National Flag and Emblem Locator Map TEXT HIGHLIGHTS

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

National Flag and Emblem Locator Map TEXT HIGHLIGHTS SUDAN National Flag and Emblem Locator Map TEXT HIGHLIGHTS: Diaries updates, key events, brief analysis and relating news articles in timeline Overview & Diary Refreshes Sudan entered the Twentieth Century ruled as an Anglo-Egyptian Condominium, a unique constitutional status dating from 1899. After the First World War, Sudanese nationalist sentiment grew drawing inspiration from Egyptian nationalism. The Mahdist Movement The Mahdi, his real name was Mohammad Ahmad Ibn El Sayed Abdullah, was born in Dongola, in Northern Sudan, in 1844. He followed the true tradition of the warrior/religious leaders of Islam. Like desert sand storm he appeared suddenly and inexplicably out of nowhere, and, by some strange process of attraction, generated an ever-increasing force as he moved along. A larger contingent of Sudanese and Egyptian troops of about ten thousand men, under the Command of Colonel Willi...am Hicks Pasha, was dispatched to crash Mahdism. Like Abu Saud’ s force, the Hicks column was totally destroyed. At this point the British Government urged the Nubar Cabinet to completely evacuate the Sudan and the Egyptian Government reluctantly agreed. The British Government appointed General Sir Charles Gordon Pasha (1833-1885) (4), an ex Governor of the Sudan better known as Ghardoon Pasha, to carry on the mission of evacuating the Egyptian troops and their families. The Mahdists besieged Gordon in Khartoum (5) and, after a heroic defense, the city fell to the rebels on January 26, 1885. Gordon was killed defending the Governor General mansion and his dead body was decapitated and paraded in the streets of the fallen city. The Mahdi did not live long enough to savor his victory; he died in Omdourman five months after the fall of Khartoum. However, it was only much later, following the 1952 July Revolution in Egypt, that Sudan gained independence. The 1953 Anglo-Egyptian Agreement provided for a three-year transitional period before self-rule. Sudan became independent on 1 January 1956, but political infighting and economic incompetence soon extinguished popular optimism. In November 1958, Major-General Ibrahim Abboud led the army to power in a bloodless coup, determined to end the short, flawed rule of the politicians. Six years later faced with popular disillusionment, Abboud's regime collapsed and new parliamentary elections were held in 1965. Once more, parliamentary democracy brought weak, unstable governance and, in 1969, Colonel Jaafar Nimeiri seized power. Meanwhile, southern Sudan was suffering from escalating conflict between Government forces and rebels. In 1972 Nimeiri signed a peace agreement with the South Sudan Liberation Movement. During the 1970s, the regime's pledges gradually unravelled and by 1983, when Nimeiri proclaimed the application of Islamic law (Shari'a) throughout the country, southern resistance forces were re-mobilising into what became the Sudan People's Liberation Army/Movement (SPLA/M). Majour-General Mohammed Nimeiri was little more popular in the North, but challenges to his rule were met with bloody purges. Widening anger eventually sparked a military take-over in April 1985 and the following year elections were held. Parliamentary rule was to last less than four years, a period in which five governments were formed, each under the premiership of veteran politician Sadiq al-Mahdi. Peace talks with southerners and the poor state of the economy strengthened dissent in the north. On 30 June 1989, the army overthrew the democratically elected government of Sadiq al-Mahdi and installed a Revolutionary Command Council, chaired by General Omar al-Bashir. Bashir ruled by decree at the head of the Revolutionary Command Council and banned all political parties except his own National Islamic Front (NIF), renamed the National Congress Party (NCP) in 1998. In 1996 Bashir was elected President and a National Assembly was elected in a flawed election which was boycotted by the opposition. Bashir was re-elected (with 86% of the vote) in 2000. Again a number of key opposition parties boycotted the election, claiming it was flawed and unfair. The elections did nothing to resolve the ongoing north-south civil war in Sudan. The NCP continued to pursue war in the south, conscripting northerners through the call to jihad. And through Hassan al-Turabi, who served as National Assembly speaker in the 90s, it welcomed an array of militants from the wider Arab and Islamic worlds – including Usama Bin Laden, who lived in Sudan from 1992 to 1996. After 9/11, the NCP began to work with the West on counter-terrorism issues, leading to the lifting of sanctions imposed after the assassination attempt on Egyptian President Mubarak just weeks after the attacks in New York. This rehabilitation, the ongoing deadlock in the North/South civil war, and President Bush’s move away from the Clinton-era policy of isolating Khartoum led to the beginning of peace talks between the NCP and SPLM/A, brokered by the Inter-Governmental Authority on Development (IGAD). In 2003 and 2004 peace talks were held between the Khartoum government and the SPLM. Significant international attention was focused on the talks, including from the UK as part of the “Troika”, along with the US and Norway. The outcome was the Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA), signed on 15 January 2005. This detailed agreement set the terms for an internationally monitored ceasefire, allowing the UN Mission in Sudan (UNMIS) into Sudan, and set out a power sharing agreement, including an SPLM/A Vice-President, and made provision for national elections in five years time. Crucially, it granted southern Sudan significant autonomy for six years, to be followed by a referendum on their independence in 2011. In January 2011, the people of South Sudan voted in a referendum to decide whether to break away from Sudan and become an independent state. An overwhelming majority - 99.83% of voters - voted for secession. On 9 July 2011 the southern region became independent with the name of the Republic of South Sudan. Many of the issues that should have been resolved as part of the CPA, however, remain the subject of negotiation between Sudan and South Sudan, including how oil revenues should be shared, citizenship, and the disputed region of Abyei. Formerly known as : Anglo-Egyptian Sudan Achieved independence in 1st January, 1956 Headship since independence; Head of instrumental self-administration Sudan went through two prolonged civil wars most of the 20th century. Sudan’s dispute with Egypt over Halayeb: Regarding the dispute with Egypt over Halayeb triangle, al-Sadig said Khartoum has documents clearly proving that the area is a Sudanese territory. He pointed that Sudan has not engaged in meetings with the Egyptian side on Halayeb, saying the issue could be referred to international arbitration as was the case during the dispute between Egypt and Israel over Taba area. “We don’t oppose [referral of the case to the] international arbitration to resolve the issue particularly as Sudan has maps as well as legal and historical documents proving that Halayeb and Shalateen are part of the Sudanese territory,” he said. The Halayeb triangle overlooks the Red Sea and has been a contentious issue between Egypt and Sudan since 1958, shortly after Sudan gained independence from British-Egyptian rule. The contested border area has been under de facto Egyptian administration since the mid-1990s, but both countries have jockeyed for its control for over a century. Egypt brushed aside Sudan’s repeated calls for referring the dispute to international arbitration. Earlier Sudan’s top diplomat told a group of Egyptian politicians in Cairo that the dispute over Halayeb area can’t be resolved by “imposing a fait accompli” but through dialogue or by referring the case to the concerned international institutions. Origins of name: Derived from the Arabic phrase, "Bilad as-Sudan" Arabic meaning meaning for, "land of the blacks" The triggers were mostly to do with the domination of largely non-Muslim, non-Arab southern Sudanese. North/South Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA), signed in January 2005 offering the southerners autonomy for six years. And a referendum to determine independence of North and South or unity conducted in January 2011, Southern Sudanese voters opted for secession. In 2003, a conflict broke out in Darfur. Sudan's government has been fighting rebels in Darfur since 2003. This left between 200,000 and 400,000 people dead and displaced about 2 million people. The ICC says Mr. Bashir orchestrated a campaign of murder, rape, and other crimes against civilians in the region. The U.N. says fighting and related violence in Darfur have killed an estimated 300,000 people and displaced some 2.7 million others. But, Sudan does not recognize the authority of the International Criminal Court, and Mr. Bashir has flouted the arrest warrants by repeatedly traveling abroad, though mostly to countries that are not ICC members. A Republic in northeastern Africa on the Red Sea. According to Arab historians, The Sudan is where Arabia meets Africa, a geography enshrined in the place's name: "Bilad Al-Sudan" is an Arabic meaning for "land of the blacks". It had been the biggest country in Africa in it's geographical position until recently. The Sudan's arid-north regions had a long history of attachment with Egypt, Islam, and it's home mainly to Arabic-speaking muslims, ruled under the Otoman empire and Otoman- Egyptian rule from 1820 until 1885. In the mid-nineteenth century, Egypt and present day Sudan were indeed one under the Egyptian Khedive Ismael. And the northern Sudan and Egypt have shared a common past for stretched durations even before the ascendance of Islam in the region. A pro-Muslim ruler called Mohammed Ahmed, raised as the founder of a Dervish-Mahdist movement, ruled the Sudan from 1870 until an Anglo- Egyptian joint rule was made in 1899.
Recommended publications
  • Report on Public Forum
    Anti-Terrorism and the Security Agenda: Impacts on Rights, Freedoms and Democracy Report and Recommendations for Policy Direction of a Public Forum organized by the International Civil Liberties Monitoring Group Ottawa, February 17, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .......................................................................................................2 ABOUT THE ICLMG .............................................................................................................2 BACKGROUND .....................................................................................................................3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .....................................................................................................4 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR POLICY DIRECTION ..........................................................14 PROCEEDINGS......................................................................................................................16 CONCLUDING REMARKS...................................................................................................84 ANNEXES...............................................................................................................................87 ANNEXE I: Membership of the ICLMG ANNEXE II: Program of the Public Forum ANNEXE III: List of Participants/Panelists Anti-Terrorism and the Security Agenda: Impacts on Rights Freedoms and Democracy 2 __________________________________________________________________________________ ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Forum session reporting
    [Show full text]
  • The Biden Administration Must Defend Americans Targeted by the International Criminal Court Steven Groves
    BACKGROUNDER No. 3622 | MAY 17, 2021 MARGARET THATCHER CENTER FOR FREEDOM The Biden Administration Must Defend Americans Targeted by the International Criminal Court Steven Groves he Declaration of Independence cataloged the KEY TAKEAWAYS ways in which King George III infringed upon American liberties. Among King George’s Since its founding, the United States has T offenses listed in the Declaration was “Transporting tried to protect its citizens from legal us beyond the Seas to be tried for pretended Offences.” harassment and persecution by foreign courts. The king claimed the authority to seize American col- onists and force them to stand trial in Great Britain for criminal offenses allegedly committed in America. The Prosecutor of the International Almost 250 years later, another foreign tribunal— Criminal Court has compiled a secret annex listing American citizens to be the International Criminal Court (ICC), located in targeted for prosecution for alleged war The Hague in the Netherlands—is working toward crimes. issuing arrest warrants for American citizens for allegedly abusing detainees in Afghanistan. The court The Biden Administration should stop the is pursuing this course despite the fact that the United ICC from persisting in its misguided pros- States is not a party to the Rome Statute of the Inter- ecution of American citizens that have national Criminal Court and therefore not subject to already been investigated by the U.S. the ICC’s jurisdiction. This paper, in its entirety, can be found at http://report.heritage.org/bg3622 The Heritage Foundation | 214 Massachusetts Avenue, NE | Washington, DC 20002 | (202) 546-4400 | heritage.org Nothing written here is to be construed as necessarily reflecting the views of The Heritage Foundation or as an attempt to aid or hinder the passage of any bill before Congress.
    [Show full text]
  • Army Regulation 15-6: Final Report Investigation Into FBI Allegations Of
    UNCLASS 1 Apr 05 (Amended 9 Jun 05) Army Regulation 15-6: Final Report Investigation into FBI Allegations of Detainee Abuse at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba Detention Facility EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Detention and interrogation operations at Joint Task Force Guantanamo (JTF-GTMO) cover a three-year period and over 24,000 interrogations. This AR 15-6 investigation found only three interrogation acts in violation of interrogation techniques authorized by Army Field Manual 34-52 and DoD guidance. The AR 15-6 also found that the Commander of JTF-GTMO failed to monitor the interrogation of one high value detainee in late 2002. The AR 15-6 found that the interrogation of this same high value detainee resulted in degrading and abusive treatment but did not rise to the level of being inhumane treatment. Finally, the AR 15-6 found that the communication of a threat to another high value detainee was in violation of SECDEF guidance and the UCMJ. The AR 15-6 found no evidence of torture or inhumane treatment at JTF-GTMO. INTRODUCTION In June 2004, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) began an internal investigation to determine if any of its personnel had observed mistreatment or aggressive behavior towards detainees at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba (GTMO). On 9 Jul 04, the FBI – Inspection Division (INSD), sent an e-mail message to all FBI personnel who had served in any capacity at GTMO. The e-mail stated in relevant part: “You have been identified as having conducted an assignment at GTMO, Cuba since 9/11/2001. The Inspection Division has been tasked with contacting those employees who have served in any capacity at GTMO and obtain information regarding the treatment of detainees.
    [Show full text]
  • AMERICA's CHALLENGE: Domestic Security, Civil Liberties, and National Unity After September 11
    t I l AlLY r .... )k.fl ~FS A Ot:l ) lO~Ol R.. Muzaffar A. Chishti Doris Meissner Demetrios G. Papademetriou Jay Peterzell Michael J. Wishnie Stephen W. Yale-Loehr • M I GRAT i o~]~In AMERICA'S CHALLENGE: Domestic Security, Civil Liberties, and National Unity after September 11 .. AUTHORS Muzaffar A. Chishti Doris Meissner Demetrios G. Papademetriou Jay Peterzell Michael J. Wishnie Stephen W . Yale-Loehr MPI gratefully acknowledges the assistance of Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen & Hamilton in the preparation of this report. Copyright © 2003 Migration Policy Institute All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without prior permission in writing from the Migration Policy Institute. Migration Policy Institute Tel: 202-266-1940 1400 16th Street, NW, Suite 300 Fax:202-266-1900 Washington, DC 20036 USA www.migrationpolicy.org Printed in the United States of America Interior design by Creative Media Group at Corporate Press. Text set in Adobe Caslon Regular. "The very qualities that bring immigrants and refugees to this country in the thousands every day, made us vulnerable to the attack of September 11, but those are also the qualities that will make us victorious and unvanquished in the end." U.S. Solicitor General Theodore Olson Speech to the Federalist Society, Nov. 16, 2001. Mr. Olson's wife Barbara was one of the airplane passengers murdered on September 11. America's Challenge: Domestic Security, Civil Liberties, and National Unity After September 1 1 Table of Contents Foreword
    [Show full text]
  • Ethics Abandoned: Medical Professionalism and Detainee Abuse in the “War on Terror”
    Ethics AbAndonEd: Medical Professionalism and Detainee Abuse in the “War on Terror” A task force report funded by IMAP/OSF November 2013 Copyright © 2013 Institute on Medicine as a Profession Table of Contents All rights reserved. this book or any portion thereof may not be reproduced or used in any manner whatsoever without the express written permission of the AboUt iMAP And osF v publisher except for the use of brief quotations in a book review. AcknoWlEdgMEnts vii Printed in the United states of America First Printing, 2013 ExEcUtivE sUMMArY xi institUtE on MEdicinE As A ProFEssion Findings And rEcoMMEndAtions xxxi columbia University, college of Physicians and surgeons 630 West 168th street P&s box 11, new York, nY 10032 introdUction 1 www.imapny.org chAPtEr 1: The role of health professionals in abuse of 11 prisoners in U.S. custody chAPtEr 2: Organizational structures and policies that 55 directed the role of health professionals in detainee abuse chAPtEr 3: Hunger strikes and force-feeding 83 chAPtEr 4: Education and training of military physicians on 121 treatment of prisoners chAPtEr 5: Health professional accountability for acts of 135 torture through state licensing and discipline tAsk ForcE MEMbEr biogrAPhiEs 157 APPEndicEs 1. Istanbul Protocol Guidelines for Medical Evaluations of 169 Torture and Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment, Annex 4 2. World Medical Association Declaration of Malta on Hunger Strikes 175 3. Ethics Statements and Opinions of Professional Associations on 181 Interrogation and Torture 4. Professional Misconduct Complaints Filed 201 notEs 215 About IMAP and OSF Funding for this report was provided by: thE institUtE on MEdicinE As A ProFEssion (iMAP) aims to make medical professionalism a field and a force.
    [Show full text]
  • Guantánamo and Its Aftermath
    Guantánamo and Its Aftermath u.s. detention and interrogation practices and their impact on former detainees November 2008 Human Rights Center International Human Rights Law Clinic In partnership with University of California, Berkeley University of California, Berkeley Center for Constitutional Rights Guantánamo and Its Aftermath u.s. detention and interrogation practices and their impact on former detainees Laurel E. Fletcher Eric Stover with Stephen Paul Smith Alexa Koenig Zulaikha Aziz Alexis Kelly Sarah Staveteig Nobuko Mizoguchi November 2008 Human Rights Center University of California, Berkeley International Human Rights Law Clinic University of California, Berkeley, School of Law In partnership with Center for Constitutional Rights ISBN# 978-0-9760677-3-3 Human Rights Center and International Human Rights Law Clinic, University of California, Berkeley Cover photos: Louie Palu/ZUMA Design: Melanie Doherty Design, San Francisco Human Rights Center, University of California, Berkeley The Human Rights Center promotes human rights and international justice worldwide and trains the next generation of human rights researchers and advocates. We believe that sustainable peace and devel- opment can be achieved only through efforts to prevent human rights abuses and hold those responsible for such crimes accountable. We use empirical research methods to investigate and expose serious viola- tions of human rights and international humanitarian law. In our studies and reports, we recommend specific policy measures that should be taken by governments and international organizations to protect vulnerable populations in times of war and political and social upheaval. For more information, please visit hrc.berkeley.edu. International Human Rights Law Clinic, University of California, Berkeley, School of Law The International Human Rights Law Clinic (IHRLC) designs and implements innovative human rights projects to advance the struggle for justice on behalf of individuals and marginalized communities through advocacy, research, and policy development.
    [Show full text]
  • By Any Means Necessary: the Quandary the CIA Now Faces in Light of Employing Enhanced Interrogation Methods to Combat the War on Terror Joshua Laufer
    Duquesne University Duquesne Scholarship Collection Electronic Theses and Dissertations Spring 2011 By Any Means Necessary: The Quandary the CIA Now Faces In Light of Employing Enhanced Interrogation Methods to Combat the War on Terror Joshua Laufer Follow this and additional works at: https://dsc.duq.edu/etd Recommended Citation Laufer, J. (2011). By Any Means Necessary: The Quandary the CIA Now Faces In Light of Employing Enhanced Interrogation Methods to Combat the War on Terror (Master's thesis, Duquesne University). Retrieved from https://dsc.duq.edu/etd/802 This Immediate Access is brought to you for free and open access by Duquesne Scholarship Collection. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Duquesne Scholarship Collection. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY: THE QUANDARY THE CIA NOW FACES IN LIGHT OF EMPLOYING ENHANCED INTERROGATION METHODS TO COMBAT THE WAR ON TERROR A Thesis Submitted to the McAnulty College and Graduate School of Liberal Arts Duquesne University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts By Joshua Laufer May 2011 BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY: THE QUANDARY THE CIA NOW FACES IN LIGHT OF EMPLOYING ENHANCED INTERROGATION METHODS TO COMBAT THE WAR ON TERROR By Joshua Laufer Approved March 14, 2011 ________________________________ ________________________________ Kent Moors, Ph.D. John Sawicki, Ph.D., C.S.Sp. First Reader, Professor of Political Second Reader, Assistant Professor
    [Show full text]
  • Spies, Civil Liberties, and the Senate: the 1975 Church Committee
    Spies, Civil Liberties, and the Senate: The 1975 Church Committee Doctorate of Philosophy Department of History Dafydd Townley May 2018 Abstract This research examines the relationship between US public opinion and national security policy. The focus of this study is the role that public opinion played during the Year of Intelligence, the sixteen-month investigation by Congress into alleged domestic abuses by the US intelligence community. The period, between January 1975 and April 1976, saw the innermost secrets of various US intelligence agencies laid bare before the world as a result of televised public hearings and investigative journalism. The research analyses what both President Gerald R. Ford and Congress defined as public opinion, and how they used such information to shape their strategic decisions concerning national security. The study investigates the ways in which Congress responded to public opinion during the creation of the Church Committee, and how great an influence public opinion had on the objectives and methods of the Church Committee investigation. The research also assesses whether the Church Committee fulfilled its obligations the Senate and the American public and considers the criticism that some contemporaries and academics have levelled at the committee’s chairman, Senator Frank Church of Idaho. Using extensive archival evidence supported by oral history interviews, the research identifies that public opinion played an important role during the Year of Intelligence and, as a consequence, national security policy. The significance of the role is clearly illustrated by the research’s contrast of the failure of the Ford administration to achieve any of its strategic objectives, and the success of Congress in gaining substantial reform to congressional oversight of the intelligence community.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigative Commissions and Reports, Congressional Hearings, and Non-Governmental Initiatives
    ICTJ Research Brief – November 2008 Research Brief: Selected examples of Defence, Intelligence and Justice Investigative Reports into detention and interrogation practices1 International Center for Transitional Justice (ICTJ)2 November 2008 _____ I. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE................................................................................... 2 NOVEMBER 2003: RYDER REPORT................................................................................... 2 JANUARY 2004: TAGUBA REPORT ................................................................................ 2 FEBRUARY 2004: MIKOLASHEK/DAIG REPORT ............................................................. 3 MAY 2004: SCHLESINGER PANEL .......................................................................... 3 JUNE 2004: JACOBY REPORT ................................................................................. 5 AUGUST 2004: FAY/JONES REPORT ............................................................................ 5 AUGUST 2004: ARMY RESERVE TRAINING REVIEW.................................................... 6 MARCH 2005: CHURCH REPORT ............................................................................... 7 APRIL 2005: ARMY SURGEON GENERAL’S REPORT ................................................ 8 JULY 2005: FURLOW/SCHMIDT REPORT ................................................................ 8 JUNE 2006: FORMICA REPORT ............................................................................... 9 AUGUST 2006: INSPECTOR GENERAL, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE,
    [Show full text]
  • The Continuing Pursuit of Unchecked Executive Power 13 May 2005 AI Index: AMR 51/063/2005
    Public amnesty international UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Guantánamo and beyond: The continuing pursuit of unchecked executive power 13 May 2005 AI Index: AMR 51/063/2005 I used to think that America had respect for human rights when it came to prison. Mohammed Nechle, extrajudicially removed from Bosnia and Herzegovina by US agents1 My husband is a tall man with black hair and black eyes…He is now imprisoned in Guantánamo. We don’t know why. Wife of Mohammed Nechle, Algerian national, 20042 Public ........................................................................................................................ - 1 - UNITED STATES OF AMERICA .......................................................................... - 1 - Guantánamo and beyond: The continuing pursuit of unchecked executive power .. - 1 - 1. Summary: The pursuit of unfettered executive power .................................. - 3 - 2. Violating human rights erodes security and trust in government ............... - 10 - 3. Guantánamo detainees – the international legal framework ....................... - 13 - 4. Hypocrisy vs. human rights ........................................................................ - 15 - 5. Human rights law rejected by a war mentality ........................................... - 28 - 6. Seeking to render the Rasul decision meaningless ..................................... - 45 - 7. A judge with security credentials takes a more critical view ..................... - 52 - 8. The Combatant Status Review Tribunal – no laughing matter ..................
    [Show full text]
  • Getting Away with Torture RIGHTS the Bush Administration and Mistreatment of Detainees WATCH
    United States HUMAN Getting Away with Torture RIGHTS The Bush Administration and Mistreatment of Detainees WATCH Getting Away with Torture The Bush Administration and Mistreatment of Detainees Copyright © 2011 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 1-56432-789-2 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch 350 Fifth Avenue, 34th floor New York, NY 10118-3299 USA Tel: +1 212 290 4700, Fax: +1 212 736 1300 [email protected] Poststraße 4-5 10178 Berlin, Germany Tel: +49 30 2593 06-10, Fax: +49 30 2593 0629 [email protected] Avenue des Gaulois, 7 1040 Brussels, Belgium Tel: + 32 (2) 732 2009, Fax: + 32 (2) 732 0471 [email protected] 64-66 Rue de Lausanne 1202 Geneva, Switzerland Tel: +41 22 738 0481, Fax: +41 22 738 1791 [email protected] 2-12 Pentonville Road, 2nd Floor London N1 9HF, UK Tel: +44 20 7713 1995, Fax: +44 20 7713 1800 [email protected] 27 Rue de Lisbonne 75008 Paris, France Tel: +33 (1)43 59 55 35, Fax: +33 (1) 43 59 55 22 [email protected] 1630 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 500 Washington, DC 20009 USA Tel: +1 202 612 4321, Fax: +1 202 612 4333 [email protected] Web Site Address: http://www.hrw.org July 2011 ISBN: 1-56432-789-2 Getting Away with Torture The Bush Administration and Mistreatment of Detainees Summary ........................................................................................................................... 1 Recommendations ............................................................................................................ 12 I. Background: Official Sanction for Crimes against Detainees .......................................... 13 II. Torture of Detainees in US Counterterrorism Operations ............................................... 18 The CIA Detention Program .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION; AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION, Plaintiffs, DECLARATION OF JONATHAN HAFETZ v. 09 Civ. 8071 (BSJ) (FM) DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE; CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY; DEPARTMENT OF ECF Case STATE; DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Defendants. DECLARATION OF JONATHAN HAFETZ I, Jonathan Hafetz, under penalty of perjury declare as follows: 1. I represent plaintiffs the American Civil Liberties Union and the American Civil Liberties Union Foundation in this action concerning a FOIA request that seeks from the Department of Defense (“DOD”) and other agencies records about, among other things, prisoners at Bagram Air Base (“Bagram”) in Afghanistan. 2. I submit this declaration in support of plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment and in opposition to the DOD’s motion for partial summary judgment. The purpose of this declaration is to bring the Court’s attention to official government disclosures, as well as information in the public domain, concerning the citizenship, length of detention, and date, place, and circumstances of capture of detainees held at the Bagram and similarly-situated suspected terrorists and combatants in U.S. military custody at the U.S. Naval Base at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba (“Guantánamo”). 1 Publicly-Available Information about Detainees at Bagram Prison 3. On April 23, 2009, plaintiffs submitted a Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) request to DOD, the Central Intelligence Agency, the Department of Justice and the State Department seeking ten categories of records about Bagram, including records pertaining to detainees’ names, citizenships, length of detention, where they were captured, and the general circumstances of their capture.
    [Show full text]