DOCSLIB.ORG

D4.2 Aquaspace Case Study Final Reports

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
D4.2 Aquaspace Case Study Final Reports Horizon 2020 AQUASPACE Ecosystem Approach to making Space for Aquaculture EU Horizon 2020 project grant no. 633476 Deliverable 4.2 (revised) CASE STUDY FINAL REPORTS LeaD Beneficiary Institute of Marine Research Deliverable authors Øivind Strand and Øivind Bergh. Case study (CS) leaders: Roberto Pastres John Icely, Ibon Galparsoro, Kerepeczki Éva, Adele Boyd, Suzanne Bricker, Ana Martins Sequeira, Nafsika Papageorgiou, Aline Gagnery, Antje Gimpel, Jon Grant, Hui Liu, Suzi Billing, Jeffrey Ren Case study authors given under each case study. Deliverable version 2.0 Type of deliverable Report Dissemination level Public Delivery Date in DoW 27 Actual Delivery Date 17/08/2018 RevieweD by Paul Tett, SAMS The research leaDing to these results has been unDertaken as part of the AquaSpace project (Ecosystem Approach to making Space for Aquaculture, http://aquaspace-h2020.eu) anD has receiveD funDing from the European Union's Horizon 2020 Framework Programme for Research anD Innovation under grant agreement n° 633476. AquaSpace 633476 D4.2 Change log Version Date Author Reason for change 0.1 Nov-Dec 2016 CS leaDers Initial Draft for WP leader review 0.2 25/01/2017 CS leaDers Full draft for WP leader review 0.3 April-June CS leaDers ReviseD baseD on input from ØS, ØB anD AMO, AM 0.4 1/7/2017 ØS, ØB DelivereD to coorDinator for review 1.0 5/7/2017 ØS, ØB Incorporates coorDinator’s comments 2.0 12/08/2018 ØS, ØB Response to external reviewers’ comments Review log Version Date Reviewer Comments 1.0 July 2017 Anne Marie O’Hagan & Ellen MacMahon (UCC) 1.0 July 2017 Paul Tett (SAMS) 1.0 July 2018 RejecteD by project reviewers 2.0 August 2018 Paul Tett (SAMS) ApproveD resubmission ii AquaSpace 633476 D4.2 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................... vii 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 8 2. ADriatic sea, italy ............................................................................................................. 11 2.1. General characteristics ......................................................................................... 11 2.2. Spatial planning anD management issues .............................................................. 11 2.3. StakeholDer engagement anD participation .......................................................... 14 2.4. Tools useD in the case stuDy ................................................................................. 16 2.5. Case stuDy results ................................................................................................. 17 2.6. Application of tools ............................................................................................... 20 2.7. Relevance of the case stuDy within Aquaspace ..................................................... 21 2.8. Conclusions anD future prospects ......................................................................... 21 2.9. References............................................................................................................ 22 3. Algarve Coast, Portugal ................................................................................................... 23 3.1. General characteristics ......................................................................................... 23 3.2. Spatial planning anD management issues .............................................................. 25 3.3. Tools useD in the case stuDy ................................................................................. 29 3.4. Application of tools ............................................................................................... 29 3.5. StakeholDer engagement anD participation .......................................................... 31 3.6. Case stuDy results ................................................................................................. 34 3.7. Relevance of the case stuDy within AquaSpace ..................................................... 43 3.8. Conclusions anD future prospects ......................................................................... 44 3.9. References............................................................................................................ 45 4. Basque Country, Spain..................................................................................................... 48 4.1. General characteristics ......................................................................................... 48 4.2. Spatial planning anD management issues .............................................................. 52 4.3. StakeholDer engagement anD participation .......................................................... 56 4.4. Tools useD in the case stuDy ................................................................................. 57 4.5. Case stuDy results ................................................................................................. 58 4.6. Application of tools ............................................................................................... 65 4.7. Relevance of the case stuDy within Aquaspace ..................................................... 66 4.8. Conclusions anD future prospects ......................................................................... 68 4.9. References............................................................................................................ 68 5. Békés county case stuDy, Hungary ................................................................................... 71 5.1. General characteristics ......................................................................................... 71 5.2. Spatial planning anD management issues .............................................................. 75 5.3. StakeholDer engagement anD participation .......................................................... 77 5.4. Tools useD in the case stuDy ................................................................................. 81 5.5. Case stuDy results ................................................................................................. 82 5.6. Relevance of the case stuDy within Aquaspace ..................................................... 88 5.7. Conclusions anD future prospects ......................................................................... 88 5.8. References............................................................................................................ 89 6. Carlingford Lough, UK...................................................................................................... 91 6.1. General characteristics ......................................................................................... 91 6.2. Spatial planning anD management issues .............................................................. 96 iii AquaSpace 633476 D4.2 6.3. StakeholDer engagement anD participation ........................................................ 107 6.4. Tools useD in the case stuDy ............................................................................... 107 6.5. Application of tools ............................................................................................. 108 6.6. Case stuDy results ............................................................................................... 109 6.7. Conclusions anD future prospects ....................................................................... 130 6.8. References.......................................................................................................... 131 7. Great Bay Piscataqua anD Long IslanD SounD, USA. ....................................................... 132 7.1. General characteristics ....................................................................................... 132 7.2. Spatial planning anD management issues ............................................................ 136 7.3. StakeholDer engagement anD participation ........................................................ 138 7.4. Tools useD in the case stuDies ............................................................................. 139 7.5. Case stuDy results ............................................................................................... 144 7.6. Relevance of the case stuDies within AquaSpace ................................................. 149 7.7. Conclusions anD future prospects ....................................................................... 150 7.8. References.......................................................................................................... 152 8. Houtman Abrolhos Archipelago - Western Australia ...................................................... 155 8.1. General characteristics ....................................................................................... 155 8.2. Spatial planning anD management issues ............................................................ 156 8.3. StakeholDer engagement anD participation ........................................................ 157 8.4. Tools useD in the case stuDy ............................................................................... 157 8.5. Case stuDy results ............................................................................................... 158 8.6. Relevance of the case stuDy within AquaSpace ................................................... 158 8.7. Conclusions anD future prospects ......................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Överklass Crinozoa – Crinozoer KLASS Crinoidea – Liljestjärnor
    2 • nationalnyckeln till sveriges flora och fauna ÖVERKLASS Crinozoa – crinozoer STAM Echinodermata ÖVERKLASS Överklassen Crinozoa omfattar tagghudingar vilkas crinozoer. Liljestjärnor utgör den äldsta av de nu le­ KLASS kropp byggs upp av en bägarlik struktur, calyx, där vande klasserna av tagghudingar och är kända genom ORDNING FAMILJ både mun och analöppning är placerade på översi­ ungefär 545 miljoner år gamla fossil, dvs. från början SLÄKTE dan. Undersidan (aboralsidan) fäster vid ett underlag, av kambrium. antingen direkt med ett antal ”gripklor” (cirrer) på Fossillagren antyder att crinozoer var en domine­ calyx eller med en mer eller mindre lång stjälk. Från rande djurgrupp fram till slutet av karbon (för ca 300 calyx övre del utgår fem eller fler armar, som kan vara miljoner år sedan), då många grupper dog ut. Ytterli­ mer eller mindre rikt förgrenade. gare grupper dog ut i det stora massutdöendet i slutet Förutom den nu levande klassen Crinoidea av perm (för ca 250 miljoner år sedan). (lilje stjärnor) finns åtminstone en utdöd klass av KLASS Crinoidea – liljestjärnor STAM Echinodermata ÖVERKLASS Crinozoa Liljestjärnor är den enda klassen av crinozoer som le­ Bland dessa finns stjälkade (ca 100) och ostjälkade KLASS ver i dag. Gruppens systematik är omdiskuterad, men (ca 550) arter. De ostjälkade arterna kallas hårstjärnor ORDNING FAMILJ man urskiljer när denna nationalnyckelvolym produ­ och de stjälkade benämner vi här sjöliljor (ett namn SLÄKTE ceras (2013) åtta ordningar, som inkluderar fler än som ofta har använts för hela gruppen Crino idea), 6 000 beskrivna fossila arter. I vilka av dessa ordning­ i analogi med engelskans indelning i stjälkade ”sea ar de nu levande ca 650 arterna ska placeras är inte lilies” och ostjälkade ”feather stars”.
    [Show full text]
  • Crinoids, Belonging to the Families Antedonidae and Atelecrinidae
    RECENT UNSTALKED CRINOIDS. 129 NOTE XXV. Descriptions of twenty new recent unstalked Crinoids, belonging to the families Antedonidae and Atelecrinidae, from the Dutch East Indies BY Austin+H. Clark The work of the the steamship »Siboga” among islands of the East Indian Archipelago resulted in the discovery of of unstalked many new species crinoids. In view of the amount of in and large work necessary assembling digest- the data ing accumulated on these, and especially on the species already known, it has seemed advisable to publish in advance preliminary diagnoses of the new forms in order to guard against possible anticipation. In the the present paper new species belonging to the families ANTEDONIDAE and ATELECRINIDAE, including among them the most striking of those collected by the »Siboga”, are considered. All of the new species will be described in greater detail and figured in the final memoir on these animals in the »Siboga” series 1). Family ANTEDONIDAE. Antedon moluccana, sp. nov. The centrodorsal is low hemispherical, the bare dorsal with rounded pole very slightly convex an obscure broadly median tubercle surrounded by obsolete cirrus-sockets, 1.5 mm. in diameter. See for the of the Nos f the various 1) explanation 0 page 156. Notes from the Leyden Museum, "Vol. XXXIV. 9 130 RECENT UNSTALKED CRINOIBS 15—17 the The cirri are about XXX, (usually latter), is the longest about 18 mm. long; the first segment very is and to two short, the second one one half times as median the third is from two and long as the diameter, three the
    [Show full text]
  • Antedon Petasus (Fig
    The genus Antedon (Crinoidea, Echinodermata): an example of evolution through vicariance Hemery Lenaïg 1, Eléaume Marc 1, Chevaldonné Pierre 2, Dettaï Agnès 3, Améziane Nadia 1 1. Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, Département des Milieux et Peuplements Aquatiques Introduction UMR 5178 - BOME, CP26, 57 rue Cuvier 75005 Paris, France 2. Centre d’Océanologie de Marseille, Station Marine d’Endoume, CNRS-UMR 6540 DIMAR Chemin de la batterie des Lions 13007 Marseille, France 3. Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, Département Systématique et Evolution The crinoid genus Antedon is polyphyletic and assigned to the polyphyletic family UMR 7138, CP 26, 57 rue Cuvier 75005 Paris, France Antedonidae (Hemery et al., 2009). This genus includes about sixteen species separated into two distinct groups (Clark & Clark, 1967). One group is distributed in the north-eastern Atlantic and the Mediterranean Sea, the other in the western Pacific. Species from the western Pacific group are more closely related to other non-Antedon species (e.g. Dorometra clymene) from their area than to Antedon species from the Atlantic - Mediterranean zone (Hemery et al., 2009). The morphological identification of Antedon species from the Atlantic - Mediterranean zone is based on skeletal characters (Fig. 1) that are known to display an important phenotypic plasticity which may obscure morphological discontinuities and prevent correct identification of species (Eléaume, 2006). Species from this zone show a geographical structuration probably linked to the events that followed the Messinian salinity crisis, ~ 5 Mya (Krijgsman Discussion et al., 1999). To test this hypothesis, a phylogenetic study of the Antedon species from the Atlantic - The molecular analysis and morphological identifications provide divergent Mediterranean group was conducted using a mitochondrial gene.
    [Show full text]
  • FAU Institutional Repository
    FAU Institutional Repository http://purl.fcla.edu/fau/fauir This paper was submitted by the faculty of FAU’s Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institute. Notice: ©1989 Marine Biological Laboratory. The final published version of this manuscript is available at http://www.biolbull.org/. This article may be cited as: Eckelbarger, K. J., Young, C. M., & Cameron, J. L. (1989). Ultrastructure and Development of Dimorphic Sperm in the Abyssal Echinoid Phrissocystis multispina (Echinodermata: Echinoidea): Implications for Deep Sea Reproductive Biology. The Biological Bulletin, 176(3), 257‐271. Reference: BioL Bull. 176: 257—271.(June, 1989) Ultrastructure and Development of Dimorphic Sperm in the Abyssal Echinoid Phrissocystis multispina (Echinodermata: Echinoidea): Implications for Deep Sea Reproductive Biology KEVIN J. ECKELBARGER, CRAIG M. YOUNG, AND J. LANE CAMERON Division ofMarine Sciences, Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institution, 5600 Old Dixie Highway, Fort Pierce, Florida 34946 Abstract. Mature males of the abyssal echinoid Phris et a!., 1982; Tyler, 1988). Until now, however, technol socystis multispina produce two types of sperm includ ogy has restricted the study of deep-sea reproduction ing a euspermatozoon typical of echinoids, and a para largely to the analysis of paraffin sections of preserved spermatozoon, which is bipolar-tailed. The structure of gonads collected from trawls or dredge collections the testis and most features of spermatogenesis are sim (Georgeand Menzies1967,1968;Rokop, 1974,1977; ilar to that of other echinoids. Development of both Ahfeld, 1977; Pain et a!., 1982a, b; Tyler and Gage, 1982, sperm types is identical until the spermatid stage when 1983, 1984; Tyler et al., 1982). Little is known about ga the nucleus ofthe paraspermatozoon undergoes chroma mete structure, fertilization biology, or development of tin reduction.
    [Show full text]
  • Download PDF Version
    MarLIN Marine Information Network Information on the species and habitats around the coasts and sea of the British Isles Solitary ascidians, including Ascidia mentula and Ciona intestinalis, with Antedon spp. on wave- sheltered circalittoral rock MarLIN – Marine Life Information Network Marine Evidence–based Sensitivity Assessment (MarESA) Review John Readman 2016-02-15 A report from: The Marine Life Information Network, Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. Please note. This MarESA report is a dated version of the online review. Please refer to the website for the most up-to-date version [https://www.marlin.ac.uk/habitats/detail/1069]. All terms and the MarESA methodology are outlined on the website (https://www.marlin.ac.uk) This review can be cited as: Readman, J.A.J., 2016. Solitary ascidians, including [Ascidia mentula] and [Ciona intestinalis], with [Antedon] spp. on wave-sheltered circalittoral rock. In Tyler-Walters H. and Hiscock K. (eds) Marine Life Information Network: Biology and Sensitivity Key Information Reviews, [on-line]. Plymouth: Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. DOI https://dx.doi.org/10.17031/marlinhab.1069.1 The information (TEXT ONLY) provided by the Marine Life Information Network (MarLIN) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-Share Alike 2.0 UK: England & Wales License. Note that images and other media featured on this page are each governed by their own terms and conditions and they may or may not be available for reuse. Permissions beyond the scope of this license are available here. Based on a work at www.marlin.ac.uk (page left blank) Solitary ascidians, including Ascidia mentula and Ciona intestinalis, with Antedon spp.
    [Show full text]
  • A Survey of the Echinoderm Associates of the North-East Atlantic Area
    A SURVEY OF THE ECHINODERM ASSOCIATES OF THE NORTH-EAST ATLANTIC AREA by G. D. N. BAREL Zoologisch Laboratorium der Rijksuniversiteit, Kaiserstraat 63, Leiden, the Netherlands and P. G. N. KRAMERS Rijksinstituut voor de Volksgezondheid, P.O. Box 1, Bilthoven, the Netherlands With 17 text-figures CONTENTS Introduction 3 Systematic list of associate records 6 Protozoa 7 Coelenterata 31 Platyhelminthes 32 Mesozoa 41 Nematoda 42 Rotatoria 43 Entoprocta 44 Annelida 44 Tardigrada 58 Arthropoda 59 Mollusca 81 Bryozoa 90 Hemichordata 91 Chordata 91 Schizomycetes 92 Cyanophyta 92 Chlorophyta 92 Incertae sedis 92 List of collecting localities 93 Alphabetic list of the host species and their associates 94 Host-associate relationships 108 Acknowledgements 112 References 113 Index to the associate-species 138 Figures 143 INTRODUCTION Animals living in association with echinoderms are known from at least sixteen phyla. The majority belongs to some of the largest phyla (Protozoa, Platyhelminthes, Annelida, Mollusca and Arthropoda), but representatives of small and inconspicuous groups such as Mesozoa, Rotatoria, Tardigrada and 4 ZOOLOGISCHE VERHANDELINGEN 156 (1977) Entoprocta have repeatedly been recorded as associates of echinoderms. Vertebrates living in echinoderms are exemplified by the fishes of the genus Carapus, which are associated with holothurians. Other examples from phyla which are rarely involved in intimate relation- ships with echinoderms are the ctenophore Coeloplana astericola, which was found in great numbers on Echinaster luzonicus from Amboina (Mortensen, 1927a) and the sponge Microcordyla asteriae, which was found at the bases of the arm spines of Asterias tenuispina at Naples (Zirpolo, 1927). Not only animals, but also a few plant species have been recorded to live in or on echinoderms.
    [Show full text]
  • Ring Test Bulletin 46
    The National Marine Biological Analytical Quality Control Scheme www.nmbaqcs.org Ring Test Bulletin 46 Year 20 (2013/2014) Authors: Tony Freeston, Ruth Barnich & Carsten Wolff Reviewed by: Adam Procter Approved by: Richard Arnold Contact: Ruth Barnich [email protected] Thomson Unicomarine Ltd. Date of Issue: October 2014 2 RING TEST 46 DETAILS Type/Contents: General Circulated: 03/02/2014 Completion Date: 04/04/2014 Number of Subscribing Laboratories: 21 Number of Participating Laboratories: 20 Number of Results Received: 24 (multiple data entries per laboratory permitted) General remarks An additional terminal character has been added within each LabCode (small case sequential letters) to permit multiple data entries from each laboratory, i.e. two participants from laboratory 01 would be coded as Lab2001a & Lab2001b. For details of your LabCode please contact your Scheme representative or Thomson Unicomarine Ltd. SUMMARY OF DIFFERENCES PER SPECIMEN (For details see Table 1) Total differences for 24 returns Specimen Genus Species Genus Species RT4601 Lepidonotus squamatus 0 0 RT4602 Gattyana cirrhosa 2 4 RT4603 Malmgrenia andreapolis 1 11 RT4604 Nymphon brevirostre 0 3 RT4605 Endeis spinosa 0 4 RT4606 Anoplodactylus petiolatus 1 1 RT4607 Mytilus edulis 0 0 RT4608 Abra tenuis 0 0 RT4609 Nucella lapillus 3 3 RT4610 Modiolus modiolus 2 4 RT4611 Musculus subpictus 0 1 RT4612 Crenella decussata 0 0 RT4613 Magelona johnstoni 0 2 RT4614 Owenia borealis (*) - - RT4615 Lysianassa ceratina 0 0 RT4616 Socarnes erythrophthalmus 2 2 RT4617 Perrierella audouiniana 0 0 RT4618 Lembos websteri 3 4 RT4619 Aora gracilis 0 8 RT4620 Polygordius sp. 1 1 RT4621 Antedon bifida 0 2 RT4622 Spirobranchus lamarcki 0 1 RT4623 Eclysippe vanelli 7 7 RT4624 Acrocnida brachiata 5 5 RT4625 Ophiura ophiura 0 0 Total differences 27 63 Average diff.
    [Show full text]
  • Loch Torridon- August 2000
    Torridon 2000 Survey deepwater brittlestar August 2000 clingfish on eelgrass Summary Report red cushion star & seasquirts Fries' goby diver recording on maerl bed clingfish in maerl Outer Loch Torridon Loch Diabaig Upper Loch Torridon Narrows Sites 5, 6, 7 and 8, at the entrance to Loch Torridon, were the most exposed sites surveyed. Kelp forest Sites 11 and 12 ran into Loch Diabaig from the top of the At only 20m deep, the narrows between of cuvie Laminaria hyperborea and sugar kelp Laminaria saccharina dominated rock slopes to around sill separating it from Loch Torridon. In shallow water at Upper Loch Torridon and Loch Shieldaig 10m, with the lower limit of kelp at around 15m. In many places the kelp forest was heavily grazed by Site 12, furbellows Saccorhiza polyschides was abundant, (Sites 3 and 4) are current-swept for a large urchins. At Site 6, dabberlocks Alaria esculenta and tangle Laminaria digitata were dominant in narrow in extensive pure stands. On top of the bedrock sill at 12- part of the tidal cycle. The seabed was of band around low water, and at Site 7 there were a few jewel anemones Corynactis viridis in shallow 14m sparse sugar kelp was covered with featherstars and scoured rock, boulders and coarse water, indicating the more exposed nature of these sites around Sgeir na Trian. At the base of the rock ascidians thriving in the enhanced currents across the sill. sediments, with typical current-swept slopes, there were coarse sediments of sand and shell gravel with scattered boulders and cobbles. At Some of the featherstars here were the northern species communities of soft corals, brittlestars and Site 8, Sgeir a' Ghair, waves of coarse sediments at 15-16m had pink, live maerl Phymatolithon Antedon petasus.
    [Show full text]
  • Marlin Marine Information Network Information on the Species and Habitats Around the Coasts and Sea of the British Isles
    MarLIN Marine Information Network Information on the species and habitats around the coasts and sea of the British Isles Leptometra celtica assemblage on Atlantic upper bathyal coarse sediment MarLIN – Marine Life Information Network Marine Evidence–based Sensitivity Assessment (MarESA) Review Ellen Last, Laura Robson and Samantha Garrard 2019-07-04 A report from: The Marine Life Information Network, Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. Please note. This MarESA report is a dated version of the online review. Please refer to the website for the most up-to-date version [https://www.marlin.ac.uk/habitats/detail/1186]. All terms and the MarESA methodology are outlined on the website (https://www.marlin.ac.uk) This review can be cited as: Last, E.K., Robson, L.M. & Garrard, S.L. 2019. [Leptometra celtica] assemblage on Atlantic upper bathyal coarse sediment. In Tyler-Walters H. and Hiscock K. (eds) Marine Life Information Network: Biology and Sensitivity Key Information Reviews, [on-line]. Plymouth: Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. DOI https://dx.doi.org/10.17031/marlinhab.1186.1 The information (TEXT ONLY) provided by the Marine Life Information Network (MarLIN) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-Share Alike 2.0 UK: England & Wales License. Note that images and other media featured on this page are each governed by their own terms and conditions and they may or may not be available for reuse. Permissions beyond the scope of this license are available here. Based on a work at www.marlin.ac.uk (page left blank) Date: 2019-07-04 Leptometra celtica assemblage on Atlantic upper bathyal coarse sediment - Marine Life Information Network Leptometra celtica assemblage Photographer: Anon.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Site Condition Monitoring of Marine Sedimentary and Reef Habitats in Loch Laxford SAC
    Scottish Natural Heritage Commissioned Report No. 943 2015 site condition monitoring of marine sedimentary and reef habitats in Loch Laxford SAC COMMISSIONED REPORT Commissioned Report No. 943 2015 site condition monitoring of marine sedimentary and reef habitats in Loch Laxford SAC For further information on this report please contact: Lisa Kamphausen Scottish Natural Heritage Great Glen House INVERNESS IV3 8NW Telephone: 01463 725014 E-mail: [email protected] This report should be quoted as: Moore, C.G., Cook, R.L., Porter, J.S., Sanderson, W.G., Want, A., Ware, F.J., Howson, C., Kamphausen, L. & Harries, D.B. 2017. 2015 site condition monitoring of marine sedimentary and reef habitats in Loch Laxford SAC. Scottish Natural Heritage Commissioned Report No. 943. This report, or any part of it, should not be reproduced without the permission of Scottish Natural Heritage. This permission will not be withheld unreasonably. The views expressed by the author(s) of this report should not be taken as the views and policies of Scottish Natural Heritage. © Scottish Natural Heritage 2017. COMMISSIONED REPORT Summary 2015 site condition monitoring of marine sedimentary and reef habitats in Loch Laxford SAC Commissioned Report No. 943 Project No: 014988 Contractor: Heriot-Watt University Year of publication: 2017 Keywords benthos; monitoring; condition; reefs; maerl; sediment; SAC; SCM; marine Background Loch Laxford SAC was established to afford protection for the marine features ‘large shallow inlets and bays’ and 'reefs'. The aim of the current 2015 study was to carry out site condition monitoring (SCM) of the designated features of the SAC, in order to identify any deterioration in the condition of the features and to form a judgement on their current condition.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Analysis of Large Epibenthos in the Nordic Seas
    Community analysis of large epibenthos in the Nordic Seas Eric dos Santos Faculty of Life and Environmental University of Iceland 2010 Community analysis of large epibenthos in the Nordic Seas Eric dos Santos 90 ECTS thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of a Magister Scientiarum degree in marine biology Advisor(s) Jörundur Svavarsson Øle Tendal Judicator Guðmundur Guðmundsson Faculty of Life and Environmental Sciences School of Engineering and Natural Sciences University of Iceland Reykjavik, January 2010 Community analysis of large epibenthos in the Nordic Seas 90 ECTS thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of a Magister Scientiarum degree in marine biology Copyright © 2010 Eric dos Santos All rights reserved Faculty of Life and Environmental Sciences School of Engineering and Natural Sciences University of Iceland Sturtlugata 7 101 Reykjavik Iceland Telephone: 525 4000 Bibliographic information: Eric dos Santos, 2010, Community analysis of large epibenthos in the Nordic Seas, Master’s thesis, Faculty of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Iceland, pp. 47. Printing: Háskólafjölritun / Háskólaprent, Fálkagötu 2, 101 Reykjavík Reykjavik, Iceland, January 2010 Hér með lýsi ég því yfir að ritgerð þessi er samin af mér og að hún hefur hvorki að hluta né í heild verið lögð fram áður til hærri prófgráðu. __________________________ I declare that this thesis is supported by my research work, written by myself and has not partly or as a whole been published before to higher educational degree. __________________________ Abstract The aim of the presented project was to provide information about the community structure and diversity of epibenthic megafauna in the Nordic Seas. The focus was the importance of hard substrate in the formation and definition of animal communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections
    SMITHSONIAN MISCELLANEOUS COLLECTIONS VOLUME 61, NUMBER 15 NOTES ON THE RECENT CRINOIDS IN THE BRITISH MUSEUM BY AUSTIN HOBART CLARK Assistant Curator, Division of Marine Invertebrates, U. S. National Museum (Publication 2242) CITY OF WASHINGTON PUBLISHED BY THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION DECEMBER 31, 1913 Zfyt. iiorb $3aftttnore (preea BALTIMORE, MD., U. S. A. NOTES ON THE RECENT CRINOIDS IN THE BRITISH MUSEUM By AUSTIN HOBART CLARK ASSISTANT CURATOR, DIVISION OF MARINE INVERTEBRATES, U. S. NATIONAL MUSEUM PREFACE During the summer of 1910 I paid a short visit to the British Museum for the purpose of studying the magnificent collection of recent crinoids, more especially the comatulids, preserved in that institution. Thanks to the courtesy of Professor F. Jeffrey Bell, who, in the most generous manner and, I fear, at no inconsiderable personal inconvenience, did everything which lay in his power to facilitate and to expedite my work, I was able in the limited time at my dis- posal to examine the entire collection of recent comatulids, taking copious notes on all the specimens upon which published records have been based, and identifying all of the unnamed material, at the same time drawing up diagnoses of such new species as I found. It was my wish to leave with Professor Bell my diagnoses of these new species so that he might describe them under his own name, as it seemed somewhat presumptuous for me to publish new and interesting observations based upon the material under the care of Professor Bell ; he, however, with his usual courtesy, insisted that he had no such feeling about the matter, and urged me to publish the descriptions of the new species I found under my name alone as opportunity offered.
    [Show full text]