DOCSLIB.ORG

The Black Country Local Flood Risk Management Strategy Strategic Environmental Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Black Country Local Flood Risk Management Strategy Strategic Environmental Assessment 50600596 THE BLACK COUNTRY LOCAL FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT STRATEGY STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OCTOBER, 2015 THE BLACK COUNTRY LOCAL FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT STRATEGY THE BLACK COUNTRY LOCAL FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT STRATEGY The Black Country Local Authorities Project no: 50600596 Date: October, 2015 WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff Three White Rose Office Park, Millshaw Park Lane Leeds LS11 0DL Tel: +0 (0) 113 395 6200 Fax: +0 (0) 113 395 6201 www.wspgroup.com www.pbworld.com QUALITY MANAGEMENT ISSUE/REVISION FIRST ISSUE REVISION 1 REVISION 2 REVISION 3 Remarks Draft for Consultation Date 28/10/2015 Prepared by Kim Bossingham Signature Checked by Nic Macmillan Signature Authorised by Nic Macmillan Signature Project number 50600596 Report number V1 File reference \aaENVIRONMENTALP LANNING\04projects\50 600596 – Black Country SEA\3.SEA ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS .......................................................................................3 1 INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................4 2 STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ........................8 3 APPRAISAL OF LFRMS ............................................................25 4 NEXT STEPS ..............................................................................33 APPENDICES APPENDIX A REVIEW OF PLANS, PROGRAMMES AND SUSTAINABILITY OBJECTIVES APPENDIX B BASELINE DATA APPENDIX C SCOPING COMMENTS APPENDIX D LFRMS MEASURES AND ACTIONS APPENDIX E ASSESSMENT OF THE LFRMS The Black Country Local Flood Risk Management Strategy WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff The Black Country Local Authorities Project No 50600596 October, 2015 3 ABBREVIATIONS AMR Annual Monitoring Report AONB Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty BAP Biodiversity Action Plan CRoW Countryside and Rights of Way Act cSAC candidate Special Areas of Conservation DCLG Department for Communities and Local Government DMBC Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council EA Environment Agency EIA Environmental Impact Assessment FMfSW Flood Map for Surface Water FCERM Flood and Coastal Erosion Risk Management HAPs Habitat Action Plans HLC Historic Landscape Characterisation HRA Habitats Regulations Assessment LAs Local Authorities LFRMS Local Flood Risk Management Strategy LLFAs Local Flood Risk Authorities LNR Local Nature Reserves LSOA Lower Super Output Areas NNR National Nature Reserves NPPF National Planning Policy Framework NTS Non Technical Summary NVZs Nitrate Vulnerable Zones ONS Office of Neighbourhood Statistics PFRA Preliminary Flood Risk Assessment pSPA potential Special Protection Areas RBMP River Basin Management Plan RSDF Regional Sustainable Development Framework SA Sustainability Appraisal SAC Special Areas of Conservation SAPs Species Actions Plan SEA Strategic Environmental Assessment SFRA Strategic Flood Risk Assessment SHLAA The Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment SINCs Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation SMBC Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council SPA Special Protection Areas SSSIs Sites of Special Scientific Interest SuDS Sustainable Drainage Systems WC Walsall Council WCC Wolverhampton City Council WFD Water Framework Directive The Black Country Local Flood Risk Management Strategy WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff The Black Country Local Authorities Project No 50600596 October, 2015 4 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 BACKGROUND TO AND PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT 1.1.1 A Local Flood Risk Management Strategy (LFRMS) has been prepared for the Black Country Local Authorities (LA’s). The Black Country LA’s comprise Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council (SMBC), Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council (DMBC), Walsall Council (WC) and Wolverhampton City Council (WCC). 1.1.2 As part of the production of the Black Country LFRMS, a Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) was undertaken. This report provides a summary of the SEA process so far and presents the findings and recommendations of the assessment of the Black Country LFRMS. 1.1.3 This SEA Report provides a summary of the SEA process so far and presents the findings and recommendations of the assessment of the LFRMS. The key aims of this SEA Report are to: Æ Provide information on the LFRMS and the SEA process; Æ Present the key existing social, economic and environmental conditions within the Black Country, in the context of existing plans, programmes and sustainability objectives, together with relevant baseline information; Æ Identify, describe and evaluate the likely significant effects of the LFRMS; Æ Recommend measures to avoid, reduce or offset any potentially significant adverse effects; and Æ Propose an approach to monitoring that can be used to monitor the identified significant effects. 1.2 BACKGROUND TO AND PURPOSE OF THE BLACK COUNTRY LFRMS 1.2.1 Under the Flood and Water Management Act 2010, the Black Country LA’s have a key role in the management of flood risk and this includes a duty to develop and maintain a local strategy for flood risk management. The purpose of this strategy is to explain how they will manage flood risk from surface water, groundwater and ordinary watercourses, now and in the future. It will provide details of other organisations that are responsible for managing flood risk and what those responsibilities are. 1.2.2 The Act requires LFRMS’s to specify: Æ The risk management authorities within the authority’s area (in the Black Country, these are the Environment Agency, SMBC, DMBC, WC and WCC (as the Lead Local Flood Authorities (LLFAs) and the Highway Authorities) and Severn Trent Water; Æ The flood and coastal erosion risk management functions that may be exercised by those authorities in relation to the area; Æ The assessment of local flood risk for the purpose of strategy; Æ The objectives for managing the local flood risk (including any objectives included in the authority’s flood risk management plan prepared in accordance with the Flood Risk Regulations 2009); Æ The measures proposed to achieve those objectives; Æ How and when the measures are expected to be implemented; Æ The costs and benefits of those measures, and how they are to be paid for; The Black Country Local Flood Risk Management Strategy WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff The Black Country Local Authorities Project No 50600596 October, 2015 5 Æ How and when the strategy is to be reviewed; and Æ How the strategy contributes to the achievement of wider environmental objectives. 1.2.3 LLFA’s must consult risk management authorities that may be affected by the strategy as well as the general public about its LFRMS. 1.2.4 The Strategy provides a set of flood risk management objectives and actions that will ensure that these objectives are achieved within the Black Country. It will also help individuals, communities and businesses and understand flood risk and what action they can take to reduce the effects of flooding. 1.2.5 The Objectives for managing flood risk within the Black Country reflect the Government’s strategic objectives (set out in the ‘National Flood and Coastal Erosion Risk Management Strategy for England’, Environment Agency and Defra, 2011) at a local level and are detailed in Section 2.4.9 1.3 BACKGROUND TO AND PURPOSE OF THE SEA 1.3.1 SEA is a systemic process for evaluating the sustainability effects of plans and programmes to ensure that sustainability issues are integrated and assessed at the earliest opportunity in the decision-making process, and that sustainable development is at the heart of the plan-making process. Article 1 of the SEA Directive states that the aim is to: ‘provide for a high level of protection of the environment and to contribute to the integration of environmental considerations into the preparation and adoption of plans and programmes with a view to promoting sustainable development’ 1.3.2 SEA became a requirement when the European Directive 2001/42/EC ‘on the assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment’ (known as the ‘SEA Directive’) was implemented in Member States in July 2004. The Directive was transposed in England through the Environmental Assessment of Plans and Programmes Regulations, 2004, under which SEA is a mandatory requirement for certain plans and programmes which are likely to give rise to significant environmental impacts. Flood Risk Management Strategies do not clearly fall within the requirements of these regulations. 1.3.3 However, under the Flood and Water Management Act (2010) (‘the Act’), local authorities were given a new role to manage local flood risk in their area. The Act requires the LLFAs, which includes the Black Country LA’s, to produce an LFRMS. These strategies must be consistent with the National Flood and Coastal Erosion Risk Management Strategy. They will set out a vision for the management of flood risk and, although the Act specifies some of the key elements that must be included in the LFRMS, it is intended that they will be locally specific, reflecting key local issues and enabling communities to be more involved in decision-making regarding flood risk management. Guidance on the production of LFRMSs1 refers to the need for them to be subject to SEA, stating that “the local FRM Strategy is likely to require statutory SEA, but this requirement is something the LLFA must consider”. 1.3.4 Given the uncertainty around the need for SEA and the likely delays and costs associated with screening, the Black Country LA’s have decided to take a pragmatic approach and subject their emerging LFRMS to SEA. It is also noted that the guidance recognises that: “LLFAs should take a proportionate approach to applying SEA to
Load more

Recommended publications
  • STAFFORDSHIRE. (KELLY'a Erected in 1868, at a Cost of £X,6S7, Will Seat 150 Persons
    30 BARR (GB~:AT). STAFFORDSHIRE. (KELLY'A erected in 1868, at a cost of £x,6s7, will seat 150 persons. 1 and principal landowners. The soil is a stiff lo~m; subsoil, The charities are as follows :-( 1) one-third of the profits of gravel. The chief crops are wheat and roots. The area ia land granted upon trust in 1579 by Thomas Bromwich, of 4,960 acres; rateable value, £"1o,464; in 1891 the population Perry Barr, to the rector of Handsworth and four others, was 1,388. and now administered by nine trustees, including the l'arish Clerk, Charles Jelf. incumbents of Handsworth, Perry Barr and Great Barr PosT OFJ<"ICE.-Thomas Richards, sub-postmaster. Letters (these three being trustees ex-officio), under a scheme from Birmingham arrive at 6.45 a.m. ; dispatched at 10 sanctioned by the Charity Commissioners: the charity, a.m. & 7.25 p.m.; sundays at to a.m. The nearest which, at its present value, yields about £8o a year to Great money order & telegraph office is at Hamstead Barr, is to be applied according to the provisions of the above-mentioned scheme, for the benefit of the poor of the PILLAR LETTER BOXES :- three parishes; (2) the profits of about 66 acres of land Beacon inn, cleared at 8.30 a.m. & 6.40 p.m.; sundays, assigned for the repairs of the church; (3) an annual charge 8.3oa.m of £3 t6s. upon two farms for the education of five poor Queslett, 8.15a.m. &6.15p.m.; sundays, 10.15a.m children; (4) an annual charge of £2 12s.
    [Show full text]
  • How Useful Are Episcopal Ordination Lists As a Source for Medieval English Monastic History?
    Jnl of Ecclesiastical History, Vol. , No. , July . © Cambridge University Press doi:./S How Useful are Episcopal Ordination Lists as a Source for Medieval English Monastic History? by DAVID E. THORNTON Bilkent University, Ankara E-mail: [email protected] This article evaluates ordination lists preserved in bishops’ registers from late medieval England as evidence for the monastic orders, with special reference to religious houses in the diocese of Worcester, from to . By comparing almost , ordination records collected from registers from Worcester and neighbouring dioceses with ‘conven- tual’ lists, it is concluded that over per cent of monks and canons are not named in the extant ordination lists. Over half of these omissions are arguably due to structural gaps in the surviving ordination lists, but other, non-structural factors may also have contributed. ith the dispersal and destruction of the archives of religious houses following their dissolution in the late s, many docu- W ments that would otherwise facilitate the prosopographical study of the monastic orders in late medieval England and Wales have been irre- trievably lost. Surviving sources such as the profession and obituary lists from Christ Church Canterbury and the records of admissions in the BL = British Library, London; Bodl. Lib. = Bodleian Library, Oxford; BRUO = A. B. Emden, A biographical register of the University of Oxford to A.D. , Oxford –; CAP = Collectanea Anglo-Premonstratensia, London ; DKR = Annual report of the Deputy Keeper of the Public Records, London –; FOR = Faculty Office Register, –, ed. D. S. Chambers, Oxford ; GCL = Gloucester Cathedral Library; LP = J. S. Brewer and others, Letters and papers, foreign and domestic, of the reign of Henry VIII, London –; LPL = Lambeth Palace Library, London; MA = W.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix B1 SAD AAP CIL Recommended Modifications
    Appendix B - Proposed Modifications to SAD, AAP and CIL Cabinet 27th July 2016 Appendix B – Walsall SAD, AAP, CIL Proposed Pre-Submission Modifications Appendix Bi: Proposed Pre-Submission Modifications to Walsall’s SAD Proposed Modifications – text proposed to be deleted is shown as strike through, text proposed to be added is shown underlined. Main Modifications are shown in bold text. Bold red text indicates that at the time of writing further information or discussions are required from or with third parties. Proposed Modifications to Site Allocation Document (SAD) Reference Page Policy/ Section Modification Main Reason for Modification Potential Modification? Significant Effects - SA Required? General MODSAD1 Whole All chapters, and in Update proposed site allocations and other No To ensure that the No Plan particular policy designations to reflect the situation at – updating information in the SAD is as 4. Providing for the baseline date of 31.03.16. Delete only up-to-date as possible and Industrial Jobs and allocations where development has that there is a consistent Prosperity – Policies commenced or is under construction. Add baseline date for the IND1 – IND5 explanatory text in Introduction and individual information included in the 5. Strengthening Our chapters as appropriate. plan where possible. Local Centres – Policy SLC2 8. Sustainable Waste Update details of assets and constraints where Management – not mentioned under individual topics and Policies W2, W3, W4 sites below 9. Sustainable Use of Minerals – Policies 1 Appendix B - Proposed Modifications to SAD, AAP and CIL Cabinet 27th July 2016 M2 – M9 to 31.03.16 MODSAD2 Whole All chapters Ensure that references to policies that are No Standardisation No Plan carried forward from the UDP are – editing only throughout the Plan standardised as “UDP Saved Policy” MODSAD3 Whole All chapters Remove question marks re references to the No Standardisation No Plan BCCS and apply use of singular / plural – editing only throughout the Plan indicator(s)/ target(s) consistently.
    [Show full text]
  • Dudley Business Group
    DUDLEY BOROUGH LOCAL ACCESS FORUM Monday 16th March, 2009 at 6.30pm in Committee Room 4 at the Council House, Priory Road, Dudley PRESENT: - Mr M Freer (Chairman) Mr D Woodruff (Vice-Chairman) Mr T Antill, Mr D Bates, Mr R Burgess (for part of the meeting only), Mr A Cutler, Mr D Davies, Mrs C Freer and Mr R Vickers. Officers: Ms A Roberts – Planning Policy Manager and Mr R Whitehouse - Senior Planning Policy Officer, (Both Directorate of the Urban Environment) and Miss K Fellows – Democratic Services Officer, (Directorate of Law and Property). Also in Attendance: Ms C Davies and Mrs S Davies, residents from Leasowes, Ms M Diller representative of Friends of Leasowes and Mr C Leech representative from Groundwork Black Country. 36. APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE Apologies for absence from the meeting were submitted on behalf of Mr J Butler, Councillor T Crumpton and Mr N Williams. 37. DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST The Chairman declared a personal interest in agenda item no. 8 – Treherns Farm Public Enquiry, as he remains a member of the Forum and the Halesowen Abbey Trust. Mr Antill declared a personal interest in relation to agenda item no. 5 – Comments by the Chairman, agenda item no. 8 – Treherns Farm Public Enquiry and agenda item no. 11 – Closure of section of path providing access to the canal and the Leasowes, as he was the founder and remains a member of The Monarch’s Way Association and Mr A Cutler declared a personal interest in agenda item no. 12(b) – Gating Orders – Murcroft/Wychbury Road, as he had a relative who resides within close proximity to the vicinity.
    [Show full text]
  • (SAD) Core Document List for Submission
    Walsall SAD and Town Centre AAP: Core Document List for Submission Last Updated 25th September 2017 Walsall Sites Allocation Document (SAD) Core Document List for Submission Note: All documents are produced by Walsall Council unless the author is given. Ref Document Publication Date Examination Documents - Post Submission Documents EXAM1 Main Matter 3 – Housing Topic Paper July 2017 matter_3_housing_topic_paper.pdf EXAM2 Walsall Council SAD Examination Opening Statement September Walsall_Site_Allocation_Document_Opening_Statement_MS_05_09_2017.pdf 2017 EXAM3 Appeal Decision 2009 - Land to the west of Northgate, Aldridge, Walsall, WS9 8TL (Appeal Ref: APP/V4630/A/08/2091047) September Appeal_Decision_2009_-_Land_to_the_West_of_Northgate.pdf 2017 EXAM4 Note Submitted by Mr Griffiths including Planning Permission for Unit 10 Merchants Way September Note_submitted_by_Mr_Griffiths_including_Planning_Permission_for_Unit_10_Merchants_Way.pdf 2017 EXAM5 Main Matter 5 - Minerals Examination Note September Matter_5_Minerals_Note.pdf 2017 1 Walsall SAD and Town Centre AAP: Core Document List for Submission Last Updated 25th September 2017 Ref Document Publication Date EXAM6 Main Matter 6 - Waste Examination Note September Matter_6_Waste_Note.pdf 2017 EXAM7 HBF – Chiltern Delivery DPD – Initial Appraisal September HBF-Chiltern_Delivery_DPD_Initial_Appraisal.pdf 2017 EXAM8 HBF – Chiltern Delivery DPD – Inspector’s Suspension Letter September HBF-Chiltern_Delivery_DPD-Inspector_Suspension_Letter.pdf 2017 EXAM9 HBF – Forest of Dean Interim Findings September
    [Show full text]
  • Sub-Regional Green Infrastructure Strategy
    WARWICKSHIRE, COVENTRY & SOLIHULL SUB-REGIONAL GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE STRATEGY [Consultation Draft, February 2013] Prepared by Warwickshire Museum and Natural Environment Acknowledgements: Coventry, Solihull and Warwickshire Association of Planning Officers (CSWAPO) would like to thank Natural England for the financial and officer support in preparing this document. CSWAPO would also like to acknowledge the assistance from Landuse Consultants and Richard Drakely (WCC Tourism Officer) in preparing the Accessibility elements, Mike Murray for preparing the Landscape elements and Dave Lowe (WCC Principal Ecologist) for preparing the Biodiversity elements. CSWAPO would also like to thank the support from the Local Authority Planning Officers and Local Authority discipline leads that formed the CSWAPO Project Officer Group, who steered the report over the 3 years of preparation. 1 Contents Vision ...................................................................................................................................................... 3 Executive Summary .............................................................................................................................. 3 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... 5 Purpose ............................................................................................................................................... 5 Structure .............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Warwickshire, Coventry and Solihull Sub- Regional Green Infrastructure Study
    Warwickshire, Coventry and Solihull Sub - Regional Green Infrastructure Study Prepared for Natural England by Land Use Consultants July 2011 www.landuse.co.uk LUC SERVICES Environmental Planning Landscape Design Landscape Management Masterplanning Landscape Planning Ecology Environmental Assessment Rural Futures Digital Design Urban Regeneration Urban Design 43 Chalton Street 37 Otago Street London NW1 1JD Glasgow G12 8JJ Tel: 020 7383 5784 Tel: 0141 334 9595 Fax: 020 7383 4798 Fax: 0141 334 7789 [email protected] [email protected] 14 Great George Street 28 Stafford Street Bristol BS1 5RH Edinburgh EH3 7BD Tel: 0117 929 1997 Tel: 0131 202 1616 Fax: 0117 929 1998 [email protected] [email protected] DOCUMENT CONTROL SHEET Version Status: Version Details: Prepared Checked Approved by: by: by: Ver: Date: Principal 1 09/05/11 Draft Final Report Louise Philip Philip Smith Tricklebank Smith 2 13/0 7/11 Final Report Louise Philip Philip Smith Tricklebank Smith 3 27/07/11 Final Report (reissue with Stratford Louise Philip Philip Smith changes) Tricklebank Smith CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 2 2 DEFINING AND IDENTIFYING SUB-REGIONAL ASSETS 3 Defining Sub-Regional Green Infrastructure Assets ................................................... 3 Identifying Sub-Regional Assets ............................................................................... 4 3 ANALYSIS OF GI SUPPLY AND FUNCTIONAL NEED 10 Analysis by Local Authority .................................................................................. 11 North Warwickshire Borough
    [Show full text]
  • The Transport System of Medieval England and Wales
    THE TRANSPORT SYSTEM OF MEDIEVAL ENGLAND AND WALES - A GEOGRAPHICAL SYNTHESIS by James Frederick Edwards M.Sc., Dip.Eng.,C.Eng.,M.I.Mech.E., LRCATS A Thesis presented for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Salford Department of Geography 1987 1. CONTENTS Page, List of Tables iv List of Figures A Note on References Acknowledgements ix Abstract xi PART ONE INTRODUCTION 1 Chapter One: Setting Out 2 Chapter Two: Previous Research 11 PART TWO THE MEDIEVAL ROAD NETWORK 28 Introduction 29 Chapter Three: Cartographic Evidence 31 Chapter Four: The Evidence of Royal Itineraries 47 Chapter Five: Premonstratensian Itineraries from 62 Titchfield Abbey Chapter Six: The Significance of the Titchfield 74 Abbey Itineraries Chapter Seven: Some Further Evidence 89 Chapter Eight: The Basic Medieval Road Network 99 Conclusions 11? Page PART THREE THr NAVIGABLE MEDIEVAL WATERWAYS 115 Introduction 116 Chapter Hine: The Rivers of Horth-Fastern England 122 Chapter Ten: The Rivers of Yorkshire 142 Chapter Eleven: The Trent and the other Rivers of 180 Central Eastern England Chapter Twelve: The Rivers of the Fens 212 Chapter Thirteen: The Rivers of the Coast of East Anglia 238 Chapter Fourteen: The River Thames and Its Tributaries 265 Chapter Fifteen: The Rivers of the South Coast of England 298 Chapter Sixteen: The Rivers of South-Western England 315 Chapter Seventeen: The River Severn and Its Tributaries 330 Chapter Eighteen: The Rivers of Wales 348 Chapter Nineteen: The Rivers of North-Western England 362 Chapter Twenty: The Navigable Rivers of
    [Show full text]
  • The Lunar Society
    Ch F-X ang PD e w Click to buy NOW! w m o w c .d k. ocu-trac The Lunar Society The Lunar Circle or Society was an informal club or association of significant scientific men which flourished in and around Birmingham for nearly forty years. Origins: The origins of the Lunar Society lie in a pattern of friendships that emerged in the late 1750s. Erasmus Darwin and Matthew Boulton first met in early 1757, possibly through family connections, as Boulton's mother's family were patients of Darwin; or possibly though shared friendships, as both were admirers of the printer John Baskerville and friends of the astronomer and geologist John Michell, a regular visitor to Darwin's house in Lichfield1. Darwin was a physician and poet who had studied at Cambridge and Edinburgh; Boulton had left school at fourteen and started work in his father's business making metal goods in Birmingham at the age of 21. Despite their different backgrounds they shared a common interest in experiment and invention, and their activities would show Darwin's theoretical understanding and Boulton's practical experience to be complementary2. Soon they were visiting each other regularly and conducting investigations into scientific subjects such as electricity, meteorology and geology3. Erasmus Darwin Matthew Boulton In 1758, first Boulton and then Darwin became friends of the Derby-based clockmaker John Whitehurst. The link began with Whitehurst supplying clock movements to Boulton’s manufacturing operation but then extended into other experiments. Boulton, Darwin and Whitehurst were in turn introduced by Mitchell to Benjamin Franklin on his visit to Birmingham in July 1758 "to improve and increase Acquaintance among Persons of Influence"4, and Franklin returned in 1760 to conduct experiments with Boulton on electricity and sound5.
    [Show full text]
  • Case Name: Great Barr Hall and Chapel Case Number: 1432461
    Historic England Advice Report 27 April 2016 Case Name: Great Barr Hall and Chapel Case Number: 1432461 Background Historic England has been asked to assess Great Barr Hall to ensure that its statutory listing at Grade II* is appropriate. The present amendment case was raised internally and follows discussions with interested parties concerning the fact that the building is on the Buildings at Risk Register. The hall was listed at Grade II* in 1971 and the designation of the Hall and the Registered landscape were last considered for amendment in 2008. At that time the boundary of the registered park was redrawn and the grades were confirmed at Grade II* for the house and Grade II for the park. The hall building functioned as a hospital until 1978, together with a cluster of purpose-built, mid-C20 hospital structures to the south-east of the hall. The C20 hospital buildings were demolished in the early-C21 and replaced by a denser residential development, grouped around a former driveway to the hall. The Hall has gradually become dilapidated and the park is overgrown in some areas. A previous owner had plans to restore the hall with money from an enabling development in part of the park, but this did not happen. The present owners also wish to restore the house to use as a wedding venue and conference centre through an enabling development. The site was formerly fenced and guarded at all times, but this constant vigil has now lessened and there are signs of vandalism on site, together with further dilapidation.
    [Show full text]
  • Dudley and Sandwell MG
    H V N A O E U gg M I E 334 O L R L H R L S O N A NL L G A D U R N D I A I A V EE N School R U H E R N O 310 N T 637 T A R 26 27 R I L V E N C G CUMB ERLA B L H A D D E O S Green Priestfield M A Heath G 4 S DE A E E 64 R L O Walsall Campus R D H R T 39 34A K E DARLASTON LV LAK H 637 45 E O W D R E V C L 26A 27A D E A C R E L 63 N . O 23.26A.34 334 74 A A R T G S 4H S N 34 H of University of I R S 77 G 23 O W U W O 334 57 R SLATER’S E 63 R O 23 L LA. 401E S N 255 N 530 R 303 S RD E D N Y B 74 Y O A A O R R E O . A B H 4M Wolverhampton T T D L IX H A D P D 79 H T IC 256 34 R OUG LANGLF EY ROAD B V E G T E P A X U N R C . A D S Wolverhampton College S 34.37.310 T L N 637 R O E E OW . S R LL N A S A T.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservative Campaign Headquarters 30 Millbank London SW1P 4DP 3 April 2012 Boundary Commission for England 35 Great Smith Stree
    Conservative Campaign Headquarters 30 Millbank London SW1P 4DP 3rd April 2012 Boundary Commission for England 35 Great Smith Street London SW1P 3BQ Dear Sirs, Second consultation period – West Midlands Region We have much pleasure in enclosing our response to the representations received during the first consultation period on the initial proposals for the West Midlands Region. Yours sincerely, Roger Pratt CBE Boundary Review Manager WEST MIDLANDS REGION Submission of the Conservative Party regarding the responses to the initial proposals for the West Midlands region 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 We note that the Commission have received a large number of representations from the West Midlands proportionally larger than any other Region. 1.2 We note that the large majority of the representations are in opposition to the proposals, although in certain places a large number of representations support the proposals of the Commission, for example in Staffordshire Moorlands. 1.3 We note that a very large number of representations have come from Sutton Coldfield but we believe a lot of the representations there are based on misunderstandings and misinformation. 1.4 We will examine the proposals and any counter-proposals on the basis of Rule 5 of the Rules for Redistribution of Seats – Schedule 2 to the Act. 1.5 In particular we will look at the factors that can be taken account of under Rule 5 (1): a) Geographical factors; b) Local Government boundaries; c) Existing constituencies; d) Local ties that are broken from existing constituencies. 1.6 We note that both the Labour Party and the Liberal Democrats have submitted comprehensive counter-proposals.
    [Show full text]