DOCSLIB.ORG

Rule Book T a B L E O F C O N T E N T S

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

HELLENES: Campaigns of the Peloponnesian War 1 RULE BOOK T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S Introduction .................................................................. 2 12.0 Peace of Nicias ................................................ 12 1.0 The Map ............................................................. 2 13.0 Persian Aid ....................................................... 12 2.0 The Blocks ......................................................... 3 14.0 Victory ............................................................. 13 3.0 The Cards ........................................................... 4 15.0 Scenarios .......................................................... 13 4.0 Actions ............................................................... 5 15.1 The 431 Campaign .................................. 13 5.0 Movement .......................................................... 6 15.2 The Sicily Campaign .............................. 14 6.0 Combat .............................................................. 7 15.3 The 413 Campaign .................................. 14 7.0 Siege .................................................................. 8 15.4 The 415 Campaign .................................. 15 8.0 Siege Combat ..................................................... 9 Strategy Notes ............................................................ 15 9.0 Winter .............................................................. 10 Credits ....................................................................... 15 10.0 New Year ......................................................... 11 Index ......................................................................... 15 11.0 Olympians ........................................................ 12 Charts and Tables ...................................................... 16 GMT Games, LLC P.O. Box 1308, Hanford, CA 93232-1308 www.GMTGames.com © 2011 GMT Games, LLC 2 HELLENES: Campaigns of the Peloponnesian War INTRODUCTION In Winter, units outside friendly-controlled Cit- rulebook Organization ies (including besiegers) need Maintenance (a This running sidebar contains clarifications, Hellenes is a strategy game on the Peloponesian possible Winter Action). Units seeking Winter examples, and commentary. New changes are War between the Athenian Empire and the shelter can usually move without Action cost, in red. New edits for clarity are in blue. Spartan League, 431–404 BC. The object is to but no new attacks are allowed. amass Prestige by winning battles and captur- Winter ends with a Year End procedure (9.5). ing or pillaging opposing cities. 4 scenarios are SequeNCe of plaY - game Year provided (playing times: 2– 6 hours). Players can select sides randomly, or bid Prestige to New Year play a side. The Spartan player sits to the south, 1.0 THE MAP • Deal 6 cards to each player the Athenian player to the north. The map depicts ancient Greece and its envi- • New Year Event / Sacrifice rons, divided into land and sea areas. SpriNg/ Summer/ HigHSummer/ fall ThE GAME YEAr • Persia consists of Phrygia and Lydia. • iNitiative (card play) A Game Year consists of New Year plus 5 • sicily includes all areas on the Sicily inset • 1St plaYer turN Seasons. Players get 6 cards per Year, playing map (including the Gulf of Rhegium). aCtioN Phase one card per NewYear/Season. • italy is Taras, Croton & adjacent seas. • An Event occurs; OR • The rest of the map area is Greece. • Actions occur (any order): New Year (10.0) 1.1 Land Areas Movement / Pillaging / Building Deal each player 6 cards. One is played imme- Combat Phase Black borders divide land areas, or Provinces. diately as a NewYear Event or Sacrifice (10.3). Thick black borders divide Nations, and dashed Battles / Siege Combat borders divide Provinces within a Nation. • 2Nd plaYer turN (as above) CampaigNiNg SeaSoNS A Province containing a City is known as a wiNter Campaigning Seasons (Spring through Fall) CityState. All islands are playable. • iNitiative (card play: NO Events) consist of an Initiative phase, followed by a • 1St plaYer wiNter aCtioNS Player Turn (“turn”) for each side. 1.2 Sea Areas Wintering Movement Initiative Phase (3.3) Blue lines separate Sea Areas. Thick DeepSea • Homing to Home City (free) borders are risky to cross (5.22). Double lines • Quartering to adj. City (free) To begin each Season the players each commit show Narrows, which are easier to defend (6.5). • Group Moves (cost 1 Action) one card face-down, then reveal them simulta- Building neously. Cards have Action Values (coins) and 1.3 Cities and Towns Winter Maintenance Events on opposite ends and can serve either Cities [squares] and Ports [hexagons] are Disbanding use but not both. Play the card with its intended color-coded by Nationality and contain City use upright from your point of view. • (2Nd plaYer repeats as above) Value numbers. City Capacity (in units) is • 1St plaYer SiegebreakiNg Combat The lower Action Value takes the first Player double the City Value. Homing Battles Turn (Events have zero Action Value). Sparta Ports are Cities with fortified harbors. The Port (Win: enter City / Lose: Disband) goes first in case of ties. symbol projects into its single Offshore Sea, Sorties to which it retains access even when Besieged • (2Nd plaYer repeats as above) Player Turns (7.2). When not besieged, units in a Province • 1St plaYer Siege Combat The 1st Player does an Action phase and a Com- have access to all adjacent seas. bat phase. Then the 2nd Player does the same. Siege Assaults / Siege Attrition (triple) Every City has an inherent immobile Garrison • (2Nd plaYer repeats as above) (2.3) block that is only placed on the map as • Action Phase (3.1, 4.0) • Year eNd needed (they are NOT units and do NOT count • Tribute Collection Events are resolved first. Playing an Event against City Capacity). means having no Actions that turn. • Victory Check Towns [colored circles] are barbarian centers • Advance Year marker Action Values (coins) entitle a player to make with no City advantages. • Collect & Shuffle cards 1–3 Actions that turn (possibly increased by a Leader or Continuing Event). Actions include 1.31 City Loyalty Group Movement, Building, and Pillaging. Cities with white outlines (green/blue/purple) City representation are loyal to Athens. Those with black-outlines Most CityStates contained several cities. Only • Combat Phase (6.0) (red/orange/yellow) are Loyal to Sparta. the most important is shown, but the given City Value includes all cities. In the Combat Phase, battles and sieges for Cities retain their Loyalty regardless of occupa- disputed areas (i.e., units of both sides present) tion or control. Cities Loyal to the enemy are Neutral CityStates are resolved one at a time, smallest battles first. termed Opposing Cities. Scenario instructions may specify additional White Cities are neutral and cannot be entered. wiNter SeaSoN (9.0) neutral CityStates for specific scenarios. Entry Some scenarios specify other neutral Cities. Winter follows a different play sequence. into these is also prohibited. • Initiative 1.32 City/Town Nationality Offshore Seas -- clarifications Unit labels are also color-coded by Nationality • Winter Actions: Player 1 / Player 2 Leucas (Ambracia): Gulf of Ambracia • SiegeBreaking Combat: Player 1 / Player 2 (the central symbol color). Lipara (Sicily): Tyrrhenian Sea • Offensive Combat: Player 1 / Player 2. © 2011 GMT Games, LLC HELLENES: Campaigns of the Peloponnesian War 3 A unit must be in a Home City (same color/ Barbarian units have 2-color backgrounds Nationality) to build up in strength. This is with dark tan predominant [Persians have light City Control crucial to game play. tan predominant, see sidebar]. They arrive in A CityState is always controlled by its original home towns (colored dots) at maximum cv, and Athenian Subject Cities are a lighter blue than owner unless occupied by an enemy block. can make 1 free move from there, but disband Attica (Athens/Platea): they are not the same Besieged Cities are controlled by the defender. in the next Winter (9.24). Nationality. Lacedaemon [red] and Corinth [orange] are also different Nations. Sicilian units: (Greek/Barbarians with Home Area Control Cities/towns in Sicily), have distinctive back- Areas are controlled by the occupying player. 1.33 Subject regions ground label colors, with barbarians 2-colored Unoccupied areas that are not CityStates are Subject Cities are grouped into Subject Regions as above [see sidebar]. uncontrolled. In Sieges, the besieger controls such as Ionia [see sidebar, p. 5]. Spartan con- Unit ID numbers (1–60) are shown to aid setup. the land area of a CityState (i.e., its surround- trolled Subject Cities make other Cities within ing Province). that Region more likely to Revolt (3.12). For both sides, unit ID numbers are coded for the Scenarios (15.0) in which they appear: 1.4 Area & City Control ID# 1–40 431, 415 & 413 Units City control governs Wintering (9.21) and ID# 41–46 415 & 413 only Tribute (9.51). Control of land and sea areas ID# 47+ Sicily & 415 only GrEEkS affects Retreats (6.4). Control is re-evaluated Units with ID#s in white boxes can only appear after each Action phase and Combat phase. under certain specified circumstances. Controlled cities / areas are termed Friendly. • Sole occupation controls any area. 2.11 Unit Nationality • Vacant CityStates are controlled by the Each unit’s central symbol is color-coded to side to which they are loyal (i.e., a con- match its Home Cities/towns. This is crucial
Recommended publications
  • The Satrap of Western Anatolia and the Greeks

    The Satrap of Western Anatolia and the Greeks

    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2017 The aS trap Of Western Anatolia And The Greeks Eyal Meyer University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons Recommended Citation Meyer, Eyal, "The aS trap Of Western Anatolia And The Greeks" (2017). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 2473. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2473 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2473 For more information, please contact [email protected]. The aS trap Of Western Anatolia And The Greeks Abstract This dissertation explores the extent to which Persian policies in the western satrapies originated from the provincial capitals in the Anatolian periphery rather than from the royal centers in the Persian heartland in the fifth ec ntury BC. I begin by establishing that the Persian administrative apparatus was a product of a grand reform initiated by Darius I, which was aimed at producing a more uniform and centralized administrative infrastructure. In the following chapter I show that the provincial administration was embedded with chancellors, scribes, secretaries and military personnel of royal status and that the satrapies were periodically inspected by the Persian King or his loyal agents, which allowed to central authorities to monitory the provinces. In chapter three I delineate the extent of satrapal authority, responsibility and resources, and conclude that the satraps were supplied with considerable resources which enabled to fulfill the duties of their office. After the power dynamic between the Great Persian King and his provincial governors and the nature of the office of satrap has been analyzed, I begin a diachronic scrutiny of Greco-Persian interactions in the fifth century BC.
  • A Bronze Pail of Athena Alalkomenia

    A Bronze Pail of Athena Alalkomenia

    A BRONZE PAIL OF ATHENA ALALKOMENIA (PLATES 31-34) T HE remarkable archaic Greek bronze vessel published here (P1. 31, a) was l.4 purchased in Mantinea in Arcadia in the spring of 1957 and donated to the Museum in Tegea where other antiquities from the same region have their abode. It had been found by a local shepherd some distance to the north of the ruins of Man- tinea but, unfortunately, the exact location of the discovery could not be ascertained.' The major part of the vessel is preserved, including about half of its upper profiled edge and one attachment for the handle which passed through its upper ring. The whole of this ring is still filled with iron and it is evident that the missing handle was made of this material. The carefully proportioned body has a height of 0.241 m. to the upper edge of the lip. Its largest diameter, 0.215 m., is slightly smaller than the total height and exactly the same both at the outer edge of the lip and at the greatest width of the body which, in turn, occurs precisely half way between that edge and the bottom of the vessel, 0.12 m. distant from both. The upper face of the lip inclines outward slightly to allow overspilling liquid to run off, as it were, from an architectural cornice. The proportion of diameter to height, the rounded bottom and the contraction of the width under the lip combine to give the impression of an elastic curvilinear rhythm to the generally ovoid form.
  • Ancient History Sourcebook: 11Th Brittanica: Sparta SPARTA an Ancient City in Greece, the Capital of Laconia and the Most Powerful State of the Peloponnese

    Ancient History Sourcebook: 11Th Brittanica: Sparta SPARTA an Ancient City in Greece, the Capital of Laconia and the Most Powerful State of the Peloponnese

    Ancient History Sourcebook: 11th Brittanica: Sparta SPARTA AN ancient city in Greece, the capital of Laconia and the most powerful state of the Peloponnese. The city lay at the northern end of the central Laconian plain, on the right bank of the river Eurotas, a little south of the point where it is joined by its largest tributary, the Oenus (mount Kelefina). The site is admirably fitted by nature to guard the only routes by which an army can penetrate Laconia from the land side, the Oenus and Eurotas valleys leading from Arcadia, its northern neighbour, and the Langada Pass over Mt Taygetus connecting Laconia and Messenia. At the same time its distance from the sea-Sparta is 27 m. from its seaport, Gythium, made it invulnerable to a maritime attack. I.-HISTORY Prehistoric Period.-Tradition relates that Sparta was founded by Lacedaemon, son of Zeus and Taygete, who called the city after the name of his wife, the daughter of Eurotas. But Amyclae and Therapne (Therapnae) seem to have been in early times of greater importance than Sparta, the former a Minyan foundation a few miles to the south of Sparta, the latter probably the Achaean capital of Laconia and the seat of Menelaus, Agamemnon's younger brother. Eighty years after the Trojan War, according to the traditional chronology, the Dorian migration took place. A band of Dorians united with a body of Aetolians to cross the Corinthian Gulf and invade the Peloponnese from the northwest. The Aetolians settled in Elis, the Dorians pushed up to the headwaters of the Alpheus, where they divided into two forces, one of which under Cresphontes invaded and later subdued Messenia, while the other, led by Aristodemus or, according to another version, by his twin sons Eurysthenes and Procles, made its way down the Eurotas were new settlements were formed and gained Sparta, which became the Dorian capital of Laconia.
  • The Case of Chalkis

    The Case of Chalkis

    Transactions of the American Philological Association 144 (2014) 263–306 Tax Exemption and Athenian Imperial Politics: The Case of Chalkis joshua d. sosin Duke University summary: This paper argues that the clause at IG I3 40.52–57, which refers to taxation of aliens at Chalkis and has long puzzled scholars, stipulated that any non-Chalkidian who had been granted immunity from Athenian tele, condi- tional on residence at Athens or not, should enjoy the same immunity from Chalkidian tele at Chalkis; that the inscription belongs to 424/3 b.c.e, when Athenian law and honorific practice were much concerned with taxation and immunities. Though long seen as fiscal punishment by a newly imperial Athens, the action was connected to later debates about local honors and domestic taxa- tion, and was rather mild. ig i3 40 preserves terms imposed by athens on chalkis, and on itself. the occasion is thought to be the aftermath of Euboian revolt in 446/5 or else Athenian action against the island in 424/3.1 This document is among our richest epigraphic witnesses to what it meant to be on the receiving end of Athenian imperialism. To understand the terms of this settlement is to il- luminate not only the “popularity” of the Athenian empire or the “language of Athenian imperialism”2 but also some measure of the legal, political, and 1 446/5: Thuc. 1.114; Diod. Sic.12.7, 12.22.2; Strabo 10.1.3; Plut. Per. 23.3. 424/3: Philochoros FGrHist 328 F130 [Σ Ar. Vesp. 718], also F119.
  • Archaic Eretria

    Archaic Eretria

    ARCHAIC ERETRIA This book presents for the first time a history of Eretria during the Archaic Era, the city’s most notable period of political importance. Keith Walker examines all the major elements of the city’s success. One of the key factors explored is Eretria’s role as a pioneer coloniser in both the Levant and the West— its early Aegean ‘island empire’ anticipates that of Athens by more than a century, and Eretrian shipping and trade was similarly widespread. We are shown how the strength of the navy conferred thalassocratic status on the city between 506 and 490 BC, and that the importance of its rowers (Eretria means ‘the rowing city’) probably explains the appearance of its democratic constitution. Walker dates this to the last decade of the sixth century; given the presence of Athenian political exiles there, this may well have provided a model for the later reforms of Kleisthenes in Athens. Eretria’s major, indeed dominant, role in the events of central Greece in the last half of the sixth century, and in the events of the Ionian Revolt to 490, is clearly demonstrated, and the tyranny of Diagoras (c. 538–509), perhaps the golden age of the city, is fully examined. Full documentation of literary, epigraphic and archaeological sources (most of which have previously been inaccessible to an English-speaking audience) is provided, creating a fascinating history and a valuable resource for the Greek historian. Keith Walker is a Research Associate in the Department of Classics, History and Religion at the University of New England, Armidale, Australia.
  • Lelantine War Sources

    Lelantine War Sources

    ! Sources for the Lelantine War (in approximate chronological order) Hesiod, Works and Days 654ff Crossed over to Chalcis, I did, to the funeral games For old Amphidamas. Te great man’s sons had put up Prizes aplenty for the contests, and I’m proud to say !I won the songfest and took home an eared tripod Archilochus, Fragment 3 Not many bows will be stretched nor will there be numerous slings, whenever Ares brings together the press of battle on the plain it will be the woeful work of swords. Tis is the warfare in !which those spear-famed lords of Euboea are skilled. Teognis 891ff Shame on weakness! Cerinthus is being destroyed, and Lelantum’s fine vineyards are being ravaged; the nobles are in exile and base men govern the city. May Zeus destroy the race of the !Cypselids. Herodotus 5.99 Te Eretrians participated in the war in Ionia not for the sake of the Athenians, but to repay a debt they owed to the Milesians, who had earlier helped the Eretrians wage war against Chalcis at the !very time when the Samians had to the aid of the Chalcidians. Tucydides 1.15 Such wars as took place were all local affairs between contiguous states, and the Greeks did not undertake distant expeditions for foreign conquest. Te big cities had not yet formed leagues of subject allies, nor did they choose to make common cause in any joint expedition: rather all wars were fought individually between neighbors. Te main exception was the war fought long ago !between Chalcis and Eretria, when alliance with one side or the other split the rest of Greece.
  • The Battlefield Role of the Classical Greek General

    The Battlefield Role of the Classical Greek General

    _________________________________________________________________________Swansea University E-Theses The battlefield role of the Classical Greek general. Barley, N. D How to cite: _________________________________________________________________________ Barley, N. D (2012) The battlefield role of the Classical Greek general.. thesis, Swansea University. http://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa43080 Use policy: _________________________________________________________________________ This item is brought to you by Swansea University. Any person downloading material is agreeing to abide by the terms of the repository licence: copies of full text items may be used or reproduced in any format or medium, without prior permission for personal research or study, educational or non-commercial purposes only. The copyright for any work remains with the original author unless otherwise specified. The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holder. Permission for multiple reproductions should be obtained from the original author. Authors are personally responsible for adhering to copyright and publisher restrictions when uploading content to the repository. Please link to the metadata record in the Swansea University repository, Cronfa (link given in the citation reference above.) http://www.swansea.ac.uk/library/researchsupport/ris-support/ Swansea University Prifysgol Abertawe The Battlefield Role of the Classical Greek General N. D. Barley Ph.D. Submitted to the Department of History and Classics for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2012 ProQuest Number: 10821472 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted.
  • Investment Profile of the Chios Island

    Investment Profile of the Chios Island

    Island of Chios - Investment Profile September 2016 Contents 1. Profile of the island 2. Island of Chios - Competitive Advantages 3. Investment Opportunities in the island 4. Investment Incentives 1. Profile of the island 2. Island of Chios - Competitive Advantages 3. Investment Opportunities in the island 4. Investment Incentives The island of Chios: Οverview Chios is one of the largest islands of the North East Aegean and the fifth largest in Greece, with a coastline of 213 km. It is very close to Asia Minor and lies opposite the Erythraia peninsula. It is known as one of the most likely birthplaces of the ancient mathematicians Hippocrates and Enopides. Chios is notable for its exports of mastic and its nickname is ”The mastic island”. The Regional Unit of Chios includes the islands of Chios, Psara, Antipsara and Oinousses and is divided into three municipalities: Chios, Psara and Oinouses. ➢ Area of 842.5 km² ➢ 5th largest of the Greek islands ➢Permanent population: ➢52.574 inhabitants (census 2011) including Oinousses and Psara ➢51.390 inhabitants (only Chios) Quick facts The island of Chios is a unique destination with: Cultural and natural sites • Important cultural heritage and several historical monuments • Rich natural environment of a unique diversity Archaeological sites: 5 • Rich agricultural land and production expertise in agriculture and Museums: 9 livestock production (mastic, olives, citrus fruits etc) Natura 2000 regions: 2 • RES capacity (solar, wind, hydro) Beaches: 45 • Great concentration in fisheries and aquaculture Source: http://www.chios.gr • Satisfactory infrastructure of transport networks (1 airport, 2 ports and road network) • Great history, culture and tradition in mercantile maritime, with hundreds of seafarers and ship owners Transport infrastructure Chios is served by one airport and two ports (Chios-central port and Mesta-port) and a satisfactory public road network.
  • Meet the Philosophers of Ancient Greece

    Meet the Philosophers of Ancient Greece

    Meet the Philosophers of Ancient Greece Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Ancient Greek Philosophy but didn’t Know Who to Ask Edited by Patricia F. O’Grady MEET THE PHILOSOPHERS OF ANCIENT GREECE Dedicated to the memory of Panagiotis, a humble man, who found pleasure when reading about the philosophers of Ancient Greece Meet the Philosophers of Ancient Greece Everything you always wanted to know about Ancient Greek philosophy but didn’t know who to ask Edited by PATRICIA F. O’GRADY Flinders University of South Australia © Patricia F. O’Grady 2005 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior permission of the publisher. Patricia F. O’Grady has asserted her right under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, 1988, to be identi.ed as the editor of this work. Published by Ashgate Publishing Limited Ashgate Publishing Company Wey Court East Suite 420 Union Road 101 Cherry Street Farnham Burlington Surrey, GU9 7PT VT 05401-4405 England USA Ashgate website: http://www.ashgate.com British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Meet the philosophers of ancient Greece: everything you always wanted to know about ancient Greek philosophy but didn’t know who to ask 1. Philosophy, Ancient 2. Philosophers – Greece 3. Greece – Intellectual life – To 146 B.C. I. O’Grady, Patricia F. 180 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Meet the philosophers of ancient Greece: everything you always wanted to know about ancient Greek philosophy but didn’t know who to ask / Patricia F.
  • Determining the Significance of Alliance Athologiesp in Bipolar Systems: a Case of the Peloponnesian War from 431-421 BCE

    Determining the Significance of Alliance Athologiesp in Bipolar Systems: a Case of the Peloponnesian War from 431-421 BCE

    Wright State University CORE Scholar Browse all Theses and Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 2016 Determining the Significance of Alliance athologiesP in Bipolar Systems: A Case of the Peloponnesian War from 431-421 BCE Anthony Lee Meyer Wright State University Follow this and additional works at: https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/etd_all Part of the International Relations Commons Repository Citation Meyer, Anthony Lee, "Determining the Significance of Alliance Pathologies in Bipolar Systems: A Case of the Peloponnesian War from 431-421 BCE" (2016). Browse all Theses and Dissertations. 1509. https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/etd_all/1509 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at CORE Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Browse all Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of CORE Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DETERMINING THE SIGNIFICANCE OF ALLIANCE PATHOLOGIES IN BIPOLAR SYSTEMS: A CASE OF THE PELOPONNESIAN WAR FROM 431-421 BCE A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts By ANTHONY LEE ISAAC MEYER Dual B.A., Russian Language & Literature, International Studies, Ohio State University, 2007 2016 Wright State University WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES ___April 29, 2016_________ I HEREBY RECOMMEND THAT THE THESIS PREPARED UNDER MY SUPERVISION BY Anthony Meyer ENTITLED Determining the Significance of Alliance Pathologies in Bipolar Systems: A Case of the Peloponnesian War from 431-421 BCE BE ACCEPTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF Master of Arts. ____________________________ Liam Anderson, Ph.D.
  • Applying Modern Immunology to the Plague of Ancient Athens

    Applying Modern Immunology to the Plague of Ancient Athens

    Pursuit - The Journal of Undergraduate Research at The University of Tennessee Volume 10 Issue 1 Article 7 May 2020 Applying Modern Immunology to the Plague of Ancient Athens Juhi C. Patel University of Tennessee, Knoxville, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/pursuit Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons, Disease Modeling Commons, and the Epidemiology Commons Recommended Citation Patel, Juhi C. (2020) "Applying Modern Immunology to the Plague of Ancient Athens," Pursuit - The Journal of Undergraduate Research at The University of Tennessee: Vol. 10 : Iss. 1 , Article 7. Available at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/pursuit/vol10/iss1/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Volunteer, Open Access, Library Journals (VOL Journals), published in partnership with The University of Tennessee (UT) University Libraries. This article has been accepted for inclusion in Pursuit - The Journal of Undergraduate Research at The University of Tennessee by an authorized editor. For more information, please visit https://trace.tennessee.edu/pursuit. Applying Modern Immunology to the Plague of Ancient Athens Cover Page Footnote The author would like to thank Dr. Aleydis Van de Moortel at the University of Tennessee for research supervision and advice. This article is available in Pursuit - The Journal of Undergraduate Research at The University of Tennessee: https://trace.tennessee.edu/pursuit/vol10/iss1/7 1.1 Introduction. After the Persian wars in the early fifth century BC, Athens and Sparta had become two of the most powerful city-states in Greece. At first, they were allies against the common threat of the Persians.
  • Athens Guide

    Athens Guide

    ATHENS GUIDE Made by Dorling Kindersley 27. May 2010 PERSONAL GUIDES POWERED BY traveldk.com 1 Top 10 Athens guide Top 10 Acropolis The temples on the “Sacred Rock” of Athens are considered the most important monuments in the Western world, for they have exerted more influence on our architecture than anything since. The great marble masterpieces were constructed during the late 5th-century BC reign of Perikles, the Golden Age of Athens. Most were temples built to honour Athena, the city’s patron goddess. Still breathtaking for their proportion and scale, both human and majestic, the temples were adorned with magnificent, dramatic sculptures of the gods. Herodes Atticus Theatre Top 10 Sights 9 A much later addition, built in 161 by its namesake. Acropolis Rock In summer it hosts the Athens Festival (see Festivals 1 As the highest part of the city, the rock is an ideal and Events). place for refuge, religion and royalty. The Acropolis Rock has been used continuously for these purposes since Dionysus Theatre Neolithic times. 10 This mosaic-tiled theatre was the site of Classical Greece’s drama competitions, where the tragedies and Propylaia comedies by the great playwrights (Aeschylus, 2 At the top of the rock, you are greeted by the Sophocles, Euripides) were first performed. The theatre Propylaia, the grand entrance through which all visitors seated 15,000, and you can still see engraved front-row passed to reach the summit temples. marble seats, reserved for priests of Dionysus. Temple of Athena Nike (“Victory”) 3 There has been a temple to a goddess of victory at New Acropolis Museum this location since prehistoric times, as it protects and stands over the part of the rock most vulnerable to The Glass Floor enemy attack.