Of New Zealand's Local Government

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Of New Zealand's Local Government Peter Hodder Measuring the Effectiveness of New Zealand’s Taken together, these results reveal Local Government an emphasis on assessing managerial activity, with less attention being paid to Abstract effective engagement with ratepayers. A reorientation of the programme to better Local Government New Zealand’s recently introduced CouncilMARK™ meet current expectations of central scheme assesses local councils’ effective management of finance government and ratepayers for improved and resources, their leadership and their responsiveness to their community well-being is suggested. communities, and enables them to be compared and the prospect Setting the scene for a quality enhancement for collaboration towards improved performance explored. Other regime Local governments in New Zealand own measures of reputation and ratepayer participation suggest that $119 billion in fixed assets, employ 25,000 CouncilMARK may be over-emphasising managerial capability staff and spend annually nearly $10 billion relative to stakeholder engagement, which may have implications (Productivity Commission, 2018, p.4). Seventy-eight local authorities, which vary for the scheme’s value if community well-being is introduced as a considerably in size, deliver about 10% of prominent measure of performance. total public services. A small proportion of spending is locally allocated compared to Keywords local government, quality enhancement, stakeholder most OECD countries, but many central engagement, reputation, localism government services rely strongly on local authorities for delivery. In response to its ocal Government New Zealand management, service delivery and asset reputation research (discussed later in this (LGNZ) has established a voluntary management, and stakeholder engagement. article), Local Government New Zealand Lquality enhancement programme – This article compares the results of developed a ‘Local Government Excellence CouncilMARK – for local authorities in this assessment for the participating Programme’, of which CouncilMARK is a New Zealand. The programme assesses councils and also discusses the results of component. councils’ comparative performance another instrument that makes an overall On its website, LGNZ previously in aspects of governance, financial judgement on the sector’s reputation. identified three issues that needed attention: ‘Residents, ratepayers, businesses Peter Hodder is an Advisor, Accreditation and Projects in the School of Government at Victoria and central government all expect the best University of Wellington and a Director at HodderBalog Social and Scientific Research, Wellington. services and value from councils, but most Policy Quarterly – Volume 15, Issue 3 – August 2019 – Page 75 Measuring the Effectiveness of New Zealand’s Local Government Table 1: Priorities and performance indicators for CouncilMARK* Priority areas Priority 1: Governance, leadership Priority 2: Financial decision- Priority 3: Service delivery and Priority 4: Communicating and and strategy† making and asset management‡ engaging with the transparency‡ public and business† Performance indicators Performance indicators Performance indicators Performance indicators for Priority 1§ for Priority 2§ for Priority 3§ for Priority 4§ • Vision, goals and strategy • Financial strategy • Aligning services with strategy • Communication and • Professional development for • Financial data • Environmental monitoring and engagement strategy elected members • Risk and control function reporting • Digital engagement • Performance of elected • Budgeting • Determining, monitoring and • Reputation members • Financial control of councils assessing service levels • Media • Relationship/culture between • Transparency • Service delivery models • Engagement with iwi/Mäori elected members and the Chief • Service delivery capability and • Engagement with diverse Executive capacity communities • Health and Safety Framework • Service delivery quality – asset • Engagement with the general • Management management public • Audit and Risk Committee • Service delivery quality – • Civil defence and crisis • Information and Advice breakdown of individual communications services and infrastructure • Engagement with business and • Policy planning/spatial key stakeholders¶ planning • Compliance with regulatory requirements • Accountability reporting • Capital investment decisions and delivery • Operational risk management * From: Draft performance assessment framework for regional democratic local decision making and action by, and on behalf § The framework document suggests documents and other councils as at 21 December 2016. This document would of, communities’ information (including stakeholder interviews) to guide the have been used by councils participating in the CouncilMARK ‡ Consistent with the other of the dual roles of local government assessment panel reports referred to in this paper. Although this document is prescribed in the Local Government Act 2002: ‘to meet the ¶ Specifically mentioned are: ‘primary sector, industry, residents no longer publicly available, similar information is currently current and future needs of communities for good-quality and environmental organisations’; significant omissions provided in CouncilMARK (2019, pp.23-35) local infrastructure, local public services, and performance include: community organisations (other than environmental † Consistent with one of the dual roles for local government of regulatory functions in a way that is most cost effective for organisations), District Health Boards, and relevant prescribed in the Local Government Act 2002: ‘to enable households and businesses’ Government ministries, departments and agencies of these customers don’t believe this longer readily available online, these 21 councils originally committed to the happens’; ‘Most customers don’t fully aspirations have been recast recently in principles of the scheme through being understand or value what we do for them more corporate terms (CouncilMARK, ‘foundation members’; a few of these were every day’; and ‘However well some 2019). involved in a pilot scheme. Although 28 councils perform, there are strongly Cycles of continuous improvement are councils are currently participating, a negative perceptions of local government often an outcome of a quality assurance challenge for LGNZ will be to raise this performance, which affects us all.’ As system and LGNZ’s aspiration for this to participation rate: LGNZ has yet to solutions to these issues LGNZ suggested occur as a result of CouncilMARK is convince the more than 30 other potential that: ‘A continuous cycle of performance reasonable. Whether CouncilMARK can participating councils of the value of assessment and improvement ensures a lift influence the reputation of councils – CouncilMARK in demonstrating their in service and value from councils and the currently assessed through the New commitment to the continuous sector’; ‘LGNZ will provide tools, services Zealand Local Government Survey – is less improvement of their management and and share best practice to help councils lift certain. The methodologies and results of governance procedures and systems. performance’; ‘Igniting a responsive the two assessment components in the Presumably with that in mind, LGNZ culture improves engagement and Excellence Programme – CouncilMARK indicated in the position description for accountability for results, taking our and the Local Government Survey – are the programme manager of CouncilMARK customers and communities with us’; and discussed in this article. that the appointee would spearhead a ‘A new era of transparency will lift Involvement by councils in the marketing and promotion campaign. performance and reputation.’ Although no CouncilMARK scheme is voluntary, with Page 76 – Policy Quarterly – Volume 15, Issue 3 – August 2019 Table 2: Ranking for priority areas for city, district and regional councils participating in CouncilMARK, arranged in order of scores Priority areas Leading Locally (LL) Investing Money Well (IMW) Delivering What’s Important (DWI) Listening and Responding (LAR) Hauraki District Council Dunedin City Council Greater Wellington Greater Wellington Regional Council Regional Council 8 Waimakariri District Waikato Regional Council 8 8 7 Council Hauraki District Council Hauraki District Council Greater Wellington Environment Canterbury Regional Council Waikato Regional Council Central Hawke’s Bay District Council 7 Hastings District Council Matamata-Piako District Dunedin City Council Council Dunedin City Council Napier City Council Environment Canterbury Napier City Council Hastings District Council Central Hawke’s Bay 7 Hastings District Council District Council Rangitïkei District Council New Plymouth District Napier City Council Council Dunedin City Council Waimakariri District 6 Ruapehu District Council 7 Council Porirua City Council Greater Wellington South Taranaki District Regional Council Environment Canterbury Queenstown Lakes District Council 6 Council New Plymouth District Hastings District Council Waimakariri District Council Ruapehu District Council New Plymouth District Council Waikato Regional Council Council Waimakariri District Masterton District Council Council South Taranaki District Porirua City Council Matamata-Piako District Council Far North District Council 6 Queenstown Lakes District Council Masterton District Council Council Matamata-Piako District Nelson City Council Council Matamata-Piako District South Taranaki District New Plymouth District Council
Recommended publications
  • Zone Council Community Board 1 Far North District Council Te Hiku Bay
    Zone Council Community Board 1 Far North District Council Te Hiku Bay of Islands-Whangaroa Kaikohe-Hokianga 2 Opotiki District Council Coast Otorohanga District Council Kawhia Otorohanga Rotorua District Council Rotorua Lakes South Waikato District Council Tirau Taupo District Council Turangi-Tongariro Thames-Coromandel District Council Coromandel-Colville Mercury Bay Tairua-Pauanui Thames Whangamate Waikato District Council Huntly Community Board Ngaruawahia Community Board Onewhero-Tuakau Community Board Raglan Communtiy Board Taupiri Community Board Waipa District Council Cambridge Te Awamutu Western Bay of Plenty District Council Katikati Community Board Maketu Community Board Omokoroa Community Board Te Puke Community Board Waihi Beach Community Board Whakatane District Council Murupara Ohope Beach Rangitaiki Taneatua Whakatane 3 Hastings District Council Rural Community Board Horowhenua District Council Foxton New Plymouth District Council Clifton Inglewood Kaitake Waitara Rangitiki District Council Ratana Community Board Taihape Community Board Ruapehu District Council National Park Waimarino-Waiouru South Taranaki District Council Egmont Plains Eltham Hawera-Normanby Patea Tararua District Council Dannevirke Eketahuna Wanganui District Council Wanganui Rural 4 Hutt City Council Eastbourne Community Board Petone Community Board Wainuiomata Community Board Kapiti Coast District Council Otaki Paraparaumu/Raumati Waikanae Paekakariki South Wairarapa District Council Featherston Greytown Martinborough Wellington City Council Makara-Ohariu
    [Show full text]
  • Hauraki District Council Candidates’ Stance on Arts and Creativity
    Hauraki District Council Candidates’ stance on arts and creativity Name Q1 What is your favourite recent arts Q2 What do you think should be at the core of Q3 How do you think the council should invest in experience? the council’s arts strategy? the arts and arts infrastructure? Mayoral Candidates Toby Adams No response No response No response Josie Anderson The Erritja Gallery Exhibition hosted by Paeroa 1. Social inclusion - the weaving together of Working with communities, the art sector and Iwi: Society of Arts. An exclusive exhibition of people and communities by growing their 1. Build a collective vision (requires consultation Aboriginal art, the only exhibition of this work in participation in the arts. and active and ongoing engagement). Aotearoa NZ. 2. Review and refresh Council's arts and culture 2. Development of an authentic Hauraki identity action plan, testing its relevance, now and for Te Puna o Te Pito Mata (Thames High School that (a) recognizes and promotes the unique the future. Kapa Haka), winners of the 2018 Hauraki potential and point of difference the indigenous 3. Review and audit the extent of resource Cultural Festival, performed põwhiri and creative sector provides for the region, and (b) support to galleries and museums throughout the whakangahau to mark the visit of the Taiwan promotes and celebrates diverse arts and district, identifying gaps/challenges/ Tourism Bureau to Tirohia Marae as guests of cultural traditions within the district. inconsistencies and solutions for mitigation. Council. 4. Develop an overarching strategy that has 3. Enrichment of the lives of the district's people particular regard for tangata whenua through economic regeneration and social (ie.engagement), cultural diversity (ie.reflecting inclusion.
    [Show full text]
  • Making a Community: Filipinos in Wellington
    Making a Community: Filipinos in Wellington September 2017 ISBN 978-0-9941409-4-4 (PDF) Making a Community: Filipinos in Wellington About the Author As an American living in New Zealand, I’ve been observing the debate here on immigration and multiculturalism. I arrived in Wellington last year with my Kiwi husband and three-year old son – and while settling in we’ve spent a lot of time discovering the delights of the city and its people. The experience also gave me some perspective on being a migrant far from home. I have a professional interest in South East Asian history, languages and culture - I just completed a PhD on the subject. I speak some Filipino, and am fascinated by the Philippines’ complex history. One of the major phenomena in the Philippines since the 1970s has been the growth of the global Filipino diaspora. That story has often been full of sadness. So I was intrigued by anecdotes of positivity and success from Wellington. Writing about how the migrant Filipino community has settled in New Zealand has been more than just a research project. It has highlighted how migration plays a role in community building. It also has meaning for me and my family’s future here. I really wanted to share some of the stories that I think reflect successful outcomes from immigration over the past thirty years. By Dr Rebecca Townsend 1 Key Points 1. 2. 3. Filipinos comprise 1 percent of Filipinos are a vital part of Most Filipinos in New Zealand are New Zealand’s population – the New Zealand’s dairy, healthcare, not Overseas Filipino Workers third largest Asian ethnic group construction, nursing, aged care, (OFW).
    [Show full text]
  • Local Government Leaders' Climate Change Declaration
    Local Government Leaders’ Climate Change Declaration In 2015, Mayors and Chairs of New Zealand declared an urgent need for responsive leadership and a holistic approach to climate change. We, the Mayors and Chairs of 2017, wholeheartedly support that call for action. Climate change presents significant opportunities, challenges and risks to communities throughout the world and in New Zealand. Local and regional government undertakes a wide range of activities that will be impacted by climate change and provides infrastructure and services useful in reducing greenhouse gas emissions and enhancing resilience. We have come together, as a group of Mayors and Chairs representing local government from across New Zealand to: 1. acknowledge the importance and urgent need to address climate change for the benefit of current and future generations; 2. give our support to the New Zealand Government for developing and implementing, in collaboration with councils, communities and businesses, an ambitious transition plan toward a low carbon and resilient New Zealand; 3. encourage Government to be more ambitious with climate change mitigation measures; 4. outline key commitments our councils will take in responding to the opportunities and risks posed by climate change; and 5. recommend important guiding principles for responding to climate change. We ask that the New Zealand Government make it a priority to develop and implement an ambitious transition plan for a low carbon and resilient New Zealand. We stress the benefits of early action to moderate the costs of adaptation to our communities. We are all too aware of challenges we face shoring up infrastructure and managing insurance costs.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2006/07
    Hamilton City Council 2006/07 Annual Report Building A Vibrant Hamilton INVESTING IN OUR PEOPLE CREATING IDENTITY & PROSPERITY PROTECTING OUR FUTURE Hamilton City Council Municipal Offices Garden Place Private Bag 3010 Hamilton 3240 Ph: 07 838 6699 Fax: 07 838 6599 Email: [email protected] Website: www.hamilton.co.nz ISSN 1178-1017 Whakatauki and He Mihi Kotahi ano te kohao te ngira E kuhuna ai te miro ma, te miro whero Me te miro pango. A muri I a au kia mau ki te ture, Ki te whakapono, ki te aroha. Hei aha te aha! Hei aha te aha! There is but one eye of the needle Through which the white, red and black threads must pass. After me obey the commandments, keep faith, And hold fast to love and charity Forsake all else. Na take i korerohia e tatau i mua Tui ai te kupu korero I korerotia Kia tu te winiwini kia tu te wanawana I nga pu korero I wanangatia I roto I te whai ao I te ao marama We bring our combined history and past discussions Into our plans here for the future. Be open and stand strongly For the issues considered and discussed, To benefit the world, now and in the future. Na Potatau Te Wherowhero, 1858 This Annual Report was adopted by Hamilton City Council on 28 September 2007. The report, which was audited by Audit New Zealand, received an unqualified audit opinion. Table of Contents (RAARANGI KORERO) 1.0 Mayor and Chief Executive’s Letter....................................................................1 2.0 The Annual Report In Context............................................................................5 3.0 Your City,
    [Show full text]
  • Auckland Council, Far North District Council, Kaipara District Council and Whangarei District Council
    Auckland Council, Far North District Council, Kaipara District Council and Whangarei District Council Draft Proposed Plan Change to the District / Unitary Plan Managing Risks Associated with Outdoor Use of Genetically Modified Organisms Draft Section 32 Report January 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Scope and Purpose of the Report 1 1.2 Development of the Plan Change 1 1.3 Structure of the Report 3 2. GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISMS 4 2.1 Introduction 4 2.2 Benefits and Risks 5 2.2.1 Benefits 5 2.2.2 Risks 7 2.3 Risk Management and Precaution 10 2.4 Consultation 12 2.4.1 Community Concerns Regarding GMO Use 12 2.4.2 Māori Perspectives 14 2.4.3 Summary 15 2.5 Synopsis 16 3. THE PLAN CHANGE 17 3.1 Introduction 17 3.2 Significant Resource Management Issue 17 3.3 Objectives and Policies 18 3.4 Related Provisions 19 3.4.1 Activity Rules 19 3.4.2 General Development and Performance Standards 20 3.4.3 Definitions 20 4. SECTION 32 EVALUATION 21 4.1 Introduction 21 4.2 Alternative Means to Address the Issue 22 4.2.1 Do Nothing 22 4.2.2 Central Government Amendment to the HSNO Act 23 4.2.3 Local Authority Regulation through the RMA 24 4.2.4 Assessment of Alternatives Considered 24 4.3 Risk of Acting or Not Acting 26 4.3.1 Ability to Deliver a Precautionary Approach 27 4.3.2 Proportionate Action and Difficulties Arising From Inaction 29 i 4.4 Appropriateness of the Objectives in Achieving the Purpose of the Act 31 4.5 Appropriateness, Costs and Benefits of Policies, Rules and Other Methods 33 4.5.1 Appropriateness 33 4.5.2 Costs 34 4.5.3 Benefits 36 5.
    [Show full text]
  • New Zealand National Climate Summary 2011: a Year of Extremes
    NIWA MEDIA RELEASE: 12 JANUARY 2012 New Zealand national climate summary 2011: A year of extremes The year 2011 will be remembered as one of extremes. Sub-tropical lows during January produced record-breaking rainfalls. The country melted under exceptional heat for the first half of February. Winter arrived extremely late – May was the warmest on record, and June was the 3 rd -warmest experienced. In contrast, two significant snowfall events in late July and mid-August affected large areas of the country. A polar blast during 24-26 July delivered a bitterly cold air mass over the country. Snowfall was heavy and to low levels over Canterbury, the Kaikoura Ranges, the Richmond, Tararua and Rimutaka Ranges, the Central Plateau, and around Mt Egmont. Brief dustings of snow were also reported in the ranges of Motueka and Northland. In mid-August, a second polar outbreak brought heavy snow to unusually low levels across eastern and alpine areas of the South Island, as well as to suburban Wellington. Snow also fell across the lower North Island, with flurries in unusual locations further north, such as Auckland and Northland. Numerous August (as well as all-time) low temperature records were broken between 14 – 17 August. And torrential rain caused a State of Emergency to be declared in Nelson on 14 December, following record- breaking rainfall, widespread flooding and land slips. Annual mean sea level pressures were much higher than usual well to the east of the North Island in 2011, producing more northeasterly winds than usual over northern and central New Zealand.
    [Show full text]
  • Our Drinking Water the Safety of Kawerau’S Drinking Water Is a Top Priority for Council
    OUR DRINKING WATER THE SAFETY OF KAWERAU’S DRINKING WATER IS A TOP PRIORITY FOR COUNCIL GOVERNMENT INQUIRY INTO DRINKING WATER Following the 2016 Havelock North water contamination which made more than 5000 people ill and caused numerous businesses to close for days, a government inquiry was held. The Stage Two Report from the Inquiry has recommended significant changes to New Zealand’s drinking water standards and the treatment of drinking water nationally. RESIDUAL TWO OF THE KEY TREATMENT DISINFECTION RECOMMENDATIONS of all drinking of drinking water OF THE REPORT water supplies i.e. treatment with chlorine WHAT IT MEANS FOR KAWERAU Council has made the decision that the only way to ensure the safety of our drinking water is to begin chlorination. From 1 July 2018, chlorine will be added to the water supply. WHY DO WE NEED TO START USING CHLORINE? Treating water with chlorine is backed up by science and more than a century of use around the world as a safe and effective water disinfectant. • Chlorine is recognised world-wide as the most effective way to kill bacteria, such as campylobacter, in drinking water supplies. • UV treatment does effectively clean water but only at the point of treatment. • Chlorine stays in the water so that if bugs get in at some point in the pipe network, e.g. through a mains break or contamination from a back flow, the chlorine will kill them. For more information visit kaweraudc.govt.nz or call 07 306 9009 SOME USEFUL FACTS ON CHLORINE DOES CHLORINE AFFECT THE TASTE WHY IS CHLORINE NEEDED AS WELL AND SMELL OF DRINKING WATER? AS UV TREATMENT? Not usually.
    [Show full text]
  • Monthy Grant Summary April 2019-Feb 2020 .Xlsx
    Organisation Name TLA Amount Requested Allocated Amount WAIKATO / BOP Animal Evac New Zealand Trust Board Whakatane District Council $8,262.00 $2,817.62 Bay of Plenty Pipes & Drums Inc Tauranga City Council $24,070.00 $7,000.00 Beerescourt Tennis Club Inc. Hamilton City Council $5,480.00 $3,000.00 Blue Light Ventures Inc - Whakatane Whakatane District Council $55,000.00 $30,000.00 Box Office Boxing Inc New Plymouth District Council $22,000.00 $2,200.00 Coastguard Eastern Region Inc Tauranga City Council $126,695.00 $50,000.00 East End Surf Life Saving Club Inc New Plymouth District Council $27,200.00 $8,000.00 Frankton School Hamilton City Council $51,270.00 $25,000.00 Hamilton Cricket Assn Inc Hamilton City Council $35,000.00 $30,000.00 Hamilton Squash & Tennis Club Inc Hamilton City Council $30,000.00 $20,000.00 Hillcrest High School Hamilton City Council $18,350.00 $13,755.00 Hukanui School Hamilton City Council $40,000.00 $10,000.00 Katch Katikati Inc Western Bay of Plenty District Council $25,000.00 $10,000.00 Knighton Normal School Hamilton City Council $17,690.00 $8,000.00 Lake Taupo Cycle Challenge Trust Taupo District Council $8,346.00 $8,299.70 Maketu Volunteer Fire Brigade Inc Western Bay of Plenty District Council $2,299.00 $2,299.00 Matamata Childcare Centre Inc Matamata-Piako District Council $1,414.00 $1,230.00 Mount Maunganui Badminton Club Inc Tauranga City Council $8,732.00 $7,000.00 Mt Maunganui Primary School Tauranga City Council $2,181.00 $2,181.00 Northern Districts Cricket Assn Inc Western Bay of Plenty District
    [Show full text]
  • Kids Voting Registered Schools
    Name of School Address City or district General council area Electorate Cromwell College Barry Ave, Cromwell Central Otago Waitaki 9310 District Council Aidanfield Christian Nash Road, Oaklands, Christchurch City Wigram School 8025 Council Heaton Normal Heaton Street, Merivale, Christchurch City Ilam Intermediate Christchurch 8052 Council Queen's High School Surrey Street, St Clair, Dunedin City Dunedin South Dunedin 9012 Council Columba College Highgate, Kaikorai, Dunedin City Dunedin North Dunedin 9010 Council Longford Intermediate Wayland Street, Gore Gore District Clutha-Southland 9710 Council Sacred Heart Girls' Clyde Street, Hamilton Hamilton City Hamilton East College East, Hamilton 3216 Council Hamilton Girls' High Ward Street, Hamilton Hamilton City Hamilton West School 3204 Council Peachgrove Peachgrove Road, Hamilton City Hamilton East Intermediate Hamilton 3216 Council Karamu High School Windsor Ave, Hastings, Hastings District Tukituki 4122 Council Hastings Christian Copeland Road, Hawkes Hastings District Tukituki School Bay 4122 Council Taita College Eastern Hutt Road, Hutt City Council Rimutaka Holborn 5019 Avalon Intermediate High Street, Avalon, Hutt City Council Rimutaka School Lower Hutt 5011 St Oran's College High Street, Boulcott, Hutt City Council Hutt South Lower Hutt 5010 Naenae Intermediate Walters Street, Avalon, Hutt City Council Rimutaka Lower Hutt 5011 Sacred Heart College Laings Road, Lower hutt Hutt City Council Rimutaka 5010 Southland Boys' High Herbert Street, Invercargiill City Invercargill School Invercargill
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Recovery Strategy
    Manawatū-Whanganui Region (Post-COVID-19) Economic Recovery Strategy “WHAT” Survive Short-term Keep people in their jobs; keep businesses alive • Cash Support for businesses Survive 0-6 months 3 • Advice Wage subsidy 3 Keep people in work; provide work for businesses Revive Medium-term Shovel-ready, • Jobs Revive suffering from the COVID downturn 6-12 months job-rich infrastructure Phases Work • Businesses projects Create new, valuable jobs. Build vigorous, productive Plans Thrive Long-term Big Regional Thrive • Resilience businesses. Achieve ambitious regional goals. 12+ months Development Projects • Future-proof Priority Projects Box 2 – Project Detail High $ Estimated Central NZ Projects Impact Food O2NL Investment Jobs distribution Central NZ distribution – Regional Freight Ring Road and HQ Ruapehu c. $3-3.5 Freight efficiency and connectivity across Central North Island Freight Hub - significant development SkillsSkills & & Te Ahu a billion c. 350 for central New Zealand and ports, reduced freight Tourism project: new KiwiRail distribution hub, new regional freight Talent (public and construction costs, reduced carbon emissions, major wealth Talent Turanga ring road commercial) and job creation Shovel-ready Highway Lead: PNCC – Heather Shotter Skills & Talent Projects Critical north-south connection, freight SH1 – Otaki to North of Levin (O2NL) – major new alignment c. 300 over 5 Te Puwaha - c. $800 efficiency, safety and hazard resilience, major 1 2 for SH1 around Levin years for million wealth and job creation through processing, Whanganui Lead: Horowhenua District Council – David Clapperton construction Impact manufacturing and logistics growth Marton Port axis Manawatū Ruapehu Tourism - increasing Tourism revenue from $180m Facilities and tourism services development Rail Hub c.
    [Show full text]
  • General Distribution and Characteristics of Active Faults and Folds in the Mackenzie District, South Canterbury D.J.A
    General distribution and characteristics of active faults and folds in the Mackenzie District, South Canterbury D.J.A. Barrell D.T. Strong GNS Science Consultancy Report 2010/147 Environment Canterbury Report No. R10/44 June 2010 DISCLAIMER This report has been prepared by the Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences Limited (GNS Science) exclusively for and under contract to Environment Canterbury. Unless otherwise agreed in writing by GNS Science, GNS Science accepts no responsibility for any use of, or reliance on, any contents of this report by any person other than Environment Canterbury and shall not be liable to any person other than Environment Canterbury, on any ground, for any loss, damage or expense arising from such use or reliance. The data presented in this report are available to GNS Science for other use from June 2010 BIBLIOGRAPHIC REFERENCE Barrell, D.J.A., Strong, D.T. 2010. General distribution and characteristics of active faults and folds in the Mackenzie District, South Canterbury. GNS Science Consultancy Report 2010/147. 22 p. © Environment Canterbury Report No. R10/44 ISBN 978-1-877574-18-4 Project Number: 440W1435 2010 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .........................................................................................................II 1. INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................................1 2. INFORMATION SOURCES .........................................................................................2 3. GEOLOGICAL OVERVIEW
    [Show full text]