The Trip from Bursa to Edi̇rne to Join Him, He Agreed to Leave Him with the Grand Vizier

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Trip from Bursa to Edi̇rne to Join Him, He Agreed to Leave Him with the Grand Vizier THE TRIP FROM BURSA TO EDİRNE In a peripatetic life that included forty years of sustained travel, Evliya Çelebi spent twelve years in the service of Melek Ahmed Pasha, governor of a number of Ottoman provinces and grand vizier between 1650–1651. Evliya traveled with his patron—a relative on his mother’s side—to postings in Ochakiv (Özü), Silistre, Van, Bitlis, and Sofia, remaining with him until the pasha’s death in 1662. Due to the circumstances described below, however, Evliya was away from his patron during the 1659 trip from Bursa to Edirne, traveling in the retinue of grand vizier Köprülü Mehmed Pasha. Evliya was deeply attached to his kinsman Melek Ahmed, and to his wife Qaya Sultan, a daughter of Sultan Murad IV (r. 1623–1640), who died in early 1659, a few months before Evliya’s journey. Twenty days after Melek Ahmed Pasha’s wife Qaya Sultan died, he was summoned before the young Sultan Mehmed IV along with the grand vizier Köprülü Mehmed Pasha. The sultan granted Melek Ahmed the governorship of Bosnia province and additional monetary allowances in what seems to have been an act of consolation; Evliya describes Köprülü’s astonishment at the sultan’s generosity toward Melek Ahmed. After leaving the sultan’s audi- ence, the two men quarreled over Köprülü’s recommendation that Melek Ahmed appoint one of Köprülü’s own protégés as an administrator in his newly acquired post. When Melek Ahmed Pasha set out toward Bosnia from Istanbul on 15 March 1659, Evliya was in his retinue. The pasha’s cortege quartered for a week on the Topcılar Plain to the northwest of the city as they acquired the necessary provisions for the journey. From that encampment Evliya was dispatched several times to the grand vizier to take care of small errands, during which time Köprülü seems to have taken a liking to him. Days later, when Melek Ahmed’s cortege reached its second station, a few of the pasha’s aghas openly confronted Evliya, obviously annoyed by his being treated as a special assistant (qapucular kethudası) to Melek Ahmed. Although, according to Evliya, he assured them that he had no interest in such a position, the confrontation quickly turned into a fight, in which Melek Ahmed’s treasurer and Evliya were injured. While Evliya was recuperating at Melek Ahmed’s tent, a letter arrived from grand vizier Köprülü suggesting that the pasha send Evliya to him. As the pasha was about to continue on to Bosnia and Evliya was in no position 2 the trip from bursa to edi̇rne to join him, he agreed to leave him with the grand vizier. Köprülü granted Evliya a handsome salary and recruited him temporarily into his household, although Evliya had to be kept in confinement for twenty days before his case with the treasurer was closed. He stayed in Istanbul for another month and then joined the retinue of the grand vizier and Sultan Mehmed IV, traveling from Istanbul to Bursa, then from Bursa to Edirne during the next few months (V: 78b–80a).1 Sultan Mehmed IV set out from Istanbul with a sizable army in May 1659, on an Anatolian campaign to crush the Jelali rebellions led by Abaza Hasan Pasha.2 The army camped in Üsküdar for twenty days, during which time hundreds of people who had been arrested in various parts of Anatolia were executed with allegations that they were Jelali rebels. The army marched in the direction of İzmid, where the Sultan decided not to proceed further in person. Instead, İsmail Pasha was appointed to handle the campaign. He departed with an army of ten thousand soldiers in the direction of Aleppo, where Abaza Hasan was known to be stationed. Bursa was fixed upon as the Sultan’s new destination.3 Although the grand admiral Köse Ali Pasha followed the sultan’s cortege with the imperial galea bastarda, Mehmed decided to proceed by land. Evliya traveled with the imperial cortege until İznik, where he obtained permission from the stew- ard of the grand vizier to make several excursions before he joined them in Bursa. The sultan, with Köprülü Mehmed Pasha at his side, entered Bursa with an enormous procession. Evliya never mentions the imperial mother Hadice Turhan Sultan during this trip, although other sources suggest that she was also traveling alongside her son.4 The stay in Bursa lasted more than seventy days, after which petitions arrived from Sührab Mehmed Pasha, the commander of Bozcaada, communicating that the Venetians were prepar- ing to capture the island. After consultations with the imperial council, the sultan decided to head for the Dardanelles. The struggle for domination of the North Aegean between the Ottomans and the Venetians continued for a quarter of a century. Bozcaada and Lim- nos were captured by the Venetians in 1656 and taken back by the Ottomans only a year later, i.e., two years before Evliya’s visit described in the pas- sages edited here. While the castles built during the time of Mehmed II 1 The section paraphrased above is also available in English translation in Robert Dank- off, The Intimate life of an Ottoman statesman, 237f. 2 Abdurrahman Abdi Paşa, Vekayiname, 140; Silāḥdār ta’rīḫi, vol. 1, 164. 3 According to Silāḥdār ta’rīḫi however the destination was set from the start on. 4 Lucienne Thys-Şenocak, Ottoman Women Builders, 111..
Recommended publications
  • Selim I–Mehmet Vi)
    CHRONOLOGY (SELIM I–MEHMET VI) Years of Sultan Important dates reign 1512–1520 Selim I Conquest of Egypt, Selim assumes the title of Caliph (1517) 1520–1566 Süleyman Vienna sieged (1529); War with Venice (1537–1540); Annexation of Hungary (1541) 1566–1574 Selim II Ottoman navy loses the battle of Lepanto (1571) 1574–1595 Murad III Janissary revolts (1589 and 1591–1592) 1595–1603 Mehmed III War with Austria continues (1595– ) 1603–1617 Ahmed I War with Austria ends; Buda is recovered (1604) 1617–1622 Osman II Janissaries murder Osman (1622) 1622–1623 Mustafa I Janissary Revolt (1622) 1623–1640 Murad IV Baghdad recovered (1638); War with Iran (1624–1639) 1640–1648 İbrahim I War with Venice (1645); Assassination of İbrahim (1648) 1648–1687 Mehmed IV Janissary dominance in Istanbul and anar- chy (1649–1651); War with Venice continues (1663); War with Austria, and siege of Vienna (1683) 1687–1691 Süleyman II Janissary revolt (1687); Austria’s occupation of Belgrade (1688) 1691–1695 Ahmed II War with Austria (1694) 1695–1703 Mustafa II Treaty of Karlowitz (1699); Janissary revolt and deposition of Mustafa (1703) 1703–1730 Ahmed III Refuge of Karl XII (1709); War with Venice (1714–1718); War with Austria (1716); Treaty of Passarowitz (1718); ix x REFORMING OTTOMAN GOVERNANCE Tulip Era (1718–1730) 1730–1754 Mahmud I War with Russia and Austria (1736–1759) 1754–1774 Mustafa III War with Russia (1768); Russian Fleet in the Aegean (1770); Inva- sion of the Crimea (1771) 1774–1789 Abdülhamid I Treaty of Küçük Kaynarca (1774); War with Russia (1787)
    [Show full text]
  • 1 EBRU TURAN Fordham University-Rose Hill 441 E
    Turan EBRU TURAN Fordham University-Rose Hill 441 E. Fordham Road, Dealy 620 Bronx NY, 10458 [email protected] (718-817-4528) EDUCATION University of Chicago, Ph.D., Near Eastern Languages and Civilizations, March 2007 Bogazici University, B.A., Business Administration, 1997 Bogazici University, B.A., Economics, 1997 EMPLOYMENT Fordham University, History Department, Assistant Professor, Fall 2006-Present Courses Thought: Introduction to Middle East History, History of the Ottoman Empire (1300-1923), Religion and Politics in Islamic History University of Chicago, Near Eastern Languages and Civilizations, Graduate Lecturer, 2003-2005 Courses Thought: Ottoman Turkish I, II, III; History of the Ottoman Empire (1300-1700); Islamic Political Thought (700-1550) GRANTS AND FELLOWSHIPS Visiting Research Fellow, Institute for Historical Studies, University of Texas-Austin, 2008-2009 Grant to attend the Folger Institute's Faculty Weekend Seminar,"Constantinople/Istanbul: Destination, Way-Station, City of Renegades," September 2007 Dissertation Write-Up Grant, Division of Humanities, Franke Institute for the Humanities, University of Chicago, 2005-2006 Grant to participate in Mellon Summer Institute in Italian Paleography Program, Newberry Library, Summer 2005 Turkish Studies Grant, University of Chicago, Summer 2004 Overseas Dissertation Research Fellowship, Division of Humanities, University of Chicago, 2003 American Research Institute in Turkey Dissertation Grant, 2002-2003 Turkish Studies Grant, University of Chicago, Summer 2002 Doctoral Fellow in Sawyer Seminar on Islam 1300-1600, Franke Institute for Humanities, University of Chicago, 2001-2002 Tuition and Stipend, Division of Humanities, University of Chicago, 1997-2001 PUBLICATIONS Articles: “Voice of Opposition in the Reign of Sultan Suleyman: The Case of Ibrahim Pasha (1523-1536),” in Studies on Istanbul and Beyond: The Freely Papers, Volume I, ed.
    [Show full text]
  • ALBANIAN SOLDIERS in the OTTOMAN ARMY DURING the GREEK REVOLT at 1821 Ali Fuat ÖRENÇ
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Epoka University IBAC 2012 vol.2 ALBANIAN SOLDIERS IN THE OTTOMAN ARMY DURING THE GREEK REVOLT AT 1821 ∗∗ Ali Fuat ÖRENÇ Introduction Ottoman Army organization had started to deteriorate from the mid-17th century. Military failures made the social and economic problems worse. In this situation, alternative potentials in the empire appeared because of the increasing military needs of the central government and the provincial governors. By the way, general employment of the Albanian warriors who were famous with their courage and strength became possible.1 There were a lot of reasons for employing Albanian warriors with salary while there was Ottoman regular army corps, including janissaries and soldiers from the states. Governing problems, had existed in the states and land system after the defeat in Vienne at 1683, was one of these reasons. Also after the end of the conquering era, the castles and fortresses at the borderlines were built for defense and there were not a necessary number of soldiers in these buildings. This problem was tried to by employing the warriors with long- matchlock-guns from Bosnia, Herzegovina and Albania.2 During the time, the necessity of mercenary increased too much as seen in the example of the Ottoman army which established for pressing the Greek Revolt in 1821, was almost composed of the Albanian soldiers.3 There were historical reasons for choosing Albanian soldiers in the Balkans. A strong feudal-system had existed in the Albanian lands before the Ottoman rule. This social structure, which consisted of the local connections and obedience around the lords, continued by integrating, first, timar (fief) system after the Ottoman conquest in 1385 and then, devshirme system.
    [Show full text]
  • The Concept of Ministry in the Arabic Political Tradition Its Origin, Development, and Linguistic Reflection
    The Concept of Ministry in the Arabic Political Tradition Its origin, development, and linguistic reflection IVAN V. SIVKOV Abstract The paper presents the results of an analysis of the term “ministry” (wizāra) as one of the pivotal concepts in the Arabic/Islamic political tradition. The ministry as key political/administrative institution in the Arabic/Islamic traditional state machinery is researched from a historical/institutional perspective. The concept of ministry is treated from the point of its origin and historical development, as well as its changeable role and meaning in the variable Arabic political system. The paper is primarily dedicated to the investigation of the realization of the concept of ministry and its different types and branches in the Arabic language through the etymological and semantic examination of the terms used to denote this institution during the long period of administrative development of the Arabic world from its establishment as such and during the inception of the ʿAbbāsid caliphate to its usage in administrative apparatus of modern Arab states. The paper is based on Arabic narrative sources such as historical chronicles, collections of the official documents of modern Arabic states, and the lists of its chief magistrates (with special reference to government composition and structure). Keywords: term, terminology, concept, semantic, etymology, value, derivation Introduction The term wazīr is traditionally used to denote the position of vizier who was the state secretary, the aide, helper and councilor of the caliph/sultan of the highest rank in the administrative apparatus of ʿAbbāsid Caliphate and its successor states (e.g., Būyids, Fāṭimids, Ayyūbids and Salǧūqs).
    [Show full text]
  • A Chapter in the History of Coffee: a Critical Edition and Translation of Murtad}A> Az-Zabīdī's Epistle on Coffee
    A Chapter in the History of Coffee: A Critical Edition and Translation of Murtad}a> az-Zabīdī’s Epistle on Coffee Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Heather Marie Sweetser, B.A. Graduate Program in Near Eastern Languages and Cultures The Ohio State University 2012 Thesis Committee: Dr. Georges Tamer, Advisor Dr. Joseph Zeidan Copyright by Heather Marie Sweetser 2012 Abstract What follows is an edition and translation of an Arabic manuscript written by Murtad}a> az-Zabīdī in 1171/1758 in defense of coffee as per Islamic legality. He cites the main objections to coffee drinking and refutes them systematically using examples from Islamic jurisprudence to back up his points. The author also includes lines of poetry in his epistle in order to defend coffee’s legality. This particular manuscript is important due to its illustrious author as well as to its content, as few documents describing the legal issues surrounding coffee at such a late date have been properly explored by coffee historians. The dictionary Ta>j al-ʿAru>s, authored by Murtad}a> az-Zabīdī himself, as well as Edward Lane’s dictionary, were used to translate the manuscript, which was first edited. Unfortunately, I was only able to acquire one complete and one incomplete manuscript; other known manuscripts were unavailable. Arabic mistakes in the original have been corrected and the translation is annotated to provide appropriate background to the epistle’s commentary. A brief introduction to the history of coffee, a sample of the debate surrounding the legality of coffee in Islam, and a biography of the author is provided.
    [Show full text]
  • Animal Welfare and the Protection of Draft Animals in the Ottoman Fatwa¯ Literature and Legislation
    religions Article Be Gentle to Them: Animal Welfare and the Protection of Draft Animals in the Ottoman Fatwa¯ Literature and Legislation Necmettin Kızılkaya Faculty of Divinity, Istanbul University, 34452 Istanbul,˙ Turkey; [email protected] Received: 5 August 2020; Accepted: 16 October 2020; Published: 20 October 2020 Abstract: Animal studies in the Islamic context have greatly increased in number in recent years. These studies mostly examine the subject of animal treatment through the two main sources of Islam, namely, the Qur’an and the traditions of the Prophet Muhammad. Some studies that go beyond these two sources examine the subject of animal treatment through the texts of various disciplines, especially those of Islamic jurisprudence and law. Although these two research approaches offer a picture of how animal treatment is perceived in Islamic civilization, it is still not a full one. Other sources, such as fatwa¯ books and archive documents, should be used to fill in the gaps. By incorporating these into the pool of research, we will be better enabled to understand how the principles expressed in the main sources of Islam are reflected in daily life. In this article, I shall examine animal welfare and ( animal protection in the Ottoman context based on the fataw¯ a¯ of Shaykh al-Islam¯ Ebu’s-Su¯ ud¯ Efendi and archival documents. Keywords: animal welfare; animal protection; draft animals; Ottoman Legislation; Fatwa;¯ Ebussuud¯ Efendi In addition to the foundational sources of Islam and the main texts of various disciplines, the use of fatwa¯ (plural: fataw¯ a¯) collections and archival documents will shed light on an accurate understanding of Muslim societies’ perspectives on animals.
    [Show full text]
  • I TREATING OUTLAWS and REGISTERING MISCREANTS IN
    TREATING OUTLAWS AND REGISTERING MISCREANTS IN EARLY MODERN OTTOMAN SOCIETY: A STUDY ON THE LEGAL DIAGNOSIS OF DEVIANCE IN ŞEYHÜLİSLAM FATWAS by EMİNE EKİN TUŞALP Submitted to the Graduate School of Arts and Social Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Sabancı University Spring 2005 i TREATING OUTLAWS AND REGISTERING MISCREANTS IN EARLY MODERN OTTOMAN SOCIETY: A STUDY ON THE LEGAL DIAGNOSIS OF DEVIANCE IN ŞEYHÜLİSLAM FATWAS APPROVED BY: Assoc. Prof. Dr. Tülay Artan (Thesis Supervisor) ………………………… Ass. Prof. Dr. Akşin Somel ………………………… Ass. Prof. Dr. Dicle Koğacıoğlu ………………………… Prof. Dr. Ahmet Alkan (Dean of the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences) ………………………… Prof. Dr. Nakiye Boyacıgiller (Director of the Institute of Social Sciences) ………………………… DATE OF APPROVAL: 17/06/2005 ii © EMİNE EKİN TUŞALP ALL RIGHTS RESERVED iii ABSTRACT TREATING OUTLAWS AND REGISTERING MISCREANTS IN EARLY MODERN OTTOMAN SOCIETY: A STUDY ON THE LEGAL DIAGNOSIS OF DEVIANCE IN ŞEYHÜLİSLAM FATWAS Emine Ekin Tuşalp M.A., History Supervisor: Assoc. Prof. Dr. Tülay Artan June 2005, ix + 115 pages This work investigates the forms of deviance rampant in early modern Ottoman society and their legal treatment, according to the fatwas issued by the Ottoman şeyhülislams in the 17th and 18th centuries. One of the aims of this thesis is to present different behavioural forms found in the şeyhülislam fatwas that ranged from simple social malevolencies to acts which were regarded as heresy. In the end of our analysis, the significance of the fatwa literature for Ottoman social history will once more be emphasized. On the other hand, it will be argued that as a legal forum, the fetvahane was not merely a consultative and ancillary office, but a centre that fabricated the legal and moral devices/discourses employed to direct and stem the social tendencies in the Ottoman society.
    [Show full text]
  • 235On the Trail of Evliya Çelebi's Inscriptions and Graffiti
    235«A mari usque ad mare» Cultura visuale e materiale dall’Adriatico all’India a cura di Mattia Guidetti e Sara Mondini 235On the Trail of Evliya Çelebi’s Inscriptions and Graffiti Mehmet Tütüncü (Research Centre for Turkish and Arabic World, Haarlem, Netherlands) Abstract The Turkish traveller Evliya Çelebi was accustomed to leave a small graffito, or even a skillfully carved inscription, in the places he visited during his long travels across the whole Otto- man World. These traces can be compared with what he recorded in his oceanic Seyahatname and in other writings, a work in progress whose first results are offered in this paper. Summary 1 Introduction. – 2 Inscriptions Written by Evliya Çelebi. – 2.1 The Uyvar (Nové Zámky) Inscriptions. – 2.2 Crete-Kandiye (Heraklion). – 2.3 Zarnata Castle. – 2.4 Mora Zarnata Mosque. – 3 Evliya Çelebi’s Memento Inscriptions (graffiti). – 3.1 Wall and Tree Inscriptions Mentioned in the Seyahatname. – 3.2 Not Mentioned Wall Inscriptions in the Seyahatname. – 3.3 Evliya Çelebi’s Inscription on Pir Ahmed Efendi Mosque. – 3.4 Evliya’s graffito in Pécs (Hungary). Keywords Evliya Çelebi. Ottoman inscriptions. Balkans. I first met Gianclaudio in 2009 in a Symposium about Bektashism in Albania in Tirana (fig. 1). He presented there his findings of the Survey in Delvina, with a focus on the graffiti in the portico of Gjin Aleksi Mosque. On that oc- casion we spoke about the findings and I speculated that this graffiti could be the work of Evliya Çelebi and asked whether I could join him to see and inspect the graffiti.
    [Show full text]
  • The Armenian Genocide
    The Armenian Genocide During World War I, the Ottoman Empire carried out what most international experts and historians have concluded was one of the largest genocides in the world's history, slaughtering huge portions of its minority Armenian population. In all, over 1 million Armenians were put to death. To this day, Turkey denies the genocidal intent of these mass murders. My sense is that Armenians are suffering from what I would call incomplete mourning, and they can't complete that mourning process until their tragedy, their wounds are recognized by the descendants of the people who perpetrated it. People want to know what really happened. We are fed up with all these stories-- denial stories, and propaganda, and so on. Really the new generation want to know what happened 1915. How is it possible for a massacre of such epic proportions to take place? Why did it happen? And why has it remained one of the greatest untold stories of the 20th century? This film is made possible by contributions from John and Judy Bedrosian, the Avenessians Family Foundation, the Lincy Foundation, the Manoogian Simone Foundation, and the following. And others. A complete list is available from PBS. The Armenians. There are between six and seven million alive today, and less than half live in the Republic of Armenia, a small country south of Georgia and north of Iran. The rest live around the world in countries such as the US, Russia, France, Lebanon, and Syria. They're an ancient people who originally came from Anatolia some 2,500 years ago.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of Muslim Economic Thinking in the 11Th A.H
    Munich Personal RePEc Archive A study of Muslim economic thinking in the 11th A.H. / 17th C.E. century Islahi, Abdul Azim Islamic Economics Institute, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, KSA 2009 Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/75431/ MPRA Paper No. 75431, posted 06 Dec 2016 02:55 UTC Abdul Azim Islahi Islamic Economics Research Center King Abdulaziz University Scientific Publising Centre King Abdulaziz University P.O. Box 80200, Jeddah, 21589 Kingdom of Saudi Arabia FOREWORD There are numerous works on the history of Islamic economic thought. But almost all researches come to an end in 9th AH/15th CE century. We hardly find a reference to the economic ideas of Muslim scholars who lived in the 16th or 17th century, in works dealing with the history of Islamic economic thought. The period after the 9th/15th century remained largely unexplored. Dr. Islahi has ventured to investigate the periods after the 9th/15th century. He has already completed a study on Muslim economic thinking and institutions in the 10th/16th century (2009). In the mean time, he carried out the study on Muslim economic thinking during the 11th/17th century, which is now in your hand. As the author would like to note, it is only a sketch of the economic ideas in the period under study and a research initiative. It covers the sources available in Arabic, with a focus on the heartland of Islam. There is a need to explore Muslim economic ideas in works written in Persian, Turkish and other languages, as the importance of these languages increased in later periods.
    [Show full text]
  • Talaat Pasha's Report on the Armenian Genocide.Fm
    Gomidas Institute Studies Series TALAAT PASHA’S REPORT ON THE ARMENIAN GENOCIDE by Ara Sarafian Gomidas Institute London This work originally appeared as Talaat Pasha’s Report on the Armenian Genocide, 1917. It has been revised with some changes, including a new title. Published by Taderon Press by arrangement with the Gomidas Institute. © 2011 Ara Sarafian. All Rights Reserved. ISBN 978-1-903656-66-2 Gomidas Institute 42 Blythe Rd. London W14 0HA United Kingdom Email: [email protected] CONTENTS Introduction by Ara Sarafian 5 Map 18 TALAAT PASHA’S 1917 REPORT Opening Summary Page: Data and Calculations 20 WESTERN PROVINCES (MAP) 22 Constantinople 23 Edirne vilayet 24 Chatalja mutasarriflik 25 Izmit mutasarriflik 26 Hudavendigar (Bursa) vilayet 27 Karesi mutasarriflik 28 Kala-i Sultaniye (Chanakkale) mutasarriflik 29 Eskishehir vilayet 30 Aydin vilayet 31 Kutahya mutasarriflik 32 Afyon Karahisar mutasarriflik 33 Konia vilayet 34 Menteshe mutasarriflik 35 Teke (Antalya) mutasarriflik 36 CENTRAL PROVINCES (MAP) 37 Ankara (Angora) vilayet 38 Bolu mutasarriflik 39 Kastamonu vilayet 40 Janik (Samsun) mutasarriflik 41 Nigde mutasarriflik 42 Kayseri mutasarriflik 43 Adana vilayet 44 Ichil mutasarriflik 45 EASTERN PROVINCES (MAP) 46 Sivas vilayet 47 Erzerum vilayet 48 Bitlis vilayet 49 4 Talaat Pasha’s Report on the Armenian Genocide Van vilayet 50 Trebizond vilayet 51 Mamuretulaziz (Elazig) vilayet 52 SOUTH EASTERN PROVINCES AND RESETTLEMENT ZONE (MAP) 53 Marash mutasarriflik 54 Aleppo (Halep) vilayet 55 Urfa mutasarriflik 56 Diyarbekir vilayet
    [Show full text]
  • The Portraits of Two Ottoman Sultans Preserved at the Palace of Prince Mohamed Ali Museum, Egypt
    id5039093 pdfMachine by Broadgun Software - a great PDF writer! - a great PDF creator! - http://www.pdfmachine.com http://www.broadgun.com Egyptian Journal of Archaeological and Restoration Studies "EJARS" An international peer-reviewed journal published bi-annually Volume 9, Issue 2, December - 2019: pp: 219-228 www. ejars.sohag-univ.edu.eg Doi: 10.21608/ejars.2019.66992 Original article THE PORTRAITS OF TWO OTTOMAN SULTANS PRESERVED AT THE PALACE OF PRINCE MOHAMED ALI MUSEUM, EGYPT Hosny, A. Islamic Archaeology dept., Faculty of Archaeology, Aswan Univ., Aswan, Egypt E-mail: [email protected] Received 8/12/2018 Accepted 13/10/2019 Abstract The present study analyzes and publishes a portrait of an Ottoman Sultan in the museum's register, entitled "the portrait of Sultan Muhammad al-Fatih". It is preserved in the Store of Islamic Department, Prince Mohamed Ali Museum, Cairo under number (3) and register no. (516). It was drawn on paperboard with watercolors. It is in good condition, and it measures 52î 46 cm. It is published and studied for the first time with its distinctive artistic formation. The problem is that the portrait does not include any dates. Accordingly, the study adopts the comparative analytical approach of the technical composition and design method. The elements of the colors used were identified and thus the date of this portrait could be traced back to the 13th AH. / 19th A.D. century, to the art center in Egypt. Keywords: Sultan Muhammad al-Fatih, Murad IV, Portrait, SEM-EDS, Paper, Painting, Ottoman decoration. 1. Introduction Othman Sultans and other rulers of nted in many modern artistic trends dom- the Islamic world were fond of the art inated by the expressive character in a new of portrait and brought foreign artists to framework combining the originality of carry out this artistic task [1].
    [Show full text]