Report on a Rapid Hydrologic and Vegetation Investigation English Pdf 11.87 MB

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Report on a Rapid Hydrologic and Vegetation Investigation English Pdf 11.87 MB REPORT ON A RAPID HYDROLOGIC AND VEGETATION INVESTIGATINVESTIGATIONION At Anlung Pring Crane Reserve in Kampot province and Boeung Prek Lapov Crane Reserve in Takeo province, Cambodia Le Phat Quoi and Nguyen Huu Thien June 2006 Under suppoted by Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust Acknowledgements First and foremost, we would like to thank to Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust (WWT) for supporting the activity at two wetland sites in Cambodia: Anlung Pring and Boueng Prek Lapouve Crane Reserves. I wish to express my sincere gratitude to Mr. Andy Graham, Head of Wetlands for People of WWT for providing us opportunity to complete the hydrologic and vegetation investigation in the two wetlands. We express enormous thanks to Robert Van Zalinge - Cambodian Lower Mekong Wetlands Project Technical Advisor - with his abundantly help and we ogether went through a sweaty field work. Especially, this report would not have been possible without the enthusiastic support of him. Last but certainly not least we would like express our sincere thanks to Mr. Seng Kim Hout, National Project Manager for guidance of field works. HYDROLOGIC AND VEGETATION INVESTIGATION TABLE OF CONTENS Background .......................................................................................................................1 Overall objective ...............................................................................................................1 Methodology.....................................................................................................................2 Hydrology ......................................................................................................................2 Physical features and vegetation.....................................................................................2 ANLUNG PRING CRANE RESERVE .......................................................................................3 1. General information....................................................................................................3 1. General information....................................................................................................4 2. Findings .....................................................................................................................5 2.1. Hydrology...........................................................................................................5 2.1.1. Catchment and site features........................................................................... 5 2.1.2. Seasonality .....................................................................................................7 2.1.2.1. Seasonal Calendar.......................................................................................7 2.1.2.2. Annual water regime................................................................................... 8 2.1.3. Observed field conditions ...............................................................................9 2.1.3.1. The southern part .......................................................................................9 2.1.3.2. The northern part ..................................................................................... 10 2.1.4. Crane stay at the reserve ..............................................................................11 2.2. Physical features and plant communities - habitats...........................................12 2.2.1. Topography ..................................................................................................13 2.2.2. Geological features.......................................................................................15 2.2.3. Soil Types...................................................................................................... 17 2.2.4. Water quality................................................................................................20 2.2.5. Vegetation and habitats................................................................................21 2.2.5.1. Species......................................................................................................21 2.2.5.2. Habitats ....................................................................................................23 2.2.6. Vegetation and Sarus Crane.......................................................................... 29 3. Conclusion and Recommendation................................................................................32 3.1. Hydrological management.................................................................................32 3.2. Vegetation and habitats ....................................................................................34 PART 2: BOEUNG PREK LAPOUV ......................................................................................36 1. General information ....................................................................................................36 1. General information ....................................................................................................37 2. Findings ...................................................................................................................38 2.1. Hydrology.........................................................................................................38 2.1.1. Catchment features ......................................................................................38 2.1.2. Site features .................................................................................................40 2.1.3. Seasonality ...................................................................................................44 2.1.3.1 Seasonal calendar .......................................................................................44 2.1.3.2. Annual Hydroperiod....................................................................................45 2.1.4. Observed Field conditions............................................................................. 45 2.1.5. Crane stay at the reserve ..............................................................................47 2.1.6. Crane feeding ...............................................................................................51 2.1.7. Discussion.....................................................................................................52 2.2. Physical features and plant communities ..........................................................54 2.2.1. Physical features...........................................................................................54 2.2.1.1. Topography...............................................................................................54 2.2.1.2. Geological features ................................................................................... 56 2.2.1.3. Soil characteristics ....................................................................................57 2.2.1.4. Water quality............................................................................................60 2.2.2. Plants and habitats .......................................................................................61 2.2.2.1. Species......................................................................................................61 2.2.2.2. Plant communities ....................................................................................66 2.2.3. Vegetation communities and birds ............................................................... 77 3. Conclusion and recommendations............................................................................78 3.1. Hydrological management................................................................................78 3.1.1 Recommended Experimental plots ............................................................... 79 3.1.2 Design and construction ............................................................................... 79 3.1.3 Habitat management within the experimental plots.....................................80 3.1.4 Monitoring and evaluation of the experimental plots ...................................80 3.1.5 Overall Field Monitoring Program.................................................................82 3.2. Plant communities and habitats .......................................................................83 References ......................................................................................................................85 Annex 1. Soil Profile Description......................................................................................87 1.1. Soil profile description in Anlung Pring ...................................................................... 87 2.2. Soil profile description in Boueng Prek Lapouve ........................................................ 89 Annex 2. List of species of vegetation ..............................................................................95 2.1. Main plant species in Anlung Pring area, Kampot Province, Cambodia...................... 95 2.2. Main plant species in Boeung Prek Lapouv, Takeo Province, Cambodia................... 106 2.3. List of plant species grouped by families................................................................. 128 HYDROLOGIC AND VEGETATION INVESTIGATION LIST OF FIGURES PART 1: ANLUNG PRING CRANE RESERVE1 Figure 1. Location of Anlung Pring in Kampot province and Boeung Prek Lapouv in Takeo province, Cambodia..................................................................................1 Figure
Recommended publications
  • Minimum Dietary Diversity for Women a Guide to Measurement
    FANTA III FOOD AND NUTRITION TECHNICAL A SSISTANCE Minimum Dietary Diversity for Women A Guide to Measurement Minimum Dietary Diversity for Women A Guide to Measurement Published by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and USAID’s Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance III Project (FANTA), managed by FHI 360 Rome, 2016 Recommended citation: FAO and FHI 360. 2016. Minimum Dietary Diversity for Women: A Guide for Measurement. Rome: FAO. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), or of FANTA/FHI 360 concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO, or FHI 360 in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. Additional funding for this publication was made possible by the generous support of the American people through the support of the Office of Health, Infectious Diseases, and Nutrition, Bureau for Global Health, U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), under terms of Cooperative Agreement AID-OAA-A-12-00005 through the Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance III Project (FANTA), managed by FHI 360. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO, FHI 360, UC Davis, USAID or the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Sedges in Our Wetlands Typha Latifolia Schoeneplectus (Scirpus) Acutus • Native, Common, Sedge Family, up to 10’ Tall and S
    TULE (COMMON and CALIFORNIA) CATTAIL, COMMON/BROAD-LEAVED BULLRUSH (COMMON and SOUTHERN) Sedges in Our Wetlands Typha latifolia Schoeneplectus (Scirpus) acutus • Native, common, sedge family, up to 10’ tall and S. californicus • Wetland Obligate in fresh water up to 0.8 m • Native, common, sedge family, up to10’ tall “Sedges have edges. Rushes are round. depth • Wetland Obligate, in standing freshwater Grasses have knees that bend to the ground. ” • Intrudes into marshes when salinity decreases marshes, can tolerate slight salinity Description: The Cyperaceae are a family of graminoid (grass-like), monocot- • Can block channels, but lays down in high flow • Rhizomatous, dense monotypic colony yledonous flowering plants known as sedges. The family is large, with some 5,500 • Used as a bioremediator to absorb pollutants known species described in about 90 genera, the largest being the "true sedges" ge- • Terminal panicle inflorescence nus Carex with over 2,000 species. The stems of Cyperaceae are often triangular • Can be weaved into baskets, mats, seats, and • California Tule – bright green triangular stems (found in and mostly solid, whereas those of grasses are never triangular and are usually hol- binding for tule canoes ECWRF ponds) low except at the nodes. Sedges differ from grasses in many features, most obvious- Ethnobotany: All parts of the cattail are edible ly in their sheaths and the arrangement of the leaves on the stem. The leaves are ar- • Common Tule – grey green round stem (found in Shollen- when gathered at the appropriate stage of growth. ranged such that they spiral around the stem in 3-ranks and have a basal portion that berger Park channel) The young shoots are cut from the rhizomes sheaths the stem.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix Color Plates of Solanales Species
    Appendix Color Plates of Solanales Species The first half of the color plates (Plates 1–8) shows a selection of phytochemically prominent solanaceous species, the second half (Plates 9–16) a selection of convol- vulaceous counterparts. The scientific name of the species in bold (for authorities see text and tables) may be followed (in brackets) by a frequently used though invalid synonym and/or a common name if existent. The next information refers to the habitus, origin/natural distribution, and – if applicable – cultivation. If more than one photograph is shown for a certain species there will be explanations for each of them. Finally, section numbers of the phytochemical Chapters 3–8 are given, where the respective species are discussed. The individually combined occurrence of sec- ondary metabolites from different structural classes characterizes every species. However, it has to be remembered that a small number of citations does not neces- sarily indicate a poorer secondary metabolism in a respective species compared with others; this may just be due to less studies being carried out. Solanaceae Plate 1a Anthocercis littorea (yellow tailflower): erect or rarely sprawling shrub (to 3 m); W- and SW-Australia; Sects. 3.1 / 3.4 Plate 1b, c Atropa belladonna (deadly nightshade): erect herbaceous perennial plant (to 1.5 m); Europe to central Asia (naturalized: N-USA; cultivated as a medicinal plant); b fruiting twig; c flowers, unripe (green) and ripe (black) berries; Sects. 3.1 / 3.3.2 / 3.4 / 3.5 / 6.5.2 / 7.5.1 / 7.7.2 / 7.7.4.3 Plate 1d Brugmansia versicolor (angel’s trumpet): shrub or small tree (to 5 m); tropical parts of Ecuador west of the Andes (cultivated as an ornamental in tropical and subtropical regions); Sect.
    [Show full text]
  • Typification and Nomenclature of the Convolvulaceae in N. L. Burman's Flora Indica, with an Introduction to the Burman Collect
    Candollea 60(2): 445-467 (2005) Typification and nomenclature of the Convolvulaceae in N. L. Burman’s Flora Indica, with an introduction to the Burman collection at Geneva GEORGES W. STAPLES & FERNAND JACQUEMOUD ABSTRACT STAPLES, G. W. & F. JACQUEMOUD (2005). Typification and nomenclature of the Convol- vulaceae in N. L. Burman’s Flora Indica, with an introduction to the Burman collection at Geneva. Candollea 60: 445-467. In English, English and French abstracts. The history and current status of the Burman Herbarium conserved at Geneva (G) are reviewed. Lectotypifications are made for seven Burman names in Convolvulaceae, Convolvulus angularis Burm. f., C. mollis Burm. f., C. nervosus Burm. f., C. uniflorus Burm. f., C. vitifolius Burm. f., Evolvulus emarginatus Burm. f., Ipomoea paniculata Burm. f., and an eighth name is neotypified, Porana volubilis Burm. f. A new lectotype for Convolvulus gemellus Burm. f. is selected. The discovery of the heretofore missing holotype of Ipomoea sagittifolia Burm. f. requires a name change for the widespread Old World species, I. sepiaria Roxb., which has recently undergone several name changes, latterly to I. marginata (Desr.) Manitz. RÉSUMÉ STAPLES, G. W. & F. JACQUEMOUD (2005). Typification et nomenclature des Convolvulaceae dans la Flora Indica de N. L. Burman, précédées d’une introduction aux collections Burman déposées à Genève. Candollea 60: 445-467. En anglais, résumés anglais et français. Les auteurs présentent l’histoire et la situation actuelle de l’herbier Burman conservé à Genève (G). Sept noms de la famille des Convolvulaceae publiés par Burman sont lectotypifiés, Convolvulus angularis Burm. f., C. mollis Burm. f., C.
    [Show full text]
  • Aniseia Martinicensis (Jacq.) Choisy
    Aniseia martinicensis (Jacq.) Choisy Identifiants : 2497/animar Association du Potager de mes/nos Rêves (https://lepotager-demesreves.fr) Fiche réalisée par Patrick Le Ménahèze Dernière modification le 05/10/2021 Classification phylogénétique : Clade : Angiospermes ; Clade : Dicotylédones vraies ; Clade : Astéridées ; Clade : Lamiidées ; Ordre : Solanales ; Famille : Convolvulaceae ; Classification/taxinomie traditionnelle : Règne : Plantae ; Sous-règne : Tracheobionta ; Division : Magnoliophyta ; Classe : Magnoliopsida ; Ordre : Solanales ; Famille : Convolvulaceae ; Genre : Aniseia ; Synonymes : Aniseia uniflora Choisy, Convolvulus martinicensis Jacq, Convolvulus uniflorus Burm.f, Ipomoea uniflora Roem. & Schult, Ipomoea uniflora Choisy, Ipomoea martinicensis G.F.W. Meyer, et d'autres ; Nom(s) anglais, local(aux) et/ou international(aux) : Ulan puteh, , Anndat trakuet, Lidah patong, Lotombo, Venthiruthali, Vor andatt trokourt ; Rapport de consommation et comestibilité/consommabilité inférée (partie(s) utilisable(s) et usage(s) alimentaire(s) correspondant(s)) : Parties comestibles : feuilles, légumes{{{0(+x) (traduction automatique) | Original : Leaves, Vegetable{{{0(+x) La plante entière est consommée en période de pénurie alimentaire. Les feuilles sont utilisées comme légume Partie testée : feuilles{{{0(+x) (traduction automatique) Original : Leaves{{{0(+x) Taux d'humidité Énergie (kj) Énergie (kcal) Protéines (g) Pro- Vitamines C (mg) Fer (mg) Zinc (mg) vitamines A (µg) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 néant, inconnus ou indéterminés. Illustration(s) (photographie(s) et/ou dessin(s)): Page 1/3 Autres infos : dont infos de "FOOD PLANTS INTERNATIONAL" : Statut : C'est un aliment de famine{{{0(+x) (traduction automatique). Original : It is a famine food{{{0(+x). Distribution : Une plante tropicale. Cela peut être dans les marécages ou les forêts ouvertes. Il pousse près du niveau de la mer. C'est surtout près de la côte{{{0(+x) (traduction automatique).
    [Show full text]
  • Evolvulus Alsinoides (Convolvulaceae): an American Herb in the Old World Daniel F
    This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and education use, including for instruction at the authors institution and sharing with colleagues. Other uses, including reproduction and distribution, or selling or licensing copies, or posting to personal, institutional or third party websites are prohibited. In most cases authors are permitted to post their version of the article (e.g. in Word or Tex form) to their personal website or institutional repository. Authors requiring further information regarding Elsevier’s archiving and manuscript policies are encouraged to visit: http://www.elsevier.com/copyright Author's personal copy Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Journal of Ethnopharmacology 117 (2008) 185–198 Review Evolvulus alsinoides (Convolvulaceae): An American herb in the Old World Daniel F. Austin Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum, 2021 North Kinney Road, Tucson, AZ 85743, USA Received 23 October 2007; received in revised form 28 January 2008; accepted 29 January 2008 Available online 12 February 2008 Abstract People in the Indian region often apply shankhapushpi and vishnukranti, two Sanskrit-based common names, to Evolvulus alsinoides. These are pre-European names that are applied to a medicinal American species transported into the area. The period of introduction is uncertain, but probably took place in the 1500s or 1600s. Examination of relationships of Evolvulus alsinoides, geographic distribution, its names in Asia, medical uses, and chemical and laboratory analysis indicates that the alien plant was adopted, given an ancient Indian name, and incorporated into some Old World pharmacopoeias. The herb apparently was included in medicines because it not only reminded people of certain aspects of their gods and goddesses, but also because the chemicals it contained were useful against some maladies.
    [Show full text]
  • Allelopathic Potential of Mustard Crop Residues on Weed Management
    J Bangladesh Agril Univ 16(3): 372–379, 2018 https://doi.org/10.3329/jbau.v16i3.39398 ISSN 1810-3030 (Print) 2408-8684 (Online) Journal of Bangladesh Agricultural University Journal home page: http://baures.bau.edu.bd/jbau, www.banglajol.info/index.php/JBAU Weed diversity of the family Poaceae in Bangladesh Agricultural University campus and their ethnobotanical uses Ashaduzzaman Sagar, Jannat-E-Tajkia and A.K.M. Golam Sarwar Laboratory of Plant Systematics, Department of Crop Botany, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh ARTICLE INFO Abstract A taxonomic study on the weeds of the family Poaceae growing throughout the Bangladesh Agricultural Article history: University campus was carried out to determine species diversity of grasses in the campus. A total of 81 Received: 03 July 2018 species under 46 genera and 2 subfamilies of the family Poaceae were collected and identified; their uses Accepted: 19 November 2018 in various ailments were also recorded. Out of the three subfamilies, no weed from the subfamily Published: 31 December 2018 Bambusoideae was found. Among the genera, Digitaria, Eragrostis, Brachiaria, Panicum, Echinochloa and Sporobolus were most dominant in context to number of species with a total of 29 species. While 28 Keywords: genera were represented by single species each in BAU campus; of these 15 genera were in Bangladesh as Grass weeds; Phenology; well. Some of them are major and obnoxious weeds in different crop fields including staples rice and Taxonomy; BAU campus; wheat. The flowering period will be helpful for the management of respective weed population. Many of Ethnobotanical uses these weed species have high economical, ethnomedicinal and other uses.
    [Show full text]
  • Int. J. Biosci. 2017
    Int. J. Biosci. 2017 International Journal of Biosciences | IJB | ISSN: 2220-6655 (Print), 2222-5234 (Online) http://www.innspub.net Vol. 11, No. 4, p. 144-149, 2017 RESEARCH PAPER OPEN ACCESS Ability of local species plant in surface flow constructed wetland to reduce biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) and chemical oxygen demand (COD) in sasirangan wastewater Nopi Stiyati Prihatini*1, Jumar2, Rima Sari Arisnawati1, Raudhyna Zata Nadhillah1, Romadhini Putri Wulandari1, Dwi Apriliani Fazriati1, Soemarno3 1Department of Environmental Engineering, Lambung Mangkurat University, Indonesia 2Department of Agrotechnology, Lambung Mangkurat University, Indonesia 3Department of Soil Sciences, University of Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia Key words: BOD, COD, Constructed wetlands (CW), Sasirangan http://dx.doi.org/10.12692/ijb/11.4.144-149 Article published on October 21, 2017 Abstract Sasirangan wastewater has characteristics of high pH as well as high level of biochemical oxygen demand(BOD)and chemical oxygen demand(COD). Sasirangan industries produce large amount of wastewater, which then is directly discarded around the environment without treatment processes. The effect afterward is the oxygen supply in the water diminishes and eventually triggers the activity of anoxic-anaerobic microorganisms that produces odors. Constructed wetlands are able to become the alternative to waste treatment technology at the economical household scale industries. This study was conducted to determine the ability of the removal of BOD and COD in the sasirangan effluent with constructed wetlands (CW) surface flow system using the batch method. Plants used in CW is Hydrilla verticillata, purun tikus (Eleocharis dulcis) and lotus (Nelumbo nucifera). CW was running for 0, 3, 6, 9 and 12 days.
    [Show full text]
  • Cyperaceae of Puerto Rico. Arturo Gonzalez-Mas Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1964 Cyperaceae of Puerto Rico. Arturo Gonzalez-mas Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Gonzalez-mas, Arturo, "Cyperaceae of Puerto Rico." (1964). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 912. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/912 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This dissertation has been 64—8802 microfilmed exactly as received GONZALEZ—MAS, Arturo, 1923- CYPERACEAE OF PUERTO RICO. Louisiana State University, Ph.D., 1964 B o ta n y University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan CYPERACEAE OF PUERTO RICO A Dissertation I' Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Botany and Plant Pathology by Arturo Gonzalez-Mas B.S., University of Puerto Rico, 1945 M.S., North Carolina State College, 1952 January, 1964 PLEASE NOTE: Not original copy. Small and unreadable print on some maps. Filmed as received. UNIVERSITY MICROFILMS, INC. ACKNOWLEDGMENT The author wishes to express his sincere gratitude to Dr. Clair A. Brown for his interest, guidance, and encouragement during the course of this investigation and for his helpful criticism in the preparation of the manuscript and illustrations.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Weeds in Ratnapura and Kurunegala Districts of Sri Lanka
    J. Natn. Sci. Cozrn. Sri Lanka 1989 17 (2) : 187-21 1 A SURVEY OF RICE - FIELD WEEDS IN RATNAPURA AND KURUNEGALA DISTRICTS OF SRI LANKA J. P. N. R. CHANDRASENA Dtyartment of Botany, University of Colombo, P. 0. Box 1490, Colombo 3, Sri Lanka. (Date of receipt : 24 Februar-y 1989) (Date of acceptance : 09 August 1989) Abstract: A survey of rice-field weeds was carried out in the Districts of Ratnapura and ~urunegaladuring the 'Yala' and 'Maha' seasons of 1986. Two hundred and thirty four fields of the Ratnapura District and 196 fields of the Kurunegala District were sampled at a time when the rice was at heading to flowering and farmers had carried out weeding or herbicide applications for weed control. One hundred and forty seven species of weeds belonging to 95 genera and 37 plant families were recor- ded from the two districts, indicating a vcry rich diversity in thc weed-flora. Of thcse, 38 species occurred in less than 10% of the fields ;65 species in 10-20% of the fields and 44 species in 20% or more fields. By far the commonest and problematic wceds were monocotylcdons of the families Poaceae (Gramineae) and Cyperaceae. Tl11.e~grass spccies Echirrochloa crirs-galli (L.)Beauv., Echinochloa cotanurn (L.) Link. and Iscbat,~nnmrrrgosum Salisb. emerged as the most abundant species in both districts, both in tcrrns of frcqucncy of occurrence and levels of infestation. kiwzbri- stylis milinccu (L.)Vahl, C~~prrus.piL)susVahl and Cyperus iria L. of the Cyperaceae were also vcry common in both LJistricts.
    [Show full text]
  • High Risk, Widely Naturalized, Agricultural Weed, Tropical Vine, Seed Contaminant
    Family: Convolvulaceae Taxon: Ipomoea triloba Synonym: Ipomoea krugii Urb. Common Name: little bell three-lobed morning-glory Questionaire : current 20090513 Assessor: Chuck Chimera Designation: H(HPWRA) Status: Assessor Approved Data Entry Person: Chuck Chimera WRA Score 15 101 Is the species highly domesticated? y=-3, n=0 n 102 Has the species become naturalized where grown? y=1, n=-1 103 Does the species have weedy races? y=1, n=-1 201 Species suited to tropical or subtropical climate(s) - If island is primarily wet habitat, then (0-low; 1-intermediate; 2- High substitute "wet tropical" for "tropical or subtropical" high) (See Appendix 2) 202 Quality of climate match data (0-low; 1-intermediate; 2- High high) (See Appendix 2) 203 Broad climate suitability (environmental versatility) y=1, n=0 n 204 Native or naturalized in regions with tropical or subtropical climates y=1, n=0 y 205 Does the species have a history of repeated introductions outside its natural range? y=-2, ?=-1, n=0 y 301 Naturalized beyond native range y = 1*multiplier (see y Appendix 2), n= question 205 302 Garden/amenity/disturbance weed n=0, y = 1*multiplier (see Appendix 2) 303 Agricultural/forestry/horticultural weed n=0, y = 2*multiplier (see y Appendix 2) 304 Environmental weed n=0, y = 2*multiplier (see Appendix 2) 305 Congeneric weed n=0, y = 1*multiplier (see y Appendix 2) 401 Produces spines, thorns or burrs y=1, n=0 n 402 Allelopathic y=1, n=0 n 403 Parasitic y=1, n=0 n 404 Unpalatable to grazing animals y=1, n=-1 405 Toxic to animals y=1, n=0 y 406 Host
    [Show full text]
  • Eleocharis Dulcis) and GIANT MOLESTA (Salvinia Molesta) EXTRACT
    Sys Rev Pharm 2020;11(12):916-924 A multifaceted review journal in the field of pharmacy PHYTOCHEMICAL COMPOUNDS AND ANTIOXIDANT ACTIVITY OF WATER CHESTNUT (Eleocharis dulcis) AND GIANT MOLESTA (Salvinia molesta) EXTRACT BAEHAKI, Ace1*; TAMPUBOLON1, Nindi Herawati, LESTARi; Shanti Dwita1 1Sriwijaya University, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Fisheries Product Technology. Indonesia. * Corresponding author e-mail: acebaehaki_thi@unsri,ac,id ABSTRACT The purpose of this research was to observe of phytochemical The results of antioxidant activity with the water chesnut and giant content and antioxidant activity of chinese water chesnut molesta extracts had very weak IC50 values in n-hexan solvents (Eleocharis dulcis) and giant molesta (Salvinia molesta) extracts valued at 1977.22 ppm and 3211.2 ppm. Water chesnut of extract with three solvents of different levels of polarity. This study used had the highest ABTS value in ethyl acetate solvents at a an experimental laboratory method and data analysis was carried concentration of 1000 ppm at 85.253% and in giant molesta out descriptively. Some of the steps carried out include the stages extract at a concentration of 1000 ppm using ethanol solvent had of sampling, sample extraction, calculation of extract extracts, the highest value of 76.665%. Ethanol extract in water chesnut quantitative phytochemical analysis (flavonoid content, phenol extract and giant molesta had the highest reducing ability power content, phenolic content, and tannin content), and test of with a mean absorbance of 0.477 and 0.520. The best solvent for antioxidant activity (DPPH, ABTS and Reducing ability. The extracting water chesnut and giant molesta were ethanol.
    [Show full text]