DOCSLIB.ORG

Scanned Document

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Scanned Document Vessel Inventory U.S. Department of Transportation Maritime Report Administration as of January 1, 1991 Prepared by Office of Trade Analysis and Insurance Division of Statistics PART I VESSELS BY NAME VESSEL INVENTORY REPORT UNITED STATES FLAG DRY CARGO AND lANKER FLEETS 1,000 GROSS TONS AND OI{ER JAN 01, 1991 NAME OF VESSEl VESSEL TYPE OWNER/OPERATOR DESIGN TYPE: OWT YB lS T Ll ALEX SONNY RU RO WILKINGTON JRUSI CO T-AKX C 23100 1980 lSI LI BALDO LOPE CONTRORO Wll~INGTON lRUSI CO 1-Al<.X 26,00 1985 lSI Ll .JACK LUMHU CONTRORU WIL'IlNGlON TRUST CO 1-AKX. 26500 1986 ZNO ll .JOHN P BUB RO RO Wll~INGTON TRUST CO I-AKX 26500 1985 ADABELlE LYKES CONTStUP LYKES BROS STEAMSHIP COMPANY INC t6-H-fl47A 15100 1969 ADElPHI VICTORY FREIGHTER LU SUI SAN BAY V£.2-S-AP 2. 10100 19Lt:, AOHIRALIY BAY ~ANKER KATHIASEN•S TANKER J~DUSTRIES l~C PRIVATE 80800 1971 ADONIS TANKER FIRSI PENNSYlVANIA BANK N. A· FOREIGN C.ONST 80200 1966 AD VANTAGE FREIGHTER REO RIVER SHIPPING CORP. FOREIGN CUNT. 2.7800 1977 AD VENTURER PART CUHI LU JlMES RIVER C3-S-38A 11000 1960 AtENl PART CONI HA - CHARTER 10 ~SC t3-S-38A 11100 1961 ALBERT E. WATTS TANKER U S COAST GliAilO PRlVA IE 16900 l<Jitl ALBION VICTORY FREIGHTER lU JAKES RIVER VC2-S-AP2 10600 1945 All.E,HENY VICTORY FREIGHTER lU BEAUMONT VC2-S-AP2. 10700 1945 ALLISON LYKES PART CONI LYKES BROS STEAMSHIP COKPANY INC Cb-S-60( 12BOO 19M ALMERIA LYKES tONlSHIP AMERICAN PRESIDENT LINES l TO C6-S-69C t 17500 1968 AMARILLO VICTORY FREIGHTER LU BEAUMONT VC2-S-AP2 1.0700 1945 AMBASSADOR RO RO CROWLEY CARIBBEAN TRANSPORT~ INC. fOREIGN tONSl 9000 1980 AMERICAN BANKER CONTSHIP LU JAMES RIVER t&-S-1X ( 20000 1962 AMERICAN CONDOR RU RO AMERICAN TRANSPORT LINE FDREI GN C1JNS1 .20700 1981 AHERILAN CORKORAN FREIGHTER AUTl»>AR Ill FOREIGN CONSl 52100 1975 AMERICAN EAGlE RO RO lHE NeW t~ONNECTICUT NATIONAL BANK FOREIGN CONST 20700 1981 AMERICAN EXPLORER lANKER LU BEAUMONT I5-s-RH2A AMERICAN f:AlLON RU RO 2.2900 1959 AMERICAN TRANSPORT LINE fOREIGN WNST 20700 1'181 AMERICAN HERITAGE lANKEK Clt JF AMERICA INC. 18-S-1006 93300 1976 AHERICAh KESTREL CONI bARL AMERICAN KESIREL CORP. C8-S-81H 29800 1972 AMERICAN MONARCtl PART lUNl H·P·K• TRANSPJRlATION. INC. Clt-S-698 13100 1969 AMERICAN OSPREY TANKER KA - CHARTER 10 HSC PRIVATE 33100 1958 AMERICAN RACER FRf:IGiilER lU SU IS AN BAT C~-S-61tA 13300 1964 AMERICAN RANGER fREIGHTER LU JAKES Rl VER tlt-S-64A 13300 1965 AMERICAN RELIANCE FREIGHTER LU SIJISAN flAY tlt-S-64A 13300 1965 AKERJCAN RESERVIS PARI CONT UNI lEO SlATES ll NES CS·A· J, INC• Cb-S-608 15£00 1964 AHE:RI'-'AN SPllFIRE PART CONl K.P.K. TRANSPGRTATlOHs INC. t~-S-698 13100 1969 AHERJ(AN TITAN PART CONl K.P .tt. lRANSPilRTATI UN~ INC. C4-S-69B 13100 1968 AMERICAN TRADER lANKER AKERltAN TRADING TRA~SPORTATIOH CU PRIVATE 60700 1969 AMERICA~ VETERAN CONT 6ARt LU SU ISAN BAY t8-S-81B 29800 1973 AMERICAN VICTORY FREIGHTER LU .JAKES RIVER VC2-S-AP2 10700 1945 ANCHORAGE VICTORY fREitHlER llJ JAMES RIVE.R VC2-S-AP2 10700 1945 ARCO ALASKA TANKER ARCH TANKERS INC PRIVAlE 188400 1979 1 - VES~EL INVENTORY REPORt UNIJE.O STATES FLAG DRY CARGO ANO TANKER FLEElS 1 :tOOO GROSS TONS ANO OVER JAN 01, 1991 NAME Of VESSEL VESSEl. lYPE OWNERIOPERAIOR DESI~N TYPE: OWl YB ARUJ ANCHORAGE TANKER. UtE FIRSt NAT•L BANK Of CHICAGO PRIVA.lE 122200 1973 1980 ARCO CALIFORNIA TANKER ARtO MARINE, INC PRIVAlE 188700 1974 ARCO FAIRBANKS TANKER BANK Of AMER NAT TRUS1 t SAY ASSOt PRIVATE 120300 262400 1977 ARCO I~OEPENDENCE lANKER ARCO MARINEs INC T lO-S-lOlB ARCO JUNEAU TANKER BANKERS TRUST COKPANl PRIVATE 120300 191lt 1971 ARCO PRUDHOE SAY TANKER TANKERS LEASING CORP PRIVATE 70400 70400 1972 ARCO SAG RIVER lANKER OIL TANKERS lEA51NG CORP PRIVAIE 26Zit00 1977 ARCO SPIRIT TANKER ARCO KARINEs lNC t 10-S-lOlB 1973 ARCO tEXAS TANKER ARC.O KAR.INE, INC PRIVA'tE: 90000 ARGONAUT CONTSHIP UNI lED STATES TRUS l C.O UF NEW YURK c;-s-73B 16100 1979 ARZEW l•N•G• AR&EN I INC• Ui9-S-94A 74000 1978 10700 1945 ASBURY VIC lORY FREIGHTER lU BEAUMONT VC2-S-APl 1963 ASHLEY LYKES PART C.ONl lYKf!i BROS STEAMSHIP COMPANY INC. t5-S-3lF L 14300 ASPEN lANKER &53 LEASING COMPANY PRIVATE 80600 1971 AliGUN PASS TANKER THE N=W CONNECTICUT NATIONAL BANK PRIVAIE 173400 1977 AUSTRAL LIGHTNING CONT BARG KA - CHARTER IO MSC tS-S-818 29800 1971 1972 AUSTRAl RAINBOW C.ONT SARG CENTRAl GUlf LINES c.s-s-BJ.B 29700 188100 1976 B·l• ALASKA TANKER BANKERS TRUST COMPANY PRIVATE B.J. SAN DIEGO TANKER BANKERS TRUSI COMPANY PRJ VAlE 188100 1978 1983 BALTIMORE T/6-TNK THIR.il 1&;{./BAR{;E CORPORATION PRIVAIE 48000 SAlllMORE TRADER TANKER AMERICAN lRAOlNG TRANSPORTAl I ON CO PRIVAlE .J 58600 1955 BANNER PART CONI KA - C.HARTEk 10 HSC C3-S-4&A 12600 1961 BARNARD VICTORY FRE lGttlER LU SUI.SAN BAY vcz-s-AP2 10700 1945 BARRE YICIORY FREIGHTER LU SUISAN BAY vcz-s-APZ 10600 1945 BATTLE CREEK VIti FREIGHTER LU BEAUMONl VCZ-S-APZ 10700 1945 12600 1961 SAY PARI C.ONl ~.~ SJ I SAN BAY C3-S-4hA BAY RIDGE TANKER WJLKING10N TRUST CO TIO-S-92A 224400 1979 BAYAHON RO RO LU JM1ES R1 VE< PRIVAlE. 14200 1970 BEATRICE VICTORY FREIGtHER LU JAKES Rl VER VC.l-S -AP 2 10100 1945 BEAU.JOLAIS TANKER LU BE:AUHONl PRIVATE 28800 1954 16200 1965 BEAVER STATE PART tOfH l.U J~KES RIVER Co-S-bOB BELGIUM VICIORY FRE IGHlf:k LU BEAUK1NT Vt2-S-AP3 10700 19Lt4 BEREA VICTORY FRE IGtHER lU SUISAN BAY VC2 -S-AP.2 10700 1945 BERKELEY VICTORY FRE JGHTER lU SUISAN BAY VCZ-S-AP2 1C700 1945 BE ITY WUOO 1/B-BLK GULFCOASl TRANSIT CO. PRIVATE 23700 1973 BlUE RIDGE lANKER UNION Oil C.OftPAMY OF (All FORN lA PRJ VA IE. 42300 1981 80681 J lANKER INlliAL SHIPPING co. PRIVAlE: 1900 1947 BONNIE B TANKER KOlOR VE.SSEl-POllNb BROS., ::.9, INC. lANKER 2000 1956 BRAVADO CHEM lKR SEALI F I :r INC. FOREIGN f.ONSl Lt~OO 1977 2 - VESSEL INVENTORY REPORT UNllEO Sl AlES FlAG DRY CARGO AND TANKER FLEElS 1~000 GROSS lONS 'NO OVER .JAN 01 2 1991 NAME Of VESSEL VESSEL TYPE: OWNER/OPERATOR DE:SIGN lYP£ DNT YS BRAZIL VICTORY FRE l'tHER LU SUISAN BAY VC2.-S-AP3 10700 1941i BRAZOS lANKER l.U BE AUKONT 12-SE-Al-J 24000 1945 BRIDGE TUN lANKER C:.HES~PEAK.E SHl PP lNG INC: • FOREIGN CONST li01400 1977 BRINlON lYKES PART LOtH LU BEAUMONT t5-S-37FC ~ lli300 1962 BROOklYN lANKER WllKINGTON TRUST CO Tl0-S-9ZA 22b200 1973 BROOkS RAN€.E TANKER THE NEW CONNEC II CUT NATIONAL BAhk. PRIVATE 113400 1978 B UCKNEl.L VI t IO RY FRElGHlER LU SU ISAN BAY Vt.Z-S-AP2 10900 1945 BUilDER PART tONT lU JAMES RIVER t3-S-46A 12.500 1962 C C H Y V I C TOR 1 FREIGHlER LU JAMES RIVER VtZ-S-AP2 10600 1945 CALIFORNIA FREIGHTER KA - C.H ARTER TO HSC tli-S-lU 14300 1962 CALRICE TRANSPORT T/8-BlK LU SUISAN BAY PRIVATE 25400 1976 CAPE Al.AVA FREIGHTER KA - CHARTER TO MSC Clt-S-58A 12700 19&2 CAPE AlEXANDER FREIGHTER KA - CHARTER TO MSC C4-S-58A 12700 1962 tAPE ANN FREIGHTER KA - CHARTER lO KSC. tlt-S-58A 12700 1962 CAPE ARCHWAY FREIGHTER KA - CHAR TE:R TO HSC. t4-S-58A 12700 1963 CAPE BlANCO FREIGHTER KA - CHARIER 10 HSC C4-S-66A 14700 1966 CAPE BON FREIGHTER KA - CHARTER 10 KSC C4-S-6&A 14700 1967 CAPE BORDA FREIGHTER KA - CHARTER TO KSC C.4-S-66A lli700 1967 CAPE BOYER FREIGHTER MA - CHARTER I 0 HSC tlt-S-6f;,A 14700 19&7 CAPE BRETON FREIGHTER KA - CHARTER TO KSC tlt-S-o6A 13800 1967 CAPE CANSO FREIGHTER KA - LHARIER TO HSC C3-S-37C 12700 1963 CAPE CARTHAGE FREIGHIER KA - CHARTER TO KSC. C3-S-37t 12700 1963 CAPE CATAWBA FREIGHTER HA - CHARTER TO KSC C3-S-33A 12400 1961 CAPE CAIOCI£ FREIGHTER KA - CHARIER TO KSC C3-S-31C 11300 .1963 CAPE CHALKER S FREIGHTER LU BEAUMONT t3-S-37C 11300 1963 CAPE CHARlES FREIGHTER KA - CHARIER TO HSt £3-S-37£ 11300 1963 CAPE ClEAR FREIGHTER KA - [.HARTER lO HSC C3-S-37C 12700 1963 CAPE COO FREIGHTER KA - CHARIER TO HSC C3-S-37C 12100 1963 CAPE OECIS ION RO RO KA - CHARTER. TO MSC FOREI.GN CONST 23900 1973 CAPE DIAMOND RO RO KA - CHARIER TO KSC FOREIGN tONSl 2.3900 1972 CAPE OOfUNGD RO RO KA - CHARTER TO KSC FOREIGN C:ONSl 23900 1913 CAPE DOUGlAS RG RO KA - CHARTER JO HSC FOREIGN CONST 13900 1913 CAPE DUCATO RO RO KA - CHARTER TO KSC FOREIGN CONST 13800 191Z CAPE EDKONT RIJ RO HA - CHARIER TO HSC FOREIGN f.UNSl 20000 "1911 CAPE fAREWEll tONI BARG HA - CHARTER TO HSC C9-S-810 li0400 1973 CAPE FlAllERY CONI BARG KA - CHARTER TO KSC C9-S-81D 40600 1973 CAPE flORIDA CONT BARG KA - CHARTER TO HSC tB-S-818 2:9800 1971 CAPE GIBSON PART tONI KA - CHARTER 10 HSC C5-S-75A 22200 1968 CAPE l.lRAROEAU PART t-ONI KA - CHARTER TO KSC t5-S-15A 22200 1968 3 - ---- VESSEL INVENTORY REPORT UNITED STAlES FLAG DRY CARGO AND TANKER FLEETS 1,000 GROSS TONS AND OVER .JAN OJ., 1991 NAME Of VESSEL VESSEL TYPE OWNER/OPERA lOR DESIG-N lYPE OWl Yll C.APE HENRY Ru RO KA - CHARIER TO MSC FOREIGN CONS I 32000 1979 CAPE HORN RO RO KA - CHARTER TO HSC: FOREIGN C.ONSl 31800 1979 tAPE HUDSON RO RO KA - CHARIER TO KSC FOREIGN CONSl 31900 1979 tAPE lNSCRIPllUN RO RO HA - CHARTER TO HSC t7-S-95A 19100 1976 CAPE .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Boats and Harbors Publication 9-06
    ® $4.00 -and-har ats bo bo rs .c w. o w m BOATS & HARBORS w SECOND SEPTEMBER ISSUE 2019 VOLUME 62 NO. 13 Covering The East Coast, Gulf Coast, West Coast & Inland Waterways “THE” MARINE MARKETPLACE PH: (931) 484-6100 • Email: [email protected] Ok Bird Brain, there’ s the boat, let’ s see how your aim is.......people first, sails second, and new wax job third! BOATS AND HARBORS® P. O. Drawer 647 Crossville, TN 38557-0647 USA PAGE 2 - SECOND SEPTEMBER ISSUE 2019 See Us on the WEB at www.boats-and-harbors.com BOATS & HARBORS WANT VALUE FOR YOUR ADVERTISING DOLLAR? DENNIS FRANTZ • FRANTZ MARINE CORPORATION, INC. CELLULAR (504) 430-7117• Email: [email protected] • Email: [email protected] (ALL SPECIFICATIONS AS PER OWNER AND NOT GUARANTEED BY BROKER) 320' x 60' x 28 - Built 1995, 222' x 50' clear deck; U.S. flag. Over 38 Years in the Marine Industry Class: ABS +A1 +DP2. 280' L x 60' B x 24' D x 19' - loaded draft. Blt in 2004, US Flag, Class 1, +AMS, +DPS-2. Sub Ch. L & I. 203' x 50' clear deck. OSV’s - Tugs - Crewboats - Pushboats - Barges 272' L x 56' B x 18' D x 6' - light draft x 15' loaded draft. Built in 1998, Class: ABS +A1, +AMS, DPS-2. AHTS: 262' L x 58' B x 23' depth x 19' - loaded draft. Built in 195' x 35' x 10' 1998, Class: ABS + A1, Towing Vessel, AH (E) + AMS, DPS-2, SOLAS, US Flag. 260 L x 56 B x 18D x 6.60' - light draft x 15.20' loaded draft.
    [Show full text]
  • Container-‐On-‐Barge for Illinois Fueled by Biodiesel an Operating
    Container-on-Barge for Illinois Fueled by Biodiesel An Operating Plan and Business Plan August 27, 2011 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction and Overview ------------------------------------------------------------------- 4 2.0 Research/Investigation/Reports -------------------------------------------------------------------- 6 3.0 Lessons to Consider -------------------------------------------------------------------- 8 4.0 Inland Rivers Operations -------------------------------------------------------------------- 9 4.1 Ownership -------------------------------------------------------------------- 9 4.2 Towboats/Barges -------------------------------------------------------------------- 9 4.3 River Operations Modes -------------------------------------------------------------------- 10 4.4 The “Power Split” -------------------------------------------------------------------- 12 4.5 River Freight Pricing -------------------------------------------------------------------- 13 5.0 Designing Illinois COB -------------------------------------------------------------------- 15 5.1 Design Alternatives -------------------------------------------------------------------- 15 5.1.1 Purchased -------------------------------------------------------------------- 15 5.1.2 Leased -------------------------------------------------------------------- 18 5.1.3 Unit Tow -------------------------------------------------------------------- 19 6.0 Gulf COB – Cargo Flexibility -------------------------------------------------------------------- 21 7.0 COB Program
    [Show full text]
  • APH / PPHTD Transportation Alternative APH / PPHTD Transportation Alternative
    Loyola Business Leadership Summit – October 9, 2018 Global Maritime Trade to Double by 2030 • Significant growth in world trade projected in next 10 years • Doubling of seaborne trade volumes • Trade to grow from 10 Billion Tons to 20 Billion Tons by 2030 Source: Danish Maritime Forum, 24-28 October 2016 2025 World Container Port Market Demand 260% Increase 2009 Recession Millions of TEUs Millions Source: Drewry Shipping Consultants 50 Years of Container Vessel Evolutionary Growth Old Panamax: 4,800 TEUs Neo-Panamax: 14,800 TEUs Near Term Mega Vessel: 24,000 TEUs Source: Allianz Global Corporate & Specialty - Data: Container-Transportation.com Historical Trade Patterns • Pre-Panama Canal Expansion Gulf Coast Ports handled 6.4% of total U.S. container volume • Mid-West Represents 40% of U.S. Land Area 15% of U.S. GDP 92% of the U.S. agricultural exports 60% of U.S. grain exports Approximately 200 million metric tons of exports • Pre-Panama / Suez Canal Expansions – Mississippi Watershed Trade Majority shipped through West Coast Ports Post Panama / Suez Canal Expansions • Canals Handling Larger Vessels Panama Canal now handing up to 18,000 TEU vessels . Beam limit 51.25 Meters as of June 1, 2018 Suez Canal has no existing limits on vessel size Larger vessels have inherent cost efficiencies • Additional Sailing Time to Gulf Coast Offset by Growing West Coast Delays • Gulf Coast Ports “Market Share” of U.S. Container Trade Up to 8.48% in 2017 U.S. Container market share increased from 9.5% to 11.9% Recent Shifts in Trade Patterns
    [Show full text]
  • Report to Hudson River Waterfront Alliance Concerning Proposed Hudson River Anchorages
    REPORT TO HUDSON RIVER WATERFRONT ALLIANCE CONCERNING PROPOSED HUDSON RIVER ANCHORAGES Project No. 3529 30 November 2016 By Charles R. Cushing, Ph.D., P.E. C. R. Cushing & Co., Inc. 30 Vesey Street New York, NY 10007 C.R. CUSHING & CO., INC. INDEX PAGE I. THE HUDSON RIVER …………………………………………………………….. 3 A. GENERAL ………………………………………………………………………. 3 B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS OF THE HUDSON RIVER ….. 5 C. COMMERCIAL TRAFFIC ………………………………………………… 14 II. ANCHORAGES ………………………………………………………………………. 25 A. PROPOSED ANCHORAGES …………………………………………….. 25 B. EXISTING ANCHORAGES ………………………………………………. 38 C. HUDSON RIVER NATIONAL DEFENSE RESERVE FLEET ANCHORAGE ………………………………………….……………………… 42 D. THE NEED FOR ANCHORAGES ……………………………………… 43 ` E. AUTHORITY FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF ANCHORAGES ………………………………………………………………. 47 F. CRITERIA THAT U.S.C.G. MAY USE IN SELECTING ANCHORAGES ………………………………………………………………. 49 G. DEVELOPING NEW ANCHORAGES ……………………………….. 52 H. GOVERNMENTAL ACTIONS IN DEVELOPING NEW ANCHORAGES ………………………………………………………………. 54 I. ENFORCEMENT OF ANCHORING REGULATIONS …………. 55 III. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT …………………………………………………… 56 A. OIL SPILLS ……………………………………………………………………. 56 B. NOISE ……………………………………………………………………………. 63 C. LIGHT AND SOUNDS …………………………………………………….. 66 D. AIR SPACE ZONES …………………………………………………………. 67 E. EFFECT OF ANCHORS ON RIVER BOTTOM …………………… 68 2 C.R. CUSHING & CO., INC. I. THE HUDSON RIVER A. General The majestic Hudson River is one of America’s most important and scenic rivers. It originates high in the Adirondack Mountains, 4,500 feet above sea level, flowing southward 315 miles through New York State and between New York and New Jersey to the Atlantic Ocean. The Upper Hudson River is impounded by the Federal Dam at Troy, New York. South of the dam the river is free flowing on its 153 mile journey from Troy to the New York Harbor and fed by many tributaries particularly the Mohawk.
    [Show full text]
  • Prevalence of Heavy Fuel Oil and Black Carbon in Arctic Shipping, 2015 to 2025
    Prevalence of heavy fuel oil and black carbon in Arctic shipping, 2015 to 2025 BRYAN COMER, NAYA OLMER, XIAOLI MAO, BISWAJOY ROY, DAN RUTHERFORD MAY 2017 www.theicct.org [email protected] BEIJING | BERLIN | BRUSSELS | SAN FRANCISCO | WASHINGTON ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors thank James J. Winebrake for his critical review and advice, along with our colleagues Joe Schultz, Jen Fela, and Fanta Kamakaté for their review and support. The authors would like to acknowledge exactEarth for providing satellite Automatic Identification System data and for data processing support. The authors sincerely thank the ClimateWorks Foundation for funding this study. For additional information: International Council on Clean Transportation 1225 I Street NW, Suite 900, Washington DC 20005 [email protected] | www.theicct.org | @TheICCT © 2017 International Council on Clean Transportation TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ................................................................................................................. iv 1. Introduction and Background ............................................................................................1 1.1 Heavy fuel oil ................................................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Black carbon .................................................................................................................................... 3 1.3 Policy context ..................................................................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • Cashman Dredging and Marine Contracting, LLC (Cashman)
    1750 American Boulevard Suite 200 Pennington, NJ 08534 PH 609.895.1400 www.geosyntec.com February 4, 2021 Via Email Mr. Christos Tsiamis Remedial Project Manager – Gowanus Canal Site Emergency and Remedial Response Division United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region 2 290 Broadway, 20th Floor New York, New York 10007-1866 Subject: Incident Report - Weeks #71 Barge Gowanus Canal Superfund Site Unilateral Administrative Order (UAO) Docket Nos. CERCLA 02-2019-2010 and CERCLA 02-2020-2003 Dear Mr. Tsiamis: B&B Engineers & Geologists of New York, P.C. (B&B), an affiliate of Geosyntec Consultants, respectfully submits on behalf of the Gowanus Canal PRP Group the Incident Report regarding the submersion of the Weeks #71 Barge at Bay Ridge Flats over the weekend of January 23, 2021. The Incident Report is the outcome of a thorough investigation conducted by the PRP Group to obtain information regarding the cause of the incident. The Incident Report and the associated attachments describe the details of the incident, the root cause and contributing factors, corrective measures, and overall safety program for the project. This cover letter gives an executive summary of the events, with the attachments providing further details. Summary of Incident On Friday, January 22 the Weeks #71 barge was loaded with sediment and prepared for transport to the Clean Earth processing facility in Jersey City, NJ. The barges utilized for transport to Jersey City are the same barges used by the Department of Sanitation for trash transport in the harbor and are the same barges used during the Pilot Study in the Fourth St.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidance for Subaqueous Dredged Material Capping
    Technical Report DOER-1 June 1998 US Army Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station Dredging Operations and Environmental Research Program Guidance for Subaqueous Dredged Material Capping by Michael R. Palermo, James E. Clausner, Marian P. Rollings Gregory L. Williams, Tommy E. Myers, WES Thomas J. Fredette, New England District Robert E. Randall, Texas A&M University Approved For Public Release; Distribution Is Unlimited Prepared for Headquarters, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers The contents of this report are not to be used for advertising, publication, or promotional purposes. Citation of trade names does not constitute an official endorsement or approval of the use of such commercial products. The findings of this report are not to be construed as an official Department of the Army position, unless so desig- nated by other authorized documents. PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER Dredging Operations and Technical Report DOER-1 Environmental Research Program June 1998 Guidance for Subaqueous Dredged Material Capping by Michael R. Palermo, James E. Clausner, Marian P. Rollings Gregory L. Williams, Tommy E. Myers U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station 3909 Halls Ferry Road Vicksburg, MS 39180-6199 Thomas J. Fredette U.S. Army Engineer District, New England 696 Virginia Road Concord, MA 01742-2751 Robert E. Randall Texas A&M University College Station, TX 77843 Final report Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited Prepared for U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Washington, DC 20314-1000 Waterways Experiment Station Cataloging-in-Publication Data Guidance for subaqueous dredged material capping / by Michael R. Palermo ... [et al.] ; prepared for U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Marcon International, Inc. Coupeville, WA 98239 U.S.A
    P.O. Box 1170 9 NW Front Street, Suite 201 Marcon International, Inc. Coupeville, WA 98239 U.S.A. Telephone (360) 678 8880 Vessels and Barges for Sale or Charter Worldwide Fax (360) 678-8890 E Mail: [email protected] http://www.marcon.com Barges An Overview of the Workhorses of the Marine Industry By: Bob Beegle Barges are the workhorses of the towing industry. They perform myriads of chores from cargo transport, pipelay, heavy- lift, water-desalinization, and power generation to offshore floating production and storage. Barges haul millions of tons of cargoes or otherwise work offshore and through the river systems and harbors of every continent in the world. Although there are no accurate records, I would not be surprised if there are at least 150,000 barges from the coasts of Albania to Lake Kariba in Zimbabwe. Non-propelled barges range from under 10’ to almost 1,000’ in length. While usually built out of steel, Marcon has over the years listed and sold barges constructed of concrete, aluminum and, even, wood. At the top of the range of cargo barges are the 30,000dwt+ ocean tank barges, 40,000dwt+ Great Lakes bulk barges and the 25,000dwt+ submersible and launch barges for ocean transport of equipment, such as drill rigs, drydocks, floating storage & production units, and of high value project cargoes requiring dry-tows for secure and/or faster deliveries. The world’s largest launch and float-over/cargo barge designed for worldwide operation is Heerema’s 852’ x 207’ x 49’ with a maximum 130,514mt and launch capacity of 40,000mt “H-851”.
    [Show full text]
  • DNVGL-RU-SHIP-Pt5ch11 Non Self-Propelled Units
    RULES FOR CLASSIFICATION Ships Edition July 2016 Part 5 Ship types Chapter 11 Non self-propelled units The content of this service document is the subject of intellectual property rights reserved by DNV GL AS ("DNV GL"). The user accepts that it is prohibited by anyone else but DNV GL and/or its licensees to offer and/or perform classification, certification and/or verification services, including the issuance of certificates and/or declarations of conformity, wholly or partly, on the basis of and/or pursuant to this document whether free of charge or chargeable, without DNV GL's prior written consent. DNV GL is not responsible for the consequences arising from any use of this document by others. The electronic pdf version of this document, available free of charge from http://www.dnvgl.com, is the officially binding version. DNV GL AS FOREWORD DNV GL rules for classification contain procedural and technical requirements related to obtaining and retaining a class certificate. The rules represent all requirements adopted by the Society as basis for classification. © DNV GL AS July 2016 Any comments may be sent by e-mail to [email protected] If any person suffers loss or damage which is proved to have been caused by any negligent act or omission of DNV GL, then DNV GL shall pay compensation to such person for his proved direct loss or damage. However, the compensation shall not exceed an amount equal to ten times the fee charged for the service in question, provided that the maximum compensation shall never exceed USD 2 million.
    [Show full text]
  • Rules for the Classification and Construction of Sea-Going Ships
    RUSSIAN MARITIME REGISTER OF SHIPPING RULES FOR THE CLASSIFICATION AND CONSTRUCTION OF SEA-GOING SHIPS PART I CLASSIFICATION Saint-Petersburg Edition 2019 Rules for the Classification and Construction of Sea-Going Ships of Russian Maritime Register of Shipping have been approved in accordance with the established approval procedure and come into force on 1 January 2019. The present edition of the Rules is based on the 2018 edition taking into account the amendments developed immediately before publication. The unified requirements, interpretations and recommendations of the International Association of Classification Societies (IACS) and the relevant resolutions of the International Maritime Organization (IMO) have been taken into consideration. The Rules are published in the following parts: Part I "Classification"; Part II "Hull"; Part III "Equipment, Arrangements and Outfit"; Part IV "Stability"; Part V "Subdivision"; Part VI "Fire Protection"; Part VII "Machinery Installations"; Part VIII "Systems and Piping"; Part IX "Machinery"; Part X "Boilers, Heat Exchangers and Pressure Vessels"; Part XI "Electrical Equipment"; Part XII "Refrigerating Plants"; Part XIII "Materials"; Part XIV "Welding"; Part XV "Automation"; Part XVI "Structure and Strength of Fiber-Reinforced Plastic Ships"; Part XVII "Distinguishing Marks and Descriptive Notations in the Class Notation Specifying Structural and Operational Particulars of Ships"; Part XVIII "Common Structural Rules for Bulk Carriers and Oil Tankers". The text of the Part is identical to that of the IACS Common Structural Rules; Part XIX "Additional Requirements for Structures of Container Ships and Ships, Dedicated Primarily to Carry their Load in Containers". The text of the Part is identical to IACS UR S11A "Longitudinal Strength Standard for Container Ships" (June 2015) and S34 "Functional Requirements on Load Cases for Strength Assessment of Container Ships by Finite Element Analysis" (May 2015).
    [Show full text]
  • The Operational Efficiency of Waterway Transport of Forest Chips on Finland’S Lake Saimaa
    Silva Fennica 46(3) research articles SILVA FENNICA www.metla.fi/silvafennica · ISSN 0037-5330 The Finnish Society of Forest Science · The Finnish Forest Research Institute The Operational Efficiency of Waterway Transport of Forest Chips on Finland’s Lake Saimaa Kalle Karttunen, Kari Väätäinen, Antti Asikainen and Tapio Ranta Karttunen, K., Väätäinen, K., Asikainen, A. & Ranta, T. 2012. The operational efficiency of waterway transport of forest chips on Finland’s Lake Saimaa. Silva Fennica 46(3): 395–413. New and cost-efficient methods for use in supply chains for energy wood should be found, to reach the targets of the renewable energy utilisation set by the European Union. The long- distance waterway transportation of forest fuels should be thoroughly investigated, especially in areas where the transport distance is long and waterways could provide a feasible method of conveying forest fuel. In comparison to transport of forest chips by truck, barge-based waterway transport shows a competitive advantage due to the larger loads and higher bulk density of chips it allows. The cost-efficiency of waterway transportation operations related to forest chips in Finland’s Lake Saimaa region was studied using practical demonstrations and discrete-event simula- tion. The varying demand for fuel wood in three separate bio-power plants on the Saimaa lakeside (near the cities of Varkaus, Mikkeli, and Savonlinna) was addressed in several barge transportation scenarios. Finally, the economy of barge transportation was compared to the economy of truck transportation as a function of transportation distance and in terms of the annual performance of the transportation methods examined.
    [Show full text]
  • Prototype Container Vessel
    Union League Club, Chicago, IL June 14, 2017 Achieving the Promise of Tomorrow’s Emerging Rail & Waterway Opportunities M. John Vickerman Williamsburg, Virginia Copyright © 2017 Vessel Cargo Handling Circa 1955 Copyright © 2017 Cargo Handling Circa 2010 Copyright © 2017 US Navy Fast Frigate Circa 2045 Copyright © 2017 What We Know Today... Will Surely Be Different Tomorrow! Copyright © 2017 Linking Railroads, Ports, Trucks, and Waterways Since my last presentation at the 2016 Rail Summit a year ago, Three Major Events have changed the US Marine/Inland Waterway/Rail Industry: ✓The US Arrival of the Mega Container Ships ✓High Speed & Capacity Inland Waterway Vessels ✓The US Midwest Freight Battleground Matures Copyright © 2017 Linking Railroads, Ports, Trucks, and Waterways Maritime Vessel Technology Trends: Emergence of the Mega Container Vessel Copyright © 2017 Largest Container Ship Yet to Call on the Port of Virginia – May 8, 2017 COSCO Development Container Ship – 13, 092 TEUs Copyright © 2017 May 8, 2017 Largest Container Vessel to Call at the Port of Virginia COSCO Development Container Ship – 13, 092 TEUs Containership COSCO DEVELOPMENT at 1,200 feet long and 158 feet wide, It is 100-plus feet longer that the U.S. Navy’s newest aircraft carrier the Gerald R. Ford Copyright © 2017 Relative Size of the Mega Container Vessel COSCO DEVELOPMENT Largest Ship to Call Along the East Coast COSCO Develop Copyright © 2017 40 Years of Container Ship Size Growth (TEU Capacity) MEGA CONTAINER SHIP Circa 2020 NEO PANAMAX As of June 2016 OLD PANAMAX Up to June 2016 Source: HIS Maritime & Trade Historical Vessel and Orderbook Data Copyright © 2017 50 Years of Container Vessel Evolutionary Growth Old Panamax: 4,800 TEUs Neo-Panamax: 12,600 TEUs Near Term Mega Vessel: 22,000 TEUs Source: Allianz Global Corporate & Specialty - Data: Container-Transportation.com Copyright © 2017 Maersk’s 18,000 TEU - Wide Body - Shallow Draft Container Ship Copyright © 2017 The Biggest Ship Ever in San Francisco Bay CMA CGM Benjamin Franklin 1,300 ft.
    [Show full text]