DOCSLIB.ORG

History of the Boise National Fo 1905 1976. C

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
History of the Boise National Fo 1905 1976. C HISTORY OF THE BOISE NATIONAL FO 1905 1976. C 0 0 0 • A HISTORY OF THE BOISE NATIONAL FOREST 1905-1976 by ELIZABETH M. SMITH IDAHO STATE HISTORICAL SOCIETY BOISE 1983 History of the Boise National Forest, 1905-1976, is published under a co- operative agreement between the Idaho State Historical Society and the Boise National Forest. DEDICATION This history is dedicated to the memory of Guy B. Mains, who served as supervisor of the former Payette National Forest from 1908 to 1920 and 1924 to 1925 and was supervisor of the former Boise National Forest from 1925 to 1940. He spent a total of twenty-eight years in the development of the present Boise National Forest, serving as a supervisor for over one-third of the total history of the forest from its beginning in 1905 to the present. kJ TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments vii Boise National Forest Data ix PART I: BEFORE THE NATIONAL FOREST Indians 3 Fur Trade, Exploration, and Emigration 7 Mining 11 Chinese 18 Settlement 20 Place Names 25 7. Early Transportation 29 PART II: CREATION, DEVELOPMENT, AND ADMINISTRATION Creation of the Boise National Forest 39 Administering the Forest 44 Civilian Conservation Corps 55 Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station 61 The Lucky Peak Nursery 66 Youth Conservation Corps 68 PART III: RESOURCES AND FUNCTIONS Geology 71 Watershed, Soils, and Minerals 73 Timber Management 82 Range Management 91 Wildlife Management 99 Recreation and Land Use 105 Fire Management 111 Improvements and Engineering 127 Conclusion 135 APPENDICES Supervisors and Headquarters Locations 139 Early Mining Methods and Terms 140 Towns and Mining Camps 143 Changes in Management Through Legislation 148 Dams and Reservoirs 153 Graves in the Boise National Forest 158 BIBLIOGRAPHY 161 Illustrations Map of the Boise National Forest Photographs following page 78 . i U ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This book is a brief record of the monumental task that has been per- formed by a long line of dedicated foresters. In the larger sense, this history has been "written" by those whose lives have been spent caring for, managing, and improving the Boise National Forest. Many past and present Forest Service personnel and numerous other people have contributed facts, ideas, and reminiscences. Some have read, cor- rected and added to portions of this work. I am indebted to the person- nel of the Boise National Forest at the time the study was written for their gracious cooperation and helpfulness, and particularly to the district rangers who dug deep into their files; Wally Shiverdecker and Don Hansen, then the public relations officers, who kept pushing the work; and Edward C. Maw, then the forest supervisor. I am grateful to Dr. Merle Wells, state historian and archivist, Idaho State Historical Society, for taking time to read critically Part I of this manuscript. Other Historical Society staff who gave assistance are Judith Austin and Robert Romig. Robert Brown of the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, Boise; William Harvey, of the Idaho Department of Transportation; personnel of the Idaho De- partment of Fish and Game; and Joanne Thompson, Boise Cascade Corpora- tion also provided valuable assistance. Elizabeth M. Smith ) BOISE NATIONAL FOREST Location: Southwestern part of the state of Idaho. Derivation of name: The forest was named for the Boise River, which flows through much of it. The word Boise is from the French, meaning "wooded." The river was called Boise as early as 1812. Principal drainage: Boise River, Payette River, Middle and South forks of the Salmon River. All of the river drainages are part of the Snake River system. Predominating timber species: Ponderosa pine, Douglas fir. The Boise National Forest is one of the largest of the nation's national forests. The gross area within its boundaries is 2,958,356 acres, in- cluding 2,642,453 acres of national-forest lands and 315,903 acres in other ownership. PART I BEFORE THE NATIONAL FOREST INDIANS There is evidence that intelligent, highly skilled people have lived in Idaho for at least the past twelve to fifteen thousand years. Near the end of the Ice Age or Pleistocene geological epoch, some 13,000 years ago, people living a semi-nomadic life apparently entered Idaho. 1 Anthropologists have found two Indian cultural groups in Idaho, known as Plateau and Great Basin. Though Plateau cultures are found north of the Salmon River, evidence suggests that Plateau people occupied areas of southwestern and west-central Idaho some time between the fourteenth and eighteenth centuries. The Great Basin cultures found south and east of the Salmon River include such groups as the Northern and Western Shoshoni, the Bannock, 2 and the Northern Paiute. These groups were known generally in the nineteenth century as Snake Indians. The Northern Shoshoni left evidence in central Idaho of having held to a way of life for 8,000 years or more. Eight to ten thousand years ago, their patterns of existence in southern Idaho were similar to those found over a large part of the Great Basin in Utah and Nevada. However, a change of climate about 7,000 years ago dried up much of the Great Basin and changed the way of life of people in that low-lying geo- graphic area. The ancestors of the Northern Shoshoni slowly moved to high mountain country in central Idaho, where they could continue their big-game-hunting way of life. As a result, they survived into the nine- teenth and twentieth centuries and provide likely evidence of a much older way of life. Their relatives the Western Shoshoni and Northern Paiute changed their way of life to fit their changing environment and became dependent upon seed gathering and hunting of small mammals.3 Unchallenged by other Indians, the Mountain Shoshoni--a branch of the Northern Shoshoni often called Sheepeaters or Tukudeka--used most of the area that is now the Payette, Salmon, Boise, Challis, Sawtooth, and Beaverhead national forests. 4 The Sheepeaters never used horses in great numbers, though other Shoshoni acquired them as early as 1700. The area inhabited by the Sheepeaters was too rough to support horses and allow them to be used to advantage in hunting and travel. Sheep- eaters who did acquire horses tended to leave the extremely rough areas of central Idaho and join their relatives the Lemhi Indians, who were largely Mountain Shoshoni living in more open country where they could support horses and use them to advantage in hunting buffalo. The Sheepeaters' diet included a variety of roots, seeds, and ber- ries. They constructed weirs and dams to catch salmon. They were the most skilled hunters on foot of all Idaho Indians, using excellent bows of laminated horn of the bighorn mountain sheep, light snowshoes in win- ter, and dogs trained for the chase. They were excellent furriers, and their skin products were highly prized by other Indians and by white fur traders.5 Most of the Boise National Forest has been sparsely inhabited by Indians. Archaeological sites, including several rock shelters, camp- 4 sites, and burial grounds, have been located on various rivers in the area. Pictographs have been discovered near rock shelters and artifacts have been found along the rivers.6 Within historic times the area of the Boise National Forest was primarily Northern Shoshoni country, including both Mountain (Sheep- eater) Shoshoni and, in the southern part, Boise Shoshoni. Other Indian groups ventured into the area for hunting and for trade. The old fur- trade Fort Boise trading post, built in 1834, was located near the mouth of the Boise River because this was an area where Indians gathered for fishing and trade. The area was common ground for Shoshoni and Bannock; the Nez Perce came regularly for annual trading fairs. Other groups that occasionally ventured into this area included Northern Paiute, Cayuse, and Plains Indians. During the years of the fur trade, the Indians of Idaho had no ma- jor wars with the white newcomers, although there were some minor skir- mishes. The fur trade did not seriously disrupt the Indian way of life. But when gold seekers in the 1860's moved into the mountains where the Sheepeaters fished and hunted, many of the Sheepeaters moved out and joined their relatives among the Lemhi Indians.7 Permanent white settlement and ranching, which followed the rush for gold, made life difficult for the Indians. As more country was set- tled, serious trouble arose. In 1878, a year after the Nez Perce War began in north Idaho, the Bannock War broke out in south Idaho. A ser- ies of irritations and grievances had built up, including poor manage- ment of the Fort Hall Reservation, friction between Bannock and Shoshoni groups, and trouble over the white man's pasturing pigs and other live- stock on Camas Prairie. The summer of 1878 was a restless time for residents of the Boise Valley as Buffalo Horn led his Bannock warriors westward, sinking Glenn's ferryboat on the Snake and battling the whites at South Mountain in the Owyhees. After the death of Buffalo Horn, the Bannocks joined Chief Egan's Oregon band of Northern Paiutes. As the war dissipated in eastern Oregon, Bannock warriors filtered back into Idaho, Montana, and Wyoming, raising trouble along the way. Some of these Indians, who were pursued by the military, sought refuge among the Sheepeaters; this may have given the Sheepeaters their undeserved repu- tation as a band of outcasts. During the Bannock War, an ambush of four whites in Long Valley near Cascade was attributed by some to the Sheepeaters, as was the kill- ing of five Chinese miners on Loon Creek Challis National Forest) on February 12, 1879.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Oregon Historic Trails Report Book (1998)
    i ,' o () (\ ô OnBcox HrsroRrc Tnans Rpponr ô o o o. o o o o (--) -,J arJ-- ö o {" , ã. |¡ t I o t o I I r- L L L L L (- Presented by the Oregon Trails Coordinating Council L , May,I998 U (- Compiled by Karen Bassett, Jim Renner, and Joyce White. Copyright @ 1998 Oregon Trails Coordinating Council Salem, Oregon All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Printed in the United States of America. Oregon Historic Trails Report Table of Contents Executive summary 1 Project history 3 Introduction to Oregon's Historic Trails 7 Oregon's National Historic Trails 11 Lewis and Clark National Historic Trail I3 Oregon National Historic Trail. 27 Applegate National Historic Trail .41 Nez Perce National Historic Trail .63 Oregon's Historic Trails 75 Klamath Trail, 19th Century 17 Jedediah Smith Route, 1828 81 Nathaniel Wyeth Route, t83211834 99 Benjamin Bonneville Route, 1 833/1 834 .. 115 Ewing Young Route, 1834/1837 .. t29 V/hitman Mission Route, 184l-1847 . .. t4t Upper Columbia River Route, 1841-1851 .. 167 John Fremont Route, 1843 .. 183 Meek Cutoff, 1845 .. 199 Cutoff to the Barlow Road, 1848-1884 217 Free Emigrant Road, 1853 225 Santiam Wagon Road, 1865-1939 233 General recommendations . 241 Product development guidelines 243 Acknowledgements 241 Lewis & Clark OREGON National Historic Trail, 1804-1806 I I t . .....¡.. ,r la RivaÌ ï L (t ¡ ...--."f Pðiräldton r,i " 'f Route description I (_-- tt |".
    [Show full text]
  • Histories: Boise Project” Vol
    The Boise Project Wm. Joe Simonds Bureau of Reclamation History Program Denver, Colorado Originally printed:1997 Reformatted, reedited, and reprinted by Brit Storey: December 2009 Table of Contents Table of Contents..............................................................1 The Boise Project..............................................................2 Project Location.........................................................2 Historic Setting .........................................................3 Project Authorization.....................................................4 Construction History .....................................................4 Boise River Diversion Dam, Deer Flat Embankments, and Main Canal........6 Arrowrock Dam..................................................12 The Payette Division..............................................21 Black Canyon Dam ...............................................22 Deadwood Dam ..................................................27 Anderson Ranch Dam .............................................31 Cascade Dam....................................................38 Post Construction History ................................................40 Settlement of Project Lands ...............................................45 Project Benefits and Uses of Project Water...................................47 Conclusion............................................................49 About the Author .............................................................49 Bibliography ................................................................50
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 18 Southwest Idaho
    Chapter: 18 State(s): Idaho Recovery Unit Name: Southwest Idaho Region 1 U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service Portland, Oregon DISCLAIMER Recovery plans delineate reasonable actions that are believed necessary to recover and/or protect the species. Recovery plans are prepared by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and, in this case, with the assistance of recovery unit teams, State and Tribal agencies, and others. Objectives will be attained and any necessary funds made available subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved, as well as the need to address other priorities. Recovery plans do not necessarily represent the views or the official positions or indicate the approval of any individuals or agencies involved in the plan formulation, other than the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Recovery plans represent the official position of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service only after they have been signed by the Director or Regional Director as approved. Approved recovery plans are subject to modification as dictated by new findings, changes in species status, and the completion of recovery tasks. Literature Citation: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2002. Chapter 18, Southwest Idaho Recovery Unit, Idaho. 110 p. In: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Bull Trout (Salvelinus confluentus) Draft Recovery Plan. Portland, Oregon. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This chapter was developed with the assistance of the Southwest Idaho Bull Trout Recovery Unit Team, which includes: Dale Allen, Idaho Department of Fish and Game Dave Burns, U.S. Forest Service Tim Burton, U.S. Bureau of Land Management (formerly U.S. Forest Service) Chip Corsi, Idaho Department of Fish and Game Bob Danehy, Boise Corporation Jeff Dillon, Idaho Department of Fish and Game Guy Dodson, Shoshone-Paiute Tribes Jim Esch, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Conditions
    Lower Owyhee Watershed Assessment Lower Owyhee Watershed Assessment IV. Historical Conditions © Owyhee Watershed Council and Scientific Ecological Services Contents A. Pre-contact 6. Oregon Trail roadside conditions B. At contact Owyhee to the Malheur 1. The journals 7. Conclusions 2. The effect of trapping on conditions D. Early settlement 3. General description of the Owyhee 1. Discovery of gold country side 2. Description of the environment 4. Vegetation a. Willows a. Few trees 3. Introduction of resource based b. Willow industries c. Other vegetation a. Livestock industry 5. Fires b. Farming 6. Game c. Salmon a. Lack of big game d. Timber b. Antelope 4. Water c. Deer 5. Roads d. Bison a. Willamette Valley and Cascade e. Native consumption of game Mountain Military Wagon Road 7. Fish 6. Settlements 8. The Owyhee River 7. Effects of livestock 9. River fluctuation 8. Changes and constants 10. Land E. End of the nineteenth century, early twenti- C. Oregon trail travelers eth century 1. General description 1. Mining 2. Climate 2. Grazing Pressure 3. Vegetation 3. Fauna a. Grass and shrubs 4. Fish b. No trees 5. Vegetation 4. Wildlife 6. Geology 5. Fish 7. Settlements IV.1 Lower Owyhee Watershed Assessment Historical Conditions Pre Euro-American contact 8. Farming and the first irrigation along the f. Livestock lower Owyhee River g. Turkeys 9. River functioning h. Moonshine 10. Watson Area i. Watson water use a. People j. Attitude to the dam b. Roads 11. Water use - below dam c. Vegetation 12. Water on the range d. Climate 13. Taylor Grazing Act e.
    [Show full text]
  • LOCATION of IDAHO's TERRITORIAL CAPITAL Number 344 December 24, 1964
    344 IDAHO STATE HISTORICAL SOCIETY REFERENCE SERIES LOCATION OF IDAHO'S TERRITORIAL CAPITAL Number 344 December 24, 1964 On December 24, 1864, Boise became the capital of the territory of Idaho. But although the act of the territorial legislature was clear and simple, the situation was not, and the story surrounding it is typical of politics of that day. When the territory of Idaho was established by Congress, March 4, 1863, the law provided that the first territorial legislature should select a permanent capital. Originally, before the new territory was set up, the weight of population had been in the north and the principal city there was Lewiston. When the first territorial governor, William Henson Wallace, reached the territory in July, 1863, it was logical for him to establish his office in Lewiston and proclaim the organization of the territory from that town. It was also to Lewiston that he summoned the first territorial legislature in December, 1863. But for a little more than a year the center of population had been shifting. Gold had been struck in the Boise Basin in the summer of 1862, and the new mines had drawn population from north to south. When the census, on which apportionment was based, was taken in September, 1863, the area around Boise already had far more people than did the northern mines around Lewiston. The trend continued in coming years. That first legislature in Lewiston in 1863 did not face the issue of locating a definite territorial capital. Thus all through 1864, Lewiston was the temporary seat of the territorial government, but there was no permanent capital.
    [Show full text]
  • Interior Columbia Basin Mollusk Species of Special Concern
    Deixis l-4 consultants INTERIOR COLUMl3lA BASIN MOLLUSK SPECIES OF SPECIAL CONCERN cryptomasfix magnidenfata (Pilsbly, 1940), x7.5 FINAL REPORT Contract #43-OEOO-4-9112 Prepared for: INTERIOR COLUMBIA BASIN ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT PROJECT 112 East Poplar Street Walla Walla, WA 99362 TERRENCE J. FREST EDWARD J. JOHANNES January 15, 1995 2517 NE 65th Street Seattle, WA 98115-7125 ‘(206) 527-6764 INTERIOR COLUMBIA BASIN MOLLUSK SPECIES OF SPECIAL CONCERN Terrence J. Frest & Edward J. Johannes Deixis Consultants 2517 NE 65th Street Seattle, WA 98115-7125 (206) 527-6764 January 15,1995 i Each shell, each crawling insect holds a rank important in the plan of Him who framed This scale of beings; holds a rank, which lost Would break the chain and leave behind a gap Which Nature’s self wcuid rue. -Stiiiingfieet, quoted in Tryon (1882) The fast word in ignorance is the man who says of an animal or plant: “what good is it?” If the land mechanism as a whole is good, then every part is good, whether we understand it or not. if the biota in the course of eons has built something we like but do not understand, then who but a fool would discard seemingly useless parts? To keep every cog and wheel is the first rule of intelligent tinkering. -Aido Leopold Put the information you have uncovered to beneficial use. -Anonymous: fortune cookie from China Garden restaurant, Seattle, WA in this “business first” society that we have developed (and that we maintain), the promulgators and pragmatic apologists who favor a “single crop” approach, to enable a continuous “harvest” from the natural system that we have decimated in the name of profits, jobs, etc., are fairfy easy to find.
    [Show full text]
  • High Resolution Adobe PDF
    115°20'0"W 115°0'0"W 114°40'0"W 114°20'0"W PISTOL LAKE " CHINOOK MOUNTAIN ARTILLERY DOME SLIDEROCK RIDGE FALCONBERRY PEAK ROCK CREEK SHELDON PEAK Red Butte "Grouse Creek Peak WHITE GOAWTh iMte OVaUlleNyT MAoIuNntain LITTLE SOLDIER MOUNTAIN N FD " N FD 6 8 8 T d Parker Mountain 6 Greyhound Mountain r R a k i e " " 5 2 l e 0 1 0 r 0 0 il 1 C l i a 1 n r o Big Soldier Mountain a o e pi r n Morehead Mountain T Pinyon Peak L White MoSunletain g Deer Rd " T " HONEYMOON LAKE " " BIG SOLDIER MOUNTAIN SOLDIER CREEK GREYHOUND MOUNTAIN PINYON PEAK CASTO SHERMAN PEAK CHALLIS CREEK LAKES TWIN PEAKS PATS CREEK Lo FRANK CHURCH - RIVER OF NO RETURN WILDERNESS o n Sherman Peak C Mayfield Peak Corkscrew Mountain r " d e " " R ek ls R l d a Mosquito Flat Reservoir F r e Langer Peak rl g T g k a Ruffneck Peak " ac d D P R d " k R Blue Bunch Mo"untain d e M e k R ill C r e Bear Valley Mountain k e e htmile r " e ig C r E C en r C re d ave Estes Mountain e G ar B e k " R BLUE BUNCH MOUNTAIN d CAPE HORN LAKES LANGER PEAK KNAPP LAKES MOUNT JORDAN l Forest CUSTER ELEVENMILE CREEK BAYHORRSaEm sLhAorKn EMountaiBn AYHORSE Nat De Rd Keysto"ne Mountain velop Road 579 d R " Cabin Creek Peak Red Mountain rk Cape Horn MounCtaaipne Horn Lake #1 o Bay d " Bald Mountain F hors R " " e e Cr 2 d e eek 8 R " nk Rd 5 in Ya d a a nt o ou Lucky B R S A L M O N - C H A L L I S N Fo S p M y o 1 C d Bachelor Mountain R q l " u e 2 5 a e d v y 19 p R Bonanza Peak a B"ald Mountain e d e w Nf 045 D w R R N t " s H s H C d " e sf r e o Basin Butte r 0 t U ' o r e F a n e 0 l t 21 t
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change Vulnerability and Adaptation in the Intermountain Region Part 1
    United States Department of Agriculture Climate Change Vulnerability and Adaptation in the Intermountain Region Part 1 Forest Rocky Mountain General Technical Report Service Research Station RMRS-GTR-375 April 2018 Halofsky, Jessica E.; Peterson, David L.; Ho, Joanne J.; Little, Natalie, J.; Joyce, Linda A., eds. 2018. Climate change vulnerability and adaptation in the Intermountain Region. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-375. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. Part 1. pp. 1–197. Abstract The Intermountain Adaptation Partnership (IAP) identified climate change issues relevant to resource management on Federal lands in Nevada, Utah, southern Idaho, eastern California, and western Wyoming, and developed solutions intended to minimize negative effects of climate change and facilitate transition of diverse ecosystems to a warmer climate. U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service scientists, Federal resource managers, and stakeholders collaborated over a 2-year period to conduct a state-of-science climate change vulnerability assessment and develop adaptation options for Federal lands. The vulnerability assessment emphasized key resource areas— water, fisheries, vegetation and disturbance, wildlife, recreation, infrastructure, cultural heritage, and ecosystem services—regarded as the most important for ecosystems and human communities. The earliest and most profound effects of climate change are expected for water resources, the result of declining snowpacks causing higher peak winter
    [Show full text]
  • Yellowstone National Park, Submerged Resources Survey
    te t/:p--J038 .. } ,' ,, .. ' . ·� . I ; ,· . ' . '/ YEL.LOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK " � ! I '!'' • SUBMERGED RESOURCES SURVEY I ·' I i I \. ,· i .\ I: ··r· 'I I CC®ll®IT' §��IID� YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK a product of the NATIONAL PARK SERVICE SYSTEMWIDE ARCHEOLOGICALINVENTORY PROGRAM YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK Submerged Resources Survey James E. Bradford Archeologist Matthew A. Russell Archeologist Larry E. Murphy Archeologist Timothy G. Smith Geodesist Submerged Resources Center Intermountain Region National Park Service Santa Fe, New Mexico 1999 11 Submerged Resources Center Cultural Resources Management Intermountain Region National Park Service US Department of the Interior 111 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ..................................................................................................................... vii FOREWORD ................................................................................................................................. X ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .......................................................................................................... xi PART 1: REMOTE SENSING SURVEY ..................................... ............................................ 1 Matthew A. Russell, Larry E. Murphy and Timothy G. Smith INTRODUCTION .... ............................ ................ ........................................... ............. 2 PROBLEM STATEMENT................... ........................................................................ 3 SURVEY DESIGN AND RATIONALE ..............
    [Show full text]
  • V for Vendetta’: Book and Film
    UNIVERSIDADE DE LISBOA FACULDADE DE LETRAS DEPARTAMENTO DE ESTUDOS ANGLÍSTICOS “9 into 7” Considerations on ‘V for Vendetta’: Book and Film. Luís Silveiro MESTRADO EM ESTUDOS INGLESES E AMERICANOS (Estudos Norte-Americanos: Cinema e Literatura) 2010 UNIVERSIDADE DE LISBOA FACULDADE DE LETRAS DEPARTAMENTO DE ESTUDOS ANGLÍSTICOS “9 into 7” Considerations on ‘V for Vendetta’: Book and Film. Luís Silveiro Dissertação orientada por Doutora Teresa Cid MESTRADO EM ESTUDOS INGLESES E AMERICANOS (Estudos Norte-Americanos: Cinema e Literatura) 2010 Abstract The current work seeks to contrast the book version of Alan Moore and David Lloyd‟s V for Vendetta (1981-1988) with its cinematic counterpart produced by the Wachowski brothers and directed by James McTeigue (2005). This dissertation looks at these two forms of the same enunciation and attempts to analise them both as cultural artifacts that belong to a specific time and place and as pseudo-political manifestos which extemporize to form a plethora of alternative actions and reactions. Whilst the former was written/drawn during the Thatcher years, the film adaptation has claimed the work as a herald for an alternative viewpoint thus pitting the original intent of the book with the sociological events of post 9/11 United States. Taking the original text as a basis for contrast, I have relied also on Professor James Keller‟s work V for Vendetta as Cultural Pastiche with which to enunciate what I consider to be lacunae in the film interpretation and to understand the reasons for the alterations undertaken from the book to the screen version. An attempt has also been made to correlate Alan Moore‟s original influences into the medium of a film made with a completely different political and cultural agenda.
    [Show full text]
  • Payette Rad!O Limited 730 St
    OREGON STATE UN VERS TV LIBRARIES III 11111111111 liiiI I 11111111 12 0143739858 Printed Privately for PAYETTE RAD!O LIMITED 730 ST. JAMES sr.W., MONTREAL 3,c. 1961 THE OREGON COUNTRY UNDER THE UNION JACK A REFERENCE BOOK OF HISTORICAL DOCUMENTS FOR SCHOLARS AND HISTORIANS B. C. PAYETTE Printed privately for PAYETTE RADIO LIMITED 730 St James Street W Montreal 3, Canada 1961 THE SOURCE OF DOCUMENTS THE HUDSON'S BAY COMPANY THE PUBLIC ARCHIVES OF CANADA. THE MONTREAL MUNICIPAL LIBRARY. THE FAYETTE PAPERS. TO: Pierre Brunet, Assistant Archivist, The Public Archives of Canada Miss Marie Baboyant, Librarian, The Montreal Municipal Library Dr. Roger C. Fitch, Fayette, Idaho "He wanted to know" Hervé Jolicoeur, Montreal. "He did all the work" Miss Agnes Kemp HoInes "For her help" David A. Murphy "For his assistance" B. C. PAYETTE Montreal 1961 THE OREGON COUNTRY under THE STARS AND STRIPES The Oregon Country was made up of what is now the States of Oregon, Washington, Idaho and we stern parts of Wyoming and Montana. In 1811 the Oregon Country was occupied by the Pacific Fur Company, an American Company with headquarters in Montreal. John Jacob Astor was the owner and the members of this company were called Astorians. The Astorians traded and trapped from the 43rd to the 48th parallel from 1811 to 1813 THE OREGON COUNTRY AND THE WAR OF 181Z The documentations in this book start from this period B. C. FAYETTE Montreal - 1961 THIS BOOK HAS NOT BEEN EDITED. ONLY A MINIMUM OF NOTES HAVE BEEN ADDED. Rather important page s: - Page13 THE UNION JACK Page 175 THE RESTORATION Page 185 THE MONROE DOCTRINE (FROM THE PUBLIC ARCHIVES OF CANADA) EXTRACT FROM MR.
    [Show full text]
  • Fur Traders' Pistols Charles E
    Fur Traders' Pistols Charles E. Hanson, Jr. The fur trade lasted over 400 years as our frontiers moved slowly to the west and- north across North America. Hundreds of thousands of guns were used by white traders and sold to Indians. Some of them were, quite naturally, pistols. Ordinarily Indians used long guns for hunting and were not too interested in pistols. However, a few were sold to them by British companies in the 18th Century and hundreds more were issued to Indian allies by the British during the War of 1812. Traders and their employees in the wilderness habitually carried both pocket and holster pistols for protection. The photographs show a few ordinary utility pistols which have possible association with the fur trade either by virtue of the location where they were collected or by In 1803, Alexander Mackenzie & Co., received from the name of their maker; there are others in various England: "6 prs. 10 in. pistols, sights, etc. and 3 prs. ditto, museums. Years ago the historical exhibit in the Vancouver brown barrels." In 1804 there is an invoice for "10 pair, Hudson's Bay Company store included a fine flintlock good pistols, 12 in. and 6 pair neat brown same."' over-and-under pocket pistol brought to Victoria by the At least some of these pistols were specified to have well-known trader, John Work. brass acorn guards which were something of an Most of the traders' pistols were common models anachronism in the first decade of the 19th ~entury.~This generally available from dealers and gunmakers, but the was probably related in some way to the traditions of the particular demands of the trading fraternity led to the Montreal merchants who ruled the North West Company, manufacture of some rather exotic special models through since it appears the pistols were intended to arm their the years.
    [Show full text]