DOCSLIB.ORG

Inversion of Acoustic Zooplankton Measurement for Adaptive Physical-Biological Ocean Forecast

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Inversion of Acoustic Zooplankton Measurement for Adaptive Physical-Biological Ocean Forecast Inversion of Acoustic Zooplankton Measurement for Adaptive Physical-Biological Ocean Forecast by Bertrand Renard alumnus of Ecole Normale Superieure de Cachan, Agr6gation in Civil Engineering, Technological and Energetical Equipments, 2001 Submitted to the Departments of Ocean Engineering and Material Science and Engineering in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Ocean Engineering MASSACHUSETTS INSTiTUTE at the OF TECHNOLOGY Massachusetts Institute of Technology June 2003 AUG 2 5 2003 C 2003 Bertrand Renard LIBRAR IES All rights reserved The author hereby grants MIT permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part. A u th or ................................................................................................. ...... .................................. Bertrand Renard Department of aE ,003 Certified b y ............................................................................ fik Schmidt Professor and Department Head, a Engineering, Chairman, Dept Committee on Graduate Students, Graduat dmissions Officer, d") , I ', ,, Thesis Supervisor Accepted by ........................................................ .......... Michael Triantafyllou Professor of Ocean Engineering Chairman, Departmental Committee on Graduate Studies Room 14-0551 77 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02139 Ph: 617.253.2800 MITLibraries Email: [email protected] Document Services http://Iibraries.mit.edu/docs DISCLAIMER OF QUALITY Due to the condition of the original material, there are unavoidable flaws in this reproduction. We have made every effort possible to provide you with the best copy available. If you are dissatisfied with this product and find it unusable, please contact Document Services as soon as possible. Thank you. The images contained in this document are of the best quality available. This research is performed as part of the Poseidon project, at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology department of Ocean Engineering, in cooperation with the Harvard University department of Earth and Planetary Sciences. Funding for this research was provided by: The National Science Fundation (NSF), via Information Technology Research (ITR), A and by the US Department of Commerce (DOC), via the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and the National Sea Grant program (Sea Grant) as part of the Poseidon project. Principal Investigators: Profs. Nicholas M. Patrikalakis and Henrik Schmidt, Department of Ocean Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Profs. Allan R. Robinson and Jim McCarthy, Department of Earth and Planetary Science, Harvard University kTeA2 2 Abstract The Poseidon project is aimed at bringing multi disciplinary oceanographic data together on an Information Technology backbone in real-time, for improved understanding and forecasting. In this framework zooplankton acoustic backscatter is needed for better biology understanding, and can in turn benefit from the input of physical and biological models. Zooplankton backscatter models are subdivided in three categories: fluid-like, hard elastic shells, and gas bladder animals. Zooplankton species neither dominant in number, size or biomass can overwhelm part of the acoustic target strength spectrum, implying a necessary species-specific measurement. Furthermore, the too few high frequencies sampled by available sonars leave the acoustic inversion widely underdetermined. Real data inversion from WHOI's BiomaperlI has provided plankton population estimation comparable to what nets data and counting had recorded. Multiple species acoustic inversion has been demonstrated with the fluid-like and the elastic-shelled model. Purely acoustic field data inversion would require unjustifiable assumptions and lead to unbearable levels of uncertainty, which have always been reduced by cameras and labor-intensive direct tows. While other methods remain necessary to validate large-scale acoustic data, the Poseidon project's adaptive modeling, sampling, and the automatic input of biological information as part of data assimilation could significantly reduce acoustic uncertainty. Other issues addressed are acoustic inversion simulation behavior with various target sizes, the inversion's probabilistic validation, multiple species inversion, bubbles detection, application on WHIIG's BiomaperlI data, sources of error and adaptive modeling. Keywords Zooplankton acoustics, bioacoustics, model inversion, adaptive sampling. 3 Foreword I want to pay a special tribute to my parents for the best gift of all: life. My warmest gratitude goes to my advisor who was always smiling and focused although he had to squeeze me in his tight schedule as department head. For their invaluable criticism, teaching and advice on my research I would like to thank Dr. Andone Lavery, Dr. Tim Stanton, Dr. Peter Wiebe, Prof. James J. McCarthy, Dr. Van Holliday, Prof. Nicholas Patrikalakis, Dr. Pierre Lermusiaux, Dr. Constantinos Evangelinos, Dr. Michele Zanolin, Gareth Lawson, Luiz Souza, Joshua Wilson, Patricia Moreno, Ding Wang and Da Guo. For their help and support: Sabina Rataj, Geoffrey Fox, Kathy de Zengotita, Eda Daniel and Mary Mullowney For their cheering support, allow me to mention my Ocean Engineering friends: Nick (also known as Prof. Nicholas C. Makris), Dr. Purnima Ratilal, Dr. Monica Montanari, Yi-san Lai, Irena Veljkovic, Wenyu Luo, Tianrun Chen, Hwee Min Charles Low, Sunwoong Lee, Travis Poole, Joe Edwards, Andrea Kraay, Jennifer Watson, Ian Ingram; The friends who helped me create the Club Francophone: Olivier Grunberg, Fr6d&ric Latour, Yannick Foing, Geraldine Kim, Prof. Johann Sadock, Wesley Farfan; and my other friends: Moshe Alamaro, Patricia Sampson, Raihan Khan, Dr. Pavel Hradecky, Adam Saffer, Todd Garvin, Oliver Pfeil. 4 Table of content ABSTRACT....................................................................................................................... 3 Key w o rds ..................................................................................................................... 3 FO REW O RD .................................................................................................................... 4 INTRO DU CTIO N ....................................................................................................... 7 1. ZOOPLANKTON ACOUSTICS BACKGROUND .......................................... 9 1.1 CHALLENGES OF ZOOPLANKTON BIOMASS ASSESSMENT ................................... 9 1.11 Introduction.................................................................................................. 9 1.12 Net tows...................................................................................................... 10 1.13 Video camera counting ............................................................................. 11 1.2 CHARACTERISTICS OF ACOUSTIC BACKSCATTER ............................................. 12 1.21 Zooplankton ............................................................................................... 12 1.22 Acoustic sensors......................................................................................... 14 1.23 Relevant acoustical-biologicalparameters ............................................... 16 1.3 ACOUSTIC BACKSCATTER OF BIOLOGICAL TARGETS: ......................................... 18 1.31 Fluid-like animals...................................................................................... 19 1.32 Hard elastic shelled and gas bladdered animals....................................... 22 1.33 Backscatter addition and considerations.................................................. 23 2. M ETH O D S .............................................................................................................. 25 2.1 FROM TARGET TO BACKSCATTER: MEASUREMENT MODELS ............................ 25 2.11 Empirical methods .................................................................................... 25 2.12 Model-based methods ............................................................................... 26 2.13 Acoustics adaptive modeling....................................................................... 27 2.2 THE COMPUTATIONAL MEASUREMENT MODEL ................................................... 28 2.21 Physical basis............................................................................................. 28 2.22 Geometry of the instrumentalsonars........................................................ 29 2.23 Towing method and data presentation...................................................... 31 2.3 ACOUSTIC INVERSION ........................................................................................ 34 2.31 Least squares minimum norm inversion ................................................... 34 2.32 Newton polynomials implementation........................................................ 35 2.33 Multiple models inversion........................................................................ 36 5 3. RESU LTS ................................................................................................................ 37 3.1 SINGLE SPECIES SIMULATION .......................................................................... 37 3.11 Fluid-like animals: euphausiids, copepods, krill....................................... 37 3.12 Standard deviation robustness.................................................................. 40 3.13 Plankton radius andpolynom ial order influence
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A New Type of Plankton Food Web Functioning in Coastal Waters Revealed by Coupling Monte Carlo Markov Chain Linear Inverse Metho
    A new type of plankton food web functioning in coastal waters revealed by coupling Monte Carlo Markov Chain Linear Inverse method and Ecological Network Analysis Marouan Meddeb, Nathalie Niquil, Boutheina Grami, Kaouther Mejri, Matilda Haraldsson, Aurélie Chaalali, Olivier Pringault, Asma Sakka Hlaili To cite this version: Marouan Meddeb, Nathalie Niquil, Boutheina Grami, Kaouther Mejri, Matilda Haraldsson, et al.. A new type of plankton food web functioning in coastal waters revealed by coupling Monte Carlo Markov Chain Linear Inverse method and Ecological Network Analysis. Ecological Indicators, Elsevier, 2019, 104, pp.67-85. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.04.077. hal-02146355 HAL Id: hal-02146355 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02146355 Submitted on 3 Jun 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. 1 A new type of plankton food web functioning in coastal waters revealed by coupling 2 Monte Carlo Markov Chain Linear Inverse method and Ecological Network Analysis 3 4 5 Marouan Meddeba,b*, Nathalie Niquilc, Boutheïna Gramia,d, Kaouther Mejria,b, Matilda 6 Haraldssonc, Aurélie Chaalalic,e,f, Olivier Pringaultg, Asma Sakka Hlailia,b 7 8 aUniversité de Carthage, Faculté des Sciences de Bizerte, Laboratoire de phytoplanctonologie 9 7021 Zarzouna, Bizerte, Tunisie.
    [Show full text]
  • Crustacean Zooplankton in Lake Constance from 1920 to 1995: Response to Eutrophication and Re-Oligotrophication
    Arch. Hydrobiol. Spec. Issues Advanc. Limnol. 53, p. 255-274, December 1998 Lake Constance, Characterization of an ecosystem in transition Crustacean zooplankton in Lake Constance from 1920 to 1995: Response to eutrophication and re-oligotrophication Dietmar Straile and Waiter Geller with 9 figures Abstract: During the first three quarters ofthis century, the trophic state ofLake Constance changed from oligotrophic to meso-/eutrophic conditions. The response ofcrustaceans to the eutrophication process is studied by comparing biomasses ofcrustacean zooplankton from recent years, i.e. from 1979-1995, with data from the early 1920s (AUERBACH et a1. 1924, 1926) and the 1950s (MUCKLE & MUCKLE­ ROTTENGATTER 1976). This comparison revealed a several-fold increase in crustacean biomass. The relative biomass increase was more pronounced from the early 1920s to the 1950s than from the 1950s to the 1980s. Most important changes ofthe species inventory included the invasion of Cyclops vicinus and Daphnia galeata and the extinction of Heterocope borealis and Diaphanosoma brachyurum during the 1950s and early 1960s. All species which did not become extinct increased their biomass during eutrophication. This increase in biomass differed between species and throughout the season which re­ sulted in changes in relative biomass between species. Daphnids were able to enlarge their seasonal window ofrelative dominance from 3 months during the 1920s (June to August) to 7 months during the 1980s (May to November). On an annual average, this resulted in a shift from a copepod dominated lake (biomass ratio cladocerans/copepods = 0.4 during 1920/24) to a cladoceran dominated lake (biomass ratio cladocerans/copepods = 1.5 during 1979/95).
    [Show full text]
  • Fertilizing the Ocean with Iron Is This a Viable Way to Help Reduce Carbon Dioxide Levels in the Atmosphere?
    380 Fertilizing the Ocean with Iron Is this a viable way to help reduce carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere? 360 ive me half a tanker of iron, and I’ll give you an ice Twenty years on, Martin’s line is still viewed alternately age” may rank as the catchiest line ever uttered by a as a boast or a quip—an opportunity too good to pass up or a biogeochemist.“G The man responsible was the late John Martin, misguided remedy doomed to backfire. Yet over the same pe- former director of the Moss Landing Marine Laboratory, who riod, unrelenting increases in carbon emissions and mount- discovered that sprinkling iron dust in the right ocean waters ing evidence of climate change have taken the debate beyond could trigger plankton blooms the size of a small city. In turn, academic circles and into the free market. the billions of cells produced might absorb enough heat-trap- Today, policymakers, investors, economists, environ- ping carbon dioxide to cool the Earth’s warming atmosphere. mentalists, and lawyers are taking notice of the idea. A few Never mind that Martin companies are planning new, was only half serious when larger experiments. The ab- 340 he made the remark (in his Ocean Iron Fertilization sence of clear regulations for “best Dr. Strangelove accent,” either conducting experiments he later recalled) at an infor- An argument for: Faced with the huge at sea or trading the results mal seminar at Woods Hole consequences of climate change, iron’s in “carbon offset” markets Oceanographic Institution outsized ability to put carbon into the oceans complicates the picture.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Oceanography - Legendre, Louis and Rassoulzadegan, Fereidoun
    OCEANOGRAPHY – Vol.II - Biological Oceanography - Legendre, Louis and Rassoulzadegan, Fereidoun BIOLOGICAL OCEANOGRAPHY Legendre, Louis and Rassoulzadegan, Fereidoun Laboratoire d'Océanographie de Villefranche, France. Keywords: Algae, allochthonous nutrient, aphotic zone, autochthonous nutrient, Auxotrophs, bacteria, bacterioplankton, benthos, carbon dioxide, carnivory, chelator, chemoautotrophs, ciliates, coastal eutrophication, coccolithophores, convection, crustaceans, cyanobacteria, detritus, diatoms, dinoflagellates, disphotic zone, dissolved organic carbon (DOC), dissolved organic matter (DOM), ecosystem, eukaryotes, euphotic zone, eutrophic, excretion, exoenzymes, exudation, fecal pellet, femtoplankton, fish, fish lavae, flagellates, food web, foraminifers, fungi, harmful algal blooms (HABs), herbivorous food web, herbivory, heterotrophs, holoplankton, ichthyoplankton, irradiance, labile, large planktonic microphages, lysis, macroplankton, marine snow, megaplankton, meroplankton, mesoplankton, metazoan, metazooplankton, microbial food web, microbial loop, microheterotrophs, microplankton, mixotrophs, mollusks, multivorous food web, mutualism, mycoplankton, nanoplankton, nekton, net community production (NCP), neuston, new production, nutrient limitation, nutrient (macro-, micro-, inorganic, organic), oligotrophic, omnivory, osmotrophs, particulate organic carbon (POC), particulate organic matter (POM), pelagic, phagocytosis, phagotrophs, photoautotorphs, photosynthesis, phytoplankton, phytoplankton bloom, picoplankton, plankton,
    [Show full text]
  • Algae and Lakes Algae Are Primitive, Usually Microscopic, Organisms Found in Every Lake
    Algae and Lakes Algae are primitive, usually microscopic, organisms found in every lake. Like green plants, most algae have pigments that allow them to create energy from sunlight through the process of photosynthesis. Algae use this energy and nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorus to grow and reproduce. Algae form the base of the food web in lakes. Small animals called zooplankton feed on algae. In Drawings from IFAS, Center for Aquatic Plants, turn, zooplankton become food for fish. Algae University of Florida, 1990; and U.S. Soil Conservation Service, Water Quality Indicators Guide: Surface Waters, also produce some of the oxygen found in lake 1989. water and in the atmosphere What types of algae live in my lake? There are thousands of species of freshwater algae living in lakes around the world. Most species of algae in Snohomish County lakes are free-floating, collectively known as phytoplankton. There are also many species of algae that attach to rocks, docks, and aquatic plants, called periphyton. There are three main groups of algae—the green algae (Chlorophyta), the golden brown algae (Chrysophyta) which also includes a large group called diatoms, and A typical microscopic view of algae found in local lakes the blue-green algae (Cyanobacteria)—as well as several smaller groups (euglenoids, cryptomonads, and dinoflagellates). Under the microscope, many algae have beautiful shapes and colors. Algae are important for healthy lakes. Without algae, your lake would likely be devoid of fish and other wildlife. Most algae are inconspicuous and do not cause problems. Unfortunately, a few types of algae can cause water quality problems in lakes.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of N:P:Si Ratios and Zooplankton Grazing on Phytoplankton Communities in the Northern Adriatic Sea
    AQUATIC MICROBIAL ECOLOGY Vol. 18: 37-54, 1999 Published July 16 Aquat Microb Ecol 1 Effects of N:P:Si ratios and zooplankton grazing on phytoplankton communities in the northern Adriatic Sea. I. Nutrients, phytoplankton biomass, and polysaccharide production Edna Granelil.*, Per ~arlsson',Jefferson T. urne er^, Patricia A. ester^, Christian Bechemin4, Rodger ~awson',Enzo ~unari' 'University of Kalmar, Department of Marine Sciences. POB 905, S-391 29 Kalmar. Sweden 'Biology Department. University of Massachusetts Dartmouth. North Dartmouth, Massachusetts 02747. USA 3National Marine Fisheries Service, NOAA, Southeast Fisheries Science Center. Beaufort Laboratory, Beaufort. North Carolina 28516, USA 4CREMA-L'Houmeau(CNRS-IFREMER), BP5, F-17137 L'Houmeau, France 'Chesapeake Biological Laboratory, University of Maryland, Solomons, Maryland 20688. USA '~aboratoriodi Igiene Ambientale, Istituto di Sanita, Viale R. Elena 299. 1-00161 Rome, Italy ABSTRACT: The northern Adriatic Sea has been historically subjected to phosphorus and nitrogen loading. Recent signs of increasing eutrophication include oxygen def~ciencyin the bottom waters and large-scale formation of gelatinous macroaggregates. The reason for the formation of these macroag- gregates is unclear, but excess production of phytoplankton polysacchandes is suspected. In order to study the effect of different nutrient (nitrogen~phosphorus:silicon)ratios on phytoplankton production, biomass, polysacchandes, and species succession, 4 land-based enclosure experiments were per- formed with northern Adriatic seawater. During 2 of these experiments the importance of zooplankton grazlng as a phytoplankton loss factor was also investigated. Primary productivity in the northern Adri- atic Sea is thought to be phosphorus limited, and our experiments confirmed that even low daily phos- phorus additions Increased phytoplankton biomass.
    [Show full text]
  • Iron Fertilization: a Scientific Review with International Policy Recommendations
    Iron Fertilization: A Scientific Review with International Policy Recommendations By Jennie Dean* TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ................................ ....... .322 I. CLIMATE CHANGE AND THE OCEAN ......................................... 322 A . D escribing the problem ................................................................ 322 B. Identifying a potential solution .................................................... 323 II. IRON FERTILIZATION EXAMINED ............................................... 326 A . Potential benefits .......................................................................... 326 B . Potential problem s ........................................................................ 328 C. Synthesis and suggested action .................................................... 333 III. IRON FERTILIZATION AND INTERNATIONAL LAW ................. 334 A . Introduction .................................................................................. 334 B. Coverage under pollution and dumping regulations ..................... 334 C. Coverage under biological conservation regulations .................... 336 D. Coverage under global climate change mitigation regulations ..... 338 IV. RECOM M ENDATION S ..................................................................... 339 A . Suggested modifications ............................................................. 339 B . F easibility ..................................................................................... 340 C O N C L U SIO N ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ocean Primary Production
    Learning Ocean Science through Ocean Exploration Section 6 Ocean Primary Production Photosynthesis very ecosystem requires an input of energy. The Esource varies with the system. In the majority of ocean ecosystems the source of energy is sunlight that drives photosynthesis done by micro- (phytoplankton) or macro- (seaweeds) algae, green plants, or photosynthetic blue-green or purple bacteria. These organisms produce ecosystem food that supports the food chain, hence they are referred to as primary producers. The balanced equation for photosynthesis that is correct, but seldom used, is 6CO2 + 12H2O = C6H12O6 + 6H2O + 6O2. Water appears on both sides of the equation because the water molecule is split, and new water molecules are made in the process. When the correct equation for photosynthe- sis is used, it is easier to see the similarities with chemo- synthesis in which water is also a product. Systems Lacking There are some ecosystems that depend on primary Primary Producers production from other ecosystems. Many streams have few primary producers and are dependent on the leaves from surrounding forests as a source of food that supports the stream food chain. Snow fields in the high mountains and sand dunes in the desert depend on food blown in from areas that support primary production. The oceans below the photic zone are a vast space, largely dependent on food from photosynthetic primary producers living in the sunlit waters above. Food sinks to the bottom in the form of dead organisms and bacteria. It is as small as marine snow—tiny clumps of bacteria and decomposing microalgae—and as large as an occasional bonanza—a dead whale.
    [Show full text]
  • Ocean Fertilization the Potential of Ocean Fertilization for Climate Change Mitigation
    Report to Congress Ocean Fertilization The potential of ocean fertilization for climate change mitigation Requested on page 636 of House Report 111-366 accompanying the fiscal year 2010 Consolidated Appropriations Act (P.L. 111-117). 1 Executive Summary Page 636 of House Report 111-366 that accompanies the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2010 (Public Law 111-117) calls for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) to “provide a report on the potential of ocean fertilization for climate change mitigation” to the House and Senate Committees on Appropriation within 60 days of enactment of the Act. Climate change mitigation includes any efforts to reduce climate change including reducing emissions of heat-trapping gases and particles, and increasing removal of heat-trapping gases from the atmosphere. The oceans contain about 50 times as much carbon dioxide (CO2) as the atmosphere, comprising around 38,118 billion metric tons of carbon compared to 762 billion metric tons in the atmosphere. What allows the oceans to store so much CO2 is the fact that when CO2 dissolves in surface seawater, it reacts with a vast reservoir of carbonate ions to form bicarbonate ions. This reaction effectively removes the dissolved gas form of CO2 from the surface water, allowing the water to absorb more gas from the overlying air. This process, in combination with large-scale ocean circulation, has resulted in the transfer of between a quarter and a third of human-induced emissions of CO2 from the atmosphere into the ocean since the beginning of the industrial revolution. Ocean biology enhances the ocean’s ability to absorb CO2 from the atmosphere as follows: plants in the ocean, mostly microscopic floating plants called phytoplankton, absorb CO2 and nutrients when they grow, packaging them into organic material.
    [Show full text]
  • Zooplankton Structure and Potential Food Web Interactions in the Plankton of a Subtropical Chain-Of- Lakes
    Research Article TheScientificWorldJOURNAL (2002) 2, 926–942 ISSN 1537-744X; DOI 10.1100/tsw.2002.171 Zooplankton Structure and Potential Food Web Interactions in the Plankton of a Subtropical Chain-of- Lakes Karl E. Havens Watershed Management Department, South Florida Water Management District, West Palm Beach, FL 33496 E-mail: [email protected] Received January 29, 2002; Accepted February 15, 2002; Published April 8, 2002 This study evaluates the taxonomic and size structure of macro-zooplankton and its potential role in controlling phytoplankton in the Kissimmee Chain-of-Lakes, six shallow interconnected lakes in Florida, U.S. Macro-zooplankton species biomass and standard limnological attributes (temperature, pH, total phosphorus [TP], chlorophyll a [Chl a], and Secchi transparency) were quantified on a bimonthly basisfrom April 1997 to February -1 1999. Concentrations of TP ranged from below 50 to over150 µg l . Peak concentrations of particulate P coincided with maximal Chl a, and in one instance a high concentration of soluble reactive P followed. The cladoceranzooplankton was dominated by small species, including Eubosmina tubicen, Ceriodaphnia rigaudi, and Daphnia ambigua. The exotic daphnid, D. lumholtzii, periodically was abundant. The copepods were strongly dominated by Diaptomus dorsalis, a species previously shown to be highly resistant to fish predation. These results, and findings of controlled experiments on a nearby lake with a nearlyidentical zooplankton species complement, suggest that fish predation may be amajor factor structuring the macro-zooplankton assemblage. Zooplankton biomass,on the other hand, may be affected by resource availability. There was a significantpositive relationship between average biomass of macro-zooplankton and the average concentration of TP among the six lakes.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Water Quality, Eutrophication, and Zooplankton Community in Lake Burullus, Egypt
    diversity Article Assessment of Water Quality, Eutrophication, and Zooplankton Community in Lake Burullus, Egypt Ahmed E. Alprol 1, Ahmed M. M. Heneash 1, Asgad M. Soliman 1, Mohamed Ashour 1,* , Walaa F. Alsanie 2, Ahmed Gaber 3 and Abdallah Tageldein Mansour 4,5 1 National Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries, NIOF, Cairo 11516, Egypt; [email protected] (A.E.A.); [email protected] (A.M.M.H.); [email protected] (A.M.S.) 2 Department of Clinical Laboratories Sciences, The Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Taif University, P.O. Box 11099, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia; [email protected] 3 Department of Biology, College of Science, Taif University, P.O. Box 11099, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia; [email protected] 4 Animal and Fish Production Department, College of Agricultural and Food Sciences, King Faisal University, P.O. Box 420, Al-Ahsa 31982, Saudi Arabia; [email protected] 5 Fish and Animal Production Department, Faculty of Agriculture (Saba Basha), Alexandria University, Alexandria 21531, Egypt * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Burullus Lake is Egypt’s second most important coastal lagoon. The present study aimed to shed light on the different types of polluted waters entering the lake from various drains, as well as to evaluate the zooplankton community, determine the physical and chemical characteristics of the waters, and study the eutrophication state based on three years of seasonal monitoring from Citation: Alprol, A.E.; Heneash, 2017 to 2019 at 12 stations. The results revealed that Rotifera, Copepoda, Protozoa, and Cladocera A.M.M. ; Soliman, A.M.; Ashour, M.; dominated the zooplankton population across the three-year study period, with a total of 98 taxa from Alsanie, W.F.; Gaber, A.; Mansour, 59 genera and 10 groups detected in the whole-body lake in 2018 and 2019, compared to 93 species A.T.
    [Show full text]
  • Microbial Food Webs & Lake Management
    New Approaches Microbial Food Webs & Lake Management Karl Havens and John Beaver cientists and managers organism’s position in the food web. X magnification under a microscope) dealing with the open water Organisms occurring at lower trophic are prokaryotic cells that represent one (pelagic) region of lakes and levels (e.g., bacteria and flagellates) of the first and simplest forms of life reservoirs often focus on two are near the “bottom” of the food web, on the earth. Most are heterotrophic, componentsS when considering water where energy and nutrients first enter meaning that they require organic quality or fisheries – the suspended the ecosystem. Organisms occurring at sources of carbon, however, some can algae (phytoplankton) and the suspended higher trophic levels (e.g., zooplankton synthesize carbon by photosynthesis or animals (zooplankton). This is for good and fish) are closer to the top of the food chemosynthesis. The blue-green algae reason. Phytoplankton is the component web, i.e., near the biological destination of (cyanobacteria) actually are bacteria, but responsible for noxious algal blooms and the energy and nutrients. We also use the for the purpose of this discussion, are it often is the target of nutrient reduction more familiar term trophic state, however not considered part of the MFW because strategies or other in-lake management only in the context of degree of nutrient they function more like phytoplankton solutions such as the application of enrichment. in the grazing food chain. Flagellates algaecide. Zooplankton is the component (Figure 1c), larger in size (typically 5 that provides the food resource for Who Discovered the to 10 µm) than bacteria but still very most larval fish and for adults of many Microbial Food Web? small compared to zooplankton, are pelagic species.
    [Show full text]