DOCSLIB.ORG

Ethics Abandoned: Medical Professionalism and Detainee Abuse in the “War on Terror”

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ethics Abandoned: Medical Professionalism and Detainee Abuse in the “War on Terror” Ethics AbAndonEd: Medical Professionalism and Detainee Abuse in the “War on Terror” A task force report funded by IMAP/OSF November 2013 Copyright © 2013 Institute on Medicine as a Profession Table of Contents All rights reserved. this book or any portion thereof may not be reproduced or used in any manner whatsoever without the express written permission of the AboUt iMAP And osF v publisher except for the use of brief quotations in a book review. AcknoWlEdgMEnts vii Printed in the United states of America First Printing, 2013 ExEcUtivE sUMMArY xi institUtE on MEdicinE As A ProFEssion Findings And rEcoMMEndAtions xxxi columbia University, college of Physicians and surgeons 630 West 168th street P&s box 11, new York, nY 10032 introdUction 1 www.imapny.org chAPtEr 1: The role of health professionals in abuse of 11 prisoners in U.S. custody chAPtEr 2: Organizational structures and policies that 55 directed the role of health professionals in detainee abuse chAPtEr 3: Hunger strikes and force-feeding 83 chAPtEr 4: Education and training of military physicians on 121 treatment of prisoners chAPtEr 5: Health professional accountability for acts of 135 torture through state licensing and discipline tAsk ForcE MEMbEr biogrAPhiEs 157 APPEndicEs 1. Istanbul Protocol Guidelines for Medical Evaluations of 169 Torture and Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment, Annex 4 2. World Medical Association Declaration of Malta on Hunger Strikes 175 3. Ethics Statements and Opinions of Professional Associations on 181 Interrogation and Torture 4. Professional Misconduct Complaints Filed 201 notEs 215 About IMAP and OSF Funding for this report was provided by: thE institUtE on MEdicinE As A ProFEssion (iMAP) aims to make medical professionalism a field and a force. it promotes this mission through research and policy initiatives. Four key values underlie medical professionalism: physicians and the health care system must be committed to (1) altruism and promotion of patients’ best interests, (2) effective physician self-regulation, (3) maintenance of technical competence, and (4) physician civic engagement to promote patient and societal well-being. thE oPEn sociEtY FoUndAtions work to build vibrant and tolerant soci- eties whose governments are accountable to their citizens. Working with local communities in more than 100 countries, the open society Foundations sup- port justice and human rights, freedom of expression, and access to public health and education. Acknowledgments tAsk ForcE MEMbErs: scott A. Allen, Md, FAcP steven reisner, Phd University of California, Riverside Coalition for an Ethical Psychology george J. Annas, Jd, MPh hernán reyes, Md, FMh ob/gyn Boston University International Committee of the Red Cross karen brudney, Md david J. rothman, Phd Columbia University Columbia University richard n. gottfried, Jd leonard s. rubenstein, Jd New York State Assembly Johns Hopkins University vincent iacopino, Md, Phd steven s. sharfstein, Md, MPA Physicians for Human Rights Sheppard Pratt Health Systems Allen s. keller, Md Albert J. shimkus, Jr. New York University U.S. Naval War College robert s. lawrence, Md Eric stover Johns Hopkins University University of California, Berkeley steven h. Miles, Md gerald E. thomson, Md University of Minnesota Columbia University Aryeh neier Frederick E. turton, Md, MbA, MAcP Open Society Foundations Emory University deborah Alejandra Popowski, Jd brig. gen. (ret.) stephen n. xenakis, Md Harvard University United States Army viii | Ethics AbAndonEd Acknowledgments | ix leonard rubenstein and gerald thomson provided overall leadership in the Funding for the project was provided by iMAP and the open society Foundations. organization of the task Force and the research, writing, and review of this report. the overview of clinically and ethically appropriate responses to hunger strikes The principal authors and reviewers of chapters and other sections are as follows. contained in chapter 3 was published in expanded form in hernán reyes, scott Institutional affiliations listed for identification purposes only. A. Allen, and george J. Annas, “Physicians and hunger strikes in Prison: confrontation, Manipulation, Medicalization and Medical Ethics,” World introdUction: david rothman, Aryeh neier Medical Journal 59, no. 1 (February 2013) and no. 2 (April 2013). it is used here review by steven Miles, leonard rubenstein, gerald thomson with permission. chAPtEr 1: leonard rubenstein review by vincent iacopino, steven Miles, steven reisner, Albert shimkus, Eric stover, gerald thomson, stephen xenakis chAPtEr 2: leonard rubenstein review by vincent iacopino, steven Miles, steven reisner, Albert shimkus, Eric stover, gerald thomson, stephen xenakis chAPtEr 3: hernán reyes, scott Allen, leonard rubenstein, george Annas review by steven Miles, gerald thomson chAPtEr 4: karen brudney, Frederica stahl (not a task Force member), with assistance from david rothman review by leonard rubenstein, steven Miles chAPtEr 5: deborah Popowski, kate nicholson, with contributors shuenn (Patrick) ho, Pooja nair (nicholson, ho, and nair are not task Force members) review by richard gottfried, leonard rubenstein Eric stover read the entire report for consistency, accuracy, and style. Albert Pierce, Phd, University Professor of Ethics and national security, national defense University, participated in task Force discussions as an observer. Jonathan Marks, director, bioethics Program, Pennsylvania state University, reviewed and provided extensive comments on draft chapters of the report. sondra crosby, Md, Associate Professor of Medicine, boston University, reviewed chapter 3. in addition, the task Force thanks the following individuals for research assistance: Frederica stahl, Whitney Adair, katherine Footer, shuenn (Patrick) ho, sarah humphries, and Pooja nair. Jonathan cobb read and contributed helpful comments on the entire manuscript. laura sider Jost edited the manuscript. other individuals who made substantial contributions to this report wish to remain anonymous. Executive Summary thE 9/11 tErrorist AttAcks on the United states resulted in U.s. govern- ment-approved harsh treatment and torture of detainees suspected of having information about terrorism.1 Military and intelligence-agency physicians and other health professionals, particularly psychologists, became involved in the design and administration of that harsh treatment and torture—in clear conflict with established international and national professional principles and laws.2 in 2010, the institute on Medicine as a Profession (iMAP) and the open society Foundations convened the task Force on Preserving Medical Profes- sionalism in national security detention centers (task Force) to examine what is known about the involvement of health professionals in infliction of torture or cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment of detainees in U.s. custody and how such deviation from professional standards and ethically proper conduct occurred, including actions that were taken by the U.s. department of defense (dod) and the ciA to direct this conduct. the task Force met regularly between december 2009 and January 2012. its members authored and reviewed chapters and policy proposals for the group to consider. this report contains the task Force’s analyses, findings, and recom- mendations. the report is based on information from unclassified, publicly avail- able information. Where gaps in knowledge exist, we note that information is missing and discuss its importance and its potential impact on the issue assessed, as well as the value of further investigation. in a few instances, a member of the task Force had personal knowledge of facts discussed, but consistent with an approach that relied on the public record, the report is not based on information obtained by any of its members in another capacity. Additionally, because of the professional roles they play, some members of the task Force may have a person- al stake in the report’s findings and conclusions; in such instances, we disclose that fact in the discussion. the task Force sought consensus on findings and xii | Ethics AbAndonEd Executive Summary | xiii recommendations. Members agreed to approve the final product, however, even violations against detainees progressed differently in the military and when they did not agree with every statement and recommendation. the ciA, both facilitated that involvement in similar ways, including A note on the terminology used in this report: When a document refers to a undermining health professionals’ allegiances to established principles specific category of medical personnel (e.g., physician or psychologist), this of professional ethics and conduct through reinterpretation of those report refers to that individual using the same term. in many of the documents, principles. however, no specific occupation is identified. in such cases, we use more gener- 3. the secrecy surrounding detention policies that prevailed until 2004– al terminology, either “health professional,” where the context is clear that it 2005, when leaked documents began to reveal those policies. secrecy refers to someone holding a professional license, or “medical personnel,” which allowed the unlawful and unethical interrogation and mistreatment of includes all occupations in the health field, including physicians, psychologists, detainees to proceed unfettered by established ethical principles and registered nurses, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, corpsmen (U.s. standards of conduct as well as societal, professional,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Annual Report 2015 COMMITTEE to PROTECT JOURNALISTS ANNUAL REPORT 2015 | 1 Annual Report 2015
    ANNUAL REPORT 2015 COMMITTEE TO PROTECT JOURNALISTS ANNUAL REPORT 2015 | 1 Annual REPORT 2015 DEAR CPJ SUPPORTER, threat. By mid-year 2015, imprisoned there. In October, after 18 journalists were behind bars an international campaign, members The January 7 attack on the office in Egypt. of Ethiopia’s Zone 9 blogging of Charlie Hebdo left 12 dead This terror dynamic—in which collective were cleared of trumped- and served as a chilling reminder journalists are caught between the up terrorism charges. that in the global struggle for free violence of militant and criminal We challenged other countries expression, there is no safe haven. groups and the repressive policies that, while not the worst abusers, Days after the attack, millions came of governments—presents a unique were failing to live up to their own together in Paris to express their challenge for press freedom. CPJ standards. In Nairobi, we took the horror and defend their rights. has responded by deepening its Kenyan government to task for At the front of the march, political research, expanding its assistance weakening media protections. In leaders from around the world and security support, and Brussels, we called on the European marched shoulder to shoulder. confronting governments at Union to strengthen press freedom But free expression wasn’t what every turn. protections within its borders in united them. Instead, many leaders CPJ’s research is systematic and order to exercise greater influence exploited the Charlie Hebdo tragedy sustained, and our database of outside them. In Washington, to give their domestic anti-terror journalists killed since 1992 is the we urged the White House to policies a patina of international world’s most comprehensive.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on Public Forum
    Anti-Terrorism and the Security Agenda: Impacts on Rights, Freedoms and Democracy Report and Recommendations for Policy Direction of a Public Forum organized by the International Civil Liberties Monitoring Group Ottawa, February 17, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .......................................................................................................2 ABOUT THE ICLMG .............................................................................................................2 BACKGROUND .....................................................................................................................3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .....................................................................................................4 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR POLICY DIRECTION ..........................................................14 PROCEEDINGS......................................................................................................................16 CONCLUDING REMARKS...................................................................................................84 ANNEXES...............................................................................................................................87 ANNEXE I: Membership of the ICLMG ANNEXE II: Program of the Public Forum ANNEXE III: List of Participants/Panelists Anti-Terrorism and the Security Agenda: Impacts on Rights Freedoms and Democracy 2 __________________________________________________________________________________ ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Forum session reporting
    [Show full text]
  • Interrogation, Detention, and Torture DEBORAH N
    Finding Effective Constraints on Executive Power: Interrogation, Detention, and Torture DEBORAH N. PEARLSTEIN* INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................................1255 I. EXECUTIVE POLICY AND PRACTICE: COERCIVE INTERROGATION AND T O RTU RE ....................................................................................................1257 A. Vague or Unlawful Guidance................................................................ 1259 B. Inaction .................................................................................................1268 C. Resources, Training, and a Plan........................................................... 1271 II. ExECuTrVE LIMITs: FINDING CONSTRAINTS THAT WORK ...........................1273 A. The ProfessionalM ilitary...................................................................... 1274 B. The Public Oversight Organizationsof Civil Society ............................1279 C. Activist Federal Courts .........................................................................1288 CONCLUSION ........................................................................................................1295 INTRODUCTION While the courts continue to debate the limits of inherent executive power under the Federal Constitution, the past several years have taught us important lessons about how and to what extent constitutional and sub-constitutional constraints may effectively check the broadest assertions of executive power. Following the publication
    [Show full text]
  • Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law — Volume 18, 2015 Correspondents’ Reports
    YEARBOOK OF INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW — VOLUME 18, 2015 CORRESPONDENTS’ REPORTS 1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Contents Overview – United States Enforcement of International Humanitarian Law ............................ 1 Cases – United States Federal Court .......................................................................................... 3 Cases – United States Military Courts – Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces (CAAF) ...... 4 Cases — United States Military Courts – United States Army ................................................. 4 Cases — United States Military Courts – United States Marine Corps .................................... 5 Issues — United States Department of Defense ........................................................................ 6 Issues — United States Army .................................................................................................... 8 Issues —United States Navy .................................................................................................... 11 Issues — United States Marine Corps ..................................................................................... 12 Overview – United States Detention Practice .......................................................................... 12 Detainee Challenges – United States District Court ................................................................ 13 US Military Commission Appeals ........................................................................................... 16 Court of Appeals for the
    [Show full text]
  • Book JAVNOST 4-2013.Indb
    “BRAND CHINA” IN THE OLYMPIC CONTEXT COMMUNICATIONS CHALLENGES OF CHINA’S SOFT POWER INITIATIVE SUSAN BROWNELL 82 - Abstract The Beijing 2008 Olympics were widely considered to be Susan Brownell is Professor China’s moment for improving its national image worldwide. of Anthropology in the However, the consensus both inside and outside China was Department of Anthropology, that although the Olympics succeeded in advancing an Sociology, and Languages, image of an emerging powerful, prosperous, and well-or- University of Missouri-St. Louis; ganised nation, the message was hijacked by interest groups e-mail: [email protected]. critical of government policies on human rights and Tibet, who were more successful in putting forward their positions in the international media than the Chinese government was. The article analyses the communications challenges that created obstacles for genuine dialogue on sensi- Vol.20 (2013), No. 4, pp. 65 4, pp. (2013), No. Vol.20 tive issues. In its post-Olympics assessment, the Chinese government acknowledged the weakness of China’s voice in international (especially Western) media and responded with a planned US$6 billion investment for strengthening its foreign communications capacity as part of its “soft power” initiative (fi rst called for by President Hu Jintao in 2007). 65 For the eight years from the time that Beijing announced its bid for the 2008 Olympic Games until the conclusion of the games, observers both inside and out- side China widely considered the Beijing 2008 Olympics to be China’s moment for improving its national image worldwide. Beneath this att ention to “national image” lay a power struggle.
    [Show full text]
  • Genealogy of the Concept of Securitization and Minority Rights
    THE KURD INDUSTRY: UNDERSTANDING COSMOPOLITANISM IN THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY by ELÇIN HASKOLLAR A Dissertation submitted to the Graduate School – Newark Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Program in Global Affairs written under the direction of Dr. Stephen Eric Bronner and approved by ________________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ Newark, New Jersey October 2014 © 2014 Elçin Haskollar ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION The Kurd Industry: Understanding Cosmopolitanism in the Twenty-First Century By ELÇIN HASKOLLAR Dissertation Director: Dr. Stephen Eric Bronner This dissertation is largely concerned with the tension between human rights principles and political realism. It examines the relationship between ethics, politics and power by discussing how Kurdish issues have been shaped by the political landscape of the twenty- first century. It opens up a dialogue on the contested meaning and shape of human rights, and enables a new avenue to think about foreign policy, ethically and politically. It bridges political theory with practice and reveals policy implications for the Middle East as a region. Using the approach of a qualitative, exploratory multiple-case study based on discourse analysis, several Kurdish issues are examined within the context of democratization, minority rights and the politics of exclusion. Data was collected through semi-structured interviews, archival research and participant observation. Data analysis was carried out based on the theoretical framework of critical theory and discourse analysis. Further, a discourse-interpretive paradigm underpins this research based on open coding. Such a method allows this study to combine individual narratives within their particular socio-political, economic and historical setting.
    [Show full text]
  • The Biden Administration Must Defend Americans Targeted by the International Criminal Court Steven Groves
    BACKGROUNDER No. 3622 | MAY 17, 2021 MARGARET THATCHER CENTER FOR FREEDOM The Biden Administration Must Defend Americans Targeted by the International Criminal Court Steven Groves he Declaration of Independence cataloged the KEY TAKEAWAYS ways in which King George III infringed upon American liberties. Among King George’s Since its founding, the United States has T offenses listed in the Declaration was “Transporting tried to protect its citizens from legal us beyond the Seas to be tried for pretended Offences.” harassment and persecution by foreign courts. The king claimed the authority to seize American col- onists and force them to stand trial in Great Britain for criminal offenses allegedly committed in America. The Prosecutor of the International Almost 250 years later, another foreign tribunal— Criminal Court has compiled a secret annex listing American citizens to be the International Criminal Court (ICC), located in targeted for prosecution for alleged war The Hague in the Netherlands—is working toward crimes. issuing arrest warrants for American citizens for allegedly abusing detainees in Afghanistan. The court The Biden Administration should stop the is pursuing this course despite the fact that the United ICC from persisting in its misguided pros- States is not a party to the Rome Statute of the Inter- ecution of American citizens that have national Criminal Court and therefore not subject to already been investigated by the U.S. the ICC’s jurisdiction. This paper, in its entirety, can be found at http://report.heritage.org/bg3622 The Heritage Foundation | 214 Massachusetts Avenue, NE | Washington, DC 20002 | (202) 546-4400 | heritage.org Nothing written here is to be construed as necessarily reflecting the views of The Heritage Foundation or as an attempt to aid or hinder the passage of any bill before Congress.
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate Safeguarding Policy (Adults & Children)
    Corporate Safeguarding Policy (Adults & Children) Revised August 2020 1 Content 1 Introduction 2 Scope 3 Policy Statement 4 Context 5 Governance arrangement 6 Recognising and raising concerns about an adult or child where abuse or neglect is suspected. 7 Domestic abuse and employment 8 Information sharing and confidentiality 9 Safeguarding children in Education 10 Safeguarding in Employment 11 Training 12 Communication and Media 13 Review Appendices A. Definitions relevant to safeguarding adults at risk including categories and indicators of abuse B. Definitions relevant to safeguarding children at risk including categories and indicators of abuse C. Other causes of harm: Child sexual exploitation (CSE) Child criminal exploitation (CCE) Radicalisation Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) Forced Marriage Modern Slavery & Human Trafficking Hate Crime D. Domestic violence and abuse E. Safeguarding report – children F. Adult at risk referral form 2 1. Introduction “Safeguarding means preventing and protecting children and adults at risk from abuse or neglect and educating those around them to recognise the signs and dangers.” Wales Safeguarding Procedures Safeguarding is everyone’s business whether they work for, or on behalf of the Council. This safeguarding policy sets out the Council’s duty and commitment to safeguard and promote the health, wellbeing and human rights of adults and children at risk. In addition, to ensure that effective practices are in place throughout the Council and its commissioned services such that individuals can live their life free from harm, abuse and neglect. 2. Scope This policy is in respect of the Council’s responsibility towards Adults and Children at risk. The Social Services and Well-being (Wales) Act 2014 states that: An adult at risk is an adult (aged 18 or over) who is experiencing or is at risk of abuse or neglect, has needs for care and support (whether or not the authority is meeting any of those needs); and as a result of those needs is unable to protect himself or herself against the abuse or neglect or the risk of it.
    [Show full text]
  • The Abu Ghraib Convictions: a Miscarriage of Justice
    Buffalo Public Interest Law Journal Volume 32 Article 4 9-1-2013 The Abu Ghraib Convictions: A Miscarriage of Justice Robert Bejesky Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/bpilj Part of the Human Rights Law Commons, and the Military, War, and Peace Commons Recommended Citation Robert Bejesky, The Abu Ghraib Convictions: A Miscarriage of Justice, 32 Buff. Envtl. L.J. 103 (2013). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/bpilj/vol32/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at Digital Commons @ University at Buffalo School of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Buffalo Public Interest Law Journal by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ University at Buffalo School of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE ABU GHRAIB CONVICTIONS: A MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE ROBERT BEJESKYt I. INTRODUCTION ..................... ..... 104 II. IRAQI DETENTIONS ...............................107 A. Dragnet Detentions During the Invasion and Occupation of Iraq.........................107 B. Legal Authority to Detain .............. ..... 111 C. The Abuse at Abu Ghraib .................... 116 D. Chain of Command at Abu Ghraib ..... ........ 119 III. BASIS FOR CRIMINAL CULPABILITY ..... ..... 138 A. Chain of Command ....................... 138 B. Systemic Influences ....................... 140 C. Reduced Rights of Military Personnel and Obedience to Authority ................ ..... 143 D. Interrogator Directives ................ ....
    [Show full text]
  • Clergy Sexual Abuse: Annotated Bibliography of Conceptual and Practical Resources
    Clergy Sexual Abuse: Annotated Bibliography of Conceptual and Practical Resources. Preface The phenomenon of sexual abuse as committed by persons in fiduciary relationships is widespread among helping professions and is international in scope. This bibliography is oriented to several specific contexts in which that phenomenon occurs. The first context is the religious community, specifically Christian churches, and particularly in the U.S. This is the context of occurrence that I best know and understand. The second context for the phenomenon is the professional role of clergy, a religious vocation and culture of which I am a part. While the preponderance of sources cited in this bibliography reflect those two settings, the intent is to be as comprehensive as possible about sexual boundary violations within the religious community. Many of the books included in this bibliography were obtained through interlibrary loan services that are available at both U.S. public and academic libraries. Many of the articles that are listed were obtained through academic libraries. Daily newspaper media sources are generally excluded from this bibliography for practical reasons due to the large quantity, lack of access, and concerns about accuracy and completeness. In most instances, author descriptions and affiliations refer to status at time of publication. In the absence of a subject or name index for this bibliography, the Internet user may trace key words in this PDF format through the standard find or search feature that is available as a pull-down menu option on the user’s computer. The availability of this document on the Internet is provided by AdvocateWeb, a nonprofit corporation that serves an international community and performs an exceptional service for those who care about this topic.
    [Show full text]
  • Army Regulation 15-6: Final Report Investigation Into FBI Allegations Of
    UNCLASS 1 Apr 05 (Amended 9 Jun 05) Army Regulation 15-6: Final Report Investigation into FBI Allegations of Detainee Abuse at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba Detention Facility EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Detention and interrogation operations at Joint Task Force Guantanamo (JTF-GTMO) cover a three-year period and over 24,000 interrogations. This AR 15-6 investigation found only three interrogation acts in violation of interrogation techniques authorized by Army Field Manual 34-52 and DoD guidance. The AR 15-6 also found that the Commander of JTF-GTMO failed to monitor the interrogation of one high value detainee in late 2002. The AR 15-6 found that the interrogation of this same high value detainee resulted in degrading and abusive treatment but did not rise to the level of being inhumane treatment. Finally, the AR 15-6 found that the communication of a threat to another high value detainee was in violation of SECDEF guidance and the UCMJ. The AR 15-6 found no evidence of torture or inhumane treatment at JTF-GTMO. INTRODUCTION In June 2004, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) began an internal investigation to determine if any of its personnel had observed mistreatment or aggressive behavior towards detainees at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba (GTMO). On 9 Jul 04, the FBI – Inspection Division (INSD), sent an e-mail message to all FBI personnel who had served in any capacity at GTMO. The e-mail stated in relevant part: “You have been identified as having conducted an assignment at GTMO, Cuba since 9/11/2001. The Inspection Division has been tasked with contacting those employees who have served in any capacity at GTMO and obtain information regarding the treatment of detainees.
    [Show full text]
  • Mitchell James 01.16.17.Ptx
    Case 2:15-cv-00286-JLQ Document 176-1 Filed 05/22/17 Exhibit 1 Case 2:15-cv-00286-JLQ Document 176-1 Filed 05/22/17 Page 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SPOKANE - - - SULEIMAN ABDULLAH : SALIM, MOHOMED AHMED : DOCKET NO. BEN SOUD, OBAID ULLAH : (as personal : 2:15-CV-286-JLQ representative of GUL : RAHMAN), : : Plaintiffs, : : v. : : JAMES ELMER MITCHELL : and JOHN "BRUCE" : JESSEN, : : Defendants. : - - - Monday, January 16, 2017 - - - Videotaped deposition of JAMES E. MITCHELL taken pursuant to notice, was held at the law offices of Blank Rome, 130 N. 18th Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103, beginning at 10:13 AM, on the above date, before Constance S. Kent, a Registered Professional Reporter and Notary Public in and for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. * * * MAGNA LEGAL SERVICES (866) 624-6221 www.MagnaLS.com Case 2:15-cv-00286-JLQ Document 176-1 Filed 05/22/17 Page 6 Page 8 1 NO. DESCRIPTION PAGE 1 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: We are 2 Exhibit 20 Fax, Generic Description 321 of the Process, Bates 2 now on the record. 3 DOJ OLC 1126 through 3 This begins DVD No. 1 in the 1144 4 4 deposition of James Elmer Mitchell Exhibit 21 CIA Comments on the 323 5 in the matter of Salim versus 5 Senate Select Committee James Elmer Mitchell and Bruce -- on Intelligence Report 6 6 on the Rendition, 7 John Bruce Jessen in the United Detention and 8 States District Court for the 7 Interrogation Program 8 Exhibit 22 Document, Bates USA 1629 335 9 Eastern District of Washington.
    [Show full text]