City Magnets II: Benchmarking the Attractiveness of 50 Canadian Cities

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

City Magnets II: Benchmarking the Attractiveness of 50 Canadian Cities City Magnets II: Benchmarking the Attractiveness of 50 Canadian Cities ISRN 12TH Annual National Conference RENAISSANCE TORONTO HOTEL DOWNTOWN May 5-7, 2010 Mario Lefebvre Director, Centre for Municipal Studies www.conferenceboard.ca What’s New • Analysis conducted at the city level rather than at the CMA level, making it easier for city officials to use the results in their policy choices. • Analysis broken down by level of education. This is a very important breakthrough. The study investigates whether certain attributes appeal more to university-educated migrants while other appeal more to non-university-educated migrants. www.conferenceboard.ca The Premise • According to the 2006 Census, 2/3 of Canada’s population growth between 2001 and 2006 was attributable to net immigration. • Statistics Canada predicts that by 2030, net immigration will account for ALL of Canada’s population growth. • Therefore, if a city is unable to attract people, it will be faced with weak population growth down the road, which does not bode well for its economic potential. www.conferenceboard.ca The Premise • The “people go where the jobs are” paradigm is slowly changing and we believe that it will keep on changing. • Given the aging of the population and the impact that this will have on the labour force, more and more businesses will choose to locate in cities with a relatively big pool of skilled labour, allowing them to grow over the short, medium and long term. • As a result, a city that struggles to attract people will also struggle to attract businesses—yet another blow to the future prosperity of that city. www.conferenceboard.ca Methodology • 41 indicators are used to measure a city’s attractiveness to people • Indicators are split between seven domains: Economy, Education, Environment, Health, Housing, Innovation and Society www.conferenceboard.ca Methodology • For each indicator, a grade of A, B, C or D is distributed to each city, using the following formula: (Highest Score – Lowest Score) / 4 • Top quartile gets an A, second quartile a B, etc. www.conferenceboard.ca Methodology • Scores for each indicator are then normalized, allowing for the calculation of overall scores by domain. This is done using the following formula: (Score – Lowest Score) / (Highest Score – Lowest Score) • That way, the highest score gets a 1 and the lowest score gets a 0. The domain score is the average score of all the indicators of that domain. www.conferenceboard.ca Society • 14 indicators, covering: • Accessibility: mode of travel, population density, access to culture • Diversity: foreign-born population, age of population, multilingualism • Social cohesion: immigrant success, crime, gender equality, poverty • Creativity: cultural employment www.conferenceboard.ca 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 Society 0.0 A Toronto D www.conferenceboard.ca Montreal Brantford Saguenay Saint John Trois-Rivieres Source: The Conference Board of Canada. Saskatoon Kelowna Health • 4 indicators • Hospital beds per 100,000 population • General practitioners per 100,000 • Specialist physicians per 100,000 • Proportion of population employed in health- care services www.conferenceboard.ca 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 Health 0.0 A Kingston St. John's D www.conferenceboard.caRichmond Hill Longueuil Burnaby Coquitlam Gatineau Abbotsford Laval Markham Barrie Mississauga Surrey Richmond Source: The ConferenceCam Boardbri dgof Canada.e Oshawa Kitchener Vaughan Brampton Economy • 7 indicators, including: • GDP level • GDP growth • Employment growth • Unemployment rate • Disposable income per capita www.conferenceboard.ca 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 Economy 0.2 0.0 A Calgary Vaughan Edmonton D www.conferenceboard.caPeterborough Hamilton Greater Sudbury Moncton Coquitlam Sherbrooke Brantford Laval Thunder Bay St. Catharines Montréal Trois-Rivières Source: The Conference BoardWindsor of Canada. Saint John Oshawa Longueuil Saguenay Environment • 4 indicators • Average monthly maximum temperature • Domestic water usage • Air quality advisory days • Median driving distance to work for solo commuters www.conferenceboard.ca 1.0 0.8 0.6 Environment 0.4 0.2 0.0 A Abbotsford D www.conferenceboard.caVictoria Kelowna St. John's Coquitlam Regina Vancouver Surrey Sherbrooke Richmond Saint John Longueuil Source: TheM Conferenceississauga Board of Canada. Burlington Vaughan Oakville Montréal Education • 4 indicators • Proportion of the population with a bachelor’s degree • Proportion of the population with an advanced degree (master’s, doctorate, law, medicine) • Number of teachers (elementary and secondary per school age population • Number of professors and college instructors per 1,000 adult population www.conferenceboard.ca 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 Education 0.2 0.0 A Waterloo D www.conferenceboard.caKingston Saguenay Abbotsford Barrie Laval Longueuil Brampton Brantford Oshawa Source: The Conference Board of Canada. Saint John Surrey Kelowna Cambridge Innovation • 5 indicators • Productivity level and growth • Proportion of workers employed in natural and applied sciences • Proportion of workers employed in computer and high-technology occupations • Number of university graduates with a major in engineering, mathematics, or computer, applied, and physical science www.conferenceboard.ca 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 Innovation 0.2 0.0 A Calgary Richmond Hill Ottawa D www.conferenceboard.ca Surrey Cambridge Longueuil Laval Moncton Peterborough Hamilton Barrie Greater Sudbury Abbotsford St. Catharines Oshawa Kelowna Source: The ConferenceThunder Board of Canada. Bay Saguenay Sherbrooke Brantford Trois-Rivières Housing • 3 indicators • Percentage of household income spent on mortgages • Percentage of household income spent on rent • Percentage of homes in need of major repair www.conferenceboard.ca 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 Housing 0.0 A Lévis Calgary D www.conferenceboard.ca Saguenay Oakville Sherbrooke Vancouver Oshawa Coquitlam Barrie Source: The ConferenceRichmond Board of Canada. Burnaby Victoria Peterborough Weights of Each Category in University- Educated’s Decision to Move Society Economy 20% 13% Education 21% Innovation 19% Housing Environment 7% Health 8% 12% www.conferenceboard.ca Weights of Each Category in Non- University-Educated’s Decision to Move Society 20% Economy 32% Innovation 8% Housing 6% Health 8% Education 10% Environment 16% www.conferenceboard.ca Final Ranking: Who Is Attractive and 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 Who Is Not 0.0 A Calgary Waterloo www.conferenceboard.ca B Ottawa Richmond Hill Vancouver St. John's Edmonton Victoria Source: TheMa Conferencerkha Boardm of Canada. Vaughan Kingston Oakville Final Ranking: Who Is Attractive and 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 Who Is Not 0.0 B Guelph Toronto C www.conferenceboard.caLondon Halifax Lévis Regina Québec Burlington Sherbrooke Source: The Conference Board of Canada. Winnipeg Gatineau Mississauga Richmond Final Ranking: Who Is Attractive and 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 Who Is Not 0.0 Kitchener C Burnaby www.conferenceboard.ca Coquitlam Barrie Saskatoon Moncton Abbotsford Brampton Source: The ConferenceKelowna Board of Canada. Montréal Thunder Bay Peterborough Final Ranking: Who Is Attractive and 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 Who Is Not 0.0 C Surrey St. Catharines www.conferenceboard.caGreater Sudbury D Hamilton Cambridge Laval Trois-Rivières Windsor Brantford Source: The ConferenceSaguena Board of Canada.y Longueuil Saint John Oshawa Conclusion • The study does bring empirical evidence forward that migrants value different criteria in their choices about where to live depending on their level of education. • University-educated people prefer cities with higher Education and Society outcomes. • Non-university-educated place more value on the Economy category. • Notwithstanding these important distinctions, an attractive city is attractive to everyone. www.conferenceboard.ca Conclusion • The top six cities – Calgary, Waterloo, Ottawa, Vancouver, St. John’s and Richmond Hill come out on top in all rankings. • Unlike other work, this study does not argue that attracting university-educated migrants first will necessarily generate an influx of all types of newcomer. The dynamics of domestic and international migration are too complex to leap to such conclusion. Thus, policy makers have to be careful in crafting policies solely aimed at attracting university graduates. www.conferenceboard.ca Final Thought • Immigrants will be a critical part of Canada’s future and they will continue to flock to our urban centres. Building a strong, competitive and caring Canadian society will require the contributions of immigrants with all kinds of skills and education backgrounds. We have to continue to learn about what makes cities attractive to people in order to find the right policies and guidelines to create dozens of “A” cities, not just a handful. www.conferenceboard.ca Thank you Visit us at: www.conferenceboard.ca www.conferenceboard.ca.
Recommended publications
  • Demographic Context
    Demographic context Greater Montréal encompasses 82 municipalities, broken down into 5 territories, and includes the island of Montréal at its centre and the cities of Longueuil and Laval along the north and south shores. According to the 2016 Census, the Montréal census metropolitan area (CMA) had 4,098,930 inhabitants, up 4.2% from 2011. The Toronto CMA’s population rose 6.2% and the Vancouver CMA’s population rose 6.5% over the same period.1 OVER 800,000 CHILDREN UNDER 18 A total of 821,275 children under age 18 were living in the Montréal CMA in 2016. — 46% were between the ages of 13 and 17 (Figure 1). 1 Unless otherwise indicated, demographic data are taken from the 2016 Census. Figure 1.8 Breakdown of the population under the age of 18 (by age) and in three age categories (%), Montréal census metropolitan area, 2016 Source: Statistics Canada (2017). 2016 Census, product no. 98-400-X2016001 in the Statistics Canada catalogue. The demographic weight of children under age 18 in Montréal is higher than in the rest of Quebec, in Vancouver and in Halifax, but is lower than in Calgary and Edmonton. While the number of children under 18 increased from 2001 to 2016, this group’s demographic weight relative to the overall population gradually decreased: from 21.6% in 2001, to 20.9% in 2006, to 20.3% in 2011, and then to 20% in 2016 (Figures 2 and 3). Figure 2 Demographic weight (%) of children under 18 within the overall population, by census metropolitan area, Canada, 2011 and 2016 22,2 22,0 21,8 21,4 21,1 20,8 20,7 20,4 20,3 20,2 20,2 25,0 20,0 19,0 18,7 18,1 18,0 20,0 15,0 10,0 5,0 0,0 2011 2016 Source: Statistics Canada (2017).
    [Show full text]
  • Riverside School Board
    RIVERSIDE SCHOOL BOARD Three-Year Plan for the Allocation and Destination of Immovables Deposited for consultation from September 19, 2020 to November 7, 2020 CONSULTATION With respect to the Three-Year Plan of Allocation and Destination of Immovables for School Years, 2021-2022, 2022-2023 and 2022-2024, the school board is required to consult with all municipalities whose territories are situated entirely or partially within its area. The following groups will also be consulted on the full document: Governing Boards Parents’ Committee Advisory Committee on Services for Handicapped Students and Students with Social Maladjustments or Learning Disabilities Unions and Management Associations BUILDING CAPACITY The calculation used to arrive at the building capacity for schools shown on the following pages is as follows: Elementary: number of classrooms minus number of specialty rooms and regional program rooms multiplied by 24 plus number of regional program rooms x 10 x 90% High Schools: number of classrooms + gymnasia + labs x 29 x 85% x 90% Page 1 THREE-YEAR PLAN OF ALLOCATION AND DESTINATION OF IMMOVABLES 2020-2023 Total Specialty Regional Total Actual MEES’S MEES’S MEES’S Level Cycle Building Rooms that could Programs Building Enrolment Enrolment Enrolment Enrolment Capacity not be converted to (REACH, Capacity September Forecast Forecast Forecast SEEDS, (Classrooms) classrooms (Students) 30, 2020 Name of School or Centre (Music, Art, SAIL, NEST, Premises at the disposal Civic address Building Code Science, BOOST, etc.) of the school or center computers, Average of 2020-2021 2021-2022 2022-2023 2023-2024 OT, etc.) 10 students per room CORE AREA Brossard-Greenfield Park-St.
    [Show full text]
  • CUSTOMER GUIDE PARATRANSIT SERVICE Réseau De Transport De Longueuil My RTL User Number :______My Online Reservation Access Code :______My OPUS Card Number :______
    CUSTOMER GUIDE PARATRANSIT SERVICE Réseau de transport de Longueuil My RTL user number : ___________________________________ My online reservation access code : ________________________ My OPUS card number : __________________________________ TELEPHONE 450-670-2992 WRITE US Réseau de transport de Longueuil Paratransit department 1150 boul. Marie-Victorin Longueuil QC J4G 2M4 EMAIL [email protected] FAX 450-443-3768 WEBSITE http://rtl-longueuil.qc.ca/en-CA/ rtl-paratransit-service/our-services/ SUBSCRIBE TO OUR EMAILS You’ll be among the first to find out about our latest I want to news and recent events. Consult the Paratransit tab on subscribe to Paratransit our website for more information. FOLLOW US http://www.facebook.com/RTLlongueuil http://twitter.com/RTL_info http://www.linkedin.com/company/rtl-longueuil http://www.youtube.com/c/rtl-longueuil Contact us By telephone at 450-670-2992 Select an option Menu 1 Menu 2 RESERVATIONS TRAVEL INFO 7 days a week, 9 a.m. to 7 p.m. To : - report a delay - cancel a reservation 1 CHANGE YOUR - consult a schedule RESERVATION - report a lost item Monday-Thursday 6:30 a.m. to midnight Monday-Thursday 6:30 a.m. to midnight Friday and Saturday 6:30 a.m. to 1 a.m. Friday and Saturday 6:30 a.m. to 1 a.m. Sunday 6:30 a.m. to 11 p.m. Sunday 6:30 a.m. to 11 p.m. RTL CUSTOMER SERVICE • Eligibility application form • Fares, comments and other information 2 Monday to Friday: 7 a.m. to 8 p.m. Saturday, Sunday and statutory holidays: 8:30 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • RACISM Against Racism and Discrimination and DISCRIMINATION
    Coalition of List of Municipalities who have joined the MlllllClpalities /\gamst Canadian Coalition of Municipalities RACISM Against Racism and Discrimination and DISCRIMINATION United Nations Canadian Liste des municipalites ayant adhere a la Educational, Scientific and Commission Coalition canadienne des municipalites contre Cultural Organization ror UNESCO le racisme et la discrimination Date of the City Council Resolution Municipalities I Municipalites Province Date de la resolution du Conseil 1. Saskatoon Saskatchewan 05-2005 2. Grand Bank Newfoundland 02-2006 3. Windsor Ontario 03-2006 4. Toronto Ontario 04-2006 5. Wood Buffalo (incl. Fort Alberta 05-2006 McMurrav) 6. Calgary Alberta 07-2006 7. Thunder Bay Ontario 09-2006 I Nova Scotia 8. Halifax 09-2006 Nouvelle Ecosse 9. Montreal Quebec 10-2006 10. Grande Prairie Alberta 10-2006 11 . Gatineau Quebec 11-2006 12. Edmonton Alberta 11-2006 13. Drayton Valley Alberta 12-2006 14. Brooks Alberta 01-2007 15. Oshawa Ontario 04-2007 British Columbia 16. Lions Bay 04-2007 Colombie Britanniaue 17. Tecumseh Ontario 06-2007 18. Sudbury Ontario 06-2007 Prince Edward Island 19. Stratford 07-2007 lie-du-prince-Edouard 20. Winnipeg Manitoba 07-2007 21. London Ontario 07-2007 22. Vaughan Ontario 08-2007 New Brunswick 23. Saint John 08-2007 Nouveau-Brunswick British Columbia 24. Williams Lake 08-2007 Colombie Britanniaue 25. Leth bridge Alberta 09-2007 26. Oakville Ontario 10-2007 Nova Scotia 27. Truro 12-2007 Nouvelle Ecosse Revised-Revise 2017-05-03 Date of the City Council Resolution Municipalities/ Municipalites Province Date de la resolution du Conseil 02-2008 28. Saint-Justin Quebec 29.
    [Show full text]
  • Coverage Areas
    Coverage Areas Fraser Valley NOVA SCOTIA Niagara Abbottsford Halifax (partial) Fort Erie Chilliwack Grimsby Mission ONTARIO Lincoln Barrie Niagara-on-the-Lake Victoria Kingston Niagara Falls Ottawa-Gatineau Capital Pelham Stratford Port Colborne Central Saanich St Catharines Colwood Dufferin Orangeville Thorold Esquimalt Wainfleet Highlands Durham Welland Langford West Lincoln Metchosin Ajax North Saanich Brock Peel Oak Bay Clarington Oshawa Brampton Saanich Caledon Sidney Pickering Scugog Mississauga Sooke Simcoe Victoria Uxbridge View Royal Whitby Bradford West Gwillimbury Squamish-Lillooet Halton Toronto Whistler Burlington Toronto Kamloops Halton Mills Milton Waterloo MANITOBA Oakville Cambridge East St Paul Kitchener Hamilton North Dumfries Headingley Hamilton West St Paul Waterloo Winnipeg Navigation System 123 Coverage Areas Wellington Frontenac QUÉBEC Guelph Gray Municipalites Regionales de Comte Puslinch Haldimand-Norfolk Haliburton Beauharnois-Salaberry York Hastings Brome-Missisquoi Aurora Huron Coaticook East Gwillimbury Kawartha Lakes La Haute-Yamaska Georgina Lambton La Vallee-du-Richelieu King Lanark Le Haut-Richelieu Markham Leeds and Granville Le Haut-St-Laurent Newmarket Lennox and Addington Les Jardins-de-Napierville Richmond Hill Middlesex Memphremagog Vaughan Muskoka Roussillon Whitchurch-Stouffville Northumberland Rouville Oxford Vaudreuil-Soulanges Windsor Perth Montreal Essex Peterborough Lasalle Prescott and Russell Deux-Montagnes Tecumseh Prince Edward Deux-Montagnes Windsor Simcoe Oka Stormont, Dundas and Glengarry Oka Paroisse Inter-Town (partial) Coverage Waterloo Pointe-Calumet Counties/Districts/Regional Wellington St-Eustache St-Joseph-du-Lac Municipalities Ste-Marthe-sur-le-Lac Brant Bruce Chatham-Kent Dufferin Elgin Essex 124 Navigation System Coverage Areas L’assomption Montreal CANADA CONNECTOR ROADS Charlemagne Montreal The Cross-Canada Connector Road Le Gardeur Rousillon allows for travel between the Repentigny Candiac provinces of British Columbia and Quebec in DCA 11.
    [Show full text]
  • Quebec-Montreal-MAJ2017 EN.Pdf
    Conduent Public Sector Public Mobility and Transportation Solutions Case Study For more than 20 years, Conduent contactless ticketing systems have been accompanying the development of public transport networks in the province of Quebec (Canada). Since 1997, public transport operators 20 years of service in Quebec have depended on the 20 years later, the system is still running smoothly. Conduent has provided assistance with changes reliability and open-endedness of in the network: equipment upgrade in 2011, launch Conduent contactless ticketing of the Rapibus bus rapid transit line in 2013, solutions to extend their networks and interoperability with the OC Transpo network of improve their service offering. In this neighbouring city Ottawa, interface with the new AVL system. way, these systems have contributed to facilitating the daily journeys of several Conduent is continuing its development million citizens. in Quebec In 2008, on the initiative of Société des Transports de Montréal (STM – public transport operator for Montreal), six Quebecer operators covering A continental first in Gatineau Montreal, capital city Quebec, Laval, Longueuil, In 1997, the Société des Transports de l’Outaouais, Sorel-Varennes and the regional train operator the public transport operator for the city of AMT adopted a common contactless ticketing Gatineau (province of Quebec, Canada), called system. They launched a new contactless on Conduent (known as Ascom at that time) ticket, the OPUS card, which can be used to deploy a highly innovative ticketing system: throughout their networks. The system manages indeed, Gatineau became the first North- interoperability aspects while at the same time American city to offer contactless cards in its allowing all operators to keep their respective public transport network.
    [Show full text]
  • Hunter's Panoramic Guide from Niagara Falls to Quebec
    HUNTER'S PANORAMIC GUIDE FROM NIAGARA FALLS TO QUEBEC 1857 -^^^^^4h^ **r:5B/'^ T»L _ Ji:l^i£iiC 151133 HUNTER'S PANORAMIC GUIDE NIAGARA FALLS TO QUEBEC, BY WM. S. HUNTER, JR. BOSTON: PUBLISHED BY JOHN P. JEWETT & COMPANY CLEVELAND, OHIO: HENRY P. B. JEWETT. 1857. Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year 1857, by JOHN P. JEWETT AND COMPANY, In the Clerk's Office of the District Court of the District of Massachusetts. Kectro-Stereotjped bj GEO. J. STILES, 23 Congress Street, Boston. KooK», Printers, 16 DtvoBstire Street. B,>t<>u. ; PEEFACE. The folloAving work is intended to supply what has long appeared a desideratum to the tourist who visits Niagara and the St. Lawrence,— a Panoramic or Pic- ture Map of all the most celebrated and picturesque points along this noble river. The Author has, through a variety of difficulties and at great ex- pense, finished the work which he contemplated and however great may have been the task, the assur- ance and encouragement of many friends give him every reason to believe, that he will have no cause to regret the attempt of bringing before the public his Panoramic Guide from Niagara to Quebec. As the country embraced in the range of his illus- trated scenery has been fully explored and noticed by other travellers, the Author has not deemed it necessary to add long descriptions of the different towns and villages to his work. He trusts that his . VIII P II E F A C E Panorama itself will be found sufficient, mainly, for the object in view: viz., that of condensing much important matter within a very small space.
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Adventist
    CANADIAN ADVENTIST essSeptember 1985 er CANADIAN ADVENTIST From The President's Diary Volume 54. No 9. Septemher 1985, Oshawa, Ontaru G.E. Maxson/Editor June Polishuk/Associate Editor Allan Colleran/Art Director CONFERENCE EDITORS L. Larsen/Alberta M. Tetz/British Columbia D.M. MacIvor/Man.-Sask. L. Lowe/Maritime D. Crook/Newfoundland E.R. Bacchus/Ontario C. Sabot/Quebec Official Organ of the Seventh-day Adventist Church in Canada: President, J.W. Wilson; Secretary, G.E. Maxson; Treasurer, NW. Klam; Departmental Directors: Education, J.D.V. Fitch; Personal Ministries and Sabbath School, CS. Greene; Ministerial, W.R Bornstein; Public Affairs D.D. Devnich; Publishing, W. Rube; Youth and Stewardship, P.A. Parks; Trust Services, F. Lloyd Bell; Consultant to Health Care Institutions, A.G. Rodgers Issued monthly, annual subscription price in 11 Canada $5.00. Out of Union $10.00. "Speak, for thy Conference Directory CANADIAN UNION CONFERENCE J.W. Wilson, President; G.E. Maxson, Secretary; N.W. Klam, Treasurer; 1148 King Street East, Oshawa, Ontario LIH 1H8. (416)433-0011. ALBERTA CONFERENCE — H.S. Larsen, President; W. Olson, Secretary-Treasurer; Box 5007, Red Deer, Alberta T4N 6A1. OBS WERE IN SHORT SUPPLY. An advertisement for a (403)342-5044. BRITISH COLUMBIA CONFERENCE — G.B. DeBoer, President; telegraph operator was posted. One young fellow saw the P.W. Dunham, Secretary, E. Tetz, Treasurer, Box 1000, Abbotsford, notice and since he knew Morse code, he applied. British Columbia V2S 4P5. (604)853-5451. MANITOBA - SASKATCHEWAN CONFERENCE — D.M. Thej crowded office was already filled with would-be operators, Maclvor, President; M.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Coverage Areas
    Coverage Areas Canada Detailed Coverage Areas BRITISH COLUMBIA Whatcom, Wa Point Roberts (Community) ALBERTA Greater Vancouver Banff Anmore Belcarra Fraser Valley Canmore Abbotsford Airdrie Bowen Island Burnaby Chilliwack Calgary Mission Cochrane Coquitlam Crossfield Delta Chestermare Langley Victoria Edmonton Langley TWP Capital Lions Bay Central Saanich Maple Ridge Colwood New Westminster Esquimelt North Vancouver Highlands North Vancouver District Langford Pitt Meadows Metchosin Port Coquitlam North Saanich Port Moody Oak Bay Richmond Saanich Surrey Sidney Vancouver Sooke West Vancouver Victoria White Rock View Royal Squamish-Lillooet Whistler Navigation System 73 Coverage Areas ONTARIO Niagara Waterloo Ottawa-Gatineau Fort Erie Cambridge Grimsby Kitchener Dufferin Lincoln North Durnfries Orangeville Niagara-on-the-lake Waterloo Niagara Falls Durham Pelham Wellington Ajax Port Colborne Guelph Brock St Catharines Pusllrich Clarington Thoroid Oshawa Wainfleet York Pickering Welland Aurora Scugog West Lincoln East Gwillimbury Uxbridge Georgina Whitby Peel King Brampton Markham Halton Caledon Newmarket Burlington Misslssauga Richmond Hill Halton Hills Vaughan Milton Simcoe Whitchurch-Stouffville Oakville Bradford West Gwillinbury Windsor Hamilton Essex Hamilton Toronto Lasalle Toronto Tecumaeh Windsor 74 Navigation System Coverage Areas Inter-Town (partial) Coverage Prince Edward Pointe-Calumet Counties/Districts/Regional Simcoe St-Eustache Municipalities Stormont, Dundas and Glengarry St-Joseph-du-Lac Brant Waterloo Ste-Marthe-sur-le-Lac
    [Show full text]
  • Rivalry and Alliance Among the Native Communities of Detroit, 1701--1766 Andrew Keith Sturtevant College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences
    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 2011 Jealous neighbors: Rivalry and alliance among the native communities of Detroit, 1701--1766 andrew Keith Sturtevant College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the Canadian History Commons, Indigenous Studies Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Sturtevant, andrew Keith, "Jealous neighbors: Rivalry and alliance among the native communities of Detroit, 1701--1766" (2011). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539623586. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-crtm-ya36 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. JEALOUS NEIGHBORS: RIVALRY AND ALLIANCE AMONG THE NATIVE COMMUNITIES OF DETROIT, 1701-1766 Andrew Keith Sturtevant Frankfort, Kentucky Master of Arts, The College of William & Mary, 2006 Bachelor of Arts, Georgetown College, 2002 A Dissertation presented to the Graduate Faculty of the College of William and Mary in Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Lyon G. Tyler Department of History The College of William and Mary August, 2011 Copyright 2011, Andrew Sturtevant APPROVAL PAGE This Dissertation is submitted in partial fulfillment
    [Show full text]
  • Employee Or Self-Employed Person?
    Revenu Québec www.revenu.gouv.qc.ca Performing, recording and the fact that both the employer and the employee are in favour of such a change does not mean that film artists Revenu Québec will consider the individual in When an artist gives performances under an question to be self-employed. employment contract, his or her employer has the Excellent service at all our offices Revenu Québec may, in the course of an audit, same fiscal obligations as other employers subject determine that a worker identified as a self- Gatineau Québec to Québec legislation. However, artists may choose 170, rue de l’Hôtel-de-Ville, 6e étage 200, rue Dorchester employed person is actually an employee. The to be considered self-employed persons in a given Gatineau (Québec) J8X 4C2 Québec (Québec) G1K 5Z1 employer will then be required to pay the contri- Employee or year if they have entered into several engagements Jonquière Rimouski butions that should have been remitted with 2154, rue Deschênes 212, avenue Belzile, bureau 250 with one or more producers in that year and work Jonquière (Québec) G7S 2A9 Rimouski (Québec) G5L 3C3 respect to the employee. in a field of artistic endeavour covered by the Act Laval Rouyn-Noranda Self-Employed respecting the professional status and conditions of 4, Place-Laval, bureau RC-150 19, rue Perreault Ouest, RC Laval (Québec) H7N 5Y3 Rouyn-Noranda (Québec) J9X 6N5 engagement of performing, recording and film artists. Help in determining a Longueuil Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu Person? Where an artist resident in Canada informs a pro- Place-Longueuil 855, boulevard Industriel ducer that he or she has chosen to be considered worker’s status 825, rue Saint-Laurent Ouest Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu (Québec) J3B 7Y7 Longueuil (Québec) J4K 5K5 a self-employed person, the producer has none of If an employer and a worker do not agree on the Sept-Îles Montréal 391, avenue Brochu, bureau 1.04 the fiscal obligations an employer would have with worker’s status, they may ask Revenu Québec for • Complexe Desjardins Sept-Îles (Québec) G4R 4S7 regard to the artist.
    [Show full text]
  • The St. Lawrence Seaway a R S C Johnstown Thorold E Welland Canal Section the St
    Sept-Îles Highway H2O Port-Cartier Autoroute H2O Baie-Comeau Gulf of St. Lawrence Golfe du Saint-Laurent Thunder Bay M INNESOTA The St. Lawrence Lake Superior Duluth Lac Supérieur QUÉBEC ONTARIO QUEBEC er iv R nt Québec re e u c a en L Sault Ste. Marie locks r t- Bécancour w n Les écluses de Saut Ste. Marie a i L Sa Trois-Rivières Seaway t. e S v Sorel eu Fl Montréal QUÉBEC W ISCONSIN Salaberry-de- OTTAWA Saint-Jérôme Valleyfield T Repentigny Green Bay N QUEBEC Prescott E Lake Huron R Terrebonne Ogdensburg Y U Lake Michigan Lac Huron A A Blainville W -L La Voie maritime Lac Michigan Oshawa EA T Goderich Lake Ontario S IN ATLANTIC OCEAN Boucherville Oswego E A Lachute Boisbriand Milwaukee Toronto Lac Ontario C S Laval EN U Mont-Saint-Hilaire MICHIGAN Hamilton R D Saint-Eustache W E OCÉAN ATLANTIQUE Longueuil LA Hawkesbury Sarnia T. IM Boston Buffalo S IT NEW Pointe- Saint-Lambert Detroit Lake Erie AR Calumet Chicago M Brossard du Saint-Laurent Monroe Windsor Lac Érié Erie IE YORK O Oka V Hudson Kirkland Burns Ashtabula Conneaut LA Ports Harbour Toledo Vaudreuil- Côte-Sainte-Catherine I LLINOIS Lorain Cleveland Dorion Sainte-Anne- Saint-Constant PENNSYLV ANIA de-Bellevue Chateauguay I NDIANA PENNSYLV ANIE Lower Beauharnois / Écluse Saint-Jean- OHIO New York Upper Beauharnois / Écluse Melocheville inférieure de Beauharnois Pittsburgh supérieure de Beauharnois Beauharnois sur-Richelieu Alexandria Coteau-du-Lac Saint-Timothée Saint-Rémi Coteau-Landing Casselman Salaberry-de-Valleyfield The Great Lakes St. Lawrence Seaway System, or Highway Le réseau Grands Lacs-Voie maritime du Saint-Laurent, ou Saint-Zotique Saint-Louis-de-Gonzague Saint-Stanislas-de-Kostka Bainsville H2O, is a 3,700-kilometre deep-draft waterway into the heart encore l’autoroute H2O, est une voie navigable à fort tirant qui Sainte-Barbe of North America.
    [Show full text]