DOCSLIB.ORG

紀要19号A(P99-107).Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
紀要19号A(P99-107).Pdf 愛知工業大学研究報告 99 第四号A 昭和59 年 ORIENTAL NOTHINGNESS Kohei Kohei KOKETSU 東洋的無 瀕旗康兵 ln ln this short paper ，1 would like to explain briefty about th 巴 philosophy of Nishida ，Tanabe ， Nishitani Nishitani and Hisamatsu. World ，" "Goethe's Metaphysical Background" and 1. 1. NISHIDA'S PHILOSOPHY OF ABSOLUTE "The Unity of Opposites." The first of these analyzes the the Mind which contains all reality according to NOTHINGNESS Mahayana though t. The title ， "The lntelligible World ，'" refers to the images and concepts present Although Kitaro Nishida (1870 時 1945) is one of ]apan's ]apan's greatest Zen Buddhist philosophers ， his idiom within the Mind. According to Nishida ， the Mind is and style of thought-organization are difficult for composed of four separate levels ，each supported by West 巴rn readers to follow. the next ， in the same way ， to use his words ， as a fine kimono is lined with silk. From the outermost level to Typical Typical of Mahayana Buddhism is his empha- the innermost ，we have: the Universal of ]udgment ， sis sis on the contradictory aspect of phenomeno th 巴 Universal of Self-consciousness ， the Universal of logical logical reality ，which is finally "nothingness" or the lntelligible W orld ， and then a level called "voidness. "voidness. "ー. Everyone who is familiar with Nothingn 巴ss. One fundamental aspect of Nishida's lndian lndian and Buddhist philosophy knows the philosophy is that being supported by or having a difficulty difficulty of rendering into Western terms and "place" in the Universal of the mind is a necessary concepts concepts those Oriental views which are ascetical prerequisite for the state of "being. 川 ways of approaching salvation rather than The innermost level of Nothingness ， although it philosophical philosophical concepts and therefor 巴 d巴fy ana- supports all the others ， does not itself rest on lytical lytical examination. Nishida ，though ， tried with anything ， so N othingness cannot be said to hav 巴 any the the help of Western philosophy to find a new logic "being" and ther 巴fore must be "nonbeing" or N 0- which would also incorporate such views. N 0 thingness. As such ，N othingness is the undistorted wonder ，then ， the difficulty in understanding him ， mirror of the Mind ，reftecting all finite objects.' The and his constant complaint that he was never "external world" of personality and individuality are understood understood even by his best pupils ， Orinetals included in the Universal of ]udgmen t. All d巴finable though they were ， familiar with his cultural phenomena are "predicates" of the Universal ，and background. background. ーー. the fact remains that Nishida is among these is that of self conceived of as an individual individual thinke r. What is the subject (thinker) of the the most demanding thinker ]apan ever produce 田 d. d. To understand him the reader must bring ， in these predicates ，and how does the concept of an addition addition to a competent knowledge of Western individual self come forth? we can answer these and Eastern philosophy ，a willingness to try to questions by proceeding to the second level of the see see "the beyond" which is Nishida himself. The Mind ， the Universal of Self-consciousness crux crux of the matter is ，1 think ， that Nishida wants On the second level ， consciousness of the self as to to be a universal thinke r. To put it better ，though "something thinking" rather than "something thought Nishida Nishida wants indeed to give his logic to Oriental " occurs.' If these first two levels of the Mind were all culture ， his aim is also to place it in a world that existed ，we might think there was a definite and culture ， to make it universa l. It is this bold inherent di 任erence between thinker and thoughts ， or attempt attempt much more than his poetical style or his between subject and object ， but exploring further ，we overly-repetitious overly-repetitious accumulation of dialectical discover the Universal of the lnt 巴lligible W orld ， negations ，which gives rise to the complexity of where these divisions ar 巴 erased. 6 At this level ， Nishida's Nishida's thought and the reader's difficulties. 1 subject and object are combined and indistinguishable from each othe r. However ， there is an apparent ln ln his book ， lntelligibility and the Philosophy 01 contradiction in this Universal ，because ， like Plato's Nothingness. Nothingness. there are three essays: "The lntelligible world of ideas ， there is some incongruity between 100 100 Kohei KOKETSU what is and what ought to be. At this level ， "in the goes where there is nothing degree degree in which the conscience sharpens ，one feels And just in this coming from nothingness and more guilty."7 Arriviing at the innermost level of the going into nothingness ther 巴 is the gentle sound Mind ，N othingness ， even moral contradictions cease of humanity. to to exist. At this level ，any distinction between values ， Yes ， Goethe's universalism is just the opposite like like good and evil are understood as meaningless of that of Spinoza. His philosophy of life ， based on this kind of universalism ， does not remind us Existence Existence of the moral Self means conscious- of the intellectual love of the Stoic sage ， but of ness ness of one's own imperfection ，and an infinite the love of Maria ， the Eternal-Womanly.12 striving striving towards the idea l. In the degree in which the the conscience sharpens ， one feels more guilty. In the following lines from Faust ， Nishida 自nds To solve this contradiction ，and to see the true indications of the N othingness constituting Goethe's depth depth of the Self ， means to reach religious metaphysical background : salvation. salvation. Man comes to know the real bottom of the the Self ， only by denying himself completely. In "All earth comprises this this state of mind ， there is neither good nor evil 1s symbol alone ; By transcending even the intelligible Self in the What there ne'er su 伍ces direction direction of noesis. one frees oneself even of the As fact here is known : free free wil l. There is no more Self which could sin. All past the humanly Even the idea of the good is the shadow of Wrought here in love; something that is without form 8 The Eternal-Womanly Draws us above".13 In In the end ，reality is this formless N othingness ， in which there is no di 仔erence between good and evil ，no In his essay ，"The Unity 01 Ottosites" ， Nishida conception conception of the self as an individual ，no distinction discusses the philosophy of N othingness as it applies between subject and object ， nor among all the to problems such as the apparent di 妊erence between particular particular predicates of th 巴 Universal of Judgment. past and future ，and between one and many. These The essay ， "Goethe's Meta 戸，hysical Background ，" seemingly antithetical concepts are formed in the was written to show that Goethe had an intuitive unity of real experience. The past consists of events understanding understanding of N othingness. already fixed and unchangeable ， while in the future ， To depict eternity ，Greek artists used perfection of an infinite number of potential new forms can be form ， but Oriental art is "formless 吋 with eternity a conceived to exis t. In an abstract sense ， history part part of the background ，which "embraces all things progresses from past to future ， but in actual reality ， from behind."10 It has also been said that Goethe's there is only the present. One can exist neither in the poetry poetry is formless ， communicating a feeling of past nor in the future ， yet information on the individuality individuality against a background of N othingness concretely determined past and expectations of the Nishida Nishida says: nebulous future are opposites which are conjoin 巴d only only in the unity of the moment of experience. .. Goethe's pantheism encloses individuality This present is a point without duration. Even an everywhere. everywhere. Nature ， in Goethe's sense ， does not infinitely short movement in any direction will take deny individuality ， but produces som 巴thing us into the past of future ， both of which are beyond individual individual everywhere. This nature is like an the realm of actual experience: we dwell only in the infinite infinite space which ， itself formless ， produces duratioriless present. The "World" proceeds from form everywhere. Like the moonlight in "An den present to presen t. The point where the indefinite Mond" ， like the sea in "Der Fischer" ，and like the future turns into unchangeable past is the moment of mist mist in "Erlkonig" ， Goethe's "nature" is essential- "forming" and is called the present. Thus ， history is ly ly something that harmonizes with our heart. ll the movement from "formed" to "forming" experienc- ed ed in the timeless present. The forming (present) Goethe's Goethe's Nature both produces and encloses indivi- includes both the fo 口ned (past) and the unformed dual dual forms at the same time in the pantheistic sense ， (future) and is therefore a unity of these opposites. and as such cannot be distinguished from Buddhist Nishida says: N othingness In In the world as unity of opposites ，moving from Goethe's Goethe's universalism does not ， like Spinoza's ， the formed towards the forming ， past and future ， reduce reduce everything to the one substance ， denying negating each other ， join in the present; the man; he sees all things in man. '.. For Goethe ， present ， as unity of opposites ， has form ， and there there is no inward and no outward ; everything is moves ， forming itself ，from present to present as as it is; it comes from where ther 巴 is nothing ，and The world moves ， as one single present ，from the ORIENT AL NOTHINGNESS 101 formed to the forming.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Special Issue on the Concepts of Contradiction and Unity of Opposites
    World Journal of Education and Humanities ISSN 2687-6760 (Print) ISSN 2687-6779 (Online) Vol. 2 No. 2, 2020 www.scholink.org/ojs/index.php/wjeh Special Issue On the Concepts of Contradiction and Unity of Opposites Prof. Zhiyong Dong1* 1 Northwest University, P. R. China * Prof. Zhiyong Dong, Northwest University, P. R. China Received: October 10 18, 2019 Accepted: October 22, 2019 Online Published: October 30, 2019 doi:10.22158/wjeh.v2n2p182 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.22158/wjeh.v2n2p182 1. Contradiction In Chinese language, the concept of contradiction first refers to the phenomena that people make the two things, which could not be the true things at the same time, as the true things at the same time, that is, to make two opposite and conflict opinions as the correct opinions at the same time. For example, there is a story in ancient China. It is said that a person is selling weapons on the street. He says that his spears could thorn through any thing at one time. Then he says that his shields can keep out any thing at another time. An onlooker asks him what would happen if he use your spear to thrown your shield. Then the person could not answer. (Note 1) This kind of phenomena are called contradiction in formal logic in Chinese language. From this example we can see that it is quite easy to make the phenomena of contradiction in the sense of formal logic, when people make the results of different processes of thinkings as the phenomena and matters to begin a new process of thinking.
    [Show full text]
  • HAVE YOU EVER WONDERED Why Life Comes in Opposites?
    2 H AVE YOU EVER WONDERED why life comesin opposites?Why everything you value is one of a pair of opposites? Why all deci- sions are between opposites? Why all desires are based on opposites? Notice that all spatial and directional dimensions are opposites: up vs. down, inside vs. outside, high vs. low, long vs. short, North vs. South, big vs. small, here vs. there, top vs. bottom, left vs. right. And notice that all things we consider serious and important are one pole of a pair of opposites: good vs. evil, life vs. death, pleasure vs. pain, God vs. Satan, freedom vs. bondage. So also, our social and esthetic values are always put in terms of op- posites: successvs. failure, beautiful vs. ugly, strong vs. weak, intelligent vs. stupid. Even our highest abstractions rest on opposites. Logic, for instance, is concerned with the true vs. the false; epistemology, with appearance vs. reality; ontology, with being vs. non-being. Our world seemsto be a massive collection of opposites. This fact is so commonplace as to hardly need mentioning, but the more one ponders it the more it is strikingly peculiar. For nature, it seems, knows nothing of this world of opposites in which people live. Nature doesn't grow true frogs and false frogs, nor moral trees and immoral trees, nor right oceans and wrong oceans. There is no trace in nature of ethical mountains and unethical mountains. Nor are there even such things as beautiful speciesand ugly species-at least not to Nature, for it is pleased to produce all kinds.
    [Show full text]
  • Metanoia As a Response to Philosophy's Death
    KRITIKE VOLUME FIVE NUMBER ONE (JUNE 2011) 62-69 Article Metanoia as a Response to Philosophy’s Death: From Injustice to Conversion Jonathan Ray Villacorta Abstract: When the fate of the Japanese people has been decided at the end of the war, the Japanese intellectuals cannot feign a naïve stance of innocence that would have mitigated pursed lips, silent pens and empty sheets of paper. And when some of them did take this recourse, or worse, tried to revise their earlier positions with regard to the Japanese’ involvement in the World War by tampering on their published works, Hajime Tanabe took the road less traveled and confronted the issue of flawed scientific philosophical position head-on; his is a genuine attempt at self-criticism that would put to question every inveterate beliefs one has held at the expense of an openness to a reality that is neither pre-given nor statically perfect. This paper, then, will be a reflection on Tanabe’s suggestion on what we should or could do if rationality has become pathological, if thinking can no longer contain the irrational, and if at the demise of philosophy, nothing remains but the haunting gossamer of injustice’s debris crying for recognition, demanding for an apology. Key words: Hajime Tanabe, metanoia, zange, metanoetics Prologue hen the fate of the Japanese people was decided at the end of the Second World War, the Japanese intellectuals could not feign a naïve Wstance of innocence that would have mitigated pursed lips, silent pens and empty sheets of paper. And when some of them did take this recourse, or worse, tried to revise their earlier positions with regard to the Japanese’ involvement in the War by tampering on their published works, Hajime Tanabe took the road less traveled and confronted the issue of flawed scientific philosophical position head-on.1 The easy path of preserving through 1 James Heisig gave a picturesque portrait of this event.
    [Show full text]
  • THE PHILOSOPHY BOOK George Santayana (1863-1952)
    Georg Hegel (1770-1831) ................................ 30 Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860) ................. 32 Ludwig Andreas Feuerbach (1804-1872) ...... 32 John Stuart Mill (1806-1873) .......................... 33 Soren Kierkegaard (1813-1855) ..................... 33 Karl Marx (1818-1883).................................... 34 Henry David Thoreau (1817-1862) ................ 35 Charles Sanders Peirce (1839-1914).............. 35 William James (1842-1910) ............................ 36 The Modern World 1900-1950 ............................. 36 Friedrich Nietzsche (1844-1900) .................... 37 Ahad Ha'am (1856-1927) ............................... 38 Ferdinand de Saussure (1857-1913) ............. 38 Edmund Husserl (1859–1938) ....................... 39 Henri Bergson (1859-1941) ............................ 39 Contents John Dewey (1859–1952) ............................... 39 Introduction....................................................... 1 THE PHILOSOPHY BOOK George Santayana (1863-1952) ..................... 40 The Ancient World 700 BCE-250 CE..................... 3 Miguel de Unamuno (1864-1936) ................... 40 Introduction Thales of Miletus (c.624-546 BCE)................... 3 William Du Bois (1868-1963) .......................... 41 Laozi (c.6th century BCE) ................................. 4 Philosophy is not just the preserve of brilliant Bertrand Russell (1872-1970) ........................ 41 Pythagoras (c.570-495 BCE) ............................ 4 but eccentric thinkers that it is popularly Max Scheler
    [Show full text]
  • Contributions to Phenomenology
    Contributions To Phenomenology In Cooperation with The Center for Advanced Research in Phenomenology Volume 101 Series Editors Nicolas de Warren, Pennsylvania State University, PA, USA Ted Toadvine, Pennsylvania State University, PA, USA Editorial Board Lilian Alweiss, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland Elizabeth Behnke, Ferndale, WA, USA Rudolfh Bernet, Husserl Archive, KU Leuven, Belgium David Carr, Emory University, GA, USA Chan-Fai Cheung, Chinese University Hong Kong, China James Dodd, New School University, NY, USA Lester Embree, Florida Atlantic University, FL, USA Alfredo Ferrarin, Università di Pisa, Italy Burt Hopkins, University of Lille, France José Huertas-Jourda, Wilfrid Laurier University, Canada Kwok-Ying Lau, Chinese University Hong Kong, China Nam-In Lee, Seoul National University, Korea Rosemary R.P. Lerner, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, Peru Dieter Lohmar, University of Cologne, Germany William R. McKenna, Miami University, OH, USA Algis Mickunas, Ohio University, OH, USA J.N. Mohanty, Temple University, PA, USA Junichi Murata, University of Tokyo, Japan Thomas Nenon, The University of Memphis, TN, USA Thomas M. Seebohm, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität, Germany Gail Soffer, Rome, Italy Anthony Steinbock, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale, IL, USA Shigeru Taguchi, Hokkaido University, Japan Dan Zahavi, University of Copenhagen, Denmark Richard M. Zaner, Vanderbilt University, TN, USA Scope The purpose of the series is to serve as a vehicle for the pursuit of phenomenological research across a broad spectrum, including cross-over developments with other fields of inquiry such as the social sciences and cognitive science. Since its establishment in 1987, Contributions to Phenomenology has published more than 80 titles on diverse themes of phenomenological philosophy.
    [Show full text]
  • HISTORY and ETERNITY in TANABE's PHILOSOPHY Makoto OZAKI
    239 HISTORY AND ETERNITY IN TANABE'S PHILOSOPHY Makoto OZAKI ABSTRACT. The paper attempts to elucidate the relationship of action, history, and eternity in terms of the so-called Logic of Species, advocated by the Kyoto School philosopher, Tanabe Hajime. Tanabe does not presuppose any eternal prototype of history prior to history, but starts from the present situation given in the actual world. History is composed of subjective action and objective being, and is directed towards the future as a moving point or contact point between time and eternity. This shows a parallel to A.N. Whitehead's conception of process constituted by subjective becoming and objective or superjective being with the irreversible direction towards the future. The irreversibility of time corresponds to Tanabe's concept of the future as the actively creating presence of eternity in the world. Time, however, does not exist by or in itself, but is rather created by actual entities in succession. The reciprocal transformation of action and being, or, subject and object, occurs in and through the mediation of eternity as the principle of absolute universality in the field of history. The movement of history and eternity in and through action is interpreted by the dialectic of the triadic Logic of Species. KEYWORDS: future, eternity, action, history, negation, dialectic, Absolute Nothingness Hajime Tanabe (1885–1962), the so-called Kyoto School philosopher of modern Japan, explores his own unique Triadic Logic of Species in the form of the Dialectic as the foundation of his whole system of thought. He creates a new synthesis of Western and Eastern philosophy on the basis of the traditional Buddhist notion of Emptiness or Absolute Nothingness, the latter of which was first used by his mentor Kitaro Nishida under whose influence Tanabe develops his ideas in a different way from Nishida„s.
    [Show full text]
  • From Tanabe's Dialectical Perspective
    406 RELIGION AND THE STATE: FROM TANABE’S DIALECTICAL PERSPECTIVE Makoto OZAKI ABSTRACT. Tanabe Hajime, the Kyoto School philosopher of modern Japan, proposes a new idea of the relationship between religion and politics in terms of the triadic logic of species that is motivated by the religious moment of repentance. Even the state existence has the inherently radical evil as in the case of the individual person, due to its duality of the species level of being. This means that the state existence is on the way of actualization of the genus-like universality, while always involving in the regression into the past substrative being which prevents it from realizing its own universality. In other words, the state existence is not absolute as such but rather a balanced being between ideality and reality, absolute and relative. This entails that politics is in need of perpetual reformation in connection with the religious act of repentance for sin and evil deeply lurked in human beings from time immemorial. Tanabe’s Logic of Species as the dialectic elucidates the negative mediation of politics and religion from the metanoetic perspective and sheds a new light on the relation of world religion and politics today. KEYWORDS: religion, the state existence, repentance, sin and evil, Absolute Nothingeness, politics, species, dialectic Contrary to Hegel, who regards the state existence as the Kingdom of God realized in history, Tanabe asserts that the state existence is inevitably involved in radical evil. For Tanabe, the state is not the realization of eternal truth in the actual world, but is, in its authentic form of the realized universality, sustained through the individual’s subjective action mediated by Absolute Nothingness.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wisdom of the Unsayable in the Chinese Tradition Karl-Heinz Pohl
    3 The Wisdom of the Unsayable in the Chinese Tradition Karl-Heinz Pohl Concerning Eastern teachings such as Daoism, Buddhism, and Confucianism, there is often widespread confusion about how these are to be classified—as religion or as philosophy. This problem, however, is culturally homemade: the distinction between religion and philosophy based on European cultural tradi- tions often does not apply when we leave our culture behind. Thus, the Eastern teachings, which are often referred to as “wisdom religions” (e.g. by Hans Küng), are either religion and philosophy or neither religion nor philosophy; whichever way you prefer ideologically. As is well known, there is a certain “family resemblance” (as Wittgenstein would put it) between Daoism and Buddhism. There is, however, very little that connects these Asian philosophies and religions with the European tradition emanating from Greco-Roman and Christian thought. This does not mean that their philosophemes would be fundamentally alien to the Europeans: at most they do not belong to the European mainstream. So the family resemblance could certainly be extended to certain European philoso- phers and schools: There is in Europe a tradition—from the pre-Socratics through the apophatic theology and mysticism of the Middle Ages to existen- tialism and philosophy of language of modernity—that has very much in common with Daoism and Buddhism. Hence, a blend of selected passages from Heraclitus (cf. Wohlfart 1998: 24–39), Neo-Pythagoreanism, Sextus Empiricus, Gnosticism, Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite, Nicholas of Cusa, Meister Eckhart, Jacob Boehme, Montaigne, Hegel (cf. Wohlfart 1998: 24–39), Heidegger, Wittgenstein, Derrida, et al.
    [Show full text]
  • The Limit of Logicism in Epistemology: a Critique of the Marburg and Freiburg Schools” ______
    Journal of World Philosophies Articles/1 Translation of Tanabe Hajime’s “The Limit of Logicism in Epistemology: A Critique of the Marburg and Freiburg Schools” _____________________________________ TAKESHI MORISATO Université libre de Bruxelles ([email protected]) This article provides the first English translation of Tanabe’s early essay, “The Limit of Logicism in Epistemology: A Critique of the Marburg and Freiburg Schools” (1914). The key notion that the young Tanabe seeks to define in relation to his detailed analyses of contemporary Neo-Kantian epistemology is the notion of “pure experience” presented in Nishida’s philosophy. The general theory of epistemology shared among the thinkers from these two prominent schools of philosophy in early 20th century Germany aimed to eliminate the empirical residues in Kant’s theory of knowledge while opposing naïve empiricism and the uncritical methodology of positive science. Their “logicistic” approach, according to Tanabe, seems to contradict Nishida’s notion of pure experience, for it cannot allow any vestige of empiricism in its systematic framework, which is specifically designed to ground scientific knowledge. Yet given that the Neo-Kantian configuration of epistemology does not create the object of knowledge, it must face sensation or representational content as its limiting instance. Thus, to ground a Neo-Kantian theory of knowledge while taking account of this limit of logicism involves explaining their understanding of the unity of subject and object in human knowing. For this,
    [Show full text]
  • REVIEW ARTICLE James W. Heisig, Philosophers of Nothingness: an Essay on the Kyoto School University of Hawaii Press, 2001
    PARRHESIA NUMBER 10 • 2010 • 87-92 REVIEW ARTICLE James W. Heisig, Philosophers of Nothingness: An Essay on the Kyoto School University of Hawaii Press, 2001 Eugene Thacker 1. DEATH IN DEEP SPACE There is a motif commonly found in science fiction, which derives from earlier narratives of nautical adven- ture and stories of castaways. The motif is that of the sole human being, unmoored, set loose, and adrift in space. One of the most popular versions of this is found in Stanley Kubrick’s 2001: A Space Odyssey, in which astronaut Frank Poole is set loose by the intelligent supercomputer HAL to drift aimlessly into the depths of deep space. In the film Kubrick portrays the scene without a soundtrack or, for that matter, any sound at all. The scene of being set adrift into space is depicted with silent horror: all we as viewers see is a lone figure speeding off into a black abyss. JAMES W. HEISIG, PHILOSOPHERS OF NOTHINGNESS During the Golden Age of science fiction in the 1920s and 1930s, pulp authors tended to depict the “adrift in space” motif as being “lost in space,” that is, as a by-product of inter-galactic adventure narratives. One was only lost in space until the next adventure, the next battle, the next conquest. However, for earlier works—most notably Camille Flammarion’s metaphysical science fiction Lumen—being adrift in space is less a by-way to yet another adventure, but a speculative opportunity in and of itself. Being adrift in space is the story itself, so much so that Edgar Allen Poe could pen entire cosmic dialogues around the theme, without character, plot, or setting.
    [Show full text]
  • The Relativity of the Unity of Opposites
    RELATIVITY OF THE UNITY OF OPPOSITES 185 essence of the doctrine and would open the door to mech­ anism, relativism, teleology, and modern neo-Hegelianism. Indeed the mechanists also, as we know, are ready to admit that" all flows, all changes." But" flows and changes" in CHAPTER V their understanding is only a quantitative process, the actual elements remaining unchanged. And the relativist not only admits that " all changes, all flows," but makes THE RELATIVITY OF THE such change absolute, including within it our own know­ UNITY OF OPPOSITES AND THE ledge. Thus every kind of stability in objective phenomena ABSOLUTENESS OF THEIR is swept away, becoming but a subjective appearance. Our knowledge is held to be limited and distorted in its very CONFLICT nature so that it does not even reflect truly the creative flow ofreality. The teleologically inclined bourgeois thinker also admits IN THE FOR E W 0 R D to the first volume of Capital Marx that" all flows, all changes." But he goes on to affirm wrote: that this flow, this change, is nothing else than the path to " In its rational form dialectic is a scandal and an the realization of ever more perfect forms, the tendency abomination to the bourgeoisie and its doctrinaire spokes­ towards which is deeply seated in life itself, that movement men because while supplying a positive understanding is determined by those ideal forms in which the imminent of th~ existin~state ofthings, it at the same time furni<;hes purposes of life reside. an understanding of the negation of that state of things, There are other eclectic points of view, as, for instance, and enables us to recognize that that state of things will the theory that history shows an alternation of stable and inevitably break up; it is an abomination to them be­ revolutionary epochs, the first characterized by definiteness, cause it regards every historically ?evdoped soci~ form stability and self-identity of the processes found in it, the as in fluid movement, as traDSlent; because It lets.
    [Show full text]
  • The Concept of Non-Duality in Śaṅkara and Cusanus
    Comparative Philosophy Volume 12, No. 1 (2021): 98-110 Open Access / ISSN 2151-6014 / www.comparativephilosophy.org https://doi.org/10.31979/2151-6014(2021).120109 THE CONCEPT OF NON-DUALITY IN ŚAṄKARA AND CUSANUS JEROME KLOTZ ABSTRACT: When comparing diverse philosophical traditions, it becomes necessary to establish a common point of departure. This paper offers a comparative analysis of Advaita Vedānta Hinduism and esoteric Christianity, as represented by the two highly celebrated figures of Śaṅkara and Nicholas Cusanus, respectively. The common point of departure on which I base this comparison is the concept of “non-duality”—a concept that is fitting for at least two reasons. First, it is general enough to encompass both traditions, pervading the work of each figure, and thus allowing for a kind of “shared language.” Second, it is specific enough to identify a set of core and well-defined principles amenable to systematic study, chief among which are the notions of (1) the “Absolute” as an infinite unity that transcends all determinations (“no-thing”) and exceeds all oppositions (“not-other”), and (2) the world as an ontologically ambiguous “reflection” that simultaneously hides and manifests its meta- ontological Principle. In drawing these connections, I hope to show how the concept of non- duality provides the possibility for a mutual understanding among diverse traditions at the philosophical level. Keywords: Advaita Vedānta, metaphysics, mysticism, Nicholas Cusanus, non-duality, Śaṅkara 1. INTRODUCTION The concept of “non-duality” is not the exclusive possession of any one philosophical system. On the contrary, it can be found—mutatis mutandis—within religio- philosophical traditions the world over: from Philosophical Daoism, Mahāyāna Buddhism, and Advaita Vedānta Hinduism in the East, to Kabbalistic Judaism, esoteric Christianity, and mystical Islam in the West.
    [Show full text]