Core 1..190 Hansard (PRISM::Advent3b2 7.50)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Core 1..190 Hansard (PRISM::Advent3b2 7.50) CANADA House of Commons Debates VOLUME 138 Ï NUMBER 077 Ï 2nd SESSION Ï 37th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Tuesday, March 25, 2003 Speaker: The Honourable Peter Milliken CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) All parliamentary publications are available on the ``Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire´´ at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca 4619 HOUSE OF COMMONS Tuesday, March 25, 2003 The House met at 10 a.m. PETITIONS MARRIAGE Prayers Mr. Tom Wappel (Scarborough Southwest, Lib.): Madam Speaker, I have two petitions signed by numerous people from a Ï (1005) variety of places but mainly from the Nepean and Ottawa areas. Both [English] petitions call upon Parliament to reject any requests to change the The Speaker: Order, please. Since today is the final allotted day traditional definition of marriage, family and spouse, to continue to for the supply period ending March 26, 2003, the House will go affirm the importance of the family as the foundation of Canadian through the usual procedures to consider and dispose of the supply society and that nothing in the future will change its fundamental bills. role in society. In view of recent practices, do hon. members agree that the bills STEM CELL RESEARCH be distributed now? Some hon. members: Agreed. Mr. Ovid Jackson (Bruce—Grey—Owen Sound, Lib.): Madam Speaker, I have the honour to present, pursuant to Standing Order 36, two petitions from my constituents of Bruce—Grey—Owen Sound. ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS [English] The first petition indicates that in society there are many diseases and problems with illnesses, including spinal injuries. They feel that GOVERNMENT RESPONSE TO PETITIONS adult non-embryonic stem cells is the way to go and that we should Mr. Geoff Regan (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of follow that particular legislation. the Government in the House of Commons, Lib.): Madam Speaker, pursuant to Standing Order (36(8) I have the honour to TOURISM INDUSTRY table, in both official languages, the government's response to 11 petitions. Mr. Ovid Jackson (Bruce—Grey—Owen Sound, Lib.): Madam *** Speaker, the second petition comes from the Bruce Peninsula. [Translation] Yesterday the minister announced some $811 million for parks. COMMITTEES OF THE HOUSE There is a visitor centre that is overdue. They have started road FISHERIES AND OCEANS construction. Our petitioners are asking the minister to go ahead with Mr. Tom Wappel (Scarborough Southwest, Lib.): Madam that project this year since it is very important for tourism in the district. Speaker, I have the honour to present to the House, in both official languages, the second report of the Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans entitled, “Custodial Management Outside Canada's 200- FIREARMS REGISTRY mile Limit”. [English] Mr. Scott Reid (Lanark—Carleton, Canadian Alliance): Madam Speaker, last weekend I was presented with a petition Pursuant to Standing Order 109, the committee requests that the containing the signatures of 10,000 residents of eastern Ontario on government table a comprehensive response to this report within 150 the subject of the long gun registry. It had been presented to days. The report deals with the examination of the government's Ontario's minister of public security, Bob Runciman, but because it response to our first report, the rejection of the government's was a federal matter it was passed to me to present in the House, response and the reiteration of the points in our first report. with his approval. 4620 COMMONS DEBATES March 25, 2003 Supply The petitioners call upon Parliament to take into account, when (c) to verify and correct the information in the 4 million records in the Firearms voting on Bill C-68, the fact that expenses are 500 times over Interest Police database and to bring it into full compliance with the Privacy Act and the Charter of Rights and Freedoms; budget; that the Auditor General has indicated that the government has failed to keep Parliament informed with regard to the cost of the (d) to register the ten million unregistered guns in Canada; gun registry; that a majority of long gun owners in Canada have not (e) to licence the half million unlicensed gun owners in Canada; and registered their guns; that the government has failed to provide any (f) to the economy and jobs. conclusive or verifiable evidence that the registry results in a reduction in crime; and that the registry has the effect of withdrawing He said: Madam Speaker, I will be splitting my time, as will all resources that could be used for the reduction of criminal offences Alliance members today. with firearms. No program has been a bigger failure or a bigger embarrassment I present this petition to the House. for the government than this seven year old billion dollar firearms *** fiasco. (1010) Ï The Auditor General said that Parliament was misled. We need to QUESTIONS PASSED AS ORDERS FOR RETURN go back to the drawing board because that is true. Mr. Geoff Regan (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons, Lib.): Madam Today Parliament can decided to stop the misleading. Today is the Speaker, if Question No. 136 could be made an order for return, the day the process to uncover truth about the gun registry can begin. return would be tabled immediately. Today Parliament can do the job we were sent here to do; to start taking control over the waste of money on useless government The Acting Speaker (Ms. Bakopanos): Is it agreed? programs. Now is the time to do what is right and that is the purpose of our debate today. Some hon. members: Agreed. (Return Tabled) The Auditor General made it clear that the cost of the gun registry [Text] would be more than the billion dollars that she reported. The President of the Treasury Board admitted that she still did not know Question No. 136—Mr. James Moore: the total cost of the gun registry to date when she appeared before Responding with a list in both printed and electronic formats, what are the committee last week. government's holdings in all its vehicle fleets as of December 31, 2002, including: (a) vehicle class; (b) model type; (c) model year; (d) colour; (e) size of engine (rating as Before the Prime Minister whips his MPs into tears and forces per number of cylinders); (f) department holding the ownership; (g) original purchase price and date; (h) individual assigned to the vehicle (if applicable); and (i) fuel type? them to vote for another $59 million tonight, should he not tell them how much the gun registry has cost so far and how much it will cost (Return tabled.) to fully implement? None of that has been told here. If the members [English] opposite would listen to the debate today they might learn something. Mr. Geoff Regan: Madam Speaker, I ask that all remaining questions be allowed to stand. Today we are asking the government to stop pouring good money The Acting Speaker (Ms. Bakopanos): Is it agreed? after bad. We are asking the government to stop registering guns until a cost benefit analysis has been completed or at least cabinet Some hon. members: Agreed. releases the one that has already been done. How can we support a program if we do not know what this cost benefit analysis is? In March 1994 the justice minister was clearly told in a briefing GOVERNMENT ORDERS note from his own officials, which we obtained through access to [English] information: Accurate information about costs and benefits must be obtained before any firm SUPPLY commitment can be made.... ALLOTTED DAY—FIREARMS PROGRAM That was in reference to the gun registry. That was never done. Mr. Garry Breitkreuz (Yorkton—Melville, Canadian Alliance) moved: Why should we approve more money when we do not have that That, as this House supported the reduction of funds for the firearms program in the information? The sad fact is that the cost benefit analysis was done. Supplementary Estimates on December 5, 2002, this House should continue to It just has never been released by cabinet. support the reduction of funds for the firearms program in this supply period and subsequent supply periods until the government can provide a comprehensive cost- benefit analysis for the program and provide an accurate total of expenditures to date Last week the new CEO of the Canadian Firearms Centre and a realistic estimate of future costs of implementing the Firearms Act including admitted, in a briefing for opposition MPs and senators, that cabinet the total cost: has refused to release the cost benefit analysis. All Canadians must (a) to fully enforce the Firearms Act; wonder why it would want to hide this information. All Canadians (b) to verify the 5 million unverified firearms in the registry; must wonder what the Liberal government is hiding, not just why. March 25, 2003 COMMONS DEBATES 4621 Supply Given the reality of violent crime in Canada, taxpayers would re-register their guns without a licence. What will it cost to go back have to wonder why the government has chosen to go down the gun and fix that? The government has never told us. registry trail of wasted loonies. Why not spend the money in the most cost effective manner: target the root causes of violence and of crime in our society? Sixth, up to 10 million guns still have to be registered or re- Some past justice ministers have claimed that the gun registry is registered in the system. What will that cost to complete? saving lives, but every year Statistics Canada data proves the opposite. In 2001 only 31% of homicides were committed with a firearm and almost two-thirds of these were with handguns.
Recommended publications
  • SFU Thesis Template Files
    Pulp Fictional Folk Devils? The Fulton Bill and the Campaign to Censor “Crime and Horror Comics” in Cold War Canada, 1945-1955 by Joseph Tilley B.A. (Hons., History), Simon Fraser University, 2008 Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in the Department of History Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences Joseph Tilley 2015 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY Fall 2015 Approval Name: Joseph Tilley Degree: Master of Arts (History) Title: Pulp Fictional Folk Devils? The Fulton Bill and the Campaign to Censor “Crime and Horror Comics” in Cold War Canada, 1945-1955 Examining Committee: Chair: Roxanne Panchasi Associate Professor Allen Seager Senior Supervisor Associate Professor Lara Campbell Supervisor Professor, Department of Gender, Sexuality, and Women’s Studies John Herd Thompson External Examiner Professor Emeritus Department of History Duke University Date Defended/Approved: December 15, 2015 ii Abstract This thesis examines the history of and the social, political, intellectual, and cross-border influences behind the “Fulton Bill” and the campaign to censor “crime and horror comics” in Canada from roughly 1945 to 1955. Many – though by no means all – Canadians had grown to believe reading comic books was directly linked with a perceived increase in rates of juvenile criminal behaviour. Led primarily by PTA activists and other civic organizations, the campaign was motivated by a desire to protect the nation’s young people from potential corrupting influences that might lead them to delinquency and deviancy and resulted in amendments to the Criminal Code passed by Parliament in 1949. These amendments criminalized so-called “crime comics” and were thanks to a bill introduced and championed by E.
    [Show full text]
  • 1866 (C) Circa 1510 (A) 1863
    BONUS : Paintings together with their year of completion. (A) 1863 (B) 1866 (C) circa 1510 Vancouver Estival Trivia Open, 2012, FARSIDE team BONUS : Federal cabinet ministers, 1940 to 1990 (A) (B) (C) (D) Norman Rogers James Ralston Ernest Lapointe Joseph-Enoil Michaud James Ralston Mackenzie King James Ilsley Louis St. Laurent 1940s Andrew McNaughton 1940s Douglas Abbott Louis St. Laurent James Ilsley Louis St. Laurent Brooke Claxton Douglas Abbott Lester Pearson Stuart Garson 1950s 1950s Ralph Campney Walter Harris John Diefenbaker George Pearkes Sidney Smith Davie Fulton Donald Fleming Douglas Harkness Howard Green Donald Fleming George Nowlan Gordon Churchill Lionel Chevrier Guy Favreau Walter Gordon 1960s Paul Hellyer 1960s Paul Martin Lucien Cardin Mitchell Sharp Pierre Trudeau Leo Cadieux John Turner Edgar Benson Donald Macdonald Mitchell Sharp Edgar Benson Otto Lang John Turner James Richardson 1970s Allan MacEachen 1970s Ron Basford Donald Macdonald Don Jamieson Barney Danson Otto Lang Jean Chretien Allan McKinnon Flora MacDonald JacquesMarc Lalonde Flynn John Crosbie Gilles Lamontagne Mark MacGuigan Jean Chretien Allan MacEachen JeanJacques Blais Allan MacEachen Mark MacGuigan Marc Lalonde Robert Coates Jean Chretien Donald Johnston 1980s Erik Nielsen John Crosbie 1980s Perrin Beatty Joe Clark Ray Hnatyshyn Michael Wilson Bill McKnight Doug Lewis BONUS : Name these plays by Oscar Wilde, for 10 points each. You have 30 seconds. (A) THE PAGE OF HERODIAS: Look at the moon! How strange the moon seems! She is like a woman rising from a tomb. She is like a dead woman. You would fancy she was looking for dead things. THE YOUNG SYRIAN: She has a strange look.
    [Show full text]
  • Core 1..146 Hansard (PRISM::Advent3b2 8.00)
    CANADA House of Commons Debates VOLUME 140 Ï NUMBER 098 Ï 1st SESSION Ï 38th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Friday, May 13, 2005 Speaker: The Honourable Peter Milliken CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) All parliamentary publications are available on the ``Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire´´ at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca 5957 HOUSE OF COMMONS Friday, May 13, 2005 The House met at 10 a.m. Parliament on February 23, 2005, and Bill C-48, an act to authorize the Minister of Finance to make certain payments, shall be disposed of as follows: 1. Any division thereon requested before the expiry of the time for consideration of Government Orders on Thursday, May 19, 2005, shall be deferred to that time; Prayers 2. At the expiry of the time for consideration of Government Orders on Thursday, May 19, 2005, all questions necessary for the disposal of the second reading stage of (1) Bill C-43 and (2) Bill C-48 shall be put and decided forthwith and successively, Ï (1000) without further debate, amendment or deferral. [English] Ï (1010) MESSAGE FROM THE SENATE The Speaker: Does the hon. government House leader have the The Speaker: I have the honour to inform the House that a unanimous consent of the House for this motion? message has been received from the Senate informing this House Some hon. members: Agreed. that the Senate has passed certain bills, to which the concurrence of this House is desired. Some hon. members: No. Mr. Jay Hill (Prince George—Peace River, CPC): Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Map of Canada, Official Results of the 38Th General Election – PDF Format
    2 5 3 2 a CANDIDATES ELECTED / CANDIDATS ÉLUS Se 6 ln ln A nco co C Li in R L E ELECTORAL DISTRICT PARTY ELECTED CANDIDATE ELECTED de ELECTORAL DISTRICT PARTY ELECTED CANDIDATE ELECTED C er O T S M CIRCONSCRIPTION PARTI ÉLU CANDIDAT ÉLU C I bia C D um CIRCONSCRIPTION PARTI ÉLU CANDIDAT ÉLU É ol C A O N C t C A H Aler 35050 Mississauga South / Mississauga-Sud Paul John Mark Szabo N E !( e A N L T 35051 Mississauga--Streetsville Wajid Khan A S E 38th GENERAL ELECTION R B 38 ÉLECTION GÉNÉRALE C I NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR 35052 Nepean--Carleton Pierre Poilievre T A I S Q Phillip TERRE-NEUVE-ET-LABRADOR 35053 Newmarket--Aurora Belinda Stronach U H I s In June 28, 2004 E T L 28 juin, 2004 É 35054 Niagara Falls Hon. / L'hon. Rob Nicholson E - 10001 Avalon Hon. / L'hon. R. John Efford B E 35055 Niagara West--Glanbrook Dean Allison A N 10002 Bonavista--Exploits Scott Simms I Z Niagara-Ouest--Glanbrook E I L R N D 10003 Humber--St. Barbe--Baie Verte Hon. / L'hon. Gerry Byrne a 35056 Nickel Belt Raymond Bonin E A n L N 10004 Labrador Lawrence David O'Brien s 35057 Nipissing--Timiskaming Anthony Rota e N E l n e S A o d E 10005 Random--Burin--St. George's Bill Matthews E n u F D P n d ely E n Gre 35058 Northumberland--Quinte West Paul Macklin e t a s L S i U a R h A E XEL e RÉSULTATS OFFICIELS 10006 St.
    [Show full text]
  • Core 1..96 Hansard
    CANADA House of Commons Debates VOLUME 138 Ï NUMBER 002 Ï 2nd SESSION Ï 37th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Tuesday, October 1, 2002 (Part A) Speaker: The Honourable Peter Milliken CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) All parliamentary publications are available on the ``Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire´´ at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca 15 HOUSE OF COMMONS Tuesday, October 1, 2002 The House met at 10 a.m. pornography. They are disappointed and frustrated by a recent court decision related to child pornography. The petitioners call on Prayers parliament to take all necessary steps to protect our children by outlawing all materials that promote or glorify child pornography. *** ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS QUESTIONS ON THE ORDER PAPER Ï (1000) Mr. Geoff Regan (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of [Translation] the Government in the House of Commons, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, I PETITIONS ask that all questions be allowed to stand. INUIT COMMUNITY OF NUNAVIK The Speaker: If there are any, they will stand. I thank the hon. Mr. Guy St-Julien (Abitibi—Baie-James—Nunavik, Lib.): Mr. parliamentary secretary. Speaker, I would like to table a petition signed by residents from Puvirnituq, in Nunavik, and several other communities. The petitioners are asking Parliament to set up a public inquiry to shed light on the policy of sled dog killings in New Quebec. SPEECH FROM THE THRONE During the fifties and the sixties, the Royal Canadian Mounted [English] Police and the Government of Canada killed all sled dogs in Nunavik, and the Inuit from Nunavik are asking for an inquiry into RESUMPTION OF DEBATE ON ADDRESS IN REPLY the matter.
    [Show full text]
  • Debates, May 12, 2008
    CANADA House of Commons Debates VOLUME 142 Ï NUMBER 093 Ï 2nd SESSION Ï 39th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Monday, May 12, 2008 Speaker: The Honourable Peter Milliken CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) Also available on the Parliament of Canada Web Site at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca 5697 HOUSE OF COMMONS Monday, May 12, 2008 The House met at 11 a.m. the consideration of a motion, the effect of which was to deem adopted the remaining parts of the bill and to agree that the bill be reported to the House without further debate or amendment. This motion was adopted on division by the committee. Prayers The hon. member for Windsor—Tecumseh also referred to previous Speaker's rulings where motions in amendment at report stage were selected on the basis that members involved did not have PRIVATE MEMBERS' BUSINESS the opportunity to present motions during the committee considera- CLIMATE CHANGE ACCOUNTABILITY ACT tion stage. Specifically, he cited a ruling given on January 28, 2003, regarding Bill C-13, An Act respecting assisted human reproduction, The House proceeded to the consideration of Bill C-377, An Act and a ruling given on November 6, 2001, regarding Bill C-10, An to ensure Canada assumes its responsibilities in preventing Act respecting the national marine conservation areas of Canada. dangerous climate change, as reported (with amendments) from the committee. In his intervention on Friday, May 9, 2008, the hon. deputy Ï (1105) government House leader also reviewed the sequence of events surrounding the committee consideration of the bill and referred to [Translation] the two rulings just cited.
    [Show full text]
  • Party Competition in Alberta, Saskatchewan and Manitoba
    CODE POLITICS: PARTY SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT ON THE CANADIAN PRAIRIES Jared J. Wesley Department of Political Studies University of Manitoba [email protected] For Presentation at: The Annual Meeting of the Canadian Political Science Association Carleton University Ottawa, Ontario Please do not cite without permission. May 29, 2009 Abstract Similar in so many ways, questions persist as to why Canada’s three Prairie Provinces have developed such distinct patterns of party competition. Right-wing dynasties thrive in Alberta; Saskatchewan’s natural governing party is avowedly social democratic; while party politics in Manitoba remains relatively balanced between the forces of the right and left. This paper supplements conventional solutions to this “prairie paradox” - grounded in political culture and settlement patterns - with an ideational analysis of campaign narratives. This examination reveals that each system is focused around a unique provincial “code.” In Alberta, Social Credit and Progressive Conservative leaders have emphasized “freedom” over “security,” whereas New Democrats in Saskatchewan have stressed precisely the opposite. Successful politicians in Manitoba have steered a middling course, underscoring the importance of “moderation” in their campaign rhetoric. Cultivated by, and constraining, prominent leaders over time, these dominant discourses help explain the persistent differences between the three worlds of party competition in the region. Introduction Considering their many commonalities, the three Prairie Provinces ought to feature similar patterns of party competition. Manitoba, Saskatchewan, and Alberta are each separated by essentially artificial boundaries, their borders based on arbitrary longitudinal lines, rather than topographic or ethnic divisions (Elton, 1970). All three are associated with a common iconic landscape: one with vast stretches of prairie, bounded only by mountains to the West and the Canadian Shield to the East.
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons in Womanhood: Education at the Prison for Women, 1934-1965
    Lessons in Womanhood: Education at the Prison for Women, 1934-1965 By Katie-Marie McNeill A thesis submitted to the Graduate Program in Education in conformity with the degree requirements for the Degree of Master of Education Queen’s University Kingston, Ontario, Canada August, 2017 Copyright © Katie-Marie McNeill, 2017 Lessons in Womanhood i Abstract The Prison for Women (P4W) in Kingston, Ontario was the sole federal prison for Canadian women throughout the majority of the twentieth century. As such, studying P4W represents a comprehensive study of Canadian women’s incarceration, which is unique in Canadian prison history in comparison to men’s institutions. This thesis explores the educational history of P4W from 1934-1965 to examine what opportunities were afforded to incarcerated women and to reveal the intentions of the Penitentiary Service in their provision of education. This thesis argues that education at P4W intended to reform incarcerated women into models of respectable womanhood. This project relies on archival documents from the Correctional Service of Canada fonds at Library and Archives Canada, files from the Public Safety Library Archives, the Isabel J. Macneill fonds from the Nova Scotia Archives, and prisoner press publications. To frame this research, this thesis takes a blended functionalist and narrative approach to legal history to underscore that the development of education in P4W followed the development of education in Ontario, and that narratives are required to appreciate P4W’s gendered educational history. P4W’s education is contextualized by Chapter One, which provides an overview of imprisonment in English Canadian history. To further deepen analysis, education has been separated and organized into three categories: academic, vocational, and recreational.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rotting Heart of Gatineau Park: How and Why the Kingsmere-Meech Lake Privatopia Prevented a National Park Near Canada's Ca
    The rotting heart of Gatineau Park: How and why the Kingsmere-Meech Lake privatopia prevented a national park near Canada’s capital by Michael Christopher Lait A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Affairs in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Sociology in Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences Carleton University Ottawa, Ontario © 2017 Michael Christopher Lait Lait (draft do not cite) I Abstract First proposed in 1913, Gatineau Park could have been the first national park east of the Rocky Mountains, the first in Quebec, and the first near-urban national park in Canada. Ultimately, the Quebec government proved unwilling to cede territory to the federal government, and the park proposal was shelved. In 1938, the Mackenzie King government responded to a public campaign organized by local cottagers and the Ottawa Ski Club by establishing the “Gatineau Park.” Newspapers announced the creation of a national park, and the first expropriations were carried out under this pretense. Gatineau Park is a failed national park. This study shows that federal authorities not only proceeded to establish a park without the consent of the Quebec government, they also failed to consolidate territorial control. My analysis addresses the question of how and why this national park failed, and documents the influence of the Meech Lake Association (MLA) and Kingsmere Property Owners’ Association (KPOA) on the park’s creation, development, and management. I argue that the park’s status as a “mixed- use/ownership area” represents a provisional achievement of these property owners’ associations.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Sovereignty Rests with the Courts:” the Constitutional Foundations of J
    Title Page “Parliamentary sovereignty rests with the courts:” The Constitutional Foundations of J. G. Diefenbaker’s Canadian Bill of Rights Jordan Birenbaum Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the PhD degree in History Department of History Faculty of Arts University of Ottawa © Jordan Birenbaum, Ottawa, Canada, 2012 Abstract The 1980s witnessed a judicial “rights revolution” in Canada characterized by the Supreme Court of Canada striking down both federal and provincial legislation which violated the rights guaranteed by the 1982 Charter of Rights. The lack of a similar judicial “rights revolution” in the wake of the 1960 Canadian Bill of Rights has largely been attributed to the structural difference between the two instruments with the latter – as a “mere” statute of the federal parliament – providing little more than a canon of construction and (unlike the Charter) not empowering the courts to engage in judicial review of legislation. Yet this view contrasts starkly with how the Bill was portrayed by the Diefenbaker government, which argued that it provided for judicial review and would “prevail” over other federal legislation. Many modern scholars have dismissed the idea that the Bill could prevail over other federal statutes as being incompatible with the doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty. That is, a bill of rights could only prevail over legislation if incorporated into the British North America Act. As such, they argue that the Diefenbaker government could not have intended the Bill of Rights to operate as anything more than a canon of construction. However, such a view ignores the turbulence in constitutional thinking on parliamentary sovereignty in the 1930s through 1960s provoked by the Statute of Westminster.
    [Show full text]
  • CONSTITUTIONAL REFORM of the CANADIAN JUDICIARY The
    CONSTITUTIONAL REFORM OF JUDICIARY 103 CONSTITUTIONAL REFORM OF THE CANADIAN JUDICIARY PETER H. RUSSELL* A consideration of both the ;udicial sections of the B.N .A. Act and the public expectations concerning the ;udiciary suggest three basic norms which are relevant to the exercise of judicial power in the Canadian Constitutional system-the independence of the judiciary, bilingualism and biculturalism, and federalism. The author analyzes the Canadian ;udiciary from the point of view of each of these precepts and makes suggestions for constitutional reform of the Canadian Judiciary. The question of reforming the judicial provisions of the Canadian Constitution must first be put in the general context of constitutional reform in Canada. I am certainly one of those who wholeheartedly favours a broad-based reconstruction and repatriation of the Canadian Constitution. And it can be said that as of February, 1968, the federal government and the provinces are committed to begin working towards a revision of the Constitution. The immediate cause of this current interest in constitutional reform is, of course, the political confrontation between Quebec and the rest of Canada. In this context constitutional revision is apt to be approached by government negotiators primarily as a matter of political tactics. Up to a point that is both unavoidable and appropriate, for the classic purpose of constitutional settlements has been to crystallize the resolution of basic conflict in the body politic. But a constitution should also serve a more timeless purpose: for the on-going public life of the polity it should establish the fundamental norms governing the ways in which authoritative power may be acquired, ·distributed and exercised.
    [Show full text]
  • Constitutional Conference Federal and Provincial
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL CONFERENCE OF . FEDERAL AND PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENTS January 10-12, 1950 OTTAWA EDMOND CLOUTIER, C.M.G., B.A., L.PH., KING'S PRINTER AND CONTROLLER OF STATIONERY 1950 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL CONFERENCE OF FEDERAL AND PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENTS January 10-12, 1950 OTTAWA EDMOND CLOUTIER, C.M.G., B.A., L.PH., KING'S PRINTER AND CONTROLLER OF STATIONERY 1950 TABLE OF CONTENTS First Session, Tuesday, January 10, 1950 OPENING ADDRESS BY THE PRIME MINISTER, Right Hon. L. S. St. Laurent.. 5 ADDRESSES BY PROVINCIAL PREMIERS: Hon. Leslie M. Frost. .. .. ... ...... .... ........... ...... ....... ........ 11 Hon. Maurice L. Duplessis.. .. ...... ... .... ...... ... .. .. ... ............. 14 Hon. Angus L. Macdonald . 17 Hon. John B. McNair....... ..... .. ... .......... .. ...... .. .... .......... 21 Hon. Douglas L. Campbell..... ..... ... .. ... ... .. ... ... ............. .... 26 Hon. Byron L. Johnson . ... ........................ ..... .. ...... .. ... .. .... 29 Hon. J. Walter Jones... .. ................... ......... .......... 30 Hon. T. C. Douglas. 32 Hon. E. C. Manning . 40 Hon. J. R. Smallwood . • 44 CLOSING REMARKS BY THE PRIME MINISTER............. .............. 46 Second Session, Wednesday, January 11, 1950 Right Hon. L. S. St. Laurent. .............. .... ..... ............... ....... .. ... 49 Hon. Leslie M. Frost. 50 Hon. Maurice L. Duplessis............. .. ........... ................ ... ....... 51 Hon. Angus L. Macdonald. 51 Hon. John B. McNair. 55 Hon. Douglas L. Campbell. 56 Hon. Byron
    [Show full text]