DOCSLIB.ORG

Teesmouth and Cleveland Coast Pspa Departmental Brief.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Teesmouth and Cleveland Coast Pspa Departmental Brief.Pdf Departmental Brief: Teesmouth and Cleveland Coast potential Special Protection Area (pSPA) and Ramsar Natural England March 2018 SPA Departmental Brief version 11.2 Page 1 of 95 07/03/18 Table of Contents Summary .......................................................................................................................... 4 1. Assessment of SPA against Selection Guidelines ................................................. 6 1.1. Stage 1 .................................................................................................................. 6 1.2. Stage 2 .................................................................................................................. 7 2. Assessment of Ramsar site interests ..................................................................... 8 2.1 Criterion 5 .............................................................................................................. 8 2.2 Criterion 6 .............................................................................................................. 8 3. Rationale and data underpinning site classification ................................................ 8 4. Site status and Boundary ..................................................................................... 10 4.1. Description of the existing SPA/Ramsar and boundary ........................................ 10 4.2. Description of the pSPA, Ramsar extension and boundaries ............................... 11 4.2.1 Seaward boundary of the pSPA ........................................................................... 11 4.2.2 Landward boundary of the marine extent of the pSPA ......................................... 20 4.2.3 Terrestrial extension of the pSPA and Ramsar .................................................... 20 5. Location and Habitats .......................................................................................... 21 5.1. Portrack Marsh .................................................................................................... 22 5.2. South end of Cowpen Marsh ............................................................................... 22 5.3. Number 4 Brinefield ............................................................................................. 22 5.4. Greenabella Marsh .............................................................................................. 22 5.5. Greatham Tank Farm .......................................................................................... 22 5.6. Hartlepool Bay and foreshore .............................................................................. 23 5.7. Seal Sands brownfield extension ......................................................................... 23 5.8. Vopak foreshore .................................................................................................. 23 5.9. Bran Sands South ............................................................................................... 23 5.10. Coatham Marsh ................................................................................................... 23 5.11. Coatham Lagoons ............................................................................................... 23 5.12. Greatham North / Saltern Wetlands ..................................................................... 23 5.13. Cowpen Bewley ................................................................................................... 23 5.14. RSPB Saltholme .................................................................................................. 24 6. Assessment of Ornithological Interest .................................................................. 25 6.1. Survey information and summary ........................................................................ 25 6.2. Annex 1 species .................................................................................................. 25 Pied avocet Recurvirostra avosetta ..................................................................... 25 Ruff Calidris pugnax ............................................................................................ 26 Common tern Sterna hirundo .............................................................................. 26 Sandwich tern Thalasseus sandvicensis ............................................................. 27 Little tern Sternula albifrons................................................................................. 27 6.3. Regularly occurring migratory species ................................................................. 27 Red knot Calidris canutus ................................................................................... 27 Common redshank Tringa totanus ...................................................................... 28 6.3.1. Waterbird assemblage ......................................................................................... 28 Eurasian wigeon Anas penelope ......................................................................... 29 Gadwall Anas strepera ........................................................................................ 29 Northern shoveler Anas clypeata ........................................................................ 30 Northern lapwing Vanellus vanellus .................................................................... 30 Sanderling Calidris alba ...................................................................................... 30 Herring gull Larus argentatus .............................................................................. 30 Black-headed gull Chroicocephalus ridibundus ................................................... 31 7. Qualifying and assemblage bird species’ use of proposed terrestrial extensions to the SPA and Ramsar................................................................................................. 31 7.1. Portrack Marsh .................................................................................................... 31 7.2. Cowpen Marsh .................................................................................................... 31 7.3. Number 4 Brinefield ............................................................................................. 31 7.4. Greenabella Marsh .............................................................................................. 32 7.5. Greatham Tank Farm .......................................................................................... 32 7.6. Hartlepool Bay and foreshore .............................................................................. 32 SPA Departmental Brief version 11.2 Page 2 of 95 07/03/18 7.7. Seal Sands brownfield extension ......................................................................... 32 7.8. Vopak foreshore .................................................................................................. 32 7.9. Bran Sands South ............................................................................................... 33 7.10. Coatham Marsh ................................................................................................... 33 7.11. Coatham Lagoons ............................................................................................... 33 7.12. Greatham North / Saltern Wetlands ..................................................................... 33 7.13. Cowpen Bewley ................................................................................................... 33 7.14 RSPB Saltholme .................................................................................................. 34 8. Comparison with other sites in Great Britain ........................................................ 38 9. Conclusion........................................................................................................... 41 10. References .......................................................................................................... 42 Annex 1: Map 1. Displaying the existing Teesmouth and Cleveland Coast SPA and proposed pSPA extension ................................................................................................... 44 Annex 1: Map 2. Displaying existing Ramsar site and proposed Ramsar extension ........ 45 Annex 1: Map 3. Displaying the existing SPA and Ramsar sites with proposed extension area 46 Annex 2: SPA Citation ..................................................................................................... 47 Annex 3: Ramsar Citation ............................................................................................... 50 Annex 4: Data Sources ................................................................................................... 52 Annex 5: Detailed information on the definition of little tern foraging areas and seaward boundary definition. ............................................................................................. 53 1. Background and overview ................................................................................... 53 2. Data collection ..................................................................................................... 53 2.1 Seaward extent of little tern distribution (boat-based survey) ............................... 53 2.2 Alongshore extent of little tern distribution (shore-based surveys) ....................... 54 3. Data analysis ....................................................................................................... 54 3.1 Site-specific options ............................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PEIR Appendix
    Preliminary Environmental Information Report Volume III - Appendices Appendix 17A: Landscape Character The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 (as amended) Prepared for: Net Zero Teesside Power Ltd. & Net Zero North Sea Storage Ltd. Appendix 17A Landscape Character Table of Contents 17A. Landscape Character .....................................................17-1 17.1 National ...................................................................................................... 17-1 17.2 Regional ..................................................................................................... 17-4 17.3 Local ........................................................................................................... 17-4 17.4 References ................................................................................................. 17-9 Tables Table 17A-1: NCA Summary Table ....................................................................... 17-1 Table 17A-2: MCA Summary Table (Marine Management Organisation, 2018) .... 17-3 Table 17A-3: Landscape Tracts summary table (Redcar & Cleveland Borough Council, 2006) ....................................................................................................... 17-5 Table 17A-4: Landscape Character Areas Summary Table (Stockton on Tees Borough Council, 2011) ......................................................................................... 17-7 Table 17A-5: Landscape Character Types Summary Table (Hartlepool Borough Council, 2000)
    [Show full text]
  • Contaminated Land Inspection Strategy 2013
    Area Management Regulatory Services Environmental Protection Contaminated Land Inspection Strategy 2013 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY On April 1st 2000, Part 2A of the Environmental Protection Act 1990 (inserted into that Act by section 57 of the Environment Act 1995) came into force. The main objective requires local authorities to take a “strategic approach” to inspecting their areas to identify land where contamination is causing unacceptable risks to human health or the wider environment. This document is the second review and sets out the manner in which Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council proposes to implement its inspection duties under Part 2A in accordance with the revised Statutory Guidance issued by the Department of Environment and Rural Affairs in April 2012 which should be read in conjunction with this Strategy. This is a comprehensive review of the Strategy to reflect the many changes in contaminated land legislation and guidance published in the last few years. Using a bespoke software package (GeoEnviron) with the Council’s GIS system, contaminated land has been identified and prioritised. The Council identified landfill sites within the borough as highest priority for inspection due to problems from landfill gas, land stability and leachate pollution, potentially posing high risks to neighbouring occupants, and therefore concentrated resources in these areas. To-date, following successful funding bids to Defra, the Council has investigated 3 former landfill sites known to have domestic waste tipped and continues to monitor and manage gas at these sites to minimise the risk to nearby residents. From the work carried out to-date, no sites have been determined as contaminated land, under the definition stated within the statutory guidance.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex a Ecology Survey Report 2020
    Dogger Bank C/Sofia Onshore Works Application Appendix 4 – Annex A Ecology Survey Report 2020 Classification: Internal Status: Draft Expiry date: N/A 1 of 28 Classification: Internal Status: Draft Expiry date: N/A 2 of 28 Doc. No. PM763-ARCUS-00001; 003655558-01 Rev. no. 01 Ecology Survey Report Valid from: July 2020 Table of Contents 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 4 2 Methods ......................................................................................................................................................... 5 3 Results ........................................................................................................................................................... 8 Classification: Internal Status: Draft Expiry date: N/A 3 of 28 Doc. No. PM763-ARCUS-00001; 003655558-01 Rev. no. 01 Ecology Survey Report Valid from: July 2020 1 Introduction 1.1 Purpose of the Report This Report provides baseline information for the Ecology Assessment which supports the Environmental Appraisal submitted to support the planning application (the Application) made by Doggerbank Offshore Wind Farm Project 3 Projco Limited (the Projco) and Sofia Offshore Wind Farm Limited (SOWFL) (the Applicants), for consent pursuant to Section 62 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 as amended. The Application includes five areas of alternative and additional infrastructure to the consented 9 kilometres (km) buried onshore grid connection, from approximately 1.5 km landward of the landfall for Dogger Bank Wind Farm C (DB-C) and Sofia Offshore Wind Farm (Sofia) to the National Grid at Lackenby Substation (the Works). 1.2 Development Context For the ease of reference, the Works, as shown in Figure 1.2 (a – c) of the Environmental Appraisal, is split into areas as below: Area 1 – A174 Crossing; Area 2 – South of Kirkleatham Memorial Park; Area 3 – Wilton East; Area 4 – Main Welfare Hub south of Wilton; and Area 5 – HVAC Cable Corridor.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Infrastructure Supplementary Planning Document Consultation Statement May 2020
    Green Infrastructure Supplementary Planning Document Consultation Statement May 2020 1 1. Introduction 1.1 The Green Infrastructure Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) has been prepared by Hartlepool Borough Council. The Draft SPD was published for public consultation over a ten week period from 7 February 2020 until 17 April 2020. The consultation period was extended to provide further time to comment in light of the Covid-19 pandemic. 1.2 This Consultation Statement addresses the requirements of Regulation 12 of the Town and Country Planning (Local Planning) (England) Regulations 2012 that requires Local Planning Authorities to prepare a statement setting out: the persons the Local Planning Authority consulted when preparing the supplementary planning document; a summary of the main issues raised by those persons; and how those issues have been addressed in the supplementary planning document. 1.3 Section 2 of this Statement outlines the consultation processes and provides details of those people and organisations that were consulted. 1.4 Section 3 gives an overview of the representations made within the consultation period. Appendix 1 provides a full schedule of the representations made and the Council’s response to each. Where a representation has informed a revision to the SPD, this is set out. 1.5 Section 4 gives a brief overview of the next steps in the process of adopting the SPD. 2. Consultation Process 2.1 A public consultation on the Draft SPD was approved at the Regeneration Services Committee meeting of 5 February 2020. 2.2 The public consultation began on the 7 February 2020 until 17 April 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Minerals and Waste Core Strategy
    Tees Valley Joint Minerals and Waste Development Plan Documents In association with Core Strategy DPD Adopted September 2011 27333-r22.indd 1 08/11/2010 14:55:36 i ii Foreword The Tees Valley Minerals and Waste Development Plan Documents (DPDs) - prepared jointly by the boroughs of Darlington, Hartlepool, Middlesbrough, Redcar and Cleveland and Stockton-on-Tees - bring together the planning issues which arise from these two subjects within the sub-region. Two DPDs have been prepared. This Minerals and Waste Core Strategy contains the long-term spatial vision and the strategic policies needed to achieve the key objectives for minerals and waste developments in the Tees Valley. The separate Policies and Sites DPD, which conforms with it, identifies specific sites for minerals and waste development and sets out policies which will be used to assess minerals and waste planning applications. The DPDs form part of the local development framework and development plan for each Borough. They cover all of the five Boroughs except for the part within Redcar and Cleveland that lies within the North York Moors National Park. (Minerals and waste policies for that area are included in the national park’s own local development framework.) The DPDs were prepared during a lengthy process of consultation. This allowed anyone with an interest in minerals and waste in the Tees Valley the opportunity to be involved. An Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State carried out an Examination into the DPDs in early 2011. He concluded that they had been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 and were sound.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Wildlife and Geological Sites January 2017
    Redcar & Cleveland Local Wildlife and Geological Sites January 2017 this is Redcar & Cleveland 1 BACKGROUND 3 2 SCHEDULE OF LOCAL WILDLIFE SITES 5 3 SCHEDULE OF LOCAL GEOLOGICAL SITES 11 APPENDIX 1: Location Maps 15 2017 y anuar J te Upda Sites Geological and e ildlif W Local Redcar & Cleveland Local Plan 1 2 Local Wildlife and Geological Sites Update January 2017 R edcar & Cle v eland Local Plan 1. BACKGROUND What are Local Sites and why do we need them? 1.1 Local Sites can be Local Wildlife Sites (LWS) or Local Geological Sites (LGS). Local Wildlife Sites are areas of land which meet specific, objective criteria for nature conservation value. These criteria, which are based on the Defra guidance(1), have been decided locally by the Tees Valley Local Sites Partnership. The sites represent a range of important habitat types and variety of species that are of conservation concern. The Tees Valley RIGS (Regionally Important Geological Sites) group advises the Local Sites Partnership on the selection and management of Local Geological Sites, areas which they have identified as being of geological importance. 1.2 Local Sites can provide local contact with nature and opportunities for education, however designation as a Local Site does not confer any right of access. 1.3 Formerly known as Sites of Nature Conservation Interest (SNCIs) and RIGS, Local Sites are non-statutory site designations that have a lower level of protection than statutory designations, such as Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs). Local Sites, excluding those within the North York Moors National Park, currently receive protection from certain types of inappropriate development through our Local Development Framework.
    [Show full text]
  • Other Reports Template
    Habitats Regulations Assessment Redcar and Cleveland Draft Local Plan On behalf of Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council Project Ref: 29032/HRA/01 | Rev: AA | Date: May 2016 Office Address: 10 Queen Square, Bristol, BS1 4NT T: +44 (0)117 928 1560 E: [email protected] HRA Screening Report Redcar and Cleveland draft Local Plan Contents 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background ................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Statutory Requirements ................................................................................................. 1 1.3 Aims of the Screening Report ....................................................................................... 2 1.4 Report Structure ............................................................................................................ 2 2 Methodology ................................................................................................................................ 4 2.1 Overview to the HRA process ....................................................................................... 4 2.2 Identifying potentially relevant Natura 2000 Sites ......................................................... 5 2.3 Screening for Likely Significant Effects ......................................................................... 5 3 Natura 2000 Sites Considered ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Draft-Freight-Implementation-Plan.Pdf
    Contents 1. Introduction 3 2. Role of Freight 4 3. Existing Conditions / Current Issues 5 4. Aspirations for Tees Valley Freight Network 21 5. Interventions 22 7. Action Plan 25 2 Draft Freight Implementation Plan 1. Introduction Tees Valley Combined Authority is the local transport authority for the Tees Valley. This is the Tees Valley Freight Implementation Plan, part of the first Strategic Transport Plan for the region, for the period up to 2029. It has been developed by the Combined Authority in collaboration with our five constituent Local Authorities, Darlington, Hartlepool, Middlesbrough, Redcar & Cleveland and Stockton-on-Tees. The Combined Authority has ambitious plans to grow the region’s economy and our Strategic Economic Plan aims to create 25,000 Our vision for new jobs and deliver an additional £2.8billion into Tees Valley by Tees Valley is: 2026. We are also developing a Local Industrial Strategy, an agreement between us and the Government on how we will To provide a high improve our economy over the next ten years and how this will quality, clean, feed into the Government’s overall UK strategy. quick, affordable, reliable and safe In order to ensure that everyone in Tees Valley is able to work, transport network study, enjoy and fully participate in these ambitious plans for the for people and future, we need a world-class transport system that also encourages inward investment. Transport is about connecting freight to move people and businesses in Tees Valley and beyond. Delivering a within, to and from world-class transport system that is fit for the future is a critical Tees Valley.
    [Show full text]
  • Teesside Archaological Society
    Recording the First World War in the Tees Valley TEESSIDE ARCHAOLOGICAL SOCIETY The following gazetteer is a list of the First World War buildings in the Tees Valley Area. Tees Archaeology has the full image archive and documentation archive. If particular sites of interest are wanted, please contact us on [email protected] 1 | P a g e Recording the First World War in the Tees Valley HER Name Location Present/Demolished Image 236 Kirkleatham Hall TS0 4QR Demolished - 260 WWI Listening Post Boulby Bank Present (Sound Mirror) NZ 75363 19113 270 Marske Hall Redcar Road, Present Marske by the Sea, TS11 6AA 2 | P a g e Recording the First World War in the Tees Valley 392 Seaplane Slipway Previously: Present Seaplane Slipway, Seaton Snook Currently: on foreshore at Hartlepool Nuclear Power Plant, Tees Road, Hartlepool TS25 2BZ NZ 53283 26736 467 Royal Flying Corps, Green Lane, Demolished - Marske Marske by the Sea (Airfield) Redcar 3 | P a g e Recording the First World War in the Tees Valley 681 Hart on the Hill Hart on the Hill, Present (Earthworks) Dalton Piercy, parish of Hart, Co. Durham TS27 3HY (approx. half a mile north of Dalton Piercy village, on the minor road from Dalton Piercy to Hart Google Maps (2017) Google Maps [online] Available at: https://www.google.co.uk/maps/place/Hart-on-the- Hill/@54.6797131,- 1.2769667,386m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m5!3m4!1s0x487ef3527f0a44 21:0xe4080d467b98430d!8m2!3d54.67971!4d-1.274778 4 | P a g e Recording the First World War in the Tees Valley 698 Heugh Gun Battery Heugh Battery, Present Hartlepool
    [Show full text]
  • Tees Valley Joint Minerals and Waste Development Plan Documents
    Draft Only i APPENDIX 2(i) Tees Valley Joint Minerals and Waste Development Plan Documents Core Strategy Publication Document August 2009 Draft Only ii Draft Only iii Foreword The preparation of Joint Minerals and Waste Development Plan Documents (DPDs) for Darlington, Hartlepool, Middlesbrough, Redcar and Cleveland and Stockton-on-Tees Boroughs presents an important opportunity to understand and deal with the cross boundary issues which arise from these two subjects in the Tees Valley. Two DPDs are being prepared. This Core Strategy contains the long-term spatial vision and the strategic policies needed to achieve the key objectives for minerals and waste developments in the Tees Valley. The Policies and Sites document will, in conformity with this Core Strategy, identify specific sites for future minerals and waste development and provide a limited range of policies which will be used to assess minerals and waste planning applications. The DPDs will form part of the Local Development Framework for each Borough, which together with the Regional Spatial Strategy for North East England will form the Development Plan for the area. The DPDs cover all of the land within the five Boroughs except for the part within Redcar & Cleveland Borough that also falls within the North York Moors National Park. The Publication Document represents the third stage of the preparation process. The first stage, in May 2007, was the production of an Issues and Options Report, where the issues affecting minerals and waste development in the Tees Valley were identified and consultees and the general public were asked to identify which of the options presented were the most appropriate for dealing with the issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Notice of Variation and Consolidation with Introductory Note the Environmental Permitting (England & Wales) Regulations 2016
    Notice of variation and consolidation with introductory note The Environmental Permitting (England & Wales) Regulations 2016 RWE Generation UK PLC Seal Sands Power Station North South Access Road Seal Sands Middlesbrough TS2 1FB Variation application number EPR/CP3939QN/V002 Permit number EPR/CP3939QN Seal Sands Power Station Variation and consolidation number EPR/CP3939QN/V002 1 Seal Sands Power Station Permit number EPR/CP3939QN Introductory note This introductory note does not form a part of the notice. Under the Environmental Permitting (England & Wales) Regulations (EPR) 2016 (schedule 5, part 1, paragraph 19) a variation may comprise a consolidated permit reflecting the variations and a notice specifying the variations included in that consolidated permit. Purpose of this variation (EPR/CP3939QN/V002): This variation is required to assess the permit for compliance with the revised Best Available Techniques (BAT) Conclusions for the LCP sector published on 17 August 2017 including the incorporation of relevant BAT Associated Emission Levels (AELs) into the permit. Review permit conditions Article 21(3) of the IED requires the Environment Agency to review conditions in permits that it has issued and to ensure that the permit delivers compliance with relevant standards, within four years of the publication of updated decisions on BAT Conclusions. We have reviewed the permit for this installation against the revised BAT Conclusions for the LCP sector published on 17 August 2017. Only activities covered by this BAT Reference Document
    [Show full text]
  • Normal Template
    Document Ref: 8.61 PINS Ref: EN010082 Tees CCPP Project The Tees Combined Cycle Power Plant Project Land at the Wilton International Site, Teesside Stack Diameter Sensitivity Study Applicant: Sembcorp Utilities UK Date: September 2018 Version: 1 CONTENTS 1.1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.2 BACKGROUND 1 1.3 MODELLING APPROACH 2 1.4 RESULTS 2 1 STACK DIAMETER SENSITIVITY STUDY 1.1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Within the Development Consent Order (‘DCO’) there is a desire to maintain flexibility in the final power plant design, as this has not yet been confirmed. One item which requires this flexibility is the final internal stack diameter. Flexibility is required as the diameter may change from the current 8.0 metres (‘m’), depending upon the final specification of the plant and turbines that would be used. During the examination process, the question has been raised as to what difference would arise in environmental impacts if the stack diameter is varied. Small changes in environmental impacts can be potentially significant. This is because nearby sensitive ecological receptors are subject to baseline conditions that are in excess of the Critical Load, and therefore there is only a small degree of ‘headroom’ for additional impacts. 1.2 The current impact assessment for the Project uses an 8.0m internal diameter stack and identifies that impacts at all relevant ecological receptors are below the threshold of potentially significant impacts (Refer to the No Significant Effects Report REP1-001). Notwithstanding this, care needs to be taken around any design commitments that could potentially increase these impacts. 1.2 BACKGROUND 1.3 Dispersion modelling has been undertaken for the Environmental Impact Assessment (‘EIA’) for the Proposed Power Plant, consisting of two 850MWthermal gas turbines.
    [Show full text]