Federal Reserve Bulletin

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Federal Reserve Bulletin VOLUME 73 • NUMBER 5 • MAY 1987 FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM, WASHINGTON, D.C. PUBLICATIONS COMMITTEE Joseph R. Coyne, Chairman • Michael Bradfield • S. David Frost • Griffith L. Garwood • James L. Kichline • Edwin M. Truman The FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN is issued monthly under the direction of the staff publications committee. This committee is responsible for opinions expressed except in official statements and signed articles. It is assisted by the Economic Editing Section headed by Mendelle T. Berenson, the Graphic Communications Section under the direction of Peter G. Thomas, and Publications Services supervised by Linda C. Kyles. Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Table of Contents 321 U.S. INTERNATIONAL TRANSACTIONS Affairs, March 24, 1987. [Vice Chairman IN 1986 Johnson presented identical testimony be- fore the Subcommittee on International Fi- The external deficit of the United States nance and Monetary Policy of the Senate widened to a record level in 1986, despite Committee on Banking, Housing, and Ur- the further decline in the foreign exchange ban Affairs, March 25, 1987.] value of the dollar. 347 ANNOUNCEMENTS 330 TREASURY AND FEDERAL RESERVE FOREIGN EXCHANGE OPERATIONS Redeposit service approved for Federal Re- serve Banks. After trading fairly steadily throughout No- vember and the first half of December, the Reductions approved in the fee structure dollar moved sharply lower until the end of for book-entry securities. January. Money stock data revised to include changes in benchmarks and seasonal fac- 336 INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION tors. Industrial production increased an estimat- Changes in official staff commentaries on ed 0.5 percent in February. Regulations B, E, and Z. Proposal to incorporate credit risks on off- 338 STATEMENTS TO CONGRESS balance-sheet interest rate and exchange rate contracts into a proposed risk-based Martha R. Seger, Member, Board of Gover- capital measure. nors, discusses legislation that has been introduced to require disclosures of prices Admission of five state banks to member- and terms in credit card applications and to ship in the Federal Reserve System. establish a nationwide ceiling on credit card interest rates, in a statement submitted to 351 LEGAL DEVELOPMENTS the Subcommittee on Consumer Affairs and Various bank holding company, bank ser- Coinage of the House Committee on Bank- vice corporation, and bank merger orders; ing, Finance and Urban Affairs, March 18, and pending cases. 1987. 341 Manuel H. Johnson, Jr., Vice Chairman, 393 DIRECTORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve BANKS AND BRANCHES System, provides an overview of bank- List of directors by Federal Reserve Dis- affiliated export trading companies and says trict. that the Board opposes any proposals that would increase the risk to the bank from the AI FINANCIAL AND BUSINESS STATISTICS affiliated export trading company, before the Subcommittee on Financial Institutions, A3 Domestic Financial Statistics Supervision, and Regulation of the House A44 Domestic Nonfinancial Statistics Committee on Banking, Finance and Urban A53 International Statistics Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis A69 GUIDE TO TABULAR PRESENTATION, A87 INDEX TO STATISTICAL TABLES STATISTICAL RELEASES, AND SPECIAL TABLES A89 FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS, BRANCHES, AND OFFICES A80 BOARD OF GOVERNORS AND STAFF A90 MAP OF FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM A82 FEDERAL OPEN MARKET COMMITTEE AND STAFF; ADVISORY COUNCILS A84 FEDERAL RESERVE BOARD PUBLICATIONS Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis U.S. International Transactions in 1986 Charles P. Thomas, of the Board's Division of securities, continuing the trend that began in International Finance, prepared this article. 1984. However, official inflows increased mark- edly, after having been negligible in 1985, as The external deficit of the United States widened foreign official agencies bought U.S. dollar as- to a record level in 1986, despite the further sets in response to upward pressure on their decline in the foreign exchange value of the currencies against the dollar. dollar. For the year as a whole, the merchandise The lower value of the dollar and the possibili- trade deficit reached $148 billion, while the cur- ty of more balanced fiscal and monetary policies rent account deficit, which includes net receipts worldwide lend credence to a slightly improved of investment income and other services in addi- outlook for the U.S. trade deficit. However, the tion to merchandise trade, reached $141 billion continuation of large current account deficits (chart 1). The depreciation of the dollar began to implies further erosion of the U.S. net foreign have noticeable effects in U.S. export markets, asset position and points to deterioration in the helping the volume of U.S. exports to grow service account in the future. strongly during 1986 in the face of some slowing in the growth of gross national product abroad; but it appears to have restrained the growth of MAJOR INFLUENCES ON imports only slightly. The slow response of the U.S. INTERNATIONAL TRANSACTIONS trade balance to the depreciation is attributable in part to normal lags in the adjustment of trade U.S. international transactions were dominated volume and prices. It also reflects an unusually in 1986 by the continued decline of the dollar and laggard response of import prices to the depreci- the persistent effects of its prolonged apprecia- ation, the uneven rate of depreciation against the tion between 1980 and 1985. Changes in econom- currencies of several key regions, and the contin- ic activity at home and abroad affected the U.S. ued expansion of U.S. consumption in spite of external balances in 1986 relatively little, as slower income growth. growth rates in the United States and the rest of The current account deficit in 1986 was fi- the world converged (chart 2). Domestic demand nanced largely by private purchases of U.S. grew somewhat more at home than abroad on average in 1986 and contributed to the sustained strength in imports. 1. U.S. trade and current accounts Changes in U.S. international price competi- Billions of dollars tiveness, measured by the ratio of foreign prices in dollar terms to U.S. prices, explain much of the movement in the U.S. trade position in recent years, as illustrated in chart 3. When foreign prices rise faster than U.S. prices or when the dollar depreciates, U.S. price competi- tiveness improves. Movements in real net ex- ports have tended to track shifts in price compet- itiveness with a lag of one to two years. The depreciation of the dollar that began in 1971 was followed by a sharp increase in net exports in the Source. U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis. years 1973 through 1975. Similarly, the deprecia- Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 322 Federal Reserve Bulletin • May 1987 2. Growth of real GNP first quarter of 1985, the dollar adjusted for Percentage change from year earlier changes in relative consumer prices appreciated 6 percent against the Canadian dollar and 25 percent against the currencies of eight major U.S. trading partners among the developing countries; against the currencies of the other major industrial countries it appreciated roughly 65 percent (chart 4). (This price-adjusted, or real, exchange rate is simply the inverse of the mea- sure of price competitiveness depicted in chart 3.) Since early 1985, the price-adjusted dollar has 1. The GNP of foreign industrial countries is the weighted average declined sharply against the currencies of the GNP for the Group of Ten countries besides the United States and industrial countries other than Canada, but it has Switzerland. Weights are proportional to each country's share in world exports plus imports during 1972-76. continued to rise against those of the developing countries on average. At the end of 1986, the value of the price-adjusted dollar was 5 percent tion during 1977-78 fostered another sharp in- above its 1980 level relative to the currencies of crease in net exports beginning in 1978. In both the industrial countries and 34 percent above the cases rapid increases in exports accounted for 1980 level relative to those of the developing most of the gain in net exports. In 1986, the countries. dollar depreciated 10 percent in nominal terms Much of the change in the dollar's value over against the currencies of 18 major trading coun- the past six years has reflected differences in tries, while U.S. consumer price inflation was 6 real, or inflation-adjusted, interest rates across percentage points lower than the average price countries. Over most of the period of floating inflation in the same 18 countries. These changes exchange rates since early 1973, the price-adjust- in exchange rates and prices improved U.S. price ed value of the dollar against the currencies of competitiveness during the year, returning the the other Group of Ten countries and the differ- index of relative consumer prices to about its ence between U.S. long-term real interest rates 1981 level. Movements in U.S. price competi- and an average of comparable rates for those tiveness based on relative wholesale prices tell countries have moved roughly together (chart 5). about the same story, qualitatively. The two series diverged beginning in early 1984, The improvement in U.S. price competitive- as the dollar continued to rise sharply despite a ness over the past two years has not been decline in the relative real return on dollar assets. uniform across countries. Between 1980 and the Since early 1985, however, the relationship ap- pears to have been reestablished. The sustained 3. U.S. price competitiveness and net exports 1 Billions of 1982 dollars 1980= 100 4.
Recommended publications
  • The Wild Ride of Mortgage-Backed Securities
    The Wild Ride of Mortgage-Backed Securities The roots of the current home ITWASN’TSUPPOSED to hap- pen this way. The market for home mort- mortgage market crisis. gage loans was never supposed to shut. No matter the crisis—war, banking fail- ure, or presidential impeachment—the mortgage market was not supposed to deny credit to American homeowners. So how could this happen? How could the mortgage industry, a close to trillion- dollar industry, suddenly collapse? Who is to blame for the ordinary Americans being denied a mortgage to buy into the American dream? How could $80 billion to $90 billion be wiped out virtually overnight? Blame it on Lew Ranieri, father of the mortgage market. I know. I STEPHENA.ROTH was there from the beginning. 3 4 ZELL/LURIEREALESTATECENTER In 1978, I applied to Stanford dollars in concession stand sales and say- University’s Graduate School of Business. ing good-bye to everyone from security to If there was anyone who should not have the back-stage hands. When the teacher’s been allowed to attend an MBA program, assistant for dummy math went around it was me. I was a graduate of public the room and made everyone give their schools, son of a car dealer without a col- name and prior occupation, there was lege education, and my first career had dead silence after I spoke. I heard some- been as a concert promoter. What a mis- one from the back, dressed in a polo shirt fit—and I was a misfit—for what Business with kakis and tassel-loafers, say: “You’re Week had called that year the “Best in the wrong room.” Business School in the U.S.” I managed to make it through two I had somehow managed to graduate years of preppie-dom because Stanford Phi Beta Kappa from Berkeley—although was on an “Honors,” “Pass,” or “Fail” sys- I think it was largely a recognition that I tem.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Details of the Elliott 152 and 153
    Appendix 1 Technical Details of the Elliott 152 and 153 Introduction The Elliott 152 computer was part of the Admiralty’s MRS5 (medium range system 5) naval gunnery project, described in Chap. 2. The Elliott 153 computer, also known as the D/F (direction-finding) computer, was built for GCHQ and the Admiralty as described in Chap. 3. The information in this appendix is intended to supplement the overall descriptions of the machines as given in Chaps. 2 and 3. A1.1 The Elliott 152 Work on the MRS5 contract at Borehamwood began in October 1946 and was essen- tially finished in 1950. Novel target-tracking radar was at the heart of the project, the radar being synchronized to the computer’s clock. In his enthusiasm for perfecting the radar technology, John Coales seems to have spent little time on what we would now call an overall systems design. When Harry Carpenter joined the staff of the Computing Division at Borehamwood on 1 January 1949, he recalls that nobody had yet defined the way in which the control program, running on the 152 computer, would interface with guns and radar. Furthermore, nobody yet appeared to be working on the computational algorithms necessary for three-dimensional trajectory predic- tion. As for the guns that the MRS5 system was intended to control, not even the basic ballistics parameters seemed to be known with any accuracy at Borehamwood [1, 2]. A1.1.1 Communication and Data-Rate The physical separation, between radar in the Borehamwood car park and digital computer in the laboratory, necessitated an interconnecting cable of about 150 m in length.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report
    COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS ANNUAL REPORT July 1,1996-June 30,1997 Main Office Washington Office The Harold Pratt House 1779 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W. 58 East 68th Street, New York, NY 10021 Washington, DC 20036 Tel. (212) 434-9400; Fax (212) 861-1789 Tel. (202) 518-3400; Fax (202) 986-2984 Website www. foreignrela tions. org e-mail publicaffairs@email. cfr. org OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS, 1997-98 Officers Directors Charlayne Hunter-Gault Peter G. Peterson Term Expiring 1998 Frank Savage* Chairman of the Board Peggy Dulany Laura D'Andrea Tyson Maurice R. Greenberg Robert F Erburu Leslie H. Gelb Vice Chairman Karen Elliott House ex officio Leslie H. Gelb Joshua Lederberg President Vincent A. Mai Honorary Officers Michael P Peters Garrick Utley and Directors Emeriti Senior Vice President Term Expiring 1999 Douglas Dillon and Chief Operating Officer Carla A. Hills Caryl R Haskins Alton Frye Robert D. Hormats Grayson Kirk Senior Vice President William J. McDonough Charles McC. Mathias, Jr. Paula J. Dobriansky Theodore C. Sorensen James A. Perkins Vice President, Washington Program George Soros David Rockefeller Gary C. Hufbauer Paul A. Volcker Honorary Chairman Vice President, Director of Studies Robert A. Scalapino Term Expiring 2000 David Kellogg Cyrus R. Vance Jessica R Einhorn Vice President, Communications Glenn E. Watts and Corporate Affairs Louis V Gerstner, Jr. Abraham F. Lowenthal Hanna Holborn Gray Vice President and Maurice R. Greenberg Deputy National Director George J. Mitchell Janice L. Murray Warren B. Rudman Vice President and Treasurer Term Expiring 2001 Karen M. Sughrue Lee Cullum Vice President, Programs Mario L. Baeza and Media Projects Thomas R.
    [Show full text]
  • Salomon Brothers, Inc
    Investment Company Act of 1940/3c CR c44 14Y MAN GEORGE CLEARY R.3MINO M.XRR 1690- 19611 MARK PRAWLEY JR FOWLER HAMILTON GERGE 05 SIPIO lOll -1954 ANDRE NEWBURG CLEARY GOTTLIEB STEEN HAMILTON LEO GOTTLIEB JAMES BLAIR %LTER ROTHSCHILD MELVIN STEEN GEORGE BALL .RD PUGH ONE STATE STREET PLAZA OE WEISZ LYMAN TOMDEL.JR HA000RT JAMES JOHNSON JR STILES NEW YORK N.Y 10004 COUNSEL ...-IEYM.CONE.m 1752 STREET N.W ALAN APPELBAUM WASHINGTON D.C 00030 EDWIN MISHKIN 202 725-2700 GEORGE COHEN 212 344-0600 TELEX 440507 STEPHEN L.DINCES FAX OPS 513 lOll 409.0542 ..J.SPEED CARROLL FAX 003 /0/3 lOll 420-0046 PETER PAINE.JR CABLE CLEARGOLAW 41.AVENUE CE FRIEDLAND ANTHONY 000CH 75008 PARIS FRANCE ROGER W.THOMAS TELEX 1-563-1494 ALBERT PERGAM WUI 62985 TELEX 650021 GEORGE .1 ORUMBACHJR RCA 235438 FAX GPO 1-563-6637 PETER KARASZ FAX 0P3I 18633509 LOUIS KAHN FACSIMII.E RUE DE LA LQI 23 STE MARK WALKER TELEc0PIERGPS 1/2/3 212 480-0152 LESLIE SAMUELS 1040 BRUSSELS BELGIUM RAPIFAX 212 483-1361 2-030-2020 ALLAN SPERLNG FAX 2I2 344 0925 TELEX 22935 PETER GAPROW GP2 JAMES MUMSELL FAX GPO 12301635 SANDRA WEIKSNER FAX SF3 0-630-0006 EVAN DAVIS WINCHESTER HOUSE WEBB MON 12 77 LONDON WALL MARIETTA POERIO 17 LAND ALAN DUNNING Aor1 M_tco4zPrIoA.ENO CHRISTOPHER LUNDINO TELEX 67659 LAURENT ALPERT BARRY M.FOX pt _.i-C-ft JUDITH RIPPS VICTOR LEWKOW -4 -_.- f\ I0iCCNOUSC$TRCET LESLIE SILVERMAN RICHARD SUSKO SHALEN TELEX 00401 STEPHEN FAX 003 1-101100 RICHARD ZIEGLER JAMES PEASLEE ALAN SELLER -- ---- THOMAS .1 MOLONEY DAVID BABEL EDWARD KLEINBARD ReSIDENT PARTNERS __________
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Industry Programme
    CETACEAN STOCK ASSESSMENT IN RELATION TO EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION INDUSTRY SOUND by Prepared for Joint Industry Programme 30 September 2009 LGL Report TA4582-1 CETACEAN STOCK ASSESSMENT IN RELATION TO EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION INDUSTRY SOUND by LGL Limited, environmental research associates 22 Fisher Street, POB 280 King City, Ontario, Canada L7B 1A6 9768 Second Street Sidney, British Columbia, Canada V8L 3Y8 and LGL Alaska Research Associates Inc. 1101 East 76th Avenue, Suite B Anchorage, Alaska, United States 99518 Prepared for Joint Industry Programme 30 September 2009 LGL Report TA4582-1 Executive Summary Purpose and Objectives This project investigated the relationship between the oil industry‘s offshore E&P activities and trends in the distribution, abundance and rates of increase of key cetacean stocks found in three areas where E&P activities are intensive. The approach taken was to compare the status and population trends of stocks of key cetacean species in three areas with E&P activities―Alaska (subdivided into three regions, the Beaufort, Bering and Chukchi seas), Australia (Western and southeast regions), and Sakhalin Island, Russia―with corresponding parameters for stocks of the same species (where possible) in areas where E&P activities were absent or greatly reduced. The project involved a critical review of existing and historical data on cetacean stocks, and a compilation of data on E&P activities and non-industry factors that may have influenced stocks, in the areas of interest. Data were assessed in terms of quality, quantity, and temporal and spatial coverage to determine whether sufficient data were available for a reasonable assessment of correlations between cetacean populations and E&P activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Warren Buffett's Wild Ride at Salomon (Fortune, 1997)
    Warren Buffett's Wild Ride at Salomon (Fortune, 1997) Warren Buffett, interim chairman of Solomon Brothers, Inc., gestures during testimony before a House Commerce subcommittee on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., Sept. 5, 1991. Photograph by Marcy Nighswander — AP Photos By CAROL J. LOOMIS October 27, 1997 As Sanford I. Weill, 64, the dealmaking CEO of Travelers Group, steps up to his biggest acquisition ever—the purchase of Salomon Inc. for $9 billion—a famous Wall Street figure, Warren E.Buffett, 67, steps out of Salomon. His days there began almost precisely a decade ago, in the early fall of 1987, when his company, Berkshire Hathaway, became Salomon‘s largest shareholder and he moved in as a director. But that was training-wheels stuff, nothing to the high- wire unicycle act that came later: Buffett was physically, emotionally, and really at Salomon for nine months in 1991 and 1992, when the firm’s trading illegalities created a giant sucking sound that brought him in to run the place. Though much has been written about Buffett and Salomon, a lot of what you will read here will be new. I have been a friend of Buffett‘s for about 30 years and have long been a shareholder of Berkshire (though never a shareholder of Salomon). As a friend, I do some editing every year on Buffett‘s well-known annual report, and we have for eons talked about collaborating on a book about his business life. All this has given me many opportunities to learn Buffett‘s thinking. Some of what I’ve gleaned has ended up in FORTUNE stories that I wrote, most especially in an April 11, 1988, article, “The Inside Story of Warren Buffett,” and in an accompanying box, “The Wisdom of Salomon?” But much of what I learned about Buffett‘s experiences at Salomon in 1991 was confidential, embargoed by him because Salomon was both struggling to regain its footing and dealing with big legal problems.
    [Show full text]
  • Commercial Banks and the Capital Markets
    Size Matters: Commercial Banks and the Capital Markets CHARLES K. WHITEHEAD* The conventional story is that the Gramm–Leach–Bliley Act broke down the Glass–Steagall Act’s wall separating commercial and investment banking in 1999, increasing risky business activities by commercial banks and precipitating the 2007 financial crisis. But the conventional story is only one-half complete. What it omits is the effect of change in commercial bank regulation on financial firms other than the commercial banks. After all, it was the failure of Lehman Brothers—an investment bank, not a commercial bank—that sparked the meltdown. This Article provides the rest of the story. The basic premise is straightforward: By 1999, the Glass–Steagall Act’s original purpose— to protect commercial banks from the capital markets—had reversed. Instead, its main function had become protecting the capital markets from new competition by commercial banks. Once the wall came down, commercial banks gained a sizeable share of the investment banking business. To offset lost revenues, investment banks pursued riskier businesses, growing their principal investments and increasing the amounts they borrowed to finance them. In effect, they assumed the features of commercial banks—a reliance on short-term borrowing to finance longer-term (and riskier) investments. For the investment banks, combining the two was lethal and eventually triggered the financial meltdown. The divide between two sets of regulators, those regulating commercial banks and those regulating investment banks, enabled the change. The need for greater regulatory coordination has grown with convergence in the financial markets. Although new regulation has addressed some of the concern, the gap between regulators continues today—raising the risk of repeating mistakes from the past.
    [Show full text]
  • The Big Short: Inside the Doomsday Machine
    The Big Short Inside the doomsday machine Also by Michael Lewis Home Game Liar's Poker The Money Culture Pacific Rift Losers The New New Thing Next Moneyball Coach The Blind Side EDITED BY MICHAEL LEWIS Panic The Big Short INSIDE THE DOOMSDAY MACHINE Michael Lewis W. W. NORTON & COMPANY NEW YORK LONDON Copyright (c) 2010 by Michael Lewis All rights reserved For information about permission to reproduce selections from this book, write to Permissions, W. W. Norton & Company, Inc., 500 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10110 ISBN: 978-0-393-07819-0 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 500 Fifth Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10110 www.wwnorton.com W. W. Norton & Company Ltd. Castle House, 75/76 Wells Street, London W1T 3QT For Michael Kinsley To whom I still owe an article The most difficult subjects can be explained to the most slow-witted man if he has not formed any idea of them already; but the simplest thing cannot be made clear to the most intelligent man if he is firmly persuaded that he knows already, without a shadow of doubt, what is laid before him.--Leo Tolstoy, 1897 Contents Prologue Poltergeist Chapter 1 A Secret Origin Story Chapter 2 In the Land of the Blind Chapter 3 "How Can a Guy Who Can't Speak English Lie?" Chapter 4 How to Harvest a Migrant Worker Chapter 5 Accidental Capitalists Chapter 6 Spider-Man at The Venetian Chapter 7 The Great Treasure Hunt Chapter 8 The Long Quiet Chapter 9 A Death of Interest Chapter 10 Two Men in a Boat Epilogue Everything Is Correlated Acknowledgments PROLOGUE Poltergeist The willingness of a Wall Street investment bank to pay me hundreds of thousands of dollars to dispense investment advice to grown-ups remains a mystery to me to this day.
    [Show full text]
  • MOISA 2: Fostering Regional Partnerships and Innovation for Maritime Security, Safety, and Resilience
    MOISA 2: Fostering Regional Partnerships and Innovation for Maritime Security, Safety, and Resilience September 2015 Version 1.1 Prepared by the Department of Human Centered Design & Engineering at the University of Washington Prepared for the Department of Homeland Security Interagency Operations Center, the National Maritime Intelligence-Integration Office, and the Program Manager for the Information Sharing Environment Copyright © 2015 University of Washington PREPARED FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY INTERAGENCY OPERATIONS CENTER, THE NATIONAL MARITIME INTELLIGENCE-INTEGRATION OFFICE, AND THE PROGRAM MANAGER FOR THE INFORMATION SHARING ENVIRONMENT, BY THE UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN CENTERED DESIGN & ENGINEERING This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, nor any of their contractors, subcontractors or their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or any third party’s use or the results of such use of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof or its contractors or subcontractors. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. First printing, September 2015 TITLE PAGE IMAGES US Coast Guard photo by Petty Officer 3rd Class Nathan Bradshaw.
    [Show full text]
  • Mos Episode Transcript: Sallie Krawcheck REID HOFFMAN
    MoS Episode Transcript: Sallie Krawcheck REID HOFFMAN: When you think of the first computer, maybe you imagine a huge mainframe ​ in a college lab in the 1950s; serious-looking people in white coats feeding in punch cards as the machinery whirs. But the story of computing started much earlier. And it probably looked a bit different than you imagine. STEVEN JOHNSON: In the 1830s Charles Babbage, the British inventor, invented ​ basically a programmable computer that was a hundred years ahead of its time. HOFFMAN: That’s Steven Johnson, host of the podcast “American Innovations”, and author of ​ many books about technology and progress that you should read. Steven’s latest book is called Farsighted: How We Make the Decisions That Matter the Most. As he wrote it, he kept thinking ​ about Babbage and this first computer. JOHNSON: These machines had almost all the key elements of modern computing. ​ They were programmable, they had the sense of a CPU, they had the sense of RAM, the sense of a hard drive-like storage. HOFFMAN: There was just one small problem: this was the 1830s. Scientists hadn’t yet ​ mastered electricity. Babbage’s designs were too complex to be built. But this didn’t stop them from sparking people’s imaginations. And one person they sparked was a mathematician named Ada Lovelace. JOHNSON: Lovelace was a young woman who was a math prodigy at a time when this ​ is very unusual. And she is now widely considered to be the first software programmer. HOFFMAN: Lovelace wrote the first example of what we’d now call “computer code”.
    [Show full text]
  • Joseph Erlanger Director Financial Control Group Joe Erlanger Is A
    Joseph Erlanger Director Financial Control Group Joe Erlanger is a Director in the Financial Control Group. He is the senior financial manager responsible for the Futures and Cleared Options Product Control and Regulatory Reporting Group. He has held this responsibility since 2009. Mr. Erlanger joined a predecessor company of Citigroup in 1998. Since joining he has held numerous positions in the Finance Group, generally in the areas of Product Control and Regulatory Reporting. Prior to joining Citigroup he held a similar position at J.P. Morgan for 10 years, including a 4 year assignment in Frankfurt, Germany as the Head of Product Control. He began his career as a financial auditor with Price Waterhouse. He graduated from St. Francis College in 1982 with a B.S. in Accounting. James A. Forese Co-President of Citigroup and Chief Executive Officer Institutional Clients Group Mr. Forese is a member of the Citigroup Operating Committee. He is based in New York. The Institutional Clients Group encompasses the Markets and Securities Services business, Treasury and Trade Solutions business, and Corporate and Investment Banking activities as well as the Citi Private Bank. Mr. Forese first joined the Salomon Brothers division in 1985 and began his career in securities trading. He was named a Managing Director in 1992 and has held various management positions throughout the Markets division, including head of that division, before being named to run the Securities and Banking unit in 2011. Mr. Forese graduated summa cum laude from Princeton University in 1985 with a Bachelor of Science in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science.
    [Show full text]
  • [Disclosure Booklet]
    <Translation> [Disclosure Booklet] Explanatory Documents on the Status of Business and Property for the fiscal year ended Dec 31, 2018 This disclosure booklet is prepared by the Company for publication on the Internet under Article 46-4 of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Law. Contents I Outline and Organization 1. Corporate Name ………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 1 2. Registration Date ( Registration Number ) …………………………………………………………………………… 1 3. History and Organization ………………………………………………………………………………………………… 1 4. Shareholders in the Top 10, Number of Shares Held and Percentage of Voting Rights ………………………… 3 5. Names of Board of Directors and Statutory Auditor ………………………………………………………………… 3 6. Names of Employees Specified by Cabinet Order …………………………………………………………………… 3 7. Business Operation ……………………………………………………………………………………………………… 4 8. Addresses of Head Office and Other Branches ……………………………………………………………………… 5 9. Other Business Operation ……………………………………………………………………………………………… 5 10. Engaged Businesses included in the Matters Set Forth in Article 7(3)(a), (3)-2, (3)-3(a) and from (4) to (9) of the Cabinet Office Ordinance on Concerning Financial Instruments Business …………………………………… 6 11. Complaint Processing and Dispute Resolution ……………………………………………………………………. 6 12. Financial Instruments Firms Associations and Certified Investor Protection Organization Memberships………… 7 13. Financial Instruments Exchange Memberships………………………………………………………………………… 7 14. Investor Protection Fund Membership …………………………………………………………………………… 7 II Business Overview 1. Business
    [Show full text]