DOCSLIB.ORG

The Pacific Oyster (Crassostrea Gigas) in the UK: Economic, Legal and Environmental Issues Associated with Its Cultivation, Wild Establishment and Exploitation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Pacific Oyster (Crassostrea Gigas) in the UK: Economic, Legal and Environmental Issues Associated with Its Cultivation, Wild Establishment and Exploitation The Pacific Oyster (Crassostrea gigas) in the UK: Economic, Legal and Environmental Issues Associated with its Cultivation, Wild Establishment and Exploitation Report for the Shellfish Association of Great Britain Final: October 2012 The Pacific Oyster (Crassostrea gigas) in the UK: Economic, Legal and Environmental Issues Associated with its Cultivation, Wild Establishment and Exploitation Prepared by: Centre for Conservation Ecology & Environmental Science Bournemouth University Christchurch House Talbot Campus Fern Barrow Poole Dorset BH12 5BB ABP Marine Environmental Research Ltd Quayside Suite Medina Chambers Town Quay Southampton Hampshire SO14 2AQ Jhc research Prospect Cottage Happy Bottom Corfe Mullen Dorset BH21 3DP Plymouth University Centre for Marine and Coastal Policy Research Plymouth University Reynolds Building Drake Circus Plymouth PL4 8AA Suggested Citation: Herbert, R.J.H., Roberts, C., Humphreys, J. and Fletcher, S., 2012. The Pacific Oyster (Crassostrea gigas) in the UK: Economic, Legal and Environmental Issues Associated with its Cultivation, Wild Establishment and Exploitation. Report for the Shellfish Association of Great Britain. (i) The Pacific Oyster (Crassostrea gigas) in the UK: Economic, Legal and Environmental Issues Associated with its Cultivation, Wild Establishment and Exploitation Summary Introduction and Methods 1. This paper presents an independent review of current economic, legal and environmental issues pertaining to the Pacific oyster (Crassostrea gigas) industry in the UK. The study was commissioned by the Shellfish Association of Great Britain (SAGB) and a steering group consisting of industry members and regulatory agencies. The study draws on evidence from comparable temperate regions around the world where Pacific oysters are grown and from UK and European stakeholders, industry, growers and regulators. 2. Although legally cultivated, wild Pacific oysters are classified as an invasive non-native species in the UK and the impetus for this study has been the ecological risk associated with the growth of wild populations of Pacific oysters as a result of rising sea temperatures caused by climate change. On the continent, the recent growth of wild populations has resulted in ‘reef’ formation which has displaced or modified habitat protected under EU Habitats legislation. There are concerns that this could also happen in the UK, resulting in protected areas not meeting favourable ecological condition status. Currently the UK Technical Advisory Group (UKTAG) has classified the species on the Water Framework Directive (WFD) ‘high impact list’, although a proposal has recently been made by UKTAG to move the species to a ‘moderate impact list’. An independent risk assessment commissioned by the GB Non Native Species Secretariat (NNSS) concluded that the species presents a ‘medium risk’. 3. These environmental concerns have created uncertainty over the future of UK Pacific oyster cultivation. Appropriate Assessments related to new Pacific oyster aquaculture licences have repeatedly failed to satisfy regulators that measures and mitigation have been put in place to reduce the ecological risks associated with wild settlement. Yet UK marine policy now includes a presumption in favour of sustainable development and there is a desire amongst stakeholders and regulators to promote the sustainable development of the industry. 4. A systematic (i.e. repeatable) review of evidence in the literature pertaining to all aspects of the study was conducted. In addition, a questionnaire was sent to all members of the SAGB and to all Mollusc Aquaculture Production Businesses (APBs) within England and Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland. A separate questionnaire was sent to the Inshore Fisheries and Conservation Authorities (IFCAs) to gather up-to-date information on wild settlement and management measures. Information on the cultivation and production processes was obtained during site visits, as were figures used to estimate the economic contribution of the species. Expert opinion was also sought from a wide range of other institutions and organisations. Cultivation and Economic Value 1. The risk of industry decline in the wake of uncertainty has prompted this review to provide a broad estimate of the economic value of the Pacific oyster industry in the UK and to review the beneficial ecosystem processes and services, including food production that wild settlement of Pacific oysters might provide. (ii) The Pacific Oyster (Crassostrea gigas) in the UK: Economic, Legal and Environmental Issues Associated with its Cultivation, Wild Establishment and Exploitation 2. The distinct cultivation and purification stages in the production of Pacific oysters suitable for consumption are reflected in a market structure in which individual companies may be involved in one or more of these processes. While some aquaculture and fishing companies also have depuration operations, others sell on to companies that combine depuration and wholesale functions in the value chain. In some cases single companies (or groups with common or overlapping ownership) combine aquaculture and depuration with wholesale operations and even restaurants, thereby retaining most, or even all, of the value chain components within a single enterprise. 3. Around 1,200 tonnes of Pacific oysters are produced each year in the UK of which it is estimated that 67% is exported across the globe from France to south-east Asia. Based on 2011/12 prices and an analysis of the value chain, the total economic contribution as GVA (Gross Value Added), including indirect and induced effects, is estimated at £10.137 million. This value does not include seed production. 4. In addition to economic benefits, the case for long term growth in UK production is supported by strategic considerations including both food security and public health, particularly in the context of growing populations and the over- exploitation and plateauing of wild fisheries production. 5. With a large worldwide market, international demand will remain the key driver for British oyster production in the foreseeable future, and in this respect the comparatively low level of current UK production in comparison to neighbouring countries suggests that increasing market share, rather than just meeting growing demand, might provide a plausible component of business plans. Yet the fact that the 19th century British oyster boom was fuelled mainly by British consumption, along with hints from retail sales patterns, suggest significant growth in home consumption is feasible given appropriate marketing. 6. An extensive literature review provided evidence that wild Pacific oysters might provide beneficial ecosystem processes and services, in addition to food production via aquaculture, although these benefits are most likely to be associated with ‘reef’ formation that would only develop if wild settlement was particularly high. Relatively few studies have been carried out on wild Pacific oyster reefs, however some evidence was found for Crassostrea species (including C. gigas), although the beneficial characteristics and attributes of particular oyster species are likely to differ. 7. Collectively the beneficial ecosystem processes include biological control, formation of species habitat, formation of physical barriers (that attenuate the energy of water flow), erosion control, climate regulation and water purification. Biogeochemical cycling is an assumed beneficial ecosystem process based on the species’ water filtration function. Beneficial ecosystem services include fisheries, other wild harvesting, aquaculture, cultch materials (shells) and construction materials (shells). Other inferred beneficial ecosystem services are natural hazard protection, environmental resilience and pollution regulation. 8. With respect to the societal benefit of food provision, it is clear that on the south-east coast of England, the colonisation of C. gigas has enabled the survival of the oyster industry from income arising from the management of this additional resource. However, no other ecological or societal benefits that may arise from the development of C. gigas reefs or the use of C. gigas individuals (in the case of research and education) were found to be unique and these services are already being provided to some extent by other habitats. (iii) The Pacific Oyster (Crassostrea gigas) in the UK: Economic, Legal and Environmental Issues Associated with its Cultivation, Wild Establishment and Exploitation Origins of Larval Settlement 1. The first introduction of Crassostrea gigas to British waters can reliably be dated to 1890 or before and commercial importation of the Pacific oyster seed continued from 1926 until 1962. Although by 1965 the species was thought to have died out, it was known to be capable of “limited breeding” in the creeks of Essex and Kent and may have persisted in the Blackwater at least until 1970. 2. Although it has long been known that the species could episodically spawn in British waters, even as recently as 2002, the Pacific oyster was considered unlikely to be able to establish self- sustaining populations in the UK. However, although there is still a high level of uncertainty, current sea temperature projections are thought likely to result in certain non-native species, including C. gigas, recruiting every year in south-west England, Wales and Northern Ireland by 2040. An analysis of the effect of rising temperatures, under a medium emissions scenario, on the distribution of C.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Quick Guide to Cooking with Ausab Abalone in Brine
    A Quick Guide to Cooking With Ausab Abalone in Brine Ausab Canned Abalone is a versatile product that requires minimal effort to create the perfect meal at home. The abalone is completely cleaned and cooked, and ready to eat. With a unique umami flavor, it can be used in many different ways. The meat is smooth and tender, and the perfect balance between sweet and salty. Ensure the canned abalone is stored in a well ventilated, cool place out of direct sunlight. How to Prepare the Abalone The abalone is canned, ready to eat with mouth attached. To preserve it’s tender texture, it is best to use the abalone when just heated through. This can be achieved by using the abalone at the end of cooking, or slowly heated in the can. To safely heat the abalone in it’s can follow these steps: 1. Leave the can unopened and remove all labels. 2. Place the can into a pot of water so that it is fully submerged and is horizontal. 3. Bring the water to a gentle simmer and leave submerged for 15 – 20 minutes. 4. Remove the pot from the heat and wait for the water to cool before carefully lifting the can out of the water with large tongs. 5. Open the can once it is cool enough to handle. 6. The abalone can be served whole or sliced thinly. Abalone Recipes Ausab Canned Abalone can be pan fried, used in soups or grilled. Teriyaki Abalone Serves 4 1 x Ausab Canned Abalone in Brine 250ml Light Soy Sauce 200ml Mirin 200ml Sake 60g Sugar 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Diseases Affecting Finfish
    Diseases Affecting Finfish Legislation Ireland's Exotic / Disease Name Acronym Health Susceptible Species Vector Species Non-Exotic Listed National Status Disease Measures Bighead carp (Aristichthys nobilis), goldfish (Carassius auratus), crucian carp (C. carassius), Epizootic Declared Rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss), redfin common carp and koi carp (Cyprinus carpio), silver carp (Hypophtalmichthys molitrix), Haematopoietic EHN Exotic * Disease-Free perch (Percha fluviatilis) Chub (Leuciscus spp), Roach (Rutilus rutilus), Rudd (Scardinius erythrophthalmus), tench Necrosis (Tinca tinca) Beluga (Huso huso), Danube sturgeon (Acipenser gueldenstaedtii), Sterlet sturgeon (Acipenser ruthenus), Starry sturgeon (Acipenser stellatus), Sturgeon (Acipenser sturio), Siberian Sturgeon (Acipenser Baerii), Bighead carp (Aristichthys nobilis), goldfish (Carassius auratus), Crucian carp (C. carassius), common carp and koi carp (Cyprinus carpio), silver carp (Hypophtalmichthys molitrix), Chub (Leuciscus spp), Roach (Rutilus rutilus), Rudd (Scardinius erythrophthalmus), tench (Tinca tinca) Herring (Cupea spp.), whitefish (Coregonus sp.), North African catfish (Clarias gariepinus), Northern pike (Esox lucius) Catfish (Ictalurus pike (Esox Lucius), haddock (Gadus aeglefinus), spp.), Black bullhead (Ameiurus melas), Channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus), Pangas Pacific cod (G. macrocephalus), Atlantic cod (G. catfish (Pangasius pangasius), Pike perch (Sander lucioperca), Wels catfish (Silurus glanis) morhua), Pacific salmon (Onchorhynchus spp.), Viral
    [Show full text]
  • How You Can Help Restore Water Quality & Our Native Oyster!
    Oyster Gardening: How You Can Help Restore Water Quality & Our Native Oyster! Chesapeake Bay Foundation Tommy Leggett, Chris Moore, Jackie Harmon Chesapeake Bay Foundation • Mission – “Save the Bay” • 200,240 Members • 165 Employees • CBF Works to Save the Bay through – Environmental Education – Environmental Protection – Environmental Restoration Hampton Roads Office - cbf.org/hamptonroads •Food Oysters • Filter • Habitat 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 0 Virginia OysterLandings1880 - 2001 1880 1884 1888 1892 1896 1900 1904 Over Harvesting 1908 (1000s ofbushels) 1912 1916 1920 1924 1928 1932 1936 1940 1944 1948 1953 1957 1961 Slide adapted from VirginiaInstitutefrom Slide of adapted MSX 1965 1969 1973 1977 Dermo 1981 1985 1989 Marine Science (Stan Allen)presentati Marine Science 1993 1997 2001 2006 2010 2014 Oyster Biology • Oysters are a bivalve (2 shells) mollusk • They mature at age 1 and spawn several times each summer as long as they live • They start their lives as MALES and may become FEMALE as they get older and larger • The bigger they are, the more eggs they produce – a 3” female can produce 30 million eggs. A 3.5” oyster can produce TWICE that many! • The only time they are mobile is as microscopic larvae during their first two – three weeks of life • A single 3” oyster can filter up to 50 gallons of water in a single summer day • Oysters were once abundant enough to filter the volume of Chesapeake Bay in less than a week Aggressive Restoration is the Key! 2010 goal is for a 10X increase in native oyster biomass Strategy
    [Show full text]
  • Optimization of in Vitro Fertilization Using Cryopreserved Sperm of Crassostrea Angulata and Establishment of a Cryopreservation Protocol for Chamelea Gallina
    Ana Luísa Lopes Santos Optimization of in vitro fertilization using cryopreserved sperm of Crassostrea angulata and establishment of a cryopreservation protocol for Chamelea gallina UNIVERSIDADE DO ALGARVE FACULDADE DE CIÊNCIAS E TECNOLOGIA 2018 Ana Luísa Lopes Santos Optimization of in vitro fertilization using cryopreserved sperm of Crassostrea angulata and establishment of a cryopreservation protocol for Chamelea gallina Thesis for Master Degree in Aquaculture and Fisheries Specialization Aquaculture Thesis supervision by: Professora Doutora Elsa Cabrita, CCMAR, Universidade do Algarve Dra Catarina Anjos, CCMAR, Universidade do Algarve UNIVERSIDADE DO ALGARVE FACULDADE DE CIÊNCIAS E TECNOLOGIA 2018 ii “Declaro ser a autora deste trabalho, que é original e inédito. Autores e trabalhos consultados estão devidamente citados no texto e constam da listagem de referências incluída.” ________________________________________________ Ana Luísa Lopes Santos Copyright © “A Universidade do Algarve tem o direito, perpétuo e sem limites geográficos, de arquivar e publicitar este trabalho através de exemplares impressos reproduzidos em papel ou de forma digital, ou por qualquer outro meio conhecido ou que venha a ser inventado, de o divulgar através de repositórios científicos e de admitir a sua cópia e distribuição com objetivos educacionais ou de investigação, não comerciais, desde que seja dado crédito ao autor e editor.” iii Eles não sabem, nem sonham, que o sonho comanda a vida, que sempre que um homem sonha o mundo pula e avança como bola colorida entre as mãos de uma criança.” António Gedeão iv This work was supported by VENUS Project (0139_VENUS_5_E) “Estudio Integral de los bancos naturales de moluscos bivalvos en el Golfo de Cádiz para su gestión sostenible y la conservación de sus hábitats asociados”.
    [Show full text]
  • OHA Issues Advisory for Softshell Clams Along Oregon Coast Removing Skin from Clam’S Siphon Dramatically Reduces Arsenic Levels, Public Health Officials Say
    EDITORS: Oregon Public Health Division staff members will be available for interviews from 4 p.m. to 4:30 p.m. TODAY (July 13) in Room 1-A (first floor), Portland State Office Building, 800 NE Oregon St. July 13, 2015 Media contact: Jonathan Modie, 971-246-9139, [email protected] OHA issues advisory for softshell clams along Oregon Coast Removing skin from clam’s siphon dramatically reduces arsenic levels, public health officials say The Oregon Health Authority is issuing a health advisory for the length of the Oregon Coast for softshell clams because they contain high levels of naturally occurring arsenic. The advisory is most important for people who dig their own clams and target the specific species Mya arenaria, since these clams are not commercially available in markets or restaurants. The advisory, issued today by the OHA Public Health Division, recommends removing the skin from the siphon, or “neck,” of softshell clams before eating them. Softshell clams are found primarily in estuary and intertidal regions of the Oregon coast. This advisory stems from tests the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality performed on a variety of shellfish species collected along the Oregon coast as part of its Water Quality Toxics Monitoring Program. DEQ’s tests found that when analyzed whole without the shell, softshell clams contained unusually high levels of inorganic arsenic. Most of the arsenic was concentrated in the skin covering the clam’s siphon. Researchers found that by removing the skin covering the siphon before eating, the arsenic can be greatly reduced, to levels that are not harmful.
    [Show full text]
  • Olympia Oyster (Ostrea Lurida)
    COSEWIC Assessment and Status Report on the Olympia Oyster Ostrea lurida in Canada SPECIAL CONCERN 2011 COSEWIC status reports are working documents used in assigning the status of wildlife species suspected of being at risk. This report may be cited as follows: COSEWIC. 2011. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Olympia Oyster Ostrea lurida in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. xi + 56 pp. (www.sararegistry.gc.ca/status/status_e.cfm). Previous report(s): COSEWIC. 2000. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Olympia Oyster Ostrea conchaphila in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. vii + 30 pp. (www.sararegistry.gc.ca/status/status_e.cfm) Gillespie, G.E. 2000. COSEWIC status report on the Olympia Oyster Ostrea conchaphila in Canada in COSEWIC assessment and update status report on the Olympia Oyster Ostrea conchaphila in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. 1-30 pp. Production note: COSEWIC acknowledges Graham E. Gillespie for writing the provisional status report on the Olympia Oyster, Ostrea lurida, prepared under contract with Environment Canada and Fisheries and Oceans Canada. The contractor’s involvement with the writing of the status report ended with the acceptance of the provisional report. Any modifications to the status report during the subsequent preparation of the 6-month interim and 2-month interim status reports were overseen by Robert Forsyth and Dr. Gerald Mackie, COSEWIC Molluscs Specialist Subcommittee Co-Chair. For additional copies contact: COSEWIC Secretariat c/o Canadian Wildlife Service Environment Canada Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3 Tel.: 819-953-3215 Fax: 819-994-3684 E-mail: COSEWIC/[email protected] http://www.cosewic.gc.ca Également disponible en français sous le titre Ếvaluation et Rapport de situation du COSEPAC sur l’huître plate du Pacifique (Ostrea lurida) au Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of the Aquacultural Potential of the Portuguese Oyster Crassostrea Angulata
    Assessment of the aquacultural potential of the Portuguese oyster Crassostrea angulata Frederico Miguel Mota Batista Dissertação de doutoramento em Ciências do Meio Aquático 2007 Frederico Miguel Mota Batista Assessment of the aquacultural potential of the Portuguese oyster Crassostrea angulata Dissertação de Candidatura ao grau de Doutor em Ciências do Meio Aquático submetida ao Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas de Abel Salazar da Universidade do Porto. Orientador – Doutor Pierre Boudry Categoria – Investigador Afiliação – “Institut Français de Recherche pour l’Exploitation de la Mer” Co-orientador – Professora Doutora Maria Armanda Henriques Categoria –Professora catedrática Afiliação – Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar da Universidade do Porto. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First of all, I would like to thank Dr. Pierre Boudry for accepting to supervise this work, for your commitment and for providing me all conditions that made possible this work. Thank you also for your guidance and at the same time for giving me the freedom to make my own decisions which helped me to become a more independent researcher. Gostaria de agradecer à minha co-orientadora, a Professora Doutora Maria Armanda Henriques por me ter aceite como seu aluno de doutoramento e pela disponibilidade. Gostaria de agradecer ao Dr. Carlos Costa Monteiro por ter permitido a realização de parte deste trabalho na estação experimental de moluscicultura de Tavira do Instituto Nacional de Investigação Agrária e das Pescas (INIAP/IPIMAR). Gostaria também de agradecer-lhe pela disponibilidade e incentivo durante o desenrolar do doutoramento. Je remercie Dr. Philippe Goulletquer et Dr. Tristan Renault pour m’avoir accueillie au sein du Laboratoire de Génétique et Pathologie de la Station de La Tremblade de l’Institut Français de Recherche pour l’Exploitation de la Mer (IFREMER).
    [Show full text]
  • Spisula Solidissima) Using a Spatially Northeastern Continental Shelf of the United States
    300 Abstract—The commercially valu- able Atlantic surfclam (Spisula so- Management strategy evaluation for the Atlantic lidissima) is harvested along the surfclam (Spisula solidissima) using a spatially northeastern continental shelf of the United States. Its range has con- explicit, vessel-based fisheries model tracted and shifted north, driven by warmer bottom water temperatures. 1 Declining landings per unit of effort Kelsey M. Kuykendall (contact author) (LPUE) in the Mid-Atlantic Bight Eric N. Powell1 (MAB) is one result. Declining stock John M. Klinck2 abundance and LPUE suggest that 1 overfishing may be occurring off Paula T. Moreno New Jersey. A management strategy Robert T. Leaf1 evaluation (MSE) for the Atlantic surfclam is implemented to evalu- Email address for contact author: [email protected] ate rotating closures to enhance At- lantic surfclam productivity and in- 1 Gulf Coast Research Laboratory crease fishery viability in the MAB. The University of Southern Mississippi Active agents of the MSE model 703 East Beach Drive are individual fishing vessels with Ocean Springs, Mississippi 39564 performance and quota constraints 2 Center for Coastal Physical Oceanography influenced by captains’ behavior Department of Ocean, Earth, and Atmospheric Sciences over a spatially varying population. 4111 Monarch Way, 3rd Floor Management alternatives include Old Dominion University 2 rules regarding closure locations Norfolk, Virginia 23529 and 3 rules regarding closure du- rations. Simulations showed that stock biomass increased, up to 17%, under most alternative strategies in relation to estimated stock biomass under present-day management, and The Atlantic surfclam (Spisula solid- ally not found where average bottom LPUE increased under most alterna- issima) is an economically valuable temperatures exceed 25°C (Cargnelli tive strategies, by up to 21%.
    [Show full text]
  • Impacts of Shellfish Aquaculture on the Environment
    Shellfish Industry Development Strategy A Case for Considering MSC Certification for Shellfish Cultivation Operations April 2008 CONTENTS Page Executive Summary 3 Introduction 5 Mollusc Cultivation Mussel Cultivation Bottom Culture 6 Spat Collection 6 Harvesting 7 Suspended Culture 7 Longline Culture 8 Pole Culture 8 Raft Culture 9 Spat Collection 10 Environmental Impacts 11 Scallop Cultivation Japanese Method 13 New Zealand Methods 15 Scottish Methods 15 Environmental Impacts 16 Abalone Cultivation 16 Hatchery Production 17 Sea Culture 17 Diet 18 Environmental Impacts 19 Clam Cultivation 19 Seed Procurement 20 Manila Clams 20 Blood Cockles 20 Razor Clams 21 Siting of Grow Out Plots 21 Environmental Impacts 21 Oyster Cultivation 23 Flat Oysters 24 Cupped Oysters 24 Hanging Culture 24 Raft Culture 24 Longline Culture 25 Rock Culture 25 Stake Culture 25 Trestle Culture 25 Stick Culture 26 1 Ground Culture 26 Environmental Impacts 27 Crustacean Culture Clawed Lobsters Broodstock 29 Spawning 29 Hatching 29 Larval Culture 30 Nursery Culture 30 On-Growing 31 Ranching 31 Environmental Impacts 32 Spiny Lobsters 32 Broodstock and Spawning 33 Larval Culture 33 On-Growing 33 Environmental Impacts 34 Crab Cultivation Broodstock and Larvae 34 Nursery Culture 35 On-growing 35 Soft Shell Crab Production 36 Environmental Impacts 36 Conclusions 37 Acknowledgements 40 References 40 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The current trend within the seafood industry is a focus on traceability and sustainability with consumers and retailers becoming more concerned about the over-exploitation of our oceans. The Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) has a sustainability certification scheme for wild capture fisheries. Currently there is no certification scheme for products from enhanced fisheries1 and aquaculture2.
    [Show full text]
  • A Regional Shellfish Hatchery for the Wider Caribbean Assessing Its Feasibility and Sustainability
    FAO ISSN 2070-6103 19 FISHERIES AND AQUACULTURE PROCEEDINGS FAO FISHERIES AND AQUACULTURE PROCEEDINGS 19 19 A regional shellfish hatchery for the Wider Caribbean Assessing its feasibility and sustainability A regional shellfish hatchery for the Wider Caribbean – Assessing its feasibility and sustainability A regional FAO Regional Technical Workshop A regional shellfish hatchery for 18–21 October 2010 Kingston, Jamaica the Wider Caribbean It is widely recognized that the development of aquaculture in Assessing its feasibility and sustainability the Wider Caribbean Region is inhibited, in part, by the lack of technical expertise, infrastructure, capital investment and human resources. Furthermore, seed supply for native species FAO Regional Technical Workshop relies, for the most part, on natural collection, subject to 18–21 October 2010 natural population abundance with wide yearly variations. This Kingston, Jamaica situation has led to the current trend of culturing more readily available exotic species, but with a potentially undesirable impact on the natural environment. The centralizing of resources available in the region into a shared facility has been recommended by several expert meetings over the past 20 years. The establishment of a regional hatchery facility, supporting sustainable aquaculture through the seed production of native molluscan species was discussed at the FAO workshop “Regional shellfish hatchery: A feasibility study” held in Kingston, Jamaica, in October 2010, by representatives of Caribbean Governments and experts in the field. Molluscan species are particularly targeted due to their culture potential in terms of known techniques, simple grow-out technology and low impact on surrounding environment. It is proposed that a regional molluscan hatchery would produce seed for sale and distribution to grow-out operations in the region as well as provide technical support for the research on new species.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter Bibliography
    VU Research Portal Pacific oysters and parasites Goedknegt, M.A. 2017 document version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link to publication in VU Research Portal citation for published version (APA) Goedknegt, M. A. (2017). Pacific oysters and parasites: Species invasions and their impact on parasite-host interactions. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal ? Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. E-mail address: [email protected] Download date: 02. Oct. 2021 Bibliography Bibliography A Abrams, P. A. (1995) Implications of dynamically variable traits for identifying, classifying and measuring direct and indirect effects in ecological communities. The American Naturalist 146:112-134. Aguirre-Macedo, M. L., Kennedy, C. R. (1999) Diversity of metazoan parasites of the introduced oyster species Crassostrea gigas in the Exe estuary. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the UK 79:57-63. Aguirre-Macedo, M. L., Vidal-Martinez, V.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Species Delimitation and Biogeography of Canadian Marine Planktonic Crustaceans
    Molecular Species Delimitation and Biogeography of Canadian Marine Planktonic Crustaceans by Robert George Young A Thesis presented to The University of Guelph In partial fulfilment of requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Integrative Biology Guelph, Ontario, Canada © Robert George Young, March, 2016 ABSTRACT MOLECULAR SPECIES DELIMITATION AND BIOGEOGRAPHY OF CANADIAN MARINE PLANKTONIC CRUSTACEANS Robert George Young Advisors: University of Guelph, 2016 Dr. Sarah Adamowicz Dr. Cathryn Abbott Zooplankton are a major component of the marine environment in both diversity and biomass and are a crucial source of nutrients for organisms at higher trophic levels. Unfortunately, marine zooplankton biodiversity is not well known because of difficult morphological identifications and lack of taxonomic experts for many groups. In addition, the large taxonomic diversity present in plankton and low sampling coverage pose challenges in obtaining a better understanding of true zooplankton diversity. Molecular identification tools, like DNA barcoding, have been successfully used to identify marine planktonic specimens to a species. However, the behaviour of methods for specimen identification and species delimitation remain untested for taxonomically diverse and widely-distributed marine zooplanktonic groups. Using Canadian marine planktonic crustacean collections, I generated a multi-gene data set including COI-5P and 18S-V4 molecular markers of morphologically-identified Copepoda and Thecostraca (Multicrustacea: Hexanauplia) species. I used this data set to assess generalities in the genetic divergence patterns and to determine if a barcode gap exists separating interspecific and intraspecific molecular divergences, which can reliably delimit specimens into species. I then used this information to evaluate the North Pacific, Arctic, and North Atlantic biogeography of marine Calanoida (Hexanauplia: Copepoda) plankton.
    [Show full text]