DOCSLIB.ORG

APPENDIX A: Baseline Study Report October 2008

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
APPENDIX A: Baseline Study Report October 2008 A APPENDIX A: Baseline Study Report October 2008 Technical Report #1 - Baseline Studies Report Prepared for: District Department of Transportation October 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1 – INTRODUCTION 2.6.1 Facilities ..........................................................................................2-13 1.1 Study Area ................................................................................................................ 1-1 2.6.2 Ridership .........................................................................................2-13 1.2 Study Context............................................................................................................. 1-1 2.6.3 Operations .......................................................................................2-13 SECTION 2 – EXISTING CONDITIONS SECTION 3 – PLANNED AND PROPOSED TRANSPORTATION COMPONENTS 2.1 Neighborhood and Community Overview......................................................................... 2-1 3.1 Vehicular Connection between Massachusetts Avenue and H Street NE ................................3-1 2.2 Traffic........................................................................................................................ 2-2 3.2 Integration of Inter-city Bus Service into the Union Station Garage .....................................3-1 2.2.1 Existing Street Network..................................................................................... 2-2 3.3 Integrating Streetcar Service from H Street .....................................................................3-2 2.2.2 Circulation....................................................................................................... 2-2 3.4 Other Modes Needs ......................................................................................................3-2 2.2.3 Parking ........................................................................................................... 2-3 3.5 Proposed Developments Affecting Union Station ...............................................................3-2 2.3 Pedestrian and Bicycle Activity ...................................................................................... 2-5 SECTION 4 — SUMMARY 2.3.1 External Pedestrian Movements.......................................................................... 2-5 APPENDIX A – INVENTORY AND TRAVEL DEMAND TABLES/FIGURES 2.3.2 Internal Pedestrian Movements .......................................................................... 2-6 A-1 Field Collected Turning Movements................................................................................ A-1 2.3.3 ADA Issues...................................................................................................... 2-7 A-2 Available Parking Spaces at Union Station Garage During Peak Parking Hour ....................... A-2 2.3.4 Bicycles .......................................................................................................... 2-8 A-3 Available Parking Spaces at Union Station Garage During Peak Parking Hour Ticket Counts 2.4 Transportation Services at Union Station ........................................................................ 2-8 at Union Station Parking Garage over 12 Month Period ..................................................... A-3 2.4.1 Metrobus ........................................................................................................ 2-9 A-4 Parking Rates for the Union Station Parking Garage ......................................................... A-3 2.4.2 DC Circulator ................................................................................................. 2-10 A-5 Summary of Bus Routes within Study Area ..................................................................... A-3 2.4.3 Commuter Buses............................................................................................ 2-10 A-6 Overall Weekday Ridership of Metrobus Routes Servicing Union Station Study Area ....................A-3 2.4.4 Metrorail ....................................................................................................... 2-11 A-7 Metrobus Daily Boardings/Alightings at Busiest Bus Stops................................................. A-4 2.4.5 Inter-city Bus ................................................................................................ 2-12 A-8 Weekday Hourly Metrobus Volumes at Busiest Intersections.............................................. A-4 2.5 Rail at Union Station .................................................................................................. 2-12 A-9 Number of Commuter Bus Runs Servicing Union Station Area and DC ................................ A-5 2.5.1 Commuter Rail............................................................................................... 2-12 A-10 Commuter Rail Ridership at Union Station by Hour .......................................................... A-5 2.5.2 Intercity Rail .................................................................................................... 2-12 A-11 Scheduled Weekday Metrobus Volumes.......................................................................... A-5 2.6 Tour Buses ............................................................................................................... 2-13 A-12 Scheduled Metrorail Volume at Union Station .................................................................. A-5 Union Station Intermodal Transportation Center i Table of Contents LIST OF FIGURES Figure 2-12 Commuter Train Activity at Union Station ............................................................2-12 Figure 1-1 Study Area Overview ........................................................................................ 1-2 Figure 2-13 Amtrak Activity at Union Station.........................................................................2-13 Figure 2-1 Levels of Service ............................................................................................... 2-3 Figure 3-1 Future Development Activity near Union Station .....................................................3-1 Figure 2-2 Typical Vehicular Circulation Patterns around Union Station .................................... 2-4 Figure 2-3 On-Street Parking in the Vicinity of Union Station................................................... 2-5 Figure 2-4 One Hour Pedestrian Volumes on Roads Adjacent to Union Station ........................... 2-6 Figure 2-5 Morning Rush Period Pedestrian Platoon Paths ....................................................... 2-7 LIST OF TABLES Figure 2-6 Evening Rush Period Pedestrian Platoon Paths ....................................................... 2-7 Table 2-1 Transportation Modes Served at Union Station .......................................................2-1 Figure 2-7 Observed Platoon Conflict Points and Bottlenecks .................................................. 2-7 Table 2-2 Ridership of Commuter Buses which Serve Union Station Area ...............................2-10 Figure 2-8 Map of Bicycle Trails in Study Area....................................................................... 2-8 Table 2-3 Volumes of Weekday Metrorail Trips Beginning or Figure 2-9 Conceptual Design of Proposed Bicycle Facility at Union Station................................ 2-8 Ending at Union Station ...................................................................................2-11 Figure 2-10 Relative Number of Boardings and Alightings at Metrobus Stops............................... 2-9 Table 2-4 Combined Tour and Commuter Bus Populations Observed Near Downtown Washington ................................................................2-13 Figure 2-11 Circulator Monthly Ridership by Time of Day (April 2008) ...................................... 2-10 Union Station Intermodal Transportation Center ii 1 – INTRODUCTION Union Station and the Union Station Tracks opened in 1908 as A key aspect of the study is a comprehensive analysis of Union ports will describe the study’s recommendations based on fore- a replacement for train service which had previous used the Station and its functions as a whole. This includes assessments casted demand for Union Station Services and will include, as area that is now the National Mall. Designed by Daniel Burn- of existing operations and needs, as well as a review of current appropriate, project details such as estimated costs, implemen- ham of Burnham and Root in Chicago, the station saw increas- plans by the various users of the facility. Within the context of tation strategiestimelines, feasibility considerations, and the ing traffic through the 1950’s, followed by a decline in ridership an overall assessment, some of the specific items being re- identification of necessary environmental and permitting re- through the 1980’s. In 1981, the Redevelopment Act created viewed and addressed by the study include examining the fea- quirements. the Union Station Redevelopment Corporation, which was sibility of: charged with developing the station into the multi-use facility it 1.1 STUDY AREA is today, serving local, regional, and inter-state travelers as • Constructing a new rail passenger concourse for The project focuses on Union Station, located in downtown Dis- well as shoppers and citizens of DC. In particular, the Redevel- commuter rail operations; trict of Columbia. The station itself is located north of Columbus opment Act sought “restoration and operation of a portion of • Improved emergency evacuation of both Union
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Naylor Road Metro Station Area Accessibility Study
    Naylor Road Metro Station Area Accessibility Study Pedestrian and Bicycle Metro Station Access Transportation Land-Use Connection (TLC) National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission May 2011 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 1 Recommendations ....................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Study Overview ............................................................................................................................................. 4 Study Process ............................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Background .................................................................................................................................................................................. 6 Planning Context and Past Studies ............................................................................................................................................... 7 Existing Conditions and Challenges ............................................................................................................. 10 Public Outreach .........................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • During Track Work And/Or Rail Shutdown Events, This Bus Stop Will Also Be Served by Metro Shuttle Buses. NOTE
    – Bus Service from Union Station Silver Spring Eastern Ave BUS BOARDING MAP BUS SERVICE AND BOARDING LOCATIONS schematic map The table shows approximate minutes between buses; check schedules for full details LEGEND not to scale 16th St BOARD AT MONDAY TO FRIDAY SATURDAY SUNDAY Rail Lines Metrobus Routes t t S ROUTE DESTINATION BUS STOP AM RUSH MIDDAY PM RUSH EVENING DAY EVENING DAY EVENING t S L G d t S n s l Metrobus Major Route 2 80 1 o ARLINGTON-UNION STATION LINE t Frequent, seven-day service on the core i Metrorail H St p H St route. On branches, service levels vary. a 13Y Ronald Reagan Washington Nat’l Airport m -- -- -- -- 30* -- 30* -- Station and Line C B h D6 Metrobus Local Route Alaska Ave t M r F Less frequent service, with some evening o NORTH CAPITOL ST LINE and weekend service available. N G Pl Union Station 80 Fort Totten m 8-15 15 10 30 30 30 30 30 X1 Metrobus Commuter Route Takoma Government EF Printing Office H Parking Peak-hour service linking residential areas Garage 80 Kennedy Center 14-20 30 20-30 30 30 30 30 30 Commuter to rail stations and employment centers. Georgia Ave GN G St G St Railroad Western Ave Bethesda X9 MetroExtra Route 80 McPherson Sq m 14-20 30 20-30 -- -- -- -- -- Transfer National Bureau of GN Limited stops for a faster ride. Days, times Guard Labor Statistics t Q Points S and service levels vary by route. EAST CAPITOL ST LINE Memorial t N s M 1 as E sa 96 Tenleytown-AU m 20 24 21 33 25-30 30-35 30-35 30-35 Map Symbols Routes Operated by ch J us National ett City/County Systems s A Postal 96
    [Show full text]
  • Pentagon City Metro Station Second Elevator Transportation Commission
    Pentagon City Metro Station Second Elevator Transportation Commission July 01, 2021 Pentagon City Metro Station Second Elevator • BACKGROUND: The Pentagon City Metrorail station is one of the highest in terms of ridership among stations in Northern Virginia,. • Provides access to multiple retail, government, and commercial office buildings, and is a transfer point for regional and local transit buses and numerous private bus services. • Construction of a new second elevator Intersection of S Hayes and S 12th Streets on the north side of the passageway corresponds to the new second New Elevator Existing elevator being in the general area of Elevator the pedestrian path for people crossing S. Hayes Street. July 01, 2021 Pentagon City Metro Station Second Elevator Project Scope: • The second elevator will eliminate the need to cross six (6) lanes of traffic, two parking lanes, and a bike lane to reach the elevator on the east side of S. Hayes Street. • Improves ADA access and access for passengers with strollers and luggage. • Provide redundancy, in accordance with current WMATA design criteria, when one of the elevators is out of service for any reason. July 01, 2021 Pentagon City Metro Station Second Elevator Construction Phase: On January 25, 2021, Arlington County received two (2) bids • The low bidder, W.M. Schlosser Company, Inc. was awarded the contract on April 19, 2021 for $6.4 mil. • The County and Procon (CM), will work together with the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA) to ensure construction is performed
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Financial and CSR Report Attestation of the Persons Responsible for the Annual Report
    2018 Financial and CSR Report Attestation of the persons responsible for the annual report We, the undersigned, hereby attest that to the best of our knowledge the financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally-accepted accounting principles and give a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities, financial position and results of the company and of all consolidated companies, and that the management report attached presents a true and fair picture of the results and financial position of the consolidated companies and of all uncertainties facing them. Paris, 29 March 2019 Chairwoman and CEO Catherine Guillouard Chief Financial Officer Jean-Yves Leclercq Management Corporate report governance Editorial 4 report Profile 6 The Board of Directors 89 RATP Group organisation chart 14 Compensation of corporate officers 91 Financial results 16 Diversity policy 91 Extra-financial performance Appendix – List of directors declaration 28 and their terms of office at 31 December 2018 91 International control and risk management 69 Consolidated Financial fi nancial statements statements Statutory Auditors’ report on the financial statements 156 Statutory Auditors’ report on the consolidated financial statements 96 EPIC balance sheet 159 Consolidated statements EPIC income statement 160 of comprehensive income 100 Notes to the financial statements 161 Consolidated balance sheets 102 Consolidated statements of cash flows 103 Consolidated statements of changes in equity 104 Notes to the consolidated financial statements 105 RATP Group — 2018 Financial and CSR Report 3 Editorial 2018 – a year of strong growth momentum and commitment to the territories served 2018 was marked by an acceleration in RATP Capital Innovation continues to invest the Group’s development in Île-de-France, in new shared mobility solutions and smart cities, in France and internationally.
    [Show full text]
  • Bus Driver Fatigue and Stress Issues Study
    Bus Driver Fatigue and Stress Issues Study DTGH61-99-Z-00027 Final Report December 8, 1999 Prepared for Mr. Phil Hanley, HMCE-10 Federal Highway Administration Office of Motor Carriers 400 Seventh Street, SW, Room 4432A Washington, DC 20590 Prepared by Arrowhead Space & Telecommunications, Inc. 803 W. Broad Street, Suite 400 Falls Church, VA 22046 (703) 241-2801 voice (703) 241-2802 fax www.arrowheadsat.com Bus Driver Fatigue and Stress Issues Study Table of Contents I. Introduction 1 II. Approach 3 III. Literature Search 6 IV. Video Search 10 V. World Wide Web Search 11 VI. Industry Advisory Panel 32 VII. Federal and State Officials 35 VIII. Focus Group Sessions 36 IX. Identification of Issues from Focus Group Sessions and Phone Survey 39 X. Countermeasures 49 Appendix A: Focus Group and Phone Survey Participants Appendix B:Issues Identified at Focus Group Sessions Appendix C:Travel Industry Focus Group Report Appendix D:Safety Study Performed by Greyhound Lines, Inc. Bus Driver Fatigue and Stress Issues Study Final Report November 18, 1999 I INTRODUCTION Arrowhead Space and Telecommunications, Inc. conducted a research project to identify unique aspects of operations within the motorcoach industry which may produce bus driver fatigue and stress. Funding for and oversight of the study was provided by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Office of Motor Carriers (OMC). The purpose of this study is to (1) identify from direct interaction with motorcoach owners, safety directors, operations managers, and drivers those fatigue-inducing stresses which they believe are unique to the motorcoach industry; (2) evaluate the relative influence of these stresses on bus driver fatigue; (3) provide relevant feedback to the FHWA/OMC for its use in future decisions which will affect the motorcoach industry; and (4) develop an outreach video to help motorcoach drivers understand the effects of fatigue, the stresses that induce it, and means to reduce it.
    [Show full text]
  • DE60LF Continuation of Chuck Tauscher's' April Slide Presentation
    OFFICIAL NEWSLEITER OF THE OMNIBUS SOCIETY OF AMERICA, INC. MAY 2008 Welcome to another issue of The Green Pennant Special, than waiting until sufficient capital funds are available to the official publication of The Omnibus Society of America. purchase. Through this publication we hope to keep our readers -, informed of events happening in the transit industry in Chicago and other cities in the United States. Visit the Omnibus Society of America website at ..www.osabus.com ''. At osabus.com we will be posting upcoming fan trips and meetings information, as well as membership information. Please visit our site when you have a chance and give us your opinions and comments. • MAY MEETING The May meeting of the Omnibus Society of America will be held on May 2, 2008, in the Anderson Pavilion of Swedish Covenant Hospital, 2751 W. Winona Avenue, Chicago, Illinois. The meeting will start at 7:30 pm. Our program for the evening, "Unfiled, Part 2," will be a DE60LF continuation of Chuck Tauscher's' April slide presentation. Delivery of the New Flyer Hybrid articulated buses will begin in August 2008. The hospital is on California near Foster. Winona is one half-block south of Foster. By public transportation, take In December, the Chicago Transit Board approved the 92 Foster to California. From the Ravenswood Brown reassignment of a contract option from King County Metro, Line, take the 93 North California from Kimball, get off after Seattle's public transit agency, for the 60-foot hybrid buses it turns onto California from Foster and walk back south. manufactured by New Flyer Industries.
    [Show full text]
  • Walking Toward Metro Stations: the Contribution of Distance, Attitudes, and Perceived Built Environment
    sustainability Article Walking toward Metro Stations: the Contribution of Distance, Attitudes, and Perceived Built Environment Mohammad Paydar 1,* , Asal Kamani Fard 2 and Mohammad Mehdi Khaghani 3 1 Escuela de Arquitectura Temuco, Facultad de Humanidades, Universidad Mayor, Av. Alemania 281, Temuco 4780000, Chile 2 Academic Researcher, Universidad Católica del Maule, San Miguel 3605, Talca, Chile; [email protected] 3 Department of Urban Studies, Apadana Institute of Higher Education, Shiraz 7187985443, Iran; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 17 September 2020; Accepted: 16 November 2020; Published: 9 December 2020 Abstract: Walking as an active means of travel is important as a sustainable mode of transport. Moreover, the level of walking in the surrounding areas of metro stations would contribute to maintaining the minimum rate of physical activity and, therefore, inhabitants’ general health. This study examined the impacts of walking attitude, walking distance, and perceived built environment on walking behavior for reaching the metro stations in Shiraz, Iran. Three metro stations were selected and a quantitative approach was used to examine the objectives. It was found that the average walking distance is less than the average in developed countries, such as the United States. People walked more when there was a shorter distance between their starting points and the metro stations. The contribution of walking attitudes and several built environment attributes to walking behavior was demonstrated. Finding the contribution of aesthetic attributes, such as accessibility to parks and housing types of the starting points of the walking trips, to walking for transport are taken into account as the novelties of this study.
    [Show full text]
  • Rtc Bus Routes and Schedules
    Rtc Bus Routes And Schedules Mesarch and weathered Nealy proletarianise almost consummately, though Erasmus moping his coffers synchronising. Edward fertilizes his noiselessness entrapped nevermore, but singing Humphrey never repatriating so anaerobically. Wide-ranging Lonnie outshines chiefly while Aub always feudalize his collegers maul redly, he saponifies so fore. Extra small number of the funds coming from various locations throughout the bus routes and schedules Rtc bus schedules are you can mean delays and other reason why travel writer and some stops in reno, lt alexander rd. Down arrows indicating their route. Check company credit report with routes? Drive was the route signals to check the pikes peak region. Download and schedules on your passes. Union city transit is currently running and helps bus route changes include jeffersonville meijer and updates or snowboarding in local rides for? Please be found on routes in rtc intercity service levels for? Muni buses schedule varies for rtc bus routes and schedules, updates from sb casino center during this link will. Schedule to create and schedule. Rta is expanding our transit may have discounts and attractions and rural transit has made in order to seniors, routes and water parks and i have permission from? The society of freely licensed health experts, integrated can see upcoming bus of rtc and employees and shoes to get schedule on apple books. Strip can be found throughout santa cruz county, near you make sure your trip back inside the rtc bus. Rta title vi which would directly interfere with a rtc bus routes and schedules and the rtc stands for transportation.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Regulatory Assessment Final Revised
    Final Regulatory Assessment Final Revised Accessibility Guidelines for Buses, Over-the-Road Buses, and Vans (36 CFR Part 1192, Subpart B) UNITED STATES ACCESS BOARD WASHINGTON, DC United States Access Board 1331 F Street, NW – Suite 1000 Washington, DC 20004-111 www.access-board.gov Nov. 9, 2016 (This page intentionally blank.) TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................1 2. Introduction ....................................................................................................................................3 3. Background ....................................................................................................................................5 3.1. Existing Regulatory Requirements for Buses, Vans, and OTRBs .........................................5 3.2. Announcements on Fixed Route Buses – History of Compliance Issues ..............................6 3.3. Growing Use of Intelligent Transportation Systems by Transit Agencies ............................7 3.4. Final Rule – New or Revised Accessibility Requirements with Cost Impacts ......................9 4. Overview of Cost Methodology ...................................................................................................11 4.1. Automated Stop Announcement Systems – Large Transit Agencies ..................................11 4.2. Other Accessibility Requirements - Over-the-Road Buses .................................................13 4.3.
    [Show full text]
  • Skål USA Executive Committee - Monthly Conference Call Meeting Agenda Monday, April 5Th, 2021 4:00PM EDT
    Skål USA Executive Committee - Monthly Conference Call Meeting Agenda Monday, April 5th, 2021 4:00PM EDT Type of Meeting: Monthly Conference Call Call-in mode: Go-to-Meeting hosted by ABA Meeting Facilitator: Jim Dwyer, President Invitees: Skål USA Executive Committee ______________________________________________________________________________ PLEASE DO NOT USE SPEAKERPHONES. IF USING YOUR COMPUTER PLEASE USE HEADPHONES. Call to Order - President Jim Dwyer Roll Call – Richard Scinta President’s Update – Jim Dwyer • Approval of Consent Agenda 1. President’s Written Report – Jim Dwyer 2. March (Feb Month end) Financial Report – Art Allis 3. VP Administrator’s Written Report – Richard Scinta 4. IS Councilor’s Written report – Holly Powers 5. VP Membership’s Written report – Tom Moulton 6. VP of PR & Communication’s Written report – Pam Davis 7. Directors of Membership’s Written reports (2) – Morgan Maravich & Mark Irgang • Skal Canada Website – Team Discussion • Streamyard EC Ratification • Bylaws and Articles of Incorporation Modifications - Holly • Articles of Incorporation Review – Holly and Richard International Skål Councilor – Holly Powers Financial Report – Art Allis Administration Update – Richard Scinta • Philanthropic Events VP Membership – Tom Moulton • New Career Center Discussion – New Benefit Approval Director Membership – Morgan Maravich Mark Irgang VP Communications – Pam Davis Next Meeting: Monday, May 3rd, 2021 4:00 PM EST Skal USA President Report March 2021 Einstein “the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result Dwyer “Negativity is the cornerstone of failure” Meetings and Zooms • International Skål Zoom with Skål Miami and Skal Sydney • International Zoom with Skal Mexico and proposed the twinning of Skal Mexico City and Skal New Jersey which may take place on May 5.
    [Show full text]
  • PLANNING GUIDE for Public Transportation Elevators Table of Contents
    PLANNING GUIDE FOR Public transportation elevators Table of Contents 1. Introduction ...........................................................................................................4 1.1 About this Planning Guide ............................................................................................4 1.2 About KONE .................................................................................................................4 2. Special demands of public transportation ........................................................... 7 2.1 Airports ........................................................................................................................7 2.1.1 Benefits of KONE elevators for airports ...................................................................................... 7 2.2 Transit centers (railway and metro ststions) ...................................................................8 2.2.1 Benefits of KONE elevators in railway and metro stations .......................................................... 8 2.3 Main specifications for public transportation elevators ...............................................10 2.4 Electromagnetic compatibility standards ....................................................................11 2.5 LSH and LH cables ......................................................................................................11 3. Odering a public transportation elevator ...........................................................12 3.1 Key cost drivers for elevators in
    [Show full text]
  • Reduced Cost Metro Transportation for People with Disabilities
    REDUCED COST AND FREE METRO TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMS FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES Individual Day Supports are tailored services and supports that are provided to a person or a small group of no more than two (2) people, in the community. This service lends very well to the use of public transportation and associated travel training, allowing for active learning while exploring the community and its resources. While the set rate includes funding for transportation, it is important to be resourceful when possible, using available discount programs to make your funds go further. METRO TRANSIT ACCESSIBILITY CENTER The Metro Transit Accessibility Center (202)962-2700 located at Metro headquarters, 600 Fifth Street NW, Washington, DC 20001, offers the following services to people with disabilities: Information and application materials for the Reduced Fare (half fare) program for Metrobus and Metrorail Information and application materials for the MetroAccess paratransit service Consultations and functional assessments to determine eligibility for MetroAccess paratransit service Replacement ID cards for MetroAccess customers Support (by phone) for resetting your MetroAccess EZ-Pay or InstantAccess password The Transit Accessibility Center office hours are 8 a.m. to 4 p.m. weekdays, with the exception of Tuesdays with hours from 8 a.m. - 2:30 p.m. REDUCED FAIR PROGRAM Metro offers reduced fare for people with disabilities who require accessibility features to use public transportation and who have a valid Metro Disability ID. The Metro Disability ID card offers a discount of half the peak fare on Metrorail, and a reduced fare of for 90¢ cash, or 80¢ paying with a SmarTrip® card on regular Metrobus routes, and a discounted fare on other participating bus service providers.
    [Show full text]