The Beginnings of Gregorian Chant; Other Rites and Other Sorts of Chant

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Beginnings of Gregorian Chant; Other Rites and Other Sorts of Chant Chapter 2 The beginnings of Gregorian chant; other rites and other sorts of chant Gregorian chant was established as the chant repertory of the Carolingian Empire, the dominant political power in the late eighth and ninth centuries, and this ensured its survival through the rest of the Middle Ages and, in various transformations, down to the present. Which is how Gregorian chant comes to occupy a central position in this book. But it was not the only sort of medieval chant. In the Latin West other chant repertories were sung for Latin rites independent of Rome. And in the Eastern Roman Empire yet others – the chant of the rites of Jerusalem, Antioch and Constantinople, the Georgian and Armenian rites, and various types of Slavonic chant – achieved a greater or lesser degree of fixity, enabling us to study them today. Even if they cannot be described in detail in this short book, their existence should be borne in mind as a parallel to the Gregorian chant repertory dominant in the West. 2.i The Christian church in the late Roman Empire; Rome and the Franks The early centuries Gregorian chant is the musical element in a rich ritual, a ritual developed and performed by a stable religious community. Instability threatens or destroys the tradition, if things cannot be remembered and repeated year after year. The stable conditions in which chant could flourish were achieved in principle (if not every- where in practice) after Christianity was recognized as one of the official religions of the Roman Empire under Constantine the Great (324–37). We cannot trace par- ticular pieces of chant back to the fourth century, but the progressive elaboration of religious ritual can clearly be observed in documents from that time onwards. The earliest Christians were Jews, and it has often been speculated that musical elements of Jewish ritual were perpetuated in early Christian worship. While this may indeed have been the case, it is very difficult to demonstrate with concrete examples. If one could point to a particular melody or melodic pattern, used for a similar text (allowing for the difference of language) in a parallel ritual situation in 83 Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Chinese University of Hong Kong, on 13 Sep 2019 at 00:47:14, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use , available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807848.005 84 Gregorian Chant the two religious traditions, all with a reasonable claim to date back to the first three or four centuries AD, one would feel to be on firm ground. But such examples are practically non-existent. The threat to, and partial collapse of, social order in the last phase of the Roman Empire is the main reason why the record of Christian worship in the early centuries is incomplete. Under Constantine’s successor, Constantius II (337–61), the heretical form of Christianity called Arianism was declared official. The next emperor, Julian the Apostate, actually favoured non-Christian cults, whereas Theodosius the Great (379–95) declared Christianity to be the official state religion in 391 and banned heathen cults. After Theodosius the unity of the empire ended. In 404 the capital in the West was moved from Rome, under threat from the Goths, to Ravenna, while Constantinople/Byzantium, refounded by Constantine in 324, maintained itself as the great capital of the Eastern Roman Empire after the end of the Western Empire in 476. Conditions were therefore more favourable in the East, where not only Constantinople but also Antioch, Jerusalem and Alexandria were centres of great importance and developed their own forms of worship. While the Roman church was recognized as pre-eminent, its authority in matters of worship was inevitably limited. In the West, where political and social instability during the centuries of migration by Germanic tribes was greater than in the East, some essential elements of worship remained common. But there are considerable differences, in their Latin texts and their melodies, between the liturgies for which we have concrete evidence: on the one hand Rome, and on the other Milan, Benevento, the Spanish peninsula, and Gaul. We cannot describe chanting in early Christian worship with any precision. New songs seem to have been just as important as psalms from the Old Testament. The seemingly obvious connection with Jewish worship is not straightforward. Although psalms were sung in the temple of Jerusalem before its destruction by the Romans in 70, temple worship was a very special, indeed unique, ritual, not imitated by Christians or anyone else. Meetings in the Jewish synagogue were primarily for reading, instruction and prayer, but not psalm-singing or other community singing. (Psalm-singing in the synagogue is not actually documented before the eighth century.) Christians met privately, often for a common meal at the house of a prominent member of their community, and here the eucharistic service might also be performed. So, while it would be foolish to deny the possibility that singing in Christian worship drew upon tones and patterns sung by the Jews, one cannot speak of a simple transfer of ritual practices. The Eucharist had become separated from the evening meal by the second century, and was preceded by readings, prayers and instruction. A description of it by Justin Martyr (d. c.165) does not specify chanting, whereas singing still accompanied Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Chinese University of Hong Kong, on 13 Sep 2019 at 00:47:14, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use , available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807848.005 The beginnings of Gregorian chant; other rites and other sorts of chant 85 the evening gatherings. There is some evidence that psalms were beginning to be preferred to non-biblical songs by the third century, psalms being safer in a time of controversy with heretical sects. A great stimulus to psalm-singing came in the fourth century, when many Christians joined groups of ascetics in the deserts of Egypt. The chief occupation of the monks and hermits was prayer, achieved effectively by the continuous chanting of the Psalter. Those who lived in communities would not sing the Psalter in unison together. One monk would sing a psalm while the others listened, sometimes adding a refrain. This practice remained constant when monasticism spread to Europe. For example, the Rule of the Master (written near Rome c.520) and the Rule of St Benedict (about a decade later) organize monastic life around set times of prayer, and specify the content of each service, including a considerable number of psalms. For both, solo singing of the psalms, by single monks in order of seniority, is the norm. The community would frame the recitation by singing antiphons. St Benedict Most of what is known about St Benedict (c.480–c.550) is found in the second book of the Dialogues of St Gregory (PL 77, 149–430). He was born at Nursia (modern Norcia,´ near Spoleto). About 500 he withdrew to a life of seclusion in a cave at Subiaco. Disciples gradually joined him and he eventually founded twelve monasteries, each with twelve monks. Internal disputes caused him to move with a small band to Montecassino in about 525, where he died. His sister Scholastica was buried with him. The Rule which he composed about 530 or 540 to direct the way of life of his monks was partly influenced by the slightly earlier anonymous ‘Rule of the Master’, and by other monastic rules, and it also draws upon the practice of Roman urban monasteries of the time. The most important task of the monks is the celebration of the Divine Office, referred to as the ‘Opus Dei’, the work of God. (Passages from the Rule are given in text box 1.2 above.) The Rule of St Benedict was adopted by more and more communities across Europe over the next three centuries. It was brought to England c.690 by St Wilfrid, and established in Germany by St Boniface in the early eighth century. By the time of Charlemagne later in the century it was known everywhere. St Benedict’s life, as recounted by St Gregory, became the pattern for many monastic saints, or at least their biographies. Worship in towns and cities differed from the meditative practices of monasticism. In the fourth century a morning and an evening service became established, whose chief character was one of praise. The psalms to be sung (148–150 in the morning, 140 in the evening) did not change – quite different from the way monastic commu- nities would repeatedly sing their way through the whole Psalter. Of great interest Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Chinese University of Hong Kong, on 13 Sep 2019 at 00:47:14, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use , available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807848.005 86 Gregorian Chant are the descriptions of services in Jerusalem in the early fifth century by the pilgrim Aetheria (or Egeria). Here the morning and evening services are preceded by sessions of psalm-singing by monks. (The services take place at sites connected with Christ’s death and resurrection.) On the other hand, the holding of a popular nightly vigil service became common in the same period, where people sang hymns and psalms. A famous description of this practice in St Ambrose’s church in Milan in 386 by St Augustine speaks of it as something recently introduced from the East. St Ambrose (d. 397) is the author of hymns in a simple style very suitable for congregational singing.
Recommended publications
  • 2020-11-01 Gregorian Chant, Preliminary
    All Souls’ Day (Transferred from November 2) Sunday, November 1, 2020, 5:00 p.m. ALL SOULS’ DAY/ALL SOULS’ REQUIEM The tradition of observing November 2 as a day of commemoration began in the tenth century as a complement to All Saints’ Day, November 1. The traditional service of remembering the dead — whether on this day or during an actual funeral — is called a Requiem, the first word of the Latin text, meaning “rest.” The solemnity of the liturgy and the beauty of the music help us to mourn with hope. Thus we are encouraged to trust ever more in God’s gift of eternal life through the death and resurrection of our Lord Jesus Christ. THE GREGORIAN CHANT REQUIEM The oldest musical setting of the Requiem is the version in Gregorian Chant (plainsong, melody only, no harmony). Created sometime in the first millennium A.D., it does have one “new” movement, the Dies irae, dating from no later than the 1200s. The Dies irae melody has been quoted in non-Requiem music by Hector Berlioz, Franz Liszt, Sergei Rachmaninoff, and Camille Saint-Saëns, among others. Some composers of Requiem settings have omitted the Dies irae text, either because of its length or because of its expression of fear, guilt, and judgment. Regarding the latter issue, Jesus, his apostles, and his Hebrew prophets do indeed declare a day of reckoning, and fear is a legitimate human feeling, expressed in the Psalms and in the Prophets. However, God’s grace can ease our fear, and — through the Holy Spirit’s ministry — can offset it by giving us confidence in Christ’s merit rather than our own.
    [Show full text]
  • Introitus: the Entrance Chant of the Mass in the Roman Rite
    Introitus: The Entrance Chant of the mass in the Roman Rite The Introit (introitus in Latin) is the proper chant which begins the Roman rite Mass. There is a unique introit with its own proper text for each Sunday and feast day of the Roman liturgy. The introit is essentially an antiphon or refrain sung by a choir, with psalm verses sung by one or more cantors or by the entire choir. Like all Gregorian chant, the introit is in Latin, sung in unison, and with texts from the Bible, predominantly from the Psalter. The introits are found in the chant book with all the Mass propers, the Graduale Romanum, which was published in 1974 for the liturgy as reformed by the Second Vatican Council. (Nearly all the introit chants are in the same place as before the reform.) Some other chant genres (e.g. the gradual) are formulaic, but the introits are not. Rather, each introit antiphon is a very unique composition with its own character. Tradition has claimed that Pope St. Gregory the Great (d.604) ordered and arranged all the chant propers, and Gregorian chant takes its very name from the great pope. But it seems likely that the proper antiphons including the introit were selected and set a bit later in the seventh century under one of Gregory’s successors. They were sung for papal liturgies by the pope’s choir, which consisted of deacons and choirboys. The melodies then spread from Rome northward throughout Europe by musical missionaries who knew all the melodies for the entire church year by heart.
    [Show full text]
  • SACRED MUSIC Fall 2003 Volume 130 No.3
    SACRED MUSIC Fall 2003 Volume 130 No.3 - ...... ~ . _0- -~'f'. ........ --. -, -. -~- . Aerial View. St. Peter's and Piazza, Rome Renaissance-Baroque. 1506-1668. Chief Architects: Bramante, Michelangelo, Maderna, Bernini SACRED MUSIC Volume 130, Number 3, Fall 2003 FROM THE EDITOR 3 THE CHANTS OF THE PROPRIUM MISSAE versus ALIUS CANTUS APTUS 5 Professor Laszlo Dobszay REVIEWS 27 OPEN FORUM 28 NEWS 28 CONTRIBUTORS 32 SACRED MUSIC Continuation of Caecilia, published by the Society of St. Caecilia since 1874, and The Catholic Choirmaster, published by the Society of St. Gregory of America since 1915. Published quarterly by the Church Music Association of America. Office of Publication: 134 Christendom Drive, Front Royal, VA 22630-5103. E-mail: [email protected] Editorial Assistant: Christine Collins News: Kurt Poterack Music for Review: Calvert Shenk, Sacred Heart Major Seminary, 2701 West Chicago Blvd., Detroit, MI 48206 Susan Treacy, Dept. of Music, Franciscan University, Steubenville, OH 43952-6701 Membership, Circulation and Advertising: P.O. Box 960, Front Royal, VA 22630 CHURCH MUSIC ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA Officers and Board of Directors President Father Robert Skeris Vice- President Father Robert Pasley General Secretary Rosemary Reninger Treasurer Vincent Sly Directors Rev. Ralph S. March, S.O. Cist. Kurt Poterack Father Robert Pasley Paul F. Salumunovich Rosemary Reninger Brian Franck Rev. Robert A. Skeris Calvert Shenk Susan Treacy Ralph Stewart Monsignor Richard Schuler Vincent Sly Stephen Becker Membership in the Church Music Association of America includes a subscription to SACRED MUSIC. Membership is $30.00 annually; student membership is $15.00 annually. Single copies are $7.50. Send applications and changes of address to SACRED MUSIC, P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Gregorian Chant, a Textbook for Seminaries, Novitiates And
    ^» «»»» * » » » 3 » Please handle this volume with care. The University of Connecticut Libraries, Storrs Music MT K6 C-7 MUSIC LIBRARY UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT §TQRRS, CONNECTICUT MUSIC LIBRARY UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT 8T0RRS, CONNECTICUT Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2013 http://archive.org/details/gregorianchantteOOklar GREGORIAN CHANT GREGORIAN CHANT A TEXTBOOK FOR SEMINARIES, NOVITIATES AND SECONDARY SCHOOLS MUSIC LIBRARY CUI ONWER^OFCON CONHECTICUIS STORRS. by REV. ANDREW F. KLARMANN Teacher of Music Cathedral College, Brooklyn, N. Y. Published by GREGORIAN INSTITUTE OF AMERICA TOLEDO, OHIO Imprimatur *MOST REV. THOMAS E. MOLLOY, S.T.D. ~* Bishop of Brooklyn * i Nihil Obstat REV. JOHN F. DONOVAN^ Censor Ltbrorum JANUARY 27, 1945 Desclee and Company of Tournai, Belgium, has granted permission to the author to use the rhythmic marks in this textbook. Copyright, 1945, by Gregorian Institute printed in u.s.a. all rights reserved Dedicated to MOST REVEREND THOMAS E. MOLLOY Bishop of Brooklyn FOREWORD In the following pages Father Klarmann presents a clear, orderly, systematic treatment of liturgical chant. At the very beginning of his treatise he provides an explanation of certain fundamental terms, such as notation, signs, rhythm, chant structure, etc., which is very serviceable in preparing the reader for the fuller development of the general theme in the sub- sequent chapters of this book. With the same thought and purpose the author more particu- larly gives an early definition of the chief subject of discussion, namely, chant, which he defines, in the usually accepted sense, as liturgical music in the form of plain song, which is monophonic, unaccompanied and free in rhythm.
    [Show full text]
  • In Latin and English
    THE HOLY MASS OF THE SECOND VATICAN COUNCIL in Latin and English for the Solemn Celebration of the Ordinary Form of the Roman Rite at St. John the Beloved Catholic Church in McLean, Virginia “Particular law remaining in force, the use of the Latin language is to be preserved in the Latin rites.” (Vatican II, Sacrosanctum Concilium, n. 36) “Steps should be taken so that the faithful may also be able to say or to sing together in Latin those parts of the Ordinary of the Mass which pertain to them.” (Vatican II, Sacrosanctum Concilium, n. 50) “Pastors of souls should take care that besides the vernacular ‘the faith- ful may also be able to say or sing together in Latin those parts of the Ordinary of the Mass which pertain to them.”’ (Sacred Congregation of Rites, Musicam sacram (1967), n. 47) “The Roman Church has special obligations towards Latin, the splen- did language of ancient Rome, and she must manifest them whenever the occasion presents itself.” (John Paul II, Dominicae cenae (1980), n. 10) “Mass is celebrated either in Latin or in another language, provided that liturgical texts are used which have been approved according to the norm of law. Except in the case of celebrations of the Mass that are scheduled by the ecclesiastical authorities to take place in the language of the people, Priests are always and everywhere permitted to celebrate Mass in Latin.” (Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments, Redemptionis Sacramentum (2004), n. 112) “I ask that future priests, from their time in the seminary, receive the preparation needed to understand and to celebrate Mass in Latin, and also to use Latin texts and execute Gregorian chant; nor should we for- get that the faithful can be taught to recite the more common prayers in Latin, and also to sing parts of the liturgy to Gregorian chant.” (Bene- dict XVI, Sacramentum caritatis (2007), n.
    [Show full text]
  • CHANT in Many Cultures, Chant Is Used to Heighten the Delivery of Text in Religious Or Ritual Contexts. the Musical Delivery Is
    This material is under copyright and the source is E Giraud, ‘Chant’, The SAGE International Encyclopedia of Music and Culture, ed. Janet Sturman, (SAGE: 2019). CHANT In many cultures, chant is used to heighten the delivery of text in religious or ritual contexts. The musical delivery is often received as a more spiritual means of expression than the spoken word. In most cases, chant is exclusively a vocal repertoire (without instrumental accompaniment), and usually consists of a single (‘monophonic’) melody line. Although chant presents many of the attributes associated with secular musical performance—out of context, chant may sound like song—it is often not classed as ‘music’ itself: its purpose is not primarily to provide enjoyment to its listeners, but rather to add weight or ceremony to the (often sacred) words that chant accompanies, and/or to facilitate comprehension or recollection of the ritual. As such, chant is functional, reserved for use in certain ritual activities. The remainder of this entry examines a small selection of the world’s chant traditions, placing them in their historical and cultural contexts, in order to provide insight into some of the various forms and practices in which chant is used. Gregorian chant The most widespread form of plainchant in the Latin Christian West, both in the middle ages and today, is ‘Gregorian’ chant; other medieval repertories included Old Hispanic (see below), Gallican, Old Roman, Beneventan and Ambrosian chant. The name ‘Gregorian’ is misleading and stems from the once-held belief that the repertory was composed by Pope Gregory I (590-604). It is now widely accepted that ‘Gregorian’ chant cannot be traced back to Gregory I (sources contemporary to the pope provide no evidence for his involvement in composing chant or arranging the liturgy—‘liturgy’ being the regular, formal, communal acts of worship, rather than private devotion), but instead emerged in the eighth century in the Carolingian empire.
    [Show full text]
  • Gregorian Chant
    GREGORIAN CHANT GREGORIAN CHANT A TEXTBOOK FOR SEMINARIES, NOVITIATES AND SECONDARY SCHOOLS by REV. ANDREW F. KLARMANN Published by GREGORIAN INSTITUTE OF AMERICA TOLEDO, OHIO Imprimatur *MOST REV. THOMAS E. MOLLOY, S.T.D. Bishop of Brooklyn Nihil Obstat REV. JOHN F. DONOVAN Censor Librorum JANUARY 27, 1945 Desclee and Company of Tournai, Belgium, has granted permission to the author to use the rhythmic marks in this textbook. COPYRIGHT, 1945. BY GREGORIAN INSTITUTE PRINTED IN U.S.A. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Dedicated to MOST REVEREND THOMAS E. MOLLOY BISHOP OF BROOKLYN FOREWORD In the following pages Father Klarmann presents a clear, orderly, systematic treatment of liturgical chant. At the very beginning of his treatise he provides an explanation of certain fundamental terms, such as notation, signs, rhythm, chant structure, etc., which is very serviceable in preparing the reader for the fuller development of the general theme in the sub- sequent chapters of this book. With the same thought and purpose the author more particu- larly gives an early definition of the chief subject of discussion, namely, chant, which he defines, in the usually accepted sense, as liturgical music in the form of plain song, which is monophonic, unaccompanied and free in rhythm. Very interestingly also chant structure is explained. The author then proceeds to record the his- torical development of chant at least in its salient features. It is readily understood of course that the Infant Church could not promote a notable advancement in liturgical music during the period of ruthless persecution. And still it seems quite certain that even in the catacombs hymns were used in connection with religious worship.
    [Show full text]
  • Mozarabic Chant
    Mozarabic chant Mozarabic chant (also known as Hispanic chant, itself until after 1014, at the request of the Holy Roman Old Hispanic chant, Old Spanish chant, or Visig- Emperor Henry II.) othic chant) is the liturgical plainchant repertory of the Visigothic/Mozarabic rite of the Roman Catholic Church, related to the Gregorian chant. It is primarily associated with Hispania under Visigothic rule (mainly in what was to become modern Spain) and with the Catholic Visigoths/Mozarabs living under Muslim rule, and was soon replaced by the chant of the Roman rite following the Christian Reconquest. Although its original medieval form is largely lost, a few chants have survived with read- able musical notation, and the chanted rite was later re- vived in altered form and continues to be used in a few isolated locations in Spain, primarily in Toledo. The city of Toledo 1 Terminology The Visigothic rite (later Mozarabic rite) shares similar- Dissatisfaction with the Islamic term “Mozarabic chant” ities with the Ambrosian rite and Gallican rite, and dif- has led to the use of several competing names for the fers from the Roman rite. As the Christian reconquest of music to which it refers. The Islamic term Mozarabic Hispania went on, the Roman rite supplanted the Mozara- was used by the Islamic rulers of Hispania (Al Andalus) bic. With the papal appointment of a French abbot as the to refer to the Mozarabs, that is, the Visigothic Chris- new archbishop of Toledo, which had been recaptured in tians of Hispania (modern Spain and Portugal) living un- 1085, Roman influence could be enforced throughout the der Muslim rule.
    [Show full text]
  • Textbook of Gregorian Chant
    TEXT BOOK OF GREGORIAN CHANT ACCORDING TO THE SOLESMES METHOD BY Dom Gregory SUNOL, 0. S. B., Monk of Montserrat TRANSLATED FROM THE SIXTH FRENCH EDITION WITH AN INTRODUCTION BY G. M. DURNFORD OBLATE OF SOLESHES. SOCIETY OF ST JOHN EVANGELIST D£SCLEE & Co Printers to the Holy See and the Sacred Coogr. of Rites TOURNAI (Belgium) PREFACE. Few words are necessary to introduce the present work to English speaking students of plainsong. Such a handbook has long been needed and is sure of its welcome. Neither the well- known Stanbrook Grammar of Plainsong nor Madame Ward's valuable school courses cover so much ground as Dom Gregory Suflol in his Spanish " Metodo ". The book first appeared in 1905, prefaced by a commendatory letter from Dom Andre Mocquereau, the famous director of the Solesmes School. Its author has many years of teaching experience behind him, as well as sound theoret- ical knowledge of his subject. His work has proved its popu- larity and practical usefulness by going through a number of editions in the original Spanish, besides being translated into French and German. Indeed by compressing the Solesmes teach- ing within the narrow limits of a general text book Dom Sufiol has rendered good service to the Gregorian cause. Not everyone has access to the monumental publications of Solesmes, the Mono- graphies gregoriennes or the Paleographie Musicale> and countless students will be glad to find the subject matter of this latter Work, especially the important seventh volume on Gregorian Rhythm, here summed up and analysed, while the extensive quotations from Dom Mocquereau's Nombre Musical gregorien, with which the Spanish author has enriched his later editions, will make them desirous of seeing this fascinating synthesis of the whole subject brought out in English.
    [Show full text]
  • Memory, Music, Epistemology, and the Emergence of Gregorian Chant As Corporate Knowledge
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 12-2012 "Sing to the Lord a new song": Memory, Music, Epistemology, and the Emergence of Gregorian Chant as Corporate Knowledge Jordan Timothy Ray Baker [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Part of the Epistemology Commons, Medieval Studies Commons, and the Musicology Commons Recommended Citation Baker, Jordan Timothy Ray, ""Sing to the Lord a new song": Memory, Music, Epistemology, and the Emergence of Gregorian Chant as Corporate Knowledge. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 2012. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/1360 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Jordan Timothy Ray Baker entitled ""Sing to the Lord a new song": Memory, Music, Epistemology, and the Emergence of Gregorian Chant as Corporate Knowledge." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Music, with a major in Music. Rachel M. Golden, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance:
    [Show full text]
  • New Oxford History of Music Volume Ii
    NEW OXFORD HISTORY OF MUSIC VOLUME II EDITORIAL BOARD J. A. WESTRUP (Chairman) GERALD ABRAHAM (Secretary) EDWARD J. DENT DOM ANSELM'HUGHES BOON WELLESZ THE VOLUMES OF THE NEW OXFORD HISTORY OF MUSIC I. Ancient and Oriental Music ii. Early Medieval Music up to 1300 in. Ars Nova and the Renaissance (c. 1300-1540) iv. The Age of Humanism (1540-1630) v. Opera and Church Music (1630-1750) vi. The Growth of Instrumental Music (1630-1750) vn. The Symphonic Outlook (1745-1790) VIIL The Age of Beethoven (1790-1830) ix. Romanticism (1830-1890) x. Modern Music (1890-1950) XL Chronological Tables and General Index ' - - SACRED AND PROFANE MUSIC (St. John's College, MS. B. Cambridge, 18.) Twelfth century EARLY MEDIEVAL MUSIC UP TO BOO EDITED BY DOM ANSELM HUGHES GEOFFREY CUMBERLEGE OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS LONDON NEWYORK TORONTO 1954 Oxford University Press, Amen House, London E.C.4 GLASGOW NEW YORK TORONTO MELBOURNE WELLINGTON BOMBAY CALCUTTA MADRAS KARACHI CAPE TOWN IBADAN Geoffrey Cumberlege, Publisher to the University PRINTED IN GREAT BRITAIN GENERAL INTRODUCTION THE present work is designed to replace the Oxford History of Music, first published in six volumes under the general editorship of Sir Henry Hadow between 1901 and 1905. Five authors contributed to that ambitious publication the first of its kind to appear in English. The first two volumes, dealing with the Middle Ages and the sixteenth century, were the work of H. E. Wooldridge. In the third Sir Hubert Parry examined the music of the seventeenth century. The fourth, by J. A. Fuller-Maitland, was devoted to the age of Bach and Handel; the fifth, by Hadow himself, to the period bounded by C.
    [Show full text]
  • JAMES D. BABCOCK, MBA, CFA, CPA 191 South Salem Road  Ridgefield, Connecticut 06877 (203) 994-7244  [email protected]
    JAMES D. BABCOCK, MBA, CFA, CPA 191 South Salem Road Ridgefield, Connecticut 06877 (203) 994-7244 [email protected] List of Addendums First Addendum – Middle Ages Second Addendum – Modern and Modern Sub-Categories A. 20th Century B. 21st Century C. Modern and High Modern D. Postmodern and Contemporary E. Descrtiption of Categories (alphabetic) and Important Composers Third Addendum – Composers Fourth Addendum – Musical Terms and Concepts 1 First Addendum – Middle Ages A. The Early Medieval Music (500-1150). i. Early chant traditions Chant (or plainsong) is a monophonic sacred form which represents the earliest known music of the Christian Church. The simplest, syllabic chants, in which each syllable is set to one note, were probably intended to be sung by the choir or congregation, while the more florid, melismatic examples (which have many notes to each syllable) were probably performed by soloists. Plainchant melodies (which are sometimes referred to as a “drown,” are characterized by the following: A monophonic texture; For ease of singing, relatively conjunct melodic contour (meaning no large intervals between one note and the next) and a restricted range (no notes too high or too low); and Rhythms based strictly on the articulation of the word being sung (meaning no steady dancelike beats). Chant developed separately in several European centers, the most important being Rome, Hispania, Gaul, Milan and Ireland. Chant was developed to support the regional liturgies used when celebrating Mass. Each area developed its own chant and rules for celebration. In Spain and Portugal, Mozarabic chant was used, showing the influence of North Afgican music. The Mozarabic liturgy survived through Muslim rule, though this was an isolated strand and was later suppressed in an attempt to enforce conformity on the entire liturgy.
    [Show full text]