Virus Like Particle-Based Vaccines Against Emerging Infectious Disease Viruses
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
VIROLOGICA SINICA 2016, 31 (4): 279–287 DOI: 10.1007/s12250-016-3756-y REVIEW Virus like particle-based vaccines against emerging infectious disease viruses Jinliang Liu, Shiyu Dai, Manli Wang, Zhihong Hu, Hualin Wang, Fei Deng* State Key Laboratory of Virology, Wuhan Institute of Virology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, China Emerging infectious diseases are major threats to human health. Most severe viral disease outbreaks occur in developing regions where health conditions are poor. With increased international travel and business, the possibility of eventually transmitting infectious viruses between different countries is increasing. The most effective approach in preventing viral diseases is vaccination. However, vaccines are not currently available for numerous viral diseases. Virus- like particles (VLPs) are engineered vaccine candidates that have been studied for decades. VLPs are constructed by viral protein expression in various expression systems that promote the self- assembly of proteins into structures resembling virus particles. VLPs have antigenicity similar to that of the native virus, but are non-infectious as they lack key viral genetic material. VLP vaccines have attracted considerable research interest because they offer several advantages over traditional vaccines. Studies have shown that VLP vaccines can stimulate both humoral and cellular immune responses, which may offer effective antiviral protection. Here we review recent developments with VLP-based vaccines for several highly virulent emerging or re-emerging infectious diseases. The infectious agents discussed include RNA viruses from different virus families, such as the Arenaviridae, Bunyaviridae, Caliciviridae, Coronaviridae, Filoviridae, Flaviviridae, Orthomyxoviridae, Paramyxoviridae, and Togaviridae families. KEYWORDS emerging infectious disease; self-assembly; vaccine; virus; virus-like particle (VLP) INTRODUCTION break was reported in West Africa. By December 2015, 28, 637 cases of Ebola infection were reported, including With the increase in international travel, pathogen trans- 11, 315 deaths (WHO, 2015), with mortality rates of up to mission across countries has increased and has resulted in 40%. Such pandemics cause significant mortality and eco- several pandemics, especially of viral diseases. In 2012, nomic losses; thus, it is critical to prevent the spread of the outbreak of a newly identified coronavirus, Middle emerging viruses. East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) was Vaccination is most effective in preventing viral infec- reported in Saudi Arabia (de groot et al., 2013). As of tion; however, vaccine development against emerging vi- December 2015, the World Health Organization (WHO) ruses faces several challenges. Some emerging viruses was notified of 1625 laboratory-confirmed MERS-CoV cause high infectivity and mortality; therefore, a maxi- infections from 26 countries, with at least 586 deaths mum (level 4) biosafety lab is needed, and live attenuated (WHO, 2016). In March 2014, an Ebola virus disease out- strains or inactivated vaccines are not adequately safe (Garcia-sastre and Mena, 2013). Second, in an outbreak of Received: 29 February 2016, Accepted: 25 June 2016, infections by an emerging virus, every second matters; Published online: 11 July 2016 *Correspondence: therefore, a rapid development of engineered vaccines is Phone: +86-27-87198465, Fax: +86-27-87198465 required for pandemic control. Third, some vaccines, such Email: [email protected] as influenza virus vaccines, are not effective against all ORCID: 0000-0002-5385-083X strains. Because of mutations, antigenic drift, and antigenic © Wuhan Institute of Virology, CAS and Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2016 AUGUST 2016 VOLUME 31 ISSUE 4 279 VLP-based vaccines for emerging infectious diseases shift, influenza virus strains differ with influenza seasons vaccines have been produced using this system, such as and pandemics. Furthermore, because a virus cannot re- one against hepatitis E virus (HEV) VLPs (Hecolin1, Xia- produce autonomously in vitro, vaccines against viruses men Innovax Biotech Co. Ltd.). The E. coli expression are produced by propagating viruses in large quantities in system is the most economical and easy-to-use system. living cells of susceptible organisms. For example, tradi- However, this system lacks a post-translational modifica- tional influenza vaccines are manufactured using embry- tion system and can only be used to produce simple VLPs, onated chicken eggs for virus propagation. However, such as non-enveloped VLPs, which are based on the abil- some viruses still cannot be cultured in cells or organs, ity of viral protein components to self-assemble in the outside of the natural host(s). bacterial host during expression. Yeast systems are com- Virus-like particles (VLPs) are generated from viral monly used in VLP vaccine production, for example with proteins that self-assemble into structures resembling na- the HBV vaccine Engerix-B® (GlaxoSmithKline) and the tive virions and can have some antigenicity of the native HPV vaccine Gardasil® (Merck & Co., Inc). Yeast sys- virus, but are non-infectious due to their lack of viral ge- tems offer high expression and easy scale-up and, unlike netic material. VLPs have been studied as vaccines for the E. coli system, provide post-translational modification decades, and the first VLP-based vaccine approved by the of the expressed proteins. However, neither the E. coli nor US FDA was the HBV vaccine (HEPTAVAX-B; Merck; the yeast system can express enveloped VLPs. The bacu- 1981) (Zhao et al., 2013). More recently, 2 VLP-based lovirus-insect cell and mammalian-cell systems show HPV vaccines, Gardasil1 (Merck and Co. Inc.) and Cer- more complete post-translational modification including varix1 (GlaxoSmithKline), were approved by the US glycosylation and are better systems for expressing com- FDA. These vaccines are produced in yeast and insect plex VLPs (Rodriguez-limas et al., 2013). Successful VLP cells, respectively (Rodriguez-limas et al., 2013). With ad- vaccines produced using these systems include the HPV vances in biotechnology, the development of VLP vac- vaccine Cervix® (GlaxoSmithKline) and the HBV vac- cines has progressed greatly. VLPs offer several advan- cine GenHevac B® (Pasteur-Mérieux Aventis). These sys- tages as vaccines against emerging viruses. First, safety tems are more expensive than E. coli and yeast, and down- consideration in developing these vaccines is not neces- stream processing is more difficult. In the plant expres- sary, as VLPs are not live viruses; thus, the manufactur- sion system, protein assembly and post-translational ing process offers a safer environment for the operators. modifications are similar to those occurring in mammalian Second, VLPs can display major antigens and elicit strong cells. As production system, it is cost-effective and highly humoral and cellular immune responses. The potency of scalable. VLPs in stimulating immune responses can be signifi- Most emerging human pathogens are single-stranded cantly enhanced relative to inactivated viral particles, as RNA viruses. Here, we summarize several VLP vaccines viruses have evolved different ways to evade the host im- against emerging viruses, including negative-strand RNA mune system. Some structural and non-structural proteins viruses belonging to 5 families (Arenaviridae, Bunyavi- inhibit immune responses, especially cellular immune re- ridae, Filoviridae, Orthomyxoviridae and Paramyxoviridae) sponses (Frazer et al., 1999; Pukhalsky et al., 2003; and positive-strand RNA viruses from 4 families (Calicivi- Sarobe et al., 2003), but VLPs can be deficient in proteins ridae, Coronaviridae, Flaviviridae, and Togaviridae). or domains that inhibit immune responses. Compare to the Some viruses from these families are human pathogens individual proteins or peptides, VLPs have better immu- with high virulence and lethality, and vaccines against nogenicity, as the peptides conformation of VLPs is more these viruses are urgently needed for pandemic control. similar to the virus than in inactivated viruses. Due to highly repetitive epitopes on the surface, VLPs are able to induce strong B cells responses (Roldão et al., 2010). NEGATIVE-STRAND RNA VIRUSES VLPs can also be internalized by antigen presenting cells that active CD4+ and CD8+ T cells to elicit and sustain Arenaviridae family specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) responses (Wagner Arenaviruses are pathogens of rodents-transmitted dis- et al., 1994; Chackerian et al., 2002; Cox et al., 2014), and eases, some of which cause severe cases and are responsi- CD4+ T cells play an important role in sustaining virus- ble for hemorrhagic fever (Oldstone, 2002). Lassa fever is specific CD8+ CTLs during virus infection (Matloubian et an acute viral illness that has been reported in West Africa al., 1994). and is caused by Lassa fever virus (LASV), which is a Several platforms for producing VLPs exist, such as member of the Arenaviridae family. The genome of bacteria (Escherichia coli), yeast, insect cells, mammalian LASV consists of 2 RNA segments (S and L). The S seg- cells, plant expression systems, and in vitro cell-free sys- ment encodes the viral nucleocapsid protein (NP) and 2 tems. The bacterial expression system was the first sys- glycoproteins (GP1 and GP2), whereas the L segment en- tem used to produce VLPs, and several commercial VLP codes the viral polymerase (L) and RING-finger matrix 280 AUGUST 2016 VOLUME 31 ISSUE 4