DOCSLIB.ORG

EPA Board of Enquiry Hon Sir John Hanley David Bunting, Environment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
EPA Board of Enquiry Hon Sir John Hanley David Bunting, Environment EPA Board of Enquiry Hon Sir John Hanley David Bunting, Environment Commissioner Glenice Paine Mark Appledoorn Intro My name is Ruben Blok and I live at 79 Belvedere Ave, Waikanae. I am a Business Intelligence consultant with a private local firm and I create analytic reporting solutions for major private and public sector organisations throughout the Australasia. I am usually not too worried about government decisions but given my field of expertise and what I have witnessed with this project something very wrong is happening here and the information does simply not add up. I oppose the NZTA Makays to Peka Peka proposal and would like to tell you my experience and explain my findings. Lead Up We moved from Auckland to Kapiti (originally to Raumati South) in 2007 to start a family and fell in love with the community and surroundings. The combination of bush, beach, and lifestyle was an easy decision. We heard about KCDCs initial proposal to create a new alternate road and bridge to Waikanae I quite liked the idea. It seems a little crazy that you can almost walk to Waikanae from Paraparaumu Beach faster than you can drive (we tested it the other day). A year or two later we received the notification from NZTA that as part of the Roads of National Significance project they were planning to upgrade the existing SH1 to future proof the national grid. We again quite optimistic when we saw the proposals (WO and EO only) and chose option EO, upgrade the existing SH1, as it had minimal impact on the existing community leaving SH1 as close to its original location as possible. I remember speaking to a lot of local community members and colleagues about these options and was surprised at the lack of interest with the common response being “they have been talking about it for long, they should just chose the best option and start building already”. The Meeting On9th of September 2009 I attended, what I thought was just going to be a final decision announcement for WO or EO, at the Southward Car Museum. What happened here was unbelievable. There were about 1000 people present and the initial presenter was Manager of Highways from NZTA. He started talking about the two options and the means of compensations but kept getting interrupted by the crowd, with angry comments I could not hear. He then started to talk about the Western Link Road designation where he made clear that this was not being presented as a solution due to the massive impact and social severance of the community this would create. This proceeded with a mass booing of this gentleman by the croud! At this stage I was still unsure what was going here until Hon Steve Joyce took the stand, saving poor guy from NZTA who never even really got a chance to speak, and announced due to overwhelming response he would perform a revote and include the WLR (Sand Hills) option in the proposal. This was met by thunderous applause. I was a little in shock and it took a moment for me to come to grips with what was happening, these people were clapping that they were planning to build a 4-lane, 100km/h highway straight through not one but all of their towns, Raumati South, Raumati, Paraparaumu Beach, Waikanae, and Peka Peka. Why would these people want this barrier in their community when the NZTA was not even proposing it as an option? Then I got it, these were the people that were directly affect by the WO and EO options. I left thinking, that was a great show, but oh well these are just a few people trying to save their homes, when the next vote comes out again they will lose miserably anyway as who would want this highway here. So this is how the WLR proposal was put forward as an option, and it is my belief that this was a premeditated plan by the government and Steve Joyce to utilise the KCDCs WLR plan, use their designation, making this seem like cheapest option, and seemingly giving the people wanted. Imagine the response if they had had only proposed the WLR solution in the first place. The Vote Now with the WLR option on the table it still had to be voted in for the government to be able to capitalise on their scheme. This was not too difficult as the interest in this road was already very low, a revote was bound to not get much or a response, apart from those people who attended that Southward Car Museum meeting of course. According to the official results in the Engagement Report (mackays-pekapeka-engagement- report.pdf) they were as follows: A. Eastern Option 1041 B. Western Option 619 C. WLR Expressway Option 1609 Alternate submissions 1177 Total 4446/46,000 population = < 10 % uptake Hardly an impressive result for a government to make a half billion dollar decision on. Of these there were 394 anonymous votes, identified as did not state names and/or addresses, which were counted. The detail of how these voted was not provided. Of those 1177 alternate submissions most were made encompassed multiple points, total 6108, and they were grouped by NZTA. The summation of these results was as follows: • Negative impacts/concerns 3747 • Positive comments 542 • Mixed results 1819 (Reading the groups most of the mixed results would also have been negative. For example 679 submissions made positive and/or negative comments on the effects of the expressway options on the character, amenity and local economies of the Paraparaumu and Waikanae Town Centres). Either way a much more overwhelming response not to build the WLR Sand Hills highway than there were was for it. I could not find the official results of the first vote anywhere. Also as part of the Engagement Report (mackays-pekapeka-engagement-report.pdf) there were 21 stake holders listed and interviewed for their opinion. These were parties with vested interest like the local MP, KCDC, DOC, etc. These parties preference were as follows: A. Eastern Option 4 B. Western Option 0 C. WLR Expressway Option 3 D. Other 7 E. Not stated 7 So 18 against 3 for. The ones that voted for the WLR were: • AA, they just presented before us today so their point is clear. • Waikanae Community Board, preference: was either Western or WLR Expressway Options due to not wanting a 100km/h zone through their main street. • Wellington Regional Chamber of Commerce, the cheapest option of course. So given the above haven’t changed their minds, that leaves 18 parties with vested interest against the idea. Telephone Interview The next piece of evidence the NZTA used to justify that this is what the community wanted was the Telephone Survey Report (colmar-brunton-phone-report-dec09.pdf). This was performed by Colmar Brunton of 1000 residents and had a 62% response rate. The result was nearly half (49%) of residents preferred the Western Link Road option, key word was “road”. The question was not “do you want a 100km/h impassable barrier that you will not be able to use for local traffic through the middle of your community?” To prove this point, the main reason given by these people for choosing this option was the least community impact! And a final interesting fact on this report was that 91% of the people interviewed did not have the NZTA documentation available to them. All other evidence that only supported the WLR Sand Hills motorway over the other options was financial benefit. However as I am sure you have heard from numerous other by now, it is only the cheapest option because the land was already purchased by KCDC for the Western link Road road. Time check The time taken by the NZTA to reach the WLR Sand Hills Expressway decision was also another point of concern. The project has been in the making for about 30 years. Now there was a proposal on the table that was not even up for consideration a few months earlier. And it was selected within a couple of months! Submission So back to my submission, the main reasons I am opposed to the Sand Hills Motorway is as follows: • Creates a massive social divide through the heart of the Kapiti community. NZTA knew this but were forced into the cheap option by the government. • The negative health impact of living too close to major roads, especially motorways (Sabiens field). • KCDC did not want this but it was taken over by the government. • Developed counties do not do this anymore, new motorways are either build under or around townships, not through the middle. • The visual impact of a 4 lane expressway thought the ‘Nature Coast’ will be horrendous. • There is a huge colony of birds, too many to count, that gathers every evening above the Firewood company on Kapiti Road making a spectacular visual show. • Fiscal responsibility: is it worth spending 600 million dollars to save a few minutes in traffic. Where 150 millions for a local road is much more affordable given the current economic condition. And if the figures are correct, 70% of the traffic will be relieved from the existing SH1, as it is local traffic. Summary I know I may sound like a NIMBY (Not In My Back Yard), but that is not the case at all. I fully support the improvement of this country and its transport system is a vital element. However this plan is the cheap and nasty option. The Kapiti Coast towns are just a few of dozens of 50km/h and traffic light zones between Auckland and Wellington.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Kapiti Coast District / [email protected] / P
    APRIL 2019 KAPITI COAST DISTRICT WWW.INTEREST.CO.NZ / [email protected] / P. 09 3609670 KAPITI COAST DISTRICT HOME LOAN AFFORDABILITY REPORT April 2019 Home loan affordability is a measure of the proportion of take-home pay that is needed to make the mortgage payment for a typical household. If that is less than 40%, then a mortgage is considered ‘affordable’. The following are typical assessments for households at three stages of home ownership. FIRST HOME BUYERS 25-29 YOUNG FAMILY 30-34 OLDER FAMILY 35-39 First home buyers earn a medi- Young family buyers earn medi- Older family buyers earn medi- an income for their age group, an incomes in their age bracket, an incomes in their age brack- and buy a first quartile house and buy a median house in et, and buy a median house in in their area. Both parties work their area. One partner works their area. Both partners work full-time. half-time. full-time. Mortgage payment as a Mortgage payment as a Mortgage payment as a percentage of the take home pay percentage of the take home pay percentage of the take home pay Take Home April 19 29.7% Take Home April 19 29.2% Take Home Pay Pay Pay April 19 17.6% April 18 30.3% April 18 26.8% $1,517.11 $1,334.99 $1,856.59 April 18 17.1% per Week April 17 26.9% per Week April 17 29.2% per Week April 17 19.4% April 14 - April 14 26.0% April 14 33.3% This report estimates how affordable it would be for a couple This report estimates how affordable it would be for a couple This report estimates how affordable it would be for a couple where both are aged 25–29 and are working full time, to buy a with a young family to move up the property ladder and buy their who are both aged 35-39 and working full time, to move up the home at the lower quartile price in Kapiti Coast District.
    [Show full text]
  • Making a Community: Filipinos in Wellington
    Making a Community: Filipinos in Wellington September 2017 ISBN 978-0-9941409-4-4 (PDF) Making a Community: Filipinos in Wellington About the Author As an American living in New Zealand, I’ve been observing the debate here on immigration and multiculturalism. I arrived in Wellington last year with my Kiwi husband and three-year old son – and while settling in we’ve spent a lot of time discovering the delights of the city and its people. The experience also gave me some perspective on being a migrant far from home. I have a professional interest in South East Asian history, languages and culture - I just completed a PhD on the subject. I speak some Filipino, and am fascinated by the Philippines’ complex history. One of the major phenomena in the Philippines since the 1970s has been the growth of the global Filipino diaspora. That story has often been full of sadness. So I was intrigued by anecdotes of positivity and success from Wellington. Writing about how the migrant Filipino community has settled in New Zealand has been more than just a research project. It has highlighted how migration plays a role in community building. It also has meaning for me and my family’s future here. I really wanted to share some of the stories that I think reflect successful outcomes from immigration over the past thirty years. By Dr Rebecca Townsend 1 Key Points 1. 2. 3. Filipinos comprise 1 percent of Filipinos are a vital part of Most Filipinos in New Zealand are New Zealand’s population – the New Zealand’s dairy, healthcare, not Overseas Filipino Workers third largest Asian ethnic group construction, nursing, aged care, (OFW).
    [Show full text]
  • Memorandum of Understanding Between
    Attachment 1 to Report 06.583 Page 1 of 5 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN CAPITAL AND COAST DISTRICT HEALTH BOARD AND KAPITI COAST DISTRICT COUNCIL, PORIRUA CITY COUNCIL, WELLINGTON CITY COUNCIL, AND WELLINGTON REGIONAL COUNCIL PURPOSE The parties to this Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) share a common obligation to enhance the well being and health of people in Kapiti, Porirua and Wellington, and to work with them in building strong, vibrant and healthy communities. This MoU will assist in achieving the Regional Community Outcome: "Healthy Community" as outlined in the Wellington Regional Strategy. This MoU sets out a process to assist co-operation between the above organisations. It is intended that this MoU will: • ensure that resources (people, funding and materials) are used to improve the well being of the communities in Kapiti, Porirua and Wellington • ensure communication between the organisations is open and timely. PROTOCOLS AND PRINCIPLES • the parties will work together on issues where it is agreed that the population of Kapiti, Porirua and Wellington will benefit from a collaborative approach • the MoU acknowledges each organisation's unique accountability and contribution to shared processes • the parties agree to act in good faith on issues of information and disclosure • the parties agree to work collaboratively in an open and transparent manner • the parties agree to build on work currently undertaken within Kapiti, Porirua and Wellington. • the parties acknowledge the role of Regional Public Health (RPH) in delivering regional public health services, and that this MoU will not preclude the development of such relationships by each party with RPH As signatories of this MoU each party will ensure: • early notification to affected parties through the distribution of draft documentation, of major policy discussions, which may have implications beyond the boundaries of the decision-making party.
    [Show full text]
  • Wellington Region Rail Programme Paraparaumu Station
    Paraparaumu Greater Wellington Station Regional Council and KiwiRail (ONTRACK Wellington With the extension of double tracked lines, and Tranz Metro) a second platform will be built at are working closely Paraparaumu. Region Rail together to bring passengers more Programme reliable and frequent train services. Key features A new 200 metre platform on the eastern side of the railway A station building behind the new platform, similar to the proposed Waikanae building Removal of existing overbridge, to be replaced by a new subway under the railway, which will connect with the existing road subway Parking for an additional 12 cars at the southern end of the existing car park. For more information go to: Coastlands www.ontrack.govt.nz Improving Waikanae and www.gw.govt.nz Paraparaumu Stations Kapiti Road Designing the improvements to Waikanae and Paraparaumu Stations is now well SH1 underway, with construction to begin in early 2010. New platform Waikanae To Overbridge (demolished) New station building New car park Subway with stairs and ramp Epiha Street Waikanae Elizabeth Street Station Crossing With the increase in train services to A number of options were investigated at Train Storage More space is needed to store the new Matangi Waikanae, the Elizabeth Street level Waikanae including moving the station. crossing will be upgraded to reduce However, until road layouts change, these trains. It is more efficient to keep trains near where they will start their journey in the morning and end traffic congestion. alternatives are not possible. The station it each evening. The additional storage will be split is therefore to be upgraded in its current between an extension of the existing facility at location.
    [Show full text]
  • Kapiti Coast District Council and Other Councils, Including Population Forecasts
    Housing and Business Development Capacity Assessment Kāpiti Coast District Council November 2019 Housing and Business Land Capacity Assessment 229 230 Housing and Business Land Capacity Assessment Contents Executive Summary 232 5.0 Infrastructure 270 Background 233 5.1 Three Waters 270 Residential demand 233 5.2 Local Road Network 271 Residential capacity 233 5.3 State Highway Network 272 Business demand 234 5.4 Public Transport 272 Business capacity 234 5.5 Open Space 273 Infrastructure capacity 234 5.6 Education 273 1.0 Introduction 237 6.0 Relationship between Housing and Business Land 274 2.0 Existing Policy Context 238 7.0 Monitoring 275 2.1 Kāpiti Coast District Plan 238 7.1 Historic Development Activity 275 2.2 Development Management Strategy 2007 238 7.2 Market Indicators 278 2.3 Infrastructure Strategy 2018-2048 238 7.3 Price Efficiency Indicators 285 2.4 Roads of National Significance and Town Centres Transformation 239 8.0 Conclusion 293 3.0 Residential Demand and Capacity 240 9.0 Next Actions 294 3.1 Historic urban growth and settlement 240 3.2 Current growth and settlement trends 240 3.3 Future Housing Demand 241 3.4 Housing Development Capacity 248 3.5 Housing Feasibility, Realisation and Sufficiency 251 4.0 Business Demand and Capacity 258 4.1 Business Development Context 258 4.2 Current Economic and Business Drivers 259 4.3 Future Business Demand 260 4.4 Business Development Capacity 264 4.5 Business Feasibility, Realisation and Sufficiency 266 Housing and Business Land Capacity Assessment 231 Executive Summary This report presents the results from the Wellington Region Housing and Business Development Capacity Assessment (HBA) for the Kāpiti Coast District Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Waikanae Estuary
    Where the wild things are Waikanae Estuary Facilities Parking Swimming Toilets Bird watching Pram accessible Picnic table (but only trail buggy) Walking tracks Dog walking (on leash) Highlight More species of coastal and aquatic birds, including a large number of migratory species, visit Waikanae Estuary than any other site on the Wellington coast. Stroll the tracks and see how many birds you can identify! Description, values & signif icance At Waikanae Estuary freshwater from the Tararua Ranges meets the sea. This mixing of the waters and the ever-shifting river mouth creates an environment sustaining rich plant and animal communities. The estuary provides an important habitat for birds, aquatic plants and is an important breeding ground and nursery for both fresh water and marine fish species. Waikanae Estuary is a nationally significant reserve and restoration work by a dedicated care group continually improves it. Accessibility/How to get there/particular time of year to visit Waikanae Estuary is located between Paraparaumu and Waikanae on the Kāpiti coast north of Wellington. The main entry points into the Waikanae Estuary Scientific Reserve are on Manly St North, Paraparaumu Beach. One track leads out onto the seaward side of the lagoon and the other follows the inland side of the estuary. Whitebait fishing is permitted in the reserve by a gazette notice, from 15August and 30 November (inclusive). Threatened species/species of interest The mosaic of tidal sand flats, sand dunes, salt marshes and lakelets provide a home for vulnerable plants such as two regionally rare carex species and carpets of remuremu (Selliera radicans) growing in the firm mud of the estuary.
    [Show full text]
  • Realigning Lifestyle
    REALIGNING LIFESTYLE An integrated approach to living, ecology and production within rural subdivision Monica Wong Realigning Lifestyle: an integrated approach to living, ecology and production within rural subdivision By Monica Wong A 120-point thesis submitted to the Victoria University of Wellington in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Landscape Architecture Victoria University of Wellington School of Architecture 2016 iv ABSTRACT The Kapiti Coast is changing. The long awaited expansion of the state highway will see rapid growth along the coast and with it, the rural landscape will face a new set of challenges. As the demand for rural land increases, so does land-use tension. Productive land, which was once converted from an extensive wetland network, is slowly being redeveloped into residential subdivisions in order to fulfil an increasing demand for the country lifestyle. However, lifestyle blocks usually have little productive value and subdivisions fragment natural habitats and ecological systems. The typical method of dealing with land-use is the district plan, which designates the most appropriate land-use to the most appropriate area. However, despite good intentions, it has become increasingly apparent that this planning process is no longer reaching its desired outcome. This thesis will explore new strategies for designing rural-residential subdivision, aiming to address land-use issues through increasing diversity. Set in the beach hamlet of Peka Peka, the design investigates one of the last undeveloped areas of private coastal land in the district. This area is prime real estate, but also holds a high capacity for production. It is situated on the remnants of the Great Swamp, a large network of interconnecting wetlands that used to span the length of the coast, providing the potential to significantly increase the ecological value of this land.
    [Show full text]
  • Waikanae Park Population and Household Forecasts 2013 to 2043
    Kāpiti Coast District Waikanae Park Population and household forecasts 2013 to 2043 population forecast Compiled and presented in forecast.id®. http://forecast.id.com.au/kapiti Table of contents About the forecast areas 1 Drivers of population change 6 Population summary 7 Population, households and dwellings 9 Population and age structure 12 Household types 14 Dwellings and development map 16 Population and age structure map 18 Household types map 20 Residential development 21 Net migration by age 22 Non-private dwellings 23 About the forecasts 24 Factors of population change 25 Household and suburb life cycles 27 Forecast modelling process 30 Glossary 32 copyright © 2017 .id Consulting Pty Ltd ACN 084 054 473. All rights reserved. Please read our Report Disclaimer and Copyright Notice which governs your use of this Report. Waikanae Park About the forecast areas Waikanae Park is bounded by the area above Ngarara Road and the locality of Waikanae Beach – Peka Peka to the north, the area bordering Nga Manu Nature Reserve, Waikanae Park and the locality of Waikanae-Reikorangi to the east, the Waikanae River to the south and the area close to Rutherford Drive and the locality of Waikanae Beach- Peka Peka to the west. The place name Waikanae is derived from the river of kanae (mullet) Hau saw while following Wairaka. Important Population 2017 Population 2043 Change 2017-43 Statistics 1,914 4,368 128.26% Forecast areas Waikanae Park Legend Kāpiti Coast Small areas v17.09.06-1.0.0 Source: Population and household forecasts, 2013 to 2043, prepared by .id, the population experts, February 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment Annual Plan 2020/21
    Annual Plan 2020/21 Toitū Kāpiti Year three of our Long Term Plan 2018-38 About our annual plan Our Annual Plan sets out for our community the activities we intend to undertake in that year. Kapiti Coast District Council has broad responsibilities required by law and we provide a range of services to the Kāpiti community. To direct our activities effectively and ensure we manage our budget and ratepayers’ money responsibly, we work to clear priorities and detailed plans. Long Term Plan sets direction and some small budget adjustments. These changes are highlighted in the Our activities and services section (pages The Annual Plan reflects COVID-19 impacts Our overarching plan is the long term plan (LTP). Currently 23-35). and includes recovery support initiatives we are working within our Toitū Kāpiti Long Term Plan 2018-38 which we adopted in June 2018 after extensive Annual Plan focuses on informing community The extent of the impacts of COVID-19 became apparent as engagement and consultation. The content of this annual plan complies with the Local Council was developing the draft Annual Plan. As soon as Our LTP describes the Council’s vision for the district for 20 Government Act 2002, which aims to make annual plans Council became aware of how significant the pandemic was years with a focus on the first three years. It outlines the more user friendly and accessible. and the likely long term effects, we decided to review the service levels and activities we provide, major work The legislation requires that annual plans only include draft plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Dump Station in New Zealand a Guide for Motor Home Users Motor Home Users
    FINDING A DUMP STATION IN NEW ZEALAND A GUIDE FOR MOTOR HOME USERS MOTOR HOME USERS Be responsible when emptying your motor home toilet and waste water – always use a designated dump station. It’s better for New Zealand’s environment and our health. Play your part and help look after our environment. You can find your nearest dump station by using this guide, and looking for the blue symbol. DUMP STATIONS AT HOLIDAY PARKS Dump stations at holiday parks are for guests only. There may be a charge at some holiday parks for use by non-guests. Key DOC Department of Conservation Mt Mount RD Rural Delivery SH State Highway For extra information visit the Ministry of Tourism’s website www.tourism.govt.nz 1. NORTHLAND Haruru Falls, ‘Panorama’ Old Wharf Road, Haruru Falls The Park Top 10 Ninety Mile Beach Ninety Mile Beach, Kaitaia, Twin Pines Tourist Park 18 km north, Kaitaia, Uri ramp Puketona Road, Haruru Falls, Paihia Bay of Islands Holiday Park Whatuwhiwhi Top 10 Holiday Park Lily Pond, Puketona Road, Paihia 17 Whatuwhiwhi Road, Kaitaia Beachside Holiday Park Wagener Holiday Park Paihia-Opua Road, Paihia Houhora Heads, Kaitaia Russell Top 10 Holiday Park Kaitaia Public Dump Station Long Beach Road, Russell Located behind Community Centre, junction of Mathews Ave and SH!, Waitangi Holiday Park Kaitaia 21 Tahuna Road, Waitangi Mangonui Public Dump Station Oakura Motels & Caravan Park Beach Road, next to public toilets, Te Kapua Street, Oakura Bay 400km from SH10, Kaitaia Kawakawa Public Dump Station Norfolk Campervan Park Waimio Street, off SH!,
    [Show full text]
  • Part C.10 Landscapes for List of Outstanding Landscapes and the Planning Maps)
    APPENDIX 3 Operative Kāpiti Coast District Plan Objectives and Policies Proposed Kāpiti Coast District Plan Objectives and Policies S149(G)3 Key Issues Report – Kāpiti Coast District Council C.1: RESIDENTIAL ZONE C.1 RESIDENTIAL ZONE Over 90% of the district's population live on less than 4% of the land. This land comprises the residential environment. To accommodate this population there has been considerable investment made in buildings, services (water, gas, wastewater disposal) roading and amenity facilities (shops and schools). This represents a significant physical resource which needs to be managed to enable people and communities to meet their needs and to minimise any adverse effects of activities on both the natural and physical environment. The management of this resource can be achieved within the District Plan through controls in the design of subdivision, use and development. The objectives and policies set out below in C.1.1 are intended to address the significant resource management issues identified in B.2. The related subdivision and development issues in B.8 are addressed in C.7. C.1.1 Objectives & Policies OBJECTIVE 1.0 - GENERAL ENSURE THAT THE LOW DENSITY, QUIET CHARACTER OF THE DISTRICT’S RESIDENTIAL ENVIRONMENTS IS MAINTAINED AND THAT ADVERSE EFFECTS ON THE AMENITY VALUES THAT CONSTITUTE THIS CHARACTER AND MAKE THE RESIDENTIAL ENVIRONMENTS SAFE, PLEASANT AND HEALTHY PLACES FOR RESIDENTS ARE AVOIDED, REMEDIED OR MITIGATED. The residential environments within the Kapiti Coast District generally have a low density character, typified by low building heights and density and a high proportion of public and private open space.
    [Show full text]
  • Communitrak™ Survey
    COMMUNITRAK™ SURVEY PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS AND INTERPRETATIONS OF COUNCIL SERVICES AND REPRESENTATION PREPARED AS PART OF THE PUBLIC FEEDBACK PROGRAMME FOR: WHAKATĀNE DISTRICT COUNCIL MAY / JUNE 2019 National Research Bureau Ltd PO Box 10118, Mt Eden, Auckland, New Zealand P (09) 6300 655, www.nrb.co.nz CONTENTS Page No. A. SITUATION AND OBJECTIVES .............................................................................................. 1 B. COMMUNITRAK™ SPECIFICATIONS ................................................................................. 2 C. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................... 6 D. MAIN FINDINGS ..................................................................................................................... 26 1. Council Services/Facilities ............................................................................................ 27 a. Satisfaction With Council Services And Facilities ........................................... 28 i. Parks And Reserves .................................................................................. 28 ii. Sportsfields ................................................................................................ 31 iii. Street Lighting ........................................................................................... 34 iv. Public Toilets ............................................................................................. 37 v. Footpaths ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]