DOCSLIB.ORG

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,516,132 B2 Selgas Et Al

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,516,132 B2 Selgas Et Al USOO8516132B2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,516,132 B2 Selgas et al. (45) Date of Patent: Aug. 20, 2013 (54) METHOD OF ACCESSING ASELECTED 4,470.417 A 9, 1984 Gruber NETWORK 4,529,870 A 7, 1985 Chaum 4,757,267 A 7, 1988 Riskin (75) Inventors: Thomas Drennan Selgas, Garland, TX ... A 3. S.al (US); Michael Brian Massing, Boulder 5,198.806 A * 3/1993 Lord ............................... T26.36 Creek, CA (US); John Everett 5,241,594 A 8/1993 Kung Gmuender, Campbell, CA (US) 5,263,165 A 11/1993 Janis 5,287.461 A 2f1994 Moore (73) Assignee: MyMail, Ltd., San Angelo, TX (US) 5.426,4275,410,543 A 4/19956/1995 ChinnockSeitz et al. 5,475,819 A 12, 1995 Miller (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this 5483,596 A 1/1996 Rosenow patent is extended or adjusted under 35 5.499,289 A 3, 1996 Bruno U.S.C. 154(b) by 1133 days. (Continued) (21) Appl. No.: 10/417,756 FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS EP O 233 682 A2 8, 1987 (22) Filed: Apr. 16, 2003 EP O 270 882 A2 6, 1988 (65) Prior Publication Data (Continued)Continued US 2003/O195967 A1 Oct. 16, 2003 OTHER PUBLICATIONS Microsoft Web article: “Microsoft Announces Internet Referral Related U.S. Application Data Server to Facilitate Selection of Internet Serivce Provider for Users of (60) Division of application No. 09/100,619, and a Windows, Microsoft Internet Explorer'. Jul. 30, 1996, http://www. continuation-in-part of application No. 09/100,619, microsoft.com/presspass/press/1996/jul96/reflsvpr.mspx.* filed on Jun. 19, 1998, now Pat. No. 6,571,290. (Continued) (51) Int. Cl. Primar G6F 5/16 2006.O1 y Examiner — Kenny Lin (52) U.S. Cl ( ) (74) Attorney, Agent, or Firm — Gardere Wynne Sewell LLP USPC ........................................... 709/228; 709/227 (57) ABSTRACT (58) Field of Classification Search USPC ................. 709/227 229, 230, 237, 217 219, The ppresent invention comprisesp a method of and aroparatuspp 709/250; 379/114.02 for simplifying the process of access to a network for a roam See application file for complete search history. ing computer user, divides the responsibility of servicing a given user wanting to access the network between multiple (56) References Cited parties and minimizes the possibility of improper dissemina tion of email header data as well as improper use of network U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS resources (including server systems) by non-clients. 3,885,104 A * 5, 1975 Smith et al. ................... 370/377 4,430,702 A 2f1984 Schiebe 21 Claims, 17 Drawing Sheets START CASE: ? INSTALATON RESTRAEON READ RELAR USE NS, ANUALUPA MULT-AL REGULAR USE PROCEDURE SEM INFORMATION SERER PNCER REGUIREC GET INFORATION DISCONNEC AND FROSERVER RESTART TRE RANSPARENT UPDATE RECURE? FASE NTINUE UNTIL SER DISCONNECTS (RECONFIGURE ADAPTER PROTOCOL. HCH ACAFFER CE CONFIGURE AUL-OAL PROCEDRE I US 8,516,132 B2 Page 2 (56) References Cited 5,890,172 A 3, 1999 Borman et al. 5,893,091 A 4/1999 Hunt et al. 5,894,556 A 4/1999 Grimm U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS 5,896,444 A 4/1999 Perlman 5,558,339 A * 9/1996 Perlman .......................... 463/42 5,898,780 A 4, 1999 Liu 5,572,643 A 11/1996 Judson 5,898,839 A 4/1999 Berteau 5,586.257 A 12/1996 Perlman 5,905,736 A 5/1999 Ronen et al. 5,617,526 A 4/1997 Oran et al. 5,908.469 A 6, 1999 Botz 5,635,940 A * 6/1997 Hickman et al. .............. 342/389 5,913,040 A 6/1999 Rakavy 5,636,209 A 6, 1997 Perlman 5,914,714 A 6, 1999 Brown 5,638.433 A * 6/1997 Bubien et al. ................. 379,130 5,918,013 A 6/1999 Mighdoll 5,638.494. A 6, 1997 Pinard et al. 5,918,016 A 6/1999 Brewer et al. 5,638,513 A 6, 1997 Ananda 5,918,019 A 6/1999 Valencia 5,642,419 A 6, 1997 Rosen 5,919,247 A 7, 1999 Van Hoffetal. 5,644,737 A 7, 1997 Tuniman et al. 5,928,333 A 7/1999 Landfield et al. 5,644,739 A 7, 1997 MourSund 5,930,258 A 7/1999 Dato Solis et al. 5,655,077 A 8, 1997 Jones 5,935,207 A 8/1999 Logue 5,675,507 A 10, 1997 Bobo 5,940,074 A 8/1999 Britt, Jr. et al. 5,680,549 A 10/1997 Raynak 5,944,824 A 8, 1999. He 5,682,325 A 10/1997 Lightfoot 5,950,010 A 9, 1999 Hesse et al. 5,684.950 A 11, 1997 Dare 5,953,504 A 9, 1999 Sokal 5,689,638 A 1 1/1997 Sadovsky 5,956,391 A 9, 1999 Melen 5,694,546 A 12/1997 Reisman 5,960,411 A 9, 1999 Hartman et al. 5,694,549 A * 12/1997 Carlin et al. .................. 709/250 5,963,964 A 10, 1999 Nielsen 5,706,502 A 1/1998 Foley et al. 5,974,461 A 10, 1999 Goldman et al. 5,708,780 A 1/1998 Levergood 5,978,381 A * 1 1/1999 Perlman et al. ............... 370/432 5,721,780 A 2f1998 Ensor 5,983,244 A 11/1999 Nation 5,732.219 A 3, 1998 Blumer et al. 5,983,273 A 11/1999 White et al. 5,745,555 A * 4, 1998 Mark ......................... 379,9303 5,987,498 A 1 1/1999 Athing 5,749,075 A 5, 1998 Toader 5,987,611 A * 1 1/1999 Freund .............................. T26/4 5,751,812 A 5, 1998 Anderson 5.991,807 A 11/1999 Schmidt 5,752,244 A 5, 1998 Rose et al. 6,006,333 A 12/1999 Nielsen 5,758,084 A 5, 1998 Silverstein et al. 6,009,474 A 12/1999 Lu et al. 5,761,683 A 6/1998 Logan et al. 6,011,794. A * 1/2000 Mordowitz et al. ........... 370,389 5,764,639 A 6/1998 Staples 6,012,088 A 1/2000 Li et al. ......................... TO9,219 5,764,902 A 6, 1998 Rothrock 6,023,585 A 2/2000 Perlman et al. 5,768,508 A 6, 1998 Eikeland 6,023,698 A 2/2000 Lavey et al. 5,774,869 A 6, 1998 Toader 6,023,729 A 2/2000 Samuel 5,781,724 A 7, 1998 Nevarez 6,026,079 A * 2/2000 Perlman ........................ 370,260 5,790,548 A 8, 1998 Sistanizadeh et al. 6,026,151 A * 2/2000 Bauer et al. .............. 379,114.24 5,790,800 A * 8/1998 Gauvin et al. ................ 709,227 6,034,689 A 3/2000 White et al. 5,793,854. A * 8/1998 Kashepava.................... 379,130 6,035,330 A 3/2000 AStiz et al. 5,796,393 A 8/1998 MacNaughton et al. 6,038,599 A 3/2000 Black 5,799,071 A * 8/1998 AZaret al. ............... 379,114.02 6,058,250 A 5, 2000 Harwood et al. 5,801,702 A 9, 1998 Dolan 6,061,798 A 5/2000 Coley et al. 5,802,304 A 9, 1998 Stone 6,067,568 A 5, 2000 Li 5,802,502 A * 9/1998 Gell et al. ....................... 705/37 6,070,192 A 5, 2000 Holt et al. 5,802,530 A 9, 1998 Van Hoff 6,070,243 A 5, 2000 See et al. 5,806,043 A 9, 1998 Toader 6,073,168 A 6/2000 Mighdoll et al. 5,809,242 A 9, 1998 Shaw 6,088,451 A 7/2000 He et al. 5,812,819 A 9, 1998 Rodwin et al. 6,101,328 A 8, 2000 Bakshi et al. 5,815,665 A 9/1998 Teper 6,101,510 A 8, 2000 Stone et al. 5,818.447 A 10, 1998 Wolfetal. 6,119,152 A 9, 2000 Carlin et al. 5,821,927 A 10/1998 Gong 6,119,161 A 9, 2000 Lita 5,822.539 A 10, 1998 Van Hoff 6,128,660 A 10/2000 Grimm et al. 5,825,357 A 10, 1998 Malamud et al. 6,128,663 A 10/2000 Thomas et al. 5,825,890 A 10/1998 Elgamal et al. 6,130,933 A * 10/2000 Miloslavsky .............. 379,90.01 5,826,000 A 10/1998 Hamilton 6,134,590 A 10/2000 Perlman 5,826,025 A 10, 1998 Gramlich 6,138,142 A 10/2000 Linsk 5,828,837 A 10, 1998 Eikeland 6,141,694. A 10/2000 Gardner 5,828,843. A 10, 1998 Grimm 6,145,002 A * 1 1/2000 Srinivasan .................... 709,225 5,835,712 A 11/1998 DuFresne 6,178,505 B1 1/2001 Schneider et al. 5,835,725 A 11/1998 Chiang et al. 6,182,229 B1 1/2001 Nielsen et al. 5,835,914 A 11, 1998 Brim 6,185,625 B1 2/2001 Tso et al. 5,845,070 A * 12/1998 Ikudome ......................... T26/28 6, 192,045 B1* 2/2001 Williams et al. .............. 370,352 5,845,073. A 12/1998 Carlin 6, 195,691 B1 2/2001 Brown et al. 5,845,075 A 12/1998 Uhler et al. 6,199,065 B1 3/2001 Kenyon 5,845,077 A 12/1998 Fawcett 6,199,110 B1 3, 2001 Rizvi 5,852,722 A 12/1998 Hamilton 6,205,126 B1* 3/2001 Moon ........................... 370,329 5,854,901 A 12/1998 Cole et al.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Ambulance the Squad Car & the Internet.Pdf
    The Ambulance, the Squad Car, & the Internet The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Susan P. Crawford, The Ambulance, the Squad Car, & the Internet, 21 Berkeley Tech. L.J. 873 (2006). Published Version http://scholarship.law.berkeley.edu/btlj/vol21/iss2/5/ Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:12956284 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA Berkeley Technology Law Journal Volume 21 | Issue 2 Article 5 March 2006 The Ambulance, the Squad Car, & the Internet Susan P. Crawford Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.berkeley.edu/btlj Recommended Citation Susan P. Crawford, The Ambulance, the Squad Car, & the Internet, 21 Berkeley Tech. L.J. 873 (2006). Available at: http://scholarship.law.berkeley.edu/btlj/vol21/iss2/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals and Related Materials at Berkeley Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Berkeley Technology Law Journal by an authorized administrator of Berkeley Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE AMBULANCE, THE SQUAD CAR, & THE INTERNET By Susan P. Crawfordt TABLE OF CONTENTS I. IN T R OD U C T IO N ............................................................................................ 874 II. THE MARKET CONTEXT ........................................................................... 877 III. FCC INTERNET SOCIAL POLICIES ......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Valuation Handbook – Guide to Cost of Capital and Data Published Therein in Connection with Their Internal Business Operations
    Market Results Through #DBDLADQ 2014 201 Valuation Handbook Guide to Cost of Capital Industry Risk Premia Company List Cover image: Duff & Phelps Cover design: Tim Harms Copyright © 2015 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey. Published simultaneously in Canada. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning, or otherwise, except as permitted under Section 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without either the prior written permission of the Publisher, or authorization through payment of the appropriate per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, (978) 750-8400, fax (978) 646-8600, or on the Web at www.copyright.com. Requests to the Publisher for permission should be addressed to the Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, (201) 748-6011, fax (201) 748- 6008, or online at http://www.wiley.com/go/permissions. The forgoing does not preclude End-users from using the 2015 Valuation Handbook – Guide to Cost of Capital and data published therein in connection with their internal business operations. Limit of Liability/Disclaimer of Warranty: While the publisher and author have used their best efforts in preparing this book, they make no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this book and specifically disclaim any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose.
    [Show full text]
  • 6709BWOL Webstock
    RIDING THE WEB-STOCK ROLLER COASTER Reprinted from the August 12, 2004 issue of BusinessWeek Online. Copyright © 2004 by The McGraw-Hill Companies. This reprint implies no endorsement, either tacit or expressed, of any company, product, service or investment opportunity. RIDING THE WEB-STOCK ROLLER COASTER Our BW Web 20 Index tracks a selection of favorite Net stocks, and this column will help interpret the ups and downs he past month has been rotten Just last week, Forrester Research christening the BW Web 20 Index Tfor Internet investors. Stocks raised its e-commerce forecast, pre- – is intended to help aggressive have been hammered since second- dicting U.S. online sales of $227 bil- investors accept the risk inherent in quarter earnings showed Web out- lion in 2007, up from earlier projec- the Web, but balance it by focusing fits growing pretty much as they had tions of $204 billion. Forrester on “real” companies with solid prod- promised – a change from their habit expects e-commerce in the U.S. to ucts, services, and profits. Every of slightly besting quarterly projec- grow 14% annually through 2010 – month, this column will do more than tions. The carnage has been just as three to four times faster than the track how stocks in our index trade – severe in the Real World Internet economy. Meanwhile, growth in it also will help investors figure out Index, a group of Web stocks we Europe is predicted to average 33% which rallies are sustainable and spot picked in 2002 to help ordinary annually through 2009. the bubblicious behavior that earned investors play the Internet without Net investing a bad rap.
    [Show full text]
  • The Internet and the Web T6 a Technical View of System Analysis and Design
    Technology Guides T1 Hardware T2 Software T3 Data and Databases T4 Telecommunications ᮣ T5 The Internet and the Web T6 A Technical View of System Analysis and Design Technology Guide The Internet 5 and the Web T5.1 What Is the Internet? T5.2 Basic Characteristics and Capabilities of the Internet T5.3 Browsing and the World Wide Web T5.4 Communication Tools for the Internet T5.5 Other Internet Tools T5.1 T5.2 Technology Guide The Internet and the Web T5.1 What Is the Internet?1 The Internet (“the Net”) is a network that connects hundreds of thousands of inter- nal organizational computer networks worldwide. Examples of internal organiza- tional computer networks are a university computer system, the computer system of a corporation such as IBM or McDonald’s, a hospital computer system, or a system used by a small business across the street from you. Participating computer systems, called nodes, include PCs, local area networks, database(s), and mainframes.A node may include several networks of an organization, possibly connected by a wide area network. The Internet connects to hundreds of thousands of computer networks in more than 200 countries so that people can access data in other organizations, and can communicate and collaborate around the globe, quickly and inexpensively. Thus, the Internet has become a necessity in the conduct of modern business. The Internet grew out of an experimental project of the Advanced Research Proj- BRIEF HISTORY ect Agency (ARPA) of the U.S. Department of Defense.The project was initiated in 1969 as ARPAnet to test the feasibility of a wide area computer network over which researchers, educators, military personnel, and government agencies could share data, exchange messages, and transfer files.
    [Show full text]
  • Fox Interactive Media Ranks #1 in Page Views; Yahoo! Sites Attract the Most Unique Visitors Comscore Media Metrix Releases November Top 50 Web Rankings and Analysis
    Fox Interactive Media Ranks #1 in Page Views; Yahoo! Sites Attract the Most Unique Visitors comScore Media Metrix Releases November Top 50 Web Rankings and Analysis RESTON, VA, December 19, 2006 - comScore Media Metrix today released its monthly analysis of U.S. consumer activity at top online properties and categories for November. Fox Interactive Media topped all properties with 39.5 billion page views in November, primarily driven by the 38.7 billion pages consumed at MySpace.com, based on traffic from home, work and university locations. While Fox Interactive Media supplanted Yahoo! Sites as the top Web property by page views in November, Yahoo! Sites retained the top spot in audience size with 129.9 million unique visitors. Further, Yahoo's increased integration of AJAX technology may have had a dampening effect on page views, as the technology enables real-time site updates without the need to refresh a page. An additional comScore analysis released this week highlighted the importance of including home, work and university audiences in measuring the Web's largest properties. In fact, if university usage is omitted, the comparison of page views at Fox Interactive Media and Yahoo! Sites tells a very different story: Yahoo! Sites, with 35.6 billion page views for November, would rank higher than Fox Interactive Media with 34.9 billion. "Inclusion of online activity occurring at university locations is critical to producing accurate online audience measurements," said Jack Flanagan, executive vice president of comScore Media Metrix. "The market was understandably perplexed by reports that offered seemingly conflicting opinions on whether Fox Interactive or Yahoo! had actually captured the top ranking in terms of page views." "The difference lies in whether the online activity of college students, which represents nearly 15 million people, is included in the measurements - a critically important detail when measuring activity at MySpace.com, which is included in the Fox Interactive property," Flanagan added.
    [Show full text]
  • Online Selling & Ecrm August 2002
    Online Selling & eCRM August 2002 www.emarketer.com This report is the property of eMarketer, Inc. and is protected under both the United States Copyright Act and by contract. Section 106 of the Copyright Act gives copyright owners the exclusive rights of reproduction, adaptation, publication, performance and display of protected works. Accordingly, any use, copying, distribution, modification, or republishing of this report beyond that expressly permitted by your license agreement is prohibited. Violations of the Copyright Act can be both civilly and criminally prosecuted and eMarketer will take all steps necessary to protect its rights under both the Copyright Act and your contract. If you are outside of the United States: copyrighted United States works, including the attached report, are protected under international treaties. Additionally, by contract, you have agreed to be bound by United States law. Online Selling & eCRM Table of Contents 3 Methodology 5 The eMarketer Difference 6 The Benefits of eMarketer’s Aggregation Approach 7 “Benchmarking” and Projections 7 I Introduction 9 A. Estimating the Number of Commercial Websites 10 B. Estimating the Number of Website Visitors 15 C. The Growing Importance of the Internet Channel 20 II B2C Websites 23 A. Website Capabilities 24 Website Budgeting and ROI 26 E-Commerce and General Website Capabilities 35 Managing Website Traffic 43 B. Consumer Preferences 51 III B2B Websites 65 A. Website Capabilities 66 B. User Preferences 81 IV Online Customer Service & eCRM 87 A. Website Capabilities 88 B. User Preferences 105 Index of Charts 117 3 ©2002 eMarketer, Inc. Reproduction of information sourced as eMarketer is prohibited without prior, written permission.
    [Show full text]
  • Why the Survivors Survived: Examining The
    WHY THE SURVIVORS SURVIVED: EXAMINING THE CHARACTERISTICS OF ONLINE COMPANIES DURING THE DOT-COM ERA By Peyton Elizabeth Purcell Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for Departmental Honors in the Department of Finance Texas Christian University Fort Worth, Texas May 7, 2018 ii WHY THE SURVIVORS SURVIVED: EXAMINING THE CHARACTERISTICS OF ONLINE COMPANIES DURING THE DOT-COM ERA Project Approved: Supervising Professor: Dr. Paul Irvine, Ph.D. Department of Finance Cheryl Carithers, M.A. Department of English iii ABSTRACT This paper examines the dot-com bubble and the characteristics that enabled certain online companies to survive the crash in March of 2000. The purpose of the study was to examine financial data to understand what enabled certain companies to survive the dot- com bubble, while other companies with seemingly similar characteristics did not. The past few years sparked debate amongst investors on whether or not another bubble formed among technology companies such as Facebook, Amazon, Tesla, and Netflix. Currently, the world is in the middle of a technology boom. Investors care about the future success of technology companies that have a lot of promise baked into their stock price. My thesis attempts to examine the dot-com bubble that “burst” in March of 2000 and the companies that were able to withstand the crash until 2005. My results reveal a few conclusions about the companies in the dot-com era including (1) companies with negative earnings had a lower chance of survival; (2) companies with “.com” had a lower chance of survival; (3) companies with more volatile stock prices had a lower chance of survival; (4) companies that had higher advertising expenses had a lower chance of survival; (5) companies with higher shares outstanding had a higher chance of survival and; and (6) companies with pure online operations had a lower chance of survival.
    [Show full text]
  • Access, Demographics & Usage, February 2002
    North America Online: Access, Demographics & Usage February 2002 www.emarketer.com This report is the property of eMarketer, Inc. and is protected under both the United States Copyright Act and by contract. Section 106 of the Copyright Act gives copyright owners the exclusive rights of reproduction, adaptation, publication, performance and display of protected works. Accordingly, any use, copying, distribution, modification, or republishing of this report beyond that expressly permitted by your license agreement is prohibited. Violations of the Copyright Act can be both civilly and criminally prosecuted and eMarketer will take all steps necessary to protect its rights under both the Copyright Act and your contract. If you are outside of the United States: copyrighted United States works, including the attached report, are protected under international treaties. Additionally, by contract, you have agreed to be bound by United States law. North America Online Table of Contents 3 Methodology 7 The eMarketer Difference 8 The Benefits of eMarketer’s Aggregation Approach 9 “Benchmarking” and Future-Based Projections 9 I Introduction 11 A. Key Findings - Then and Now 13 II Internet Users 17 A. Worldwide Internet Users 20 B. Internet Users in the US 22 C. Who is Not Online and Why? 28 III Internet Households 35 A. Comparative Estimates: Online Households in the US 38 B. Households Online by Technology 40 Broadband Users 55 Satellite 60 Fixed Wireless 61 IV Internet Access Devices: PC, TV and Mobile Devices 63 A. PCs 66 B. TV 71 C. Mobile Phones & PDAs 73 V Online Demographics 77 A. Gender 82 B. Age 90 C.
    [Show full text]
  • United States District Court Western District of Texas San Antonio Division
    Case 5:17-cv-00967-OLG Document 108 Filed 07/14/21 Page 1 of 44 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION ROY C. SPEGELE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. USAA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Case No. 5:17-cv-967-OLG Defendant. UNOPPOSED MOTION PURSUANT TO RULE 23(H) FOR AN AWARD OF ATTORNEYS’ FEES, COSTS, AND EXPENSES TO CLASS COUNSEL AND NAMED PLAINTIFF SERVICE AWARD AND MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT THEREOF Case 5:17-cv-00967-OLG Document 108 Filed 07/14/21 Page 2 of 44 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 1 II. HISTORY OF THE LITIGATION ...................................................................................... 2 III. SUMMARY OF THE RESULTS ACHIEVED THROUGH THE SETTLEMENT ......... 14 A. The Settlement Class................................................................................................ 14 B. The Settlement Benefits ........................................................................................... 15 1. Cash Settlement Fund .................................................................................. 15 2. Attorneys’ Fees, Costs and Expenses, and Service Award .......................... 15 3. Expenses for Settlement Administration ..................................................... 15 4. The Settlement Fund is Non-Reversionary. ................................................. 16 IV. CLASS COUNSEL’S ATTORNEYS’ FEE REQUEST
    [Show full text]
  • Homestore Gateway Clients
    Homestore, Inc. Gateway Client List Homestore has relationships with the following companies to provide REALTOR.com® powered listing searches through their websites. Virtual Tours delivered to active REALTOR.com® listings can be viewed by consumers searching for real estate listings through these web sites.* AOL.com Digital Cities Compuserve Netscape MSN Wall Street Journal Chicago Sun Times Daily Herald Excite IWON.com United Online www.juno.com www.netzero.net www.mybluelight.com * Internet Broadcasting Systems (IBS) Internet Broadcasting Systems create websites for television news stations across the nation. Virtual Tours delivered to REALTOR.com® listings can be viewed by consumers searching for real estate listings through these web sites. www.thenewmexicochannel.com www.ksat.com www.thebakersfieldchannel.com www.thewbalchannel.com www.nbc11.com www.nbc13.com www.thebostonchannel.com www.nbc5.com www.channelcincinnati.com www.nbc4.com www.thedenverchannel.com www.thehometownchannel.com www.nbcsandiego.com www.thehometownchannel.com www.thecarolinachannel.com www.wxii12.com www.nbc30.com www.thehawaiichannel.com www.theindychannel.com www.thejacksonchannel.com www.news4jax.com www.thekansascitychannel.com www.nbc4.tv www.thelouisvillechannel.com www.themilwaukeechannel.com www.theksbwchannel.com www.theneworleanschannel.com www.newsnet5.com www.wnbc.com www.channeloklahoma.com www.theomahachannel.com www.wesh.com www.nbc10.com www.thepittsburghchannel.com www.thechamplainchannel.com www.turnto10.com www.thekcrachannel.com www.10news.com www.moretv32.com www.wpbfnews.com www.clickondetroit.com www.local10.com www.nbc6.net Internet Broadcasting Systems – COX * www.wsbtv.com www.wsbtv.com www.wsoctv.com www.whiotv.com www.kfoxtv.com www.ktvu.com www.wjactv.com www.wftv.com www.foxreno.com www.wtov9.com Franchise Gateways* Homestore has relationships with the following Franchises to provide REALTOR.com® powered listing searches.
    [Show full text]
  • 12364 Front.Qxp
    cover_pages.qxp 10/15/2007 7:58 AM Page 1 Sharing, Privacy and Trust in Our Networked World A Report to the OCLC Membership Sharing, Privacy and Trust in Our Networked World A Report to the OCLC Membership Sharing, Privacy and Trust in Our Networked World A Report to the OCLC Membership Principal contributors Cathy De Rosa, MBA, Vice President for the Americas and Global Vice President of Marketing Joanne Cantrell, Marketing Analyst Andy Havens, Manager, Creative Services Janet Hawk, MBA, Director, Market Research & Analysis Lillie Jenkins, PhD, MSIS, Market Research Support Specialist Graphics, layout and editing Brad Gauder, Creative Services Writer Rick Limes, Art Director Contributors Diane Cellentani, MBA, Market Research Consultant to OCLC Tam Dalrymple, MLS, Senior Information Specialist Larry Olszewski, PhD, MLS, Director, OCLC Library Sam Smith, Art Director Tom Storey, Editor OCLC Dublin, Ohio USA Copyright © 2007, OCLC Online Computer Library Center, Inc. 6565 Kilgour Place Dublin, Ohio 43017-3395 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without prior written permission of the copyright holder. The following are trademarks and/or service marks of OCLC Online Computer Library Center, Inc.: Find in a Library, OCLC, the OCLC logo, WebJunction, WorldCat® and WorldCat.org. Third-party product, service, business and other proprietary names are trademarks and/or service marks of their respective owners. Printed in the United States of America Cataloged in WorldCat on September 11, 2007 OCLC Control Number: 170923242 ISBN: 1-55653-370-5 12 11 10 09 08 07 1 2 3 4 5 6 Table of Contents Introduction vii Methodology xi Our Digital Lives 1-1 Our Social Spaces 2-1 Privacy, Security and Trust 3-1 U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of the Value Chain Adaptation for Digital Content
    Evolution of the Value Chain Adaptation for Digital Content Delivery in a Broadband World OECD Working Party of the Information Economy Digital Broadband Content Panel Paris, 3rd June 2004 Dennis Weller OECD WPIE Broadband Content Panel 3 June 2004 ICT Development and Market Structure Demand side: Adoption of ICTs leads to changes in structure among business users ÊNew internal organization, skills ÊNew patterns of outsourcing Supply side: New generations of ICTs lead to changes in market structure of telecom, information firms ÊShifting roles, complex interactions among firms in supply chain 2 Broadband As a Driver of Change Network operators How to generate revenue to support investment in next- generation networks? Replace loss of traditional business What can you do with 100 MBPS that you can’t do with 3? Content providers Old distribution methods are fading Need to find new business models Intermediaries Existing players reinvent themselves, as new ones emerge 3 Content Offers Over Broadband – Roles of the Players Management publishing offer Content Provider Supply of Supply connection access and CONTENT-SERVICE CONTENT- SERVICE TLC OperatorTLC FINAL USER CONTENT -SERVICE CONTENT CONTENT-SERVICE Management of access to content Manager Technol, authorization Technol, Manager Payment Management Management of the transaction 4 Basic Activities in the Value Chain 1. Rights acquisition / manag. 2. Content protection. Management publishing offer 3. Content production. Content Provider 4. Sale of adevert space. 5. Packaging & distrib. Content. Supply of connection and access CONTENT- SERVICE 6. Marketing of publishing offer. OperatorTLC 7. Management of emerging FINAL publishing services. USER 8. Profiling user. 9. Billing management. -SERVICE CONTENT Management of access to content to access of Management 10.
    [Show full text]