DOCSLIB.ORG

Financing Plan (In Us$)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Financing Plan (In Us$) GEF-6 PROJECT IDENTIFICATION FORM (PIF) PROJECT TYPE: FULL-SIZED PROJECT TYPE OF TRUST FUND: GEF TRUST FUND For more information about GEF, visit TheGEF.org PART I: PROJECT INFORMATION Project Title: Sustainable Forest Management and Conservation Project in central and south Benin (Departments of Borgou and Donga) Country(ies): Benin GEF Project ID:1 9383 GEF Agency(ies): AfDB (select) (select) GEF Agency Project ID: Other Executing Partner(s): Ministry of Environment, Department of Submission Date: 23.03.2016 Climate Change Management, Reforestation, and Natural Resource and Forest Protection GEF Focal Area(s): Multi-focal Areas Project Duration (Months) 48 Integrated Approach Pilot IAP-Cities IAP-Commodities IAP-Food Security Corporate Program: SGP Name of parent program: [if applicable] Agency Fee ($) 249,587 A. INDICATIVE FOCAL AREA STRATEGY FRAMEWORK AND OTHER PROGRAM STRATEGIES2 (in $) Objectives/Programs (Focal Areas, Integrated Approach Pilot, Corporate Trust Programs) GEF Project Co- Fund Financing financing BD-1 Program 1 (select) (select) GEFTF 863,242 5,420,000 LD-2 Program 3 (select) (select) GEFTF 459,018 2,600,000 (select) CCM-2 Program 4 (select) GEFTF 429,224 2,655,000 (select) (select) SFM-1 GEFTF 437,871 2,600,000 (select) (Select) SFM-2 GEFTF 437,871 2,655,000 Total Project Cost 2,627,226 15,930,000 B. INDICATIVE PROJECT DESCRIPTION SUMMARY Project Objective: To promote socially and environmentally sustainable forest management in central and south Benin by improving forest and land management to preserve forest cover, prevent biodiversity loss, and monitor carbon stocks and emissions. (in $) Finan Trust GEF Project Components cing Project Outcomes Project Outputs Co- 3 Fund Project Type financing Financing Component 1: Inv 1.1 Improvement in 1.1.1 150,000 ha of GEFTF 883,828 4,800,000 Enhancing Benin’s forest communal forests conservation of forest ecosystems in targeted included in protected ecosystems and departments, with an areas wildlife in classified increase in total area forests protected and reduced 1.1.2 Implementation pressure on high value of the management forests plans for 2 PAs (Monts Kouffé and Wari Maro forest reserves) (building on previous AfDB and WB projects) 1 Project ID number will be assigned by GEFSEC and to be entered by Agency in subsequent document submissions. 2 When completing Table A, refer to the excerpts on GEF 6 Results Frameworks for GETF, LDCF and SCCF. 3 Financing type can be either investment or technical assistance. 1 GEF-6 PIF Template-Sept2015 1.1.3 Assessment of a financing plan to sustain protected area management (Monts Kouffé and Wari Maro) 1.2 Improved 1.2.1 Three (3) new management of protected wildlife ranches areas in Benin’s targeted (communal) set up regions, with concurrent (Zogbodomey, Djidja reduction in and Savalou), with encroachment and improved protected poaching rates of area management elephants, wild cats, and effectiveness scores other threatened species for total 8,000 ha 1.2.2 Two (2) protected areas (Monts Kouffé, Wari Maro) up-scaled to involve communities in the management process 1.2.3 # of households (TBD) benefiting from the promotion of alternative livelihood activities to poaching and deforestation, including via the introduction of new seeds 1.2.4 Endangered species protected in 2 PAs - endemic species (details in section B) 1.3 Capacity enhanced 1.3.1 Capacity for sustainable forest development for SFM management (SFM) within districts: # of within local communities trainings held in target departments to enhance community awareness and knowledge on forestry issues 1.3.2 Community groups formed and trained to oversee community forestry activities 2 GEF-6 PIF Template-Sept2015 Component 2: TA 2.1 Improved forest 2.1.1 Rehabilitation GEFTF 783,828 4,700,000 Improving management and of 20,000-25,000 ha sustainability and restoration, with of forest plantations functioning of forest consequent conservation ecosystems and enhancement of 2.1.2 Benin National carbon stock Forestry Code updated 2.1.3 Forestry Resources Inventories completed for targeted reserves 2.1.4 Early Warning System (EWS) to prevent bushfires 2.2 Increased installed contribution of agro- and forest landscapes and their ecosystem services 2.2.1 Agro-forestry to local livelihoods and promoted on 5,500 economic development ha, including the introduction of Teak and Gmelina plants 2.2.2 Enhanced area under community forestry: 300 ha of nurseries to raise seedlings; 5,500 trees in forest plantations and woodlots; 30,000 trees planted in fruit orchards 2.2.3 At least 5 alternative income generating activities identified and implemented with local communities, based on climate smart agro-practices Component 3: TA 3.1 Technical and 3.1.1 Integrated GEFTF 522,070 4,165,000 Greenhouse Gas institutional capacity landscape restoration Emissions Inventory strengthened to identify plans with degraded forest participatory forestry landscapes and monitor monitoring, forest restoration, carbon reporting, and stocks, and other data verification systems established 3.1.2 Mapping of degraded areas with GIS, and training in targeted departments on forest monitoring 3 GEF-6 PIF Template-Sept2015 to better identify, manage and monitor forest resources and loss 3.2.1 GHG emissions 3.2 Accelerated adoption baseline established of monitoring practices for communal forests to support GHG emission reduction and carbon 3.2.2 Robust new sequestration and to GHG accounting improve the conservation methodologies and enhancement of applied for carbon stocks in targeted monitoring regional forests forests 3.2.3 One (1) data collection system relevant to GHG accounting established Component 4: Project TA 4.1 Enhanced 4.1.1 Participatory GEFTF 300,000 1,470,000 coordination and coordination, monitoring implementation and knowledge and evaluation coordination management mechanism established to monitor the project 4.1.2 M&E plan formulated and implemented 4.2 Project knowledge management aspect 4.2.1 A knowledge enhanced to capture management platform project results operational 4.2.2 Database for project data established Subtotal 2,489,726 14,500,000 Project Management Cost (PMC)4 137,500 795,000 Total Project Cost 2,627,226 15,930,000 For multi-trust fund projects, provide the total amount of PMC in Table B, and indicate the split of PMC among the different trust funds here: ( ) C. INDICATIVE SOURCES OF CO-FINANCING FOR THE PROJECT BY NAME AND BY TYPE, IF AVAILABLE Sources of Type of Name of Co-financier Amount ($) Co-financing Co-financing GEF Agency African Development Bank Loans 14,720,000 Recipient Government Government of Benin Cash 1,000,000 Beneficiaries Local communities In-kind 210,000 Total Co-financing 15,930,000 4 For GEF Project Financing up to $2 million, PMC could be up to10% of the subtotal; above $2 million, PMC could be up to 5% of the subtotal. PMC should be charged proportionately to focal areas based on focal area project financing amount in Table D below. 4 GEF-6 PIF Template-Sept2015 D. INDICATIVE TRUST FUND RESOURCES REQUESTED BY AGENCY(IES), COUNTRY(IES) AND THE PROGRAMMING OF FUNDS A) Country (in $) GEF Program Trust / Agenc Focal Area ming GEF Project Agency Fee Total Fund Regional y of Funds Financing (a) (b)b) (c)=a+b / Global AfDB GEFTF Benin Biodiversity N/A 863,242 82,008 945,250 AfDB GEFTF Benin Climate Change N/A 429,224 40,776 470,000 AfDB GEFTF Benin Land Degradation N/A 459,018 43,607 502,625 AfDB GEFTF Benin Multi-focal Areas N/A 875,742 83,196 958,938 Total GEF Resources 2,627,226 249,587 2,876,813 a) Refer to the Fee Policy for GEF Partner Agencies. E. PROJECT PREPARATION GRANT (PPG)5 Is Project Preparation Grant requested? Yes No If no, skip item E. PPG AMOUNT REQUESTED BY AGENCY(IES), TRUST FUND, COUNTRY(IES) AND THE PROGRAMMING OF FUNDS Project Preparation Grant amount requested: $100,000 PPG Agency Fee: $9,500 (in $) GEF Trust Country/ Programming Focal Area Agency Total Agency Fund Regional/Global of Funds PPG (a) Fee6 (b) c = a + b AfDB GEFTF Benin Biodiversity N/A 50,000 4,750 54,750 AfDB GEFTF Benin Multi-focal Areas 25,000 2,375 27,375 AfDB GEFTF Benin Land Degradation 25,000 2,375 27,375 Total PPG Amount 100,000 9,500 109,500 5 PPG requested amount is determined by the size of the GEF Project Financing (PF) as follows: Up to $50k for PF up to$2m (for MSP); up to $100k for PF up to $3m; $150k for PF up to $6m; $200k for PF up to $10m; and $300k for PF above $10m. On an exceptional basis, PPG amount may differ upon detailed discussion and justification with the GEFSEC. 6 PPG fee percentage follows the percentage of the Agency fee over the GEF Project Financing amount requested. 5 GEF-6 PIF Template-Sept2015 F. PROJECT’S TARGET CONTRIBUTIONS TO GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS7 Provide the expected project targets as appropriate. Corporate Results Replenishment Targets Project Targets 1. Maintain globally significant biodiversity Improved management of landscapes and 150,000 Hectares and the ecosystem goods and services that seascapes covering 300 million hectares it provides to society 2. Sustainable land management in 120 million hectares under sustainable land 41,000 Hectares8 production systems (agriculture, management rangelands, and forest landscapes) 3. Promotion of collective management of Water-food-ecosystems security and conjunctive Number of transboundary water systems and management of surface and groundwater in at freshwater basins implementation of the full range of policy, least 10 freshwater basins; legal, and institutional reforms and 20% of globally over-exploited fisheries (by Percent of investments contributing to sustainable use volume) moved to more sustainable levels fisheries, by volume and maintenance of ecosystem services 4.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • S a Rd in Ia
    M. Mandarino/Istituto Euromediterraneo, Tempio Pausania (Sardinia) Land07-1Book 1.indb 97 12-07-2007 16:30:59 Demarcation conflicts within and between communities in Benin: identity withdrawals and contested co-existence African urban development policy in the 1990s focused on raising municipal income from land. Population growth and a neoliberal environment weakened the control of clans and lineages over urban land ownership to the advantage of individuals, but without eradicating the importance of personal relationships in land transactions or of clans and lineages in the political structuring of urban space. The result, especially in rural peripheries, has been an increase in land aspirations and disputes and in their social costs, even in districts with the same territorial control and/or the same lines of nobility. Some authors view this simply as land “problems” and not as conflicts pitting locals against outsiders and degenerating into outright clashes. However, decentralization gives new dimensions to such problems and is the backdrop for clashes between differing perceptions of territorial control. This article looks at the ethnographic features of some of these clashes in the Dahoman historic region of lower Benin, where boundaries are disputed in a context of poorly managed urban development. Such disputes stem from land registries of the previous but surviving royal administration, against which the fragile institutions of the modern state seem to be poorly equipped. More than a simple problem of land tenure, these disputes express an internal rejection of the legitimacy of the state to engage in spatial structuring based on an ideal of co-existence; a contestation that is put forward with the de facto complicity of those acting on behalf of the state.
    [Show full text]
  • Monographie Des Départements Du Zou Et Des Collines
    Spatialisation des cibles prioritaires des ODD au Bénin : Monographie des départements du Zou et des Collines Note synthèse sur l’actualisation du diagnostic et la priorisation des cibles des communes du département de Zou Collines Une initiative de : Direction Générale de la Coordination et du Suivi des Objectifs de Développement Durable (DGCS-ODD) Avec l’appui financier de : Programme d’appui à la Décentralisation et Projet d’Appui aux Stratégies de Développement au Développement Communal (PDDC / GIZ) (PASD / PNUD) Fonds des Nations unies pour l'enfance Fonds des Nations unies pour la population (UNICEF) (UNFPA) Et l’appui technique du Cabinet Cosinus Conseils Tables des matières 1.1. BREF APERÇU SUR LE DEPARTEMENT ....................................................................................................... 6 1.1.1. INFORMATIONS SUR LES DEPARTEMENTS ZOU-COLLINES ...................................................................................... 6 1.1.1.1. Aperçu du département du Zou .......................................................................................................... 6 3.1.1. GRAPHIQUE 1: CARTE DU DEPARTEMENT DU ZOU ............................................................................................... 7 1.1.1.2. Aperçu du département des Collines .................................................................................................. 8 3.1.2. GRAPHIQUE 2: CARTE DU DEPARTEMENT DES COLLINES .................................................................................... 10 1.1.2.
    [Show full text]
  • BENIN FY2020 Annual Work Plan
    USAID’s Act to End NTDs | West Benin FY20 WORK PLAN USAID’s Act to End Neglected Tropical Diseases | West Program BENIN FY2020 Annual Work Plan Annual Work Plan October 1, 2019 to September 30, 2020 1 USAID’s Act to End NTDs | West Benin FY20 WORK PLAN Contents ACRONYM LIST ............................................................................................................................................... 3 NARRATIVE ..................................................................................................................................................... 6 1. National NTD Program Overview....................................................................................................... 6 2. IR1 PLANNED ACTIVITIES: LF, TRA, OV ............................................................................................... 8 i. Lymphatic Filariasis ........................................................................................................................ 8 ii. Trachoma ..................................................................................................................................... 12 iii. Onchocerciasis ............................................................................................................................. 14 3. SUSTAINABILITY STRATEGY ACTIVITIES (IR2 and IR3) ...................................................................... 16 i. DATA SECURITY AND MANAGEMENT .......................................................................................... 16 ii.
    [Show full text]
  • (Buruli Ulcer) in Rural Hospital, Southern Benin, 1997–2001 Martine Debacker,* Julia Aguiar,† Christian Steunou,† Claude Zinsou,*† Wayne M
    Mycobacterium ulcerans Disease (Buruli Ulcer) in Rural Hospital, Southern Benin, 1997–2001 Martine Debacker,* Julia Aguiar,† Christian Steunou,† Claude Zinsou,*† Wayne M. Meyers,‡ Augustin Guédénon,§ Janet T. Scott,* Michèle Dramaix,¶ and Françoise Portaels* Data from 1,700 patients living in southern Benin were Even though large numbers of patients have been collected at the Centre Sanitaire et Nutritionnel Gbemoten, reported, the epidemiology of BU remains obscure, even in Zagnanado, Benin, from 1997 through 2001. In the Zou disease-endemic countries. In 1997, a first report was pub- region in 1999, Buruli ulcer (BU) had a higher detection rate lished on 867 BU patients from the Republic of Benin (21.5/100,000) than leprosy (13.4/100,000) and tuberculo- (West Africa) for 1989–1996 (4). Our study covers the sis (20.0/100,000). More than 13% of the patients had osteomyelitis. Delay in seeking treatment declined from 4 ensuing 5 years (1997 to 2001), during which a collabora- months in 1989 to 1 month in 2001, and median hospital- tive project was initiated to improve detection and control ization time decreased from 9 months in 1989 to 1 month of BU. This study describes BU in Benin and presents in 2001. This reduction is attributed, in part, to implement- demographic trends and epidemiologic data from the four ing an international cooperation program, creating a nation- southern regions of Benin (Zou, Oueme, Mono, and al BU program, and making advances in patient care. Atlantique), as seen in a rural hospital in the Zou Region. uruli ulcer (BU), caused by Mycobacterium ulcerans, Patients and Methods Bis the third most common mycobacterial disease in Our observations are based on 1,700 consecutive humans after tuberculosis and leprosy (1).
    [Show full text]
  • République Du Bénin Ministère De L'eau Et Des Mines (MEM) Société Nationale Des Eaux Du Bénin (SONEB)
    République du Bénin Ministère de l'Eau et des Mines (MEM) Société Nationale des Eaux du Bénin (SONEB) Étude de collecte de données pour le développement des eaux souterraines et l’amélioration des systèmes d’approvisionnement en eau dans les départements de Couffo et Plateau en République du Bénin Rapport Final Avril 2018 Agence Japonaise de Coopération Internationale (JICA) Sanyu Consultants Inc. GE JR 18-047 Table des Matières Carte de localisation de la zone cible du Projet Table des Matières Liste des Tableaux et Figures/Abréviations/Taux de change CHAPTER 1 Présentation de l’Étude ............................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Contexte et objectifs de l’Étude ........................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Calendrier de l’étude .............................................................................................................. 1-1 CHAPTER 2 Présentation du secteur de l’eau Bénin .................................................................. 2-1 2.1 Plan de niveau supérieur dans le secteur de l’eau ............................................................ 2-1 2.2 Organisation du secteur de l’eau .......................................................................................... 2-1 2.3 Orientations de la coopération financière du Japon ......................................................... 2-4 2.4 Projets des autres bailleurs de fonds et organismes de coopération ............................. 2-5 CHAPTER
    [Show full text]
  • Policy Brief
    Policy Brief Falylath Babah Daouda and Paul T.M. Ingenbleek October 2020 Endogenous Products to Increasing Food Security in Benin Who is this aimed at? • Agricultural policy makers in government and institutions • Agri-businesses Key messages • The white KG with small grain size is highly accepted and strongly demanded in Benin. • The production of KG is the main barrier to its market development. • Farmers’ decision to augment the quantity of their production of KG is based on an assessment of a combination of contract farming attributes. • To be successful in implementing a contract farming on the production of KG, a contracting company needs either to be well-known by the farmers or to rely on a well-known procurement officer by farmers. Policy options • Traditional marketing system may be considered for market development for KG • Institutional arrangements can help to increase the production of KG • Satisfying farmers ultimate needs for producing KG may be a first milestone to insuring KG accessibility and affordability. Executive Summary and was based on a quasi-experiment with 254 farmers in KG growing basin (Central region of Benin). The contract attributes for the supply of KG are pre-production agreements Kersting groundnut (KG) is a crop used mostly in feasts and between the farmer and the eventual buyer to reduce big events and known as Doyiwé in Benin that has been uncertainties and costs related to farm input, output market and neglected because of a lack of incentive, policy and research quality of KG. support for its production. Production and marketing systems for the crop seem to be fragmented as there are many varieties of the grains being cultivated.
    [Show full text]
  • Benin Private Health Sector Census
    BENIN PRIVATE HEALTH SECTOR CENSUS December 2014 This document was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by Andrew Carmona, Sean Callahan, and Kathryn Banke for the Strengthening Health Outcomes through the Private Sector (SHOPS) project. Recommended Citation: Carmona, Andrew, Sean Callahan, and Kathryn Banke. 2014. Benin Private Health Sector Census. Bethesda, MD: Strengthening Health Outcomes through the Private Sector Project, Abt Associates Inc. Download copies of SHOPS publications at: www.shopsproject.org Cooperative Agreement: GPO-A-00-09-00007-00 Submitted to: Ricardo Missihoun Commodities and Logistics Specialist United States Agency for International Development/Benin Marguerite Farrell, AOR Bureau of Global Health Global Health/Population and Reproductive Health/Service Delivery Improvement United States Agency for International Development Abt Associates Inc. 4550 Montgomery Avenue, Suite 800 North Bethesda, MD 20814 Tel: 301.347.5000 Fax: 301.913.9061 www.abtassociates.com In collaboration with: Banyan Global Jhpiego Marie Stopes International Monitor Group O’Hanlon Health Consulting BENIN PRIVATE HEALTH SECTOR CENSUS DISCLAIMER The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States government. TABLE OF CONTENTS Acronyms ........................................................................................................................... vi Acknowledgements
    [Show full text]
  • Benin• Floods Situation Report #8 4 November 2010
    Benin• Floods Situation Report #8 4 November 2010 This report was issued by UNOCHA Benin. It covers the period from 27 October to 4 November. The next report will be issued on or around 11 November. I. HIGHLIGHTS/KEY PRIORITIES • Rains continue, mostly in the north of the country, although the dry season is expected to start soon. • The Emergency Humanitarian Appeal Plan was launched this week requesting US$ 46,847,399 to assist flood victims. • On 30 October WFP started food distribution in Zagnanado for 2,450 vulnerable people in collaboration with the National Red Cross. II. Situation Overview The latest governmental figures report that 680,000 people and 55 municipalities out of 77 in the country have been affected by floods since the start of heavy rains in August. The flooding has caused at least 46 deaths, 1,000 injuries and left more than 150,000 people homeless. According to field reports, sporadic rains continue mostly in the north, but waters are gradually receding in many parts of the country. In some departments water stagnation continues. Humanitarian organizations, including United Nations agencies and NGOs, are working to provide assistance to those in need, especially in the area of food, health, shelters, and water and sanitation. Health could become a major concern in the worst affected areas, as the recession of water in the next few weeks could increase the number of cholera and malaria cases. Serious humanitarian consequences will be registered particularly in the agricultural sector as the planting season, due to start in November, will be severely affected by the unexpectedly high rainfall.
    [Show full text]
  • Republique Du Benin
    REPUBLIQUE DU BENIN Fraternité-Justice-Travail JUIN 2020 SOMMAIRE LISTE DES TABLEAUX, GRAPHIQUES ET FIGURES ..................................................................ii LISTE DES SIGLES ET ABREVIATIONS ......................................................................................... iii DECLARATION LIMINAIRE ............................................................................................................. vii FAITS SAILLANTS ................................................................................................................................ ix I. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................... 1 II. METHODOLOGIE ET PROCESSUS DE PREPARATION DE L’EXAMEN ....................... 2 2.1. Note conceptuelle et feuille de route du processus .............................................. 2 2.2. Ateliers nationaux d’animation du processus .......................................................... 3 2.3. Ateliers Régionaux et internationaux et partage d’expériences autour du processus .......................................................................................................................................... 3 III. POLITIQUE ET ENVIRONNEMENT FACILITATEUR. ...................................................... 4 3.1. Appropriation des Objectifs de Développement Durable ................................... 4 3.2. Incorporation des Objectifs de Développement Durable dans les cadres nationaux ........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Hiv Testing Policy and Practices in Benin
    ASSESSMENT OF HIV TESTING POLICY AND PRACTICES IN BENIN AUGUST 2005 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by Souleymane Martial L. Barry, M.D., on behalf of Social & Scientific Systems, Inc., under The Synergy Project through Contract HRN-C-00-99-00005-00. Bureau for Global Health Office of HIV/AIDS United States Agency for International Development 1300 Pennsylvania Ave., NW Washington, DC 20523 ASSESSMENT OF HIV TESTING POLICY AND PRACTICES IN BENIN The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ...................................................vii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY....................................................................... ix BACKGROUND......................................................................................1 HIV/AIDS SITUATION .........................................................................1 HIV/AIDS TESTING IN THE WEST AFRICA SUB-REGION...............3 METHODOLOGY ................................................................................4 KEY FINDINGS ......................................................................................4 DEVELOPMENT OF POLICIES, NORMS, STANDARDS, AND PROTOCOLS ...................................................................................4 AVAILABILITY OF PMTCT, VCT, AND ARV SERVICES ...................5 COMMUNITY
    [Show full text]
  • Benin-Projet PRESREDI-Resume EIES-03 2017.Docx
    PROJECT : RESTRUCTURING AND EXTENSION PROJECT FOR THE SBEE DISPATCHING AND DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (PRESRDI) COUNTRY : BENIN SUMMARY ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (ESIA) Chef d’équipe D. IBRAHIME, Analyste Financier RDGN1 2549 A. MOUSSA, Ingénieur électricien RDGN1/COMA 7335 M. KINANE, Environnementaliste Principal SNSC 2933 P.H. SANON, Spécialiste Principal en Développement SNSC 5828 Social Membres d’équipe O. OUATTARA, Expert en gestion financière RDGN1/COSN 6561 Équipe du Projet M. ANASSIDE, Expert en acquisitions COML 7228 D. NDOYE, économiste pays Bénin RDGW0 / LIBJ Chef de Division Z. AMADOU PESD2 2211 pour le secteur Directeur pour le BALDEH H. P, PESD 4026 secteur Directeur régional LITSE J. RDGW 4047 1 Project Title: Restructuring and Extension Project for the SBEE SAP Code: P-BJ-FA0-004 Dispatching and Distribution System (PRESREDI) Country : Benin Department OITC Division: ONEC-1 1. INTRODUCTION At the request of Benin’s Authorities, the African Development Bank will support the implementation of the Restructuring and Extension Project for the SBEE Dispatching and Distribution System (PRESRDI) by providing co-financing with the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA). This project presents a summary Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) of the project. This assessment of the project were conducted in 2016, and is in compliance with the assessment conducted in 2015 as well as an update on it. According to national regulations, the project forms part of those activities for which a comprehensive environmental and social impact assessment is required. From an environmental and social standpoint, the project is classified in Category 1 in line with AfDB’s environmental and social assessment procedures given the nature of the works to be carried out, the size and scope of the project, as well as its potential direct and indirect impacts.
    [Show full text]
  • Improving the Health Resilience of Communities Vulnerable to Climate
    Improving the health resilience of communities vulnerable to climate change in Benin, focusing on the regions of Adjohoun, Bonou and Dangbo, as well as malaria, cardiovascular diseases and acute respiratory infections | Benin FNEC 4 March 2020 Improving the health resilience of communities vulnerable to climate change in Benin, focusing on the regions of Adjohoun, Bonou and Project/Programme title: Dangbo, as well as malaria, cardiovascular diseases and acute respiratory infections Country(ies): Benin National Designated Ministry of Living Environment and Sustainable Development Authority(ies) (NDA): Consortium GRAFED, Direction Nationale de la Santé Publique / Executing Entities: Ministère de la Santé Accredited Entity(ies) (AE): Fonds National pour L'Environnement Date of first submission/ 3/4/2020 1 V.1 version number: Date of current submission/ 3/4/2020 1 V.1 version number A. Project / Programme Information (max. 1 page) ☒ Project ☒ Public sector A.2. Public or A.1. Project or programme A.3 RFP Not applicable private sector ☐ Programme ☐ Private sector Mitigation: Reduced emissions from: ☐ Energy access and power generation: 0% ☐ Low emission transport: 0% ☐ Buildings, cities and industries and appliances: 0% A.4. Indicate the result ☐ Forestry and land use: 0% areas for the project/programme Adaptation: Increased resilience of: ☒ Most vulnerable people and communities: 33.333% ☒ Health and well-being, and food and water security: 33.333% ☒ Infrastructure and built environment: 33.333% ☐ Ecosystem and ecosystem services: 0% A.5.1. Estimated mitigation impact (tCO2eq over project lifespan) A.5.2. Estimated adaptation impact 1,488,701.3 direct beneficiaries (number of direct beneficiaries) A.5. Impact potential A.5.3.
    [Show full text]