Pteridophyta – Vascular Cryptogams

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Pteridophyta – Vascular Cryptogams Pteridophyta – Vascular cryptogams Dr. Pallavi J.N.L College Khagaul Division of Pteridophyta Pteridophytes includes four classes. • Psilopsida: Psilotum • Lycopsida: Lycopodium,Selaginella • Sphenopsida: Equisetum (Horse tail) • Pteropsida or Filicopsida: Pteridium, Adiantum GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS • Pteridophytes (pteron= feather, phyton= plant, i.e. plants with feather like leaves). • These are also known as vascular cryptogams. • They are represented by about 400 living and fossils genera and some 10,500 species. • These plants originated about 380 million years ago in the Silurian period of the Paleozoic era and formed dominant vegetation on the earth during the Devonian period. HABITAT • Most of the living pteridophytes are terrestrial, growing in moist and shady places. • Some members are aquatic (Azolla, Marsilea, Salvinia) usually occurring in permanent ponds. • A few forms are xerophytic like Equisetum. • the greatest diversity of pteridophytes is found in the tropics, with only about six hundred species adapted for life in temperate climates. Species living today are relics of ancient lineages that once dominated • Ferns reproduce by releasing spores rather than seeds. • There is a rich fossil record showing that pteridophytes have ancestors dating back nearly four hundred million years. Before there were seed plants, there were pteridophytes such as large, treelike (up to 36.5 meters [120 feet] tall) Lepidodendron, an ancestor of modern club mosses (which are no more than .30 meter [1 foot] tall), and shrubby Sphenophyllum PLANT BODY • They show much variation in their form, size and habit. They ranges from small annual (e.g. Azolla) to large tree-like perennials. • The main plant body is sporophytic, differentiated into root, stem and leaves. • The primary roots are ephemeral and are soon replaced by adventitious roots (which develop on rhizome). • The stem is an underground rhizome by which ferns reproduce vegetatively. Some primitive ferns have tree-like stem. • The leaves are scaly (Equisetum), small and sessile (e.g Lycopodium), or large, petiolate and compound (Ferns). • Leaves may be small microphyllous (Lycopodium) or large megaphyllous (Pteris). These are called fronds. • The root and stem have well developed vascular system, composed of xylem and phloem. The xylem is made up of tracheid and the phloem has sieve tubes only. Cambium is absent. • Internal structure • The vascular system in both rhizome and aerial stems is a protostele. It is a solid vascular cylinder consisting of a fluted cylinder of xylem (actinostele) completely surrounded by phloem. As in the dicot root vascular cylinder (solid, ridged xylem cylinder with radial xylem/phloem arrangement), Psilotum has a similar format. REPRODUCTION • Vegetative reproduction takes place by fragmentation of rhizome, adventitious buds etc. • They reproduce by spores, produced in sporangia. The sporsporangia are usually borne on the ventral surface of the leaf. • Sporangia occur on the surface of leaves in cluster called sori. (Sing. Sorus) and these leaves, bearing sporangia, are known as sporophylls • The sporophylls with megasporangia are called megasporophylls and with microsporangia are called microsporophylls. • Sporophylls are either unifromly distributed or are aggregated into compact cones (known as strobili) at the apex of the stem. • In aquatic forms like Azolla, Salvinia, and Marsilea the sporangia are present within specialized structure called sporocarps. • Most pteridophytes are homosporous, i.e. they produce only one type of spores, e.g., Lycopodium, Equisetum etc. • Some others are heterosporous, i.e. they produce two types of spores (microspres and megaspore). The megaspore and microspore germinate to give rise female and male gametophyte respectively. • Gametophyte is a thalloid, called prothallus. It is a free-living gametophyte bearing sex organs, antheridia and archegonia. • The antheridia are small hemispherical structures enclosing 32-48 sporocytes (Spore mother cell). • The antherozoids are unicellular, uninucleate and spirally coiled flagella. • The archegonium is flask-shaped structures that are partially embedded in the prothallus. Neck of archegonium has 4 vertical rows of cells. • Water is essential for fertilization. The antherozoid and egg fuse to form a diploid zygote, which functions as the mother cells of sporophyte generation. • Fertilization and and development of zygote into young embryo take place within the young gametophyte. This event is a precursor to the seed habit considered as an important step in evolution. • The life cycle shows alternation of generation in which a dominant sporophyte and an inconspicuous gametophyte • ECONOMIC IMPORTANCE • Ornamental value : Because of their delicate and graceful foliage, ferns are grown as ornamental plants in gardens. • Drugs : Rhizome and petiole of Dryopteris yield an antihelminthic drug. Lycopodium is used in the treatment of rheumatism and Adiantum roots help to cure throat infection. • Food : Some are rich source of starch. • Soil binding : Pteridophytes protect the soil from erosion even along hill slopes by binding the soil. • Scouring : Equisetum stems are used in scouring (cleaning of utensils) and polishing of metals. • Biofertilisers : Azolla has a symbiotic association with nitrogen-fixing cyanobacterium, Anabaena. It is inoculated to paddy fields to function as a biofertilisers. • Similarities with Gymnosperms: • (i) Plant body is sporophytic, dominant and can be differentiated into root, stem and leaves in both the groups. • (ii) Gametophytic phase is of short duration. • (iii) Young leaves show circinate vernation. • (iv) Vascular tissue is well developed. Xylem lacks vessels (except in order Gnetales of Gymnosperms) and companion cells are absent in phloem). • (v) Like Gymnosperms many Pteridophytes are heterosporous (e.g., Marsilea, Selaginella). • (vi) Like Pteridophytes many Gymnosperms show ciliate antherozoids (e.g., Cycas, Ginkgo). • (vii) Like Gymnosperms, in some Pteridophytes megaspore is retained within the megasporangium (e.g., Selaginella). • (viii) Regular alternation of sporophytic and gametophytic phase is present. .
Recommended publications
  • General Botany Lab Review Fungi, Algae, Bryophytes, Ferns & Fern Allies
    General Botany Lab Review Fungi, Algae, Bryophytes, Ferns & Fern Allies You have looked at a lot of stuff – both live and via prepared slides. You’ve also labeled at least one Life Cycle Diagram for each of the groups. Know what your benchmarks are for a general life cycle diagram and be able to label them. I will not ask you to identify anything to species or genus; be able to identify things to “group” (i.e., ascomycete, bryophyta, etc.) Be able to identify growth form (e.g., unicell, filamentous, etc.). Recognize the differences between sexual and asexual reroductive structures. All questions will be multiple choice. Material looked at: UNIT 1: FUNGI EXERCISE 1: CHYTRIDS/ CHYTRIDOMYCOTA: Allmyces arbusculus – life and prepared slides EXERCISE 2: ZYGOMYCETES/ ZYGOMYCOTA: Rhizopus stolonifer – live and prepared slides EXERCISE 2: MYCORRHIZA and the GLOMEROMYCETES/ GLOMEROMYCOTA – prepared slides only EXERCISE 3: ASCOMYCETES/ ASCOMYCOTA Aspergillus sp., Penicillium sp., Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Peziza sp., Sordaria fimicola, and Morchella sp. – a mixture of live and prepared materials EXERCISE 4: BASIDIOMYCETES/BASIDIOMYCETES Agaricus, Coprinus, Cronartium (a rust), Ustilago (a smut) – slides, fresh, and dried EXERCISE 5: SLIME MOLDS – live and prepared Physarum EXERCISE 6: LICHENS – live and prepared slides be able to identify the various growth forms UNIT 2: ALGAE EXERCISE 1: CYANOBACTERIA Anabaena sp., Nostoc, and Oscillaroria – live and prepared material EXERCISE 2: SUPERGROUP EXCAVATA (Phylum Euglenophyta) – live and prepared material
    [Show full text]
  • Heterospory: the Most Iterative Key Innovation in the Evolutionary History of the Plant Kingdom
    Biol. Rej\ (1994). 69, l>p. 345-417 345 Printeii in GrenI Britain HETEROSPORY: THE MOST ITERATIVE KEY INNOVATION IN THE EVOLUTIONARY HISTORY OF THE PLANT KINGDOM BY RICHARD M. BATEMAN' AND WILLIAM A. DiMlCHELE' ' Departments of Earth and Plant Sciences, Oxford University, Parks Road, Oxford OXi 3P/?, U.K. {Present addresses: Royal Botanic Garden Edinburiih, Inverleith Rojv, Edinburgh, EIIT, SLR ; Department of Geology, Royal Museum of Scotland, Chambers Street, Edinburgh EHi ijfF) '" Department of Paleohiology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC^zo^bo, U.S.A. CONTENTS I. Introduction: the nature of hf^terospon' ......... 345 U. Generalized life history of a homosporous polysporangiophyle: the basis for evolutionary excursions into hetcrospory ............ 348 III, Detection of hcterospory in fossils. .......... 352 (1) The need to extrapolate from sporophyte to gametophyte ..... 352 (2) Spatial criteria and the physiological control of heterospory ..... 351; IV. Iterative evolution of heterospory ........... ^dj V. Inter-cladc comparison of levels of heterospory 374 (1) Zosterophyllopsida 374 (2) Lycopsida 374 (3) Sphenopsida . 377 (4) PtiTopsida 378 (5) f^rogymnospermopsida ............ 380 (6) Gymnospermopsida (including Angiospermales) . 384 (7) Summary: patterns of character acquisition ....... 386 VI. Physiological control of hetcrosporic phenomena ........ 390 VII. How the sporophyte progressively gained control over the gametophyte: a 'just-so' story 391 (1) Introduction: evolutionary antagonism between sporophyte and gametophyte 391 (2) Homosporous systems ............ 394 (3) Heterosporous systems ............ 39(1 (4) Total sporophytic control: seed habit 401 VIII. Summary .... ... 404 IX. .•Acknowledgements 407 X. References 407 I. I.NIRODUCTION: THE NATURE OF HETEROSPORY 'Heterospory' sensu lato has long been one of the most popular re\ie\v topics in organismal botany.
    [Show full text]
  • XI MOBILE NO:9340839715 CHAPTER-3 Plant Kingd
    NAME OF THE TEACHER: SR. RENCY GEORGE SUBJECT: BIOLOGY TOPIC: CHAPTER -1 CLASS: XI MOBILE NO:9340839715 CHAPTER-3 Plant Kingdom Objectives :- Observe plants closely to notice features and characteristics of growth and development. Observe and identify differences in plants and animals. Observe similarities among plants (seeds, roots, stems, leaves, flowers, fruit) Learning Strategies:- • Explain Different systems of Classification. • Differentiate between Artificial and Natural System of Classification. • Explain Algae and its significance. • Differentiate between various classes of Algae. • Explain various modes of reproduction in Algae. RESOURCES: i.Text books ii.Learning Materials iii.Lab manual iv.E-Resources,video ,L.C.D etc… CLICK HERE TO PLAY CONTENT RELATED VIDEO ON YOU TUBE. https://youtu.be/SWlVX1gDd98 https://youtu.be/P_MyyxIQzm4 https://youtu.be/KmbFGIiwP4k https://youtu.be/mepU8gStVpg https://youtu.be/fnE01M0YlTc https://youtu.be/xir7xvLi8XE Contents Introduction Plant kingdom includes algae, bryophytes, pteridophytes, gymnosperms and angiosperms. ... Depending on the type of pigment possessed and the type of stored food, algae are classified into three classes, namely Chlorophyceae, Phaeophyceae and Rhodophyceae. Eukaryotic, multicellular, chlorophyll containing and having cell wall, are grouped under the kingdom Plantae. It is popularly known as plant kingdom. • Phylogenetic system of classification based on evolutionary relationship is presently used for classifying plants. • Numerical Taxonomy use computer by assigning code for each character and analyzing the features. • Cytotaxonomy is based on cytological information like chromosome number, structure and behaviour. • Chemotaxonomy uses chemical constituents of plants to resolve the confusion. Algae: These include the simplest plants which possess undifferentiated or thallus like forms, reproductive organs single celled called gametangia.
    [Show full text]
  • The Associations Between Pteridophytes and Arthropods
    FERN GAZ. 12(1) 1979 29 THE ASSOCIATIONS BETWEEN PTERIDOPHYTES AND ARTHROPODS URI GERSON The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Faculty of Agriculture, Rehovot, Israel. ABSTRACT Insects belonging to 12 orders, as well as mites, millipedes, woodlice and tardigrades have been collected from Pterldophyta. Primitive and modern, as well as general and specialist arthropods feed on pteridophytes. Insects and mites may cause slight to severe damage, all plant parts being susceptible. Several arthropods are pests of commercial Pteridophyta, their control being difficult due to the plants' sensitivity to pesticides. Efforts are currently underway to employ insects for the biological control of bracken and water ferns. Although Pteridophyta are believed to be relatively resistant to arthropods, the evidence is inconclusive; pteridophyte phytoecdysones do not appear to inhibit insect feeders. Other secondary compounds of preridophytes, like prunasine, may have a more important role in protecting bracken from herbivores. Several chemicals capable of adversely affecting insects have been extracted from Pteridophyta. The litter of pteridophytes provides a humid habitat for various parasitic arthropods, like the sheep tick. Ants often abound on pteridophytes (especially in the tropics) and may help in protecting these plants while nesting therein. These and other associations are discussed . lt is tenatively suggested that there might be a difference in the spectrum of arthropods attacking ancient as compared to modern Pteridophyta. The Osmundales, which, in contrast to other ancient pteridophytes, contain large amounts of ·phytoecdysones, are more similar to modern Pteridophyta in regard to their arthropod associates. The need for further comparative studies is advocated, with special emphasis on the tropics.
    [Show full text]
  • Pteridophyte Fungal Associations: Current Knowledge and Future Perspectives
    This is a repository copy of Pteridophyte fungal associations: Current knowledge and future perspectives. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/109975/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Pressel, S, Bidartondo, MI, Field, KJ orcid.org/0000-0002-5196-2360 et al. (2 more authors) (2016) Pteridophyte fungal associations: Current knowledge and future perspectives. Journal of Systematics and Evolution, 54 (6). pp. 666-678. ISSN 1674-4918 https://doi.org/10.1111/jse.12227 © 2016 Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences. This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Pressel, S., Bidartondo, M. I., Field, K. J., Rimington, W. R. and Duckett, J. G. (2016), Pteridophyte fungal associations: Current knowledge and future perspectives. Jnl of Sytematics Evolution, 54: 666–678., which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/jse.12227. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving. Reuse Unless indicated otherwise, fulltext items are protected by copyright with all rights reserved. The copyright exception in section 29 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 allows the making of a single copy solely for the purpose of non-commercial research or private study within the limits of fair dealing. The publisher or other rights-holder may allow further reproduction and re-use of this version - refer to the White Rose Research Online record for this item. Where records identify the publisher as the copyright holder, users can verify any specific terms of use on the publisher’s website.
    [Show full text]
  • Curitiba, Southern Brazil
    data Data Descriptor Herbarium of the Pontifical Catholic University of Paraná (HUCP), Curitiba, Southern Brazil Rodrigo A. Kersten 1,*, João A. M. Salesbram 2 and Luiz A. Acra 3 1 Pontifical Catholic University of Paraná, School of Life Sciences, Curitiba 80.215-901, Brazil 2 REFLORA Project, Curitiba, Brazil; [email protected] 3 Pontifical Catholic University of Paraná, School of Life Sciences, Curitiba 80.215-901, Brazil; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +55-41-3721-2392 Academic Editor: Martin M. Gossner Received: 22 November 2016; Accepted: 5 February 2017; Published: 10 February 2017 Abstract: The main objective of this paper is to present the herbarium of the Pontifical Catholic University of Parana’s and its collection. The history of the HUCP had its beginning in the middle of the 1970s with the foundation of the Biology Museum that gathered both botanical and zoological specimens. In April 1979 collections were separated and the HUCP was founded with preserved specimens of algae (green, red, and brown), fungi, and embryophytes. As of October 2016, the collection encompasses nearly 25,000 specimens from 4934 species, 1609 genera, and 297 families. Most of the specimens comes from the state of Paraná but there were also specimens from many Brazilian states and other countries, mainly from South America (Chile, Argentina, Uruguay, Paraguay, and Colombia) but also from other parts of the world (Cuba, USA, Spain, Germany, China, and Australia). Our collection includes 42 fungi, 258 gymnosperms, 299 bryophytes, 2809 pteridophytes, 3158 algae, 17,832 angiosperms, and only one type of Mimosa (Mimosa tucumensis Barneby ex Ribas, M.
    [Show full text]
  • The Structure, Function, and Biosynthesis of Plant Cell Wall Pectic Polysaccharides
    Carbohydrate Research 344 (2009) 1879–1900 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Carbohydrate Research journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/carres The structure, function, and biosynthesis of plant cell wall pectic polysaccharides Kerry Hosmer Caffall a, Debra Mohnen a,b,* a University of Georgia, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology and Complex Carbohydrate Research Center, 315 Riverbend Road Athens, GA 30602, United States b DOE BioEnergy Science Center (BESC), 315 Riverbend Road Athens, GA 30602, United States article info abstract Article history: Plant cell walls consist of carbohydrate, protein, and aromatic compounds and are essential to the proper Received 18 November 2008 growth and development of plants. The carbohydrate components make up 90% of the primary wall, Received in revised form 4 May 2009 and are critical to wall function. There is a diversity of polysaccharides that make up the wall and that Accepted 6 May 2009 are classified as one of three types: cellulose, hemicellulose, or pectin. The pectins, which are most abun- Available online 2 June 2009 dant in the plant primary cell walls and the middle lamellae, are a class of molecules defined by the pres- ence of galacturonic acid. The pectic polysaccharides include the galacturonans (homogalacturonan, Keywords: substituted galacturonans, and RG-II) and rhamnogalacturonan-I. Galacturonans have a backbone that Cell wall polysaccharides consists of -1,4-linked galacturonic acid. The identification of glycosyltransferases involved in pectin Galacturonan a Glycosyltransferases synthesis is essential to the study of cell wall function in plant growth and development and for maxi- Homogalacturonan mizing the value and use of plant polysaccharides in industry and human health.
    [Show full text]
  • An Illustrated Guide to the WETLAND FERNS and FERN ALLIES of FLORIDA John David Tobe, Ph.D
    INDEX TO FAMILIES OF FLORIDA WETLAND FERN AND FERN ALLIES ASPLENIACEAE 15 ATHYRIACEAE 22 AZOLLACEAE 25 BLECHNACEAE 26 DENNSTAEDITACEAE 30 DRYOPTERIDACEAE 32 EQUISETACEAE 36 GLEICHENIACEAE 37 HYMENOPHYLLACEAE 38 ISOËTACEAE 40 LYCOPODIACEAE 41 LYGODIACEAE 43 MARSILEACEAE 45 NEPHROLEPIDACEAE 47 OPHIOGLOSSACEAE 49 OSMUNDACEAE 53 PARKERIACEAE 55 POLYPODIACEAE 56 PSILOTACEAE 58 PTERIDACEAE 59 SALVINIACEAE 65 SCHIZAEACEAE 66 SELAGINELLACEAE 67 TECTARIACEAE 69 THELYPTERIACEAE 71 An Illustrated Guide to the WETLAND FERNS and FERN ALLIES of FLORIDA John David Tobe, Ph.D. First Edition Illustrated and Written by John David Tobe Copyright © 2019 John David Tobe All rights reserved under International and Pan-American Copyright Conventions. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form or by any means without permission in writing from John David Tobe. CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ............................................................................... 1 The Natural History of Ferns and Fern Allies ...................................... 3 Fern Life Cycle ..................................................................................... 4 Pteridophyte Structural Terminology ................................................... 5 Fern Leaf Types .................................................................................... 7 Illustrated Key to the Pteridophytes of Florida .................................... 8 DESCRIPTIVE PTERIDOPHYTE FLORA Illustrated Ferns and Fern Allies ..................................................... 9-78 INDEX
    [Show full text]
  • A Note on the Fern (Pteridophyte) Diversity from Riau
    ICST 2016 A Note on the Fern (Pteridophyte) Diversity from Riau Nery Sofiyanti1*, Dyah Iriani2, Fitmawati3 and Afni Atika Marpaung 4 1234Dept. Of Biology, Fac. Of Math and Natural Science, Universitas Riau [email protected], *Corresponding Author Received: 11 October 2016, Accepted: 4 November 2016 Published online: 14 February 2017 Abstract: An exploration of fern (Pteridophyta) species from Riau had been carried out. The aim of this study were to identify the fern species and examine their morphology and palynology. Samples were collected using exploration method. A total of 82 fern species are identified from Riau. The morphologycal characters among the identified species showed high variation. Keywords: Fern; morphology; Riau; spore 1. Introduction Fern (Pterodphyte) is a member of plant group that chracterized by having spore and varsular bundle. The members of fern do not produced seeds. Sexual reproduction of this group is accomplished by the release of spores. Fern leaves is called frond, or fiddlehead when young. Fronds ususally appear upward from the rhizome. Most fern species are herbaceous perennials, and only few species are annuals and wellknown as tree-like fern (Guo et al 2003). The member of this plant groub is nearly about 10.000 – 12.000 species (Wagner & Smith, 1993; Hoshizaki & Moran, 2001), that widely distributed in tropical region. The identification and classification of fern need carefully examination of morphological characters, due to its great diversity. Moreover, some fern species have polymorphism that cause identification difficulty . The exploration of fern in Indonesia is limited. Whereas, this country is blessed by its high flora diversity, including fern.
    [Show full text]
  • Parallel Evolution of Highly Conserved Plastid Genome Architecture in Red Seaweeds and Seed Plants
    Lee et al. BMC Biology (2016) 14:75 DOI 10.1186/s12915-016-0299-5 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Parallel evolution of highly conserved plastid genome architecture in red seaweeds and seed plants JunMo Lee1, Chung Hyun Cho1, Seung In Park1, Ji Won Choi1, Hyun Suk Song1, John A. West2, Debashish Bhattacharya3† and Hwan Su Yoon1*† Abstract Background: The red algae (Rhodophyta) diverged from the green algae and plants (Viridiplantae) over one billion years ago within the kingdom Archaeplastida. These photosynthetic lineages provide an ideal model to study plastid genome reduction in deep time. To this end, we assembled a large dataset of the plastid genomes that were available, including 48 from the red algae (17 complete and three partial genomes produced for this analysis) to elucidate the evolutionary history of these organelles. Results: We found extreme conservation of plastid genome architecture in the major lineages of the multicellular Florideophyceae red algae. Only three minor structural types were detected in this group, which are explained by recombination events of the duplicated rDNA operons. A similar high level of structural conservation (although with different gene content) was found in seed plants. Three major plastid genome architectures were identified in representatives of 46 orders of angiosperms and three orders of gymnosperms. Conclusions: Our results provide a comprehensive account of plastid gene loss and rearrangement events involving genome architecture within Archaeplastida and lead to one over-arching conclusion: from an ancestral pool of highly rearranged plastid genomes in red and green algae, the aquatic (Florideophyceae) and terrestrial (seed plants) multicellular lineages display high conservation in plastid genome architecture.
    [Show full text]
  • Structure and Function of Spores in the Aquatic Heterosporous Fern Family Marsileaceae
    Int. J. Plant Sci. 163(4):485–505. 2002. ᭧ 2002 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved. 1058-5893/2002/16304-0001$15.00 STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION OF SPORES IN THE AQUATIC HETEROSPOROUS FERN FAMILY MARSILEACEAE Harald Schneider1 and Kathleen M. Pryer2 Department of Botany, Field Museum of Natural History, 1400 South Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, Illinois 60605-2496, U.S.A. Spores of the aquatic heterosporous fern family Marsileaceae differ markedly from spores of Salviniaceae, the only other family of heterosporous ferns and sister group to Marsileaceae, and from spores of all ho- mosporous ferns. The marsileaceous outer spore wall (perine) is modified above the aperture into a structure, the acrolamella, and the perine and acrolamella are further modified into a remarkable gelatinous layer that envelops the spore. Observations with light and scanning electron microscopy indicate that the three living marsileaceous fern genera (Marsilea, Pilularia, and Regnellidium) each have distinctive spores, particularly with regard to the perine and acrolamella. Several spore characters support a division of Marsilea into two groups. Spore character evolution is discussed in the context of developmental and possible functional aspects. The gelatinous perine layer acts as a flexible, floating organ that envelops the spores only for a short time and appears to be an adaptation of marsileaceous ferns to amphibious habitats. The gelatinous nature of the perine layer is likely the result of acidic polysaccharide components in the spore wall that have hydrogel (swelling and shrinking) properties. Megaspores floating at the water/air interface form a concave meniscus, at the center of which is the gelatinous acrolamella that encloses a “sperm lake.” This meniscus creates a vortex-like effect that serves as a trap for free-swimming sperm cells, propelling them into the sperm lake.
    [Show full text]
  • What Were the Constraints on the Earliest Photolithotrophs on Land? Implicit Comparison with Marine/Freshwater Biota
    What were the Constraints on the Earliest Photolithotrophs on Land? Implicit comparison with marine/freshwater biota: (1) Water vapour loss during CO2 uptake from atmosphere. (2) Increased incident UV flux (3) Greater short-term extent of temperature changes. All shared to some extent by relatives in marine intertidal (but covered by high tide: need not photosynthesize when emersed), small bodies of freshwater. Atmosphere as only source of CO2 the dominant unique problem. Cyanobacteria, green algae, earliest embryophytes on land were: Poikilohydric, i.e. unable to control water loss to atmosphere; path for water vapour loss to atmosphere necessary if CO2 is to be fixed; Desiccation-tolerant, otherwise could not survive on land without continuous rain/occult precipitation. Both traits inherited from marine intertidal/shallow freshwater ancestors. Later embryophytes (Late Silurian: 400 Ma) at pteridophyte grade of organisation were homoiohydric, i.e. able to control water loss to atmosphere. When water is available in soil, plant loses water vapour at atmosphere while taking up CO2 (driving force and pathway for water vapour loss). When water is not available in soil in sufficient amounts to satisfy evaporative demand of atmosphere, water vapour loss is restricted, so plant stays hydrated (at least for a while) but does not fix atmosphere CO2. Homoiohydric requirements include Cuticle Stomata Intercelluar gas spaces Xylem (or its functional equivalent) Roots (or their functional equivalent) Homoiohydry permits plants to grow in habitats with discontinuous water supply without being desiccation-tolerant in their vegetative state. Vegetative desiccation toleration (‘resurrection plant’ habit) rare in extant tracheophyte sporophytes (commonest in pteridophyte grade; absent in conifers; very rare in dicotyledons.
    [Show full text]