Diptera: Calliphoridae)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Diptera: Calliphoridae) Revision of the cluster-flies of the Polleniø venturii species-group, with a cladistic analysis of Palaearctic species of Polleniø Robineau-Desvoidy (Diptera: Calliphoridae) KNUT ROGNES Rognes, K.: Revision of the cluster-flies of the Pollenio venturii species-group, with a cladistic Ent. scand. analysis of Palaearctic species of Pollenio Robineau-Desvoidy (Diptera: Calliphoridae). Ent. scand. 23:233-248. Copenhagen, Denmark. October 1992. ISSN 0013-8711. Within Pollenia Robineau-Desvoidy a venturii species-group is defined and revised. It consists of a single species P venturiiZumpt. P solitario Grunin is proposed as a junior synonym, It is characterizedby unique features in the male aedeagus and the lateral sacs of the internal female reproductive organs. Male and female terminalia are illustrated, the latter for the first time. A preliminary cladistic analysis of all known Palaearctic species of Pollenis (except P jøponica Kano & Shinonaga) suggests that the sister-group of P venturii is a clade consisting of the vistica + vogabunda + omentaria + hqeretica species-groups. A sclerotized internal wall of the lateral sacs in the internal reproductive system of female Pollenio appears to be a parallelism developed independently in the venturii, rudis, most members of the tenuiforceps and some members of the semicinereo groups, rather than an underlying synapomorphy. P. venturii is known from France, Germany, Greece, Italy and Russia. A key is provided to species-groupsin Pollenio. K. Rognes, Stavanger Lærerhøgskole, Postboks252l U[andh&ug, N-4004 Stavanger, Norway. Introduction nym used in the text): Department of Entomology, The present paper is a sequel to earlier ones revising The Natural History Museum, London (BMNH); various species-groups in the cluster-fly genus Mus6um National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris Pollenis, some members of which, in the larval (MNHN); the Venturi collection in Universitå degli stages, are known to be parasites or predators of Studi, Istituto d'Entomologia Agraria, Pisa earthworms (Rognes 1987a, b, 1988, l99lb, 1992). (PISA); Staatliches Museum fiir Naturkunde, Its purpose is to define a venturii species-group Stuttgart (SMNK); United States National Muse- within this genus and revise its nominal species. Ti) uffi, Smithsonian Institution, Entomology, clarify its relationship with other species-groups Washington (USNM); Universitetets Zoologiske within Pollenio a cladistic analysis of all known Museum, København (ZMUC) and the Zoological Palaearctic species of Pollenio (except the Japanese Museum, Moscow Lomonosov State University, Pollenia japonicaKano & Shinonaga) has been per- Moscow (ZMMSU). formed. The analysis is based partly on data in my Morphological terms and abbreviations follow already published species-group revisions, and Rognes (1991a). partly on data from species-group revisions still un- Cladistic analyses were performed using Farris' der preparation (amentaria, griseotomentosa, parsimony program HENNIGS6 (Farris 1988). It is tenuiforceps, haeretica and japonica species- based on the }Palaearctic species of Pollenialisted groups). (with abbreviations) in Appendix l. 43 characters (with numbers 0 - 42) employed in the analysis and their coding are explained in Appendix 2. The data Material and methods matrix is shown in Appendix 3. A group consisting The study is based primarily on material in the fol- of Morinia + Melanodexia + an hypothetical lowing collections (followed by the depository acro- 'outgrou' assumed to embody the ground plan fea- O Entomologica scandinavica (Grp 6) 234 Rognes, K. ENT. SCAND. VOL. 23:3 (t992) tures of the subfamily Polleniinae (cf. Rognes all females, ås they are insufficiently known in l99la) was used as outgroup for rooting the clado- many species-groups. The key does not cover the gram. Tiees were first calculated by the command East Palaearctic genus Xanthotryxus, even if it will sequen ce mh*; bb*,' with all characters given unity probably be relegated to the status of a separate spe- weight (UNWEIGHTED). This resulted in 108 cies-group within Potlenia in the future because of equally parsimonious trees (length 107 steps, con- its profuse vestiture of yellow-white curly , sistency index 0.55, retention index 0.82). Subse- Polleniq-hairs'. Its species are very large and have quently, the successive weighting procedure of the parafacialia entirely bare. The composition of HENNIG86 (Farris 1988, 1989; see also Seberg the species-groups is indicated in Appendix l. 1989: 189) was employed by repeating the command l. Costa hairy below to about halfway between sequen ce mh*; bb*; xsteps w; cc,' until the weights junctions with R, and Rr*, (i.e. second and at no longer changed (SUCCESSIVE WEIGHT- ieast half of third costal sector hairy below) . ' ' species) resulted in 7 56 equally parsimonious ING). This c;;; n"i.v u.io* i:';f:ri,ill,l#n(r trees (after 4 rounds of the command sequence) occasionally some hairs";il between junctions with (length 468, ci 0.83 , ri 0.94). From the latter trees a Sc and R, (i.e. second costal sector bare below) ' ' ' 2 strict consensus cladogram was calculated using the 2. Aedeagui wittr a median midventral hypophallic lobe (absent in one member of the griseotomen- nelsen option which retains only the monophyletic tosa group); each lateral hypophallic lobe more groups present in all the 756 trees (Fig. 11). or leis triangular with a central sclerotization A second series of analyses was performed in (scleroti zatron absent in another member of the which character 20 ( Q lateral sacs, unordered) was griseotomentoso group); ovipositor only with wavy setae on tip, no spines. 3 coded instead by ordinal branched coding as out- ioft " ' Aedeagus without a median hypophallic lobe; (1990). Position 20 in lined by Mickevich & Weller each hypophallic lobe differently shaped and ab- the data-matrix was replaced by the following solutely without central rod-like sclerotization; codes (the position 20 score in Appendix 3 in ovipositor with or without spines on tip . ' ' ' 7 tarsi shorter than hind tibia; basi- parenthesis): unsclerotizedtubes 00 (0), sclerotized 3. Male hind costa black 4 (2), tubes 10 (1), sclerotized fused spheres 20 sclero- Male hind tarsi longer than hind tibia; basicosta tised disks 1l (3), and treated as additive characters yellow or black 6 (ordered). This character state tree for the lateral 4. if inO leg of male with specialized vestiture of ti- bia at d tarsus (except tenuiforceps); facial sac character assumes that sclerotized fused spheres carina distinct; male cerci of normal width; as well as sclerotized disks derive independently aedeagus with blunt rounded apex of each hy- from sclerotized tubes. Otherwise the data matrix pophallic lobe; each paraphallic process appear- views was identical to the one showed in Appendix 3. The in§ somewhat thickened apically in some curving strongly inwards towards command sequence mh*; bb*; resulted in 144 and apically midline; median hypophallic lobe fully sclero- equally parsimonious trees (length 108 steps, ci tized female lateral sacs when sclerotized 0.54, ri 0.82). A subsequent successive weighting shaped as flat disks . tenuiforceps group (4 species) procedure resulted in 658 equally parsimonious Maie hind leg usually without modified vestiture (except pectinata of the semicinereo group); trees (length 466, ci 0.83 , ri 0.94) after 3 iterations. male Cerci very narrow; apex of paraphallic pro- using The strict consensus cladogram calculated cesses usually not curving strongly towards the nelsen command contained exactly the same midline, nor apically thickened; median hypo- posterior part 5 groups as the tree in Fig. 11. phallic lobe at most sclerotized in 5. buter ph setapresent; facial carina usually con- spicuous; body size typical for a Pollenia; distally very sharp hy- Pollemø Robineau-Desvoidy aedag.rs with triangular Genus pophltlic lobes, these lobes with a very distinct Pollenia Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830: 412. Type-species: ientral sclerotization; female lateral sacs when Muscs rudis Fabricius, by original designation. For a sclerotized shaPed as long tubes (5 comprehensive list of generic synonyms and a diagnosis . semicinerea group sPecies) of the genus, see Rognes (l99la). Outer phseta usually absent; facial carina absent or very indistinct; body size small for a Pollenia; abdomen with dusted tessellations in an unusual longitudinal band occu- ^pyirgpattern (dark blackish Key to species-groups of Palaearctic Pollenia central half of tergites or broad blackish ånteriorly narrowing triangles); lateral hypo- Dissection of male and female terminalia is neces- phallic lobes often with indistinct central sclero- sary before the key can be used. It will not work for iization (møyeri, which has a very dense ' brush ' ENT. SCAND. VOL. 23:3 (1992) The Pollenio venturii species-group 235 of long setae on male ST5); median hypophallic now recogni zable in both sexes (the female has lobe (griseotomentosa); sometimes absent fe- hitherto been unidentifiable). It is characterized by male lateral sacs unsclerotized sPecies) the following two autapomorphies which also are 6. B;;i;;,;å -",t,; tåf ;:iZT,' :::Å:,,'å?'12 unique in Pollenia: ened; lappets of metathoracic spiracle yellow; (l) A peculiar aedeagus (Figs 3-4) 0(2)]. facial carina conspicuous; paraphallic processes [character proceeding distad parallel with long axis of The aedeagus is equipped with long hypophallic aedeagus, thus not curving toward midline; fe- lobes a male with sclerotized lateral sacs in
Recommended publications
  • The Blowflies of California
    BULLETIN OF THE CALIFORNIA INSECT SURVEY VOLUME 4,NO. 1 THE BLOWFLIES OF CALIFORNIA (Diptera: Calliphoridae) BY MAURICE T. JAMES (Department of Zo'dlogy, State College of Washington, Pullman) UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS BERKELEY AND LOS ANGELES 1955 BULLETIN OF THE CALIFORNIA INSECT SURVEY Editors: E. G. Linsley, S. B. Freeborn, R. L. Usinger Volume 4, No. 1, pp. 1-34, plates 1-2, 1 figure in text Submitted by Editors, January 13, 1955 Issued October 28, 1955 Price, 50 cents UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS BERKELEY AND LOS ANGELES CALIFORNIA CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS LONDON. ENGLAND PRINTED BY OFFSET IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA THE BLOWFLIES OF CALIFORNIA (Diptera: Calliphoridae) by Maurice T. James Identification of the blowflies of North America Blowflies are important from a medical and has been made much easier and more secure in veterinary standpoint. Some are obligatory or recent years by the publication of the monograph facultative parasites on man or on domestic or of that family by Hall (1948). However, there other useful animals. In our area, the primary exists ti0 regional treatment that covers any screwworm, Callitroga hominivorax (Coquerel), definite part of the United States. Hall's mono- 'is the only obligatory parasite that invades graph gives only general information about the living tissue, although larvae of Pmtocalliphora, geographical distribution of most of the species. represented in the Califdrnia fauna by seven These considerations, together with the fact that known species, feed on the blood of nesting Hall had obviously examined an insufficient birds, often with fatal results. Of the facultative amount of material from the western states, parasites, Callitroga macellaria (Fabricius), makes a review of the California species partic- Phaenicia sericata (Meigen), and Phormia regina ularly desirable.
    [Show full text]
  • Diptera: Calliphoridae)
    Systematic Entomology (1987) 12, 475-502 The taxonomy of th e Polleniø rudis species'group in the Holarctic Region (Diptera: Calliphoridae) KNUT ROGNES HavØrnbrautene 7a,Madla, Norway ABSTRACT. A rudis species-group is defined withrn Pollenia Robineau- Desvoidy, and new characters found useful in the taxonomy of this genus are presented . P.rudis (Fabricius) , P.angustigena Wainwright, stat.rev. and P.pseudorudis Rognes are redescribed . P.hungarica sP.tr., p.longithecasp.n. and P.luteovillosasp.n. are described as new to science. A key is provided, and the terminalia of both sexes are illustrated for all the species. Some features of the puparia are figured for the species where these are known. A neotype is designated for Musca rudis, and a lectotype for P. angustigena. P.angustigena, P.pseudorudis and P.rudi§ are Holarc- tic species, and the latter two have also been found in New Zealand. The remaining species are confined to the western Palaearctic . P.hungarica rs known from central Europe, including southern parts of Scandinavia, p.longitheca from the eastern Mediterranestr, and P.luteovillosa from Algeria and Morocco in North Africa. In the larval stages P.rudis-group members are parasites of or predators on earthworms. The species have several generations each year, and normally overwinter as adults . Eisenia rosea (Savigny) serves as a host for P.hungarica, P.pseudorudis and p.rudis according to the reared material available. A previous detailed account of the immature stages and life-cycle of 'rudis' from North America is tentatively assigned to pseudorudis. Keitin's (1909,7915) often cited accounts of the immature stages and life-cycle of a species called 'rudis' are rejected as a source of information for any member of the rudis group.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to Biology, Dispersal, and Management of the House Fly and Related Flies for Farmers, Municipalities, and Public Health Offi Cials 3
    The Fly Management Handbook A Guide to Biology, Dispersal, Connecticut and Management of the House Agricultural Fly and Related Flies for Experiment Farmers, Municipalities, and Station, Public Health Offi cials New Haven Bulletin 1013 KIRBY C. STAFFORD III, PH.D. Vice Director, State Entomologist May 2008 The Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station New Haven, CT 06504 GENERAL ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Thanks are given to Joyce Meader, Connecticut Cooperative Extension Service, Dr. Bruce Sherman, Connecticut Department of Agriculture, Patricia M. Beckenhaupt, Director of Health of the Northeast District Department of Health, and Dr. Louis A. Magnarelli, The Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station (CAES), for reviewing the handbook. Their comments and suggestions were sincerely appreciated. I extend a particular thank you to James Rock (emeritus), Connecticut Cooperative Extension Service, for his considerable input and support. Thanks are also extended to Rose Bonito (CAES) for scanning illustrations and pictures and Vickie Bomba-Lewandoski (CAES) for publication and printing assistance. Much of the material on cluster flies is from a CAES fact sheet by Gale E. Ridge (available on the CAES website, www.ct.gov/caes). Thank you, Gale. Several portions on poultry IPM are based on Special Circular 338, Poultry Pest Management for Pennsylvania and the Northeast (1986), by Kirby C. Stafford III and Clarence A. Collison. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FOR FIGURES Most sources for the pictures and illustrations are noted in the figure captions. Requests for use of photographs and illustrations by the author or CAES may be directed to the author. Permission to use any other material must be obtained from the original source. The historical 1916 illustration of the unsanitary conditions in the introduction is from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Public Health Image Library (8264); the stable fly and green-bottle fly in Figure 6 and 8, respectively, are from United States Department of Agriculture Farmer’s Bulletin 1408.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ecology of Pollenia Rudis and It's Host Earthworms
    1'RE fi_COLOGY OF POLLE'NI4. RUOIS AtJD IT'S HOS'f" EAR'fH\ICJRl"iS ... ' "Vlords fail to describe their general depravity; it is beyond expression. If you wish to be happy. be sure you don't introduce cluster flies into your family." Dall; 1882. THE ECOLOGY OF POLLENIA RUDIS (DIPTERA:CALLIPHORIDAE) AND ITS HOST EARTHWORMS (LUMBRICIDAE), WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO THE HOST-PARASITE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN P. RUDIS AND EISENIA ROSEA by ALAN JOHN THOMSON, B.Sc. A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for• the degree Doctor of Philosophy McMaster University May 1972 DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY (1972) McMASTER UNIVERSITY (Biology) Hamilton, Ontario TITLE: The ecology of Pollenia rudis (Diptera:Calliphoridae) and its host earthworms (Lumbricidae), with special reference to the host-parasite relationship between P. rudis and Eisenia rosea. AUTHOR: Alan John Thomson, B.Sc. (Glasgow University, Scotland) SUPERVISOR: Professor D. M. Davies NUMBER OF PAGES: (vii) 170 SCOPE AND CONTENTS: The distribution of Eisenia rosea, the main host of P. rudis, is influenced mainly by soil moisture and bulk density. Cluster-fly larvae locate hosts by random locomotion through the soil pores, whereupon penetration is induced by a substance present in the worm slime. Penetration occurs mainly on the upper surface of the worm, with fewer penetrations occurring towards either end of the worm. Several species of earthworm, including some which do not normally act as hosts, were infected in the laboratory. The encystment, surface casting, burrowing and autotomising behaviour of E. rosea varies with soil moisture and bulk density.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter Alaska Entomological Society
    Newsletter of the Alaska Entomological Society Volume 8, Issue 1, March 2015 In this issue: Moths land on Murkowski’s desk—Senate Resolu- tion 70 . .8 Two new Lepidoptera host plant relationships . .9 First record of a cluster fly (Calliphoridae: Pollenia) The DNA barcoding UAMU Project: Testing the in Alaska . .1 insect identification power of DNA barcoding What is a specimen? What should we count and technology . 14 report when managing an entomology collection?3 Review of the eighth annual meeting . 18 First record of a cluster fly (Calliphoridae: Pollenia) in Alaska by Matt Bowser1 most abundant and conspicuous insects in the vicinity of the Kenai National Wildlife Refuge’s headquarters build- ing south of Soldotna. Adam Jewiss-Gaines (Brock Univer- sity, St. Catharines, Ontario) identified a specimen as Pol- lenia vagabunda (Meigen, 1826). Thirty-five specimens were collected in the Soldotna area 11th of February to the 17th of March, where they were found in spider webs, in build- ings, on snow, and sunning on any warm aspect in the after- noons. To the best of my knowledge, this is the first report of a cluster fly from Alaska. Cluster flies are native to the Old World, but have be- come established across much of North America. Until re- cently, all cluster flies collected from the Nearctic were con- sidered to be one species, Pollenia rudis (Fabricius), but now six species are recognized from North America (Whitworth, 2006; Jewiss-Gaines et al., 2012). Pollenia vagabunda was first collected in North America in 1958 and is now distributed from the East Coast to southern British Columbia (see dis- tribution map of Jewiss-Gaines et al., 2012).
    [Show full text]
  • Test Key to British Blowflies (Calliphoridae) And
    Draft key to British Calliphoridae and Rhinophoridae Steven Falk 2016 BRITISH BLOWFLIES (CALLIPHORIDAE) AND WOODLOUSE FLIES (RHINOPHORIDAE) DRAFT KEY March 2016 Steven Falk Feedback to [email protected] 1 Draft key to British Calliphoridae and Rhinophoridae Steven Falk 2016 PREFACE This informal publication attempts to update the resources currently available for identifying the families Calliphoridae and Rhinophoridae. Prior to this, British dipterists have struggled because unless you have a copy of the Fauna Ent. Scand. volume for blowflies (Rognes, 1991), you will have been largely reliant on Van Emden's 1954 RES Handbook, which does not include all the British species (notably the common Pollenia pediculata), has very outdated nomenclature, and very outdated classification - with several calliphorids and tachinids placed within the Rhinophoridae and Eurychaeta palpalis placed in the Sarcophagidae. As well as updating keys, I have also taken the opportunity to produce new species accounts which summarise what I know of each species and act as an invitation and challenge to others to update, correct or clarify what I have written. As a result of my recent experience of producing an attractive and fairly user-friendly new guide to British bees, I have tried to replicate that approach here, incorporating lots of photos and clear, conveniently positioned diagrams. Presentation of identification literature can have a big impact on the popularity of an insect group and the accuracy of the records that result. Calliphorids and rhinophorids are fascinating flies, sometimes of considerable economic and medicinal value and deserve to be well recorded. What is more, many gaps still remain in our knowledge.
    [Show full text]
  • Cluster Flies and Other “Winter Flies” Fact Sheet No
    Cluster Flies and other “Winter Flies” Fact Sheet No. No. 5.618 Insect Series|Home & Garden W. Cranshaw1 During the cool months some insects There are some other kinds of flies Quick Facts have the habit of moving into buildings that will be found indoors and these are • Cluster flies frequently use as a temporary winter shelter. Common reviewed in Fact Sheet 5.502 Flies in the buildings for winter shelter examples of such cool season "nuisance in- Home. Among these are some other "win- and can be the most common vaders" are boxelder bugs, western conifer- ter flies" that use homes for winter shelter, seed bug, and elm leaf beetles. Cluster flies particularly the “blue bottle flies” (Calliphora fly found indoors during the (Pollenia species) are the most common of species) and the black blow fly (Phormia cool season. the flies that often use buildings as a tem- regina). The habits of these differ in some • Cluster flies develop by porary shelter through winter. important ways from those of cluster flies feeding on earthworms. and are discussed below. Cluster flies tend to be particularly com- • Cluster flies found in buildings mon in higher elevation communities, but are in a dormant state and Life History and Habits of problems with cluster flies within buildings cannot reproduce indoors. can occur statewide. Most often they are a Cluster Flies problem where there are nearby areas of ir- • Sealing buildings by prior to rigated turfgrass, near streams or rivers, and Cluster flies are not a type of "filth fly" when cluster flies enter in late other sites where soils are moist.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mysterious Life of the Vagabond Cluster Fly by Matt Bowser
    Refuge Notebook • Vol. 17, No. 49 • December 4, 2015 The mysterious life of the vagabond cluster fly by Matt Bowser A male cluster fly suns on the siding of the Kenai National Wildlife Refuge headquarters building, March 23,2015 (http://bit.ly/1IFhfuB). Last February through March as our snow melted first North American record of this species on theEast away, some of early spring’s most precocious inverte- Coast in 1958, it has spread west to British Columbia brates pranced in the sunshine, warming themselves and now southcentral Alaska. on south-facing wood siding of the Kenai National Cluster flies get their name from their habit of Wildlife Refuge’s headquarters building. Intermin- gathering in dense aggregations in and on man-made gling among the usual metallic green and blue flesh structures from late fall to early spring, where they flies that typically awake in the early spring were can be a serious nuisance simply because there are so many large, dark flies having a golden wooliness. many of them. Pest control techs can do a brisk busi- These were cluster flies (genus Pollenia), a kind of fly ness in response to sometimes remarkable numbers of that had not previously been found in Alaska (article: flies reminiscent of the Biblical plagues. Now youcan http://bit.ly/1Q1iPyA). even buy Cluster Buster™ traps specifically designed Worldwide, there are 196 species of cluster flies ac- to trap and kill these flies. cording to the Catalogue of Life, all of them native to Thankfully, cluster flies really are no more thana the Old World.
    [Show full text]
  • Flies of Illinois
    )OLHVRI,OOLQRLV86$ $QJHOOD0RRUHKRXVH,OOLQRLV1DWXUH3UHVHUYHV&RPPLVVLRQ 3KRWRV$QJHOOD0RRUHKRXVH DQJHOODPRRUHKRXVH#LOOLQRLVJRY 3URGXFHG$QJHOOD0RRUHKRXVHDQG$OLFLD'LD])LHOG0XVHXP,GHQWLILFDWLRQDVVLVWDQFHSURYLGHG -RKQ$VFKHU-RKQDQG-DQH%DODEDQ.HOVH\-53%\HUV 5RE&DQQLQJV-RKQ)&DUU&KULV&RKHQ%HQ&RXOWHU(YHQ'DQNRZLF]%LOO'HDQ0DUWLQ+DXVHU5RVV+LOO -RKQ.O\PNR6SHQFHU3RWH+HUVKHO5DQH\$UWXUR6DQWRV.DWMD6FKXO]$DURQ6FKXVWHII/LDP:ROIIand .HQ:ROJHPXWK (bugguide.net; inaturalist.org) Please note: (—) = Unknown species and genus due to photographic limitations, * = Name of subfamily. )LHOG0XVHXP &&%<1&/LFHQVHGZRUNVDUHIUHHWRXVHVKDUHUHPL[ZLWKDWWULEXWLRQEXWGRHVQRWSHUPLWFRPPHUFLDOXVHRIWKHRULJLQDOZRUN 1HPDWRFHUD&UDQH)OLHV0LGJHV0RVTXLWRHVDQG%ODFN)OLHV >ILHOGJXLGHVILHOGPXVHXPRUJ@>@ versiRn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
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution of Cluster Fly Species (Pollenia Spp, Diptera: Calliphoridae) ………
    DISTRIBUTION OF CLUSTER FLY SPECIES (POLLENIA SPP, DIPTERA: CALLIPHORIDAE) ACROSS CANADA INCLUDING RANGE EXTENSIONS AND FIRST PROVINCIAL RECORDS A Thesis Submitted to the Committee on Graduate Studies in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Degree of Master of Science in the Faculty of Arts and Science TRENT UNIVERSITY Peterborough, Ontario, Canada © Copyright by Bshayer A. Samkari 2018 Environmental & Life Sciences M.Sc. Graduate Program September 2018 Abstract Distribution of Cluster Fly Species (Pollenia, spp. Diptera: Calliphoridae) Across Canada Including Range Extensions and First Provincial Records Bshayer A. Samkari This thesis looks at the genus Pollenia: historically where they were first introduced into Canada and spatially, where they are found now. This project involved me identifying 2211 files, sorted from the 3 years of field specimens obtained in 2011, 2012, 2013. P. pediculata was the most abundant and widespread, yielding 1272 specimens out of 2211, and it was found in all provinces sampled. The previous understanding of all Pollenia specimens as being P. rudis appears to be incorrect both in terms of actual number of species – which is known – and how prevalent it is. P. rudis comprised only 20% of the entire collection. The least common was P. griseotomentosa, occurring as 45 of 2211, or 2%. I found new eight first provincial records: four species in Alberta (P. angustigena, P. labialis, P. rudis, P. vagabunda) , one species for Saskatchewan (P. pediculata), two for New Brunswick (P. griseotomentosa, P. labialis), and one for Nova Scotia (P. labialis). P. labialis was new to three provinces, the other species to one province each.
    [Show full text]
  • Fly Times Issue 64
    FLY TIMES ISSUE 64, Spring, 2020 Stephen D. Gaimari, editor Plant Pest Diagnostics Branch California Department of Food & Agriculture 3294 Meadowview Road Sacramento, California 95832, USA Tel: (916) 738-6671 FAX: (916) 262-1190 Email: [email protected] Welcome to the latest issue of Fly Times! This issue is brought to you during the Covid-19 pandemic, with many of you likely cooped up at home, with insect collections worldwide closed for business! Perhaps for this reason this issue is pretty heavy, not just with articles but with images. There were many submissions to the Flies are Amazing! section and the Dipterists Lairs! I hope you enjoy them! Just to touch on an error I made in the Fall issue’s introduction… In outlining the change to “Spring” and “Fall” issues, instead of April and October issues, I said “But rest assured, I WILL NOT produce Fall issues after 20 December! Nor Spring issues after 20 March!” But of course I meant no Spring issues after 20 June! Instead of hitting the end of spring, I used the beginning. Oh well… Thank you to everyone for sending in such interesting articles! I encourage all of you to consider contributing articles that may be of interest to the Diptera community, or for larger manuscripts, the Fly Times Supplement series. Fly Times offers a great forum to report on research activities, to make specimen requests, to report interesting observations about flies or new and improved methods, to advertise opportunities for dipterists, to report on or announce meetings relevant to the community, etc., with all the digital images you wish to provide.
    [Show full text]
  • Jqotes on Tbe Diptera of Somerset
    jQotes on tbe Diptera of Somerset Part III. 1 BY H. J. CHARBOMIER. HIS present portion of the list deals with the Tachini- dae, Muscidae and Anthomyidae. The Tachinidae are a large and very difficult group of medium to very large flies, covered with numerous spines and mostly grey, brown, or black insects only one species hairs ; ; is of a brilliant green, i.e. Gymnochaeta viridis. In the larval stage they are, as far as known, parasitic in the bodies of other insects ; often in the larvae of lepidoptera, sometimes on the early stages of hymen op tera ; sometimes on beetle larvae, and one genus, Onesia, has been discovered by M. D. Keilin to be parasitic in earthworms. The Muscidae form a small group, containing many well known flies, such as the Blue-bottle, and House-fly and the brilliant green fly Lucilia sericata, whose larva is the dreaded Sheep-maggot, which sometimes does much damage in this and other European countries, and has unfortunately been introduced into Australia. Several of these flies sting both men and cattle. Most of the larvae live in decaying vegetable .and animal matter ; some are carnivorous, devouring other fly larvae, and one species has been proved by M. D. Keilin to be para- sitic in earthworms, i.e. that of Pollenia rudis. 1. Part I was printed in the Proceedings, Vol. LXI, 189-204 ; Part II in Vol. LXIII, 162-170. Notes on the Diptera of Somerset. 87 The Anthomyidae are a very numerous group, and some of the species are very difficult to determine ; they are mostly small to medium grey flies, and although they do not sting they are a great pest by worrying merl and cattle.
    [Show full text]