Periodic Report - Second Cycle Section II-

1. World Heritage Property Data 2. Statement of Outstanding Universal Value

1.1 - Name of World Heritage Property 2.1 - Statement of Outstanding Universal Value / Studenica Monastery Statement of Significance Comment 1.2 - World Heritage Property Details Under evaluation of UNESCO''s advisory bodies. State(s) Party(ies) Retrospective statement of OUV delivered to UNESCO in janary 2012.  Type of Property 2.2 - The criteria (2005 revised version) under which the cultural property was inscribed Identification Number (i)(ii)(iv)(vi) 389 Year of inscription on the World Heritage List 2.3 - Attributes expressing the Outstanding Universal 1986 Value per criterion

1.3 - Geographic Information Table 2.4 - If needed, please provide details of why the Statement of Outstanding Universal Value should be Name Coordinates Property Buffer Total Inscription (latitude/longitude) (ha) zone (ha) year revised (ha) No need to be revised. Studenica 43.486 / 20.537 1.16 269.34 270.5 1986 Monastery 2.5 - Comments, conclusions and / or recommendations Total (ha) 1.16 269.34 270.5 related to Statement of Outstanding Universal Value No comments, conclusions or recommendations. 1.4 - Map(s) Title Date Link to source 3. Factors Affecting the Property Studenica Monastery - inscribed property 03/12/2009

3.14. Other factor(s) 1.5 - Governmental Institution Responsible for the Property 3.14.1 - Other factor(s) Comment Institute for the Protection of Cultural Monuments of Serbia, Radoslava Grujica 11, 11118 Belgrade, SERBIA

1.6 - Property Manager / Coordinator, Local Institution / Agency  Vladimir Dzamic Institute for protection of Cultural Monuments of Serbia Art Historian / Conservator Department for research, protection and documentation Comment Additional telephone number - cell: +381(0)628828122 Alternative e-mail: [email protected]

1.7 - Web Address of the Property (if existing) Comment http://www.manastirstudenica.rs/

1.8 - Other designations / Conventions under which the property is protected (if applicable) Comment Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property European Convention on Architectural Heritage European Convention on Archaeological Heritage European Landscape Convention

Page 1 Monday, October 13, 2014 (8:34:13 PM CEST) Periodic Report - Section II-Studenica Monastery World Heritage Centre Periodic Report - Second Cycle Section II-Studenica Monastery

3.15. Factors Summary Table

3.15.1 - Factors summary table Name Impact Origin 3.1 Buildings and Development 3.1.5 Interpretative and visitation facilities

3.2 Transportation Infrastructure 3.2.1 Ground transport infrastructure

3.2.4 Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure

3.3 Services Infrastructures 3.3.2 Renewable energy facilities

3.3.4 Localised utilities

3.5 Biological resource use/modification 3.5.3 Land conversion

3.5.4 Livestock farming / grazing of domesticated animals

3.5.5 Crop production

3.5.7 Subsistence wild plant collection

3.5.9 Subsistence hunting

3.5.10 Forestry /wood production

3.6 Physical resource extraction 3.6.2 Quarrying

3.6.4 Water (extraction)

3.7 Local conditions affecting physical fabric 3.7.1 Wind

3.7.2 Relative humidity

3.7.6 Water (rain/water table)

3.8 Social/cultural uses of heritage 3.8.1 Ritual / spiritual / religious and associative uses

3.8.2 Society's valuing of heritage

3.8.4 Changes in traditional ways of life and knowledge system

3.8.5 Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community

3.8.6 Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation

3.9 Other human activities 3.9.1 Illegal activities

3.10 Climate change and severe weather events 3.10.1 Storms

3.10.2 Flooding

3.10.3 Drought

3.10.6 Temperature change

3.10.7 Other climate change impacts

3.11 Sudden ecological or geological events 3.11.2 Earthquake

3.11.6 Fire (widlfires)

3.12 Invasive/alien species or hyper-abundant species 3.12.1 Translocated species

3.12.6 Modified genetic material

3.13 Management and institutional factors 3.13.1 Low impact research / monitoring activities

Page 2 Monday, October 13, 2014 (8:34:13 PM CEST) Periodic Report - Section II-Studenica Monastery World Heritage Centre Periodic Report - Second Cycle Section II-Studenica Monastery

Name Impact Origin 3.13.3 Management activities

Legend Current Potential Negative Positive Inside Outside

3.16. Assessment of current negative factors

3.16.1 - Assessment of current negative factors Spatial scale Temporal scale Impact Management Trend response 3.3 Services Infrastructures 3.3.4 Localised utilities restricted one off or rare minor medium capacity static 3.8 Social/cultural uses of heritage 3.8.4 Changes in traditional ways of life widespread intermittent or sporadic minor medium capacity increasing and knowledge system 3.8.6 Impacts of tourism / visitor / extensive frequent minor medium capacity increasing recreation

Page 3 Monday, October 13, 2014 (8:34:13 PM CEST) Periodic Report - Section II-Studenica Monastery World Heritage Centre Periodic Report - Second Cycle Section II-Studenica Monastery

 Question 6.02 3.17. Comments, conclusions and / or Decision on the buffer zone and the protection of the natural recommendations related to factors affecting the setting of Studenica Monastery was legally adopted in 1988. property Comment The Spatial Plan for National Park and Studenica 3.17.1 - Comments Biosphere Reservation (MAB Biosphere Reserve) was It is impossible to have high capacity management response adopted in 2009: official Gazette Republic of Serbia, No. because the management of cultural properties is not clearly 16/2009; Decision on the property boundaries and areas was governed by legal ruling. adopted in 2009: 33th session of The World Heritage Committee, Seville, 2009, decision: 34 COM 8D 4. Protection, Management and Monitoring of the Property 4.2.2 - Is the legal framework (i.e. legislation and / or regulation) adequate for maintaining the Outstanding Universal Value including conditions of Integrity and / or 4.1. Boundaries and Buffer Zones Authenticity of the property? An adequate legal framework for the maintenance of the 4.1.1 - Buffer zone status Outstanding Universal Value including conditions of There is a buffer zone Authenticity and / or Integrity of the World Heritage property exists but there are some deficiencies in implementation 4.1.2 - Are the boundaries of the World Heritage property adequate to maintain the property's Outstanding 4.2.3 - Is the legal framework (i.e. legislation and / or Universal Value? regulation) adequate in the buffer zone for maintaining the Outstanding Universal Value including conditions of The boundaries of the World Heritage property are adequate Integrity and / or Authenticity of the property? to maintain the property's Outstanding Universal Value An adequate legal framework for the maintenance of the Outstanding Universal Value including conditions of 4.1.3 - Are the buffer zone(s) of the World Heritage Authenticity and / or Integrity of the World Heritage property property adequate to maintain the property's Outstanding exists but there are some deficiencies in implementation Universal Value? The buffer zones of the World Heritage property are adequate 4.2.4 - Is the legal framework (i.e. legislation and / or to maintain the property's Outstanding Universal Value regulation) adequate in the area surrounding the World Heritage property and buffer zone for maintaining the 4.1.4 - Are the boundaries of the World Heritage property Outstanding Universal Value including conditions of known? Integrity and / or Authenticity of the property? The boundaries of the World Heritage property are known by An adequate legal framework exists for the area surrounding both the management authority and local residents / the World Heritage property and the buffer zone, but there are communities / landowners. some deficiencies in its implementation which undermine the maintenance of the Outstanding Universal Value including 4.1.5 - Are the buffer zones of the World Heritage property conditions of Authenticity and / or Integrity of the property known? The buffer zones of the World Heritage property are known 4.2.5 - Can the legislative framework (i.e. legislation and / by both the management authority and local residents / or regulation) be enforced? communities / landowners. There is acceptable capacity / resources to enforce legislation and / or regulation in the World Heritage property but some 4.1.6 - Comments, conclusions and / or recommendations deficiencies remain related to boundaries and buffer zones of the World Heritage property 4.2.6 - Comments, conclusions and / or recommendations related to protective measures 4.2. Protective Measures The term Word Heritage property is not recognized by the applicable national law (Law of Cultural Heritage 1994). 4.2.1 - Protective designation (legal, regulatory, contractual, planning, institutional and / or traditional) 4.3. Management System / Management Plan · The Spatial Plan for National Park Golija (MAB Biosphere Reserve) which encompasses the monastery of 4.3.1 - Management System Studenica as well, is in its final phase Steering group: legally constituted (1991) · Decision on the buffer zone and the protection of the natural setting of Studenica Monastery was legally adopted in Periodic Reporting Cycle 1 (2001-2006) Section 2 1988 Source: Periodic Reporting Cycle 1 (2001-2006) Submitted on Monday, October 31, 2005 Periodic Reporting Cycle 1 (2001-2006) Section 2 Question 5.02 Source: Periodic Reporting Cycle 1 (2001-2006)  Submitted on Monday, October 31, 2005 Stering group or similar management committee has been set up to guide the management of the site  Question 5.03 Set up date: 1991 Page 4 Monday, October 13, 2014 (8:34:13 PM CEST) Periodic Report - Section II-Studenica Monastery World Heritage Centre Periodic Report - Second Cycle Section II-Studenica Monastery

Function: Its function was to obtain the best ways of Industry Non-existent managing and protection of the World Heritage site and its natural setting. 4.3.8 - If present, do local communities resident in or near Mandate: 4 years Constituted: legal the World Heritage property and / or buffer zone have input in management decisions that maintain the  Question 5.04 Plans in place to set up a "steering group: Outstanding Universal Value? The activities of the Board for Studenica Monastery were Local communities have some input into discussions relating interrupted by the economic crisis and war in former to management but no direct role in management Yugoslavia. No plan for re-establishment of this Board exist at the moment.  Question 5.05 4.3.9 - If present, do indigenous peoples resident in or Overall management system of the site regularly using the World Heritage property and / or buffer o Management under protective legislation zone have input in management decisions that maintain the Outstanding Universal Value? o Management under traditional protective measures or customary law Indigenous peoples have some input into discussions relating to management but no direct role Comment The WH site management is the responsibility of the Serbian 4.3.10 - Is there cooperation with industry (i.e. forestry, Orthodox Church and the Government of the Republic of mining, agriculture, etc.) regarding the management of Serbia through Institute for the Protection of Cultural the World Heritage property, buffer zone and / or area Monuments of Serbia. Institute for the Protection of Cultural surrounding the World Heritage property and buffer Monuments of Serbia is preparing Managament plan for the zone? property. There is contact but only some cooperation with industry regarding the management of the World Heritage property, 4.3.2 - Management Documents buffer zone and / or area surrounding the World Heritage property and buffer zone Comment There is no managament plan for this property. The Institute 4.3.11 - Comments, conclusions and / or for the Protection of Cultural Monuments of Serbia is working recommendations related to human resources, expertise on it, but there is lot of difficulties, the most important is that and training there is no support in the Law of Cultural Heritage that would help creating and implementing document. It could use some help in the education of focal pionts, site managers and other experts involved in the development of the management plan by the UNESCO''s WHC and advisory 4.3.3 - How well do the various levels of administration bodies. (i.e. national / federal; regional / provincial / state; local / municipal etc.) coordinate in the management of the World Heritage Property ? 4.3.12 - Please report any significant changes in the legal status and / or contractual / traditional protective There is a range of administrative bodies / levels involved in measures and management arrangements for the World management but there is little or no coordination between Heritage property since inscription or the last Periodic them for managing different aspects of the property report There is no significant changes. 4.3.4 - Is the management system / plan adequate to maintain the property's Outstanding Universal Value ? No management system / plan is currently in place to 4.4. Financial and Human Resources maintain the property's Outstanding Universal Value 4.4.1 - Costs related to conservation, based on the 4.3.5 - Is the management system being implemented? average of last five years (relative percentage of the funding sources) The management system is not being implemented Multilateral funding (GEF, World Bank, etc) 0% 4.3.6 - Is there an annual work / action plan and is it being International donations (NGO´s, foundations, etc) 0% implemented? Governmental (National / Federal) 100% No annual work / action plan exists despite an identified Governmental (Regional / Provincial / State) 0% need Governmental (Local / Municipal) 0% In country donations (NGO´s, foundations, etc) 0% 4.3.7 - Please rate the cooperation / relationship with Individual visitor charges (e.g. entry, parking, camping fees, etc.) 0% World Heritage property managers / coordinators / staff of Commercial operator payments (e.g. filming permit, concessions, 0% the following etc.) Other grants 0% Local communities / residents Poor Local / Municipal authorities Poor Indigenous peoples Poor 4.4.2 - International Assistance received from the World Landowners Poor Heritage Fund (USD) Visitors Poor Title Year Amount Link to source Researchers Fair Expert mission to assess threats to Studenica 1988 2500.00 Tourism industry Poor Monastery

Page 5 Monday, October 13, 2014 (8:34:13 PM CEST) Periodic Report - Section II-Studenica Monastery World Heritage Centre Periodic Report - Second Cycle Section II-Studenica Monastery

Expert mission for the preservation of the marble 1990 9000.00 Community outreach Poor façades of Studenica Monastery Interpretation Fair Purchase of a computer and photographic 1991 51000.00 Education Poor equipment for the restoration of murals at Studenica Monastery Visitor management Poor Total 62500 Conservation Good Administration Fair 4.4.3 - Is the current budget sufficient to manage the Risk preparedness Poor World Heritage property effectively? Tourism Fair The available budget is acceptable but could be further Enforcement (custodians, police) Fair improved to fully meet the management needs 4.4.14 - Please rate the availability of training 4.4.4 - Are the existing sources of funding secure and opportunities for the management of the World Heritage likely to remain so? property in the following disciplines The existing sources of funding are secure in the medium- Research and monitoring Low term and planning is underway to secure funding in the long- Promotion Low term Community outreach Low Interpretation Low 4.4.5 - Does the World Heritage property provide Education Medium economic benefits to local communities (e.g. income, Visitor management Low employment)? Conservation High There is some flow of economic benefits to local communities Administration Medium Risk preparedness Medium 4.4.6 - Are available resources such as equipment, Tourism Low facilities and infrastructure sufficient to meet management needs? Enforcement (custodians, police) Low There are some adequate equipment and facilities, but deficiencies in at least one key area constrain management 4.4.15 - Do the management and conservation at the World Heritage property programmes at the World Heritage property help develop local expertise? 4.4.7 - Are resources such as equipment, facilities and A capacity development plan or programme is drafted or in infrastructure adequately maintained? place, but is not being implemented There is basic maintenance of equipment and facilities 4.4.16 - Comments, conclusions and / or 4.4.8 - Comments, conclusion, and / or recommendations recommendations related to human resources, expertise related to finance and infrastructure and training

4.4.9 - Distribution of employees involved in managing the 4.5. Scientific Studies and Research Projects World Heritage property (% of total) Full-time 0% 4.5.1 - Is there adequate knowledge (scientific or Part-time 100% traditional) about the values of the World Heritage property to support planning, management and decision- making to ensure that Outstanding Universal Value is 4.4.10 - Distribution of employees involved in managing maintained? the World Heritage property (% of total) Knowledge about the values of the World Heritage property is Permanent 0% sufficient for most key areas but there are gaps Seasonal 100% 4.5.2 - Is there a planned programme of research at the 4.4.11 - Distribution of employees involved in managing property which is directed towards management needs the World Heritage property (% of total) and / or improving understanding of Outstanding Paid 100% Universal Value? Volunteer 0% There is considerable research but it is not directed towards management needs and / or improving understanding of Outstanding Universal Value 4.4.12 - Are available human resources adequate to manage the World Heritage property? 4.5.3 - Are results from research programmes A range of human resources exist, but these are below disseminated? optimum to manage the World Heritage Property. Research results are shared with local participants and some national agencies 4.4.13 - Considering the management needs of the World Heritage property, please rate the availability of professionals in the following disciplines Research and monitoring Fair Promotion Fair Page 6 Monday, October 13, 2014 (8:34:13 PM CEST) Periodic Report - Section II-Studenica Monastery World Heritage Centre Periodic Report - Second Cycle Section II-Studenica Monastery

4.5.4 - Please provide details (i.e. authors, title, and web 4.6.7 - Comments, conclusions and / or recommendations link) of papers published about the World Heritage related to education, information and awareness building property since the last Periodic Report 4.7. Visitor Management 4.5.5 - Comments, conclusions and / or recommendations related to scientific studies and research projects 4.7.1 - Please provide the trend in annual visitation for the last five years 4.6. Education, Information and Awareness Last year Minor Increase Building Two years ago Minor Increase Three years ago Minor Increase 4.6.1 - At how many locations is the World Heritage Four years ago Minor Increase emblem displayed at the property? Five years ago Minor Increase In one location and easily visible to visitors 4.7.2 - What information sources are used to collect trend 4.6.2 - Please rate the awareness and understanding of data on visitor statistics? the existence and justification for inscription of the World Accommodation establishments Heritage property amongst the following groups Local communities / residents Poor 4.7.3 - Visitor management documents Local / Municipal authorities within or adjacent to the Average property Local Indigenous peoples Non-existent 4.7.4 - Is there an appropriate visitor use management Local landowners Poor plan (e.g. specific plan) for the World Heritage property Visitors Poor which ensures that its Outstanding Universal Value is Tourism industry Average maintained? Local businesses and industries Non-existent There is some management of the visitor use of the World Heritage property

4.6.3 - Is there a planned education and awareness 4.7.5 - Does the tourism industry contribute to improving programme linked to the values and management of the visitor experiences and maintaining the values of the World Heritage property? World Heritage property? There is no education and awareness programme, despite There is contact between those responsible for the World an identified need Heritage property and the tourism industry but this is largely confined to administrative or regulatory matters 4.6.4 - What role, if any, has designation as a World Heritage property played with respect to education, 4.7.6 - If fees (i.e. entry charges, permits) are collected, do information and awareness building activities? they contribute to the management of the World Heritage World Heritage status has partially influenced education, property? information and awareness building activities No fees are collected

4.6.5 - How well is the information on Outstanding 4.7.7 - Comments, conclusions and / or recommendations Universal Value of the property presented and related to visitor use of the World Heritage property interpreted? The Outstanding Universal Value of the property is not adequately presented and interpreted 4.8. Monitoring

4.6.6 - Please rate the adequacy for education, 4.8.1 - Is there a monitoring programme at the property information and awareness building of the following which is directed towards management needs and / or visitor facilities and services at the World Heritage improving understanding of Outstanding Universal property Value? Visitor centre Not provided There is considerable monitoring but it is not directed but needed towards management needs and / or improving Site museum Poor understanding of Outstanding Universal Value Information booths Poor Guided tours Poor 4.8.2 - Are key indicators for measuring the state of Trails / routes Poor conservation used to monitor how the Outstanding Information materials Poor Universal Value of the property is maintained? Transportation facilities Adequate Information on the values of the World Heritage property is sufficient and key indicators have been defined Other but monitoring the status of indicators could be improved

4.8.3 - Please rate the level of involvement in monitoring of the following groups World Heritage managers / coordinators and staff Excellent Local / Municipal authorities Poor Page 7 Monday, October 13, 2014 (8:34:13 PM CEST) Periodic Report - Section II-Studenica Monastery World Heritage Centre Periodic Report - Second Cycle Section II-Studenica Monastery

Local communities Not applicable Researchers Average NGOs Poor Industry Non-existent Local indigenous peoples Poor

4.8.4 - Has the State Party implemented relevant recommendations arising from the World Heritage Committee? No relevant Committee recommendations to implement

4.8.5 - Please provide comments relevant to the implementation of recommendations from the World Heritage Committee

4.8.6 - Comments, conclusions and / or recommendations related to monitoring

4.9. Identification of Priority Management Needs

4.9.1 - Please select the top 6 managements needs for the property (if more than 6 are listed below) Please refer to question 5.2

Page 8 Monday, October 13, 2014 (8:34:13 PM CEST) Periodic Report - Section II-Studenica Monastery World Heritage Centre Periodic Report - Second Cycle Section II-Studenica Monastery

5. Summary and Conclusions

5.1. Summary - Factors affecting the Property

5.1.1 - Summary - Factors affecting the Property World Heritage Actions Monitoring Timeframe Lead agency (and More info / comment criteria and others involved) attributes affected 3.3 Services Infrastructures 3.3.4 Localised No criteria and Constant monitoring There is constant There is no time The Institute for the There is one cell utilities attributes are efectied and the cooperation monitoring and the frame, when technical Protection of Cultural tower in the buffer directly. between relevant relevant agencies do capabilities allow a Monuments of Serbia. zone, that provides agencies and the not allow object like signal to the mobile The Institute for Nature signal for cell phones Company mobile that (cell towers) to be phone without the Conservation of Serbia. for whole area. It can''t (owner of cell tower). build in the buffer tower, it will be be dislocated because zone. removed from the the whole area (larger buffer zone. than the buffer zone) should lose signal for mobile networks. 3.8 Social/cultural uses of heritage 3.8.4 Changes in No criteria and Workshops with old Provide constant 3-5 years. The Institute for the There is significant traditional attributes are efectied skills and crafts focused monitoring of Protection of Cultural migration of the local ways of life directly. on the local population. migration, changes in Monuments of Serbia. population. Modern and Publications and Web lifestyle and work. The Serbian Orthodox life has crowded out knowledge pages (applications) Church (owner of the the knowledge of system that encourage the property). traditional crafts, old ancient and natural ways of farming and ways of living and even the old way of working in the life. countryside. 3.8.6 Impacts of No criteria and Relevant agency Provide constant 2-3 years The Institute for the There is a significant tourism / attributes are efectied together with the owner monitoring of the Protection of Cultural increase in the visitor / directly. should provide training number of visitors as Monuments of Serbia. number of visitors, but recreation for tourist guides, and well as on their The Serbian Orthodox not content to visitors, affect the completion of behavior and interests Church (owner of the as well as the lack of facilities for visitors to during a visit. property). information on the print brochures and monument as property other content that inscribed on World explain the reasons Heritage List. why the property is inscribed on the WHL.

5.2. Summary - Management Needs

5.2.2 - Summary - Management Needs 4.6 Education, Information and Awareness Building Actions Timeframe Lead agency (and others More info / comment involved) 4.6.3 There is no It is necessary to organize training 1-2 years. The Institute for the Protection of Guides and those who care for education and for tourist guides and those who Cultural Monuments of Serbia. visitors do not have adequate awareness care for visitors at the Worl The knowledge of the values that led to programme Heritage Site. It must be organized (owner of the property). the inscription of the property on with co-operation with the owner of the World Heritage List. the property (The Serbian Orthodox Church). 4.6.4 World Special classes in which the 3-5 years. The Institute for the Protection of World Heritage status is partially Heritage students were be informed of the Cultural Monuments of Serbia. influenced education but it can be status has importance of property inscribed improved in cooperation with local partially on theWorld Heritage List in their school authorities. influenced surroundings should be organized education, within the school hours in the local information community, . and awareness building activities 4.6.5 The It is necessary to provide better 2 years. The Institute for the Protection of The Outstanding Universal Value Outstanding information for tourist guides and Cultural Monuments of Serbia. of the property is presented fair but Universal those who care for visitors at the could be improved. Value of the World Heritage Site about OUV of property is not the property through brochures adequately and web applications. presented and interpreted 4.7 Visitor Management Page 9 Monday, October 13, 2014 (8:34:13 PM CEST) Periodic Report - Section II-Studenica Monastery World Heritage Centre Periodic Report - Second Cycle Section II-Studenica Monastery

4.7.4 Some Site museum should be expanded 2-3 years. The Institute for the Protection of Facilities for visitor use of the management and enriched with new content Cultural Monuments of Serbia. property are fair but this could be of visitor use (which exist in the property). It is improved, especially when it of the property necessary to provide audio comes to the site museum and but this could guidance through site (especially audio guidance through site. be improved because of the increasing number of foreign visitors). 4.7.5 Contact with Developing content that is not 4-6 years. The Institute for the Protection of There is good cooperation between the tourism directly related to the monument, Cultural Monuments of Serbia. owner, tourism companies and industry is but that can contribute to the National Tourisam Organization of local authorities, but this could be largely overall tourist offer of the site. This Serbia. The Serbian Orthodox improved, especially in the confined to could lead to an increase in the Church (owner of the property). segment of time that visitors will administrative time that visitors spend at the site. spend at the site, which is relatively or regulatory short. matters

Page 10 Monday, October 13, 2014 (8:34:13 PM CEST) Periodic Report - Section II-Studenica Monastery World Heritage Centre Periodic Report - Second Cycle Section II-Studenica Monastery

6.5 - Please provide suggestions for improvement of the 5.3. Conclusions on the State of Conservation of Periodic Reporting questionnaire the Property 6.6 - Please rate the level of support for completing the Periodic Report questionnaire from the following entities 5.3.1 - Current state of Authenticity UNESCO Good The authenticity of the World Heritage property has been State Party Representative preserved Good Advisory Body Poor 5.3.2 - Current state of Integrity The integrity of the World Heritage property is intact 6.7 - How accessible was the information required to complete the Periodic Report? Most of the required information was accessible 5.3.3 - Current state of the World Heritage property’s Outstanding Universal Value The World Heritage property’s Outstanding Universal Value 6.8 - The Periodic Reporting process has improved the has been maintained. understanding of the following The concept of Outstanding Universal Value 5.3.4 - Current state of the property's other values The concept of Integrity and / or Authenticity Other important cultural and / or natural values and the state The property's Integrity and / or Authenticity of conservation of the World Heritage property are Managing the property to maintain the Outstanding Universal Value predominantly intact 6.9 - Please rate the follow-up to conclusions and 5.4. Additional comments on the State of recommendations from previous Periodic Reporting Conservation of the Property exercise by the following entities UNESCO Satisfactory 5.4.1 - Comments State Party Unsatisfactory Site Managers Satisfactory Advisory Bodies 6. World Heritage Status and Conclusions on Satisfactory Periodic Reporting Exercise 6.10 - Summary of actions that will require formal consideration by the World Heritage Committee 6.1 - Please rate the impacts of World Heritage status of the property in relation to the following areas  Statement of Outstanding Universal Value / Statement of Significance Conservation Positive Reason for update: Under evaluation of UNESCO''s Research and monitoring Positive advisory bodies. Retrospective statement of OUV Management effectiveness No impact delivered to UNESCO in janary 2012. Quality of life for local communities and indigenous No impact peoples 6.11 - Comments, conclusions and / or recommendations Recognition No impact related to the Assessment of the Periodic Reporting Education No impact exercise Infrastructure development Positive Funding for the property Positive International cooperation Positive Political support for conservation Positive Legal / Policy framework No impact Lobbying No impact Institutional coordination Positive Security Positive Other (please specify) No impact

6.2 - Comments, conclusions and / or recommendations related to World Heritage status

6.3 - Entities involved in the preparation of this Section of the Periodic Report Site Manager/Coordinator/World Heritage property staff

6.4 - Was the Periodic Reporting questionnaire easy to use and clearly understandable? yes

Page 11 Monday, October 13, 2014 (8:34:13 PM CEST) Periodic Report - Section II-Studenica Monastery World Heritage Centre