DOCSLIB.ORG

Coleoptera: Buprestidae) Fauna of Mazandaran Province of Iran

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Coleoptera: Buprestidae) Fauna of Mazandaran Province of Iran Кавказский энтомол. бюллетень 5(1): 63- © CAUCASIAN ENTOMOLOGICAL BULL. 2009 Contribution to the knowledge of the jewel beetles (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) fauna of Mazandaran province of Iran Материалы к изучению фауны жуков-златок (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) провинции Мазандаран, Иран H. Barimani Varandi1, M.Yu. Kalashian2, H. Barari1 Х. Баримани Варанди1, М.Ю. Калашян2, Х. Барари1 1Agricultural and Natural Resources Research Centre of Mazandaran, PO Box 48175-556 Sari, Iran. E-mail: [email protected] 2Institute of Zoology, Scientific Centre of Zoology and Hydroecology of the National Academy of Sciences of Armenia, Yerevan 0014 Armenia. E-mail: [email protected] 1Исследовательский центр сельскохозяйственных и природных ресурсов Мазандарана. PO Box 48175-556 Сари, Иран 2Институт Зоологии (Научный центр зоологии и гидроэкологии НАН РА), Ереван 0014 Армения Key words: Coleoptera, Buprestidae, Iran, Mazandaran, fauna, new records. Ключевые слова: Coleoptera, Buprestidae, Иран, Мазандаран, фауна, новые указания. Abstract. 34 species of jewel-beetles (Coleoptera, Introduction Buprestidae) were collected in Mazandaran province of Iran during 2007–2008. Of these 3 species (Anthaxia sponsa Fauna of the jewel-beetles of Mazandaran Kiesenwetter, 1857, Agrilus derasofasciatus Lacordaire, province of Iran is studied insufficiently. In most recent list 1835, Agrilus obscuricollis Kiesenwetter, 1857) are new of Palaearctic beetles – Catalogue of Palaearctic Coleoptera for Iranian fauna, and 14 species (Acmaeoderella mimonti (thereafter – “Catalogue”) [Bílý, 2006; Jendek, 2006; Kubáň, (Boieldieu, 1865), Acmaeoderella gibbulosa (Ménétriés, 2006; Volkovitsh, 2006; Volkovitsh, Kalashian, 2006; 1832), Lamprodila tuerki (Ganglbauer, 1882), Sphenoptera Volkovitsh, Kubáň, 2006] 366 species and subspecies of cauta cauta Jakovlev, 1904, Sphenoptera simplex Jakovlev, Buprestidae are referred to Iranian fauna. Among these 1893, Sphenoptera tappesi Marseul, 1865, Anthaxia only 40 species are cited for Mazandran province (including passerini (Pecchioli, 1837), Anthaxia hungarica sitta 15 species which are reported for “Northern provinces (Küster, 1852), Agrilus graminis Kiesenwette, 1857, Agrilus of Iran” as a whole without reference to the concrete pratensis Ratzeburg, 1837, Agrilus hyperici (Creutzer, provinces) in several survey works on Iranian fauna 1799), Coraebus elatus (Fabricius, 1787), Trachys minutus (both faunistic and dedicated to agricultural and forestry (Linnaeus, 1758) and Trachys phlyctaenoides Kolenati, pests) [Farahbakhsh, 1961; Radjabi, 1968, 1974, 1991; Bílý, 1846) are new for Mazandaran province. 1983; Abai, 1984; Modarres Awal, 1997; Borumand, 2002; Резюме. В 2007–2008 годах в провинции Ghahari et al., 2008]. Actual taxonomic position of many of the species listed in the works above mentioned is not Мазандаран (Северный Иран) были собраны 34 вида clear and some identifications are obviously wrong. So, жуков-златок (Coleoptera,Buprestidae). 3 из них (Anthaxia faunistic composition of the fauna of Mazandaran have to sponsa Kiesenwetter, 1857, Agrilus derasofasciatus be clarified. In this paper the results of study of material Lacordaire, 1835, Agrilus obscuricollis Kiesenwetter, 1857) collected by one of the authors (H. Barimani Varandi) in оказались новыми для фауны Ирана и 14 (Acmaeoderella 2007–2008 in the province are presented; in general 34 mimonti (Boieldieu, 1865), Acmaeoderella gibbulosa species were collected, 3 of them are new for Iranian fauna (Ménétriés, 1832), Lamprodila tuerki (Ganglbauer, 1882), and 14 – for the fauna of Mazandaran. Sphenoptera cauta cauta Jakovlev, 1904, Sphenoptera simplex Jakovlev, 1893, Sphenoptera tappesi Marseul, 1865, Materials and Methods Anthaxia passerini (Pecchioli, 1837), Anthaxia hungarica sitta (Küster, 1852), Agrilus graminis Kiesenwette, 1857, The material was collected from different parts Agriluspratensis Ratzeburg, 1837, Agrilushyperici (Creutzer, of Mazandaran province in 2007 and 2008. Traditional 1799), Coraebus elatus (Fabricius, 1787), Trachys minutus collecting methods were used: sweeping on grass (Linnaeus, 1758) и Trachys phlyctaenoides Kolenati, 1846) vegetations, beating of branches of trees and bushes, впервые указываются для Мазандарана. trapping using different kinds of traps: sticky traps [Oliver 64 H. Barimani Varandi, M.Yu. Kalashian, H. Barari et al., 2004], color traps [Sakalian, Langourov, 2003], Azerbaijan, Bakhtiaria and Chaharmahal, and as A. f. window traps, yellow pan traps [Bellamy, 2000], malaise persica Mannerheim, 1837 from Gilan, Mazandaran and traps [Matheus, Matheus, 1983]. Some species were reared Khorasan, and by Borumand [2002] as Acmaeodera (sic!) from field-collected larvae in cages. f. decorata Marseul, 1865 from Kerman and Acmaeodera Data on general distribution, taxonomy and (sic!) f. persica Mnnh. from Sistan and Belujistan (the name nomenclature are given according to Catalogue. Data on persica Mnnh. now is attributed as subspecific name for distribution in Iran are taken mainly from some surveys on taxon belonging to Acmaeodera pilosellae, and the name country’s fauna listed in Introduction. decorata Mars. now is in use for subspecies of A. mimonti Boield. So, the names of taxa mentioned by both authors List of species are not clear), and by Bílý [1983] – as A. f. tschitscherini Semenov, 1895, from Golestan. In Catalogue [Volkovitsh, 2006] only A. f. aequistriata and A. f. chorasanica Volkovitsh Subfamily Polycestinae Lacordaire, 1857 et Alexeev, 1994, are referred for Iran (without exact locality data). Distributional patterns and state of the subspecies of A. flavofasciata in Iran have to be clarified. Acmaeodera (s. str.) pilosellae (Bonelli, 1812) Acmaeoderella (Carininota) mimonti (Boieldieu, 1865) Material. Sari, Alamdardeh, 36°21’21”N / 53°15’60”E, 396 m, 19.07.2007, on Rubus persica; Sari, Varand, 36°32’05”N / 53°11’33”E, 413 m, 1.04.2008; Pahnehcola, 36°27’14”N / 53°03’06”E, 218 m, 28.04 and Material. Poshte-Koh: Kevat, 36°14’58”N / 53°46’52”E, 1501 m, 11.06.2008, window trap; same locality, 13.05.2008, color traps; Savadkoh 18.07.2008, color traps. Sorkh-Abad, 35°58’15”N / 53°00’29”E, 1128 m, 11.05.2008, on Haplophyllum perforatum. Distribution. SE Europe, Turkey, Georgia, Distribution. The species is distributed in S Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, SW Siberia (A. m. mimonti Europe, Algeria, Turkey (A. p. pilosellae Bonelli, 1812), (Boieldieu, 1865)); NE Turkey, Armenia, Azerbaijan (A. Israel, Syria, S Turkey, Iraq (A. p. syriaca Abeille de Perrin, m. decorata Marseul, 1865). Reported by Volkovitsh and 1900) and in Transcaucasia, Turkmenistan, Turkey and Iran Alexeev [1994] from Iran without exact data and subspecies (A. p. persica Mannerheim, 1837); reported by Bílý [1983] name; this record was omitted in Catalogue [Volkovitsh, as A. araxicola Reitter, 1890 from S Iran (Zagros: Sisakht) 2006]. Our material belongs to A. m. decorata. New record and by Volkovitsh [1986] with the same name from Central for Mazandaran. Ostan, Semnan, Mazandaran and Fars. Acmaeoderella (Euacmaeoderella) gibbulosa Acmaeodera (Acmaeotethya) rufoguttata Reitter, 1890 (Ménétriés, 1832) Material. Sari, Alamdardeh, 36°21’21”N / 53°15’60”E, 396 m, Material. Poshte-Koh Kevat, , 36°14’58”N / 53°46’52”E, 1501 17.06.2007, yellow pan traps; same locality, 18, 25, 27.05.2008, window trap; m, 15.08.2008, color traps; Savadkoh Sorkh-Abad, 35°58’15”N / 53°00’29”E, same locality, 3.04.2008, color traps; same locality, 3, 25.04, 8.05, 12.06, 1128 m, on Haplophyllum perforatum, 11.05.2008. 18.07.2008, sticky traps; Sari, Varand, 36°32’50”N / 53°11’33”E, 413 m, and 36°20’50”N / 53°11’30”E, 279 m, 1.04.2008, on Senecio vulgaris; Haftkhal, 36°17’36”N / 53°28’30”E, 1600 m, 27.05.2007, yellow pan traps and sticky Distribution. Known from Bulgaria, Macedonia, traps; Haftkhal, 36°17’16”N / 53°23’43”E, 855 m, 3.04.2008, color traps; Greece, Ukraine, Southern Russia, Turkey, Jordan, Israel, Pahnehkola, 36°27’14”N / 53°03’06”E, 218 m, 11.06.2008, color traps; same Syria, Lebanon, Iraq, Trancaucasia, Turkmenistan and locality, 11.06.2008, window trap; Pahnehkola, 36°27’30”N / 53°05’67”E, 171 Kazakhstan; Iran: reported by Volkovitsh [1986] from m, 13.05.2008; same locality, 11.06, 17.07.2008, sticky traps; Ghaemshahr, 36°42’00”N / 53°12’26”E, 88 m, 6.06.2008, malaise trap. Central ostan, Semnan, Lorestan, Hamadan, and Fars and by Bílý [1983] from Golestan. New record for Mazandaran. Distribution. S Azerbaijan (Lenkoran, Talysh Mts.); Iran: reported by Volkovitsh [1986] from Gilan and Mazandaran. Subfamily Chrysochroinae Laporte, 1835 Capnodis tenebricosa (Oliver, 1790) Acmaeoderella (Carininota) flavofasciata (Piller et Mitterparcher, 1783) Material. Evel Village, 36°14’01”N / 53°40’16”E, 1686 m, 28.05.2008, on Rumex acetelosa; Pahnehkola, 36°27’14”N / 53°03’06”E, 218 Material. Sari, Varand, 36°32’05”N / 53°11’33”E, 413 m, m, 28.05.2007, sticky traps; Pahnehkola, 36°27’30”N / 53°05’67”E, 171 m, 8.04.2007; Sari, Alamdardeh, 36°21’21”N / 53°15’60”E, 396 m, 8.07.2007, 28.04, 13.05, 11.06, 16, 31.08.2008, sticky traps; env. Pahnehkola, 28.04.2008, 1.06.2008, yellow pan traps; Savadkoh: Sorkh-Abad, 35°58’15”N / 53°00’29”E, on Rumex acetelosa. 1128 m, 11.05.2008, on Haplophyllum perforatum; Kordmir, 36°14’57”N / 53°42’37”E, 1857 m, 28.05.2008. Distribution. Widely distributed in SW Palaearctic from SW Europe and N Africa to Central Asia, Distribution. This species is widely distributed Kazakhstan, Iraq and Afghanistan; Iran: reported by Bílý in Southern Palaearctic Region (from Western Europe and [1983] as C. t. aurosparsa Abeille, 1891 (synonym of C. t. North Africa to Mongolia) and it is divided into several tenebricosa (Oliver, 1790)) from several localities from S, subspecies. From Iran it is reported by Volkovitsh [1986] N and NE Iran. According to Borumand [2002] this species as A. f. aequistriata Abeille de Perrin, 1904, from Western is represented in Iran in 3 subspecies – C. t. tenebricosa Contribution to the knowledge of the jewel beetles (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) fauna of Mazandaran province of Iran 65 in Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari, Fars, Golestan, Kerman, mentioned P. l. transcaspica Semenov, 1890 is reported for Khorasan, Khuzestan, Kohgiluyeh-Boyerahamad and Iran as well.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Pohoria Burda Na Dostupných Historických Mapách Je Aj Cieľom Tohto Príspevku
    OCHRANA PRÍRODY NATURE CONSERVATION 27 / 2016 OCHRANA PRÍRODY NATURE CONSERVATION 27 / 2016 Štátna ochrana prírody Slovenskej republiky Banská Bystrica Redakčná rada: prof. Dr. Ing. Viliam Pichler doc. RNDr. Ingrid Turisová, PhD. Mgr. Michal Adamec RNDr. Ján Kadlečík Ing. Marta Mútňanová RNDr. Katarína Králiková Recenzenti čísla: RNDr. Michal Ambros, PhD. Mgr. Peter Puchala, PhD. Ing. Jerguš Tesák doc. RNDr. Ingrid Turisová, PhD. Zostavil: RNDr. Katarína Králiková Jayzková korektúra: Mgr. Olga Majerová Grafická úprava: Ing. Viktória Ihringová Vydala: Štátna ochrana prírody Slovenskej republiky Banská Bystrica v roku 2016 Vydávané v elektronickej verzii Adresa redakcie: ŠOP SR, Tajovského 28B, 974 01 Banská Bystrica tel.: 048/413 66 61, e-mail: [email protected] ISSN: 2453-8183 Uzávierka predkladania príspevkov do nasledujúceho čísla (28): 30.9.2016. 2 \ Ochrana prírody, 27/2016 OCHRANA PRÍRODY INŠTRUKCIE PRE AUTOROV Vedecký časopis je zameraný najmä na publikovanie pôvodných vedeckých a odborných prác, recenzií a krátkych správ z ochrany prírody a krajiny, resp. z ochranárskej biológie, prioritne na Slovensku. Príspevky sú publikované v slovenskom, príp. českom jazyku s anglickým súhrnom, príp. v anglickom jazyku so slovenským (českým) súhrnom. Členenie príspevku 1) názov príspevku 2) neskrátené meno autora, adresa autora (vrátane adresy elektronickej pošty) 3) názov príspevku, abstrakt a kľúčové slová v anglickom jazyku 4) úvod, metodika, výsledky, diskusia, záver, literatúra Ilustrácie (obrázky, tabuľky, náčrty, mapky, mapy, grafy, fotografie) • minimálne rozlíšenie 1200 x 800 pixelov, rozlíšenie 300 dpi (digitálna fotografia má väčšinou 72 dpi) • každá ilustrácia bude uložená v samostatnom súbore (jpg, tif, bmp…) • používajte kilometrovú mierku, nie číselnú • mapy vytvorené v ArcView je nutné vyexportovať do formátov tif, jpg,..
    [Show full text]
  • Blackberry Biocontrol
    Managing crown land boundaries Future challenges for Invasive Species Control The purpose of the session is to highlight the issues at private/public interface which impact now and how they are bring dealt with. Also explore projected changes in the future and options for management. Before lunch • Pathogens for blackberry biocontrol. Louise Morin, CSIRO • Blackberry biological control; invertebrate options and a role for citizen science. Greg Lefoe and Raelene Kwong DEDJTR • Lessons from the Community Wild Dog Control Program, Barry Davies DELWP • Morning tea • Projected increases in Deer populations. Greg Baxter University of Qld. After lunch • HVP Plantations Boundary Management Program, Andrew Bussau • DELWP Good Neighbour Program, Stefan Kaiser , DELWP • Regional and Local Parks Victoria Pest Plant and Animal Control, John Silins, Ranger I Kiewa Murray Area I Upper Murray and Elaine Thomas, Regional Project Co- ordinator (Alps Intensive Management Program) • Group Discussions: What’s working? What can we do better? Opportunities to get better outcomes. Foundations for the day • Listen • Respect others point of view • Contribute your ideas in group session- everyone involved • Focus on issue not person • Be solutions focussed • Explore what is possible and think outside the square Blackberry Biocontrol: Invertebrate options – Raelene Kwong Role for citizen science – Greg Lefoe Background History of biocontrol of blackberry in Australia • First surveys conducted in 1977 across continental Europe, mostly central and southern Europe
    [Show full text]
  • Start 2013.Qxd 31.05.15 13:27 Seite 173
    Monnerat et al_2.qxp_Start 2013.qxd 31.05.15 13:27 Seite 173 Mitteilungen der SchweizeriSchen entoMologiSchen geSellSchaft BULLETIN DE LA SOCIETE ENTOMOLOGIQUE SUISSE 88: 173–228, 2015 liste commentée des lucanidae, cetoniidae, Buprestidae et cerambycidae (coleoptera) de Suisse annotated checklist of the lucanidae, cetoniidae, Buprestidae and cerambycidae (coleoptera) of Switzerland chriStian Monnerat , Y annick chittaro , a ndreaS Sanchez & Y veS gonSeth info fauna – cScf, Passage Maximilien-de-Meuron 6, ch-2000 neuchâtel; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] a critical list of Swiss lucanidae, cetoniidae, Buprestidae and cerambycidae is presented. this work is based on an extensive survey conducted on specimens deposited in museums and private collec - tions or mentioned in the literature and notes available in the cScf database. Seven species of luca - nidae, 18 cetoniidae, 89 Buprestidae and 179 cerambycidae are considered as valid for Switzerland. one species of cetoniidae, one Buprestidae and 18 cerambycidae are considered as imported. finally, 74 species (three cetoniidae, 44 Buprestidae, and 30 cerambycidae) often misidentified in the litera - ture or for which available specimens are of doubtful origin, are listed and discussed. keywords: Buprestidae, cerambycidae, cetoniidae, lucanidae, checklist, Switzerland, faunistics, new records. introduction les quatre familles de coléoptères traitées dans cette liste correspondent aux groupes cibles du projet de liste rouge des coléoptères du bois. elles appartiennent aux superfamilles des Scarabaeoidea, Buprestoidea et chrysomeloidea et ne for - ment donc pas d’entité systématique homogène. comparativement à d’autres familles de coléoptères, elles ont de longue date suscité l’intérêt des coléoptéristes.
    [Show full text]
  • Catalogo De Los Eucinetoidea Y Dascilloidea (Coleoptera) De Nicaragua
    Rev Rev. Nica. Ent. (1993) 25:51-54. CATALOGO DE LOS EUCINETOIDEA Y DASCILLOIDEA (COLEOPTERA) DE NICARAGUA. Por Jean-Michel MAES* RESUMEN Este catálogo presenta las 9 especies de Coleoptera Eucinetoidea (1 Eucinetidae, 1 Clambidae, 7 Scirtidae) y las 9 especies de Dascilloidea (3 Dascillidae, 6 Rhipiceridae) reportadas de Nicaragua. ABSTRACT This catalogue presents the 9 species of Coleoptera Eucinetoidea (1 Eucinetidae, 1 Clambidae, 7 Scirtidae) and the 9 species of Dascilloidea (3 Dascillidae, 6 Rhipiceridae) presently known from Nicaragua. file:///C|/My%20Documents/REVISTA/REV%2025/25%20Eucinetoidea.htm (1 of 5) [10/11/2002 05:50:39 p.m.] Rev * Museo Entomológico, A.P. 527, León, Nicaragua. INTRODUCCION Los Coleoptera Eucinetoidea agrupan tres familias existentes en Nicaragua : Eucinetidae, Clambidae y Scirtidae (=Helodidae). Los Eucinetidae son coleópteros pequeños (2.5 - 3 mm). Son ovalados y con la cabeza metida debajo del pronoto. Presentan 6 segmentos abdominales visibles y las coxas posteriores son dilatadas en forma de placas, cubriendo casi todo el primer segmento abdominal visible. Se encuentran bajo corteza de árboles ó sobre hongos. Los Eucinetidae son reportados por primera vez de Nicaragua. Los Clambidae son coleópteros muy pequeños, alrededor de 1 mm. Son cafés o negro. Pueden doblar la cabeza y el protórax sobre el abdomen para formar una pequeña esfera. Son pubescentes y presentan las coxas posteriores en placas. Se encuentran en materia vegetal en descomposición. Los Clambidae son reportados por primera vez de Nicaragua. Los Scirtidae ó Helodidae son coleópteros parecidos a los Chrysomelidae Alticinae, presentan fémures posteriores adaptados para brincar. Las larvas son acuáticas y los adultos se encuentran en lugares húmedos sobre plantas o sobre pedazos de troncos sobre el suelo.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution and Genomic Basis of Beetle Diversity
    The evolution and genomic basis of beetle diversity Duane D. McKennaa,b,1,2, Seunggwan Shina,b,2, Dirk Ahrensc, Michael Balked, Cristian Beza-Bezaa,b, Dave J. Clarkea,b, Alexander Donathe, Hermes E. Escalonae,f,g, Frank Friedrichh, Harald Letschi, Shanlin Liuj, David Maddisonk, Christoph Mayere, Bernhard Misofe, Peyton J. Murina, Oliver Niehuisg, Ralph S. Petersc, Lars Podsiadlowskie, l m l,n o f l Hans Pohl , Erin D. Scully , Evgeny V. Yan , Xin Zhou , Adam Slipinski , and Rolf G. Beutel aDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152; bCenter for Biodiversity Research, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152; cCenter for Taxonomy and Evolutionary Research, Arthropoda Department, Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, 53113 Bonn, Germany; dBavarian State Collection of Zoology, Bavarian Natural History Collections, 81247 Munich, Germany; eCenter for Molecular Biodiversity Research, Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, 53113 Bonn, Germany; fAustralian National Insect Collection, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia; gDepartment of Evolutionary Biology and Ecology, Institute for Biology I (Zoology), University of Freiburg, 79104 Freiburg, Germany; hInstitute of Zoology, University of Hamburg, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany; iDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Wien, Wien 1030, Austria; jChina National GeneBank, BGI-Shenzhen, 518083 Guangdong, People’s Republic of China; kDepartment of Integrative Biology, Oregon State
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Trap Color on Captures of Bark- and Wood-Boring Beetles
    insects Article Effect of Trap Color on Captures of Bark- and Wood-Boring Beetles (Coleoptera; Buprestidae and Scolytinae) and Associated Predators Giacomo Cavaletto 1,*, Massimo Faccoli 1, Lorenzo Marini 1 , Johannes Spaethe 2 , Gianluca Magnani 3 and Davide Rassati 1,* 1 Department of Agronomy, Food, Natural Resources, Animals and Environment (DAFNAE), University of Padova, Viale dell’Università, 16–35020 Legnaro, Italy; [email protected] (M.F.); [email protected] (L.M.) 2 Department of Behavioral Physiology & Sociobiology, Biozentrum, University of Würzburg, Am Hubland, 97074 Würzburg, Germany; [email protected] 3 Via Gianfanti 6, 47521 Cesena, Italy; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] (G.C.); [email protected] (D.R.); Tel.: +39-049-8272875 (G.C.); +39-049-8272803 (D.R.) Received: 9 October 2020; Accepted: 28 October 2020; Published: 30 October 2020 Simple Summary: Several wood-associated insects are inadvertently introduced every year within wood-packaging materials used in international trade. These insects can cause impressive economic and ecological damage in the invaded environment. Thus, several countries use traps baited with pheromones and plant volatiles at ports of entry and surrounding natural areas to intercept incoming exotic species soon after their arrival and thereby reduce the likelihood of their establishment. In this study, we investigated the performance of eight trap colors in attracting jewel beetles and bark and ambrosia beetles to test if the trap colors currently used in survey programs worldwide are the most efficient for trapping these potential forest pests. In addition, we tested whether trap colors can be exploited to minimize inadvertent removal of their natural enemies.
    [Show full text]
  • Schutz Des Naturhaushaltes Vor Den Auswirkungen Der Anwendung Von Pflanzenschutzmitteln Aus Der Luft in Wäldern Und Im Weinbau
    TEXTE 21/2017 Umweltforschungsplan des Bundesministeriums für Umwelt, Naturschutz, Bau und Reaktorsicherheit Forschungskennzahl 3714 67 406 0 UBA-FB 002461 Schutz des Naturhaushaltes vor den Auswirkungen der Anwendung von Pflanzenschutzmitteln aus der Luft in Wäldern und im Weinbau von Dr. Ingo Brunk, Thomas Sobczyk, Dr. Jörg Lorenz Technische Universität Dresden, Fakultät für Umweltwissenschaften, Institut für Forstbotanik und Forstzoologie, Tharandt Im Auftrag des Umweltbundesamtes Impressum Herausgeber: Umweltbundesamt Wörlitzer Platz 1 06844 Dessau-Roßlau Tel: +49 340-2103-0 Fax: +49 340-2103-2285 [email protected] Internet: www.umweltbundesamt.de /umweltbundesamt.de /umweltbundesamt Durchführung der Studie: Technische Universität Dresden, Fakultät für Umweltwissenschaften, Institut für Forstbotanik und Forstzoologie, Professur für Forstzoologie, Prof. Dr. Mechthild Roth Pienner Straße 7 (Cotta-Bau), 01737 Tharandt Abschlussdatum: Januar 2017 Redaktion: Fachgebiet IV 1.3 Pflanzenschutz Dr. Mareike Güth, Dr. Daniela Felsmann Publikationen als pdf: http://www.umweltbundesamt.de/publikationen ISSN 1862-4359 Dessau-Roßlau, März 2017 Das diesem Bericht zu Grunde liegende Vorhaben wurde mit Mitteln des Bundesministeriums für Umwelt, Naturschutz, Bau und Reaktorsicherheit unter der Forschungskennzahl 3714 67 406 0 gefördert. Die Verantwortung für den Inhalt dieser Veröffentlichung liegt bei den Autorinnen und Autoren. UBA Texte Entwicklung geeigneter Risikominimierungsansätze für die Luftausbringung von PSM Kurzbeschreibung Die Bekämpfung
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera: Introduction and Key to Families
    Royal Entomological Society HANDBOOKS FOR THE IDENTIFICATION OF BRITISH INSECTS To purchase current handbooks and to download out-of-print parts visit: http://www.royensoc.co.uk/publications/index.htm This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 UK: England & Wales License. Copyright © Royal Entomological Society 2012 ROYAL ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF LONDON Vol. IV. Part 1. HANDBOOKS FOR THE IDENTIFICATION OF BRITISH INSECTS COLEOPTERA INTRODUCTION AND KEYS TO FAMILIES By R. A. CROWSON LONDON Published by the Society and Sold at its Rooms 41, Queen's Gate, S.W. 7 31st December, 1956 Price-res. c~ . HANDBOOKS FOR THE IDENTIFICATION OF BRITISH INSECTS The aim of this series of publications is to provide illustrated keys to the whole of the British Insects (in so far as this is possible), in ten volumes, as follows : I. Part 1. General Introduction. Part 9. Ephemeroptera. , 2. Thysanura. 10. Odonata. , 3. Protura. , 11. Thysanoptera. 4. Collembola. , 12. Neuroptera. , 5. Dermaptera and , 13. Mecoptera. Orthoptera. , 14. Trichoptera. , 6. Plecoptera. , 15. Strepsiptera. , 7. Psocoptera. , 16. Siphonaptera. , 8. Anoplura. 11. Hemiptera. Ill. Lepidoptera. IV. and V. Coleoptera. VI. Hymenoptera : Symphyta and Aculeata. VII. Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea. VIII. Hymenoptera : Cynipoidea, Chalcidoidea, and Serphoidea. IX. Diptera: Nematocera and Brachycera. X. Diptera: Cyclorrhapha. Volumes 11 to X will be divided into parts of convenient size, but it is not possible to specify in advance the taxonomic content of each part. Conciseness and cheapness are main objectives in this new series, and each part will be the work of a specialist, or of a group of specialists.
    [Show full text]
  • GALLARDO, P.: Relationship Between Insect Damage and Chlorophyll Content in Mediterranean Oak Species
    Cárdenas – Gallardo: Relationship between insect damage and chlorophyll content in Mediterranean oak species - 477 - RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INSECT DAMAGE AND CHLOROPHYLL CONTENT IN MEDITERRANEAN OAK SPECIES CÁRDENAS, A. M.* ‒ GALLARDO, P. Dpto. de Zoología, Edificio Darwin, Campus Rabanales, E-14071, University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain (tel: +34 957 218604) *Corresponding author e-mail: [email protected] (Received 10th Jun 2016; accepted 23rd Jul 2016) Abstract. Considering that the damage caused by phytophagous insects can alter the chlorophyll content of plants, we established the hypothesis that variations in chlorophyll concentration could be applied to assess stress caused by these kind of harmful agents. In this paper, relationship between insect damage and the chlorophyll content of sclerophyllous oak species (Quercus suber and Q. ilex) is investigated. The survey was carried out in Hornachuelos Natural Park (southern Iberian Peninsula). For each plant species, a comparative study of chlorophyll concentration on healthy leaves was performed among a control group of harmless trees and other groups affected by one of the following damaging insects: woodborers, chewing and gall-formers. Results relative to Q. ilex indicated that only damage by gall-formers had a significant effect on average chlorophyll content of healthy leaves. As regard Q. suber, differences in chlorophyll content were only significant when injuries were caused by the woodborer Coraebus florentinus. In conclusion, insect damage could influence the chlorophyll content of the holm and cork oaks, but the effect varies depending on the plant species and the type of harmful agent. Keywords: environmental assessment, oak forests, Quercus ilex, Quercus suber, photosynthesis Introduction Several herbivorous insects are associated with Quercus species (Romanyk and Cadahía, 1992) and, depending on the way of affecting the plant, can be classified as woodborers, carpophagous and folivorous (chewing insects and galls-formers).
    [Show full text]
  • Inventory and Review of Quantitative Models for Spread of Plant Pests for Use in Pest Risk Assessment for the EU Territory1
    EFSA supporting publication 2015:EN-795 EXTERNAL SCIENTIFIC REPORT Inventory and review of quantitative models for spread of plant pests for use in pest risk assessment for the EU territory1 NERC Centre for Ecology and Hydrology 2 Maclean Building, Benson Lane, Crowmarsh Gifford, Wallingford, OX10 8BB, UK ABSTRACT This report considers the prospects for increasing the use of quantitative models for plant pest spread and dispersal in EFSA Plant Health risk assessments. The agreed major aims were to provide an overview of current modelling approaches and their strengths and weaknesses for risk assessment, and to develop and test a system for risk assessors to select appropriate models for application. First, we conducted an extensive literature review, based on protocols developed for systematic reviews. The review located 468 models for plant pest spread and dispersal and these were entered into a searchable and secure Electronic Model Inventory database. A cluster analysis on how these models were formulated allowed us to identify eight distinct major modelling strategies that were differentiated by the types of pests they were used for and the ways in which they were parameterised and analysed. These strategies varied in their strengths and weaknesses, meaning that no single approach was the most useful for all elements of risk assessment. Therefore we developed a Decision Support Scheme (DSS) to guide model selection. The DSS identifies the most appropriate strategies by weighing up the goals of risk assessment and constraints imposed by lack of data or expertise. Searching and filtering the Electronic Model Inventory then allows the assessor to locate specific models within those strategies that can be applied.
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera: Buprestidae: Agrilinae) from the Leyte Island, Philippines 1
    Zootaxa 2292: 57–64 (2009) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2009 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) Three new species of Coraebini Bedel, 1921 (Coleoptera: Buprestidae: Agrilinae) from the Leyte Island, Philippines 1 C. L. BELLAMY* & SADAHIRO OHMOMO** * Plant Pest Diagnostic Branch, California Department of Food & Agriculture, 3294 Meadowview Road, Sacramento, California, 95832, U.S.A.; email: [email protected] ** 1-chome 12-4, Sumiyoshi, Ami-machi, Inashiki-gun, Ibaraki-ken 300-1151, Japan; email: [email protected] Abstract Three new species of Coraebini (Coleoptera: Buprestidae: Agrilinae, subtribes Coraebina and Toxoscelina) from the Philippine island of Leyte are described: the tenth species of Coraebosoma Obenberger, 1923: C. viridis; the second species of Lumawigia Bellamy, 2005: L. leytensis; and the third species of Philippscelus Bellamy, 1998: P. gracilis. All three are distinguished from their congeners in new or modified keys and illustrated with color photographs of the respective dorsal habitus and male genitalia. Key words: Coleoptera, Buprestidae, Coraebosoma, Lumawigia, Philippscelus, new species, Philippines, Leyte, keys Introduction This paper, our first collaborative work on the Philippine Coraebini Bedel, 1921 (Coleoptera: Buprestidae: Agrilinae), represents the eighth contribution to the modern understanding of that regional fauna (Bellamy 1990a, 1990b, 1991a, 1991b, 1998, 2005; Ohmomo 2002). New taxa from the genera Coraebosoma Obenberger, 1923, Lumawigia Bellamy, 2005 and Philippscelus Bellamy, 2005 are available for description now, while other new Philippine species of Coraebini are accumulating for future descriptive papers. Although listed alphabetically above, these three genera will be discussed in a systematic sequence (see Kubáň, et al., 2001) below.
    [Show full text]
  • New Records of Buprestidae (Coleoptera) from Israel with Description of a New Species
    ISRAEL JOURNAL OF ENTOMOLOGY, Vol. 34, 2004, pp. 109-152 New records of Buprestidae (Coleoptera) from Israel with description of a new species MARK VOLKOVITSH Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russia ABSTRACT In two expeditions to Israel (in 1994 and 1996), 123 species of Buprestidae (Coleoptera), including one with two subspecies, were collected. Data col- lected, general distribution, and known larval host plants are given for each species. Fifteen Buprestidae species, and new hosts for four species, are recorded from Israel for the first time, including three new host associations for species that already had other known hosts. Xantheremia (Xantheremia) freidbergi is described as a new species. Acmaeodera (Palaeotethya) macchabaea Abeille de Perrin is resurrected from synonymy with A. rubro- maculata sensu Volkovitsh 1986, in part, and two new synonyms, A. pharsaea Obenbberger and A. houskai Obenberger, are established for this species. Acmaeoderella sefrensis Pic is a new status for Acmaeodera rufo- marginata var. sefrensis Pic, and two new synonyms are established for it: A. rufomarginata var. stramineipennis Chobaut and A. virgulata var. lucasi Théry. Acmaeodera miribella Obenberger is a new subspecies of Acmaeo- derella elegans (Harold) n. comb., and Acmaeodera eucera Obenberger is its synonym. Acmaeoderella adspersula arabica Cobos is elevated to species status. Lectotypes are designated for A. rufomarginata var. sefrensis, A. rufomarginata var. stramineipennis, and A. virgulata var. lucasi. INTRODUCTION The study of buprestid fauna of Israel has been relatively poor. Bodenheimer (1937) listed 84 species. There are only a few publications on Israeli buprestids in the 20th century that either summarize data collected (Obenberger, 1946; Niehuis, 1996) or are devoted to buprestid fauna of certain localities (Chikatunov et al., 1999; Volkovitsh et al., 2000).
    [Show full text]