Pultlng the LABELING THEORY to the Emplrlcal TEST
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
THE EFFECT OF GETTING CAUGHT: PUlTlNG THE LABELING THEORY TO THE EMPlRlCAL TEST A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of Graduate Studies of The University of Guelph by TARA LEIGH HENDERSON In partial fulfillment of requirements for the degree of Master of Arts December, 1997 O Tara Henderson, 1997 National Library Bibliothèque nationale I+I.,anada du Canada Acquisitions and Acquisitions et Bibliographic Services services bibliographiques 395 Wellington Street 395. me Wellington OttawaON K1AON4 OttawaON K1AON4 Canada Canada vour fib votre reference Our fils Notre rcifdrence The author has granted a non- L'auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive licence dowing the exclusive permettant à la National Library of Canada to Bibliothéque nationale du Canada de reproduce, loan, distribute or sell reproduire, prêter, distribuer ou copies of this thesis in microform, vendre des copies de cette thèse sous paper or electronic formats. la fonne de microfiche/^ de reproduction sur papier ou sur format électronique. The author retains ownership of the L'auteur conserve la propriété du copyright in this thesis. Neither the droit d'auteur qui protège cette thèse. thesis nor substantial extracts fiom it Ni la thèse ni des extraits substantiels may be printed or otherwise de celle-ci ne doivent être imprimés reproduced without the author's ou autrement reproduits sans son permission. autorisation. ABSTRACT THE EFFECT OF GETTlNG CAUGHT: PUlTfNG THE LABELING THEORY 10 THE EMPlRlCAL TEST Tara Leigh Henderson Advisor University of Guelph, 1997 Dr. Ron Hinch Labeling theory proposes that it is not the actor alone, but the reactors, or agents of social control who detemine whether or not a youth will progress down a delinquent path. This paper reports the results of a multiple regression model that used longitudinal data to examine interactive effects of negative social sanctions, namely the application of stigmatizing labels. Specifically, this study examines the effects of the charging and diversionary pradices of the police on recidivisrn among young offenders. in a southem Ontario region. As key gatekeepers of the juvenile justice system, it is the police who ultimately determine which youths will be processed through the system. The model asserts that the most important predidor variables of recidivism include a set of both legal; age, sex, comrnunity, and extra legal variables; charge laid, seriousness of the first offence, severity of the disposition for the first offence and severity of disposition, and seriousness of subsequent offences. It is concluded that the labeling perspective may have the potential of directing us into the type of research that will infom us as to what the police really do and what the consequences of these actions really are. Acknowledgrnents First and foremost, I would like to thank my advisor, Dr. Ron Hinch for his guidance and support over the past year, especially helping me through the numerous panic stages I experienced. As for my cornmittee memben, Dr. Neil MacKinnon and Dr. William O'Grady, I thank you for your time, but most of al1 your expertise. I would also like to thank Joanne Duncan-Robinson for her unconditional and ongoing guidance throughout this entire process. To my fellow graduate students, thank you for the fun and the challenges, in particular, Karen MacCon and Melanie Bremner, the only other two people who really understand. I would also like to thank lnspector Dan Okuloski for the opportunity to conduct this research, and his ongoing support throughout. Finally, a special thanks goes to Dr. Susan Reid-MacNevin for her support in every aspect of my life over the past five years. Without her I wuld not be where I am today. Thank you for forcing me to realize my potential. I wuld also like to thank my family and friends for their encouragement, but most of al1 their belief in me. Thanks for helping me through the tough times. In retum, I dedicate this finished product to al1 of you, without whose guidance, support and encouragement, this accornplishment would not have been possible. TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments ........................... .. ................................................. i Table of Contents .................... .. ............................................................. ii ........................................ List of Tables ........................................ v List of Figures .......................... .. ....................................................... vi CHAPTER I: Introduction .................................................................... 1 Objectives of the Study ...................................................................... 1 Chapter Summaries ............................................................................. 3 CHAPTER 2: Literature Review ...................................... .. ................. Rates of Recidivism Among Canadian Youths ........................................... Ag e ........................................................................................................ Sex ....................................................................................................... Seriousness of Offence ........................... .... ..................................... Number of Charges Laid .................... ... .......................................... Severity of Disposition .......................................................................... Theoretical Framework ............................................................................. Symbolic lnteractionism ........................................................................ Social Construction of Crime ............................... ... .......................... Frank Tannenbaum ............................................................................. Edwin Lemert ........................................................................................ Howard Becker ..................................................................................... Labeling as a Self-Fulfilling Prophecy ..................... ... ....................... Assumptions of the Labelling Theory ................................................... Labeling and Deviance .............................................................................. Locating the Social Origins of the Stigmatic Label ............................... Evolution of the Juvenile Justice System in Canada ............................ Charging ................................................................................................ Diversion .............................................................................................. Documenting the Application of These Labels to Selected Populations Assessing the Consequencas of the Labeling Process for Recipients Future Conduct ..................................................................... Limitations ................................................................................................. CHAPTER 3: Methodology ..................................................................... 41 Sampling ..................................... ... ....................................................... 41 Data Collection ..................................................................................... 41 Phase I ....................................................................................................... 42 Extra Legal Variables ............................................................................ 43 Legal Variables ......................... ....................................................... 44 Previous Offence History ...................................................................... 47 Co-accused ........................................................................................... 48 PhaseII ...................................................................................................... 48 Measurernent ........................................................................................ 49 Exogenous Constructs .......................................................................... 49 Endogenous Constructs ........................................................................ 49 Data Analysis ........................................................................................ 54 CHAPTER 4: Findings ............................................................................. Bivariate Analysis ....................................................................................... Rates of Recidivisrn ............................................................................... Effect of Number of Charges Laid for the First Offence on Recidivism ........................................................................................ Effect of Seriousness of the First Offence on Recidivism ..................... Effect of Severity of the Disposition for the First Offence on Recidivism ........................................................................................ Effect of Age on Recidivism ................................................................... Effect of Sex on Recidivism ................................................................... Effect of Area of Residence on Recidivism ........................................... Summary of Results .............................................................................. Multivariate Analysis .................................................................................. Criterion