Opuscula Philolichenum, 7: 101-120. 2009

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Opuscula Philolichenum, 7: 101-120. 2009 Opuscula Philolichenum, 7: 101-120. 2009. Lichens and Related Fungi of Pine Bluff Arsenal, Arkansas 1 DOUGLAS LADD ABSTRACT. – A total of 161 taxa of lichens and related fungi were documented from Pine Bluff Arsenal in Jefferson County, on the Gulf Coastal Plain in south-central Arkansas. Constrained time entitations in five natural area units within the arsenal revealed a high degree of similarity among the lichen biota of the units. Crustose lichens are the most common growth form, comprising nearly 60% of the lichen diversity at the site. The lichen biota of the Pine Bluff Arsenal has strong biogeographic affinities to the southeastern coastal plain, including western range extensions for sev- eral coastal plain species. INTRODUCTION Pine Bluff Arsenal encompasses 14,944 acres (5,978 ha) along the west side of the Arkansas River in Jefferson County, south-central Arkansas, north of the town of Pine Bluff. Established in 1941, the facility has provided various manufacturing, storage and dismantling functions for specialty munitions and chemical weapons. Most of the site lies within the West Gulf Coastal Plain ecoregion, although some of the low wetlands and riparian areas fall within the Mississippi River Alluvial Plain ecoregion (TNC 1999). The site consists of a mix of flat lowlands and moderately dissected low rolling uplands, with a total elevational relief of 145 feet. Some steep soil banks with generally eastern exposure occur along the Arkansas River and Yellow Lake. Detailed descriptions of the site, its physical features, and vascular vegetation are provided by Campbell et al. (1997). Despite a long history of disturbance associated with military use, more than 10,000 acres (4046 ha) of the tract is forested. These woodlands range from hardwood and pine-hardwood stands in the uplands to bottomland hardwoods in the poorly drained sites, and a few wetlands with old growth Bald Cypress (Taxodium distichum). Dominant trees in the uplands include Loblolly Pine (Pinus taeda), Shortleaf Pine (Pinus echinata), White Oak (Quercus alba), Post Oak (Q. stellata), and Southern Red Oak (Q. falcata). In addition to Bald Cypress, trees of more mesic and wet sites include Sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), Water Oak (Quercus nigra), Willow Oak (Q. phellos), Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica), Beech (Fagus grandifolia), Sugarberry (Celtis laevigata), Box Elder (Acer negundo), Hornbeam (Carpinus caroliniana), and Bitternut Hickory (Carya cordiformis). METHODS Most field work for this project was conducted in December 1999 (Ladd 2000). Attempts were made to survey all habitats and substrates throughout non-restricted portions of the Pine Bluff Arsenal. To assess the equability of lichen distribution within the arsenal property, and to ensure the completeness of the survey, detailed lichen inventories were compiled for five natural area units within the site, spending approximately equal area-corrected survey time in each unit (minimum 0.5 person days/unit). Four of these units, the Phillips Creek, Refuge Woods, Tripletts Bluff, and Yellow Lake units, are the same as those described in Campbell et al. (1997). The Eastwood Bayou unit is immediately east of the unit described in Campbell et al. (1997). Attempts were made to investigate all habitat types and substrates within each unit. All lichens observed in each unit were recorded, along with substrate information and qualitative observations of abundance. A lower intensity of survey effort was also directed to areas outside of the natural area units, in an attempt to assess as many potential habitats, substrates, and landscape conditions as possible. Where appropriate, acetone extracts of lichens were chromatographed on Whatman K6 60Å 250μm silica gel coated 10 Η 20 cm glass plates using the three solvent system of Culberson and Kristinsson (1970), with the methyl tert- butyl ether substitution modification in solvent B (Culberson & Johnson 1982). 1 DOUGLAS LADD – The Nature Conservancy, 2800 S. Brentwood Blvd., St. Louis, MO, 63144, USA. – e-mail: [email protected] 101 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION I. – DIVERSITY A total of 161 taxa of lichens and related fungi, including some unnamed species, have been documented from Pine Bluff Arsenal. This level of lichen diversity is less than would be expected for an equivalent area in the Ozark region, which is one of the few areas in midcontinental North America for which within-site lichen diversity is available. Lichen diversity at the arsenal is likely constrained by both the lack of saxicolous substrates and the long history of intensive land use, including farming prior to establishment of the arsenal. For comparison, Ladd (1996) documented 201 lichens from two forest units totaling 1,231 acres (492 ha) in the northern portion of the Missouri Ozarks, although 62 (31%) of these taxa were obligately saxicolous. Wetmore (1992) reported 179 lichens from Hercules Glades Wilderness, a 12,315 acre (4,926 ha) wilderness area in southwestern Missouri. Again, at least 37 (21%) of the taxa in Wetmore’s report are obligately saxicolous. Thus the non-saxicolous diversity known from Hercules Glades Wilderness is lower than that for that of Pine Bluff Arsenal, an area of approximately similar size. Ladd and Grabner (1998) reported more than 250 lichens from the nine units of the Missouri Ozark Forest Ecosystem Project, encompassing some 9,400 acres (3,760 ha) in the southeastern Missouri Ozarks. All of these areas, however, have well-developed saxicolous substrates, greater microhabitat diversity, and a less intensive and environmentally severe land use history. Thus, given the paucity of saxicolous substrates and the past disturbance history of the area, the presence of 161 taxa of lichens at Pine Bluff Arsenal is significant, and represents a diverse cohort of lichens. As shown in Table 1 (below), coefficients of similarity reveal that the lichen biota among the five natural area units is compellingly similar. Even more compelling is the uniform variance displayed by the narrow range of similarity coefficients among the lichens of any pair of units, ranging only from 0.67 to 0.73. Forty-seven (30%) of the lichens are common to all five units, and an additional 21 (14%) are known from four units. Site (lichen taxa) YL TB RW PC Eastwood Bayou (76) .68 .73 .69 .73 Phillips Creek (92) .70 .73 .67 Refuge Woods (95) .69 .68 Tripletts Bluff (92) .70 Yellow Lake (102) Table 1. Coefficients of similarity among the lichen biota of natural area units within Pine Bluff Arsenal. With the exception of the Eastwood Bayou unit, the lichen biota of each of the survey units has a similar level of diversity of about 100 lichen taxa. The significantly lower diversity of the Eastwood Bayou unit probably results from a combination of less survey time and more anthropogenically disrupted habitat, including large areas of former farmland. Forty-one (26%) of the lichens are known only from a single unit. Most of these are uncommon lichens of minor importance from a dominance or cover perspective. Fourteen of these are known only from the Refuge Woods unit, eleven are known only from the Yellow Lake unit, nine are known only from the Tripletts Bluff unit, and seven occur only within the Phillips Creek unit. There were no lichens unique to the Eastwood Bayou unit. II. – PHYSIOGNOMY A majority of the lichens of Pine Bluff Arsenal are crustose (Table 2, below). This parallels physiognomic profiles from elsewhere in North America: Ladd (1996) reported a similar distribution of physiognomic types from woodlands in the northern Ozarks of Missouri, with 65% of the lichens crustose, 25% foliose, and 9% fruticose. A study of the lichens of a small preserve in southwestern Connecticut (Ladd et al. 2009) was also similar in pattern of lichen physiognomy: 59% crustose, 26% foliose, 15% fruticose. It is interesting to speculate whether this ratio among physiognomic classes prevails throughout intact habitats in eastern and central North America. The low diversity of 102 gelatinous lichens at Pine Bluff is likely due to past land use history and the sensitivity of many gelatinous lichens to both habitat perturbation and air pollution. The former clearing of much of the Pine Bluff site, and the presence of a large pulp mill immediately to the south, have both undoubtedly impacted the local biota, including the lichens. Physiognomy # of taxa % of flora Crustose 96 59.6 Foliose 45 28.0 Fruticose 20 12.4 Table 2. Physiognomic profile of the lichens of Pine Bluff Arsenal III. – SUBSTRATES AND HABITATS At Pine Bluff Arsenal, primary substrates available to lichens are trees and, to a lesser extent, soil, and lignin. There are extremely limited occurrences of saxicolous substrates associated with poorly consolidated sand and siltstones in soil exposures, as well as some weathered old concrete bridges and culverts. Bryophytes are locally abundant, but muscicolous lichens are rare at the site. Lichens are widely distributed on almost every available substrate throughout all portions of the arsenal that were surveyed, except for mowed open lawn expanses and high usage areas surrounding buildings and other facilities. In some of the more heavily overgrown or younger secondary timbers, lichens were not as abundant as in more mature and open woodlands, but all woodlands had a pervasive lichen presence. Corticolous lichens dominated the site diversity, with 126 lichens (87% of the biota). Fifteen lichens (10% of the biota) occurred on lignin, which consisted primarily of decorticate stumps and logs of oaks and pines. Twelve lichen taxa (8% of the biota) were terricolous; these occurred primarily on exposed to lightly shaded, stable, well-drained soil embankments above flood levels along streams and in association with established cultural features such as ditches and dikes. Despite the near absence of saxicolous substrates, eight taxa (5% of the biota) inhabited the sparse, small sedimentary fragments found in a few soil embankments, and on weathered concrete of bridges, culverts, and abutments.
Recommended publications
  • Three Challenges to Contemporaneous Taxonomy from a Licheno-Mycological Perspective
    Megataxa 001 (1): 078–103 ISSN 2703-3082 (print edition) https://www.mapress.com/j/mt/ MEGATAXA Copyright © 2020 Magnolia Press Review ISSN 2703-3090 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/megataxa.1.1.16 Three challenges to contemporaneous taxonomy from a licheno-mycological perspective ROBERT LÜCKING Botanischer Garten und Botanisches Museum, Freie Universität Berlin, Königin-Luise-Straße 6–8, 14195 Berlin, Germany �[email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3431-4636 Abstract Nagoya Protocol, and does not need additional “policing”. Indeed, the Nagoya Protocol puts the heaviest burden on This paper discusses three issues that challenge contempora- taxonomy and researchers cataloguing biodiversity, whereas neous taxonomy, with examples from the fields of mycology for the intended target group, namely those seeking revenue and lichenology, formulated as three questions: (1) What is gain from nature, the protocol may not actually work effec- the importance of taxonomy in contemporaneous and future tively. The notion of currently freely accessible digital se- science and society? (2) An increasing methodological gap in quence information (DSI) to become subject to the protocol, alpha taxonomy: challenge or opportunity? (3) The Nagoya even after previous publication, is misguided and conflicts Protocol: improvement or impediment to the science of tax- with the guidelines for ethical scientific conduct. Through onomy? The importance of taxonomy in society is illustrated its implementation of the Nagoya Protocol, Colombia has using the example of popular field guides and digital me- set a welcome precedence how to exempt taxonomic and dia, a billion-dollar business, arguing that the desire to name systematic research from “access to genetic resources”, and species is an intrinsic feature of the cognitive component of hopefully other biodiversity-rich countries will follow this nature connectedness of humans.
    [Show full text]
  • H. Thorsten Lumbsch VP, Science & Education the Field Museum 1400
    H. Thorsten Lumbsch VP, Science & Education The Field Museum 1400 S. Lake Shore Drive Chicago, Illinois 60605 USA Tel: 1-312-665-7881 E-mail: [email protected] Research interests Evolution and Systematics of Fungi Biogeography and Diversification Rates of Fungi Species delimitation Diversity of lichen-forming fungi Professional Experience Since 2017 Vice President, Science & Education, The Field Museum, Chicago. USA 2014-2017 Director, Integrative Research Center, Science & Education, The Field Museum, Chicago, USA. Since 2014 Curator, Integrative Research Center, Science & Education, The Field Museum, Chicago, USA. 2013-2014 Associate Director, Integrative Research Center, Science & Education, The Field Museum, Chicago, USA. 2009-2013 Chair, Dept. of Botany, The Field Museum, Chicago, USA. Since 2011 MacArthur Associate Curator, Dept. of Botany, The Field Museum, Chicago, USA. 2006-2014 Associate Curator, Dept. of Botany, The Field Museum, Chicago, USA. 2005-2009 Head of Cryptogams, Dept. of Botany, The Field Museum, Chicago, USA. Since 2004 Member, Committee on Evolutionary Biology, University of Chicago. Courses: BIOS 430 Evolution (UIC), BIOS 23410 Complex Interactions: Coevolution, Parasites, Mutualists, and Cheaters (U of C) Reading group: Phylogenetic methods. 2003-2006 Assistant Curator, Dept. of Botany, The Field Museum, Chicago, USA. 1998-2003 Privatdozent (Assistant Professor), Botanical Institute, University – GHS - Essen. Lectures: General Botany, Evolution of lower plants, Photosynthesis, Courses: Cryptogams, Biology
    [Show full text]
  • One Hundred New Species of Lichenized Fungi: a Signature of Undiscovered Global Diversity
    Phytotaxa 18: 1–127 (2011) ISSN 1179-3155 (print edition) www.mapress.com/phytotaxa/ Monograph PHYTOTAXA Copyright © 2011 Magnolia Press ISSN 1179-3163 (online edition) PHYTOTAXA 18 One hundred new species of lichenized fungi: a signature of undiscovered global diversity H. THORSTEN LUMBSCH1*, TEUVO AHTI2, SUSANNE ALTERMANN3, GUILLERMO AMO DE PAZ4, ANDRÉ APTROOT5, ULF ARUP6, ALEJANDRINA BÁRCENAS PEÑA7, PAULINA A. BAWINGAN8, MICHEL N. BENATTI9, LUISA BETANCOURT10, CURTIS R. BJÖRK11, KANSRI BOONPRAGOB12, MAARTEN BRAND13, FRANK BUNGARTZ14, MARCELA E. S. CÁCERES15, MEHTMET CANDAN16, JOSÉ LUIS CHAVES17, PHILIPPE CLERC18, RALPH COMMON19, BRIAN J. COPPINS20, ANA CRESPO4, MANUELA DAL-FORNO21, PRADEEP K. DIVAKAR4, MELIZAR V. DUYA22, JOHN A. ELIX23, ARVE ELVEBAKK24, JOHNATHON D. FANKHAUSER25, EDIT FARKAS26, LIDIA ITATÍ FERRARO27, EBERHARD FISCHER28, DAVID J. GALLOWAY29, ESTER GAYA30, MIREIA GIRALT31, TREVOR GOWARD32, MARTIN GRUBE33, JOSEF HAFELLNER33, JESÚS E. HERNÁNDEZ M.34, MARÍA DE LOS ANGELES HERRERA CAMPOS7, KLAUS KALB35, INGVAR KÄRNEFELT6, GINTARAS KANTVILAS36, DOROTHEE KILLMANN28, PAUL KIRIKA37, KERRY KNUDSEN38, HARALD KOMPOSCH39, SERGEY KONDRATYUK40, JAMES D. LAWREY21, ARMIN MANGOLD41, MARCELO P. MARCELLI9, BRUCE MCCUNE42, MARIA INES MESSUTI43, ANDREA MICHLIG27, RICARDO MIRANDA GONZÁLEZ7, BIBIANA MONCADA10, ALIFERETI NAIKATINI44, MATTHEW P. NELSEN1, 45, DAG O. ØVSTEDAL46, ZDENEK PALICE47, KHWANRUAN PAPONG48, SITTIPORN PARNMEN12, SERGIO PÉREZ-ORTEGA4, CHRISTIAN PRINTZEN49, VÍCTOR J. RICO4, EIMY RIVAS PLATA1, 50, JAVIER ROBAYO51, DANIA ROSABAL52, ULRIKE RUPRECHT53, NORIS SALAZAR ALLEN54, LEOPOLDO SANCHO4, LUCIANA SANTOS DE JESUS15, TAMIRES SANTOS VIEIRA15, MATTHIAS SCHULTZ55, MARK R. D. SEAWARD56, EMMANUËL SÉRUSIAUX57, IMKE SCHMITT58, HARRIE J. M. SIPMAN59, MOHAMMAD SOHRABI 2, 60, ULRIK SØCHTING61, MAJBRIT ZEUTHEN SØGAARD61, LAURENS B. SPARRIUS62, ADRIANO SPIELMANN63, TOBY SPRIBILLE33, JUTARAT SUTJARITTURAKAN64, ACHRA THAMMATHAWORN65, ARNE THELL6, GÖRAN THOR66, HOLGER THÜS67, EINAR TIMDAL68, CAMILLE TRUONG18, ROMAN TÜRK69, LOENGRIN UMAÑA TENORIO17, DALIP K.
    [Show full text]
  • <I> Lecanoromycetes</I> of Lichenicolous Fungi Associated With
    Persoonia 39, 2017: 91–117 ISSN (Online) 1878-9080 www.ingentaconnect.com/content/nhn/pimj RESEARCH ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.3767/persoonia.2017.39.05 Phylogenetic placement within Lecanoromycetes of lichenicolous fungi associated with Cladonia and some other genera R. Pino-Bodas1,2, M.P. Zhurbenko3, S. Stenroos1 Key words Abstract Though most of the lichenicolous fungi belong to the Ascomycetes, their phylogenetic placement based on molecular data is lacking for numerous species. In this study the phylogenetic placement of 19 species of cladoniicolous species lichenicolous fungi was determined using four loci (LSU rDNA, SSU rDNA, ITS rDNA and mtSSU). The phylogenetic Pilocarpaceae analyses revealed that the studied lichenicolous fungi are widespread across the phylogeny of Lecanoromycetes. Protothelenellaceae One species is placed in Acarosporales, Sarcogyne sphaerospora; five species in Dactylosporaceae, Dactylo­ Scutula cladoniicola spora ahtii, D. deminuta, D. glaucoides, D. parasitica and Dactylospora sp.; four species belong to Lecanorales, Stictidaceae Lichenosticta alcicorniaria, Epicladonia simplex, E. stenospora and Scutula epiblastematica. The genus Epicladonia Stictis cladoniae is polyphyletic and the type E. sandstedei belongs to Leotiomycetes. Phaeopyxis punctum and Bachmanniomyces uncialicola form a well supported clade in the Ostropomycetidae. Epigloea soleiformis is related to Arthrorhaphis and Anzina. Four species are placed in Ostropales, Corticifraga peltigerae, Cryptodiscus epicladonia, C. galaninae and C. cladoniicola
    [Show full text]
  • Piedmont Lichen Inventory
    PIEDMONT LICHEN INVENTORY: BUILDING A LICHEN BIODIVERSITY BASELINE FOR THE PIEDMONT ECOREGION OF NORTH CAROLINA, USA By Gary B. Perlmutter B.S. Zoology, Humboldt State University, Arcata, CA 1991 A Thesis Submitted to the Staff of The North Carolina Botanical Garden University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Advisor: Dr. Johnny Randall As Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements For the Certificate in Native Plant Studies 15 May 2009 Perlmutter – Piedmont Lichen Inventory Page 2 This Final Project, whose results are reported herein with sections also published in the scientific literature, is dedicated to Daniel G. Perlmutter, who urged that I return to academia. And to Theresa, Nichole and Dakota, for putting up with my passion in lichenology, which brought them from southern California to the Traingle of North Carolina. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………….4 Chapter I: The North Carolina Lichen Checklist…………………………………………………7 Chapter II: Herbarium Surveys and Initiation of a New Lichen Collection in the University of North Carolina Herbarium (NCU)………………………………………………………..9 Chapter III: Preparatory Field Surveys I: Battle Park and Rock Cliff Farm……………………13 Chapter IV: Preparatory Field Surveys II: State Park Forays…………………………………..17 Chapter V: Lichen Biota of Mason Farm Biological Reserve………………………………….19 Chapter VI: Additional Piedmont Lichen Surveys: Uwharrie Mountains…………………...…22 Chapter VII: A Revised Lichen Inventory of North Carolina Piedmont …..…………………...23 Acknowledgements……………………………………………………………………………..72 Appendices………………………………………………………………………………….…..73 Perlmutter – Piedmont Lichen Inventory Page 4 INTRODUCTION Lichens are composite organisms, consisting of a fungus (the mycobiont) and a photosynthesising alga and/or cyanobacterium (the photobiont), which together make a life form that is distinct from either partner in isolation (Brodo et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstracts for IAL 6- ABLS Joint Meeting (2008)
    Abstracts for IAL 6- ABLS Joint Meeting (2008) AÐALSTEINSSON, KOLBEINN 1, HEIÐMARSSON, STARRI 2 and VILHELMSSON, ODDUR 1 1The University of Akureyri, Borgir Nordurslod, IS-600 Akureyri, Iceland, 2Icelandic Institute of Natural History, Akureyri Division, Borgir Nordurslod, IS-600 Akureyri, Iceland Isolation and characterization of non-phototrophic bacterial symbionts of Icelandic lichens Lichens are symbiotic organisms comprise an ascomycete mycobiont, an algal or cyanobacterial photobiont, and typically a host of other bacterial symbionts that in most cases have remained uncharacterized. In the current project, which focuses on the identification and preliminary characterization of these bacterial symbionts, the species composition of the resident associate microbiota of eleven species of lichen was investigated using both 16S rDNA sequencing of isolated bacteria growing in pure culture and Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis (DGGE) of the 16S-23S internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region amplified from DNA isolated directly from lichen samples. Gram-positive bacteria appear to be the most prevalent, especially actinomycetes, although bacilli were also observed. Gamma-proteobacteria and species from the Bacteroides/Chlorobi group were also observed. Among identified genera are Rhodococcus, Micrococcus, Microbacterium, Bacillus, Chryseobacterium, Pseudomonas, Sporosarcina, Agreia, Methylobacterium and Stenotrophomonas . Further characterization of selected strains indicated that most strains ar psychrophilic or borderline psychrophilic,
    [Show full text]
  • The Lichens and Allied Fungi of Mercer County, New Jersey
    Opuscula Philolichenum, 18: 17–51. 2019. *pdf effectively published online 15March2019 via (http://sweetgum.nybg.org/philolichenum/) The Lichens and Allied Fungi of Mercer County, New Jersey DENNIS P. WATERS1 AND JAMES C. LENDEMER2 ABSTRACT. – A checklist of the lichens and allied fungi from Mercer County, New Jersey, is presented. It was derived from inventories of 14 tracts of preserved and undeveloped land, which yielded 905 collections and 174 taxa. These include 37 new records for New Jersey, two of which, Catinaria neuschildii and Strangospora pinicola, have been rarely reported from North America. It also includes Agonimia flabelliformis, which is newly reported for North America from localities throughout the Appalachian and Ozark Mountains. Catillaria patteeana is described as new to science as well. These inventories demonstrate that substantial lichen diversity remains undiscovered even in densely populated regions of the Mid-Atlantic characterized by highly fragmented and disturbed natural landscapes with relatively small areas of unaltered, contiguous core-natural habitat. KEYWORDS. – Biogeography, Coastal Plain, diabase, floristics, Piedmont, rare species, species- richness, symbiosis. INTRODUCTION Mercer County is located in central New Jersey, bounded on the west by the Delaware River (Fig. 1). It is home to the New Jersey state capital, Trenton, including the New Jersey State Museum and the New Jersey Geological Survey. Princeton University, the Institute for Advanced Study, Rider University, The College of New Jersey, and Thomas Edison State University are also within its boundaries. Despite this scientific and political infrastructure, and its central location on the New York-Philadelphia corridor, the lichen biota of the county has been poorly documented.
    [Show full text]
  • Jamesiella Scotica New to North America from USA, Alaska
    Folia Cryptog. Estonica, Fasc. 53: 23–24 (2016) http://dx.doi.org/10.12697/fce.2016.53.03 Jamesiella scotica new to North America from USA, Alaska Tor Tønsberg Department of Natural History, University Museum, University of Bergen, N-5020 Bergen, Norway Email: [email protected] Abstract: Jamesiella scotica is reported new to North America from Kenai Fjords National Park in Alaska. It was found on live and moribund leaves of the bryophyte Paraleucobryum longifolium on sea-shore rocks just above high tide line. Keywords: lichen, Kenai Fjords National Park, new species, sea shore INTRODUCTION During field work in Kenai Fjords National Park, and live bryophyte leaves of Paraleucobryum SW of Anchorage in Alaska, U.S.A, in July 2015, longifolium (Hedw.) Loeske on a thin layer of I collected a specimen of Massalongia carnosa humus. It was collected from the upper, flat (Dicks.) Körb. Later, when I was processing the part of a low boulder on sea-shore granitic rock specimen, I realized that the Massalongia was just between the upper tide line and a fringe of associated with a specimen of Jamesiella scotica Alnus viridis. Juvenile hyphophores were more (P. James) Lücking, Sérus. & Vězda. As this spe- or less colourless and translucent, whereas well- cies appears to be new to North America (see Es- developed ones were reddish brown and up to slinger 2015) it is further commented on below. 0.12 mm wide and tall. The inner part supported some scattered and clustered algal cells. Close Jamesiella Lücking, Sérus. & Vězda is a recently associates of lichens were Massalongia carnosa, described genus of four species (Lücking et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Lichens of the Golfo Dulce Region.Pdf
    Natural and Cultural History of the Golfo Dulce Region, Costa Rica Historia natural y cultural de la región del Golfo Dulce, Costa Rica Anton WEISSENHOFER , Werner HUBER , Veronika MAYER , Susanne PAMPERL , Anton WEBER , Gerhard AUBRECHT (scientific editors) Impressum Katalog / Publication: Stapfia 88 , Zugleich Kataloge der Oberösterreichischen Landesmuseen N.S. 80 ISSN: 0252-192X ISBN: 978-3-85474-195-4 Erscheinungsdatum / Date of deliVerY: 9. Oktober 2008 Medieninhaber und Herausgeber / CopYright: Land Oberösterreich, Oberösterreichische Landesmuseen, Museumstr.14, A-4020 LinZ Direktion: Mag. Dr. Peter Assmann Leitung BiologieZentrum: Dr. Gerhard Aubrecht Url: http://WWW.biologieZentrum.at E-Mail: [email protected] In Kooperation mit dem Verein Zur Förderung der Tropenstation La Gamba (WWW.lagamba.at). Wissenschaftliche Redaktion / Scientific editors: Anton Weissenhofer, Werner Huber, Veronika MaYer, Susanne Pamperl, Anton Weber, Gerhard Aubrecht Redaktionsassistent / Assistant editor: FritZ Gusenleitner LaYout, Druckorganisation / LaYout, printing organisation: EVa Rührnößl Druck / Printing: Plöchl-Druck, Werndlstraße 2, 4240 Freistadt, Austria Bestellung / Ordering: http://WWW.biologieZentrum.at/biophp/de/stapfia.php oder / or [email protected] Das Werk einschließlich aller seiner Teile ist urheberrechtlich geschütZt. Jede VerWertung außerhalb der en - gen GrenZen des UrheberrechtsgesetZes ist ohne Zustimmung des Medieninhabers unZulässig und strafbar. Das gilt insbesondere für VerVielfältigungen, ÜbersetZungen, MikroVerfilmungen soWie die Einspeicherung und Verarbeitung in elektronischen SYstemen. Für den Inhalt der Abhandlungen sind die Verfasser Verant - Wortlich. Schriftentausch erWünscht! All rights reserVed. No part of this publication maY be reproduced or transmitted in anY form or bY anY me - ans Without prior permission from the publisher. We are interested in an eXchange of publications. Umschlagfoto / CoVer: Blattschneiderameisen. Photo: AleXander Schneider.
    [Show full text]
  • Gyalideopsis Pusilla (Gomphillaceae, Lichenized Ascomycetes), a New Species from Southeastern North America
    North American Fungi Volume 11, Number 7, Pages 1-4 Published November 9, 2016 Gyalideopsis pusilla (Gomphillaceae, lichenized Ascomycetes), a new species from southeastern North America Robert Lücking1, Tor Tønsberg2 1Kustos, Kryptogamen, Botanischer Garten und Botanisches Museum Berlin, Königin-Luise-Strasse 6-8, 14195 Berlin, Deutschland. email: [email protected]; 2Department of Natural History, University Museum, University of Bergen, Allégaten 41, P.O. Box 7800, N-5020 Bergen, Norway. email: [email protected] Lücking, R., and T. Tønsberg. 2016. Gyalideopsis pusilla (Gomphillaceae, lichenized Ascomycetes), a new species from southeastern North America. North American Fungi 11(8): 1-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.2509/naf2016.011.007 Corresponding author: Tor Tønsberg ([email protected]). Accepted for publication November 2, 2016 http://pnwfungi.org Copyright © 2016 Pacific Northwest Fungi Project. All rights reserved. Abstract: Gyalideopsis pusilla Lücking & Tønsberg is described as new to science from U.S.A., Tennessee, the Great Smoky Mountains National Park in the Southern Appalachian Mountains, where it was foliicolous on Rhododendron maximum. It is distinguished from other Gyalideopsis species by the combination of very small, usually 3-septate ascospores, short, setiform hyphophores with filiform, non-septate diahyphae, and foliicolous habit. Key words: Appalachian mountains, Great Smoky Mountains National Park, Gyalideopsis, new species, Southeastern North America, Tennessee. 2 Lücking & Tønsberg. Gyalideopsis pusilla. North American Fungi 11(8): 1-4 Introduction: Field work in the Great Smoky usually formed singly in the center of individual Mountain National Park by the second author in thallus patches, erumpent, regularly rounded, 2006 yielded material of a Gyalideopsis species 0.1–0.15 mm diam.
    [Show full text]
  • (215)-801-6948 Education: Phd, City
    JAMES C. LENDEMER INSTITUTE OF SYSTEMATIC BOTANY THE NEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN BRONX, NY, 10458-5126, USA E-MAIL: [email protected] PHONE: (1)-(215)-801-6948 Education: PhD, City University of New York 2007-present Biology: Plant Sciences Bachelor of Arts, University of Pennsylvania 2002-2006 Biology Appointments: 2003-2007 Student Research Associate, The Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 2004 Curatorial Associate, Lichen Herbarium, Arizona State University (Tempe, AZ; functioned as collection manager of ASU-Lichen Herbarium) 2006 McHenry Fellow, The Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 2006 3 mo. Research Fellow, The Field Museum of Natural History 2007-present Graduate Research Associate, The Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 2007-2009 Research Fellow, City University of New York (GC-CUNY) 2007-2012 Research Fellow, The New York Botanical Garden (NYBG) Professional Experience: 2000-2003 Researcher/Curatorial Assistant, Department of Botany, The Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 2003-2006 Student Research Associate, Department of Botany, The Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 2004 Curatorial Associate, Lichen Herbarium, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States 2006 Photographer & Collector for Lichen Flora of the Ozarks, New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY, United States 2006 Curatorial Assistant, Department of Botany, The Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia Editorial & Publishing Experience: 2003-present Editor/Curator, Lichens of Eastern North America Exsiccati (issued
    [Show full text]
  • The Lichens of the Alps – an Annotated Checklist
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal MycoKeys 31: 1–634 (2018) The lichens of the Alps - an annotated checklist 1 doi: 10.3897/mycokeys.31.23658 MONOGRAPH MycoKeys http://mycokeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research The lichens of the Alps – an annotated checklist Pier Luigi Nimis1, Josef Hafellner2, Claude Roux3, Philippe Clerc4, Helmut Mayrhofer2, Stefano Martellos1, Peter O. Bilovitz2 1 Department of Life Sciences, University of Trieste, Via L. Giorgieri 10, 34127 Trieste, Italy 2 Institute of Plant Sciences, NAWI Graz, University of Graz, Holteigasse 6, 8010 Graz, Austria 3 Chemin des Vignes- Vieilles, 84120 Mirabeau, France 4 Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, 1 chemin de l’Impératrice, 1292 Chambésy/GE, Switzerland Corresponding author: Helmut Mayrhofer ([email protected]) Academic editor: H.T. Lumbsch | Received 11 January 2018 | Accepted 6 February 2018 | Published 12 March 2018 Citation: Nimis PL, Hafellner J, Roux C, Clerc P, Mayrhofer H, Martellos S, Bilovitz PO (2018) The lichens of the Alps – an annotated checklist. MycoKeys 31: 1–634. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.31.23568 Abstract This is the first attempt to provide an overview of the lichen diversity of the Alps, one of the biogegraphi- cally most important and emblematic mountain systems worldwide. The checklist includes all lichenised species, plus a set of non- or doubtfully lichenised taxa frequently treated by lichenologists, excluding non- lichenised lichenicolous fungi. Largely based on recent national or regional checklists, it provides a list of all infrageneric taxa (with synonyms) hitherto reported from the Alps, with data on their distribution in eight countries (Austria, France, Germany, Liechtenstein, Monaco, Italy, Slovenia, Switzerland) and in 42 Operational Geographic Units, mostly corresponding to administrative subdivisions within the countries.
    [Show full text]