The Collected Works of Eric Voegelin, Volume 15: Order and History, Volume II, the World of the Polis

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Collected Works of Eric Voegelin, Volume 15: Order and History, Volume II, the World of the Polis The Collected Works of Eric Voegelin, Volume 15: Order and History, Volume II, The World of the Polis Athanasios Moulakis, Editor University of Missouri Press the collected works of ERIC VOEGELIN VOLUME 15 ORDER AND HISTORY VOLUME II THE WORLD OF THE POLIS projected volumes in the collected works 1. On the Form of the American Mind 2. Race and State 3. The History of the Race Idea: From Ray to Carus 4. The Authoritarian State: An Essay on the Problem of the Austrian State 5. Modernity without Restraint: The Political Religions; The New Science of Politics; and Science, Politics, and Gnosticism 6. Anamnesis 7. Published Essays, 1922– 8. Published Essays 9. Published Essays 10. Published Essays, 1940–1952 11. Published Essays, 1953–1965 12. Published Essays, 1966–1985 13. Selected Book Reviews 14. Order and History, Volume I, Israel and Revelation 15. Order and History, Volume II, The World of the Polis 16. Order and History, Volume III, Plato and Aristotle 17. Order and History, Volume IV, The Ecumenic Age 18. Order and History, Volume V, In Search of Order 19. History of Political Ideas, Volume I, Hellenism, Rome, and Early Christianity 20. History of Political Ideas, Volume II, The Middle Ages to Aquinas 21. History of Political Ideas, Volume III, The Later Middle Ages 22. History of Political Ideas, Volume IV, Renaissance and Reformation 23. History of Political Ideas, Volume V, Religion and the Rise of Modernity 24. History of Political Ideas, Volume VI, Revolution and the New Science 25. History of Political Ideas, Volume VII, The New Order and Last Orientation 26. History of Political Ideas, Volume VIII, Crisis and the Apocalypse of Man 27. The Nature of the Law, and Related Legal Writings 28. What Is History? And Other Late Unpublished Writings 29. Selected Correspondence 30. Selected Correspondence 31. Hitler and the Germans 32. Miscellaneous Papers 33. Miscellaneous Papers 34. Autobiographical Reflections and Index order and history I. Israel and Revelation II. The World of the Polis III. Plato and Aristotle IV. The Ecumenic Age V. In Search of Order editorial board Paul Caringella Jürgen Gebhardt Thomas A. Hollweck Ellis Sandoz The Editorial Board offers grateful acknowledgment to the Earhart Foundation, Liberty Fund, Inc., Robert J. Cihak, M.D., and John C. Jacobs Jr. for support provided at various stages in the preparation of this book for publication. A special thanks for support goes to the Charlotte and Walter Kohler Charitable Trust. The University of Missouri Press offers its grateful acknowledgment for generous contributions from the Earhart Foundation and from the Eric Voegelin Institute in support of the publication of this volume. THE COLLECTED WORKS OF ERIC VOEGELIN VOLUME 15 ORDER AND HISTORY VOLUME II THE WORLD OF THE POLIS edited with an introduction by ATHANASIOS MOULAKIS universityof missouri press columbia and london Copyright © 2000 by The Curators of the University of Missouri University of Missouri Press, Columbia, Missouri 65201 Printed and bound in the United States of America All rights reserved 54321 0403020100 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Voegelin, Eric, 1901 Order and history. p. cm.—(The collected works of Eric Voegelin ; v. 15) Originally published: Baton Rouge : Louisiana State University Press, 1956– 1987. With new introd. Includes bibliographical references and index. Contents: — v. 2. The World of the Polis / edited with an introduction by Athanasios Moulakis. isbn 0-8262-1283-2 (v. 2 : alk. paper) 1. Civilization—Philosophy. 2. Order (Philosophy) I. Moulakis, Athanasios. II. Title. cb19.v58 2000 901—dc21 99-053537 ⅜ϱ ™ This paper meets the requirements of the American National Standard for Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, Z39.48, 1984. Designer: Albert Crochet Typesetter: BookComp, Inc. Printer and binder: Thomson-Shore, Inc. Typeface: Trump Mediaeval Contents Editor’s Introduction 1 Preface 53 Introduction: Mankind and History 67 Part One. Cretans, Achaeans, and Hellenes 1. Hellas and History 93 2. The Cretan and Achaean Societies 120 3. Homer and Mycenae 135 Part Two. From Myth to Philosophy 4. The Hellenic Polis 181 5. Hesiod 195 6. The Break with the Myth 234 7. The Aretai and the Polis 254 8. Parmenides 274 9. Heraclitus 292 Part Three. The Athenian Century 10. Tragedy 317 11. The Sophists 341 12. Power and History 406 Index 449 This page intentionally left blank THE WORLD OF THE POLIS This page intentionally left blank Editor’s Introduction The text first published by Louisiana University Press in 1957 has been reset to agree with the format of The Collected Works of Eric Voegelin. Consequently the pagination is different. Otherwise the text is unchanged, except for minor corrections: I replaced unfamiliar forms of ancient names, such as “Ovidius” or “Rhodus,” with standard English forms such as “Ovid” and “Rhodes.” In all cases I adopted a single variant of a name, e.g., “Knossos” or “Dionysos,” throughout. I sought to rectify the solecisms that crept into some of the transliterated Greek. Minor idiosyncrasies of usage have been corrected. I did not otherwise presume to tamper with the style of a book that the author himself had seen through the press. 1. The Style of aMilitantAuthor Voegelin was sensitive to matters of language, perceiving in the use of words an index of intellectual clarity and rectitude.1 He was, moreover, as one who had worked arduously to fashion an 1. On the need to oppose the “destruction language,” a symptom and cause of “false consciousness,” see Eric Voegelin, Autobiographical Reflections, ed. Ellis Sandoz (1989; available Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 1999), 17, where he acknowledges the influence of the Stefan George circle and its efforts to “regain” the German language, and of Karl Kraus, whose analysis of the decay of language is central to his Kulturkritik. More explicitly on Kraus’s insight into the concomitant destruction of the social fabric as conducive to the rise of leaders representative of its decay, the emergence of mass movements and the atrocities that must follow, see p. 50. For degraded language as an unsuitable tool of analysis, being itself in need of being subjected to critical analysis—equivalent to Francis Bacon’s notion of idols—see Autobiographical Reflections, 93. One could easily multiply references to Voegelin’s concern with the deformation of language and the need to develop the intellectual apparatus to deal with it. 1 editor’s introduction instrument of scholarly expression in a language not his own, un- derstandably resentful of supercilious, dismissive criticisms of his English. He sought competent advice and took pride in the approval and encouragement he received from distinguished American men of letters such as Cleanth Brooks. Yet even sympathetic readers found Order and History “heavy going” and “not written for relaxation by the fireside.”2 Others protested what they considered Voegelin’s persistent “use of tech- nical vocabulary which is neither clear in itself, nor adequately elucidated by the author.”3 In an extensive and constructive re- view, that goes a long way toward explaining Voegelin’s true pur- pose, Gerhart Niemeyer addressed “the peculiar—and very great— difficulties of communication between Voegelin and his readers.”4 These go beyond the use of ugly neologisms or “Teutonic” infe- licities of style.5 Niemeyer correctly identified Voegelin’s manner of inquiry as unusual in the current practice of social science, and deliberately contrary to the dominant contemporary climate of opinion. On this reading, Voegelin was an embattled thinker, engaged on developing, against the inertia of received language, a critical vocabulary by means of which to analyze and, as far as is in the power of scholarship, help overcome the crisis of his time. It was to be expected, then, that the objects of his criticism would be resistant to his message. In this sense, the “problem of communication between Voegelin and his readers is itself a problem of political order.”6 This is what Voegelin described as the “Platonic position” of the thinker moved to aquest for true order by the 2. Charles W. Schull in Social Science 34 (1959): 54, qualifies his praise for Voegelin’s “clear language” and “sustained and lucid” style. R. L. Shinn, Saturday Review 41 (March 8, 1958): 27. 3. Robert Ammerman in Journal of Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 19 (11958): 540. Norman W. Porteous, English Historical Review 75 (1960): 288–89, writes “not easy reading.” One could multiply the examples. 4. Gerhart Niemeyer in Review of Politics 21 (1959): 588–97, 594. 5. Victor Ehrenberg in Historische Zeitschrift 187 (1959): 369–73, 373: “ugly abstract words, reminiscent of sociological jargon, such as civilizational, imma- nentization, dilemmatic.” H. H. Scullard in History 44 (1959): 34: “heavy reading,” “frequent use of ugly words and jargon.” C. A. Robinson in American Historical Review 63 (1957–1958): 939–41: “a style that is unnecessarily difficult.” John Angus Campbell discusses the significance of Voegelin’s work “as it touches the deep ambiguities of the word as a force of order and disorder in the individual society” but characterizes him as “a major Teutonic scholar” of “Beethovenesque or Wagnerian vehemance [sic] and pathos”: Quarterly Journal of Speech 68 (1982): 80–91, 80, 91. 6. Niemeyer, Review of Politics, 594. 2 editor’s introduction experience of disorder.7 In the introduction to volume I of Order and History he writes: “The movement towards truth starts from man’s awareness of his existence in untruth.”8 His personal reaction to the ideological climate of his time is an equivalent of Plato’s critical opposition to the corruption of Athens. Plato thus becomes emblematic of all genuine philosophical endeavor. Dante Germino embraces and discusses the “Platonic position” in his introduction to the next volume of Order and History, Plato and Aristotle.9 It suffices here to point out the pivotal importance of Plato in Voegelin’s philosophy of history and in his interpretation of the Greeks in particular.
Recommended publications
  • 1 ETHNICITY and JEWISH IDENTITY in JOSEPHUS by DAVID
    ETHNICITY AND JEWISH IDENTITY IN JOSEPHUS By DAVID McCLISTER A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2008 1 © 2008 David McClister 2 To the memory of my father, Dorval L. McClister, who instilled in me a love of learning; to the memory of Dr. Phil Roberts, my esteemed colleague; and to my wife, Lisa, without whose support this dissertation, or much else that I do, would not have been possible. 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I gladly recognize my supervisory committee chair (Dr. Konstantinos Kapparis, Associate Professor in the Classics Department at the University of Florida). I also wish to thank the other supervisory commiteee members (Dr. Jennifer Rea, Dr. Gareth Schmeling, and Dr. Gwynn Kessler as a reader from the Religious Studies Department). It is an honor to have their contributions and to work under their guidance. I also wish to thank the library staff at the University of Florida and at Florida College (especially Ashley Barlar) who did their work so well and retrieved the research materials necessary for this project. I also wish to thank my family for their patient indulgence as I have robbed them of time to give attention to the work necessary to pursue my academic interests. BWGRKL [Greek] Postscript® Type 1 and TrueTypeT font Copyright © 1994-2006 BibleWorks, LLC. All rights reserved. These Biblical Greek and Hebrew fonts are used with permission and are from BibleWorks, software for Biblical
    [Show full text]
  • Conceptualizing and Theorizing Peace in Ancient Greece*
    Transactions of the American Philological Association 139 (2009) 225–250 Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Conceptualizing and Theorizing Peace in Ancient Greece* Brown University “ Pointless Wars” (2008). As it happens, my address focuses on a different di- mension of the same problem. Although I will explore mostly Greek ideas, I could easily have chosen Roman ones too. In the late republic, after centuries of almost incessant warfare and the conquest of a huge empire, both Cicero and Sallust tried hard to demonstrate that intellectual achievements (in rhetoric, law, and history) had as much merit as those of the statesman and general. As Sallust puts it, “It is beautiful to do good for the res publica, but neither does it lack distinction to speak well: it is possible to gain renown in peace as well as in war (vel pace vel bello clarum fieri licet); both those who were doers (qui fecere) and those who wrote about the deeds of others are praised * This is a slightly revised version of the paper I delivered at the Annual Meeting of the APA in January 2009; the only major change is the addition of a section on the role of thoughts about peace in other Mediterranean societies. I presented versions of the same paper at the European Social Sciences and History Conference in Lisbon in February 2008, in the Classics Department at Brown University in March 2008, at a meeting of the European Network for the Study of Ancient Greek History in Trento in September 2008, at a colloquium on “Maintaining Peace and Interstate Stability in the Greek World” (organized by Julia Wilker at Harvard University), and at the University of Münster, both in May 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Tuning the Lyre, Tuning the Soul'
    Greek and Roman Musical Studies 8 (2020) 111-155 brill.com/grms ‘Tuning the Lyre, Tuning the Soul’ Harmonia, Justice and the Kosmos of the Soul in Plato’s Republic and Timaeus Tosca A.C. Lynch Jesus College, University of Oxford, Turl Street, Oxford, OX1 3DW [email protected] Abstract This paper will focus on Plato’s thought-provoking depiction of justice as special kind of harmonia (Resp. 4.443c-444a) that epitomises the best possible organisation of the soul, exploring his nuanced use of the model of lyre tunings in performative, theoreti- cal as well as educational terms. By comparing Plato’s use of harmonic imagery with technical discussions of lyre tunings and their key role in educational settings, I will show how Plato exploited distinctive features of traditional Greek lyre harmoniai to give shape to his innovative understanding of the structure of the soul and the harmo- nious, but not strifeless, relationship between its individual components. In the sec- ond part of this paper, I will look at how the model outlined in the Republic sheds light on the musical structure that gives shape to the World Soul in the Timaeus, advancing a new interpretation of its elusive harmonic organisation. Keywords Plato’s harmonics – harmonia – justice – lyre tunings – musical education – Republic – Timaeus – Philolaus Plato’s dialogues offer many revealing discussions of the ethical, political, psy- chological and educational importance that music had for the Greeks. This is especially true in the case of the Republic and the Laws, works which describe in detail the political set-up of two ideal constitutions as well as the lifestyle and ethical values embraced by their citizens.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Era in the Study of Global History Is Born but It Needs to Be Nurtured
    [JCH 5.1-2 (2018–19)] JCH (print) ISSN 2051-9672 https://doi.org/10.1558/jch.39422 JCH (online) ISSN 2051-9680 A New Era in the Study of Global History is Born but It Needs to be Nurtured Harvey Whitehouse1 University of Oxford, UK Email: [email protected] (corresponding author) Peter Turchin2 University of Connecticut Email: [email protected] (corresponding author) Pieter François3, Patrick E. Savage4, Thomas E. Currie5, Kevin C. Feeney6, Enrico Cioni7, Rosalind Purcell8, Robert M. Ross9, Jennifer Larson10, John Baines11, Barend ter Haar12, R. Alan Covey13 Abstract: Thisa rticle is a response to Slingerland e t al. who criticize the quality of the data from Seshat: Global History Databank utilized in our Nature paper entitled “Complex Societies Precede Moralizing Gods throughout World History”. Their cri- tique centres around the roles played by research assistants and experts in procuring and curating data, periodization structure, and so-called “data pasting” and “data fill- ing”. We show that these criticisms are based on misunderstandings or misrepresenta- tions of the methods used by Seshat researchers. Overall, Slingerland et al.’s critique (which is crosslinked online here) does not call into question any of our main findings, but it does highlight various shortcomings of Slingerland et al.’s database project. Our collective efforts to code and quantify features of global history hold out the promise of a new era in the study of global history but only if critique can be conducted con- structively in good faith and both the benefitsa nd the pitfalls of open science fully recognized.
    [Show full text]
  • Barbarians at the Gate: Herodotus, Bisotun, and a Persian Punishment in Egypt
    Barbarians at the Gate: Herodotus, Bisotun, and a Persian Punishment in Egypt Keating P. J. McKeon American Journal of Philology, Volume 141, Number 3 (Whole Number 563), Fall 2020, pp. 349-380 (Article) Published by Johns Hopkins University Press DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/ajp.2020.0020 For additional information about this article https://muse.jhu.edu/article/763624 [ Access provided at 27 Jan 2021 06:13 GMT from Harvard Library ] BARBARIANS AT THE GATE: HERODOTUS, BISOTUN, AND A PERSIAN PUNISHMENT IN EGYPT KEATING P. J. MCKEON u Abstract: This paper argues that Cambyses’ treatment of Psammenitus in Book 3 of Herodotus’ Histories constitutes the adaptation of a punishment recorded in the Old Persian text of the Bisotun inscription. By outlining a typology for the practice, the article demonstrates the primacy of a Persian source, and proposes a series of specific, programmatically significant alterations made by Herodotus in the constructi on of the punishment. The resulting episode represents a complex engagement with questions arising from the Persian invasion of Egypt both in the Histories and in the wider historical record concerning Cambyses’ legitimacy as Egyptian ruler. RECENT WOrk ON HERODOTUS has done much to elucidate his incorporation, and deliberate modification, of Near Eastern material.1 Rather than obvious processes of either direct insertion or uneasy Hel- lenization, the appearance of such material often reflects a sophisticated attempt to tailor raw sources to fit the wider context of the Histories and address the author’s recurrent concerns. The treatment of Psammenitus by Cambyses detailed in Book 3 has been studied more often for its lachrymose outcome than its punitive design.2 Closer examination reveals a particularly striking example of non-Greek practice subtly refashioned to accommodate a Greek narrative pattern.
    [Show full text]
  • WHY GREECE?I
    For publication in a Serbian translation only! THE QUEST FOR PEACE IN THE ANCIENT WORLD: WHY GREECE?i Kurt A. Raaflaub The dramatic date of the Chinese film “Hero” (Yingxiong) is the end of the Warring State Period (403-221 BCE), in which seven kingdoms fought ruthlessly for supremacy, causing massive slaughter and suffering for the population.ii In the film, the king of Qin, determined to conquer all of known China, has defeated most of his enemies. Over the years, however, he has been the target of many assassins. Three of these are still alive, Broken Sword, Flying Snow, and Sky. To anyone who defeats these three, the king promises great rewards: power, riches, and a private audience with the king himself. For ten years no one comes close to claiming the prize. Then an enigmatic person, Nameless, appears in the palace, bearing the legendary weapons of the slain assassins. His story is extraordinary: for ten years he has studied the arts of the sword, before defeating the mighty Sky in a furious fight and destroying the famed duo of Snow and Broken Sword, using a weapon far more devastating than his sword—their love for each other. The king, however, replies with a different story: of a conspiracy between the four, in which Nameless’ victories were faked to enable him to come close to the king and kill him. Nameless indeed has a chance to achieve his goal. The king, exposed to his sword, tells him of his true aspiration: to conquer the warring states in order to overcome war and violence once and for all, to create a unified empire, and to establish lasting peace.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ghosts of Monotheism: Heaven, Fortune, and Universalism in Early Chinese and Greco-Roman Historiography
    The Ghosts of Monotheism: Heaven, Fortune, and Universalism in Early Chinese and Greco-Roman Historiography FILIPPO MARSILI Saint Louis University [email protected] Abstract: This essay analyzes the creation of the empires of Rome over the Medi- terranean and of the Han dynasty over the Central Plains between the third and the second centuries BCE. It focuses on the historiographical oeuvres of Polybius and Sima Qian, as the two men tried to make sense of the unification of the world as they knew it. The essay does away with the subsequent methodological and conceptual biases introduced by interpreters who approached the material from the vantage point of Abrahamic religions, according to which transcendent per- sonal entities could favor the foundation of unitary political and moral systems. By considering the impact of the different contexts and of the two authors’ sub- jective experiences, the essay tries to ascertain the extent to which Polybius and Sima Qian tended to associate unified rule with the triumph of universal values and the establishment of superior, divine justice. All profound changes in consciousness, by their very nature, bring with them characteristic amnesias. Out of such oblivions, in specific historical circumstances, spring narratives.—Benedict Anderson1 The nation as the subject of History is never able to completely bridge the aporia between the past and the present.—Prasenjit Duara2 Any structure is the ingenuous re-proposition of a hidden god; any systemic approach might actually constitute a crypto-theology.—Benedetto Croce3 Introduction: Monotheism, Systemic Unities, and Ethnocentrism Scholars who engage in comparisons are often wary of the ethnocentric biases that lurk behind their endeavors.
    [Show full text]
  • Response to Reviewers on How the Gospels Became History
    M. David Litwa. SBL Draft Paper. December 2020 M. David Litwa, Australian Catholic University, Institute for Religion and Critical Inquiry How the Gospels Became History: Reflections on a Recent Monograph (20 min) Tag(s): History of Christianity (History & Culture), New Testament (Ideology & Theology), Myth (Ancient Near Eastern Literature - Genre) My work How the Gospels Became History: Jesus and Mediterranean Myths was published by Yale University Press in June of 2019. In this brief paper, I address its reception in recent academic reviews, responding in particular to criticisms. These days—when there is such a flood of new books to read—it is an honor to receive a review at all, and I am deeply grateful for those who took the time to write them. First, a brief summary of my thesis. In the book, I argue that the canonical gospels contain a host of mythoi, a term by which ancient Greeks understood fantastical tales. Ancient historians included fantastical tales in their writings on a regular basis, but they did their best to give them the air of historicality through a set of historiographical tropes. Among these I include (1) objectification (describing individually experienced phenomena as if they were fully knowable and observable by others); (2) synchrony (noting well- known persons or occurrences); (3) syntopy (mentioning known places on the map); (4) straightforward, matter-of-fact presentation (which often frames the description of fantastical or anomalous events); (5) vivid presentation (which includes the addition of random and circumstantial details); the rhetoric of accuracy (akribeia), which includes (6) the introduction of literary eyewitnesses (such as the Beloved Disciple) and (7) staged skepticism among the eyewitnesses (as in Matt.
    [Show full text]
  • Anthropogony, Myth and Gender: Athenian Autochthony As a Case Study
    Anthropogony, Myth and Gender: Athenian Autochthony as a Case Study Di Yan Faculty of Classics University of Cambridge Murray Edwards College November 2018 This dissertation is submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Preface Declaration This dissertation is the result of my own worK and includes nothing which is the outcome of work done in collaboration except as declared in the Preface and specified in the text. It is not substantially the same as any that I have submitted, or, is being concurrently submitted for a degree or diploma or other qualification at the University of Cambridge or any other University or similar institution except as declared in the Preface and specified in the text. I further state that no substantial part of my dissertation has already been submitted, or, is being concurrently submitted for any such degree, diploma or other qualification at the University of Cambridge or any other University or similar institution except as declared in the Preface and specified in the text. It does not exceed the prescribed word limit for the relevant Degree Committee. Di Yan November 12, 2018 III Abstract This thesis, with its reflections on previous myth theories, especially structuralism in the 20th century and post-structuralist readings in recent decades, suggests a new approach for understanding GreeK mythology. TaKing Athenian autochthony as a case study, it argues that, instead of regarding GreeK myth as either a narrative system with one universal logic (structuralist reading) or as an ever-changing corpus without a unified concern (post-structuralist reading), it is more plausible to understand various myths as a dynamic system of social conversation, where individual authors and different genres respond to, argue with, or even compete against one another concerning core issues for a compelling explanation and understanding of the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Der Philipperbrief Des Paulus Des Philipperbrief Der
    29 29 29 Im vorliegenden Band sind Eve-Marie Beckers Arbeiten zur Per- Eve-Marie Becker son des Paulus und zu seiner literarischen Tätigkeit zusammen- gestellt. Besonderes Interesse gilt dabei dem Philipperbrief und seiner Rezeptions- und Wirkungsgeschichte bis zu Ernst Loh- Der Philipperbrief meyer. Die Beiträge stehen im Zusammenhang der Kommen- tierung des Briefes für die Serie: „Meyers Kritisch-Exegetischer des Paulus Kommentar (KEK)“. Der Kommentar soll die wirkmächtige Auslegung von Ernst Lohmeyer (1928/1930) ersetzen. Vier der Vorarbeiten zu insgesamt sechzehn Aufsätze, die im vorliegenden Band zusam- mengestellt sind, wurden bisher nicht oder nicht auf Deutsch einem Kommentar oder Englisch veröffentlicht, die übrigen zwölf Aufsätze sind zwi- schen 2005 und 2018 erschienen. Der Philipperbrief des Paulus des Philipperbrief Der Herausgegeben von Eve-Marie Becker, Jens Herzer, Friedrich W. Horn, Oda Wischmeyer und Hanna Zapp www.narr.de Eve-Marie Becker Open Access Download von der Narr Francke Attempto Verlag eLibrary am 21.05.2020 um 16:13 Uhr ISBN 978-3-7720-8688-5 38688_Umschlag.indd 1,3 08.01.2020 12:07:50 Der Philipperbrief des Paulus Open Access Download von der Narr Francke Attempto Verlag eLibrary am 21.05.2020 um 16:13 Uhr Neutestamentliche Entwürfe zur Theologie Band 29 • 2020 Herausgegeben von Eve-Marie Becker, Jens Herzer, Friedrich W. Horn, Oda Wischmeyer und Hanna Zapp Open Access Download von der Narr Francke Attempto Verlag eLibrary am 21.05.2020 um 16:13 Uhr Eve-Marie Becker Der Philipperbrief des Paulus Vorarbeiten zu einem Kommentar Open Access Download von der Narr Francke Attempto Verlag eLibrary am 21.05.2020 um 16:13 Uhr Bibliografische Information der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie; detaillierte bibliografische Daten sind im Internet erüb http://dnb.dnb.de abrufbar.
    [Show full text]
  • Historiographical Disputes About the Aromanian Problem (19Th-20Th Centuries)
    EMANUIL INEOAN1 HISTORIOGRAPHICAL DISPUTES ABOUT THE AROMANIAN PROBLEM (19TH-20TH CENTURIES) Abstract: The presence of Aromanians in the Balkans has sparked numerous controversies about their autochthonous character or the origins of their spoken idiom. Their identity as a Romance people has been challenged, on countless occasions, by more or less biased researchers. The emergence of the Megali Idea project of the modern Greek State has exerted a considerable impact on the group of Balkan Aromanians, as attempts have been made to integrate them into the Hellenic national grand narrative. Our study aims to inventory and analyse some of the reflections encountered in the Balkan historiographies from the second half of the 19th century until the dawn of the 21st century. Keywords: Aromanians, ethnogenesis, language, Greece, controversy * Far from proposing a definitive elucidation of one of the most intriguing ethnic questions of the Balkans - the origins of the Aromanians -, this study provides an introduction into this issue through an inventory of the main interpretations produced in the Greek, Romanian, Serbian, Bulgarian and Albanian historiographies relating to the subjects of our study. Today most historians agree that the Romanian people was formed on a territory that stretched both north and south of the Danube, a territory that obviously went far beyond the present-day borders of Romania. From a single common trunk, the branches that subsequently got separated included the Daco-Romanians, forming the so-called North Danubian Romanianness, and the Aromanians, the Megleno- Romanians and the Istro-Romanians, forming South Danubian Romanianness. The three groups constitute, to this day, the testimony of Eastern Romanness in a part of Europe that underwent radical changes over time, which modified almost entirely the Roman legacy in the area.
    [Show full text]
  • Walter Scheidel
    1 Walter Scheidel Departments of Classics and History, Stanford University, Stanford CA 94305, USA [email protected] tel. (650) 725-3800 http://www.walterscheidel.com Academic employment 2008– Dickason Professor in the Humanities, Stanford University 2004– Professor of Classics and (since 2012) of History, Stanford University 2003–2004 Associate Professor of Classics, Stanford University 2002 Visiting Associate Professor of History, University of Chicago 2000–2002 Visiting Assistant Professor of History, University of Chicago 1999_2000 Acting Assistant Professor, Department of Classics and Social Science History Institute, Stanford University 1996_1999 Moses and Mary Finley Research Fellow in Ancient History, Darwin College; Invited Lecturer, Faculty of Classics; Senior Member, Faculty of History, University of Cambridge 1990_1995 ‘Vertragsassistent’ and University Lecturer in Ancient History, Department of Ancient History, University of Vienna Fellowships and secondary visiting positions 2020 Visiting Scholar, Lund University (virtual due to COVID-19) 2017_2018 Fellow of the John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation 2017_2018 Visiting Scholar, Institute for Public Knowledge, New York University 2017 ‘Gastprofessor’ (Visiting Professor), Faculty of Law, University of Zürich 2016 Guest Professor, Saxo Institute, University of Copenhagen 2015_2016 Stanford Humanities and Arts Enhanced Sabbatical Fellowship, Stanford University 2013_2021 Catherine R. Kennedy and Daniel L. Grossman Fellow in Human Biology, Stanford University 2011 Visiting
    [Show full text]