DOCSLIB.ORG

Big and Little Histories: Sizing up Ethics in Historiography

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Big and Little Histories: Sizing up Ethics in Historiography BIG AND LITTLE HISTORIES This book introduces students to ethics in historiography through an exploration of how historians in different times and places have explained how historyought to be written and how those views relate to different understandings of ethics. No two histories are the same. The book argues that this is a good thing because the differences between histories are largely a matter of ethics. Looking to histories made across the world and from ancient times until today, readers are introduced to a wide variety of approaches to the ethics of history, including well-known ethical approaches, such as the virtue ethics of universal historians, and utilitarian approaches to collective biography writing while also discovering new and emerg- ing ideas in the ethics of history. Through these approaches, readers are encouraged to challenge their ideas about whether humans are separate from other living and non- living things and whether machines and animals can write histories. The book looks to the fundamental questions posed about the nature of history making by Indigenous history makers and asks whether the ethics at play in the global vari- ety of histories might be better appreciated in professional codes of conduct and approaches to research ethics management. Opening up the topic of ethics to show how historians might have viewed ethics differently in the past, the book requires no background in ethics or history theory and is open to all of those with an interest in how we think about good histories. Marnie Hughes- Warrington is Deputy Vice-Chancellor Research and Enterprise at the University of South Australia and Visitor at the School of History, Australian National University, Australia. She is the author of several historiography texts, including Fifty Key Thinkers on History (three editions), History Goes to the Movies (2007) and History as Wonder (2018). Anne Martin is Director of the Tjabal Indigenous Higher Education Centre at the Australian National University, Australia. She is an Aboriginal rights activist and educator who is dedicated to changing the future for our next generation of leaders. What does it mean to do history “ethically”? Marnie Hughes-Warrington’s book examines this question from a variety of different vantage points, ingeniously linking the continued effort of approaching our pasts morally to the scale and scope by which we comprehend and represent those pasts. Whether it be from the perspective of microhistory, Big history, and everything in between, Hughes-Warrington deploys an assortment of examples from antiquity to 9/11. She thereby raises important issues that have bearing not only on how we engage ethically and empathetically with the world as it was but also with the world as it is and may yet become. Daniel Woolf, Queen’s University, Canada In eminently readable prose, Marnie Hughes-Warrington and Anne Martin take us on a magisterial tour of how narrating the past sheds light on the choices that face us in the present. There's no cookie-cutter way to write the past. Every single choice entails the denial of others. Yet together, the kaleidoscopic range of historical writing offers a vital guide to the never-ending work of leading the good life. Big and Little Histories is an indispensable guide in this process. Sam Wineburg, Stanford University, USA This is an astonishingly agile and stimulating book. It scales heights and depths and zooms in and out, scoping histories from the micro level of minutes to the macro of millennia, as it explores the proposition that Aristotle’s modelling of ethics as practical, inexact and plural can help us think productively about histories as much as ethics and about the interactions between them. The book is a history and an exposition of a range of ethical theories - addressing virtue, utilitarian, deontological, cosmopolitan ethics, infinite, entanglement ethics and much more. Equally, it is an exploration of varieties of historiography, including microhistory, children’s histories, global histories, collective biographies, and indigenous histories. It is also a sustained reflection on the ethical implications of the form of history telling - exploring circular narrative structures, first and second-personal histories, universal philosophical histories, reflexive histories and much else besides. It does all this with admirable clarity and lightness of touch. The book communicates an infectious curiosity about the rich complexities of human and animal pasts - ranging over slice histories of moments, didactic thumb bibles, Big Histories of 13.8 billion years, snowball hurling, oxygen holocausts, and swarm histories written by algorithms. Its chapters enact their arguments, scale-shifting themselves and anchoring insights in particular moments and in grand narrative arcs. It is both highly readable and cries out to be read and re-read. It will be enjoyed with great profit by students of history and students of philosophy and is an argument by example for closer dialogue between the two. Arthur Chapman, Associate Professor in History Education, UCL Institute of Education, UK Big and Little Histories is stimulating reading that imaginatively integrates the theories and problems of ethics with the histories of different sizes and shapes across the globe. This is an important book, because it not only argues that ethics is foundational for the writing of history, but also explains how ethics as individual responsibility is relevant and present in this practice. Jouni-Matti Kuukkanen, University of Oulu, Finland BIG AND LITTLE HISTORIES Sizing Up Ethics in Historiography Marnie Hughes-­Warrington, with Anne Martin First published 2022 by Routledge 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN and by Routledge 605 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10158 Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business © 2022 Marnie Hughes- Warrington, with Anne Martin The right of Marnie Hughes- Warrington, with Anne Martin to be identified as authors of this work has been asserted by them in accordance with sections 77 and 78 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. The Open Access version of this book, available at www.taylorfrancis. com, has been made available under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 license. Trademark notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe. British Library Cataloguing- in- Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloging- in- Publication Data A catalog record has been requested for this book ISBN: 978- 0- 367- 02354- 6 (hbk) ISBN: 978- 0- 367- 02355- 3 (pbk) ISBN: 978- 0- 429- 39999- 2 (ebk) DOI: 10.4324/9780429399992 Typeset in Bembo by SPi Technologies India Pvt Ltd (Straive) For Bruce and Ari, loved across all scales CONTENTS Acknowledgements ix Advisory for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander readers xi 1 Good histories 1 2 Universal histories and virtue ethics 11 3 Collective biographies and utilitarian ethics 29 4 Philosophical world histories and deontological ethics 47 5 Little world histories and sentiment ethics 65 6 Global histories and cosmopolitan ethics 85 7 Microhistories and social contract ethics 102 8 Slice histories and infinite ethics 118 9 Big histories and information ethics 136 10 Non- human histories and entanglement ethics 154 viii Contents 11 Indigenous histories and place ethics with Anne Martin 174 12 One angel? Scaling the ethics of history 184 Bibliography 188 Index 205 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS From Marnie Hughes- Warrington: You can walk past a door multiple times and not notice it. When you do see it, you wonder where it will lead you. I want to thank everyone who encouraged me to ask why no two histories are the same size and to seek the answer by knocking on doors around the world. Those doors were generously opened by many scholars, and I am profoundly grateful for their intellectual hospitality. Frank Bongiorno played a key role in encouraging me to step from wonder to eth- ics in historiography. His support and conviviality, along with that of Chris Wallace, Ann McGrath and other colleagues in the Australian National University School of History, continue to inspire. Peter Harrison, Charlotte Rose- Millar, Ethan Kleinberg, Mark Donnelly, Jouni- Matti Kuukkanen, Arthur Chapman, Anna Clark, Tamson Pietsch, Kristyn Harman, Paul Kiem and colleagues generously hosted seminars and discussions on the ideas in this book—some when my ideas were very nascent—at the Institute for Advanced Studies in the Humanities at the University of Queensland, Wesleyan College, St Mary’s University Twickenham, the Centre for Philosophical Studies at Oulu University, University College London, the Australian Centre for Public History at the University of Technology Sydney, the University of Tasmania and the History Teacher’s Association of New South Wales. I am also grateful for those who read and commented on sections of the book, including Tyson Retz at Stavanger University, Norway. Merry Wiesner- Hanks and David Christian were thought-provoking interlocutors at the World History Association Conference in San Juan, Puerto Rico, in 2019. The 2019 humani- ties forum at Rhodes House in Oxford provided a great opportunity to test some of the questions in the conclusion. I am also grateful to the Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, at which the proposal for this book took shape,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Historical Concepts, Social Ontology, Macrohistory*
    Historical Concepts, Social Ontology, Macrohistory* Daniel Little University of Michigan-Dearborn There is a body of work in history and historical sociology in which it is possible to identify the strands of a new paradigm of historical inquiry—what might be called “meso-history.” This work provides examples of strong, innovative macro-explanations that give more compelling and nuanced expression to this approach to historiography than past macro-history. I characterize this paradigm as “conjunctural contingent meso- history” (CCM), and I argue that this approach allows for a middle way between grand theory and excessively particularistic narrative. The paradigm recognizes historical contingency—at any given juncture there are multiple outcomes which might have occurred. It recognizes the role of agency—leaders, inventors, engineers, activists, and philosophers are able to influence the course of development in particular historical contexts. It recognizes the multiplicity of causes that are at work in almost all historical settings—thereby avoiding the mono-causal assumptions of much previous macro- history. And it recognizes, finally, that there are discernible structures, processes, and constraints that recur in various historical settings and that play a causal role in the direction and pace of change. It is therefore an important part of the historian’s task to identify these structures and trace out the ways in which they constrain and motivate individuals in particular settings, leading to outcomes that can be explained as contingent * Earlier versions of this paper were presented at the Social Science History Association (October 2000) and at the University of Michigan-Dearborn, and the author expresses his gratitude for comments and suggestions extended on those occasions.
    [Show full text]
  • Information Ethics in the Context of Information Literacy
    Proinflow: časopis pro informační vědy 2/2016 Information ethics in the context of information Literacy Františka Tomoriová Comenius University on Bratislava, Department of Library and Information Science Abstract The concept of information ethics is quite extensive. It is necessary to deal with it also with regard to information literacy, as prove recent and traditional concepts and definitions of information literacy with incorporated ethical espects. Information ethics and information literacy are closely connected, as illustrates the RPT (R-Resource, P-Product, T-Target) model of information ethics created by Luciano Floridi1, Christine Bruce's model of Seven Faces of information literacy, which deals with ethical aspects in connection with wise use of information2 and Nancy Tuana's concept of moral literacy3. Critical thinking is perceived as necessary in the context of both information literacy and information ethics. As Richard Paul4 stresses, information ethics without critical thinking can lead to indoctrination. On the basis of these approaches were created visualizations of connection between information ethics and information literacy. Keywords: information ethics, information literacy, crithical thinking 1 FLORIDI, Luciano. 2013. The Ethics of Information. United States of America: Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780199641321. 2 BRUCE, Christine. The Seven Faces of Information Literacy. Australia: Auslib Press, 1997. ISBN 978- 1875145430. 3 TUANA, Nancy. Conceptualizing Moral Literacy. Journal of Educational Administration [online]. 2007, 45(4), 364-378 [cit. 2016-06-16]. Retrieved from: http://site.ebrary.com/lib/uniba/reader.action?docID=10196373 4 PAUL, Richard. Ethics Without Indoctrination. In: The Critical Thinking Community [online]. 2013 [cit. 2016- 06-16]. Retrieved from: http://www.criticalthinking.org/pages/ethics-without-indoctrination/494 85 Františka Tomoriová Information ethics in the context..
    [Show full text]
  • Is There a Future for Italian Microhistory in the Age of Global History?
    Is There a Future for Italian Microhistory in the Age of Global History? Francesca Trivellato In the late 1970s and 80s, particularly after the appearance of Carlo Ginzburg’s The Cheese and the Worms (1976) and Giovanni Levi’s Inheriting Power (1985), Italian microhistory shook the ground of established historiographical paradigms and practices. Since then, as Anthony Grafton put it, “Microhistories have captivated readers, won places on syllabi, been translated into many languages – and enraged and delighted their [the authors’] fellow professionals” (2006, 62). Are the questions that propelled Italian microhistory still significant or have they lost impetus? How has the meaning of microhistory changed over the past thirty years? And what can this approach contribute nowadays, when ‘globalization’ and ‘global’ are the dominant keywords in the humanities and the social sciences – keywords that we hardly associate with anything micro? In what follows, I wish to put forth two arguments. I suggest that the potential of a microhistorical approach for global history remains underexploited. Since the 1980s, the encounter between Italian microhistory and global history has been confined primarily to the narrative form. A host of studies of individuals whose lives traversed multiple linguistic, political, and religious boundaries has enjoyed considerable success among scholars and the broad public alike. These are predicated on the idea that a micro- and biographical scale can best portray the entanglement of cultural traditions produced by the growing contacts and clashes between different societies that followed the sixteenth- century European geographical expansion. They also reflect a greater comfort among historians and the general reader, perhaps most pronounced in Anglophone countries, with narration rather than social scientific analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Metanoia As a Response to Philosophy's Death
    KRITIKE VOLUME FIVE NUMBER ONE (JUNE 2011) 62-69 Article Metanoia as a Response to Philosophy’s Death: From Injustice to Conversion Jonathan Ray Villacorta Abstract: When the fate of the Japanese people has been decided at the end of the war, the Japanese intellectuals cannot feign a naïve stance of innocence that would have mitigated pursed lips, silent pens and empty sheets of paper. And when some of them did take this recourse, or worse, tried to revise their earlier positions with regard to the Japanese’ involvement in the World War by tampering on their published works, Hajime Tanabe took the road less traveled and confronted the issue of flawed scientific philosophical position head-on; his is a genuine attempt at self-criticism that would put to question every inveterate beliefs one has held at the expense of an openness to a reality that is neither pre-given nor statically perfect. This paper, then, will be a reflection on Tanabe’s suggestion on what we should or could do if rationality has become pathological, if thinking can no longer contain the irrational, and if at the demise of philosophy, nothing remains but the haunting gossamer of injustice’s debris crying for recognition, demanding for an apology. Key words: Hajime Tanabe, metanoia, zange, metanoetics Prologue hen the fate of the Japanese people was decided at the end of the Second World War, the Japanese intellectuals could not feign a naïve Wstance of innocence that would have mitigated pursed lips, silent pens and empty sheets of paper. And when some of them did take this recourse, or worse, tried to revise their earlier positions with regard to the Japanese’ involvement in the War by tampering on their published works, Hajime Tanabe took the road less traveled and confronted the issue of flawed scientific philosophical position head-on.1 The easy path of preserving through 1 James Heisig gave a picturesque portrait of this event.
    [Show full text]
  • THE PHILOSOPHY BOOK George Santayana (1863-1952)
    Georg Hegel (1770-1831) ................................ 30 Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860) ................. 32 Ludwig Andreas Feuerbach (1804-1872) ...... 32 John Stuart Mill (1806-1873) .......................... 33 Soren Kierkegaard (1813-1855) ..................... 33 Karl Marx (1818-1883).................................... 34 Henry David Thoreau (1817-1862) ................ 35 Charles Sanders Peirce (1839-1914).............. 35 William James (1842-1910) ............................ 36 The Modern World 1900-1950 ............................. 36 Friedrich Nietzsche (1844-1900) .................... 37 Ahad Ha'am (1856-1927) ............................... 38 Ferdinand de Saussure (1857-1913) ............. 38 Edmund Husserl (1859–1938) ....................... 39 Henri Bergson (1859-1941) ............................ 39 Contents John Dewey (1859–1952) ............................... 39 Introduction....................................................... 1 THE PHILOSOPHY BOOK George Santayana (1863-1952) ..................... 40 The Ancient World 700 BCE-250 CE..................... 3 Miguel de Unamuno (1864-1936) ................... 40 Introduction Thales of Miletus (c.624-546 BCE)................... 3 William Du Bois (1868-1963) .......................... 41 Laozi (c.6th century BCE) ................................. 4 Philosophy is not just the preserve of brilliant Bertrand Russell (1872-1970) ........................ 41 Pythagoras (c.570-495 BCE) ............................ 4 but eccentric thinkers that it is popularly Max Scheler
    [Show full text]
  • Contributions to Phenomenology
    Contributions To Phenomenology In Cooperation with The Center for Advanced Research in Phenomenology Volume 101 Series Editors Nicolas de Warren, Pennsylvania State University, PA, USA Ted Toadvine, Pennsylvania State University, PA, USA Editorial Board Lilian Alweiss, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland Elizabeth Behnke, Ferndale, WA, USA Rudolfh Bernet, Husserl Archive, KU Leuven, Belgium David Carr, Emory University, GA, USA Chan-Fai Cheung, Chinese University Hong Kong, China James Dodd, New School University, NY, USA Lester Embree, Florida Atlantic University, FL, USA Alfredo Ferrarin, Università di Pisa, Italy Burt Hopkins, University of Lille, France José Huertas-Jourda, Wilfrid Laurier University, Canada Kwok-Ying Lau, Chinese University Hong Kong, China Nam-In Lee, Seoul National University, Korea Rosemary R.P. Lerner, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, Peru Dieter Lohmar, University of Cologne, Germany William R. McKenna, Miami University, OH, USA Algis Mickunas, Ohio University, OH, USA J.N. Mohanty, Temple University, PA, USA Junichi Murata, University of Tokyo, Japan Thomas Nenon, The University of Memphis, TN, USA Thomas M. Seebohm, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität, Germany Gail Soffer, Rome, Italy Anthony Steinbock, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale, IL, USA Shigeru Taguchi, Hokkaido University, Japan Dan Zahavi, University of Copenhagen, Denmark Richard M. Zaner, Vanderbilt University, TN, USA Scope The purpose of the series is to serve as a vehicle for the pursuit of phenomenological research across a broad spectrum, including cross-over developments with other fields of inquiry such as the social sciences and cognitive science. Since its establishment in 1987, Contributions to Phenomenology has published more than 80 titles on diverse themes of phenomenological philosophy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Epic Vantage-Point: Roman Historiographical Allusion Reconsidered
    Histos () – THE EPIC VANTAGE-POINT: ROMAN HISTORIOGRAPHICAL ALLUSION RECONSIDERED Abstract: This paper makes the case that Roman epic and Roman historiographical allusive practices are worth examining in light of each other, given the close relationship between the two genres and their common goal of offering their audiences access to the past. Ennius’ Annales will here serve as epic’s representative, despite its fragmentary state: the fact that the epic shares its subject-matter with and pre-dates most of the Roman historiographical tra- dition as we know it suggests that the poem may have had a significant role in setting the terms on which the two genres interacted at Rome; and what the first surviving generation of its readers, as principally represented by Cicero, have to say about the epic rather con- firms that suggestion (§I). Points of contact between the genres on which the paper focuses are: extended repetition of passages recognisable from previous authors (§II); allusion that is contested among the speakers of a given text (§III); citation practices (§IV); and the recur- rence of recognisable material stemming from the Annales in the historiographical tradition’s latter-day, when all sense of that material’s original context has been lost, along with its ability to generate new meaning (§V). n this paper,1 I consider how reading Ennius’ Annales can shed light on the extent to which allusion, as it operates in historiography, is differentiable I from allusion in other genres. David Levene has made the argument that historiography
    [Show full text]
  • Classical Ethics in A/IS
    The IEEE Global Initiative on Ethics of Autonomous and Intelligent Systems Classical Ethics in A/IS We applied classical ethics methodologies to considerations of algorithmic design in autonomous and intelligent systems (A/IS) where machine learning may or may not reflect ethical outcomes that mimic human decision-making. To meet this goal, we drew from classical ethics theories and the disciplines of machine ethics, information ethics, and technology ethics. As direct control over tools becomes further removed, creators of autonomous systems must ask themselves how cultural and ethical presumptions bias artificially intelligent creations. Such introspection is more necessary than ever because the precise and deliberate design of algorithms in self-sustained digital systems will result in responses based on such design. By drawing from over two thousand years’ worth of classical ethics traditions, we explore established ethics systems, including both philosophical traditions (utilitarianism, virtue ethics, and deontological ethics) and religious and culture-based ethical systems (Buddhism, Confucianism, African Ubuntu traditions, and Japanese Shinto) and their stance on human morality in the digital age.1 In doing so, we critique assumptions around concepts such as good and evil, right and wrong, virtue and vice, and we attempt to carry these inquiries into artificial systems’ decision-making processes. Through reviewing the philosophical foundations that define autonomy and ontology, we address the potential for autonomous capacity of artificially intelligent systems, posing questions of morality in amoral systems and asking whether decisions made by amoral systems can have moral consequences. Ultimately, we address notions of responsibility and accountability for the decisions made by autonomous systems and other artificially intelligent technologies.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the Raymond M. Herbenick Papers
    University of Dayton eCommons Guides to Archival and Special Collections University Libraries January 2014 Guide to the Raymond M. Herbenick papers Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.udayton.edu/finding_aid eCommons Citation "Guide to the Raymond M. Herbenick papers" (2014). Guides to Archival and Special Collections. 22. https://ecommons.udayton.edu/finding_aid/22 This Finding Aid is brought to you for free and open access by the University Libraries at eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Guides to Archival and Special Collections by an authorized administrator of eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Guide to the Raymond M. Herbenick papers, 1965-1998 UASC.025 Finding aid prepared by Rachel DeHart This finding aid was produced using the Archivists' Toolkit September 27, 2012 Describing Archives: A Content Standard University Archives and Special Collections University of Dayton 300 College Park Dayton, Ohio, 45469-1360 937-229-4256 [email protected] Guide to the Raymond M. Herbenick papers, 1965-1998 UASC.025 Table of Contents Summary Information ............................................................................................................................. 3 Biography of Raymond M. Herbenick..........................................................................................................4 Scope and Content.........................................................................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • Title Spons Agency Bureau No Pub Date Contract Note
    DOCUMENT LIZSUME ED 071' C87 82 015 524 TITLE Project Musics Reader 2,Motion in the Heavens. .INSTITUTION Harvard Univ., Cambridge,Mass. Harvard Project _Physics. SPONS AGENCY Office of Education (DREW), Washington, D.C.,Bureau of Research. BUREAU NO BK-5-1038 PUB DATE 68 CONTRACT 08C-5-10-058 NOTE 233p.; Authorized InterimVersion EDRS PRICE MF -$0.65 HC-89.87 _DESCRIPTORS Astronomy; Instructional Materials;.*Motion; *Physics; Science, Fiction;. Science Materials; _Secondary Grades; *Secondary School Science; *Space; *Supplementary Reading Materials IDENTIFIER'S Harvard Project Physics ABSTRACT As a supplement to.Projpct Physics Unit 2, specially, selected articles are presented in this reader for student browsing. _Eight excerpts are given under headings:,the starry messenger, Newton_. And the principia, an appreciation of the earth, space the unconquerable, Is there intelligent life beyond the earth3,11 the life story of a galaxy, expansion of the universe, and Dyson sphere. Seven book passages. are included under. the, headings of the black cloud, roll call, a night at the observatory, Repler's celestial music, universal gravitation, a table of stars within twenty-two light years that could have habitable planets, and three poetic _fragments about astronomy. The remaining articles includea preface to the books of the ,revolutions, Kepler, Kepler on. Mars, laws of ..motion and proposition one,, garden of Epicurus, a search for life on earth at Kilometer resolution, the. boy who redeemed his father's _name, great comet of 1965, gravity experiments, unidentified flying objects, and negative mass. Illustrations for explanationpurposes . are provided. The work of Harvard. Project Physics has been .financially supported by: the Carnegie Corporation of New York, the Ford.
    [Show full text]
  • Max Planck Institute for the History of Science Aristotle And
    MAX-PLANCK-INSTITUT FÜR WISSENSCHAFTSGESCHICHTE Max Planck Institute for the History of Science 2012 PREPRINT 422 TOPOI – Towards a Historical Epistemology of Space Pietro Daniel Omodeo, Irina Tupikova Aristotle and Ptolemy on Geocentrism: Diverging Argumentative Strategies and Epistemologies TOPOI – TOWARDS A HISTORICAL EPISTEMOLOGY OF SPACE The TOPOI project cluster of excellence brings together researchers who investigate the formation and transformation of space and knowledge in ancient civilizations and their later developments. The present preprint series presents the work of members and fellows of the research group Historical Epistemology of Space which is part of the TOPOI cluster. The group is based on a cooperation between the Humboldt University and the Max Planck Institute for the History of Science in Berlin and commenced work in September 2008. Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Aristotle 5 2.1 Aristotle’s confrontation with the cosmologies of his prede- cessors . 6 2.2 Aristotle’s presentation of his own views . 9 3 Ptolemy 15 3.1 The heavens move like a sphere . 16 3.2 The Earth, taken as a whole, is sensibly spherical . 24 3.3 The Earth is in the middle of the heavens . 24 3.4 The Earth has the ratio of a point to the heavens . 32 3.5 The Earth does not have any motion from place to place . 33 4 Conclusions and perspectives 37 Chapter 1 Introduction This paper aims at a comparison of the different argumentative strategies employed by Aristotle and Ptolemy in their approaches to geocentrism through an analysis of their discussion of the centrality of the Earth in De caelo II, 13-14 and Almagest, I, 3-7.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 16, Issue 1, June 2018
    Volume 16, Issue 1, June 2018 Contradictory Perspectives on Freedom and Restriction of Expression in the context of Padmaavat: A Case Study Ms. Ankita Uniyal, Dr. Rajesh Kumar Significance of Media in Strengthening Democracy: An Analytical Study Dr. Harsh Dobhal, Mukesh Chandra Devrari “A Study of Reach, Form and Limitations of Alternative Media Initiatives Practised Through Web Portals” Ms. Geetika Vashishata Employer Branding: A Talent Retention Strategy Using Social Media Dr. Minisha Gupta, Dr. Usha Lenka Online Information Privacy Issues and Implications: A Critical Analysis Ms. Varsha Sisodia, Prof. (Dr.) Vir Bala Aggarwal, Dr. Sushil Rai Online Journalism: A New Paradigm and Challenges Dr. Sushil Rai Pragyaan: Journal of Mass Communication Volume 16, Issue 1, June 2018 Patron Dr. Rajendra Kumar Pandey Vice Chancellor IMS Unison University, Dehradun Editor Dr. Sushil Kumar Rai HOD, School of Mass Communication IMS Unison University, Dehradun Associate Editor Mr. Deepak Uniyal Faculty, School of Mass Communication IMS Unison University, Dehradun Editorial Advisory Board Prof. Subhash Dhuliya Former Vice Chancellor Uttarakhand Open University Haldwani, Uttarakhand Prof. Devesh Kishore Professor Emeritus Journalism & Communication Research Makhanlal Chaturvedi Rashtriya Patrakarita Evam Sanchar Vishwavidyalaya Noida Campus, Noida- 201301 Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay Professor & HOD Dept. of Jouranalism & Mass Communication MGK Vidhyapith University, Varanasi Dr. Sanjeev Bhanwat Professor & HOD Centre for Mass Communication University of Rajasthan, Jaipur Copyright @ 2015 IMS Unison University, Dehradun. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, or stored in any retrieval system of any nature without prior written permission. Application for permission for other use of copyright material including permission to reproduce extracts in other published works shall be made to the publisher.
    [Show full text]