DOCSLIB.ORG

Mamíferos De Argentina. Sistemática Y Distribución

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mamíferos De Argentina. Sistemática Y Distribución MAMÍFEROS DE ARGENTINA Sistemática y Distribución Rubén M. Barquez, M. Mónica Díaz y Ricardo A. Ojeda Editores 2006 SAREM Sociedad Argentina para el Estudio de los Mamíferos La presente es una Publicación de la Asociación Argentina para el estudio de los Mamíferos (SAREM), Argentina MAMÍFEROS DE ARGENTINA Sistemática y Distribución Rubén M. Barquez M. Mónica Díaz Ricardo A. Ojeda Editores 2006 ÍNDICE Prólogo _____________________________________________________________ P P Los Autores _________________________________________________________ P P Introducción _________________________________________________________ P P Información General___________________________________________________ P P Breve historia de la Mastozoología en Argentina ____________________________ P P Lista sistemática de los mamíferos de Argentina ____________________________ P P ORDEN DIDELPHIMORPHIA: David A. Flores ____________________________ P P ORDEN PAUCITUBERCULATA: David A. Flores __________________________ P P ORDEN MICROBIOTHERIA: David A. Flores _____________________________ P P MEGAORDEN XENARTHRA: Sergio F. Vizcaíno, Agustín M. Abba y César M. García Esponda __________________________________________________ P P ORDEN CHIROPTERA: Rubén M. Barquez _______________________________ P P ORDEN PRIMATES: Marta D. Mudry, Mariela Nieves, Eliana R. Steinberg y Gabriel E. Zunino ___________________________________________________ P P ORDEN CARNIVORA ________________________________________________ P P Familia Canidae: M. Mónica Díaz y Mauro Lucherini ______________________ P P Familia Felidae: Pablo Perovic y Javier A. Pereira _________________________ P P Familias Mephitidae, Mustelidae, Procyonidae: M. Mónica Díaz y Mauro Lucherini _________________________________________________________ P P Familias Otariidae, Phocidae: Ricardo Bastida y Diego Rodríguez _______________ P P ORDEN PERISSODACTYLA: Silvia Chalukian y Mariano L. Merino __________ P P ORDEN ARTIODACTYLA ____________________________________________ P P Suborden Suiformes, Familia Tayassuidae: Germán M. Gasparini, Edgardo Ortiz-Jaureguizar y Alfredo A. Carlini __________________________________ P P Suborden Tylopoda, Familia Camelidae: Bibiana Vilá ______________________ P P Suborden Rumiantia, Familia Cervidae: Mariano L. Merino _________________ P P ORDEN CETACEA: Ricardo Bastida y Diego Rodríguez _____________________ P P ORDEN RODENTIA __________________________________________________ P P Familia Sciuridae: Luis I. Ferro ________________________________________ P P Familia Cricetidae __________________________________________________ P P Tribu Akodontini: Ulyses F. J. Pardiñas, Guillermo D’Elía, Pablo Teta, Pablo E. Ortiz, Pablo J. Jayat y Sebastián Cirignoli _____________________________ P P Tribu Oryzomyini: Sebastián Cirignoli, Pablo Teta, Ulyses F. J. Pardiñas y Guillermo D’Elía ___________________________________________________ P P Tribu Phyllotini: M. Mónica Díaz, Pablo Teta, Ulyses F. J. Pardiñas y Rubén M. Barquez __________________________________________________ P P Tribu Reithrodontini: Ulyses F. J. Pardiñas, Pablo Teta y Guillermo D’Elía ____________________________________________________________ P P Tribu Thomasomyini: M. Mónica Díaz, Ulyses F. J. Pardiñas y Rubén M. Barquez___________________________________________________________ P P 6 Mamíferos de Argentina “Abrotrichinos”: Pablo Teta, Ulyses F. J. Pardiñas y Guillermo D’Elía _________ P P Incertae Sedis: Guillermo D’Elía, Pablo Teta y Ulyses F. J. Pardiñas __________ P P Familias Erethizontidae, Chinchillidae: Martín R. Álvarez y Romari A. Martínez __________________________________________________________ P P Familia Caviidae: Ricardo A. Ojeda ____________________________________ P P Familias Hydrochoeridae, Agoutidae, Dasyproctidae: Martín R. Álvarez y Romari A. Martínez _________________________________________________ P P Familia Ctenomyidae: Claudio Bidau ___________________________________ P P Familia Octodontidae: M. Mónica Díaz y Diego Verzi ______________________ P P Familias Abrocomidae, Echimyidae, Myocastoridae: Martín R. Álvarez y Romari A. Martínez _________________________________________________ P P ORDEN LAGOMORPHA: Never A. Bonino _______________________________ P P Literatura Citada______________________________________________________ P P Palabras Finales ______________________________________________________ P P Anexo I (Nombres científicos) _________________________________________ P P Anexo II (Nombres comunes) _________________________________________ P P _________________________________________________________________ P P _________________________________________________________________ P P _________________________________________________________________ P P _________________________________________________________________ P P Prólogo 7 PRÓLOGO Las investigaciones sobre mamíferos neotropicales han tenido un importante impulso en los últimos años. Este crecimiento se ha visto reflejado en la aparición de un importante número de trabajos, monografías y libros en las más diversas disciplinas, desde tratamien- tos sistemáticos y filogenéticos, hasta análisis de faunas regionales, ecología de comunida- des, estudios moleculares, fisiológicos y comportamentales, entre otros. A éstos se suma la creación y consolidación de grupos regionales de investigación y de sus sociedades, como la Sociedad Argentina para el Estudio de los Mamíferos (SAREM), Sociedade Brasileira de Mastozoologia (SBMz), Asociación Mexicana de Mastozoología (AMAC), Asociación Venezolana para el Estudio de los Mamíferos (ASOVEM), la reciente Asociación Bolivia- na de Investigadores sobre Mamíferos (ABIMA), revistas científicas como Mastozoología Neotropical, Chiroptera Neotropical y la creciente interacción e integración entre éstas y la comunidad científica internacional. La elaboración de una “Lista formal de Especies” ha sido un anhelo de la SAREM, casi contemporáneo a su nacimiento en 1983. Esta Sociedad ha realizado múltiples reuniones científicas en las que se han expuesto los resultados de diversas líneas de investigación nacional, y siempre ha estado en el “aire” la intención de hacer realidad una publicación “global” impulsada por ella misma. Con el transcurrir del tiempo, la intensa vida académica de sus miembros, los resultados de sus proyectos, la descripción de nuevas especies, nuevos registros de distribución, mayores datos sobre historia natural y otros estudios, han generado una voluminosa información, que estimábamos importante volcar en una obra de la naturaleza de este libro, con la valiosa cooperación de los especialistas de los distintos taxa. Los mamíferos de Argentina: sistemática y distribución tomó su impulso definitivo gra- cias a conversaciones mantenidas entre los editores quienes, en noviembre de 2002, duran- te las Jornadas Argentinas de Mastozoología en Mar del Plata, concretaron el acuerdo de convocar a diversos autores para dar inicio al proyecto. Esto se hizo efectivo en abril de 2003, cuando la comisión directiva de SAREM estaba a cargo de Noemí Gardenal y de Carlos Borghi. Desde entonces se desarrolló el proceso de discusiones e intercambios de ideas para concretar la lista de mamíferos de la Argentina que se ofrece en este trabajo. El objetivo original de la obra fue poner a disposición de la comunidad científica, el estado actual del conocimiento de los mamíferos de Argentina, desde la óptica y conoci- miento de los especialistas nacionales, quienes debían resumir la información de las espe- cies reconocidas hasta el momento, la taxonomía que debe utilizarse y las distribuciones de cada una. Este trabajo fue pensado para servir de base conceptual actualizada para futuras investigaciones y para proyectos de investigadores y jóvenes que deseen desarrollar sus estudios de tesis o becas. La meta principal del plan fue cumplida con algunas variantes respecto del proyecto original, ya que los especialistas invitados eligieron a colaboradores que consideraron ade- cuados. Así la lista de autores se amplió a expertos de otros países, vinculados estrecha- mente al conocimiento de la situación de las especies de Argentina. De este modo se fue conformando la lista final de autores, en número mayor que la de los invitados inicialmen- te, lo que contribuyó al enriquecimiento de la información brindada para las especies. 8 Mamíferos de Argentina Los autores de cada capítulo han abreviado la información disponible sobre las especies reconocidas hasta el momento en Argentina, definiendo los nombres que deben utilizarse y las distribuciones actualizadas de cada una. Esto está respaldado en la experiencia con los grupos, el contacto permanente con la “problemática”, relevamientos en el país, además del conocimiento de citas bibliográficas locales poco difundidas, que contienen indiscuti- ble valor y cuya ignorancia puede inducir a erróneas conclusiones sobre la identidad de especies, biogeografía, evolución y otros aspectos. La obra reúne datos precisos y breves, ofreciendo información orientativa y la literatura imprescindible para cada especie. Este compendio de conocimientos no plantea una revi- sión sistemática de cada grupo, sino la expresión experta de los autores, quienes han actua- do con independencia de criterio y son responsables de las opiniones emitidas. Es nuestra aspiración que este volumen sirva de punto de partida y base sobre la cual proyectar el desarrollo de futuras investigaciones, tanto para investigadores como para estudiantes de postgrado interesados en los distintos aspectos
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Matter of Weight: Critical Comments on the Basic Data Analysed by Maestri Et Al
    DOI: 10.1111/jbi.13098 CORRESPONDENCE A matter of weight: Critical comments on the basic data analysed by Maestri et al. (2016) in Journal of Biogeography, 43, 1192–1202 Abstract Maestri, Luza, et al. (2016), although we believe that an exploration Recently, Maestri, Luza, et al. (2016) assessed the effect of ecology of the quality of the original data informs both. Ultimately, we sub- and phylogeny on body size variation in communities of South mit that the matrix of body size and the phylogeny used by these American Sigmodontinae rodents. Regrettably, a cursory analysis of authors were plagued with major inaccuracies. the data and the phylogeny used to address this question indicates The matrix of body sizes used by Maestri, Luza, et al. (2016, p. that both are plagued with inaccuracies. We urge “big data” users to 1194) was obtained from two secondary or tertiary sources: give due diligence at compiling data in order to avoid developing Rodrıguez, Olalla-Tarraga, and Hawkins (2008) and Bonvicino, Oli- hypotheses based on insufficient or misleading basic information. veira, and D’Andrea (2008). The former study derived cricetid mass data from Smith et al. (2003), an ambitious project focused on the compilation of “body mass information for all mammals on Earth” We are living a great time in evolutionary biology, where the combi- where the basic data were derived from “primary and secondary lit- nation of the increased power of systematics, coupled with the use erature ... Whenever possible, we used an average of male and of ever more inclusive datasets allows—heretofore impossible— female body mass, which was in turn averaged over multiple locali- questions in ecology and evolution to be addressed.
    [Show full text]
  • Repositiorio | FAUBA | Artículos De Docentes E Investigadores De FAUBA
    Biodivers Conserv (2011) 20:3077–3100 DOI 10.1007/s10531-011-0118-9 REVIEW PAPER Effects of agriculture expansion and intensification on the vertebrate and invertebrate diversity in the Pampas of Argentina Diego Medan • Juan Pablo Torretta • Karina Hodara • Elba B. de la Fuente • Norberto H. Montaldo Received: 23 July 2010 / Accepted: 15 July 2011 / Published online: 24 July 2011 Ó Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011 Abstract In this paper we summarize for the first time the effects of agriculture expansion and intensification on animal diversity in the Pampas of Argentina and discuss research needs for biodiversity conservation in the area. The Pampas experienced little human intervention until the last decades of the 19th century. Agriculture expanded quickly during the 20th century, transforming grasslands into cropland and pasture lands and converting the landscape into a mosaic of natural fragments, agricultural fields, and linear habitats. In the 1980s, agriculture intensification and replacement of cattle grazing- cropping systems by continuous cropping promoted a renewed homogenisation of the most productive areas. Birds and carnivores were more strongly affected than rodents and insects, but responses varied within groups: (a) the geographic ranges and/or abundances of many native species were reduced, including those of carnivores, herbivores, and specialist species (grassland-adapted birds and rodents, and probably specialized pollinators), sometimes leading to regional extinction (birds and large carnivores), (b) other native species were unaffected (birds) or benefited (bird, rodent and possibly generalist pollinator and crop-associated insect species), (c) novel species were introduced, thus increasing species richness of most groups (26% of non-rodent mammals, 11.1% of rodents, 6.2% of birds, 0.8% of pollinators).
    [Show full text]
  • Cómo Citar El Artículo Número Completo Más
    Mastozoología Neotropical ISSN: 0327-9383 ISSN: 1666-0536 [email protected] Sociedad Argentina para el Estudio de los Mamíferos Argentina Teta, Pablo; Abba, Agustín M.; Cassini, Guillermo H.; Flores, David A.; Galliari, Carlos A.; Lucero, Sergio O.; Ramírez, Mariano LISTA REVISADA DE LOS MAMÍFEROS DE ARGENTINA Mastozoología Neotropical, vol. 25, núm. 1, 2018, Enero-Junio, pp. 163-198 Sociedad Argentina para el Estudio de los Mamíferos Argentina Disponible en: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=45758865015 Cómo citar el artículo Número completo Sistema de Información Científica Redalyc Más información del artículo Red de Revistas Científicas de América Latina y el Caribe, España y Portugal Página de la revista en redalyc.org Proyecto académico sin fines de lucro, desarrollado bajo la iniciativa de acceso abierto Mastozoología Neotropical, 25(1):163-198, Mendoza, 2018 Copyright ©SAREM, 2018 http://www.sarem.org.ar Versión on-line ISSN 1666-0536 http://www.sbmz.com.br Artículo LISTA REVISADA DE LOS MAMÍFEROS DE ARGENTINA Pablo Teta1, 5, Agustín M. Abba2, 5, Guillermo H. Cassini1, 3, 5, David A. Flores4 ,5, Carlos A. Galliari2, 5, Sergio O. Lucero1, 5 y Mariano Ramírez1, 5 1 División Mastozoología, Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernardino Rivadavia”, Buenos Aires, Argentina. [Correspondencia: Pablo Teta <[email protected]>] 2 Centro de Estudios Parasitológicos y de Vectores (CEPAVE, CONICET-UNLP), La Plata, Argentina. 3 Departamento de Ciencias Básicas, Universidad Nacional de Luján, Luján, Buenos Aires, Argentina. 4 Instituto de Vertebrados, Unidad Ejecutora Lillo (CONICET- Fundación Miguel Lillo), Tucumán, Argentina. 5 Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Argentina. RESUMEN. Se presenta una lista revisada de los mamíferos de Argentina, incorporando los cambios taxonómi- cos recientes y los nuevos registros para el país producidos desde la publicación de un listado previo en 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • Sobre a BIOTA NEOTROPICA
    Biota Neotrop. vol. 9, no. 1, jan./mar. 2009 ISSN 1678-6424 ISSN 1678-6424 vol. 9, no. 1, jan./mar. 2009 jan./mar. 1, no. 9, vol. Sumário Artigos Uma revisão da distribuição de Ocotea curucutuensis J.B. Baitello na região sudeste do Brasil vol. 9, no. 1, jan./mar. 2009 Frederico Alexandre Roccia Dal Pozzo Arzolla, João Batista Baitello, George John Shepherd, Gláucia Cortez Ramos de Paula & Ricardo Bertoncello ...............................................21 Novos registros, sinonímia e descrição do macho de Culicoides horticola Lutz (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) Maria Luiza Felippe-Bauer & Gustavo Ricardo Spinelli .....................................................................................................................................................................................................27 Os pequenos mamíferos da altamente impactada Floresta Atlântica do Nordeste do Brasil, Centro de Endemismo Pernambuco Paulo Henrique Asfora & Antonio Rossano Mendes Pontes ..............................................................................................................................................................................................31 Ácaros associados ao cafeeiro (Coffea spp.) no estado de São Paulo, Brasil. Parte I. Mesostigmata Jeferson Luiz de Carvalho Mineiro, Adalton Raga, Mario Eidi Sato & Antonio Carlos Lofego ...........................................................................................................................................37 Relações entre diversidade íctia e fatores hidrodinâmicos
    [Show full text]
  • Biosystematics of the Native Rodents of the Galapagos Archipelago, Ecuador
    539 BIOSYSTEMATICS OF THE NATIVE RODENTS OF THE GALAPAGOS ARCHIPELAGO, ECUADOR JAMES L. PATTON AND MARK S. HAFNER' Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720 The native rodent fauna of the Galapagos Archipelago consists of seven species belonging to the generalized Neotropical rice rat (oryzomyine) stock of the family Cricetidae. These species comprise three rather distinct assemblages, each of which is varyingly accorded generic or subgeneric rank: (1) Oryzomys (sensu stricto), including 0. galapagoensis [known only from Isla San Cristobal] and 0. bauri [from Isla Santa Fe] ; (2) Nesoryzomys, including N. narboroughi [from Isla Fernandina], N. swarthi [from Isla Santiago], N. darwini [from Isla Santa Cruz] , and N. indefessus [from both Islas Santa Cruz and Baltra] ; and (3) Megalomys curioi [from Isla Santa Cruz]. Megalomys is only known from subfossil material and will not be treated here. Four of the remaining six species are now probably extinct as only 0. bauri and N. narboroughi are known cur- rently from viable populations. The time and pattern of radiation, and the phylogenetic relationships of Oryzomys and Nesoryzomys are assessed by karyological, biochemical, and anatomical investigations of the two extant species, and by multivariate morpho- metric analyses of existing museum specimens of all taxa. These data suggest the following: (a) Nesoryzomys is a very unique entity and should be recognized at the generic level; (b) there were at least two separate invasions of the islands with Nesoryzomys representing an early entrant followed considerably later by Oryzomys (s.s.); (c) both taxa of Oryzomys are quite recent immigrants and are probably derived from 0.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrative Taxonomy of the Southernmost Tucu-Tucus in the World: Differentiation of the Nominal Forms Associated with Ctenomys
    Mammalian Biology https://doi.org/10.1007/s42991-020-00015-z ORIGINAL ARTICLE Integrative taxonomy of the southernmost tucu‑tucus in the world: diferentiation of the nominal forms associated with Ctenomys magellanicus Bennett, 1836 (Rodentia, Hystricomorpha, Ctenomyidae) Pablo Teta1 · Guillermo D’Elía2 · Juan C. Opazo2 Received: 19 July 2019 / Accepted: 23 January 2020 © Deutsche Gesellschaft für Säugetierkunde 2020 Abstract We reviewed the alpha taxonomy of the genus Ctenomys Blainville, 1826 in southernmost South America, with emphasis on those nominal forms previously associated with C. magellanicus Bennett, 1836. We integrate distinct lines of evidence, including variation of mtDNA sequences, and the assessment of quantitative and qualitative traits of skins and skulls; when available, karyotypic data was also considered. Phylogenetic analysis of molecular markers shows low levels of divergence among specimens from southern South American mainland and the island of Tierra del Fuego (ca. 0.4%). This evidence plus the results of the multivariate analysis of metric data suggest that the nominal forms C. colburni J. A. Allen, 1903, C. fueginus Philippi, 1880, C. osgoodi J. A. Allen, 1905, C. m. dicki Osgood, 1943, and C. m. obscurus Texera, 1975 are subjective junior synonyms of C. magellanicus. In addition, we reviewed the status of C. fodax Thomas, 1910, a nominal form that have been alternatively considered as a valid species or related to C. magellanicus by previous researchers. Based on quantitative and qualitative morphological traits, we preliminarily regard C. fodax at the species level while citing it for the frst time to Chile. Keywords Caviomorpha · Octodontoidea · Taxonomy · Patagonia · Tierra del Fuego Introduction With ca.
    [Show full text]
  • Chromosomal Relationships Among the Native Rodents (Cricetidae: Oryzomyini) of the Galápagos Islands, Ecuador
    THERYA, 2021, Vol. 12(2):317-329 DOI:10.12933/therya-21-1126 ISSN 2007-3364 Chromosomal relationships among the native rodents (Cricetidae: Oryzomyini) of the Galápagos Islands, Ecuador ROBERT C. DOWLER1* AND MArcIA A. REVELEZ2 1 Department of Biology, Angelo State University, San Angelo 76909. Texas, USA. E-mail: [email protected]. 2 Museum of Texas Tech University, Lubbock 76409-3191. Texas, USA, E-mail: [email protected]. *Corresponding author Although the Galápagos Islands are recognized for their contribution to our understanding of evolutionary theory and have received the attention of scientists for over 185 years, our understanding of the native rodents there has been minimal relative to many other groups of organisms. Much of what we knew through most of the 20th century was based solely on species descriptions. Chromosome data has been limited to only Nesoryzomys narboroughi (2n = 32, FN (number of autosomal arms) = 50) and Aegialomys galapagoensis (2n = 56; FN = 58). We present the karyotypes of the only remaining extant species in the genus, N. swarthi (2n = 56; FN = 54) and N. fernandinae (2n = 44; FN = 54). Chromosomal banding reveals that extensive rearrangement has occurred within Nesoryzomys, including Robertsonian fusion and tandem fusion events but these alone cannot account for the diverse diploid numbers found within the genus. We propose that 1) N. swarthi repre- sents the ancestral karyotype for the genus, similar to A. galapagoensis, 2) N. swarthi and N. fernandinae share the same fundamental number, suggesting divergence by Robertsonian fusions, and 3) N. narboroughi has the most derived karyotype, based on banding morphology and low diploid number.
    [Show full text]
  • With Focus on the Genus Handleyomys and Related Taxa
    Brigham Young University BYU ScholarsArchive Theses and Dissertations 2015-04-01 Evolution and Biogeography of Mesoamerican Small Mammals: With Focus on the Genus Handleyomys and Related Taxa Ana Villalba Almendra Brigham Young University - Provo Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd Part of the Biology Commons BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Villalba Almendra, Ana, "Evolution and Biogeography of Mesoamerican Small Mammals: With Focus on the Genus Handleyomys and Related Taxa" (2015). Theses and Dissertations. 5812. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/5812 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Evolution and Biogeography of Mesoamerican Small Mammals: Focus on the Genus Handleyomys and Related Taxa Ana Laura Villalba Almendra A dissertation submitted to the faculty of Brigham Young University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Duke S. Rogers, Chair Byron J. Adams Jerald B. Johnson Leigh A. Johnson Eric A. Rickart Department of Biology Brigham Young University March 2015 Copyright © 2015 Ana Laura Villalba Almendra All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT Evolution and Biogeography of Mesoamerican Small Mammals: Focus on the Genus Handleyomys and Related Taxa Ana Laura Villalba Almendra Department of Biology, BYU Doctor of Philosophy Mesoamerica is considered a biodiversity hot spot with levels of endemism and species diversity likely underestimated. For mammals, the patterns of diversification of Mesoamerican taxa still are controversial. Reasons for this include the region’s complex geologic history, and the relatively recent timing of such geological events.
    [Show full text]
  • Museum Receives National Medal, Accreditation 2014 Volunteer of the Year in the Footsteps of Dinosaurs What's in a Name? Hungr
    TracksSummer 2014 Newsletter Vol. 26, No. 2 IN THIS ISSUE Museum Receives National Medal, Accreditation 2014 Volunteer of the Year In the Footsteps of Dinosaurs What’s in a Name? Hungry Planet: What the World Eats Formed in Stone: The Natural Beauty of Fossils TRACKS, SPRING 2014: VOLUME 26 NO. 1 MUSEUM INFORMATION OUR MISSION TRACKS The Sam Noble Museum at the Editor-in-Chief: Michael A. Mares Address University of Oklahoma inspires Managing Editor: Pam McIntosh Sam Noble Museum minds to understand the world Associate Editor: Jen Tregarthen The University of Oklahoma through collection-based research, Layout: Jen Tregarthen 2401 Chautauqua Ave. interpretation and education. Norman, OK 73072-7029 This publication is printed on paper OUR VISION containing 30% post consumer recycled Telephone: (405) 325-4712 As one of the finest museums, we are at fiber. Please recycle. Email: [email protected] the heart of our community, collectively This publication, printed by the Sam Noble Museum, Web: www.SamNobleMuseum.org working to inspire understanding, is issued by the University of Oklahoma. 1,500 copies appreciation and stewardship of have been prepared and distributed at a cost of $2,381 the earth and its peoples. to the taxpayers of the state of Oklahoma. The University of Oklahoma in compliance with all applicable federal and state laws and regulations does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, sexual orientation, genetic information, sex, age, religion, disability, political beliefs, or status as a veteran in any of its policies, practices or procedures. This includes but is not limited to admissions, employment, financial aid and educational services.
    [Show full text]
  • Chigger Mites (Acariformes: Trombiculidae) of Chiloé Island, Chile, with Descriptions of Two New Species and New Data on the Genus Herpetacarus
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/346943842 Chigger Mites (Acariformes: Trombiculidae) of Chiloé Island, Chile, With Descriptions of Two New Species and New Data on the Genus Herpetacarus Article in Journal of Medical Entomology · December 2020 DOI: 10.1093/jme/tjaa258 CITATIONS READS 2 196 8 authors, including: Carolina Silva Alexandr A Stekolnikov Universidad Austral de Chile Russian Academy of Sciences 42 PUBLICATIONS 162 CITATIONS 98 PUBLICATIONS 666 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Thomas Weitzel Esperanza Beltrami University of Desarrollo Universidad Austral de Chile 135 PUBLICATIONS 2,099 CITATIONS 12 PUBLICATIONS 18 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: THE ROLE OF RODENTS IN THE DISTRIBUTION OF TRICHINELLA SP. IN CHILE View project Fleas as potential vectors of pathogenic bacteria: evaluating the effects of diversity and composition community of fleas and rodent on prevalence of Rickettsia spp. and Bartonella spp. in Chile View project All content following this page was uploaded by Esperanza Beltrami on 11 December 2020. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. applyparastyle "fig//caption/p[1]" parastyle "FigCapt" applyparastyle "fig" parastyle "Figure" Journal of Medical Entomology, XX(X), 2020, 1–12 doi: 10.1093/jme/tjaa258 Morphology, Systematics, Evolution Research Chigger Mites (Acariformes: Trombiculidae) of Chiloé Island, Chile, With Descriptions of Two New Species and New Data on the Genus Herpetacarus Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/jme/advance-article/doi/10.1093/jme/tjaa258/6020011 by guest on 11 December 2020 María Carolina Silva-de la Fuente,1 Alexandr A.
    [Show full text]
  • Cytogenetics of Some Mammal Species from Central
    CYTOGENETICS OF SOME MAMMAL SPECIES FROM CENTRAL ARGENTINA by SERGIO I. TIRANTl, B.S. A THESIS IN ZOOLOGY Submitted to the Gradúate Faculty of Texas Tech University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Approved August, 1996 ^f5 'f\\iV 30- Ho i^'í> "h Copyright 1996, Sergio I. Tiranti ACKNOWLEDGMENTS My special thanks go to Robert J. Baker, my committee chairman, for his encouragement and support throughout my stay at Texas Tech. Committee members Robert D. Bradley and Michael R. Willig, offered comments and suggestions that benefited the final outcome of this thesis. Portions of this thesis were reviewed by John Bickham, Meredith J. Hamilton, Steve Kasper, Karen McBee and Lara E. Wiggins, thus contributing to its improvement. My work in La Pampa Province, Argentina, was supported by the Subsecretaría de Cultura, where Norma Durango, Gustavo Siegenthaler and Eduardo Fiorucci contributed in many ways to the accomplishment of this research project. Numerous localities visited in this study were sampled as part of La Pampa Province Vertébrate Survey. My stay at TTU is supported in part by the Dirección Nacional de Cooperación Internacional, Ministerio de Cultura y Educación, Argentina and the Universidad Nacional de La Pampa, Argentina. Finally, I am heartedly indebted to my parents, Iván and Irene, for their neverending encouragement and support. 11 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ü ABSTRACT v LIST OF TABEES vi LIST OF FIGURES vii CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION 1 II. THE KARYOTYPE OFMYQTIS.LEYIS (CHIROPTERA, VESPERTILIONIDAE). 7 Introduction...... 7 Material and Methods . 7 Results and Discussion .... 9 III. CHROMOSOMAL POLYMORPHISM VARL\TION IN THE SCRUB MOUSE AKODON MOLINAE (RODENTL\: SIGMODONTINAE) IN CENTRAL ARGENTINA 11 Abstract.
    [Show full text]
  • Lista Revisada De Los Mamíferos De Argentina
    Mastozoología Neotropical, 25(1):163-198, Mendoza, 2018 Copyright ©SAREM, 2018 Versión on-line ISSN 1666-0536 http://www.sarem.org.ar https://doi.org/10.31687/saremMN.18.25.1.0.15 http://www.sbmz.com.br Artículo LISTA REVISADA DE LOS MAMÍFEROS DE ARGENTINA Pablo Teta1, 5, Agustín M. Abba2, 5, Guillermo H. Cassini1, 3, 5, David A. Flores4 ,5, Carlos A. Galliari2, 5, Sergio O. Lucero1, 5 y Mariano Ramírez1, 5 1 División Mastozoología, Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernardino Rivadavia”, Buenos Aires, Argentina. [Correspondencia: Pablo Teta <[email protected]>] 2 Centro de Estudios Parasitológicos y de Vectores (CEPAVE, CONICET-UNLP), La Plata, Argentina. 3 Departamento de Ciencias Básicas, Universidad Nacional de Luján, Luján, Buenos Aires, Argentina. 4 Instituto de Vertebrados, Unidad Ejecutora Lillo (CONICET- Fundación Miguel Lillo), Tucumán, Argentina. 5 Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Argentina. RESUMEN. Se presenta una lista revisada de los mamíferos de Argentina, incorporando los cambios taxonómi- cos recientes y los nuevos registros para el país producidos desde la publicación de un listado previo en 2006. Se registraron 409 especies nativas, correspondientes a 181 géneros, 46 familias y 12 órdenes, más 23 especies introducidas con poblaciones silvestres. ABSTRACT. Revised checklist of mammals from Argentina. We present a revised checklist of the mammals of Argentina, incorporating recent taxonomical changes and new records of mammals for the country produced since the publication of a previous list in 2006. We recordered 409 native species, corresponding to 181 genera, 46 families and 12 orders, plus 23 introduced taxa with wild populations. Palabras clave: América del Sur.
    [Show full text]