A Statistical Analysis of Commercial Aviation Accidents 1958-2017

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Statistical Analysis of Commercial Aviation Accidents 1958-2017 01 Airbus A Statistical Analysis of Commercial Aviation Accidents 1958-2017 Contents Scope and definitions 02 1.0 2017 & beyond 04 Accidents in 2017 07 Beyond 2017 08 Forecast increase in number of aircraft 2017-2036 09 2.0 Commercial aviation accidents since the advent of the jet age 10 Evolution of the number of flights & accidents 12 Evolution of the yearly accident rate 13 Evolution of the commercial air transport fleet 14 Impact of technology on aviation safety 16 Evolution of accident rates by aircraft generation 17 3.0 Commercial aviation accidents over the last 20 years 18 Evolution of the yearly accident rate 20 Ten year moving average of accident rate 21 Accidents by flight phase 22 Distribution of accidents by accident category 24 Evolution of the three main accident categories 25 Controlled Flight Into Terrain (CFIT) accident rates 26 Loss Of Control In-flight (LOC-I) accident rates 27 Runway Excursion (RE) accident rates 28 List of tables & graphs 29 A Statistical Analysis of Commercial Aviation Accidents 1958 / 2017 02 Scope and definitions This publication provides Airbus’ a flight in a commercial aircraft is annual analysis of aviation accidents, an inherently low risk activity. with commentary on the year 2017, Since the goal of any review of aviation as well as a review of the history of accidents is to help the industry Commercial Aviation’s safety record. further enhance safety, an analysis This analysis clearly demonstrates of forecasted aviation macro-trends that our industry has achieved huge is also provided. These highlight key improvements in safety over the factors influencing the industry’s last decades. It also underlines the consideration of detailed strategies significant contribution that technology for the further enhancement of has made in ensuring that taking Aviation Safety. Scope of the Brochure • All western-built commercial MD-11, MD-80/90, Mercure, air transport jets above Trident, VC-10, VFW 614. 40 passengers. Note: non-western-built jets are The following aircraft are included excluded due to lack of information in the statistics: 328 JET, A300, and business jets are not considered A300-600, A310, due to their particular operating A318/319/320/321, A330, A340, environment. A350, A380, Avro RJ series, B707, B717, B720, B727, B737, B747, • Since 1958, the advent B757, B767, B777, B787, BAC of commercial jets -111, BAE 146, Bombardier CRJ series, Caravelle, Comet, Concorde, • Revenue flights Convair 880/990, DC-8,DC-9, DC- • Operational accidents 10, Embraer E series, Embraer ERJ series, F-28, F-70, F-100, L-1011, • Hull loss and fatal types of accidents Source of Data • The accident data was extracted from official accident reports, as well as ICAO, Ascend and Airbus data bases. • Flight operations data were extracted from the Ascend data base. A Statistical Analysis of Commercial Aviation Accidents 1958 / 2017 03 Definitions • Revenue flight: flight involving become detached from the aircraft, the transport of passengers, or cargo or mail. Non revenue flight - direct exposure to jet blast, except such as training, ferry, positioning, when the injuries are from natural demonstration, maintenance, causes, self-inflicted or inflicted by acceptance and test flights are other persons, or when the injuries excluded. are to stowaways hiding outside the areas normally available to the • Operational accident: an accident passengers and crew. taking place between the time any person boards the aircraft with the • Hull loss: an event in which an intention of flight until such time as aircraft is destroyed or damaged all such persons have disembarked, beyond economical repair.The excluding sabotage, military actions, threshold of economical repair is terrorism, suicide and the like. decreasing with the residual value of the aircraft. Therefore, as an • Fatal accident: an event in which at aircraft is ageing, an event leading least one person is fatally or seriously to a damage economically repairable injured as a result of: years before may be considered - being in the aircraft, or a hull loss. - direct contact with any part of the aircraft, including parts which have Definition of accident categories Aviation organisations define more than 40 different accident categories. However the five listed below are the individual types which cause the most significant number of accidents. Runway Excursion (RE): Abnormal Runway Contact A lateral veer off or (ARC): longitudinal overrun off the Hard or unusual landing, runway surface, not primarily not primarily due to SCF, due to SCF or ARC. leading to an accident. Loss of Control in Flight System/Component Failure (LOC-I): or Malfunction (SCF): Loss of aircraft control while Failure or malfunction of an in flight not primarily due to aircraft system or component, SCF. related to either its design, the manufacturing process or a Controlled Flight Into maintenance issue, which leads Terrain (CFIT): to an accident. SCF includes In-flight collision with terrain, the powerplant, software and water, or obstacle without database systems. indicationof loss of control. A Statistical Analysis of Commercial Aviation Accidents 1958 / 2017 04 1.0 2017 & beyond 1.1 Accidents in 2017 07 1.2 Beyond 2017 08 1.3 Forecast increase in number of aircraft 2017-2036 09 A Statistical Analysis of Commercial Aviation Accidents 1958 / 2017 07 1.1 Accidents in 2017 Last year, like in 2015, western built accident per 10 million flights; half that commercial jets of the type included of third generation jets. in this analysis experienced only Industry-wide, hull losses were also one accident with fatalities. Whilst it reduced in number compared to 2016 is true that this news is not of any with only 6 such events occurring reassurance to the people impacted during operations, compared to by tragedy, our industry is nevertheless 13 the previous year. coming ever closer to having its first year with zero fatal accidents. But the lesson to be drawn from these encouraging results is not that Indeed, for the latest (fourth) generation we reached our targets. Far from it. of commercial jets, there were zero Now more than ever, we must avoid fatal accidents in 2017. This lowered the complacency and remember to keep our moving average of fatal accident rate for eyes clearly focused on emerging threats. this category of jet to less than one fatal 1 0.39 6 Fatal accident Hull losses in 2017 in 2017 0.15 0.17 0.03 Fatal accidents per million flight cycles Hull losses per million flight cycles 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 Flight 33 35 departures MILLION MILLION In-service 22,300 24,550 fleet AIRCRAFT AIRCRAFT A Statistical Analysis of Commercial Aviation Accidents 1958 / 2017 08 1.2 Beyond 2017 Historical data KEEPING AN EYE ON EMERGING THREATS In the last 20 years, the industry-wide Considering these trends, we might shows air traffic accident rate has been divided by conclude that if the accident rate stays around 8 for fatal accidents, and by the same, the industry’s increased doubles every around 3 for hull losses considering all exposure to accidents in numerical generations of aircraft. Over the same terms is in direct proportion to this period, traffic increased by around increase in activity. To put it simply, 15 years 150%. This shows that investments more flights will mean more accidents in safety bear fruit, safety is enhanced, unless we work to decrease and accidents are largely prevented the accident rate. Airbus’ Global Market Forecast (GMF) from happening. predicts the same doubling of global That is why we at Airbus believe air traffic over the next next 15 years. However, when we observe the there is no room for complacency. increasing levels of congestion in our We believe we must be ambitious, Such a significant growth of industry airports and skies, the relative stability inject even more vigour into our activity means there is no room for of the industry in current times could industry’s long tradition of improvement, complacency in maintaining safety. be considered as somewhat stressed. and challenge ourselves to drive accident rates lower than ever before, The industry will need to work Additionally, the fleet’s growth rate is co-operatively together to increase tremendous, with traffic doubling every To achieve this, we will need to work safety enhancement efforts in order 15 years and the industry planning to co-operatively together, and increase to decrease the accident rate. be delivering over 2000 new aircraft our safety enhancement efforts per year by 2019. This growth must be by identifying the most promising supported by a proportional increase opportunities we have for responding in the number of trained personnel to the new hazards and threats which including pilots, technicians, cabin crew, are arising. and air traffic controllers and beyond. World annual traffic forecast x2 x2 x2 A Statistical Analysis of Commercial Aviation Accidents 1958 / 2017 09 1.3 Forecast increase in number of aircraft 2017-2036 Each aircraft delivered must be supported by a proportional increase in the number of trained pilots, Increase technicians, cabin crew, air traffic controllers, etc. in world fleet Ensuring that sufficient numbers of suitably trained personnel will be by 2036 available is one of the challenges +21,430 facing our industry. NORTH AMERICA EUROPE CIS +1,896 +3,258 +843 SOUTH AMERICA AFRICA MIDDLE EAST ASIA-PACIFIC +1,654 +931 +2,010 +10,838 A Statistical Analysis of Commercial Aviation Accidents 1958 / 2017 10 2.0 Commercial aviation accidents since the advent of the jet age 2.1 Evolution of the number of flights & accidents 12 2.2 Evolution of the yearly accident rate 13 2.3 Evolution of the commercial air transport fleet 14 2.4 Impact of technology on aviation safety 16 2.5 Evolution of accident rates by aircraft generation 17 A Statistical Analysis of Commercial Aviation Accidents 1958 / 2017 12 2.1 Evolution of the number of flights & accidents No growth in the number of accidents despite a massive increase in exposure Accidents are rare occurrences, consequently their number may vary considerably from one year to the next.
Recommended publications
  • Would Competition in Commercial Aviation Ever Fit Into the World Trade Organization Ruwantissa I
    Journal of Air Law and Commerce Volume 61 | Issue 4 Article 2 1996 Would Competition in Commercial Aviation Ever Fit into the World Trade Organization Ruwantissa I. R. Abeyratne Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.smu.edu/jalc Recommended Citation Ruwantissa I. R. Abeyratne, Would Competition in Commercial Aviation Ever Fit into the World Trade Organization, 61 J. Air L. & Com. 793 (1996) https://scholar.smu.edu/jalc/vol61/iss4/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at SMU Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Air Law and Commerce by an authorized administrator of SMU Scholar. For more information, please visit http://digitalrepository.smu.edu. WOULD COMPETITION IN COMMERCIAL AVIATION EVER FIT INTO THE WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION? RUWANTISSA I.R. ABEYRATNE* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ................................. 794 II. THE GENESIS OF AIR TRAFFIC RIGHTS ......... 795 A. TiH CHICAGO CONFERENCE ...................... 795 B. THE CHICAGO CONVENTION ..................... 800 C. POST-CHICAGO CONVENTION TRENDS ............ 802 D. THiE BERMUDA AGREEMENT ...................... 805 E. Ti ROLE OF ICAO ............................. 808 III. RECENT TRENDS .................................. 809 A. THE AI TRANSPORT COLLOQUIUM .............. 809 B. POST-COLLOQUIuM TRENDS ...................... 811 C. THE WORLD-WIDE AIR TRANSPORT CONFERENCE. 814 D. SOME INTERIM GLOBAL ISSUES ................... 816 E. OBJECTWES OF THE CONFERENCE ................ 819 F. EXAMINATION OF ISSUES
    [Show full text]
  • A Statistical Analysis of Commercial Aviation Accidents 1958-2019
    Airbus A Statistical Analysis of Commercial Aviation Accidents 1958-2019 Contents Scope and definitions 02 1.0 2020 & beyond 05 Accidents in 2019 07 2020 & beyond 08 Forecast increase in number of aircraft 2019-2038 09 2.0 Commercial aviation accidents since the advent of the jet age 10 Evolution of the number of flights & accidents 12 Evolution of the yearly accident rate 13 Impact of technology on aviation safety 14 Technology has improved aviation safety 16 Evolution of accident rates by aircraft generation 17 3.0 Commercial aviation accidents over the last 20 years 18 Evolution of the yearly accident rate 20 Ten year moving average of accident rate 21 Accidents by flight phase 22 Distribution of accidents by accident category 24 Evolution of the main accident categories 25 Controlled Flight Into Terrain (CFIT) accident rates 26 Loss Of Control In-flight (LOC-I) accident rates 27 Runway Excursion (RE) accident rates 28 List of tables & graphs 29 A Statistical Analysis of Commercial Aviation Accidents 1958 / 2019 02 Scope and definitions This publication provides Airbus’ a flight in a commercial aircraft annual analysis of aviation accidents, is a low risk activity. with commentary on the year 2019, Since the goal of any review of aviation as well as a review of the history of accidents is to help the industry Commercial Aviation’s safety record. further enhance safety, an analysis This analysis clearly demonstrates of forecasted aviation macro-trends that our industry has achieved huge is also provided. These highlight key improvements in safety over the factors influencing the industry’s last decades.
    [Show full text]
  • Commercial Aviation Safety Team and Joint Safety Analysis Teams
    Commercial Aviation Safety Team and Joint Safety Analysis Teams Raymond E. King, Psy.D. Major, USAF, BSC Chief, Research Branch HQ Air Force Safety Center Policy, Research, and Technology Division ABSTRACT Commission and the NCARC both The number of commercial airplanes in service recommended that, to find a way to reduce will nearly double by the year 2015, going from aviation accidents, the FAA work with the airline about 12,000 airplanes today to over 23,000 in industry to establish some form of strategic 2015. On a worldwide basis, the data suggest safety plan. nearly a hull loss accident per week by the year 2015 at the current accident rate, which has In 1997, at an NCARC hearing, FAA and airline plateaued over the last decade. Many ideas for industry representatives testified about how they enhancing safety focus on technology were investigating the root causes of aviation improvements to airplanes. While such accidents. The FAA Deputy Director of Aircraft improvements are important, it should be noted Certification Service, Beth Erickson, testified for that their impact would not be significant unless the agency: "We had learned from past efforts they can be implemented on the existing airplane that safety improvements were better fleet. A large portion of the airplanes that will be accomplished when we worked with competent operating in 2007 have already been built, and aviation authorities--pilot unions, airlines, most of the rest have already been designed. The aircraft and aerospace manufacturers, and so data show there are significant factors outside of forth--all pooling our expertise to come up with the airplane design itself that influence the the best way to deal with safety issues.
    [Show full text]
  • WASHINGTON AVIATION SUMMARY March 2018 EDITION
    WASHINGTON AVIATION SUMMARY March 2018 EDITION CONTENTS I. REGULATORY NEWS .............................................................................................. 1 II. AIRPORTS ................................................................................................................ 3 III. SECURITY AND DATA PRIVACY ............................................................................ 6 IV. E-COMMERCE AND TECHNOLOGY ....................................................................... 7 V. ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT ................................................................................ 9 VI. U.S. CONGRESS .................................................................................................... 11 VII. BILATERAL AND STATE DEPARTMENT NEWS ................................................... 13 VIII. EUROPE/AFRICA ................................................................................................... 14 IX. ASIA/PACIFIC/MIDDLE EAST ................................................................................ 17 X. AMERICAS ............................................................................................................. 19 For further information, including documents referenced, contact: Joanne W. Young Kirstein & Young PLLC 1750 K Street NW Suite 200 Washington, D.C. 20006 Telephone: (202) 331-3348 Fax: (202) 331-3933 Email: [email protected] http://www.yklaw.com The Kirstein & Young law firm specializes in representing U.S. and foreign airlines, airports, leasing companies,
    [Show full text]
  • The Impacts of Globalisation on International Air Transport Activity
    Global Forum on Transport and Environment in a Globalising World 10-12 November 2008, Guadalajara, Mexico The Impacts of Globalisation on International Air Transport A ctivity Past trends and future perspectives Ken Button, School of George Mason University, USA NOTE FROM THE SECRETARIAT This paper was prepared by Prof. Ken Button of School of George Mason University, USA, as a contribution to the OECD/ITF Global Forum on Transport and Environment in a Globalising World that will be held 10-12 November 2008 in Guadalajara, Mexico. The paper discusses the impacts of increased globalisation on international air traffic activity – past trends and future perspectives. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS NOTE FROM THE SECRETARIAT ............................................................................................................. 2 THE IMPACT OF GLOBALIZATION ON INTERNATIONAL AIR TRANSPORT ACTIVITY - PAST TRENDS AND FUTURE PERSPECTIVE .................................................................................................... 5 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 5 2. Globalization and internationalization .................................................................................................. 5 3. The Basic Features of International Air Transportation ....................................................................... 6 3.1 Historical perspective .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Economic Impact of Civil Aviation on the U.S. Economy
    The Economic Impact of Civil Aviation on the U.S. Economy State Supplement November 2020 Contents Introduction “Civil aviation provides the means of transporting millions Introduction...............................................................3 of passengers and tons of freight to all corners of the State Economic Impact .....................................................9 globe each and every day. Consumers rely on this physical Economic Impact by Expenditure Category ..................................... 18 connectivity to improve their quality of life and businesses Airline Operations....................................................... 18 depend on it to facilitate transactions, both of which are key Airport Operations ...................................................... 18 to increasing a nation’s economic productivity and prosperity.” General Aviation ........................................................ 19 — The Economic Impact of Civil Aviation on the U.S. Economy, January 2020 Aircraft, Aircraft Engines and Parts Manufacturing ............................. 19 This report supplements Federal Aviation The National Report incorporated the 2014- Avionics Manufacturing .................................................. 20 Administration’s (FAA) publication The Economic 2016 years’ data from the U.S. Department Impact of Civil Aviation on the U.S. Economy, of Commerce (DOC), Department of Research and Development (R&D).......................................... 20 released in January 2020. The Economic Impact Transportation
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Report for More Details on the Definition of Direct and Indirect Impacts1 and the Study Methodology
    TABLE OF CONTENTS NEW YORK STATEWIDE AIRPORT ECONOMIC IMPACTS STUDY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................... i 1. STUDY CONTEXT: NATIONAL AVIATION INDUSTRY & ECONOMIC FACTORS.........................................................................................................3 1.1 Impacts of the Global Economic Recession on Aviation in New York ..................3 1.2 Review of Other Economic Impact Studies .............................................................9 1.3 Activity at New York’s Commercial Service and GA Airports ............................11 1.4 Air Cargo’s Role in New York’s Economy ...........................................................17 1.5 Strategies for Revenue Generation and Increased Airport Economic Output .......20 1.6 NextGen Implementation and Anticipated Benefits in New York ........................33 2. STATEWIDE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF AVIATION ....................................................36 2.1 Job Impacts ............................................................................................................36 2.2 Income Impacts ......................................................................................................42 2.3 Output Impacts .......................................................................................................47 2.4 State & Local Tax Revenue Impacts .....................................................................52 2.5 Local Economic Impact .........................................................................................55
    [Show full text]
  • Commercial Aviation Safety Team Working Together for Aviation Safety ______Date: June 2010 Contact: Alison Duquette, FAA, 202-267-3883
    Commercial Aviation Safety Team Working Together For Aviation Safety ________________________________________________________________________ Date: June 2010 Contact: Alison Duquette, FAA, 202-267-3883 Fact Sheet Commercial Aviation Safety Team The nation’s impressive safety record is due in part to the fact that the aviation industry and federal government are voluntarily investing in the right safety enhancements to reduce the fatality risk in commercial air travel in the United States. The work of the Commercial Aviation Safety Team (CAST), along with new aircraft, regulations and other activities, reduced the fatality risk for commercial aviation in the United States by 83 percent from 1998 to 2008. Looking ahead CAST has evolved to the point that the group is now moving beyond the “historic” approach of examining past accident data to a more proactive approach that will focus on risk prediction and mitigation strategies. The goal over the next decade is to transition to prognostic safety analysis. The increasing number of flights requires greater emphasis on acquiring, sharing and analyzing aviation safety data. Using incident data, CAST is examining emerging and changing risks to identify prevention strategies. There are few commercial aviation accidents and no common causes. Therefore, more data points are needed. Voluntary reporting programs such as the Aviation Safety Action Program (ASAP) and the Flight Quality Assurance (FOQA) program give airlines and government insight into millions of operations so that potential safety issues and trends can be identified. The Aviation Safety Information Analysis and Sharing (ASIAS) program ties together the safety databases across the industry and is integrated into the CAST process. The program is evolving but has matured to the point that the FAA can now look at data from air carriers representing 80 percent of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Aviation Safety Data: Uses and Issues Related to Sanctions and Confidentiality James L
    Journal of Air Law and Commerce Volume 70 | Issue 1 Article 4 2005 United States Aviation Safety Data: Uses and Issues Related to Sanctions and Confidentiality James L. Simmons Jefferty S. Forrest Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.smu.edu/jalc Recommended Citation James L. Simmons et al., United States Aviation Safety Data: Uses and Issues Related to Sanctions and Confidentiality, 70 J. Air L. & Com. 83 (2005) https://scholar.smu.edu/jalc/vol70/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at SMU Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Air Law and Commerce by an authorized administrator of SMU Scholar. For more information, please visit http://digitalrepository.smu.edu. UNITED STATES AVIATION SAFETY DATA: USES AND ISSUES RELATED TO SANCTIONS AND CONFIDENTIALITY JAMES L. SIMMONS* JEFFREY S. FORREST** I. INTRODUCTION T HE WORLDWIDE commercial aviation accident rate has re- mained relatively constant during the past decade. For 40 years prior to this period, however, the global aviation industry maintained a positive rate of improved safety. Innovations in aircraft technologies and improved flight crew training pro- grams are among the factors widely credited for this long-term favorable trend; yet, more remains to be done. Even if the cur- rent accident rate continues, it is inevitable that there will be a larger number of accidents in the future if the industry's pre- dicted growth in the international aviation fleet and expansion of air service materializes. Of course, many initiatives exist with the goal of reducing the accident rate.
    [Show full text]
  • American Airlines: Bankrupt, Like Every Other Legacy Airline
    American Airlines: Bankrupt, Like Every Other Legacy Airline June 2012 Written by Jeffrey S. Harrison, Siri Kalburgi and Colleen Koch Reed at the Robins School of Business, University of Richmond. Copyright © Jeffrey S. Harrison. This case was written for the purpose of classroom discussion. It is not to be duplicated or cited in any form without the copyright holder’s express permission. For permission to reproduce or cite this case, contact Jeff Harrison at [email protected]. In your message, state your name, affiliation and the intended use of the case. Permission for classroom use will be granted free of charge. Other cases are available at: http://robins.richmond.edu/centers/case-network.html In November of 2011, a giant fell. AMR, the holding company of American Airlines, American Eagle Airlines and AmericanConnection, which collectively serve 250 cities in 40 countries and average over 3,400 flights a day, filed for voluntary bankruptcy under Chapter 11 in a New York Federal Court.1 The roots of this legacy airline run deep. What is now American Airlines (“American”), principle subsidiary of AMR, started out as American Airways in the 1920s – the pioneer age of aviation. AMR is one of four remaining legacy carriers to have survived the Great Depression, 1978 Airline Deregulation, September 11 and the Great Recession that began in late 2007. Slowly fading from our consciousness are the legacy airlines of the past: TWA, Eastern, and Pan American. Only United, Delta, U.S. Airways and AMR still exist. The fact that AMR held out to the end was a point of pride, mostly for 2003-2011 Chairman and CEO Gerard Arpey, because Arpey saw bankruptcy as a sign of failure.
    [Show full text]
  • Fact Sheet: the Growth in Greenhouse Gas Emissions From
    The Growth in Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Commercial Aviation Part 1 of a Series on Airlines and Climate Change October 2019 This fact sheet begins a series on commercial aviation, by examining the impact the growth of air travel and freight will have on greenhouse gas emissions. The second installment will feature mitigation efforts and industry commitments to reduce its contribution to climate change, and our final issue will examine the effects of a warming planet on industry operations. In 1960, 100 million passengers traveled by air,1 at the time a relatively expensive mode of transportation available only to a small fraction of the public. By 2017, the total annual world-wide passenger count was 4 billion.2 The “hypermobility”3 of air travel is available to greater numbers of people worldwide, with rapid growth in aviation projected for developing nations and sustained growth in the large established aviation markets of developed countries. While our collective use of automobiles, our production of electricity, and the industrial and agricultural sectors each exceed the climate change impact of commercial aviation, passenger air travel is producing the highest and fastest growth of individual emissions,4 despite a significant improvement in efficiency of aircraft and flight operations over the last 60 years. Airline Energy Intensity and Emissions From 1970 to 2016 in the United States, engine and design technology advances, improvements in air traffic operations, denser seat configurations, and higher passenger loads together reduced the energy intensity of air travel, expressed as British Thermal Units (BTUs) per passenger mile, by 75 percent.5 In the last two decades, carbon 6 dioxide (CO2) emissions from commercial aviation worldwide grew at a slower pace than the growth of the industry, but emissions from aviation have accelerated in recent years as increasing commercial air traffic continues to raise the industry’s contribution to global emissions.
    [Show full text]
  • G600 Prepping for Service Entry
    PUBLICATIONS Vol.50 | No.8 $9.00 AUGUST 2019 | ainonline.com Modifications G600 prepping for service entry Tamarack winglets back in service page 32 by Curt Epstein Gulfstream’s newest addition to its lineup, certificate awards represent its third model the Gulfstream G500.” He added that the Pilot Report the large-cabin, long-range G600, earned to receive both approvals simultaneously, G600 program tallied nearly 100,000 hours both its type and production certificates joining the G550 in 2003 and the G500. of laboratory testing and more than 3,200 We fly the Airbus A220 from the FAA on June 28, paving the way for “Getting both authorizations on the hours of flight testing. deliveries to begin later this year. If the pro- same day is evidence of the maturity The G600 has a cabin that is configurable narrowbody page 34 cess follows Gulfstream’s experience with of our G600 production processes and for three living areas, with a range of 6,500 the smaller sibling to the G600, the G500, speaks to the safety and reliability of the nm at its long-range cruise of Mach 0.85, those deliveries would likely start next aircraft’s design,” said Mark Burns, the and at its high-speed cruise of Mach 0.90 Training month. The G500 received U.S. approval in Georgia-based airframer’s president. can travel 5,500 nm. “We can’t wait to put AIN editor tries Go/No-go July 2018 and Gulfstream delivered the first “Even more remarkable is the fact that we the newest member of our aircraft family, of the model on September 27.
    [Show full text]