DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix D: Working Group Meeting Materials 11/18/2016 D-1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix D: Working Group Meeting Materials 11/18/2016 D-1 Appendix D: Working Group Meeting Materials 11/18/2016 D-1 SHRP2 Interstate 64 Corridor Plan Project Study Area Shenandoah Piedmont area Collaborative I‐64 from mile marker 87 to Effort (SPaCE) mile marker 118 (Charlottesville to Staunton) US‐250 from the I‐81 Project Introduction and Overview Interchange to the Charlottesville US250/29 Bypass CSX Buckingham Branch, November 18, 2016 Amtrak from Charlottesville to Staunton Project Funding Grant funding provided by Federal Strategic Highway Research Program Highway Administration (SHRP2 (SHRP2) Project Solutions Program) SHRP2 Authorized under SAFETEA‐LU Funding $100,000 in federal funds Funds innovation research and pilot projects that address state and local CA‐MPO $70,000 challenges SAW‐MPO $30,000 Improving the way transportation plan, CA‐MPO providing project management operate, maintain and ensure safety on and oversight Americas roadways 1 11/18/2016 D-2 Capacity PlanWorks: Better planning. Better projects. (C01) Plan Web based decision support tool Works Supports and improves collaborative decision making Built around key decision points in the project, LRTP, & planning proces Provides a flexible roadmap for project planning and stakeholder involvement Project Scope Corridor Planning Toolkit 1. Open a dialog with interests in the I64 Corridor The Decision Guide streamlines the transportation Scope 2. Build an understanding of the issues through Plan process by systematically building in collaboration. It collaborative discussions and by engaging the Works was developed using examples of successful practice experts and with input from all partners in transportation 3. Use transportation performance measure to decision making. identify deficiencies in the corridor The Decision Guide was developed from 23 in‐depth, 4. Identify ways to improve collaboration and detailed case studies (Including the CA‐MPO 2040 LRTP communication on issues of governance, TCAPP Process) maintenance and project identification 5. Document lessons learned and produce a final document that outlines deficiencies and concept level solutions 2 11/18/2016 D-3 Project Activities Working Group Meetings •Scope and problem statement Multi‐agency and jurisdiction working Meeting 1 (Nov) •Project Goals and process Public Open House group Dec 12 Project Meeting 2 (Jan) •Goals Joint MPO meetings (SAW‐MPO CA‐ • Public Safety Activities MPO) • Evaluation Criteria Meeting 3 (Mar) •Economic Development/ Accessibility Data collection Joint MPO Meeting Meeting 4 • Identify Hotspots Needs assessment (May) • Environmental Draft MOU’s Meeting 5 •Congestion and traffic •Review problem areas Draft Corridor Study Results and (Jul) Joint MPO Meeting Lessons Learned • Lessons Learned Public Open House Meeting 6 (Aug) • Recommendation of problem areas & next steps Preliminary Data Existing Projects Highway performance related measures Data AADT Truck Traffic Crashes Demographics Commuting patterns Incomes 3 11/18/2016 D-4 AADT Percent Heavy Vehicles (trucks) Crashes Analyzing Crashes: 2011‐2016 • Eastbound I-64 sees delays as crews clean up crash The Daily Progress staff reports. Nov 3,140 total crashes 14, 2016 Accident is about a mile east of the Route 20 interchange. • Crashes clog I-64 eastbound The Daily Progress staff reports. Nov 7, 2016 At least four Rear end collisions are the most prevalent crashes reported eastbound around Ivy in the last hour. • Both lanes of eastbound I-64 now open at crash scene near Ivy exit The Daily Progress staff 30 fatalities reports. Nov 2, 2016 Traffic is beginning to move smoother through the site. • Eastbound I-64 crash is cleared and traffic slowly getting back to normal The Daily Progress Average number of crashes per year is 523 staff reports. Oct 25, 2016 Crash is in the left lane. Traffic is crawling through the site. • Crash cleared, traffic getting back to normal on eastbound I-64 near Ivy The Daily Progress Average of 1.5 crashes per day staff reports. Oct 18, 2016 Third crash on the interstate in just over 24 hours. • I-64 crash injures 3, ties up traffic The Daily Progress staff reports. Oct 17, 2016 State 25% occur during peak afternoon police said at least one of the injured had serious injuries, but no further information on their conditions was available Monday evening. commute times • I-64 traffic crash cleared at Ivy, all traffic lanes open The Daily Progress staff reports. Oct 10, 2016 A crash on Interstate 64 involving a camper-style vehicle closed westbound lanes of Fridays have slightly higher number the highway closed at mile marker 114 near the Ivy exit. 4 11/18/2016 D-5 Crash Type Crash Severity Collision Type Number Fatality Serious Injury Serious or Fatal % of Severity Number Percentage of 1% Total Total 5% Rear End Collision 1023 3 31 3% Property 2152 69% Fixed Object Off Road 687 6 44 7% 17% Damage Only Angle 535 8 27 7% Non‐Visible 257 8% Deer or Other Animal 466 0 2 .5% Injury 8% Sideswipe (Either Direction) 222 2 6 4% Visible Injury 548 17% Non‐Collision 72 2 17 26% 69% Head On 54 3 10 24% Ambulatory 154 5% Other 36 1 3 11% Injury Fixed Object In Road 19 1 0 5% Fatal Injury 29 1% PDO Non‐Vis Visible Ambulatory Fatal Pedestrian 18 3 6 50% Backed Into 8 0 0 N/A TOTAL 3140 29 146 Severity Heat Map: 2011‐2016 Fatal Crashes: 2011‐2016 Assigned numeric value to Crash Severity: • 29 Crashes that resulted in 30 Deaths • 1= Property Damage Only • 3 involved adverse weather conditions • 2= Non‐Visible Injury • 4 crashes involved with 3‐axle or more • 3= Visible Injury vehicle • 4= Ambulatory Injury • 6 Crashes were known to have impaired • 5= Fatal Injury (drinking) motorists Darker red indicates clustering of more severe • Majority occurred in morning & afternoon crashes (3,4, & 5) commute times 5 11/18/2016 D-6 Crash Rates Per One Hundred Million Miles: 2011‐2016 Crash Counts Per Year High Crash Rate Crash Counts Per Year: 2011‐2016 Segments 700 590 600 554 554 555 556 500 400 300 331 200 100 0 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Crash Rates Per One Hundred Million Miles: 2011‐2016 Crash Rates Per One Hundred Million Miles: 2011‐2016 6 11/18/2016 D-7 2011 Crashes 2012 Crashes 2013 Crashes 2014 Crashes 7 11/18/2016 D-8 2015 Crashes 2016 Crashes Deer Crash Heat Map: 2011‐2016 Streetlight: Waynesboro to Cville Peak AM 398 Total Deer Crashes 40 Other Animals Crashes 8 11/18/2016 D-9 Streetlight: Waynesboro to Cville Peak PM Demographics Community Profile: Population Change Community Profile: Age Population Pyramids (2010) 2010‐15 160,000 Geography 2015 Pop *Charlottesville‐Albemarle has a large cohort of college students that are cut off on this chart Growth Rate Charlottesville‐Albemarle Staunton‐Augusta‐Waynesboro 140,000 Virginia 8,382,993 4.8% 100 100 120,000 95 95 C‐A 153,261 7.6% 90 90 85 85 100,000 80 80 Charlottesville 48,210 10.9% 75 75 70 70 80,000 65 65 Albemarle 105,051 6.1% 60 60 Male 55 55 60,000 50 Male 50 SAW 121,218 2.3% Charlottesville‐ Female 45 45 Albemarle 40 Female 40 Staunton 24,542 3.4% 40,000 35 35 Staunton‐Augusta‐ 30 30 25 25 Waynesboro Augusta 74,881 1.5% 20,000 20 20 15 15 10 10 5 5 Waynesboro 21,795 3.8% ‐ 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 0 0 1,500 1,000 500 0 500 1,000 1,500 1,500 1,000 500 0 500 1,000 1,500 9 11/18/2016 D-10 Community Profile: Age Community Profile: Age Age Structure in Staunton, Augusta, and Waynesboro Age Structure in Charlottesville and Albemarle Community Profile: Race and Ethnicity Community Profile: Income 3% Median household income in Charlottesville is Both regions are more White Virginia 8% significantly higher than in the Valley Median Household Income than the state as a whole, with 6% The income spread is similar in both communities Charlottesville 19% across most income brackets. $59,189 the Valley being significantly Metro Area 64% Major difference is presence of about 10,000 more White Staunton‐Wboro additional households earning $100,000 or more in $49,262 Charlottesville/Albemarle Metro Area Charlottesville‐Albemarle Staunton‐Augusta‐Waynesboro 3% 1%2% 12,000 6% 3% Non‐Hispanic White 10,000 5% 7% 8,000 12% Non‐Hispanic Black 6,000 Asian HouseholdsHouseholds 4,000 2,000 74% Other (including 87% multiracial) 0 < $20K $20K ‐ $35K $35 ‐ $50K $50K ‐ $75K $75K ‐ $100K $100K ‐ $150K $150K + Charlottesville‐Albemarle Staunton‐Augusta‐Waynesboro 10 11/18/2016 D-11 Community Profile: Poverty & Community Profile: Educational Employment Attainment General Economic Indicators The contrast in educational attainment is more Median Non‐student Unemployment dramatic than the contrast in income Geography Household Poverty Rate Poverty Rate Rate (BLS) Income 40,000 Charlottesville Metro Area $59,189 15.2% 10.2% 3.9% 35,000 30,000 Charlottesville $47,218 27.5% 15.1% 3.7% 25 25,000 over Albemarle $67,958 9.7% 8.4% 3.9% 20,000 15,000 Adults Staunton‐Waynesboro Metro Area $49,262 13.2% 13.2% 4.3% 10,000 5,000 Staunton $39,982 18.2% 17.8% 4.4% ‐ No Diploma High School Some College or Bachelor's or Graduate or Augusta $54,018 9.3% 9.4% 4.1% Diploma Associate's Higher Professional Degree Waynesboro $45,499 20.7% 20.8% 4.7% Charlottesville‐Albemarle Staunton‐Augusta‐Waynesboro Community Profile: Housing Community Profile: Housing The dominant form of housing in both regions is Housing age single‐family detached. Charlottesville has more multi‐ 30,000 family. 25,000 Charlottesville‐Albemarle Staunton‐Augusta‐Waynesboro 2% 20,000 3% 7% Single‐family 9% detached units of 11% SF Attached 15,000 or Duplex 17% Number 4% 3‐19 units 10,000 57% 20 or more 5,000 units 14% 76% Mobile home ‐ or RV
Load more

Recommended publications
  • History of Virginia
    14 Facts & Photos Profiles of Virginia History of Virginia For thousands of years before the arrival of the English, vari- other native peoples to form the powerful confederacy that con- ous societies of indigenous peoples inhabited the portion of the trolled the area that is now West Virginia until the Shawnee New World later designated by the English as “Virginia.” Ar- Wars (1811-1813). By only 1646, very few Powhatans re- chaeological and historical research by anthropologist Helen C. mained and were policed harshly by the English, no longer Rountree and others has established 3,000 years of settlement even allowed to choose their own leaders. They were organized in much of the Tidewater. Even so, a historical marker dedi- into the Pamunkey and Mattaponi tribes. They eventually cated in 2015 states that recent archaeological work at dissolved altogether and merged into Colonial society. Pocahontas Island has revealed prehistoric habitation dating to about 6500 BCE. The Piscataway were pushed north on the Potomac River early in their history, coming to be cut off from the rest of their peo- Native Americans ple. While some stayed, others chose to migrate west. Their movements are generally unrecorded in the historical record, As of the 16th Century, what is now the state of Virginia was but they reappear at Fort Detroit in modern-day Michigan by occupied by three main culture groups: the Iroquoian, the East- the end of the 18th century. These Piscataways are said to have ern Siouan and the Algonquian. The tip of the Delmarva Penin- moved to Canada and probably merged with the Mississaugas, sula south of the Indian River was controlled by the who had broken away from the Anishinaabeg and migrated Algonquian Nanticoke.
    [Show full text]
  • Addendum No. 2
    Addendum No. 2 Issue Date: 22 May 2017 To: Bidding Contractors - Plan Holders Project: Blue Ridge (Crozet) Tunnel Rehabilitation and Trail Project Nelson County Board of Supervisors The following items are being issued here for clarification, addition or deletion and have been incorporated into the Construction Documents and Project Manual, and shall be included as part of the bid documents. All Contractors shall acknowledge this Addendum No. 2 in the Bid Form. Failure of acknowledgment may result in rejection of your bid. All Bidders shall be responsible for seeing that their subcontractors are properly apprised of the contents of this addendum. BID DATE AND TIME: 1. The sign in sheet from the pre-bid meeting held on Friday May 12 th is included with Addenda 2. 2. At this time, the bid opening remains May 31 st at 2.00 PM. CLARIFICATIONS / CONTRACTOR QUESTIONS: 1. Q: The unit of measurement for the aggregate base material is in cubic yards. Can the units be revised to reflect the number of tons? A: Section 607.12 Unit Costs and Measures provides for the acceptable units for measurement. The quantity reflected in the bid form is based upon the area x thickness of the material. Please note that the volume is measured as “in-place and does not account for any volumetric loss due to compaction. The conversion from cubic yards to tons is based upon the unit weight of the material. For example, assuming a unit weight of 130 lbs/ft 3, which may be considered normal for VDOT 21B material, the conversion to tons would be 1 CY x (27 ft 3 / yd 3) x (130 lbs/ft 3) x (1 ton/2000 lbs).
    [Show full text]
  • Download Guidebook to Richmond
    SIA RVA SOCIETY FOR INDUSTRIAL ARCHEOLOGY 47th ANNUAL CONFERENCE MAY 31 - JUNE 3, 2018 RICHMOND, VIRGINIA GUIDEBOOK TO RICHMOND SIA RVA SOCIETY FOR INDUSTRIAL ARCHEOLOGY 47th ANNUAL CONFERENCE MAY 31 - JUNE 3, 2018 RICHMOND, VIRGINIA OMNI RICHMOND HOTEL GUIDEBOOK TO RICHMOND SOCIETY FOR INDUSTRIAL ARCHEOLOGY MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY 1400 TOWNSEND DRIVE HOUGHTON, MI 49931-1295 www.sia-web.org i GUIDEBOOK EDITORS Christopher H. Marston Nathan Vernon Madison LAYOUT Daniel Schneider COVER IMAGE Philip Morris Leaf Storage Ware house on Richmond’s Tobacco Row. HABS VA-849-31 Edward F. Heite, photog rapher, 1969. ii CONTENTS Acknowledgements ..................................................................................iv INTRODUCTION Richmond’s Industrial Heritage .............................................................. 3 THURSDAY, MAY 31, 2018 T1 - The University of Virginia ................................................................19 T1 - The Blue Ridge Tunnel ....................................................................22 T2 - Richmond Waterfront Walking Tour ..............................................24 T3 - The Library of Virginia .....................................................................26 FRIDAY, JUNE 1, 2018 F1 - Strickland Machine Company ........................................................27 F1 - O.K. Foundry .....................................................................................29 F1 & F2 - Tobacco Row / Philip Morris USA .......................................32 F1 &
    [Show full text]
  • VIRGINIA STATE RAIL PLAN Executive Summary
    2017 VIRGINIA STATE RAIL PLAN Executive Summary Enclosure 9 Virginia’s rail network is a valuable asset that drives the economy, reduces congestion, improves safety, and saves taxpayer money. Continued investment in rail infrastructure will ensure the mission and vision of the Commonwealth’s transportation network is achieved. CONTENTS 02 BENEFITS OF RAIL IN VIRGINIA 07 FUTURE OF RAIL IN VIRGINIA 09 VIRGINIA’S VISION FOR THE FUTURE 15 PRIORITY IMPROVEMENTS AND INVESTMENTS Enclosure 9 BENEFITS OF RAIL IN VIRGINIA VIRGINIA’S RAIL SYSTEMS Virginia’s rail network is state. The Commonwealth significant state investments a valuable asset for the recognizes the privately have leveraged private and Commonwealth. It provides owned rail network as part of a federal funds to improve an efficient means of moving multimodal system with public freight and passenger rail freight and passengers both benefits and growing economic transportation and support the within and through the impacts. Since the 2000s, overall transportation system. TRAVEL SAFE 18 LIVES SAVED AND 3,000 CRASHES AVOIDED EACH YEAR Shipping by rail avoids Passenger travel by rail avoids about about 1.7 billion miles 271 million miles of personal of truck travel in Virginia driving in Virginia BREATHE EASIER 3M TONS OF CO2 EMISSIONS AVOIDED (6.4% OF TOTAL IN VIRGINIA PER YEAR) CO2 On average, railroads Moving freight by2 rail instead The total estimated level are four times more fuel of truck generates 75% less of rail service in Virginia in efficient than trucks greenhouse gas emissions 2015 was about 25 billion ton-miles SAVE MONEY $123M PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE SAVINGS (6% OF ANNUAL VDOT MAINTENANCE BUDGET) 8 = 240 100 = 340 PASSENGER PASSENGER FREIGHT SEMI-TRAILER RAILCARS VEHICLES RAILCARS TRUCKS GROW THE ECONOMY RAIL SERVICES DRIVE 6% OF VIRGINIA’S TOTAL ECONOMY.
    [Show full text]
  • Greenwood-Afton Rural Historic District Overview of the Greenwood-Afton Rural Historic District
    Driving Tour: Greenwood-Afton Rural Historic District Overview of the Greenwood-Afton Rural Historic District The Greenwood-Afton Rural Historic District in Albemarle County, Virginia contains some of the most picturesque landscape in central Virginia. Set in the shadows of the Blue Ridge Mountains, the National Register of Historic Places historic district features rolling hills, farmland, woodlands, and scenic views within an approximately 16,300-acre area. The area was home to some of the earliest settlers to this region of Virginia. The area was settled in the early-to mid-eighteenth century by Scots-Irish and German settlers as the fertile soils of the region were perfect for farming. Much of the agriculture centered around tobacco and continued to do so into the twentieth century. Up until Emancipation, the tobacco was harvested by slaves on larger farms. The development of industry and commerce coincided with the agricultural production of the Greenwood-Afton area. Most of the early industry centered on the rivers and included flour and grist mills. Sawmills and distilleries as wel I as brick manufacturers and tanneries provided services to the communities throughout the Greenwood-Afton area. Orchards, particularly apples, and vineyards provided crop diversification beginning in the later decades of the nineteenth century after wheat and tobacco production waned. Today the Greenwood-Afton Rural Historic District still relies on orchards and vineyards as part of the local agricultura I economy as well as heritage and outdoor recreational tourism. Villages of the Greenwood-Afton Rural Historic District Afton Village Afton, a mid-nineteenth century village located at the base of the Blue Ridge Mountains, was established around 1853.
    [Show full text]
  • Blue Ridge Tunnel Trail
    Blue Ridge Tunnel Trail Trailhead Locations: Western Trailhead: U.S. 250 immediately west of Colony House Motel 250 (Parking loop is one way.) ¤£ N38° 02.609' W78° 51.454' To Waynesboro Eastern Trailhead: 215 Afton Depot Lane Afton, VA 22920 N38° 01.999' W78° 50.547' !j Don't forget a strong flashlight or headlamp with fresh batteries! The tunnel can be cold and wet, so dress for conditions. Trail open West Portal sunrise to sunset only. To Charlottesville Current Rail Tunnel length: UV6 Tunnel 4,273 ft. ¤£ 250 !j UV6 East Portal I-64 Exit 99 Blue Ridge Parkway 0 0.125 0.25 0.5 Miles ¯ (c) 2020 Jeff Monroe - www.hikingupward.com Service Layer Credits: © OpenStreetMap (and) contributors, CC-BY-SA USGS The National Map: National Boundaries Dataset, 3DEP Elevation Program, Geographic Names Information System, National Hydrography Dataset, National Land Cover Database, National Structures Dataset, and National Transportation Dataset; USGS Global Ecosystems; U.S. Census Bureau TIGER/Line data; USFS Road Data; Natural Earth Data; U.S. Department of State Humanitarian Information Unit; and NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information, U.S. Coastal Relief Model. Data refreshed May, 2020. Blue Ridge Tunnel - Afton, Virginia Length Difficulty Streams Views Solitude Camping 4.6 mls N/A N/A N/A Hiking Time: 2.0 hours including breaks Elev. Gain: 470 ft Parking: Parking at the west parking area for the directions below. 38.04348, -78.85757 By Trail Contributor: Jeff Monroe The Blue Ridge Tunnel Trail opened in November, 2020 and was an immediate hit with hikers, bikers, dog walkers and families.
    [Show full text]
  • A Year in Review Fy 2018
    A YEAR IN REVIEW FY 2018 CSPDC: A Year in Review 2018 Page 1 OUR MISSION To help communities and agencies within the Central Shenandoah Valley work together by providing high quality planning, technical assistance, and facilitation services that address local, regional, and state needs in an innovative, timely, and cooperative manner. COMMISSIONERS (AS OF JANUARY 1, 2018) AUGUSTA COUNTY HARRISONBURG ROCKINGHAM COUNTY Marshall Pattie, Treasurer Ted Byrd Ned Overton Terry Kelley George Hirschmann Rick Chandler Vickie Moran Adam Fletcher Casey Armstrong, Secretary Leslie Tate Kim Sandum BATH COUNTY HIGHLAND COUNTY STAUNTON Edward Hicklin Kevin Wagner, Vice Chairman Carolyn Dull Sharon Angle BUENA VISTA LEXINGTON WAYNESBORO Lisa Clark Frank Friedman, Chairman Jeff Freeman Rusty Johnson ROCKBRIDGE COUNTY Jay Lewis Chris Slaydon Page 2 CSPDC: A Year in Review 2018 OUR MEMBER JURISDICTIONS Proudly serving the counties of Augusta, Bath, Highland, Rockbridge, and Rockingham; the cities of Buena Vista, Harrisonburg, Lexington, Staunton, and Waynesboro; and the towns of Bridgewater, Broadway, Craigsville, Dayton, Elkton, Glasgow, Goshen, Grottoes, Monterey, Mount Crawford, and Timberville. CSPDC: A Year in Review 2018 Page 3 Bike-Walk Summit The 6th annual Harrisonburg-Rockingham Bike-Walk Summit was held in November 2017 on the James Madison University (JMU) campus. The 80 attendees represented local elected bodies, community and bicycle advocacy groups, small business owners, and local, regional, and state government staff. The Summit’s theme was “Engaging to Build More Walkable and Bikeable Communities,” and Fionnuala Quinn presented the keynote speech and hands-on, interactive activities. Ms. Quinn is the founder and director of the non-profit Bureau of Good Roads, which develops and delivers STEM- based learning materials and activities related to the design of transportation infrastructure.
    [Show full text]
  • Policy Board Meeting Agenda August 1, 2018, 10:00 A.M
    112 MacTanly Place Phone (540) 885-5174 Staunton, VA 24401 Fax (540) 885-2687 Policy Board Meeting Agenda August 1, 2018, 10:00 a.m. Central Shenandoah Planning District Commission 112 MacTanly Place Staunton, VA 24401 1. Call to Order and Welcome of New Members 2. Public Comment 3. Approval of Minutes of the June 6, 2018 Policy Board Meeting * 4. FY 2018 UPWP Budget Update and Year-End Report (Board Memo #18 - 11) ** 5. Small Area Study Program Update (Board Memo #18 - 12) • US 340 (Rosser Avenue) Signal Timing Study • FY 2019 Study S 6. Presentation: BRITE State of Transit Update, Cindi Johnson, CSPDC Fiscal Officer 7. Presentation: Transit Funding Reforms, Nick Britton, Statewide Manager of Transit Planning, DRPT 8. Agency Updates • VDOT • DRPT • Transit 9. Other Business • BUILD Grant Application for the Crozet Blue Ridge Tunnel (Fact Sheet attached) • Annual Joint SAWMPO-CAMPO Meeting - October 10, 2018 10. Upcoming Meetings • August 15 - SAWMPO TAC Meeting, 2:00 pm at CSPDC Office • August 23 - VDOT I-81 Corridor Study Meeting at BRCC Plecker Center 4:00 PM – 7:00 PM • September 5 - SAWMPO Policy Board Meeting, 10:00 am at CSPDC Office 11. Adjournment * Action Required ** Provided at meeting 112 MacTanly Place Phone (540) 885-5174 Staunton, VA 24401 Fax (540) 885-2687 Policy Board Regular Meeting Minutes June 6, 2018, 10:00 a.m. Central Shenandoah Planning District Commission 112 MacTanly Place, Staunton Virginia Present (22): Voting Members Non-Voting Members Others City of Staunton Va DRPT Terrell Hughes, VDOT James Harrington,
    [Show full text]
  • 2020-12 Institute Report
    Virginia Military Institute Institute Report Volume 49, Number 4, December 2020 Wins Named Interim Superintendent By Amy Goetz On the evening of Wednesday, Nov. 18, to turn down the U.S. Naval Academy’s 2020, Maj. Gen. Cedric T. Wins ’85 donned offer—“A career in the military didn’t his uniform and headed to Cameron interest me.” Immediately afterward, his Hall to address the Corps of Cadets as father had a talk with him. the interim superintendent of VMI. The “I’ll never forget it. He sat me down significance of this action did not escape and said ‘I’ve got to tell you, I was really, Wins. While he carries himself with a really stunned when you turned down settled focus “on the things at hand,” he is an opportunity to go to Navy. But what I circumspect as he considers the first time want you to understand, is these guys at he stepped foot on post, some 39 years ago. VMI, they have been talking to you and In the fall of 1981, Wins was, as he recruiting you since you started your describes himself, “a lean, tall, pretty senior season. They have offered you a decent basketball player” from Maryland, full-ride scholarship, so more than any- who had been recruited to play Division thing else, that's an indication to me they I basketball by both the Naval Academy have plans for you. If I were you, I would and VMI. He would be the first in the Wins family to attend college. He decided See Wins, page 18 Maj.
    [Show full text]
  • Middle James Segment Plan
    Middle James Segment Plan Cover The following state agency employees served on the advisory committee or otherwise provided input into this plan: Heather Mackay, DEQ Katie Conner, VTC Michael Womack, DOF Megan Lopes, VDH Tom, DOF John, VDOT Scott Smith, DWR Nick Ruiz, DRPT John Kirk, DWR Christen Miller, DCR Steve, DWR David Boyd, DCR Marc Wagner, DHR Lynn Crump, DCR Elizabeth Lipford, DHR Nathan Burrell, DCRABSTRACT James Hare, DHR Sarah Richardson, DCRThis document identifies focus areas Jolene Smith, DHR within the James River Watershed between Lynchburg and Maidens that have heritage, agritourism and outdoor Staff from the James River Association, in particular Justin Doyle, Amber Ellis and Rob Campbell, have recreation assets. With additional also provided input and reviewed material. Other stakeholders invited to help shape the draft document investment, collective impact, protection John with the Scenic River Advisory Committee, and Joe Elton, landowner. and promotion, these special places could help make the James River Local representatives at focus area meetings helped develop the action itemsHeritage and were Corridor invited a worldto review class the plan as well. They are listed along with each matrix of proposed trail actionsdestination. found in the Appendix. Cover photo: This is named the Clifton Lee, owned by Ryan Hamlet. Brian is on rear sweep. Photo courtesy of Holt with the Virginia Canals and Navigations Society. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation December 2020 MIDDLE JAMES SEGMENT PLAN Making the
    [Show full text]
  • Downtown Crozet in Motion Strategic Plan Downtown Crozet Initiative, Inc
    Downtown Crozet in Motion Strategic Plan Downtown Crozet Initiative, Inc. Crozet, Virginia May 2018 Prepared by: Patricia A. Groot, Principal 1965 Ashmere Drive Charlottesville VA 22902 (434) 962-2029 [email protected] For: Downtown Crozet Initiative, Inc. Deliverable for DHCD Commercial District Affiliate Grant; County of Albemarle, Fiscal Agent Downtown In Motion – Strategic Plan 1 May 25, 2018 Background Patricia Groot of Groot Consulting and Grant Services was retained by the Downtown Crozet Initiative, Inc. (DCI), a newly formed nonprofit, to assist with its organizational development and create a strategic plan. Mary Beth Bowen of Hive Creative Group was also retained to improve the DCI website and Facebook communications, and reinstate a DCI monthly blog. Under the grant awarded from DHCD under the Commercial District Affiliate program, DCI committed to learning more about the Main Street Program and incorporated those principles into the strategic plan. The elements of this strategic plan include a workplan, budget, economic restructuring, scope of work and fundraising plan. During the second planning session, the Board of Directors opted to refine three Catalyst Transformation Strategies as a workplan. Albeit, time only allowed to refine two of the three Strategies as part of this strategic planning process. It is significant to note that the DCI began as a community planning group in March of 2015. That group, with many of the same members, has formed the nonprofit of today. This report is based on the review of work completed by DCI in all its permutations, siX planning sessions with the Board of Directors, of which three sessions included community members, driving and walking tours of the area, and review of various materials and planning documents.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lodger Volunteer John Rockett As Long As Three Months
    The July 2014 Lodger Issue 6 NEWSLETTER FOR RESIDENTS AND FRIENDS OF THE LODGE AT OLD TRAIL Another Lodge RESIDENT F CUS Innovation Many of us shudder at the thought of In this era of rapid change, even trash is being mathematics, but for Ron Herd it was rethought. By viewing trash as a resource instead of his way of life. Ron was in high demand a throwaway, commercial composters are popping for his mastery of math which he could up here and elsewhere to offer another way for disposing of food scraps. The Lodge recently apply to solve unbelievable queries. embarked on its own effort by employing the He worked for a variety of operations services of a new Charlottesville area composter research firms and in no time rose to that collects food scraps from The Lodge kitchen on the highest executive positions a twice weekly basis to make nutrient-rich soil. “We are not only helping the including the vice presidency of the environment,” says The Lodge’s internationally known consulting firm Tess Marshall, “but we also hope for an economic advantage as Booze Allen. well.” Even though there is a cost Ron, 93, relocated from Leesburg to The Lodge in to The Lodge for the composting April 2014 and lives in his Ridges third floor apartment service, solid waste disposal cost overlooking the Blue Ridge Mountains. Because of a will be reduced by eliminating mini-stroke that affected his ability to speak, his food from that waste stream. engaging son, Milton, agreed to sit down with this Organized in 2011, Black Bear Composting provides The reporter to review his father’s past.
    [Show full text]