DOCSLIB.ORG

Group Correct Citation for Th Is Publication

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Group Correct Citation for Th Is Publication Prepared by FRASER RIVER ACflON PIAN, Fishery Management Group Correct citation for th is publication: Department of Fisheries and Oceans. 1995. Fraser River sockeye salmon. Prep. by Fraser River Action Plan , Fishery Management Group. Vancouver, B.C. 55 p. CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................... 3 LIST OF TABLES AND APPENDICES ................................................................................. .4 SUMMARy ................................................................................................... .. ...................... .... 5 1.0 OVERVIEW ..................................................................................................................... 6 2.0 LIFE HISTORy ................................................................................................................ 7 2. 1 CYCLIC DOMINANCE ......................................................................................... 9 3.0 STOCK DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................ 11 3.1 STUART / TAKLA HABITAT MANAGEMENT AREA .................................... 11 Early Stuart Sockeye Stocks .................................................................................. 11 Late Stuart Sockeye Stocks ................................................................................... 12 3.2 NECHAKO HABITAT MANAGEMENT AREA ........................... ..................... 13 Stellako River Sockeye Stock ............................................................................... 13 Nadina River Sockeye Stocks ............................................................................... 14 3.3 UPPER FRASER RIVER HABITAT MANAGEMENT AREA .......................... 14 Bowron River Sockeye Stock ............................................................................... 14 3.4 QUESNEL RIVER HABITAT MANAGEMENT AREA .................................... 15 Horsefly River Sockeye Stock .............................................................................. 15 Mitchell Ri ver Sockeye Stock ............................................................................... 15 3.5 CHILCOTIN HABITAT MANAGEMENT AREA .................... .......................... 16 Chilko and Taseko Sockeye Stocks ..................................................... .................. 16 3.6 THOMPSON / SHUSWAP HABITAT MANAGEMENT AREA ........................ 17 Earl y Run Shuswap Lake Sockeye Stocks ............................................................ 17 Late Run Shuswap Lake Sockeye Stocks ............................................................. IS 3.7 NORTH THOMPSON HABITAT MANAGEMENT AREA ............................... 20 Raft River and Fennel Creek Sockeye Stocks ...................................................... 20 3.S SETON / BRIDGE HABITAT MANAGEMENT AREA ..................................... 20 Gates Creek Sockeye Stock ................................................................................... 21 Portage Creek Sockeye Stock ............................................................................... 21 3.9 HARRISON HABITAT MANAGEMENT AREA ............................................... 21 Birkenhead River Sockeye Stock .......................................................................... 22 Weaver Creek Sockeye Stock ................................................................................ 22 Harrison River Mainstem Sockeye Stock ............................................................. 23 3.10 PITT / STAVE HABITAT MANAGEMENT AREA ............................................ 23 Upper Pitt Lake Sockeye Stocks ........................................................................... 23 3.11 CHILLIWACK/LOWER FRASER HABITAT MANAGEMENT AREA ........... 24 Cultus Lake Sockeye Stock ................................................................................... 24 3.12 STOCK STATUS SUMMARY ............................................................................. 24 1 4.0 SOCKEYE SALMON HARVEST MANAGEMENT ......................................................... 27 4. 1 CURRENT MANAGEMENT STRATEGY .............................................................. 27 4.2 ALLOCATION .............................................................................................. ............. 29 Intern ational Allocation .... .............................................. ................................. 29 Domestic Allocation ...................................................... .... .................................. ... .... 29 4.3 STOCK MONITORING ........... ................................................................... ... ............. 30 Run Size Monitoring ... ... .. .. ........................................................................................ .30 Racial Stock Identifi cation ....................................... .............. .. ............ .. ...... 31 Migration Pathways / Timing ..................................................................................... 31 Escapement Monitoring ................ ... ........................................................................... .32 4.4 SOCKEYE MANAGEMENT AND FISHERY CATCHES ............................. .......... 32 North Coast Fishery ........................... ............................................. ............................. 33 WCVl Troll Fishery................ .. ...................................... ............................... 34 Johnstone Strait - Sabine Channel Fishery ................................................................. .34 Juan de Fuca Strait Fishery...................... .. .......................................................... 35 Strait of Georgia Fishery ............................................................................................ 35 Aboriginal Food Fishery ............................................................................................ 36 Sport Fishery .................................................................... .. .... ... ... ....... ........................ .37 U.S. Fishery .................................................. .............................................................. 37 Incidental Catch of Other Stocks and Species ............................................................ 38 5.0 ENHANCEMENT ......................... .... ................................................................................... 38 6.0 ASSESSMENT OF THE PRODUCTION POTENTIAL FOR REBUILDING FRASER RIVER SOCKEYE STOCKS ...................................... .................... .40 6.1 HISTORICAL CATCH REVIEW ............................................................................ ..40 6.2 STOCK RECRUIT ANALYSIS ............... .... .............................................................. .40 6.3 POTENTIAL SPAWNING CAPACITY ANALYSIS ...... .. ....................................... .42 6.4 POTENTIAL LAKE REARING CAPACITY ANALYSIS ...................................... ..42 6.5 SUMMARY OF REBUILDING POTENTIAL ......................................................... .42 7.0 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................... .............................................................................. .43 8.0 REFERENCES ..................................................................................................................... .44 2 LIST OF FIGURES I. Four year average of total run size of Fraser River sockeye salmon stocks, 1954 - 1993 ....... 6 2. Sockeye salmon spawning areas in the Fraser Ri ver watershed ............................................... 7 3. Approx imate return migration timing to the lower Fraser River. ............................................. 8 4. Migration routes utilized by Fraser sockeye salmon ................................................................ 9 5. Fraser River Habitat Management Areas ." ................................................................... ... ....... 11 6. Total returns of the Early Stuart sockeye stocks, 1956 - 1989 brood years ........................... 11 7. Escapements and resulting total returns by cycle line for the Early Stuart sockeye stocks, 1957 - 1988 brood years .......................................................................................................... 12 8. Total returns of the late Stuart sockeye stocks, 1956 - 1988 brood years .............................. 13 9. Total returns of the Stellako River sockeye stock, 1956 - 1988 brood years ......................... 13 10. Total returns of the late Nadina sockeye stock, 1956 - 1988 brood years .............................. 14 I I. Total returns of the Bowron River sockeye stock, 1956 - 1988 brood years ........................ 15 12. Total returns of the Horsefly River sockeye stock, 1956 - 1988 brood years ....................... 15 13. Total returns and brood escapements of the Mitchell River sockeye stocks [or the 1993 alld 1994 cycle lines .......................................................................................... 16 14. Total returns of the Chi lko River sockeye stock, 1956 - 1988 brood years ........................... 16 15. Total returns of the Seymour River sockeye stock, 1956 - 1988 brood years ........................ 17 16. Total returns of the Scotch Creek sockeye stock, 1956 - 1988 brood years ........................... 17 17. Total returns of the Lower Adams River sockeye stock, 1956 - 1988 brood
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Two Wheel Drive: Mountain Biking British Columbia's Coast Range
    Registration 1/5/16, 12:00 PM Ritt Kellogg Memorial Fund Registration Registration No. 9XSX-4HC1Z Submitted Jan 4, 2016 1:19pm by Erica Evans Registration Sep 1, 2015- Ritt Kellogg Memorial Fund Waiting for Aug 31 RKMF Expedition Grant 2015/2016/Group Application Approval This is the group application for a RKMF Expedition Grant. In this application you will be asked to provide important details concerning your expedition. Participant Erica Evans Colorado College Student Planned Graduation: Block 8 2016 CC ID Number: 121491 [email protected] [email protected] (435) 760-6923 (Cell/Text) Date of Birth: Nov 29, 1993 Emergency Contacts james evans (Father) (435) 752-3578 (436) 760-6923 (Alternate) Medical History Allergies (food, drug, materials, insects, etc.) 1. Fish, Pollen (Epi-Pen) Moderate throat reaction usually solved by Benadryl. Emergency prescription for Epi-Pen for fish allergy 2. Wear glasses or contacts Medical Details: I wear glasses and contacts. Additional Questions Medications No current medications Special Dietary Needs No fish https://apps.ideal-logic.com/worker/report/28CD7-DX6C/H9P3-DFPWP_d9376ed23a3a456e/p1a4adc8c/a5a109177b335/registration.html Page 1 of 12 Registration 1/5/16, 12:00 PM Last Doctor's Visit Date: Dec 14, 2015 Results: Healthy Insurance Covered by Insurance Yes Insurance Details Carrier: Blue Cross/ Blue Shield Name of Insured: Susanne Janecke Relationship to Erica: Mother Group Number: 1005283 Policy Number: ZHL950050123 Consent Erica Evans Ritt Kellogg Memorial Fund Consent Form (Jul 15, 2013) Backcountry Level II Recorded (Jan 4, 2016, EE) Erica Evans USE THIS WAIVER (Nov 5, 2013) Backcountry Level II Recorded (Jan 4, 2016, EE) I.
    [Show full text]
  • Midcretaceous Thrusting in the Southern Coast Belt, British
    TECTONICS, VOL. 15, NO. 2, PAGES, 545-565, JUNE 1996 Mid-Cretaceous thrusting in the southern Coast Belt, British Columbia and Washington, after strike-slip fault reconstruction Paul J. Umhoefer Departmentof Geology,Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff Robert B. Miller Departmentof Geology, San JoseState University, San Jose,California Abstract. A major thrust systemof mid-Cretaceousage Introduction is presentalong much of the Coast Belt of northwestern. The Coast Belt in the northwestern Cordillera of North North America. Thrusting was concurrent,and spatially America containsthe roots of the largest Mesozoic mag- coincided,with emplacementof a great volume of arc intrusives and minor local strike-slip faulting. In the maticarc in North America, which is cut by a mid-Creta- southernCoast Belt (52ø to 47øN), thrusting was followed ceous,synmagmatic thrust system over muchof its length by major dextral-slipfaulting, which resultedin significant (Figure 1) [Rubin et al., 1990]. This thrust systemis translationalshuffling of the thrust system. In this paper, especiallywell definedin SE Alaska [Brew et al., 1989; Rubin et al., 1990; Gehrels et al., 1992; Haeussler, 1992; we restorethe displacementson major dextral-slipfaults of the southernCoast Belt and then analyze the mid-Creta- McClelland et al., 1992; Rubin and Saleeby,1992] and the southern Coast Belt of SW British Columbia and NW ceousthrust system. Two reconstructionswere madethat usedextral faulting on the Yalakom fault (115 km), Castle Washington(Figure 1)[Crickmay, 1930; Misch, 1966; Davis et al., 1978; Brown, 1987; Rusrnore aad Pass and Ross Lake faults (10 km), and Fraser fault (100 Woodsworth, 199 la, 1994; Miller and Paterson, 1992; km). The reconstructionsdiffer in the amount of dextral offset on the Straight Creek fault (160 and 100 km) and Journeayand Friedman, 1993; Schiarizza et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Fisheries Presentation to the CEAA Panel on the Prosperity Project April 27, 2010
    Fisheries Presentation to The CEAA Panel On the Prosperity Project April 27, 2010 20+20=20+20= 4040 By: Richard Holmes MSc. RPBio. QEP WildWild SalmonSalmon PolicyPolicy (Photo by Peter Essick) ConservationConservation UnitsUnits sockeye-lake 218 sockeye-river 24 chinook 68† coho 43 chum 38† pink-even 13 pink-odd 19 Sub-total 423 FishFish SpeciesSpecies KnownKnown toto InhabitInhabit TasekoTaseko RiverRiver ¾ BullBull TroutTrout ¾ DollyDolly VardenVarden ¾ LongnoseLongnose SuckerSucker ¾ MountainMountain WhitefishWhitefish ¾ RainbowRainbow TroutTrout ¾ SockeyeSockeye SalmonSalmon ¾ ChinookChinook SalmonSalmon ¾ SteelheadSteelhead ¾ WhitefishWhitefish (General)(General) TasekoTaseko RiverRiver SockeyeSockeye EscapementEscapement 19491949--20092009 ¾¾ EscapementEscapement == thosethose returningreturning toto spawnspawn ¾¾ 19631963 == 31,66731,667 ¾¾ 19881988 == 11,13811,138 ¾¾ 2009=2009= 4040 ¾¾ Sorry,Sorry, butbut II’’mm notnot convincedconvinced whatsoeverwhatsoever thatthat thingsthings areare simplysimply goinggoing toto bebe okok inin thethe TasekoTaseko RiverRiver watershedwatershed shouldshould thisthis minemine bebe grantedgranted approvalapproval toto proceedproceed Lake Sockeye CUs in Pacific/Yukon 218 CUs • notable diversity: NC CC, NVI, SFj Diversity = Production Lake Sockeye CUs in Pacific/Yukon 218 CUs • notable diversity: NC CC, NVI, SFj Diversity = Production Year Population Peak of Spawn Total Males Females Jacks 1948 Taseko Lake 0000 1949 Taseko Lake 100 62 38 0 1950 Taseko Lake 500 250 250 0 1951 Taseko Lake 500 250
    [Show full text]
  • Inventory of Wildlife, Ecological and Landscape Coonectivity Values
    INVENTORY OF WILDLIFE, ECOLOGICAL, AND LANDSCAPE CONNECTIVITY VALUES, TSILHQOT'IN FIRST NATIONS CULTURAL/HERITAGE VALUES, & RESOURCE CONFLICTS IN THE DASIQOX-TASEKO WATERSHED, BC CHILCOTIN FINAL REPORT (Revised) August 4, 2014 For Xeni Gwet’in & Yunesit’in First Nations By Wayne McCrory, RPBio McCrory Wildlife Services Ltd. Phone: 250-358-7796; email: [email protected] and First Nations cultural/heritage research: Linda Smith, MSc, & Alice William GIS mapping by Baden Cross, Applied Conservation GIS Corridor modeling by Dr. Lance Craighead, Craighead Research Institute ii LEGAL COVENANT FROM THE XENI GWET’IN GOVERNMENT When the draft of this report was completed in March 2014, the following legal covenant was included: The Tsilhqot'in have met the test for aboriginal title in the lands described in Tsilhqot’in Nation v. British Columbia 2007 BCSC 1700 (“Tsilhqot’in Nation”). Tsilhqot’in Nation (Vickers J, 2007) also recognized the Tsilhqot’in aboriginal right to hunt and trap birds and animals for the purposes of securing animals for work and transportation, food, clothing, shelter, mats, blankets, and crafts, as well as for spiritual, ceremonial, and cultural uses throughout the Brittany Triangle (Tachelach’ed) and the Xeni Gwet’in Trapline. This right is inclusive of a right to capture and use horses for transportation and work. The Court found that the Tsilhqot’in people also have an aboriginal right to trade in skins and pelts as a means of securing a moderate livelihood. These lands are within the Tsilhqot'in traditional territory, the Xeni Gwet'in First Nation’s caretaking area, and partially in the Yunesit’in Government’s caretaking area.
    [Show full text]
  • Taseko Lake Outfitters
    MANAGEMENT PLAN Taseko Lake Outfitters Siegfried Jurgen Reuter Kelly Gayle Reuter October 2012 Taseko Lake Outfitters Management Plan 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Management Plan 2 Proponents & General Overview of Business 2 Description of Operation & Activities 2 1.1 General Area & Base Operation 2 1.2.1 Purpose & Description of Experience 2 Activities Offered 2 1.2.2 Improvements 2 1.2.3 Detailed list of Activities & Level of Use 2 Table 1 Extensive Use Area 2 1.2.4 Staff 2 1.3 Intensive Use Sites 2 Facilities & Camps 2 Table 3 Details of Intensive Use Sites 2 Overlap with Environmental & Cultural Values 2 2.1 Fish Values 2 2.2 Wildlife Values 2 2.3 Water Values 2 2.4 First Nations 2 Overlap with Existing Use 2 3.1 Mineral tenures 2 Taseko Lake Outfitters Management Plan 2 3.2 Timber Tenures and Public Recreation: 3 3.3 Land Use, Community, Public Health 3 3.4 Hazards and Safety Plan 3 Maps of Taseko Lake Outfitters 3 Taseko Lake Outfitters Management Plan 3 MANAGEMENT PLAN Taseko Lake Outfitters Executive Summary Proponents & General Overview of Business Siegfried & Kelly Reuter wholly owns Taseko Lake Outfitters. It is a subsidiary of North- ern Spruce Log homes & Landscaping Ltd. and was incorporated on January 16, 1991 with British Columbia incorporation #399997. The Taseko Lake Lodge has been on a License of Occupation for Guide Outfitting for over 75 years. The structures are solid log and not merely tent frames. There has been substantial investment and improvement made to BC land over the years by dedicated and hard working pioneers of wilderness tourism, former guide outfitters.
    [Show full text]
  • Record of Large, Late Pleistocene Outburst floods Preserved in Saanich Inlet Sediments, Vancouver Island, Canada A
    ARTICLE IN PRESS Quaternary Science Reviews 22 (2003) 2327–2334 Record of large, Late Pleistocene outburst floods preserved in Saanich Inlet sediments, Vancouver Island, Canada A. Blais-Stevensa,*, J.J. Clagueb,c, R.W. Mathewesd, R.J. Hebdae, B.D. Bornholdf a Geological Survey of Canada, 601 Booth Street, Ottawa, Ont., Canada K1A 0E8 b Department of Earth Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada BC V5A 1S6 c Geological Survey of Canada, 101-605 Robson Street, Vancouver, Canada BC V6B 5J3 d Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada BC V5A 1S6 e Royal British Columbia Museum, P.O. Box 9815 Stn. Prov. Gov., Victoria, Canada BC V8W 9W2 f School of Earth and Ocean Science, University of Victoria, P.O. Box 3055, Stn. CSC, Victoria, Canada BC V8W 3P6 Received 23 December 2002; accepted 27 June 2003 Abstract Two anomalous, gray, silty clay beds are present in ODP cores collected from Saanich Inlet, Vancouver Island, British Columbia, Canada. The beds, which date to about 10,500 14C yr BP (11,000 calendar years BP), contain Tertiary pollen derived from sedimentary rocks found only in the Fraser Lowland, on the mainland of British Columbia and Washington just east of the Strait of Georgia. Abundant illite-muscovite in the sediments supports a Fraser Lowland provenance. The clay beds are probably distal deposits of huge floods that swept through the Fraser Lowland at the end of the Pleistocene. Muddy overflow plumes from these floods crossed the Strait of Georgia and entered Saanich Inlet, where the sediment settled from suspension and blanketed diatom-rich mud on the fiord floor.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Collection and Geochemical Characterization of Potential Mesozoic Source Rocks on Northern Vancouver Island and the Queen Charlotte Islands
    Field Collection and Geochemical Characterization of Potential Mesozoic Source Rocks on Northern Vancouver Island and the Queen Charlotte Islands Report prepared for University of Victoria (UVic) – Ministry of Energy and Mines (MEM) Partnership Program Dr. Torge Schuemann School of Earth and Ocean Sciences University of Victoria 2005 1 Introduction The Tertiary Queen Charlotte Basin (QCB) is located immediately inboard of the Pacific - North American plate boundary and comprises Dixon Entrance, Hecate Strait, and Queen Charlotte Sound from north to south (Figure 3). A network of fault-bound sub-basins in Hecate Strait and Queen Charlotte Sound contain up to 5 km of sandstones, siltstones and conglomerates with some coals, which are known as the Skonun Formation (Figure 1). Based on reflection seismic and well data the Skonun Formation has been divided into syn-rift and post-rift successions. Fossils indicate Miocene and Pliocene ages. At many locations, the basal sediments either interfinger or overly extensional basaltic rocks of the Masset Formation (Hickson, 1992; Hyndman & Hamilton, 1993). Masset rocks on Graham Island have yielded ages of 35-12 Ma; most fall between 25-20 Ma (Figure 1). Unfortunately no reliable dates are available from basalts drilled in the wells. Upper Triassic / Lower Jurassic potential source rocks, mainly in the Peril, Sandilands and Ghost Creek formations from the Kunga and Maude groups as well as Cretaceous formations, are exposed on the Queen Charlotte Islands (QCI). Both the Sandilands and Ghost Creek formations comprise significant organic-rich petroleum source rocks in the region, which reach up to 600m in thickness with Total Organic Carbon (TOC) up to 6.1%, comprising oil-prone Type I and oil and gas-prone Type II kerogens with Hydrogen Index (HI) values ranging up to 589 mg HC/g Corg (Bustin & Mastalerz, 1995; Macauley, 1983; Snowdon etal., 2002, see also Figure 2).
    [Show full text]
  • In the Supreme Court of British Columbia
    No. 90 0913 Victoria Registry IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA BETWEEN: ROGER WILLIAM, on his own behalf and on behalf of all other members of the Xeni Gwet’in First Nations Government and on behalf of all other members of the Tsilhqot’in Nation PLAINTIFF AND: HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA, THE REGIONAL MANAGER OF THE CARIBOO FOREST REGION and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA DEFENDANTS PLAINTIFF’ S REPLY APPENDIX 1B PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO THE DEFENDANTS’ SUBMISSIONS ON DEFINITE TRACTS OF LAND WOODWARD & ATTORNEY GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF COMPANY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA JUSTICE, CANADA Barristers and Solicitors Civil Litigation Section Aboriginal Law Section 844 Courtney Street, 2nd Floor 3RD Floor, 1405 Douglas Street 900 – 840 Howe Street Victoria, BC V8W 1C4 Victoria, BC V8W 9J5 Vancouver, B.C. V6Z 2S9 Solicitors for the Plaintiff Solicitor for the Defendants, Her Solicitor for the Defendant, Majesty the Queen in the Right of The Attorney General of Canada the Province of British Columbia and the Manager of the Cariboo Forest Region ROSENBERG & BORDEN LADNER ROSENBERG GERVAIS LLP Barristers & Solicitors Barristers & Solicitors 671D Market Hill Road 1200 Waterfront Centre, 200 Vancouver, BC V5Z 4B5 Burrard Street Solicitors for the Plaintiff Vancouver, BC V7X 1T2 Solicitor for the Defendants, Her Majesty the Queen in the Right of the Province of British Columbia and the Manager of the Cariboo Forest Region Exhibit 43 Photograph 38 Plaintiff’s Reply Appendix 1B Plaintiff’s Response to the Defendants’ Submissions on Definite Tracts of Land A. Southeast Tsilhqox Biny (Chilko Lake): west Ts’il?os (Mount Tatlow) and Relevant Portions of the Tl’echid Gunaz (Long Valley), Yuhitah (Yohetta Valley), Ts’i Talhl?ad (Rainbow Creek), Tsi Tese?an (Tchaikazan Valley) and Tsilhqox Tu Tl’az (Edmonds River) Watersheds ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae
    McCRORY WILDLIFE SERVICES LTD. RESPONSE TO 2011 TERRESTRIAL-WILDLIFE COMPONENT OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT (EIS) & ASSOCIATED DOCUMENTS REGARDING THE PROPOSED NEW PROSPERITY GOLD-COPPER MINE PROJECT AT TEZTAN BINY (FISH LAKE) WITH SPECIFIC REFERENCE TO THE GRIZZLY BEAR [With added comments on Northwestern Toad & Wild Horses] Report for Friends of Nemaiah Valley (FONV) for submission to the CEAA Panel CEAR reference number 782 August 14, 2013 version Wayne P. McCrory, RPBio McCrory Wildlife Services 2 PROFESSIONAL BACKGROUND AND QUALIFICATIONS & DISCLAIMER INFORMATION Professional background & relevant qualifications This report was prepared by me, bear biologist Wayne McCrory, for Friends of Nemaiah Valley (FONV) for submission to the federal CEAA Panel reviewing the New Prosperity mine proposal in the BC Chilcotin. I am a registered professional bear biologist in the province of British Columbia. I have an Honours Zoology degree from the University of British Columbia (1966) and have more than 40 years professional experience. My wildlife and extensive bear work has been published in ten proceedings, peer-reviewed journals, and government publications. I have produced 80 professional reports, some peer-reviewed, many involving environmental impacts, and bear habitat and bear hazard assessments. I served for four years on the BC government’s Grizzly Bear Scientific Advisory Committee (GBSAC). Qualifications relevant to my review of the New Prosperity 2011 EIS include the following. I have had extensive experience in environmental impact assessment involving a diverse array of developments, including impacts of logging on grizzly bears, caribou surveys in the Yukon related to the Gas Arctic Pipeline, impacts of the Mackenzie Valley Pipeline road, impacts of the Syncrude Tar Sands development on waterfowl and other wildlife, and others.
    [Show full text]
  • Robert C. (Bob) Harris
    Robert C. (Bob) Harris An Inventory of Material In the Special Collections Division University of British Columbia Library © Special Collections Division, University Of British Columbia Library Vancouver, BC Compiled by Melanie Hardbattle and John Horodyski, 2000 Updated by Sharon Walz, 2002 R.C. (Bob) Harris fonds NOTE: Cartographic materials: PDF pages 3 to 134, 181 to 186 Other archival materials: PDF pages 135 to 180 Folder/item numbers for cartographic materials referred to in finding aid are different from box/file numbers for archival materials in the second half of the finding aid. Please be sure to note down the correct folder/item number or box/file number when requesting materials. R. C. (Bob) Harris Map Collection Table of Contents Series 1 Old Maps – Central B. C. 5-10 Series 2 Old Maps – Eastern B. C. 10-17 Series 3 Old Maps – Miscellaneous 17-28 Series 4 Central British Columbia maps 28-39 Series 5 South-central British Columbia maps 39-50 Series 6 Okanagan maps 50-58 Series 7 Southern Interior maps 58-66 Series 8 Old Cariboo maps [i.e. Kootenay District] 66-75 Series 9 Additional Cariboo maps 75-77 Series 10 Cariboo Wagon Road maps 77-90 Series 11 Indian Reserve maps 90-99 Series 12 North-eastern British Columbia maps [i.e. North-western] 99-106 Series 13 BC Northern Interior maps 106-116 Series 14 West Central British Columbia maps 116-127 Series 15 Bella Coola and Chilcotin maps 127-130 Series 16 Series 16 - Lillooet maps 130-133 -2 - - Robert C. (Bob) Harris - Maps R.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Discoveryv47 2019 Final for Website
    Spectacular 2019 Niut Lakes Camp a Smashing Success by Stephen Partington WHAT AN AMAZING SETTING for a Nature loomed large to the west and south Vancouver camp! while the vast Chilcotin Plateau Twelve minutes or so in the heli- stretched invisibly to the east. copter was all it took to hop overtop From here, the Nature Vancouver of the imposing mountains tower- 2019 campsite ofered a stunningly ing above Bluf Lake south of Tatla gorgeous 360-degree view free from Lake and to be deposited near the any signs of humans. Nature was at treeline about 1000 m higher than our doorstep. Te quiet was delicious. the chopper launch pad. No-one needed to hike anywhere— Instant wilderness! we were already there! Helicopter delivery of all goods And there we were—on a small and personnel was key to the com- plateau forested with patches of low fortable establishment of our near- pines at about 2000 m elevation alpine occupation. Not many who and tucked among a series of small attended this camp would have been lakes and ponds. Te rugged Niut happy to make the hike to such a Range peaks of the Coast Mountains place. Our fight was feetingly short View of lakes, Goat Ridge, glacier and Niut Peak from Snow Patch Peak. Photo: Caroline Penn 48 Discovery at a little more than 10 km, but the level as a root embedded within the terrain that we few over was rugged, mantle of the earth. rocky, steep and trackless. Te geologic conditions changed Geology of the Niut Range radically, however, about 5 million years ago when a shift in the ofshore Te Niut Range is a place where plate subduction zones resulted in the immense geological events have appearance of the Cascade Volcanic unfolded.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography of British Columbia Archaeology
    Bibliography of British Columbia Archaeology In the first BC Studies "Special Issue" on archaeology in 1970 I compiled an initial twenty-five page "Bibliography of Archaeology in British Colum­ bia" which listed most publications about British Columbian prehistory up to that time. That bibliography proved a useful tool for British Columbia archaeologists, and was partially updated in the 1980-81 "Special Issue." That included another twenty pages of references, although there was no intent to make that listing fully comprehensive. In tune with the accelerating pace of change in almost all aspects of modern life, since 1981-82 there has been a veritable explosion in the quantity of material written about British Columbia prehistory. Keeping abreast of that information has been distinctly challenging for even pro­ fessional archaeologists, and much of it has fallen beyond the reach of other British Columbians, including the politicians and bureaucrats who exert some control over how archaeology is carried out in this province. At the very least, there should be a basic bibliographic file of professional articles and papers so that interested observers can easily determine what has been written about their favourite area or topic. Thus, I hope the following bibliography will provide an initial view of the large body of written information about British Columbia's prehistory, and prove a useful tool for both archaeologists and non-archaeologists. I have tried to compile all significant monographs, books, and journal articles of any date not listed in the two previous bibliographies, although naturally most references post-date 1980. I have also included many graduate theses bearing on British Columbian prehistory from the three universities (British Columbia, Simon Fraser, and Victoria) as well as many of the longer and more significant unpublished "permit-reports," or "Cultural Resource Management reports," submitted to government or industry.
    [Show full text]