UK Telecoms for Dummies®, CGI Special Edition
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
BT and Openreach Go Their Separate Ways
BT And Openreach Go Their Separate Ways BT And Openreach Go Their Separate Ways 1 / 2 Nov 29, 2016 — It is one of the most dragged-out divorces in corporate history but it seems that BT and Openreach will definitely go their separate ways. Jul 5, 2016 — We assumed that Three and O2 would keep competing as separate entities ... There is always a competitive tension for mobile network operators (MNOs) in ... We looked at a number of ways in which BT could have tried to harm EE's ... I do not intend to go into great detail on the substance of the case (the .... Another way, although I doubt it will work for liability reasons, would be to contact Facebook ... Is there any way of establishing contact directly with Openreach? ... Get help for all your BT products and services you use at home and on the go.. [12] Since 2005, BT have been accused of abusing their control of Openreach, ... It now required a licence in the same way as any other telecommunications operator. ... The next major development for British Telecommunications, and a move ... BT stated that PlusNet will continue to operate separately out of its Sheffield .... May 21, 2021 — Another way, although I doubt it will work for liability reasons, would be to ... I can't find any other way to contact Openreach on their website. ... Get help for all your BT products and services you use at home and on the go. After this encounter, Bo and Lauren go their separate ways. ... What settings should I use for a fibre router that's connected to a BT Openreach modem? Persons ... -
Transformation Solutions, Unlocking Value for Clients
CEO Study Telecom Implementations Chris Pearson Global Business Consulting Industry Leader 21.11.2008 1 IBM Telecom Industry Agenda . CEO Study – Enterprise of the Future . IBM’s view of the Telecom market . IP Economy . The Change agenda . World is becoming Smarter 2 Storm Warning | ZA Lozinski | Clouds v0.0 - September 2008 | IBM Confidential © 2008 IBM Corporation We spoke toIBM 1,130 Telecom CEOs Industry and conducted in-depth analyses to identify the characteristics of the Enterprise of the Future How are organizations addressing . New and changing customers – changes at the end of the value chain . Global integration – changes within the value chain . Business model innovation – their response to these changes Scope and Approach: 1,130 CEOs and Public Sector Leaders . One-hour interviews using a structured questionnaire . 78% Private and 22% Public Sector . Representative sample across 32 industries . 33% Asia, 36% EMEA, 31% Americas . 80% Established and 20% Emerging Economies Analysis: Quantitative and Qualitative . Respondents’ current behavior, investment patterns and future intent . Choices made by financial outperformers . Multivariate analysis to identify clusters of responses . Selective case studies of companies that excel in specific areas 3 Storm Warning | ZA Lozinski | Clouds v0.0 - September 2008 | IBM Confidential © 2008 IBM Corporation IBM Telecom Industry The Enterprise of the Future is . 1 2 3 4 5 Hungry Innovative Globally Disruptive Genuine, for beyond integrated by not just change customer nature generous imagination 4 Storm Warning | ZA Lozinski | Clouds v0.0 - September 2008 | IBM Confidential © 2008 IBM Corporation Telecom CEOsIBM Telecom anticipate Industry more change ahead; are adjusting business models; investing in innovation and new capabilities Telecom CEOs : Hungry . -
Order of the President (Amendment And
IN THE COMPETITION Case No.: 1278/5/7/17 APPEAL TRIBUNAL B E T W E E N: (1) BRITISH TELECOMMUNICATIONS PLC (2) EE LIMITED (3) PLUSNET PLC (4) DABS.COM LIMITED Claimants -v- (1) MASTERCARD INCORPORATED (2) MASTERCARD INTERNATIONAL INCORPORATED (3) MASTERCARD EUROPE SA Defendants _____________________________________________________________________ ORDER _____________________________________________________________________ HAVING REGARD TO the Tribunal’s Reasoned Order of 28 September 2017 AND UPON reading the Claimants’ application made on 18 October 2017 (the “Application”) under rules 31(2) and 32(1)(b) of the Competition Appeal Tribunal Rules 2015 (the “Tribunal Rules”) for permission: (i) to amend the Claim Form and Particulars of Claim; and (ii) to serve the claim outside the jurisdiction on the First and Second Defendants IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The Claimants be permitted to amend the Claim Form and Particulars of Claim in the form of the draft attached to the Application. 2. The Claimants be permitted to serve the Amended Claim Form and Particulars of Claim on First and Second Defendants outside the jurisdiction. 3. This order is without prejudice to the rights of the First and Second Defendants to apply pursuant to rule 34 of the Tribunal Rules to dispute the jurisdiction. REASONS 1. The claim and an application for service out of jurisdiction on the First and Second Defendants were filed at the Tribunal on 12 September 2017. Pursuant to that Application, I granted permission for service out for the reasons set out in my Order of 28 September 2017. After Directions for Service were sent to the Claimants, the Claimants’ solicitors became aware that on 15 September 2017 the Fourth Claimant, which at the time the claim was filed was a public company, had re-registered as a private limited company. -
BT Group Regulatory Affairs, Response Remove All 4
Annex to the BT response to Ofcom’s consultation on promoting competition and investment in fibre networks – Wholesale Fixed Telecoms Market Review 2021-26 29 May 2020 Non - confidential version Branding: only keep logos if the response is on behalf of more than one brand, i.e. BT/Openreach joint response or BT/EE/Plusnet joint response. Comments should be addressed to: Remove the other brands, or if it is purely a BT BT Group Regulatory Affairs, response remove all 4. BT Centre, London, EC1A 7AJ [email protected] BT RESPONSE TO OFCOM’S CONSULTATION ON COMPETITION AND INVESTMENT IN FIBRE NETWORKS 2 Contents CONTENTS .................................................................................................................................................. 2 A1. COMPASS LEXECON: REVIEW OF OFCOM'S APPROACH TO ASSESSING ULTRAFAST MARKET POWER 3 A2. ALTNET ULTRAFAST DEPLOYMENTS AND INVESTMENT FUNDING ...................................................... 4 A3. EXAMPLES OF INCREASING PRICE PRESSURE IN BUSINESS TENDERING MARKETS .............................. 6 A4. MARKET ANALYSIS AND REMEDIES RELATED TO PHYSICAL INFRASTRUCTURE ................................... 7 Our assessment of Ofcom’s market analysis ............................................................................................ 8 Our assessment of Ofcom’s remedies .................................................................................................... 12 A5. RISKS BORNE BY INVESTORS IN BT’S FIBRE INVESTMENT ................................................................ -
Anticipated Acquisition by BT Group Plc of EE Limited
Anticipated acquisition by BT Group plc of EE Limited Appendices and glossary Appendix A: Terms of reference and conduct of the inquiry Appendix B: Industry background Appendix C: Financial performance of companies Appendix D: Regulation Appendix E: Transaction and merger rationale Appendix F: Retail mobile Appendix G: Spectrum, capacity, and speed Appendix H: Fixed-mobile bundles Appendix I: Wholesale mobile: total foreclosure analysis Appendix J: Wholesale mobile: partial foreclosure analysis Appendix K: Mobile backhaul: input foreclosure Appendix L: Retail fixed broadband: Market A Appendix M: Retail broadband: superfast broadband Glossary APPENDIX A Terms of reference and conduct of the inquiry Terms of reference 1. In exercise of its duty under section 33(1) of the Enterprise Act 2002 (the Act) the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) believes that it is or may be the case that: (a) arrangements are in progress or in contemplation which, if carried into effect, will result in the creation of a relevant merger situation in that: (i) enterprises carried on by, or under the control of, BT Group plc will cease to be distinct from enterprises currently carried on by, or under the control of, EE Limited; and (ii) section 23(1)(b) of the Act is satisfied; and (b) the creation of that situation may be expected to result in a substantial lessening of competition within a market or markets in the United Kingdom (the UK) for goods or services, including the supply of: (i) wholesale access and call origination services to mobile virtual network operators; and (ii) fibre mobile backhaul services to mobile network operators. -
Access to Infrastructure Nadine I
University of Wisconsin Milwaukee UWM Digital Commons School of Information Studies Faculty Articles Information Studies (School of) 2015 Access to Infrastructure Nadine I. Kozak University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.uwm.edu/sois_facpubs Part of the Library and Information Science Commons Recommended Citation Kozak, Nadine I., "Access to Infrastructure" (2015). School of Information Studies Faculty Articles. 8. https://dc.uwm.edu/sois_facpubs/8 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by UWM Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in School of Information Studies Faculty Articles by an authorized administrator of UWM Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Pre-publication print, February 2014. Kozak, N. I. (2015). Access to infrastructure. In Ang, P. H. & Mansell, R. (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Digital Communication & Society. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI: 10.1002/9781118290743/wbiedcs146 Access to Infrastructure Nadine I. Kozak University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee [email protected] Word count (not including abstract): 5001 Abstract Access to infrastructure is a perennial issue in the field of communication, which started in the era of postal services and continues to the present era of broadband networks. As infrastructures, or large- scale systems, information and communication technologies (ICTs) are central to citizens’ political, economic, and social lives. Historically and today, a variety of factors such as political and regulatory decisions impact access to infrastructure. Current concerns about equitable access include the network neutrality. Keywords: access, communication and public policy, history of media and communications, information and communication technology, media convergence, media law and policy, media regulation. -
The Global Telecommunications Traffic Report- 1991
International Institute of Communications (IIC) THE GLOBAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS TRAFFIC REPORT- 1991 Gregory C. Staple -Editor Principal International Telecom Flows © HC 1991 THE GLOBAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS TRAFFIC REPORT - 1991 Gregory C. Staple - Editor © Copyright 1991 International Institute of Communications T~S ~S co~,¥ .o./~ DO NOT REPRODUCE The IIC is an independent educational and policy research organi- zation with members in more than 70 countries. It focuses on telecommunications and broadcasting issues on a world-wide basis. Institute publications include a bimonthly magazine, Intermedia, and a range of topical brief’rag papers. IIC publications and reports do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Institute’s officers, trustees or members. Previous IIC reports in this series: 1990 The Global Telecommunications Traffic Boom 1989 Global Telecommunications Traffic Flows and Market Structures For additional copies of this report or other publications, contact: International Institute of Communications Tavistock House South, Tavistock Square, London WCIH 9LF Tel: 071-388-0671/Fax: 071-380-0623/Telex: 24578 IICLDN G Cover Illustration - The cover maps the largest streams of switched international telecommunications traf17c onto a ci~cular projection. Routes shown generally had a two-way flow in 1990 exceeding gO million Minutes of Telecommunication Traf17c (MITT). Some routes have been omitted for presentation purposes. Shaded map areas show major points of origin and destination. Concept: Gregory C. Staple. Illustration: Maryland CartoGraptffcs. ©International Institute of Communications 1991 The Global Telecommunications T:aflqc R#port- 1991 This report could not have been compiled without assistance. Carriers, government departments and regulatory organizations from around the world responded to our informational requests. -
BT Group Plc Annual Report 2020 BT Group Plc Annual Report 2020 Strategic Report 1
BT Group plc Group BT Annual Report 2020 Beyond Limits BT Group plc Annual Report 2020 BT Group plc Annual Report 2020 Strategic report 1 New BT Halo. ... of new products and services Contents Combining the We launched BT Halo, We’re best of 4G, 5G our best ever converged Strategic report connectivity package. and fibre. ... of flexible TV A message from our Chairman 2 A message from our Chief Executive 4 packages About BT 6 investing Our range of new flexible TV Executive Committee 8 packages aims to disrupt the Customers and markets 10 UK’s pay TV market and keep Regulatory update 12 pace with the rising tide of in the streamers. Our business model 14 Our strategy 16 Strategic progress 18 ... of next generation Our stakeholders 24 future... fibre broadband Culture and colleagues 30 We expect to invest around Introducing the Colleague Board 32 £12bn to connect 20m Section 172 statement 34 premises by mid-to-late-20s Non-financial information statement 35 if the conditions are right. Digital impact and sustainability 36 Our key performance indicators 40 Our performance as a sustainable and responsible business 42 ... of our Group performance 43 A letter from the Chair of Openreach 51 best-in-class How we manage risk 52 network ... to keep us all Our principal risks and uncertainties 53 5G makes a measurable connected Viability statement 64 difference to everyday During the pandemic, experiences and opens we’re helping those who up even more exciting need us the most. Corporate governance report 65 new experiences. Financial statements 117 .. -
BT Strategic Report
BT Group plc Annual Report 2020 Strategic report 1 New BT Halo. ... of new products and services Contents Combining the We launched BT Halo, We’re best of 4G, 5G our best ever converged Strategic report connectivity package. and fibre. ... of flexible TV A message from our Chairman 2 A message from our Chief Executive 4 packages About BT 6 investing Our range of new flexible TV Executive Committee 8 packages aims to disrupt the Customers and markets 10 UK’s pay TV market and keep Regulatory update 12 pace with the rising tide of in the streamers. Our business model 14 Our strategy 16 Strategic progress 18 ... of next generation Our stakeholders 24 future... fibre broadband Culture and colleagues 30 We expect to invest around Introducing the Colleague Board 32 £12bn to connect 20m Section 172 statement 34 premises by mid-to-late-20s Non-financial information statement 35 if the conditions are right. Digital impact and sustainability 36 Our key performance indicators 40 Our performance as a sustainable and responsible business 42 ... of our Group performance 43 A letter from the Chair of Openreach 51 best-in-class How we manage risk 52 network ... to keep us all Our principal risks and uncertainties 53 5G makes a measurable connected Viability statement 64 difference to everyday During the pandemic, experiences and opens we’re helping those who up even more exciting need us the most. Corporate governance report 65 new experiences. Financial statements 117 ... to enable Additional information 204 a safer world This year, we used artificial intelligence (AI) Look out for these throughout the report: to anticipate emerging threats and help protect the nation from up to 4,000 cyberattacks a day. -
Openreach Progress with Implementation of the New Arrangements Between Openreach and BT
Openreach progress with Implementation of the new arrangements between Openreach and BT Report to Ofcom’s Openreach Monitoring Unit June 2019 Foreword Openreach is a wholesale network provider. We support more than 600 Communications Providers (CPs) to connect the 30 million UK homes and business to their networks. We sell our products and services to CPs so they can add their own products and provide their customers with bundled landline, mobile, broadband, TV and data services. Our services are available to everybody and our products have the same prices, terms and conditions, no matter who buys them. This report is provided by Openreach Limited1 to Ofcom’s Openreach Monitoring Unit as input to its forthcoming Commitments Implementation Report. 1 Openreach Limited is a wholly-owned subsidiary of BT Group Plc. Non-Confidential Version Page 2 of 52 Table of Contents Foreword ........................................................................................................ 2 I. Executive Summary ................................................................................. 5 II. Introduction ............................................................................................. 9 III. Implementation: Setting up Openreach Limited .................................... 10 IV. Openreach Rebranding .......................................................................... 12 ‘Scrub and Buff’ ........................................................................................................ 12 New van livery ........................................................................................................ -
The Economics of Next Generation Access - Final Report
WIK-Consult • Report Study for the European Competitive Telecommunication Association (ECTA) The Economics of Next Generation Access - Final Report Authors: Dieter Elixmann Dragan Ilic Dr. Karl-Heinz Neumann Dr. Thomas Plückebaum WIK-Consult GmbH Rhöndorfer Str. 68 53604 Bad Honnef Germany Bad Honnef, September 10, 2008 The Economics of Next Generation Access I Contents Tables IV Figures VII Abbreviations X Preface XIII Executive Summary XV 1 Introduction 1 2 Literature review 3 2.1 OPTA: Business cases for broadband access 3 2.1.1 OPTA: Business case for sub-loop unbundling in the Netherlands 3 2.1.2 OPTA: Business case for fibre-based access in the Netherlands 5 2.2 Comreg: Business case for sub-loop unbundling in Dublin 8 2.3 BIPT: The business case for sub-loop unbundling in Belgium 10 2.4 Analysys: Fibre in the Last Mile 12 2.5 Avisem studies for ARCEP 15 2.5.1 Sharing of the terminal part of FTTH 16 2.5.2 Intervention of local authorities as facilitators 18 2.6 AT Kearney: FTTH for Greece 19 2.7 ERG opinion on regulatory principles of NGA 23 2.8 JP Morgan: The fibre battle 26 2.9 OECD 28 2.9.1 Public rights of way for fibre deployment to the home 29 2.9.2 Developments in fibre technologies and investment 32 3 Experiences in non-European countries 44 3.1 Australia 44 3.1.1 Overall broadband market penetration 44 3.1.2 Current broadband market structure 45 3.1.3 Envisaged nationwide “Fibre to the Node” network 47 3.1.4 Regulation, wholesale services 50 3.2 Japan 51 3.2.1 Overall broadband market penetration 51 II The Economics of -
Reining in the Cost of Connectivity Policies for Better Broadband in 2014
New America Foundation Reining in the Cost of Connectivity Policies for Better Broadband in 2014 By Nick Russo, Patrick Lucey, Danielle Kehl, and Hibah Hussain January 2014 Americans in major cities such as New York, Los Angeles, and Washington DC, continue to pay higher prices for slower Internet service when compared to similar cities in other parts of the world. Clearly, the United States’ collective broadband experience does not measure up to that of other countries. In this paper, we examine America’s broadband challenges, analyzing a number of factors that impact speeds and prices. Our analysis is based on the data we collected for The Cost of Connectivity 2013, a survey of consumer broadband pricing data from 24 cities around the world. This paper identifies ways to promote more robust competition and provide consumers with better service at a more affordable price. Acknowledging that no single solution or “magic bullet” can solve all of America’s broadband challenges, we offer recommendations aimed at improving the status quo. We argue that it is crucial to create better conditions for providers to enter the market, to compete more effectively, and to innovate on existing and new services. In particular, policymakers should improve data collection practices around pricing information, work to remove barriers to the development of local networks, encourage cooperation in broadband build outs, support pro-consumer and pro-competitive policies, and enforce competitive protections in upcoming spectrum auctions. Nick Russo and Patrick Lucey are policy program associates at the New America Foundation’s Open Technology Institute (OTI). Danielle Kehl and Hibah Hussain are policy analysts at OTI.