DOCSLIB.ORG

Corral Hollow at Linne Rd

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Development Corral Hollow at Linne Rd. Opportunity Tracy, CA 95377 (115.47 ± Acres) Kevin Dougherty, Dough CCIM Nancy Ann Queirolo +1 209 461 6400 +1 209 461 6400 [email protected]@naibenc [email protected] Corral Hollow at Linne Road Offering Memorandum 1 Table of Contents Area Profile 3 Offering Highlights 4 Property Description 5 Parcel Maps 6 Property Map 7 Tracy General Plan Map 8 Tracy Overview 9 Corral Hollow at Linne Road Tracy, CA 95377 Corral Hollow at Linne Road Tracy, California 2 Area Profile San Joaquin County has a well-balanced, diversified economy with a wide range of employment and housing opportunities. Agriculture is the largest economic producer in the County. The County is one of the top ten agricultural-producing counties in the U.S. and produces 20% of the country’s dairy products. The County projects an average Annual population growth of 2.3 tp 2.8 percent between 1990 and 2010, higher than the state average. Expansion is projected in the retail, service, office and manufacturing sectors of the economy. It is the County’s goal to provide a well-balanced, diversified economy with employment opportunities for all economic segments of the County. San Joaquin County is aggresively pro-business and is committed to growth while maintaining a desirable business and living environment while preserving natural resources. This community offers a diversity of views and opinions in its art and culture, providing a wealth of knowledge about past and present. Over 75 languages are spoken within the region and the blending of customs, foods and cultures creates an air of celebration. From preschool to higher education, San Joaquin County has it covered with an abundant array of opportunities to learn and grow. The University of the Pacific, California State University, Stanislaus - Stockton Center, Humphrey’s College and School of Law, National University, and the San Joaquin Delta Community College offer a wide variety of choices for educational opportunities. The county’s 17 school districts provide families with a wide choice for children’s educational development. Corral Hollow at Linne Road Offering Memorandum 3 Offering Highlights • Adjacent to the City of Tracy • Located between two large land planning areas ZLWKLQWKH&LW\RI7UDF\7UDF\+LOOV6SHFLÛF3ODQ DQG(OOLV6SHFLÛF3ODQ • In the path of residential growth • Approximately 1,466 residential units and 50 acres of commercial parcels surround subject property currently being processed • Subject property is located in the County and will require annexation to the City of Tracy in order to secure City Services • Currently zoned AU20 (Agriculture-Urban Reserve) and is in the Williamson Act • Zoned Urban Reserve 10 by the City of Tracy and pre-zoned as light industrial • Byron Bethany Irrigation District (BBID) • Two wells on property: Domestic Well for house; and Well for irrigating the property • 1 mile west of ACE Train Station CorralCorral HollowHollow at LinneLinne Road TTracy,racy, CCaliforniaalifornia 4 Property Description Asking Price: $4,150,000 - $36,000 ± per acre x 115.47 acres Location: 2601 S. Corral Hollow Road, Tracy APN 253-020-11 – 10.09+/- Acres APN 253-020-12 – 105.38+/- Acres Land: ±115.47/- Acres Zoning: AU20 (Agriculture-Urban Reserve), County of San Joaquin Corral Hollow at Linne Road Offering Memorandum 5 Property Parcel Map Corral Hollow at Linne Road Tracy, California 6 Property Map CORDES RANCH 253-020-11 10.09+/- AC Ellis Specific Plan 253-020-12 105.38+/- AC Tracy Hills Specific Plan Corral Hollow at Linne Road Offering Memorandum 7 City of Tracy General Plan Map W PeoriaPeoria AveAve ±±32,63432,634 VVPDPD Corral Hollow at Linne Road Tracy, California 8 Tracy Overview City of Tracy solid base of small businesses, national retailers and restaurants. With an ongoing Population 83,103 commitment to providing high-quality, economical, responsive services to the local FRPPXQLW\7UDF\LVZHOOSRVLWLRQHGIRUIXWXUHFRPPHUFLDORIÛFHDQGLQGXVWULDO Median Age 32.5 development. Under 24 53% 24 - 74 years 18% Top Distribution Employers 75+ years 29% Company Median Household Income $83,460 Costco Cold Storage Costco Distribution Center Median Home Price $118,000 Crate & Barrel Home Depot Distribution Kelloggs-Keebler/APL Logistics McLane Food Service Community Overview Orchard Supply Hardware Tracy is centered in a triangle formed by major Interstate Pepsi/Gatorade - Jacobson Distribution I-205 to the north, I-580 to the west and I-5 to the east. Restoration Hardware This arrangement offers easy access to a modern, well Safeway Distribution Center maintained network of roads and easy access to the Yellow Freight cities of Sacramento, San Francisco, San Jose and Winco Foods Los Angeles. Recreation hot spots like the Bay Delta, Yosemite, Tahoe and the San Francisco Bay area also within easy reach. The City of Tracy has established itself as an important suburb to the San Francisco Bay Area region with its Corral Hollow at Linne Road Offering Memorandum 9 Presented By: NAI Benchmark First Commercial 2920 Pacific Avenue Stockton, CA 95204 +1 209 461 6400 naibenchmark.com Kevin Dougherty, CCIM Principal +1 209 461 6400 BRE#01258350 [email protected] NNancy AQAnn Queirolo Senior Associate +1 209 461 6400 BRE#01134315 [email protected] JudyJ d StillianStilli Executive Assistant +1 209 461 6400 BRE#01386505 [email protected] Hollow at Linne Road Tracy, California 10.
Recommended publications
  • Floodplain and Wetland Assessment for the Site 300 Entrance/Exit Corral Hollow Road Widening Project

    Floodplain and Wetland Assessment for the Site 300 Entrance/Exit Corral Hollow Road Widening Project

    LLNL-AR-820616 L L NFloodplain and Wetland L - XAssessment for the Site 300 X XEntrance/Exit Corral X -Hollow Road Widening X X XProject Adjacent to the X XLawrence Livermore National Laboratory Experimental Test Site March 15, 2021 Floodplain and Wetland Assessment for the Site 300 Entrance/Exit Corral Hollow Road Widening Project Prepared by: Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC Environmental Functional Area Water Resources and Environmental Planning Group Prepared for: U.S. Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration Livermore Field Office Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory is operated by Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, for the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration under Contract DE-AC52-07NA27344. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory ii Floodplain and Wetland Assessment for the Site 300 Entrance/Exit Corral Hollow Road Widening Project Table of Contents Overview ......................................................................................................................................... 1 Project Description.......................................................................................................................... 1 Description of the Project Site ........................................................................................................ 2 Potential Floodplains Impacts ......................................................................................................... 3 Potential Wetlands Impacts............................................................................................................
  • (Oncorhynchus Mykiss) in Streams of the San Francisco Estuary, California

    (Oncorhynchus Mykiss) in Streams of the San Francisco Estuary, California

    Historical Distribution and Current Status of Steelhead/Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in Streams of the San Francisco Estuary, California Robert A. Leidy, Environmental Protection Agency, San Francisco, CA Gordon S. Becker, Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration, Oakland, CA Brett N. Harvey, John Muir Institute of the Environment, University of California, Davis, CA This report should be cited as: Leidy, R.A., G.S. Becker, B.N. Harvey. 2005. Historical distribution and current status of steelhead/rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in streams of the San Francisco Estuary, California. Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration, Oakland, CA. Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration TABLE OF CONTENTS Forward p. 3 Introduction p. 5 Methods p. 7 Determining Historical Distribution and Current Status; Information Presented in the Report; Table Headings and Terms Defined; Mapping Methods Contra Costa County p. 13 Marsh Creek Watershed; Mt. Diablo Creek Watershed; Walnut Creek Watershed; Rodeo Creek Watershed; Refugio Creek Watershed; Pinole Creek Watershed; Garrity Creek Watershed; San Pablo Creek Watershed; Wildcat Creek Watershed; Cerrito Creek Watershed Contra Costa County Maps: Historical Status, Current Status p. 39 Alameda County p. 45 Codornices Creek Watershed; Strawberry Creek Watershed; Temescal Creek Watershed; Glen Echo Creek Watershed; Sausal Creek Watershed; Peralta Creek Watershed; Lion Creek Watershed; Arroyo Viejo Watershed; San Leandro Creek Watershed; San Lorenzo Creek Watershed; Alameda Creek Watershed; Laguna Creek (Arroyo de la Laguna) Watershed Alameda County Maps: Historical Status, Current Status p. 91 Santa Clara County p. 97 Coyote Creek Watershed; Guadalupe River Watershed; San Tomas Aquino Creek/Saratoga Creek Watershed; Calabazas Creek Watershed; Stevens Creek Watershed; Permanente Creek Watershed; Adobe Creek Watershed; Matadero Creek/Barron Creek Watershed Santa Clara County Maps: Historical Status, Current Status p.
  • Earle E. Williams Papers, 1853-1983 (Bulk 1952-1983)

    Earle E. Williams Papers, 1853-1983 (Bulk 1952-1983)

    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/tf058000z8 No online items Guide to the Earle E. Williams papers, 1853-1983 (bulk 1952-1983) Processed by The Bancroft Library staff The Bancroft Library. University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California, 94720-6000 Phone: (510) 642-6481 Fax: (510) 642-7589 Email: [email protected] URL: http://bancroft.berkeley.edu © 1998 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Note History --History, California --History, Central Valley/SierraGeographical (By Place) --California --Central Valley/Sierra Guide to the Earle E. Williams BANC MSS 86/50 c 1 papers, 1853-1983 (bulk 1952-1983) Guide to the Earle E. Williams Papers, 1853-1983 (bulk 1952-1983) Collection number: BANC MSS 86/50 c The Bancroft Library University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California Contact Information: The Bancroft Library. University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California, 94720-6000 Phone: (510) 642-6481 Fax: (510) 642-7589 Email: [email protected] URL: http://bancroft.berkeley.edu Processed by: The Bancroft Library staff Date Completed: 1997 Encoded by: Xiuzhi Zhou © 1998 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Collection Summary Collection Title: Earle E. Williams Papers, Date (inclusive): 1853-1983 Date (bulk): (bulk 1952-1983) Collection Number: BANC MSS 86/50 c Creator: Williams, Earle E. Extent: Number of containers: 7 cartonsLinear feet: 8.75 Repository: The Bancroft Library. Berkeley, California 94720-6000 Physical Location: For current information on the location of these materials, please consult the Library's online catalog. Abstract: Correspondence, writings, and research, chiefly relating to the history of Tracy and San Joaquin County, Calif.
  • Preliminary General Plan

    Preliminary General Plan

    ® General Plan Revision Preliminary General Plan April 2015 ® General Plan Revision Preliminary General Plan Prepared for: California State Parks Off-Highway Motor Vehicle Recreation Division Edmund G. Brown, Jr. Governor John Laird Secretary, The Natural Resources Agency Lisa Mangat Acting Director, California State Parks P.O. Box 942896 Sacramento, CA 94296-0001 April 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page ACRONYMS AND OTHER ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................................ iv CHAPTER 1 – INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1 Local and Regional Context ............................................................................................. 1-1 1.2 Purpose of Acquisition ..................................................................................................... 1-1 1.3 Sense of Place .................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.4 Site Characteristics ........................................................................................................... 1-3 1.5 Purpose of the General Plan ............................................................................................. 1-3 1.6 Organization of the General Plan ..................................................................................... 1-4 1.7 Subsequent Planning .......................................................................................................
  • Final Report on the Archaeological

    Final Report on the Archaeological

    Final Report on the Archaeological Field Work Conducted on a Portion of the Kiriṭ-smin ’ayye Sokṓte Tápporikmatka [Place of Yerba Buena and Laurel Trees Site] CA-SCL-895 (Blauer Ranch) Located within the Evergreen Valley District, San Jose, Santa Clara County, Ca. Report Prepared for San Jose State University, Department of Anthropology The Muwekma Ohlone Tribe of the San Francisco Bay Area, and College of Social Sciences Research Foundation Prepared by: Emily C. McDaniel, Alan Leventhal (MA), Diane DiGiuseppe (MS), Melynda Atwood (MS), David Grant (MS) and Muwekma Tribal Members: Rosemary Cambra, Charlene Nijmeh, Monica V. Arellano, Sheila Guzman-Schmidt, Gloria E. Gomez, and Norma Sanchez With Contributions by Dr. Eric Bartelink, Department of Anthropology, California State University, Chico Dr. Brian Kemp, Department of Anthropology, Washington State University, Pullman Cara Monroe, School of Biological Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman Jean Geary (MS), Department of Nutrition, Food Science and Packaging, SJSU Orhan Kaya, Archaeological Illustrator December 2012 Table of Contents Page No. Table of Contents i List of Figures iii List of Tables x List of Maps xii Acknowledgments xiii Dedication of this Report xiv Chapter 1: Introduction, Excavation Background History and Overview 1-1 (Emily C. McDaniel and Alan Leventhal) Chapter 2: Environmental Setting and Paleo-Ecological Reconstruction and Catchment Analysis (Alan Leventhal and Emily C. McDaniel) 2-1 Chapter 3: The Analysis of Human Osteological Remains 3-1 (Emily C. McDaniel, Melynda Atwood, Diane DiGiuseppe, and Alan Leventhal) Chapter 4: Preliminary Report on the Extraction of DNA for Sites: CA-SCL-30H, CA-SCL-38, CA-SCL-287/SMA263, CA-SCL-755, CA-SCL-851, CA-SCL-870, CA-SCL-894, and CA-SCL-895 4-1 (Cara Monroe and Dr.
  • Alameda Countywide Clean Water Program Stormwater Resource Plan

    Alameda Countywide Clean Water Program Stormwater Resource Plan

    ALAMEDA COUNTYWIDE CLEAN WATER PROGRAM STORM WATER RESOURCE PLAN MEMBER AGENCIES: Alameda Albany PUBLIC RELEASE Berkeley Dublin DRAFT Emeryville Fremont Hayward Livermore Newark Oakland Piedmont Pleasanton San Leandro Union City County of Alameda Alameda County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Zone 7 Water Agency October 2018 Table of Contents Table of Contents ..................................................................................................................... 2 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Purpose of the Plan .................................................................................................... 5 1.2 Alameda County’s Watersheds: Approach and Characterization ................................ 5 1.3 Water Quality Issues And Regulatory Requirements .................................................. 5 1.4 Organization of the SWRP .......................................................................................... 6 2. Coordination and Collaboration ...................................................................................... 7 2.1 Entities Involved in Plan Development ........................................................................ 7 2.2 Coordination of Cooperating Entities and Stakeholders .............................................. 7 2.3 Relationship with Existing Planning Documents .......................................................... 7 2.3.1 San Francisco
  • Brief History of the Tesla Area

    Brief History of the Tesla Area

    Brief History of the Tesla Area Dan L. Mosier Thousands of years ago, the Yokuts, Ohlones, and probably other Native American tribes inhabited the Tesla area. They came for the abundant game and plant food, and established seasonal villages along stream courses. In 1776, Spanish explorer Juan Bautista de Anza passed through the Corral Hollow region while on his return trip to Monterey. De Anza camp number 102 was designated at Tesla by a plaque erected in 1976 during the Bicentennial Celebration of that famous trek. Because of the strong winds prevalent in the canyon, de Anza named it "El Arroyo de los Buenos Aires," or Creek of the Good Winds. Early Mexican vaqueros later established a well-known trail called "El Camino Viejo" through Corral Hollow which was to connect San Antonio (Oakland) with San Pedro (Los Angeles). It was along this trail that the vaqueros ran cattle and wild mustangs and held them in temporary corrals before being herded down the trail to Mexico. In 1846, Captain Charles Imus and his party of emigrants, who parted from the Donner party at Fort Bridger, made a winter camp in the mouth of Corral Hollow. Like the Mexican vaqueros, Captain Imus also captured wild horses and built corrals until he was ordered by landowner Antonio Pico to leave for trespassing. These abandoned horse corrals were noticed by the Argonauts traveling over El Camino Viejo on their way to the gold fields, and the canyon soon became known as "Corral Hollow." In 1850, Horatio Wright, John Stockholm, William Breyton, and Edward B.
  • 3.4 Biological Resources for the Purpose of This EIR, Biological Resources Comprise Vegetation, Wildlife, Natural Communities, and Wetlands and Other Waters

    3.4 Biological Resources for the Purpose of This EIR, Biological Resources Comprise Vegetation, Wildlife, Natural Communities, and Wetlands and Other Waters

    Impact Analysis Alameda County Community Development Agency Biological Resources 3.4 Biological Resources For the purpose of this EIR, biological resources comprise vegetation, wildlife, natural communities, and wetlands and other waters. Potential biological resource impacts associated with the program and the two individual projects are analyzed. Potential impacts are described quantitatively and qualitatively in Section 3.4.2, Environmental Impacts. This section also identifies specific and detailed measures to avoid, minimize, or compensate for potentially significant impacts on biological resources, where necessary. 3.4.1 Existing Conditions Regulatory Setting Federal Endangered Species Act Pursuant to the federal Endangered Species Act (ESA), USFWS and the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) have authority over projects that may result in take of a species listed as threatened or endangered under the act. Take is defined under the ESA, in part, as killing, harming, or harassing. Under federal regulations, take is further defined to include habitat modification or degradation that results, or is reasonably expected to result, in death or injury to wildlife by significantly impairing essential behavioral patterns, including breeding, feeding, or sheltering. If a likelihood exists that a project would result in take of a federally listed species, either an incidental take permit, under Section 10(a) of the ESA, or a federal interagency consultation, under Section 7 of the ESA, is required. Several federally listed species—vernal pool fairy shrimp (Branchinecta lynchi), longhorn fairy shrimp (Branchinecta longiantenna), vernal pool tadpole shrimp (Lepidurus packardi), California tiger salamander (Ambystoma californiense), California red‐legged frog (Rana draytonii), Alameda whipsnake (Masticophis lateralis euryxanthus), and San Joaquin kit fox (Vulpes macrotis mutica)—have the potential to be affected by activities associated with the Golden Hills and Patterson Pass projects as well as subsequent repowering projects.
  • ALAMEDA COUNTYWIDE CLEAN WATER PROGRAM STORM WATER RESOURCE PLAN January 2019

    ALAMEDA COUNTYWIDE CLEAN WATER PROGRAM STORM WATER RESOURCE PLAN January 2019

    ALAMEDA COUNTYWIDE CLEAN WATER PROGRAM STORM WATER MEMBER AGENCIES: RESOURCE PLAN Alameda Albany Berkeley Dublin Emeryville Fremont Hayward Livermore Newark Oakland Piedmont Pleasanton San Leandro Union City County of Alameda Alameda County Flood January 2019 Control and Water Conservation District Zone 7 Water Agency Table of Contents Table of Contents ..................................................................................................................... 2 1. Introduction ................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Purpose of the Plan .................................................................................................... 5 1.2 Alameda County’s Watersheds: Approach and Characterization ................................ 5 1.3 Water Quality Issues And Regulatory Requirements .................................................. 5 1.4 Organization of the SWRP .......................................................................................... 6 2. Coordination and Collaboration ................................................................... 8 2.1 Entities Involved in Plan Development ........................................................................ 8 2.2 Coordination of Cooperating Entities and Stakeholders .............................................. 8 2.3 Relationship with Existing Planning Documents .......................................................... 8 2.3.1 San Francisco Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan ................
  • Safety Element

    Safety Element

    SAFETY ELEMENT ALAMEDA COUNTY Adopted January 8, 2013 Amended February 4, 2014 ALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY This page has been intentionally left blank CREDITS AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Alameda County Board of Supervisors Scott Haggerty, District 1 Richard Valle, District 2 Wilma Chan, District 3 Nate Miley District 4 Keith Carson, District 5 Alameda County Planning Commission Frank Imhof, District 1 Alane Loisel, District 1 Lawrence Ratto, District 2 Kathie Ready, District 3 Jeff Moore, District 4 Richard Rhodes, District 4 Mike Jacob, District 5 Alameda County Community Development Agency Chris Bazar, Agency Director Albert Lopez, Planning Director Elizabeth McElligott, Assistant Planning Director Angela Robinson Piñon, Senior Planner Robert Taylor, GIS Analyst SAFETY ELEMENT OF THE ALAMEDA COUNTY GENERAL PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................iv 1.0 OVERVIEW .........................................................................................................iv 1.1. Planning Context ....................................................................................................iv 1.2. Citizen Participation ...............................................................................................iv 1.3. Scope and Organization ........................................................................................ v 2.0 AUTHORITY AND PURPOSE .............................................................................vi
  • August 21, 2020

    August 21, 2020

    Growing Northern California fires straining resources as Newsom calls for help By Dominic Fracassa, Alexei Koseff and Dustin Gardiner San Francisco Chronicle, Friday, August 21, 2020 Friday brought another day of intense firefighting across Northern California, as clusters of lightning- sparked conflagrations continue their deadly march across the region. The fires so far have killed at least four people, displaced thousands — possibly for weeks rather than days — destroyed homes and torched precious redwood forests with little sign of reprieve in sight. The SCU Lightning Complex fire, comprised of some 20 conflagrations in Santa Clara County, Alameda County, Contra Costa County, San Joaquin County and Stanislaus counties became the largest blaze in the state after it exploded to cover just under 230,000 acres as of Friday afternoon. Firefighters have so far placed containment barriers around just 10% of the fire, which is now the seventh largest on record in the state. The LNU Lightning Complex fire in Napa, Sonoma, Lake, Yolo and Solano counties grew more modestly overnight, standing at just over 219,000 acres Friday afternoon and with 7% containment. Firefighters have still not been able to eke out any containment against the 50,000-acre CZU August Lightning Complex in Santa Cruz and San Mateo counties, which was bearing down menacingly on the already evacuated UC Santa Cruz campus. Law enforcement and fire officials have evacuated 64,600 residents between the two counties. Chris Clark, chief deputy of the Santa Cruz County Sheriff’s Office, warned those fleeing the fires that it could be weeks before they can return to their homes due to the unpredictable nature of the blazes.
  • California Log of Bridges on State Highways

    California Log of Bridges on State Highways

    October, 2018 LOG OF BRIDGES ON STATE HIGHWAYS i October, 2018 LOG OF BRIDGES ON STATE HIGHWAYS California Log of Bridges on State Highways Contents Bridge List Items and Keys to Coded Information...................................................ii County Table................................................................................................................v Alphabetic City Code Table.......................................................................................vi District Log..................................................................................................................1 Index of Bridge Numbers...........................................................................................I1 Prepared by California Department of Transportation Structure Maintenance & Investigations The information in this publication is available on the World Wide Web at: http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/structur/strmaint/brlog2.htm ii LO G OF BR IDGE S ON STA TE HIG HW A YSOctober, 2018 LOG OF BRIDGES ON STATE HIGHWAYSOctober, BRIDGE LIST ITEMS AND KEYS TO CODED INFORMATION Postmile Entries in BOLD type show DISTRICT-COUNTY-ROUTE. Other entries show postmile prefix followed by postmile to the nearest hundredth of a mile. Prefixes of R, M, and N refer to re-aligned routes. Prefix L refers to a section or route paralleling another route. When the route is on the deck of the bridge, the postmile is recorded at the beginning of the structure (i.e. the lowest postmile on the bridge). When the route goes under the structure, the postmile