DOCSLIB.ORG

City of New York Department of Sanitation APPENDIX D – WMNY

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
City of New York Department of Sanitation APPENDIX D – WMNY City of New York Department of Sanitation APPENDIX D – WMNY TRANSFER, TRANSPORT AND DISPOSAL MANAGEMENT SOUTHWEST BROOKLYN MARINE TRANSFER STATION June 2018 This page intentionally left blank. APPENDIX D -TRANSFER, TRANSPORT and DISPOSAL MANAGEMENT TO THE SERVICE CONTRACT FOR MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT, TRANSPORTATION AND DISPOSAL SOUTHWEST BROOKLYN MARINE TRANSFER STATION Brooklyn, NY March 2018 This page intentionally left blank. TRANSFER, TRANSPORT and DISPOSAL MANAGEMENT PLAN Appendix D TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. MTS MANAGEMENT PLAN .......................................................................................... 4 1.1 OVERVIEW OF CONTRACTUAL ARRANGEMENTS .................................................... 4 1.2 TRANSPORT OBLIGATIONS ........................................................................................... 6 1.3 FUNDAMENTALS OF THE TRANSFER, TRANSPORT AND DISPOSAL SYSTEM ............. 7 1.4 PERSONNEL AND SUPPORT ...................................................................................... 7 1.S WMNYSTAFFING ...................................................................................................... 8 2. MTS PIER ................................................................................................................ 8 2.1 PIEROVERVIEW ........................................................................................................ 8 2.2 FACILITY STAFFING PLAN (WMNY) ........................................................................... 9 2.3 SOUTHWEST BROOKLYN MARINE TRANSFER STATION OPERATIONS ..................... 13 2.4 CRANE AND PIER MAINENANCE ............................................................................. 15 2.5 TRAINING AND CONTINGENCY PLAN ...................................................................... 23 3. BARGE PLAN ......................................................................................................... 31 3.1 BARGE MOVEMENTS .............................................................................................. 31 3.2 BARGES AND STORAGE ........................................................................................... 32 3.3 BARGE INSPECTION, REPAIR, AND MAINTENANCE PLAN ....................................... 32 3.4 TUG OPERATING PLAN ............................................................................................35 3.5 FIRE FIGHTING ON BARGES PROCEDURES .............................................................. 43 3.6 EXPLOSION IN A CONTAINER OR BARGE PROCEDURES .......................................... 43 3.7 SUNKEN VESSEL PROCEDURES ............................................................................... 43 3.8 MARINE CONTINGENCY PLAN ................................................................................ 43 4. ELl2ABETH INTERMODAL TERMINAL PLAN ............................................................. 45 Page 2 _ _IBA1\lS£ER,_IBAf'JS£Qfil_and_DJ S~QS8LMAl'Jllli£MEJ\JIJ>LAN._.. ________ _ __.Ap.pendix.D __ 4.1 Hours of Operation ................................................................................................. 45 5. RAIL OPERATIONS PLAN ....................................................................................... 48 5.1 Rail Connections ............................................................................................................ 48 5.2 Railcar Movements ........................................................................................................ 48 5.3 Railcar Movements TO DISPOSAL SITES ................................................................. 48 5.4 Rail Routes to Disposal Sites ................................................................................... 49 5.5 Rail Capacity Plan ................................................................................................... 49 5.6 Trip Plans ................................................................................................................ 49 5.7 lntermodal Container Inspection, Cleaning and repair .......................................... 51 5.8 INTERUPTIONS TO SERVICE .................................................................................... 51 5.9 RAIL TRANSPORT AND OPERATIONS EQUIPMENT ......................................... , ........ 52 ATTACHMENTS - DRAWINGS AND FIGURES ...............................................................53 ATIACHMENT 1: Rail Route to High Acres ......................................................................... 54 ATIACHMENT 2: Rail Route to Atlantic Waste Disposal. ..................................................... 55 ATIACHMENT 3: Transflo Rail Yard ........................................................................................ 56 ATIACHMENT 4: Truck Route EMT to Transflo .................................................................. 57 ATIACHMENT 5: Rail Route Collier VA/Petersburg to Atlantic Waste Disposal.. .............. 58 ATIACHMENT 6: Atlantic Waste Disposal UnloadingTrack.................................................. 59 ATIACHMENT 7: Emergency Plan ............................................................................................ 60 ATIACHMENT 8: Sample Barge lnspection ........................................................................... 61 Page 3 TRANSFER, TRANSPORT and DISPOSAL MANAGEMENT PLAN Appendix D 1. MTS MANAGEMENT PLAN 1.1 OVERVIEW OF CONTRACTUAL ARRANGEMENTS The New York City (City) Department of Sanitation (DSNY) has contracted with Waste Management of New York-LLC (WMNY) for a 20-year period, with two five-year renewal options at the City's sole discretion, for the provision of transport and disposal services for DSNY-managed Waste processed at the Southwest Brooklyn Marine Transfer Station (SWBMTS). In general, WMNY is responsible for managing pier and crane operations at the SWBMTS, providing transportation via Tugboat/Barge, rail and other ground transport and providing the Designated Disposal Sites. 1.1.1 MTSPIER Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) being delivered into the facility, tipping and loading operations will be performed by Department of Sanitation New York City (DSNY) personnel. WMNY's responsibilities will primarily remain outside of the enclosed building segregated to the pier deck and rail-mounted gantry cranes, providing empty containers to DSNY personnel for loading of MSW as well as removal of full containers. Full containers are to be loaded onto a barge which will then be transported to Elizabeth lntermodal Terminal (EIT) in Elizabeth, NJ for disposal to one of the designated facilities. WMNY will be assisted with MTS Pier operations including gantry crane operations by Watco Companies LLC. For each instance where reference is made to WMNY/WATCO, it pertains to WATCO personnel with a WMNY Supervisor providing oversight. Watco Companies LLC is a leader in bulk, break-bulk, and liquids rail/truck transloading, railroad switching, warehousing, liquid tank storage, and barge and vessel loading/unloading. With over 80 ports and terminals, Watco handles more than 350 different products, including ethanol, crude oil, chemicals, dry bulk, food grade products, plastics, and containerized waste materials in a safe, cost-effective, and environmentally responsible way. Watco and its predecessor company has been performing railcar switching for WMNY for nearly two decades at the WMNY Harlem River Yards, Varick Avenue and Review Avenue rail served transfer stations. 1.1.2 BARGE MOVEMENT WMNY, through a subcontract with Norfolk Tug (NTC), Tug Company, is responsible for transporting containers of DSNY-managed Waste from the SWBMTS in Brooklyn, NY to EMT in Elizabeth, NJ. The scope of NTC's subcontract includes barge movements with the New York waterways, using two or more Tugs to provide service. The NTC subcontract agreement is coterminous with the Service Contract. WMNY is responsible for procuring three barges and one Tug. 1.1.3 RAIL MOVEMENT WMNY, through a subcontract with CSX Transportation, Inc. (CSX), the rail haul carrier, is responsible for transporting containers of DSNY-managed Waste from the Transflo Railyard in Elizabeth, NJ to the designated disposal sites rail sidings. Containers will be drayed to Transflo from Page 4 TRANSFER, TRANSPORT and DISPOSAL MANAGEMENT PLAN Appendix D ------------- EMT. The CSX subcontract is subject to renewal, by mutual agreement between WMNY and CSX and subject to DSNY's approval, every 10 years starting on the anniversary of the service date, or alternatively WMNY may competitively re-procure, in coordination with the City, a new rail carrier contract. CSX will provide direct rail service to the High Acres Landfill designated disposal sites and a transfer to Norfolk Southern to reach the Atlantic Disposal Landfill. WMNY is responsible for procuring 665 intermodal containers, 118 rail cars, and other equipment required for rail transport service, rail yard operations, and contingent truck transport operations. Page 5 TRANSFER, TRANSPORT and DISPOSAL MANAGEMENT PLAN Appendix D 1.2 TRANSPORT OBLIGATIONS Each operating day over the term of the contract, WMNY is required to accept all loaded containers of DSNY-managed waste and to supply clean and empty containers in the quantities necessary to containerize all DSNY-managed waste received at the MTS(s). Averaging over Fiscal Year (FYs) 2017 and 2018, the average quantity of DSNY-managed waste generated in the Brooklyn Districts designated for the MTS was approximately 1,800 tons per day (tpd). WMNY is acquiring
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Boats and Harbors Publication 9-06
    ® $4.00 -and-har ats bo bo rs .c w. o w m BOATS & HARBORS w SECOND SEPTEMBER ISSUE 2019 VOLUME 62 NO. 13 Covering The East Coast, Gulf Coast, West Coast & Inland Waterways “THE” MARINE MARKETPLACE PH: (931) 484-6100 • Email: [email protected] Ok Bird Brain, there’ s the boat, let’ s see how your aim is.......people first, sails second, and new wax job third! BOATS AND HARBORS® P. O. Drawer 647 Crossville, TN 38557-0647 USA PAGE 2 - SECOND SEPTEMBER ISSUE 2019 See Us on the WEB at www.boats-and-harbors.com BOATS & HARBORS WANT VALUE FOR YOUR ADVERTISING DOLLAR? DENNIS FRANTZ • FRANTZ MARINE CORPORATION, INC. CELLULAR (504) 430-7117• Email: [email protected] • Email: [email protected] (ALL SPECIFICATIONS AS PER OWNER AND NOT GUARANTEED BY BROKER) 320' x 60' x 28 - Built 1995, 222' x 50' clear deck; U.S. flag. Over 38 Years in the Marine Industry Class: ABS +A1 +DP2. 280' L x 60' B x 24' D x 19' - loaded draft. Blt in 2004, US Flag, Class 1, +AMS, +DPS-2. Sub Ch. L & I. 203' x 50' clear deck. OSV’s - Tugs - Crewboats - Pushboats - Barges 272' L x 56' B x 18' D x 6' - light draft x 15' loaded draft. Built in 1998, Class: ABS +A1, +AMS, DPS-2. AHTS: 262' L x 58' B x 23' depth x 19' - loaded draft. Built in 195' x 35' x 10' 1998, Class: ABS + A1, Towing Vessel, AH (E) + AMS, DPS-2, SOLAS, US Flag. 260 L x 56 B x 18D x 6.60' - light draft x 15.20' loaded draft.
    [Show full text]
  • Container-‐On-‐Barge for Illinois Fueled by Biodiesel an Operating
    Container-on-Barge for Illinois Fueled by Biodiesel An Operating Plan and Business Plan August 27, 2011 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction and Overview ------------------------------------------------------------------- 4 2.0 Research/Investigation/Reports -------------------------------------------------------------------- 6 3.0 Lessons to Consider -------------------------------------------------------------------- 8 4.0 Inland Rivers Operations -------------------------------------------------------------------- 9 4.1 Ownership -------------------------------------------------------------------- 9 4.2 Towboats/Barges -------------------------------------------------------------------- 9 4.3 River Operations Modes -------------------------------------------------------------------- 10 4.4 The “Power Split” -------------------------------------------------------------------- 12 4.5 River Freight Pricing -------------------------------------------------------------------- 13 5.0 Designing Illinois COB -------------------------------------------------------------------- 15 5.1 Design Alternatives -------------------------------------------------------------------- 15 5.1.1 Purchased -------------------------------------------------------------------- 15 5.1.2 Leased -------------------------------------------------------------------- 18 5.1.3 Unit Tow -------------------------------------------------------------------- 19 6.0 Gulf COB – Cargo Flexibility -------------------------------------------------------------------- 21 7.0 COB Program
    [Show full text]
  • Scanned Document
    Vessel Inventory U.S. Department of Transportation Maritime Report Administration as of January 1, 1991 Prepared by Office of Trade Analysis and Insurance Division of Statistics PART I VESSELS BY NAME VESSEL INVENTORY REPORT UNITED STATES FLAG DRY CARGO AND lANKER FLEETS 1,000 GROSS TONS AND OI{ER JAN 01, 1991 NAME OF VESSEl VESSEL TYPE OWNER/OPERATOR DESIGN TYPE: OWT YB lS T Ll ALEX SONNY RU RO WILKINGTON JRUSI CO T-AKX C 23100 1980 lSI LI BALDO LOPE CONTRORO Wll~INGTON lRUSI CO 1-Al<.X 26,00 1985 lSI Ll .JACK LUMHU CONTRORU WIL'IlNGlON TRUST CO 1-AKX. 26500 1986 ZNO ll .JOHN P BUB RO RO Wll~INGTON TRUST CO I-AKX 26500 1985 ADABELlE LYKES CONTStUP LYKES BROS STEAMSHIP COMPANY INC t6-H-fl47A 15100 1969 ADElPHI VICTORY FREIGHTER LU SUI SAN BAY V£.2-S-AP 2. 10100 19Lt:, AOHIRALIY BAY ~ANKER KATHIASEN•S TANKER J~DUSTRIES l~C PRIVATE 80800 1971 ADONIS TANKER FIRSI PENNSYlVANIA BANK N. A· FOREIGN C.ONST 80200 1966 AD VANTAGE FREIGHTER REO RIVER SHIPPING CORP. FOREIGN CUNT. 2.7800 1977 AD VENTURER PART CUHI LU JlMES RIVER C3-S-38A 11000 1960 AtENl PART CONI HA - CHARTER 10 ~SC t3-S-38A 11100 1961 ALBERT E. WATTS TANKER U S COAST GliAilO PRlVA IE 16900 l<Jitl ALBION VICTORY FREIGHTER lU JAKES RIVER VC2-S-AP2 10600 1945 All.E,HENY VICTORY FREIGHTER lU BEAUMONT VC2-S-AP2. 10700 1945 ALLISON LYKES PART CONI LYKES BROS STEAMSHIP COKPANY INC Cb-S-60( 12BOO 19M ALMERIA LYKES tONlSHIP AMERICAN PRESIDENT LINES l TO C6-S-69C t 17500 1968 AMARILLO VICTORY FREIGHTER LU BEAUMONT VC2-S-AP2 1.0700 1945 AMBASSADOR RO RO CROWLEY CARIBBEAN TRANSPORT~ INC.
    [Show full text]
  • APH / PPHTD Transportation Alternative APH / PPHTD Transportation Alternative
    Loyola Business Leadership Summit – October 9, 2018 Global Maritime Trade to Double by 2030 • Significant growth in world trade projected in next 10 years • Doubling of seaborne trade volumes • Trade to grow from 10 Billion Tons to 20 Billion Tons by 2030 Source: Danish Maritime Forum, 24-28 October 2016 2025 World Container Port Market Demand 260% Increase 2009 Recession Millions of TEUs Millions Source: Drewry Shipping Consultants 50 Years of Container Vessel Evolutionary Growth Old Panamax: 4,800 TEUs Neo-Panamax: 14,800 TEUs Near Term Mega Vessel: 24,000 TEUs Source: Allianz Global Corporate & Specialty - Data: Container-Transportation.com Historical Trade Patterns • Pre-Panama Canal Expansion Gulf Coast Ports handled 6.4% of total U.S. container volume • Mid-West Represents 40% of U.S. Land Area 15% of U.S. GDP 92% of the U.S. agricultural exports 60% of U.S. grain exports Approximately 200 million metric tons of exports • Pre-Panama / Suez Canal Expansions – Mississippi Watershed Trade Majority shipped through West Coast Ports Post Panama / Suez Canal Expansions • Canals Handling Larger Vessels Panama Canal now handing up to 18,000 TEU vessels . Beam limit 51.25 Meters as of June 1, 2018 Suez Canal has no existing limits on vessel size Larger vessels have inherent cost efficiencies • Additional Sailing Time to Gulf Coast Offset by Growing West Coast Delays • Gulf Coast Ports “Market Share” of U.S. Container Trade Up to 8.48% in 2017 U.S. Container market share increased from 9.5% to 11.9% Recent Shifts in Trade Patterns
    [Show full text]
  • Report to Hudson River Waterfront Alliance Concerning Proposed Hudson River Anchorages
    REPORT TO HUDSON RIVER WATERFRONT ALLIANCE CONCERNING PROPOSED HUDSON RIVER ANCHORAGES Project No. 3529 30 November 2016 By Charles R. Cushing, Ph.D., P.E. C. R. Cushing & Co., Inc. 30 Vesey Street New York, NY 10007 C.R. CUSHING & CO., INC. INDEX PAGE I. THE HUDSON RIVER …………………………………………………………….. 3 A. GENERAL ………………………………………………………………………. 3 B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS OF THE HUDSON RIVER ….. 5 C. COMMERCIAL TRAFFIC ………………………………………………… 14 II. ANCHORAGES ………………………………………………………………………. 25 A. PROPOSED ANCHORAGES …………………………………………….. 25 B. EXISTING ANCHORAGES ………………………………………………. 38 C. HUDSON RIVER NATIONAL DEFENSE RESERVE FLEET ANCHORAGE ………………………………………….……………………… 42 D. THE NEED FOR ANCHORAGES ……………………………………… 43 ` E. AUTHORITY FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF ANCHORAGES ………………………………………………………………. 47 F. CRITERIA THAT U.S.C.G. MAY USE IN SELECTING ANCHORAGES ………………………………………………………………. 49 G. DEVELOPING NEW ANCHORAGES ……………………………….. 52 H. GOVERNMENTAL ACTIONS IN DEVELOPING NEW ANCHORAGES ………………………………………………………………. 54 I. ENFORCEMENT OF ANCHORING REGULATIONS …………. 55 III. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT …………………………………………………… 56 A. OIL SPILLS ……………………………………………………………………. 56 B. NOISE ……………………………………………………………………………. 63 C. LIGHT AND SOUNDS …………………………………………………….. 66 D. AIR SPACE ZONES …………………………………………………………. 67 E. EFFECT OF ANCHORS ON RIVER BOTTOM …………………… 68 2 C.R. CUSHING & CO., INC. I. THE HUDSON RIVER A. General The majestic Hudson River is one of America’s most important and scenic rivers. It originates high in the Adirondack Mountains, 4,500 feet above sea level, flowing southward 315 miles through New York State and between New York and New Jersey to the Atlantic Ocean. The Upper Hudson River is impounded by the Federal Dam at Troy, New York. South of the dam the river is free flowing on its 153 mile journey from Troy to the New York Harbor and fed by many tributaries particularly the Mohawk.
    [Show full text]
  • Prevalence of Heavy Fuel Oil and Black Carbon in Arctic Shipping, 2015 to 2025
    Prevalence of heavy fuel oil and black carbon in Arctic shipping, 2015 to 2025 BRYAN COMER, NAYA OLMER, XIAOLI MAO, BISWAJOY ROY, DAN RUTHERFORD MAY 2017 www.theicct.org [email protected] BEIJING | BERLIN | BRUSSELS | SAN FRANCISCO | WASHINGTON ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors thank James J. Winebrake for his critical review and advice, along with our colleagues Joe Schultz, Jen Fela, and Fanta Kamakaté for their review and support. The authors would like to acknowledge exactEarth for providing satellite Automatic Identification System data and for data processing support. The authors sincerely thank the ClimateWorks Foundation for funding this study. For additional information: International Council on Clean Transportation 1225 I Street NW, Suite 900, Washington DC 20005 [email protected] | www.theicct.org | @TheICCT © 2017 International Council on Clean Transportation TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ................................................................................................................. iv 1. Introduction and Background ............................................................................................1 1.1 Heavy fuel oil ................................................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Black carbon .................................................................................................................................... 3 1.3 Policy context ..................................................................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • Cashman Dredging and Marine Contracting, LLC (Cashman)
    1750 American Boulevard Suite 200 Pennington, NJ 08534 PH 609.895.1400 www.geosyntec.com February 4, 2021 Via Email Mr. Christos Tsiamis Remedial Project Manager – Gowanus Canal Site Emergency and Remedial Response Division United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region 2 290 Broadway, 20th Floor New York, New York 10007-1866 Subject: Incident Report - Weeks #71 Barge Gowanus Canal Superfund Site Unilateral Administrative Order (UAO) Docket Nos. CERCLA 02-2019-2010 and CERCLA 02-2020-2003 Dear Mr. Tsiamis: B&B Engineers & Geologists of New York, P.C. (B&B), an affiliate of Geosyntec Consultants, respectfully submits on behalf of the Gowanus Canal PRP Group the Incident Report regarding the submersion of the Weeks #71 Barge at Bay Ridge Flats over the weekend of January 23, 2021. The Incident Report is the outcome of a thorough investigation conducted by the PRP Group to obtain information regarding the cause of the incident. The Incident Report and the associated attachments describe the details of the incident, the root cause and contributing factors, corrective measures, and overall safety program for the project. This cover letter gives an executive summary of the events, with the attachments providing further details. Summary of Incident On Friday, January 22 the Weeks #71 barge was loaded with sediment and prepared for transport to the Clean Earth processing facility in Jersey City, NJ. The barges utilized for transport to Jersey City are the same barges used by the Department of Sanitation for trash transport in the harbor and are the same barges used during the Pilot Study in the Fourth St.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidance for Subaqueous Dredged Material Capping
    Technical Report DOER-1 June 1998 US Army Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station Dredging Operations and Environmental Research Program Guidance for Subaqueous Dredged Material Capping by Michael R. Palermo, James E. Clausner, Marian P. Rollings Gregory L. Williams, Tommy E. Myers, WES Thomas J. Fredette, New England District Robert E. Randall, Texas A&M University Approved For Public Release; Distribution Is Unlimited Prepared for Headquarters, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers The contents of this report are not to be used for advertising, publication, or promotional purposes. Citation of trade names does not constitute an official endorsement or approval of the use of such commercial products. The findings of this report are not to be construed as an official Department of the Army position, unless so desig- nated by other authorized documents. PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER Dredging Operations and Technical Report DOER-1 Environmental Research Program June 1998 Guidance for Subaqueous Dredged Material Capping by Michael R. Palermo, James E. Clausner, Marian P. Rollings Gregory L. Williams, Tommy E. Myers U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station 3909 Halls Ferry Road Vicksburg, MS 39180-6199 Thomas J. Fredette U.S. Army Engineer District, New England 696 Virginia Road Concord, MA 01742-2751 Robert E. Randall Texas A&M University College Station, TX 77843 Final report Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited Prepared for U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Washington, DC 20314-1000 Waterways Experiment Station Cataloging-in-Publication Data Guidance for subaqueous dredged material capping / by Michael R. Palermo ... [et al.] ; prepared for U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Marcon International, Inc. Coupeville, WA 98239 U.S.A
    P.O. Box 1170 9 NW Front Street, Suite 201 Marcon International, Inc. Coupeville, WA 98239 U.S.A. Telephone (360) 678 8880 Vessels and Barges for Sale or Charter Worldwide Fax (360) 678-8890 E Mail: [email protected] http://www.marcon.com Barges An Overview of the Workhorses of the Marine Industry By: Bob Beegle Barges are the workhorses of the towing industry. They perform myriads of chores from cargo transport, pipelay, heavy- lift, water-desalinization, and power generation to offshore floating production and storage. Barges haul millions of tons of cargoes or otherwise work offshore and through the river systems and harbors of every continent in the world. Although there are no accurate records, I would not be surprised if there are at least 150,000 barges from the coasts of Albania to Lake Kariba in Zimbabwe. Non-propelled barges range from under 10’ to almost 1,000’ in length. While usually built out of steel, Marcon has over the years listed and sold barges constructed of concrete, aluminum and, even, wood. At the top of the range of cargo barges are the 30,000dwt+ ocean tank barges, 40,000dwt+ Great Lakes bulk barges and the 25,000dwt+ submersible and launch barges for ocean transport of equipment, such as drill rigs, drydocks, floating storage & production units, and of high value project cargoes requiring dry-tows for secure and/or faster deliveries. The world’s largest launch and float-over/cargo barge designed for worldwide operation is Heerema’s 852’ x 207’ x 49’ with a maximum 130,514mt and launch capacity of 40,000mt “H-851”.
    [Show full text]
  • DNVGL-RU-SHIP-Pt5ch11 Non Self-Propelled Units
    RULES FOR CLASSIFICATION Ships Edition July 2016 Part 5 Ship types Chapter 11 Non self-propelled units The content of this service document is the subject of intellectual property rights reserved by DNV GL AS ("DNV GL"). The user accepts that it is prohibited by anyone else but DNV GL and/or its licensees to offer and/or perform classification, certification and/or verification services, including the issuance of certificates and/or declarations of conformity, wholly or partly, on the basis of and/or pursuant to this document whether free of charge or chargeable, without DNV GL's prior written consent. DNV GL is not responsible for the consequences arising from any use of this document by others. The electronic pdf version of this document, available free of charge from http://www.dnvgl.com, is the officially binding version. DNV GL AS FOREWORD DNV GL rules for classification contain procedural and technical requirements related to obtaining and retaining a class certificate. The rules represent all requirements adopted by the Society as basis for classification. © DNV GL AS July 2016 Any comments may be sent by e-mail to [email protected] If any person suffers loss or damage which is proved to have been caused by any negligent act or omission of DNV GL, then DNV GL shall pay compensation to such person for his proved direct loss or damage. However, the compensation shall not exceed an amount equal to ten times the fee charged for the service in question, provided that the maximum compensation shall never exceed USD 2 million.
    [Show full text]
  • Rules for the Classification and Construction of Sea-Going Ships
    RUSSIAN MARITIME REGISTER OF SHIPPING RULES FOR THE CLASSIFICATION AND CONSTRUCTION OF SEA-GOING SHIPS PART I CLASSIFICATION Saint-Petersburg Edition 2019 Rules for the Classification and Construction of Sea-Going Ships of Russian Maritime Register of Shipping have been approved in accordance with the established approval procedure and come into force on 1 January 2019. The present edition of the Rules is based on the 2018 edition taking into account the amendments developed immediately before publication. The unified requirements, interpretations and recommendations of the International Association of Classification Societies (IACS) and the relevant resolutions of the International Maritime Organization (IMO) have been taken into consideration. The Rules are published in the following parts: Part I "Classification"; Part II "Hull"; Part III "Equipment, Arrangements and Outfit"; Part IV "Stability"; Part V "Subdivision"; Part VI "Fire Protection"; Part VII "Machinery Installations"; Part VIII "Systems and Piping"; Part IX "Machinery"; Part X "Boilers, Heat Exchangers and Pressure Vessels"; Part XI "Electrical Equipment"; Part XII "Refrigerating Plants"; Part XIII "Materials"; Part XIV "Welding"; Part XV "Automation"; Part XVI "Structure and Strength of Fiber-Reinforced Plastic Ships"; Part XVII "Distinguishing Marks and Descriptive Notations in the Class Notation Specifying Structural and Operational Particulars of Ships"; Part XVIII "Common Structural Rules for Bulk Carriers and Oil Tankers". The text of the Part is identical to that of the IACS Common Structural Rules; Part XIX "Additional Requirements for Structures of Container Ships and Ships, Dedicated Primarily to Carry their Load in Containers". The text of the Part is identical to IACS UR S11A "Longitudinal Strength Standard for Container Ships" (June 2015) and S34 "Functional Requirements on Load Cases for Strength Assessment of Container Ships by Finite Element Analysis" (May 2015).
    [Show full text]
  • The Operational Efficiency of Waterway Transport of Forest Chips on Finland’S Lake Saimaa
    Silva Fennica 46(3) research articles SILVA FENNICA www.metla.fi/silvafennica · ISSN 0037-5330 The Finnish Society of Forest Science · The Finnish Forest Research Institute The Operational Efficiency of Waterway Transport of Forest Chips on Finland’s Lake Saimaa Kalle Karttunen, Kari Väätäinen, Antti Asikainen and Tapio Ranta Karttunen, K., Väätäinen, K., Asikainen, A. & Ranta, T. 2012. The operational efficiency of waterway transport of forest chips on Finland’s Lake Saimaa. Silva Fennica 46(3): 395–413. New and cost-efficient methods for use in supply chains for energy wood should be found, to reach the targets of the renewable energy utilisation set by the European Union. The long- distance waterway transportation of forest fuels should be thoroughly investigated, especially in areas where the transport distance is long and waterways could provide a feasible method of conveying forest fuel. In comparison to transport of forest chips by truck, barge-based waterway transport shows a competitive advantage due to the larger loads and higher bulk density of chips it allows. The cost-efficiency of waterway transportation operations related to forest chips in Finland’s Lake Saimaa region was studied using practical demonstrations and discrete-event simula- tion. The varying demand for fuel wood in three separate bio-power plants on the Saimaa lakeside (near the cities of Varkaus, Mikkeli, and Savonlinna) was addressed in several barge transportation scenarios. Finally, the economy of barge transportation was compared to the economy of truck transportation as a function of transportation distance and in terms of the annual performance of the transportation methods examined.
    [Show full text]