DOCSLIB.ORG

Native Cool Season Grasses Guide 70

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Native Cool Season Grasses Guide 70 N millbornseeds.com 24/7/365 NATIVE COOL SEASON GRASSES GUIDE Pure Stand Wetland Seeding Rates Scientific Name Indicator Height (PLS Lbs / Acre) Premium Grade Blue Joint Reed Grass Calamagrostis canadensis FACW 4’ 0.4 (Canada Bluejoint) Canada Bluegrass Poa compressa FACU 8” 2.0 Canada Wildrye Elymus canadensis FACU 4’ 8.0 Eastern Gamagrass Tripsacum dactyloides FAC 7’ 12.0 Fowl Blue Grass Poa palustris FACW 2’ 0.8 Fowl Mannagrass Glyceria striata OBL 3’ 0.8 Fringed Brome Bromus ciliatus FAC 4’ 10.0 Green Needlegrass Stipa virdula UPL 3’ 8.0 Hairy Wood Chess Bromus pubescens FACU 4’ 12.0 Indian Ricegrass Achnatherum hymenoides FACU 1.5’ 8.0 Meadow Barley Hordeum brachyantherum FAC 2.5’ 10.0 Hesperostipa comata UPL 3’ 9.5 Nodding Fescue Festuca subverticillata FACU 2’ 5.0 Pale Sedge Carex granularis FACW 2’ 6.0 Nuttall’s Alkaligrass Puccinellia nuttalliana OBL 1’ 1.0 Path Rush Juncus tenuis FAC 1’ 0.2 Porcupine Grass Hesperostipa spartea UPL 4’ 20.0 Pennsylvania Smartweed Polygonum pennsylvanicum FACW 2.5’ 10.0 Poverty Oats Danthonia spicata UPL 1’ 4.0 Plains Oval Sedge Carex brevior FAC 1’ 2.3 Prairie Brome Bromus kalmii FAC 3’ 12.0 Pointed Brome Sedge (Oval Sedge) Carex scoparia FAC 2’ 1.2 Prairie Junegrass Koeleria macrantha UPL 2’ 0.8 Porcupine Sedge (Bottlebrush Sedge) Carex hystricina OBL 3’ 3.0 Prairie Wedgegrass Sphenopholis obtusata FACW 3’ 5.0 Prairie Sedge (Copper-Shouldered Oval Sedge) Carex bicknellii FAC 3’ 5.8 Rattlesnake Grass Glyceria canadensis OBL 3’ 1.0 River Bulrush Scirpus fluvialtilis OBL 5’ 0.2 Rice Cutgrass Leersia oryzoides OBL 4’ 3.0 Slender Rush Scirpus heterochaetus OBL 4’ 0.2 Riverbank Wildrye Elymus riparius FAC 4’ 8.0 Slough Sedge Carex obnupta OBL 2.5’ 5.0 ATIVE COOL SEASON GRASSES GUIDE COOL ATIVE Russian Wildrye Psathyrostachys juncea FACU 4’ 8.0 Smoothcone Sedge Carex laeviconica OBL 2.5’ 8.0 Silky Wildrye Elymus villosus FACU 3’ 8.0 Softstem (Great) Bulrush Scirpus validus OBL 4’ 1.5 Slender Wheatgrass Elymus trachycaulus FACU 3’ 8.0 Three Square Rush (Chairmaker's Rush) Scirpus pungens OBL 4’ 3.5 Squirreltail Grass Elymus elymoides UPL 2’ 8.0 Torrey's Rush Juncus torreyi FACW 2’ 0.2 Streambank Wheatgrass Elymus lanceolatus ssp. riparius FACU 2.5’ 10.0 Tussock Sedge Carex stricta OBL 3.5’ 1.8 Virginia Wildrye production field Thickspike Wheatgrass Elymus lanceolatus ssp. lanceolatus FACU 2.5’ 10.0 Water Sedge Carex aquatilis OBL 2.5’ 2.3 Virginia Wildrye Elymus virginicus FAC 3’ 12.0 Wheat Sedge Carex atherodes OBL 4’ 3.3 Western Wheatgrass Pascopyrum smithii FACU 3’ 12.0 Wool Grass Scirpus cyperinus OBL 4’ 0.2 WetlandWoolly Indicator Sedge Code: Carex pellita OBL 3’ 3.4 OBL (Obligate Wetland) = Almost always occur in wetlands FACWYellow (Facultative Fruit Sedge Wetland) = Usually occur in wetlands,Carex but may annectens occur in non-wetlands FACW 2’ 1.1 FAC (Facultative) = Occur in wetlands and non-wetlands FACU (Facultative Upland) = Usually occur in non-wetlands, but may occur in wetlands 70 UPL (Obligate Upland) = Almost never occur in wetlands OBL (Obligate Wetland) = Almost always occur in wetlands FACW (Facultative Wetland) = Usually occur in wetlands, but may occur in non-wetlands FAC (Facultative) = Occur in wetlands and non-wetlands FACU (Facultative Upland) = Usually occur in non-wetlands, but may occur in wetlands UPL ( Obligate Upland) = Almost never occur in wetlands.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Poaceae: Pooideae) Based on Plastid and Nuclear DNA Sequences
    d i v e r s i t y , p h y l o g e n y , a n d e v o l u t i o n i n t h e monocotyledons e d i t e d b y s e b e r g , p e t e r s e n , b a r f o d & d a v i s a a r h u s u n i v e r s i t y p r e s s , d e n m a r k , 2 0 1 0 Phylogenetics of Stipeae (Poaceae: Pooideae) Based on Plastid and Nuclear DNA Sequences Konstantin Romaschenko,1 Paul M. Peterson,2 Robert J. Soreng,2 Núria Garcia-Jacas,3 and Alfonso Susanna3 1M. G. Kholodny Institute of Botany, Tereshchenkovska 2, 01601 Kiev, Ukraine 2Smithsonian Institution, Department of Botany MRC-166, National Museum of Natural History, P.O. Box 37012, Washington, District of Columbia 20013-7012 USA. 3Laboratory of Molecular Systematics, Botanic Institute of Barcelona (CSIC-ICUB), Pg. del Migdia, s.n., E08038 Barcelona, Spain Author for correspondence ([email protected]) Abstract—The Stipeae tribe is a group of 400−600 grass species of worldwide distribution that are currently placed in 21 genera. The ‘needlegrasses’ are char- acterized by having single-flowered spikelets and stout, terminally-awned lem- mas. We conducted a molecular phylogenetic study of the Stipeae (including all genera except Anemanthele) using a total of 94 species (nine species were used as outgroups) based on five plastid DNA regions (trnK-5’matK, matK, trnHGUG-psbA, trnL5’-trnF, and ndhF) and a single nuclear DNA region (ITS).
    [Show full text]
  • Fire Ecology, Forest Dynamics, and Vegetation Distribution on Square Butte, Chouteau County, Montana
    Fire Ecology, Forest Dynamics, and Vegetation Distribution on Square Butte, Chouteau County, Montana Prepared for: U.S. Bureau of Land Management Lewistown District Office By: Elizabeth Crowe Montana Natural Heritage Program Natural Resource Information System Montana State Library January 2004 Fire Ecology, Forest Dynamics, and Vegetation Distribution on Square Butte, Chouteau County, Montana Prepared for: U.S. Bureau of Land Management Lewistown District Office Agreement Number: ESA010009 - Task Order #17 By: Elizabeth Crowe © 2004 Montana Natural Heritage Program P.O. Box 201800 • 1515 East Sixth Avenue • Helena, MT 59620-1800 • 406-444-5354 ii This document should be cited as follows: Crowe, E. 2004. Fire Ecology, Forest Dynamics, and Vegetation Distribution on Square Butte, Chouteau County, Montana. Report to the U.S. Bureau of Land Management, Lewistown District Office. Montana Natural Heritage Program, Helena, MT. 43 pp. plus appendices. iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Square Butte is a singular landscape feature of types (41%) and two woodland (forest- southern Chouteau County in central Montana, an shrubland-grassland-rock outcrop) complexes eroded remnant of Tertiary volcanic activity. Most (43%). Pure shrubland and herbaceous habitat of the land area on the butte is managed by the U. types are a minor component (9%) within the S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land ACEC boundary. Management (BLM) and has been designated an Area of Critical Environmental Concern (ACEC). The primary stochastic ecological disturbance The BLM partnered with the Montana Natural process on Square Butte is wildfire. The Heritage Program to conduct a survey of vegetation map (Figure 7) produced portrays the biological resources there, focusing on vegetation distribution of vegetative communities and units distribution and fuel loads in forested stands.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Grasses Benefit Butterflies and Moths Diane M
    AFNR HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE Native Grasses Benefit Butterflies and Moths Diane M. Narem and Mary H. Meyer more than three plant families (Bernays & NATIVE GRASSES AND LEPIDOPTERA Graham 1988). Native grasses are low maintenance, drought Studies in agricultural and urban landscapes tolerant plants that provide benefits to the have shown that patches with greater landscape, including minimizing soil erosion richness of native species had higher and increasing organic matter. Native grasses richness and abundance of butterflies (Ries also provide food and shelter for numerous et al. 2001; Collinge et al. 2003) and butterfly species of butterfly and moth larvae. These and moth larvae (Burghardt et al. 2008). caterpillars use the grasses in a variety of ways. Some species feed on them by boring into the stem, mining the inside of a leaf, or IMPORTANCE OF LEPIDOPTERA building a shelter using grass leaves and silk. Lepidoptera are an important part of the ecosystem: They are an important food source for rodents, bats, birds (particularly young birds), spiders and other insects They are pollinators of wild ecosystems. Terms: Lepidoptera - Order of insects that includes moths and butterflies Dakota skipper shelter in prairie dropseed plant literature review – a scholarly paper that IMPORTANT OF NATIVE PLANTS summarizes the current knowledge of a particular topic. Native plant species support more native graminoid – herbaceous plant with a grass-like Lepidoptera species as host and food plants morphology, includes grasses, sedges, and rushes than exotic plant species. This is partially due to the host-specificity of many species richness - the number of different species Lepidoptera that have evolved to feed on represented in an ecological community, certain species, genus, or families of plants.
    [Show full text]
  • Grass Flowers: an Untapped Resource for Floral Evo-Devo
    Journal of Systematics JSE and Evolution doi: 10.1111/jse.12251 Review Grass flowers: An untapped resource for floral evo-devo Amanda Schrager-Lavelle1, Harry Klein1, Amanda Fisher2, and Madelaine Bartlett1* 1Biology Department, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, USA 2Biological Sciences Department, California State University, Long Beach, CA 90840, USA *Author for correspondence. E-mail: [email protected] Received 14 February 2017; Accepted 27 March 2017; Article first published online xx Month 2017 Abstract The abrupt origin and rapid diversification of the flowering plants presents what Darwin called “an abominable mystery”. Floral diversification was a key factor in the rise of the flowering plants, but the molecular underpinnings of floral diversity remain mysterious. To understand the molecular biology underlying floral morphological evolution, genetic model systems are essential for rigorously testing gene function and gene interactions. Most model plants are eudicots, while in the monocots genetic models are almost entirely restricted to the grass family. Likely because grass flowers are diminutive and specialized for wind pollination, grasses have not been a major focus in floral evo-devo research. However, while grass flowers do not exhibit any of the raucous morphological diversification characteristic of the orchids, there is abundant floral variation in the family. Here, we discuss grass flower diversity, and review what is known about the developmental genetics of this diversity. In particular, we focus on three aspects of grass flower evolution: (1) the evolution of a novel organ identity—the lodicule; (2) lemma awns and their diversity; and (3) the convergent evolution of sexual differentiation. The combination of morphological diversity in the grass family at large and genetic models spread across the family provides a powerful framework for attaining deep understanding of the molecular genetics of floral evolution.
    [Show full text]
  • Floristic Quality Assessment and Monitoring of Brown Bridge Quiet Area Wetlands
    Floristic Quality Assessment and Monitoring of Brown Bridge Quiet Area Wetlands Prepared by: Phyllis J. Higman Michigan Natural Features Inventory P.O. Box 13036 Lansing, MI 48901-3036 For: Grand Traverse Conservation District 1450 Cass Road, Traverse City, Michigan, 49685 October 30, 2013 Report Number 2013-17 Acknowledgements This work was made possible by a Great Hyde assisted with early surveys and delivery of Lake Restoration Initiative grant through the a workshop for local stewards. Brian Klatt and Environmental Protection Agency, awarded to Glenn Palmgren provided valuable guidance on the Grand Traverse Conservation District in sampling strategies and Reb Ratliff provided Traverse City, Michigan. Many thanks to Robin enthusiastic energy to kick off the field sampling Christensen for writing the grant and for inviting and assemble necessary field gear. Thanks to us to do this work. Suzan Campbell and Daria you all. Cover photos by Phyllis J. Higman, 2012- 2013. Clockwise from left to right: Brown Bridge Pond, Brown Bridge Dam, The Boardman River Coursing through the Brown Bridge Quiet Area after Dam Removal, and Newly Exposed Bottomlands at Brown Bridge Quiet Area after Dam Removal. Copyright 2013 Michigan State University Board of Trustees. Michigan State University Extension programs and materials are open to all without regard to race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, marital status, or family status. Table of Contents Table of Contents ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • LANDFIRE Biophysical Setting Model
    LANDFIRE Biophysical Setting Model Biophysical Setting 3911410 Northwestern Great Plains Mixedgrass Prairie This BPS is lumped with: 1085, 1488 This BPS is split into multiple models:This BpS is lumped with 1085, 1488. 1085 may be grouped into 1141 considering that the shrub species that may grow west of the Missouri River in ND and SD (Wyoming big sagebrush, silver sagebrush, rabbit brush, fringed sagewort, western snowberry, etc.) obtain less than five percent cover. There is a lot of western snowberry today, but there shouldn’t have been historically. In the mixedgrass prairie, uplands are now covered with snowberry, and that probably did not exist historically. Mesic shrubs (snowberry, chokecherry, buffaloberry etc.) did occur historically, but maybe more as inclusions within the mixedgrass prairie on more mesic sites (swales, draws, drainageways, north aspect slopes, etc.). It appears they are increasing on the landscape in absence of fire, migrating/expanding from their historic locations into adjacent uplands, especially snowberry. As combined with 1141 mixedgrass prairie, if there is more than 10% cover on over five percent of the landscape, it is probably uncharacteristic (Jeff DiBenedetto, USFS, pers comm.). Don't map 1488. In west of MZs 31, 39 and 40, put 1488 occurrences into mixedgrass systems that are adjacent to it: 1132 or 1141. General Information Contributors (also see the Comments field) Date 6/11/2007 Modeler 1 Co-RL Elena [email protected] Reviewer Jack Butler rvwd [email protected] Contreras concept Modeler 2 Reviewer Jeff DiBenedetto [email protected] Modeler 3 Reviewer Cody Wienk [email protected] Vegetation Type Dominant Species Map Zone Model Zone PSSP6 Upland 39 Alaska Northern Plains NAVI4 Grassland/Herbaceous California N-Cent.Rockies General Model Sources PASM Great Basin Pacific Northwest Literature HECOC8 Great Lakes South Central Local Data SCSC Hawaii Southeast Expert Estimate KOMA Northeast S.
    [Show full text]
  • Restoration Manual For
    A GUIDE TO PRAIRIE AND WETLAND RESTORATION IN EASTERN NEBRASKA CHAPTER 5 - SEED MIXING AND MIXES Designing the seed mix is a key step in We develop our seed mixes in late fall all prairie and wetland restorations. We design after seed processing and before planting. separate seed mixes for each plant community Areas are marked on a shed floor for each type at a restoration site. For example, for needed seed mix (e.g. Rainwater Basin marsh Rainwater Basin restorations we design a mix, Rainwater Basin wet-mesic mix or tallgrass prairie mix for uplands bordering northeastern Nebraska tallgrass prairie mix). wetlands, a wet-mesic prairie mix for moist We pour seed of wildflowers, sedges and non- lowlands and a marsh mix for deep-watered dominant grasses into each pile in the amount areas. For river valley restorations we sow level needed for each restoration. We call this our bottoms with a wet-mesic prairie mix, swales “forb mix.” Rings can also be built of scrap with a marsh mix and sand ridges with a sand- lumber to corral the seed. When all the seed is prairie mix. poured into piles, it is thoroughly mixed with Soil type at a restoration site must be grain shovels and then stored in barrels or bags. considered when designing seed mixes. The Mixing the seed of about 200 species for several species composition of specific plant community hundred acres of restoration takes about a day. types often varies depending on soil type. For example, tallgrass prairies in areas of Jefferson County along the Little Blue River have loamy sand soils formed from underlying Dakota Sandstone.
    [Show full text]
  • Legacies of Afforestation on Prairie Plant, Seed Bank, and Nematode
    Legacies of afforestation on prairie plant, seed bank, and nematode communities in a northern rough fescue prairie By Victory Coffey A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Science degree Department of Biology Master of Science in Bioscience, Technology, and Public Policy University of Winnipeg Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada August 2018 1 2 Acknowledgements First and foremost, Raf, you have truly taught me that ‘adventure can be real happiness’ and I can’t thank you enough for that. It’s been an incredibly inspiring trip and I can’t believe how far we’ve all come in building the lab. My work and the recent success of the lab wouldn’t at all have been possible without your tireless dedication and infectious passion for exciting ecological questions. I’m so thankful to have been along for the ride and couldn’t be prouder to be a member of the Prairie Lab. Can’t wait to keep exploring the new and exciting questions that have come from this journey! I want to thank all of the Prairie Lab members past and present for supporting me along the way and sharing so many laughs and great experiences. Special thanks go to Hilary Pinchbeck for being the best field companion a girl could ask for. You’re a gem. I would also like to thank my awesome committee members Dr. Craig Willis and Dr. Jacques Tardif. Your suggestions and guidance early on were definitely key to making this project happen. Special thanks go out to Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Community Composition and Structure Monitoring for Jewel Cave National Monument 2012 Annual Report
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Plant Community Composition and Structure Monitoring for Jewel Cave National Monument 2012 Annual Report Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NGPN/NRTR—2013/676 ON THE COVER Long-term plant community monitoring plot PCM_018 in Jewel Cave National Monument, 2012. Photograph by: NGPN Plant Community Composition and Structure Monitoring for Jewel Cave National Monument 2012 Annual Report Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NGPN/NRTR—2013/676 Isabel W. Ashton Michael Prowatzke Stephen K. Wilson National Park Service Northern Great Plains Inventory & Monitoring Network 231 East Saint Joseph St. Rapid City, SD 57701 January 2013 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Technical Report Series is used to disseminate results of scientific studies in the physical, biological, and social sciences for both the advancement of science and the achievement of the National Park Service mission. The series provides contributors with a forum for displaying comprehensive data that are often deleted from journals because of page limitations. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner.
    [Show full text]
  • LANDFIRE Biophysical Setting Model
    LANDFIRE Biophysical Setting Model Biophysical Setting: 5214120 North-Central Interior Sand and Gravel Tallgrass Prairie This BPS is lumped with: This BPS is split into multiple models: General Information Contributors (also see the Comments field) Date 11/26/2007 Modeler 1 John Harrington [email protected] Reviewer Doug Cox [email protected] et Modeler 2 Richard Richard.Henderson@wisc Reviewer Mike Kost [email protected] Henderson onsin.gov Modeler 3 Brad Slaughter [email protected] Reviewer Becky Schillo [email protected] Vegetation Type Dominant Species Map Zone Model Zone SCSC Upland 52 Alaska Northern Plains Grassland/Herbaceous SONU2 California N-Cent.Rockies General Model Sources BOCU Great Basin Pacific Northwest Literature HESP11 Great Lakes South Central Local Data Hawaii Southeast Expert Estimate Northeast S. Appalachians Southwest Geographic Range This BpS occurs on glacial features such as kames, eskers, moraines, sandplains, along eolian dunes, and on lakeplains, excluding the Great Lakes, in the northern Midwest, primarily MN, WI and MI (NatureServe 2007). In MZ52, this system was likely of local occurrence, where prairie would have occupied small patches in a matrix of oak savanna and oak-hickory forest, likely concentrated in the Southern Michigan/Northern Indiana Drift Plains Ecoregion of northern IN (Woods et al. 1998). Smaller, more widely dispersed occurrences would have occurred on appropriate substrates in the till plains of west- central OH and central IN. Biophysical Site Description Within MZ52, North-Central Interior Sand and Gravel Tallgrass Prairie occupied kames, eskers, moraines, lakeplains, and sandplains characterized by a sandy, rocky, or gravelly substrate. This BpS was likely concentrated in the Southern Michigan/Northern Indiana Drift Plains Ecoregion of northern Indiana, where these glacial features are common (Woods et al.
    [Show full text]
  • A Floristic Inventory of Phillips and Valley Counties, Montana, U.S.A., M.S., Department of Botany, May, 2013
    To The University of Wyoming: The members of the Committee approve the thesis of Joseph L.M. Charboneau presented on January 31, 2013. Ronald L. Hartman, Chairperson Larry C. Munn, External Department Member Gregory K. Brown APPROVED: Gregory K. Brown, Department Chair, Department of Botany B. Oliver Walter, Dean, College of Arts and Sciences Charboneau, Joseph L.M., A floristic inventory of Phillips and Valley counties, Montana, U.S.A., M.S., Department of Botany, May, 2013. This study marks the first floristic inventory of Valley and Phillips counties on the glaciated plains of northeastern Montana. The 8,954 sq mi (23,191 sq km) study area was surveyed for all vascular plant taxa on lands managed by the Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, State of Montana, American Prairie Reserve, and The Nature Conservancy. Elevation ranges from 2,020–5,720 ft (616–1,743 m). In the summers of 2010 and 2011, 12,785 voucher specimens were collected from 308 sites documenting 761 unique taxa, 717 species, and 358 genera from 86 families. Among these are 108 taxa exotic to Montana, nine noxious weed species, and 15 taxa of conservation concern. Approximately 32% of the taxa collected are newly documented within the area. Results are enumerated in an annotated checklist and vegetation types are described. Analyses of the study’s sampling adequacy are also discussed. 1 A FLORISTIC INVENTORY OF PHILLIPS AND VALLEY COUNTIES, MONTANA, U.S.A. by Joseph L.M. Charboneau A thesis submitted to the Department of Botany and the University of Wyoming in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in BOTANY Laramie, Wyoming May, 2013 ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Montana/Dakotas BLM provided funding for this study.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to North American Grasslands
    Desert Volume 29, Number 2 Published by The University of Arizona for Plants the Boyce Thompson Arboretum A Guide to North American Grasslands David E. Brown and Elizabeth Makings Relict Great Basin Shrub-Grassland near Wupatki National Monument northeast of Flagstaff, Coconino County, Arizona, 1,650 m (5,413 ft). Volume 29, Number 2 Desert Plants Published by The University of Arizona for the Boyce Thompson Arboretum A journal devoted to broadening knowledge of plants 37615 E US Highway 60 indigenous or adapted to arid and sub-arid regions and Superior, AZ 85173 to encouraging the appreciation of these plants. Copyright 2014. The Arizona Board of Regents on Mark D. Siegwarth, editor behalf of The University of Arizona. The Boyce [email protected] Thompson Arboretum at Superior, Arizona, is cooperatively managed by the Boyce Thompson Production Director: Kim Stone Southwestern Arboretum, Inc., The University of Arizona, and Arizona State Parks. Boyce Thompson Arboretum From the editor As Desert Plants begins its 35th year with a new staff, it in editorship comes the opportunity to rethink what Desert seems somewhat appropriate that as we begin a new chap- Plants is and could be. Desert Plants is devoted to broad- ter in the history of Desert Plants, we start with A Guide ening knowledge of plants indigenous or adapted to arid to North American Grasslands by David E. Brown and Eliza- and sub-arid regions and to encouraging the appreciation of beth Makings. Probably one of the most quoted, used and these plants. With such a broad mandate, it is open to vari- reprinted issues of Desert Plants to this day is Volume 4, ous interpretations.
    [Show full text]