The Molecular Basis of Male Sexual Differentiation
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Ethical Principles and Recommendations for the Medical Management of Differences of Sex Development (DSD)/Intersex in Children and Adolescents
Eur J Pediatr DOI 10.1007/s00431-009-1086-x ORIGINAL PAPER Ethical principles and recommendations for the medical management of differences of sex development (DSD)/intersex in children and adolescents Claudia Wiesemann & Susanne Ude-Koeller & Gernot H. G. Sinnecker & Ute Thyen Received: 8 March 2009 /Accepted: 9 September 2009 # The Author(s) 2009. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract The medical management of differences of sex the working group “Bioethics and Intersex” within the development (DSD)/intersex in early childhood has been German Network DSD/Intersex, which are presented in detail. criticized by patients’ advocates as well as bioethicists from Unlike other recommendations with regard to intersex, these an ethical point of view. Some call for a moratorium of any guidelines represent a comprehensive view of the perspectives feminizing or masculinizing operations before the age of of clinicians, patients, and their families. consent except for medical emergencies. No exhaustive Conclusion The working group identified three leading ethical guidelines have been published until now. In particular, ethical principles that apply to DSD management: (1) to the role of the parents as legal representatives of the child is foster the well-being of the child and the future adult, (2) to controversial. In the article, we develop, discuss, and present uphold the rights of children and adolescents to participate ethical principles and recommendations for the medical in and/or self-determine decisions that affect them now or management of intersex/DSD in children and adolescents. later, and (3) to respect the family and parent–child We specify three basic ethical principles that have to be relationships. -
History of the Research on Sex Determination
Review Article ISSN: 2574 -1241 DOI: 10.26717/BJSTR.2020.25.004194 History of The Research on Sex Determination Jacek Z Kubiak1,2, Malgorzata Kloc3-5 and Rafal P Piprek6* 1UnivRennes, CNRS, UMR 6290, IGDR, Cell Cycle Group, F-35000 Rennes, France 2Military Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology, ZMRiBK, Warsaw, Poland 3The Houston Methodist Research Institute, USA 4Department of Surgery, The Houston Methodist Hospital, USA 5University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, USA 6Department of Comparative Anatomy, Institute of Zoology and Biomedical Research, Jagiellonian University, Poland *Corresponding author: Rafał P Piprek, Department of Comparative Anatomy, Institute of Zoology and Biomedical Research, Jagiellonian University, Poland ARTICLE INFO Abstract Received: Published: January 28, 2020 Since the beginning of the humanity, people were fascinated by sex and intrigued by February 06, 2020 how the differences between sexes are determined. Ancient philosophers and middle Citation: age scholars proposed numerous fantastic explanations for the origin of sex differences in people and animals. However, only the development of the modern scientific methods Jacek Z Kubiak, Malgorzata Kloc, allowed us to find, on the scientific ground, the right answers to these questions. In this Rafal P Piprek. History of The Research on review article, we describe the history of these discoveries, and which major discoveries allowed the understanding of the origin of sex and molecular and cellular basis of the Sex Determination. Biomed J Sci & Tech Res -
Next Generation Sequencing Panels for Disorders of Sex Development
Next Generation Sequencing Panels for Disorders of Sex Development Disorders of Sex Development – Overview Disorders of sex development (DSDs) occur when sex development does not follow the course of typical male or female patterning. Types of DSDs include congenital development of ambiguous genitalia, disjunction between the internal and external sex anatomy, incomplete development of the sex anatomy, and abnormalities of the development of gonads (such as ovotestes or streak ovaries) (1). Sex chromosome anomalies including Turner syndrome and Klinefelter syndrome as well as sex chromosome mosaicism are also considered to be DSDs. DSDs can be caused by a wide range of genetic abnormalities (2). Determining the etiology of a patient’s DSD can assist in deciding gender assignment, provide recurrence risk information for future pregnancies, and can identify potential health problems such as adrenal crisis or gonadoblastoma (1, 3). Sex chromosome aneuploidy and copy number variation are common genetic causes of DSDs. For this reason, chromosome analysis and/or microarray analysis typically should be the first genetic analysis in the case of a patient with ambiguous genitalia or other suspected disorder of sex development. Identifying whether a patient has a 46,XY or 46,XX karyotype can also be helpful in determining appropriate additional genetic testing. Abnormal/Ambiguous Genitalia Panel Our Abnormal/Ambiguous Genitalia Panel includes mutation analysis of 72 genes associated with both syndromic and non-syndromic DSDs. This comprehensive panel evaluates a broad range of genetic causes of ambiguous or abnormal genitalia, including conditions in which abnormal genitalia are the primary physical finding as well as syndromic conditions that involve abnormal genitalia in addition to other congenital anomalies. -
Disorders of Sexual Differentiation: a Study on the Incidence and Types of Female Pseudo Hermaphrodites J.Radhika *1, C.Bhuvaneswari 2, Arudyuti Chowdhury 3
International Journal of Integrative Medical Sciences, Int J Intg Med Sci 2016, Vol 3(12):455-60. ISSN 2394 - 4137 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.16965/ijims.2016.156 Original Research Article Disorders of Sexual Differentiation: A study on the Incidence and Types of Female Pseudo Hermaphrodites J.Radhika *1, C.Bhuvaneswari 2, Arudyuti Chowdhury 3. *1 Associate Professor, Department of Anatomy, SRM Medical College Hospital & Research Centre, SRM University, Kattankulathur, India. 2 Assistant Professor, Department of Anatomy, SRM Medical College Hospital & Research Centre, SRM University, Kattankulathur, India. 3 Professor, Prasad Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India. ABSTRACT Aim: The present study was done to find out the prevalence of disorders of sexual development in our population and the genetic and environmental factors in the causation of disorders. Primarily, the study focused on the incidence and types of Female Pseudo Hermaphrodites. Materials and Methods: The present study included 300 cases over a period of 3 years in the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Egmore. Of these 300 cases, 29.3% were identified as Female pseudo hermaphrodite by examining the external and internal genitalia and through Karyotypes, ultrasound and hormonal assay. Results and Conclusion: The increased incidence of Female Pseudo hermaphrodite was found to be due to avoidable factors except for a few cases. This highlights the importance of early diagnosis for assigning appropriate gender without causing much social and emotional problems. KEY WORDS: Ambiguous Genitalia, Female Pseudo Hermaphrodite, Masculinization Of External Genitalia, Karyotype. Address for correspondence: Dr.J.Radhika, M.D, Ph.D, Associate Professor, Department of Anatomy, SRM Medical College Hospital & Research Centre, SRM University, Kattankulathur, India. -
Sexual Differentiation of the Vertebrate Nervous System
T HE S EXUAL B RAIN REVIEW Sexual differentiation of the vertebrate nervous system John A Morris, Cynthia L Jordan & S Marc Breedlove Understanding the mechanisms that give rise to sex differences in the behavior of nonhuman animals may contribute to the understanding of sex differences in humans. In vertebrate model systems, a single factor—the steroid hormone testosterone— accounts for most, and perhaps all, of the known sex differences in neural structure and behavior. Here we review some of the events triggered by testosterone that masculinize the developing and adult nervous system, promote male behaviors and suppress female behaviors. Testosterone often sculpts the developing nervous system by inhibiting or exacerbating cell death and/or by modulating the formation and elimination of synapses. Experience, too, can interact with testosterone to enhance or diminish its effects on the central nervous system. However, more work is needed to uncover the particular cells and specific genes on which http://www.nature.com/natureneuroscience testosterone acts to initiate these events. The steps leading to masculinization of the body are remarkably con- Apoptosis and sexual dimorphism in the nervous system sistent across mammals: the paternally contributed Y chromosome Lesions of the entire preoptic area (POA) in the anterior hypothala- contains the sex-determining region of the Y (Sry) gene, which mus eliminate virtually all male copulatory behaviors3,whereas induces the undifferentiated gonads to form as testes (rather than lesions restricted to the sexually dimorphic nucleus of the POA (SDN- ovaries). The testes then secrete hormones to masculinize the rest of POA) have more modest effects, slowing acquisition of copulatory the body. -
The Genetic Basis for Skeletal Diseases
insight review articles The genetic basis for skeletal diseases Elazar Zelzer & Bjorn R. Olsen Harvard Medical School, Department of Cell Biology, 240 Longwood Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA (e-mail: [email protected]) We walk, run, work and play, paying little attention to our bones, their joints and their muscle connections, because the system works. Evolution has refined robust genetic mechanisms for skeletal development and growth that are able to direct the formation of a complex, yet wonderfully adaptable organ system. How is it done? Recent studies of rare genetic diseases have identified many of the critical transcription factors and signalling pathways specifying the normal development of bones, confirming the wisdom of William Harvey when he said: “nature is nowhere accustomed more openly to display her secret mysteries than in cases where she shows traces of her workings apart from the beaten path”. enetic studies of diseases that affect skeletal differentiation to cartilage cells (chondrocytes) or bone cells development and growth are providing (osteoblasts) within the condensations. Subsequent growth invaluable insights into the roles not only of during the organogenesis phase generates cartilage models individual genes, but also of entire (anlagen) of future bones (as in limb bones) or membranous developmental pathways. Different mutations bones (as in the cranial vault) (Fig. 1). The cartilage anlagen Gin the same gene may result in a range of abnormalities, are replaced by bone and marrow in a process called endo- and disease ‘families’ are frequently caused by mutations in chondral ossification. Finally, a process of growth and components of the same pathway. -
Reproduction – Sexual Differentiation
Reproduction – sexual differentiation Recommended textbook for reproductive biology M.H. Johnson & B.J. Everitt, Essential Reproduction, Blackwell. Third edition (1988) or later. Topics to think about Why do many organisms have sex? Why are there two sexes (and not one, or three)? How does the difference be- tween gametes contribute to the different reproductive strategies of male and female? Are the mother and fetus working towards the same goals? When might their goals differ? How might such differ- ences lead to problems, and to sex-linked phenotypic differences? The Red Queen, by Matt Ridley (1994), is a fascinating look at these questions. Highly recommended, though has little direct bearing on your course. Genetic determinants of sex • Humans have 46 chromosomes: 22 pairs of autosomes and one pair of sex chromosomes. • The male has one X and one Y sex chromosome (the heterogametic sex). The female has two X chromosomes (ho- mogametic). • The Y chromosome is small and carries few (2) genes1 – far too few to make a testis, for example. Its function is to confer maleness on the embryo, and it does so by altering the expression of genes on other chromosomes. The criti- cal gene is on a region of the short arm of the Y chromosome and is called testis-determining factor (TDF). If this is present, the embryo will be gonadally male; if it is absent the default is for the embryo to develop as a female. • The precise mechanism by which the TDF gene causes initiates testicular development is unknown. • The X chromosome is large and carries many (>50) genes. -
Mutations Within Or Upstream of the Basic Helixð Loopð Helix Domain of the TWIST Gene Are Specific to Saethre-Chotzen Syndrome
European Journal of Human Genetics (1999) 7, 27–33 © 1999 Stockton Press All rights reserved 1018–4813/99 $12.00 t http://www.stockton-press.co.uk/ejhg ARTICLES Mutations within or upstream of the basic helix–loop–helix domain of the TWIST gene are specific to Saethre-Chotzen syndrome Vincent El Ghouzzi, Elisabeth Lajeunie, Martine Le Merrer, Val´erie Cormier-Daire, Dominique Renier, Arnold Munnich and Jacky Bonaventure Unit´e de Recherches sur les Handicaps G´en´etiques de l’Enfant, Institut Necker, Paris, France Saethre-Chotzen syndrome (ACS III) is an autosomal dominant craniosynostosis syndrome recently ascribed to mutations in the TWIST gene, a basic helix–loop–helix (b-HLH) transcription factor regulating head mesenchyme cell development during cranial neural tube formation in mouse. Studying a series of 22 unrelated ACS III patients, we have found TWIST mutations in 16/22 cases. Interestingly, these mutations consistently involved the b-HLH domain of the protein. Indeed, mutant genotypes included frameshift deletions/insertions, nonsense and missense mutations, either truncating or disrupting the b-HLH motif of the protein. This observation gives additional support to the view that most ACS III cases result from loss-of-function mutations at the TWIST locus. The P250R recurrent FGFR 3 mutation was found in 2/22 cases presenting mild clinical manifestations of the disease but 4/22 cases failed to harbour TWIST or FGFR 3 mutations. Clinical re-examination of patients carrying TWIST mutations failed to reveal correlations between the mutant genotype and severity of the phenotype. Finally, since no TWIST mutations were detected in 40 cases of isolated coronal craniosynostosis, the present study suggests that TWIST mutations are specific to Saethre- Chotzen syndrome. -
Expression Levels of Mullerian-Inhibiting Substance, GATA4 and 17Α
365 Expression levels of Mullerian-inhibiting substance, GATA4 and 17-hydroxylase/17,20-lyase cytochrome P450 during embryonic gonadal development in two diverse breeds of swine S A McCoard, T H Wise and J J Ford United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, US Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center, Nebraska 68933, USA (Requests for offprints should be addressed to S A McCoard who is now at Nutrition and Behaviour Group, AgResearch Limited, Private Bag 11008, Tennent Drive, Palmerston North, New Zealand; Email: [email protected]) Abstract Sexual differentiation and early embryonic/fetal gonad advancing gestation, with greater levels of MIS and development is a tightly regulated process controlled by P450c17 in testes of MS compared with WC embryos. numerous endocrine and molecular signals. These signals Organization of ovarian medullary cords and formation of ensure appropriate structural organization and subsequent egg nests was evident at similar ages in both breeds; development of gonads and accessory organs. Substantial however, a greater number of MS compared with WC differences exist in adult reproductive characteristics in embryos exhibited signs of ovarian differentiation at 30 Meishan (MS) and White Composite (WC) pig breeds. dpc. In summary, despite breed differences in MIS and This study compared the timing of embryonic sexual P450 levels in the testis, which may be related to Sertoli c17 differentiation in MS and WC pigs. Embryos/fetuses were and Leydig cell function, the timing of testicular differen- evaluated on 26, 28, 30, 35, 40 and 50 days postcoitum tiation did not differ between breeds and is unlikely to (dpc). -
MECHANISMS in ENDOCRINOLOGY: Novel Genetic Causes of Short Stature
J M Wit and others Genetics of short stature 174:4 R145–R173 Review MECHANISMS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY Novel genetic causes of short stature 1 1 2 2 Jan M Wit , Wilma Oostdijk , Monique Losekoot , Hermine A van Duyvenvoorde , Correspondence Claudia A L Ruivenkamp2 and Sarina G Kant2 should be addressed to J M Wit Departments of 1Paediatrics and 2Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, Email The Netherlands [email protected] Abstract The fast technological development, particularly single nucleotide polymorphism array, array-comparative genomic hybridization, and whole exome sequencing, has led to the discovery of many novel genetic causes of growth failure. In this review we discuss a selection of these, according to a diagnostic classification centred on the epiphyseal growth plate. We successively discuss disorders in hormone signalling, paracrine factors, matrix molecules, intracellular pathways, and fundamental cellular processes, followed by chromosomal aberrations including copy number variants (CNVs) and imprinting disorders associated with short stature. Many novel causes of GH deficiency (GHD) as part of combined pituitary hormone deficiency have been uncovered. The most frequent genetic causes of isolated GHD are GH1 and GHRHR defects, but several novel causes have recently been found, such as GHSR, RNPC3, and IFT172 mutations. Besides well-defined causes of GH insensitivity (GHR, STAT5B, IGFALS, IGF1 defects), disorders of NFkB signalling, STAT3 and IGF2 have recently been discovered. Heterozygous IGF1R defects are a relatively frequent cause of prenatal and postnatal growth retardation. TRHA mutations cause a syndromic form of short stature with elevated T3/T4 ratio. Disorders of signalling of various paracrine factors (FGFs, BMPs, WNTs, PTHrP/IHH, and CNP/NPR2) or genetic defects affecting cartilage extracellular matrix usually cause disproportionate short stature. -
Sexual Determination and Differentiation During Embryonic and Fetal Development of New Zealand Rabbit Females
Int. J. Morphol., 36(2):677-686, 2018. Sexual Determination and Differentiation During Embryonic and Fetal Development of New Zealand Rabbit Females Determinación y Diferenciación Sexual Durante el Desarrollo Embrionario y Fetal de Conejos Hembras de Nueva Zelanda Lara Carolina Mario1; Jéssica Borghesi1; Adriana Raquel de Almeida da Anunciação1; Carla Maria de Carvalho Figueiredo Miranda1; Amilton César dos Santos1; Phelipe Oliveira Favaron1; Daniela Martins dos Santos2; Daniel Conei3,4; Bélgica Vásquez5; Mariano del Sol3,6 & Maria Angélica Miglino1 MARIO, L. C.; BORGHESI, J.; DA ANUNCIAÇÃO, A. R. A.; MIRANDA, C. M. C. F.; DOS SANTOS, A. C.; FAVARON, P. O.; DOS SANTOS, D. M.; CONEI, D.; VÁSQUEZ, B.; DEL SOL, M. & MIGLINO, M. A. Sexual determination and differentiation during embryonic and fetal development of New Zealand rabbit females. Int. J. Morphol., 36(2):677-686, 2018. SUMMARY: The aim of this study was to know the embryonic and fetal development of the female rabbit genital system (Oryctolagus cuniculus), describing its main phases and the moment of sexual differentiation. Eleven pregnant New Zealand female rabbits were used in different gestational phases. The day of coitus was determined as day 0. For each stage a minimum of two animals was considered. The samples were obtained every two days from the ninth day post-coitus (dpc) until the 28th dpc. The gestational period was divided in two: animals with undifferentiated sex (group 1) and animals with differentiated sex (group 2). The ages of embryos and fetuses were estimated through the crown-rump method. Subsequently, embryos and fetuses were dissected, fixed and processed to be embedded in paraffin (Histosec). -
Blueprint Genetics Comprehensive Growth Disorders / Skeletal
Comprehensive Growth Disorders / Skeletal Dysplasias and Disorders Panel Test code: MA4301 Is a 374 gene panel that includes assessment of non-coding variants. This panel covers the majority of the genes listed in the Nosology 2015 (PMID: 26394607) and all genes in our Malformation category that cause growth retardation, short stature or skeletal dysplasia and is therefore a powerful diagnostic tool. It is ideal for patients suspected to have a syndromic or an isolated growth disorder or a skeletal dysplasia. About Comprehensive Growth Disorders / Skeletal Dysplasias and Disorders This panel covers a broad spectrum of diseases associated with growth retardation, short stature or skeletal dysplasia. Many of these conditions have overlapping features which can make clinical diagnosis a challenge. Genetic diagnostics is therefore the most efficient way to subtype the diseases and enable individualized treatment and management decisions. Moreover, detection of causative mutations establishes the mode of inheritance in the family which is essential for informed genetic counseling. For additional information regarding the conditions tested on this panel, please refer to the National Organization for Rare Disorders and / or GeneReviews. Availability 4 weeks Gene Set Description Genes in the Comprehensive Growth Disorders / Skeletal Dysplasias and Disorders Panel and their clinical significance Gene Associated phenotypes Inheritance ClinVar HGMD ACAN# Spondyloepimetaphyseal dysplasia, aggrecan type, AD/AR 20 56 Spondyloepiphyseal dysplasia, Kimberley