The Behavioural Economics of Government Responses to COVID-19

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Behavioural Economics of Government Responses to COVID-19 Journal of Behavioral Economics for Policy, Vol. 4, COVID-19 Special Issue 3, 11-43, 2020 The behavioural economics of government responses to COVID-19 Gigi Foster1* Abstract How have governments around the world responded to the novel coronavirus first discovered in China’s Wuhan province in late 2019 (the cause of COVID-19 disease)? What has driven governments’ responses, and to what extent can behavioural economics help us to understand the policies that have been enacted? In this short paper I examine the responses of four countries, mapped against media reporting, local context and viral spread, and discuss how core behavioural economics insights can illuminate the possible reasons for those responses. The paper concludes with observations about how these insights can be used for good by governments – in predicting public reactions, and in setting and selling government policy – the next time that the world faces a pandemic. JEL Classification: H12; I18; Z18 Keywords COVID-19 — fear — media — salience — reference dependence 1UNSW Business School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia *Corresponding author: [email protected] Introduction review a suite of well-documented behavioural phenomena and outline how each of them may have played a role in gener- The world has been shaken by the COVID-19 pandemic in ating the public sentiment and subsequent political responses a way unlike what we have seen in any prior global health we have seen. Part 3 concludes with a set of lessons from the event. What started as a local health anomaly in one Chinese experience that humanity can take to its next confrontation province quickly became a world-stopping crisis affecting with a contagious global health threat. every major nation in 2020. Industries from travel to man- No certainty about causality is claimed in any of this anal- ufacturing suffered acute, sudden disruptions due to politi- ysis, nor is there a claim that the news reports and announce- cal action to lock down cities and block free movement of ments analysed, gathered in good faith but under significant people and goods between countries. This experience pro- time pressure, are an unbiased selection of all reporting deliv- vides an unprecedented opportunity to examine political lead- ered during this period to residents of each country. Rather ers’ responses to an acute global crisis in light of the wealth than focussing heavily on sample representativeness of media of insights from behavioural economics, and ask which be- reports or convincing econometric identification, I employ in havioural elements may have influenced public sentiment and this paper mainly logical scientific deduction, with the goal the ensuing political responses we have seen. Scientific re- of delivering policy-relevant reflection on what we have been flection on what has happened is a step towards enabling through, and guided by the assumption that the stylized be- governments around the world to better prepare for the likely havioural insights observed in many other contexts will likely public response, and be better equipped to implement counter- also have played a role here. The analysis in this paper bene- measures to safeguard human interests, when the world faces fits from some, but not perfect, hindsight: while we now know another pandemic. far more than we did in January 2020 about this new virus, we This short paper proceeds as follows. In Part 1 I review the are still learning. As the remaining uncertainty resolves over timeline and nature of responses of several nations to the de- the coming months and years, the picture of what we should veloping coronavirus phenomenon, selecting geographically have done in response to the virus will also become clearer. and economically diverse nations that saw varying degrees of penetration of the virus. A core feature of this review is to Part 1: Responses of world leaders chart popular media reports about the virus accessible to the public in each country, and to discuss the chronological align- to COVID-19 ment of those reports and other global and national markers Leaders in developed and developing nations, with different of the pandemic’s trajectory with the country’s public policy evolving trajectories of novel coronavirus infection and deaths announcements. Second, informed by the results in Part 1, I due to COVID-19, have responded in different ways to the The behavioural economics of government responses to COVID-19 — 12/43 new virus. Tables 1A-1D provide week-by-week timelines of 1b Sweden country-specific viral and economic trajectories, local context, As shown in Table 1B, the Swedish policy timeline starts to be global events, and media reports relevant to the virus,1 mapped very active before mid-March, with multiple announcements to government responses for a selection of countries from and proactive steps taken by the government, including state- different points on the spectra of economic development and ments on 12 March about the efficient allocation of testing degree of severity of the virus’s attack: Australia, Thailand, resources and the potential negative consequences of closing Sweden, and the UK. The timelines run from mid-January to schools and undirected testing. Instead of blanket instruc- the end of April 2020. tions directed towards everyone in the society at all times, specific instructions are provided in government messaging 1a Australia pertaining to certain activities and population sub-groups in The trajectory of the virus in Australia was very muted during the days leading up to the release of the Imperial College the window of observation compared either to epidemiolo- London estimates. The only large-scale policy act even in the gists’ initial projections,2 or to the trajectory followed by the days immediately following the release of the ICL estimates virus during this window in many other developed countries. was the closure of senior high schools. Headlines do not seem However, Table 1A shows that media reports about the virus fearful but instead mainly report facts, and as early as 24 through the month of March were increasingly frantic. Early March focus on optimistic angles such as a reduction in home in that month, headlines were offering grim infection and break-ins and “stories of progress to bring you hope”. death count projections and signalling an imminent economic tailspin, with stocks in “freefall”, tourism and the finance 1c Thailand sector reeling, and consumers panic-buying essential supplies. Table 1C shows that Thailand’s headlines were reasonably During February and the first week of March, government sparse until mid-March, focussing mainly on mask supplies, policy focused mainly on travel bans and announcements grad- depressive effects on the tourism industry, and reporting of ually upgrading the risk posed by the virus. On 11 March, single- and double-digit counts of new infections, while the Australia’s health minister said the country could not pre- government announced reactionary steps until that time that dict the trajectory of the virus, and words and phrases that mainly targeted particular traveller groups perceived to be at stoke fear continued to appear in headlines over the ensuing risk. With the exception of one plea not to stockpile food, three weeks – like “chaos”, “panic”, “slaughtered”, “fears”, the government did not make any reassuring statements dur- “go bust”, “hit the wall”, “falls off a cliff”, and “edge of a ing this period that may have helped calm its residents (and precipice” – when speaking both of the virus and, particularly, the request against stockpiling may well have come across of projected economic effects. In headlines focussing on the as desperate and itself sparked more panic). On 18 March, virus itself, there is little evidence of comparisons against two days after the release of the abovementioned Imperial existing illnesses, death rates for different age groups, or other College London projections, new modelling was released that perspective. At late as 13 March the country’s chief med- projected 400,000 infections in the country, and this was fol- ical officer tried to urge calm, saying that COVID-19 was lowed by a slew of government action a few days later towards “a very mild illness” (an accurate description of most novel lockdown. After that point, the headlines shift to describing coronavirus infections). However, between 16 March (the the orders and punitive measures one would expect in a police release date of Imperial College London modelling predict- state, and government policy focusses mainly on control of ing millions of deaths in the US and the UK) and 30 March, the population, with only two announcements about aid: one the government moved to gradually lock down the economy. from the government purse, and a second one requesting help After this point, reporting became less focused on stoking from private donors. fear, and more focused on providing the public with informa- tion and tracking about the disease that had arguably taken 1d The United Kingdom up residence in their minds as the right thing to fear at this Headlines early in the window of observation in the UK (see moment. Table 1D) are reasonably controlled, presenting facts and ex- plicitly pushing against fear (“UK warns against mass panic”) but also increasingly suggesting that the government was 1 Headlines tabulated in Tables 1A-1D were selected from sources and under-reacting (e.g., the sarcastic headline “Now wash your according to the search algorithms detailed in the Appendix. Data on gov- ernment actions were gathered from the news sources from which headlines hands” on 27 February, and the near-simultaneous reporting were selected plus official sources, such as the UK government’s daily press in late February of dire warnings about the virus and reassur- briefing. Supplementary data on the actual spread of the virus and local con- ing statements from the government).3 15 March brought the text (drawn from local sources) and notable chronological markers covered telling headline that a surge in the death toll “forces [Boris] broadly in worldwide news are also shown in each timeline.
Recommended publications
  • Coronavirus COVID-19 Outbreak in the EU – Fundamental Rights Implications”
    Coronavirus pandemic in the EU – Fundamental Rights Implications Country: Sweden Contractor’s name: Emerga Institute Date: 2 July 2020 DISCLAIMER: This document was commissioned under contract as background material for a comparative report being prepared by the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) for the project “Coronavirus COVID-19 outbreak in the EU – fundamental rights implications”. The information and views contained in the document do not necessarily reflect the views or the official position of the FRA. The document is made available for transparency and information purposes only and does not constitute legal advice or legal opinion. 1 Measures taken by government/public authorities 1.1 Emergency laws/states of emergency Provide information on emergency laws/declarations of states of emergency, including actions taken by police to enforce them and court rulings concerning the legality of such measures. Please include in particular information on developments relating to the protection of the right of association/demonstration; for example, with respect to the public gatherings that took place concerning the death of George Floyd, or other such events. In Sweden, the only constitutionally protected freedom or right that has been restricted for all inhabitants in connection with the spread of the corona virus is the freedom of assembly. According to section 1 of the Ordinance on prohibition on holding public gatherings and public events (Förordning [2020:114] om förbud mot att hålla allmänna sammankomster och offentliga tillställningar), general meetings and public events with more than 50 participants may not be held within Sweden until further notice.1 All other restrictions aimed at the public are posed as recommendations from the government and/or the relevant authorities and cannot be imposed by any actions taken by the police.
    [Show full text]
  • Workshop Reports PDF 2.8 MB
    Workshop reports Data science and AI in the age of COVID-19 Reflections on the response of the UK’s data science and AI community to the COVID-19 pandemic Below are the individual reports from the research. Another example of collaboration return to a context in which advances achieved workshops that were convened by The Alan between organisations was the development of during the pandemic would not be possible Turing Institute and the Centre for Facilitation adaptive clinical trials (e.g. RECOVERY8). once the COPI regulations come to an end, in November and December 2020, following despite evidence indicating public support for Challenges the Turing’s ‘AI and data science in the age of the use of health data in research.12 COVID-19’ conference. The workshops were The ability of the data science community to Workshop participants also reported that data summarised by the facilitators and theme respond more successfully to the challenge of sources could benefit from being better linked leads, and the editorial team of the primary the pandemic was hindered by several hurdles. to each other – despite more collaboration, report then applied light editing. These reports many UKRI-funded studies (ISARIC4C,13 are a reflection of the views expressed by Better standardisation and documentation PHOSP-COVID14) are still relatively standalone. workshop participants, and do not necessarily of clinical data (and other forms of data, e.g. Connecting expertise – the right people to reflect the views of The Alan Turing Institute. location) would have been beneficial. Some positive examples of standardisation could the right data to the right problem – was Several of the reports end with references have been replicated for far wider benefit.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparing and Analyzing Organization Responses to Crises
    Clemson University TigerPrints All Theses Theses 5-2019 Comparing and Analyzing Organization Responses to Crises Through Stakeholder Engagement Between the Cruise and Hotel Industries Cody Caster Norris Clemson University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_theses Recommended Citation Norris, Cody Caster, "Comparing and Analyzing Organization Responses to Crises Through Stakeholder Engagement Between the Cruise and Hotel Industries" (2019). All Theses. 3064. https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_theses/3064 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses at TigerPrints. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Theses by an authorized administrator of TigerPrints. For more information, please contact [email protected]. COMPARING AND ANALYZING ORGANIZATION RESPONSES TO CRISES THROUGH STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT BETWEEN THE CRUISE AND HOTEL INDUSTRIES A Thesis Presented to the Graduate School of Clemson University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts Communication, Technology and Society by Cody Caster Norris May 2019 Accepted by: Dr. Andrew Pyle, PhD, Committee Chair Dr. Erin Ash, PhD Dr. Meghnaa Tallapragada, PhD i ABSTRACT Crises in the tourism industries are repeatedly occurring and the way organizations respond have yet to reach an acceptable level expected by crisis communication scholars based on current literature and research. Through a comparative case study, cruise line crises will be examined through the lens of Discourse of Renewal and compared to hotel crises to determine how the both tourism organizations are responding and engaging with stakeholders during these crises. Furthermore, insight and implications of current crisis response efforts and guidelines on how cruise lines should transition to best practices are offered.
    [Show full text]
  • The Critical Importance of Expert Statistical Input
    Sent to the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet 18 August 2020 A proposal to enhance Australia’s capability to manage epidemics The critical importance of expert statistical input 1 2 Nicholas Fisher and Dennis Trewin Executive summary Given the high level of global mobility, pandemics are likely to be more frequent, and with potentially devastating consequences for the Australian community and its way of life. Whilst parts of Australia are experiencing a second wave of COVID-19, the country is in relatively better shape than most others. The number of people who have died or been seriously ill as a consequence of the virus, whilst tragically high, is nonetheless comparable with most of the best-performing countries. That said, we believe there is a critical need for strategic statistical oversight of the whole process of anticipating, managing and learning from the current pandemic to improve the quantitative information and advice provided to policy makers. This proposal outlines quantitative aspects of a plan to enable Australia to deal more efficiently and effectively with future such events, thus enhancing both the social and the economic welfare of its people. Indeed, expeditious action may well assist materially in managing possible future waves of the current pandemic, and its aftermath. A dispassionate assessment of Australia’s health and economic response to the pandemic over the last six months reveals some very significant inadequacies in the data, statistical analysis and interpretation used to guide Australia’s preparations and actions. Data to answer some of the most basic of questions about prevalence in population have not been available and remain unavailable.
    [Show full text]
  • Read the Report As a PDF Exploring the Covid-19
    Contents Contents 1 About 2 Executive summary 3 Introduction 5 Landscape review 5 Key findings at this stage 6 A number of symptom trackers in the ecosystem 6 Ecosystem structure 6 Lack of collaboration 6 Lack of transparency around data collection 6 Open data availability 6 User base 7 Specific types of users 7 Location 7 Data discovery 8 Types of data 8 Observations about types of data 9 Commonly asked questions 9 Data standards 9 Representation of communities 10 Changes over time 10 Mental health and wellbeing 11 Outputs 11 Individual guidance 11 Research insights 11 Improvements to existing services 11 How does the data collected relate to the outputs? 12 The symptom tracking data ecosystem 13 The UK symptom tracking data ecosystem 13 Where is value being created in this example? 14 Barriers to impact 14 Opportunities 15 International variations 15 A single source approach 15 A more collaborative approach 16 Where is value being created in this example 17 Open Data Institute 2020 / Report Exploring the Covid-19 symptom-tracking ecosystem 1 Discussion 18 Data discovery 18 Legal complexities 18 Technical barriers 20 Trust and trustworthiness 20 Recommendations 20 Standards for data 21 Enabling hub to facilitate interactions 21 Building trust with the public through ethical approaches 22 Appendices 23 About This report has been researched and produced by the Open Data Institute, and published in January 2021. Its lead author was James Maddison with contributions from Olivier Thereaux and Jeni Tennison. If you want to share feedback by email or would like to get in touch, contact the Open Covid-19 project team at [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • This Is a Daily Compilation of Media Articles Concerning the Covid-19 Impact to the Global Cruise Industry
    1 THIS IS A DAILY COMPILATION OF MEDIA ARTICLES CONCERNING THE COVID-19 IMPACT TO THE GLOBAL CRUISE INDUSTRY. Please note this isn’t a complete listing of media articles but a snapshot only. 29 March, 2020: PASSENGERS TRANSFERRED FROM VIRUS-STRICKEN CRUISE SHIP OFF PANAMA Passengers on a virus-stricken cruise liner stranded off Central America were transferred to another ship Saturday, after the US-bound vessel was given permission to pass through the Panama Canal. The Zaandam had been stuck in the Pacific Ocean since March 14 after dozens of the 1,800 people on board reported flu-like symptoms and several South American ports refused to let it dock. The ship's Dutch owner Holland America said Friday four passengers had died and two more had tested positive for COVID- 19. Panama on Saturday reversed its decision to block the Zaandam from its canal, and said it would be allowed to pass "to provide humanitarian help." Another ship, the Rotterdam, has since arrived off the coast of Panama from San Diego carrying food, medical staff, testing kits, medicine and food for the beleaguered vessel. Passengers showing no signs of the virus were ferried from the Zaandam to the Rotterdam on Saturday, a French tourist told AFP by telephone. "It's like emptying a bathtub with a teaspoon," she said. "The boats can hold about 100 people, and they are putting about half in at a time. That's why it's going slowly." The Zaandam cruise liner left Buenos Aires on March 7 and was supposed to arrive two weeks later at San Antonio, near Santiago in Chile.
    [Show full text]
  • National Covid-19 Coordination Commission (Nccc)
    25th May 2020 Senator Katy Gallagher, Chair Select Committee on COVID-19 ℅ Committee Secretary Dear Senator Gallagher and Members of the Select Committee on Covid-19, I am writing to the Select Committee on COVID-19 as an Australian citizen. I have focussed my submission on my concerns regarding potential financial conflicts of interest in the Australian Government’s Covid-19 advisors. Please note that this submission contains excerpts from an extensive report I have published, entitled ‘Covid-19: Plandemic Profit.Fallout1.’ NATIONAL COVID-19 COORDINATION COMMISSION (NCCC) EXECUTIVE BOARD In March 2020, Prime Minister Scott Morrison announced the creation of the ‘National Covid-19 Coordination Commission (NCCC). “An Executive Board of Commissioners, will advise the Prime Minister on all non-health aspects of the pandemic response… [the Board will] coordinate advice to the Australian Government on actions to anticipate and mitigate the economic and social effects of the global coronavirus pandemic…. This is about working cooperatively across private-to-private and public-to-private networks to unlock resources…”2 Upon examination, the Board Members of the NCCC do not appear to represent the interests of small business or ‘everyday Australians’. Instead, they hold senior board positions of companies in mining, oil and gas, airlines, private hospitals, pharmaceutical companies, casinos and superannuation giants. One member is a billionaire. Another was recently accused for being ‘an international tax dodger’ by an Australian Senator. Another Chairs an international organisation at the forefront of brokering private-public partnerships and garnering billions in taxpayer dollars to fund Covid-19 vaccine development. The Morrison Government’s choice of NCCC board members, and the glaring omission of any member who could be said to represent small business or employee unions, is a farcical premise of ‘mitigating the economic and social effects’ of Covid-10.
    [Show full text]
  • April 2019 Issue 118 Price $9.35 (Incl Gst)
    22ND YEAR OF PUBLICATION ESTABLISHED 1998 APRIL 2019 ISSUE 118 PRICE $9.35 (INCL GST) Andrea Bocelli (right) and son Matteo Bocelli Hollywood Icon Sophia Loren Cirque du Soleil A Starry, Starry Night in Southhampton NAMING CEREMONY OF MSC BELLISSIMA Featuring a comprehensive coverage of Global Cruising for Cruise Passengers, the Trade and the Industry www.cruisingnews.com discover what makes Princess #1 cruise line in australia* 4 years running New Zealand 13 Australia & New Zealand 12 Majestic Princess® | Ruby Princess® Nights Majestic Princess® Nights Sydney Bay of Islands Sydney South Pacific Ocean AUSTRALIA AUSTRALIA 2015 - 2018 South Pacific Auckland Ocean Melbourne Auckland Tauranga Tauranga NEW ZEALAND Tasman Tasman Wellington Hobart Sea NEW ZEALAND Sea Akaroa Akaroa Fiordland National Park Dunedin Scenic cruising Dunedin Fiordland National Park (Port Chalmers) Scenic cruising (Port Chalmers) 2019 DEPARTURES 30 Sep, 1 Nov, 14 Nov, 22 Nov 2019 DEPARTURES 15 Dec, 27 DecA 2020 DEPARTURES 8 Jan, 11 Feb, 24 FebA, 8 Mar A Itinerary varies: operates in reverse order 2014 - 2018 A Itinerary varies: operates in reverse order *As voted by Cruise Passenger Magazine, Best Ocean Cruise Line Overall 2015-2018 BOOK NOW! Visit your travel agent | 1300 385 631 | www.princess.com 22ND YEAR OF PUBLICATION ESTABLISHED 1998 APRIL 2019 ISSUE 118 PRICE $9.35 (INCL GST) The Cruise Industry continues to prosper. I attended the handover and naming ceremony recently for the latest MSC ship, MSC Bellissima. It was an incredible four day adventure. Our front cover reveals the big event and you can read reports on page 5 and from page 34.
    [Show full text]
  • Ppc/S5/16/4/A Public Petitions Committee
    PPC/S5/16/4/A PUBLIC PETITIONS COMMITTEE AGENDA 4th Meeting, 2016 (Session 5) Thursday 29 September 2016 The Committee will meet at 9.30 am in the Mary Fairfax Somerville Room (CR2). 1. Consideration of continued petitions: The Committee will consider- PE1223 by Ron Beaty on school bus safety; PE1319 by William Smith and Scott Robertson on improving youth football in Scotland; PE1408 by Andrea MacArthur on updating of pernicious anaemia/vitamin B12 deficiency understanding and treatment; PE1458 by Peter Cherbi on register of interests for members of Scotland’s judiciary; PE1463 by Sandra Whyte, Marian Dyer and Lorraine Cleaver on effective thyroid and adrenal testing, diagnosis and treatment; PE1480 by Amanda Kopel, on behalf of The Frank Kopel Alzheimer's Awareness Campaign, on alzheimer’s and dementia awareness and PE1533 by Jeff Adamson, on behalf of Scotland Against the Care Tax, on abolition of non-residential social care charges for older and disabled people; PE1517 by Elaine Holmes and Olive McIlroy, on behalf of Scottish Mesh Survivors - Hear Our Voice campaign, on polypropylene mesh medical devices; PE1540 by Douglas Philand on permanent solution for the A83; PE1545 by Ann Maxwell, on behalf of Muir Maxwell Trust, on residential care provision for the severely learning disabled; PE1563 by Doreen Goldie, on behalf of Avonbridge and Standburn Community Council, on sewage sludge spreading; PE1568 by Catherine Hughes on funding, access and promotion of the NHS CIC; PE1577 by Rachael Wallace on adult cerebral palsy services; PE1581
    [Show full text]
  • Frequently Asked Questions About the Coronavirus (COVID-19) Impact on Funding Arrangements
    Frequently asked questions about the Coronavirus (COVID-19) impact on funding arrangements The following questions and answers have been developed by the Department of Social Services (the department) to assist funded service providers (and prospective organisations) in service delivery arrangements in light of the Coronavirus (COVID-19). There will be evolving information and guidance provided by government and we encourage you seek up to date information. Please contact your Funding Arrangement Manager in the first instance to discuss your individual circumstances and to find a flexible solution. You can contact them using the emails below: State / Territory Email address Queensland [email protected] New South Wales [email protected] Australian Capital Territory [email protected] Victoria [email protected] Tasmania [email protected] South Australia [email protected] Western Australia [email protected] Northern Territory [email protected] If you are unable to contact your Funding Arrangement Manager, please contact the Community Grants Hotline via telephone 1800 020 283 (option 6), or TTY 1800 555 677. Questions and Answers General questions ........................................................................................................................ 2 Funding arrangements already in place ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • [email protected]
    ANNEX A Document reference: 1 From: Calderwood C (Catherine) [[email protected]] Sent: 06 March 2020 10:08 To: Lloyd E (Elizabeth) <[email protected]>; SG CoronaVirus <[email protected]>; Cabinet Secretary for Health and Sport <[email protected]> Cc First Minister <[email protected]>; Minister for Public Health, Sport and Wellbeing <[email protected]>; Minister for Mental Health <[email protected]>; DG Health & Social Care <[email protected]>; Hutchison D (David) <[email protected]>; SGoRR Major Events <[email protected]>; Wright M (Malcolm) <[email protected]>; Permanent Secretary <[email protected]>; [redacted] <[email protected]>; redacted <[email protected]>; Smith G (Gregor) <[email protected]>; redacted <[email protected]>; redacted <[email protected]>; Foggo R (Richard) <[email protected]>; redacted <[email protected]>; redacted <[email protected]>; redacted <redacted @gov.scot>; redacted <[email protected]>; redacted <[email protected]>; redacted <[email protected]>; redacted <[email protected]>; McAllan M (Màiri) (Special Adviser) <[email protected]> Subject: RE: Thursday 5 March - New Cases This is an international effort. 71 people from many countries attended a conference organised by NIKE in Edinburgh 25-27th February. There are now 8 cases in the UK linked to this conference -3 in Scotland, 3 England, 1 NI. NIKE contacted all attendees after a positive case was confirmed and they have all been monitoring their health and the now positive cases came forward to be tested when they developed symptoms. There is an international effort on contact tracing which is still ongoing- PHE and PHA also involved. There is some sensitivity internationally about the index case- which people were or were not symptomatic at the time of the conference – this is still ongoing.
    [Show full text]
  • Cairney UK Coronavirus Policy 25000 14.7.20
    Paul Cairney [email protected] Draft: 14.7.20 The UK Government’s COVID-19 policy: assessing evidence-informed policy analysis in real time (using 25000 words) Abstract. In March 2020, COVID-19 prompted policy change in the UK at a speed and scale only seen during wartime. Throughout, UK government ministers emphasised their reliance on science and expertise to make the right choices at the right time, while their critics argued that ministers ignored key evidence and acted too little too late. Lessons from this debate should have a profound effect on future action, but only if based on a systematic analysis of policymaking as the problem emerged in real time. We should not confuse hindsight with foresight. To that end, I combine insights from policy analysis guides, policy theories, and critical policy analysis to frame this debate. I use the classic 5-step policy analysis structure - define the problem, identify solutions, use values to identify trade-offs, predict and compare outcomes, and recommend choices - to identify the politics of policymaking in complex systems. The pandemic exposes the need to act despite high ambiguity and uncertainty and low government control, using trial-and-error strategies to adapt to new manifestations of the problem, and producing highly unequal consequences for social groups. Lessons for the future will only have value if we take these policymaking limitations and unequal socioeconomic effects into account. Introduction: how should we characterise the UK government response? On the 23rd March 2020, the UK Government’s Prime Minister Boris Johnson declared: ‘From this evening I must give the British people a very simple instruction – you must stay at home’ (Johnson, 2020a).
    [Show full text]