DOCSLIB.ORG

Yellowstone National Park, Submerged Resources Survey

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Yellowstone National Park, Submerged Resources Survey te t/:p--J038 .. } ,' ,, .. ' . ·� . I ; ,· . ' . '/ YEL.LOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK " � ! I '!'' • SUBMERGED RESOURCES SURVEY I ·' I i I \. ,· i .\ I: ··r· 'I I CC®ll®IT' §��IID� YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK a product of the NATIONAL PARK SERVICE SYSTEMWIDE ARCHEOLOGICALINVENTORY PROGRAM YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK Submerged Resources Survey James E. Bradford Archeologist Matthew A. Russell Archeologist Larry E. Murphy Archeologist Timothy G. Smith Geodesist Submerged Resources Center Intermountain Region National Park Service Santa Fe, New Mexico 1999 11 Submerged Resources Center Cultural Resources Management Intermountain Region National Park Service US Department of the Interior 111 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ..................................................................................................................... vii FOREWORD ................................................................................................................................. X ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .......................................................................................................... xi PART 1: REMOTE SENSING SURVEY ..................................... ............................................ 1 Matthew A. Russell, Larry E. Murphy and Timothy G. Smith INTRODUCTION .... ............................ ................ ........................................... ............. 2 PROBLEM STATEMENT................... ........................................................................ 3 SURVEY DESIGN AND RATIONALE ............... ...................................................... 4 Geographic Information Systems (GIS) ..................... .......................................... 5 GIS Data Archiving ........................................ ...................................................... 6 Survey Blocks and Sample Intervals ..................................................................... 6 Positioning ................... ....................................................................................... .. 6 SURVEY INSTRUMENTATION........ ........................... ............................................. 7 Positioning ............................................................................................................. 8 RoxAnn Bottom Classification Device ................................................................. 8 Depth Sounder ....................................................................................................... 9 Side Scan Sonar .............. ...... ................................................. ................................ 9 Magnetometer .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 10 SURVEY METHODOLOGY .... ......... ......... .................... .............. ..... .......... ......... 10 Objectives ........ ................... ............ ................... ......... .... ............... ......... .......... 10 Digitizing ................... .................... ........................................................... ........... 10 Survey Planning ...................................................... .................................. .......... 12 Survey Positioning ......................... ..................................................................... 12 RoxAnn Survey ............................................................................................. ..... 13 Side Scan Sonar Survey ........... ........................................................ .................. 14 Magnetometer Survey .......................................................................................... 15 SURVEY OPERATIONS ........................................................................................... 15 Geodetic Positioning . .. ..................................................................... .................. 15 Hydrographic Survey .............................................................. ............................ 16 ROXANN TRAINING SITES .................................................................................... 17 RoxAnn Bottom Type Classifications ................................................................. 17 RoxAnn Classification Boxes .............................................................................. 18 iv SURVEY RESULTS . ...... ................ ........................................ ........... ................ 22 RoxAnn Survey ........................................................................ : ........................... 22 Side Scan Sonar Survey ........................................ ............... ............................... 23 Depth Sounder .............................. ............ .................... ....... ............. .... ........ ... 23 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ...................................................... 23 PART II: CULTURAL RESOURCES INVESTIGATIONS ............................. ............. .. 36 James E. Bradford and Matthew A. Russell 1 INTRODUCTION ...... ..... ........ ........... ............... .. ..... ................... ........ .... ... 37 2 ENVIRONMENTAL CONTEXT . ...................... ... ... ........ ... ......... .. .... ...... .. 40 Geology ..................... ............. ... ........ .............................. ............... ... ........ 40 Volcanism .... ...................... ..................................................................... 40 Glaciation . .................... ... ........................ ............... .......... ................... 43 Climate ........................................................................................................... 44 Biology .. .... ... ... .... ........................................................ ............................ 44 Flora and Fauna ........... ........................... ........... ................ ............... 44 3 llSTORICAL CONTEXT .......................... .......... ............................ ................. 47 Brief History of Yellowstone National Park ...... ............... ................ .......... 48 Yellowstone Lake Use .... ............ ................ ....... .............. ................... ........ 51 American Indian Lake Use . 51 Euroamerican Lake Use ............................................................ ........ ... 53 4 PREVIOUS ARCHEOLOGICALWORK . ... ............. ............ ....... ....... ......... 74 Fishing Bridge/Mary Bay ....... ............................. ............. ............ .............. 74 Lake/Bridge Bay ......... ............. ......................... ............. ............ ............ .. 76 West Thumb .............................. .. ........... ......... .... .. ............ ....... .. ......... 76 Southeast Arm... .... .............................................................................. ......... 77 1995 SCRU Reconnaissance ..... ........................ ......... ................................ 77 5 SURVEY RESULTS ........ ............................................ ............................... .... .. 79 Southeast Arm. ........... .... ...................................... ............. ............................ 79 Frank Island .... ........ .. ....... ,......................................................................... 81 Dot Island .... .............. ............ ............... .................................. .......... ......... 83 Pumice Point ........... ....... ................. ............... ........ ....................................... 84 Little Thumb Creek ...................................... ........................ .. ................ ..... 84 We st Thumb Geyer Basin .............................................................................. 84 Lake Boat Docks ........................ .... ........................... ........ .......... ............... 90 Small Craft ...... ............. .............. ........................................ ....... ................. 93 Zillah and Jean D ·································· ···················' ····································· 98 E. C. Wa ters ...... .......... ... .............. ............... ........................... ................. 100 v Hull Remains . 100 Propulsion System and Related Features ...................................................... 111 Disarticulated Machinery and Other Features ............................................. 120 Analysis and Discussion .............................................................................. 128 6 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................. 130 Recommendations ....................................................................................... 131 Management .......................................................................................... 131 Future Research ..................................................................................... 132 REFERENCES ....................... ........................................................................... 134 vi LIST OF FIGURES PART I 1. Planned survey blocks and side scan sonar coverage ....................................................... 11 2. Category 1: Cobble and rubble with sand ........................................................................ 19 3. Category 2: Rubble and sand on hard bottom ................................................................. 19 4. Category 3: Mud and fine sand .......................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • LOCATION of IDAHO's TERRITORIAL CAPITAL Number 344 December 24, 1964
    344 IDAHO STATE HISTORICAL SOCIETY REFERENCE SERIES LOCATION OF IDAHO'S TERRITORIAL CAPITAL Number 344 December 24, 1964 On December 24, 1864, Boise became the capital of the territory of Idaho. But although the act of the territorial legislature was clear and simple, the situation was not, and the story surrounding it is typical of politics of that day. When the territory of Idaho was established by Congress, March 4, 1863, the law provided that the first territorial legislature should select a permanent capital. Originally, before the new territory was set up, the weight of population had been in the north and the principal city there was Lewiston. When the first territorial governor, William Henson Wallace, reached the territory in July, 1863, it was logical for him to establish his office in Lewiston and proclaim the organization of the territory from that town. It was also to Lewiston that he summoned the first territorial legislature in December, 1863. But for a little more than a year the center of population had been shifting. Gold had been struck in the Boise Basin in the summer of 1862, and the new mines had drawn population from north to south. When the census, on which apportionment was based, was taken in September, 1863, the area around Boise already had far more people than did the northern mines around Lewiston. The trend continued in coming years. That first legislature in Lewiston in 1863 did not face the issue of locating a definite territorial capital. Thus all through 1864, Lewiston was the temporary seat of the territorial government, but there was no permanent capital.
    [Show full text]
  • IDAHO ACTION PLAN (V3.0) for Implementing the Department of the Interior Secretarial Order 3362
    IDAHO ACTION PLAN (V3.0) For Implementing the Department of the Interior Secretarial Order 3362: “Improving Habitat Quality in Western Big-Game Winter Range and Migration Corridors” 10 September 2020 PREFACE Secretarial Order No. 3362 (SO3362) (09 February 2018; Appendix B) directs the Department of Interior (DOI) to assist western tribes, private landowners, state fish and wildlife agencies, and state transportation departments with conserving and managing priority big game winter ranges and migration corridors. Per SO3362, the DOI invited state wildlife agencies in 2018 to develop action plans identifying big game priority areas and corresponding management efforts across jurisdictional boundaries. The Idaho Department of Fish and Game (IDFG) and DOI jointly developed Idaho’s first version (V1.0) of the SO3362 Action Plan in 2018, which identified 5 Priority Areas for managing pronghorn, mule deer, and elk winter range and migration habitat (Appendix A and D). V2.0 was prepared in 2019 with support from the Idaho Transportation Department (ITD). This V3.0 was also prepared in coordination with ITD in response to DOI’s 14 April 2020 letter to IDFG (Appendix E) requesting updated Priority Area information. Correspondingly, IDFG views this Action Plan as a living document to be reviewed and updated as needed, for example when new priorities emerge, revised information becomes available, and management efforts are completed. Each version of Idaho’s Action Plan applies best available information to identify current and future needs for managing big game winter range and migration habitat, highlight ongoing and new priority management needs, leverage collaborative resources, and narrow focus to 5 Priority Areas.
    [Show full text]
  • 3. Status of Delegates and Resident Commis
    Ch. 7 § 2 DESCHLER’S PRECEDENTS § 2.24 The Senate may, by reiterated that request for the du- unanimous consent, ex- ration of the 85th Congress. change the committee senior- It was so ordered by the Senate. ity of two Senators pursuant to a request by one of them. On Feb. 23, 1955,(6) Senator § 3. Status of Delegates Styles Bridges, of New Hamp- and Resident Commis- shire, asked and obtained unani- sioner mous consent that his position as ranking minority member of the Delegates and Resident Com- Senate Armed Services Committee missioners are those statutory of- be exchanged for that of Senator Everett Saltonstall, of Massachu- ficers who represent in the House setts, the next ranking minority the constituencies of territories member of that committee, for the and properties owned by the duration of the 84th Congress, United States but not admitted to with the understanding that that statehood.(9) Although the persons arrangement was temporary in holding those offices have many of nature, and that at the expiration of the 84th Congress he would re- 9. For general discussion of the status sume his seniority rights.(7) of Delegates, see 1 Hinds’ Precedents In the succeeding Congress, on §§ 400, 421, 473; 6 Cannon’s Prece- Jan. 22, 1957,(8) Senator Bridges dents §§ 240, 243. In early Congresses, Delegates when Senator Edwin F. Ladd (N.D.) were construed only as business was not designated to the chairman- agents of chattels belonging to the ship of the Committee on Public United States, without policymaking Lands and Surveys, to which he had power (1 Hinds’ Precedents § 473), seniority under the traditional prac- and the statutes providing for Dele- tice.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Registration Form
    NFS Form 10-900 OMB No. 10024-001 (Revised Feb. 1993) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations of eligibility for individual properties or districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NFS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer to complete all items. 1. Name of Property historic name Elfers. Jurden Henry. Barn and Field other names/site number IHSI #49-17934: SITS #10-IH-527 2. Location street & number John Day Creek N/A not for publication City or town Lucile X vicinity state Idaho code ID county Idaho code 049 zip code 83530 3. State/Federal Agency Certification_____ As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this _X nomination _request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property _X_meets _does not meet the National Register criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant _X_nationally _statewide _locally.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Governor of Idaho, 1879 [With] Report of the Surveyor-General of Idaho, 1879
    University of Oklahoma College of Law University of Oklahoma College of Law Digital Commons American Indian and Alaskan Native Documents in the Congressional Serial Set: 1817-1899 10-8-1879 Report of the Governor of Idaho, 1879 [with] Report of the Surveyor-General of Idaho, 1879 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.ou.edu/indianserialset Part of the Indian and Aboriginal Law Commons Recommended Citation H.R. Exec. Doc. No.1, 46th Cong., 2nd Sess. (1879) This House Executive Document is brought to you for free and open access by University of Oklahoma College of Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in American Indian and Alaskan Native Documents in the Congressional Serial Set: 1817-1899 by an authorized administrator of University of Oklahoma College of Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. REPORT OF THE GOVERNOR OF IDAHO. EXECUTIVE DEPA.RTMENT, IDAHO TERRITORY, Boise City, October 8, 1879. SIR: In compliance with your request of August 28th ultimo, I have the honor to submit the following pages : · . Unfortunately the subject of collecting statistics has, thus far, re­ ceived so little attention of the legislature as to render completeness of statement and exactness in detail impossible, in undertaking a report upon the annual advance made in the various departments of industry and growth, concerning which information is sought. This paper, therefore, is made up of general facts · and discussion, rather than of figures. The year bas been one of gene-ral thrift and prosperity. Agri­ culture has been remunerative. Mining bas developed with remarkable success in various parts.
    [Show full text]
  • Shoshone-Bannock Tribes of the Fort Hall Reservation in Support of Petitioner ————
    No. 17-532 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States ———— CLAYVIN B. HERRERA, Petitioner, v. STATE OF WYOMING, Respondent. ———— On Writ of Certiorari to the District Court of Wyoming, Sheridan County ———— BRIEF OF AMICUS CURIAE SHOSHONE-BANNOCK TRIBES OF THE FORT HALL RESERVATION IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONER ———— DOUGLAS B. L. ENDRESON WILLIAM F. BACON ANNE D. NOTO Counsel of Record FRANK S. HOLLEMAN, IV MONTE GRAY SONOSKY, CHAMBERS, SHOSHONE-BANNOCK TRIBES SACHSE, ENDRESON 306 Pima Dr. & PERRY, LLP Fort Hall, ID 83203 1425 K St., N.W. Suite 600 (208) 478-3822 Washington, DC 20005 [email protected] (202) 682-0240 Counsel for Amicus Curiae September 11, 2018 WILSON-EPES PRINTING CO., INC. – (202) 789-0096 – WASHINGTON, D. C. 20002 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ................................ ii INTEREST OF AMICUS CURIAE ..................... 1 STATEMENT OF FACTS ................................... 3 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT ............................. 5 ARGUMENT ........................................................ 7 I. RACE HORSE AROSE FROM THE MURDER OF BANNOCK INDIANS BY SETTLERS, NOT FROM A CONFLICT BETWEEN THE INDIANS’ TREATY RIGHTS AND STATE CONSERVATION INTERESTS .............................................. 7 A. The Murders ........................................ 8 B. The Conspiracy .................................... 10 II. THE MILLE LACS DECISION ESTAB- LISHES RACE HORSE HAS NO CONTINUING LEGAL FORCE .............. 16 III. APPLYING THE RULES OF TREATY CONSTRUCTION SET FORTH IN MILLE LACS CONFIRMS THAT THE TRIBES RETAIN THEIR RIGHTS UNDER ARTICLE 4 OF THE 1868 TREATY .................................................... 18 IV. THE TRIBES EXERCISE CO- MANAGEMENT OF THEIR OFF- RESERVATION TREATY HUNTING AND FISHING RIGHTS ............................ 26 CONCLUSION .................................................... 29 (i) ii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES CASES Page(s) Antoine v. Washington, 420 U.S. 194 (1975) ................................... 17 Brown v. Bd. of Educ., 347 U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Warren, Idaho: Mining, Race, and Environment
    A HISTORY OF WARREN, IDAHO: MINING, RACE, AND ENVIRONMENT by Cletus R. Edmunson A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in History Boise State University August 2012 © 2012 Cletus R. Edmunson ALL RIGHTS RESERVED BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY GRADUATE COLLEGE DEFENSE COMMITTEE AND FINAL READING APPROVALS of the thesis submitted by Cletus R. Edmunson Thesis Title: A History of Warren, Idaho: Mining, Race, and Environment Date of Final Oral Examination: 15 June 2012 The following individuals read and discussed the thesis submitted by student Cletus R. Edmunson, and they evaluated his presentation and response to questions during the final oral examination. They found that the student passed the final oral examination. Todd Shallat, Ph.D. Chair, Supervisory Committee Jill Gill, Ph.D. Member, Supervisory Committee Lisa Brady, Ph.D. Member, Supervisory Committee The final reading approval of the thesis was granted by Todd Shallat, Ph.D., Chair of the Supervisory Committee. The thesis was approved for the Graduate College by John R. Pelton, Ph.D., Dean of the Graduate College. DEDICATION This thesis is the culmination of my own journey back into Warren’s past and is dedicated to the man who started me on this journey, my dad, John H. Edmunson. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This thesis would not have been possible without the support of many people. The author wishes to express his deepest gratitude to all of the members of the History Department at Boise State University. The author acknowledges the inherent difficulties in helping someone attain their degree when they choose a rather circuitous route.
    [Show full text]
  • RESOLUTION NO. 97- WHEREAS, the Most Recent Edition of the Moscow Comprehensive Plan Was Adopted by the Moscow City Council By
    RESOLUTION NO. 97- 07 WHEREAS, the most recent edition of the Moscow Comprehensive Plan was adopted by the Moscow City Council by resolution on October 7, 1985; and, WHEREAS, the Planing and Zoning Commission appointed a committee to review the Moscow Comprehensive Plan and fo rward recommendations to the full Commission, and which committee held ten public meetings between July, 1982 and January, !985; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission considered the Comprehensive Plan, evaluated the most recent information available and prepared recommendations fo r updating during the course of fifteen public meetings between July, 1982 and April, 1985; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Idabo Code Section 67-6509, the Moscow Planning and Zoning Commission conducted two duly advertised public hearings on May 22, 1985 and July I 0, 1985 on the 1985 Update ofthe City of Moscow Comprehensive Plan and Comprehensive Plan Map, which are fo r the management of the physical and economical development of the City of Moscow, Idaho; and WHEREAS, subsequent to those public hearings, the City of Moscow Planning and Zoning Commission considered the testimony, and by unanimous vote on June 12, 1985, moved to recommend the 1985 Update of the City of Moscow Comprehensive Plan to the City of Moscow City Council fo r final approval; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Idaho Code Section 67-6509, the City of Moscow City Council conducted one duly published public hearing on September 16, 1985 at 8 00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of City Hall; and WHEREAS, the Comprehensive Plan adopted on July 21, 1980 which is the basis upon which the 1985 Comprehensive Plan Update has been prepared was adopted after the City Council and Planning and Zoning Commission conducted a total of nine workshops, sixteen public meetings, and five public hearings as disclosed in Resolution No.
    [Show full text]
  • Crustal Thickness and Vp/Vs Ratio of Yellowstone, Eastern Snake River
    Scholars' Mine Masters Theses Student Theses and Dissertations Summer 2017 Crustal thickness and Vp/Vs ratio of Yellowstone, Eastern Snake River Plain, Wyoming Province, and the northern Basin and Range Province through receiver function analysis Avikant Dayma Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/masters_theses Part of the Geology Commons, and the Geophysics and Seismology Commons Department: Recommended Citation Dayma, Avikant, "Crustal thickness and Vp/Vs ratio of Yellowstone, Eastern Snake River Plain, Wyoming Province, and the northern Basin and Range Province through receiver function analysis" (2017). Masters Theses. 7689. https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/masters_theses/7689 This thesis is brought to you by Scholars' Mine, a service of the Missouri S&T Library and Learning Resources. This work is protected by U. S. Copyright Law. Unauthorized use including reproduction for redistribution requires the permission of the copyright holder. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CRUSTAL THICKNESS AND 푉푝/푉푠 RATIO OF YELLOWSTONE, EASTERN SNAKE RIVER PLAIN, WYOMING PROVINCE, AND THE NORTHERN BASIN AND RANGE PROVINCE THROUGH RECEIVER FUNCTION ANALYSIS by AVIKANT DAYMA A THESIS Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the MISSOURI UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF SCIENCE IN GEOLOGY & GEOPHYSICS 2017 Approved by Stephen Gao, Advisor Kelly Liu Maochen Ge ii 2017 Avikant Dayma All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT For decades, numerous studies have been conducted and contradictory results were achieved about the origin and evolution of the Yellowstone supervolcano and the Eastern Snake River Plain. Whether the 640 km long time-progressive chain of rhyolitic calderas was formed due to mantle-plume or a result of lithospheric extension allowing the emergence of melt on the surface is still a debate.
    [Show full text]
  • Wim& Mwoygoods?
    THE PERSONNEL! OF THE IDAHO a recent speech in the House'. Mr. Pierce has entitled “ An Act relating to certain County MARRIED: At Buena Yista Bar, on tbe 8th inst., by Justice ASSEMBLY. acquired a reputation here of being a pointed Treasurers : ” Walker, Mr. J. H. Teeter to Miss Mahala Wil­ J M o » H i and logical debater, and is on his feet oftener Section 1. The County Treasurers of the coun L ewiston, Dec. 6th, 1864. ties of Nez Perce, Idaho, Boise and Shoshone liams. E ditor W orld : I have taken much trouble than any member of tbe Assembly. shall, on or before tte twentieth day of March SATURDAY, DECEMBER 17, 1864- Hon. H. C. Riggs is also a native of Ken­ «ne thousand eight hundred and sixty four, pay to ascertain the age, nativity and occupation over to the Territorial Treasurer of the Territory DIED: The mountains—.they proclaim T of the several members of the Assembly, as tucky, but came to Oregon in an early day— of Idaho, all moneys keid by them as such county At Buena Yista, on the 9th inst., Louis, adopted The everlasting creed of Liberty! Treasurers for the use of the Territory underand son of Mr. and Mrs. Heury Cooper, aged 2 years That, creed is written on the unlrampled snow. it i3 composed this Winter, and also the is about 40 years of age—and has been, I Thunder’d by torrents which no power can hold, by virtue of any law of Washington Territory and 6 weeks. believe, Mayor of Corvallis, Oregon.
    [Show full text]
  • EES Wyoming-Idaho Spring Field Course Trip Report
    EES Wyoming-Idaho Spring Field Course Trip Report In May, 2019, 24 EES students and three wizened professors flew to Salt Lake City for a a 12-day field course in Utah, Idaho and Wyoming (with a brief foray into Montana). After arriving late at night and discovering that Dr D had forgotten his driver’s license, then found it and lost it, then found it, then lost it and then found it again, the group set off on a clockwise route with 3 days of thunderstorms and rain in the forecast. Fortunately, a quick stop at the Great Salt Lake (Antelope Island) went smoothly and we were able to see the pretty lake amidst swarms of flies hovering over microbial mats, with views of the distant Wasatch Range and its impressive faulted mountain front. We then drove north into Idaho and turned west to the City of Rocks in the southern Albion Range. We lucked out with the weather and had a marvelous hike in the heavily jointed and weathered granite landscape leaving the students in happy spirits because we had truly entered a very scenic part of the wild west. We arrived late in Twin Falls, but still had time to peek into the Snake River Canyon and watch base jumpers plunging past flood basalt cliffs. The evening began with a group meal at Idaho Joes with burgers and pie slices for most. A medical incident left some people poorly rested for the next day, but after a brief stop at dramatic Shoshone Falls, we raced up to Craters of the Moon where again, we somehow avoided the rain, (although we watched a tornado) and saw all the main sites of the amazingly raw volcanic landscape of the northern Snake River Plain.
    [Show full text]
  • Henrys Fork Basin Study Final Report 1 1.0 Introduction
    Henrys Fork Basin Study Final Report Produced in partnership with the State of Idaho Water Resource Board U.S. Department of the Interior Idaho Water Resource Board Bureau of Reclamation State of Idaho Pacific Northwest Region Boise, Idaho Snake River Area Office Boise, Idaho January 2015 MISSION OF THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR PROTECTING AMERICA'S GREAT OUTDOORS AND POWERING OUR FUTURE The U.S. Department of the Interior protects America's natural resources and heritage, honors our cultures and tribal communities, and supplies the energy to power our future. MISSION OF THE BUREAU OF RECLAMATION The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. Photograph on front cover: Fly fishing, irrigated agriculture, and wildlife habitat are important activities in the Henrys Fork River basin Disclaimer The Henrys Fork Basin Study was funded jointly by the Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) and the Idaho Water Resource Board (IWRB), and is a collaborative product of the study participants as identified in Section 1.3, page 5 of this report. The purpose of the study is to assess current and future water supply and demand in the Henrys Fork Basin and adjacent areas that receive water from the basin, and to identify a range of potential strategies to address any projected imbalances. The study is a technical assessment and does not provide recommendations or represent a statement of policy or position of the Bureau of Reclamation, the Department of the Interior, or the funding partners.
    [Show full text]