DOCSLIB.ORG

BARTALK 17 Karina Software Relationships Handout

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
BARTALK 17 Karina Software Relationships Handout BARTALK 15-11-2019 by Karina Zavidova [email protected] www.zavidova.com Software: relationships 1. Software: What is it? Computer software, or simply software, is a collection of data or computer instructions that tell the computer how to work. This is in contrast to physical hardware, from which the system is built and actually performs the work. … Computer hardware and software require each other and neither can be realistically used on its own. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software the instructions that control what a computer does; computer programs https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/software Software: opposite to hardware, requires hardware to work. A set of instructions. ‘Set of instructions’ - why do I like this definition so much? Types of software: proprietary, open source, free software Proprietary (closed-source) software: Adobe, Microsoft Office, Mac OS etc. The source is closed, it is copyrighted and intellectual property remains the property of the owner and it is used by users under terms and conditions. Open source software: What is “Open Source” software? Generally, Open Source software is software that can be freely accessed, used, changed, and shared (in modified or unmodified form) by anyone. Open source software is made by many people, and distributed under licenses that comply with the Open Source Definition. https://opensource.org/faq#osd Can Open Source software be used for commercial purposes? Absolutely. All Open Source software can be used for commercial purpose; the Open Source Definition guarantees this. You can even sell Open Source software. However, note that commercial is not the same as proprietary. If you receive software under an Open Source license, you can always use that software for commercial purposes, but that doesn’t always mean you can place further restrictions on people who receive the software from you. In particular, copyleft- style Open Source licenses require that, in at least some cases, when you distribute the software, you must do so under the same license you received it under. https://opensource.org/faq#osd Is Open Source and Free Software the same thing? No. As I understand, the difference is quite ideological, where Open Source focuses on being open with a variety of terms and conditions and licensing models and Free Software focuses on freedom, giving it to you for free. 1. Software + me = a relationship 1. Who am I in this relationship? - an employee who gets the software with the job, working in a team - an individual - a freelancer - a hobbyist (‘software for stupid people’) —> A USER What does the software gets out of you? 2. Production model All software has a certain production model behind it The future of software <—> developing modern production models What are the production models behind the software I use daily? For example... InDesign – publishing house or a design studio Text Processors – Writer/Journalist/Editor How does the software handle the changes in the type of users and the ways of working? 3. Small detour: WARE Malware Vaporware (software which is announced but never released) Kitchenware 4. How do I access software? App, browser, terminal, plugins, mobile. Purchase vs cloud vs free. 5. Cloud is real The physical presence of software - Location, country - Visual uniformity (We think it all originates somewhere in California but that’s not exactly right) Cases to look up: Adobe Venezuela Livejournal Russia https://mashable.com/2017/04/10/livejournal-russian- law/?europe=true Github Iran https://thenextweb.com/dd/2019/10/24/the-iranian-developer-deadlock- stuck-between-censorship-and-us-sanctions/ 1. Software + other software = relationships(software = people) Tinder vs Bumble lawsuit duel ‘The Tinder-Bumble Feud: Dating Apps Fight Over Who Owns The Swipe’ https://www.npr.org/2018/10/30/660006488/the-tinder-bumble-feud-dating-apps-fight- over-who-owns-the-swipe?t=1573748585230 New ideas of patents for software (excerpts from the article): Then, four years ago, the Supreme Court set new guidance for patenting software with a case called Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International. The ruling, called the Alice decision, held that if you take an abstract idea and just propose using a computer or the Internet to make it happen, it’s still an abstract idea — and still not patentable. So meal-planning on the Internet: No longer patentable. But what about Tinder’s patent? Bumble argues the patent protects the idea of “matchmaking on the Internet,” and should be thrown out. Tinder, meanwhile, argues that marrying the swipe motion with a matchmaking system is a true invention, a concrete improvement to dating app interfaces. Also think of: Components (what happens when a work uses too much plugins?) Versions Who decides what is digital interaction? Unicode Consortium. (No they don’t decide e-v-e-r-y-t-h-i-n-g, but I am going to use them as an example) ‘Unicode Consortium, a non-profit that regulates the coding standards for written computer text that includes emojis’ (definition taken from the Taco Bell petition) Lobbying of emoji: Taco by Taco Bell (see the petition if curious) https://www.change. org/p/unicode-consortium-the-taco-emoji-needs-to-happen-aeb4ebc7-a323-441d- 90b9-20b90c83a8c6 Also see Durex lobbying for condom emoji How Are New Emoji Selected? The Unicode Emoji Subcommittee regularly reviews proposals for new emoji. The selection criteria are fully defined here, but in essence they boil down to this: a) will the image work at the small size at which emoji are commonly used, b) does the emoji add to what can be said using emoji or can the idea be expressed using existing emoji, c) is there substantial evidence that a large number of people will likely use this new emoji. https://home.unicode.org/emoji/ Guidelines for submitting an emoji: http://unicode.org/emoji/proposals.html#selection_ factors 1. The FUTURE ??? What does the future look like? What shifts are you noticing in the way you use software in your work and in your personal life? Few things I think about in connection to ‘The Future’ - Why am I even bothering with software…? Learning to code widely advertised as a promise of a bright future. Bootcamps. Replacing whatever I do with a ‘normal job’. - Voice interfaces: Training, replicating voices, stealing voices etc. - Software and hardware: Everything is a subscription service (Peloton example) - Memoji (platform separation) – iOs and Android producing different visual culture. - Use of face filters, what is behind it? Giving your face to the machine all over again. - No clue what the future has in stock because quite a lot of things we use today started as military projects – I won’t see it until it’s there. What is innovation anyway? (Check AI winter) Thank you for reading! Thank you for listening! .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • IIS Security and Programming Countermeasures
    IIS Security and Programming Countermeasures By Jason Coombs ([email protected]) Introduction This is a book about how to secure Microsoft Internet Information Services for administrators and programmers whose work includes a requirement for information security, a computer industry specialty field commonly referred to as infosec. In this book the terms information security and infosec are used interchangeably with the more friendly term data security. This is not a book about hacking, cracking, and the tools and techniques of the bad guys, the so-called black hat hackers. This book teaches computer professionals and infosec specialists how to build secure solutions using IIS. It is your duty to secure and defend networked information systems for the benefit of the good guys who are your end users, clients, or less technical coworkers. There is nothing you can do that will transform a programmable computer running Microsoft Windows from its vulnerable condition to an invulnerable one. Every general purpose programmable computer is inherently vulnerable because it is controlled by software and is designed to allow new software to be installed or executed arbitrarily. Network computing based on programmable general purpose computers will never be safe from an information security perspective. Eliminating the feature of general purpose programmability from a networked computer and replacing its software with firmware reduces but does not eliminate vulnerabilities. These are immutable realities of present day computing and, as always, reality represents your biggest challenge. Microsoft is in business to get as much of your money as possible using whatever means will work at a given moment and in this respect they know virtually no equal in the software business.
    [Show full text]
  • Computer Malpractice and Other Legal Problems Posed by Computer Vaporware
    Volume 33 Issue 5 Article 4 1988 Computer Malpractice and Other Legal Problems Posed by Computer Vaporware Ronald N. Weikers Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/vlr Part of the Computer Law Commons, Contracts Commons, and the Torts Commons Recommended Citation Ronald N. Weikers, Computer Malpractice and Other Legal Problems Posed by Computer Vaporware, 33 Vill. L. Rev. 835 (1988). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/vlr/vol33/iss5/4 This Comment is brought to you for free and open access by Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Villanova Law Review by an authorized editor of Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. Weikers: Computer Malpractice and Other Legal Problems Posed by Computer V 1988] "COMPUTER MALPRACTICE" AND OTHER LEGAL PROBLEMS POSED BY COMPUTER "VAPORWARE" I. INTRODUCTION The computer hardware' and software 2 trade is extremely compli- cated in that manufacturers, distributors and retailers must contend with thousands of available computer systems and parts, various financing and pricing concerns, training and retaining salespeople and much more.3 Nonetheless, the picture has recently become further clouded by 1. The term "computer hardware" describes the physical computer equip- ment. Typically, the hardware comprising a "personal computer system" con- sists of a "central processing unit"-the main body of the computer housing the processing circuitry and disk drives-, a video display monitor, and a printer. See Note, Copyright Infringement of Computer Programs: A Modification of the Substantial Similarity Test, 68 MINN. L. REV. 1264, 1264 n.1 (1984); Management Sys.
    [Show full text]
  • Mighty Number 9 and the Ethics of Kickstarter on July 18Th, 2011
    Spring 2016 | ADES 5515 Logan McLaughlin The Legend Never Dies, or Gets a Full Release: Mighty Number 9 and the Ethics of Kickstarter On July 18th, 2011 Capcom disappointed many fans of their iconic Mega Man series by announcing the cancellation of the most recent installment in the series: Mega Man Legends 3. Legends 3 had been in development for less than a year and was apparently close to having a finished Alpha build, an early playable version of the game. More importantly, lead producer Keiji Inafune had approved an interesting design process by opening a multi-national development forum to solicit ideas from carefully selected fans. I was among those on the developer forums who took part in surveys and design sessions for various mechanics and design implementations. When the game was cancelled I, like many others, had to accept that the Mega Man series was officially dead. Hope came in 2013 in the form of a Kickstarter for a new game developed independently from Capcom by Inafune himself under the banner of his new company Comcept LLC. What was promised to fans was a re-imagining of the classic 2D side scrolling Mega Man games so many had known and loved over the years. The title of this game was Mighty Number 9. The game reached its $900,000 USD target in two days, and by the end of the month-long Kickstarter campaign had raised a total of $3,845,170 USD. After the campaign, the game had a period of extended PayPal donations ultimately ending with a grand total of $4,046,579 USD raised.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. in Practice, There Are Two ...Of Detergents A. Predictions B
    In the name of God English for the students of IT Summer Term 14/6/1389 Choose the letter of correct answer and mark it on your answer sheet accordingly ﺗﻌﺪاد ﺳﻮال: 50 وﻗﺖ: هﻔﺘﺎد دﻗﻴﻘﻪ . ﻧﻤﺮﻩ ﻣﻨﻔﯽ دارد 1. In practice, there are two .......... of detergents d. described a. predictions 9. Since they both spoke simultaneously, I could not b. manipulations figure out what they were saying. The word c. evolutions SIMULTANEOUSLY is synonymous with the word d. categories* .......... a. real-time* 2. I want you to tell me the .......... truth, and nothing b. interrelated but the truth. c. instead a. tolerable d. distant b. illustrative c. approximate 10. The instructions faxed to us were garbled. We d. absolute* could not follow them. The word GARBLED is synonymous with the word .......... 3. The government .......... a new program for the a. removed improvement of the economy. b. rebuilt a. intervened c. corrupted* b. interacted d. changed c. initiated* d. extended 11. Many people regard ARPANET as the precursor of the internet. The word PRECURSOR is 4. Ram is also known as .......... memory. synonymous with the word .......... a. volatile* a. limitation b. removable b. forerunner* c. permanent c. complement d. critical d. amusement 5. .......... me those CDs over there, please. 12. Teachers disseminate knowledge to their students. a. quantify The word DISSEMINATE is synonymous with the b. manipulate word .......... c. locate a. record d. fetch* b. receive c. distribute* 6. She was .......... for the loss of her arm in the d. add accident. a. increased 13. Which of the following is a proper noun? b.
    [Show full text]
  • Vaporware: Imaginary High-Tech Products and Real Antitrust Liability
    Vaporware: Imaginary H-igh-Tech Products and Real Antitrust Liability in a Post-Chicago World ROBERT PRBNTICE* I. INTRODUCTION In rejecting a consent decree in the antitrust case United States v. Microsoft Corp.,1 Judge Stanley Sporkin noted that "vaporware," the high- technology industry's marketing ploy of preannouncing products that do not exist at the time of the announcement and may never come into existence in anything like their described form,2 "is a practice that is deceitful on its face and everybody in the business community knows it." 3 In part because of his misgivings about Microsoft Corporation's alleged * University Distinguished Teaching Professor and Ed and Molly Smith Centennial Professor of Business Law, Graduate School of Business, University of Texas, Austin, Texas. 1 159 F.R.D. 318 (D.D.C. 1995), rev'dper curiam, 56 F.3d 1448 (D.C. Cir. 1995). The original complaint charged Microsoft with violating sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act in the market for personal computer operating systems for the x86 class of microprocessors. The complaint attacked three of Microsoft's marketing practices: (a) "per processor" licenses by which Microsoft required original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) to pay a royalty for each computer the OEM sold regardless of whether it contained a Microsoft operating system; (b) "minimum commitments" distribution practices whereby Microsoft induced OEMs to commit to buy a minimum number of units of Microsoft operating systems under circumstances making it economically unattractive to install any non-Microsoft system; and (c) use of non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) to discourage independent software developers (ISVs) from developing applications for competing operating systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Information to Users
    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6” x 9” black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. UMI A Bell & Howell Information Company 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor MI 48106-1346 USA 313/761-4700 800/521-0600 PRIVACY-IMPLICATED SYSTEM DESIGN IN THE VIRTUAL MARKETPLACE DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University By Huichuan Liu, B.A., M.A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Thick of the Fray: Open Source Software in Libraries in the First Decade of This Century 2 R E B by K.G
    Special Section The Thick of the Fray: Open Source Software in Libraries in the First Decade of this Century 2 r e b by K.G. Schneider m u N , Open Source Software in Libraries 5 3 e he library community has been a-buzz of late about open source rooms – has gotten into the game. OCLC’s Developer’s Network now m u l o software (OSS). The air is thick with wildly divergent opinions of its collaborates in an “open source, code-sharing infrastructure” in which library V – value and utility for libraries even as wikis, blogs, conferences and developers, among other things, “share software code with other network 9 0 T 0 journal articles about OSS flood the library attention-economy. members and the community-at-large in an open source environment” [1] . 2 y r a u n a J / The Body Count r To no one’s surprise, a raw “body count” of libraries using open source What Is Free? e The chattering classes have been busy with OSS. At one extreme, skeptics b m integrated library systems indicates that the vast majority of libraries e condemn OSS as a low-grade, poor-man’s substitute for licensed software c e continue to rely on legacy proprietary systems. However, awareness of OSS D and argue that libraries are better served with off-the-shelf proprietary – y as a potentially viable approach for library technology is much more products. At the other extreme, OSS evangelists intimate it can cure cancer, g o l o widespread and growing, particularly as libraries use and become dissolve cellulite and always out-perform any other software.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Source Software Development* Walt Scacchi Institute for Software Researcher University of California, Irvine Irvine, CA 92697-3455 USA
    Open Source Software Development* Walt Scacchi Institute for Software Researcher University of California, Irvine Irvine, CA 92697-3455 USA Abstract This article examines and reviews what is known so far about free/open source software development (FOSSD). FOSSD is not the same as software engineering as that is portrayed in common textbooks. Instead, it is a complementary approach to address the many challenges that arise in the development of complex software systems that are often built outside of a traditional corporate software development environment. This article highlights some of the basic understandings for how FOSSD works based on empirical studies of FOSSD projects, processes, and work practices in different communities. This includes identification of different types of informal online artifacts that facilitate and constrain FOSSD projects. This article also identifies what different studies examine as well as the approaches used to sample and systematically study FOSSD. Next, opportunities for constructive crossover studies of software engineering and FOSSD help reveal new directions for further research study. Finally, the last section presents limitations and conclusions regarding studies of FOSSD. Keywords: open source software, free software, FLOSS, free/open source software development * Revised version appears in Encyclopedia of Software Engineering, Taylor and Francis, 614-626, 2011. 1. Introduction This articles examines practices, patterns, and processes that have been observed in studies of free/open source software development (FOSSD) projects. FOSSD is a way for building, deploying, and sustaining large software systems on a global basis, and differs in many interesting ways from the principles and practices traditionally advocated for software engineering [26]. Thousands of FLOSS systems are now in use by thousands to millions of end-users, and some of these FLOSS systems entail hundreds-of-thousands to millions of lines of source code.
    [Show full text]
  • Boston University Journal of Science & Technology
    4 B.U. J. SCI. & TECH. L. 8 September 30, 1998 Boston University Journal of Science & Technology Law Note The Year 2000—Delight or Disaster: Vendor Liability and the Year 2000 Bug in Computer Software Suzanne R. Eschrich Table of Contents I. Introduction............................................................................................................[1] II. Background.............................................................................................................[4] A. Examples......................................................................................................[7] 1. Happy Birthday...............................................................................[8] 2. Who Came First...............................................................................[9] 3. Mortgage Snafu.............................................................................[10] 4. Happy New Year...........................................................................[12] B. Industry Developments and Litigation...............................................[17] III. Theories of Liability..........................................................................................[21] A. Uniform Commercial Code....................................................................[23] 1. Application......................................................................................[23] 2. Specific Provisions.........................................................................[29] a. UCC § 2-313......................................................................[29]
    [Show full text]
  • NALIT Summer 2004 DRAFT 5
    National Association of Legislative Information Technology Inside this Issue: Analysis of CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 (Page 2) -- Illinois System (Page 4) -- NCSL Annual Meeting Agenda (Page 6) -- Preliminary NALIT PDS agenda (Page 10) -- Preview of NALIT Fall PDS (Page 11) -- NALIT News (Page 12) -- NCSL web site redesign (Page 14) National Conference of State Legislatures 7700 East First Place, Denver, CO 80230 (303) 364-7700 By Maryann Trauger And, to top it all off, we get to do all this in beautiful Salt Manager, Information Technology Services Lake City with a private concert by the marvelous Morman North Dakota Legislative Council Tabernacle Choir and then a visit to the Olympic Oval. [email protected] Anyway, if you haven’t guessed, I am very enthused about the sessions and the opportunity to visit gorgeous Utah. I hope It is almost impossible to believe that the annual meeting is that you all plan to come to the annual meeting and that I will only weeks away. Not see you there! only have our annual Then on to Vermont! (You can’t say that NALIT members meeting planning don’t get around.) The NALIT Professional Development committee members Seminar will be held in Burlington, Vermont, on September 8- been working hard to 11. Duncan Goss and his committee members have developed make this program of a great agenda including “Malware,” “Managing Software value and interest to all Updates,” “Gadgets, Gizmos, & Gear,” “Contingency Planning NALIT members, but a and Business Continuity,” “Security,” “Voice over IP,” “Web lot of fun as well, Tips,” etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Games of Empire Electronic Mediations Katherine Hayles, Mark Poster, and Samuel Weber, Series Editors
    Games of Empire Electronic Mediations Katherine Hayles, Mark Poster, and Samuel Weber, Series Editors 29 Games of Empire: Global Capitalism and Video Games Nick Dyer- Witheford and Greig de Peuter 28 Tactical Media Rita Raley 27 Reticulations: Jean-Luc Nancy and the Networks of the Political Philip Armstrong 26 Digital Baroque: New Media Art and Cinematic Folds Timothy Murray 25 Ex- foliations: Reading Machines and the Upgrade Path Terry Harpold 24 Digitize This Book! The Politics of New Media, or Why We Need Open Access Now Gary Hall 23 Digitizing Race: Visual Cultures of the Internet Lisa Nakamura 22 Small Tech: The Culture of Digital Tools Byron Hawk, David M. Rieder, and Ollie Oviedo, Editors 21 The Exploit: A Theory of Networks Alexander R. Galloway and Eugene Thacker 20 Database Aesthetics: Art in the Age of Information Overfl ow Victoria Vesna, Editor 19 Cyberspaces of Everyday Life Mark Nunes 18 Gaming: Essays on Algorithmic Culture Alexander R. Galloway 17 Avatars of Story Marie-Laure Ryan 16 Wireless Writing in the Age of Marconi Timothy C. Campbell 15 Electronic Monuments Gregory L. Ulmer 14 Lara Croft: Cyber Heroine Astrid Deuber- Mankowsky 13 The Souls of Cyberfolk: Posthumanism as Vernacular Theory Thomas Foster 12 Déjà Vu: Aberrations of Cultural Memory Peter Krapp 11 Biomedia Eugene Thacker 10 Avatar Bodies: A Tantra for Posthumanism Ann Weinstone 9 Connected, or What It Means to Live in the Network Society Steven Shaviro 8 Cognitive Fictions Joseph Tabbi 7 Cybering Democracy: Public Space and the Internet Diana Saco 6 Writings Vilém Flusser 5 Bodies in Technology Don Ihde 4 Cyberculture Pierre Lévy 3 What’s the Matter with the Internet? Mark Poster 2 High Techne¯: Art and Technology from the Machine Aesthetic to the Posthuman R.
    [Show full text]
  • The User Friendly Guide to INTERNET & COMPUTER TERMS
    The User Friendly Guide to INTERNET & COMPUTER TERMS Charles Steed Gold Standard Press Inc. Reno, Nevada Copyright ã 2001 Charles Steed and Gold Standard Press Inc. Permission is granted to ALL USERS and readers to download, print and freely dis- tribute The User Friendly Guide To Internet & Computer Terms. No changes to this text is authorized. THIS TEXT MAY NOT BE SOLD EXCEPT BY AUTHORIZED AGENTS OR REPRESENTATIVES OF GOLD STANDARD PRESS INC. For information, contact Gold Standard Press Inc. 1475 Terminal Way, Suite E, Reno, Nevada 89502, tel. 360-482-2510. This book contains information gathered from many sources. It is published for gen- eral reference and not as a substitute for independent verification by users when circumstances warrant. It is sold with the understanding that neither the author nor publisher is engaged in rendering legal, psychological, accounting or professional advice. The publisher and author disclaim any personal liability, either directly or indirectly, for advice presented within. Although the author and publisher have used care and diligence in the preparation, and made every effort to ensure the accuracy and completeness of information contained in this book, we assume no responsibility for errors, inaccuracies, omissions, or any inconsistency herein. Any slights of people, places, publishers, books, or organizations are unintentional. The online version of this text has been slightly modified to faciliate easy download- ing. No significant differences from the printed version are present. Library of Congress
    [Show full text]