DOCSLIB.ORG

MPA Book Finalcover

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
MPA Book Finalcover CreatingCreating andand ManagingManaging MarineMarine PProtectedrotected AreasAreas inin thethe PhilippinesPhilippines White Aliño Meneses Fisheries Improved for Sustainable Harvest Project Implemented by the Government of the Philippines Supported by the United States Agency for International Development Coastal Conservation and Education Foundation, Inc. Supported by the Pew Fellows Program for Marine Conservation of the Pew Charitable Trusts University of the Philippines Marine Science Institute Cebu City, Philippines 2006 Creating and Managing Marine Protected Areas in the Philippines Alan T. White Porfirio M. Aliño Anna Blesilda T. Meneses 2006 Printed in Cebu City, Philippines Alan T. White, Ph.D.: Advisor, Fisheries Improved for Sustainable Harvest (FISH) Project of Tetra Tech EM Inc. and President of the Coastal Conservation and Education Foundation, Inc., Cebu City. Porfirio M. Aliño, Ph.D.: Professor in Marine Science, Marine Science Institute of the University of the Philippines Diliman, Quezon City. Anna Blesilda T. Meneses, M.S.: Coordinator of the Marine Protected Area Project of the Coastal Conservation and Education Foundation, Inc., Cebu City. Citation: White, A.T., P.M. Aliño and A.T. Meneses. 2006. Creating and managing marine protected areas in the Philippines. Fisheries Improved for Sustainable Harvest Project, Coastal Conservation and Education Foundation, Inc. and University of the Philippines Marine Science Institute, Cebu City, Philippines. 83 p. This publication was made possible through support provided by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) under the terms and conditions of Contract No. AID-492-C-00-03-00022-00, USAID/ Philippines Environment Governance 2 Project under Contract No. AID-492-C-00-04-00037-00 and the support provided by the Pew Fellows Program for Marine Conservation of the Pew Charitable Trusts. The views expressed and opinions contained in this publication are those of the authors and are not intended as statement of policy of USAID or the authors’ parent organization. This publication may be reproduced or quoted in other publications as long as proper reference is made to the source. Copy editing: Marie Sol M. Sadorra Layout and graphics: Ysolde Collantes-Jatulan Front and back cover illustrations: Amiel Rufo Cover photos: (L-R): CRMP file photo, Homer de Dios and Al Linsangan FISH Document No. 19-FISH/2005 List of Tables and Figures iv Acronyms and Abbreviations vi Acknowledgments vii contents Preface viii chapter 1 Why Use Marine Protected Areas for Managing Coastal and Marine Habitats and Fisheries? 1 chapter 2 Integrated Coastal Management and Marine Habitat Protection 6 chapter 3 Is It a Marine Protected Area, Park, Reserve, or Sanctuary? 10 chapter 4 Legal and Jurisdictional Concerns for Marine Protected Areas 13 chapter 5 Planning and Establishing a Marine Protected Area 17 Phase 1. Issue identification and baseline assessment 17 Phase 2. Plan preparation and adoption 22 Phase 3. Action plan and project implementation 30 Phase 4. Monitoring and evaluation 42 Phase 5. Information management, education, and outreach 48 chapter 6 Creating Networks of Marine Protected Areas 49 What is an ecological MPA network? 50 Biophysical and ecological advantages of an MPA network 50 Broad basis for ecological MPA networks 51 MPA network design 53 Social, information, and administrative networks 55 Field approach and process 56 Creating MPA networks that are sustainable 58 MPA networks—final key points 58 chapter 7 The Challenge of Sustainability 59 Bibliography 61 Appendices 1 Marine Protected Area Report Guide 66 2 Marine Protected Area Training Manual (in CD) 81 3 Networks Supporting Marine Protected Areas in the Philippines 82 iii Tables 1 Useful publications on MPA management in the Philippines. 9 2 Examples of national and local categories for protected areas. 10 3 The National Integrated Protected Areas System (NIPAS). 13 4 Important national MPAs in the Philippines declared under NIPAS. 14 5 Fisheries Code of 1998. 15 6 Phases and activities for MPA establishment and management within local government jurisdictions. 18 7 Key chapters in a coastal environmental profile. 20 8 Sample outline of a site management plan. 23 9 Factors to consider when establishing reserve boundaries. 25 10 Compatible and restricted activities within potential management/use zones for different types of MPA. 30 11 Summary of ordinances that have served the Apo Island Marine Reserve, 1986 and 1999. 38 12 User fee system for the Tubbataha Reef National Marine Park. 41 13 MPA rating system for municipal/city MPAs. 43 14 Selected coastal and marine related networks and primary concerns. 55 list of tables & figures Figures 1 Exchange of mutual benefits among mangrove, seagrass, and coral reef ecosystems. 2 2 Sumilon Island, Cebu: Coral reef and reserve (circa 1984). 3 3 Change in fish yield reported for Sumilon and Apo Islands from 1976 through 1986, reflecting the effects of different management regimes. 4 4 Increase in the biomass of large predators inside and adjacent to the Apo Island reserve over 20 years. 4 5 Dispersal of fish and larvae from the sanctuary of a marine reserve enhances reproduction and recruitment outside. 4 6 Estimates of biomass of surgeonfish and jackfish at Apo Island, Philippines. 5 7 Cyclical ICM data collection, planning, implementation, and monitoring process. 6 8 Tools to manage MPAs in the context of ICM. 7 9 Municipal or city management area with various CRM interventions including MPAs. 8 10 Marine reserve boundaries and zones, survey locations and political subdivisions on San Salvador Island, Masinloc, Zambales. 12 iv 11 MPAs documented in the Marine Protected Coast, Reef and Management Database. 16 12 PCRA exercise to refine maps. 21 13 Example of reserve system with core sanctuary and “traditional use” buffer areas applied to small islands. 26 14 The “box and border” model where a sanctuary is established along the coastline and a buffer zone of a certain width is created around its perimeter to form the “reserve area”. 26 15 The “multiple use marine reserve model” where a section of the marine area is a sanctuary and the remaining areas form a reserve with various zones for different activities. 27 16 Olango Island, Cebu: An example of zoning for multiple uses. 28 17 Nonactive gear generally permitted to operate in municipal waters (but not within most marine reserves) provided they are not damaging to habitats under local circumstances. 31 18 Common fishing gear (nationally or locally) in the Philippines and the potential damage caused by the gear. 33 19 Components of a permanent mooring buoy. 34 20 Amount and allocation of user fees collected from divers and snorkelers visiting the Gilutongan Marine Sanctuary, Cordova, Cebu. 37 21 Balicasag Island, Bohol Sanctuary and coral reef with monitoring locations. 46 22 Comparison of mean percent living and dead substrate cover and fish density for Balicasag Island, 1984, 1992, 1999, and 2003. 47 23 Cyclical MPA planning and implementation process. 48 24 Biogeographic areas important for marine conservation planning based on geomorphology, basins, bathymetry, and major water circulation patterns. 51 25 Primary marine corridors of the Philippines. 52 26 Requirements for an effective MPA network, Cebu Strait and surrounding areas. 54 27 MPAs established in the Danajon Bank are beginning to form a network and are supported by their respective municipal CRM programs. 57 v CO community organizer CRM coastal resource management DA-BFAR Department of Agriculture - Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources DENR Department of Environment and Natural Resources FARMC Fisheries and Aquatic Resources Management Council GMPS general management planning strategy acronyms & acronyms ICM integrated coastal management abbreviations IEC information, education, and communication LGU local government unit M/CFARMC Municipal/City Fisheries and Aquatic Resources Management Council MPA marine protected area NGO nongovernment organization NIPAS National Integrated Protected Areas System OIWS Olango Island Wildlife Sanctuary PAMB Protected Area Management Board PCRA participatory coastal resource assessment PO people’s organization SMC Sanctuary Management Committee SPAGS spawning aggregations vi This book reflects the effort of many individuals and institutions that over the last 15 years have contributed to the development and management of marine protected areas in the Philippines. It builds on the foundation provided by the publication in 2001: “Managing Coastal Habitats and Marine Protected Areas” published by the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR), the Department of Agriculture-Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources (DA-BFAR), the Department of the Interior and Local Government (DILG) and the Coastal Resource Management Project (CRMP) supported by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), authored by A. White, S. Nakashima and M. Gleason. This current edition incorporates lessons and tools regarding marine protected area management that have been learned through the joint efforts of the Coastal Conservation and Education Foundation, Inc. (CCEF), the University of the Philippines-Marine Science Institute (UP-MSI) and the Fisheries Improved for Sustainable Harvest (FISH) Project together with many other partners. Individuals and their institutions that deserve special mention for contributing to this book include: Angel Alcala, Ph.D., Director, Silliman University Angelo King
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Brief of Amici Curiae Interfaith Coalition in Support of Appellees and Affirmance ______
    No. 17-15589 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ______________________ STATE OF HAWAI’I; ISMAIL ELSHIKH, Plaintiffs - Appellees, v. DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY; JOHN F. KELLY, in his official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE; REX W. TILLERSON, in his official capacity as Secretary of State; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendants - Appellants. ______________________ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawai’i, No. 17-cv-00050 (Watson, J.) ______________________ BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE INTERFAITH COALITION IN SUPPORT OF APPELLEES AND AFFIRMANCE ______________________ ROBERT D. FRAM LIGIA M. MARKMAN ALEXANDRA P. GRAYNER KARUN TILAK COVINGTON & BURLING LLP MICHAEL BAKER One Front Street, 35th Floor ANDREW GUY San Francisco, California 94111 COVINGTON & BURLING LLP Telephone: (415) 591-6000 One CityCenter 850 Tenth Street, NW Washington, DC 20001 Telephone: (202) 662-6000 Attorneys for Amici Curiae Interfaith Coalition CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.1, corporate amici curiae state that they do not have parent corporations and that no publicly held corporation owns 10 percent or more of any stake or stock in amici curiae. i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTEREST OF AMICI CURIAE INTERFAITH COALITION ............................... 1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Current Year Appropriation Agency: Supplemental Appropriations Operating Unit: Continuing Appropriations Organization Code (UACS) Off-Budget Account
    QUARTERLY PHYSICAL REPORT OF OPERATION As of 4TH Quarter CY 2017 Department: Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Region IX X Current Year Appropriation Agency: Supplemental Appropriations Operating Unit: Continuing Appropriations Organization Code (UACS) Off-Budget Account PHYSICAL TARGETS PHYSICAL ACCOMPLISHMENT UACS VARIANCE AS OF PARTICULARS 1ST 2ND 3RD 4TH 1ST 2ND 3RD 4TH REMARKS CODE TOTAL TOTAL December 2017 QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER (7) (12) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (8) (9) (10) (11) (13) (14) =(3+4+5+6) =(8+9+10+11) A.01 General Administration and Support Services A.01.a General Management and Supervision 1. Personnel Management Appointment preparation (no) Regional Office 2 3 1 2 8 2 137 3 142 134 Personnel records maintained/ updated (no) Regional Office 1,700 1,700 1,700 1,700 1,700 1,700 1,700 1,700 1,700 1,700 Applications/clearance processed (no) Regional Office 150 150 150 150 600 160 140 300 60 660 60 2. Procurement Services Agency procurement plan prepared (no) Regional Office 1 1 1 1 Bidding conducted (no) Regional Office 1 1 1 1 4 2 2 2 6 2 Zamboanga del Norte 1 1 1 1 4 1 7 4 5 17 13 Zamboanga Del Sur 1 1 1 1 4 2 2 4 Zamboanga Sibugay 1 1 1 1 4 2 20 8 30 26 Abstract of quotation/purchase order approved (no) Regional Office 10 15 15 20 60 360 40 204 604 544 Resolutions approved (no) Regional Office 5 5 10 40 60 113 179 249 63 604 544 Documents on procurement for payment Regional Office 10 20 30 60 120 166 218 243 495 1,122 1,002 Agency purchase request acquired (PS-DBM) (no) Regional Office 1 1 1 3 7 6 9 (10) 12 9 Purchased request acted upon(no) Regional Office 15 30 30 40 115 275 255 365 314 1,209 1,094 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Cebu 1(Mun to City)
    TABLE OF CONTENTS Map of Cebu Province i Map of Cebu City ii - iii Map of Mactan Island iv Map of Cebu v A. Overview I. Brief History................................................................... 1 - 2 II. Geography...................................................................... 3 III. Topography..................................................................... 3 IV. Climate........................................................................... 3 V. Population....................................................................... 3 VI. Dialect............................................................................. 4 VII. Political Subdivision: Cebu Province........................................................... 4 - 8 Cebu City ................................................................. 8 - 9 Bogo City.................................................................. 9 - 10 Carcar City............................................................... 10 - 11 Danao City................................................................ 11 - 12 Lapu-lapu City........................................................... 13 - 14 Mandaue City............................................................ 14 - 15 City of Naga............................................................. 15 Talisay City............................................................... 16 Toledo City................................................................. 16 - 17 B. Tourist Attractions I. Historical........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Blue Paradox: Preemptive Overfishing in Marine Reserves
    PAPER The blue paradox: Preemptive overfishing in COLLOQUIUM marine reserves Grant R. McDermotta,1,2, Kyle C. Mengb,c,d,1,2, Gavin G. McDonaldb,e, and Christopher J. Costellob,c,d,e aDepartment of Economics, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403; bBren School of Environmental Science & Management, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106; cDepartment of Economics, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106; dNational Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA 02138; and eMarine Science Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 Edited by Jane Lubchenco, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, and approved July 25, 2018 (received for review March 9, 2018) Most large-scale conservation policies are anticipated or an- This line of reasoning suggests that the anticipation of a new nounced in advance. This risks the possibility of preemptive conservation policy may give rise to a set of incentives that is resource extraction before the conservation intervention goes distinct from—but possibly just as important as—the incentives into force. We use a high-resolution dataset of satellite-based fish- arising from the policy’s implementation. While this kind of pre- ing activity to show that anticipation of an impending no-take emptive behavior has been well-documented for landowners, gun marine reserve undermines the policy by triggering an unin- owners, and owners of natural resource extraction rights, it has tended race-to-fish. We study one of the world’s largest marine not been studied in the commons. For vast swaths of the ocean, reserves, the Phoenix Islands Protected Area (PIPA), and find that no single owner has exclusive rights and so must compete against fishers more than doubled their fishing effort once this area was others for extraction.
    [Show full text]
  • Power Supply Procurement Plan
    POWER SUPPLY PROCUREMENT PLAN ZAMBOANGA DEL NORTE ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC. POWER SUPPLY PROCUREMENT PLAN In compliance with the Department of Energy’s (DOE) Department Circular No. DC 2018-02-0003, “Adopting and Prescribing the Policy for the Competitive Selection Process in the Procurement by the Distribution Utilities of Power Supply Agreement for the Captive Market” or the Competitive Selection process (CSP) Policy, the Power Supply Procurement Plan (PSPP) Report is hereby created, pursuant to the Section 4 of the said Circular. The PSPP refers to the DUs’ plan for the acquisition of a variety of demand-side and supply-side resources to cost-effectively meet the electricity needs of its customers. The PSPP is an integral part of the Distribution Utilities’ Distribution Development Plan (DDP) and must be submitted to the Department of Energy with supported Board Resolution and/or notarized Secretary’s Certificate. The Third-Party Bids and Awards Committee (TPBAC), Joint TPBAC or Third Party Auctioneer (TPA) shall submit to the DOE and in the case of Electric Cooperatives (ECs), through the National Electrification Administration (NEA) the following: a. Power Supply Procurement Plan; b. Distribution Impact Study/ Load Flow Analysis conducted that served as the basis of the Terms of Reference; and c. Due diligence report of the existing generation plant All Distribution Utilities’ shall follow and submit the attached report to the Department of Energy for posting on the DOE CSP Portal. For ECs such reports shall be submitted to DOE and NEA. The NEA shall review the submitted report within ten (10) working days upon receipt prior to its submission to DOE for posting at the DOE CSP Portal.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Protected Areas (Mpas) in Management 1 of Coral Reefs
    ISRS BRIEFING PAPER 1 MARINE PROTECTED AREAS (MPAS) IN MANAGEMENT 1 OF CORAL REEFS SYNOPSIS Marine protected areas (MPAs) may stop all extractive uses, protect particular species or locally prohibit specific kinds of fishing. These areas may be established for reasons of conservation, tourism or fisheries management. This briefing paper discusses the potential uses of MPAs, factors that have affected their success and the conditions under which they are likely to be effective. ¾ MPAs are often established as a conservation tool, allowing protection of species sensitive to fishing and thus preserving intact ecosystems, their processes and biodiversity and ultimately their resilience to perturbations. ¾ Increases in charismatic species such as large groupers in MPAs combined with the perception that the reefs there are relatively pristine mean that MPAs can play a significant role in tourism. ¾ By reducing fishing mortality, effective MPAs have positive effects locally on abundances, biomass, sizes and reproductive outputs of many exploitable site- attached reef species. ¾ Because high biomass of focal species is sought but this is quickly depleted and is slow to recover, poaching is a problem in most reef MPAs. ¾ Target-species ‘spillover’ into fishing areas is likely occurring close to the MPA boundaries and benefits will often be related to MPA size. Evidence for MPAs acting as a source of larval export remains weak. ¾ The science of MPAs is at an early stage of its development and MPAs will rarely suffice alone to address the main objectives of fisheries management; concomitant control of effort and other measures are needed to reduce fishery impacts, sustain yields or help stocks to recover.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Patterns in Marine Mammal Distributions
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION I. TAXONOMIC DECISIONS In this work we followed Wilson and Reeder (2005) and Reeves, Stewart, and Clapham’s (2002) taxonomy. In the last 20 years several new species have been described such as Mesoplodon perrini (Dalebout 2002), Orcaella heinsohni (Beasley 2005), and the recognition of several species have been proposed for orcas (Perrin 1982, Pitman et al. 2007), Bryde's whales (Kanda et al. 2007), Blue whales (Garrigue et al. 2003, Ichihara 1996), Tucuxi dolphin (Cunha et al. 2005, Caballero et al. 2008), and other marine mammals. Since we used the conservation status of all species following IUCN (2011), this work is based on species recognized by this IUCN to keep a standardized baseline. II. SPECIES LIST List of the species included in this paper, indicating their conservation status according to IUCN (2010.4) and its range area. Order Family Species IUCN 2010 Freshwater Range area km2 Enhydra lutris EN A2abe 1,084,750,000,000 Mustelidae Lontra felina EN A3cd 996,197,000,000 Odobenidae Odobenus rosmarus DD 5,367,060,000,000 Arctocephalus australis LC 1,674,290,000,000 Arctocephalus forsteri LC 1,823,240,000,000 Arctocephalus galapagoensis EN A2a 167,512,000,000 Arctocephalus gazella LC 39,155,300,000,000 Arctocephalus philippii NT 163,932,000,000 Arctocephalus pusillus LC 1,705,430,000,000 Arctocephalus townsendi NT 1,045,950,000,000 Carnivora Otariidae Arctocephalus tropicalis LC 39,249,100,000,000 Callorhinus ursinus VU A2b 12,935,900,000,000 Eumetopias jubatus EN A2a 3,051,310,000,000 Neophoca cinerea
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Marine Protected Areas in Sustaining Fisheries
    The role of marine protected areas in sustaining fisheries Callum Roberts University of York, UK After World War II there was much optimism that fisheries could feed the World. But at the beginning of the 21st century, we are not so sure. Quota management of fisheries in the European Union has failed to deliver sustainability 100 80 60 40 20 Percentage of Quota Fish Stocks of Quota Percentage 0 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 Year Healthy At risk In danger Data from ICES Cod decline in the Kattegat, North Sea Extinction is the ultimate in unsustainable fishing, whether or not the species of concern are targets of the fishery What is missing from fishery management? • Real provision for habitat protection and recovery • Precautionary targets • Resolute enforcement Objectives of marine reserves Maintaining ecosystem processes and services Conservation Sustaining fisheries Tree cover www.worldwildlife.org/oceans/pdfs/fishery_effects.pdf Spillover Reproduction & Dispersal Colonization & Growth Abundance Diversity What is the evidence that reserves work? Reserves all over the world show dramatic increases in spawning stocks Usually by at least 2-3 times in 5-10 years Long-term studies in New Zealand, Philippines, Florida and many other countries show strong responses to reserve protection Fish in reserves do live longer, grow larger and produce more eggs Egg production from protected fish stocks increases by much more than stock biomass Catches do increase Soufrière Marine Management Area, St. Lucia: Established 1995 35% of reef area closed
    [Show full text]
  • The Regional Development Report Scorecard Xix Joint RDC IX and RPOC IX Resolution Xxi Foreword Xxiii Message Xxiv Executive Summary Xxv
    Zamboanga Peninsula 2019Regional Development Report Table of Contents Acronyms and Abbreviations iii List of Tables and Figures xi The Regional Development Report Scorecard xix Joint RDC IX and RPOC IX Resolution xxi Foreword xxiii Message xxiv Executive Summary xxv Chapter 02 Global and Regional Trends and Prospects 1 Chapter 03 Overlay of Economic Growth, Demographic Trends and 5 Physical Characteristics Chapter 04 Zamboanga Peninsula Regional Development Plan 2017-2022 9 Overall Framework Chapter 05 Ensuring People-Centered, Clean and Efficient Governance 13 Chapter 06 Pursuing Swift and Fair Administration of Justice 21 Chapter 07 Promoting Philippine Culture and Values 29 Chapter 08 Expanding Economic Opportunities in Agriculture, Forestry, 33 and Fisheries Chapter 09 Expanding Economic Opportunities in Industry and Services 49 through Trabaho at Negosyo Chapter 10 Accelerating Human Capital Development 57 Chapter 11 Reducing Vulnerability of Individuals and Families 67 Chapter 12 Building Safe and Secure Communities 71 Chapter 13 Reaching for the Demographic Dividend 75 Chapter 14 Vigorously Advancing Science, Technology and Innovation 79 Chapter 15 Ensuring Sound Macroeconomic Policy 85 Chapter 17 Attaining Just and Lasting Peace 95 Chapter 18 Ensuring Security, Public Order and Safety 105 Chapter 19 Accelerating Infrastructure Development 117 Chapter 20 Ensuring Ecological Integrity, Clean and Healthy 133 Environment Chapter 22 Plan Implementation and Monitoring 145 Glossary of Terms 153 2019 Zamboanga Peninsula Regional Development
    [Show full text]
  • CENTRAL VISAYAS Regional Development Investment Program
    CENTRAL VISAYAS Regional Development Investment Program 2018-2022 CENTRAL VISAYAS Regional Development Investment Program 2018-2022 ©2018 by the National Economic and Development Authority Region 7 All rights reserved. Any part of this publication may be used and reproduced provided proper acknowledgment is made. Central Visayas Regional Development Investment Program 2018-2022 Published by: National Economic and Development Authority Regional Office 07 Government Center, Sudlon, Lahug, Cebu City, Philippines Tel: (032) 414-5254 / (032) 414-5263 Email: [email protected] RDC 07 Website: www.rdc7.net.ph NEDA Website: www.neda7.ph Contents Page Message RDC Chairman iii Message RDC Vice-Chairman iv Executive Summary 1 Chapter 1 Enhancing the Social Fabric 3 Chapter 2 Inequality-Reducing Transformation 6 Chapter 3 Increasing Growth Potential 53 Chapter 4 Foundations for Sustainable Development 57 List of Tables and Figures Page Tables 1 Summary of Programs, Activities, and Projects by 1 Development Outcome 1 Enhancing the Social Fabric PAPs 5 2 Inequality-Reducing Transformation PAPs 9 3 Increasing Growth Potential PAPs 55 4 Foundations for Sustainable Development PAPs 61 Figures 1 Distribution of the Investment Requirement by 2 Development Outcome 1.1 Annual Investment Requirement (Chapter 1) 3 1.2 Investment Requirement by Agency (Chapter 1) 3 1.3 Investment Requirement by Location (Chapter 1) 4 2.1 Annual Investment Requirement (Chapter 2) 6 2.2 Investment Requirement by Agency (Chapter 2) 7 2.3 Number of PAPs by Location (Chapter 2) 7 2.4 Investment Requirement by Location (Chapter 2) 8 3.1 Annual Investment Requirement (Chapter 3) 53 4.1 Annual Investment Requirement (Chapter 4) 57 4.2 Number of PAPs by Implementing Agency 58 4.3 Investment Requirement by Implementing Agency (Chapter 4) 59 4.4 Investment Requirement by Location (Chapter 4) 59 Executive Summary Background The Central Visayas RDC coordinated the preparation of the Regional Development Investment Program (RDIP).
    [Show full text]
  • Djrmh-May 2018
    Republic of the Philippines DR. JOSE RIZAL MEMORIAL HOSPITAL - Lawaan, Dapitan City MEDICAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FUND UTILIZATION REPORT As of May 2018 Name of Hospital: Dr. Jose Rizal Memorial Hospital Month: May Date Name of Patient Address Age Type of Assistance Amount Provided 1 05/01/2018 JENREY CADORNA Talisay, Dapitan City 12 X-ray 350.00 2 05/01/2018 MELCHOR MONTE Sulangon, Dapitan City 73 Laboratory/Medicines 1,450.10 3 05/01/2018 KINGBERT CARDENAS Rizal, Z.N 15 Hospital Bill 2,447.10 4 05/01/2018 GEERA CALAGUAN Dapitan City 16 Hospital Bill 4,614.45 5 05/01/2018 KINGBERT CARDENAS North Mapang, Rizal, Z.N 15 Medicines 226.80 6 05/01/2018 OSCAR GAHISAN Banonong, Dapitan City 74 Hospital Bill 14,955.44 7 05/01/2018 SATURNINA COLATA Liyang, Dapitan City 66 Hospital Bill 18,869.87 8 05/01/2018 NIMFLOR BAIT-IT Villahermosa, Polanco, Z.N 46 X-ray/Laboratory 2,200.50 9 05/01/2018 CONRADA BAIT-IT Burgos, Dapitan City 75 Hospital Bill 24,440.04 10 05/01/2018 RODRIGO FANO Talisay, Dapitan City 74 Hospital Bill 21,190.64 11 05/02/2018 MERLYN BAJAMUNDE Adante, Piñan, Z.N 41 Hospital Bill 3,139.90 12 05/02/2018 TITO BAHIAN Napo, Dapitan City 70 Medicines 2,908.50 13 05/02/2018 MICHEL CINCO Napo, Dapitan City 29 Medicines 1,428.50 14 05/02/2018 SATURNINA COLATA Liyang, Dapitan City 66 Medicines 1,413.00 15 05/02/2018 DIOSCORO NAPIAL Piñan, Z.N 74 Medicines/X-ray/Laboratory 2,764.00 16 05/02/2018 TITA CABILIN Bagting, Dapitan City 83 Laboratory 1,190.50 17 05/02/2018 EPEGENIA BULAY-OG Banbanan, Dapitan City 61 Meds.Supplies 240.00 18 05/02/2018 JASMEN SUMALPONG Polo, Dapitan City 9 UTZ 750.00 19 05/02/2018 JOSHUA EMPEYNADO Linabo, Dapitan City 12 Medicines 196.50 20 05/02/2018 ERNESTO GANOT JR.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Environment Protection Project for Panglao in Philippines
    REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES THE PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT OF BOHOL SUSTAINABLE ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION PROJECT FOR PANGLAO IN PHILIPPINES PROJECT COMPLETION REPORT NOVEMBER 2015 JAPAN INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AGENCY NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. 1R NJS CONSULTANTS CO., LTD. JR 15-051 REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES THE PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT OF BOHOL SUSTAINABLE ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION PROJECT FOR PANGLAO IN PHILIPPINES PROJECT COMPLETION REPORT NOVEMBER 2015 JAPAN INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AGENCY NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. NJS CONSULTANTS CO., LTD. EXCHANGE RATE (As of September 2015) US Dollar (US$) 1.00 = Philippines Peso (PHP) 46.65 Philippines Peso (PHP) 1.00 = Japanese Yen (¥) 2.611 ｃｃLocation Map Sustainable Environment Protection Project for Panglao Project Completion Report Sustainable Environment Protection Project for Panglao Project Completion Report Table of Contents Location Map List of Tables ………………………………………………………………………………………......iv List of Figures …………………………………………………………………………………………..v List of Abbreviations… . ……………………………………………………………………………..…vi 1. OUTLINE OF THE PROJECT ....................................................................................................... 1 1.1. Background of the Project ................................................................................................ 1 1.2. Structure of the Project ..................................................................................................... 1 1.3. Project Area .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]