ， the Mind is and style of thought-organization are difficult for composed of four separate levels ，each supported by West 巴rn readers to follow. the next ， in the same way ， to use his words ， as a fine kimono is lined with silk. From the outermost level to Typical Typical of Mahayana Buddhism is his empha- the innermost ，we have: the Universal of ]udgment ， sis sis on the contradictory aspect of phenomeno th 巴 Universal of Self-consciousness ， the Universal of logical logical reality ，which is finally "nothingness" or the lntelligible W orld ， and then a level called "voidness. "voidness. "ー. Everyone who is familiar with Nothingn 巴ss. One fundamental aspect of Nishida's lndian lndian and Buddhist philosophy knows the philosophy is that being supported by or having a difficulty difficulty of rendering into Western terms and "place" in the Universal of the mind is a necessary concepts concepts those Oriental views which are ascetical prerequisite for the state of "being.
    [Show full text]